Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 03/28/2012 East.Valley tooWater District 3694 HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE #30, HIGHLAND, CA BOARD MEETING March 28, 2012 5:30 P.M. AGENDA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District Secretary by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesday meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors". - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CALL 'I'0 ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC COMMENTS - At this time, members of the public may address the Board of Directors regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the East Valley Water District. The Board of Directors may BRIEFLY respond to statements made or questions posed. Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. AGENDA - This agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Except MW as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes a determination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action on the item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda. 1. Approval of Agenda 2. CONSENT CALENDAR- All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board of Directors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no discussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unless members of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific items to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar. a. Approval of the board meeting minutes for March 14, 2012 b. Accounts Payable Disbursements: Accounts Payable Checks 4231611 through 4231831 which were distributed during the period of March 1, 2012 through March 14, 2012 in the amount of $1,156,261.66. Payroll and benefit contributions for the period ended March 14, 2012 and included checks and direct deposits, in the amount of$213,461.99. Total Disbursements for the period $1,369,723.65. NEW BUSINESS 3. Resolution 2012.05 —A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District in recognition of Richard Becerra's twenty-five years of service I 4. Discussion and possible action regarding the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District's proposed rate increase 5. Discussion and possible action regarding Robert Reeb's legislative update, report and recommendations regarding the District's legislative positions 6. Review, update and presentation regarding the Ralph M. Brown Act by the District's legal counsel 7. Discussion regarding the roles and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, General Manager/CEO and staff 8. Discussion and possible action regarding the District's 2012 committee structure and assignments REPORTS 9. General Manager/ Staff Reports • SCE Rebate Program Update 10. Legal Counsel Report 11. Oral comments from Board of Directors ADJOURN PLEASE NOTE: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the District's office located at 3654 E. Highland Ave, Suite 18, Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are available on the District's website at www.eastvallev.ora subject to staffs ability to post the documents before the meeting. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above- agendized public meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Manager at (909) 885-4900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting. 2 Sublect to approval: EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT MARCH 14, 2012 REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Huffstutler led the flag salute. PRESENT: Directors: Coleman, LeVesque, Morales, Wilson ABSENT: Directors: Sturgeon STAFF: John Mura, CEO/General Manager; John Vega, Assistant General Manager; Eliseo Ochoa, District Engineer; Brian Tompkins, Chief Financial Officer; Justine Hendricksen, Administrative Manager LEGAL COUNSEL: Steve Kennedy GUESTS: Members of the public PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The Chairman declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 5:30 p.m. "There being no written or verbal comments, the public participation section was closed. APPROVAL OF AGENDA M/S/C (Wilson-Morales) that the March 14, 2012 agenda be approved as submitted. The Board presented a resolution of appreciation to former board member Mr. Larry Mahnberg. APPROVAL OF BOARD MEETING MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 22, 2012 MIS/C (Wilson-Morales) that the board meeting minutes for February 22, 2012 be approved as submitted. ACCEPT AND FILE THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 2012 M/S/C (Wilson-Morales) that the Board accept and file the Financial Statements for the period ended January 2012. Minutes: 03/14/12jph DISBURSEMENTS M/S/C (Wilson-Morales) that General Fund Disbursements #231611 through #231831which were distributed February 9, 2012 through February 27, 2012 in the amount of $1,625,706.00 and payroll checks for period ending February 27, 2012 and included checks and direct deposits, in the amount of $220,715.18. Total disbursements for the period were $1,846,421.18 be approved. DIRECTORS' FEES AND EXPENSES FOR FEBRUARY 2012 M/S/C (Wilson-Morales) that the Directors' fees and expenses for February 2012 be approved as submitted. APPROVE THE DISTRICT'S MID-YEAR BUDGET AMENDMENTS The General Manager and Chief Financial Officer reviewed several adjustments to the 2011-12 fiscal year budget. The proposed adjustments include changes relating to operating revenue, operating expenses, capital replacements, and the capital improvement program in addition to contributing $152K to reserves at year-end. Board member Coleman offered his appreciation to District staff for reviewing cost saving measures relating to the sewer/vactor truck and gate valve exercise equipment. M/S/C (Wilson-Morales) that the Board approve the mid-year budget amendments as submitted. APPROVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AB 3030 LEGISLATION Vice Chairman Morales reviewed the Legislative & Public Affairs Committee recommendations regarding AB 3030 with the Board. M/S/C (Coleman-Wilson) that the Legislative & Public Affairs Committee recommendations regarding AB 3030 be approved as submitted. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT The General Manager stated that he requested Mr. Martin defer his consultant report at this time. Information only. COMMITTEE REPORTS a. Legislative & Public Affairs Committee — Vice Chairman Morales stated that he attended ACWA's Legislative Symposium on March 6-7. Vice Chairman Morales 2 Minutes: 03/14/12jph also stated that the District will be participating in the City of Highland's Citrus Harvest Festival which will be held on March 31St. b. Personnel Committee —Board member Coleman stated that the committee had met on March 12 and discussed the following items: • Vision Coverage for employees • AB 1633 which can affect the CalPERS retirement system • Proposal to hire three employees Information only. LEGAL COUNSEL REPORT Mr. Kennedy stated that lie will be providing updates regarding the Ralph M Brown Act and discussing the roles and responsibilities of the Board, General Manager and staff at the next board meeting. Information only. CONSULTANT REPORTS No reports at this time. ORAL COMMENTS FROM BOARD OF DIRECTORS Aw Board member Wilson proposed that the District purchase a table for WRI's "Water Ilero" event honoring retired General Manager Robert Martin. Vice Chairman ]Morales stated that he truly enjoyed the recent "Strategic Planning" session held on March 1St. Chairman LeVesque stated that Mr. Dyer withdrew his claim for damages after he met with the General ]Manager/CEO. Board member Coleman stated that the Personnel Committee will be reviewing additional employee benefit programs for the District. The Board took a break at 6:20 pm. The Board returned to session at 6:26 pm. CLOSED SESSION The Board entered into Closed Session at 6:26 p.m. as provided in the California Open Meeting Law. Government Code Section 54945.9(a), to discuss the item listed on the agenda. 3 Minutes: 03/14/12 jph ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS The Board returned to regular session at 6:44 p.m. The item listed on the agenda was discussed in closed session with no reportable action being taken. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 6:44 p.m. Matt LeVesque, Board President John J. Mura, Secretary 4 Minutes: 03/14/12 jph BOARD AGENDA STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 28,2012 t o fm*� vater D Di strict Public Hearing: Discussion Item: Consent Item: March 16, 2012 TO: GCVERNING BOARD MEMBERS FROM: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER SUBJECT: DISBURSEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached list of accounts payable checks and payroll issued BA.CKGROUNDiANALYSIS: Listings of accounts payable checks, and the total for payroll and benefits costs incurred, are submitted to the board of directors for review and approval with each board packet. The attached check register, and the total for payroll cited below, were disbursed during the period March 1, 2012 through March 14, 2012. Accounts payable checks for the period included check numbers 231832 through 232019 for a total of$1,156,261.66. The source of funds for this amount is as follows: Unrestricted Funds $ 1,037,100.53 Bond Financing $ 75,847.89 State Financing $ 43,313.24 Payroll and benefit contributions paid for this period totaled $213,461.99. Total disbursed during the period March I to March 14, 2012 is $1,369,723.65. REVIEW BY OTHERS: This agenda itern has been reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer and the Accounting Supervisor. Pagel 1 SR#0077 AGENDA DATE: MARCH 28, 2012 SUBJECT: DISBURSEMENTS FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact associated with this agenda item is $1,369,723.65 (budgeted expenditures). Respectfully submitted: Recommended by: U "r John Mura Brian W. Tompkins General Manager/CEO Chief Financial Officer Page 12 SR#0077 Z U on on U p 00 00 ° ° p on ° x w u ,y �OO .c E O O O O N N Q W YO O n r O O YO i0 N fD m (O (O YO (O i O N N N U (O N O O) O) r r r O O t0 W (O 'ice n O U1 t0 10 N ` � •- � E ii c 0 U C� C m O � - N .. a m U �Ei N ry Q u m ° z w y v cn J c to u o ¢ m u _J m m p U Na Z p IY C] (0 d K 7 02 ¢ ~ Q w U TWT 3 O N N m Z 2t`D Z L`L' C] h O N u N C S Z ° 0 0 d U U d U U J Z J N U U V m a ( s m p w ._ w w w S a Z i> Z Z w Z q o N O O t m r j 5 M C C m C C LL T T O m (n N q 0Y m QI H E K ._ v, z ¢ -o -o Z w d z m m r o.n ° a M > o E m K m q H m m q E E ¢ E E q a a U 0 E C] �' ° m ° a m S n z ¢ a w M m m on W m m N m m S > > q o` `o ¢ m ¢ S ¢ ¢ m ¢ a N N 0 C F 7 N C N N N N N N � (yI N l0 ry N N O N O d O pNj O U m N M 0 0 0 _ o T O y o m K v Yn z z m m z m m d w o `o o` a a o a o > 2 0 . .- - =N v v ¢w ¢ o ¢ E =i v v U o > > r r v a w v M N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N M S <O O N M � O ON ON ON ON N Ot0 m OQ Or r Ob N Or Or Or O - m Om 0 N Y O Y O Y O Y O o U ° O U ° 0 000 F- O O Y O Y O Y O Y Y o U > U > U V > > N ¢ > N ¢ � N ¢ > Q > > > U > > V > > U > E w Z m o s M ,Y M m m m c7 0 m M . N M � ml M n c7 m m v N V U rA m aD _N m OD m cO W_ ry O (O OD ry fO N N W m i� n n n n m n r r n - n n n n n n n E:� a t c7 , M m M o (`') m m Mm m Mm Mm mo Mm m ("> m N1m M m Nm m Mo O F J U N o N o N N o o N o o N o o N o C V o o N m N o N o N o o N av� Z U U O O f0 (O Q 1� N N O O O (O Q O Q Q O m c7 m Q O nl M O O O O N N a E O O O m t0 C1 N Q Q t0 [p (O C.1 O nl M N N N O N 6 Gi m N O O O O N N O Q 0 N N (`� P m Q Q (O (O O O N W T ❑ �� � O N W N (�l M d K U C J O U m_ ❑ T N m C C m m C 0 p O _o a m m » d n Q Q ❑ v M M ~ z N m m U w K w a a a z m ah•� U w O LL Y N U K Z 2 Q 3 j > O N N N O Tw ❑ m w m N N N Q m `y O w U' Q Q Q w ❑ Z w z z ti ~ m g m cl m x m w O ? ? w x z O A m w Q ~ � x U Of T Q U Q (((_ W d O } Q Q m m = W m N av'i ami m U p m w o 0 0 '° w o W SS N m U _ _ zQ c Q m m� S a O o o Y c ❑U U d 'Z .Z N U U N N i C C C C) Q O. LL ic w r N Q N m N Q N N N N m Q N N O D O ry ❑ O O O O n0 0 N M x O 0vC v i r p F- N N r 2 O O Z o 2 i U w o - m w - 0 E w t5 o m m o 0 0:21 Q Q o o m d m 5 U J O O O C U m U m vi x 0 U O U U U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O N N O O O O ON O N N O r r O O r O O r r r O O O r r p O O ❑I O (p O N N N N N (O N 52 O1 N N N O O O N O I� O r r O N O N O O N O d Y O Y O Y O Y Y O Yo Y > > Y O 1' > > Y ❑ O YO YO Y000 Y O V > U > U > > U > U > > U Q > U > U > U > > > U > U > U > U > U U _ � w U i w G r r t0 r N N 0 0 ID Oi N N OD 4D IV lV V V 0 0 C7 r O V 1� Q I!) O 0 0 O • tD N (7 fp r N N r r O] N Q O N (D O O M C'1 N N r C'l O f0 (O t0 n1 O N N r ❑ � (p r (p N N (O r uJ O � N N I!I N N M N I(] Q (") Q o r E O I1 IY U C J O U ❑ C O d U N_ N d U y ❑ C K v o y ry N U t a Z ? O Z Z W Z N w O Z Q > w W of " � d O < Z U O N F w w w m O 1 H 12 L° " Z K ! Z N w Z w m Y > W O 2 0 0 0 W O !- W u = w O W v v v LL y Z w O Z .0 m m m Z C7 j r U u -cmi w 00 > > > O w Z v w d a c w z N NTT Fa � NNN W � 2 xW ¢ 222 X - W Z K E w w a s W ii m 1 > W m a al m a n n w w w Z .9 m E E > LL Q n ¢ w O N w w Z V N N ❑ c c w W W w W n OI w N W w w e c c c W e K 0 N N N c y v � o oq n m v In n E � o m o m m m 0 m 0 -1 N a M °o o o o o ° O �, E ° lu, m n :-_ o aci ° m m m w m a° °° m ° ° 0 0 0 0 ° w E ° o w Ti W m •• w = Z > w X 'o Q ¢ w w a°i aci m y O m w O N m -°� i U w d ❑ w T a W 'm w 0 0 0 w m W m W d w m w > > > > a y a O U U > > :1 2 0 U U U U > O c c c c = O U N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 1� o o n <0 0 o n o n a o o O O 0 0 n O ^ ° o n <O O O O o n O O O CJ ^ r • N (O O O O O O N r IO I') I'1 N w N ❑IN Or 1 ON � � O (NO Ow w w Ot0 Ow OIL 0 O - - N >�O Y Y0 YO Y YO YO YO YO YOOOO Y ❑ O YO < > > > > > > Y > F- > U Q > U ;� > > U > U > > > U > V > U > V > V > > > > U Q > V > V � � Y U W w OI O Y NO N6 (Om Ip N :ON (O ao Nn N1� Nry X, . m ton r W n n n •� ry N » N N ry W m N m N E' v r n Mn n lyr n n � n � n r n Fyn inn Mn Mn n n n � r Mlo O f D U o CJ o o N o o N o N o O O CV o N a N Z U v r w U N M I� O N N M O O O m r O O W N O N N M M r r N A m ro of O O tm Yl m N cl;O0; co O r M (O N V K E d K U � N C N r � � m U w J Q H UJ O � _ Q LL O w O v a O O z K u Z m U ❑ d a` F- w a Y L J � U a Y m w Z w > } U Z T W No F N U K H W ? Q v y aoi K o K w O O > O 4 w m 2 Y F > Z d. Q U U Q m �? Q z a z w z w N C m J K Q ~' 1 F- � Ur O Y m > J W U Q 0_ W o D m Ja w S U o. Z >i a O F v. w O Q s J M Q 00 w 00 z O O0 S U W N Z w N Z y S y LL J N LL T C T T T N p� a Q O Q m W D °� N Q a� a a a ❑ W -p Ja r `" LL -� W 'o > > m > S m- 2 c c S a Z m O m Z a F j Z a -' m y w U Y Z J (n m w w fn C J J = C = 7 J N m N m d m N m N � 03 W ctl a a a a r � w' N0 o0 E o0 E N � Z LL c c m Z LL U U U U N U o@ ° N Z O O Q U W Z_o°I o u u g N U > > > > > U v V O w 0 V 0000 U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O YO O O O O LO YO YO YO YO O O YO YO YO 00 O O `l0 `L >A U Q > > > > U > U > U > U > U > > > U > U < > U > U Q > > > U > U `m 4 � w U o p7 N M O N O F J U O N o 0 o O o N O N o N O N o N o N o N Z V r w M o M m r m W m oo uJO m MM v � uJ VJ mN o0 0o mm � o v N om Q q p V m W O M O V V N O N W W m N N N N C) 0 i N m W Of V O O n m U N N In «J (O (O N P M M �O D) (V lV CJ O lf) N N N I� OJ l") O W 2 Y U O V C � N m m 0 O � o r C? V 0 m m W W ❑ ❑ w W Z Z J J W W a a a a c o 0 J J m m 0 U ry U M v O O K J J Z � t a +waa O U d n Z C~ O ❑ N W V 3 z ZMM c w z W N? J U d y O m Z O O O F J W 1 ry 'o g ¢ ¢ U U ¢ F. Z K 7 N c p m F Z o w a m m F U H c Z Z w A Y❑ O O W K J U m tW a C o ¢ O o n n Z O O:E O O O U c _ K U E U U O w Q w W J N na U 2 U n cn a+n > > > > m c c in m V! V) N m E CC N fn m N 7 m m 00 0 m � mad NS o of M c 'S a ° 0 w � M ca o � � � o c n w a m m m m O C! N U O N O m w y O O v n m m 1°- m m Z w o o E m o f V E °� 1p `-0 V w N F N F m m p? o ¢ '^ " C y J w ° ❑ «° ¢ ¢ g' V c U a? an d w e N Q m 10 N E N (0 Y J O O J o m J j J j > w > ::E 2022 O U U U U U N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N CD m o O r� r- P� (D m m W (O O n O f' � O N O (D O N O N O r- O n• O W O (° m m O N ry > > > > > 00 YO YOO YO YO YO YO YO YO YO 0 > > > YO a w Z M V N m I� m Q7 O m m c N M m rn n r m r m m m m J'Jm NJm rJO Mm m M J'Jm Mm Mm m o r'Jm N o N N o N o N o N o N o N o o N o 'AMY` o co-) o v% 1 O ❑ ❑ U ❑ p O O O U ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ O e x a E m O O N N Q �D N N Q Q of r0 O O O M M O O m Q �D t0 0 0 6 r r ¢ M OO maD C6 � N OO M [+i Oi O m c0N W N ❑ N N � E O u rt U C J O U N_ C U O U a N a u a ❑ U N v v o Y � t a N Ja dU 0 a 5 N N U � T W ❑ m J Y w > d `a w w Z ¢ U L U � ~ m N ' 2Q Z m I Z ` N w O U O O O w m W O o o O F- «_ «_ X S m K t O W p H F- 2 w O O 0 0 2 w Z x Y w E E E w a U c m QmQ a u '° Z W W a O Y N a E E ¢ y N N Y y U m w Z u'. ii u'. O o h a O a a 2 L Z iy c Z i n i n c c c c O c a a a d U C E C E E E v °� -ro o vn p O -off r ¢ 0 . rn E or o w w N �o O o O U w w w u S p'- m u Y E O y o E a a > Z o QY ¢O t a E a J S U U O C 7 U U U U M 2 H 0 0 0 L O U N N N N N N N N N N N N N W O Yo Yo Y p Y O Y O Yo Y O U ❑ O Y O Y O O O Y O Y O Y O > U > U >> U ¢ > U > U > U > U > N ¢ > U > U > > > U > U > U > N m Y m U _ � w N ry M m N m m m N m N o o N o N o N m N m N m a E O 1- J U O N o N o N o o N o N o N a N o 2 U o r � 00 0 0 00 00 x w _ U r m N N N w w m m 0 0 0 0 m m O O Inn m m N N m m m y O Q E r V N V P r r O O 0 0 mm 0 0 m m m m m m Ol m O IO m m 0 M M r r r M M r r O O O O O O O O M M < O N N M M m 0 m IN n r If1 p IN M N r r N N INN O O V V m m O O V V M M Q O CJ CJ O O N N N N r_r N N V V r r of m N Ill t m O N m ev E !1 Y U C_ O U 0 In W D W 2 J W a a ° J N V a m m O - w H U w � Y F p m a U O a t Z J U Q LL It S a z o w w o O O v z m0 o W U O N N Z g la o a U U O Q O U N O o ul d 2 Z 0 > W Z Z W r J Z Z Q W Z LL' LL O F Z Q W g N S w LL Z Z K Q LL W w Z Z d S c Z W' m LL' W J S O O w t p U m W P N Q W . W U Z m 0 h D w m LL c 0 U w X c O 7 c m m !D c 1- 'p Y w N w ~ w to a El Q m m U m O .y m � y Z o Z Z w _Y m > m O m w m O= F w Z W c Q Y K OU m N p- N w tail ? U a to N = w m 2 •. c d w w w m tL - N ° O � r Q°In d m cl O j m Q L Wo O wo y Z _- 2 Z .j O a o W W 2 O x Q w Q Q Q O O .w_ mw m p S O m S m :21[� > U U O U Of w LL w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N {J O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N iV N N N N N N N N N N N w O In IO m d' ° N O ° fO N N ° N N Ip N �I O (1) ID O N O INN O r O r w �YUO YO '� O YO YO YO YO YO YO YO YO YO Y00 YOO F- U Q > V > U > U > U > U > U > U > :J > U > U > U > U > > U Q > Q. u w U On rvi mm iA Olm Ole OlN s �m'l M . m W % In W 0 I IN M0 0 w m r- m r r m m m m n r r M m C�"1m Mm M <+l Mn Mm 1�+1 Mm Mm M Mm M Mm m i- U N o o N o N O N o No No iNO N o N o No No No No o No 0 y Z�Z U m I W O O N Q Q OJ O W 6] (O R1 N N a 0 Q �lJ r t � ° 0 p K U C J O U N_ ❑ C O d U y N N V u ❑ N y N u o } Ot n ¢ ¢ 3 ❑ w a ¢ ¢ o T F U ¢ Z U U > - a ry d ¢ z K I- a w U w w LL c 0 O K N c Q U a5 ¢ Z Ic w Q Q W O y j }Z U>i r p c m Y z uZWi U O ❑ 0 0 0 J .� .� 0 ¢ ° p U U m h E 0' a. W N ° ZI 0 O d > > m `m a�O�W M o0 ❑L m ro o o W F- `m Q N `m o�' v o N m c o N rn �Jn � E Q E Q m `m M N m m m M K c m W M NS d o L t o w w p E f m m m o� ,�¢ o - 65 m m m >an d N m m N E= fC > > > o > m m S O U U W U 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N O p p O iz p O O O O x 0 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 r O N f0 N Q N O N 0 0 0 0 b ` O N O N O p O O O O N 5 M �p (p M N M ❑I O I� r O N O N O n O N O (D O (O (O f0 O r r O N O N O r n O (O (O O N o � � ❑ O m O O Y O Y O Y O Y O O O Y O O Y O Y O Y O O Y O O Y O Y Y Y U ¢ > U > U > U > U > U > U > > > U > > U > U > U > > U > > U > `n E a m Y � o U _ - W V N N N m N n ONi N ONi m O) m O) N � m N m m mN o O)m Ol m mN m � _Ory O Mm p r y U N o o N o N o N o N m N a U S Y OI p p p p O p p p c o o p p p p p p p p p U p m ac 000 m i 0 0 0 0 CJ 0 m N m O N 0 0 O w to D7 Q 01 m O> m 01 N O r• h O 10 00 w - .- M N h K V C� J� O C O N O � a - q y C 2 - N � Um p c d C C « o > z N3 N N N N j S W p N Z Z tQ > ry o W O o O U W Z p > " O I o Q Z (r N Q c o c Q o a LL v m v m w rn m Q Q O O <O m M C> N O o O w O `p O D U N N O m m m m m m m m m m m UI O m m �'- E C7H o m V o j 2 2 o f O E W E E E E E E E E E E w o ft K w w o -� o W u Oa pm ;n � ° � � � 000 ,p o 0 0 000 � m Qd QNy ��:> j E N N 6 Q Ca Cp Q Q Qcc 'c cc 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c Q J c m J J m U Vl H U U U U O M n D m D D U fn N N N N N N N N N N N N N CJ N N ON N N N ON N N N O O O O 0 m �- i� a o a r' 00000000 0o rn o0 O N �i O M r- N N N N w w w w w w w w w w N N N m M N "J M M '0 M C'1 N (`� N (7 w f0 l0 w N w (D <O m (D M N M M M N M p O N O ap O r• O O O � � O N O N Orr- r n• n r r n r• r• O N O N O O N Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O O Y O Y O F- Y O O Y O Y O U p Y U > U > U > > > > > > > > > > > > > > U > U > N Q > U w m n n n r n n n n n n n . n r n r r n n o m m o m M o M o M m M 0 0 0 0 0 o N N N o o N o r ❑ O ❑ O 000 CIO ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ a x W ° m oo rnm mm o0 00 Coco mm mm oo r r va m r o0 00 0 r o mm m o0 v v 66 �nm NN m � vi ui v 6 �0 <6 0o ro v vi air vi ui jai co rr �iN r � vi E O a � u 0 U ❑ w O w S >Q W J > < _ F S m W N Z � W _O < LL O J N N O a C, O x N m U w z w z r r dU < < Z W U_ « ❑ Z O > 3 ❑ o o Q0 a O 0 w o o D Q W Y A ,, LL << wa p Z o = J ._ a _ u g O w m z < N W 17 x V ~ U w H t w m t < O U m ar Z c W 2 z ❑ I m ❑ m m w U m C7 c a Z w m > Z m m y E m v N S y O m X ] W K E ° ° O w O W ❑ m O c ° Z c an d c) w K r a� °_ 0 in r m N o v m w a v d � m m `m `m ° aci o �i o � o v� ❑d oU oj- om Q ° 1 om f o f E E c ° O O o w E U oU o f mo° m m K o O ❑ u U FD U U o0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ❑ N O r O N O N O (O O m O � � (D O N r O r O r O r O N O N O r O b m O YO YO YO YO YO Y Y O YO O YO YO O YO YO YO y� �> U > U > U > >> U > U > U > > > U > > U > U > U > U > U > U > U `m � Q r M Y U _ w Z m r m rn o m N N N M v N m r m m E t U M m M n m m M m M n M m n M m N o N o N o N o M m M m c�1 Z V - r w f U o 0 Q aE c CA m O O O> c (V (V N w Oi mm M C7 O O O O Q Q (O CO OJ aC% m Oi Oi CJ (J Q Q O C] N mm O l LU [O EE Q Q M [ry N N Y) t(1 N (O CO ¢1 N N Q Q N N Q Q W W t` t` ❑ act C QQ MM MM (] M QQ CM C7 0 !1 Y V C J O U m C] W H >Q J Q F N O_ a LL m O N_ d Z ❑ C U O N y N O < W Ca t a O _W w 6 J _M U ? ❑ J Z ❑ W Q O Z N w Z o U S a W ❑ ti ti pQ t- a V z ❑ Z m g d z ? C9 °o w Z F O « t Q a g Z !_ " " 7 H d ❑ O ¢ y H 3 x w U « w U m J U >Q (7 0 y K `° W U K to ❑ > W S m O o F to Y Z > H e W co } t c S N N W O m W U U F ❑ J ❑ m Z Z Q m 7 0 U w u w w a m g 0 ¢ m z NN UO z > S U E y -wo K d W ¢ U O m ILL- ¢n N o m K 'm m p m j O M « K -o Q ¢ ¢ ❑ a Q � xa a Z M L OI M N Q N 10 od M m O LL N m d d O U m ao ry m ° O C ° m om UE rnE C9 ❑ m K .` w ¢ o Q u y p " V V o p o p o ❑ U ¢ �I-D E ? m 7 7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O Q V1 �O Q O Q d T O O N b ❑I�- r O N O !� O t0 O f` O r O N O N 00 Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y 0 Y Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O YO Y O > > > U > U :> U > U > >> U > U > V > > V > U > U > U > U > U > U > U w W v °e `o O M Olc 01 n Ole W Ot iv °a e a tiryn•' ° Y 5 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O O O cl O O O s w ! U E O O O O m m N d N O V V N N N m m m m N m N m V O O O N f m m m N O m O r O r V N N V a C) O O (O (O [D N r r r r 01 O T T O O) .- r Q7 �' r r O O M c7 Y q O r 0 6 K U m IE m m o U ❑ C O d U y N d U d ❑ N N d o Y U O U c}d 2 U U ~ N h K V Z p W O d d Q W O m m V L) Q m Q 7 d W F K M O Q ❑ Z N Q Z ry d fn F- Q J U 2 6 ❑ O C, 0 2i s O In O W Y W g z N W > Q Z �_ W Y ~_ W W Q t ❑ OW ❑ u 00 K = d W rL Y 0' m m H m u z z Z z Q yLL W J K E Z E N z W ❑ d N ¢ 41 U C J y GdG' N (/J Vl Q N -O O Z Z a Z y Z 'Q Z v Q N Y �c J J D d n K K o (Y K W 0 0 d N o E2 o o m °o u� O E o d ° m ° E ° E p d ° E z rn z o z o z o O �- O O LL J ¢K¢ Q�Q > O O P O N of E z E z Z '^ 4 �, U O U a O U U 0 U U C7 U V N N N O O ❑ p r O r O m O r O N O m O r O N O N O r O N O r O N O N O N AY 0 O O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y 0 Y O � Y Y O Y U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > V > U > 2 ki F a m U LL m z p ti j U N O N o N o N o N O N o N o N o N O N o N o N o N o N o N o g U x w .- " ° rnrn corm aom mom � mm mm rr MM rnm o0 o mm NN [� G NN Mr 6 Q Q NM (A MM MM mm MM NN MM QQ m " � L r r O r (h m m m m m m Q Q m [O N N r r M M Q Q O) N Q N N Q Q M N 2 L U C O U N_ C O d U a_ m d Z U d 0 N G K v w N d F u n U N L r d N J W H 6i U U W } } z T N Z N OJ z O N O p d d d Z d m a o m U Z a U O� W 0 O Z w O 0 m w Z � (7 N a O ¢ m m ¢ w J umi m m r J ¢z W O z Q m Z O o LLI O O Z U d ¢ D - o O O n w Q Q U ¢ @ w �- ¢ H w y m U t' > > K W d Y ¢ >. E w H x K Z z m ¢ "° '° ¢ m U m E J „� a a y w m W w Z m Q a U '- ¢ w .° O J w m 'O Z in W m Z '^ c a c Z d a c VJ F- c to to 00 ¢ o w E E N N Mm m � I d o a to N d o c c a d o d ° w o w °o 0 °o E U I z E oa °—' rn o X n E O o o °— �' t°- Z c w ° O ' v� g w Z v z z 0 2 j ¢a a ;� o- `.c N 'c U N rn m ° m ° j U > c7 U I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O N N N N N N N O N N O O N O r r O N O r r O N O N O r O r O N O N O r O N N O N O N d Y O U > YU Y O Y O Y O O Y O Y > > U > U > > > U > U > > > > > Y O Y O U > U > z ;L O W i , i y a°iDe O�) o ry Ohm Ohm mm W N pN � � O� � Ohm W m mry om M pmn Oo v me m p mm m �„ rn Ln m mm m m sue: o U t2 ti o r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . x a 00 no mom N N no 00 N N O mm O r O) N N Q N �1J a0 ro N 0 Q E mm no N O O mm Mm no O r m � O Mm N Q Q M r m m M l0 m Q m N O U co co O O M M O t0 N M M vf N O6 O of M N Q m M M Q M o7 Q M N Q M t7 0) r 47 Ol O N CO � N [O Q N M Q ❑ 00 N N O O M N N N N O 0 R K V C J O U ❑ C O d U N_ m N V y ❑ Y m ° U a w a z 3 W U W 0 U U U p o Tw ❑ N z > LL W w K K J J O Z m vwi v LL > N a Z � O O O ❑ w N y O U ? U O c c N Y J Q LL O U O G Z J m m o v W t ¢ W m a } W K N ❑ Z u Q O LL N 6 Z O N V Ej E O `^ U LL w w 'ttla O -mo z -o z Z N a] m do. E ~ w o E z F D Z m H Y F- ❑ c 7 7 'a ❑ ❑ m c o. m m ° - n m y E m o m a ' 01 °' °- W .� m W a u o to n m N n r 0 w Ir'�� °O U N O V F = r N NF U p F' U 3 0 O❑ d O a N s N m 0 p 7 ¢ E = E E O E o f O o W 0 - z E D Q o N w (m o n o ?E H W "3 N = N o 0 o o o o 2 2 U o m O U a w ¢ a m O N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O N �O m C'l N Cl M C"l ❑I O N O r O r r O N O N O r O r r O � O !� O �O m tD m r r r r r r r r `d Yo YO Y O O Y0 YO Y O Y 0 0 YO YO Y O O O O O O O O O O O O O U > U > U > > U > U > U > U > > U > U > U > > > > > > > > > > > > > n` m Y A U o W m z Z O m O n O o m o m O r O e O M O m O m O H 7 p N O N o N O o N o N O N o N o 0 r i w a W rn m W r m Q m m m r r o o m m W Q Q N N NO c6 R1 m QQ rr 00 00 m M N N 46 W m W c O W to N 6 Y U C 7 O U _N O f T C N O E 0 rUr,� c S o � d U (p N N (7 N V N p C V O JG z W O ¢ cl m N m v U 2 ¢ a °o z No z w w w a W S U W O w Y z z U Y . y U Z NN NN z N J zoi > a w 'o U v O N O C O C C N v p 0 U O N O RI E O" 'O. 6 6 J O 2' UI W N o a g w n W U 7 I- I- 1- U O U to N N N N N N N mOM N O O O O N b N N OI�- ON Or r Orr ON Or � � O � N O Y 0 0>O (J U L) > > Y U > V O Q O Y O Y 0 F- U7 U > » > U > o > U Y e N [J u t O m O N O m O v sW' BOARD AGENDA STAFF REPORT Meeting Date:March 28,2012 tovater stValley DiPublic Hearing, strict Discussion Item: Consent Item: F-1 March 8,2012 TO: GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS FROM: GENERAL MANAGER/CEO SUBJECT: RESOLUTION 2012.05 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Directors approve Resolution 2012.05 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: East Valley Water District has traditionally recognized employees who have attained 25 years of exemplary service to the District, by honoring them with a Resolution. Richard Becerra who is being recognized for his twenty-five years of dedicated service to the District. REVIEW BY OTHERS: This agenda item has been reviewed by the Administration Department. R-5-CAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact associated with this agenda item is $123.16 which is a budgeted expenditure. Respectfully submitted: Recommended by: John Mura Justine Hendricksen General Manager/CEO Administrative Manager ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2012.05 �4:,_ Page!, 1 SR#0072 RESOLUTION2012.05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT INRECOGNITION OF RICHARD BECERRA'S TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE BE IT HEREBYRESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District as follows: WHEREAS, RICHARD BECERRA has been employed by the East Valley Water District since February 9, 1987, and WHEREAS, RICHARD BECERRA has in those twenty-five years, performed in an outstanding and honorable capacity in the positions of Water Service Worker I, Water Service Worker II, Equipment Operator I, Equipment Operator II, Water Service Worker-111, Water Service Foreman, and Water Service Supervisor, and WHEREAS, the said RICHARD BECERRA has been dedicated and conscientious, and has displayed a high sense of duty, sincere interest and personal competence in the performance of his duties which have been for the benefit of all staff members and customers of the East Valley Water District, and WHEREAS, the said RICHARD BECERRA in serving the Districtfor twenty-five years has, through his untiring efforts, personal growth, and cooperation with staff and customers, contributed greatly to the successful operation of the East Valley Water District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District, and each of them on behalf of the Board, staff and citizens of the District, hereby express to RICHARD BECERRA their sincere appreciation for his twenty-five years of dedicated service. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be placed in the minutes of the East Valley Water District and the original of this Resolution be signed by all members of the Board of Directors and presented to RICHARD BECERRA, after being suitably framed. DATED: March 28, 20,,12 i MATT S.LEVESQUE JAMES MORALES, JR. Pen Vice Presider t KIPSTURGEON GE`ORG E WILSON Director Director Attest: BEN C. COLEMAN JOHNJ.MURA Director General Manager/Board Secretary BOARD AGENDA STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 28,2012 East Valley Public Hearing: � Water District Discussion Item: Consent Item: F-1 March 21,2012 TO: GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS FROM: GENERAL MANAGER/CEO SUBJECT: SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2012/2013 GROUNDWATER CHARGE INCREASE RECOMMENDATION: 1. Review presentation given by San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District General Manager 2. Provide staff direction regarding the proposed rate increase BACKGROUN D/ANALY S IS: The San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (Conservation District) has completed their 2011/2012 Engineering Investigation of the Bunker Hill Basin. This annual report is required in connection with groundwater charges levied on producers within the Conservations District's boundaries. Based on the findings of the recently completed Engineering Investigative report, Conservation District staff is recommending that the groundwater production rate for non-agricultural purposes be increased from the current rate of$9.81 to $11.28 per acre-foot. If approved these increase would take effect on all production after July 1, 2012. The Conservation District uses the proceeds of the groundwater charge to fund ongoing groundwater replenishment of the basin, including direct recharge, facility operation, repairs and maintenance. A public meeting regarding this matter is scheduled for April 11, 2012 and a Public Hearing is scheduled for April 30, 2012. Both of these meetings will be conducted at the Conservation District Board Room. �j p Pagel 1 SR#0078 AGENDA DATE: MARCH 28, 2012 SUBJECT: SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2012/2013 GROUNDWATER CHARGE INCREASE A copy of the Engineering Investigation Study and a letter from the Conservation District are attached to this report for your review. REVIEW BY OTHERS: This agenda item has been reviewed by the District's Chief Financial Officer. FISCAL IMPACT: The financial impact of this rate increase if passed, as proposed, will be included in the 2012/13 Fiscal Year Operational Budget. Based on the previous 12 months of actual groundwater production this increase would result in an increased assessment cost of$27,000. Respectfully submit led John Mora, Generaf Manager/CEO ATTACHMENTS • Letter dated March 13, 2012 from Daniel Cozad, General Manager of San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District • Engineering Investigation of the Bunker Hill Basin 2011-2012 Page ( 2 SR#0078 P BeONSER VA170ry O'S SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION DIS'T'RICT (E Established 1932 P low` 1630 West Redlands 13ov4evard,Suite A BO.Box 1839 Redlands,CA 93373-8032 2edlands.CA 92373-0581 (909) 793-2503 OU'p Mt`'S Fax:(909) 793-0188 NAME IS OUR March 13, 2012 East Valley Water District Mr.John Mura 1'.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino,CA 92413 Dear Mr. Mora: The San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District(Conservation District) has completed its 2011-12 Engineering Investigation of the Bunker Hill Basin. This report is required in connection w th the Board of Directors' consideration of a groundwater charge on groundwater production within the Conservation District's boundaries. Article 1, Section 75560 of the California Water Code, requires that a water conservation district that proposes to levy or continue a groundwater extraction fee"...shall annually cause to be made an engineering investigation and report upon groundwater conditions of the District." A copy of the Conservation District's 2012 report is available for review online at the District's website at http://www.sbvwcd.dst.ca.us/reports-data/documents/2012Fnaineeringlnvesti ation.pdf or at the District's office at 1630 West Redlands Blvd., Suite A, Redlands,CA. You are being provided a copy of this notice because you are the owner or operator of a groundwater producing well in the District'sjurisdiclional boundaries. District staff is recommending to the District's Board of Directors to raise the groundwater rate of $2.73 per acre-foot for groundwater production for direct agricultural production to$3.14 per acre foot, and from$9.81 per acre-foot for groundwater production for non-agricultural purposes to$11.28 per acre-foot. The$1.47 per acre foot increase is necessary to reduce a nearly$50,000 deficit in the Groundwater Enterprise.The proposed rates will pertain to agricultural and non- agricultural groundwater production from July 1, 2012-through June 30, 2013. California Water Code 75594 dictates that the rate for non-agricultural groundwater production must be between three and five times the rate for agricultural rise. Tire groundwater charge is not imposed on a property basis,but rather is a per acre-foot charge, which relates directly to the amount of groundwater produced from wells overlying the roundwater basin within the Conservation District's boundaries. Consequently, the ultimate annount of groundwater charge to be paid by you cannot be precisely identified now, because it will depend directly upon the amount of groundwater you produce in the basin from July 1,2012 to June 30,2013. If your production for 201%13 were the same as calendar year 2011 your total charges would be$163,721.91 or an increase of$24,558.29 over current cost. The total revenue estimated to be collected from both agricultural and non-agricultural production for the 2012- 2013 water year is$737,883.00 based on 2011-2012 water production. The groundwater charge is to be collected on a semi-annual basis,based on production statements you submit for your groundwater production. The District uses the proceeds of the groundwater charge to fund ongoing groundwater replenishment of the basin, including direct water recharge, facility operations repairs and maintenance, €.nd related costs. A public meeting and public hearing on the proposed groundwater charge will be held in the Conservation District's Board Room at 1630 West Redlands Blvd., Suite A, Redlands,CA 92373. The date and time for the public meeting will be April 11, 2012,at 1:30 pm. The date and time of the public hearing will be held on April 30,2012, at 1:30 pm. You are invited to attend the public meeting and public hearing,and may submit evidence concerning groundwater conditions, water supplies of the Conservation District, or any matter relating to the proposed groundwater charge. In addition, any party wishing to protest the groundwater charge, may mail a protest to the Conservation District's office, and/or present such protest at the public meeting or public hearing. Further inquiries regarding the report or the groundwater charge,or requests for further information, may be directed to Daniel B. Cozad at 1630 West Redlands Blvd., Suite A, Redlands, CA 92373, or by telephone at(909) 793-2503. anD iel &za4d General Manager Engineering Investigation of • Bunker Basin 2011-2012 }E Prepared March 7, 2012 .,r ww wn TABLE OF CONTENTS Figures................................................................................................................iii Tables .................................................................................................................iv Appendices .........................................................................................................v 1.0 Executive Summary.................................................................................1 2.0 Introduction..............................................................................................8 2.1 Purpose and Scope.....................................................................................8 2.2 Location, Topography and Climate..........................................................10 2.3 Definition of Terms....................................................................................11 2.4 Sources of Data.........................................................................................12 3.0 Fall 2010 and Fall 2011 Groundwater Elevation Contours..................14 4.0 Task 1 - Annual Change in Storage (Fall 2010 to Fall 2011) ...............14 4.1 Hydrologic Sub-areas................................................................................14 4.2 Area and Storativity...................................................................................15 4.3 Groundwater Level Elevation Changes....................................................15 4.4 Change in Groundwater Storage.............................................................. 15 5.0 Task 2- Accumulated Change in Storage from Fall 1993 to 2011 .....16 6.0 Task 3 - Total Groundwater Production for the Preceding Water Year (July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 17 7.0 Task 4- Estimate of the Annual Change in Storage for the Current Water Year (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012).....................................................18 SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 { Bunker Hill Basin 8.0 Task 5- Estimate of the Annual Change in Storage for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013).....................................................19 9.0 Task 6- Average Annual Change in Storage for the Immediate Past 10 Water Years..................................................................................................20 10.0 Task 7- Estimated Amount of Agricultural Water and Other Than Agricultural Water to be Withdrawn for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013)......................................................................................20 11.0 Task 8- Estimated Amount of Water for Surface Distribution for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013)......................................23 12.0 Task 9 - Estimated Amount of Water for Replenishment of the Groundwater Supplies for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) 23 13.0 Genet-al Findings....................................................................................24 14.0 Conclusions............................................................................................25 15.0 Financial Data.........................................................................................26 SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 ii Bunker Hill Basin Nay\��la Figures Figure 1 Bunker Hill Basin Watershed Map Figure 2 Conservation District and Water Agency Boundaries Figure 3 Sub-areas of Bunker Hill Basin Figure 4 Precipitation Trends and Gauge Station Locations Figure 5 Fall 2010 Water Level Groundwater Contours Figure 6 Fall 2011 Water Level Groundwater Contours Figure 7 Locations of Key Wells with Hydrographs Figure 8 Groundwater Production in the Bunker Hill Basin in Appendix B Figure 9 Prediction Chart for Annual Change in Storage Figure 10 Estimate of Production for Current Water Year Figure 11 Estimate of Production for Ensuing Water Year SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 ui Banker Hill Basin �s Tables Table 1 Summary of Percentage of Normal Precipitation Table 2 Change in Groundwater Levels in Key Wells Table 3 Annual Change in Storage for the Bunker Hill Basin Table 4 Accumulated Change in Storage for Bunker Hill Basin (1987 to 2004) Table 5 Production for Sub-basins of Bunker Hill Basin Table 6 Estimates of Percentage of Normal Precipitation for Current Water Year 'Table 7 Average Annual Change in Storage for the Bunker Hill Basin 'Table 8 Summary of Surface Distribution Water for the Bunker Hill Basin SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 iv Bunker Hill Basin Appendices Appendix A Water Level Elevations for the Bunker Hill Basin Appendix B Hydrographs for Key Wells Appendix C Production Data for the Preceding Water Year Appendix D Historic Annual Precipitation All appendices are available separately on San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District's Website: http•//www.sbvwcd.org and incorporated by reference. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 V Banker Hill Basin 1.0 Executive Summary Article 1, Section 75560 of the California Water Code requires that a Water Conservation District that proposes to levy a groundwater charge "... shall annually cause to be made an engineering investigation and report upon groundwater conditions of the Districr'. In accordance with these requirements, the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (District) must make the following findings and determinations as they relate to the ground and surface water conditions of the Bunker Hill Basin and those areas within the District boundary. Refer to Figure 1 and 3 for locations. Task 1. Annual change in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year (Fall 2010 to Fall 2011); Task 2. Accumulated change in storage of the Bunker Hill Basin as of the last day of the preceding water year(June 30, 2011); Task 3. Total groundwater production from the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year (July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011); Task 4. Estimate of the annual change in the Bunker Hill Basin storage for the current water year(July 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012); Task 5. Estimate of the annual change in the Bunker Hill Basin storage for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013); Task 8. Average annual change in Bunker Hill Basin storage for the immediate past ten water years (2001 - 2011); Task 7. Estimated amount of agricultural water and other than agricultural water to be withdrawn from the groundwater supplies of the District for the ensuing water year (.July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013); Task 8. Estimated amount of water necessary for surface distribution for the ensuing water year for the Bunker Hill Basin and the District (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013); and SHV Water Canservadan District Engineering Investigation 2012 1 Bunker Hill Basin Task 9. The amount of water that is necessary for the replenishment of the groundwater supplies of the Bunker Hill Basin and the District for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013). To make the findings and determinations listed above, District staff researched available hydro-geologic and engineering data for the Bunker Hill Basin. These data were compiled and analyzed and a predictive relationship between precipitation, production, and change in basin storage. This relationship was based on empirical data since 1993 and enables the prediction of change in storage, given certain annual production and precipitation levels. In addition, annual and accumulated change in storage values were calculated based on current and historic water level changes throughout the Bunker Hill Basin. The report is Based on 20 measuring stations, precipitation throughout the contributing watershed was 93% of normal for the period October 1, 2009 to September 31, 2010. The report uses production and water level data from nearly 240 wells in the basin. The required findings for the 2012 Engineering Investigation are provided below. Each of the tasks is further explained in the main body of the report. Throughout this document a positive sign (+) denotes an increase in groundwater storage or groundwater level elevation while a negative sign (-) denotes a decrease in groundwater storage or groundwater level elevation. Section 75574 of the California Water Code requires that the District Board indicate the amount of water the District is obligated by contract to purchase. The San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District is not required by contract to purchase any water. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2011 2 Bunker Hill Basin Summary of Findings for the 2012 Engineering Investigation Task 1. Annual change in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year(July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 groundwater levels) Change in storage between Fall 2010 and Fall 2011 116,020 acre-ft (increase) The amount of water stored in the Basin increased by 116,020 acre-feet between 2010 and 2011. Task 2. Accumulated change in storage of the Bunker Hill Basin as of the last day of the preceding water year(2011) Accumulated change in storage between July 1993 and June 2011.' -224,603 acre-ft (decrease) The amount in storage in the Summer of 2011 is 224,603 acre-ft less than in the Summer of 1993. Task 3. Total groundwater production from the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year(July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011) 184,122 acre-ft In the District's Engineering Investigation (EI) prior to 1993-94, the accumulated change in storage was based on the basin storage in 1984 as considered full. A concern arose regarding the flooding of basements due to high groundwater levels in the Pressure Zone of the Bunker Hill Basin. Therefore, in response to the City of San Bernardino's comments on accumulated change in storage, all El's since that time are based on 1993 basin storage levels considered as full. SBV Water Canseivatien District Engineering Investigation 1011 3 Bunker Hill Basin Task 4. Estimate of the annual change in the Bunker Hill Basin storage for the current water year (July 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012) 7,700 acre-ft(increase) The amount of water in the Basin is estimated to increase by 7,700 acre- ft during the current water year. Task 5. Estimate of the annual change in the Bunker Hill Basin storage for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) 7,700 acre-ft (increase) The amount of water in the Basin is estimated to increase by 7,700 acre- ft during the ensuing water year. Task 6. Average annual change in Bunker Hill Basin storage for the immediate past 10 water years (2001-2011) shows a decrease, although much less in magnitude than in previous years: -362 acre-ft (decrease) Task 7. Estimated amount of agricultural water and other than agricultural water to be withdrawn from the groundwater supplies of the District for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) Estimated amount of agricultural water withdrawn from the groundwater supplies within the District boundary for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) 6,045 acre-ft SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 4 Banker Hill Basin Y YIU/, Estimated amount of other than agricultural water withdrawn from the groundwater supplies of the District for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) 58,886 acre-ft Task 8. Estimated amount of water necessary for surface distribution for the ensuing water year for the Bunker Hill Basin and the District (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 20'°3) Estimated amount of water necessary for surface distribution for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) for the Bunker Hill Basin 76,370 acre-ft Estimated amount of water necessary for surface distribution for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) within the District boundary 64,035 acre-ft Task 9. The• amount of water which is necessary for the replenishment of the groundwater supplies of the Bunker Hill Basin and the District for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) The amount of water which is necessary for the replenishment of the groundwater supplies of the Bunker Hill Basin for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) 135,843 acre-ft SBV Water Conservation District F_ngineering Investigation 2012 5 Bunker Hill Basin The amount of water which is necessary for the replenishment of the groundwater supplies within the District boundary for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013) 53,232 acre-ft In addition to the above findings, Section 75505 of the California Water Code requires that a finding be made as to the amount of water necessary to be replaced in the intake areas of the groundwater basins within the District to prevent the landward movement of salt water into the fresh groundwater body, or to prevent subsidence of the land within the District. Because of its location and the elevations of its water table, the Bunker Hill Basin is not subject to salt-water intrusion and the current groundwater levels do not indicate any significant land subsidence. Section 75540 of the California Water Code requires that the District Board establish a zone or zones where a groundwater charge is to be implemented. The Code specifically states that a single zone may include the entire District and in May 1993 the Board established the entire District as one zone. This determination may be amended in the future, but lacking any evidence to the contrary, in the 2011-11 year the entire District will remain as a single zone in regard to any groundwater charge. Section 75561 of the California Water Code further requires the Engineering Investigation to include a finding related to the amount of water the District is obligated by contract to purchase. At this time the District has no contractual obligation to purchase water for the replenishment of the groundwater supplies. However, instead cooperates with local and regional agencies to recharge the aquifer. The District works with San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley) to spread excess allocation State Project Water in the District's spreading basins. In the past the District has utilized reserves to offset the cost of water purchases which have spread in its basins. Due to the significant reduction in District reserves it has not purchased water this year. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 6 Banker Hill Basin ol Based on the results of the 2012 Engineering Investigation, the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District finds that: • Due to the imbalance between groundwater recharge and production since 1993, the Bunker Hill Basin's storage is 224,603 acre-feet below that which is considered full for purposes of this investigation. This value is significantly less than 2011 report due to local rainfall rates and management of the basin. • During the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013), the Bunker Hill Basin could be recharged, with up to 352,746 acre-feet of water. This recharge quantity would be needed to attain the 1993 storage level that is considered full. The Basin Technical Advisory Committee (BTAC) recommends a maximum of 80,000 acre-ft safely manage and recharge the basin. This amount includes 48,000 acre-ft in Mill Creek and Santa Ana River Basins. • The District must continue to take all necessary steps to maintain and enhance its capability to conduct recharge operations. These steps may include maintenance and repair of existing, diversion facilities, canals, dikes, basins, roads, and other water recharge facilities. These improvements are required to ensure that the groundwater demands on the Basin, especially during drought periods can be met. • The District should continue to work cooperatively in the collaborative planning for the Enhanced Recharge Program to plan, design, build and maintain facilities to expand the capabilities for recharge of waters that are developed as a result of water conservation due to the construction of Seven Oaks Dam (SOD). • The District has begun collaborative construction efforts with Valley to improve the capacities and delivery capabilities of the District's Upper Santa Ana River diverted water conveyance canals and spreading basins. The District should review the single zone of influence/benefit in 2012-2013 and revise if needed. w� SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2011 7 Bunker Hill Basin o...FVx,.Yx n sr W� r t if OY4 M,t 2.0 Introduction The 2011-2012 Engineering Investigation (EI) is very similar to the previous 2010-2011 El Report. The report uses the same basis of calculation, however updates the document as proposed in the work plan prepared and approved in December 2011. This approach also includes close coordination with other groups particularly San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD)who do their own calculations for elements similar to the El Report. We believe this approach makes the best use of the resources of all water entities within the basin. This year's report provides more research, source documentation, and summary displaying of surface and groundwater activities within the Bunker Hill Basin and specifically within the Water Conservation District's boundaries compared to prior years. 2.1 Purpose and Scope The San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (District) was created by a vote of the people in 1931 for the purpose of managing the recharge activities that were previously conducted by the Water Conservation Association, The Water Conservation Association was incorporated in 1909 and had been diverting flows from the Santa Ana River for groundwater recharge since 1911. Currently the District has ownership, as well as easements and/or use of properties owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), on a total of 3,735 acres within the Santa Ana River and Mill Creek Wash areas. The District boundary covers an area of approximately 50,000 acres, which represents about 60% of the Bunker Hill Basin. Figure 1 displays the project area map for the Engineering Investigation. The figure shows the District boundary along with its location relative to the County and State boundaries. Figure 2 shows the District Boundaries relative to the water agencies served by the District. Article 1, Section 75560 of the California Water Code requires that a Water Conservation District that proposes to levy a groundwater charge "... shall annually cause to be made an engineering investigation and report upon groundwater conditions of the District". In accordance with these requirements, the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 8 Banker Hilt Basin District (District) must make the following findings and determinations as they relate to the ground and surface water conditions of the Bunker Hill Basin and those areas within the District boundary. Sub-Basins of the Bunker Hill Basin are shown in Figure 3. Task 1. Annual change in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year (Fall 2010 to Fall 2011); Task 2. Accumulated change in storage of the Bunker Hill Basin as of the last day of the preceding water year(June 30, 2011); Task 3. Total groundwater production from the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year(July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011); Task 4. Estimate of the annual change in the Bunker Hill Basin storage for the current water year(July 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012); Task 5. Estimate of the annual change in the Bunker Hill Basin storage for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013); Task 6. Average annual change in Bunker Hill Basin storage for the immediate past 10 water years (2001-2011); Task 7. Estimated amount of agricultural water and other than agricultural water to be withdrawn from the groundwater supplies of the District for the ensuing water year (.July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013); Task 8. Estimated amount of water necessary for surface distribution for the ensuing water year for the Bunker Hill Basin and the District (July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013); and Task 9. The amount of water that is necessary for the replenishment of the groundwater supplies of the Bunker Hill Basin and the District for the ensuing water year(July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013). To make the findings and determinations listed above, District staff researched available hydrogeologic, precipitation, and engineering data for the Bunker Hill Basin and surrounding areas. These data were compiled and analyzed and a predictive relationship between precipitation, production, and change in basin storage was adapted from similar relationships developed by Geoscience Support Services in the preparation ,; S9 Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 9 Banker Hill Basin f ii OVP x,t'. of previous Engineering Investigations. This relationship was based on empirical data enables the prediction of change in storage, given certain annual production and precipitation levels. Precipitation trends and stations are shown in Figure 4. In addition, annual and accumulated change in storage was calculated based on historic water level changes throughout the Bunker Hill Basin. 2.2 Location, Topography and Climate The Bunker Hill Basin is located at the top of the Santa Ana River Watershed and receives all the surface water runoff from the headwaters of the Santa Ana River, Mill Creek, and a portion of that from the Lytle Creek area as well as smaller periodic flows from Plunge, City, Devil Canyon, Cajon and Elder Creeks. It is part of the inland valley called the San Bernardino Valley located in San Bernardino County, California and encompasses approximately 89,600 acres. Once past the Bunker Hill Basin, the Santa Ana River continues to flow southwesterly for approximately 60 miles until it reaches the Pacific Ocean. The Bunker Hill Basin is bounded on the northwest by the San Gabriel Mountains, on the northeast by the San Bernardino Mountains, on the south by the Crafton Hills and the Badlands, and on the southwest by a low east-facing escarpment produced by the San Jacinto fault. These geologic features are easily identified on Figure 5 and Figure 6. The major streams providing inflows and outflows for the Bunker Hill Basin are provided on Figure 1. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) administers stream flow gauging stations on all of these waterways except Mill Creek. Mill Creek flow is assumed to be 56% of the Santa Ana River flow based on historic data. Total diversions for direct use and recharge on the Santa Ana River may exceed the stream flows due to measurements by different agencies. The Bunker Hill Basin is also expressed by a large group of City and Water Agencies that are working to increasingly collaborate for improved transparency. Figure 2 SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 - 10 Bunker Hill Basin presents an overview of the Water Agency Jurisdictions with an overlay of City boundaries. The climate in the region is a semi-arid Mediterranean-type characterized by long dry summers and relatively short mild winters. The annual average temperature in the valley is 62" F, with extremes ranging from as low as 18" F to as high as 116° F (Burnham and Dutcher, 1960). Precipitation in the region is highly variable depending on location and elevation. Historical annual averages range from 11 inches near Loma Linda Fire Department located at the southwest end of the basin to over 41 inches at the Lake Arrowhead located at the upper end of the mountain watershed contributing flow to the basin. Precipitation data provided by the Water Resources Division for 20 stations are summarized in Table 1 and displayed on Figure 4. 2.3 Definition of Terms For the purposes of this report, the following terms are defined: ♦ Bunker Hill Basin - The Bunker Hill Basin is the groundwater basin that underlies the San Bernardino Valley. By strict definition according to (Dutcher and Garrett, 1963), the Bunker Hill Basin is separate from the Lytle Groundwater Basin, but receives groundwater underflow from the Lytle Basin. However, for completeness, the definition of the Bunker Hill Basin is extended to include the Lytle Basin for the purposes of this report. ♦ Production - The term production includes extraction of water by groundwater pumping from wells and surface diversions from the Santa Ana River, Mill Creek, City Creek, Devil Canyon Creek, Cajon Creek, Plunge Creek, and Lytle Creek. ♦ Preceding N later Year - As per the California Water Code, the preceding water year is the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 1 I Bunker Hill Basin ♦ Current Water Year- As per the California Water Code, the current water year is the period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012. ♦ Ensuing Water Year - As per the California Water Code, the ensuing water year is the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. 2.4 Sources of Data Data used in the development of this engineering investigation were obtained from a variety of sources including public and private agencies. The data analysis tasks involved tabulating and summarizing information from documented and undocumented reports, public and private files, and personal communication with local, State, and Federal agencies. Some of the more important data sources are listed below. Data for Fall 2010 and Fall 2011 groundwater elevations and preceding water year (July 2010 to June 2011) production were obtained from the primary water purveyors in the Bunker Hill Basin including: • City of Colton • City of Loma Linda/Loma Linda University • City of Redlands • City of Rialto • City of Riverside • City of San Bernardino • East Valley Water District • Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District/Meeks and Daley Water Company • Gage Canal Company • Riverside — Highland Water Company • San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control • Southern California Edison • San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Watermaster Support Services, Steve E. Mains SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 2 Bunker Hill Basin • West Valley Water District • United States Geological Survey, Santee, CA Office Data regarding historic diversions from the Santa Ana River, Mill Creek, Plunge Creek, City Creek, Devil Canyon Creek, Cajon Creek, and Lytle Creek were obtained from the following sources: • San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (acting as Project Manager for the Cooperative Water Project- Exchange Plan) • Western Municipal Water District • City of San Bernardino Historic precipitation data were obtained from the following sources: • San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control Current precipitation data is downloaded from USGS stations. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 13 Banker Hill Basin r�wr"6 3.0 Fall 2010 and Fall 2011 Groundwater Elevation Contours The District, the Western Municipal Water District, and the primary water purveyors in the Bunker Hill Basin provided Fall 2010 and 2011 water level data. Static groundwater elevations for wells throughout the Bunker Hill Basin are compiled in Appendix A. These elevations were plotted for 184 wells using a Geographic Information System (GIS) are plotted in Figures 5 & 6 for Fall 2010 and Fall 2011. The water elevation values were used to derive an interpolated surface for the extent of the Bunker Hill Basin. For purposes of comparison, Fall 2010 and Fall 2011 static groundwater elevation surface contours are provided in Figures 5 & 6 Fall 2010 and Fall 2011. 4.0 Task 1 - Annual Change in Storage (Fall 2010 to Fall 2011) 4.1 Hydrologic Sub-areas Using a Geographic Information System, the average groundwater elevation changes were determined for each of the nine hydrologic sub-areas shown in Figure 3 and listed below. • Bunker Hill I - Southwest of Interstate 215 • Bunker Hill I - Northeast of Interstate 215 • Bunker Hill II -West of Mentone Fault • Bunker Hill II - East of Mentone Fault • Lytle Basin - Southeast of Barrier J • Lytle Basin - Northwest of Barrier J • Pressure Zone - North of Santa Ana Wash • Pressure Zone - Santa Ana Wash Due to variations of changes in groundwater level elevation, the Bunker Hill II - East of Mentone Fault was further subdivided into Storage Units North of Redlands Fault and Southeast of Redlands Fault. These Storage Units are also shown in Figure 3. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 14 Bunker Hill Basin IY I,.Oill si 4.2 Area and Storativity Digitizing each polygon made estimates of the area extent of the sub-areas and storage. Average storativity for each sub-area was determined based on data from Hardt and Hutchinson, 1980. Both of these values are shown in Table 3. Storativity values ranged from 0.02 for the Pressure Zone - North of the Santa Ana Wash to 0.13 for the Lytle Basin - Northwest of Barrier J and Bunker Hill II - East of the Mentone Fault. 4.3 Groundwater Level Elevation Changes In order to determine the annual change in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin, Fall 2011 groundwater level elevation data were compared with the same from Fall 2010. Measurements for 238 wells were available for both periods and the differences are provided in Appendix A. Figure 7 shows key wells for the Bunker Hill basins. These wells have long hydrologic histories. Average changes in groundwater were determined by averaging the changes for all AIM,: wells in each of the eight sub-areas and storage units as shown in Table 3. 4.4 Change in Groundwater Storage The total annual change in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin was determined by summing the changes from each sub-area. Changes in groundwater storage for the period Fall 2010 to Fall 2011 for the Bunker Hill Basin were calculated using the following formula: Qchange in storage— z Al x Si x 4hi where: Qchange in storagE = Annual change in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin, (acre-feet) A; = Area of sub-area and storage unit i, (acres) S; = Storativity of sub-area and storage unit i Ahi = Average water level change of sub-area and storage unit i, (feet) SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Ltvestigation 2012 15 Bunker Hill Basin As shown in Table 3, the change in groundwater storage for the Bunker Hill Basin between Fall 2010 and Fall 2011 was an increase of 116,020 acre-ft. 5.0 Task 2 - Accumulated Change in Storage from Fall 1993 to Fall 2011 For purposes of this report, the accumulated change in storage as of the last day of the preceding water year (July 30, 2011) was based on the changes in water levels between Fall 1993, when the accumulated basin change in storage was considered "zero", and the Fall of 2011.' The accumulated change in storage as of June 30, 2011 was determined by adding the change in storage for the preceding water year (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012) of 116,020 determined in Section 4.4, to the accumulated change in storage as of June 30, 2010 (-340,623). The result of this calculation is an accumulated decrease in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin of-224,603 acre-ft. Table 4 summarizes the accumulated change in storage of the Bunker Hill Basin for the period 1988 to 2011 based on 1993 as the "zero accumulated storage year". As would be expected, storage generally increases with above average rainfall and decreases with normal and below average rainfall. ' In the District's Engineering Investigation(EI) prior to 1993-94, the accumulated change in storage was based on the basin storage in 1984 as considered full. A concern arose regarding the flooding of basements due to high groundwater levels in the Pressure Zone of the Bunker Hill Basin. Therefore,in response to the City of San Bernardino's comments on accumulated change in storage,all El's since that time are based on 1993 basin storage levels considered as full. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 16 Banker Hill Basin _¢ y fy Mli�,py 6.0 Task 3 - Total Groundwater Production for the Preceding Water Year (July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011) Production data for the preceding water year (July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011) for the Bunker Hill Basin were obtained from the primary water purveyors as listed in Section 2.4. Product on data for wells owned by some smaller water agencies were included if data was available from the Western-San Bernardino Watermaster, Western Municipal Water District and semiannual billing statements issued by the District. Appendix C shows the production for each groundwater well in the Bunker Hill Basin for the period July 2010 through June 2011. As summarized on the last page of the Appendix, groundwater production from the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year was approximately 184,122 acre-ft. Table 5 summarizes the Bunker Hill Basin groundwater production for each of the sub-areas defined in Section 4.1. .wa. Groundwater production within the Bunker Hill Basin during the period July 2010 through June 2011 is :>hown on Figure 8. The Pressure Zone has the greatest density of higher producing facilities with pockets of substantial production scattered throughout the rest of the basin. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 17 Bunker Hill Basin Ot`t�tF i py •if OVx M,t 7.0 Task 4 - Estimate of the Annual Change in Storage for the Current Water Year (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012) To estimate annual change in storage for the current water year, a multiple regression analysis was performed for the period between 1991-2011 three parameters. • Annual Change in Storage • Precipitation • Production This analysis is shown in Figure 9. In Engineering Investigations (EI) prior to 1998, data for the period 1982 calendar year through 1991 calendar year were also utilized in the regression analysis. The only production data available for this time frame was based on a calendar year period instead of the June to July period required in the El. Since the 1991-92 period, more accurate and more complete production data for the July to June period has become available, as the District has compiled detailed information for its El. Since 1998, the regression analysis has not included pre-1991 data to more accurately represent June through July production. Annual change in storage for the current water year is estimated using the following relationship between change in storage, precipitation, production, and the calculated regression coefficients. The accumulated change in storage is shown in Figure 10. QAnnual A storage=-91450+7572 * Qprec-0.342 * Qprod where: Q Annual A storage =Annual change in storage, (acre-feet) Qprec = Annual Precipitation, inches Qprod = Annual Production, acre-feet SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 18 Bunker Hill Basin A nomograph, constructed using the above equation, is shown on Figure 9. Through the use of this chart or the equation above, annual change in storage can be estimated for a given set of annual precipitation and production values. The precipitation used in the nomograph is based on the average of the representative Bunker Hill Basin drainage area stations listed in Table 6. The historic annual precipitation information is show in Table 1. The historic annual average annual precipitation for nine of the ten stations with recent data is shown in Table 6 approximately 23.1 inches (107 percent of normal). Historic annual precipitation values are plotted in Appendix D for these nine stations and twelve other local stations. Table 6 shows that for the period between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010, precipitation was 236 percent of normal for the nine stations with data. Remainder of the water year, January 1 to June 30, 2011, the rainfall averaged 56 percent of the long term average. Annually, precipitation for the 2010-11 water year averaged 112 percent. For purposes of this report, it was assumed that precipitation for the current water year (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012) would be 23.1 inches, 100 percent of the Historical average (rather than the average for the 2010 to 2011 season). The reason for this is the preceding year's average is 112 percent, which would be a high estimate based on the low amount of rain received so far this year. The precipitation for the ensuing water year (.July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) was estimated, like it has typically been done, as 100 percent of normal, or 23.1 inches of rainfall. Based on these assumptions, the estimated production for the current water year will be approximately 219,913 acre-ft as shown in Figure 10. Using this result in Figure 9 an estimated change in storage for the current water year(July 2011 to June 2012) of 7,700 acre-ft was determined. SE Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 19 Bunker Hill Basin 8.0 Task 5 - Estimate of the Annual Change in Storage for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) The annual change in storage for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) was estimated using the same method as described in Section 7.0. It was assumed that precipitation for the ensuing water year would be 100% of normal or 23.1 inches. Based on this assumption, the estimated production for the ensuing water year will be approximately 219,913 acre-ft as shown in Figure 11. Again, using this result in the nomograph shown in Figure 9, the estimated annual change in storage for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) is 7,700 acre-ft. 9.0 Task 6 - Average Annual Change in Storage for the Immediate Past 10 Water Years Table 7 shows the average annual change in storage for the immediate past ten water years (July 2001 to June 2011) using the same method as described in Section 4.0. By summing the average annual change in storage for each sub-area, a total average annual change in storage for the Bunker Hill Basin for the immediate past ten water years was determined to be -362 acre-feet/year. 10.0 Task 7 - Estimated Amount of Agricultural Water and Other Than Agricultural Water to be Withdrawn for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) The estimated amount of agricultural water and other than agricultural water to be withdrawn within the District for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) was based on the following equations: SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 20 Banker Hill Basin Qagl(10-11)= Qagr(10-11) x [(Qtotal(12-13)- Qsurf(12-13))/ (Qlotal(10-11) - Qsurf(10-11)), and Qnon-agr(10-11)— Qnon-agq 10-11) x [(Qtotal(12-13) - Qsurf(12-13))/ (Qlotal(10-11) - QsuA(10-11)), where: Qagr(12-13) = Agricultural use within the District for the ensuing water year, acre-ft Qagq;o-11) = Agricultural use within the District for the preceding water year, acre-ft (Appendix C) Qtota](12-13) = Production (including surface diversion)from the Bunker Hill Basin for the ensuing water year, acre-ft(Figure 13) Qtotal(10-11) = Production (including surface diversion) from the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year, acre-ft (Appendix C) Qnon-agr(12-13) = All other uses within the District for the ensuing water year, acre-ft Qnon-agr(10-11) = All other uses within the District for the preceding water year, acre-ft (Appendix C) Qs„n(12-13) = Surface diversions from the Bunker Hill Basin for the ensuing water year, acre-ft(Table 8) Qsurf(10-11) = Surface diversions from the Bunker Hill Basin for the preceding water year, acre-ft (Appendix C) Data on agricu tural use and other uses within the District for the preceding water year (.July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011) are provided in Appendix C. For the period July 1, 2010 through June 10, 2011 approximately 14,119 acre-ft of groundwater was produced for agricultural applications within the District boundary. For the same period, approximately 46,064 acre-ft of groundwater was produced for all other uses within the District boundary. Using the equations presented above with the following values inserted: SRV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 21 Bunker Hill Basin Qagr(10-11) = 5,061 acre-ft (Appendix C) Qtotal(12-13) = 296,283 acre-ft (Figure 13 Qtotag10-11) = 255,638acre-ft(Appendix C) Qnon-agr(10-11) = 45,954 acre-ft (Appendix C) Qsur((12-13) = 76,370 acre-ft(Task 8) Qsurt(10-11) = 71,516 acre-ft(Table 8) The estimated production within the District for the ensuing water year for agricultural uses and other than agricultural uses is: Qtotat(12-13) = 219,913 + 76,371 = 296,283 acre-ft Qagr(12-13) = 5,061 X [(296,283—76,370)/ (255,638—71,516)] = 6,045 acre-ft Qnon-agr(12-13) = 45,954 x [(296,283—76,370)/ (255,638— 71,516)] = 54,886 acre-ft Qagr(12-13) = 6,045 acre-ft Qnon-agr(12-13) = 54,886 acre-ft QD s((12-13) = 60,931 acre-ft By summing these two results, it is estimated that 60,931 acre-feet of groundwater will be withdrawn within the District for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012). Appendix C shows the Agriculture and Non-Agriculture trends for the District by sub-basin using approximately 240 wells within the District Boundary reporting type of use. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 22 Banker Hill Basin 11.0 Task 8 - Estimated Amount of Water for Surface Distribution for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) The amount of water for surface distribution for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) was estimated based on the average surface diversions for the Santa Ana River, Mil Creek, and Lytle Creek for the period 1985 to 2011. As shown in Table 8, average surface diversions for the Santa Ana River, Mill Creek, Lytle Creek and smaller tributary creeks collectively called 'Bunker Hill Creeks," between 1985 and 2011 were 42,334, 21,701, 11,207, and 1,128 acre-feet, respectively. Therefore, the total estimated amount of water for surface distribution from the Bunker Hill Basin for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) is found by summing the diversions as follows: Bunker Hill Surface Distribution =11,207 + 21,704 + 1,128 + 42,334 = 76,370 acre-ft As Lytle Creek and Bunker Hill Creeks are not within the District, the estimated amount of surface distribution from the District for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June :30, 2013) is the sum of the Santa Ana River and Mill Creek distributions. District Surface Distribution = 42,334 + 21,701 = 64,035 acre-ft 12.0 Task 9 - Estimated Amount of Water for Replenishment of the Groundwater Supplies for the Ensuing Water Year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) The amount of water necessary for replenishment of the groundwater supplies of the Bunker Hill Basin for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) was estimated based on: Replenishment = Total Production - Surface Diversions - Change in Storage SBV Wafer Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2011 23 Bunker Hill Basin The estimated production and surface diversions from the Bunker Hill Basin for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) were estimated at approximately 219,913 acre-feet (from Figure 13) and 76,370 acre-feet (from Table 8), respectively. The estimated change in storage determined in Section 8.0 and shown on Figure 9 is an increase of 7,700 acre-feet. Therefore, the amount of water necessary for replenishment of the groundwater supplies of the Bunker Hill Basin is estimated as follows: Replenishment = 223,361 -76,370 -7,700 = 135,843 acre-ft The amount of water necessary for replenishment of the District's groundwater supplies for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) was estimated using the same equation as shown above and substituting values for the District area. The estimated production within the District for the ensuing water year was estimated at approximately 60,931 acre-ft (from Section 10.0) and 64,035 acre-ft (from Section 11.0), respectively. The change in storage for the ensuing water year for the District was estimated as a increase of 7,700 acre-ft. Therefore, the amount of water necessary for replenishment of the District's groundwater supplies for the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013) is: Replenishment =Total Production - Surface Diversions - Change in Storage Replenishment = (60,931 + 64,035) -64,035 -7,700 = 53,232 acre-ft 13.0 General Findings In addition to the above findings, Section 75505 of the California Water Code requires that a finding be made as to the amount of water necessary to be replaced in the intake areas of the groundwater basins within the District to prevent the landward movement of salt water into the fresh groundwater body, or to prevent subsidence of the land within the District. Because of its location and the elevations of its water table, the Bunker Hill Basin is not subject to salt-water intrusion and the current groundwater levels will not (lowest=593 msl) result in any significant land subsidence. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 24 Banker Hill Basin Section 75540 of the California Water Code requires that the District Board establish a zone or zones where a groundwater charge is to be implemented. The Code specifically states that a single zone may include the entire District and in May 1993 the Board established the entire District as one zone. This determination may be amended in the future, but lacking any evidence to the contrary, in the 2010-11 year the entire District will remain as a single zone in regard to any groundwater charge. Section 75561 of the California Water Code further requires the Engineering Investigation to include a finding related to the amount of water the District is obligated by contract to purchase. At this time the District has no contractual obligation to purchase water for the replenishment of the groundwater supplies. 14.0 Conclusions Based on the results of the 2012 Engineering Investigation, the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District finds that: • Due to the imbalance between recharge and production since 1993, the Bunker Hill Basin's storage is 224,603 acre-feet below that which is considered full for purposes of this Investigation. • During the ensuing water year (July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013), the Bunker Hill Basin can be recharged, from all sources, with 352,746 acre-feet of water. This recharge quantity is derived by algebraically adding together the accumulated deficit as of the end of the preceding water year with the estimated quantity needed to maintain the 1993 storage level considered full. The BTAC recommends a maximum basin recharge of 80,000 acre-ft. • The District should continue to take the necessary steps to work with its partners to enhance its capability to conduct recharge operations, which includes construction of new, or maintenance and repair of existing, diversion facilities, canals, dikes, basins, roads, and other water recharge facilities. These .SSV IVater Conservation District Engineering Investigation 2012 25 Banker Hill Basin improvements are required to ensure that the increasing demands on the Basin, especially during drought periods, can be met. 15.0 Financial Data The San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District, in response to questions previously provided information about the groundwater charge in this section. The District provides a complete budget and report of operations as a companion document to this report. Any changes to the groundwater charge will not be reflected on the District's financial reports as income until the fiscal year 2012 — 2013, as the first increment of the new charge is not due until that time. SBV Water Conservation District Engineering Investigation 1012 26 Bunker Hill Basin LL ILIN s m in Cam+ M _ o _ -a EI 5 Y 4 � ', . z.. r 00 0 CL J o In 1 y N •A t'• �;a, h - r Ci d g y J � N m �• / I: � � � ice. � � d e - c FPM ' m j,. 8• •�u�. tL I • I j 8: �AnnCt°0k �'� � i J ` N a r+ Ip I i I LL a • G Awn. V, min m viz.-ou � t °� r�,{ S�,•. 3 is• ` � a 5 � A � Y• Ili II � O [ q • I n> C . x I A Q A N Cl �.•. tf•� �� I ✓ f0 O A A 1 •u N U YI m � Z S. x V Ill i' sJ C i ) n N co Is r E Q N cc a PCs In P l� M lsP3r�rP c iE � V � N d {OUO FJPj 49 p 'y V d'•` d > y N '- • f C Cj $ W I A g >> P4d Pj f0 0 A 0 vfi N U 3 ` A LL O i• n G{P0k Q a I u[ I �2 11 � a X co r" m F LL Z ry N O O ✓C q p toy O Oz W g V L Y 2 Y S a .Z. n p g C i N N uq �- y YI C p q C C C C C Y C q q n fa w f f t 4I ci co to _ O I I � m II 7Ny J Aw 1 t_ I [V = cn LLI � I 01 4b -. N I I I I I I i I _ I 4 � I - I I I I I hCfO O r a I i n N' � o w ? i � n W IL L / O I ac,s m�5 { "I '. Err p y ��Y T` lx/ �5:,, d• L L y ' � A Z'••}t�1.L�. �, � Ste_. ¢��ru S f u , a- tm EJ \ i Pik fu - Lf s p to • �� i : C „ m A /M a�i ° rn C t�•r/ S - L N O n N w • u v 1 i �• t,. -. Xj 4 0 of .1 G2�011 Ci{^� it1 tJ N ^ 1 C p d Yy O . 1 N o � f ' F � U ^ r• � ` O' o O W < w < a < N O Z Q LL < 2 N y O h C fJl N p N y C Q W E �' �Iw r • ' i �o° mod'- � t riJb i ' WZ�QNN W t A _ I \ �4€' 1i- gP 4 � m �. t fr v.i .EA 0 4 1 k ury` ro u72 4111-A O LL a E� sC a _o " ) 01 O �+ Q � d i € W C f W n3 I Y "- m St I + i 4 . . I b� d iy 'nSil F t a 5 " g 'S 4' i m O1 0 0 0 0 0 9 pp 0 —y q ;7 ^ ."5 R '? At 2 t a \ M f. - �"�.e�t. k �I � 4flld it� ,4 h; ri ! r N rc tOi EL s • ___. ,a. t N N al O C N C O �. J (J w •c V W ID � I � ft p 9 E = v ID, a m � nLL 5 m s5� sqss5� m ._• sII �' w � 9 ' b ° � 8 ° ° ° g z3 A o oo ° S ° ° o vo3�od °'3 �I � g a]. tF hip y In°hc°v9s zz -3 ti N IV if 1 Awn z ��� 1 tk )� 5 lh , • �i r� D. p cm r� d` ss' q SN A wi y Lf7 � Of i�• j 3 � j g Zli f' 'rae L a C a > a q \� •fs • a G ry eq cm gg �� a 6• -, pis....• ��. ��.� gi--'�'• �� v 'a firm_ i - .r' v�� • 3 N ` dJ W Ti yr /� C 3 j •�,..� r Calnl� I C7 •� `� I � r n y Fsfi.\ yy I T •� f 4 [ t Ev ^fit ` ••'n" { LL LD d �o A �J 01 F R < pp � 7 �!• "w is z � • . - �� O I �__ _ _- - E C ` t"' O O s r' i Imo• �t 1 NN O. F• rsq � �� I 0 ] � � � _ ? Q Fa i0 p J22 3 y M+ tm g v 00 0 / CO Ow a ....-� ,i N N °c • N o O d YH - � O O 0• Q O y N f Y :3 C Ol V� p p C W �.po 3n. - c m c � p � o i i s 9 0 li m iE U O_ y]{ N G C O n J q � is C rOii 1a N o K m f o m v t c > o w$ .. gym q0 LL .ar. pa !r u aZ r' H U xm 0 R y� r ,• q o .. ,� a op m O � o o u. II a _ ° } e4yy Np 3° O 6 N y� I G r •V � r CU tLO O a O 73 O ep d ° W C w .. c '9 am w m � � N � O � u o b�A v I p v ro t N S Eo CIS — v E-0 a o s € .-I � U u p' p •� 3y�y;i FiP t 4� N N O N xon oo C O o _ G � C W O jc N N m , O w$ m Do] 1101 ul O H � d T m T LL �O T C7 O co N O O N } t X a o N rn co n d co Ln k� � o C � O L � C (Q o �O. Y ♦ � ,U L N ♦ C O N N N o Q L O wo p � b3 L ♦ � N o A � ♦ I♦ N o S W ♦ I v �� m 9 � ry V ♦ I O 3N � �z c ♦ c � p �_ 00 ♦ J Ac m ♦ C N O O O O p O CT O ° V o ° 0 9° 3 [u-aaoe] uogonpad lenuuy n m N H N O - 3 c- k A r 5 _ Cl) c° + 0 o v r- o n P (]) l7 - o 'G N_ 6 O O L ♦ cu ,Y L � C C O v G d M m o 0 0 • ° Z m fJ.J 'v0- p N 0 O o C) Y � N u � (6 ' 4a N U y Q U G s_ ♦ h 7 LO !L. Q w N .►A- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — fCO I N 10 ♦ � dry m A , ♦ ' cC u " O r � N y W to nN N O O O O O O O �' O O O O O O O O O O O O O m`Z N O O O M N O LO u [14-ajoe] uogonpoad jenuuy e m WLa ` 8 " S x m s A 8 8 a x 8g- m QM o V. 2 ^ m 3 E s R ? M E- Al e _ n t n s i e z g x N. Change in Groundwater Levels in Key Wells Fall 2010 to Fall 2011 2010 2011 Differen Depth ce WCDCode State We[ Well Name Owner Or Measuring To Depth TO Fall 2010 Number Agency Water Water (ft) to Fall (ft) 2011 136_4 1S3W04JO1S 102 East Valley Water District 230.0 216.2 13.8 151_0 2N5W39K02S Calm Canyon Well San Bernardino City of 56.1 44.8 11.3 152_0 7NIW27M02' 27th Street Well San Bernardino,City of 287.5 261.4 26.1 151_; 1S4W10N065 Mill&D San Bernardino City of 93.5 92.2 1.3 153_7 015/04W-I0N #62,Mill&"D" San Bernardino,City of/shallow wells 93.8 159_1 2S3WO1E01S Redlands Hei hts Redlands,Ci of 170.0 172.0 -2.0 161_2_ INSW36H04S 7/LOrd7 West Valle Water District 427.0 1666 154W34P025 RaubI Riverside,City of 134.0 133.8 0.1 166E 1S4W02P02S Cooley D Riverside,Ci of 140.0 146.4 -6.4 1677 154W27A395 19 Riverside Ci of 121.0 170_2 INSW23Q015 Rialto,Ci of 284.0 212.0 72.0 D06_ 152W36F015 Magnet#1 Redlands City of 20.0 16.0 4.0 1707 ISIWOBH015 Creek#1 Redlands Ci of 0.0 1708 S2W22CO25 E. nia#2 Redlands Ci of 1705 152W21EO1S Magnet#2 Redlands,City of 45.0 24.0 21.0 1712 1S2W216025 #3 Redlands,Ci of 28.0 21.0 7.0 1]14 IS;'W2IDOSS nia#6 Redlands,Cit of 51.0 22.0 29.0 1718 153W35G095 3 Redlands,City of 64.0 58.0 6.0 1720 1.S_3W35H035 Well#16 Redlands City of 44.0 38.0 6.0 1722 1S3W21H01S Well#32 Redlands,City of 205.0 182.0 23.0 1723 1S4W24KO1S Well#34 Redlands City of 196.0 200.0 -4.0 1725 1S3W28H015 Well#41 Redlands City of 276.0 1727_ 152W39KO1S Agate 01 Redlands City of 140.0 71.0 69.0 1744 154W27HOSS Stewart 20 Riverside City of 127.2 1819 1S3W15FOIS Orange Street Redlands,City of 154.0 118.0 36.0 1851_ 1S3W06H04S 9A East Valley Water District 216.2 205.0 11.2 1865_ 1N4W25A01S 27 East Valle Water District 206.0 191.01 150 1910 1N5W03H02S Cajon Well#2 San Bernardino City of 153.0 117.5 35.5 1936 2/1-Ower7 West Valley Water District 292.0 223.0 69.0 -;, 1964 353W22AO2S Well#35 Redlands,City of 232.0 200.0 32.0 1970 1S3W32J02S Lee Well Redlands City of 219.0 212.0 ].0 1979_ 1N4W27BO1S 31st&Mtn.View San Bernardino,City of 324.2 306.0 18.2 1984_ 1N3W30NO1S 41 East Valley Water District 306.0 297.0 9.0 2007_ 1N4WO6HOIS Devil Canon 44 San Bernardino,City of 41.2 42.5 -1.3 2008 1N4W06HO2S Devil Canyon#3 San Bernardino City of 26.9 26.9 0.0 2062 SN4W32N015 Baseline Well San Bernardino,City of 257.0 270.2 -13.2 2066 1S4W02K08S Anti]Well#6 San Bernardino City of 172.0 156.3 15.7 2115_ IN5W03A02S Cajon Well#3 San Bernardino,City of 147.5 114.1 33.4 2286_ 153W32J015 SBVWCD#3 San Bernardino Valley Water Cons.Dist. 108.7 59.8 48.9 2288_ 153WIlHOIS SBVWCD#4 San Bernardino Valley Water Cons.Dist 170.4 89.5 80.9 2290 152W07K015 SBVWCD#2 San Bernardino Valley Water Cons.Dist. 104.0 74.5 29.6 2291 1S2W07BO1S SBVWCD#1 San Bernardino Valley Water Cons.Dist. 160.7 112.2 48.4 1519 1N4W27G015 30th&Mtn.View San Bernardino,City of 318.9 295.8 23.1 1010 IS3W09E02S Tri-City Concrete East Valley Water District 217.2 203.0 14.2 1401_ 153WOl H0IS 142 Mt.Harrison East Valley Water District 220.51 118.8 101.7 141° 1NSW25E015 5A/LOwer5 West Valley Water District 271.0 237.0 34.0 _ 1514 1N4W16E015 Newmark#1 San Bernardino,City of 185A 165.2 20.2 151E 1N4VJ16E035 Newmark#3 San Bernardino City of 190.8 170.71 20.1 1517_ 1N4W32D03S 19th Street No.1 San Bernardino,City of 300.4 1:525 1N4W34G01S 17th&Sierra Way#2 San Bernardino City of 1554 26-1 Riverside City Of-Gage Canal 158.0 1647 Perris Hill#5 San Bernardino City of 272.6 246.5 26.1 1660_ SN3W33F015 94 Corwin East Vail Water District 393.6 391.1 2.5 1.683 1S4W22H04S Warren Riverside,City of 1767 1S4W226035 Thorn 10 Riverside,City of 2271 1S4%V25D07S Anderson 111 Western Municipal Water District 2448 452 Brier/Gould/Tippecanoe ISan Bernardino City of/shallow wells 38.0 3' EPA E%TRAC WELL 112 San Bernardino,Ci of 424.0 347.6 76.4 01 S/04W-22C 921,Wastewater N MW 91 ISan Bernardino,City of/shallow wells ow SBVWCD 2012 Engineering Investigation Table 2 M N T H iF O N M N a M C C 1 d n N u1 Lc O N M c t O u 0' a-7 .y N .-7 N Q U N @ r1 Q rn rl '.I j •IA C 41 v tv o � 3 2 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 C O 3 N V V n V I� tp w N R N O N Ol ~ O w O QNl N 7 d d u ^ n N 6 d b,O O Q .td. Il <-I m Lr� 00 N c-1 lA l0 .r G M 0 O 00 i o v d m v (Li O N > (U a) y N M L L N V1 N O OO w O m w 00 y c m b N V o C) C w N ri M N M O N Ot Ol O N • +' C-4 H N M a to c O O U) @ v � 3 a a v o v m f6 C 00 M N s s v cu w (a L L U1 ON O ate+ M L v v 3 >. O ° — u c N y Z to T 4/ I O C w 3 = N 2 L c O Q aj LL LL LL LL C -O N IN LL U c v Q N N N U N Vl C C c •c t0 > N w C m m to DO O C '0 O w c c .� m to N c m y rt1 t>D O lU tU O � r c m 2 c 3 N O O Q O L o to O O v 7 O L L C v N 0 c m tN v= m N C U 3 N Y Y Z VI C Y v M -0 C 0 0 N N Z V1 W W Z N N F.. X w N c N N O m O > X > N 2 2 2 5 2 v i N E v N (U U) N N m m vOi N N O O Y Y Y Y Y a) m h c0 W CO Y II d C c c c c Y .N v tU Q m H ry) Accumulated Change in Storage for Bunker Hill Basin 1989 to 2011 (Based on "Zero Year" of 1993) Accumulated Storage Year [acre-ft] 1989 -58,000 1990 -170,700 1991 -196,000 1992 -191,000 1993 0 1994 -50,000 1995 41,100 1996 -43,100 1997 -75,500 1998 40,400 1999 -85,700 2000 -131,100 2001 -212,200 2002 -301,500 2003 -338,800 2004 -406,900 2005 -183,100 2006 -245,500 2007 -359,400 2008 -362,000 2009 -397,600 2010 -340,62.3 2011 -224,603 Note: A negative sign irdicates a decline in storage and a positive sign represents an increase in storage. ,ate SBVWCD 2012 Engineering Investigation Table 4 Production for Sub-basins of Bunker Hill Basin Preceding Water Year(July 2010 to June 2011) Production July 2010 to June Sub-area 2011 acre-ft Z Bunker Hill I - Northeast of Interstate 21S 7,488 Bunker Hill I -Southwest of Interstate 215 19,512 Bunker Hill II - West of Mentone Fault 35,731 Bunker Hill II - East of Mentone Fault, North 4,479 Bunker Hill II - East of Mentone Fault, South 1,188 Lytle Basin - Northwest of Barrier J 1,603 Lytle Basin -Southeast of Barrier J 15,624 Pressure Zone - North of Santa Ana Wash 66,476 Pressure Zone -Santa Ana Wash 32,020 Total 184,122 Notes: 239 Wells Used in these Calculations 1- Refer to Appendix C for Well Values Compiled for Estimate. 2 - Estimated for Water Year July 2010-June 2011 production. Data Sources:25 Primary Water Purveyors (excluding Fontana Union), as well as San Bernardino Watermaster, and SBVMWD. SBVWCD 2012 Engineering Investigation Table 5 A w cts r+ na o - r N O N IC V a: n vdi m ° m vni m �i .Ni C) a? O. w c O E e n �^ e m m R R P,I N 7 N N L e m n m N .-! m v A N o 0 > ey IV a N J co N � .y C u N U m N o '�..! O d' V1 •0 .L m M 1� N•' Oj ti LL CL. _NN CI O E y. M } y] H�OCC L l0 M O d O N ry M ti M F Cl ' Z c z y n A V- 0 O ci vi v d E 0 O O. O d oo O o n m v w O Cxo f6 c u L�rt f0 •0 (0 L � Vf 1� `+ m M O N O � CY ~ UI N GI Y M m M M d off M N :0 � � C CIF m 06 Ix O m N a O rA CN O 00 S Q R N N N V n O O O A } C uj 27 V1 •� m mm o > 'S Qc 3 o w " w N U A > ~ O N V m H Average Annual Change in Storage for Bunker Hill Basin Fall 2001 to Fall 2011 (The Immediate Past 10 Water Years) [1] [2) [31 [41 Average Average Change in 30 Annual Sub-area Years Area Storativity(S) Change in in Water Storage** Level* [ft) [acres] [acre-ft] Bunker Hill I -Southwest of 215 Freeway -2.34 11,714 0.09 -2,410 Bunker Hill I - Northeast of 215 Freeway 0.35 7,795 0.11 296 Bunker Hill II -West of Mentone Fault -5.27 35,206 0.06 -10,944 Bunker Hill II - East of Mentone Fault 2.54 11,091 0.13 3,663 Lytle Basin -Southeast of Barrier J 18.56 5,237 0.07 6,804 Lytle Basin - Northwest of Barrier J 0.97 1,924 0.13 -243 Pressure Zone- North of Santa Ana Wash 14.66 11,920 1 0.02 3,495 Pressure Zone-Santa Ana Wash -7.65 6,686 1 0.02 -1,023 Total = -362 [1] Based on average annual changes in water level within each Sub-area over last 10 years. (See Appendix E) [2] Estimated using GIS. [3] Based on data from Hardt and Hutchinson (1980). S storativity:The amount of water stored or released per unit area of aquifer given unit head change. [4] = f 1] x [2] x [3] *A positive sign denotes an increase in water level and a negative sign represents a decline in water level. SBVWCD 2011 Engineering Investigation Table 7 f ( ( ! } j !} / § E : ! \ / k ° ( ) ; \ ! ° ! § ! ; \ } ° } • § ® § ) ! E ! / - - _§ ] | ! ! ! 2 , §\ \ ! \! AA \ \ ° ( ml !} /} - . \ \ \ - } \ \ \ � ! \ \ / / } . . \§ \ � / \ \ }� { } \ \ \ , \ } _ - ! ! ] ! ! ! ! 2 ) ) } ) § ! ! ! ; / ; � ( , East Valley Water District 2011-12 Session, Second Year ADAM (, aM= D) Public drinking water standards: hexavalent chromium. .' Introduced: 2/14/2011 Last Amend: 7/12/2011 Status: 3,11/2012-In Senate. Held at Desk. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 3/1/2012-5. DESK Summary:The Calderon-Sher Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996 requires the State Department of Public Health to, among other things, adopt regulations relating to primary and secondary drinking water standards for contaminants in drinking water. Existing law requires the Department of Finance to take specified actions regarding the proposed drinking water standards not more than 90 days from when the Department of Public Health submits them. Existing law requires the department to establish a primary drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium on or before January 1, 2004. Existing law requires the department to report to the Legislature on the progress in developing a primary drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium by January 1, 2003. Violation of certain provisions relating to public water systems is a crime. This bill would require the department to post its progress subsequent to January 1, 2003, on the establishment of the standard on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would include the adoption of a primary drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium among the proposed regulations relating to maximum contaminant levels for primary or secondary water standards that are subject to a review by the Department of Finance of not more than 90 days. Laws: An act to amend Sections 116365.01 and 116365.5 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to drinking water standards. Notes 1: While the author introduced AB 2051 on the same subject, she intends to amend that legislation to address another unrelated subject. AB 403 will continue to be the legislative vehicle for addressing progress, or the lack thereof, toward the adoption of a maximum contaminant level goal for hexavalent chromium. AB 403 initially would have set a deadline for the adoption of the MCL, but the author amended the bill in the face of opposition by ACWA and others. The bill was returned to the Senate last fall and placed on the Senate Inactive File. The author removed the bill from the Inactive File recently. EVWD highest Chromium 6 results come from the Southwest portion of its system, where the District has seen readings up to 6 ppb. In the Northwest part or the system the District sees readings of 3 ppb. There are a few wells in the interior and along the Southern boundary that get readings of 1.5 ppb and below. All of EVWD wells on the East end are non-detect. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch AIL4117 (Ella D) Environment: Safe Drinking Water,Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Band Act of 2006. Introduced: 2/15/2011 Last Amend: 1/26/2012 Status: 1/:31/2012-In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. Is Urgency:Y Is Fiscal: Y Location: 1/31/2012-S. RLS. Summary: (1) The Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative statute approved by the voters at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, makes approximately $5.4 billion in bond funds available for safe drinking water, water quality and supply, Flood control, natural resource protection, and park improvements. The bond act makes $60,000,000 available to the State Department of Public Health for the purpose of loans and grants for projects to prevent or reduce contamination of groundwater that serves as a source of drinking water and requires the department to require repayment for costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination. Existing law requires the State Depzrtment of Public Health, in collaboration with the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the State Water Resources Control Board, to develop and adopt regulations governing the repayment of costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination of groundwater. This bill would instead require the State Department of Public Health, in collaboration with those agencies, to develop guidelines governing this repayment . The bill would authorize the department to enter into an agreement with a grantee that would require the grantee to attempt to ;: recover the costs from responsible parties and would allow grantees to utilize the repayments to fund activities authorized in the agreement The bill would also make a declaration concerning the Page 1/9 utilization of those repayments . This bill contains other related provisions. Laws: An act to amend Section 75101 of the Public Resources Code, relating to the environment, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. Notes 1: According to the author, AB 467 will secure funding to local agencies for additional groundwater cleanup activities. Specifically, this legislation would state the intent of the legislature that when the State Department of Public Health (DPH) develops and adopts regulations governing the repayment of costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination of groundwater to include guidelines for allowing grantees to retain repayments to fund ongoing or additional groundwater cleanup activities. The legislation also allows DPH to work with Proposition 84 grantees in the grant agreement process to allow the grantees to keep the funds recovered from polluters to fund additional groundwater cleanup activities. The measure allows DPH to receive up to 3% of the recovered funds for oversight to ensure a grantee is using the funds appropriately. Finally, the bill takes effect immediately to allow Prop 84 grantees to utilize its provisions as DPH awards the remaining grant funds this year. On November 7, 2006, voters passed Proposition 84, which includes $60 million for groundwater contamination projects. This is the first time a bond included an allocation for cleanup of groundwater contamination. The funds can only be used for a project's capital costs, and not for the actual treatment of groundwater. Furthermore, the bond requires DPH to require repayment of costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination. Should those funds be deposited into a fund administered by DPH, the author of this legislation argues that the department will incur costs to administer a new grant award cycle and will likely assess administrative costs to re- award the funds. Other State agencies, like the State Controller and the Department of Finance, will also incur costs for their responsibilities in the administration of the funds. These costs are typically budgeted at 5% of the total amount for the administering department (DPH) and additional administrative costs are charged by the other involved agencies. Therefore, local cleanup efforts would lose a minimum of $2.5 million if the full $50.4 million in grant awards is subsequently recovered. AB 467 would ensure that over $1 million more can go to groundwater cleanup instead of administrative costs. DPH is moving expeditiously in awarding the remaining Prop. 84 grant funds for the groundwater cleanup program. The author believes that AB 467 will provide an incentive to grantees to move to pursue cost recovery from responsible parties, allowing recovered funds to be put to work quickly to continue groundwater cleanup activities while saving significant state administrative costs. Unfortunately, this legislation would authorize the Department of Public Health to require a grantee to pursue cost recovery from a party responsible for groundwater contamination. The language of the bond measure does not include such a requirement, but does require the grantee to repay the State of California should it recover costs from a responsible party. This is an important distinction. A grantee could incur significant costs to characterize a contamination plume and trace its origins back to a responsible party; in addition, a grantee would then incur significant legal costs to obtain a legal judgment to recover costs. This potential could make it infeasible to apply for a state grant to address groundwater contamination. The legislation should be amended to delete the authorization to require a grantee to pursue cost recovery. The District could support the main thrust of this legislation, which would authorize a grantee to keep proceeds from cost recovery efforts to further the remediation of groundwater contamination. Otherwise, the grantee will be required to repay the State of California and possibly apply again for new funds to pay for further remediation efforts. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Favor if amended AB 685 CEng D) State water policy. Introduced: 2/17/2011 Last Amend: 1/13/2012 Status: 1/13/2012-From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 1/13/2012-5. APPR. Summary: Existing law establishes various state water policies, including the policy that the use of water for domestic purposes is the highest use of water. This bill would declare that it is the policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes . The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2013 , all relevant state agencies, including the Department of Water Resources, the State Water Resources Control Board, the California regional water quality control boards, and the State Department of Public Health, to advance the implementation of this state policy upon revising rage 2/9 existing, and upon adopting or establishing new, policies, regulations, and funding criteria when those policies, regulations, and grant criteria are pertinent to the uses of water described above. Laws: An act to add Section 106.3 to the Water Code, relating to water. Notes 1: This legislation is similar to AB 1242 (Ruskin) from 2009. ACWA officially opposed AB 1242, and the bi'I was ultimately vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger. When he vetoed AB 1242, Governor Schwarzenegger highlighted the unnecessary duplication of provisions already contained in California law, and cited the potential for"costly and constant litigation." Existing law states that the highest use of water in the State of California is for domestic purposes. ACWA researched materials from the sponsor's websites and prior fact sheet and concluded that one goal of this legislation would be to preclude water agencies from turning off a connection when a customer does not pay their bill. The sponsors note that more than 150,000 California residents lack safe water for drinking, bathing, and washing dishes. Even more have water service disconnected because they cannot afford to pay their water bill. This legislation will establish the right of every human to have access to clean water for basic human needs as a State policy and instruct State agencies to conform their practices and programs to this policy. "Adding a provision to the Water Code explicitly stating that access to an amount of clean water necessary for basic human needs is a "right" of every Californian and instructing State agencies, dealing with water resources, to conform their programs and practices to this policy will pave the way to ensure that every Californian will someday be able to confidently fill a glass of water from their tap and serve 't to their families," state the sponsors. The California Department of Public Health and county environmental management departments for very small water systems enforce California drinking water standards. Some rural households, however, rely on contaminated groundwater wells for their water supply. Other Californians are served by mutual water companies that do not have the managerial expertise, technological capability or financial wherewithal to operate a modern water system that complies with safe drinking water standards. The enactment of this legislation could have significant financial ramifications if individual wells and small water systems must be brought into compliance by the State of California or a neighboring public water system. Further, enactment of a rather nebulous state policy could have a negative impact on local water districts--both drinking water providers and agricultural water providers—as local rate-setting authority, extension of service, service shut-off due to nonpayment, and other statutory provisions relating to water service may become the subject of litigation due to perceived or actual conflicts created by the new state policy. At a minimum, AB 685 should be amended so that it only applies to state agencies, which would reflect the intent of the sponsors; i.e., that the State Water Resources Control Board and Department of Water Resources have not done enough to funnel state money into correcting contaminated water wells and small community water systems. Other amendments we currently seek offer statutory protection against imposition of such a policy on local agencies, including amendments addressing rate setting authority, Proposition 218 requirements, service extension statutes, etcetera. The January 13, 2012 amendments do not substantively amend the bill to resolve the concerns raised herein. Current Position: Oppose unless amended Recommended Position: Oppose unless amended /1111543 (Alejo D) Public contracts: Buy American. Introduced:! 1/25/2012 Status: 2/9/2012-Referred to Coms. on B., P. &C.P. and L. GOV. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 2/9/2012-A. B.,P. &C.P. Summary: 7-he California Buy American Act requires that a governing body of any political subdivision, municipal corporation, or district, and any public officer or person charged with the letting of contracts for the construction, alteration, or repair of public works or for purchasing materials for public use to only let those contracts to a person who agrees to use or supply materials produced or manufactured in the United States, as prescribed. Existing law does not apply this requirement to specified medical and scientific= equipment and instruments, sewing machines, printing presses, or office machines or supplies, as specified. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2014, also apply a similar requirement to public contracts let for the purchase or lease of any manufactured tangible personal property or for W any materials or structural components to be incorporated into real property, and would provide for Page 3/9 specified exceptions, as provided. This bill would repeal those provisions that prohibit the application of the existing United States-made preference to specified medical and scientific equipment and instruments, sewing machines, printing presses, or office machines or supplies. By imposing new duties upon local governments with respect to public contracts, this bill would impose a state- mandated local program. This bill would also make related changes. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Laws: An act to amend Sections 4300, 4301, 4303, 4304, and 4305 of, and to repeal Sections 4302, 4302.5, 4302.6, and 4303.5 of, the Government Code, relating to public contracts. Notes 1: AB 1543 creates the Bring Manufacturing Jobs Back to California Act. Specifically, this bill would require the State of California and all local government entities to purchase or lease manufactured tangible personal property, or materials or structural components to be incorporated into real property, only if they are manufactured in the United States. These manufactured items would also have to be made substantially from materials produced in the United States. Currently, there are Buy America provisions for certain infrastructure projects, such as building bridges or highways, which were enacted through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009). In 1933, the United States passed the "Buy American Act" which created preferences for U.S. made products purchased by the federal government. In 1983 Congress passed the"Buy America Act" which applies to transportation project purchases over $100,000 and funded at least in part by federal grants. AB 1543 applies to public contracts for the purchase or lease of goods (tangible personal property such as lamps, computers and desks, etc.) and for materials or structural components to be incorporated into real property (such as rebar, paint, etc.). This bill will go into effect on January 1, 2014, which the author argues would give international companies lead time to build plants and factories back in the United States in order to be eligible for public contracts with the state of California. According to the author, "the purpose of AB 1543 is bring jobs back home, to use California taxpayer dollar for in-sourcing rather than outsourcing jobs. We have an opportunity to bring manufacturing back to America. California's tax dollars should pay for goods and services provided by hard working Americans, not workers overseas. Spending tax dollars here instead of overseas creates a multiplier effect, eventually putting more and more people back to work." This legislation would allow the State of California to preempt local authority over purchasing protocol. Water and wastewater agencies rely on sophisticated computer, SCADA, pumps and other equipment to operate their systems. A significant amount of equipment and computer systems consist of foreign- made components. This legislation could create significant challenges to water and wastewater agencies, for both new purchases and repair and replacement. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Oppose AB 1626 (Yamada D) Election materials: public examination: writ of mandate: elections official. Introduced: 2/9/2012 Status: 2/23/2012-Referred to Com. on E. & R. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/23/2012-A. E. &R. Summary: Existing law requires the elections official administering a county, municipal, district, or school district election to make a copy of certain election materials available for public examination in his or her office for a period of 10 calendar days immediately following the filing deadline for submission of those documents. It permits any voter of the jurisdiction in which the election is being held, during that 10-calendar-day public examination period, to seek a writ of mandate or an injunction requiring the amendment or deletion of any or all of the materials. In the case of county and municipal elections, existing law also permits the elections official, himself or herself, to seek the above-described writ of mandate or injunction, as specified. This bill would also authorize the elections official to seek the above-described writ of mandate or injunction in the context of a district or school district election. Laws: An act to amend Sections 9380 and 9509 of the Elections Code, relating to elections. Notes 1: EVWD is a county water district formed under the County Water District Law of the California Water Code. According to Section 30523 of the California Water Code, a County Water District board of Directors shall act only by ordinance, resolution, or motion. This bill would extend from county and municipal elections to Special District and School District elections, a County Elections Official's authority to seek a writ of mandate or injunction to amend or delete errors or omissions in election materials. Page 4/9 For each election, a county elections official provides each voter with a sample ballot that contains arguments for or against measures on the ballot. In State, County and City elections any voter in the jurisdiction, or the Elections Official, may seek a writ: of mandate or injunction to prevent the inclusion of false or misleading statements or omission of fact, in a ballot argument. However, in Special District or School District elections, only a voter within that jurisdiction may attempt to stop the dissemination -- of misleading voter materials, not the Elections official him or herself. This Issue recently received attention with a local Yolo County school district parcel tax measure. While opinions are allowed in ballot arguments and the author can discuss any issue they wish, the County elections official believed that the argument submitted to the official for inclusion in the sample ballot contained incorrect and misleading information about all-mail ballot elections. However, the law did not allow the Yolo County Elections office to contest:the false statements. To ensure the dissemination of information based on fact, the official had to find a qualified voter willing to go to court on behalf of the county in time to meet legal deadlines. A court ultimately struck portions of the argument which were proved incorrect. In smaller electoral communities, which are most commonly school districts or special districts, it is often the Elections Official who is first to spot any issues with the ballot argument. In order to encourage timeliness and efficiency, the Elections official should have the ability to directly ask the courts to rectify any issues that arise as soon as possible. AB 1626 would allow county elected officials to perform a well established function of office for all elections. In addition, the bill would ensure that the integrity of smaller elections is as well maintained as larger elections. This legislation would affect the conduct of elections for special districts that adopt actions by ordinance, as well as those districts in which voters may submit a petition on the elections ballot. Section 9312 of the Elections Code provides that whenever any ordinance is required to be submitted to the vote-rs of a district at any election, the district elections official shall cause the ordinance to be printed. A copy of the ordinance shall be made available to any voter upon request. Section 9315 authorizes the persons filing an initiative petition to file a written argument in favor of the ordinance. The district board may submit an argument against the ordinance. Neither argument shall exceed 300 words in length, and both arguments shall be printed and mailed to each voter with the sample ballot for the election. Section 9317 provides that when an argument in favor and an argument against a measure have been selected for publication in the voter information pamphlet the elections official responsible for conducting the election shall send copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the authors of the argument against the measure and copies of the arguments against the measure to the authors of the argument in favor. The authors may prepare and submit rebuttal arguments not exceeding 250 words, or may authorize in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit, or sign the rebuttal argument. The rebuttal arguments shall be submitted to the elections official conducting the election no later than a date designated by the elections official. This legislation could benefit the districts in the future, particularly in circumstances where a voter or group of voters seeks to overturn an ordinance or to enact an ordinance by means of a petition. Current law authorizes a voter or the elections official for a city or county to seek a writ of mandate to change a petition or argument. This legislation would provide that authority for a special district as well. This authority could be helpful as upward pressure on rates, fees and charges creates increased voter and ratepayer backlash. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch AIUDZ2 (Berninde;- Roner D) District-based local elections. Introduced: 2/23/2012 Status: 2/24/2012-From printer. May be heard in committee March 25. Is Urgencyi� N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2,123/2012-A. PRINT Summary: Existing law provides for political subdivisions that encompass areas of representation within the state. With respect to these areas, public officials are generally elected by all of the voters of the political subdivision (at-large) or from districts formed within the political subdivision (district- based). This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to district-based dotal elections. Laws: An act relating to elections. Notes 1: This legislation is a placeholder and will require substantive amendments before it can be set for policy committee hearing. The District elects its directors in at-large elections. This legislation could be a vehicle to require local agencies like the District to elect directors by division in order to Page 5/9 address voting rights issues where an ethnic segment of the community is not represented on a board of directors due to at-large elections. It should be closely monitored given the subject matter. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch An 2000 (Hobe D) Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Delta plan. Introduced: 2/23/2012 Status: 2/24/2012-From printer. May be heard in committee March 25. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/23/2012-A. PRINT Summary:The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 requires the Delta Stewardship Council to consider the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) for inclusion in a specified Delta Plan, and requires the incorporation of the BDCP into the Delta Plan if the BDCP meets certain requirements, as specified. This bill would state findings and declarations regarding the lack of information about the regulatory and environmental consequences of incorporating the BDCP into the Delta Plan. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would include elements in the environmental impact report and environmental impact statement for the BDCP and to include certain changes in the BDCP, as specified. Laws: An act relating to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Notes 1: The Bay Delta Conservation Plan is being conducted pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act under California law. The law establishes a voluntary, collaborative process for addressing ecosystem impacts related to the development of projects like the proposed Delta conveyance improvements. BDCP will be a 50-year commitment on the part of the participants and rely on adaptive management principles to ensure that ecosystem impacts are mitigated, that certain aspects of the environment are enhanced, and that regulatory assurances are provided to enable the operation of State Water Project Delta facilities to meet expected water supply reliability goals. In addition, BDCP will be subject to CEQA and the appropriate avoidance or mitigation of potential significant adverse impacts. This legislation is a placeholder for amendments that would add requirements for BDCP and CEQA that are either not in current law or would already be included in documents prepared pursuant to NCCP and CEQA. The legislation would delay the schedule set forth by Federal and State agencies for BDCP and increase costs and increase uncertainty. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Oppose An 2402 (Huffman D) Department of Fish and Game: Fish and Game Commission: entitlements: fees: violations. Introduced: 2/24/2012 Status: 2/27/2012-Read first time. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 2/24/2012-A. PRINT Summary: Existing law establishes the Department of Fish and Game and the Fish and Game Commission and sets forth the powers and duties of that department and commission. This bill would make findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the process of developing a strategic vision for the Department of Fish and Game and the Fish and Game Commission pursuant to Chapter 424 of the Statutes of 2010, as specified. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Laws: An act to amend Sections 37, 39, 700, 2089.4, 3031.2, and 7149.8 of, to add Sections 715, 1020, 1021, 1065, 12028, and 13205 to, and to repeal and add Section 8598.3 of, the Fish and Game Code, and to amend Section 12805 of the Government Code, relating to fish and wildlife resources. Notes 1: The Department of Fish and Game is developing a strategic vision with the assistance of stakeholders. One of the critical issues facing the department is a lack of sufficient revenues to provide the desired level of services, particularly those services that are not directly supported by fee revenue related to hunting and fishing activities; i.e., public trust responsibilities. The interim strategic plan for the department is scheduled for release this month, with a final plan scheduled for later this summer. Earlier in the planning process, there was a suggestion to explore a fee on water diversion and use to raise revenues for the department. That notion seems to have been eliminated from consideration at the moment, but the plan has not yet been finalized. This legislation will be relied upon to make statutory changes that are based on the recommendations included in the final strategic plan. Therefore, the District should closely monitor the planning effort as well as this legislation to ensure that a new fee on water diversion and use is not proposed. Page 6/9 Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch AI1_24:21 (Berryilill,..tiill R) Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: peripheral canal. introduced: 2/24/2012 Status: 2)'27/2012-Read first time. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/24/2012-A. PRINT Summary: Existing law requires various state agencies to administer programs relating to water supply, water quality, and flood management in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to complete a prescribed economic feasibility analysis prior to the enactment of a statute authorizing the construction of a peripheral canal, as defined. Laws: An act to add Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 115) to Division 1 of the Water Code, relating tc the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Notes 1: This legislation is another in an ongoing series of attempts to re-open the November 2009 water package. Prior attempts to require the Office of the Legislative Analyst to conduct an economic analysis of a peripheral canal have been defeated. Current law, the California Water Resources Development Bond Law (also known as the Burns-Porter Act, authorizes Delta facilities. The 2009 package did not include any requirement for legislative review or authorization of delta conveyance improvements. The economic feasibility of a preferred alternative, which may be a tunnel as compared to a canal, will be conducted by DWR and its consultants on behalf of State Water Contractors--who will pay al costs related to the final project. It is neither necessary nor desirable to require the LAO to conduct a feasibility study. It is unlikely that the LAO has the qualifications to conduct such a study or review. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Oppose All-Zifil (.Carter D) Sewer collection agency: schedule of fees. Introduced: 2/24/2012 Status: 2/27/2012-Read first time. _, , Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: IV Location: 2/24/2012-A. PRINT Summary: Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution, generally requires that assessmerts, fees, and charges be submitted to property owners for approval or rejection after the provision of written notice and the holding of a public hearing. Existing law, the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, prescribes specific procedures and parameters for local jurisdictions to comply with Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution. Existing law establishes notice, protest, and hearing procedures for the levying of new or increased fees and charges by local government agencies pursuant to Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution. Existing law authorizes an agency that provides water, sewer, or refuse collection service to adopt a schedule of fees or charges authorizing automatic adjustments that pass through increases in wholesale charges for water or adjustments for inflation, if it complies with specified procedures. This bill would additionally authorize a sewer collection agency that charges a fee that includes a pass through increase in water treatment fees charged by a water treatment agency to adopt a schedule of fees or charges authorizing automatic adjustments in the amount of that fee, If that agency complies with specified procedures. Laws: An act to amend Section 53756 of the Government Code, relating to local government. Notes 1: This legislation would amend AB 3030 from 2008. That legislation, as the District is aware, authorized a retail water agency to pass through rate increases from a wholesale water agency, as specified. This legislation would authorize a wastewater collection agency to pass through rate increases from a wastewater treatment agency in a similar fashion. The benefits of such authority is reduced costs for Proposition 218 rate increase proceedings and a related reduction in ratepayer fatigue due to multiple Proposition 218 proceedings. In the case of wastewater treatment, much like wholesale water charges, the "retail" agency has little or no ability to influence the direction of "wholesale" rates. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch SB114G (Payley D) Wells: reports: public availability. Introduced: 2/21/2012 Status: 3/1/2012-Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and E.Q. Page 7/9 Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 3/1/2012-S. N.R. &W. Summary: Existing law requires a person who digs, bores, or drills a water well, cathodic protection well, or a monitoring well, or abandons or destroys a well, or deepens or reperforates a well, to file a report of completion with the Department of Water Resources. Existing law prohibits those reports from being made available to the public, except under certain circumstances. This bill would instead require the department to make the reports available to the public. The bill would require the department to provide specified disclaimers when providing the reports to the public. The bill would also allow the department to charge a reasonable fee to recover the cost of reproducing the report and for compliance with the Information Practices Act of 1977. Laws: An act to amend Section 13752 of the Water Code, relating to water. Notes 1: This bill mirrors provisions previously contained in last year's AB 263 (Pavley) relating to well logs public availability. Governor Jerry Brown vetoed SB 263 on October 8, 2011, stating: "The original intent of this bill recognized that wise management and use of groundwater supply requires public disclosure of well logs. Unfortunately, as amended, this bill now unduly restricts the use of these reports and imposes severe criminal penalties for disclosure. California is the only western state that does not provide ready access to well reports. That should be changed. I am directing the Department of Water Resources to work with the author to ensure responsible public access to well logs." Well log reports provide little meaningful information that would be benefit groundwater management planning. The reports include the exact location of a groundwater well and the depth from which water is drawn at the time the well was drilled, but do not include water quality information or the amount of water pumped in a given year. Well log reports are available to government agencies for purposes of conducting studies under current law. In addition, the reports are available to consultants retained to conduct groundwater contamination studies. As a result of SBX7 6 (enacted in November 2009), the Department of Water Resources developed the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) Program. The CASGEM Program establishes a basis for collaboration between local monitoring parties (Monitoring Entities) and DWR to collect groundwater elevation information statewide and make that information available to the public. The statewide data are compiled in the CASGEM Online System and made available to the public via the Internet with a GIS interface. As a result, all interested parties can use the data to evaluate and monitor groundwater conditions in California. There are three basic methods available for managing groundwater resources in California: (1) management by local agencies under authority granted in the California Water Code (AB 3030, SB 1938) or other applicable State statutes, (2) local government groundwater ordinances or joint powers agreements, and (3) court adjudications. No law requires that any of these forms of management be applied in a basin. Management is often instituted after local agencies or landowners recognize a specific groundwater problem. The level of groundwater management in any basin or subbasin is often dependent on water availability and demand. Again, government agencies have access to well log reports under current law, to the extent the information contained therein is necessary to conduct studies. The fact that other states might allow public disclosure of well log reports should not be the sole reason for California to repeal the confidential status of these reports here. The exact location of public water system groundwater wells are confidential; the information is included in vulnerability assessments conducted pursuant to Federal law. These vulnerability assessments are exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act and Federal agencies encourage local agencies to protect this information from disclosure. Further, metal theft continues to present a law enforcement challenge in California. Metal thieves are destroying pumps and appurtenant facilities to obtain metal to sell to recyclers. Providing unfettered public disclosure of the exact location of groundwater wells will only make it easier for metal thieves to located and destroy wells to steal metal. One amendment, which was offered and rejected by the author last year, was to allow a well owner to opt-out of public disclosure. The amendments that would have imposed penalties for the unauthorized release of a well log report are the same penalties that may be imposed on public water systems for various violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Absent a penalty of some sort, there will be no means of enforcing a ban on sharing or releasing a confidential well log report. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Oppose unless amended 56 1251 (Evans D) Invasive aquatic species: quagga mussels. Page 8/9 Introduced: 2/23/2012 Status: 3/8/2012-Referred to Com. on RLS. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 3/8/2012-S. RLS. ' Summary: Existing law, until January 1, 2017, generally prohibits a person from possessing, importing, shipping, or transporting, in the state, or from placing, planting, or causing to be placed or planted in any water within the state, dreissenid mussels, including, but not limited to, quagga mussels, and authorizes the Director of Fish and Game or his or her designee to engage in various enforcemE!nt activities. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to require the Department of Fish and Game to develop a new statewide quagga mussel prevention and management plan dependent on criteria, including, but not limited to, inspection protocols and the tracking of vessels. Laws: An act relating to invasive aquatic species. Notes 1: This legislation is a placeholder and will require substantive amendments before it can be set for policy committee hearing. The District has supported legislation relating to this subject matter over the past several years. Although the District does not operate or maintain recreational boating facilities, its water supply system may be vulnerable to quagga mussel infestation. This legislation should be closely monitored given the subject matter. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch SO-U511 (Keho8 D) Urban water management plans. Introduced: 2/24/2012 Status: 2%27/2012-Read first time. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/24/2012-S. PRINT Summary:The Urban Water Management Planning Act requires an urban water supplier to prepare and adopt an urban water management plan that identifies and quantifies the existing and planned sources of water available to the water supplier's service area, based on specified factors. The act states the ntent of the Legislature, in enacting the act, to permit levels of water management planning commensurate with the number of customers served and the volume of water supplied. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that intent provision. Laws: An act to amend Section 10630 of the Water Code, relating to water. Notes 1: phis legislation is a placeholder and will require substantive amendments before it can be set for policy committee hearing. It should be closely monitored given the subject matter. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch St1..]HM (S.trickland R) Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Introduced: 2/24/2012 Status: 2/27/2012-Read first time. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/24/2012-S. PRINT Summary: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those provisions. Laws: An a,-t to amend Section 21100 of the Public Resources Code, relating to environmental quality. Notes 1: This legislation is a placeholder and will require substantive amendments before it can be set for policy committee hearing. It should be closely monitored given the subject matter. Current Position: Not Yet Considered Recommended Position: Watch Total Measures: 14 Total Tracking Forms: 14 Page 9/9 RALPH M. BROWN ACT WHAT IS THE MAIN GOAL OF THE BROWN ACT? ■ To ensure that all MEETINGS of LEGISLATIVE BODIES of LOCAL AGENCIES are OPEN AND PUBLIC so that the public may participate in the decision-making process. ■ "file Brown Act is found in the California Government Code §§ 54950, et seq. ■ Interpretations of the Brown Act are contained in Opinions of the Attorney General as well as court decisions that have construed the law. An analysis of the Brown Act is also contained in a publication entitled "The Brown Act: Open Meetings for Local Legislative Bodies,"published by the California Attorney General's Office(2003)and"Open&Public IV: A Guide to the Ralph M. Brown Act" published by the League of California Cities. ■ The Brown Act permits local agencies to adopt a "Sunshine Ordinance" that reflects a commitment by the Board to comply with the Brown Act,to describe the manner in which such compliance will be achieved,and to impose upon itself certain additional requirements pertinent to the operations of the local agency. IN This material is summary in nature and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, legal advice as to individual questions. Specific questions regarding the interpretation and application of the Brown Act as it may apply to a local agency and/or any particular set of facts should be directed to legal counsel. THE BROWN ACT APPLIES TO: ■ Legislative bodies of local agencies. A LOCAL AGENCY IS: ■ A county, city, town, school district, municipal corporation, district, political subdivision, any board, commission, or agency thereof, or any other local public agency. A LEGISLATIVE BODY INCLUDES: ■ Governing bodies of local agencies, including local agencies created by State or Federal statute(boards of directors, city councils, boards of supervisors, boards of trustees, and so on). ■ Commissions, committees, boards, citizen volunteer groups, task forces, "blue ribbon committees,"or other bodies of local agencies,whether permanent or temporary,decision- making or advisory, created by resolution or other formal action of a legislative body. ■ Standing committees of a governing body with a continuing subject matter jurisdiction or meeting schedule fixed by formal action of the governing body, irrespective of their composition. ■ Governing boards of private corporations, limited liability companies, or other entities which either (1) are created by a public entity to exercise authority delegated to it by the public entity, or (2) receive funds from a public entity and whose membership includes a member of the local agency's board, appointed by the local agency. Thus, entities such as private foundations and chambers of commerce are subject to the Brown Act if the entity was created by the Agency(such as a foundation),or where an elected official is on the board of that entity AND the entity receives funds from the Agency or other local public agency (such as a chamber of commerce). ■ A newly elected official,who has not yet assumed office,must comply with the Brown Act. -2- A LEGISLATIVE BODY DOES NOT INCLUDE: IN Ad hoc advisory committees made up solely of members of the governing body (Board of Directors) and constituting less than a quorum of the legislative body, are not considered "legislative bodies" subject to the Brown Act. An example is an advisory committee composed of less than a quorum of the Board to interview candidates for a vacant position. ■ In order to be exempt from the notice,agenda,and public participation requirements of the Brown Act, all ad hoc committees of the Board must Substantially comply with the following guidelines: (1) The committee shall be comprised of less than a quorum of the Board; (2) The committee's life should be restricted to a relatively short period of time; (3) The committee's purpose should be limited to a single and specific task; (4) The committee shall not be given any independent discretionary authority to make ultimate decisions on behalf of the Board with respect to the final resolution of the task; (5) The committee's charge should not be automatically renewed upon completion of its particular assignment or expiration of its fixed tern; (6) The committee's meeting schedule should not be on a regular basis or established by formal action of the Board; and (7) Public notice of the formation of the committee shall be given in a timely manner. (Sources: Gov. Code Ej§ 54951, 54952, and 54952.1) 'W -3 - THE BROWN ACT APPLIES TO MEETINGS OF LEGISLATIVE BODIES AND ACTION TAKEN BY LEGISLATIVE BODIES ■ All meetings must comply with the provisions of the Brown Act,and be conducted publicly, in the absence of an exception which authorizes discussion in closed or executive session. ■ Exceptions to the requirements of the Brown Act are narrowly construed in favor of requiring public disclosure even if the subject matter may be viewed as sensitive. ■ As a general principle, if a matter does not fall within a closed meeting exception, all discussion, deliberations,debate,acquisition of information,and action must be conducted in public at a duly-noticed public meeting. ■ The agency must exercise care in ensuring that it does not inadvertently violate the public meeting requirements and/or the provisions regarding how action may be taken. ■ The Brown Act imposes both substantive and procedural requirements on legislative bodies, and violation may result in both civil actions and criminal penalties. -4- A MEETING IS: ■ Any congregation of a majority of the members of the legislative body at the same time and place to hear,discuss,or deliberate upon any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body or the local agency to which it pertains. A "meeting" is not limited to gatherings at which action is taken and may include an informal gathering,such as a lunch,social gathering,retreat,workshop,or conference,ifthe subject matter of the jurisdiction is discussed, and even if the focus is on team-building. ■ Any use of direct communication, personal intermediaries, or technological devices (except for teleconferenc ng, discussed below)employed by a majority of the members of the legislative body to develop a collective concurrence regarding action to be taken on an item by the legislative body. (1) This type of meeting is sometimes called a"serial meeting,"and involves a series of communications with less than a quorum of the legislative body but which, as a whole,results in a collective concurrence by a quorum and/or majority of the Board members. (2) Daisy-Chain Example: Director A calls Director B; Director B then calls Director C,to arrive at a collective concurrence among a five-member Board. This is a serial meeting in violation of the Brown Act. (3) 1Inb-and-S poke Example: The General Manager calls Director A to find out his/her opinion on a topic; the General Manager then calls Director B, and thereafter Director C, in order to reach concurrence on an issue within the Agency's jurisdiction. This is a serial meeting in violation of the Brown Act. (4) Note: A member has the right to meet with constituents to discuss issues, and to confer with a colleague about local agency business,but if,in the process,collective concurrence as to action to be taken is reached by a majority,then a violation of the Brown Act has occurred. x� 5 - ■ On July 3,2008,Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law SB 1732, which amended Government Code Section 54952.2. The new law,which went into effect on January 1,2009,prohibits a majority of the members of the Board from using a series of communications outside a Brown Act meeting to discuss,deliberate,or take action on any item of business. It codifies the Brown Act's prohibition on the use of private"serial meetings"to circumvent the requirement that all business of the Board be discussed, deliberated, and acted upon in a meeting that is open to the public. This law was written in response to a 2006 appellate court decision in a case called Wolfe v. City of Fremont, 144 Cal. App 4°i 533 (1 Dist. 2006). In Wolfe, the Court of Appeal found that a city manager's individual meetings with city council members to discuss a new policy that was later the subject of a council meeting did not violate the Brown Act's implied prohibition of serial meetings. The Court held that the Brown Act is violated by such meetings only if (I)the city official acts as a personal intermediary between legislative body members during these meetings, and (2) the meetings are used by a majority of the legislative body to develop a"collective concurrence." This decision was widely criticized as undermining the Brown Act. After the Wolfe decision, State Senator Gloria Romero introduced SB 964,a bill similar to SB 1732, aimed at overturning the appellate opinion. SB 964 was intended to prohibit a majority of members of a legislative body from using a series of communications of any kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate or take action on any item of business within the legislative body's subject matterjurisdiction. SB 964 also provided that when members of a legislative body are authorized to access a writing of the body or of the agency in administering their duties, a local agency shall not discriminate between or among the members of the legislative body as to which writing or portion of a writing is made available or when it is made available, and would prohibit a local agency from charging a fee to a member of the legislative body to inspect or obtain a copy of that writing. SB 964 was passed by the Legislature, but vetoed by the Governor. In his veto message, the Governor said,"This bill imposes an impractical standard for compliance on local officials and could potentially prohibit communication among officials and agency staff outside of a public meeting." The Governor urged legislators to "consider legislation next year that more judiciously addresses the problem of serial meetings that result in public policy decisions." In response to the Governor's concerns, SB 1732 has an added provision specifying that the serial meeting prohibition does not prevent a District employee or official from communicating outside of a Brown Act meeting with separate members of the Board for the purpose of answering questions or providing information on an item of agency business. This type of communication is not prohibited as long as the employee or official does not communicate the comments or position of any of the members of the Board to each other. In this way, the law prevents the members of the Board from using an intermediary to "discuss" an item of business with each other outside of a public meeting. SB 1732 also prohibits a local agency from discriminating among members of legislative body with regard to accessing a writing of the body or agency. This provision was enacted in response to concerns that local agencies may distribute writings onlyto some members of their legislative bodies and not to others,or ask some members to pay for copies of writings they provide to other members Without charge. -6- A MEETING IS NOT: ■ Individual contacts between a Board member and any other person. ■ Attendance of a majority of the members of the legislative body at conferences and similar gatherings open to the public to discuss issues of general interest, so long as the members do net discuss among themselves,other than as part of the scheduled program,business of a specific nature within the agency subject matter jurisdiction. ■ Attendance of a majority of the members of the legislative body at open and publicized meetings organized by persons other than the local agency to address a topic of local community concern, so lone as the members do not discuss among themselves business of a specific nature within the agency's subject matterjurisdiction other than as part of the scheduled program. ■ Attendance of a majority of the members of the legislative body at an open and noticed meeting of another body of the local agency,or ofa legislative body of another local agency, so lone as the majority of the members do not discuss among themselves business of a specific nature within the agency's subject matter jurisdiction, other than as part of the scheduled meeting. Thus,a Board majority may attend a City Council meeting,but may not discuss District business. ■ Attendance of a majority of the members of the legislative body at purely social or ceremonial occasions, so lone as the members do not discuss among themselves business of a specific nature within the agency's subject matter jurisdiction. ■ Attendance of a majority of the members of the legislative body at an open and noticed meeting of a standing committee of that body,so lone as the members of the legislative body who are not members of the standing committee attend only as observers. ■ Circu ation ofa memorandum or letter from the Agency's attorney to each Board member. ■ CAVEAT: If you are in doubt as to whether a function is or is not a"meeting" under the Brown Act, it is advisable to provide public notice of the function in accordance with the agenda and posting requirements of the Brown Act. Sources: Gov. Code §§ 54952.1; 54952.2(a)and (b); 54954.1, 54952.2; 54954.3) `"" -7- RULES FOR MEETINGS ■ Meetings cannot be held in any facility which is inaccessible to the disabled; which discriminates on the basis of race,religion,color,national origin,ancestry,or sex;or which requires that the public make payment or purchase in order to be present. • Regular and special meetings of the legislative body, including workshops and retreats, must take place within the boundaries of the local jurisdiction. • Exceptions to the location requirement include: (1) To comply with state or federal law or court order. (2) To attend a judicial or administrative proceeding to which the local agency is a party. (3) To carry out inspections of real property or personal property which cannot be conveniently brought into the local agency's jurisdiction. (4) To attend meetings and discussions on matters ofnwlti-agency significance,so long as the meetingtakes place in fl ejurisdiction of one ofthe participating agencies and is properly noticed by all of them. (5) If the local agency has no meeting facility within its boundaries,the meeting may take place outside the jurisdiction at the nearest available facility,or at the principal office of the legislative body if it is located outside ofthe jurisdiction. (6) To attend meetings with State or Federal officials solely to discuss a legislative or regulatory issue affecting the local agency and over which the Federal or State officials have jurisdiction, if a local meeting would be impractical. (7) To attend meetings in an out-of-jurisdiction facility owned by the agency if the topic of meeting is limited to items directly related to the facility. (8) To attend closed session on pending litigation at the offices of the local agency's legal counsel, if it would reduce legal fees or costs. • A joint powers authority must meet in the territory of at least one of its members, or as provided in the exceptions listed above. Statewide joint powers authorities may meet at any facility in the State so long as the facility is accessible to the disabled,the facility does not discriminate,and the facility does not require the public to make a payment or purchase to be present. • In emergencies, such as fire, flood, or earthquake, meetings shall be held in the location designated by the presiding officer ofthe legislative body as in the notice to the media by"the most rapid means of communication available at the time." ■ Audio or video teleconferencing to receive public comment, testimony, to deliberate, or even conduct a closed session, is allowed. There are a number of specific requirements: (1) At least quorum ofthe legislative body must participate from locations within the local agency's jurisdiction, but additional teleconferencing locations may be made available for the public. - 8 - (2) Each teleconference location must be accessible to the public. (3) The notice and agenda of the meeting must identify each teleconference location. (4) An agenda must be posted at each teleconference location. (5) Public opportunity to address the legislative body must be provided in the agenda. (6) All votes must be by rollcall. ■ The legislative body is prohibited from taking action by secret ballot, whether preliminary or final. ■ Members of the public may not be required,as a condition to attendance at a meeting of a legislative body of a local agency, to register his or her name, to provide other information, to complete a questionnaire. or otherwise fulfill any condition precedent to his or her attendance. ■ 11'an attendance list, register, questionnaire, or other similar document is posted at or near the entrance to the room where the meeting is to be held, or is circulated to the persons present during the meeting, it must clearly state that the signing, registering, or completion of the document is voluntary,and that al I persons may attend the meeting regardless of'whether a person signs,registers, or completes the document. ■ Any person attending an open and public meeting of a legislative body of a local agency must have the right to record the proceedings with an audio or video tape recorder or a still or motion picture camera in the absence of a reasonable finding by the legislative body of the local agency that the recording cannot continue without noise, illumination, or obstruction of view that constitutes, or would constitute, a persistent disruption of the proceedings. ■ No legislative body ofa local agency shall prohibit or otherwise restrict the broadcast of its open and public meetings in the absence of a reasonable finding that the broadcast cannot be accomplished without noise, illumination, or obstruction of view that would constitute a persistent disruption of the proceedings. (Sources: Gov. Code f§ 54953; 54953.3; 54953.5-154953.6; 54954; 54961) �r -9- NOTICE AGENDA AND PUBLIC COMMENT REQUIREMENTS ■ The agenda, documents, at the agenda theeagendayis posted for such mleeting,norpupo irdistribution tosalll,, or la majority, of the members of the legislative body, whichever occurs first. ■ Senate Bill 343 amended Government Code Section 54957.5 to require that any writing that(a) is a public record not exempt form disclosure under Government Code Sections 6253.5,6254. 6254.3, 6254.7, 6254.16 or 6254.22, (b) relates to an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting of the Board, and (c) is distributed less than 72 hours before that meeting, be made available for public inspection at a public office or location designated by the local agency at the time the writing is distributed to all or a majority of all of the members of the Board. The bill also authorizes the agency to post such a writing on the agency's website. This legislation became operative on July I,2008. Thus,a local agency is not prohibited from presenting any new materials to the Board that were not included in the original agenda packet; rather, any such new "writings" must be made available to the public at the same time that they are made available to the Board. ■ Agency agendas,agenda packets,and other writings distributed to members of the legislative body must be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability so as to provide such individuals with equal access to public meetings and decision making and to ensure that communications with members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others. IN Agency agendas shall contain a brief general description(which need not exceed twenty words)of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting, including items to be discussed n closed session. Agendas must specify the time and location of the meeting and be posted in a location that is freely accessible to the public and on the agency's website, if the agency has one. • The time and place for regular meetings of legislative bodies must be set by ordinance, resolution, or other formal rule. • Posting of the agenda for a regular meeting must occur at least 72 hours before a regular meeting. IN A special meeting may be called by the presiding officer of the legislative body or a majority of the members, subject to the following requirements: (1) Written notice must be delivered to each member of the legislative body, unless the board member has previously given a written waiver of such notice or who is present at the time the legislative body convenes the special meeting. (2) Written notice must be delivered to each local newspaperof general Circulation and radio or television station that has previously requested such notice. (3) The written notice must be delivered personally or by any other means so that is received and duly posted at least twenty-four(24) hours prior to the mecting. (4) The notice must specify the time and place of the special meeting and the business to be transacted. No other business may be considered at a special mecting. ■ Emergency meetings may be held without complying with the 24-hour notice requirement or the 24- hour posting requirement for special meetings, if there is an emergency situation (i.e., work stoppage, crippling activity, or other activity that severely impairs public health, safety, or both) where prompt action is necessary due to the disruption or planned disruption of public facilities. - 10- (1) Telephonic notice must be given by the presiding officer or his/her designee at least one hour before the meeting to any local newspaper of general circulation and radio and television stations which have previously requested such notice,or,in the event of a dire emergency (i.e., a crippling disaster, mass destruction, terrorist act, or threatened terrorist activity that poses immediate and significant peril), at or near the time the presiding officer notifies the members of the legislative body of the emergency meeting. (2) The telephone notice is waived if telephone services are not functioning, but the presiding officer shall notify the newspapers and radio and television stations of the fact of the holding of the emergency meeting, its purpose and any action taken, as soon after the meeting as possible. (3) A legislative body holding an authorized emergency meeting may meet in closed session if agreed to by a 2/3 vote of the Board members present,or, if less than 2/3 of the members are present, by a unanimous vote of the members present. (4) All other special meeting requirements apply to emergency meetings except the 24- hour notice requirement. (5) As soon as possible after the meeting, the minutes, list of the persons notified or attempted to be notified,the record of the rollcall vote,and any actions taken,shall be posted for a minimum of ten (10) days in a public place. • A legislative body of a local agency may adjourn a regular or special meeting to a time and place specified in the order of adjournment. Less than a quorum, or, if there is no member of the legislative body present, the clerk or secretary, may adjourn such meetings. (1) No new agenda need be posted if the meeting is adjourned for less than five aw calendar days, so long as no new item of business is introduced. (2) A copy of the order of adjournment must be posted at or near the door of the meeting place, within 24 hours after the adjournment. • A hearing being held by a legislative body of a local agency can be continued to a subsequent meeting in the same manner as adjournments of meetings. If the hearing is continued to a time less than 24 hours later, a copy of the order or notice of continuance must be posted immediately. • The general description of each agenda item generally need not exceed twenty (20)words. • Agendas for each meeting must include information regarding how, to whom, and when a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, may be made by a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in the public meeting. • The agenda must list all items to be discussed in closed session. • No action or discussion may take place on items not agendized. ■ Exceptions to the prohibition on discussion or action on an item that is not agendized include: (1) Members ofthe legislative body or its staffmay make brief responses to statements made or questions raised by members of the public. (2) A member of the legislative body or its staff may ask questions for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his/her own activities. I I (3) A member of the legislative body or the body itself, subject to its rules and regulations, may provide reference to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting, or to take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (4) Members of the legislative body may direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (5) In the event of an emergency, as determined by a majority vote of the legislative body. An emergency is defined to include (a) a work stoppage or other activity which severely impairs public health,safety or both;or(b)crippling disaster which impairs the public health, safety or both. (6) If the legislative body determines, by 2/3 vote of members (or unanimous vote if less than 2/3 present)that there is immediate need for action and need came to local agency's attention after the agenda was posted. Under such circumstances, the legislative body must first take action to authorize, by the requisite 2/3 vote,to add the item to the agenda;and only thereafter may the legislative body then discuss and take action on the newly-agendized item. (7) If the subject matter was previously posted at a duly-agendized meeting occurring not more than five calendar days prior to the date that the action is to be taken, and the item was duly continued from the prior meeting to the present meeting. • The legislative body must publicly identify each item prior to discussing any such item on the agenda. The legislative body need not identify any victim or alleged victim of tortiOU5 sexual conduct or child abuse unless the identity of the person has been publicly disclosed. • Members of the public must be allowed an opportunity on the agenda to directly address the legislative body. (1) At regular meetings, the public may directly address the legislative body on any item of interest that is within the body's subject matter jurisdiction; at special meetings,the public may directly address the legislative body on any item listed on the agenda. (2) If the item appears on the agenda,the public must be permitted to comment before or during the legislative body's consideration. (3) Ifthe item is not on the agenda,no discussion by the legislative body may occur and no action may be taken on that item unless it meets one of the exceptions to non- agendized items. (4) The legislative body is not required to allow public comment on an item that was already considered at a public meeting ofa committee comprised exclusively ofthe members of the legislative body, if all members of the public were given an opportunity to comment on that item at the committee, so long as the item has not been substantially changed. (5) The legislative body may impose reasonable time limits on public comment. (6) The legislative body shall not prohibit public criticism of the policies, procedures, programs or services of the legislative body. (Sources: Gov. Code §§ 54952.1; 54952.2; 54954.1; 54952.2; 54954; 54954.3; 54956; 54956.5; 54961) - 12- CLOSED SESSIONS ■ Closed sessions are an exception to the rule that all business of the legislative body must be conducted in the open. ■ Provisions authorizing closed sessions in the Brown Act are narrowly construed in favor of disclosure. ■ The Brown Act limits what types of matters may be discussed in closed session, what information must be provided on the agenda,and what information must be provided regarding the closed session after-the-fact. ■ Pendin Lg itiiz ation. The Brown Act authorizes closed sessions on the basis of"pending litigation" in situations when litigation has been formally initiated to which the local agency is a party;or when the legislative body determines, based on existing facts and circumstances,that there is significant exposure to IiNgation or that litigation should be initiated. "Litigation"includes any adjudicatory proceeding before a court,administrative bodv exercising its adjudicatory authority, hearing officer, or arbitrator. "Existing facts and circumstances" are limited to the following situations: (1) Facts and circumstances exist which are not yet known to a potential plaintiff,that might result in litigation against the agency. Disclosure of information prior to or after the closed session is not required. (2) Facts and circumstances exist which are known to potential plaintiff,and that might 400 result in litigation. Disclosure must be included on the agenda or publicly announced. (3) Receipt of tort claim threatening litigation. The claim must be available for public inspection. (4) A statement made in an open and public meeting threatening litigation. (5) A statement threatening litigation made outside open and public meeting, on a matter within agency's jurisdiction, if the official or employee has made a contemporaneous record prior to the meeting. The record must be available for public inspection (except that the identity of an alleged victim of an unlawful or tortious sexual conduct or the person making the threat need not be disclosed unless the identity of the person has already been publicly disclosed). (6) If, based on existing facts and circumstances, the local agency has decided, or is deciding, whether to initiate litigation. ■ Lin and Personnel Matters. Under the Brown Act,a closed session may be used to consider the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, discipline, or dismissal of a public employee, or to hear complaints or charges brought against an employee by another person. (1) Prior to any closed session to hear complaints or charges brought against an employee by another person,the employee must be given written notice of his/her right to have complaints heard in open session,at least 24 hours prior to the session. If the required notice is not given, any disciplinary action or other action taken against the employee will be null and void. 13 - (2) An "employee" includes officer or independent contractor who functions as an employee, and does not include elected officials, members of legislative bodies,or other independent contractors. If the individual is not an employee, the hearing must be held in open session. (3) The attorney general has issued an opinion that if charges and complaints are not pending,closed sessions to simply discuss an employee's performance are allowed. It also appears that the legislative body's deliberations on complaints or charges about employees may be held in closed session (as distinct from holding a hearing on the charges or complaints). (4) Closed sessions are not permitted to discuss overall or across-the-board procedures for evaluating employees,classifications,salary structure,salary ranges,and similar issues, which do not involve a specific individual. (5) Closed sessions held pursuant to this section must not include discussion or action on proposed compensation except for a reduction of compensation that results from the imposition of discipline. Although the amount of any proposed increase in an employee's compensation may not be considered in closed session,the employee's job performance may be discussed in closed session, including the threshold decision of whether the employee should receive a raise. (6) CAVEAT: The Board may be restricted as to the circumstances under which employee performance(other than that of the General Manager)may be discussed in closed session, where the General Manager has been vested with the exclusive right to hire, discipline, and dismiss agency employees. ■ Real Estate Negotiations. The Brown Act authorizes closed sessions with its real estate negotiator prior to the purchase,sale,exchange,or lease of real property by or for the agency,to grant authority to the negotiator regarding price and terms of payment. Prior to the closed session, the legislative body must identify in public (a) its negotiator (who may be a member ofthe legislative body itself),(b)the real property about which the negotiations concern, and (c)the persons with whom the negotiator may negotiate. ■ Labor Negotiations. The Brown Act authorizes closed sessions to allow the legislative body to meet with its labor negotiator regarding discussions with employee organizations and unrepresented employees on salaries and fringe benefits. (1) Prior to the closed session, the legislative body must identify in public its labor negotiator. (2) In the closed session, the legislative body may(a) review its position, (b) instruct its negotiator regarding the conduct of labor negotiations for present or prospective employees,and (c) may approve an agreement concluding labor negotiations with its represented employees. This may include salaries, salary schedules,and fringe benefit,as well as available funds and funding priorities so long as the issues relate to instructions to the designated negotiator. (3) The legislative body cannot take final action on the proposed compensation for one or more unrepresented employees in closed session. (4) The legislative body cannot discuss or set the salary of a specific employee in closed session (unless such action is taken as a form of disciplinary action). - 14 - ■ SeCUrit . The Brown Act authorizes closed sessions to allow the legislative body to meet with the Attorney General, district attorney, agency counsel, sheriff or chief of police, or their respective deputies, or a>ecurity consultant or a security operations manager,on matters posing a threat to the security of public buildings, essential public services (including water, drinking water, and wastewater treatment), or the public's right of access to public services or facilities. ■ Audit Report s,. The legislative body of a local agency may hold a closed session to consider its response to a confidential final draft audit report from the Bureau of State Affairs,unless the report has been publicly released or is exempted from that requirement by some other provision of law. ■ Pension fund Investments. The legislative body of a local agency that invests pension funds may hold a closed session to consider the purchase or sale of particular and specific pension fiord investments, and to make such decisions by rollcall vote entered into the minutes of the closed session and disclosed at the first open meeting of legislative body held after the earlier of the close of the investment transaction or the transfer of pension fund assets for the investment transaction. ■ Prior to commencing a closed session, the legislative body must announce the subdivision of the statute under which the closed session is being held, and provide the information mandated by the Brown Act. ■ Anv action taken in closed session, including the vote or abstention of each member, must be publicly disclosed at the same public meeting after the closed session, in accordance with the following requirements: (1) Real estate negotiations: Report any approval and substance of any agreement if final approval was given by legislative body(if final approval must be provided by other party, disclose upon inquiry once approval has been obtained). (2) Approval to legal counsel to defend, seek, or refrain from appellate review, file amicus brief in litigation: Report adverse party and substance of litigation. (3) Approval to initiate or intervene in legal action: Disclose decision and that substance and defendants will be disclosed upon inquiry after formally commenced unless disclosure would jeopardize service of process or the conclusion of existing settlement negotiations to its advantage. (4) Approval to legal counsel to settle pending litigation after settlement is final: Report acceptance of settlement offer signed by other party and identify substance; disclose upon inquiry other settlements after final approval by other party or court. (5) Disposition of tort claims: Disclose name of claimant,agency,substance,monetary amount approved and agreed upon. (6) Action taken on employment status of any public employee: Disclose position title and any change in compensation; toll disclosure of d ism issal/nonrenewal of employment contract until exhaustion of administrative remedies. (7) Labor negotiations: Report after agreement final and accepted or ratified by other party(including item approved and other party/ies). ■ Writings distributed during public meetings, must be made available for public inspection at the meeting if prepared by the local agency or a member of its legislative body. If prepared by someone else, writings roust be available after the meeting. CAVEAT: Documents prepared by the attorney for the legislative body are still protected by the attorney-client privilege even if distributed to the members of the legislative body. AW - 15 - ■ The efforts of local agencies to post agendas of regular meetings and to publicly report on actions taken in closed session are within the scope of Section 3(b)(1) of Article 1 of the California Constitution,such that the Commission on State Mandates must reconsider its test claim statements of decision on whether compliance with the statutory requirements constitute a reimbursable mandate in light of federal and state court decisions rendered since those statutes were enacted. ■ If the closed session action results in substantive changes to writings, which require retyping,then release of documents may be postponed until retyping has been completed during normal business hours, but the presiding officer or designee must summarize changes for any requestor present. ■ Government Code Section 54954.5 contains sample language which the State Legislature has determined will meet the mandate of the Brown Act for properly identifying closed session items on the legislative body's agenda and provide a "safe harbor" from legal attacks based upon such grounds. (Sources: Gov. Code §§ 54954.2; 54954.5; 54956.75; 54956.8; 54956.81; 54956,86; 54956.9; 54956.95; 54957; 54957.1; 54957.5; 54957.6; 54957.7) - I6 - " LIABILITY FOR VIOLATIONS ■ Possible criminal penalties. It is a misdemeanor for any member of the legislative body to attend a meeting where action is taken in violation of the Brown Act"where the member intends to deprive the public of information to which the member knows or has reason to know the public is entitled." ■ The District Attorney as well as any interested person may pursue a civil action to restrain violation of the Brown Act. (1) The action may be brought(a)to prevent violations or threatened violations of the Brown Act, (b) to determine the applicability of the Brown Act to actions or threatened future actions, (c) to determine whether any rule or regulation of the legislative body to penalize or discourage the expression of one or more of its members is in violation of the law, or (d) to obtain a court order to require tape recording of closed sessions. (2) The court may order the legislative body to tape record its closed sessions and preserve tape recordings for a specified period and under such terms of confidentiality as ordered by the court. ■ The District Attorney as well as any interested person may pursue a civil action to determine that an action by vie legislative body is null and void. " ■ Prior to commencing the action, the DA/interested person must first make written demand to the legislative body to cure or correct the violation. (1) The demand must be made within 90 days from the date the action was taken. However, if the action was taken in open session in violation of Government Code § 54954.2 [agenda requirements], the demand must be made within 30 days from the date the action was taken. (2) The legislative body has 30 days from receipt of the demand to cure or correct the violation or inform the demanding party of its decision not to cure or correct the challenged action. (3) the demanding party must file his/heraction within 15 days ofthe expiration of the 30-day period,or within 15 days of the decision to cure or correct,whicheveroccurs earlier. ■ No action wir- be determined to be null and void if. (1) The action taken was in substantial compliance with the Brown Act. (2) The action was taken with regard to the sale or issuance of notes, bonds, and other indebtedness. (3) The action taken gave rise to a contractual obligation (other than compensation for services in the form of salary or fees for professional services),upon which a party has in good faith and without notice of challenge, detrimentally relied. 17- (4) The action taken was in connection with collection of a tax. (5) The challenging party had actual notice of the item of business at least 72 hours prior to the meeting (if noticed as a regular meeting), or 24 hours prior to the meeting at which the action was taken (if noticed as a special meeting), or prior to an emergency meeting. (6) No action taken to cure or correct violation shall be construed or admissible as evidence of a violation. • The court may award the plaintiff attorneys fees and costs if it is determined that the legislative body violated the Brown Act. The court may award costs and attorneys' fees to a local agency if it finds that the lawsuit was entirely lacking in merit and was clearly frivolous. • Any public official who attends a closed session of the District is prohibited from disclosing confidential information acquired by being present in the closed session to any person not entitled to receive it, unless the Board of Directors, by a majority vote, has authorized the disclosure of that confidential information. The following remedies for a violation of this prohibition are available under the Brown Act: (1) Injunctive relief to prevent disclosure of confidential information. (2) Disciplinary action against employees who "willfully" disclose confidential information. "willful"misconduct by an employee requires that the employee have first received training/education regarding the requirements of the section. (3) Referral of any violator who is an elected official to the grand jury. • A local agency is prohibited from taking any action against a person who makes a confidential inquiry or complaint to a District Attorney or grand jury concerning a perceived violation of the Brown Act, expresses an opinion concerning the propriety or legality of actions taken in closed session, or discloses non-confidential information acquired in closed session. (Sources: Gov. Code §§ 54959; 54960, 54960.1; 54960.5; 54963) - ]g_ CA Codes (wat:30520-30530) Page 1 of 1 30529 . ALL legislative sessions of the board shall be public . tow littp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30520-30530) Page I of 1 30530 . The board shall establish rules for its proceedings . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30520-30530) Page 1 of 1 30521 . The board shall : (a) Provide for the time and place of holding its regular rieetincs . (b) Provide for the manner of calling special meetings . fl. littp:HNvww.leginf6.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30520-30530) Page 1 of 1 30524 . A majority of the board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30520-30530) Page 1 of 1 30523 . The board shall act only by ordinance, resolution, or mction . littp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode'?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30520-30530) Page 1 of 1 30525 . No ordinance, resolution, or motion shall be passed or become effective without the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the members of the board. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displayeode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30540-30547) Page 1 of 1 30590 . (a) The board shall, at its first meeting or as soon thereafter as practicable, appoint by a majority vote a general manager and a secretary. (b) The board shall also, by majority vote, do either of the foLlowing: ( 1) Appoint an auditor or treasurer to carry out the duties requited by Section 30582 and other duties required by the board. (2) Retain art auditor as an independent contractor, other than the auditor or treasurer appointed pursuant to paragraph ( 1) , to conduct an annua:L audit of the district ' s books, records, and financial affairs . war' littp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/egi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30540-30547) Page 1 of 1 30541 . A director shall not be the general manager, secretary, treasurer, or auditor. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30540-30547) Page 1 of 1 x',0542 . The general manager, secretary, treasurer, and auditor shall each receive the compensation determined by the board and shall serve at its pleasure . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30540-30547) Page 1 of 1 30543 . The same person may serve as general manager and secretary, secretary and auditor, or secretary and treasurer. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30540-30547) Page 1 of 1 ;0599 . The board may at any time appoint or employ and prescribe the authorities and duties of other officers, employees, attorneys, N and engineers necessary or convenient for the business of the district, each of whom shall serve at the pleasure of the board. Irttp://wNvw.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page 1 of 1 30575 . The board is the governing body of the district . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page 1 of 1 30576 . The powers of districts enumerated in this division shall, except as therein otherwise provided, be exercised by the board. MW http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page I of 1 30578 . The president shall : (a) Sign all contracts on behalf of the district . (b) Perform other duties imposed by the board . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page 1 of 1 30579 . The secretary shall : (a) Countersign all contracts on behalf of the district . (b) Perform other duties imposed by the board. =uw littp://www.leginfc).ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page 1 of 1 30579 . 5 . Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (ai of Section 30578 and subdivision (a) of Section 30579, the board may alternatively authorize, subject to such limitations and conditions as it may determine, the execution of contracts on behalf of the district by another officer or officers of the district . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page 1 of 1 0580 . The general manager shall : (a ) Have full charge and control of the maintenance, operation, and construction of the water works or water-works system of the iistri.ct . (b) Have full power and authority to employ and discharge all employees and assistants at pleasure . (c) Prescribe the duties of employees and assistants . (d) Fix and alter the compensation of employees and assistants subject to approval by the board. s� http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page 1 of 1 30581 . The general manager shall also : (a) Perform other duties imposed by the board . (b) Report to the board in accordance with the rules and regulations as it adopts . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 CA Codes (wat:30575-30586) Page 1 of 1 30582 . If the hoard appoints an auditor or treasurer pursuant to Section 30540, the auditor or treasurer shall install and maintain a ,. >ystem of auditing and accounting that shall completely and at all i..imes show the financial condition of the district . littp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wat&gro... 3/22/2012 ORDINANCE NO. 382 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ITS PUBLIC MEETINGS AND ACTIVITIES WIIERPAS, the Board of Directors of the Past Valley Water District finds as follows: A. The Last Valley Water District(°thc District") is a county water district organized and operating pursuant to California Water Code Section 30000 et seq. B. The District is governed by an elected Board of Directors ("the Board") whose meetings are subject to the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code Section 54950 et seq- ("the Brown Act"). C. The Board is authorized by Government Code Section 54953.7 to impose requirements upon itself which allow greater access to its meetings than prescribed by the Brown Act. D. ]'he purpose of this ordinance is to ensure that the Board's deliberations are open to the public to the Fullest extent permitted by law and its activities are performed in a manner that rellect a dedication to the highest standards of integrity and accountability so as to continue to earn die trust and confidence of the public served by the District. T11PRErORE, TILE BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the East Valley Water District does hereby adopt and ordain as follows: Section 1. PUBLIC ACTIVITIES. To the extent not otherwise inconsistent with applicable law or any existing or future ordimmces. resolutions, rules, regulations, or particular practices of the District, the Board hereby adopts as a matter of general policy the BoardNorms and Procedures attached hereto as Exhibit"A" 1 and incorporated herein by this reference. All amendments to such Bourel Norms as may be approved by the Board in the future are also hereby automatically incorporated hefCln by this reference as of the time that such amendments are duly adopted by the Board. Section 2. PUBLIC MEETINGS. 2.1. Statutory Requirements. All meetings ofthe Board and all committees thercol'shall he conducted in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Brown Act. 2.2. Additional Requirements. 2.2.1 . Regular Meetings. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954(x), all regular meetings of the Board shall be held at 5:30 p.m. on the second and lourth Wcdncsdays of each month at the District offices located at 3694 Highland Avenue, Suite 1130, 1 lighland, California. 2.2.2. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board shall be called and conducted in accordance with Government Code Section 54956. The Board shall not add any non- agendized item to the agenda of a special meeting. Further, no agenda fora special meeting shall provide an opportunity for the Board to consider the possible addition ofany non-agendized item to the agenda. 2.2.3. Agendas. The agendas of all Board meetings and all committee meetings that are open to the public shall be posted in the following locations: (1) an exterior bulletin board located outside the District headquarters which is accessible twenty-four(24) hours a day; (2)on-line Lit the District's website known as "eastval ley.org'; and (3) an interior bulletin board located in the lobby of the District headquarters. Section 3. REVIEW OF ORDINANCE. At times deemed appropriate by the Board, the Board shall review this ordinance to determine its effectiveness and the necessity for its continued operation. The District's General 2 Manager shall report to the Board on the operation of this ordinance, and make any reronnnendations deemed appropriate, including proposals to amend the ordinance. Upon conclusion of its review, the Board may take any action it deems appropriate concerning this ordinance. Section 4. SEVERABILITV. Ifany provision ofthis ordinancc, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance which can tie given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions ()['this ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. The provisions of this ordinance shall supersede Ordinance No. 380 adopted by the Board on April 12, 201 1, and shall take effect immediately upon adoption. Adopted this 24°i d:Ay of January, 2012. ROLL CALL Ayes: Coleman, Le Vesque, Morales, Sturgeon, Wilson Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: None L4ttttLeVesq6tie President, Board of Directors I, John J. Mura,do hereby certify that this is a true an rrect co f the record. Secretary, Board of Dir ctors JOHN J. MURA, Secret to the Board cast Valley Water Distric 3 i - _� — w�yww'- �fyff�yYft„♦ rff,.,.rs f • f:. � BOARD NORMS AND PROCEDURES GENERAL t. To take courageous action when necessary to ]seep the EVWD a progressive, well managed, innovative District. . Board of Directors provides leadership and participates in regional, state and national programs and meetings. ;. Board of Directors looks to Constituents and other elected officials for independent advice. 4. Other community leaders are consulted in the decision- making process when �. appropriate. ,. There can be extensive citizen participation and work on District programs. 6. There are numerous meetings, other than regular Board of Directors meetings. 7. We stress i raining for staff and Board of Directors. 8. Board of Directors will inform the General Manager's Administrative Manager when they will be out of town as early as possible. q. Board of Directors get the same information as much as possible: citizen complaints, letters, background, etc., in a timely manner. [43.Board of Directors members will each determine specific routine information thev want to receive such as Committee or City Agendas. r n. Return unwanted reports and documents to staff for distributing to the public or for recycling. rct.'rhe Board of Directors may ask General Manager or designee for information, providing such information requests can be reasonably accommodated without significant interruption in staff work load. The General Manager shall not be required to copy all Board Members with information obtained by other Board Members. fVWD- Board of Directors Nouns nod Procedures 13.All project assignments requested by Board Members shall be directed through the General Manager. The General Manager may place project items on the agenda if the project requires Board policy direction or approval to be implemented. 14.Items of significant expenditure of time/energy or financial impact must go to Board of Directors/General Manager to be agendized. 15.The General Manager receives formal work direction from the Board of Directors at public meetings or in closed session. Individual Board Members may not delegate formal work direction to the General Manager without approval by the rest of the Board of Directors. 16.The General Manager or Board President can request an item be placed on the agenda. 17.Read Committee Minutes in order to find out what is being worked on. i8.General Manager will discuss significant future Agenda topics with Board Members. i9.General Manager will meet regularly with Board President on Agenda preparation. 2o.Board of Directors (minority side on vote) can not bring item back for one year; majority can bring it back at will. 21.Board Members will do their homework (i.e., Read packets, complete committee work, etc.). 22.General Manager to give routine updates to Board of Directors. 130ARD OF DIRECTORS'VALUES 23.The Board of Directors and General Manager are a participatory team. 24.Board of Directors values high energy, open mindedness, and is achievement- oriented. 25.Board of Directors will care and have respect for each other. 26.Board of Directors will be straightforward, with no hidden agendas. 27.District Board of Directors values humor. 28.Traditions are respected. 29.No member of the Board of Directors shall use his or her position of public service with the District as a means to benefit his or her personal or private interests. 130ARD OF DIRECTORS INTERACTION AND COMMUNICATION 2 of R EVWD— Board of Directors Norms and Procedures ;,3o.individuals are responsible to initiate resolution of problems A.S.A.P. and riot let them fester. ;i.Board of Directors will not direct personal attacks at each other during public meetings, in the press, or any other place/time. ;2.Relationships are informal, but not casual in public. Business attire at Board meetings is appropriate. 3.Board of Directors will be cooperative in covering for each other. 34.Substantive Board of Directors/General Manager items are to receive advance notice and public notification. 3 5.Conunittee areas belong to the whole Board; they are not seen as territorial. ;G.Committees are responsible to keep the rest of the Board Members informed; and other members are responsible for letting the Committee know if they want more information or to give input. 37-Before Elected officials start moving in a new direction, they will get direction from the rest of the Board Members. ;8.The Board President forms Committees or disbands and is responsible for selection. ;().Committee reports will be made under Board Reports, when appropriate. 40.Committee summaries will be sent on an interim basis to update other Board members on: o Issues being discussed o Options being considered o Progress 41.Board of Directors and Committees will give clear and focused communication promptly. 42.if Committee and Staff disagree, it is the practice to bring the issue to full Board of Directors. 1T0.1RD INTI:I:ACTION AND COMMUNICATION WITH STAPT Gen ral M-ana er 43.Board of Directors will provide annual goals to provide direction to the General Manager at the time of the annual evaluation. L4.Board Members should always feel free to go to the General Manager and vice versa. 3o[ 8 EVWD- Board of Directors Norms and Procedures 45•When a Board Member is unhappy about a department or issues, he/she should always talk it over with the General Manager not the Department Head or other Board members. 46.Concerns about a Department Head must be taken to the General Manager or Board Attorney only. 47-Critical information will be passed to all Board Members by appropriate personnel. 48.The General Manager will provide ongoing feedback, information, and perceptions to the Board of Directors, including some response to written communications requesting feedback. 49.The General Manager deals with issues that cross department boundaries. 5o.Board of Directors will provide the General Manager with a written evaluation annually and provide some General Manager goals. Staff in General 51.Board of Directors will always be informed by staff when an unusual event occurs that the public would be concerned about, i.e., Health Department notice, big Water breaks, etc. in a timely manner (if press or media is involved). 52.Extr•eme emergencies (i.e., fatalities) are immediately communicated to Board Members by General Manager or staff. 53.The Board of Directors and staff will not blind side each other in public. Consideration for each other is our practice. 54. If a Board Member has a question on an agenda item, that member will mal<e every effort to contact the General Manager or designee prior to the meeting. Board Attorney 55.Board Attorney shall partner with Board of Directors, General Manager and Staff when and where appropriate. 56.Board Attorney goes through the General Manager on routine areas. 57.Board Attorney to regularly consult with Board Members on items of concern on the upcoming agenda at the earliest time possible. 58.Board Attorney can consult directly with General Manager as needed. J9.13oard Attorney will track Committee's actions, and relevant agendas of Board of Directors for needed input. 60.Board Attorney must oversee specialist attorneys; they are paid through the General Manager. 4o18 rVWO— Ooard of oirec[ors Norms and Procedures fil.Board Attorney to pro-actively inform and protect the Board of Directors from Potential violations and conflicts. CIIAIIt SELECTION 62.The Board President's succession is governed by the Board practices. 63.The Board President is selected by the Board of Directors. The Board President remains as one member of the Board and has no rights or authority different il•om any member of the Board. 64.1 n the event of an early vacancy in the position of Board President, the Vice ]'resident shall become Board President for the remaining portion of the outgoing Board President's term as Board President. CHAIR'S ROLI, 6r..Each Board President is unique; the role is defined by the person, based on that person's style. 66.The Board President acts as the ceremonial head or representative of the District at various civic affairs. 67.The Board President is the spokesperson for the Board of Directors when appropriate media or external organization requests are made. 68.The Board President acts as signatory to all documents requiring Board's execution. 69.The Board President makes appointments to Ad Hoc and special advisory Committees. 70.The Board President makes declarations, extends official recognition of groups or events. r71.The Board President will inform the Board of any informal correspondence sent out to anyone in relation to District business. 72.Tbe Board President regularly communicates with the General Manager. CITIZEN COMPLAINTS 73.Board of Directors will be informed of significant, urgent and repetitive complaints. 74.Statf will draft responses (letters). 5-Board of Directors shall not attempt to fix Citizens' problems on their own; it will f,,,,., be referrer to the General Manager. 76.Responses to Citizens are customized. 5 of-9 EVWD— board oJDirectors Norms and Procedures 77-Copies of responses to be included in individual packets or in Board Member's mail box. 78-if a Board Member wants action based on citizen complaint, they should go through the General Manager's office. 79.The level of detail in written responses will be selective. 80.Generally, communications are acknowledged with discretion. PUBLIC MEETINGS 8i.General Manager sets the Agenda for regular Board of Directors meetings. 82.Public continent shall be received on all action items. 83.Board of Directors members will treat everyone with courtesy. 84-Corrections to minutes are passed to the Board Secretary as soon as possible. 85.Each member may share his/her views about the issue and the reasons for his/her vote. Consent Calendar 86.There is judicious use of the Consent Calendar, such as minutes, routine District business, some appeals, things already approved in the budget. 87-If a Board Member has a question on a Consent Calendar item for their information only, they are to ask staff ahead of time, rather than having it pulled off for discussion during the meeting. 88.Staff is prepared to report on every agenda item. Public Input on Individual Agenda Items 89.Once public input is closed, further public input will not be allowed unless re- opened by Board President. 9o.Citizen's, Board President's and invited guests' comments will be limited to a reasonable time. 9i.Board President will allow other Board Members to speak first and then give his/her views vld summarizes. Public Comment Section of the Agenda 92.Public continents shall be limited to 3 minutes per speaker. 93.Each speaker will be thanked. 6 or8 EVWD— Oeorti of Directoi�Nouns and Piucedu/es 94.Generally, Board Members will not respond to Public Comments except for the Board President referring matters to the General Manager for follow up. Occasionally, a quick informational response is appropriate when an obvious answer is available. The Board of Directors will not debate or make decisions in response to public comments as they are not agenda matters under consideration. Voting 9 5.F.veryone may speak before a motion. 96.Attempts will be made to get consensus on significant policy issues. )7.'there will be roll call votes on request when a divided Board is obvious. 98.Department beads will generally attend when asked by the General Manager. 99.Board of Directors member discussions will not be redundant if they concur with what has already been said. Closed Session ioo.Closed Session materials and conversations are confidential; Board Members may retain Closed Session paper documents for analysis; documents must be destroyed when no longer needed/used. Board Members will get written reports for Closed Session items as much as possible; these reports are to be turned in at the end of the meeting. toi_General Manager may ask for Closed Sessions to be held at the convenience of the Board. io2.No violatIon of Closed Session confidentiality; Board Members will not tall(to affected / opposing parties or anyone else (press, etc.) per the Brown Act at specific Closed Session meetings. ro3.Con fidentiality relates to any non-public discussion items. Special Meetin ,s 104.SPecial meetings may be called by Board President pursuant to the Brown Act. COMM1I7EES AND BOARDS io5.Problem solving issues with Committees will be done as much as possible with Chairs. 1o6.All Committees of Board of Directors should know Board's needs: • 'Co know Board's vision/mission. • Encouraged to participate in Board-sponsored events. • Understanding of their roles/authority/"no--no's." 7 ol'8 EVWO— ltonrd of Olcecfrns Nouns nod Proredures • To know annual priorities/goals. • Process/parameters within which to work, i.e., citizen involvement. • Board of Directors reserves the right to make its own decisions. 107.Board President and Vice President are encouraged to receive annual support training. io8.All Board Members will receive annual training. These Board Norms will be reviewed on an annual basis. Approved: July 27, 2010 Approved July 27'1�, 2010 8 of8 BOARD AGENDA STAFF' REPORT Meeting Date: March 28,2012 East Valley V•/ater District Public Hearing: ❑ Discussion Item: ED Consent Item: 17-1 March 12, 2012 FO: GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS FROM: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD SUBJECT: RE'✓IEW BOARD COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS AND JURISTICTIONS RECOMMENDATION: Consider possible changes to Board Committee assignments and better define roles of the established Committees with impute from District Legal Council BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Chairman of the EVWD Board of Directors assigns Committee Members on an annual basis. The Chairman is requesting the full Board of Directors to consider changes to the current Committee assignments. It is also requested that the Board consider revisions to the topics that the Personnel Committee considers after a discussion from District Legal Counsel. REVIEW BY OTHERS This agenda item has not by others. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Recommended by: Matt Levesque Chairman of the Board ;4p„ Pagel 1 SRM0079 topEast Valley Water District EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT STANDING COMMITTEE STRUCTURE Finance Committee The purpose of the Finance Committee is to review, advise and recommend options to the Board of and the General Manager with regard to financial reports, rates, revenues, fees, charges, reserve funds, fund transfers, purchasing procedures, the budget, etc. Personnel Committee The purpose of the Personnel Committee is to review, study, advise and recommend options to the Board and General Manager with regard to personnel matters, promotions involving salary adjustments, appointments of new positions, employee disciplinary action review, wage and benefit issues, etc. Legislative and Public Affairs Committee The purpose of the Legislative & Public Affairs Committee is to review, study, advise and recommend to the Board and the General Manager with regard to community relations, legislation, public relations, press releases, public information, water conservation, customer communications, etc. Engineering and Facilities Committee The purpose of the Engineering and Facilities Committee is to review and study all engineering-related issues, which includes the District's capital improvement projects. The Committee shall also review the purchase of property, and disposition of unused, surplus property. The Committee will also review and study facility issues,which include such tasks as new District facility design, construction and remodeling. c stVa,lley eEaater District Board Memorandum No. B-02-2012 Date: March 28, 2012 From: John Vega, Assis-:ant General Manager p' Subject: District participation in SCE Pump Efficiency Program Recommendation : Information only. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Southern California Edison (SCE) offers utilities a service that provides free Pump Efficiency Testing. The pump testing is conducted annually with a focus on large energy users such as well and booster motors. The program is available on a first-come, first-served basis and offers a limited amount of funding based on meeting a series of program requirements for each individual pumping facility. Once the initial requirements are met, the utility will submit an Energy Management Solutions Incentive Application. The application will then need to be approved by a SCE which will then put each approved facility in line for available incentives. Payment for incentives are only made after all program requirements are met and the facility upgrades have been completed. Total incentive payments will not exceed 50110 of the total project cost and are subject to a calculated savings approach based on the amount of power consumed, in kilo watt hours (kWh) from the previous year and an estimated amount of kWh that will be used after realizing the increased efficiency. SCE will then provide the District with an overall efficiency report and a cost analysis of the energy use. District staff has been actively involved with the pump efficiency program and have taken advantage of the free testing services offered by SCE. In 2011, staff identified three (3) pumping facilities. Plants 125, 142 & 143 that were exhibiting low pump efficiency ratings near 60%. In response, staff began working closely with SCE to determine the extent of the rehabilitation and replacement work that would provide the necessary performance improvements to increase efficiency while meeting the program requirements to receive available incentive funding. Staff completed the rehabilitation work, for all three sites earlier this year, for a total cost of $148,000. Not only do these three pumping facilities now have energy efficient equipment, it will result in less energy consumed and less expense to the District. As a successful applicant in the SCE program, the District was awarded three individual rebate incentive checks totaling $54,819. The total project cost of$148,000, less the total rebate incentive of$54,819, resulted in 'm a net cost to the District of$93,181. The new high efficiency equipment is estimated to save as much as 800,000 kWh annually. At $0.09/kWh, that is an overall annual potential savings to the Page I I AGENDA DATE: MARCH 28, 2012 SUBJECT: DISTRICT PARTICIPATION IN SCE PUMP EFFICIENCY PROGRAM District of $72,000. Please note that the estimated savings is based on optimal efficiency and time of use which is determined by system demands seasonally. The success of this program is a credit to the commitment and dedication of staff members Becky Kasten, Accounting Supervisor and Mike Henderson, Water Production Superintendent who have worked to take advantage of an opportunity that SCE offers. Page 12