Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 11/10/2021BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 10, 2021 East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to 103,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of San Bernardino County. EVWD operates under the direction of a 5­member elected Board. GOVERNING BOARD MANAGEMENT David E. Smith Chairman of the Board John Mura General Manager/CEO Phillip R. Goodrich Vice Chairman Brian Tompkins Chief Financial Officer Chris Carrillo Governing Board Member Jeff Noelte Director of Engineering & Operations Ronald L. Coats Governing Board Member Kelly Malloy Director of Strategic Services James Morales, Jr. Governing Board Member Kerrie Bryan Director of Administrative Services Justine Hendricksen District Clerk Patrick Milroy  Operations Manager Rocky Welborn  Water Reclamation Manager EVWD Regular Board Meeting November 10, 2021 ­ 5:30 PM 31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346 Via Teleconference In an effort to protect public health and pursuant to Resolution 2021.19, an active State of Emergency still exists and continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person; therefore, there will be no physical location to attend this meeting in person and it will be held via teleconference. Members of the public are invited to make a public comment telephonically during the public comment section of the meeting and after each agenda item. In addition, a public comment card may be submitted prior to the start of the meeting, or a request may be submitted to the District Clerk via email at jhendricksen@eastvalley.org. Anyone wishing to join the meeting may do so using the following information: DIAL: 1­209­425­5876 and enter CONFERENCE ID: 878 461 520# You may also join by clicking HERE to join the meeting via Microsoft Teams. PLEASE NOTE: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111 Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are available on the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability­related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerk at (909) 885­4900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting. In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesday meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a Speaker Card and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the State of California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically be referred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at a future meeting. 1.AGENDA This agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes a determination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action on the item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda. a.Approval of Agenda 2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board of Directors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no discussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unless members of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific items to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar. a.Financial Statements for September 2021 b.Approve Directors' Fees and Expenses for October 2021 c.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.22 ­ Findings and Determinations Regarding Teleconference Meetings 3.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a.Redesign of the Current Monthly Bill b.Conservation Update 4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS a.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.17 ­ Replacing Reimbursement Resolution 2019.02 b.Consider Approval of Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Contract for the Sterling Natural Resource Center 5.REPORTS a.Board of Directors’ Reports b.General Manager/CEO Report c.Legal Counsel Report d.Board of Directors’ Comments ADJOURN BOARD OF DIRECTORSNOVEMBER 10, 2021East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to103,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of SanBernardino County.EVWD operates under the direction of a 5­member elected Board.GOVERNING BOARD MANAGEMENTDavid E. SmithChairman of the Board John MuraGeneral Manager/CEOPhillip R. GoodrichVice Chairman Brian TompkinsChief Financial OfficerChris CarrilloGoverning Board Member Jeff NoelteDirector of Engineering & OperationsRonald L. CoatsGoverning Board Member Kelly MalloyDirector of Strategic ServicesJames Morales, Jr.Governing Board Member Kerrie BryanDirector of Administrative ServicesJustine HendricksenDistrict ClerkPatrick Milroy  Operations Manager Rocky Welborn  Water Reclamation Manager EVWD Regular Board Meeting November 10, 2021 ­ 5:30 PM 31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346 Via Teleconference In an effort to protect public health and pursuant to Resolution 2021.19, an active State of Emergency still exists and continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person; therefore, there will be no physical location to attend this meeting in person and it will be held via teleconference. Members of the public are invited to make a public comment telephonically during the public comment section of the meeting and after each agenda item. In addition, a public comment card may be submitted prior to the start of the meeting, or a request may be submitted to the District Clerk via email at jhendricksen@eastvalley.org. Anyone wishing to join the meeting may do so using the following information: DIAL: 1­209­425­5876 and enter CONFERENCE ID: 878 461 520# You may also join by clicking HERE to join the meeting via Microsoft Teams. PLEASE NOTE: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111 Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are available on the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability­related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerk at (909) 885­4900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting. In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesday meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a Speaker Card and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the State of California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically be referred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at a future meeting. 1.AGENDA This agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes a determination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action on the item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda. a.Approval of Agenda 2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board of Directors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no discussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unless members of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific items to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar. a.Financial Statements for September 2021 b.Approve Directors' Fees and Expenses for October 2021 c.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.22 ­ Findings and Determinations Regarding Teleconference Meetings 3.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a.Redesign of the Current Monthly Bill b.Conservation Update 4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS a.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.17 ­ Replacing Reimbursement Resolution 2019.02 b.Consider Approval of Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Contract for the Sterling Natural Resource Center 5.REPORTS a.Board of Directors’ Reports b.General Manager/CEO Report c.Legal Counsel Report d.Board of Directors’ Comments ADJOURN BOARD OF DIRECTORSNOVEMBER 10, 2021East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to103,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of SanBernardino County.EVWD operates under the direction of a 5­member elected Board.GOVERNING BOARD MANAGEMENTDavid E. SmithChairman of the Board John MuraGeneral Manager/CEOPhillip R. GoodrichVice Chairman Brian TompkinsChief Financial OfficerChris CarrilloGoverning Board Member Jeff NoelteDirector of Engineering & OperationsRonald L. CoatsGoverning Board Member Kelly MalloyDirector of Strategic ServicesJames Morales, Jr.Governing Board Member Kerrie BryanDirector of Administrative ServicesJustine HendricksenDistrict ClerkPatrick Milroy Operations ManagerRocky Welborn Water Reclamation ManagerEVWD Regular Board MeetingNovember 10, 2021 ­ 5:30 PM31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346Via TeleconferenceIn an effort to protect public health and pursuant to Resolution 2021.19, an active State ofEmergency still exists and continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meetsafely in person; therefore, there will be no physical location to attend this meeting inperson and it will be held via teleconference.Members of the public are invited to make a public comment telephonically during the publiccomment section of the meeting and after each agenda item. In addition, a public commentcard may be submitted prior to the start of the meeting, or a request may be submitted tothe District Clerk via email at jhendricksen@eastvalley.org.Anyone wishing to join the meeting may do so using the following information:DIAL: 1­209­425­5876 and enter CONFERENCE ID: 878 461 520#You may also join by clicking HERE to join the meeting via Microsoft Teams.PLEASE NOTE:Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of theagenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are availableon the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post thedocuments before the meeting.Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability­relatedmodification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in orderto participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerkat (909) 885­4900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting. In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesday meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a Speaker Card and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the State of California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically be referred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at a future meeting. 1.AGENDA This agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes a determination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action on the item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda. a.Approval of Agenda 2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board of Directors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no discussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unless members of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific items to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar. a.Financial Statements for September 2021 b.Approve Directors' Fees and Expenses for October 2021 c.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.22 ­ Findings and Determinations Regarding Teleconference Meetings 3.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a.Redesign of the Current Monthly Bill b.Conservation Update 4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS a.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.17 ­ Replacing Reimbursement Resolution 2019.02 b.Consider Approval of Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Contract for the Sterling Natural Resource Center 5.REPORTS a.Board of Directors’ Reports b.General Manager/CEO Report c.Legal Counsel Report d.Board of Directors’ Comments ADJOURN BOARD OF DIRECTORSNOVEMBER 10, 2021East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to103,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of SanBernardino County.EVWD operates under the direction of a 5­member elected Board.GOVERNING BOARD MANAGEMENTDavid E. SmithChairman of the Board John MuraGeneral Manager/CEOPhillip R. GoodrichVice Chairman Brian TompkinsChief Financial OfficerChris CarrilloGoverning Board Member Jeff NoelteDirector of Engineering & OperationsRonald L. CoatsGoverning Board Member Kelly MalloyDirector of Strategic ServicesJames Morales, Jr.Governing Board Member Kerrie BryanDirector of Administrative ServicesJustine HendricksenDistrict ClerkPatrick Milroy Operations ManagerRocky Welborn Water Reclamation ManagerEVWD Regular Board MeetingNovember 10, 2021 ­ 5:30 PM31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346Via TeleconferenceIn an effort to protect public health and pursuant to Resolution 2021.19, an active State ofEmergency still exists and continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meetsafely in person; therefore, there will be no physical location to attend this meeting inperson and it will be held via teleconference.Members of the public are invited to make a public comment telephonically during the publiccomment section of the meeting and after each agenda item. In addition, a public commentcard may be submitted prior to the start of the meeting, or a request may be submitted tothe District Clerk via email at jhendricksen@eastvalley.org.Anyone wishing to join the meeting may do so using the following information:DIAL: 1­209­425­5876 and enter CONFERENCE ID: 878 461 520#You may also join by clicking HERE to join the meeting via Microsoft Teams.PLEASE NOTE:Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of theagenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are availableon the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post thedocuments before the meeting.Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability­relatedmodification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in orderto participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerkat (909) 885­4900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting.In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filedwith the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesdaymeeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board ofDirectors.CALL TO ORDERPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERSPUBLIC COMMENTSAny person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a SpeakerCard and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker islimited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the Stateof California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or takingaction on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically bereferred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at afuture meeting.1.AGENDAThis agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered.Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item notappearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes adetermination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action onthe item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of theagenda.a.Approval of Agenda2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDARAll matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board ofDirectors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be nodiscussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unlessmembers of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific itemsto be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar.a.Financial Statements for September 2021b.Approve Directors' Fees and Expenses for October 2021c.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.22 ­ Findings and DeterminationsRegarding Teleconference Meetings3.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a.Redesign of the Current Monthly Bill b.Conservation Update 4.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS a.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.17 ­ Replacing Reimbursement Resolution 2019.02 b.Consider Approval of Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Contract for the Sterling Natural Resource Center 5.REPORTS a.Board of Directors’ Reports b.General Manager/CEO Report c.Legal Counsel Report d.Board of Directors’ Comments ADJOURN Agenda Item #2a November 10, 20211 2 1 5 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #2a Consent Item Regular Board Meeting TO: Governing Board Members FROM: General Manager/CEO SUBJECT: Financial Statements for September 2021 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors (Board) accept and file the attached financial statements as of, and for the period ended, September 30, 2021. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS Included herewith for the Board’s review is a summary of East Valley Water District’s financial results, as of September 30, 2021. AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability A. Practice Transparent and Accountable Fiscal Management REVIEW BY OTHERS This agenda item has been reviewed by the Finance Department. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Recommended by: ________________ John Mura General Manager/CEO Respectfully submitted: ________________ Brian Tompkins Chief Financial Officer Agenda Item #2a November 10, 20212 2 1 5 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #2a Consent Item ATTACHMENTS 1. September 2021 Financial Statement Monthly Review 2. September 2021 Financial Statements FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MONTHLY REVIEW MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 page | 1 The following is a highlight summary of the District’s financial results as of September 30, 2021. Please note all values presented are in millions (unless otherwise noted). Statement of Net Position Total assets at September 30, 2021 are $359.49 million. CLASSIFICATION WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT TOTAL Cash and Investments $ 10.09 $ 6.43 $ 16.52 Utility Plant, Net 103.48 18.21 121.69 Other Assets 44.56 176.72 221.28 Current Liabilities 5.35 27.95 33.30 Long Term Liabilities 48.40 134.73 183.13 Beginning Net Position 101.56 38.33 139.89 Change in Equity 2.83 0.34 3.17 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 104.39 $ 38.67 $ 143.06 Cash and Investments are $16.52 million for the month of September, an increase of $183 thousand from the prior month. In September, the District paid $8.7 million for construction costs invoiced through August. The Water Fund’s Due from Other Governments includes Claim 22 for construction costs incurred for the SNRC bringing the ending balance to $11.35 million. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MONTHLY REVIEW MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 page | 2 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 Mi l l i o n s CASH & INVESTMENTS Restricted Unrestricted Comparing current assets to current liabilities, the District has a current ratio at September 30, 2021 of 1.33 to 1, with 2 to 1 being an indication of sound financial condition. Statement of Revenues & Expenses Operating results are presented in three ways in the attached financial statements for the period ending September 30, 2021. First is a one-page summary with monthly and year- to-date totals for revenue and expenses, presented by Expense Category. Second is a one-page summary with monthly and year-to-date totals for Revenues and Expense by Program. Third is a Budget-to-Actual presentation of program expense detail. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MONTHLY REVIEW MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 page | 3 Total Revenues & Expenses through September 30, 2021 are summarized below (in millions): Column1 WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT TOTAL Revenue $ 8.46 $ 3.59 $ 12.05 Expense 5.64 3.25 8.89 Water Sales for the month ending September 30, 2021 were $1.69M; $202K under staff projections for the month and $282K over projections year-to-date. $- $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 Mi l l i o n s WATER SALES BY TIER Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 FY 2021-22 Projection FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MONTHLY REVIEW MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 page | 4 Water Sales by Customer Class The table below shows the District’s water sales for the month of September 2021 by customer class. The following icons are to compliment the graph below: positive change, no change, negative change when comparing actuals versus projections. CUSTOMER CLASS ACTUAL PROJECTION $ VARIANCE % VARIANCE Residential 1,015,932$ 1,067,000$ (51,068)$ -5% Multi-Family 309,721 371,000 (61,279) -17% Commercial 118,987 154,000 (35,013) -23% Irrigation 249,605 305,000 (55,395) -18% TOTAL $1,694,245 $ 1,897,000 $ (202,755)-11% The following table displays customer class by tier for the month of September 2021: CUSTOMER CLASS TIER ACTUAL PROJECTION $ VARIANCE % VARIANCE Residential Tier 1 326,325$ 336,000$ (9,675)$ -3% Residential Tier 2 493,079 498,000 (4,921) -1% Residential Tier 3 196,528 233,000 (36,472) -16% Multi-Family Tier 1 135,418 143,000 (7,582) -5% Multi-Family Tier 2 103,515 136,000 (32,485) -24% Multi-Family Tier 3 70,788 92,000 (21,212) -23% Commercial Tier 1 86,026 93,000 (6,974) -7% Commercial Tier 2 5,891 11,000 (5,109) -46% Commercial Tier 3 27,070 50,000 (22,930) -46% Irrigation Tier 2 148,981 176,000 (27,019) -15% Irrigation Tier 3 100,624 129,000 (28,376) -22% TOTAL $ 1,694,245 $ 1,897,000 $ (202,755)-11% Legend - Positive Change in Actuals - Neutral Change in Actuals - Negative Change in Actuals FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MONTHLY REVIEW MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 page | 5 The chart below is a comparative illustration of Water Revenue year-to-date compared to last year’s Water Revenue year-to-date as of September 2020. As noted in the graph, Water Revenue experienced a decrease over last year. Water consumption decreased 76.9 million gallons (102K HCF) compared to September of 2020. $- $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 $8.0 $9.0 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 Mi l l i o n s COMPARATIVE MONTHLY WATER REVENUE (WATER SALES & METER CHARGES) Meter Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Total -$8,473,682 Total -$8,193,648 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MONTHLY REVIEW MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 page | 6 Water Fund Activities by Cost Center The graph below provides a year-to-date comparison of the Water Fund operating cost centers for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MONTHLY REVIEW MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 page | 7 Wastewater Fund Activities by Cost Center The graph below provides a year-to-date comparison of the Wastewater Fund operating cost centers for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT TOTAL Assets: Current Assets: 01 Cash and Cash Equivalents 1,114,563.28$ -$ 1,114,563.28$ 02 Investments 2,417,572.36 1,361,154.14 3,778,726.50 03 Accounts Receivable, Net 5,968,125.35 339,941.15 6,308,066.50 04 -Interest Receivable - 3,377.19 3,377.19 14*05 Other Receivables 843,656.98 - 843,656.98 07 Due from Sewer Fund 19,983,458.08 - 19,983,458.08 06 Due from Other Governments 4,183,907.01 7,170,026.09 11,353,933.10 08 Inventory 489,534.44 6,721.16 496,255.60 09 Prepaid Expenses 313,149.32 55,806.64 368,955.96 35,313,966.82 8,937,026.37 44,250,993.19 Non-Current Assets: 10 Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents 6,562,514.21 5,065,463.97 11,627,978.18 11 Capital Assets not being Depreciated 9,316,982.40 167,981,153.55 177,298,135.95 13 Capital Assets, Net 103,484,661.07 18,214,035.68 121,698,696.75 119,364,157.68 191,260,653.20 310,624,810.88 Total Assets:154,678,124.50 200,197,679.57 354,875,804.07 Deferred Outflow Of Resources 24*Deferred Charge on Refunding 644,319.05 302,123.06 946,442.11 25 Deferred Outflows - Pensions 2,812,884.34 857,570.73 3,670,455.07 158,135,327.89 201,357,373.36 359,492,701.25 Current Liabilities: 22 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses 1,205,245.03 27,441.76 1,232,686.79 29 Due to Water Fund - 19,983,458.08 19,983,458.08 23 Accrued Payroll and Benefits 3,726.94 - 3,726.94 15 Customer Service Deposits 1,323,621.07 - 1,323,621.07 16 Construction Advances and Retentions 106,291.60 7,680,955.61 7,787,247.21 17 Accrued Interest Payable 107,096.97 25,124.88 132,221.85 18 Current Portion of Compensated Absences 494,407.20 135,849.80 630,257.00 19 Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 2,113,921.97 96,250.00 2,210,171.97 5,354,310.78 27,949,080.13 33,303,390.91 Non-Current Liabilities: 20 Compensated Absences, less current portion 383,387.82 92,316.94 475,704.76 28 Net Pension Liability 9,421,282.28 2,892,011.95 12,313,294.23 21 Long Term Debt, Less Current Portion 38,320,169.37 131,688,717.10 170,008,886.47 27 Other Liabilities 1,173.64 - 1,173.64 Deferred Inflows Of Resources 26 Deferred Inflows - Pensions 273,164.94 57,715.59 330,880.53 48,399,178.05 134,730,761.58 183,129,939.63 53,753,488.83 162,679,841.71 216,433,330.54 31 Equity 101,555,878.78 38,334,928.45 139,890,807.23 101,555,878.78 38,334,928.45 139,890,807.23 Tot Total Revenue 8,463,978.68 3,592,635.78 12,056,614.46 Tot Total Expense 5,638,018.40 3,250,032.58 8,888,050.98 2,825,960.28 342,603.20 3,168,563.48 104,381,839.06 38,677,531.65 143,059,370.71 158,135,327.89$ 201,357,373.36$ 359,492,701.25$ Total Liabilities, Equity and Current Surplus (Deficit): Total Total Beginning Equity: Equity: Revenues Over/Under Expenses Total Current Liabilities: Total Non-Current and Deferred Inflows of Resources: Total Liabilities and Deferred Inflows of Resources: Unaudited As of September 30, 2021 Combining Schedule of Net Position Total Equity and Current Surplus (Deficit): Total Assets and Deferred Outflows of Resources: Total Current Assets: Total Non-Current Assets: Page 1 of 8 AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED REMAINING MTD YTD BUDGET MTD YTD BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BUDGET Revenue 41 Water Sales 1,694,244.81$ 5,917,028.52$ 17,488,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 17,488,000.00$ 11,570,971.48$ 42 Meter Charges 759,210.76 2,276,619.50 9,280,000.00 - - - 9,280,000.00 7,003,380.50 43 Penalties 20,319.56 57,721.08 134,000.00 8,438.10 23,904.43 130,000.00 264,000.00 182,374.49 44 Wastewater System Charges - - - 388,818.74 1,195,106.39 4,815,000.00 4,815,000.00 3,619,893.61 45 Wastewater Treatment Charges - - - 691,052.23 2,225,598.68 8,708,000.00 8,708,000.00 6,482,401.32 46 Other Operating Revenue 93,940.42 205,672.70 56,000.00 29,078.00 148,026.28 649,000.00 705,000.00 351,301.02 47 Non Operating Revenue 1,771.53 6,936.88 214,000.00 - - 30,000.00 244,000.00 237,063.12 48 Gain or Loss on Disposition - - - - - - - - 56 Benefits - - - - - - - - 68 Depreciation - - - - - - - - Revenue Total: 2,569,487.08 8,463,978.68 27,172,000.00 1,117,387.07 3,592,635.78 14,332,000.00 41,504,000.00 29,447,385.54 - - - - - Expense by Category 51 Labor 408,379.68 1,071,936.89 5,440,500.00 115,979.69 275,669.17 2,239,500.00 7,680,000.00 6,332,393.94 56 Benefits 142,669.69 1,345,037.97 2,934,350.00 37,559.25 377,669.30 1,086,650.00 4,021,000.00 2,298,292.73 63 Contract Services 431,268.27 857,521.54 4,689,100.00 747,599.34 2,376,514.33 9,389,900.00 14,079,000.00 10,644,964.13 65 Professional Development 4,301.96 43,611.60 321,650.00 988.45 15,418.40 102,350.00 424,000.00 364,970.00 53 Overtime 35,795.94 88,874.41 356,100.00 919.22 3,071.33 30,900.00 387,000.00 295,054.26 62 Materials and Supplies 261,035.80 515,567.04 1,268,450.00 10,048.30 24,198.11 315,550.00 1,584,000.00 1,044,234.85 64 Utilities 44,635.23 571,098.45 2,620,650.00 10,290.87 19,880.94 177,350.00 2,798,000.00 2,207,020.61 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 67 Other 10,508.55 630,048.44 866,200.00 2,520.01 157,127.24 161,800.00 1,028,000.00 240,824.32 54 Standby 2,800.00 7,176.87 33,000.00 180.00 483.76 2,000.00 35,000.00 27,339.37 61 Water Supply - 491,554.00 768,000.00 - - - 768,000.00 276,446.00 71 -Debt Service 15,591.19 15,591.19 3,082,000.00 - - 270,000.00 3,352,000.00 3,336,408.81 81 -Capital Improvement 39,116.75 4,744.88 3,712,000.00 238,542.21 267,076.21 217,000.00 3,929,000.00 3,657,178.91 82 -Capital Outlay 44,482.00 44,482.00 1,080,000.00 - - 50,000.00 1,130,000.00 1,085,518.00 83 -Accounting Income Add back (83,598.75) (49,226.88) - (238,542.21) (267,076.21) - - 316,303.09 Expense Total: 1,356,986.31 5,638,018.40 27,172,000.00 926,085.13 3,250,032.58 14,043,000.00 41,215,000.00 32,126,949.02 Total Surplus (Deficit):1,212,500.77$ 2,825,960.28$ -$ 191,301.94$ 342,603.20$ -$ -$ -$ Unaudited Revenue and Expense Budget-to-Actual by Category Month Ended September 30, 2021 WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT WIDE Page 2 of 8 AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED REMAINING MTD YTD BUDGET MTD YTD BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BUDGET Revenue 41 Water Sales 1,694,244.81$ 5,917,028.52$ 17,488,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 17,488,000.00$ 11,570,971.48$ 42 Meter Charges 759,210.76 2,276,619.50 9,280,000.00 - - - 9,280,000.00 7,003,380.50 43 Penalties 20,319.56 57,721.08 134,000.00 8,438.10 23,904.43 130,000.00 264,000.00 182,374.49 44 Wastewater System Charges - - - 388,818.74 1,195,106.39 4,815,000.00 4,815,000.00 3,619,893.61 45 Wastewater Treatment Charges - - - 691,052.23 2,225,598.68 8,708,000.00 8,708,000.00 6,482,401.32 46 Other Operating Revenue 93,940.42 205,672.70 56,000.00 29,078.00 148,026.28 649,000.00 705,000.00 351,301.02 47 Non Operating Revenue 1,771.53 6,936.88 214,000.00 - - 30,000.00 244,000.00 237,063.12 Revenue Total: 2,569,487.08 8,463,978.68 27,172,000.00 1,117,387.07 3,592,635.78 14,332,000.00 41,504,000.00 29,447,385.54 - - - - - Progra 1000 - Board of Directors 9,964.09 37,456.67 170,800.00 4,270.33 16,052.89 73,200.00 244,000.00 190,490.44 Progra 2000 - General Administration 62,756.21 238,616.30 931,500.00 25,088.48 94,814.33 397,500.00 1,329,000.00 995,569.37 Progra 2100 - Human Resources 31,258.02 742,584.97 1,322,400.00 7,778.89 192,147.50 349,600.00 1,672,000.00 737,267.53 Progra 2200 - Public Affairs 47,776.51 154,300.31 1,340,900.00 23,513.37 101,817.45 503,100.00 1,844,000.00 1,587,882.24 Progra 2300 - Conservation 46,779.97 70,990.61 614,000.00 - - - 614,000.00 543,009.39 Progra 3000 - Finance 62,798.09 265,391.19 890,250.00 26,851.20 109,560.57 380,750.00 1,271,000.00 896,048.24 Progra 3200 - Information Technology 32,806.06 150,637.24 895,900.00 20,692.39 79,046.81 341,100.00 1,237,000.00 1,007,315.95 Progra 3300 - Customer Service 93,923.79 256,847.35 1,022,400.00 45,640.57 121,174.42 424,600.00 1,447,000.00 1,068,978.23 Progra 3400 - Meter Service 17,836.50 65,506.82 321,000.00 - 107.17 - 321,000.00 255,386.01 Progra 4000 - Engineering 56,553.39 233,916.61 1,114,400.00 21,673.71 92,079.33 477,600.00 1,592,000.00 1,266,004.06 Progra 5000 - Water Production 276,522.25 1,605,821.39 4,539,000.00 - - - 4,539,000.00 2,933,178.61 Progra 5100 - Water Treatment 75,218.73 274,229.89 900,000.00 - - - 900,000.00 625,770.11 Progra 5200 - Water Quality 32,895.68 151,777.71 521,000.00 - - - 521,000.00 369,222.29 Progra 6000 - Field Maintenance Administration 23,199.45 187,395.48 378,000.00 2,556.43 11,272.91 42,000.00 420,000.00 221,331.61 Progra 6100 - Water Maintenance 319,394.65 787,957.19 2,808,000.00 - - - 2,658,000.00 1,870,042.81 Progra 6200 - Wastewater Maintenance - - - 726,528.01 2,370,354.86 10,216,000.00 10,216,000.00 7,845,645.14 Progra 7000 - Facilities Maintenance 86,104.39 240,785.37 971,750.00 11,751.61 41,499.37 244,250.00 1,216,000.00 933,715.26 Progra 7100 - Fleet Maintenance 65,607.34 158,212.11 506,700.00 9,740.14 20,104.97 56,300.00 563,000.00 384,682.92 Progra 8000 - Capital 15,591.19 15,591.19 7,874,000.00 - - 537,000.00 8,411,000.00 8,395,408.81 Total Surplus (Deficit):1,212,500.77$ 2,825,960.28$ -$ 191,301.94$ 342,603.20$ -$ -$ -$ Revenue and Expense Budget-to-Actual by Program Month Ended September 30, 2021 Unaudited WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT WIDE Page 3 of 8 AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED REMAINING MTD YTD BUDGET MTD YTD BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BUDGET Revenue 41 Water Sales 1,694,244.81$ 5,917,028.52$ 17,288,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 17,288,000.00$ 11,370,971.48$ 42 Meter Charges 759,210.76 2,276,619.50 9,280,000.00 - - - 9,280,000.00 7,003,380.50 43 Penalties 20,319.56 57,721.08 134,000.00 8,438.10 23,904.43 130,000.00 264,000.00 182,374.49 44 Wastewater System Charges - - - 388,818.74 1,195,106.39 4,815,000.00 4,815,000.00 3,619,893.61 45 Wastewater Treatment Charges - - - 691,052.23 2,225,598.68 8,708,000.00 8,708,000.00 6,482,401.32 46 Other Operating Revenue 93,940.42 205,672.70 56,000.00 29,078.00 148,026.28 649,000.00 705,000.00 351,301.02 47 Non Operating Revenue 1,771.53 6,936.88 214,000.00 - - 30,000.00 244,000.00 237,063.12 48 Gain or Loss on Disposition - - - - - - - - 56 Benefits - - - - - - - - 68 Depreciation - - - - - - - - Revenue Total: 2,569,487.08 8,463,978.68 26,972,000.00 1,117,387.07 3,592,635.78 14,332,000.00 41,304,000.00 29,247,385.54 Program: 1000 - Board of Directors - - - 51 Labor 5,390.00$ 15,557.50$ 73,500.00$ 2,310.00$ 6,667.50$ 31,500.00$ 105,000.00$ 82,775.00$ 56 Benefits 3,887.08 16,781.45 61,600.00 1,665.90 7,192.08 26,400.00 88,000.00 64,026.47 62 Materials and Supplies 105.00 105.00 1,400.00 45.00 45.00 600.00 2,000.00 1,850.00 63 Contract Services 63.42 63.42 13,300.00 27.18 27.18 5,700.00 19,000.00 18,909.40 65 Professional Development 518.59 4,949.30 21,000.00 222.25 2,121.13 9,000.00 30,000.00 22,929.57 Program: 1000 - Board of Directors Total: 9,964.09 37,456.67 170,800.00 4,270.33 16,052.89 73,200.00 244,000.00 190,490.44 Program: 2000 - General Administration - - - 51 Labor 27,430.64 71,662.81 387,100.00 11,756.00 27,867.62 165,900.00 553,000.00 453,469.57 53 Overtime 142.82 273.26 2,100.00 61.20 100.37 900.00 3,000.00 2,626.37 56 Benefits 10,944.96 109,812.32 237,300.00 2,883.65 42,474.37 101,700.00 339,000.00 186,713.31 62 Materials and Supplies 17.50 349.19 3,500.00 7.50 149.65 1,500.00 5,000.00 4,501.16 63 Contract Services 23,155.30 36,175.30 209,300.00 9,923.70 15,503.70 89,700.00 299,000.00 247,321.00 64 Utilities 224.37 373.72 2,800.00 96.16 160.17 1,200.00 4,000.00 3,466.11 65 Professional Development 840.62 19,969.70 89,400.00 360.27 8,558.45 36,600.00 126,000.00 97,471.85 Program: 2000 - General Administration Total: 62,756.21 238,616.30 931,500.00 25,088.48 94,814.33 397,500.00 1,329,000.00 995,569.37 Program: 2100 - Human Resources - - - - 51 Labor 12,773.83 34,172.22 207,200.00 3,193.57 7,393.76 88,800.00 296,000.00 254,434.02 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime - - 2,100.00 - - 900.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 56 Benefits 5,309.44 55,917.39 120,400.00 1,327.47 21,810.94 51,600.00 172,000.00 94,271.67 62 Materials and Supplies - - 4,900.00 - - 2,100.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 63 Contract Services 2,961.30 12,008.94 87,200.00 696.57 2,883.47 28,800.00 116,000.00 101,107.59 64 Utilities 44.26 88.52 700.00 18.97 37.94 300.00 1,000.00 873.54 65 Professional Development 89.20 11,903.07 39,200.00 22.30 2,897.64 16,800.00 56,000.00 41,199.29 67 Other 10,079.99 628,494.83 860,700.00 2,520.01 157,123.75 160,300.00 1,021,000.00 235,381.42 Program: 2100 - Human Resources Total: 31,258.02 742,584.97 1,322,400.00 7,778.89 192,147.50 349,600.00 1,672,000.00 737,267.53 Month Ended September 30, 2021 Unaudited Program Expense Detail Budget-to-Actual WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT WIDE Page 4 of 8 AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED REMAINING MTD YTD BUDGET MTD YTD BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BUDGET Month Ended September 30, 2021 Unaudited Program Expense Detail Budget-to-Actual WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT WIDE Program: 2200 - Public Affairs - - - - 51 Labor 28,590.24 74,516.86 398,400.00 11,532.16 27,420.81 170,600.00 569,000.00 467,062.33 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime 70.99 70.99 11,900.00 30.42 30.42 5,100.00 17,000.00 16,898.59 56 Benefits 7,364.97 54,620.06 185,500.00 3,015.60 44,234.77 79,500.00 265,000.00 166,145.17 62 Materials and Supplies 3,289.62 4,032.02 105,700.00 1,410.74 2,349.55 45,300.00 151,000.00 144,618.43 63 Contract Services 8,027.94 20,215.90 583,400.00 7,263.47 26,989.02 178,600.00 762,000.00 714,795.08 64 Utilities 282.29 579.92 29,400.00 196.49 679.49 12,600.00 42,000.00 40,740.59 65 Professional Development 150.46 264.56 26,600.00 64.49 113.39 11,400.00 38,000.00 37,622.05 Program: 2200 - Public Affairs Total: 47,776.51 154,300.31 1,340,900.00 23,513.37 101,817.45 503,100.00 1,844,000.00 1,587,882.24 Program: 2300 - Conservation - - - - 51 Labor 10,228.16 26,711.98 111,000.00 - - - 111,000.00 84,288.02 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime - - 7,000.00 - - - 7,000.00 7,000.00 56 Benefits 2,983.54 8,528.85 40,000.00 - - - 40,000.00 31,471.15 62 Materials and Supplies 29,507.80 21,239.66 176,000.00 - - - 176,000.00 154,760.34 63 Contract Services 3,775.50 14,176.86 213,000.00 - - - 213,000.00 198,823.14 64 Utilities 42.26 90.55 26,000.00 - - - 26,000.00 25,909.45 65 Professional Development 242.71 242.71 41,000.00 - - - 41,000.00 40,757.29 Program: 2300 - Conservation Total: 46,779.97 70,990.61 614,000.00 - - - 614,000.00 543,009.39 Program: 3000 - Finance - - - - 51 Labor 40,550.27 105,721.96 519,400.00 17,346.53 41,260.10 222,600.00 742,000.00 595,017.94 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime 598.27 1,990.16 9,100.00 256.40 769.16 3,900.00 13,000.00 10,240.68 56 Benefits 13,044.13 141,884.90 263,050.00 5,579.52 60,781.66 111,950.00 375,000.00 172,333.44 62 Materials and Supplies 77.33 784.84 7,700.00 33.14 336.36 3,300.00 11,000.00 9,878.80 63 Contract Services 8,000.95 10,870.60 67,200.00 3,409.68 4,639.53 28,800.00 96,000.00 80,489.87 64 Utilities 156.41 497.50 2,800.00 67.04 213.22 1,200.00 4,000.00 3,289.28 65 Professional Development 370.73 3,641.23 20,300.00 158.89 1,560.54 8,700.00 29,000.00 23,798.23 67 Other - - 700.00 - - 300.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 Program: 3000 - Finance Total: 62,798.09 265,391.19 890,250.00 26,851.20 109,560.57 380,750.00 1,271,000.00 896,048.24 Program: 3200 - Information Technology - - - - 51 Labor 14,120.35 36,737.33 256,200.00 11,262.05 26,831.33 109,800.00 366,000.00 302,431.34 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime - - - - - - - - 56 Benefits 3,370.89 26,207.16 139,300.00 2,866.83 14,632.88 59,700.00 199,000.00 158,159.96 62 Materials and Supplies 3,318.00 9,637.29 32,200.00 1,422.01 4,130.26 13,800.00 46,000.00 32,232.45 63 Contract Services 10,859.82 76,417.00 454,900.00 4,654.22 32,750.15 152,100.00 607,000.00 497,832.85 64 Utilities 770.20 1,271.66 4,900.00 330.08 544.99 2,100.00 7,000.00 5,183.35 65 Professional Development 366.80 366.80 8,400.00 157.20 157.20 3,600.00 12,000.00 11,476.00 Program: 3200 - Information Technology Total: 32,806.06 150,637.24 895,900.00 20,692.39 79,046.81 341,100.00 1,237,000.00 1,007,315.95 Page 5 of 8 AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED REMAINING MTD YTD BUDGET MTD YTD BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BUDGET Month Ended September 30, 2021 Unaudited Program Expense Detail Budget-to-Actual WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT WIDE Program: 3300 - Customer Service - - - - 51 Labor 18,883.37 49,170.51 277,100.00 12,068.65 28,882.54 195,900.00 473,000.00 394,946.95 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime 669.19 1,933.00 4,900.00 451.89 1,448.72 2,100.00 7,000.00 3,618.28 56 Benefits 8,141.32 95,053.21 221,600.00 4,919.40 44,066.64 59,400.00 281,000.00 141,880.15 62 Materials and Supplies 521.36 783.71 6,300.00 223.45 335.88 2,700.00 9,000.00 7,880.41 63 Contract Services 49,796.52 91,860.92 379,400.00 21,341.41 39,368.99 112,600.00 492,000.00 360,770.09 64 Utilities 15,483.47 16,492.39 115,100.00 6,635.77 7,068.16 45,900.00 161,000.00 137,439.45 65 Professional Development - - 13,200.00 - - 4,800.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 67 Other 428.56 1,553.61 4,800.00 - 3.49 1,200.00 6,000.00 4,442.90 Program: 3300 - Customer Service Total: 93,923.79 256,847.35 1,022,400.00 45,640.57 121,174.42 424,600.00 1,447,000.00 1,068,978.23 Program: 3400 - Meter Service - - - - 51 Labor 11,260.27 29,713.36 204,000.00 - - - 204,000.00 174,286.64 53 Overtime - 79.94 6,000.00 - - - 6,000.00 5,920.06 56 Benefits 4,962.49 33,067.36 96,000.00 - 15.93 - 96,000.00 62,916.71 62 Materials and Supplies 1,324.25 1,907.94 5,000.00 - 61.42 - 5,000.00 3,030.64 63 Contract Services 141.26 400.32 8,000.00 - 29.82 - 8,000.00 7,569.86 64 Utilities 148.23 337.90 2,000.00 - - - 2,000.00 1,662.10 65 Professional Development - - - - - - - - Program: 3400 - Meter Service Total: 17,836.50 65,506.82 321,000.00 - 107.17 - 321,000.00 255,386.01 Program: 4000 - Engineering - - - - 51 Labor 36,248.64 93,135.73 466,200.00 15,535.07 35,667.92 199,800.00 666,000.00 537,196.35 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime - - 2,100.00 - - 900.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 56 Benefits 9,994.11 121,036.88 130,200.00 4,282.98 51,766.31 55,800.00 186,000.00 13,196.81 62 Materials and Supplies - - 15,400.00 - - 6,600.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 63 Contract Services 4,117.91 8,516.97 343,000.00 1,764.82 2,028.53 147,000.00 490,000.00 479,454.50 64 Utilities 4,623.73 9,658.03 137,900.00 90.84 2,616.57 59,100.00 197,000.00 184,725.40 65 Professional Development 1,569.00 1,569.00 19,600.00 - - 8,400.00 28,000.00 26,431.00 Program: 4000 - Engineering Total: 56,553.39 233,916.61 1,114,400.00 21,673.71 92,079.33 477,600.00 1,592,000.00 1,266,004.06 Program: 5000 - Water Production - - - - 51 Labor 56,998.42 148,512.61 732,000.00 - - - 732,000.00 583,487.39 53 Overtime 5,090.47 12,635.62 22,000.00 - - - 22,000.00 9,364.38 54 Standby 1,100.00 2,909.47 15,000.00 - - - 15,000.00 12,090.53 56 Benefits 17,757.48 226,822.23 406,000.00 - - - 406,000.00 179,177.77 61 Water Supply - 491,554.00 768,000.00 - - - 768,000.00 276,446.00 62 Materials and Supplies 26,292.91 67,572.17 335,000.00 - - - 335,000.00 267,427.83 63 Contract Services 168,519.87 233,669.66 386,000.00 - - - 386,000.00 152,330.34 64 Utilities 733.10 421,765.63 1,864,000.00 - - - 1,864,000.00 1,442,234.37 65 Professional Development 30.00 380.00 11,000.00 - - - 11,000.00 10,620.00 Program: 5000 - Water Production Total: 276,522.25 1,605,821.39 4,539,000.00 - - - 4,539,000.00 2,933,178.61 Page 6 of 8 AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED REMAINING MTD YTD BUDGET MTD YTD BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BUDGET Month Ended September 30, 2021 Unaudited Program Expense Detail Budget-to-Actual WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT WIDE Program: 5100 - Water Treatment - - - - 51 Labor 19,851.20 54,230.43 243,000.00 - - - 243,000.00 188,769.57 53 Overtime 2,872.18 8,662.38 39,000.00 - - - 39,000.00 30,337.62 56 Benefits 6,987.90 77,583.81 147,000.00 - - - 147,000.00 69,416.19 62 Materials and Supplies 44,900.77 48,010.08 170,000.00 - - - 170,000.00 121,989.92 63 Contract Services 352.36 23,804.50 149,000.00 - - - 149,000.00 125,195.50 64 Utilities 254.32 61,938.69 152,000.00 - - - 152,000.00 90,061.31 Program: 5100 - Water Treatment Total: 75,218.73 274,229.89 900,000.00 - - - 900,000.00 625,770.11 Program: 5200 - Water Quality - - - - 51 Labor 15,020.80 39,098.15 216,000.00 - - - 216,000.00 176,901.85 53 Overtime - - 12,000.00 - - - 12,000.00 12,000.00 56 Benefits 4,024.72 84,435.96 100,000.00 - - - 100,000.00 15,564.04 62 Materials and Supplies 6,991.96 8,607.41 18,000.00 - - - 18,000.00 9,392.59 63 Contract Services 6,816.78 19,456.39 167,000.00 - - - 167,000.00 147,543.61 64 Utilities - - 2,000.00 - - - 2,000.00 2,000.00 65 Professional Development 41.42 179.80 6,000.00 - - - 6,000.00 5,820.20 Program: 5200 - Water Quality Total: 32,895.68 151,777.71 521,000.00 - - - 521,000.00 369,222.29 Program: 6000 - Field Maintenance Administration - - - - 51 Labor 13,805.99 35,984.52 180,000.00 1,521.01 3,617.54 20,000.00 200,000.00 160,397.94 52 Temporary Labor - - - - - - - - 53 Overtime - - 1,800.00 - - 200.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 54 Standby 1,700.00 4,267.40 18,000.00 180.00 483.76 2,000.00 20,000.00 15,248.84 56 Benefits 5,128.49 141,549.73 116,100.00 576.54 6,556.20 12,900.00 129,000.00 (19,105.93) 62 Materials and Supplies 221.61 221.61 2,700.00 24.62 24.62 300.00 3,000.00 2,753.77 63 Contract Services 179.30 379.71 900.00 19.92 42.18 100.00 1,000.00 578.11 64 Utilities 2,081.63 4,847.08 36,900.00 231.29 538.56 4,100.00 41,000.00 35,614.36 65 Professional Development 82.43 145.43 21,600.00 3.05 10.05 2,400.00 24,000.00 23,844.52 Program: 6000 - Field Maintenance Administration Total: 23,199.45 187,395.48 378,000.00 2,556.43 11,272.91 42,000.00 420,000.00 221,331.61 Program: 6100 - Water Maintenance - - - - 51 Labor 80,354.98 213,127.36 957,000.00 - - - 957,000.00 743,872.64 53 Overtime 26,352.02 61,737.45 219,000.00 - - - 219,000.00 157,262.55 56 Benefits 32,732.10 94,879.94 544,000.00 - - - 544,000.00 449,120.06 62 Materials and Supplies 122,939.50 298,527.02 301,000.00 - - - 301,000.00 2,472.98 63 Contract Services 57,016.05 119,685.42 637,000.00 - - - 637,000.00 517,314.58 64 Utilities - - - - - - - - Program: 6100 - Water Maintenance Total: 319,394.65 787,957.19 2,658,000.00 - - - 2,658,000.00 1,870,042.81 Program: 6200 - Wastewater Maintenance - - - - 51 Labor - - - 25,858.76 61,552.76 982,000.00 982,000.00 920,447.24 53 Overtime - - - 119.31 361.35 12,000.00 12,000.00 11,638.65 56 Benefits - - - 9,096.93 69,653.82 496,000.00 496,000.00 426,346.18 62 Materials and Supplies - - - 210.46 4,787.66 224,000.00 224,000.00 219,212.34 Wastewater Treatment - - - 691,052.23 2,225,598.68 7,610,000.00 7,610,000.00 5,384,401.32 63 Contract Services - - - 190.32 8,400.59 892,000.00 892,000.00 883,599.41 Program: 6200 - Wastewater Maintenance Total: - - - 726,528.01 2,370,354.86 10,216,000.00 10,216,000.00 7,845,645.14 Page 7 of 8 AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED REMAINING MTD YTD BUDGET MTD YTD BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BUDGET Month Ended September 30, 2021 Unaudited Program Expense Detail Budget-to-Actual WATER WASTEWATER DISTRICT WIDE Program: 7000 - Facilities Maintenance - - - - 51 Labor 10,940.03 28,399.55 130,500.00 2,936.73 6,942.24 43,500.00 174,000.00 138,658.21 53 Overtime - 1,408.18 16,500.00 - 352.04 5,500.00 22,000.00 20,239.78 56 Benefits 4,314.27 30,763.82 76,500.00 1,153.17 11,586.07 25,500.00 102,000.00 59,650.11 62 Materials and Supplies 3,283.13 10,504.51 51,250.00 786.82 2,459.93 11,750.00 63,000.00 50,035.56 63 Contract Services 61,540.90 144,246.89 574,500.00 5,780.10 15,214.41 120,500.00 695,000.00 535,538.70 64 Utilities 6,026.06 25,462.42 121,750.00 1,094.79 4,944.68 37,250.00 159,000.00 128,592.90 65 Professional Development - - 750.00 - - 250.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 Program: 7000 - Facilities Maintenance Total: 86,104.39 240,785.37 971,750.00 11,751.61 41,499.37 244,250.00 1,216,000.00 933,715.26 - - Program: 7100 - Fleet Maintenance - - - - 51 Labor 5,932.49 15,484.01 81,900.00 659.16 1,565.05 9,100.00 91,000.00 73,950.94 53 Overtime - 83.43 2,700.00 - 9.27 300.00 3,000.00 2,907.30 56 Benefits 1,721.80 26,092.90 47,700.00 191.26 2,897.63 5,300.00 53,000.00 24,009.47 62 Materials and Supplies 18,245.06 43,284.59 32,400.00 5,884.56 9,517.78 3,600.00 36,000.00 (16,802.37) 63 Contract Services 25,943.09 45,572.74 216,000.00 1,475.72 3,038.08 24,000.00 240,000.00 191,389.18 64 Utilities 13,764.90 27,694.44 122,400.00 1,529.44 3,077.16 13,600.00 136,000.00 105,228.40 65 Professional Development - - 3,600.00 - - 400.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 Program: 7100 - Fleet Maintenance Total: 65,607.34 158,212.11 506,700.00 9,740.14 20,104.97 56,300.00 563,000.00 384,682.92 - - Program: 8000 - Capital - - - 71 -Debt Service 15,591.19 15,591.19 3,082,000.00 - - 270,000.00 3,352,000.00 3,336,408.81 81 -Capital Improvement 39,116.75 4,744.88 3,712,000.00 238,542.21 267,076.21 217,000.00 3,929,000.00 3,657,178.91 82 -Capital Outlay 44,482.00 44,482.00 1,080,000.00 - - 50,000.00 1,130,000.00 1,085,518.00 83 -Accounting Income Add back (83,598.75) (49,226.88) - (238,542.21) (267,076.21) - - 316,303.09 Program: 8000 - Capital Total: 15,591.19 15,591.19 7,874,000.00 - - 537,000.00 8,411,000.00 8,395,408.81 Total Surplus (Deficit):1,212,500.77$ 2,825,960.28$ -$ 191,301.94$ 342,603.20$ -$ -$ -$ Page 8 of 8 Agenda Item #2b November 10, 20211 2 4 3 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #2b Consent Item Regular Board Meeting with Closed Session TO: Governing Board Members FROM: General Manager/CEO SUBJECT: Approve Directors' Fees and Expenses for October 2021 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors approve the Governing Board Members' Fees and Expenses for October 2021. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The Board has instructed staff to list all director fees and expenses as a separate agenda item to show full fiscal transparency. Only after Board review and approval will the compensation and expenses be paid. AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability A. Practice Transparent and Accountable Fiscal Management REVIEW BY OTHERS This agenda item has been reviewed by the Administration Department. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact associated with this agenda item is $7,000.00 which is included in the current fiscal budget. Recommended by: ________________ John Mura General Manager/CEO Respectfully submitted: ________________ Justine Hendricksen District Clerk Agenda Item #2b November 10, 20212 2 4 3 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #2b Consent Item ATTACHMENTS Director Expense Reports October 2021 Name: Month / Year:2021 Meeting No.Stipend Written Oral 1 10 /06 175 2 10 /12 175 3 10 /13 175 4 10 /26 175 5 10 /27 175 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Meetings 0.56/mi No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Subtotal TOTAL PAYMENT Date of Approval $0.00 Mileage Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description Inland Action Regular Board Meeting Expense Type $875.00 $0.00 Reimbursement Administration Signature I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Chris Carrillo Date Meeting / Event Description Date City of San Bernardino Council Meeting Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee Regular Board Meeting $875.00 Chris Carrillo October / 0.00 X ( 5 ) Report Provided Subtotal Meetings' Stipend Mileage DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET 1 Name: Month / Year:2021 1 2 3 4 5 Chris Carrillo October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. Meeting Date: Event Description: Attended online City of San Bernardino city council meeting. 10 / 6 / 2021 City of San Bernardino Council Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 12 / 2021 Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 13 / 2021 Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Phone call with CEO Mura to review agenda for regular board meeting. Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attended regular board meeting. Meeting Date:10 / 26 / 2021 Event Description:Inland Action Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attend Inland Action meeting. Meeting Date:10 / 27 / 2021 Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attend regular board meeting. DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 2 Name: Month / Year:2021 Meeting No.Stipend Written Oral 1 10 /05 175 2 10 /06 0 3 10 /07 175 4 10 /11 175 5 10 /11 0 6 10 /12 175 7 10 /13 0 8 10 /13 175 9 10 /14 175 10 10 /18 0 11 10 /18 175 12 10 /19 175 13 10 /20 0 14 10 /25 175 15 10 /27 175 16 17 18 19 20 Meetings 0.56/mi No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Subtotal TOTAL PAYMENT Date of Approval Ronald L. Coats October / 0.00 X ( 10 ) Report Provided Subtotal Meetings' Stipend Mileage Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee CSDA Committee Meetings Administration Signature I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Ronald L. Coats Date Meeting / Event Description Regular Board Meeting Date San Bernardino Valley MWD Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee San Bernardino Valley MWD, Resources Worksho $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $0.00 Reimbursement Mileage Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description San Bernardino Valley MWD ASBCSD San Bernardino Valley MWD Highland Chamber of Commerce San Bernardino Valley MWD ASBCSD Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee San Bernardino VWC District Regular Board Meeting Expense Type $0.00 DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET 1 Name: Month / Year:2021 1 2 3 4 5 Event Description:ASBCSD Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attended our monthly board meeting to discuss association business and our upcoming general meeting on October 18th. Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD They considered the following: An agreement to allow inclusion of Sites Reservoir costs on the State Water Project statement of charges and they had a presentation of determining whether water spills from Big Bear Valley Water Sustainability Project can be captured by the Valley's Enhanced Recharge Project. Meeting Date:10 / 11 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD After much discussion they voted 3-2 in favor of a replacement for the Advisory Commission on Water Policy. They will work out the details of a proposed Water Forum, that was presented today and vote on that at their November 16th board meeting. Meeting Date:10 / 11 / 2021 Meeting Date:10 / 6 / 2021 Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 7 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD, Resources Worksho Had a telephone meeting with John Mura to discuss district business Ronald L. Coats October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. Meeting Date: Event Description: The approved the expenditure of $31,815,000 for 1,657 acres of land, in Highland, formerly known as The Harmony Project. This land was purchased from Orange County Flood Control District. The sale is currently in escrow. 10 / 5 / 2021 San Bernardino Valley MWD Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 2 Name: Month / Year:2021 6 7 8 9 10 Ronald L. Coats October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. Virtually attended the Professional Development and Member Services committee meetings, where we reviewed this year accomplishments and revenue and looked to 2022 meetings, workshops, webinars and annual conference Meeting Date:10 / 18 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD This workshop was to evaluate what consultants have ascertained about a brand refresh, which may include, but not limited to, a possible name change, logo change, color pallet, etc. Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD See official board meeting minutes Meeting Date:10 / 14 / 2021 Event Description:CSDA Committee Meetings Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Had a in person meeting with John Mura to discuss district business Meeting Date:10 / 13 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino VWC District Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Nothing related to EVWD, but they are having a facilities tour on November 5th, from 8:30 AM to12:30 PM, and any EVWD board member interested can attend. I am going myself. Meeting Date:10 / 13 / 2021 Meeting Date:10 / 12 / 2021 Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 3 Name: Month / Year:2021 11 12 13 14 15 Ronald L. Coats October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. See official board meeting minutes Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Had a telephone meeting with John Mura to discuss tonight's agenda and other district business Meeting Date:10 / 27 / 2021 Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD They approved a resolution authorizing a pre-qualifications packet for bidders for public works contracts and they approved financial participation in the City of Yucaipa Wilson III phase1 Basin to increase stormwater capture in the Yucaipa basin. Meeting Date:10 / 20 / 2021 Event Description:Highland Chamber of Commerce Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attended their monthly lunch where the guest speaker was Larry Mainez, Community development director for the City of Highland Meeting Date:10 / 25 / 2021 Event Description:ASBCSD Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attended our monthly general membership meeting where the guest speaker was Stephanie Smith, Director of Elections Services for BBK's Riverside office, where she talked about "Redistricting 2021 -- Don't Try This At Home" Meeting Date:10 / 19 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 18 / 2021 DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 4 Name: Month / Year:2021 Meeting No.Stipend Written Oral 1 10 /05 175 2 10 /07 175 3 10 /12 175 4 10 /13 175 5 10 /18 0 6 10 /18 175 7 10 /20 175 8 10 /21 175 9 10 /27 175 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Meetings 0.56/mi No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Subtotal TOTAL PAYMENT Date of Approval $0.00 Mileage Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description Regular Board Meeting ASBCSD Legislative & Public Affairs Committee Meeting Chamber of Commerce Event Agenda Review Expense Type $1,400.00 $0.00 Reimbursement Administration Signature I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Phillip R. Goodrich Date Meeting / Event Description Date Finance & Human Resources Committee Meeting Agenda Review Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee $1,400.00 Phillip R. Goodrich October / 0.00 X ( 8 ) Report Provided Subtotal Meetings' Stipend Mileage Regular Board Meeting DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET 1 Name: Month / Year:2021 1 2 3 4 5 Phillip R. Goodrich October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. Meeting Date: Event Description: Attend HR-Finance Committee receive dept. updates 10 / 5 / 2021 Finance & Human Resources Committee Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 7 / 2021 Event Description:Agenda Review Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 12 / 2021 Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee Meet with CEO for review of current Agenda Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Monthly meeting with CEO full updates on District affairs Meeting Date:10 / 13 / 2021 Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attend Reg. board meeting REF.Mins. Meeting Date:10 / 18 / 2021 Event Description:ASBCSD Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attend Monthly Spcl. Districts meeting Host ed by BBK keynote delivered several leg. Updates DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 2 Name: Month / Year:2021 6 7 8 9 10 Meeting Date:10 / 18 / 2021 Event Description:Legislative & Public Affairs Committee Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attend Committee meeting updates on District outreach efforts and impacts onf new and potential legislations Meeting Date:10 / 20 / 2021 Event Description:Chamber of Commerce Event Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attend Monthly Chamber luncheon keynote delivered development updates in the City Meeting Date:10 / 21 / 2021 Event Description:Agenda Review Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD With staff for review of current agenda Meeting Date:10 / 27 / 2021 Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Attend Reg. board meeting Ref. to Mins. Meeting Date: Event Description: Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Phillip R. Goodrich October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 3 Name: Month / Year:2021 Meeting No.Stipend Written Oral 1 10 /05 175 2 10 /06 175 3 10 /12 175 4 10 /13 175 5 10 /14 175 6 10 /19 175 7 10 /20 175 8 10 /21 0 9 10 /26 175 10 10 /27 175 11 10 /28 0 12 10 /29 175 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Meetings 0.56/mi No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Subtotal TOTAL PAYMENT Date of Approval $0.00 Mileage Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description Regular Board Meeting ACWA Event ACWA Event Regular Board Meeting Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee East Valley Association of Realtors ACWA Event Chamber of Commerce Event Expense Type $1,750.00 $0.00 Reimbursement Administration Signature I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. James Morales, Jr. Date Meeting / Event Description Date Finance & Human Resources Committee Meeting San Bernardino RIX San Bernardino Board of Water Commissioners $1,750.00 James Morales, Jr.October / 0.00 X ( 10 ) Report Provided Subtotal Meetings' Stipend Mileage San Bernardino Board of Water Commissioners DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET 1 Name: Month / Year:2021 1 2 3 4 5 James Morales, Jr.October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. Meeting Date: Event Description: Please refer to public agenda. 10 / 5 / 2021 Finance & Human Resources Committee Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 6 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino RIX Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date:10 / 12 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino Board of Water Commissioners Quarterly meeting. Update on sand infiltration and contracts to remediate. Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Please refer to public agenda. Rate modeling and assumption presentation. Meeting Date:10 / 13 / 2021 Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Please refer to public agenda Meeting Date:10 / 14 / 2021 Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD District operations and SNRC update. DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 2 Name: Month / Year:2021 6 7 8 9 10 Meeting Date:10 / 19 / 2021 Event Description:East Valley Association of Realtors Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Legislative update. SNRC update and drought response update. Meeting Date:10 / 20 / 2021 Event Description:ACWA Event Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Region 9 conference program planning. Meeting Date:10 / 21 / 2021 Event Description:Chamber of Commerce Event Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Highland development update. No charge, more than 10 meetings in reporting period. Meeting Date:10 / 26 / 2021 Event Description:San Bernardino Board of Water Commissioners Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Rate setting updates and presentation additional presentation. Meeting Date:10 / 27 / 2021 Event Description:Regular Board Meeting Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Please refer to public agenda. James Morales, Jr.October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 3 Name: Month / Year:2021 11 12 13 14 15 Meeting Date:10 / 28 / 2021 Event Description:ACWA Event Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Region 9 legislstive update. No charge, more than 10 meetings in reporting period. Meeting Date:10 / 29 / 2021 Event Description:ACWA Event Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD State legislastive planning meeting. Meeting Date: Event Description: Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Statewide Executive and Regular Board Meetings. Meeting Date: Event Description: Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD Meeting Date: Event Description: Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD James Morales, Jr.October / As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s) that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being approved. DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT ACTIVITY SHEET AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM 4 Agenda Item #2c November 10, 20211 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #2c Consent Item Regular Board Meeting TO: Governing Board Members FROM: General Manager/CEO SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.22 - Findings and Determinations Regarding Teleconference Meetings RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors consider adoption of Resolution 2021.22, Findings and Determinations Regarding Teleconference Meetings. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has required new levels of flexibility and adaptability. The District continues to adjust operations to incorporate additional safety procedures and social distancing practices consistent with local health official guidance. In 2020, the District declared a local state of emergency, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the impacts that it had on the ability to safely serve the public. Maintaining the health and safety of staff and the public while continuing to provide world class services remains a top priority. State and federal officials have called for individuals to stay at home whenever possible to slow the spread of COVID-19. As part of this effort the State of California included the declaration of a statewide emergency and the issuance of an executive order to suspend portions of the Ralph M. Brown Act location noticing requirements, easing the ability for public agencies to hold virtual, or teleconference, meetings. This adjustment allows for continued public engagement in the policy making process, while allowing for social distancing. Since executive orders are only valid for a maximum of 180 days, this process was only allowed temporarily. The advancement of hosting platforms for virtual meetings that are easily accessible to the public have greatly improved over the last year. Given the broad range of emergencies that can occur in California, the maintenance of government transparency through virtual meetings has emerged as a long-term response measure. AB 361 codified the ability for government agencies to hold virtual meetings in the event of a declared emergency in order to continue conducting official business. The allowance of teleconference meeting in place of an “in-person” setting applies in emergencies like public health that require social distancing, earthquake, wildfire, and other natural or manmade emergencies. When an agency needs to implement teleconference meetings, they Governing Board must adopt a Resolution of Findings and Determinations. Agenda Item #2c November 10, 20212 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #2c Consent Item Given the on-going call to slow the spread of COVID-19, there is a health and safety needs to maintain virtual meetings as allowed by law for the next 30 days. If a need exists beyond that point in time a new resolution would be presented to the Governing Board for consideration for each 30-day period after that. Notice of meetings and posted agendas would continue to contain information which allow members of the public to access the meeting and address the Board of Directors and offer public comment including an opportunity for all persons to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option. Staff is requesting that the Board adopt a Resolution of Findings and Determinations to utilize the protocols allowed by AB 361. AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability D. Provide Quality Information to Encourage Community Engagement REVIEW BY OTHERS his agenda item has been reviewed by Public Affairs, Administration and legal counsel. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Recommended by: ________________ John Mura General Manager/CEO Respectfully submitted: ________________ Justine Hendricksen District Clerk ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2021.22 East Valley Water District Resolution 2021.22 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2021.22 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING SPECIAL RULES FOR CONDUCTING MEETINGS THROUGH TELECONFERENCE WHEREAS, East Valley Water District (“EVWD”) is a county water district established pursuant to Section 30000 et seq. of the California Water Code; and WHEREAS, all meetings of the Board of Directors of EVWD are conducted in open and public settings in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) so that any member of the public may attend, participate and watch the District’s Board of Directors conduct their business; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2020, the Governor declared a state of emergency pursuant to Government Code 8625 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and has recommended, together with local officials, measures for social distancing to assist in abating the spread of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order N-29-20 which, among other things, suspended certain Brown Act rules governing the use of teleconferencing of local agency board meetings; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2021, the Governor issued Executive Order N-15- 21 which, extended certain Brown Act rules governing the use of teleconferencing of local agency board meetings and to clarify the transition from the Executive Order to the rules adopted in AB 361; and WHEREAS, Executive Order N-15-21 expired on October 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, the California legislature has enacted, and the Governor has signed into law, AB 361 amending portions of Government Code 54953, allowing for the continued use of teleconferencing for local agency board meetings while suspending the conditions and restrictions of Government Code 54953(b)(3) if the legislative body of the local agency makes certain findings; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District hereby make the following findings and determinations: East Valley Water District Resolution 2021.22 Page 2 of 3 SECTION 1. The Governor has proclaimed a state of emergency on March 24, 2020 which continues. SECTION 2. The Governor and local officials have promoted the use of social distancing as a method to abate the spread of COVID-19 within the community. The Board of Directors finds that conducting in person meetings of the EVWD Board of Directors would be inimical to social distancing and would present imminent risks to the health or safety of the attendees and conducting meetings by teleconference would diminish that risk. SECTION 3. The Board of Directors will continue to conduct Board meetings by teleconference in compliance with Government Code 54953(e) until such time as the Governor has terminated the state of emergency and the risk to health and safety of meeting attendees is sufficiently diminished or as otherwise required by law. Notice of meetings and posted agendas will contain information which allow members of the public to access the meeting and address the Board of Directors and offer public comment including an opportunity for all persons to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective for 30 days or until such time as the Board of Directors adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which meetings of the Board of Directors may be conducted by teleconference without compliance with Government Code 54953(3)(b). ADOPTED this 10th day of November 2021. ROLL CALL: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: ______________________________ David E. Smith, Board President East Valley Water District Resolution 2021.22 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: John Mura, Secretary, Board of Directors November 10, 2021 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2021.22 adopted by the Board of Directors of East Valley Water District at its Regular Meeting held November 10, 2021. John Mura, Secretary, Board of Directors Agenda Item #3a November 10, 20211 2 3 4 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #3a Informational Item Regular Board Meeting TO: Governing Board Members FROM: General Manager/CEO SUBJECT: Redesign of the Current Monthly Bill RECOMMENDATION This agenda item is for informational purposes only, no action required. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS East Valley Water District’s monthly bill is the most constant form of communication between the District and ratepayers. This document provides an opportunity to clearly share customer consumption information, while highlighting the District’s billing structure and providing a channel for District updates. Due to the importance of the monthly bill, staff worked to modernize the design and add elements into the bill to help the customer further understand their water use. Previously updated in 2015, the current water and wastewater bill will be restructured to clearly represent services being provided while being consistent with the brand standards. This process will provide a high degree of cohesiveness with formal communications including individual account notifications and alerts. It has been designed in a manner that will allow for a seamless transition once the District takes over responsibility for wastewater treatment services when the Sterling Natural Resource Center becomes operational. As a rate-based and not-for-profit organization, the District is required by law to only charge its customers the costs associated with providing services. The monthly utility bill contributes to the District’s effort of enhancing transparency in operations and service by providing the account specific information used in the bill calculation. In the redesigned utility bill, ratepayers will be provided with a comprehensive breakdown of water and wastewater services and the following information: Streamlined options for paying their billing statement, including a variety of online, mail, and in person options; Instructions on how to access consumption information online; A calculation of how the District determines residential Tier 1 (indoor) and Tier 2 (outdoor) water budget amounts. The inclusion of this calculation will assist customers in estimating future monthly budgets, promote water use efficiency, Agenda Item #3a November 10, 20212 2 3 4 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #3a Informational Item and enhance transparency between ratepayers and the District. Staff will continue working with various departments including Customer Service and Finance to identify additional areas of improvement and opportunities to further enhance and the information provided. AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability B. Utilize Effective Communication Methods D. Provide Quality Information to Encourage Community Engagement REVIEW BY OTHERS This agenda item has been reviewed by the Executive team. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Recommended by: ________________ John Mura General Manager/CEO Respectfully submitted: ________________ Kelly Malloy Director of Strategic Services ATTACHMENTS Presentation November 10, 2021 WATER AND WASTEWATER BILL REDESIGN 2 CURRENT DESIGN -FRONT PROPOSED DESIGN -FRONT 3 CURRENT DESIGN -BACK PROPOSED DESIGN -BACK REDESIGN ENHANCEMENTS 4 •Breakdown of Services •Historical Usage Data •Message Center Visibility •Streamlined Payment Coupon 5 BILL ENHANCEMENTS •Helpful Bill Information •District Service Policy Information •Payment Coupon 6 BACK OF THE BILL Agenda Item #3b November 10, 20211 2 3 5 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #3b Informational Item Regular Board Meeting TO: Governing Board Members FROM: General Manager/CEO SUBJECT: Conservation Update RECOMMENDATION This agenda item is for informational purposes only, no action required. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS East Valley Water District has developed an extensive conservation program to engage with community members, report to the state, and protect natural resources. With more than 83% of the state experiencing extreme drought conditions, the District will continue its local and regional efforts to encourage customers and partners to conserve water. On October 19, 2021, Governor Newsom declared a statewide drought emergency to address the growing water shortage across the state. Due to investments made by regional agencies, including the District, the Bunker Hill Basin’s water supply remains in a strong position. The proclamation calls on all Californians to voluntarily reduce their usage by 15% compared to 2020 levels. The District is currently operating in Stage 1 of the Water Shortage Contingency Plan and customers are encouraged to prevent waste and unreasonable use of water. The State Water Resources Control Board will be monitoring progress and determine whether additional drought response actions are needed. Standards and expectations for water use, planning and conservation reporting requirements continue to increase year-over-year. In compliance with regulations, the District reports distribution system water losses on an annual basis through the submission of the Water Loss Audit Report. Through SB 555, signed by Governor Jerry Brown in 2015, water suppliers have been required to submit annual validated water loss audit reports. The District reported 1,427.96 acre-feet of water losses or a 7.8% loss of volume supplied in 2020. The Water Loss Audit reports the difference between real losses caused from leaks or breaks, and apparent losses caused from deliberate theft or tampering of water meters. Now that there is a foundation of information, the State Water Resource Control Board is using the report information to develop performance requirements which are scheduled take effect January 1, 2028. The District is actively engaged in these public workshops and industry discussions to ensure that the standards implemented are reasonable and achievable. A source of concern and topic of discussion is the significant infrastructure improvement costs that would be Agenda Item #3b November 10, 20212 2 3 5 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #3b Informational Item required to maintain compliance with the standards as they are currently proposed. Concurrent with regulatory and legislative discussions, the District continues to engage customers in conservation programs and encourage water efficiency efforts. Staff will be monitoring progress on voluntary reductions, continue to encourage customers to use water efficiently, and be active participants in the stewardship of our water resources. Even as the dry weather continues, the District strives to maintain an open dialogue with the community and serve as a resource for conservation tools and techniques. This approach, as compared to a strictly enforcement focused perspective, has resulted in customer behavior changes that mirrors the call to action. AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability B. Utilize Effective Communication Methods D. Provide Quality Information to Encourage Community Engagement FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. Recommended by: ________________ John Mura General Manager/CEO Respectfully submitted: ________________ Kelly Malloy Director of Strategic Services ATTACHMENTS Conservation Presentation November 10, 2021 East Valley Water District Conservation Update TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 DROUGHT SNAPSHOT Emergency Drought Proclamation for Mendocino and Sonoma counties April 21, 2021 Proclamation for 39 additional counties May 10, 2021 Proclamation 50 counties July 8, 2021 Statewide Emergency Drought Proclamation October 19, 2021 •Indoor •High Efficiency Toilet •High Efficiency Showerhead •High Efficiency Washing Machine •Outdoor •Parkway Pilot Program •High Efficiency Nozzles •Water Efficient Landscaping •Weather Based Irrigation Controller •Direct Installation Weather Based Irrigation Controller Ending Soon! 4 CONSERVATION REBATES Agenda Item #4a November 10, 20211 2 2 3 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #4a Discussion Item Regular Board Meeting TO: Governing Board Members FROM: General Manager/CEO SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of Resolution 2021.17 - Replacing Reimbursement Resolution 2019.02 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors (Board) adopt Resolution 2021.17. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The Sterling Natural Resource Center (SNRC) has been under construction since October 2018. Using the Progressive Design-Build procurement approach, the project has been able to concurrently work on design, construction, and permitting efforts. Additionally, this approach has allowed for the opportunity to incorporate improvements to the project scope resulting from the collaboration taking place within the world class team. Project enhancement incorporated in the effort include additional water efficient landscaping, integration with Southern California Edison’s high voltage energy system, and the construction of the Weaver Recharge Basins co-located with the SNRC Emergency Storage Basin. These elements were all presented to the Governing Board for consideration at the time of the FY 2021-22 Budget adoption. As a result of the enhancement resulting from the inclusion of the SNRC Emergency Storage Basins to the original construction efforts, the District must request an increase in the authorized State Revolving Funds designated for the Sterling Natural Resource Center by $6 million. It is important to note that this funding increase request reflects additional scope of work for the project rather than simply a request for additional funding due to increasing market costs. Staff has maintained open lines of communication with State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) staff regarding the process for requesting additional funds to reflect this project enhancement. This step requires that the Governing Board take action to replace the existing resolution with an updated version reflecting the Amended Guaranteed Maximum Price. In addition, staff would like to add to the SRF Loan $8 million for the cost of the Digesters that exceeded the amount previously requested to be added. This is not an increase to the project cost, but rather, aligns SRF funding with actual contract amounts making reconciliation of the project easier for Waterboard staff. The attached Reimbursement Resolution 2021.17 revises the total funding request from the SWRCB from $157 million to $171 million to reflect the Guaranteed Maximum Price Agenda Item #4a November 10, 20212 2 2 3 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #4a Discussion Item of the Sterling Natural Resource Center proposed by Balfour Beatty. The funding available through the State Water Resources Control Board provides the opportunity to use both state and federal funding for the benefit of this community. AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability A. Practice Transparent and Accountable Fiscal Management C. Pursue Alternative Funding Sources REVIEW BY OTHERS This agenda item has been reviewed by the Finance and Public Affairs Departments and Legal Counsel. FISCAL IMPACT The addition of the Weaver Basin Emergency Storage and the digesters for the SNRC will increase the amount of low interest (1.8%) loan funding requested from the State Water Resources Control Board by $14 million to $164 million. Debt service related to the incremental loan amount would be approximately $609,000. Recommended by: ________________ John Mura General Manager/CEO Respectfully submitted: ________________ Brian Tompkins Chief Financial Officer ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2021.17 East Valley Water District Resolution 2021.17 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2021.17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT REVISING RESOLUTION 2019.02 WHEREBY THE DISTRICT DECLARED ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES PAID PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD OF A CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND AND/OR WATER RECYCLING FUND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION WHEREAS, East Valley Water District (the “District”) desires to finance the costs of certain Groundwater Replenishment Facilities (Project); and WHEREAS, the Project contemplates the design and construction of public facilities in the form of a wastewater treatment plant and associated and necessary pipelines and infrastructure (the “Project”), which will treat wastewater generated within the District’s service area. The Project will produce recycled water for groundwater recharge and other beneficial uses, which will benefit the San Bernardino Basin Area, which is consistent with the policies established by the State Water Resources Control Board Recycled Water Policy adopted in 2009, as well as article X, section 2 of the California Constitution and Water Code section 13576(k). The Project will be known as the Sterling Natural Resource Center; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report for the Project was certified and CEQA Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project were adopted by the District on March 23, 2016; and WHEREAS, Amendments to the original Environmental Impact Report for the Project were certified and adopted by the District on July 24, 2019 and January 27, 2021; and WHEREAS, the District desires and intends to finance the construction and/or reconstruction of the Project or portions of the Project with moneys ("Project Funds") provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the "Obligations"), and WHEREAS, prior to the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the District has incurred certain capital expenditures (the "Expenditures") with respect to the Project from available moneys of the District for which the District will seek reimbursement; and WHEREAS, the District has determined that those moneys advanced prior to and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the District for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; and East Valley Water District Resolution 2021.17 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Resolution 2019.02 previously revised Resolution 2018.15 adopted on March 27, 2019; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of East Valley Water District as follows: Section 1. The District hereby states its intention and reasonably expects to reimburse Expenditures paid prior to the issuance of the Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds. Section 2. The reasonably expected maximum amount of the Project Construction Funds is $171,000,000, and the reasonably expected maximum principal amount of borrowed Project Construction Funds is $164,000,000. Section 3. Each District expenditure will be of a type properly chargeable to a capital account under general federal income tax principles. Section 4. This resolution is adopted as official intent of the District in order to comply with Treasury Regulation §1.150-2 and any other regulations of the Internal Revenue Service relating to the qualification for reimbursement of Project costs. Section 5. All the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct and this District so finds, determines and represents. ADOPTED this 10th day of November 2021. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Directors: Noes: Abstain: Absent: ___________________________________ David E. Smith Board President ATTEST: John Mura Secretary, Board of Directors East Valley Water District Resolution 2021.17 Page 3 of 3 November 10, 2021 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2021.17 adopted by the Board of Directors of East Valley Water District at its Regular Board Meeting held November 10, 2021. John Mura Secretary, Board of Directors Agenda Item #4b November 10, 20211 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #4b Discussion Item Regular Board Meeting TO: Governing Board Members FROM: General Manager/CEO SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Contract for the Sterling Natural Resource Center RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors authorize the General Manager to execute a contract with Geoscience Support Services, Inc. to provide two groundwater monitoring wells for the Sterling Natural Resource Center project for a not-to-exceed amount of $1,047,486. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The Sterling Natural Resource Center (SNRC) will be a state-of-the-art facility that will provide a sustainable new water supply to support the region’s water independence. Capable of recycling up to 8 million gallons of water per day, the SNRC will recharge the local Bunker Hill Groundwater Basin and create new opportunities for the surrounding community. The treatment of wastewater to produce recycled water for groundwater recharge involves extensive regulations and permitting administered by the State Water Resources Control Board. These regulations require monitoring wells to allow sampling of the groundwater so that changes in the water quality can be measured. Modeling results for the SNRC recharge activity indicate that two monitoring wells will be needed before starting the recharge of recycled water at Weaver Basins, with a third monitoring well potentially being needed a few years after the start of recharge activity. One monitoring well will be located about 800 feet west of Weaver Basins, and the second well will be located about one mile southwest of Weaver Basins. A monitoring well is constructed by drilling a 10-inch pilot borehole to a depth of 1,000 feet below ground surface for the well closest to Weaver Basins, and a depth of 600 feet for the other well. The pilot borehole is then reamed to a diameter of 17.5 inches before installing three 4-inch casings of different lengths to allow sampling of groundwater at different depths within the aquifer. Geoscience Support Services, Inc. (Geoscience) is uniquely positioned to provide monitoring well services in the Bunker Hill Groundwater Basin because they have conducted all of the groundwater modeling work for the SNRC project, as well as modeling work for other regional stakeholders in recent years. The proposal submitted by Geoscience (attached as Exhibit A) was determined by staff to be reasonable and appropriate at a not-to-exceed cost of $1,047,486. In addition to constructing two Agenda Item #4b November 10, 20212 Meeting Date: November 10, 2021 Agenda Item #4b Discussion Item monitoring wells, the proposed scope of work includes providing a tracer study work plan, which is another requirement of the groundwater recharge regulations. AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES I - Implement Effective Solutions Through Visionary Leadership A. Identify Opportunities to Optimize Natural Resources IV - Promote Planning, Maintenance and Preservation of District Resources A. Develop Projects and Programs to Ensure Safe and Reliable Services REVIEW BY OTHERS This agenda item has been reviewed by the executive management team. FISCAL IMPACT The not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,047,486 will be included as part of the upcoming request to increase the State Revolving Fund (SRF) funding for the project. In order to avoid negative schedule and cost impacts, funds may be transferred from approved departmental and capital project budgets to allow contract payments to be made prior to receiving reimbursement from SRF funding. Recommended by: ________________ John Mura General Manager/CEO Respectfully submitted: ________________ Jeff Noelte Director of Engineering and Operations ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A Proposal for Hydrogeological Services for Two Monitoring Wells and Tracer Study Workplan Development Terry Watkins, PG, CHG Senior Geohydrologist main office 160 Via Verde, Suite 150 San Dimas, CA 91773 main | 909.451.6650 twatkins@geoscience-water.com gssiwater.com gssiwater.com 1 Project Understanding We are pleased to present East Valley Water District (EVWD) with this proposal to provide professional hydrogeological services to design and construct two (2) new groundwater monitoring wells and a tracer study work plan. The purpose of the work plan will be to outline protocols required to perform a tracer study to determine groundwater travel time from the proposed Weaver aquifer recharge percolation basins to be constructed in the City of Highland, California. These basins will utilize recycled municipal wastewater and are thereby subject to the requirements of Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR’s). The nested monitoring wells will serve two primary functions. First, the monitoring wells will be used during aquifer pumping tests, the results of which, will be utilized to refine the existing groundwater model and calculate dilution factors for the tracer test. Second, following introduction of the tracer element to the groundwater aquifer, the monitoring wells will be used to detect concentrations of traced element downgradient from the proposed recharge site to validate groundwater model predictions and satisfy the requirements of the CCR’s. The suggested location of the two monitoring wells is based on CCR travel time requirements and preliminary predictive model scenarios. To accomplish these objectives, Geoscience Support Services, Inc. (Geoscience) has teamed with Yellow Jacket Drilling Services (Yellow Jacket), one of the premier drilling contractors in Southern California who specialize in drilling and constructing nested monitoring wells. This proposal includes contractor costs for drilling and construction, and laboratory fees for one sample from each completion of the nested monitoring wells (i.e., six sample sets total). Our detailed scope of work and the assumptions used as a basis for our cost estimate is presented below. Scope of Work Task 1.0 Project Management and Meetings Task 1.1 Project Management and Administration Effectively controlling a project's scope, schedule, and budget is critical to achieve a quality project. Our Project Team knows that understanding and managing the interrelationship of these three elements largely determines the project’s success with respect to budget. Scope creep increases cost and produces delay. Delays increase costs and cause critical milestones to be missed. Geoscience understands these issues and has demonstrated ability to organize tasks, manage level of effort, develop and monitor critical-path schedules, and compare actual costs to planned costs at key milestones. By using these organizational techniques and effective communication and coordination, we can help you achieve a quality, on-time, and on- schedule project. Geoscience will provide project management services throughout the entire project to verify that project elements are carried out in a proper and efficient manner. Project management activities will include coordination and correspondence with EVWD personnel, project schedule and status updates, project budget monitoring, and quality control and assurance. Task 1.2: Prepare for and Attend Project Kick- Off Meetings The primary objective of the project kick-off meetings will be to meet face-to-face with key project individuals from EVWD, Geoscience, and Yellow Jacket to verify that everyone understands the intent, objectives, tasks, budgets, schedules, milestones, and deliverables of this project. The kick-off meeting also identifies any individuals outside of Geoscience that may be responsible for implementing any part of the work. The meeting provides a forum for discussion of critical path tasks, gssiwater.com 2 such as data collection, such that those tasks can be efficiently expedited. Other objectives of the kick-off meeting include: • Clarifying key project issues • Clarifying and refining the scope of work based on the key issues • Defining the data needed to complete the scope of work • Discussion of the project schedule Geoscience will provide weekly updates via email and/or phone during active work for the duration of the project. These meetings will include project updates and important upcoming tasks along with Contractor logistics. These weekly meetings will help avoid costly miscommunication and make the Project run more efficiently. At the time of the project kick-off meeting, Geoscience and Yellow Jacket will visit the drilling locations to identify and assess any logistical issues that may need to be addressed. Potential issues include site access, available space for drilling, overhead obstructions, above ground and underground utilities, location of water source, potential discharge options, and noise constraints. Geoscience will provide email updates during throughout the project, as necessary. In addition, geoscience will prepare for and attend up to three (3) status update meetings. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that the status update meetings will be conducted via video call. Tasks 2.0 and 3.0: Construction Management, Field Supervision, and Final Monitoring Well Design (MW-A and MW-B) Task 2.1 and 3.1: Construction Management Geoscience will provide construction management services during the well construction process to confirm that the geohydrologic aspects of the project are carried out in a proper and efficient manner. Construction management activities will include: review of contractor submittals, review of contractor invoices to ensure accuracy and completeness, review of and response to contractor Request for Information (RFIs) and change order requests for legitimacy, preparation of a final “punch list”, and filing of essential paperwork, correspondence, field notes, etc. Daily email and/or phone updates will be provided along with submittal of relevant photographs. Task 2.2 and 3.2: Pilot Borehole Drilling and Geophysical Logging Field observation and technical support will be provided by Geoscience on a full-time basis during pilot borehole drilling for each monitoring well to confirm that formation samples are properly collected at 5 ft intervals (or more frequently depending on the stratigraphy encountered). Samples will be identified as to material type and production potential by visually logging them in the field using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Upon completion of borehole drilling, Geoscience personnel will provide full-time onsite observation and technical support of the geophysical borehole logging (i.e., short- and long- normal resistivity, guard or lateral, spontaneous- potential, gamma-ray, and sonic logs). For cost estimating purposed, it is assumed that the boreholes will be drilled by the mud rotary drilling method, that each well will require two drilling passes (i.e., 10-inch pilot and 17.5-inch reamed borehole), and that the pilot borehole depths will be be 1,000 and 600 ft below ground surface (ft bgs) at MW-A and MW-B, respectively, or shallower, based on review of drillers logs and geologic reports of the area. Task 2.3 and 3.3: Preparation of Final Well Design Although the anticipated lengths and dimensions of the well casing and screen, and the materials used to manufacture them have been estimated in preparation of this scope of work, ultimately these details will be determined based on the results of gssiwater.com 3 the borehole lithology and the geophysical logs, The final well design will include recommended depth intervals and diameters for the well casing and screens, and recommended borehole diameter(s). Geoscience will meet with EVWD personnel to discuss the DRAFT recommended well design prior to finalization and implementation in the field. Task 2.4 and 3.4: Borehole Reaming During reaming (enlargement) of each pilot borehole to the final design diameter and depth, Geoscience will provide part time field observation to confirm that the work is performed correctly, and that drilling fluid properties are maintained within the parameters defined by industry standards. Task 2.5 and 3.5: Installation of Casing, Screen, Filter Pack, and Annular Seal Following preparation of the final well design and meeting with EVWD, full time observation will be provided during installation of the casing, screen, filter pack, and annular seals to confirm that all materials are furnished and placed in accordance with the recommended design. Prior to installation, Geoscience personnel will inspect the filter pack material and the well casing and screen for compliance with the specified well design. Task 2.6 and 3.6: Initial Well Development by Airlifting and Swabbing Geoscience anticipates that at least 12 hours of initial well development by airlifting and swabbing of each well completion will be necessary for proper development. Geoscience will provide part-time observation during the airlift development process and will closely monitor discharge water turbidity and sand content to track the development progress of the well. Task 2.7 and 3.7: Final Well Development by Pumping and Surging Geoscience will monitor final development by pumping and surging on a part-time basis to measure the advancement of the development process and to verify that each completion is fully developed before collection of ground water quality samples. Development will continue until water pumped from each completion of the well has a turbidity of less than 5 NTU and field water quality parameters have stabilized. It is anticipated that each completion will require approximately 16 hours of final development by pumping to produce clear water that is free of suspended sediment and considered representative of groundwater. Task 2.8 and 3.8: Coordination with Laboratory and Collection of Water Quality Samples Geoscience will collect groundwater samples immediately following development of each monitoring well completion. These samples will be collected in laboratory-prepared containers and submitted under chain-of-custody protocol to a State of California certified analytical laboratory for analysis. Since these groundwater quality analyses will provide baseline water quality signatures for the aquifer(s), it is anticipated that at a minimum, a full Title 22 water quality suite will be required. The cost for water quality analysis is included with Yellow Jackets scope and cost estimate. Geoscience will coordinate with the laboratory, acquire bottles, collect samples, and deliver the samples. Task 2.9 and 3.9: Final Wellhead Completion, Post-Construction Site Condition, and Project Close-Out Geoscience will provide inspection of final wellhead completion to confirm the well casings are finished as desired by EVWD and/or the well design. The post-construction condition of the well site will also be inspected to confirm that all equipment, materials, and trash have been removed and that the site has been restored as closely as possible to its original condition. Geoscience will prepare a “punch list” of work remaining to be completed and will attend a final site walkthrough with the contractor’s representative and EVWD personnel. gssiwater.com 4 Task 4.0: Contractor Services for Drilling and Construction of Two New Nested Monitoring Wells Yellow Jacket will provide a mud rotary drilling rig equipped with tools and operators necessary to drill and construct each of the nested monitoring wells. A detailed breakdown of their services and cost is provided as Table 2. Task 5.0: Well Completion Summary Letter Reports At the conclusion of well construction activities, Geoscience will prepare a letter report that summarizes the details of drilling, construction, development, and testing of each new monitoring well. The report will include the following : • Chronology of activities • Lithologic log based on the drill cuttings • Geophysical logs • As-built diagram of the completed wells • Title 22 water quality data • California DWR well completion report • Other pertinent data and analytical results Geoscience will submit an electronic copy (i.e., PDF) of the 100% FINAL report. Task 6.0: Tracer Study Work Plan Task 6.1 Perform Aquifer Pumping Test To refine and update the existing groundwater model of the project area, it is recommended that aquifer pumping tests are performed. The tests will utilize existing EVWD production wells to perform continuous pumping at a constant rate for a period of 24 hours. During each test, the pumping water level in the production well will be monitored. In addition, water levels inside the newly constructed monitoring wells will be monitored. Data collected from these tests will be analyzed to provide more accurate aquifer parameters which will be incorporated into the groundwater model refinement. It is anticipated that two (2) 24-hour constant rate pumping tests will be performed. One test will be performed near the MW-A site (likely utilizing EVWD Well 143) and the second test will be performed using a well near the MW-B site (likely Orange Well #1). Geoscience will equip each monitoring well completion with water level transducers and record water level and production data manually. For budgeting purposes, part-time field observation and technical support will be provided during each pumping test. Task 6.2: Perform Aquifer Pumping Test Analysis Prior to incorporation into the existing groundwater model, data collected during the aquifer pumping tests (Task 6.1) will be analyzed. Data collected will provide update aquifer parameters including aquifer transmissivity, hydraulic conductivity, and storativity coefficients. Task 6.3: Update, Refine, and Recalibrate Existing Groundwater Model Data and analysis developed in Tasks 6.1 and 6.2 will be incorporated into the existing SBBA Refined Basin Flow Model (RBFM), which will be further recalibrated for the same existing calibration period from 1979 through 2004. Task 6.4: Evaluation of Dilution Factors and Break Through Times Once updated and refined, the RBFM will be used to run one scenario in order to calculate the distance of travel and recycled water contribution (RWC) using future projections of recycled water recharge for 4- months, 6-months and 12-months and the end of the selected base period. In addition, dilution factors for chemical tracer elements will be calculated. Task 6.5: Tracer Study Work Plan Development The purpose of the work plan will be to provide the appropriate steps to refine the understanding of the site specific hydrogeologic conditions in the vicinity gssiwater.com 5 of the proposed Weaver Basins and the down gradient well field. Therefore, the work plan will include the initial necessary studies to understand the flow system from the basin to the downstream monitoring points, including location and design of monitoring wells in the path between downstream wells and the tracer injection site. The work plan will include the specific protocol to inject tracer directly into the groundwater system below the basin, sampling method and schedule, and laboratory analytical protocols. By injecting the tracer at depth directly into the groundwater, we can employ a tracer such as sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) for the testing program, since the compound will not be subject to volatilization into the atmosphere. In brief, the work plan will provide the details for the following: • Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model • Updated groundwater level elevation contours • Construction details for all downstream monitoring wells • Basin pumping schedule and rates representative of future normal pumping conditions during the injection project • Update and refine the Groundwater Model with the results of the constant rate pumping tests (Task 6.1 and 6.2) • Calculation of dilution volumes for the tracer test and arrival times at each monitoring point • Complete description of the injection equipment • Injection protocol, including tracer concentrations, volumes, and injection rates • Rationale for selected intrinsic tracer analysis • Protocol for calculation of seepage velocity and groundwater retention time • Calculation of anticipated travel time to each sampling point • Sampling protocol, frequency, sample numbers, schedule, and analytical procedures for added tracer analysis at each monitoring point. • Preparation and submittal of application for exemption regarding the usage of sulfur hexafluoride to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in accordance with Section 95341(B) of Subarticle 3, “Applicability and Exemptions” (Subchapter 10 Climate Change, Article 4 “Regulations to Achieve Greenhouse Emissions Reductions.” The letter request for exemption will provide information to answer the following questions: o Describe how SF6 is used. o How much SF6 have you used annually over the last 3 years in this application(s)? o Will the use of SF6 result in less greenhouse gas emissions over the lifetime of the equipment, facility, or process than the use of all other alternatives? Please explain. o What are the alternatives that can be substituted for SF6? o Are there problems with using these substitutes? Please explain. o In using SF6, do you recover the SF6 after the application for re-use or recycle? If not, would it be possible to do this? • List of permits, agencies, and District Departments for coordination and approvals to conduct the testing program • Outline for the report of findings Task 6.6: Client Meetings and Meetings with DDW The workplan will be submitted to DDW for review and comment prior to implementation in the field. It is anticipated that as many as three (3) meetings with EVWD and regulators will be required during the Draft review process. gssiwater.com 6 Task 6.7: Prepare Final Tracer Study Work Plan After receipt of all comments to the draft workplan, a final workplan will be prepared and provided. The final workplan will form the basis for conducting the tracer study. gssiwater.com 7 Proposed Project Team We have assigned a highly experience team of professional hydrogeologists, geologists, and field personnel to support your project. Our team includes a field supervisor and four field observers to help prevent schedule delays caused by lack of field oversight. The project will be led by Terry Watkins, PG, CHG. Terry has more than 15 years of experience completing monitoring well design and tracer testing. Brian Villalobos, PG, CHG, CEG will serve as the Principal-in-Charge and oversee QA/QC activities. Dr. Johnson Yeh, PhD, PG, CHG and Tim Chen, EIT will lead modeling efforts. Logan Wicks will provide field supervision and coordination. Logan Wicks, PG will serve as the field supervisor and will be supported by Seth Kuiper, GIT, Robert Sia, Alex Arita, and Wesley Massoll, GIT. The table below lists our proposed key staff, their role, and their percentage available to support this project. Resumes are proivded as Appendix A. Staff Role Availability Terry Watkins, PG, CHG Project Manager Brian Villalobos, PG, CHG, CEG Principal-in-Charge Johnson Yeh, PhD, PG, CHG Principal Modeler Tim Chen, EIT Modeler Logan Wicks, PG Field Supervisor Seth Kuiper, GIT Field Observer Robert Sia Field Observer Alex Arita Field Observer Wesley Massoll, GIT Field Observer 50% 10% 10% 50% 80% 80% 80% 95 Wells Our assigned team has assessed 95 wells in the past five years. 16+ Wells Our assigned team has more than 16 wells in the past five years. Assigned Team Experience 50% 10% 80% gssiwater.com 8 Similar Projects Yucaipa Valley Water District, Oak Valley Town Center Recharge Project Yucaipa, CA The Oak Valley Town Center is a planned, large- scale, mixed use development that initially planned to spread recycled water using decorative lakes. However, our investigations found that recharge via spreading basins was not feasible and that artificial recharge using injection wells was best suited to the site geology. Geoscience initially completed a study to help determine recharge pond location and quantify the amount of water that could be recharged by each pond. The study developed a 3-Dimensional lithologic model based on available data and wells constructed in the area to identify potential recharge pond locations. We also completed seismic reflection surveys to determine the location of any geologic faults in the area that would prevent groundwater discharge. Based on study results, we identified a test pond location to determine the best placement for the recharge basins. To assess the recharge potential in the ponds, we installed monitoring wells and installed instrumentation to determine recharge rates. We also designed and installed automatic flow control and SCADA systems for the test pond to collect data remotely in real time. Our team used the automated system to access site data on-line to calculate recharge potential. Based on the test data, we discovered that percolation ponds likely would not recharge enough water, making injection wells the preferred option. We then completed modeling to assess the effectiveness and impact of injection wells. Based on modeling results we will recommend injection well locations and complete exploratory drilling to develop injection well designs. Project Details: Client: Yucaipa Valley Water District Client Contact: Joe Zoba Phone: (909) 797-5119 Email: jzoba@yvwd.us gssiwater.com 9 City of Oceanside, Pure Water Oceanside Oceanside, CA Geoscience has completed multiple projects for the City including groundwater recharge feasibility studies, design, and grant application support. Two projects recently completed and/or in progress projects are described below: Pure Water Oceanside Our team completed a study to evaluate indirect potable reuse (IPR) feasibility and pathogen removal through a water reclamation facility. As part of the study, our team developed an extensive exploratory program that included drilling, logging, testing, and sampling: nine monitoring wells, five sonic boreholes, three geophysical resistivity surveys, and historical data collection to better understand the basin hydrogeology and recalibrate and update the Mission Basin Groundwater Model. The feasibility study was successful in better understanding the basin and locating the best areas for injection wells. Currently, Geoscience is designing and providing construction management for three injection wells and three monitoring wells. Once completed, the project will enable the City to improve groundwater conditions, improve supply reliability, and optimize water recycling at the San Luis Rey Water Treatment Facility with IPR supplementing conventional Non-Potable Reuse (NPR) opportunities. Once the new wells are operational, the City will be able to recharge the basin with an additional 2,000 and 5,000 acre feet of recycled water per year. Mission Basin Groundwater Purification Facility USBR Grant Study As a subconsultant, Geoscience supported efforts to complete a grant application to expand the City’s Mission Basin Groundwater Purification Facility (MBGPF). Using the recalibrated and updated model, we determined the best location for new extraction wells to supply brackish water to the MBGPF without negatively impacting the basin and current operations. We also worked closely with the City and Prime Consultant, Woodard & Curran, to support discussions with the County, Regional Board, Division of Drinking Water, and other regulatory agencies. Due to these efforts the City was awarded the grant to expand the Desalter facility and help secure a more sustainable water supply. Project Details: Client: City of Oceanside Client Contact: Cari Dale Phone: (760) 435-5800 Email: CDale@oceansideca.org Appendix A: Resumes Years of Experience: 17Years with Geoscience: 15 Education: BS, Geology, Cal Poly Pomona Professional Registrations: California Professional Geologist (No. 9046) Certified California Hydrogeologist (No. 1038) Terry has completed more than 350 well projects over the course of his career. He is currently a Senior Geohydrologist at Geoscience and manages our well construction group—overseeing project aspects ranging from specifications and design, to video surveying and construction, to complete project oversight and scheduling. Terry has performed project management and well construction management and supervision on several multi-well projects throughout California including water supply wells, ASR wells, injection wells, and monitoring wells. Selected Project Experience Orange County Water District, Alamitos Barrier Improvement Project The Alamitos Barrier uses a network of 43 injection wells near the coast in southeastern Los Angeles County, and northwestern Orange County. The wells inject freshwater into the local basin to prevent seawater intrusion, protecting local groundwater supplies. Terry oversaw efforts to oversee drilling and construction, and perform testing and reporting for 17 injection wells, four nested monitoring wells, and two shallow piezometer wells. The project was completed under budget and on-time, meeting and exceeding client expectations. City of Huntington Beach, Replacement of Well No. 1 As the Project Manager, Terry oversaw preliminary design documents, technical plans and specifications for drilling, construction, development, and testing. To overcome the project challenges our team provided additional construction management and detailed design recommendations. Our team’s efforts were successful in meeting the project’s water quality and production requirements—exceeding expectations and completing the project on-budget and on-time. Terry Watkins, PG, CHG Project Manager 43+The number of clients for which Terry has provided well construction management 350+The number of well projects that Terry has completed •Superior relationship with drillers— maximize well capacity and performance •Experience with more than 350 well projects—no learning curve, efficiently complete the project potentially reducing schedule delays and cost over- runs Key qualifications... gssiwater.com Bedford Coldwater, Monitoring Wells Terry is currently developing designs for two new monitoring wells to help a groundwater sustainability agency implement their groundwater sustainability plan. Once initial design has been completed, Terry will oversee well drilling and provide contractor oversight. Municipal Water District of Orange County: Dana Point Ocean Desalination Project Hydrogeology Investigation, Phase I Intake Technology for Desalination Project Terry provided field supervision during drilling and testing efforts for four boreholes at the mouth of the San Juan Creek near Dana Point. Terry also supervised monitoring and construction of two, triple completion cluster monitoring wells. Pico Water District, Well Number 11 Terry oversaw efforts to complete a well-siting assessment and recommendations, drafted technical plans and specifications, perform contractor bid assistance, and support permitting with regulatory agencies. Selecting a suitable site for the project was challenging because of economic feasibility considerations. Working with the district and under Terry’s supervision, our team successfully found solutions to integrate the new well into the existing system and meet the drilling, construction and testing completion dates set for early 2018. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Multiple Projects As part of an on-call contract, Terry led efforts to rehabilitate six existing wells ranging in depth from 105 ft to 1,700 ft. Our team performed an initial site assessment, developed well designs, and oversaw production well construction. Currently, Terry is leading efforts to help the district to mitigate air entrainment in discharge water from an existing well. City of Lakewood Well No. 28 – 2019 to 2020 Terry was the project manager for a new well constructed for the City of Lakewood, designated Well No. 28. Tasks included in this work included preliminary design, development of contract documents, contractor bid support, construction management and field supervision, draft preliminary and final DWSAP documents, aquifer pump test analysis, and reporting. the well was completed under budget, ahead of schedule, and exceeded production expectations, producing 2,500 gpm with a specific capacity over 100 gmp/ft. Three Valley Municipal Water District – Well Site Evaluation and Construction of New Miragrand Well – 2019 to present Terry oversaw and managed a detailed site assessment and evaluation study with the purpose of identifying potential location for future groundwater wells that would maximize production and not require treatment. This task was performed using in-house GIS based software to identify potential locations. Once completed, Terry was the project manager for a new potable supply well that will be completed by the end of 2020. This project provides unique challenges in that it is in an affluent residential community whose neighbors do not want construction activity to disturb them. Close coordination and additional noise mitigation procedures will be required to complete this work. Chino Basin Desalter Authority, CDA Wells II-10 and II-11 Terry oversaw technical specifications, drilling, construction, design, development, and testing two, 450-foot deep, large diameter, high capacity municipal production wells. The wells had initial production goals of 2,500 gpm, however once completed the wells produced more than 3,500 gpm. Chino Basin Desalter Authority, Monitoring Wells Terry provided field oversight and construction management for monitoring well installation. The wells were to support an inland desalting facility to monitor salt concentrations and provide data to plan for future desalter expansion. gssiwater.com Brian Villalobos, PG, CHG, CEG Principal-in-Charge Years of Experience: 30+Years with Geoscience: 12 Education: BS, Geology, California State University, Los Angeles Professional Registrations: California Professional Geologist (No. 4153) Certified California Hydrogeologist (No. 794) California Certified Engineering Geologist (No. 1298) •30+ years of groundwater resource studies and reports •Specializes in groundwater recharge and water reuse •Certified Hydrogeologist and Engineering Geologist •Experience supporting 20 groundwater- related litigation cases Key qualifications... Brian has more than 30 years of professional experience in geohydrology and environmental geology throughout the Southern California region. His specific areas of expertise are in hydrogeologic investigations to support indirect potable reuse, groundwater recharge, and groundwater basin characterization projects. He has studied and modeled groundwater basins across the State and has led efforts to develop studies and reports including, monitoring well networks, groundwater recharge projects, sustainable yield, water budgets, and more. Brian has supported 20 groundwater related litigation cases serving as either the lead technical advisor or in a support role. Selected Project Experience California American Water Company: Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project Brian is the project manager overseeing day to day project activities. The Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP) will provide up to 6 million gallons per day (24,227 cubic meters) of desalinated water to relieve pressure on the local groundwater aquifer. Brian worked with our team to complete hydrogeologic studies of the area and design and install 24 monitoring wells to collect data. Brian oversaw our team’s efforts to design and construct a 724-foot (221 meter) test slant well for a two-year pump test. The slant well consistently produced 2,100 gallons per minute (7.9 cubic meters per minute). The project is currently in the permitting phase and is expected to begin construction in 2020. Municipal Water District of Orange County: South Orange Coast Ocean Desalination Plant Brian led efforts to develop technical data for an environmental impact report to use subsurface slant wells to obtain desalination feed water for the planned South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination Project. The project recently completed an Environmental Impact Assessment and is scheduled to begin full-scale design and construction in 2020. Olivenhain Municipal Water District: Groundwater Supply and Brine Management Program Olivenhain Municipal Water District relies almost entirely on imported water from the California and Colorado Aqueducts. To reduce independence on imported water, Brian is gssiwater.com leading our team’s efforts to determine the safe yield available in the San Dieguito basin; and determine locations for well fields, treatment facilities, pipelines, and brine discharge facilities. Currently our team is collection data, completing a hydrological investigation and updating the current groundwater model. We are also developing preliminary well designs, recommending brine management activities, supporting community outreach, and completing desk-top environmental reviews. City of Oceanside: Pure Water Oceanside Brian developed a geologic and hydrologic conceptual model and a groundwater flow and solute transport model for a 22 square mile area covering the entire Mission Groundwater Basin near Oceanside California. The model is being used to site and evaluate potential movement of recycled water from proposed injection sites. Yucaipa Valley Water District: Recycled Water Use Evaluation using the Gateway Sub-basin Focused Groundwater Model Brian managed efforts to develop a geologic and hydrologic conceptual model and a groundwater flow and solute transport model for a 10 square mile area of the Gateway sub-basin and portions of five additional sub- basins. The model is being used to evaluate potential movement of recycled water from the Wilson Creek Spreading Basin. San Bernardino County: Active Recharge Project from Tributaries of the Santa Ana River Brian led our team to develop a watershed model to estimate potential stormwater capture from 13 tributary Creeks to the Santa Ana River in the San Bernardino Valley. The project included preparing conceptual designs for stormwater capture facilities and estimating potential new conservation water added to the ground water system from urban run-off capture. Castaic Lake Water Agency: Santa Clara River Valley Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Brian led efforts to determine ambient water quality conditions and develop a plan to confirm that water management practices were consistent with the agency’s water quality objectives. The completed plan provided a framework to protect groundwater and improve groundwater resource sustainability. Brian led our team to develop a monitoring plan, and evaluate the effect that proposed projects would have on groundwater quality. Riverside County: Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Riverside Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project Brian identified available Santa Ana River surface flows to use in On-Channel and Off-Channel recharge basins and evaluated recharge impacts on the ground water surface. Riverside County: Evaluation of Potential Locations for Ground Water Recharge at the East and West Dam Sites, Diamond Valley Lake Brian assessed water quality and water level trends and other considerations to evaluate impacts from proposed recharge scenarios. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District: Recharge Investigation of the Yucaipa Groundwater Basin Brian led efforts to complete a hydrogeologic investigation at eleven potential sites within the Yucaipa Groundwater Basin for potential artificial recharge. Recommendations for subsequent phases of investigation were provided for each site. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and Partners: Determination of the Usable Capacity and Safe Yield for each Sub-basin within the Yucaipa Basin Area Brian led efforts to reevaluate sub-basin boundaries in the Yucaipa Groundwater Basin to assess the “safe yield” and storage capacity of each sub-basin. He developed a watershed model of the Yucaipa Valley to determine water balance terms previously not calculated. gssiwater.com Johnson Yeh, PhD, PG, CHG Principal Modeler Years of Experience: 30Years with Geoscience: 30 Education: BS, Geology, National Taiwan University MS, Geology National Taiwan University PhD, Sedimentology, University of Southern California Professional Registrations: California Professional Geologist (No. 6371) Certified California Hydrogeologist (No. 422) •Specializes in groundwater modeling •Assists USGS in testing GSFLOW model code •Experience supporting 30+ groundwater- related litigation cases Key qualifications... San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District: Santa Ana River Integrated Model Johnson is leading our team in an effort to use existing groundwater and surface water models to develop an integrated groundwater model using MODFLOW for the upper Santa Ana River. The resulting Upper SAR Integrated Model (or Integrated SAR Model), will be used to determine what factors may contribute to declines SAR flows, and assess cumulative effects on SAR surface flows and groundwater levels. Western Municipal Water District: Riverside-Arlington Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) Johnson is overseeing modeling efforts to develop a GSP for the Riverside-Arlington Basin. The Basin is classified by DWR as a medium priority basin and is one of the district’s primary sources of local water supply. Johnson is working in conjunction with our team and the district to complete all models necessary to complete a compliant GSP. Rancho California Water District: Surface and Ground Water Model of the Murrieta-Temecula Ground Water Basin Johnson was the lead modeler to create an Integrated Ground Water and Streamflow Model. Johnson worked with a technical panel that included, RCWD, USGS, U.S. Marines, Camp Pendleton, Stetson Engineers, Santa Margarita Watermaster, and Geoscience. The technical was formed to avoid litigation between RCWD and the Camp Pendleton Marine Base. Johnson is responsible for preparation of the model and analysis of the results. City of Pismo Beach/WSC Inc.: Regional Groundwater Sustainability Project (RGSP) The RGSP is a regional recycled water project that will help reduce the risk of seawater intrusion and help improve sustainability for the region’s water supply. Johnson is leading efforts to evaluate existing characterization studies, groundwater models, and water quality data. He is also constructing and calibrating an expanded MODFLOW groundwater model to evaluate injection and extracting scenarios, and conduct an anti- degradation analysis. Yucaipa Valley Water District: Recycled Water Use Evaluation using the Gateway Sub-basin Focused Groundwater Model Johnson was the senior modeler overseeing the construction of a groundwater model used to predict the impacts of recycled water gssiwater.com spreading on groundwater quality and to downstream municipal wells. Western Municipal Water District: Impact of Recharge on Contaminant Plumes and Modeling Johnson was the project manager and lead ground water modeler to assess and model the area around the Riverside-Corona Feeder, to show the potential future impact of an initial operation scenario on the ground water levels and ground water quality in the San Bernardino Basin Area.Jurupa Community Services District: Chino Basin Artificial Recharge Evaluation Johnson led modeling efforts to modify a previously established groundwater flow model of the Chino Basin to incorporate solute transport and assess the impact of artificial recharge operations planned by the Chino Basin Watermaster on Nitrate and TDS concentrations in the southern Chino Basin. Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority: Chino Desalter System Projects Johnson developed a detailed analysis of the Chino Ground Water Basin that included a three-dimensional numerical ground water flow model (MODFLOW). A separate analysis was also conducted to assess potential water quality changes in project and existing wells as a result of the project. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District: Remediation Strategies for Ground Water Contamination Johnson was the project manager and lead ground water modeler to refine previous USGS models to better understand, analyze, and evaluate remediation alternatives related to ground water contamination problems. California American Water, Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP) Johnson led efforts to update a three- dimensional variable density flow and solute transport model for the North Marina Area in 2008 and constructed a focused groundwater model near the CEMEX gravel plant in Marina, CA. Johnson helped revise and update the Salinas Valley Integrated Surface Water and Ground Water Model (SVIGSM) which are currently being used to evaluate local and regional impacts on groundwater levels and quality from MPSWP operations. City of Oceanside, Mission Basin Model Update and Evaluation of Indirect Potable Reuse Johnson oversaw efforts to update and refine a groundwater model used to predict the impacts of recycled water spreading and injection on groundwater quality and to downstream municipal wells. In addition, the updated model was used to evaluate the impacts on threshold water levels in the Mission Basin to stay within permit constraints City of Placentia, Dewatering for the Orangethorpe Rail Corridor Lowering Project Johnson conducted a geohydrologic investigation, and led groundwater modeling efforts to develop a MODFLOW groundwater model to investigate the effectiveness of dewatering wells in lowering historically high ground water levels near a 5-mile section of lowered railroad tracks. Caltrans, Devil’s Slide Tunnel Johnson designed, constructed and calibrated steady-state and transient 10-layer MODFLOW flow models in fractured and faulted hard rock terrain to simulate potential tunnel groundwater inflow during construction and at equilibrium of a proposed double-bore tunnel near Devil’s Slide. The flow model simulated flow in several different rock types including faulted crystalline rock and folded turbidite sequences. gssiwater.com Selected Project Experience Ventura County: Ventura County Municipal Well Rehabilitation* Tim was the project manager responsible for the design of a municipal pumping well rehabilitation by installing a new well liner casing, screen, and pump into an existing well. Tim also oversaw permitting assistance, wellhead treatment design, and construction management. Eastern Municipal Water District: Well 59 Treatment Facilities* Tim helped design a 1,000 gallon per minute GAC treatment facility to remove perfluorinated compound contamination in a potable water supply well. The project also included an engineering evaluation and cost analysis for different remediation alternatives including wellhead treatment and drilling a replacement well. Antelope Valley East Kern Water Agency (AVEK) Groundwater Bank Expansion* Tim supported efforts to expand the AVEK Eastside groundwater bank. The project increased the total groundwater recharge area to 68 acres, and installed four new groundwater pumping wells with a total capacity of 4,800 gpm to recover the additional artificial recharge. Palmdale Water District: Palmdale Regional Groundwater Recharge and Recovery Project* Tim developed preliminary designs for a groundwater bank project providing 80 acres of recharge basins and 16 groundwater pumping wells for recovery. He also designed one monitoring well and one test well to evaluate aquifer properties and groundwater quality. Rosamond Community Services District: Rosamond Hydrogeological Study* Tim led efforts to evaluate groundwater storage and well siting options based on groundwater Tim Chen, MS, EIT Project Modeler Years of Experience: 9 Years with Geoscience: 3 Education: BS, Environmental Engineering, Shanghai University MS, Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California Professional Registrations: Engineer-in-Training •Well design and groundwater modeling experience—increase project efficiency •Experience with supply, injection, water banking, and monitoring wells—identify and resolve issues •Experience on environmental investigation—help identify and mitigate constituents of concern Key qualifications... Tim has experience with groundwater and environmental investigations performed for numerous municipalities, state agencies, and private clients throughout the Southern California region. Tim has supported and led projects involving groundwater flow and solute transport modeling, geohydrologic investigations, ground water basin and water quality studies, watershed modeling and management, and artificial recharge projects. Tim also has experience in well equipping design, developing GIS applications, and project management. gssiwater.com modeling results. The project supported efforts to expand the existing potable water distribution system by developing a new groundwater supply well. City of Grimes: Grimes Test Wells* Tim supported efforts to site and design two test wells for isolated aquifer zone testing to determine aquifer production and water quality. Results from these test wells will be used for a municipal well design in the area. City of Los Angeles: One Water LA 2040 Plan* Tim worked as an in-house consultant to support the One Water LA 2040 Plan. His efforts included reviewing technical reports (i.e., wastewater facilities plan, stormwater and urban runoff facilities plan and environmental impact report), public and stakeholder outreach, and workshop preparations. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District: Yucaipa Safe Yield Study Tim helped revise the Yucaipa groundwater basin and sub-basin boundary based on groundwater level and fault information using GIS software. He calculated specific yield and storage capacity of each sub-basin for 1991 and 2008 and built the HSPF watershed model for Yucaipa watershed area based on 2005 land use. Tim also ran the HSPF watershed model, analyzed water balance, and the historical groundwater storage change for the Yucaipa basin area. City of Riverside: Recharge Modeling Tim analyzed the exceedance probability for characterized flows at Rubber Dam using USGS 15 min, daily, and watershed model data. He ran and analyzed the HSPF watershed model and water balance which included recharge and discharge components under no project, and project conditions. Tim then calculated source water percentage contributions to surface water at the MWD crossing, and analyzed HSPF watershed simulated outflow result to prepare input data for the Groundwater Flow Model. City of San Bernardino: US EPA Model Tim collected land use data for 1963, 1975, 1984 and 2005 in the San Bernardino Basin Area (SBBA) area using GIS software. He then prepared the SBBA HSPF watershed model input data including land use, precipitation, evapotranspiration, and channel type data. Finally, Tim helped build and calibrate SBBA watershed models for the period of 1962 – 1972 and 1979 – 2012. Chino Basin Desalter Authority: Chino Basin Well Siting Study Tim helped update and calibrate a historical groundwater flow model and a solute transport model. He also developed and ran predictive runs, analyzed the modeling results, and developed the final modeling report. San Luis Obispo County: Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Model Update Tim helped develop and calibrate a HSPF Watershed Model for the period of 1981 through 2011. Tim updated and recalibrated the Groundwater Flow Model using the results from the Paso Robles Watershed Model. He then helped develop and run predictive model runs for the period of 2012 through 2040. Finally, Tim analyzed the modeling results and wrote the modeling report. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District: Prepare Second Report of Recharge Parties to RWQCB Pursuant to Cooperative Agreement Tim helped collect and prepare groundwater model input files including updated groundwater levels and water quality data. He also ran the water balance and analysis for hydrologic budgets under 3 different water model scenarios. *Project completed prior to employment at Geoscience gssiwater.com Logan has more than 13 years of professional experience on more than 27 municipal direct or alternative supply wells and has completed more than 70 well field assessments and groundwater studies. As a Project Geohydrologist for Geoscience, Logan provides oversight for multiple projects involving: well siting, design, construction and deconstruction, permitting (county, state and local agencies), He also is proficient in interpretation of pump tests, well productions analysis, drilling issues, and well rehabilitations. Selected Project Experience Orange County Water District: Los Alamitos Barrier Improvement Project Logan was part of a team of hydrogeologists responsible for full time observation of conductor borehole drilling, conductor casing install, pilot borehole drilling, geophysical logging, and casing install of Injection wells and Monitoring wells. 17 Injection wells, 4 clustered Monitoring wells and 2 Piezometers make up the project. Responsible for contacting OCWD, Jensen Drilling and Mahaffey while drilling. City of Oceanside, Indirect Potable Reuse Feasibility Study Logan provided technical support on a project that evaluated the best locations for both injection and surface spreading (basin infiltration). Phase I work included background data research and groundwater model update and recalibration. Phase II involved validation of the updated model by conducting a field study involving drilling three sonic boreholes, hydropunch water quality sampling, running geophysical logs in each borehole and backfilling. The boreholes were sited in locations of data gaps and to evaluate alluvial and aquitard thickness, K-values of the aquifer, and groundwater quality. Phase II also included various geophysical resistivity surveys along areas where drilling would be difficult to do. These resistivity surveys were then correlated to the boreholes and used for another model update. Phase III used the fully updated model to run various scenarios for the best location and type of recharge in the basin (spreading or injection). This work lead to the City of Oceanside receiving a grant to design and construct three new injection wells for their IPR project Pure Water Oceanside currently in Design Phase. City of Oceanside, USBR Grant Feasibility Study for New Extraction Wells Logan managed a team of our modelers for a feasibility study that evaluated the best locations for new extraction wells for the City’s desalter facility. Using the current model Logan and team ran various scenarios for the best Logan Wicks, MS, PG Field Supervisor Years of Experience: 13Years with Geoscience: 5 Education: BS, Geology, Cal Poly Pomona BS, Biology, Cal Poly Pomona MS Geology, Cal Poly Pomona Professional Registrations: California Professional Geologist (No. 9580) •Experience and familiarity with groundwater production and monitoring well installation—help maximize well production and efficiency Key qualifications... gssiwater.com locations for up to three new wells to help bring their desalter facility to near full capacity. His work with this study lead to the City receiving a grant to design and construct up to three new extraction wells and is currently out to bid. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Multiple Projects, As part of an on-call contract, Logan led field efforts to rehabilitate six existing wells ranging in depth from 105 ft to 1,700 ft. Our team performed an initial site assessment, developed well designs, and oversaw production well construction. Imperial Irrigation District: Monitoring Wells 1 & 2 Logan provided onsite well construction observation and data analysis. He helped develop the final well design, pump design and water quality analysis. Chino Basin Desalter Authority, CDA Monitoring Well Logan oversaw technical specifications, drilling, construction, design, development, and testing of 500-foot deep, monitoring well. The well will be used to monitor groundwater quality for a near-by treatment facility well field. Rancho California Water District, Replacement of Nine Municipal Wells, Temecula, CA, 2013 – Ongoing As one of the Project Managers, Logan assisted in leading efforts to prepare large reports and plans to install nine new production wells that would replace failing supply wells. Since 2013, eight wells have been completed, one was abandoned due to water quality issues, the last two were completed early 2019. Our team provided well design, technical specifications, and helped the assigned district engineer to prepare bid packages. Our drilling phase work included zone testing, data analysis, and preparing multiple design options for water quality and production rates. City of Huntington Beach, Well 1 Replacement Logan performed well destruction and replacement for the City of Huntington Beach. He supported design efforts for well casing, screen, filter pack, and annular seal. During construction, he attended field meetings and worked with the contractor to inspect conductor bore hole drilling, casing installation, and the sanitary seal. He also sampled and logged soil cuttings, inspected aquifer zone testing for yield and water quality, and performed mechanical grading analyses. Once constructed, Logan inspected final development by pumping and surging and aquifer pumping tests. Pico Water District, Well Number 11 Logan oversaw efforts to drafted technical plans and specifications, perform contractor bid assistance, and support permitting with regulatory agencies. Site selection for the project was challenging because of economic feasibility considerations. Working with the district Logan and our team successfully found solutions to integrate the new well into the existing system and meet the project completion dates and production goals set for early 2018. Bellflower-Somerset Mutual Water Company, Leahy Avenue Well Due to permitting issues this project was delayed for several years, Logan helped manage schedule and budget to get the project back on track and completed. The project successfully met the new schedule and budget and produces more than 3,500 gpm, with a specific capacity of 60 gpm/ ft—meeting and surpassing project goals. Olivenhain Municipal Water District, San Dieguito Valley Brackish Groundwater Desalination Study Logan supported modeling efforts to study brackish groundwater desalination feasibility and location. He helped collect data, complete a hydrogeologic investigation, and performed well field and raw water collection. He also led efforts to drill construct and test a test supply well for the study. Due to the area and nearby residents, construction was difficult. He acted and supported the District in efforts to talk to the community and answer any and all questions they may have. He also designed a Noise Mitigation Program for the construction activities to comply with local noise ordnance to help keep the project on schedule and budget. gssiwater.com Seth has performed well construction inspection for tasks such as pilot borehole drilling and reaming, casing inspection and installation, air lifting and swabbing, development by pumping, and down-hole video logging. Performed water quality sample collection of ground water and surface water. Types of wells include: high capacity municipal water supply wells, test boreholes, and monitoring wells using the reverse rotary drilling method. Prepared well designs based on data collected during the drilling process, provided final pump design recommendations, and final summary reports. Performed geohydrologic investigations. Selected Project Experience Orange County Water District: Alamitos Barrier Improvement Project The Alamitos Barrier is a series of wells that inject fresh water into aquifers along northern Orange County to prevent seawater intrusion and protect inland production wells. The district recently expanded the Alamitos Barrier by installing additional injection wells. Seth provided field oversight during injection well development by pump and surge, and airlift. California American Water: Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project The Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP) is a multifaceted project to improve water supply and reliability to the Monterey Peninsula. Seth is providing monthly and quarterly monitoring and water quality testing for the slant wells that feed into the desalination plant. Drilled at an angle, the well pulls ocean water from beneath the ocean floor, protecting ocean wildlife and improving feed water quality. City of Huntington Beach: Well 1 Replacement Seth supported well destruction and replacement for the City of Huntington Beach. He performed site inspections including chlorine injection and well alignment surveys. Olivenhain Municipal Water District: Desalination Design Pilot Olivenhain Municipal Water District relies entirely on imported water for their supply. The underlying San Digueto basin is brackish and cannot be used for municipal supply without treatment. Seth is supporting efforts to complete an inland desalination pilot study. He is supporting long term pumping tests by installing transducers in pilot test wells, taking water levels and downloading transducer levels. City of Torrance (Water Works Engineers): North Torrance Wellfield Phase 3 Seth aided efforts to expand the North Torrance Wellfield by providing field support during design and construction. During design, Seth performed mechanical grading analysis on samples Seth Kuiper, GIT Field Observer •Field experience on well construction, development and testing projects—help maximize well production and efficiency Key qualifications... Years of Experience: 5Years with Geoscience: 5 Education: BA, Geology, Calvin College, Michigan MS, Geosciences/Hydrogeology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo Professional Registrations: Geologist-in-Training gssiwater.com collected in the field to determine screen intervals. During construction, he observed casing construction, filter pack placement, and completed geophysical logs. Department of Water Resources (Jensen Drilling): Perris Dam Seismic Remediation Project Dewatering Wells Seth performed field observation to install and/ or rehabilitate more than 50 dewatering wells in the vicinity of Perris Dam to improve the dam’s seismic performance. Seth oversaw well development by pump and surge. The project included field operations 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for five months. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District: Near Term Water Supply Program Seth supported our team through performing field observation relating to chemical injection for the water well rehabilitation project of three wells. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District: Warm Springs Groundwater Basin Hydrogeologic Study Seth supported field efforts to complete a hydrogeologic study of the Warm Springs Groundwater Basin to determine future production potential. He performed constant rate tests at local wells and processed results. Pico Water District: Well Siting Study Seth supported efforts to draft a well siting assessment report for the Pico Water District by analyzing the viability of multiple well locations. Rancho California Water District: Well 231 Replacement Seth supported field efforts to replace Well 231 for Rancho California Water District. He participated in field meetings, inspected pilot hole drilling, collected soil samples, and oversaw isolated aquifer zone testing for yield and water quality. He also prepared field reports and the well summary report. Rancho California Water District: Annual Subsidence Monitoring Geoscience conducts annual subsidence reporting for the district, and reviews current hydrogeological data to recommend actions needed to mitigate land subsidence. Seth has conducted research and compiled data to support the annual subsidence report. Three Valleys Municipal Water District: Miragrand Well As part of an on-call support contract, Seth performs field support to well characterization. To date, he has performed well step tests and analysis to assess well efficiency. Seth also performs field support to verify sonic sounder readings in two of the district’s wells. Western Municipal Water District: Arlington Area Well Siting Seth supports our team on an ongoing well siting study located in the Arlington Basin. He analyzes the necessary criteria using GIS software to select potential injection well locations. Yucaipa Valley Water District: Artificial Recharge Feasibility Study Seth supported field efforts to complete a feasibility study for a proposed artificial recharge facility. In the field, Seth performed a five-day pump test including setting up flow meters, and transducer network in surrounding production and monitoring wells. He also performed mechanical grading analyses in test boreholes and calculated hydraulic conductivity values. Seth provided additional support by monitoring water levels and collecting and downloading data from field instruments. gssiwater.com Wesley has performed geohydrologic investigations, well assessments, water quality monitoring, water well test drilling programs and the supervision of water well projects including: design and construction, water quality sampling and analyses, and well rehabilitation/ redevelopment. Selected Project Experience California American Water: Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project The Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (MPWSP) is a multifaceted project to improve water supply and reliability to the Monterey Peninsula. Wesley performs weekly and quarterly monitoring and water quality testing for the monitoring network and test slant well. Drilled at an angle, the slant well pulls ocean water from beneath the ocean floor, protecting ocean wildlife and improving feed water quality. Wesley managed three years of continuous monitoring data and helped develop monthly and quarterly monitoring and test slant well completion reports. He also managed and updated geologic cross-sections of the area as new lithologic data was gathered. Rancho California Water District: Well 231 Replacement Wesley supported field efforts to replace Well 231 for Rancho California Water District. He attended field meetings, inspected isolated aquifer zone testing for yield and water quality, reviewed lithology, performed mechanical grading analyses; and inspected casing, screen, filter pack, and annular steel installation. He also prepared field reports and the well summary report. Rancho California Water District: Well 124 Replacement Wesley supported field efforts to replace Well 124 for Rancho California Water District. He attended field meetings, inspected isolated aquifer zone testing for yield and water quality, reviewed lithology, performed mechanical grading analyses; and inspected casing, screen, filter pack, and annular steel installation. He also prepared field and summary reports. City of Oceanside (RMS): Mission Basin Model Update and Evaluation of Indirect Potable Reuse Wesley supported field efforts to develop a geologic and hydrologic conceptual model and groundwater flow and solute transport model for a 22 square mile area covering the entire Mission Groundwater Basin near Oceanside California. His efforts will help the City develop a groundwater recharge project using tertiary treated water from the local wastewater treatment facility. Wesley Massoll, GIT Field Observer •Field experience on well construction, development and testing projects—help maximize well production and efficiency Key qualifications... Years of Experience: 4Years with Geoscience: 4 Education: BA, Geology, University of North Carolina, Wilmington MS, Geology, University of North Carolina, Wilmington Professional Registrations: Geologist-in-Training gssiwater.com Alex has been involved in many different types of well projects, well assessments, groundwater level monitoring, water well test drilling programs, well rehabilitation, and new construction. He performs field supervision during well design and construction, water quality sampling and analyses, and well rehabilitation/redevelopment. Selected Project Experience Rancho California Water District, Well No. 102 Alex completed comprehensive Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection documentation for Well No. 102. Initially, the well was only contributing to the district’s recycled water system. To convert the well to potable water use, the district needed to know water source measurements to be able to prioritize and direct source water protection measures for safer potable water. The types of tests conducted by Alex included: calculations for the fix radius and physical barrier effectiveness. He generated shape files for the capture zones, which identified the types of Possible Contaminating Activities (PCA) that occurred within the ground water protection areas surrounding the well. He also worked on K tables to rank PCA risks. GWS #4 Development, LLC., Warren Well No. 4R, San Bernardino Alex oversaw drilling, logged soil samples, and performed mechanical grading analyses for a new groundwater production well. He also performed construction to successfully install conductor casing and sanitary seal. During isolated zone testing, he inspected zone tools, screens, the filter pack, and annular steel installation to produce data on yield and water quality. He also helped develop the well design letter which summarized the results of pilot borehole drilling, zone testing, and provided options for a casing, screen, and gravel pack design for the new well for the client. West Valley Water District (WVWD), Phase II Characterization Our team helped West Valley Water District to evaluate the production potential and water quality several potential well sites. After the sites were acquired, Alex supported field rehabilitation and helped optimize water production for the wells. He supported well development, oversaw aquifer pump tests, spinner survey, and performed composite and depth-specific groundwater quality sampling. Alex then verified production data and made recommendations to improve well production and efficiency. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD), Near Term Supply Program Alex supported field testing efforts for two wells (Cereal Well #3 and Summerly Well) for the district. Cereal Well #3 rehabilitation work and aquifer pumping test were performed to optimize water production and included pumping and surging and chemical rehabilitation. Testing for Summerly Well included aquifer pump tests to determine short and long term sustainable production for the client. Alex also Alex Arita Field Observer •Field experience and familiarity with groundwater models—help provide more accurate field data and monitoring What Alex brings to the project... Years of Experience: 3Years with Geoscience: 3 Education: BS, Geological Science, California State University, Fullerton gssiwater.com developed recommendations including installing an inflatable packer to maximize production from the lower screened intervals while preventing cascading water and subsequent air entrainment from the uppermost screened interval. Bellflower-Somerset Mutual Water Company, Leahy Avenue Well Alex supported efforts to install a new groundwater well to replace an inactive well impacted by groundwater contaminants exceeding regulatory limits. Alex oversaw well development, well and aquifer testing, flowmeter survey, and supported parts of the well completion report. Pico Water District (PWD), PWD Well No. 11 The district installed Well No. 11 to improve the existing water supply system’s reliability and efficiency. Because of the age of the district’s existing four wells, long-term reliability was a concern. During field construction oversight, reaming, casing and screen installations, filter pack oversight and well development were performed. He participated in well and aquifer testing, flowmeter survey, plumbness and alignment survey, downhole video, supported well completion reports, and well disinfection. California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Perris Dam Seismic Remediation In collaboration with the CA Department of Water Resources, a relief well system was developed as a part of a statewide effort to reduce seismic risks to Perris Dam. As part of a team, Alex provided onsite observation to rehabilitate and/or install close to 70 dewatering wells. Alex supervised redevelopment by swabbing, airlifting, and pumping. He also measured groundwater level changes in surrounding wells during constant rate pumping to assess well interference. Hansji Hotels: Yosemite Hydrogeological Study Alex helped complete a hydrogeological investigation to meet permitting requirements for new developments set by Tuolumne County to determine the source capacity for a planned hotel near Yosemite, California. Alex performed field data collection including setting transducers in eight wells at and near the project area, a 10-day pumping test, and collected water quality samples from the planned wells and nearby wells. Alex then helped assess the planned project’s impact on nearby wells, drafted figures, and helped complete the draft and final hydrogeologic report. City of Torrance (Water Systems Engineering): North Torrance Wellfield Phase 3 Alex helped develop technical plans, specifications, and construction drawings for two new wells in the City of Torrance. During construction, he provided field observation for conductor installation, pilot borehole drilling, aquifer zone testing, final gravel pack installation, and aquifer testing following construction. Rancho California Water District: New Well 176 Drilling Phase - D1896 Alex provided field oversight during construction of new well No. 176. He observed zone testing, borehole reaming, casing and gravel pack installation, pumping development, water quality sampling, final video inspection, and disinfection. CADIZ Inc.: Three New Irrigation Wells Alex provided field observation to construct three new irrigation wells for an agricultural development in California’s Mojave Desert. During construction, he observed grading analysis, final borehole reaming, gravel pack installation, well and pump development, plumbness and alignment survey, downhole video survey, and observed well disinfection. including cleaning and calibration. Three Valleys Municipal Water District: Miragrand Well Alex is currently supporting permitting efforts to design and permit a new production well. He is currently developing Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection (DWSAP) documentation to calculate distance and transit times from potential contamination sources. Alex also calculated fixed radius and physical barrier effectiveness, generated shape files for capture zones, and developed K tables to rank potential risks. Once DWSAP documents are complete, well design and construction will begin. gssiwater.com gssiwater.com Robert has more than eight years of professional experience that was earned from working as a field geologist, project manager, and client service manager on a diverse range of challenging projects that have focused on groundwater recharge and banking, construction management, environmental site investigations and characterization, real estate redevelopment/ due diligence, and regulatory compliance. Robert is experienced with managing from the field all aspects of exploratory drilling and well construction including development, pump testing, disinfection, water quality sampling, as well as well rehabilitation. He has logged, managed the construction, and participated in the design for over 35 large diameter groundwater supply wells in Southern and Northern California using mud direct rotary and reverse circulation drilling methods. Selected Project Experience Antelope Valley East Kern Water Agency: Water Supply and Stabilization Program* Robert was the lead field geologist in supporting efforts to expand the AVEK Westside groundwater bank across three different sites and managed the drilling of exploratory pilot holes 700 to 1,000 feet deep, zone testing, reaming, geophysical survey, well construction, plumbness and alignment, development, aquifer and pump testing, water quality testing, video survey, and disinfection for over 25 new groundwater pumping wells to recover the additional artificial recharge. Antelope Valley East Kern Water Agency: Eastside Groundwater Bank Expansion* Robert assisted a sub-consultant in the collection of surface geophysical field data to obtain information on well siting options. Robert was the lead field geologist in supporting efforts to expand the AVEK Eastside groundwater bank, and managed the drilling of exploratory pilot holes, reaming, geophysical survey, well construction, plumbness and alignment, well development, aquifer and pump testing, water quality testing, video survey, and disinfection for four new groundwater pumping wells to recover the additional artificial recharge. Robert also oversaw well equipping modification and well rehabilitation of one well. Palmdale Water District: Palmdale Regional Groundwater Recharge and Recovery Project* Robert was the lead field geologist and managed the drilling of exploratory pilot holes into decomposed granite, bedrock, and apparent bedrock fractures; reaming, geophysical survey, well construction, plumbness and alignment, development, and video survey of four groundwater monitoring wells as deep as 400 feet. City of Modesto: Hexavalent Chromium Water System Compliance Project* Robert was the lead field geologist and managed the drilling of exploratory pilot holes 700 to Robert Sia Field Observer •Experience with both wells and groundwater studies—help verify data to develop groundwater models and studies that reflect basin conditions Key qualifications... Years of Experience: 9Years with Geoscience: 1 Education: BS, Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton gssiwater.com 1,000 feet deep, zone testing, reaming, geophysical survey, well construction, plumbness and alignment, development, aquifer and pump testing, water quality testing, video survey, and disinfection for one stainless steel wire wrap groundwater pumping well. Robert also oversaw the abandonment of an onsite domestic groundwater well. Ventura County: Well Rehabilitation* Robert was the lead project geologist and managed the rehabilitation and pump testing of one groundwater pumping well that utilized a new well liner casing, screen, and pump into an existing well. City of Newman: Del Rio Public Water System Expansion* Robert was the lead project geologist and managed the drilling of an exploratory pilot holes, zone testing, reaming, geophysical survey, well construction, plumbness and alignment, development, aquifer and pump testing, water quality testing, video survey, and disinfection for one stainless steel wire wrap groundwater pumping well. Rosamond Community Services District: Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation Project* Robert was the lead project geologist for the design of six groundwater monitoring wells to monitor off-site groundwater. Robert also assisted in drafting sections of the project specifications. *Project completed prior to Geoscience Appendix B: Cost Proposal East Valley Water District Table 1 Task Description Principal Hydrologist Principal Modeler/Enginee r Senior Modeler Senior Geohydrologist Project Geohydrologist Senior Associate Modeler Staff Geohydrologist Technical Illustrator Clerical Labor Reimbursable Expenses1 Total Cost Hourly Rate:$271 $286 $261 $233 $207 $204 $150 $150 $106 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS 1.1 Project Management 2 2 4 12 12 7,438$ -$ 7,438$ 1.2 Prepare for and Attend Project Kick-Off Meeting, Status Update Meetings, and Site Reconnaissance 2 2 4 12 12 7,438$ -$ 7,438$ Subtotal 14,876$ -$ 14,876$ 2.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, AND FINAL DESIGN (MW-A)2 2.1 Provide Construction Management (includes contractor submittal review, response to RFIs, construction updates, invoice review, change order review, and preparation of a final "punch list")6 12 3,882$ -$ 3,882$ 2.2 Provide Field Supervision of Borehole Drilling for MW-A, Sampling of Cuttings, and Geophysical Borehole Logging (assumes full-time inspection; 1,000 ft depth)2 4 112 18,094$ 1,450$ 19,544$ 2.3 Prepare Final Monitoring Well Design 2 4 8 3,130$ -$ 3,130$ 2.4 Provide Field Supervision of Borehole enlargement (reaming) for MW-A, (assumes part-time inspection; 840 ft depth)2 4 64 10,894$ 725$ 11,619$ 2.5 Field Supervision during Installation of Casing, Screen, Filter Pack, and Annular Seal (assumes full-time inspection)2 4 26 5,194$ 290$ 5,484$ 2.6 Field Supervision during Initial Development by Swabbing and Airlifting (assumes part-time inspection)1 2 18 3,347$ 290$ 3,637$ 2.7 Inspect Final Development by Pumping and Surging (assumes full-time inspection)2 24 4,014$ 290$ 4,304$ 2.8 Coordinate with Laboratory, and Collect Groundwater Quality Samples and Deliver to Laboratory 2 2 6 1,780$ 145$ 1,925$ 2.9 Inspect Final Well Head Completion 2 4 1,066$ 145$ 1,211$ Subtotal 51,401$ 3,335$ 54,736$ 3.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, AND FINAL DESIGN (MW-B)2 3.1 Provide Construction Management (includes contractor submittal review, response to RFIs, construction updates, invoice review, change order review, and preparation of a final "punch list")6 12 3,882$ -$ 3,882$ 3.2 Provide Field Supervision of Borehole Drilling for MW-B, Sampling of Cuttings, and Geophysical Borehole Logging (assumes full-time inspection; 600 ft depth)2 4 64 10,894$ 870$ 11,764$ 3.3 Prepare Final Monitoring Well Design 2 4 8 3,130$ -$ 3,130$ 3.4 Provide Field Supervision of Borehole enlargement (reaming) for MW-B, (assumes part-time inspection; 520 ft depth)2 4 32 6,094$ 435$ 6,529$ 3.5 Field Supervision during Installation of Casing, Screen, Filter Pack, and Annular Seal (assumes full-time inspection)2 4 26 5,194$ 290$ 5,484$ 3.6 Field Supervision during Initial Development by Swabbing and Airlifting (assumes part-time inspection)1 2 18 3,347$ 290$ 3,637$ 3.7 Inspect Final Development by Pumping and Surging (assumes full-time inspection)2 24 4,014$ 290$ 4,304$ 3.8 Coordinate with Laboratory, and Collect Groundwater Quality Samples and Deliver to Laboratory 2 2 6 1,780$ 145$ 1,925$ 3.9 Inspect Final Well Head Completion 2 4 1,066$ 145$ 1,211$ Subtotal 39,401$ 2,465$ 41,866$ GEOSCIENCE SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. Cost to Provide Geohydrologic Consulting Services Related to the Design and Installation of Two (2) Nested Monitoring Wells and a Tracer Study Work Plan 15-Oct-21 Page 1 of 2 GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. East Valley Water District Table 1 Task Description Principal Hydrologist Principal Modeler/Enginee r Senior Modeler Senior Geohydrologist Project Geohydrologist Senior Associate Modeler Staff Geohydrologist Technical Illustrator Clerical Labor Reimbursable Expenses1 Total Cost Hourly Rate:$271 $286 $261 $233 $207 $204 $150 $150 $106 GEOSCIENCE SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. Cost to Provide Geohydrologic Consulting Services Related to the Design and Installation of Two (2) Nested Monitoring Wells and a Tracer Study Work Plan 4.0 CONTRACTOR SERVICES FOR DRILLING AND CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NESTED MONITORING WELLS1, 4.1 Drilling, Construction, Development, and Water Quality Sampling of Two (2) New Nested Monitoring Wells (assumes each of the 2 new nested wells will consist of one (1) borehole containing 3 screened completions)-$ 790,174$ 790,174$ Subtotal -$ 790,174$ 790,174$ 5.0 WELL COMPLETION SUMMARY LETTER REPORT 5.1 Prepare Well Completion Summary Letter Report (assumes one (1) letter report 100% FINAL submittal for each well; 2 letter reports total)2 8 12 24 8 2 9,902$ 100$ 10,002$ Subtotal 9,902$ 100$ 10,002$ 6.0 PREPARE TRACER STUDY WORK PLAN 6.1 Perform Aquifer Pumping Tests of Existing Production Wells for use in Model Update and Refinement (assumes 24 hours pumping tests of 2 existing productions wells)4 8 40 8,588$ -$ 8,588$ 6.2 Provide Aquifer Pumping Test Analysis (assumes analysis of 2 pumping tests)8 12 24 7,948$ -$ 7,948$ 6.3 Update, Refine , and Recalibrate Groundwater Model with Pumping Test Data 6 24 24 60 30 24 35,094$ -$ 35,094$ 6.4 Evaluate Dilution Factors and Breakthrough Times 8 8 40 40 20 16 28,456$ -$ 28,456$ 6.5 Prepare Draft Tracer Study Workplan 12 8 16 16 12 16 32 24 27,592$ -$ 27,592$ 6.6 Client Meetings and Meeting with DDW (assumes three meetings)8 8 16 16 12 14,844$ -$ 14,844$ 6.7 Prepare and Submit Final Tracer Study Workplan 6 4 12 12 8 8 6 4 13,310$ -$ 13,310$ Subtotal 135,832$ -$ 135,832$ TOTAL HOURS AND COST (TASKS 1-6): 50 56 116 130 164 124 598 78 6 251,412$ 796,074$ 1,047,486$ Notes: 1 Reimbursable expenses include mileage, field per diem at $145/day, sub-contract fees including 10% administrative fee, and report reproduction costs. 2 3 See Table 2 for cost break down of Contractor scope of work GEOSCIENCE is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. The work GEOSCIENCE performs does not fall under prevailing wage rate categories. All well construction supervision costs assume two (2) monitoring wells at separate locations, each borehole 200 ft below ground surface, or less. Additional inspection beyond that outlined in this cost proposal can be provided, as necessary, on a time and materials basis. It should be noted that additional costs, which cannot be foreseen at this time, are sometimes incurred due to equipment breakdowns on the part of the drilling contractor, and/or problems in material procurement or construction. Additional inspection hours for such field-related problems are not included in the above costs. 15-Oct-21 Page 2 of 2 GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. Drilling, Construction, Development, and Testing EVWD Monitoring Wells A and B Item No.Description Qty Unit Total Item Price 1 Mobilization and demobilization of all equipment to project area including site preparation, drilling permits as required, encroachment and traffic control plan if necessary, site security, noise mitigation as necessary, cleanup, and restoration of site. 1 ls $50,000 lump sum $50,000 1a Sound Wall To Protect Residences on Merris St.1 ls $22,500 lump sum $22,500 2 Containment and proper disposal of all drill cuttings, liquid waste, and all other wastes as specified.1 wells $30,000 per well $30,000 3 Drill 10 5/8-inch diameter mud rotary pilot borehole, collect formation samples at 5 ft intervals.1,000 ft $90 per foot $90,000 4 Provide geophysical borehole logs (short- and long-normal resistivity, lateral log, spontaneous potential, gamma, sonic velocity, and variable density). 1 sets $7,500 per set $7,500 5a Backfill/Abandon Lower Pilot Borehole 160 ft $40 per foot $6,400 5b Enlarge pilot borehole to 17 1/2-inch diameter by mud rotary drilling method.840 ft $70 per foot $58,800 6 Furnish and install 4 in. diameter sch 80 PVC casing and screen for shallow completion of nested monitoring well (+1-245 ft).246 ft $40 per foot $9,840 7 Furnish and install 4 in. diameter sch 80 PVC casing and screen for middle completion of nested monitoring well (+1-480 ft).481 ft $40 per foot $19,240 8 Furnish and install 4 in. diameter sch 80 PVC casing and screen for deep completion of nested monitoring well (+1-800).801 ft $40 per foot $32,040 9 Furnish and install filter pack and annular seals, as specified.840 ft $40 per foot $33,600 10 Perform initial development of each 4 in. sch 80 diameter monitoring well by swabbing and airlifting, as specified (assume 12 hrs per screen section, 3 screened sections). 36 hr $350 per hour $12,600 11 Perform final development of each 4 in. sch 80 diameter monitoring well by pumping and surging (assumes 16 hrs per completion).48 hr $350 per hour $16,800 12 Collect title 22 water quality samples from each well completion following development, as detailed in Table 1.3 sets $7,500 per set $22,500 13 Final well head completion, including furnish and install protective well cover.1 wells $7,500 per well $7,500 $419,320 YELLOW JACKET DRILLING SERVICES, LLC PROPOSAL #(CA)DC21-2973 BID SCHEDULE DRILLING, CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING OF EVWD MONITORING WELLS MW-A & MW-B EVWD MW-A Unit Price TOTAL PRICE FOR MW-A (ITEMS 1 - 13): October 2021 BS I-1 GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. Table 2 Drilling, Construction, Development, and Testing EVWD Monitoring Wells A and B YELLOW JACKET DRILLING SERVICES, LLC PROPOSAL #(CA)DC21-2973 BID SCHEDULE DRILLING, CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING OF EVWD MONITORING WELLS MW-A & MW-B Item No.Description Qty Unit Total Item Price 14 Mobilization and demobilization of all equipment to project area including site preparation, drilling permits as required, encroachment and traffic control plan if necessary, site security, noise mitigation as necessary, cleanup, and restoration of site. 1 ls $50,000 lump sum $50,000 15 Containment and proper disposal of all drill cuttings, liquid waste, and all other wastes as specified.1 wells $30,000 per well $30,000 16 Drill 10 5/8-inch diameter mud rotary pilot borehole, collect formation samples at 5 ft intervals.600 ft $90 per foot $54,000 17 Provide geophysical borehole logs (short- and long-normal resistivity, lateral log, spontaneous potential, gamma, sonic velocity, and variable 1 sets $7,500 per set $7,500 18a Backfill/Abandon Lower Pilot Borehole 80 ft $40 per foot $3,200 18b Enlarge pilot borehole to 17 1/2-inch diameter by mud rotary drilling method.520 ft $70 per foot $36,400 19 Furnish and install 4 in. diameter sch 80 PVC casing and screen for shallow completion of nested monitoring well (+1-155 ft).156 ft $40 per foot $6,240 20 Furnish and install 4 in. diameter sch 80 PVC casing and screen for middle completion of nested monitoring well (+1-305 ft).306 ft $40 per foot $12,240 21 Furnish and install 4 in. diameter sch 80 PVC casing and screen for deep completion of nested monitoring well (+1-480).481 ft $40 per foot $19,240 22 Furnish and install filter pack and annular seals, as specified.520 ft $40 per foot $20,800 23 Perform initial development of each 4 in. sch 80 diameter monitoring well by swabbing and airlifting, as specified (assume 12 hrs per screen section, 3 screened sections). 36 hr $350 per hour $12,600 24 Perform final development of each 4 in. sch 80 diameter monitoring well by pumping and surging (assumes 16 hrs per completion).48 hr $350 per hour $16,800 25 Collect title 22 water quality samples from each well completion following development, as detailed in Table 1.3 sets $7,500 per set $22,500 26 Final well head completion, including furnish and install protective well cover.1 wells $7,500 per well $7,500 $299,020 $718,340 Unit Price TOTAL PRICE FOR MW-B (ITEMS 14 - 26): TOTAL PROJECT COST (ITEMS 1 - 26): EVWD MW-B October 2021 BS I-2 GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. 1000975 950 925 900 875 850 825 800 775 750 725 700 675 650 625 600 575 550 525 500 475 450 425 400 375 350 325 300 275 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 -25 4-in Sch 80 PVC Blank Lengths (ft): Shallow - 181 Middle - 416 Deep - 736 4-in Sch 80 PVC Screen Lengths (ft): Shallow - 60 Middle - 60 Deep - 60 4-in Sch 80 PVC Sump Lengths (ft): Shallow - 5 Middle - 5 Deep - 5 4-in Sch 80 PVC Blank Lengths (ft): Shallow - 101 Middle - 241 Deep - 416 4-in Sch 80 PVC Screen Lengths (ft): Shallow - 50 Middle - 60 Deep - 60 4-in Sch 80 PVC Sump Lengths (ft): Shallow - 5 Middle - 5 Deep - 5 MW-A MW-B MW-BMW-A EVWD Proposed Monitoring Wells