HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 10/11/2023BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OCTOBER 11, 2023
East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to
104,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of San
Bernardino County.
EVWD operates under the direction of a 5member elected Board.
GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
Phillip R. Goodrich
Chairman of the Board
Michael Moore
General Manager/CEO
James Morales, Jr.
ViceChairman
Brian W. Tompkins
Chief Financial Officer
Chris Carrillo
Governing Board Member
Jeff Noelte
Director of Engineering & Operations
Ronald L. Coats
Governing Board Member
Kerrie Bryan
Director of Administrative Services
David E. Smith
Governing Board Member
Patrick Milroy
Operations Manager
Rocky Welborn
Water Reclamation Manager
Justine Hendricksen
District Clerk
Board of Directors Regular Meeting & Public Hearing
October 11, 2023 5:30 PM
31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346
www.eastvalley.org
PLEASE NOTE:
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the
agenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111
Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are available
on the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post the
documents before the meeting.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disabilityrelated
modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order
to participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerk
at (909) 8854900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting.
In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed
with the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesday
meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of
Directors.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a Speaker
Card and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker is
limited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the State
of California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or taking
action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically be
referred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at a
future meeting.
1.AGENDA
This agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered.
Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not
appearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes a
determination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action on
the item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the
agenda.
a.Approval of Agenda
2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board of
Directors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unless
members of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific items
to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar.
a.Approve the September 18, 2023 Special Board Meeting Minutes
b.Approve the September 27, 2023 Regular Board Meeting Minutes
c.Approval of Directors' Fees and Expenses for September 2023
d.Adopt Resolution 2023.14 Recognizing Matthew Armitage's 25 Years of
Service
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS
a.Reject Proposal and Consider Approval of Laboratory Services for Wastewater
Analysis Agreement with Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC
b.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2023.15 Updating Water Capacity Fees,
Public Hearing
4.REPORTS
a.Board of Directors’ Reports
b.General Manager/CEO Report
Water Supply Update
c.Legal Counsel Report
d.Board of Directors’ Comments
ADJOURN
BOARD OF DIRECTORSOCTOBER 11, 2023East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to104,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of SanBernardino County.EVWD operates under the direction of a 5member elected Board.GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTPhillip R. GoodrichChairman of the Board Michael MooreGeneral Manager/CEOJames Morales, Jr.ViceChairman Brian W. TompkinsChief Financial OfficerChris CarrilloGoverning Board Member Jeff NoelteDirector of Engineering & OperationsRonald L. CoatsGoverning Board Member Kerrie BryanDirector of Administrative ServicesDavid E. SmithGoverning Board Member Patrick Milroy Operations ManagerRocky Welborn Water Reclamation ManagerJustine Hendricksen
District Clerk
Board of Directors Regular Meeting & Public Hearing
October 11, 2023 5:30 PM
31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346
www.eastvalley.org
PLEASE NOTE:
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the
agenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111
Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are available
on the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post the
documents before the meeting.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disabilityrelated
modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order
to participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerk
at (909) 8854900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting.
In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed
with the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesday
meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of
Directors.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a Speaker
Card and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker is
limited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the State
of California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or taking
action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically be
referred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at a
future meeting.
1.AGENDA
This agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered.
Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not
appearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes a
determination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action on
the item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the
agenda.
a.Approval of Agenda
2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board of
Directors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unless
members of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific items
to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar.
a.Approve the September 18, 2023 Special Board Meeting Minutes
b.Approve the September 27, 2023 Regular Board Meeting Minutes
c.Approval of Directors' Fees and Expenses for September 2023
d.Adopt Resolution 2023.14 Recognizing Matthew Armitage's 25 Years of
Service
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS
a.Reject Proposal and Consider Approval of Laboratory Services for Wastewater
Analysis Agreement with Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC
b.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2023.15 Updating Water Capacity Fees,
Public Hearing
4.REPORTS
a.Board of Directors’ Reports
b.General Manager/CEO Report
Water Supply Update
c.Legal Counsel Report
d.Board of Directors’ Comments
ADJOURN
BOARD OF DIRECTORSOCTOBER 11, 2023East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to104,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of SanBernardino County.EVWD operates under the direction of a 5member elected Board.GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTPhillip R. GoodrichChairman of the Board Michael MooreGeneral Manager/CEOJames Morales, Jr.ViceChairman Brian W. TompkinsChief Financial OfficerChris CarrilloGoverning Board Member Jeff NoelteDirector of Engineering & OperationsRonald L. CoatsGoverning Board Member Kerrie BryanDirector of Administrative ServicesDavid E. SmithGoverning Board Member Patrick Milroy Operations ManagerRocky Welborn Water Reclamation ManagerJustine HendricksenDistrict ClerkBoard of Directors Regular Meeting & Public HearingOctober 11, 2023 5:30 PM31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346www.eastvalley.orgPLEASE NOTE:Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of theagenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are availableon the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post thedocuments before the meeting.Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disabilityrelatedmodification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in orderto participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerkat (909) 8854900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting.
In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed
with the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesday
meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of
Directors.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a Speaker
Card and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker is
limited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the State
of California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or taking
action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically be
referred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at a
future meeting.
1.AGENDA
This agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered.
Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item not
appearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes a
determination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action on
the item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the
agenda.
a.Approval of Agenda
2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board of
Directors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unless
members of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific items
to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar.
a.Approve the September 18, 2023 Special Board Meeting Minutes
b.Approve the September 27, 2023 Regular Board Meeting Minutes
c.Approval of Directors' Fees and Expenses for September 2023
d.Adopt Resolution 2023.14 Recognizing Matthew Armitage's 25 Years of
Service
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS
a.Reject Proposal and Consider Approval of Laboratory Services for Wastewater
Analysis Agreement with Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC
b.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2023.15 Updating Water Capacity Fees,
Public Hearing
4.REPORTS
a.Board of Directors’ Reports
b.General Manager/CEO Report
Water Supply Update
c.Legal Counsel Report
d.Board of Directors’ Comments
ADJOURN
BOARD OF DIRECTORSOCTOBER 11, 2023East Valley Water District was formed in 1954 and provides water and wastewater services to104,000 residents within the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and portions of SanBernardino County.EVWD operates under the direction of a 5member elected Board.GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTPhillip R. GoodrichChairman of the Board Michael MooreGeneral Manager/CEOJames Morales, Jr.ViceChairman Brian W. TompkinsChief Financial OfficerChris CarrilloGoverning Board Member Jeff NoelteDirector of Engineering & OperationsRonald L. CoatsGoverning Board Member Kerrie BryanDirector of Administrative ServicesDavid E. SmithGoverning Board Member Patrick Milroy Operations ManagerRocky Welborn Water Reclamation ManagerJustine HendricksenDistrict ClerkBoard of Directors Regular Meeting & Public HearingOctober 11, 2023 5:30 PM31111 Greenspot Road, Highland, CA 92346www.eastvalley.orgPLEASE NOTE:Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of theagenda packet are available for public inspection in the District’s office located at 31111Greenspot Rd., Highland, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are availableon the District’s website at eastvalley.org and are subject to staff’s ability to post thedocuments before the meeting.Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disabilityrelatedmodification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in orderto participate in the above agendized public meeting should be directed to the District Clerkat (909) 8854900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting.In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filedwith the District Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Wednesdaymeeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board ofDirectors.CALL TO ORDERPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERSPUBLIC COMMENTSAny person wishing to speak to the Board of Directors is asked to complete a SpeakerCard and submit it to the District Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Each speaker islimited to three (3) minutes, unless waived by the Chairman of the Board. Under the Stateof California Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from discussing or takingaction on any item not listed on the posted agenda. The matter will automatically bereferred to staff for an appropriate response or action and may appear on the agenda at afuture meeting.1.AGENDAThis agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered.Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be taken on any item notappearing on the following agenda unless the Board of Directors makes adetermination that an emergency exists or that a need to take immediate action onthe item came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of theagenda.a.Approval of Agenda2.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDARAll matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Board ofDirectors to be routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be nodiscussion of these items prior to the time the board considers the motion unlessmembers of the board, the administrative staff, or the public request specific itemsto be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar.a.Approve the September 18, 2023 Special Board Meeting Minutesb.Approve the September 27, 2023 Regular Board Meeting Minutesc.Approval of Directors' Fees and Expenses for September 2023d.Adopt Resolution 2023.14 Recognizing Matthew Armitage's 25 Years of
Service
3.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS
a.Reject Proposal and Consider Approval of Laboratory Services for Wastewater
Analysis Agreement with Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC
b.Consider Adoption of Resolution 2023.15 Updating Water Capacity Fees,
Public Hearing
4.REPORTS
a.Board of Directors’ Reports
b.General Manager/CEO Report
Water Supply Update
c.Legal Counsel Report
d.Board of Directors’ Comments
ADJOURN
Agenda Item
#2a
October 11, 20231
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #2a
Consent Item
Regular Board Meeting
TO: Governing Board Members
FROM: General Manager/CEO
SUBJECT: Approve the September 18, 2023 Special Board Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION
That the Board of Directors approve the September 18, 2023 special Board meeting
minutes as submitted.
AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability
B. Utilize Effective Communication Methods
REVIEW BY OTHERS
This agenda item has been reviewed by Administration.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Recommended by:
________________
Michael Moore
General Manager/CEO
Respectfully submitted:
________________
Justine Hendricksen
District Clerk
ATTACHMENTS
Draft September 18, 2023 Special Board Meeting Minutes
Strategic Planning Workshop
Special Board Meeting
Meeting Date: September 18, 2023
CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman of the Board called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Director Coats led the flag salute.
ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS
PRESENT
Directors: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
ABSENT
None
STAFF
Michael Moore, General Manager/CEO; William Ringland, Public Affairs/Conservation
Manager; Justine Hendricksen, District Clerk
LEGAL COUNSEL
None
GUESTS
Amy Stevens, Water Systems Consulting (WSC); Ash Dhingra, AKD Consulting
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chairman Goodrich declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 5:31
p.m.
There being no written or verbal comments, the public participation section was closed.
Subject to approval
1
2
0
1
1. Informational Items
a.Strategic Planning Workshop
The General Manager/CEO stated that the District will be conducting a comprehensive
review of the current strategic plan to identify what needs to be updated/changed
based on challenges the District has faced over the past few years, including the
pandemic, new development, and drought conditions in California. He stated that this
will be a collaborative process, and the District will be holding several planning sessions
with the Board, stakeholders, and staff.
The Public Affairs/Conservation Manager provided an overview of the Strategic Planning
process and introduced Amy Stevens from WSC and sub-consultant Ash Dhingra from
AKD Consulting. Ms. Stevens and Mr. Dhingra will help facilitate the discussion and
work through the framework of the strategic planning efforts.
Ms. Stevens reviewed the agenda for the meeting and asked the Board to review the
existing core values to see if they are still relevant and to ensure they align with the
District’s objectives, and reflect any shifts in priorities or values.
She described the project scope and stated that there are several components of the
District’s Strategic Plan, including: Mission, Vision, Values, Strategies and Goals. She
stated that we will evaluate the current plan and develop a new strategic plan which
will be actionable, measurable, and include key performance indicators. She stated that
the plan should be flexible and adaptable, allowing the District to respond effectively to
changing circumstances and challenges.
She reviewed comments received from the Community Advisory Committee regarding
the District’s Vision and whether a Mission Statement is needed.
Ms. Stevens provided in-depth details of the planning process, building blocks, long-
term vision, implementation, and timeline. Ms. Stevens responded to several questions
from the Board.
2. Reports
a. Board of Directors’ Comments
Director Coats appreciates the collaboration process.
Director Carrillo stated that he appreciates the free-flowing conversation and
exchanging ideas in a way that there is no judgment.
Vice Chairman Morales stated that he enjoys the relaxed nature of these types of
meetings. He agrees with several comments and likes the idea that this is custom
tailored to where we are going and where we have been.
1
2
0
1
Director Smith stated that this was a very enlightening meeting, he appreciates that we
will be filling in the needed gaps and that these meetings make the process very
interesting.
Chairman Goodrich stated that he looks forward to the next meeting.
For information only.
ADJOURN
Chairman Goodrich adjourned the meeting at 7:44 p.m.
Phillip R. Goodrich, Board President
Michael Moore, Board Secretary
Agenda Item
#2b
October 11, 20231
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #2b
Consent Item
Regular Board Meeting
TO: Governing Board Members
FROM: General Manager/CEO
SUBJECT: Approve the September 27, 2023 Regular Board Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDATION
That the Board of Directors approve the September 27, 2023 regular Board meeting
minutes as submitted.
AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability
B. Utilize Effective Communication Methods
REVIEW BY OTHERS
This agenda item has been reviewed by Administration.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Recommended by:
________________
Michael Moore
General Manager/CEO
Respectfully submitted:
________________
Justine Hendricksen
District Clerk
ATTACHMENTS
Draft September 27, 2023 Regular Board Meeting Minutes
Regular Board Meeting
Meeting Date: September 27, 2023
CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman of the Board called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS
PRESENT
Directors: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
ABSENT
None
STAFF
Michael Moore, General Manager/CEO; Brian Tompkins, Chief Financial Officer; Jeff
Noelte, Director of Engineering and Operations; Kerrie Bryan, Director of Administrative
Services; Patrick Milroy, Operations Manager; Rocky Welborn, Water Reclamation
Manager; William Ringland, Public Affairs/Conservation Manager; Justine Hendricksen,
District Clerk; Shayla Antrim, Administrative Specialist
LEGAL COUNSEL
Jean Cihigoyenetche
GUESTS
Members of the public
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chairman Goodrich declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 4:31
p.m.
There being no written or verbal comments, the public participation section was closed.
Draft pending approval
1
2
7
8
1.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
a.Approval of Agenda
A motion was made by Director Smith, seconded by Vice Chairman Morales, that the
Board approve the September 27, 2023 agenda as submitted.
The motion carried by the following:
Ayes: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
Noes: None
Absent: None
2.RECESS INTO CLOSED SESSION
The Board entered into Closed Session at 4:31 p.m. as provided in the Ralph M. Brown
Act Government Code Section 54957 to discuss the item listed on the agenda.
RECONVENE THE MEETING
The Board reconvened the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Director Carrillo led the flag salute.
ROLL CALL OF BOARD MEMBERS
PRESENT
Directors: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
ABSENT
None
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
With respect to Item #2a: Legal Counsel stated that no reportable action was taken.
PRESENTATIONS AND CEREMONIAL ITEMS
•Introduction of Newly Hired Employee
o Joseph Tejada, Field Service Worker I
The General Manager/CEO introduced and welcomed the newly hired employee to the
Board.
Information only.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chairman Goodrich declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 5:33
p.m.
1
2
7
8
Susan Silveria made a public comment in opposition to work being performed by the
District on her property. She stated that she’d like the record to reflect that the trees of
concern are not adjacent to her property, but are on her property.
The General Manager/CEO responded to the Board regarding Ms. Silveria’s comments.
There being no further written or verbal comments, the public participation section was
closed at 5:39 p.m.
3.APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
a.Approve the September 13, 2023 Regular Board Meeting Minutes
b.Investment Transaction Report for Month Ended August 31, 2023
c.August 2023 Disbursements: Accounts payable disbursements for the
period include check numbers 261670 through 261826, bank drafts, and
ACH payments in the amount of $8,432,544.04 and $461,036.31 for payroll
A motion was made by Director Coats, seconded by Director Smith, that the Board
approve the Consent Calendar items as submitted.
The motion carried by the following:
Ayes: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
Noes: None
Absent: None
4.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
a. Regional Recycled Water Facilities Update
The Director of Engineering and Operations provided an update on the last phases of
the regional recycled water facilities project. Information presented included, but not
limited to the construction of the Regional Recycled Water Pipeline where 2,000 feet
remain to be constructed, interagency collaboration with San Bernardino Valley
Municipal Water District, and Weaver Basin's site improvements.
The General Manager/CEO stated that now that the pipeline is near completion, staff
will begin putting together a schedule of the startup plan for the project and will bring
the plan to the Board in late October.
For information only.
5.DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS
a. Consider Approval of Extension of Contract with HORNE LLP to Receive
Low Income Household Water Assistance Program (LIHWAP) Payments
The Chief Financial Officer provided information regarding an extension of the District’s
contract with HORNE LLP for the Low Income Household Water Assistance Program
(Program). He stated that in November 2022 the Board authorized the District's
1
2
7
8
enrollment in the Program and executed a contract with HORNE LLP to disburse funds
to LIHWAP participating agencies on behalf of eligible households. The Program was
designed to assist low-income households who are delinquent on their water bills, by
paying up to $2,000 of their delinquent balance. The LIHWAP program was revised in
March 2023, making up to $15,000 per household available (one time), and allowed
LIHWAP funds to cover current and future bills. The District's contract with HORNE LLP
can be extended through May 31, 2024, or as long as funds are available.
The Chief Financial Officer stated that the District’s local service provider of the
Program is the Community Action Partnership of San Bernardino County. He stated that
the District doesn’t have any part in determining the eligibility of our customers
participating in the program and customers are directed to contact the Community
Action Partnership to apply. He stated that from December 2022 to September 2023,
District customers have been provided $93,251 in bill payment assistance, distributed
among 157 customers. He added that the contract extension was not included in the
agenda packet because it was received today; and that it is a one-page memo
extending the contract with HORNE LLP to May 2024.
A motion was made by Director Carrillo, seconded by Director Coats, that the Board of
Directors authorize the General Manager/CEO to execute a contract extension with
HORNE LLP.
The motion was carried by the following:
Ayes: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
Noes: None
Absent: None
b. Consider Approval of Contracts with Logicalis and Wirenet for an Enhanced
Security Camera System at Plant 134
The Information Technology Manager discussed the need for enhanced security
equipment at Plant 134. He described some of the security challenges and problems in
the area, and discussed the features of the enhanced security system. The IT Manager
stated that two quotes were received for the installation of the cameras and one for the
purchase of the cameras. He recommends that the District award a contract to Logicalis
for Meraki cameras and to Wirenet for the installation.
A motion was made by Director Coats, seconded by Vice Chairman Morales, that the
Board of Directors authorize the General Manager/CEO to enter into contracts with
Logicalis and Wirenet for the purchase and installation of an enhanced security camera
system at Plant 134 as submitted.
The motion was carried by the following:
Ayes: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
Noes: None
Absent: None
1
2
7
8
c. Consider Approval of Water Quality Permitting Services Contract
Amendment No. 3 with Woodard & Curran for the Sterling Natural Resource
Center
The Director of Engineering and Operations stated that the Sterling Natural Resource
Center (SNRC) requires extensive water quality analysis and monitoring to obtain
permits for the groundwater recharge project. The Woodard & Curran consulting firm
has been involved in the project since 2015, providing engineering documents,
modeling, and other services. Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 were executed to reflect
changes in the project, including the anaerobic digestion system and the discharge
location. The regulators have accepted the engineering documents, and now the focus
is on completing the monitoring requirements before the operation of the SNRC can
begin. Staff recommends amending Woodard & Curran's scope of services with
Amendment No. 3 for $336,322, bringing the total contract amount to $938,635.
A motion was made by Vice Chairman Morales, seconded by Director Carrillo, that the
Board of Directors authorize the General Manager/CEO to execute contract amendment
No. 3 with Woodard & Curran to provide additional Water Quality Permitting Services
for the Sterling Natural Resource Center project for a not-to-exceed amount of
$336,322 as submitted.
The motion was carried by the following:
Ayes: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
Noes: None
Absent: None
d. Review General Manager/CEO Achievement of Goals and Objectives,
Determination of Performance Award (first half of item)
Legal Counsel stated that pursuant to the General Manager/CEO’s employment
contract, he is entitled to an annual review of his performance by the Board of Directors
to determine if his Goals and Objectives have been met for the preceding year, and to
determine the overall performance of his work. He stated that in closed session matters
were discussed and considered by the Board. Pursuant to section 3.d. of his
employment agreement the Board is charged with determining if the General
Manager/CEO is entitled to his performance award of up to 10% of his base annual
salary.
The Board praised the General Manager/CEO for his performance and leadership during
the past year.
A motion was made by Director Coats, seconded by Vice-Chairman Morales, that the
Board approve the General Manager/CEO’s pay for performance award in the amount of
10% of his base salary, totaling approximately $30,000.
The motion was carried by the following:
Ayes: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
1
2
7
8
Noes: None
Absent: None
d. Consider Approval of Amendments to General Manager/CEO Employment
Agreement (second half of item)
Legal Counsel stated that the second item of discussion is a proposed contract
amendment to Section 3.g. of the General Manager/CEO’s employment agreement. He
provided details regarding the proposed amendment.
Legal Counsel presented the proposed amendment to the General Manager/CEO’s
contract as follows: increase the contribution to the General Manager/CEO’s
supplemental retirement 401(a) plan from $20,000 to $40,000 annually.
A motion was made by Director Coats, seconded by Vice Chairman Morales, that the
Board approve the amendment to the General Manager/CEO’s Employment Agreement
as presented.
The motion was carried by the following:
Ayes: Carrillo, Coats, Goodrich, Morales, Smith
Noes: None
Absent: None
e. Consider Approval of General Manager/CEO's 2023-24 Goals and
Objectives
The Chairman of the Board stated that as part of the General Manager/CEO’s annual
performance evaluation, the Board of Directors develop goals and objectives to provide
direction and measure degrees of organizational success. The General Manager/CEO’s
FY 2023-24 Goals and Objectives have been developed to reflect the priorities laid out
in the Agency's Goals and Objectives and the District’s Five-Year Plan. He read each of
the proposed FY 2023-24 goals and objectives to the Board.
Director Smith stated that he looks forward to working with the General Manager/CEO
on his goals and objectives.
Director Coats stated that the General Manager/CEO has a lofty set of goals.
Vice Chairman Morales stated that he likes how the General Manager/CEO’s goals align
with the agency’s goals and objectives.
A motion was made by Director Carrillo, seconded by Director Coats, that the Board
approve the 2023-24 General Manager/CEO’s Goals and Objectives as submitted.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Coats, Goodrich, Carrillo, Morales, Smith
Noes: None
Absent: None
1
2
7
8
6.REPORTS
a.Board of Directors’ Reports
Director Coats reported on the following: September 9 he participated in the California
Special Districts Association webinar Preparing for Fiscal Year 2025 Congressional
Earmarks; September 11 he attended the Finance & Human Resources Committee
meeting where they discussed LIHWAP and the Summer Internship Program;
September 11 he attended the Association of San Bernardino County Special Districts
Board meeting where they discussed their upcoming monthly membership meeting;
September 12-15 he attended the Water Education Foundation’s Eastern Sierra Tour;
September 18 he attended the District’s Strategic Planning Session; September 20 he
met with the General Manager/CEO to discuss District business; September 26 he
attended the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District’s Workshop where they
discussed their Director Handbook; and September 26 he attended the Highland
Chamber of Commerce meeting where the guest speaker was former State Senator
Mike Morrell.
Director Carrillo reported on the following: September 14 he attended the Highland
State of the City event where the mayor provided a report on the State of the City;
September 18 he attended the District’s Strategic Planning Session; and September 26
he met with the General Manager/CEO to discuss District business.
Director Smith reported on the following: September 14 he attended the Highland State
of the City event where the mayor provided a report on the State of the City;
September 18 he attended the District’s Strategic Planning Session; September 19 he
met with the General Manager/CEO to discuss District business; September 25 he
attended the Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County meeting
with nothing to report; and September 26 he attended the Highland Chamber of
Commerce meeting where former Senator Mike Morrell discussed the U.S. Constitution.
Vice Chairman Morales reported on the following: September 18 he attended the
District’s Strategic Planning Workshop; September 19 he attended the San Bernardino
Valley Municipal Water District meeting where they discussed the State Water Project;
September 21 he met with the General Manager/CEO to review the agenda and to
discuss District business; September 25 he attended the Engineering & Operations
Committee meeting; and September 26 he attended the City of San Bernardino Water
Department meeting.
Chairman Goodrich reported on the following: September 14 he attended the Highland
State of the City event where the mayor provided a summary of the status of the City;
September 18 he attended the District’s Strategic Planning Session; September 21 he
met with the General Manager/CEO to review the agenda and to discuss District
business; September 25 he attended the Engineering & Operations Committee meeting
where they provided updates on the Sterling Natural Resource Center and Plant 134;
1
2
7
8
and September 26 he attended the Highland Chamber of Commerce meeting where
former Senator Mike Morrell was the speaker.
For information only.
a.General Manager/CEO Report
The General Manager/CEO thanked the Board for his incentive and thanked staff for their
positive attitude during the transition over the past year.
The General Manager/CEO announced the following:
•Today he met with the Highland Police Captain, Chief and Lieutenant to discuss
the Emergency Operations Center and to prepare for future emergency
operations.
•September 28 the District will be hosting its annual Health Benefits Fair for staff.
Several vendors will be available to answer questions regarding health benefit
selections and supplemental plans, as well as representatives from local
businesses providing information on their services.
•October 2 staff will be participating in a Strategic Planning Workshop to discuss
possible changes/modifications to the District’s Goals & Objectives.
•October 9 District’s offices and customer service lines will be closed due to the
holiday. Customers may pay their bill online, by phone, or at any 7-Eleven
location. To report a water emergency, residents can call (909) 889-9501 and
on-call staff will provide assistance.
•The District hosted a Conservation Workshop at the Sterling Natural Resource
Center with the topic of Overcoming Common Landscaping Challenges. This was
an opportunity to invite members of the community to learn about different
tactics and techniques in creating a water-efficient outdoor space. We had about
60 community members attend and have the next workshop scheduled for
October 21.
•East Valley Water District engages with schools in our community to highlight the
career opportunities available within the water industry. Last week, a member of
our wastewater treatment team, Ryan Cerros, visited San Gorgonio High School
and showcased the different job pathways to almost 400 students.
•Director Coats and the District’s Public Affairs/Conservation Manager participated
in the Water Education Foundation’s tour of the Eastern Sierras. This tour
showcased the important water infrastructure across the State and highlighted
the value of making investments needed to maintain a safe and reliable water
supply.
1
2
7
8
•The District started the repairs of the North Fork pipeline on Highland Avenue
yesterday. So far, the repair work involves accessing the pipe just off the edge
of the road within the North Fork property and removing large roots that have
blocked the flow of water in the pipeline. The pipeline is a critical facility to the
District that supplies water from the Santa Ana River to the District’s surface
water treatment plant, Plant 134. He stated that he is hopeful that we can
complete the repair operation within a couple of weeks and restore the water
supply to the treatment plant which supplies about 25% of our customers' water.
For information only.
b.Legal Counsel Report
No report at this time.
c.Board of Directors’ Comments
Director Smith congratulated the General Manager/CEO on his success.
Director Coats commended staff for the work they do each and every day and added
that he looks forward to the future with the General Manager/CEO.
Vice Chairman Morales provided an update on the Association of California Water
Agencies (ACWA) election results, as follows:
ACWA Board for 2024-25 Term
Cathy Green, President
Ernie Avila, Vice President
ACWA Region 9 for 2024-25 Term
Patrick O’Dowd, Chair
Carol Lee Gonzales-Brady, Vice Chair
Brenda Dennstedt, Governing Board Member
Gina Dockstader, Governing Board Member
James Morales Jr., Governing Board Member
Paul Ortega, Governing Board Member
Harvey Ryan, Governing Board Member
Chairman Goodrich stated that he appreciates staff and all that they do.
For information only.
ADJOURN
1
2
7
8
Chairman Goodrich adjourned the meeting at 7:03 p.m.
Phillip R. Goodrich, Board President
Michael Moore, Board Secretary
Agenda Item
#2c
October 11, 20231
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #2c
Consent Item
Regular Board Meeting
TO: Governing Board Members
FROM: General Manager/CEO
SUBJECT: Approval of Directors' Fees and Expenses for September 2023
RECOMMENDATION
That the Board of Directors approve the Directors' Fees and Expenses for September
2023 as submitted.
AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
II - Maintain a Commitment To Sustainability, Transparency, and Accountability
A. Practice Transparent and Accountable Fiscal Management
REVIEW BY OTHERS
This agenda item has been reviewed by Administration.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact associated with this agenda item is $10,894.41 which is included in
the current fiscal year budget.
Recommended by:
________________
Michael Moore
General Manager/CEO
Respectfully submitted:
________________
Justine Hendricksen
District Clerk
ATTACHMENTS
September 2023 Director Expense Reports
Name: Month / Year:2023
Meeting
No.Stipend Written Oral
1 9 /06 236.25
2 9 /08 236.25
3 9 /13 236.25
4 9 /14 236.25
5 9 /18 236.25
6 9 /26 236.25
7 9 /27 236.25
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Meetings
0.655/mi
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Subtotal
TOTAL PAYMENT
Date of Approval
Chris Carrillo September /
0.00 X
7
Report Provided
Subtotal Meetings' Stipend
Mileage
Administration Signature
I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Chris Carrillo
Date Meeting / Event Description
Date
City of San Bernardino Council Meeting
Agenda Review
Regular Board Meeting
$1,653.75
$1,653.75
$0.00
Reimbursement
Mileage
Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description
Highland State of the City
Special Board Meeting
Agenda Review
Regular Board Meeting
Expense Type
$0.00
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
1
Name: Month / Year:2023
1
2
3
4
5
Event Description:Special Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend special board meeting regarding strategic planning session.
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend regular board meeting.
Meeting Date:9 / 14 / 2023
Event Description:Highland State of the City
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend Highland State of the City event.
Meeting Date:9 / 18 / 2023
Meeting Date:9 / 8 / 2023
Event Description:Agenda Review
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:9 / 13 / 2023
Event Description:Regular Board Meeting
Conference call with CEO Moore regarding agenda review.
Chris Carrillo September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
Attend via Zoom City Council meeting.
9 / 6 / 2023
City of San Bernardino Council Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
2
Name: Month / Year:2023
6
7
8
9
10
Chris Carrillo September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Event Description:
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Conference call with CEO Moore regarding agenda review.
Meeting Date:9 / 27 / 2023
Event Description:Regular Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend regular board meeting.
Meeting Date:
Meeting Date:9 / 26 / 2023
Event Description:Agenda Review
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
3
Name: Month / Year:2023
Meeting
No.Stipend Written Oral
1 9 /06 236.25$
2 9 /11 236.25$
3 9 /11 -$
4 9 /12 236.25$
5 9 /13 236.25$
6 9 /14 236.25$
7 9 /15 236.25$
8 9 /18 236.25$
9 9 /20 236.25$
10 9 /26 -$
11 9 /26 -$
12 9 /27 236.25$
13 9 /28 236.25$
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Meetings
0.655/mi
No.
1 9 /15
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Subtotal
TOTAL PAYMENT
Date of Approval
Ronald L. Coats September /
54.00 X
10
Report Provided
Subtotal Meetings' Stipend
Mileage
Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee
Administration Signature
I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Ronald L. Coats
Date Meeting / Event Description
Date
CSDA Webinar/Earmarks
Finance & Human Resources Committee Meeting
ASBCSD Board Meeting
$2,469.87
$2,362.50
$35.37
Reimbursement
72.00Parking
Mileage
27.00
27.00
Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description
San Bernardino Valley MWD Workshop
Highland Chamber of Commerce
Regular Board Meeting
San Bernardino Valley MWD Div 3 Fourm
Water Education Foundation Tour
Water Education Foundation Tour
Water Education Foundation Tour
Water Education Foundation Tour
Strategic Planning Session
Expense Type
$72.00
Parking at ONT
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
1
Name: Month / Year:2023
1
2
3
4
5
Event Description:Water Education Foundation Tour
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended a Water Education Foundation tour of the Eastern Sierra Mountains, Mono Lake, Owens Valley,
Los Angeles Aqueduct and other water related places of educational interest.
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended our monthly board meeting to discuss association business and our monthly general meeting the
following week.
Meeting Date:9 / 12 / 2023
Event Description:Water Education Foundation Tour
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended a Water Education Foundation tour of the Eastern Sierra Mountains, Mono Lake, Owens Valley,
Los Angeles Aqueduct and other water related places of educational interest.
Meeting Date:9 / 13 / 2023
Meeting Date:9 / 11 / 2023
Event Description:Finance & Human Resources Committee Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:9 / 11 / 2023
Event Description:ASBCSD Board Meeting
Received updates on Low Income Household Water Assistance Program; Summer Internship and
Education Partnerships; Successful Pathway Year 2023 with Arroyo Valley High School; Finance and
Human Resources Activities
Ronald L. Coats September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
Attended a webinar on the process for FY 2025 federal earmarks and possible funding we could apply for.
9 / 6 / 2023
CSDA Webinar/Earmarks
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
2
Name: Month / Year:2023
6
7
8
9
10
Ronald L. Coats September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Had a meeting with Michael Moore to discuss district business and my recent Water Education Tour of the
Eastern Sierras.
Meeting Date:9 / 26 / 2023
Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD Workshop
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended a workshop where they made revisions to update their director handbook and discussed their
current investment policy
Event Description:Strategic Planning Session
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended our first strategic planning meeting for the district.
Meeting Date:9 / 20 / 2023
Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended a Water Education Foundation tour of the Eastern Sierra Mountains, Mono Lake, Owens Valley,
Los Angeles Aqueduct and other water related places of educational interest.
Meeting Date:9 / 15 / 2023
Event Description:Water Education Foundation Tour
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended a Water Education Foundation tour of the Eastern Sierra Mountains, Mono Lake, Owens Valley,
Los Angeles Aqueduct and other water related places of educational interest.
Meeting Date:9 / 18 / 2023
Meeting Date:9 / 14 / 2023
Event Description:Water Education Foundation Tour
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
3
Name: Month / Year:2023
11
12
13
14
15
Ronald L. Coats September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Event Description:
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
See official Board Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date:9 / 28 / 2023
Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD Div 3 Fourm
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attended at water forum meeting entitled "Climate Resilience: Moving from Ideas to Action"
Meeting Date:
Event Description:Highland Chamber of Commerce
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Guest speaker was former State Senator Mike Morrell who spoke about his new book entitled "The Road
Back to Restoring the Family"
Meeting Date:9 / 27 / 2023
Event Description:Regular Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:9 / 26 / 2023
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
4
Name: Month / Year:2023
Meeting
No.Stipend Written Oral
1 9 /07 236.25
2 9 /12 236.25
3 9 /13 236.25
4 9 /14 236.25
5 9 /18 236.25
6 9 /21 236.25
7 9 /25 236.25
8 9 /26 236.25
9 9 /27 236.25
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Meetings
0.655/mi
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Subtotal
TOTAL PAYMENT
Date of Approval
Phillip R. Goodrich September /
0.00 X
9
Report Provided
Subtotal Meetings' Stipend
Mileage
Regular Board Meeting
Administration Signature
I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Phillip R. Goodrich
Date Meeting / Event Description
Date
Agenda Review
City of Highland Council Meeting
Regular Board Meeting
$2,126.25
$2,126.25
$0.00
Reimbursement
Mileage
Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description
Highland State of the City
Special Board Meeting
Agenda Review
Engineering & Operations Committee Meeting
Chamber of Commerce Event
Expense Type
$0.00
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
1
Name: Month / Year:2023
1
2
3
4
5
Event Description:Special Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Session 1 concept and development of Strategic Plan
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend Reg. Board Mtg. Ref. Mins. this Day
Meeting Date:9 / 14 / 2023
Event Description:Highland State of the City
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend State of the City where Mayor Mccallon addressed the room with updates on City Development and
Fiscal Health and future plans
Meeting Date:9 / 18 / 2023
Meeting Date:9 / 12 / 2023
Event Description:City of Highland Council Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:9 / 13 / 2023
Event Description:Regular Board Meeting
Attend Monthly City Council Mtg. updates on City Impact fee increases
Phillip R. Goodrich September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
With CEO and Vice Chair for review of current agenda and discuss District business
9 / 7 / 2023
Agenda Review
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
2
Name: Month / Year:2023
6
7
8
9
10
Phillip R. Goodrich September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Attend Regular board mtg. Ref. Mins. This day
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Event Description:Chamber of Commerce Event
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend Monthly Chamber Networking Meeting keynote speaker Sen. Mike Morrel spoke on state
Government and federal level legislative conditions
Meeting Date:9 / 27 / 2023
Event Description:Regular Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
With CEO and Vice Chair for review of current agenda also updates on District Business
Meeting Date:9 / 25 / 2023
Event Description:Engineering & Operations Committee Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Attend E and O Committee where we were updated on all Dept.activities and some future plans
Meeting Date:9 / 26 / 2023
Meeting Date:9 / 21 / 2023
Event Description:Agenda Review
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
3
Name: Month / Year:2023
Meeting
No.Stipend Written Oral
1 9 /05 0.00
2 9 /06 0.00
3 9 /07 236.25
4 9 /07 0.00
5 9 /08 236.25
6 9 /13 236.25
7 9 /18 236.25
8 9 /19 236.25
9 9 /21 236.25
10 9 /25 236.25
11 9 /26 0.00
12 9 /27 236.25
13 9 /28 236.25
14 9 /29 236.25
15
16
17
18
19
20
Meetings
0.655/mi
No.
1 9 /28
2 9 /28
3 9 /29
4 9 /29
5 9 /29
6
7
8
9
10
Subtotal
TOTAL PAYMENT
Date of Approval
James Morales, Jr.September /
60.00 X
10
30.00
30.00
Report Provided
Subtotal Meetings' Stipend
Mileage
ACWA Event
Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee
Administration Signature
I certify that the above is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
James Morales, Jr.
Date Meeting / Event Description
Date
San Bernardino Valley MWD
ACWA Event
Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee
$2,754.54
21.98
40.00
$2,362.50
$39.30
Reimbursement
249.83
Travel
Travel
23.96
16.97
Travel
Parking
Lodging
Mileage
Miscellaneous Reimbursement Description
Engineering & Operations Committee Meeting
San Bernardino Board of Water Commissioners
Regular Board Meeting
ACWA Event
San Bernardino Valley MWD
East Valley Association of Realtors
Regular Board Meeting
Special Board Meeting
San Bernardino Valley MWD
Expense Type
$352.74
ACWA State Executive Committee
ACWA Transportation Uber
ACWATransportation Uber
ACWATransportation Uber
ACWA Parking
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
1
Name: Month / Year:2023
1
2
3
4
5
Event Description:East Valley Association of Realtors
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
District update. Drought update. Board Report Assignment.
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
District operational update. SNRC update.
Meeting Date:9 / 7 / 2023
Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
No charge, more than 10 per reporting period. Policy Committee. Board report assignment.
Meeting Date:9 / 8 / 2023
Meeting Date:9 / 6 / 2023
Event Description:ACWA Event
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:9 / 7 / 2023
Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee
No charge, more than 10 per reporting period. State legislative committee special meeting. Review of
amendments for Bill AB 755.
James Morales, Jr.September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
No charge, more than 10 per reporting period. United States Geological Survey funding agreements data
collection and water science. Board report assignmenmt.
9 / 5 / 2023
San Bernardino Valley MWD
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
2
Name: Month / Year:2023
6
7
8
9
10
James Morales, Jr.September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
District operational update. SNRC update.
Meeting Date:9 / 25 / 2023
Event Description:Engineering & Operations Committee Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Please refer to public agenda.
Event Description:San Bernardino Valley MWD
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Leadership and Professional Development Training Program. Update on Recharge in the Cactus Basins
Project. State Water Project Report. Board report assignment.
Meeting Date:9 / 21 / 2023
Event Description:Meeting with General Manager/CEO or Designee
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Please refer to public agenda.
Meeting Date:9 / 18 / 2023
Event Description:Special Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Please refer to public agenda.
Meeting Date:9 / 19 / 2023
Meeting Date:9 / 13 / 2023
Event Description:Regular Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
3
Name: Month / Year:2023
11
12
13
14
15
James Morales, Jr.September /
As part of the District's commitment to transparency, please provide a brief description of any meeting/event(s)
that you will not be providing a report during the Board meeting at which your Director's Expense Sheet is being
approved.
Event Description:ACWA Event
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
State Board Meeting. Finance report. Code of conduct. Board policy revisions. Federal affairs. State
Legislative update. Various updates.
Meeting Date:
Event Description:
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Pleaes refer to public agenda.
Meeting Date:9 / 28 / 2023
Event Description:ACWA Event
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Board and Executive Committee premeeting. SNRC update.
Meeting Date:9 / 29 / 2023
Event Description:San Bernardino Board of Water Commissioners
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
No charge, more than ten per reporting period. Side letter agreements, premium pay for water for water
dept employees. Board report assignment.
Meeting Date:9 / 27 / 2023
Event Description:Regular Board Meeting
Brief Description of Meeting/Event Value to EVWD
Meeting Date:9 / 26 / 2023
DIRECTOR EXPENSE / REIMBURSEMENT
ACTIVITY SHEET
AB 1234 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FORM
4
1
2
6
4
RESOLUTION 2023.14
A RESOLUTION OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
IN RECOGNITION OF
MATTHEW ARMITAGE’S TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District
as follows:
WHEREAS, MATTHEW ARMITAGE has been employed by the East Valley Water
District since October 5, 1998, and
WHEREAS, MATTHEW ARMITAGE has in those twenty-five years, performed in an
outstanding and honorable capacity in the positions of Water Service Worker I, Water Service
Worker II , Meter Service Worker, Meter Reader II, Meter Technician III, and
WHEREAS, MATTHEW ARMITAGE has been dedicated and conscientious, and has
displayed a high sense of duty, sincere interest and personal competence in the performance of his
duties which have been for the benefit of all staff members and customers of the East Valley Water
District, and
WHEREAS, MATTHEW ARMITAGE has served the District for twenty-five years,
through his untiring efforts, personal growth, and cooperation with staff and customers,
contributed greatly to the successful operation of the East Valley Water District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Valley
Water District, and each of them on behalf of the Board, staff and citizens of the District, hereby
express to MATTHEW ARMITAGE their sincere appreciation for his twenty-five years of
dedicated service.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be placed in the minutes of the East
Valley Water District and the original of this Resolution be signed by all members of the Board of
Directors and presented to MATTHEW ARMITAGE, after being suitably framed.
DATED: October 11, 2023
________________________________ ________________________________
PHILLIP R. GOODRICH JAMES MORALES JR.
1
2
6
4
President Vice President
________________________________ ________________________________
CHRISTOPHER CARRILLO RONALD L. COATS
Director Director
________________________________ Attest: ________________________________
DAVID E. SMITH MICHAEL MOORE
Director General Manager/CEO/Board Secretary
Agenda Item
#3a
October 11, 20231
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #3a
Discussion Item
1
2
8
6
Regular Board Meeting
TO: Governing Board Members
FROM: General Manager/CEO
SUBJECT: Reject Proposal and Consider Approval of Laboratory Services for
Wastewater Analysis Agreement with Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC
RECOMMENDATION
That the Board of Directors reject the proposal received in June of 2023; approve a
Professional Services Agreement for Wastewater Analysis up to $300,000 per year for 3
years, plus 2 optional one-year extensions; and authorize the General Manager/CEO to
negotiate and execute the Agreement and related documents as necessary.
BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS
Regulations associated with the operations of the Sterling Natural Resource Center
(SNRC) require the sampling and analysis of various water quality parameters at certain
points in the process to demonstrate compliance with Waste Discharge Requirements
and the Master Recycling Permit. The analytical work must be done by an appropriately
certified Laboratory. Although SNRC has some limited laboratory equipment, the outside
laboratory analysis provides all the required permit testing and data to make process
adjustments of the treatment plant.
The District has been coordinating with the State Water Resources Control Board-
Division of Drinking Water and the Regional Water Quality Control Board to determine
the necessary permit requirements. The development of these permit requirements is
an intensive process that considers the California Environmental Quality Act, Water
Reclamation Statute, Santa Ana Water Board’s Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa
Ana River Basin, the State Water Resources Control Board Recycled Water Policy,
Antidegradation Policy, Indirect Potable Reuse Regulations, Water Rights and
Wastewater Change Petition, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, disadvantaged
and tribal community Water Quality Objectives, and several local/regional plans,
policies, regulations and objectives.
In anticipation of permit requirements, staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) in
May of 2023 and received one proposal. Staff reviewed the proposal and determined it
was not responsive to the RFP requirements because it excluded all influent sampling
analysis.
On August 1, 2023, The District received a Conditional Acceptance Letter for SNRC from
the State Water Resources Control Board-Division of Drinking Water which specified
Agenda Item
#3a
October 11, 20232
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #3a
Discussion Item
1
2
8
6
different requirements for the required laboratory activities for SNRC than identified in
the previous RFP. The RFP was modified and posted on the District’s website in
accordance with District Policy 7.1.
Two proposals were received. Both proposals meet the requirements and were
evaluated by a selection committee that considered the Laboratories’ qualifications,
references, the quality of the proposal and costs. The selection committee determined
that Eurofins Eaton Analytical proposal provided the best value to the District.
Ranking Laboratory
1 Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC
2 Babcock Laboratories, Inc.
Eurofins is a State Certified laboratory with facilities in Pomona. They have provided
drinking water laboratories services for the District in the past. Eurofins also provides
similar services for treatment plants including City of Glendale, Golden State Water
Company and Santa Clarita Valley Water.
The draft agreement is attached to this staff report for reference.
AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
IV - Promote Planning, Maintenance and Preservation of District Resources
A. Develop Projects and Programs to Ensure Safe and Reliable Services
C. Dedicate Efforts Toward System Maintenance and Modernization
REVIEW BY OTHERS
This agenda item has been reviewed by the Executive Team
FISCAL IMPACT
The first-year contract costs are included in the current fiscal year budget. Funding for
subsequent years will be subject to Board’s approval of future fiscal year budgets.
Recommended by:
________________
Michael Moore
Respectfully submitted:
________________
Rocky Welborn
Agenda Item
#3a
October 11, 20233
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #3a
Discussion Item
1
2
8
6
General Manager/CEO Water Reclamation Manager
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Agreement
1
1
2
7
5
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
AGREEMENT NO. 2023.13
FOR LABORATORY SERVICES
WITH
EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL, LLC
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 11 day of October 2023, by and between the EAST VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT, a County Water District organized and operating pursuant to California Water
Code Section 30000 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as the “DISTRICT”), and Eurofins Eaton
Analytical, LLC, a limited Liability Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “CONTRACTOR”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT desires to contract with CONTRACTOR to provide services for
Laboratory Services for Wastewater Analysis also per Exhibit “A” (hereinafter referred to as
“Project”); and
WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR is willing to contract with the DISTRICT to provide such
services; and
WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR holds itself as duly licensed, qualified, and capable of
performing said services; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement establishes the terms and conditions for the DISTRICT to retain
CONTRACTOR to provide the services described herein for the Project.
COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the faithful performance of the terms and
conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
ENGAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR
AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
1.1 ENGAGEMENT: The DISTRICT hereby engages CONTRACTOR, and CONTRACTOR hereby
accepts the engagement, to perform certain services described in Section 2.1 of this
Agreement for the term set forth in Section 6.7 of this Agreement.
1.2 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: Authorization for CONTRACTOR to proceed with all or a
portion of the work described in Section 2.1 of this Agreement will be granted in writing by
the DISTRICT as soon as both parties sign the Agreement and all applicable insurance and
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
2
other security documents required pursuant to Section 6.3 of this Agreement are received and
approved by the DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR shall not proceed with said work until so
authorized by the DISTRICT, and shall commence work immediately upon receipt of the
Notice to Proceed.
1.3 NO EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP: CONTRACTOR shall perform the services provided for
herein as an independent CONTRACTOR, and not as an employee of the DISTRICT. The
DISTRICT shall have ultimate control over the work performed for the Project.
CONTRACTOR is not to be considered an agent or employee of the DISTRICT for any
purpose, and shall not be entitled to participate in any pension plans, insurance coverage,
bonus, stock, or similar benefits that the DISTRICT provides for its employees.
CONTRACTOR shall indemnify the DISTRICT for any tax, retirement contribution, social
security, overtime payment, or workers’ compensation payment, which the DISTRICT may
be required to make on behalf of CONTRACTOR or any employee of CONTRACTOR for work
performed under this Agreement.
ARTICLE II
SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR
2.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES: The scope of services to be performed by the CONTRACTOR under
this Agreement are described in the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and
incorporated herein by this reference (“Scope of Work”), and shall, where not specifically
addressed, include all related services ordinarily provided by the CONTRACTOR under
same or similar circumstances and/or otherwise necessary to satisfy the requirements of
Section 3.3 of this Agreement. In case of conflict between the terms of this Agreement
and the provisions of the Scope of Work, this Agreement shall govern.
2.2 PREVAILING WAGES: In accordance with the provisions of the California Labor Code,
CONTRACTOR shall secure the payment of compensation to employees. To the
extent required by the California Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall pay not less than
the prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director, Department of
Industrial Relations, and State of California. Copies of such prevailing rate of per
diem wages are on file at the DISTRICT’s office, which copies will be made available
to any interested party upon request. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such
determination at each job site. If applicable, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
DISTRICT the amount of the penalty set forth in Labor Code Section 1777.7(b), or
any subsequent amendments thereto, for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each worker paid less than the specified prevailing rates for such work or craft in
which such worker is employed, whether paid by CONTRACTOR or by any
SUBCONTRACTOR.
2.3 HOURS AND WORKING CONDITIONS: The DISTRICT is a public entity in the State of
California and is subject to the provisions of the Government Code and the Labor
Code of the State. It is stipulated and agreed that all provisions of law applicable
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
3
to public contracts are a part of this Agreement to the same extent as though set
forth herein and will be complied with by CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall comply
with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code relating to working hours
and the employment of apprentices on public works projects. CONTRACTOR shall,
as a penalty to the DISTRICT, forfeit $25.00 for each worker employed in the
execution of this Agreement by CONTRACTOR or by any SUBCONTRACTOR, for each
calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than
8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week, unless
such worker received compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours at not
less than 1½ times the basic rate of pay.
ARTICLE III
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DISTRICT AND OF CONTRACTOR
3.1 DUTIES OF THE DISTRICT: The DISTRICT, without cost to CONTRACTOR, will provide all
pertinent information necessary for CONTRACTOR’S performance of its obligations under
this Agreement that is reasonably available to the DISTRICT unless otherwise specified in
the Scope of Work, in which case the CONTRACTOR is to acquire such information. The
DISTRICT does not guarantee or ensure the accuracy of any reports, information, and/or
data so provided. To the extent that any reports, information, and/or other data so provided
was supplied to the DISTRICT by persons who are not employees of the DISTRICT, any
liability resulting from inaccuracies and/or omissions contained in said information shall be
limited to liability on behalf of the party who prepared the information for the DISTRICT.
3.2 REPRESENTATIVE OF DISTRICT: The DISTRICT will designate Rocky Welborn or the Water
Reclamation Manager as the person to act as the DISTRICT's representative with respect
to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Such person will have complete
authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define the
DISTRICT's policies and decisions pertinent to the work. In the event the DISTRICT wishes
to make a change in the DISTRICT's representative, the DISTRICT shall notify the
CONTRACTOR of the change in writing.
3.3 DUTIES OF CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR shall perform the Project work in such a manner
as to fully comply with all applicable professional standards of care, including professional
quality, technical accuracy, timely completion, and other services furnished and/or work
undertaken by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall cause
all work and deliverables to conform to all applicable federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
3.4 APPROVAL OF WORK: The DISTRICT's approval of work or materials furnished hereunder
shall not in any way relieve CONTRACTOR of responsibility for the technical adequacy of its
work. Neither the DISTRICT's review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for any of
the services shall be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this Agreement
or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement. Where approval
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
4
by the DISTRICT is indicated in this Agreement, it is understood to be conceptual approval
only and does not relieve the CONTRACTOR of responsibility for complying with all laws,
codes, industry standards, and liability for damages caused by negligent acts, errors,
omissions, noncompliance with industry standards, or the willful misconduct of the
CONTRACTOR or its SUBCONTRACTORs. CONTRACTOR’S obligation to defend, indemnify,
and hold harmless the DISTRICT, and its directors, officers, employees and agents as set
forth in Section 6.9 of this Agreement also applies to the actions or omissions of the
CONTRACTOR or its SUBCONTRACTORs as set forth above in this paragraph.
ARTICLE IV
PAYMENTS TO CONTRACTOR
4.1 PAYMENT: The DISTRICT will pay CONTRACTOR for work performed under this Agreement,
which work can be verified by the DISTRICT, on the basis of the following: CONTRACTOR
shall exercise its good faith best efforts to facilitate a full and clear definition of the scope
of all assigned work so that the amount set forth in Section 4.3 of this Agreement will cover
all tasks necessary to complete the work. The amount set forth in Section 4.3 of this
Agreement is the maximum compensation to which CONTRACTOR may be entitled for the
performance of services to complete the work for the Project, unless the Scope of Work or
time to complete the work is changed by the DISTRICT in writing in advance of the work to
be performed there under. Adjustments in the total payment amount shall only be allowed
pursuant to Section 6.4 of this Agreement. In no event shall CONTRACTOR be entitled to
compensation greater than the amount set forth in Section 4.3 of this Agreement where
changes in the Scope of Work or the time for performance are necessitated by the
negligence of CONTRACTOR or any SUBCONTRACTOR performing work on the Project.
4.2 PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR: Payment will be made by the DISTRICT within thirty (30)
calendar days after receipt of an invoice from CONTRACTOR, provided that all invoices are
complete and product and services are determined to be of sufficient quality by the
DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR shall invoice DISTRICT monthly for services performed under
this Agreement. In the event that a payment dispute arises between the parties,
CONTRACTOR shall provide to the DISTRICT full and complete access to CONTRACTOR'S
labor cost records and other direct cost data, and copies thereof if requested by the
DISTRICT.
4.3 ESTIMATED CHARGES: The total estimated charges for all work under this Agreement are
$300,000 annually. The total estimated charges stated herein constitute the total amount
estimated annually and charges will reflect the unit pricing of laboratory analysis requested
based on unit pricing included in Exhibit “A”.
4.4 COST FOR REWORK: CONTRACTOR shall, at no cost to the DISTRICT, prepare any
necessary rework occasioned by CONTRACTOR'S negligent act or omission or otherwise
due substantially to CONTRACTOR'S fault.
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
5
ARTICLE V
TERM
5.1 DURATION: The duration of the services to be provided is to be for a period of 3 years
with 2 optional one-year extensions.
5.2 TIME OF ESSENCE: CONTRACTOR shall perform all services required by this Agreement in
a prompt, timely, and professional manner in accordance with the above schedule. Time
is of the essence in this Agreement.
ARTICLE VI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1 COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS: CONTRACTOR shall at all times
observe all applicable provisions of Federal, State, and Local laws and regulations including,
but not limited to, those related to Equal Opportunity Employment.
6.2 SUBCONTRACTORS AND OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS: No subcontract shall be awarded by
CONTRACTOR if not identified as a SUBCONTRACTOR in its Proposal unless prior written
approval is obtained from the DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for payment to
SUBCONTRACTORs used by them to perform the services under this Agreement. If
CONTRACTOR subcontracts any of the work to be performed, CONTRACTOR shall be as
fully responsible to the DISTRICT for the performance of the work, including errors and
omissions of CONTRACTOR’S SUBCONTRACTORs and of the persons employed by the
SUBCONTRACTOR, as CONTRACTOR is for the acts and omissions of persons directly
employed by the CONTRACTOR. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any
contractual relationship between any SUBCONTRACTOR of CONTRACTOR and the
DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR shall bind every SUBCONTRACTOR and every SUBCONTRACTOR
of a SUBCONTRACTOR to the terms of this Agreement that are applicable to CONTRACTOR’S
work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract in question and approved
in writing by the DISTRICT.
6.3 INSURANCE: CONTRACTOR shall secure and maintain in full force and effect, until the
satisfactory completion and acceptance of the Project by DISTRICT, such insurance as will
protect it and the DISTRICT in such a manner and in such amounts as set forth below. The
premiums for said insurance coverage shall be paid by the CONTRACTOR. The failure to
comply with these insurance requirements may constitute a material breach of this
Agreement, at the sole discretion of the DISTRICT.
(a) Certificates of Insurance: Prior to commencing services under this Agreement, and in
any event no later than ten (10) calendar days after execution of this Agreement,
CONTRACTOR shall furnish DISTRICT with Certificates of Insurance and endorsements
verifying the insurance coverage required by this Agreement is in full force and
effect. The DISTRICT reserves the right to require complete and accurate copies of
all insurance policies required under this Agreement.
(b) Required Provisions: The insurance policies required by this Agreement shall include
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
6
the following provisions or have them incorporated by endorsement(s):
(1) Primary Coverage: The insurance policies provided by CONTRACTOR shall be
primary insurance and any self-insured retention and/or insurance carried by or
available to the DISTRICT or its employees shall be excess and non-contributory
coverage so that any self-insured retention and/or insurance carried by or
available to the DISTRICT shall not contribute to any loss or expense under
CONTRACTOR’S insurance.
(2) Additional Insured: The policies of insurance provided by CONTRACTOR, except
Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability, shall include as additional
insureds: the DISTRICT, its directors, officers, employees, and agents when
acting in their capacity as such in conjunction with the performance of this
Agreement. Such policies shall contain a "severability of interests" provision,
also known as "Cross liability" or "separation of insured".
(3) Cancellation: Each certificate of insurance and insurance policy shall provide
that the policy may not be non-renewed, canceled (for reasons other than non-
payment of premium) or materially changed without first giving thirty (30) days
advance written notice to the DISTRICT, or ten (10) days advance written notice
in the event of cancellation due to non-payment of premium.
(4) Waiver of Subrogation: The insurance policies provided by CONTRACTOR shall
contain a waiver of subrogation against DISTRICT, its directors, officers,
employees and agents for any claims arising out of the services performed under
this Agreement by CONTRACTOR.
(5) Claim Reporting: CONTRACTOR shall not fail to comply with the claim reporting
provisions or cause any breach of a policy condition or warranty of the insurance
policies required by this Agreement that would affect the coverage afforded
under the policies to the DISTRICT.
(6) Deductible/Retention: If the insurance policies provided by CONTRACTOR
contain deductibles or self-insured retentions, any such deductible or self-insured
retention shall not be applicable with respect to the coverage provided to
DISTRICT under such policies. CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for any
such deductible or self-insured retention and the DISTRICT, in its sole discretion,
may require CONTRACTOR to secure the payment of any such deductible or self-
insured retention by a surety bond or an irrevocable and unconditional letter of
credit.
(7) CONTRACTOR’S SUBCONTRACTORs: CONTRACTOR shall include all
SUBCONTRACTORs as additional insureds under the insurance policies required
by this Agreement to the same extent as the DISTRICT or shall furnish separate
certificates of insurance and policy endorsements for each SUBCONTRACTOR
verifying that the insurance for each SUBCONTRACTOR complies with the same
insurance requirements applicable to CONTRACTOR under this Agreement.
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
7
(c) Insurance Company Requirements: CONTRACTOR shall provide insurance coverage
through insurers that have at least an "A" Financial Strength Rating and a "VII"
Financial Size Category in accordance with the current ratings by the A. M. Best
Company, Inc. as published in Best's Key Rating Guide or on said company’s web site.
In addition, any and all insurers must be admitted and authorized to conduct business
in the State of California and be a participant in the California Insurance Guaranty
Association, as evidenced by a listing in the appropriate publication of the California
Department of Insurance.
(d) Policy Requirements: The insurance required under this Agreement shall meet or
exceed the minimum requirements as set forth below:
(1) Workers' Compensation: CONTRACTOR shall maintain Workers' Compensation
insurance as required by law in the State of California to cover CONTRACTOR’S
obligations as imposed by federal and state law having jurisdiction over
CONTRACTOR’S employees and Employers' Liability insurance, including disease
coverage, of not less than $1,000,000.
(2) General Liability: CONTRACTOR shall maintain Comprehensive General Liability
insurance with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per
occurrence or claim and $1,000,000 aggregate. The policy shall include, but not
be limited to, coverage for bodily injury, property damage, personal injury,
products, completed operations and blanket contractual to cover, but not be
limited to, the liability assumed under the indemnification provisions of this
Agreement. In the event the Comprehensive General Liability insurance policy
is written on a "claims made" basis, coverage shall extend for two years after
the satisfactory completion and acceptance of the Project by DISTRICT.
(3) Automobile Liability: CONTRACTOR shall maintain Commercial Automobile
Liability insurance with a combined single limit for bodily injury and property
damage of not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence for any owned, hired, or
non-owned vehicles.
6.4 CHANGES IN SCOPE OR TIME: If the DISTRICT requests a change in the Scope of Work or
time of completion by either adding to or deleting from the original scope or time of
completion, an equitable adjustment shall be made and this Agreement shall be modified in
writing accordingly. CONTRACTOR must assert any claim for adjustment under this clause
in writing within thirty-(30) calendar days from the date of receipt from CONTRACTOR of
the notification of change unless the DISTRICT grants a further period of time before the
date of final payment under this Agreement.
6.5 NOTICES: All notices to either party by the other shall be made in writing and delivered
or mailed to such party at their respective addresses as follows, or to other such address
as either party may designate, and said notices shall be deemed to have been made when
delivered or, if mailed, five (5) days after mailing.
To DISTRICT: East Valley Water District
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
8
31111 Greenspot Road
Highland, CA 92346
Attn: Michael Moore, General Manager/CEO
To CONTRACTOR: Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC
941 Corporate Center Drive
Pomona, CA 91768
Attn: Rick Zimmer, Sales Director
6.6 CONTRACTOR'S ASSIGNED PERSONNEL: CONTRACTOR designates Rosalynn Dang to have
immediate responsibility for the performance of the work and for all matters relating to
performance under this Agreement. Substitution of any assigned personnel shall require the
prior written approval of the DISTRICT. If the DISTRICT determines that a proposed
substitution is not acceptable, then, at the request of the DISTRICT, CONTRACTOR shall
substitute with a person acceptable to the DISTRICT.
6.7 TERMINATION:
(a) If the engagement of CONTRACTOR is not extended by the mutual written consent of
the DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, then this Agreement shall expire on the latest date
set forth in the schedule contained in the Scope of Work for completion of tasks for
the Project.
(b) Notwithstanding the above, the DISTRICT may terminate this Agreement or abandon
any portion of the Project by giving ten (10) days written notice thereof to
CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR may terminate its obligation to provide further services
under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days written notice only in the event
of substantial failure by the DISTRICT to perform in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement through no fault of the CONTRACTOR.
(c) In the event of termination of this Agreement or abandonment of any portion of the
Project, the DISTRICT shall be immediately given title and possession of all original
drawings and other documents developed for the Project, if any, and the sole right
and remedy of CONTRACTOR shall be to receive payment for all amounts due and not
previously paid to CONTRACTOR for services completed or in progress in accordance
with the Agreement prior to such date of termination. If termination occurs prior to
completion of any task for which payment has not been made, the fee for services
performed during such task shall be based on an amount mutually agreed to by the
DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR. Such payments available to the CONTRACTOR under
this paragraph shall not include costs related to lost profit associated with the expected
completion of the work or other such payments relating to the benefit of this
Agreement.
6.8 ATTORNEYS’ FEES: In the event that either the DISTRICT or CONTRACTOR brings an action
or proceeding for damages for an alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, to
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
9
interpret this Agreement or determine the rights of and duties of either party in relation
thereto, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover as part of such action or proceeding
all litigation, arbitration, mediation and collection expenses, including witness fees, court
costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees. Such fees shall be determined by the Court in such
litigation or in a separate action brought for that purpose. Mediation will be attempted if
both parties mutually agree before, during, or after any such action or proceeding has
begun.
INDEMNITY:
(a) CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT, including its directors,
officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all claims,
demands, causes of action, suits, debts, obligations, liabilities, losses, damages,
costs, expenses, attorney’s fees, awards, fines, settlements, judgments or losses of
whatever nature, character, and description, with respect to or arising out of the
work to be performed under this Agreement, including without limitation, any and all
such claims, demands, causes of action, suits, debts, obligations, liabilities, losses,
damages, costs, expenses, attorney’s fees, awards, fines, settlements, judgments or
losses of whatever nature, character, and description, arising by reason of death or
bodily injury to one or more persons, including the employees of CONTRACTOR;
injury to property of any kind, including loss of use; or economic damages of any
kind, caused by, or arising out of, any alleged or actual act or omission, regardless
of whether such act or omission is active or passive, by CONTRACTOR, any of
CONTRACTOR’S SUBCONTRACTORs or DISTRICT, including their respective
directors, officers, employees, agents and assigns, excepting only such matters
arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the DISTRICT.
(b) CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT, including its directors,
officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all claims,
demands, causes of action, suits, debts, obligations, liabilities, losses, damages, costs,
expenses, attorney’s fees, awards, fines, settlements, judgments or losses of whatever
nature, character, and description, with respect to or arising out of any infringement
or alleged infringement of any patent, copyright or trademark and arising out of the
use of any equipment or materials furnished under this Agreement by the
CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR’S SUBCONTRACTORs, including their respective
directors, officers, employees, agents and assigns, or out of the processes or actions
employed by, or on behalf of, the CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR’S
SUBCONTRACTORs, including their respective directors, officers, employees, agents
and assigns, in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall have the right, in order to avoid such claims or actions, to
substitute at its expense non-infringing equipment, materials or processes, or to
modify at its expense such infringing equipment, materials, and processes so they
become non-infringing, provided that such substituted and modified equipment,
materials, and processes shall meet all the requirements and be subject to all the
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
10
provisions of this Agreement.
(c) CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT, including its directors,
officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all claims,
demands, causes of action, suits, debts, obligations, liabilities, losses, damages, costs,
expenses, attorney’s fees, awards, fines, settlements, judgments or losses of whatever
nature, character, and description, with respect to or arising out of any breach by
CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR’S SUBCONTRACTORs, including their respective
directors, officers, employees, agents and assigns, of the aforesaid obligations and
covenants, and any other provision or covenant of this Agreement.
(d) It is the intent of the parties to this Agreement that the defense, indemnity and hold
harmless obligation of CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall be as broad and
inclusive as may be allowed under California Civil Code §§ 2778 through 2784.5, or
other similar state or federal law.
6.9 SAFETY: CONTRACTOR shall perform the work in full compliance with applicable State and
Federal safety requirements including, but not limited to, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration requirements.
(a) CONTRACTOR shall take all precautions necessary for the safety of, and prevention of
damage to, property on or adjacent to the Project site, and for the safety of, and
prevention of injury to, persons, including DISTRICT’s employees, CONTRACTOR’S
employees, and third persons. All work shall be performed entirely at CONTRACTOR'S
risk. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the insurance requirements set forth in Section
6.3 of this Agreement.
(b) CONTRACTOR shall also furnish the DISTRICT with a copy of any injury prevention
program established for the CONTRACTOR’S employees pursuant to Labor Code
Section 6401.7, including any necessary documentation regarding implementation of
the program. CONTRACTOR hereby certifies that its employees have been trained in
the program, and procedures are in place to train employees whenever new
substances, processes, procedures, or equipment are introduced. CONTRACTOR shall
demonstrate compliance with Labor Code Section 6401.7 by maintaining a copy of its
Injury and Illness Prevention Plan at the Project site and making it available to the
DISTRICT.
6.10 EXAMINATION OF RECORDS: All original drawings, specifications, reports, calculations, and
other documents or electronic data developed by CONTRACTOR for the Project shall be
furnished to and become the property of the DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR agrees that the
DISTRICT will have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books,
documents, papers, and records of any and all of the transactions relating to this
Agreement.
6.11 INTEGRATION AND AMENDMENT: This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR as to those matters contained herein. No other
representations, covenants, undertakings or other prior or contemporaneous agreements,
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
11
oral or written, respecting those matters, which are not specifically incorporated herein,
may be deemed in any way to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. Each party
acknowledges that it has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any promise,
representation or warranty not set forth herein. This Agreement may not be amended
except by a writing signed by all parties hereto.
6.12 ASSIGNMENT: Neither party shall sign or transfer its interest in this Agreement without
written consent of the other party. All terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement
shall inure to and shall bind each of the parties hereto, and each of their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.
6.13 GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be construed as if it was jointly prepared by both
parties hereto, and any uncertainty or ambiguity contained herein shall not be interpreted
against the party drafting same. This Agreement shall be enforced and governed by the
laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of
this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state court situated in the County of San
Bernardino, State of California, or in a federal court within rem jurisdiction over the
Project.
6.14 HEADINGS: Article and Section headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and
are not intended to be used in interpreting or construing the terms, covenants, and
conditions of this Agreement.
6.15 PARTIAL INVALIDITY: If any term, covenant, condition, or provision of this Agreement is
found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the
remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect, and shall in no way
be affected, impaired, or invalidated thereby.
6.16 EFFECT OF DISTRICT’S WAIVER: Any failure by the DISTRICT to enforce any provision of
this Agreement, or any waiver thereof by the DISTRICT, shall not constitute a waiver of its
right to enforce subsequent violations of the same or any other terms or conditions
herein.
6.17 AUTHORITY: The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they
have the legal capacity and authority to sign this Agreement on behalf of and to so bind
their respective legal entities.
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date
first written above.
CONTRACTOR DISTRICT
By:_____________________________ By:_____________________________
Rick Zimmer, Sales Director Michael Moore, General Manager/CEO
Eurofins Easton Analytical, LLC East Valley Water District
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
13
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
The CONTRACTOR shall meet the following minimum requirements and provide the
following services:
•Certification:
o Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP)
o 95% of the analyses listed in the proposal shall be conducted in-house
without sub-contracting (excluding toxicity tests).
•Quality:
o ELAP-Approved Quality Assurance Manual
o Code of Ethics Policy
o Method detection limits (MDLs) below the method reporting limits (MRL)
o Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) and matrix spike (MS) conducted on each
sample batch (for specified tests); and
o MRL check conducted for each sample batch (for specified tests)
•Capability:
o Accreditation – Laboratory license to perform testing.
o Audit – most recent 3rd party audit report of quality systems
o Proficiency Testing (PT) Results – Most recent 3rd party proficiency test
results
o Quality Assurance (QA) manual Table of contents will demonstrate depth of
policies and procedures.
o Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) – Laboratory procedures for analysis
according to approved test methods
o MALS – Method acceptance limits for each analytical method to illustrate
precision and accuracy.
o MDLs – Annual demonstration of capabilities to meet specific reporting
limits.
o Instrumentation – documentation of laboratory’s investments in and
commitment to technological advancements
•Capacity:
o At least 1 dedicated instrument for each analysis
o At least 2 dedicated instruments and 2 dedicated staff members for
volatiles, perchlorate, nitrates
•Experience:
o Lab Overview – summary of history, expertise, and management structure
o Sample Experience – illustration of analytical capacity and ability to manage
in a production environment.
o Staffing – detail of staff education and industry experience
o Clients – profile of types of work focus and opportunities to obtain feedback
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
14
from 3 clients/references.
o Laboratory Director Requirements:
▪Bachelor’s degree in chemistry, Biology, Microbiology and/or
environmental Engineering and a minimum of 15-years of experience
•Customer Service
o Located within 55 miles of the SRNC at:
▪25376 5th Street
San Bernardino, CA 92410
o Provide delivery and transportation of samples 7 days a week.
o Web-based data reporting system
o Provide sample results in EDF format upon request.
o Electronic Data Transfer (EDT) (CDX, CLIP and SDWIS) capability
o EDD (LIMS and Hach-WIMS) capability
o Billing invoices to be received within 30 days of report.
•Program Management
o Sample kits – provide description of the kits to be used along with ordering
information.
o Sample Return Method – ease of use, ability to meet analytical hold times
and cost implications.
o Order login and Acknowledgement – method for organizing work orders and
communicating with the client any issues at the outset of the project.
o Project management – specify a main point of contact assisted to the
District and provide their resume.
o QA/QC – Measure taken to assure accuracy, precision, completeness and
correctness of data.
o Contingency – plan to work assignments in the event of instrument failure
or staff loss.
o Reporting – ease of use and documentation of QA/QC
o EDD/EDT – ease of use and cost implications for backend data management
o Web Access – Ease of use and cost implications for backend data
management
o Billing – ease of use for management and documentation of costs.
The Laboratory shall comply with all applicable Federal, State and Local laws during the
performance of work resulting from this RFP.
Billing shall be made per analysis performed according to the following table of analysis:
Agreement for Laboratory Services
October 11, 2023
15
Agenda Item
#3a
October 11, 20231
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #3a
Public Hearing
8
8
4
Regular Board Meeting
TO: Governing Board Members
FROM: General Manager/CEO
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of Resolution 2023.15 - Updating Water Capacity Fees,
Public Hearing
RECOMMENDATION
That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution 2023.15 - Updating Water Capacity Fees.
BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS
The District periodically reviews fees to ensure they are consistent with the policies of
the District. At the November 13, 2019 regular Board Meeting, IB Consulting presented
their 2019 Water and Wastewater Capacity Fee Study with proposed adjustments to
District capacity fees charged to new development. The proposed fees were adopted
and became effective January 1, 2020. Capacity fees are for new meter connections
only and ensures new development pays for its' fair share to connect to the water
system.
Since the fee update almost four years ago, the District has finished the AMI
implementation for small meters, and has been systematically replacing large meters,
defined as meters 2” in diameter or greater. The large replacement meters differ from
the legacy meters in that they utilize Ultrasonic technology to gather meter flow data.
This technology has fewer moving parts internally, resulting in decreased head loss
through the meter, and therefore allowing a greater “gallons per minute” volume
capability (capacity ratio).
The greater flow capability of the new large meters, which is significant, invalidates flow
assumptions used to allocate costs based on meter size and the potential demand
placed on the District’s water system calculated in the 2019 Capacity Fee Study. It was
therefore necessary for the District to request that IB Consulting revise their
calculations from the 2019 study to account for the increased flow capacity for new
meters being used by the District. IB Consulting has completed their revised
calculations and issued a Technical Memorandum with proposed adjustments to the
capacity fees calculated in 2019. The adjusted fees for all meter sizes were then
updated for Construction Cost Index increases that have occurred since 2019.
It is incumbent on the District to ensure that rates/fees cover reasonable costs
associated with providing a service. Updating the capacity fees to accommodate the
higher flow capacities through the newer and more reliable meters will address the
Agenda Item
#3a
October 11, 20232
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #3a
Public Hearing
8
8
4
added capacity each meter now allows; insuring developers are paying their fair share
for the higher volumes to meet their project needs. It is important to note that this is
not a full capacity fee study as adjustments being proposed only address the increase
flow rates of meters 2 inches and larger, and adjustments for Construction Cost Index
increases. A comprehensive capacity fee study, which considers the types and cost of
new facilities to accommodate new development, will be started in calendar year 2024,
after updates to the Water Master Plan are completed.
This agenda item requires a public hearing, and notices about this evening’s hearing
have been posted in a locally circulated newspaper both 14 days and 7 days in advance
of the hearing. In addition, the technical memorandum prepared by IB Consulting
supporting the proposed changes to capacity fees, and calculations supporting the
recommended miscellaneous fee adjustments, have been made available for public
inspection for 10 days prior to the hearing.
AGENCY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
IV - Promote Planning, Maintenance and Preservation of District Resources
B. Enhance Planning Efforts that Respond to Future Demands
C. Dedicate Efforts Toward System Maintenance and Modernization
REVIEW BY OTHERS
This agenda item has been reviewed by Legal Counsel and the Engineering and Finance
Departments.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.
Recommended by:
________________
Michael Moore
General Manager/CEO
Respectfully submitted:
________________
Brian Tompkins
Chief Financial Officer
Agenda Item
#3a
October 11, 20233
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
Agenda Item #3a
Public Hearing
8
8
4
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 2023.15
2. Exhibit A - Schedule of Water and Wastewater Rates and Charges
3. IB Consulting 2019 Capacity Fee Study
4. IB Consulting 2023 Technical Memo
5. Public Hearing Notice
East Valley Water District
Resolution 2023.15
Page 1 of 3
8
7
9
RESOLUTION 2023.15
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES RELATED TO THE
PROVISION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AND SUPERSEDING
RESOLUTION 2023.05
WHEREAS, East Valley Water District (“District”) is a county water district organized
and operating pursuant to California Water Code Section 30000 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to applicable law, including but not limited to Water Code Sections
31007 and 31025, the District’s Board of Directors is authorized to adopt by resolution such rates
and charges for incidental services related to the provision of water service and wastewater service
by the District to implement the rules and regulations set forth in District Ordinance No. 403 and
404, and to yield an amount sufficient to pay for the services provided to District ratepayers and
the regulatory costs incurred by the District in providing those services; and
WHEREAS, Ordinances 403 and 404 provide that Rates and Charges, may be changed
from time to time or new rates and charges may be established by resolution of the Board of
Directors; and
WHEREAS, Section 21080(b) (8) of the Public Resources Code provides that the
establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other
charges by public agencies are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) provided that certain findings are made specifying the basis for the claim of
exemption; and
WHEREAS, the District, in accordance with the requirements of Article XIIID of the
Constitution of the State of California, has established rates and fees for property related services
including water and wastewater treatment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District deems it advisable and finds that it
would be in the best interest of the District to amend or establish certain fees and charges,
consistent with applicable constitutional and statutory requirements; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIIC Section 1 of the Constitution of the State of California, excepts
certain levies, fees and charges from the definition of “tax” thereby exempting such levies, fees
and charges from the procedural requirements established by Article XIIID of the California
Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the District now wishes to establish fees and charges incidental and related to
the provision of services for water and wastewater treatment, but which fees and charges are not
for property related services as defined by Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of
California and which fees and charges may be established by resolution of the Board of Directors
of the District;
East Valley Water District
Resolution 2023.15
Page 2 of 3
8
7
9
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the District as
follows:
Section 1. It is hereby found and determined that the proposed changes to the Schedule of
Water and Wastewater Rates and Charges as set forth in Exhibit “A” are within the purposes set
forth in Section 21080(b) of the Public Resources Code, and therefore, that such changes are
exempt from CEQA.
Section 2. It is hereby found and determined that the capacity fees being increased hereby
do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which they are imposed
and that said fees do not constitute a tax pursuant to Article XIIIC Section 1(e) of the California
Constitution.
Section 3. That the Secretary is hereby ordered and directed to post a certified copy of this
Resolution in a public place within the District.
This Resolution shall take effect as of the 11th day of October 2023.
ADOPTED this 11th day of October 2023.
ROLL CALL:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
Phillip R. Goodrich
Board President
East Valley Water District
Resolution 2023.15
Page 3 of 3
8
7
9
ATTEST:
Michael Moore
Secretary, Board of Directors
October 11, 2023
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2023.15
adopted by the Board of Directors of East Valley Water District at its Regular Meeting held
October 11, 2023.
Michael Moore
Secretary, Board of Directors
EXHIBIT “A ”
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SCHEDULE O F
WATER AND WASTEWATER
RATES AND CHARGES
UPDATED OCTOBER 11, 2023
i
Table of Contents
Section 1: Water Service Charges ................................................................... 4
Monthly Water System Charge ..................................................................... 4
Commodity Charges: Potable Water ............................................................ 4
Private Fire Protection Service ..................................................................... 5
1. Commercial Standby Charge ......................................................................... 5
2. Fire Hydrant Flow Test Fee (per fire hydrant) ................................................. 5
Temporary Water Service Connection .......................................................... 6
Monthly Service Charge .................................................................................. 6
1. Commodity Charge ....................................................................................... 6
2. Meter Deposit ............................................................................................... 6
3. Temporary Service Meter Availability Charge (for reading) .............................. 6
4. Unauthorized Use of Water Charge ................................................................ 6
New Account Fees for Water Services .......................................................... 7
1. Security Deposit ........................................................................................... 7
2. Service Initiation Charge ............................................................................... 7
Miscellaneous Water Service Charges and Fees ........................................... 7
1. AMI Opt-Out Fee .......................................................................................... 7
2. Delinquency Charge ...................................................................................... 7
3. Disconnection Notice Charge ......................................................................... 7
4. Meter Test Charge ........................................................................................ 7
5. Returned Payment Fee ................................................................................. 8
6. Service Reconnect Charge (after hours) ......................................................... 8
7. Service Reconnect Charge (business hours) ................................................... 8
Cross-Connection Control ............................................................................. 9
1. Backflow Installation Fee .............................................................................. 9
2. Backflow Inspection Fee (per inspection) ....................................................... 9
3. Initial Backflow Compliance Test (per device) ................................................. 9
ii
4. Backflow Annual Administration Fee (per device) ............................................ 9
5. Annual Backflow Compliance Test (per device) ............................................... 9
Section 2: Wastewater Service Charges ........................................................ 10
Monthly Wastewater Charge - Current ....................................................... 10
Collection Charges ........................................................................................ 10
Treatment Charges ....................................................................................... 11
Wastewater Charge - SNRC ........................................................................ 12
Section 3: Developer Services ....................................................................... 14
Water Capacity and Connection Fees ......................................................... 14
Water Capacity Fees ..................................................................................... 14
Water Connection Fees ................................................................................. 14
Service Installation Benchmark Costs ......................................................... 15
Wastewater Connection Fees ..................................................................... 16
Fire Service Connection Charges ................................................................ 16
Developer Services’ Charges and Fees ....................................................... 17
1. Availability Letter ........................................................................................ 17
2. Construction Inspection Charge (per day or actual cost) ............................... 17
3. Development Agreement (per agreement or actual cost) .............................. 17
4. Development and Engineering Research Fee ($95 per hr; 4-hr min) .............. 17
5. Development Meeting Fee ........................................................................... 18
6. Easement/Quitclaim Processing (per easement) ........................................... 18
7. Fire Hydrant Installation Charge (actual cost or 5% of estimate) ................... 18
8. General Water/Sewer Service Inquiry .......................................................... 18
9. New Construction Chlorination and Flushing Fee ($355 min to actual cost) .... 18
10. Sewer Manhole and Valve Can Deposit ........................................................ 18
11. Special Facility Charge ................................................................................ 19
12. Water Main Extension Charge ...................................................................... 19
13. Water Quality Sampling Fee (per sample) .................................................... 19
14. Water/Sewer Plan Checking Fee (per sheet) ................................................. 19
15. Water System Design Charge ...................................................................... 19
iii
16. Will Serve Letter ......................................................................................... 20
Section 4: Pretreatment Program ................................................................. 21
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Discharge Violations ................ 21
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Monitoring Violations .............. 22
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Reporting Violations ................ 23
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Permit Violations ..................... 24
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Miscellaneous Violations ......... 26
History of Revisions ........................................................................................ 27
4
Section 1: Water Service Charges
Monthly Water System Charge
The water system charge is the monthly availability charge applicable to all metered water
services, and shall apply whether or not premises served by the meter are occupied. The
charges, which vary by meter size, are established at the amounts listed in the table
below.
7/1/2016 1/1/2022 1/1/2023 1/1/2024
5/8"23.06$ 24.01$ 24.74$ 25.49$
3/4"29.27$ 30.85$ 31.78$ 32.74$
1"41.71$ 44.52$ 45.86$ 47.24$
1 1/2" 72.81$ 78.69$ 81.06$ 83.50$
2"110.13$ 119.70$ 123.30$ 127.00$
3"228.30$ 229.05$ 235.93$ 243.01$
4"402.44$ 352.07$ 362.64$ 373.52$
6"819.14$ 693.79$ 714.61$ 736.05$
8" 1,503.28$ 1,923.98$ 1,981.70$ 2,041.16$
METER
SIZE
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
Commodity Charges: Potable Water
Commodity Charges are billed on a per unit basis for water consumption registered by
the water service meter. One unit is 100 cubic feet (HCF) of water, which is equal to 748
gallons.
TIERS 1/1/2020 1/1/2022 1/1/2023 1/1/2024
Tier 1 - Indoor Use $ 1.83 $ 1.98 $ 2.04 $ 2.11
Tier 2 - Outdoor Use $ 2.61 $ 2.54 $ 2.62 $ 2.70
Tier 3 - Inefficient Use $ 3.64 $ 3.93 $ 4.05 $ 4.18
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
5
The District has three price tiers with increasing rates per unit. The number of units a
customer is billed in each tier is determined by their unique water budget. See Section
10 of the District’s Water Regulation and Service Ordinance for an explanation of water
budgets.
Private Fire Protection Service
1. Commercial Standby Charge
The fire service standby charge is the monthly charge assessed per inch diameter of
the District fire service meter. Water use through this service is limited to emergency
fire requirements only.
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
7/1/2016
1"8.78$
1 1/2"13.18$
2"17.57$
3"26.35$
4"35.14$
6"52.70$
8"70.27$
10"87.84$
METER
SIZE
2. Fire Hydrant Flow Test Fee (per fire hydrant)
The fire flow test charge is a flat rate established to cover the District’s time and effort
for testing parts of the water system to obtain fire flow test data and calculate results
as requested. The District will charge a one-time fee of $270 to administer fire flow
tests.
6
Temporary Water Service Connection
A temporary service is available through the use of a fire hydrant. A customer deposit for
the temporary service will be required, and all other applicable service charges shall apply.
Monthly Service Charge
Refer to the schedule of Monthly Water System Charges for three inch (3”) meters.
1. Commodity Charge
Commodity charges for temporary services shall be billed at the Tier 3 rates based on
the Potable Water Commodity Rates. When available, and feasible, recycled water
shall be used for temporary construction uses.
The Commodity Charge shall be as follows:
AREA RATE / 100 CUBIC FEET
Potable Tier 3 Rate
2. Meter Deposit
A deposit equal to the replacement cost of the construction meter shall be collected
at the time of service application. Currently, the replacement cost is estimated to be
$2,700. The deposit will be applied to the closing bill and any remaining amount
refunded to the customer. Lost meters will result in forfeiture of the deposit.
3. Temporary Service Meter Availability Charge (for reading)
If a hydrant/construction meter is not available for a monthly reading as prescribed
by the District, a fee of $100 will be charged for each month the meter is not read in
order to cover the cost of correcting billing records.
4. Unauthorized Use of Water Charge
The unauthorized use of water charge shall be charged to any person, organization
or agency for each unauthorized use of District water or for tampering in any manner
with any meter belonging to the District where this tampering shall affect the accuracy
of such meter. The unauthorized use of water charge is hereby established at the rate
of $500 for a first occurrence and $1,000 for each subsequent occurrence.
7
New Account Fees for Water Services
The following fees are applicable to all requests for new service, or transfer of an existing
account to a new location:
1. Security Deposit
A deposit of $150 will be required until a one-year payment history, with fewer than
two delinquencies, has been established. The deposit insures payment of minimum
District charges.
2. Service Initiation Charge
The service initiation charge is a non-refundable charge of $35 per account, which
covers the reasonable District costs for initiating water service.
Miscellaneous Water Service Charges and Fees
1. AMI Opt-Out Fee
This fee covers the cost to manually read the meter and will be charged when a
customer requests to Opt-Out; that the District not install an Automated Metering
Infrastructure (AMI) meter information unit to serve their property.
2. Delinquency Charge
Rates and charges which are not paid on or before the due dates shall be subject to
interest charges. Interest will be calculated at a rate of one and one-half percent (1
½%) on all amounts that remain unpaid at the end of each billing cycle.
3. Disconnection Notice Charge
The disconnect notice charge is the charge which covers reasonable District costs to
notify customers that their water service is subject to impending termination.
4. Meter Test Charge
The meter test charge is the charge which covers the District costs for removing,
bench testing, and reinstalling the water meter to be tested.
8
5. Returned Payment Fee
A returned payment charge is a charge which covers the reasonable administrative
cost and banking charges for processing a returned check, or to respond to a disputed
charge where a payment card was fraudulently used to make payment on an account.
6. Service Reconnect Charge (after hours)
The service reconnect charge is the charge which covers the reasonable District costs
for disconnection and reconnection during non-business hours, of service connections
which are in violation of the provisions contained herein.
7. Service Reconnect Charge (business hours)
The service reconnect charge is the charge which covers the reasonable District costs
for disconnection and reconnection during regular business hours, of service
connections which are in violation of the provisions contained herein.
Summary of charges/fees for Miscellaneous Water Service:
CHARGE OR FEE NAME CHARGE/FEE
AMI Opt-Out Fee $13 (per month)
Delinquency Charge 1.5%
Disconnection Notice Charge $30
Fire Hydrant Flow Test Fee $270 (per fire hydrant)
Meter Deposit $2,700
Meter Test Charge $65
Returned Payment Fee $25
Service Initiation Charge $35 (per account)
Service Reconnect Charge (after hours)$150
Service Reconnect Charge (business hours)$50
Temporary Service Meter Availability Charge
(for reading)$100
Unauthorized Use of Water Charge $500 (first occurrence)
Unauthorized Use of Water Charge $1,000 (each subsequent occurrence)
9
Cross-Connection Control
In order to prevent water from flowing backward into the District’s water distribution
system, a backflow device must be installed by all commercial/irrigation and multi-family
customers with four (4) or more units serviced.
All backflow devices must be inspected upon installation and tested annually for
compliance. Compliance testing may be performed by a certified backflow tester and
results shall be submitted to the District.
Installation of new backflow prevention assemblies are typically completed by the owner’s
contractor, if staff performs the installation, it will be billed at actual cost.
1. Backflow Installation Fee
The charge for installation will be based on actual cost to the customer, and will be
billed accordingly.
2. Backflow Inspection Fee (per inspection)
A fee of $145 will be charged for each standard backflow inspection of newly installed
backflow prevention devices, in accordance with District Standards, and inspected by
District staff.
3. Initial Backflow Compliance Test (per device)
A fee of $60 will be charged to the customer for the initial backflow compliance test
performed by certified District staff.
4. Backflow Annual Administration Fee (per device)
The District shall appoint at least one person trained in cross-connection control to
administer and ensure all District standards are met. This backflow annual
administration fee will be assessed annually.
5. Annual Backflow Compliance Test (per device)
A fee of $5 per month will be charged to the customer when the annual backflow
compliance test is performed by certified District staff. The customer will only be billed
as a $60 lump sum when District standards regarding the inspection, testing, and
maintenance of customer-owned backflow assemblies are not followed. See Section
9 of the District’s Water Regulation and Service Ordinance for an explanation of
Inspection, Testing and Maintenance.
10
Summary of charges/fees for Cross-Connection Control:
CHARGE OR FEE NAME CHARGE / FEE
Backflow Installation Fee actual cost
Backflow Inspection Fee $145 (per inspection)
Initial Backflow Compliance Test $60 (per device)
Annual Backflow Administration Fee $15 (per device)
Annual Backflow Compliance Test $60 (per device)
Section 2: Wastewater Service Charges
Monthly Wastewater Charge - Current
Collection Charges
Collection charges were established to maintain the District's wastewater collection lines.
A. Residential Customers (1 – 3 units)
The collection charge for residential customers is a monthly fixed charge.
CUSTOMER CLASS MONTHLY CHARGE
Residential 15.36$
B. Commercial Customers
The collection charges for commercial customers include a small fixed charge plus a
volumetric charge (water usage).
CUSTOMER CLASS MONTHLY FIXED CHARGE
Commercial/Multi-Family 3.90$
Volumetric Charge per hundred cubic feet (HCF) of water used:
11
COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER TYPE CHARGE PER HCF
Multi-Family (4 or more units, Mobile Home Park)0.55$
Commercial/Retail (Non-Office, Bakery, Market)0.55$
Restaurant/Lounge 0.55$
Laundromat 0.55$
Dry Cleaner 0.55$
School/Church (Daycare, Nursery School)0.55$
Office Building/Motel (without a restroom, Municipality)0.55$
Convalescent Home 0.55$
Treatment Charges
The District pays treatment charges established by the City of San Bernardino for the
operation and maintenance of their wastewater treatment facilities. Any future increases
made by the City over the next five years following the previous public hearing, held on
January 25, 2017, may be automatically passed through and incorporated herein by this
reference, by action of the District’s Board of Directors to the extent authorized by
Government Code Section 53756 and any other applicable provision of law.
A. Residential Customers
Treatment charges for residential customers are a monthly fixed charge.
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
7/1/2017
Residential 21.55$
Multi-Family (2 Units)43.10$
Multi-Family (3 Units)64.64$
CUSTOMER CLASS
B. Commercial Customers
Treatment charges for commercial customers include a small fixed plus a volumetric
charge (water usage) which varies depending on the nature of the commercial entity.
Fixed Charges:
7/1/2017
Multi-Family (4+ Units), Mobile Home Parks 1.97$
Non-Residential Customer Classes 3.52$
CUSTOMER CLASS RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
12
Volumetric Charges (per HCF):
7/1/2017
Multi-Family (4+ Units), Mobile Home Parks 1.53$
Commercial / Retail 2.55$
Restaurants / Lounges 3.28$
Laundromats 1.83$
Dry Cleaners 2.55$
Schools / Churches 1.33$
Governments / Municipal 1.83$
Convalescent Homes 1.63$
Hotels (with Restaurants)3.28$
Offices Buildings / Motels 1.83$
Auto Repair / Service Station 1.58$
Car Wash 1.58$
RATE EFFECTIVE DATECUSTOMER CLASS
Wastewater Charge - SNRC
The commencement of operations at the District’s new Sterling Natural Resource Center
Water Reclamation Plant will require that the District transition from charging rates
established by the City of San Bernardino, to rates that were adopted as the result of a
wastewater Cost of Service Analysis conducted on District operations and facilities.
Wastewater charges consist of both a Collection (System) component and a treatment
component, and includes both fixed charges, and charges based on water usage. An
explanation of how these charges apply to different customer classes is explained below.
A. Residential Customers
The collection and treatment charges for residential customers is a monthly fixed
charge for each dwelling unit. Accounts with 1-3 dwelling units are classified as single-
family residential customers; accounts with 4 or more dwelling units are classified as
multi-family residential customers.
13
Collection Treatment Collection Treatment Collection Treatment
Single-Family Residential
Fixed Monthly Charges 14.25$ 23.37$ 15.25$ 25.01$ 16.32$ 26.77$
Multi-Family Residential
Fixed Monthly Charges 13.46$ 20.86$ 14.41$ 22.33$ 15.42$ 23.90$
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
1/1/2023 1/1/20245/1/2022
B. Commercial / Non-Residential Customers
The collection and treatment charges for non-residential customers consist of monthly
fixed charges, assessed per account, and a volumetric charge assessed for each unit
of water (HCF) used for the account during the billing period. The volumetric charge
varies based on the strength/concentration factors of the wastewater discharged by
commercial customers. Customers are assigned to a strength category based on
industry standards.
Fixed Monthly Charges:
Collection Treatment Collection Treatment Collection Treatment
10.33$ 10.83$ 11.06$ 11.59$ 11.84$ 12.41$
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
5/1/2022 1/1/2023 1/1/2024
Volumetric Charges per HCF of Water Usage:
Collection Treatment Collection Treatment Collection Treatment
Low Strength Dischargers 0.35$ 0.96$ 0.38$ 1.03$ 0.41$ 1.11$
Medium Strength Dischargers 0.46$ 1.53$ 0.50$ 1.64$ 0.54$ 1.76$
High Strength Dischargers 0.46$ 3.42$ 0.50$ 3.66$ 0.54$ 3.92$
Patton State Hospital 0.57$ 1.79$ 0.61$ 1.92$ 0.66$ 2.06$
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE
5/1/2022 1/1/2023 1/1/2024
14
Section 3: Developer Services
Water Capacity and Connection Fees
Water Capacity Fees
A “Capacity Charge” is defined within GC 66013 as a charge for public facilities in
existence at the time a charge is imposed or charges for new facilities to be constructed
in the future that is of benefit to the person or property being charged. Capacity fees
ensure new development pays its fair share to connect to the system and does not cause
additional burdens to current customers. Capital and infrastructure costs required to meet
new demand/connections should be paid by those creating the cost to be incurred.
On July 1 of each year Water Capacity Charges will automatically increase in proportion
to the published 12-month increase measured in September each year in the Construction
Cost Index, unless the EVWD Board of Directors determines that such an increase shall
not be effective for the next succeeding fiscal year, or if the index does not increase or
change.
Water Connection Fees
The water meter connection charge is the charge for installation and materials between
the service angle stop and customer connection side within the meter box. Such regular
charge shall be paid in advance by the applicant. Cost varies for the requested meter size
and type. Service line connections to the main are separate from this fee and would be
an additional non-regular charge. Where there is a non-regular charge, the District
reserves the right to require the applicant to deposit an amount equal to the estimated
cost of such service connection.
15
RATE
EFFECTIVE DATE
7/1/2023
RATE
EFFECTIVE DATE
10/11/2023
3/4" T-10 8,417$ 9,531$ 930$
3/4" Mach 10 8,417$ 9,531$ 1,035$
1"14,030$ 15,884$ 1,100$
1 1/2"28,060$ 31,766$ 1,495$
2"44,895$ 50,826$ 1,780$
3"89,790$ 158,832$ 7,515$
4"140,297$ 397,081$ 10,030$
6"280,595$ 635,327$ 15,875$
8"785,667$ 1,270,665$ 17,360$
10"1,178,500$ 2,064,814$ 22,355$
12"2,244,790$ 2,541,308$ 2,244,790$
CAPACITY CHARGE
METER
CONNECTION
CHARGE
METER
SIZE
Service Installation Benchmark Costs
Installation charges will be estimated by the District based on availability of District staff
to complete the work-site specific construction conditions and requirements. The costs in
the table shown are benchmarks, or cost references to begin from, for a short or long-
side service installation based on requested meter size. Permitting, paving/concrete costs,
and non-typical conditions are not included and will need to be assessed per connection,
on a case-by-case basis. If the applicant elects not to have District staff complete the
installation, then an administrative fee of 5% of the estimate will be charged.
Re
p
l
a
c
e
d
15
RATE
EFFECTIVE DATE
7/1/2023
RATE
EFFECTIVE DATE
10/11/2023
3/4" T-10 8,417$ 8,081$ 930$
3/4" Mach 10 8,417$ 8,081$ 1,035$
1"14,030$ 13,468$ 1,100$
1 1/2"28,060$ 26,935$ 1,495$
2"44,895$ 43,096$ 1,780$
3"89,790$ 134,675$ 7,515$
4"140,297$ 336,687$ 10,030$
6"280,595$ 538,698$ 15,875$
8"785,667$ 1,077,396$ 17,360$
10"1,178,500$ 1,750,768$ 22,355$
12"2,244,790$ 2,154,791$ 2,244,790$
CAPACITY CHARGE METER
CONNECTION
CHARGE
METER
SIZE
Service Installation Benchmark Costs
Installation charges will be estimated by the District based on availability of District staff
to complete the work-site specific construction conditions and requirements. The costs in
the table shown are benchmarks, or cost references to begin from, for a short or long-
side service installation based on requested meter size. Permitting, paving/concrete costs,
and non-typical conditions are not included and will need to be assessed per connection,
on a case-by-case basis. If the applicant elects not to have District staff complete the
installation, then an administrative fee of 5% of the estimate will be charged.
Replaces page 15 on the EVWD Schedule of Water and Wastewater Rates
and Charges.
16
METER
SIZE
SHORT SIDE
LATERAL
LONG SIDE
LATERAL
3/4" T-10 6,005$ 11,030$
3/4" Mach - 10 6,110$ 11,135$
1"6,035$ 11,060$
1 1/2"6,420$ 11,445$
2"6,640$ 11,665$
3"14,765$ 22,690$
4"17,210$ 25,135$
6"22,985$ 30,915$
8"24,470$ 32,395$
10"29,465$ 37,390$
Wastewater Connection Fees
The sewer service connection charge is the charge for the type and size of service
connection desired. Such regular charge shall be paid in advance by the applicant. Where
there is no such regular charge, the District reserves the right to require the applicant to
deposit an amount equal to the estimated cost of such service connection. The following
charges are hereby established and shall be collected at the time of application for sewer
connection:
CHARGE OR FEE NAME
Permit Charge $ 275 per connection
Inspection Charge $ 100 per connection (per visit)
Capacity Charge $ 8,803 per EDU or portion thereof
CHARGE / FEE
On July 1 of each year Wastewater Capacity Charges will automatically increase in
proportion to the published 12-month increase measured in September each year in the
Construction Cost Index, unless the EVWD Board of Directors determines that such an
increase shall not be effective for the next succeeding fiscal year, or if the index does not
increase or change.
Fire Service Connection Charges
The fire service charge is the charge for the type and size of fire service connection
desired. Such regular charge shall be paid in advance by the applicant. Where there is no
17
regular charge, the District reserves the right to require the applicant to deposit an
amount equal to the estimated cost of such service connection.
Installation charges will be estimated by the District based on availability of District staff
to complete the work and site-specific construction conditions and requirements. If the
applicant elects not to have District staff complete the installation then an administrative
fee of 5% of the estimate will be charged.
Developer Services’ Charges and Fees
1. Availability Letter
A fee of $155 will be charged for a water or sewer verification letter inquiry.
2. Construction Inspection Charge (per day or actual cost)
Where a customer service connection or facility requires inspection by District
personnel, the customer shall be charged for such inspection at the rate of $905 per
day. When District personnel are not available, inspection will be performed by third
party inspectors retained by the District. The hourly rate for third-party inspectors will
be established at the beginning of each third-party inspection assignment.
3. Development Agreement (per agreement or actual cost)
A Development Agreement is required whenever a project will include the design and
construction of water or sewer facilities which will be dedicated to the District. This
$1,375 minimum fee will cover the cost to initiate and execute a Development
Agreement with the District.
4. Development and Engineering Research Fee ($95 per hr; 4-hr min)
This fee will provide funding for Engineering staff to conduct research of existing
accounts, easements, and other development related materials. This would only apply
to obtaining information for Developers that is unique to their development area and
not general information, such as fee schedules or District design standards. Utility
Requests and providing of As-builts or other locating documentation is not included in
this fee.
This fee also encompasses the District’s time and effort spent on assisting customers
who have a requirement to construct water or sewer facilities, which must meet
District needs and conform to District standards.
18
5. Development Meeting Fee (per meeting, after first meeting)
This $475 per meeting fee will provide funding for Engineering staff to prepare for
and attend, meetings with developers regarding their projects beyond the initial
project consultation meeting and set-up. This fee will primarily impact larger, more
complex developments which may require multiple coordination meetings with staff.
6. Easement/Quitclaim Processing (per easement)
A minimum fee of $975 will be charged for review and recordation of each Easement
or Quitclaim document. If complexity of the legal document requires more time, legal
counsel, or land surveyor counsel, actual costs beyond the minimum will be collected.
7. Fire Hydrant Installation Charge (actual cost or 5% of estimate)
Installation charges will be estimated by the District based on availability of District
staff to complete the work and site-specific construction conditions and requirements.
If the applicant elects not to have District staff complete the installation, an
administrative fee of 5% of the estimate will be charged.
8. General Water/Sewer Service Inquiry
A fee of $75 will be charged for a Technician’s time for general inquiries for service to
a parcel. This inquiry usually arises from realtors and small developers.
9. New Construction Chlorination and Flushing Fee ($355 min to actual cost)
A minimum fee of $355 will be charged for new construction disinfection plan review,
inspection, and flushing prior to sampling.
10. Sewer Manhole and Valve Can Deposit
A refundable deposit of $1,500 per manhole will be charged for each sewer manhole
structure shown on the sewer construction plans. A refundable deposit of $500 per
valve can will be charged for each valve can shown on the water construction plans.
These deposits will be returned when all manholes and valve cans are constructed to
final grade by the Developer’s contractor and verified by the District.
As an alternative to the manhole and valve can deposit, a guarantee bond may be
provided in the same amount as the deposit. The guarantee bond shall contain
covenants that are satisfactory to the District. Such bond shall remain in force until all
manholes and valve cans are constructed to final grade by the Developer’s contractor
and verified by the District.
19
11. Special Facility Charge
A special facility charge shall be required for development of limited service whenever
special facilities, including pressure regulators are required. The charge to be made
to a developer or owner of land that is considered by the District to be within a limited
service area shall be based upon the Developer’s or Landowner’s proportionate share
of the cost for the installation of such Special Facility. Such proportionate share to be
borne by the developer or landowner shall be based on the percentage of such
development to the entire limited service area to be served by the Special Facilities;
and the same number of acres or area under normal conditions and the cost of
facilities to serve the acreage of area under special conditions at a higher cost.
12. Water Main Extension Charge
The water main extension charge is for the construction of a water main extending to
the far side of the property to be served. This charge shall be based on the prevailing
rates of time and material per District approved plans. The customer shall be
responsible to provide the plans and for all applicable Water/Sewer Plan Checking
charges described below.
13. Water Quality Sampling Fee (per sample)
A fee of $135 will be charged for each water quality sample taken for new
construction.
14. Water/Sewer Plan Checking Fee (per sheet)
This $800 fee is collected per sheet and is a minimum that will cover up to three in-
house plan checks. When District personnel are not available, plan checking will be
performed by third-party Engineers retained by the District. The hourly rate and
estimate for three plan checks for third-party plan checkers will be established at the
beginning of each third-party plan checking assignment. The minimum fee per sheet
established can be collected initially to begin plan checking and the Developer will
deposit the difference to cover the third-party’s plan check cost to the District. Should
more than three plan checks be required, additional funds may be deposited to bill
against, and hours will be billed at the Engineering Research Fee or the cost of the
third-party Engineer. Plan checking costs shall be paid before plans are returned.
15. Water System Design Charge
A water system design charge shall be required for all main extensions, service
20
connections and/or special facilities requiring the preparation of engineering plans and
drawings. The water system design charge is hereby established as the fee charged
by an Engineering firm of the District’s choosing, plus an additional 10% thereof for
the District’s administrative costs. In the event the costs exceed the fees charged, the
additional cost will be billed to the customer.
16. Will Serve Letter
Once a Developer has compiled or met all the items needed to make the request for
a Will Serve Letter, per the Development Guidelines and Procedures Handbook, they
may request and pay a minimum fee of $575 to review and evaluate the infrastructure
needs for a proposed project within the District’s service area. Should additional time
be required for reviewing the project information and to prepare the document, the
hourly rate established for the Engineering Research Fee shall be assessed in addition
to the minimum fee .
Summary of charges/fees for Developer Services:
CHARGE OR FEE NAME CHARGE / FEE
Availability Letter $155
Construction Inspection Charge $905 (per day) or actual cost
Development Agreement $1,375 (per agreement; min to actual cost)
Development and Engineering Research Fee $95 (flat rate, per 4-hr min)
Development Meeting Fee $475 (per meeting, after first meeting)
Easement/Quitclaim Processing $975 (per easement)
Fire Hydrant Installation Charge actual cost or 5% of estimate
General Water/Sewer Service Inquiry Fee $75
New Construction Chlorination and Flushing Fee $355 (min to actual cost)
Sewer Manhole and Valve Can Deposit $1,500 (per manhole); $500 (per valve can)
Special Facility Charge
Based on proportionate share of Developer
or Landowner share of the installation of
Special Facility
Water Main Extension Charge Based on prevailing rates of time and
material per District approved plans
Water Quality Sampling Fee $135 (per sample)
Water/Sewer Plan Checking Fee $800 (per sheet; 3 plan checks)
Water System Design Charge actual cost + 10% for administrative costs
Will Serve Letter $575 (min fee)
21
Section 4: Pretreatment Program
The District performed permit related activities will include permit processing,
inspections and monitoring. The following fees are anticipated to cover the annual costs
for each class of dischargers for the Pretreatment Program.
Class* Annual Fee
I User $2,000
II User $1,000
III User $150
IV User $500
V User $200
VI User $150
*Descriptions of each user type are defined in the East Valley Water District Sewer
Regulations and Service Charge Ordinance, definitions section.
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Discharge
Violations
The District may assess a penalty against a person or entity in compliance with the
requirements of ordinances, and enforcement response plan guidelines.
Violation & Circumstances Penalty
First Discharge
Violation in a 12-month Period - No harm to POTW None
Second Discharge
Violation in a 12-month Period - No harm to POTW $100
NMP Violation(s) —Does not result in Acute Non-
Compliance $100
22
NMP Violation(s) – Acute Non-Compliance $100, $100, $500, $1000,
each subsequent violation
Any discharge violation(s) that result in Quarterly SNC
status
$100, $100, $500, each
subsequent violation
Any discharge violation(s) that result in pass-through,
sludge contamination, or interference
$1,000 or as determined
by District review
Dilution of Wastestream — First offense None
Dilution of Wastestream — Repeat offense(s) $100
Continuous pH Monitoring indicates noncompliance $100
Septic Waste Discharged at non-authorized site or in
noncompliance with limitations at the POTW — First
Offense
$100
Septic Waste Discharged at non-authorized site or in
noncompliance with limitations at the POTW — Repeat
Offense(s)
$100, $1,000 or as
determined by the District
Discharge of any prohibited Waste — First Offense $100
Discharge of any prohibited waste — Repeat Offense(s) $100, $100, $1000 or as
determined by the District
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Monitoring
Violations
The District may assess a penalty against a person or entity in compliance with the
requirements of ordinances, and enforcement response plan guidelines.
Violation & Circumstances Penalty
Failure to sample or resample within required timeframes —
Doesn’t result in Acute Non-Compliance None
23
Failure to sample or resample within required timeframes —
Results in Acute Non-Compliance $100
Improper Sample Location — First offense None
Improper Sample Location — Repeat offense(s) $100, $500 for
subsequent violations
Improper sample collection or analytical methods — First
offense None
Improper sample collection or analytical methods — Repeat
offense(s)
$100, $500 for
subsequent violations
Failure to monitor for all required pollutants — First offense None
Failure to monitor for all required pollutants — Repeat
offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
Failure to properly maintain or operate Flow monitoring or
pretreatment equipment — First offense. None
Failure to properly maintain or operate Flow monitoring or
pretreatment equipment— Repeat offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
Failure to install required monitoring or flow equipment — First
offense. $100
Failure to install required monitoring or flow equipment —
Repeat offense(s) $100/day
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Reporting
Violations
The District may assess a penalty against a person or entity in compliance with the
requirements of ordinances, and enforcement response plan guidelines.
Violation & Circumstances Penalty
Failure to maintain records or reports as required by permit
— First offense None
24
Failure to maintain records or reports as required by permit
— Repeat offense(s) $100
Failure to submit records, reports, or correspondence — less
than 5 days late None
Failure to submit records, reports, or correspondence —
between 5 and 45 days late. $100
Failure to submit records, reports, or correspondence —
Over 45 days late – Significant Non-Compliance
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
Failure to report SMR Discharge violation — First offense None
Failure to report SMR Discharge violation — Repeat
offense(s) $100
Failure to report Slug Load or spill discharge violation —
First offense & no harm None
Failure to report Slug Load or spill discharge violation —
Repeat offense(s) — No harm $100
Failure to report Slug Load or spill discharge violation –
Harm
$250, $500, $1000 and
$1500 for subsequent
violations
Failure to submit additional monitoring — First offense None
Failure to submit additional monitoringRepeat offense(s) $100
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Permit
Violations
The District may assess a penalty against a person or entity in compliance with the
requirements of ordinances, and enforcement response plan guidelines.
Violation & Circumstances Penalty
25
Failure to submit permit application or renewal by
due date None
Failure to submit permit application renewal before
current permit expires $100
Failure to submit permit application that results in a
permit reclassification $100
Failure to comply with any permit condition of
requirement — First offense $100
Failure to comply with any permit condition or
requirement — Repeat offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
Unauthorized or Unpermitted Discharge — first
offense — No harm to POTW None
Unauthorized or Unpermitted Discharge — Repeat
offense(s) — No harm to POTW $100
Unauthorized or Unpermitted Discharge — First
offense — Harm to the POTW
$100, $500, $1000 depending
of severity
Unauthorized or Unpermitted Discharge — Repeat
offense(s) — Harm to the POTW
$100, $500, $1000 or as
determined by District review
Failure to submit required permit information or any
process modification — First offense None
Failure to submit required permit information or any
process modification — Repeat offense(s) $100
Failure to implement any plan required by the permit
(i.e. slug load, spill prevention, TOMP, etc.) — First
offense
$100
Failure to implement any plan required by the permit
(i.e. slug load, spill prevention, TOMP, etc.) —
Repeat offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
26
Penalties for Enforcement Response Plan Miscellaneous
Violations
The District may assess a penalty against a person or entity in compliance with the
requirements of ordinances, and enforcement response plan guidelines.
Violation & Circumstances Penalty
Denial of entry to perform monitoring or inspections — first
offense None
Denial of entry to perform monitoring or inspections —
Repeat offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
Spill containment not present or inadequate — First offense None
Spill containment not present or inadequate — Repeat
offense(s) $100
Spill containment area not properly maintained — First
offense None
Spill containment area not properly maintained — Repeat
offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
Illegal water softening equipment installed — First offense None
Illegal water softening equipment installed — Repeat
offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
Failure to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) —
First offense None
Failure to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) —
Repeat offense(s)
$100, $500, $1000 for
subsequent violations
27
History of Revisions
DATE
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
UPDATED OR
RESCINDED REVISION
DATE
EFFECTIVE
10/11/23 2023.15 2023.05 Update Water Capacity Fees 10/11/23
Pass-Through N/A N/A Update Capacity Fees
(per Cost Construction Index)07/01/23
03/22/23 2023.05 2021.13 Addition of Pretreatment Program Penalties 04/01/23
Pass-Through N/A N/A Update Capacity Fees
(per Cost Construction Index)07/01/22
08/11/21 2021.13 2021.07 Update AMI Opt-Out Fee 09/01/21
Pass-Through N/A N/A Update Capacity Fees
(per Cost Construction Index)07/01/21
05/12/21 2021.08 2019.19 Update Water and Wastewater Charges 01/01/22
05/12/21 2021.07 2019.19 Update Miscellaneous and Development Fees 06/01/21
Pass-Through N/A N/A Update Capacity Fees
(per Cost Construction Index)07/01/20
12/11/19 2019.19 2019.06 Update Miscellaneous and Capacity Fees 01/01/20
05/22/19 2019.06 2017.07 Update Water Charges 01/01/20
07/11/18 2018.12 2017.01 Update Wastewater Charges 08/12/18
05/24/17 2017.07 2017.01 Update Water Charges 07/01/17
01/25/17 2017.01 2016.05
Update Wastewater Treatment Charges and
Renew 5-Year Pass-Through Provision 07/01/17
02/24/16 2016.05 2015.04
Update Wastewater Charges and
Miscellaneous Fees 04/01/16
03/25/15 2015.04 2014.32 Implement Water Budget Based Rates 06/01/15
03/25/15 2015.04 Ord 391 Update Wastewater Charges 06/01/15
IB Consulting, LLC
31938 Temecula Parkway, Suite A #350
Temecula, CA. 92592
Capacity Fee Study
East Valley
Water District
December 11, 2019
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3
Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 4
Capacity Fee Methodology ............................................................................................................... 5
Existing System Demand and Future Development ......................................................................... 8
Utility Asset Values ........................................................................................................................... 9
Capacity Charge Analysis .............................................................................................................. 12
Updated Capacity Fees .................................................................................................................. 16
TABLES
Table 1 - 2019 Master Plan Demand Projections ............................................................................. 8
Table 2– Water Asset Replacement Cost Less Depreciation ......................................................... 10
Table 3– Wastewater Asset Replacement Cost Less Depreciation ............................................... 10
Table 4– Utility Net RCLD .............................................................................................................. 11
Table 5– Existing Water Meter Equivalents .................................................................................... 12
Table 6– Water Buy-In by Asset Category ..................................................................................... 13
Table 7– Wastewater Buy-In by Asset Category ............................................................................ 14
Table 8– Water Incremental Cost Component ............................................................................... 14
Table 9– Wastewater Incremental Cost Component ...................................................................... 15
Table 10– Water Proposed Capacity Fee ...................................................................................... 16
Table 11– Wastewater Proposed Capacity Fee ............................................................................. 16
FIGURES
Figure 1 – Capacity Fee Analysis ..................................................................................................... 5
Figure 2 – Asset Valuation ............................................................................................................... 6
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 3
Executive Summary
In June 2019, East Valley Water District (District) engaged IB Consulting, LLC (IBC) to complete a capacity
charge nexus study for its water and wastewater enterprises. This Water and Wastewater Capacity Fee Study
Report (Report) describes the approach, methodology, and technical analysis used to derive updated capacity
charges per California State Government Code, Section 66013 (GC 66013). GC 66013 allows an agency to
charge the estimated reasonable cost to serve a new connection for which the charge is imposed.
Currently, the District’s water capacity charge is $5,200 for a 3/4” meter, and the wastewater capacity charge
is $5,905 for a single-family residential connection, defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (1 EDU). The
District’s capacity charges were last updated in 2014 and have not been increased or indexed annually to
keep pace with the cost of construction. The updated capacity charge for water includes two primary
components: 1) a Buy-In component for existing facilities and 2) an Incremental component for a new water
treatment plant. The wastewater capacity charge also includes two components: 1) a Buy-In component for
existing collection facilities and 2) an Incremental component for the Sterling Natural Resource Center (SNRC)
and the upsizing of specific pipeline facilities required to accommodate additional demand from new
development.
The analysis contained in this Report justifies modifying the water capacity charges to $7,228 per 3/4” meter,
and the wastewater capacity charges to $7,560 per EDU. These updated charges proportionately recover
new development’s share of facility costs in existence and new public facilities to be acquired or constructed
over a 20-year planning horizon (2040) (Planning Horizon). In addition to new connections, current customers
expanding their capacity at an existing connection will also pay for the incremental demand placed on the
water and wastewater systems.
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 4
Overview
Capacity Fees
A “Capacity Charge” is defined within GC 66013 as a charge for public facilities in existence at the time a
charge is imposed or charges for new facilities to be constructed in the future that is of benefit to the person
or property being charged. Capacity fees ensure new development pays its fair share to connect to the system
and does not cause additional burdens to current customers. Capital and infrastructure costs required to meet
new demand/connections should be paid by those creating the cost to be incurred.
Based on the requirements of GC 66013, capacity charges must be based on the “reasonable cost” to
accommodate additional demand from new development or the expansion of existing development. In
addition, the State Constitution was amended through the approval of Proposition 26 in 2010, which redefined
a “tax” as any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by a local government. However, seven
exemptions are part of Proposition 26, including cost-based charges imposed as a condition of property
development (i.e. capacity charges) so long as a reasonable relationship between the charges and cost of
facilities are linked. Therefore, the nexus study summarized in this Report connects the proposed charge to
the reasonable cost of improvements in compliance with the Proposition 26 exemption.
District Background
The District is located in the high-desert of San Bernardino County (County) and consists of the entire City of
Highland, portions of the City of San Bernardino, and unincorporated areas of the County. The District spans
almost 18,000 acres and currently serves a population of approximately 103,000. Since the District’s inception
in 1954, it now provides both water and wastewater service to its customers. The District recently completed
a new Master Plan for each of the two utility systems (Water Master Plan and Wastewater Master Plan, or
collectively Master Plans). Based on the Master Plans, the population is expected to be approximately
142,000 by the year 2040, representing a 37 percent increase in population. This population growth results in
increased water demands, water supply requirements, and wastewater capacity needs.
Based on the District’s current system assets and planned improvements required to accommodate growth,
the proposed capacity charges for water and wastewater include both a Buy-In component and an Incremental
component. The Buy-In component is calculated by determining the Replacement Cost of assets Less
Depreciation (RCLD). The District has a significant amount of backbone infrastructure available to
accommodate growth, and the existing assets serve as a proxy to determine the current facility standards
serving existing customers. In addition to existing infrastructure, the Master Plans identify specific capital
improvements required to accommodate growth through 2040. The Incremental component of the proposed
water capacity fee includes a new eastside water treatment plant. For wastewater, the Incremental component
consists of the SNRC and the necessary upsizing of existing facilities.
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 5
Capacity Fee Methodology
There are four primary steps in calculating capacity fees: (1) determine demand and define the baseline
requirements for a connection, meter equivalent, or equivalent dwelling unit based on planning documents,
2) calculate the capital costs required to serve new or expanding connection, (3) determine any credits or
offsets to apply towards the total capital costs, such as grants, existing debt obligations, and available funding
through previously collected capacity fees, and (4) apportion the capital costs equitably to various types of
connections based on the demand placed on the utility system to ensure a fair share allocation.
Figure 1 – Capacity Fee Analysis
In addition to the four steps above, the three primary approaches for calculating capacity fees, are the “Buy-
In Approach,” “Incremental-Cost Approach,” and “Hybrid Approach.” The Hybrid Approach accounts for both
a buy-in component and an incremental component. Additional considerations may be required to allocate
costs between existing and new customers appropriately and to ensure no duplication of cost occurs. The
selected approach primary depends on the unique circumstances of the utility, such as existing build-out of
the service area, expected future growth, exiting infrastructure capacity, and access to up to date planning
documents/master plans.
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 6
Buy-In Approach
The system Buy-In Approach accounts for the current facility standard that existing customers receive through
their service. Using this approach ensures that new development buys-in to the utility system and funds the
necessary improvements to maintain and receive the same level of service experienced by today’s customers.
Therefore, new development pays an amount equal to their fair share of the system. This approach eliminates
any potential funding of existing system deficiencies as the District’s current asset inventory only reflects
improvements that are in the ground today.
The basis of the Buy-In approach is the value of the existing system. System assets may be valued in a few
different ways. Options include using the original cost of the improvements (OC), original cost less
depreciation of system assets to account for the time improvements are in service (OCLD), replacement cost
of the improvements by bringing the original cost into today’s dollars (RC), and replacement cost less
depreciation which brings both the original cost and the accumulated depreciation value into today’s dollars
(RCLD). The most common valuation technique is RCLD. Using RCLD generates a system value based on
today’s cost of the improvements by indexing the original cost by an appropriate indicator that reflects the
change in cost over time, while also accounting for years in service. For this analysis, we calculate RCLD by
using the Construction Cost Index (CCI), published by Engineer’s News-Record.
Figure 2 – Asset Valuation
Once the system value is determined, dividing the total value by total existing demand derives a value per
unit of demand. Demand is commonly used for system design. It is a primary driver for the current
configuration of the system and how the system expands in the future. Using meter size and the corresponding
meter capacity (water flow demand in gallons per minute) provides a means to derive a value per Meter
Equivalent (ME).
This approach is suited for agencies that 1) have built most of their facilities in advance with only a small
portion of facilities needed for build-out, 2) don’t have an adopted long-term capital improvement plan, or 3)
the “build-out” date is so far out in the future that it is difficult to project growth accurately and required facilities.
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 7
Incremental Cost Approach
The Incremental Cost Approach is based on the principle that new development should pay for improvements
required to connect them to the system, including the need for any additional capacity and/or expansions.
This approach is typically used when there are specific capital improvements identified within planning
documents that are needed for growth to occur. The Incremental Cost Approach uses the District’s most
recent Master Plan to determine growth-related improvements. Projects associated with routine repair &
replacement are not included, and any improvements identified within the Master Plan that are required to
address existing deficiencies are removed. Also, specific projects within the Master Plan may benefit both
existing and new development. In these instances, new development only pays its proportionate share based
on the demand or capacity taken from these projects.
As part of this study, there is one capital project included using the Incremental Cost Approach for water and
capital expansions required for wastewater. The District plans to construct a new water treatment plant on the
east side of the District’s service area. The treatment plant will treat surface water from the Santa Ana River
and serve the additional demand generated by new development. The Eastside Water Treatment Plant is
currently sized with a capacity of 3 Million Gallons per Day (MGD). A rate per gallon of capacity will be derived
to charge new development based on their proportional share of the capacity in the new plant. The
Wastewater Incremental component includes the new SNRC as well as certain upsizing of facilities within the
Wastewater Master Plan required for growth to occur.
Hybrid Approach
The Hybrid Approach is utilized when the existing system has available capacity and/or is substantially built
while specific capital improvements are clearly identified and needed to serve new development. Given that
the District has a significant amount of backbone infrastructure already built for its water and wastewater
systems and has a recently updated master plan that identifies additional improvements needed to serve new
development, the Hybrid Approach was used for updating the District’s capacity fees.
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 8
Existing System Demand and Future Development
Water System Demand
Based on growth forecasts developed within the 2019 Water Master Plan, the population within the District’s
service area is expected to grow to approximately 142,000 by 2040. This population growth results in
increased water demands and water supply requirements. The Water Master Plan projected total water
demand through 2040 by using a combination of population projections, land use development, and the 175
Gallons Per Capacity Per Day (GPCD) compliance target from the Regional Water Urban Management Plan.
The 175 GPCD translates to 609 gallons per day for 1 ME (3.48 persons per household x 175 GPCD). Over
the Planning Horizon, projections yielded a total water demand of 27.69 MGD (2040 Water Demand).
Wastewater System Demand
The existing wastewater system consists of approximately 213 miles of pipeline, 4,400 wastewater manholes,
7 siphons, and 5 diversion structures. The existing wastewater system conveys flows into San Bernardino
Municipal Water Department’s (SBMWD) East Trunk Sewer, which outlets to the San Bernardino Water
Reclamation Plant (SBWRP).
The District’s wastewater collection system is substantially built, and effluent is conveyed to the City of San
Bernardino regional treatment plant. The District’s collection system includes approximately 213 miles of
pipeline ranging in size from 4 inches to 24 inches in diameter. The wastewater system does not include any
lift stations or force mains, and all flow is conveyed by gravity to the East Trunk Sewer pipeline. Similar to the
Water Master Plan, total demand over the Planning Horizon was estimated using population projections, and
future land use data to yield an aggregate demand of 11.79 MGD (2040 Wastewater Demand). The
Wastewater Master Plan also identifies a near-term demand, through 2025, equal to 10.1 MGD (2025
Wastewater Demand). These projections result in an incremental increase in demand of 2.87MGD by 2025
and an additional increase in demand from 2025 to 2040 of 1.69MGD. Table 1 provides a summary of existing
and future demands.
Table 1 - 2019 Master Plan Demand Projections
Utility
Existing
[A]
2025
Demand
[B]
2025
Incremental
Demand
B - A =
[C]
2040
Demand
[D]
2040
Incremental
Demand
D - B =
[E]
Water System 20.29 MGD 25.34 MGD 5.05 MGD 27.69 MGD 2.35 MGD
Wastewater System 7.23 MGD 10.1 MGD 2.87 MGD 11.79 MGD 1.69 MGD
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 9
Utility Asset Values
Asset Value
The first step in determining the buy-in facilities development charge is to determine the value of the existing
system. As mentioned above, there are several methods of determining the current value of assets, but, for
this study, RCLD was used. RCLD valuation was thought to be the most equitable and reasonable approach
since it takes into consideration the time value of money and factors in the remaining useful life of each asset.
To accomplish this, the District provided fixed asset records containing the original cost of each asset.
Replacement cost was estimated by bringing forward the original costs to today’s dollars to reflect the
estimated cost if a similar asset were constructed today. This original cost for each asset was indexed by the
annual percentage change of the Construction Cost Index for 20-cities (CCI), published by the Engineer’s
News Record. For 2018, the CCI value is 11,062. Accumulated depreciation was also indexed by CCI to
maintain consistency with 2019 dollars. Subtracting the accumulated depreciation from the replacement cost
yields the updated RCLD of each utility and reflects facility standards in 2019 dollars. Table 2 and Table 3
show the water assets and wastewater assets, respectively. Each table summarizes original cost,
replacement cost in 2019 dollars, accumulated depreciation in 2019 dollars, and assets adjusted for the 2019
depreciation (RCLD). With the asset listings, Land values do not depreciate, and the replacement value is
estimated by increasing the original acquisition costs by a 2% inflation limit in-line with Proposition 13
constraints on assessed values. In addition, Water Rights also do not depreciate, and since water rights do
not go away, the replacement cost is equivalent to the original acquisition cost of North Fork Mutual Water
Company shares owned by the District. Detailed asset listings are on file with the District.
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 10
Table 2– Water Asset Replacement Cost Less Depreciation
Asset Category
Original
Cost
[A]
Replacement
Cost
(2019 $)
[B]
Accumulated
Depreciation
[C]
Accumulated
Depreciation
(2019 $)
[D]
RCLD
B - D =
[E]
General $15,399,082 $18,230,814 $2,992,456 $4,245,444 $13,985,370
Hydrants $51,701 $84,394 $35,710 $58,328 $26,066
Land $2,583,057 $4,162,252 $- $- $4,162,252
Meters $87,231 $131,829 $53,159 $82,629 $49,200
Pumping $14,422,349 $27,767,017 $6,190,302 $17,179,912 $10,587,105
Storage $19,837,173 $38,660,328 $6,730,702 $17,394,540 $21,265,788
Transmission/Distribution $71,171,257 $159,620,760 $23,078,956 $80,372,865 $79,247,895
Treatment $28,074,591 $39,003,730 $9,867,870 $14,808,909 $24,194,821
Water Rights $1,934,473 $1,934,473 $- $- $1,934,473
Wells $16,004,293 $26,416,665 $5,914,995 $12,810,768 $13,605,897
Total $169,565,204 $316,012,263 $54,864,150 $146,953,395 $169,058,867
Table 3– Wastewater Asset Replacement Cost Less Depreciation
Asset Category
Original
Cost
[A]
Replacement
Cost
(2019 $)
[B]
Accumulated
Depreciation
[C]
Accumulated
Depreciation
(2019 $)
[D]
RCLD
B - D =
[E]
Collection $27,510,245 $105,695,787 $10,788,676 $66,436,784 $39,259,002
General $8,127,597 $9,785,547 $1,994,319 $2,836,188 $6,949,358
Land $713,940 $1,295,735 $- $- $1,295,735
Total $36,351,783 $116,777,068 $12,782,995 $69,272,973 $47,504,096
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 11
Asset Value Adjustments
With the Buy-In Approach, any outstanding debt obligations are subtracted from the RCLD to reduce the value
of the system as these liabilities funded improvements within the asset listings. The remaining debt obligations
will be paid through rates, and if the Buy-In component disregard debt, a customer would end up paying twice
for improvements funded through debt. Table 4 summarized the final net RCLD asset values for water and
wastewater.
Table 4– Utility Net RCLD
Assets/Liabilities Water
System
Wastewater
System
RCLD $169,058,867 $47,504,096
Debt Obligations Water
System
Wastewater
System
2010 Bonds (-) ($23,000,000) ($215,000)
2013 Bonds (-) ($7,875,000) ($4,210,000)
SB Valley Turnout (-) ($3,494,341)
SRF Plant 134 (-) (6,068,369)
Net RCLD $128,621,157 $43,079,096
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 12
Capacity Charge Analysis
Water Buy-In Component
The potential demand on the water system is proportional to the potential flow through each meter. The
American Water Works Association (AWWA) publishes the safe maximum operating capacity of each meter
type in Gallons Per Minute (GPM) of flow. Using the AWWA capacity information, an equivalency for each
meter size is set based on a 3/4” meter’s GPM. Table 5 provides a summary of the total MEs within the
District.
Table 5– Existing Water Meter Equivalents
Meter
Size
Number of
Accounts
[A]
AWWA
Capacity (gpm)
[B]
AWWA
Ratio
B ÷ 30 =
[C]
Equivalent
Meter Units
A × C =
[D]
5/8" 1,624 20 0.67 1,083
3/4" 14,834 30 1.00 14,834
1" 4,138 50 1.67 6,897
1 1/2" 261 100 3.33 870
2" 286 160 5.33 1,525
3" 65 320 10.67 693
4" 23 500 16.67 383
6" 14 1,000 33.33 467
8" 10 1,800 93.33 933
Total 21,255 N/A N/A 27,685
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 13
The net RCLD asset value of the Water Utility is divided by total MEs to derive the updated Capacity Fee per
3/4” meter. However, through our evaluation, certain assets are apportioned over total 2040 Demand. This
ensures new development is not overcharged as these assets will serve both existing and new connections.
These assets include: 1) the existing Treatment Plant that treats groundwater that can serve all connections,
2) Water Rights as these rights are now owned by the District in perpetuity, and 3) Wells which will serve all
customers. Table 6 provides a summary for determining the buy-in component by Asset Category, including
adjustments for outstanding debt to derive the Buy-In Component of the Water Capacity Fee.
Table 6– Water Buy-In by Asset Category
Asset Category RCLD
[A]
Allocation
Basis
[B]
Units of
Service
[C]
Unit Rate
A ÷ C
[D]
Conversion
Factor
[E]
$ per ME
D x E =
[F]
General $13,985,370 MEs 27,685 $505.15 1 ME $505.15
Hydrants $26,066 MEs 27,685 $0.94 1 ME $0.94
Land $4,162,252 MEs 27,685 $150.34 1 ME $150.34
Meters $49,200 MEs 27,685 $1.78 1 ME $1.78
Pumping $10,587,105 MEs 27,685 $382.41 1 ME $382.41
Storage $21,265,788 MEs 27,685 $768.12 1 ME $768.12
Transmission/
Distribution $79,247,895 MEs 27,685 $2,862.45 1 ME $2,862.45
Treatment $24,194,821 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD $0.87 609 gallons $532.13
Water Rights $1,934,473 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD $0.07 609 gallons $42.55
Wells $13,605,897 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD $0.49 609 gallons $299.24
Adjustments
Debt (-) $40,437,710 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD ($1.46) 609 gallons ($889.37)
Total $4,655.75
Wastewater Buy-In Component
For wastewater, existing demand is reflected by total Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs), where 1 EDU reflects
a single-family residential customer with an average daily flow of 245 gallons per day. Existing customers are
assigned EDUs based on their average daily flow. Based on the District’s billing data, there are a total of
29,500 wastewater EDUs, which reflects exiting flow demand.
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 14
The net RCLD asset value of the Wastewater Utility is divided by the total EDUs to derive the updated Capacity
Fees. Table 7 provides a summary for determining the buy-in component by Asset Category, including
adjustments for outstanding debt to calculate the Buy-In Component of the Wastewater Capacity Fee.
Table 7– Wastewater Buy-In by Asset Category
Asset Category RCLD
[A]
Allocation
Basis
[B]
Units of
Service
[C]
Unit Rate
A ÷ C
[D]
Conversion
Factor
[E]
$ per ME
D x E =
[F]
Collection $13,985,370 EDUs 29,500 $1,330.81 1 EDU $1,330.81
General $26,066 EDUs 29,500 $235.57 1 EDU $235.57
Land $4,162,252 EDUs 29,500 $43.92 1 EDU $43.92
Adjustments
Debt (-) $4,425,000 2040 Demand 11.79 MGD ($0.38) 245 gallons ($91.95)
Total $1,518.36
Water Incremental Cost Component
As part of the Hybrid Approach, the water capacity fee also includes the eastside water treatment plant within
the Water Master Plan. The cost estimate of the plant is $12,672,000, which includes the transmission line
connecting the new plant to the water system. The Eastside Treatment Plant cost estimate reflects a 3MGD
facility, which equates to a cost of $4.22 per gallon. Utilizing the gallons per ME equal to 609 gallons , as
shown in Table 8, the Incremental Cost Component equals $2,572.42.
Table 8– Water Incremental Cost Component
Projects Cost Estimate
[A]
Allocation
Basis
[B]
Units of
Service
[C]
Unit Rate
A ÷ C
[D]
Conversion
Factor
[E]
$ per EDU
D x E =
[F]
Eastside
Treatment Plant $12,672,000 Plant Capacity 3 MGD $4.22 609 gallons $2,572.42
Total $2,572.42
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 15
Wastewater Incremental Cost Component
The wastewater capacity fee also includes an Incremental Cost Component to account for the new SNRC
and specific upsizing projects required to accommodate future growth. Table 9 provides a summary of the
Master Plan cost estimates associated with the 10 MGD SNRC and the upsizing of improvements. N -1
improvements are not included because this upsizing is directly related to the San Manual Casino expansion
and funded through a development agreement between the District and the San Manual Casino. Also, B-2 is
not included because the construction of the SNRC may eliminate the need for these improvements and
should be revisited after the SNRC is online.
Table 9– Wastewater Incremental Cost Component
Projects Cost Estimate
[A]
Allocation Basis
[B]
Units of
Service
[C]
Unit Rate
A ÷ C
[D]
Conversion
Factor
[E]
$ per EDU
D x E =
[F]
SNRC $155,398,672 Plant Capacity 10 MGD $15.54 245 gallons $3,807.27
N-1 $4,414,500 N/A - - - $-
N-2 $17,472,000 2025 Incremental Demand 2.87 MGD $6.09 245 gallons $1,491.51
N-3 $6,949,500 2025 Incremental Demand 2.87 MGD $2.42 245 gallons $593.25
B-1 $1,030,500 2040 Incremental Demand 1.69 MGD $0.61 245 gallons $149.39
B-2 $1,764,000 N/A - - - $-
Total $6,041.42
East Valley Water District – Capacity Fee Study
Page | 16
Updated Capacity Fees
Table 10 summarized the proposed water capacity charges by meter size, with the 3/4” meter set as 1 ME
and all remaining meter size capacity fees based on the calculated capacity ratios from AWWA as identified
within Table 5.
Table 11 summarizes the proposed wastewater capacity charges, for an equivalent single-family residential
dwelling unit or 1 EDU. Non-residential connections will be assigned EDUs on a case-by-case basis to account
for total flow and strength loading in relation to a single-family residential unit.
Table 10– Water Proposed Capacity Fee
Meter Size
AWWA
Capacity
Ratio
[A]
Buy-In
Component
[B]
Incremental
Component
[C]
Total Water
Capacity Fee
[D]
5/8" 0.67 $3,104 $1,715 $4,819
3/4" 1.00 $4,656 $2,572 $7,228
1" 1.67 $7,760 $4,287 $12,047
1 1/2" 3.33 $15,519 $8,575 $24,094
2" 5.33 $24,831 $13,720 $38,550
3" 10.67 $49,661 $27,439 $77,100
4" 16.67 $77,596 $42,874 $120,469
6" 33.33 $155,192 $85,747 $240,939
8" 93.33 $434,536 $240,092 $674,629
Table 11– Wastewater Proposed Capacity Fee
Single-
Family
Residential
Buy-In
Component
[B]
Incremental
Component
[C]
Total Wastewater
Capacity Fee
[D]
1 EDU $1,460 $6,041 $7,502
In conjunction with adopting updated water and wastewater capacity fees, the District should adjust the
capacity fees each year by applying the annual percentage change in the Engineering News Record
Construction Cost Index (CCI) to keep pace with inflation, coupled with a comprehensive update every 5
years.
31938 Temecula Parkway, Suite A #350, Temecula, CA 92592
1
Technical Memorandum Regarding
2019 Capacity Fee Revisions to Meter Capacity Ratios
Agency: East Valley Water District
Date: September 27, 2023
______________________________________________________________________________
2019 Capacity Fee Study
In 2019, IB Consulting LLC (IB Consulting) assisted the East Valley Water District (District) with updating
its capacity fees for water (2019 Capacity Fee Study). Since then, the District has implemented a meter
replacement program for new Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) meters. These AMI meters allow
integration between the District’s communication network, data systems, and individual meters. The
direct communication between the AMI meters and the District’s data systems provides more accurate,
efficient meter reads.
The 2019 Capacity Fee Study derived water capacity fees for new connections that varied based on the
meter size, with bigger-sized meters paying more for the additional capacity taken based on each
meter's safe maximum operating flow as defined in gallons per minute (gpm) of flow. The new AMI
meters have different safe maximum operating flow specifications than those used during the 2019
Capacity Fee Study. Therefore, this technical memorandum identifies the adjustments to the District’s
capacity fee schedule resulting from the change in meter types.
Existing Capacity Ratios
The 2019 Capacity Fee Study identified the meter capacity ratios for each meter size based on the safe
maximum operating flow in gpm, with the baseline meter reflecting a 3/4” meter. The safe maximum
operating flow capacity for each meter size was divided by the 3/4” meters’ safe operating flow capacity
of 30 gpm to determine the equivalent meter ratio. In other words, the calculations convert all larger-
sized meters to an equivalent number of 3/4" meters based on the safe operating flow capacity of 30
gpm (Meter Equivalents or ME). The capacity ratio represents the potential flow through each meter
size compared to the flow through the base 3/4” meter to establish parity between meter sizes. Table
1 identifies the capacity ratios and total Meter Equivalents used in the 2019 Capacity Fee Study.
2
Table 1: 2019 Meter Equivalents
Meter
Size
Number of
Accounts
[A]
AWWA Capacity
(gpm)
[B]
AWWA
Ratio
B ÷ 30 = [C]
Meter
Equivalents
A × C = [D]
5/8" 1,624 20 0.67 1,083
3/4" 14,834 30 1.00 14,834
1" 4,138 50 1.67 6,897
1 1/2" 261 100 3.33 870
2" 286 160 5.33 1,525
3" 65 320 10.67 693
4" 23 500 16.67 383
6" 14 1,000 33.33 467
8" 10 1,800 93.33 933
Total 21,255 N/A N/A 27,685
Updated Capacity Ratios
The capacity ratios and total Meter Equivalents have been updated using the same approach from the
2019 Capacity Fee Study but reflecting the new AMI meter specifications, as shown in Table 2. To
maintain consistency with the 2019 Capacity Fee Study, the number of accounts remained intact to show
how the water capacity fee schedule changes from updating the meter capacity ratios. The result is an
increase in total Meter Equivalents (27,685 versus the previous amount of 21,255). The District is
currently updating its water and wastewater master plans, and once those are completed, a
comprehensive update to the District’s capacity fees will be performed. In addition, the new AMI meters
that may be issued include 10” and 12” meter sizes, which were added to the fee schedule shown in
Table 2.
3
Table 2: 2023 AMI Meter Equivalents
Meter
Size
Number of
Accounts
[A]
District AMI
Capacity (gpm)
[B]
District AMI
Capacity Ratios
B ÷ 30 = [C]
Meter
Equivalents
A × C = [D]
5/8" 1,624 20 0.67 1,083
3/4" 14,834 30 1.00 14,834
1" 4,138 50 1.67 6,897
1 1/2" 261 100 3.33 870
2" 286 160 5.33 1,525
3" 65 500 16.67 1,083
4" 23 1,250 41.67 958
6" 14 2,000 66.67 933
8" 10 4,000 133.33 1,333
10" - 6,500 216.67 -
12" - 8,000 266.67 -
Total 21,255 N/A N/A 29,517
Facility Costs Related to Capacity Fees
The 2019 Capacity Fee Study included both a Buy-In and Incremental component. The Buy-In component
included the District’s 2019 water system asset values by category, with an adjustment for the remaining
outstanding debt principal. The reduction in asset value ensures customers don’t pay twice for facilities
funded by debt because debt is covered by water rates. Table 3 identifies the Buy-In component
calculated using the Updated Meter Equivalents. Table 4 identifies the Incremental component of the
2019 Capacity Fee Study related to the Eastside Water Treatment Plant. The unit rate remains the same
and is based on the plant’s capacity, equal to 3 Million Gallons per Day (MGD).
4
Table 3: Water 2019 Buy-In Component by Asset Category with AMI Meters
Asset Category RCLD
[A]
Allocation Basis
[B]
Units of
Service
[C]
Unit Rate
A ÷ C
[D]
Conversion
Factor
[E]
$ per ME
D x E =
[F]
General $13,985,370 MEs 29,517 $473.81 1 ME $473.81
Hydrants $26,066 MEs 29,517 $0.88 1 ME $0.88
Land $4,162,252 MEs 29,517 $141.01 1 ME $141.01
Meters $49,200 MEs 29,517 $1.67 1 ME $1.67
Pumping $10,587,105 MEs 29,517 $358.68 1 ME $358.68
Storage $21,265,788 MEs 29,517 $720.46 1 ME $720.46
Transmission/
Distribution $79,247,895 MEs 29,517 $2,684.82 1 ME $2,684.82
Treatment $24,194,821 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD $0.87 609 gallons $532.13
Water Rights $1,934,473 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD $0.07 609 gallons $42.55
Wells $13,605,897 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD $0.49 609 gallons $299.24
Adjustments
Debt (-) $40,437,710 2040 Demand 27.69 MGD ($1.46) 609 gallons ($889.37)
Total $4,365.88
Table 4: Water 2019 Incremental Component
Project Cost Estimate
[A]
Allocation Basis
[B]
Units of
Service
[C]
Unit Rate
A ÷ C
[D]
Conversion
Factor
[E]
$ per ME
D x E =
[F]
Eastside
Treatment Plant $12,672,000 Plant Capacity 3 MGD $4.22 609 gallons $2,572.42
Updated Capacity Fees
Combining the revised Buy-In component with the AMI capacity ratios and the Incremental component
generates a new 2019 capacity fee equal to $6,938 for a 3/4” Meter Equivalent. The District’s capacity
fees are adjusted annually based on the annual change in the Engineer’s New Record Construction Cost
Index (ENR – CCI) for September. Table 5 summarizes the revised 2019 capacity fee by meter size and
increases the fee schedule to 2023 dollars based on the ENR – CCI index change from September 2019
(11,311) to September 2023 (13,173).
5
Table 5: 2023 Water Capacity Fee Schedule
Meter Size AMI Capacity
Ratio
[A]
Buy-In
Component
[B]
ENR – CCI
Adjustment
13,173 / 11,311 =
116.46%
[C]
Total Water
Capacity Fee
[D] = B x C
5/8" 0.67 $4,626 116.46% $5,387
3/4" 1.00 $6,938 116.46% $8,081
1" 1.67 $11,564 116.46% $13,468
1 1/2" 3.33 $23,128 116.46% $26,935
2" 5.33 $37,004 116.46% $43,096
3" 16.67 $115,638 116.46% $134,675
4" 41.67 $289,096 116.46% $336,687
6" 66.67 $462,553 116.46% $538,698
8" 133.33 $925,106 116.46% $1,077,396
10" 216.67 $1,503,297 116.46% $1,750,768
12" 266.67 $1,850,212 116.46% $2,154,791
These revisions should be accompanied by the 2019 Capacity Fee Study. A comprehensive update to
the District capacity fees will occur once the updated master plans are completed and adopted by the
Board.
Water Supply Update
Northern California 8 Station
66.6 inches Updated 9/30/23
Big Bear
44.13 inches Updated 9/11/23
Annual Average: 16.8''
WATER YEAR
Highland October 1- September 30
24.2 inches Updated 9/30/23
ACRONYMS
CFS = cubic feet per second mAF = million Acre-Feet
WATER SHORTAGE STAGE
STATE WATER PROJECT
Lake Mead & Powell Updated
8/31/23
DISTRICT WATER SUPPLIES
Annual Average: 53.2''
GROUNDWATER SURFACE
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE
OTHER INDICATORS
RAINFALL
100%
Annual Average: 11.9''
38% of Capacity
STATE WATER PROJECT
ALLOCATION
Current Available CapacityAvailable Capacity Current
4.9 mAF
82% of Capacity
Bunker Hill Basin
2.59 mAF
73% of Capacity
Lake Oroville Updated 10/1/23
126.1
107.4
247.1
217.1
256.2
154.1
92.1
181.3 164.1
Santa Ana River (CFS) Total SAR Inflow
Updated 10/1/23
Last YearLast Year
20 mAF
Historic Avg
2010-2022 Monthly
Average
2023-Monthly Flow Average