Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - EVWD Board of Directors - 12/30/1957161 Heretofore the District has used said well for domestic water purposes, but it is my information that the District is no longer using said well. I plan to continue the use of said well for irrigation purposes. In doing so, I hereby agree to hold the District harmless from any and all costs in connection with the operation of the well. If the District should again commence to re-use the well, they will, of course, be expected to pay their pro-rata share of the opera- tional cost. As and when I no longer need the well for agricultural purposes, I shall convey same to the District. It, for any reason, the above is not satisfactory, would you please notify me in o/o my attorney, W. R. Holconub, 415 Anreson Building, San Bernardino." Upon motion by Director Wall, duly seconded by Director Botts, and carried unanimously, the conditions as set forth in the above letter were accepted. DISTRICT ~ Open discussion~was held regarding sale of the property PROPERTY located at 25435 Baseline, since the house was no longer 25435 occupied by the Maintenance Foreman. It was the decision of BASELINE the Board that Mr. Zoe Painter be contacted and an attempt made to trade said property for the land owned by Mr. Painter located ircaediately North and adjacent to the Water District dministration Building. ER t~©GRESS~ Engineer Rowe reperted that the sewer plans and specifications REPORT were almost 100 percent completed and were being mimiographed. The Joint Powers Agreement between the City of San Bernardino and the District w~s presented to the Board and it was reported that the City had approved the first reading of the Agreement. It was the decision of the Board that Attorney Wilson should be notified of the changes made by O'Melveny and ~yers and request that he meet with the Board, if possible before the Agreement was accepted by the City for a second reading. FIRE RATE Manager Rickert reported that he had met with Mr. Colton, Board BOARD OF of Fire Underwriters, regarding fire rate changes for the District. FIRE UNDER- Manager Rickert stated that it was his intention to prepare a WRITERS new map and submit same to the Board of Fire Unde~¢riters. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned to December 30 at 2 o'clock APPROVED: E. Dana Broo~s, President F2~T Si~I BF~N~DINO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT BOfd{D OF DIRECf©RS - ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING Deceraber 30, 1957 The Board of Directors met at 2:00 P.M., Decen~er 30, 1957, at the regular meeting place. Directors Present: Brooks, Botts, Wall, Littleton Directors ~kbsent: Taylor Also Present: Attorney Ernest Wilson, J. B. }{anauer, Engineers 3~aes Reiter and J. A. Rowe, General P~nager Rickert, Associate Engineer Cole, and fhe Secretary 162 SE~'~ERS Attorney Wilson presented to the Board the Joint Powers Agreement JOINT PO~,fERS concerning sewers between the City of San Bernardino and the District, AGRE~qF2~T He stated only three material changes had been made and that in his CITY-DISTRICT opinion the contract was ready for Beard consideration. Said Agree- ment was read section by section and discussed. RESOLUTION Attorney Wilson presented Resolution No. 108 entitled "A RESOLUTION NO. 103 AUTPORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGRE~ZENT FOR JOi~,IT CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL PDINT AND INTERCEPTOR, TRUNK, YQtD OUTFALL SAJ'IERS". Said Resolution was then read section by section, cor- rections and additions made thereto, and thereafter, upon motion of Director Littleton, duly seconded by Director Wall, and carried unanimously, by roll call vote, Resolution No. 103 was duly adopted and order made. President Brooks was called from the meeting. Director Bo':~ts was appointed to ~ill the chair during the absence of the President. PL~S & SPECI- Attorney Wilson presented Resolution No. 104 entitled "A RESOLUTION FiCATIONS FOR A!PRCVING !IDt'~S f~D SRECIFICATIONS AND CALLING FOR BID~ FOR ~iTERI7'~IS SE~[AGE SYSTE24 AND ~.~[CRK". Said Resolution ~.zas read section bM section, corrections and additions made thereto, and thereafter, upon motion by Director RESOLLTION Wall, duly seconded by Director Littleton, and carried unanimously NO. t04 by roll call vote, Resolution No. 104 was duly adopted and order made. ESTABLISHING Attorney Wilson presented Resolution No. 108 entitled "A RESOLUTION PREVAILING EST~.~LISHING PREYAILING WAGE'SCALE". Said Resolution %~as read Wi~GE SCALE section by section, corrections and additions made thereto, and thereafter, upon motion by Director Littleton, duly seconded by Director Wall, and carried unanimously by roll call vote, Reso- lution No. 108 was duly adopted and order made. NUAL OF Engineer Rowe presented for consideration a plan regarding pre- INS?RUCTIONS paration by the engineers of a "M~d[UAL OF DESIGN REQUIREMF2,[%~ FOR S~,.~ER PCR PkIV~ITE CONT2ACT S~,'~ER PLANS' that can be given to prospective INSTALI~iTICNS land developers operating within your District". Engineer Rowe stated the manual would be prepared upon a per diem ]oasis, esti- mate of cost not to exceed $1,8C0.00. It was the decision of the Board, that such a manual would save the District considerable time and-expense in the future. Upon motion by Director Wall, duly seconded by Director Li'['tleton, and carried unanimously, Daniel, l~ann, 3ohnson, & ~,ienden/uall and W. P. Rowe & Son, were authorized to prepare a l~anual of Instructions as set forth above, cost not to exceed C~{ECKING FEE Engineer Rowe submitted a cost of ~8.78 per hour for checking and approving Private Contract Sewer Plans %.hth the District during the construction of the District Sewers. It was explained that the District would recover this cost through a checking fee Which would be included in the Regulatory Ordinance. Upon motion by Director Littleton, duly seconded by Director Wall and carried unanimously, Daniel, ~]ann, Johnson & l~endenhall and W. P. Rowe & Son, were authorized to check plans during construction of the sewage system within the District cost not to exceed $8.76 per hour. SUPERVISION & Engineer Rowe stated that under the engineering fee of INSPECTION supervision and inspection engineers were provided for, but it was ENGINEERS their desire to obtain authorization from the Board to negotiate for an Engineer to supervise and inspect all installation during construction within the District. Upon motion by Director Walt, duly seconded by Director Littleton, and carried unanimously, Daniel, ~tnn, Johnson & Mendenhall, and W. P. Rowe & Son were authorized to secure an Engineer for supervision and inspection during construction. Engineer Ratter requested all questions be referred to his £irm, particularly during the period of time before bids are opened, and during construction that all questions to be referred to the Resi- dent Engineer. 163' ORDIN~2~'CE ~ Director Littleton introduced Ordinance No. 62, entitled "tQ] ORDINANCE NO. 62 ESTABLISHING RJ%TES f~D C}h'~RGES FOR SEW~GE DISPC~AL SERVICE AND PRO- S~7:~GE DIS- VIDING PROCEDU~i$ FC~ ITS ENFORCE~IENT"; Upon motion by Director POSTAL RATES Wall, duly seconded by Director Littleton, and carried unanimously upon roll call vote, Resolution No. 106, entitled "A RESOLUTION CF~GES FIXING TII~E AND PLACE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL SERVICE AND PROVIDING PROCE- RESOLUTION DURES FOR ITS ENFORCB%{ENT" was adopted and order made. Said hearing NO. 106 date as set forth in Resolution No. 106, is Tuesday, the 14th day of HEARING ON January, 1958, at 9:00 o'clock a.m. , at the regular meeting place ORDIN7~CE of said Board. NO. 62 SE~ERS FOR The Secretary presented a letter from Enqineer Reiter, which reads L~]SUBDIVIDED in part as follows: AREA SCUIHEAST OF TP~CT 48~0 "I have just reviewed the question of sewering the un- sub-divided area southeast of Tract 48~0 and, in par- ticular~ your letter of December 12, 1957, In view of what you say about the Taylor residence not being within 200 feet of a proposed sewer extension along Lc~ 96 from Drunuuond 2~venue, I feel it might be wise to simply provide a stub for future extension at the manhole located on Dru~mond at 10th Street. If you concur with this recormmendation, we will provide a stub at the aforementioned manhole for a future easterly extension of 10th Street from Drummond Ave .... " Upon motion by Director Littleton, duly seconded by Director Wall, and carried unanimously, the engineers were authorized to provide a stub for future extension at the manhole located on Drun~nond at 10th Street. RESOLL~fION " Attorney Wilson presented Resolution No. 107 entitled "A RESOLUTION NO. 107 PROVIDING P~Df~ THE ISSU£~NCE OF SKWER REYFJ.~UE BONDS, FIXING THE FORM ISSUANCE OF OF BOL~ ~%~D PROVIDING COVENANTS FOR T~IR PROTECTION" Said Reso~ Sk~qER REVENUE lution consisting of 62 sections, was read section by section, BONDS corrections and additions made thereto. Mr. J. B. Hanauer of J. B. Hanauer and Go., stated said Resolution met with his approval. Thereafter, upon motion of Director Wall, duly seconded by Director Littleton, and carried unanimously upon roll call vote, Resolution No. 107 was duly adopted and order made. OFFICIJ~L Official Notice of Sale of East San Bern~rdino County Water District NOTICE OF Sf~LE- Sewer Revenue Bonds of 1988 - Issue - ~,800,000 - Division No. 1- S~qER RkWEI~E $3,300,000 was presented. Upon motion of Director Littleton, duly BONDS OF seconded by Director Wall, and carried unanimously, the Official 1958 Notice of Sale was duly approved. P~r. J. B. }[anauer stated his office 3,800,000 would mail Notice of Sale to any and all interested parties. RESOLUTION z Attorney Wilson presented Resolution No. 108 entitled "A RESOLUTION NO. 108 CALLING FOR BID~ ON BON~ - SL~£R REVE~iUE BONDS OF 1958 - DIVISION CALLING FOR NO. I - $~,300,000. BIL~ - SKIER REVEhVJE BONDS Upon motion by Director Wall, duly seconded by Director Littleton, 3,~00,000 and carried unanimously upon roll call vote, Resolution No. 108 ~as duly adopted and order made. Said bids to be opened Thursday, January 30th at 2:00 o'clock P.I.L, at the office of the District, 7337 Del k~osa Avenue, San ~ernardino, California. I,~r. J. D. Iianauer sugq~steu that an invitation be extended to prospective bond bidders for a tour of the District on January 24. ADJOURNMF~.IT There being no further business the meetinq was adjourned. A] PROVED: r G. rth~ry