HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - EVWD Board of Directors - 11/26/1963Boyd of Valley Publications;
Spencer Sparks and Don Twomley
of the Southern California
Water Company; Contractor
Michael C. Mize; Realtors, John
and Jim Fiscalini and Richard
Corwin; Constituents, John
Bright and Jens Morley.
MINUTES The President inquired if all members had re-
ceived and read the minutes of the meeting of
November 12, 1963 which had been mailed to
them.
MOTION Upon motion by Director Disch, duly seconded
by Director Wall and carried unanimously, the
minutes of the regular Board Meeting of Novem-
ber 12, 1963 were approved with one correction
on page 5, line 25, the salary rate for Mr.
Earl D. Lyons should be $631.00 per Mo. instead
of $361.00 per Mo.
BID OPENING - The President announced that this was the time
WATER MAINS AND and place to open bids for the installation of
APPURTENANCES IN water mains and appurtenant facilities in Tract
TRACT 6986 6986, Hansel (Lester Diversified) developer.
LESTER DIVERSIFIED
The following sealed bid was opened and read by
the Secretary:
1. Michael C. Mize, Contractor $4,258.58
Engineer's estimate $4,060.00
After reviewing the bid proposal and verifying
the accuracy of the figures, the engineers
recommended the acceptance of the bid of
Michael C. Mize subject to the advice of
legal counsel.
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded
by Director Wall and carried unanimously, the
bid of Michael C. Mize was accepted in the
amount of $4,258.58 subject to the advice of
legal counsel and the President and Secretary
were authorized to execute a contract on be-
half of the Distr±c~.
SPECIAL EQUIPMENT The Fireman's Fund Insurance policy with
INSURANCE POLICY Morgan & Franz expires on November 27, 1963.
RENEWAL WITH MORGAN The amount of the policy is $4,100.00 with a
FRANZ one year premium of $51.25.
MOTION Upon motion by Director Forrest, duly seconded
by Director LeVesque and carried unanimously,
the Fireman's Fund Insurance policy covering
special equipment, with Morgan & Franz is to be
renewed for one year at $51.25.
RESOLUTION NO. 536 Engineer Joseph Rowe reported that "Among the
CALLING SPECIAL special benefits to the improvement District
ELECTION IN would be the availability of public water for
IMPROVEMENT domestic and fire protection purposes. Also
DISTRICT NO. 1 among special benefits is the possibility of
long term financing through the improvement
ENGINEER ROWE district. Included in the special benefits is
REPORT the existence of a water main of sufficient
size adjacent to the Improvement District to
afford public water service for the domestic
and fire protection purposes in the area. Also
of benefit to the Improvement District is the
right to acquire rights in public facilities.
Now, regarding the project, we have it divided
into two separate categories: One is within
Nov. 26, 1963
the Improvement District itself. Within the
Improvement District there are facilities that
need to be installed, but first the Improvement
District would have to obtain a right in the
existing facilities. The estimated cost of
obtaining rights in these facilities is $1,500.00.
A six inch main extension would be necessary.
The estimated cost of the main extension is
1,125.00. Ten water services would be neces-
sary at an estimated cost of $75.00 each or a
total of $750.00. The total would be $3,375.00
and we have used a rounded figure of $3,500.00.
Also under the project are anticipated annexa-
tions. Additional sums of money required to
provide anticipated water service as the water
service requires, results in additional financing.
Long-term financing would be made accessible to
acquire rights and existing facilities to cause
the improvement to be installed. All financing
would be self-supporting with no need for taxa-
tion for maintenance and operation or debt
service. We estimate that the total cost of
the original improvement district and anticipated
annexations for the first three years or so would
be $2,000,000.00.
Resolution No. 536 was read in its entirety by
the President. It calls for a Special Election
to be called in Improvement District No. 1 of
the East San Bernardino County Water District
for the purpose of submitting to the qualified
voters of the Improvement District the Propo-
sition of Issuing Revenue Bonds under the
Revenue Bond Law of 1941 to Provide Funds for
the Acquisition, Construction, Improving and
Financing of an Enterprise Consisting of Works
for Obtaining, Conserving, Treating and Supply-
ing of Water, Declaring the Principal Amount of
the Bonds and the Maximum Amount of Interest to
be Paid Thereon, and Providing for Notice Thereon.
WATER PROJECT
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the East
San Bernardino County Water District, San
Bernardi.no County, California, as follows:
1. A special election is hereby called and
ordered and will be held in Improvement District
No. 1 of the East San Bernardino County Water
District on Tuesday, the 21st day of January,
1964, at which election shall be submitted to
the qualified voters in the Improvement District
the proposition of issuing revenue bonds pur-
suant to the Revenue Bond Law of 1941 of the
State of California, for the purpose of provid-
ing funds for the objects and purposes set
forth in the following proposition, to wit:
PROPOSITION: "Shall Improvement District No. 1
of East San Bernardino County Water District
issue revenue bonds in the principal amount of
Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for the
acquisition, construction, improving and financ-
ing of an enterprise to consist of a water
supply, storage and distribution system for the
purpose of obtaining, conserving, treating and
supplying water within the Improvement District
for the inhabitants thereof for domestic, irri-
gation, sanitation, industrial, fire protection,
recreation, or any public or private use, in-
cluding the acquisition of lands, easements and
facilities necessary therefor, and all costs
Nov. 26, 1963
incidental thereto, pursuant to the Revenue Bond
Law of 19417"
2. The amount of debt to be incurred is
2,000,000.00, including all costs and estimated
costs incidental to or connected with the acqui-
sition, construction, improving or financing of
the enterprise and all engineering, inspection,
legal and fiscal agent's fees, costs of the bond
election and of the issuance of said revenue
bonds, bond reserve funds and working capital
and bond interest estimated to accrue during
the construction period and for a period of
not to exceed twelve months after completion
of construction.
3. The principal amount of the bonds to be
issued therefor is $2,000,000, and the rate of
interest to be paid on the bonds shall not ex-
ceed six per cent (6%) per annum, payable semi-
annually.
4. The Board of Directors does hereby submit
to the qualified voters of the Improvement
District, at the Special Improvement District
Election, this resolution and the proposition
set forth in Section 1 hereof. The Board of
Directors proposes to issue and sell revenue
bonds of the Improvement District in the amount
and for the objects and purposes specified in
the proposition if a majority of all the voters
voting on the proposition vote in favor thereof.
5. The bonds are to be revenue bonds, payable
exclusively from and secured by the revenues of
an enterprise consisting of a water supply,
storage and distribution system of the Improve-
ment District, together with all additions and
improvements to said system hereafter made, and
are not to be secured by the taxing power of
the Improvement District, and the East San
Bernardino County Water District and its offi-
cers and the Improvement District shall not be
under any obligation to pay same excepting
from said revenues.
6. All of the bonds of this issue are equally
and rateably secured, without priority, by a
lien upon the revenues herein pledged to the
payment thereof.
7. That said Special Improvement District
Election shall be held and conducted, the votes
thereof canvassed, the returns thereof made,
and result thereof ascertained and determined as
herein provided; and in all other particulars
not prescribed by this resolution the election
shall be held and the votes canvassed pursuant
to law for general District elections.
8. That the Improvement District lies within
and constitutes all or part of the following
San Bernardino County Election Precincts as
last established by the Board of Supervisors of
the County of San Bernardino for general elec-
tions, reference for further description being
thereto made:
HIGHLAND PRECINCT NO. 7
9. That there shall be one (1) precinct for
said election, consisting of a consolidation of
the said County Election Precincts. The polling
Nov. 26, 1963
President and Secretary authorized to execute
a Notice of Completion for Recording purposes.
RESOLUTION NO. 541 Resolution No. 541 was presented for accept-
ACCEPTING GRA~T DEED ance of a Grant Deed and Deed & Conveyance of
AND DEED & Water Rights from the Southern California
CONVEYANCE OF WATER Baptist Convention, a non-profit corporation,
RIGHTS IN THE as "Grantor, for valuable consideration,
WHITTEMORE WELL receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby
grants and conveys to the East San Bernardino
County Water District, as Grantee, the following
described real and personal property situated
in the County of San Bernardino, State of
California:
1. An undivided 6/60 or one-tenth interest in
and to the West 20 feet of the East 90 feet
of the North 29.71 feet of Lot 9 of Allison
and Rochet subdivision, as per plat recorded
in Book 8 of Maps, Page 28, records of San
Bernardino County.
TOGETHER WITH a like undivided 6/60 or
one-tenth interest in the well, pumping
plant, pipeline and all personal property
and equipment situated thereon.'
TOGETHER WITH all appropriative and pres-
criptive water rights acquired, owned or
held by Grantor arising out of or in any
manner connected with the use or the
fractional ownership of said pump and
well by Grantor or its predecessors in
interest.
2. A right of way for the installation, re-
placing, repairing and maintaining of a
water pipeline under the following
described property;
The North 10 feet of Lots 8 and 9 of Allison
and Rochet Subdivision, as per plat recorded
in Book 8 of Maps, Page 28, Records of San
Bernardino County.
EXCEPT the Easterly 90 feet thereof, as an
appurtenance to the following described
pretty: Lots 5 and 6, Allison and Rochet
subdivision, as per plat recorded in Book
8 of Maps, Page 28, Records of said County.
Also the West 1/2 of certain unnamed street
or road adjoining said lots on the East,
which street or road was vacated and
abandoned by order of the Board of Super-
visors of San Bernardino County, California,
on March 3, 1896."
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded
by Director Wall and carried unanimously by roll
call vote, Resolution No. 541 Accepting Grant
Deed and Deed and Conveyance of Water Rights
from the Southern California Baptist Convention,
was adopted.
AYES, and in favor thereof, Directors: Botts,
Disch, Forrest,
LeVesque, Wall.
NOES, Directors; None.
ABSENT, Directors: None.
REPORT OF WATER The General Manager-Secretary reported for the
COMMITTEE REGARDING Water Committee, Attorney Denslow Green and
WATER SHARES AND/OR the Staff who studied the matter of requiring
WELL REQUIREMENTS water shares and/or well requirements for
ON AREAS REQUESTING areas requesting annexation to District for
ANNEXATION FOR sewer service only. The recommendations for
SEWER SERVICE ONLY the formulation of a Policy in such cases is
that such annexations be allowed providing
subdividers convey to District, under the
same formulas as for water, enough shares and/
or well rights to deliver three(3) acre feet
of water per acre. North Fork would be 3
shares per acre or 30 shares for 10 acres.
Bear Valley would be 15 shares per acre or
150 shares for 10 acres. A request for
sewer service only by a subdivider would be
turned over to the staff to determine whether
or not it would be economically feasible to
serve sewer only or better to serve sewer and
water. Where annexation is requested for sewer
service only, the District would pay 5~ of
the cost of the water shares at the current
market value. In the event the Staff's studies
indicate the area could be served both water
and sewer, they would, in their report,
recommend same and state off-site costs and
water share requirements. The Deed and
Agreement for overlying water rights in trust
would still be required. Such report by the
staff to the Board would take a minimum of 30
days and a maximum of 45 days.
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded
by Director Forrest, the above recitation by
the General Manager is to be adopted as policy.
AMENDMENT Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly
seconded by Director Forrest and carried
unanimously, an amendment to the above motion
recommended that the above policy be put in
the form of a Resolution, No. 542, and brought
to the next Board Meeting for final acceptance.
ADOPTION Following this amendment, the original portion
of the motion was then unanimously approved.
JOHN AND JIM The President then recognized John Fiscalini
FISCALINI who was present in the interest of Tracts
RECOGNIZED BY 7033 and 6707, both of which had applied for
CHAIR annexation and service for sewer only, the
water to be supplied by Southern California
Water Company.
Mr. Fiscalini felt that since requests had
been made for sewer service on these two tracts,
that they should be handled under the old
policy, not under the new policy. On Tract
6707, Mr. Myerscough was under the impressing
that his two days in the Highland Well Company
would take care of the water requirements.
However, it was pointed out that engineering
studies would have to be completed as it is
not known what the well is producing or what
would be the amount of water delivered under
the two days ownership in the well. A copy
of the escrow instructions on the purchase
of the property should be made available to
the District to determine shares or days
acquired in the Well Company. Associate En-
gineer, Cole, gave some facts known as a
preliminary report on Tract 7033 and stated
that a complete written report will be ready
for next Board Meeting on December 10, 1963.
JIM FISCALINI The President then recognized Mr. Jim Fiscalini
RECOGNIZED
Nov. 26, 1963
and Mr. Richard Corwin who were interested in
the development of tracts north and east of
Base Line and Palm where a sewer extension was
voted some time ago but depending upon the
annexation of the corner property which has
never been completed. This land again is
wanting sewer only and Southern California
Water Company water. The staff is to work
with these gentlemen on their problems.
MR. BRIGHT AND The President next recognized Mr. Bright and
MR. MORLEY Mr. Morley who are already within the district
RECOGNIZED and wanting water. They were informed that
the District could possibly waive the payment of
main extension charge of $2.25per front foot
for their properties in exchange for their water
rights and rights to water without the equipment
or well site, with permission for District to
cap the well in such a manner as to provide for
observation of the water elevation. Cost of
service installation, however, would be at the
expense of Mr. Bright and Mr. Morley.
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded
by Director Wall and carried unanimously, Attorney
Henry is authorized to draw up the necessary
Deed and Conveyance of Water Rights if Mr. Bright
and Mr. Morley agree to the exchange of their
water rights and rights to water for the main
extension to their properties with the under-
standing that they pay for service installation.
FINANCIAL REPORT The directors were referred to the copies of
FOR MONTH OF the financial report for the month of October
OCTOBER 1963 which were at their places, and after a comment
or two by Auditor Bragg, were advised to take
the copies with them to be studied in order to
be familiar with the financial position of the
District at all times.
APPROVAL OF The President asked for approval of the warrants
WARRANTS as follows if all directors had reviewed them.
Water Division
3219 - 3319 (General) $69,495.99
101 - 155 (Payroll) 10,713.31 $80,209.30
Sewer Division
414 - 455 $42,917.64
MOTION Upon motion by Director Wall, duly seconded by
Director Forrest and carried unanimously, the
warrants were approved as submitted.
REPORT BY The following report was given by Director
COMMITTEE ON Forrest for the special committee which in-
REQUEST BY SECURITY vestigated the possible transfer of a portion
BANK FOR ACCOUNT of District Funds to the Security First National
Bank at Highland and Del Rosa.
Your Committee reviewed the current cash
position of District funds. It is our recom-
mendation that a minimum of $25,000.00 be
placed on deposit with the Del Rosa Branch of
Security First National Bank on December 26,
1963 in the form of Certificate of Deposit to
mature in six months at current interest rate
of 3.75 per cent per annum. Transfer of funds
to be made providing said Bank complies with
rules of District requiring necessary securities
be pledged to secure the deposit. This cer-
tificate to be renewed at maturity date unless
Board of Directors rescinds its action."
Nov. 26, 1963
Signed by Directors Forrest and Disch, and
Auditor, Bragg.
MOTION Upon motion by Director Forrest, duly seconded
by Director Wall and carried unanimously, the
recommendation of the committee as stated
above was approved.
GENERAL WATER
DISCUSSION - The President read a letter from the San
LETTER FROM S.B. Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District
VALLEY WATER regarding defending well owners within the
CONSERVATION Conservation District in the recently filed
DISTRICT Orange County Water Suit. The letter was
self-explanatory and required no action.
LETTER FROM S.B. The President then read a letter from the
VALLEY MUNICIPAL San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District
WATER DISTRICT regarding defense of those water entities
within their District. The President stated
that this District is cooperating with the
Valley District in the overall defense of the
water suit and do not wish to cast our lot
with the Conservation District.
Director LeVesque suggested that a letter be
sent to the Conservation District telling
DEFENSE OF OUR them "No thank you." We should also be willing
RIGHTS IN MUTUALS & to represent any of the water companies in
WATER COMPANIES IN which this District owns stock if they do not
ORANGE COUNTY have representation. It was also felt that
WATER SUIT the East'San Bernardino County Water District
should represent anyone who would give the
District water rights in wells which they
have.
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded
by Director Forrest and carried unanimously,
this District is coordinating with the Valley
Water District through our attorney, Denslow
Green, and our Engineer, Joseph A. Rowe. W.
P. Rowe is the overall engineer.
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded
by Director Disch and carried unanimously, this
District will defend our rights in mutuals and
water companies in the Orange County Water
Suit through Attorney Denslow Green, also well
owners or people within our District providing
they dedicate their water rights and rights
to water for District use when they no longer
use the well.
LETTER FROM ATTORNEY Attorney Henry briefly stated the information in
HENRY REGARDING his letter of November 20th, 1963 regarding the
DISTRICT FURNISHING furnishing of water by the District to lands
WATER OUTSIDE OF outside of the District. He determined that
DISTRICT District is permitted to supply water to con-
sumers outside of the District hinging on
annexation petition signing and payment of
Annexation fee. No action necessary as this
has been customary procedure.
LETTER FROM ATTORNEY The President read a letter from Attorney
HENRY REGARDING Henry dated November 20, 1963 which was
BOARD MEETING OF briefly explained by Attorney Henry to the
DECEMBER 24, 1963 effect that the Board Meeting, according to
lawl may be adjourned from a set date, but
may not be set for an earlier time.
LETTER AND REPLY A reply to the City of San Bernardino letter
TO CITY OF S.B. of November 19th by the General Manager, was read,
stating that the matter would be referred to the
Board of Directors for action.
Nov. 26, 1963
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded
by Director Wall and carried unanimously, the
letter is to be referred to Denslow Green, Attorney,
for reply to the City of San Bernardino.
LETTER FROM FUND The President read a letter from Claims Adjuster,
INSURANCE COMPANY Peter Crider of The Fund Insurance Company re-
garding the claimed damage to the Wickum property
on Perris Hill Road at the time of sewer con-
struction by Ralph deLeon Construction, Inc.
The General Manager stated that a Withhold
Notice was received from Mr. Wickum. The Con-
tractor is to be notified that the amount of the
claim will be with-held from his final payment.
SURPLUS WATER The General Manager-Secretary reported that the
DELIVERY TO CITY 1,000 acre feet of water in the Agreement between
THROUGH SBVMWD County Water District and Valley Municipal District
had now been completed for the year 1963. As
this was the amount of the original contract,
they asked that the water be turned off. He
stated that the water be turned off. He stated
that it looks as if the new contract may be for
2,000 acre feet.
GENERAL SEWER
DISCUSSION - The President again called upon Attorney Henry
LETTER FROM ATTORNEY to present his letter regarding the sewer con-
HENRY REGARDING nection to the Benvenuto-Herbert property in
BENVENUTO PROPERTY Highland. He stated that contact with Fain &
Levine, Attorneys in Los Angeles, made it im-
perative that the case just be held in abeyance.
No action necessary.
LETTER FROM The President read a letter from the Richmond
RICI~MOND Corporation of 27427 Pacific Avenue, Highland,
CORPORATION asking about the possibility of having sewer
service in the old Highland area. This is to
be left to the staff for recommendation at the
next meeting on December 10, 1963.
SEWER PAYMENTS TO It was reported that the money which the District
CITY OF S.B. pays to the City of San Bernardino under the
Joint Powers Agreement on sewer service are
possibly being used to pay police and firemen's
salaries, not used for their sewer account. It
was recommended that a letter be sent requesting
a copy of the current audit report of the City
of San Bernardino and that after received,
Auditor Bragg, Attorney Henry and Manager Rickert
would study the matter and report to the Board
at a later meeting.
FAY THOMPSON A letter was read from Mrs. Fay (C. R.) Thompson
REQUEST FOR 90 DAY requesting a 90 day extension of time in which
EXTENSION OF TIME to connect to the sewer line due to extenuating
FOR SEWER circumstances. Her property is at 7262 Olive
CONNECTION Street, Highland.
MOTION Upon motion by Director Forrest, duly seconded by
Director Disch and carried unanimously, a 90 day
extension of time was granted to Mrs. Fay
Thompson in which to connect her property at
7262 Olive Street, Highland, to the sewer line.
AUTHORIZATION FOR Authorization was asked to Record with the County
NOTICE OF NECESSITY Recorder's Office, a Notice of Necessity to
TO CONNECT TO SEWER Connect to District Sewer, the property of Wayne E.
Arnold and Herman Todd at 7485 Golondrina Drive,
San Bernardino, California. The 90 day extension
of time granted previously has expired.
MOTION Upon motion by Director LeVesque, duly seconded by
Director Wall and carried unanimously, author-
Dec. 10, 1963
ization was given to Record a Notice of
Necessity to Connect to the District Sewer.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come
before the meeting, the President declared
adjournment at 10:45 p.m.
t ar y
Board of Directors
Approved:
Venn W. Botts, President
EAST SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 10, 1963
CALL TO ORDER The President called the meeting to order at
7:30 p.m.
SALUTE TO FLAG The new United States of America and State of
California flags were in place in the Board
room for the first time, so the President
called for the repetition of the Salute to
the Flag to be led by Director Disch.
ROLL CALL Directors Present: President Botts presiding;
Disch, Forrest, LeVesque
and Wall.
Directors Absent: None.
Others Present: General Manager-Secretary,
Rickert; Associate Engineer,
Cole; Auditor-Treasurer, Bragg;
Assistant Office Manager, Lyons;
Recording Secretary, Dudley;
Attorney, Henry; Consulting
Engineers, Joseph A. Rowe of
W. P. Rowe & Son and Don
Halwes of Campbell & Miller;
John and Jim Fiscalini and
Richard Corwin, Realtors;
Spencer Sparks and Don Twomley
of Southern California Water
Company and Constituent, C. F.
Johnson.
MINUTES The President determined that all members had
received and read the minutes of the Regular
Meeting of November 26, 1963. Since there
were no additions or corrections, the minutes
were declared approved as submitted.
RESOLUTION NO. 542 Resolution No. 542 was presented, setting
POLICY FOR SEWER forth the Policy of the District in requiring
ONLY ANNEXATIONS shares of water stock or interests in water
WATER STOCK wells from those requesting annexation to the
REQUIREMENTS District.
The President read the resolution in its en-
tirety which set forth the policy as stipulated
in the minutes of the Board Meeting of November
26, 1963.