Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 02/10/2004 r-- r\n"D East Valley t' " Water District 1155 DEL ROSA AVENUE, SAN BERNARDINO, CA BOARD MEETING February 10,2004 2:00 P.M. AGENDA . - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- --- - - - -. - --- -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- ---.- - - -- -- - -- -- --- "In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District Secretary by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Tuesday meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors". -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - - CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE --- - - - - -- - -- - - - -. - -.. - - - - -- - - - --- - ---- -- --- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- --- I. Approval of Agenda 2. Public Comments CONSENT CALENDAR r-- 3. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes for January 27, 2004. 10. r-- 4. Approval of Liens for Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts. 5. Accounts Payable Disbursements: Accounts Payable Checks #196072 through #196215 were distributed January 28, 2004 through February 10, 2004 in the amount of $484,736.04. Payroll Checks for period ended January 30, 2004 and included checks and direct deposits in the amount of $86,136.48. Total Disbursements for the period were $570,8n.52. OLD BUSINESS 6. Radon Rule Update (General Manager) 7. District Headquarters Site Update/Review of LEEDS Design Issues. 8. Preliminary Design Proposal from CDM Engineering - Infrastructure requirements to address future Perchlorate Rule. NEW BUSINESS 9. Directors' Fees and Expenses for January 2004. Discussion and possible action regarding support payment to the "California Water Awareness Campaign". REPORTS 11. January 26, 2004 - Releases of Lien for Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts. -- 12. "Guidelines for Conduct" A Primer for Public Water Agency Officials. 13. General Manager's Report 14. Oral Comments from Board of Directors. MEETINGS ]5. RECEPTION FOR TERRY TAMMINEN, SECRETARY, CalEPA, hosted by WRI, CSUSB, February 13, 2004. 16. 17. 18. 19. ,,-- 20. 21. ASBCSD Membership Meeting hosted by East Valley Resources Conservation District, Shandin Hills Golf Club, San Bernardino, February 16,2004. LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST featuring Mayor Judith Valles, hosted by San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce, National Orange Show, February 24, 2004. 4th ANNUAL WRI CONFERENCE "Southern California's Water Infrastructure", DoubleTree Hotel, Ontario, CA., February 26, 2004. WEF 21st ANNUAL EXECUTIVE BRIEFING, Radisson Hotel, Sacramento, March 11-12,2004. WEF Lower Colorado River Tour, Las Vegas, NV, March 24-26, 2004. "CSDA SPECIAL DISTRICT GOVERNANCE ACADEMY" COURSE 1: COURSE 2: March 3, 2004 - Ontario Marriott March 4,2004 - Ontario Marriott April] 5,2004 - Fremont Marriott April 16, 2004 - Fremont Marriott April 22, 2004 - Sacramento/FDAS Conference May 12,2004 - Sacramento Marriott May 1],2004 - Sacramento Marriott Oct. 22, 2004 - Ventura Beach Marriott Sept. 27, 2004 - Palm Springs/CSDA Conference Oct. 21, 2004 - Ventura Beach Marriott COURSE 3: March 31, 2004 - Ontario Marriott April 26, 2004 - Fremont Marriott June 3, 2004 - Sacramento Marriott Nov. 4, 2004 - Ventura Beach Marriott CORSE 4: April 1, 2004 - Ontario Marriott April 27, 2004 - Fremont Marriott June 4, 2004 - Sacramento Marriott Sept. 27, 2004 - Palm Springs/CSDA Conference Nov. 5,2004 - Ventura Beach Marriott ADJOURN - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above-agendized "--public meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Assistant at (909) 885-4900 at least 24 hours prior to said meeting. - ----- - -- -- ------ ---------- ---------- --- ----- --- - - - - --- - --- -- - -- - - - -- - - ----- - -- 2 s. r-- DRAFT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT REGULAR BOARD MEETING JANUARY 27, 2004 :MINUTES The rneeting was called to order at 2:00 p.rn. by President Wilson. Director Negrete led the flag salute. PRESENT: ABSENT: Directors: Goodin, Negrete, Lightfoot, Sturgeon, Wilson None STAFF: Robert Martin, General Manager; Paul Dolter, District Engineer; Brian Tompkins, Chief Financial Officer; Mary Wallace, Administrative Assistant r-- LEGAL COUNSEL: Steve Kennedy GUEST(s): Jo McAndrews, Charles Roberts (Highland Community News), Jim Cimino, Anibal Blandon (CDM), Jeff Endicott (CDM) AFPROV AL OF AGENDA M/S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that the January 27,2004 Agenda be approved as submitted. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION President Wilson declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 2:02 p.rn. There being no written or verbal comments, the public participation section was closed. AFPROV AL OF JANUARY 13, 2004 BOARD MEETING MINUTES. r-- M/S/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the January 13, 2004 Board Meeting Minutes be approved as submitted. Minutes: 01127/04 ".... APPROVAL OF JANUARY 16, 2004 SPECIAL BOARD MEETING MINUTES. MlS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the January 16, 2004 Special Board Meeting Minutes be approved as submitted. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 22, 2004 SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES (BOARD WORKSHOP). MlS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the January 22, 2004 Special Meeting Minutes (Board Workshop) be approved as submitted. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 were presented to the Board for review and acceptance. MlS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2003 be accepted. ".... DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND NORTH AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES, INC. TO PROVIDE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE TO THIRTY-EIGHT (38) DWELLING UNITS WITHIN TRACT #16607 LOCATED AT CHURCH & NORWOOD IN THE CITY OF IDGHLAND was presented to the Board for approval. MlS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the Development Agrèement between East Valley Water District and North American Residential Communities, Inc. be approved. APPROVAL OF LIENS FOR DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS. MlS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the liens for delinquent water and sewer accounts be approved for processing as submitted. DISBURSEMENTS MlS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that General Fund Disbursernents #195926 through 196071 distributed during the period of January 8, 2004 through January 22,2004 in the amount of $430,028.32 and Payroll Fund Disbursernents for the period ended January 2, 2004 and January 16, 2004 in the amount of $80,798.62 and $81,521.34 totaling $592,348.28 be approved. RADON RULE UPDATE ".... The General Manager reported on the District's progress with the Rule to date; that President Wilson and he were going to Washington D.C. to pursue the Radon Rule Issue with the newly appointed administrators. Infonnation only. 2 Minutes: 01/27/04 r" DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS SITE UPDATE The General Manager gave an updated report on the District Headquarters Site; that a tour of the mAU Building in Chino had taken place to view a number of the "LEED" concepts incorporated there; that Gary Miller (Architect) was preparing a report which would encompass a portion of that program that the District may want to participate in and should have that presentation ready for the Board's review at the next regularly scheduled Board Meeting. Information only. PERCHLORATE DRINKING WATER STANDARD The General Manager presented a letter frorn Stephen Hall, ACW A Executive Director, to the newly appointed Secretary of CalEP A as an overview of the establishment of regulatory action for Perchlorate in drinking water; stated that once the rille is passed (Drinking Water Standards in California to be established in 2004), EVWD will cornply with the regulations mandated therein. Information only. DISCUSSION AND POSSmLE ACTION REGARDING DISTRICT'S 2004 BUDGET WORKSHOP. r" Several dates were suggested for EVWD's Annual Budget Workshop. Monday, May 24, 2004 at 10:00 a.m. was selected as the date for this year's workshop. Information only. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AT 28647 LEMON ST., IDGHLAND, CA. FROM JERRY BROWN. MJS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the claim for damages at 28647 Lernon St. from Jerry Brown be rejected and denied and referred to District's Legal Counsel and Insurance Agency. DISCUSSION AND POSSmLE ACTION REGARDING WATER SERVICE TO THE WYLE LABORATORJES PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SAN BERNARDINO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. The GeneraI Manager presented a letter from Wyle Laboratories wherein a request was made for water service to be provided by EVWD to their project located at the San Bernardino International Airport; stated that he wou1d confer further with the City of San Bernardino Water Department and keep the Board advised of his progress. Information only. DISCUSSION AND POSSmLE ACTION REGARDING LEASE AGREEMENT FOR IDGHLAND AVE. & PALM AVE. PROPERTY (AKA: 3654 E. IDGHLAND AVE., STE. 18, IDGHLAND, CA.). r" Minutes: 01/27/04 ".- The General Manager presented a lease proposal to the Board ftom Jim Cimino for the property mown as 3654 E. Highland Ave., Ste. #18 in the City of Highland. M/S/C ( Sturgeon-Goodin) that the proposal to lease the property mown as 3654 E. Highland Ave., Ste. 18 in the City of Highland be approved. RELEASES OF LIEN FOR DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS. List of liens released on January 20,2004 was reviewed, Infonnation only. INVESTMENT REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 The mvestrnent Report for quarter ended Decernber 31, 2003 was reviewed. Information only. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT The General Manager reported on the District's operations to date; presented a summary of FEMA reirnbursements prepared by Gary Sturdivan, the District's Safety and Regulatory Affairs Coordinator. Information only. ORAL COMMENTS FROM BOARD OF DIRECTORS r-- Director Sturgeon expressed his admiration for the honor attributed to Jerry Lewis for his twenty-five years of service to the community last Saturday evening at the Orange Show. Infonnation onIy. Director Negrete stated that he had talked with John Timmer, Councilman for the City of Highland, who had expressed the desire to have the newly elected Highland City Council rnernbers rneet with the District to discuss pending issues within the City. Infonnation only. Director Goodin stated that the ASBCSD was hosting a tour of the IEAU Building in Chino. Infonnation only. Director Wilson also commented on the event honoring Jerry Lewis which he had attended last Saturday evening. Information only. There being no further verbal or written comments from the Directors, this section of the rneeting was closed. ASBCSD SEMINAR, IEUA, 6075 KIMBALL AVE., CHINO, CA, FEBRUARY 20, 2004. Information only. ".- 4 Mmutes: 01/27/04 ,,- CMUA 72ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE, MONTEREY PLAZA HOTEL, MONTEREY, CA., MARCH 24-26, 2004. Infonnation only. PRESIDENT WILSON DECLARED A SHORT BREAK IN THE MEETING AT 2:45 P.M. PRESIDENT WILSON CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 2:55 P.M. CLOSED SESSION MJS/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the meeting adjonm to Closed Session. The Board entered into Closed Session at 2:55 p.rn. as provided for in the California Open Meeting Law, Government Code Section 54945.9(a), to discuss the itern listed on the Agenda. ADJOURN TO REGULAR SESSION President Wilson declared that the rneeting adjonm to regular session. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS ,,- The Board returned to regular session at 3:25 p.rn. The item listed on the Agenda was discussed in closed session with no reportabIe action being taken. ADJOURN The meeting was adjonmed at 3:25 p.rn. George E. Wilson, President Robert E. Martin, Secretary ,,- 5 Minutes: 01/27/04 CERTIFICATE OF LIEN FEBRUARY 10, 2004 -- ACCOUNT OWNERS NUMBER NAME 1. 0350203-06 2. 0520002..02* 3. 0650192..01* 4. 0930151-01* 5. 0940120-06* 6. 1030015-01 7. 1630414-01 8. 1640343-04 TOTAL -- * STILL OWNS PROPERTY + MULTIPLE UNITS ,,-- Page 1 of 1 PROPERTY ADDRESS / lfÍ ~, AMOUNT OWED $123.97 $83.62 $58.76 $76.41 $81.76 $266.50 $62.04 $41.99 $ 795.05 "...- r\n"D East Valley t:.' " Water District ~, Board Memorandum Date: FEB 10, 2004 From: Brian W, Tompkins I Chief ~al Officer Subject: Disbursements. '0 I Recommendation: Approve the attached list of accounts payable checks and payroll issued during the period January 28, 2004 through February 10, 2004. Background: "...- Accounts payable checks are shown on the attached listing and include numbers 196072 to 196215 for A total of $484,736.04. The source of funds for this amount is as follows: EPA Grant Funds Unrestricted Funds $484,736.04 Payroll disbursed was for the period ended January 30, 2004 included checks and direct deposits. Totaling $86,136.48. Fiscal Impact: Total disbursements- $570,872.52. "...- Dale: ~. .i~' February 05, 2004 East V~ ) Water District ~: ) 101 12 Time: Report: -" 30.rpt Usee Check kealster - Standard Con1Jany: EVWD PerIods: 07-03 Through 08-03 As of: 2/5104 Check Cheçk Check Vendor 10 Period Ref Doc InvoIce Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closocl Nbr ~ Number Date Token PaId Acct/Sub: 13110 00OOOOOOOO00000 196072 CK 1/28/04 ~þOO2 07-03 033093 va 655158 1/23104 0.00 18.93 196073 CK 1/28/04 ~I~aots WEST 07-03 07-03 033049 VO 103101583 12131/03 0.00 40.98 196073 CK 1/28/04 ~I~æ..!j¡ WEST 07-03 07-03 033087 VO 103359850 1122104 0.00 75.73 Check Tolal 116.71 196074 CK 1/28104 ~WEGA CONSmUCfION 07-03 07-03 032649 VO 321172-0 12129/03 0.00 1,453.83 196075 CK 1/28/04 ~~HEAD UNITED WAY 07-03 033103 VO ARR0123O4 1128104 0.00 50.00 196076 CK 1/28/04 ~eg'{.-STEVEN L 07-03 032650 VO 1050007-1 12/29103 0.00 50.13 196077 CK 1/28104 RI~BO~EFRIGERATION CO.,INC. 07-03 07-03 033084 VO 41414 1/22/04 0.00 596.30 196078 CK 1/28/04 8~~l£kcH INTERNATIONAL INC 07-03 033069 VO EV275 1/13104 0.00 1,913.84 196079 CK 1/28/04 8~~g!;'!:MAN-NATALIE J 07-03 032672 VO 1650225-2 12130103 0.00 25.28 196080 CK 1/28104 BlffiOóEWEESE CHEVROLET 07-03 07-03 032651 VO 1162856-1 12129/03 0.00 115.81 196081 CK 1/28/04 B8WB9fu. -RICHARD L 07-03 032703 VO 720035-13.1 12/29/03 0.00 39.30 196082 CK 1/28104 ~~8mËERJNG RESOURCES OF 07-03 033059 VO 30498 12119103 0.00 766.70 196082 CK 1/28104 ~~8mËERJNG RESOURCES OF 07-03 033060 VO 30499 12119/03 0.00 7,971.35 196082 CK 1/28/04 ~~8IWËERJNG RESOURCES OF 07-03 033061 VO 3O4G7 12119103 0.00 94.00 196082 CK 1/28/04 ~~8IWËERING RESOURCES OF 07-03 033066 VO 30546 1/16/04 0.00 2,775.00 Check Total 11,607.05 196083 CK 1/28/04 ~~IQIEW FORD SALES.iNC 07-03 033051 VO 2951 CREDIT 1/23104 0.00 75.00 196083 CK 1/28/04 ~~EW FORD SALES,INC 07-03 033062 VO 351027 1/22/04 0.00 32.95 196083 CK 1/28/04 ~I~EW FORD SALES,INC 07-03 033063 VO 351371 1123104 0.00 288.31 196083 CK 1/28104 Þ~I~IQIEW FORD SALES,INC 07-03 033088 vo 351202 1/23104 0.00 510.05 Oat., lay, February 05, 2004 East Val )Nater District Page: ~01 12 Time: , M Report: "-" O.rp! Use" KATHY Check Register. Standard Company. EVWD Periods: 07.03 Through 08-03 As of: 2/5104 Check Check Check Vendor 10 -..--. Period Rei Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vandor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Numb.. Da" Takan PaId 196083 CK 1/28104 ~W¡EW FORD SALES.INC 07.03 033123 AD 2951 CREDIT 1123/04 0.00 -75.00 196083 CK 1/28104 Þ~Iæ.;¡EW FORD SALES,INC 07.03 033124 VO 2951 1123104 0.00 75.00 Check Total 906.31 196084 CK 1/28/04 Þ~~RIl1R BROS COFÆE 07..()3 033110 VO 2891621 1128104 0.00 113.76 196085 CK 1/28/04 ÞI~ß~ AMERICAN TITLE 07..()3 033086 VO 1610205-02 1/14104 0.00 76.60 196086 CK 1/28/04 Þ8~~~H STREET ROCK CRUSHER 07..()3 07..()3 033091 VO 207097 12/23/03 0.00 355.30 196086 CK 1/28/04 Þ8~m-H STREET ROCK CRUSHER 07..()3 07..()3033111 VO 206229 1/23104 0.00 268.77 Chock Total 624.07 196087 CK 1/28104 þ~jPP~u COMPUTER PRODUCTS 07.03 033084 va 344087 1/15104 0.00 3,995.00 196088 CK 1/28/04 Þ~~ß9~ITI-JOAN E 07..()3 032809 va 191847-2.1 112/04 0.00 100.00 196089 CK 1/28/04 ~R~9~L EQUIPMENT CO 07..()3 07..()3033112 VO 62374 1/27104 0.00 2.970.67 196089 CK 1/28104 a~~9~L EQUIPMENT CO 07..()3 07..()3 033113 VO 62374 1/ZT/O4 0.00 967.59 Check Total 3,936.26 196090 CK 1/28/04 a~~ß?~E PARTS COMPANY 07..()3 07..()3 033065 VO 811556 1/21104 OA7 23.00 196090 CK 1/28/04 a~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07.03 07.03 033066 VO 811497 1/20/04 0.62 30.56 Check Total 53.56 196091 CK 1/28/04 a81111Y JANITORIAL SERVICE 07..()3 033052 VO n1 1/21104 0.00 1,315.00 196092 CK 1/28/04 ~~~~ COMPUTER SYSTEMS 07-03 033089 VO UH2627 12/31103 0.00 1,675.00 196093 CK 1/28/04 I~~ WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 07..()3 033114 VO 134103 1/28104 2.84 139.39 196093 CK 1/28/04 I~~ WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 07..()3 033115 VO 133990 1/22/04 2.93 143.61 196093 CK 1/28/04 I~~ WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 07..()3 033116 VO 134061 1126104 10.46 512.67 196093 CK 1/28104 I~~ WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 07..()3 033121 va 134102 1/26/04 25.78 1,263.45 Check Total 2,059.12 196094 CK 1/28/04 1~~ßWrMENTS PACIFICON. INC. 07..()3 032704 VO 450265-2.1 12129103 0.00 55.74 Date: )day, February OS, 2004 East Va )Water District ~ )3 of 12 TIme: AM Reøon: w630.rpt Use" Iv< fHY Check Realster - Standard Con1>any. EVWD Periods: 07.(13 Through 08-03 As of: 2/5104 Chock Chock Check Vendor ID ..---- Period Ref Doc Invoice Involco Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Typo Numb... Date Token Paid 196095 CK 1/28104 ~8~R/?;bN MACHINERY CO 07-03 07-03 033067 vo PCO30105070 1/21104 0.00 110.51 196096 CK 1/28/04 ~8~fI&(JN LIFT / HYSTER 07.(13 07.(13 033072 VO SW060139564 1/18104 0.00 4.051.44 196096 CK 1/28/04 ~8~ON LIFT / HY8TER 07.(13 07.(13 033102 va E6958601 1/19104 0.00 589.57 Check Total 4,641.01 196097 CK 1/28/04 ~mæl/ 8UPPL Y 07.(13 07.(13033117 VO 82043207.001 1123104 0.00 336.66 196097 CK 1/28/04 ~~~~ 8UPPL Y 07.(13 07.(13 033118 va 82043207.002 1/23104 0.00 1,499.23 Check Total 1,835.89 196098 CK 1/28/04 1:8~~~OTECHNICAL GROUP INC 07.(13 033092 VO 7662 1/21104 0.00 2.500.00 196099 CK 1/28/04 ~~Iò\YER INC 07-03 07.(13 033053 va 326934 1I20IO4 0.00 496.00 196100 CK 1/28/04 ~ELLI-JASON 07.(13 032705 VO 1650234-1.1 12129103 0.00 57.W 196101 CK 1/28/04 ~8~8METER INC 07.(13 033122 VO 2628369 1/12104 0.00 4,314.43 196102 CK 1/28/04 ~~L 07.(13 033104 VO 27415302 2/1104 0.00 138.16 196103 CK 1/28104 ~11:ffi¡\=DZKI-JACEK 07.(13 033050 VO MlLO12104 1/21104 0.00 1,440.00 196104 CK 1/28104 ~80~MINIINC 07-03 033070 VO 58570401 1/12104 0.00 3,067.00 196105 CK 1/28/04 ~8~~ COMPANY 07.(13 07.(13033071 VO 10593 1122104 0.00 379.11 196106 CK 1/28104 8I!žß'15-MARCELA 07.(13 032811 va 1410007-2.1 1/2104 0.00 41.06 196107 CK 1/28/04 ~IOOj'eY-CARRIE 07.(13 032812 VO 510193-2.1 1/2104 0.00 26.10 196108 CK 1/28/04 ~~18TRIBU1lNG co 07-03 07.(13 033119 VO 433768 1123104 0.00 1,771.10 196109 CK 1/28104 ~~ON-SARA H 07.(13 033105 VO REAOI23O4 1128104 0.00 108.94 Date, - Pv' February 05, 2004 East Va )Water District P-: ~Of 12 Time: Report: ~vri30.rpl Use" "", Y Check Reaister. Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-(13 Through 08-03 As of: 2/5104 Check Cheok Check VendOt"ID -_.. Pettod Rei Doc: Invole.. Involc:e DllICOunt Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid 196110 CK 1/28104 ~~<WÓNO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSN 07-03 033106 VO SANO123O4 1128104 0.00 270.90 196111 CK 1/28104 g~~! f¡1RNARDINO VALlEY WATER 07-03 033054 VO saoO12104 1/21104 0.00 68.688.37 196112 CK 1/28/04 gR8O01 07-03 033082 VO 4250623 TR PL 1/14104 0.00 78.56 196112 CK 1/28104 gR8°O1 07-03 033083 VO 4252142 SECIFA 1/14104 0.00 32.37 Check Total 110.93 196113 CK 1/28104 g8~GAS COMPANY 07-03 033055 VO 12292172009 1/21104 0.00 249.43 196113 CK 1/28104 g8~GAS COMPANY 07-03 '33056 VO 12502172005 1/21104 0.00 75.95 Check Total 325.38 196114 CK 1/28104 g8~ PUMP & WELL SERVICE 07-03 07-03 033120 VO 35112 1/15104 0.00 378.01 196115 CK 1/28104 g~OF CALIFORNIA 07-03 033107 VO STAO123O4 1128104 0.00 11,828.92 196116 CK 1/28104 g:¡:~Ë4STREET BANK & TRUST 07-03 033108 VO STA012304 1/28/04 0.00 6,617.51 196117 CK 1/28104 g=USA 07-03 07-03 033057 VO ST0123O4 1/23104 0.00 246.04 196117 CK 1/28104 g~lUSA 07-03 07-03 033058 va ST0123O4.1 1/23104 0.00 246.04 Check Total 492.08 196118 CK 1/28/04 :m1~K PACIFIC HOMES 07-03 032652 VO 1450054-0 12129103 0.00 41.00 196119 CK 1/28104 H~lm PARCEL SERVICE 07-03 033109 VO 000016XW88034 1/17/04 0.00 24.04 196120 CK 1/28/04 Hg'tP8~ES 07-03 032708 VO 55O05Q.O.1 12/29103 0.00 25.15 196121 CK 1/28/04 Wæ~ITARY SUPPLY 07-03 033085 va 62081351 1/21/04 0.00 1,319.71 196122 CK 2/4104 ~~002 0ß.03 033225 va 669538 1130/04 0.00 336.37 196123 CK 2/4104 ~B~~hD LANDSCAPE 08-03 032856 VO 321163-0 1/8104 0.00 1.417.30 Oale: 'm(~' February 05, 2004 East V¡ ) Water District Page: )5 of 12 TIme: Report: -" 30.rpt User: ""THY Check Reaister - Standard Company. EVWD Periods: 070413 Through 08-Ð3 As of: 2/5104 Check Check Check Vendor 10 Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Dete Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken PaId 196124 CK 2/4104 æg?;1FINANCIAL 08-03 032857 VO 620123-3 1/6104 0.00 289.60 196125 CK 2/4104 ~~ßCbNSTRUCTION 08-03 032858 VO 3211~ 117104 0.00 1.160.02 196126 CK 2/4104 ~E8~k-GABINO S 08-03 033173 VO BEC0204 2/2/04 0.00 50.00 196127 ZC 2/4104 REWRik-CHARLES J 08-03 08-03 032859 VO 8301Q9.0 1/8104 0.00 151.04 196127 ZC 2/4104 RIrnI/iR-CHARLES J 08-03 08-03 033020 I'D 830109-0 118104 0.00 -151.04 Check Total 0.00 196128 CK 2/4104 RI~eP~EFRIGERATION CO..INC. 08-{)3 033243 VO 40441 213104 0.00 87.93 196128 CK 2/4104 RI~eP~EFRIGERATION CO..INC. 08-{)3 033244 VO 40440 213104 0.00 107.33 Check Total 195.26 196129 CK 2/4/04 R8~ OF WATER COMMISSIONERS 08-{)3 033185 VO BOAO1O4 212/04 0.00 9,721.74 196130 CK 2/4/04 R~m--LISA 08-03 032995 VO 1110179-4.1 1/8104 0.00 96.93 196131 CK 2/4104 R~~!'lEss MOVING & STORAGE 08-{)3 033195 VO 3065FEB04 2/1104 0.00 428.60 196132 CK 2/4/04 R~~B~-RICHARD 08-03 032860 VO 520253-2 1/8104 0.00 45.36 196133 CK 2/4/04 ~8UEST. INC. 08-03 033169 VO 4C11572 1/19/04 0.00 9,370.01 196134 CK 2/4104 ~~RESSER & MCKEE INC. 08-{)3 033170 VO 8016800315 1/24/04 0.00 14.473.33 196134 CK 2/4/04 ~~RESSER & MCKEE INC. 08-03 033171 VO 80167890102 1/24/04 0.00 7,230.33 196134 CK 2/4104 ~~RESSER & MCKEE INC. 08-03 033172 VO 80167811/1 1/24/04 0.00 5,885.00 Check Total 27,588.66 196135 CK 2/4104 --"ltONZO 08-03 032807 VO 350101-1.1 1/5104 0.00 48.98 196136 CK 2/4/04 8m~c CONSTRUCTION 08-{)3 032861 VO 321146-0 1/8104 0.00 1,775.00 196137 CK 2/4/04 8E~~S-CARLOS A 08-03 032862 va 70023-5 1/5104 0.00 19.90 001.: ì~' February 05. 2004 East Vat ~ater District Page: )01 12 Time: L KATHY Check Realster - Standard Report: ~~"JO.rpt User: Company: EVWD Periods: 07.03 Through 0B.03 As of: 215104 Check Check Check VandorlD ------- Period Ref Doc Involca Invoice DIscount Amount Nbr Type Date VandorName To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid 196138 CK 214104 8~~~CH 08-03 033203 VO 944577 1123104 0.00 330.64 196139 CK 214104 8J:111mAN-RAJINDER S 0B.03 032808 YO 520241-1.1 1/5104 0.00 71.20 196140 CK 2/4/04 BtI¡!?!bRD L UTLEY 08-03 033236 VO 65690 1127104 0.00 200.00 196140 CK 2/4104 81:1~~ðRD L UTLEY 06-03 033237 VO 65691 1/29/04 0.00 110.00 Check Total 310.00 196141 CK 2/4104 8~~R01 08-03 033234 VO CMU0203O4 213104 0.00 525.00 196142 CK 2/4104 88~~%EY'S ELECTRIC, INC. 06-03 033142 VO 19327 1/23104 0.00 125.00 196143 CK 2/4104 B~IY~DENNIS 0B.03 032810 VO 210140-4.1 1/5104 0.00 26.98 196144 CK 2/4104 B~ÞR'k\MENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 06-03 033235 VO DEP0203O4 213104 0.00 150.00 196145 CK 2/4/04 BI~RmND FENCE CO 06-03 033240 VO 37701 1129104 0.00 680.00 196148 CK 2/4104 B8~W-ROXANNA L 0B.03 032863 VO 7423~2 117104 0.00 47.98 196147 CK 2/4/04 ~wœR1:KS COMPANY 06-03 033204 VO INVOO2863 1130104 0.00 1,542.82 196148 CK 2/4104 ~~~bFT.INC 06-03 033196 va R425O65 2/1/04 0.00 125.38 196149 CK 2/4/04 Þ~I~EW FORD SALES,INC 08-03 033207 VO 353540 213104 0.00 71.31 196149 CK 2/4/04 ~I~EW FORD SALES,INC 06-03 033208 va 353541 213104 0.00 16.02 Check Total 87.33 196150 CK 2/4/04 ÞI~g! 8AMERICAN REAL ESTATE 0B.03 033233 VO 108152700104 2/4104 0.00 210.31 196151 CK 2/4104 a~~ß?~E PARTS COMPANY 08-03 033143 VO 612630 1129104 0.15 7.50 196151 CK 2/4/04 a~~ß?~E PARTS COMPANY 0B.03 033144 VO 812674 1/29104 0.21 10.37 196151 CK 2/4/04 a~~ß?~E PARTS COMPANY 06-03 033145 VO 812663 1129104 0.63 30.87 Date, T JM" February 05, 2004 East Val )vater District Pag", lol 12 Time' t Report c_- .rpl User. KA,HY Check Realster - Standard CoIr >any. EVWD Periods: 07-113 Through 08-03 As of: 2/5104 Check Check Check VendorlD ~-~- Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid 196151 CK 2/4104 ~~~eI/~E PARTS COMPANY 08-03 033146 VO 812682 1/29/04 0.45 22.05 196151 CK 2/4/04 ~E~eI/~E PARTS COMPANY ()8.()3 033147 VO 812638 1/29104 0.11 5.22 196151 CK 2/4/04 ~E~eI/~E PARTS COMPANY ()8.()3 033148 VO 812512 1/28/04 0.46 22.54 196151 CK 2/4104 ~E~B~~E PARTS COMPANY 08-03 033200 VO 812795 1130104 0.19 9.50 196151 CK 2/4/04 ~E~eI/~E PARTS COMPANY 08-03 033206 VO 813238 212104 0.08 3.95 196151 CK 2/4104 ~E~eI/~E PARTS COMPANY 08-03 033245 VO 813500 213104 0.33 16.06 196151 CK 2/4/04 ~E~eI/~EPARTSCOMPANY 08-03 033246 VO 813499 213104 0.33 16.06 196151 CK 2/4/04 ~~~eI/~E PARTS COMPANY ()8.()3 033247 VO 813487 213104 0.57 27.68 Check Total 171.80 196152 CK 2/4104 a81:B~ WEST TIRE 08-03 033199 VO 2363 212104 0.00 38.27 196153 CK 2/4/04 aHtIil~REZ-PHILUP 08-03 032864 VO 720119-2 1/8104 0.00 535.87 196154 CK 2/4104 ~k EQUIPMENT COMPANY 08-03 033201 VO C331 00 1/29/04 0.00 117.74 196155 CK 2/4104 ~~8WÓOMPANY 08-03 033129 VO 3727986 1122104 0.00 172.63 196156 CK 2/4/04 ~BOY CAR WASH 08-03 033241 VO 1103 112/04 0.00 160.84 196157 CK 2/4/04 ~IW~ SAFElY ()8.()3 033139 VO 20991 1/23104 0.00 3.690.00 196156 CK 2/4/04 ~HO~ÓNSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES 08-03 033130 VO N11011305 1/22/04 0.00 260.22 196158 CK 2/4104 ~HR08¿NSTRUCT10N SPECIALTIES 08-03 033186 VO N11013645 1/26/04 0.00 248.72 Check Total 508.94 196159 CK 2/4/04 I~~ WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 08-03 033182 VO 134270 1130104 32.28 1,581.81 198159 CK 2/4104 I~~ WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 08-03 033187 VO 134269 1130104 13.04 636.85 Check Total 2,220.66 196160 CK 2/4104 1f:fF~TIONAL RUBBER & SUPPLY 08-03 033149 VO 18342 119104 0.00 48.49 196161 CK 2/4104 Jw.~EEMAN CO., INC 08-03 033188 VO 2601KJ4-O 1128104 0.00 140.00 Dale: T' 1~' February 05, 2004 East Val )Nater District Page; Îof 12 TIme: Report: O.rp! User: "'., y Check R.....lster - Standard Company. EVWD Periods: 07.03 Through 08-03 As of: 215104 Check Check Check YendorlD --- Period Ral Doc InvoIce Invoice DIscount Amount Nbr Type Date YendorName To Post Closed Nbr Typa Number Date Taken Paid 196161 CK 2/4104 ~~~EEMAN CO., INC 08-03 033189 VO 259782-4 1/28/04 0.00 46.72 196161 CK 2/4104 j~Jq~EEMAN CO., INC 08-03 033190 VO 259782-3 1/28104 0.00 96.81 196161 CK 2/4/04 j~~EEMAN CO., INC 08-03 033191 VO 259782-1 1/27104 0.00 81.67 196161 CK 2/4/04 j~~EEMANCO.,INC 08-03 033192 VO 259782-2 1/28104 0.00 84.25 196161 CK 2/4104 ~~<m:EMAN CO., INC 08-03 033193 VO 259782.0 1/26/04 0.00 553.18 196161 CK 2/4104 j~~EEMAN CO., INC 08-03 033222 VO 260349.() 2/2104 0.00 2.59 Check Total 1,005.22 196162 CK 2/4/04 ~~~~dNSmUCl10N COMPANY 08-03 032865 VO 3211~ 1/7/04 0.00 1,423.93 196163 CK 2/4104 ~Ä~ß'I?R A. KESSLER & ASSOCIATES 08-03 033174 VO 194139 12/29/03 0.00 29,458.00 196164 CK 2/4/04 ~1f¡£JW¡PLlNGER TAX LETTER 08-03 033202 VO 66974122 1/19104 0.00 59.00 196165 CK 2/4104 ~~!N~hsIE 08-03 032866 VO 630273-4 115104 0.00 46.50 196166 CK 2/4104 (\SßOdHRISTMAS mEES 08-03 032867 va 321153-0 1/7/04 0.00 1,386.09 196167 CK 2/4104 ~oekTY SUPPLY INC 08-03 033194 VO 1004189711 1/23/04 0.00 1,045.94 196168 CK 2/4/04 ~~ PRODUCTS.INC 08-03 033205 VO 1636405 1/14104 3.86 420.12 196169 CK 2/4104 ~1~B1"eR-NANCY 08-03 032868 VO 530160-8 1/6104 0.00 23.95 196169 CK 2/4104 ~~B1"eR-NANCY 08-03 032914 VO 530160-8.1 1n 104 0.00 29.30 Check Total 53.25 196170 CK 2/4104 ~RRtNANCE SOLUTIONS INC 08-03 033238 VO 1308404 1130104 0.00 155.93 196171 CK 2/4104 ~~IbWER INC 08-03 033125 VO 327121 1127/04 0.00 1,289.60 196172 CK 2/4/04 t;1H~OLlTAN LIFE INS CO 08-03 033227 VO MET02O4 2/4104 0.00 678.46 196173 CK 2/4104 t;11~ßI ¡1:DZKl-JACEK 08-03 033126 YO MILO12704 1/27/04 0.00 1.440.00 Date: i F' February 05. 2004 East Val' )vater District Page: }o/ 12 Time: Report c_- .!pl User: KJ., Y Check Realster - Standard Con1>any; EVWD Periods: 07.Q3 Through 0~3 As of: 215104 Check Check Check Vendor ID .~- Period Ref Doc InvoIce InvoIce DIscount Amount Nbr Type Dale Vendor Neme To POS1 Closed Nbr Type Number Dale Teken Paid 196174 CK 2/4104 ~IIWJbA-ISMAEL 0~3 032869 va 1360241-1 1/6104 0.00 75.00 196175 CK 2/4/04 ~8~a~ HILL LLC os-œ 032870 VO 541591-4 1/7104 0.00 32.16 196176 CK 2/4104 1:18Še5-MART 08-03 032871 VO 830149-3 1/6104 0.00 13.08 196177 CK 2/4104 ~EWmRIZONS 00.03 033131 VO 1417541 1/23104 0.00 594.00 196177 CK 2/4104 ~EWmRIZONS 00.03 033132 VO 1417531 1123104 0.00 2,962.60 Check Total 3,556.80 196178 CK 2/4104 ~IKOS'ðN-MIKE 08-03 0328n VO 340137-2 1/5104 0.00 16.61 196179 CK 2/4104 Þ~~1b CENTURY HOMES 08-03 032873 VO 325340-0 1/7/04 0.00 1,370.70 196180 CK 2/4104 Þ~EIJ!i~ EROSION 08-03 032874 VO 321173-0 1/7104 0.00 1,327.34 196181 CK 2/4104 Þ~m-SANDRA M 0~3 032875 VO 1050008-5 118104 0.00 57.35 196182 CK 2/4/04 Þ~SON-ROY 08-03 033175 VO PATO204 2/2/04 0.00 350.00 196183 CK 2/4104 Þ~~ 08-03 033176 VO PER02O4 212/04 0.00 33,437.09 196184 CK 2/4104 Þ~~~ß7RMANCE METERS INC 08-03 033150 VO 7055 1I30IO4 21.19 1,038.44 196185 CK 2/4104 þ~1CASH 00.03 032762 VO PET0107O4 1/6104 0.00 1.11 196185 CK 2/4104 þ~1CASH os-œ 033127 VO PET01O4 1/29104 0.00 213.75 196185 CK 2/4104 Þ~m1CASH os-œ 033249 AD PET0107O4 1/7/04 0.00 -1.11 Check Total 213.75 196186 CK 2/4104 Þ~8~1X HOME UFE os-œ 033177 VO PHO02O4 212/04 0.00 265.04 196187 CK 2/4104 ~EBmms FORD 08-03 033248 VO 34189 2/3104 0.00 112.89 Dale: T 1~' February 05, 2004 East Val: )vater District Page: ~of 12 TIme: l Report: Co_" .!pl User. KA'MY Check Realster - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-03 Through 08-03 As of: 2/5104 Check Chec:k Chec:k Vendor 10 ---------- POflod Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Numbe< Date Taken P8fd 196188 CK 2/4104 ~EþPJ?¡1: DEPT CITY OF S B 08-03 033226 VO oo3280A12O3 1130104 0.00 664.00 196189 CK 2/4/04 ~E~~~IA-ROSA M 08-03 032876 VO 620074-5 1/5104 0.00 2.57 196190 CK 2/4/04 ~1~RR?-oAN 08-03 033128 VO 700740.1 1/16104 0.00 50.74 196191 CK 2/4104 ~8B~~¿UEZ-oLiVIA H 08-03 032877 VO 1440042-2 116104 0.00 31.92 196192 CK 2/4104 ~8~~..pETER 08-03 032878 VO 321149-0 1(7104 0.00 1.435.37 196193 CK 2/4104 ~~~RNARDINo-CITY OF 08-03 08-03 032776 VO SAN12O3 1(7104 0.00 222,655.71 196193 VC 2/4104 ~~NARDINO-CITY OF 08-03 08-03 032776 VO SANI2O3 1 (7104 0.00 -222,655.71 Check Total 0.00 196194 CK 2/4104 ~~~"sON-RON 08-03 033178 VO SEV02O4 2/2/04 0.00 283.02 196195 CK 2/4104 ~~IBlk-ROBIN 08-03 032879 VO 820035-2 1f7104 0.00 563.57 196196 CK 2/4/04 ~8~ PUMP & WELL SERVICE 08-03 033152 VO 35142 1/23104 0.00 177.00 196197 CK 2/4104 ~~ EDISON COMPANY 08-03 033183 VO 2234380962104 1130104 0.00 2.177.88 196197 CK 2/4/04 ~8~ EDISON COMPANY 08-03 033184 VO 22437458820104 1130104 0.00 411.70 196197 CK 2/4104 ~8~ EDISON COMPANY 08-03 033197 VO 22512228570103 1130104 0.00 5,676.34 Check Total 8,265.92 196198 CK 2/4104 ~8HWPCOAST A Q M D 08-03 033140 va 1564995 1/20104 0.00 201.77 196198 CK 2/4/04 ~8H~WCOAST A Q M D 08-03 033141 VO 1564087 1/20104 0.00 75.00 Check Total Z16.77 196199 CK 2/4104 ~~~h CREDIT PlAN 08-03 033198 VO 797283000021088 1/26104 0.00 587.02 196200 CK 2/4/04 ~:¡:~~~OCOMPENSATION INS FUND 08-03 033157 VO 163494-02 12/12/03 0.00 3,630.39 196201 CK 2/4104 J~gllTHERNES & ASSOCIATES INC 08-03 033239 VO JAN 2004 2/1104 0.00 4,636.75 Dale; P ~ay. February 05, 2004 East Val' )vater District pege: lol 12 Time; ( M Report: c_-, .rpl User; IV... Check Reuister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07.03 Through 08-03 As of: 215/04 Check Check Check Vendor 10 PerIod Ref Doc InvoIce InvoIce Discount Amount Nbr Type Dale Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Dale Token PaId 196202 CK 214104 lliW-lHANH T 08-03 032880 va 1550010-10 1/5104 0.00 57.37 196203 CK 214104 :¡:¡¡IB18m-FREDM 08-03 032881 VO 350146-2 117104 0.00 16.37 196204 CK 214/04 :¡:~IU(kK PACIFIC HOMES 08-03 032882 VO 145005H1 1/8/04 0.00 26.00 196205 CK 214/04 H~B~W\;ROUND SERVICE AlERT 08-03 033228 VO 4010239 211104 0.00 152.60 196206 CK 214104 H~IY%ð PARCEL SERVICE 08-03 033138 va 000016XW88044 1/24/04 0.00 16.00 196206 CK 214104 H~IY%ð PARCEL SERVICE 08-03 033232 VO 0OOO16XW88054 1/31104 0.00 16.00 Check Total 32.00 196207 CK 214/04 H~IB~BANK OF CAUFORNIA 08-03 033179 VO UN10202O4 2l2JO4 0.00 87.421.58 196207 CK 214/04 H~IB~ BANK OF CALIFORNIA 08-03 033180 VO UNI0202O4.1 212104 0.00 72,935.22 Check Total 160,356.80 196208 CK 214104 ~H~B9& MATERIAlS COMPANY 08-03 033242 VO 185407 1/29104 5.57 215A8 196209 CK 214/04 ~æ1ANITARY SUPPLY 08-03 033151 VO 62101852 1122104 0.00 164.51 196210 CK 214104 ~m:\ AUTO PARTS 08-03 032885 VO 440090-0 118104 0.00 38.69 196211 CK 214104 W~lmEAD-ROGER 08-03 033181 VO WHIO204 2l2JO4 0.00 317.21 196212 CK 214104 W~Int-AlICIA N 08-03 032814 va 10087-3.1 1/5104 0.00 1.31 196213 CK 214/04 è~Î!AGER 08-03 032883 VO 321111.0 1/7/04 0.00 1,791.87 196214 CK 214/04 ~8HR.t!'-CHRIST1NE L 08-03 032884 va 530135-8 1/6104 0.00 46.21 196215 CK 215104 ~18~~DSSTARGROUP 08-03 033252 va HIG0205 215104 0.00 16,000.00 Date: TIme: Use, T ,"y, Februal)' 05. 2004 o. fM KATHY East Vall )vater District Check Register. Standard Periods: DHJ3 Through 0~3 A5 of: 2/5/04 Page: Report: Company: \01 12 ~__"6.rpt EVWD Check Nbr Amount Paid Check Check Type Date Dce Type Involea Number Involea Dele Discount Taken Check Count: 484,736.04 Vendor ID Vendor Name ----.---- Period To Post Closed Ref Nbr 145 A<:ct Sub 7otel: Check Type Count Amount Paid Regular 143 707,391.75 Hand 0 0.00 Void 1 -222,655.71 Slob 0 0.00 Zero 1 0.00 Mask 0 0.00 Total: 145 484,736.04 Compeny Disc Totel 122.55 Company Total 484,738.04 '1. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ".- GMID 350 W. 5th Street, Suite 201 San Bernardino, CA 92401 Phone: (909) 889-4480 Fax: (909) 384-9034 Email: genmail@grnidgroup.com A rnergerof Gary W. Miller Architect & Associates, Inc. and Interdesign To: Bob Martin Date: 1/29/2004 Company: EVWD Project: Fax#: 909-383-1481 Pages Included 4 EVWD 031162 CC: Paul Dolter DATE DESCRIPTION 1/27/2004 LEED Costs ".- Remarks: Please provide copies to ail parties. Thanks Signed: ".- '!J eß-T-r¡'b J1 CVT'-«W;;¡- Copy To: File ARCHITECTURE. PLANNING. INTERIORS January 27, 2004 East Valley Water District ( EVWD ) 1155 Del Rosa Ave San Bemardino CA 92410 Re: EVWD Administration Building Cost for LE.E.D. certification In pursuing LEED's Certification or one of the three designations, it would increase the cost of the over all construction as well as consultant fees. However, there would be no delay at this stage of the design in order to register the project. The review is done throughout the process with the assistance of a LEED's consultant. Final review of the project is done at the end during substantial completion. We would have to include as par'. of the design team a LEED consultant who would work with the designers to incorporate all feasible components that would insure the proper credits needed in getting one of the designations. Our best estimation on the construction cost increase would be 10-20% more due to the strict adherence to specifications, methods of construction, materials and administration involved in . documenting the process. A closer analysis would have to be conducted on each category and individual points to determine the cost increase and the feasibility. Some examples of increases are: 1. For Sustainable sites, we would have to install 3% of the parking stalls with an electric vehicle charging station which will cost approximately $2,500.00 each. 2. In Energy and Atmosphere, credit 1.1 through 1.5 additional points can be acquired by lowering the Title 24 requirements 20%, 30% giving us 2 points, 3 points up to 10 points. These points are possible by reducing the illumination levels and installing 'T5' lamps or up grading the system with automatic dimming near windows, increasing the cost to $1 to $2 square foot, with an increase of $3.00 a square foot. The pay back for the upgrades might not be seen. 3. The renewable energy of 5% or greater could be attained with solar panels with a considerable cost and no real pay back over the life of the system. 4. Indoor Environmental Quality, controllability of systems at the perimeter would impact the mechanical system cost with individual controls or zones but a very minimal increase for electrical. This cost is difficult to assess without further study of the different systems available and desired by the Client. These are just some examples of areas that will effect the construction cost of the project. Many others will have to be analyzed with the assistance of the LEED's consultant to determine if they are available for this project. The LEED's consultant would assist the design team by preparing an energy model, helping to select materials that would give us points, assist with contractor selection (having the right contractor with LEED experience is important), submit and assemble the docUments, assist in specification writing and collecting the required documents from the contractor. Their role would MID 350 WEST 5TH STREET, SUITE 201, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401 909/889-4480 FAX 909/384-9034 CALIFORNIA, NEVADA, UTAH ,-- be to review the project for a sustainable green building first The costs associated from a LEE D's consultant could range from $50,000.00 for Silver, $65,000.00 for Gold and $100,000.00 for a Platinum designation. There is a registration fees of approximately $2,500.00. An additional cost will be incurred for a consultant performing the commissioning of the building systems which is required. This fee could range from $25,000.00 to $75,000.00 depending on the designation. The soft cost of going LEED certified or acquiring one of the designations could be $100,000.00 just in LEED consultants, not including additional design fees from the other consultants. The attached check list indicates the items that we have or might be incorporating into the design of the project. The accumulated points are 17 and the questionable additional points are 18, with a possible total of 35. To have the building certified, we need 26-32 points, for silver we need 33- 36 points and for platinum 52-69 points. Some of the additional items will have to be reviewed with a LEE D's certified consultant to determine if those points are still available or if we qualify to receive them. SI erely, ~~ Geo e Marqu GMID ,-- ,-- GMID 350 WEST 5TH STREET, SUITE 201, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401 909/889-4480 FAX 909/384-9034 CALIFORNIA, NEVADA, UTAH VOl ? No l:IEL ,.-r " VOl ? No ~ - :¡ " ' ..::.. - ,", )( ;¡ J( J( ;¡ " X X X ;: V.. ? No prereq 1 Creda 1.1 Credt 1.2 Credt 1.3 Creda 2.1 Credt 2.2 Creda 3.1 Creda 3.2 Credt 4.1 Creda 4.2 Credt 5.1 credit 52 Credt 6 Credt 7 prereq 1 Pre!8q 2 Credt 1 Credit 2 Credt 3.1 Credit 3.2 Credit 4. 1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 CredIt 4.4 CreditS Credit 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 Credit 7.2 Credit 6.1 creä~ 6.2 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Building Reuse, Maintain 75% of Existing Shell Building Reuse, Maintain 100% of Shell Building Reuse, Maintain 100% Shell & 50% Non-Shell Construction Waste Management, Divert 50% Construction Waste Management, Divert 75% Resource Reuse, Specify 5% Resource Reuse, Specify 10% Recycled Content, Specify 5% (post-consumer + Yo post-industrla~ Recycled Content, Specify 10% (post-consumer + Yo post-industrial) LocallRegional Materials, 20% Manufactured Locally LocallRegional Materials, of 20% Above, 50% Harvested Locally Rapidly Renewable Materials Certified Wood Minimum IAQ Perfonnance Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring Ventilation Effectiveness Construction IAQ Management Plan, During Construction Construction IAQ Management Plan, Before Occupancy Low-Emitting Materials, Adhesives & Sealants Low-Emitting Materials, Paints Low-Emitting Materials, Carpet Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Wood & Agrlfiber Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control Controllability of Systems, Perimeter Controllability of Systems, Non-Perimeter Thennal Comfort, Comply with ASHRAE 55-1992 Thennal Comfort, Permanent Monitoring System Daylight & Views, Daylight 75% of Spaces Daylight & Views, Views for 90% of Spaces Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Required Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ITr I ? No ~élL~iá~t~;';iJ;~.£(~3il~ll~.~KII!j~!~~j!',';;~ è),"':":':".:',,::;, ,~, ..l.~:.~ Certified 26-32 points Silver 33-35 points Gold 39-51 points PlaUnum 52.69 points Creda1.1 Credit 1.2 Crecf~ 1.3 Credt 1.4 Credt 2 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title LEEDTM Accredited Professional U.S. Green Building Council LEED Checklist LEEDTM Green Building Rating System 2.1 .~. .~. :':.<1 . '::: .:~ :') Version 2.1 Registered Project Checklist "~. ,....u...,......................".u... EVWD Administration Building San Bernardino, CA ,--- Yes ? No []."I r-- !{ ¡¡ ::. X ,. ¡{ ;¡ Yes ? No []."I ~I Yes ? No []."I ....,... 'v - - x )( x .'. ,. :: ,--- Prereq 1 Credftl Credft 2 Credft 3 Credft 4.1 Credft 4.2 Credft 4.3 Credft 4.4 CredltS.1 CredftS2 Credft 6.1 Credlt 6.2 Credft7.1 Credft 7.2 Credft 8 Erosion & Sedimentation Control Site Selection Urban Redevelopment Brownfield Redevelopment Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms Alternative Transportation, Altemative Fuel Vehicles Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity and Carpooling Reduced Site Disturbance, Protect or Restore Open Space Reduced Site Disturbance, Development Footprint Stormwater Management, Rate and Quantity Stormwater Management, Treatment Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands, Non-Roof Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands, Roof Light Pollution Reduction Required 1 . .,', ,?~ .~---_._--_..._..-- Water Efficient landscaping, Reduce by 50% Water Efficient landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation Innovative Wastewater Technologies Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction ; , > Fundamental Building Systems Commissioning Minimum Energy Performance CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment Optimize Energy Performance Renewable Energy, 5% Renewable Energy, 10% Renewable Energy, 20% Additional Commissioning Ozone Depletion Measurement & Verification Green Power Required Required Required 110 10 Credftl.1 CI'edlt12 CI'edlt 2 Credit 3.1 Credit 32 .. . ~. prereq 1 prereq 2 prereq 3 Credft 1 ){ CI'edlt 2.1 Credft 2.2 Credft 2.3 Credft 3 Credft 4 Credit S Credft 6 U.S. Green Building Council LEED Checklist LEEDTM Green Building Rating System 2.1 -- "'II , . r- r- Green Building Costs and Finandal Benefits by Gregory H. Kats Sponsors Barr Foundation Environmental Business Council of New England, Inc. Equity Office Properties Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Massport r- In cooOperation with The City of Boston Green Buildings Task Force Greater Boston Real Estate Board Boston Sodety of Architects Western Massachusetts AIA Green Roundtable & Developers Roundtable Northeast Sustainable Energy Assodation Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce Real Estate Finance Assodation Health Care without Harm Springfield Chamber of Commerce New Ecology Inc. The Massachusetts Technology Collaborative is the state's development agency for renewable energy and the innovation economy. The agency adtninisters the Renewable Energy Trust, wlúch is maximizing the benefits of clean energy and helping to create jobs for the Commonwealth by stimulating new supply and demand for green power. The Trost was created in 1998 through the electric restructuring law and is funded through a monthly surcharge on electric utility bills. For more information, please visit the agency's website www.rnasstech.org. Captions for co.., photos (top to bollam) Th.j.F. Williams F.d.ral Building in Boston includ.. 30 kW ofsoiar photol'O/taics Qnd Q 75 kW cogen.ration syslem. Through Qn MTC gront, 0 dolQ acquisition system has "'en installed otlhe s/le to monitor the produClÌon Qnd SD.in8' of these systems. Artislsfor HumQnity is building 0 new focility in the Fort Point Channel district of Bonon to house ils ortseducotion programs. The building has been designed to reduce energy use by 65% Qnd to includ. significant daylighting and other green buildingpotutes. Up to 100% of remaining energy needs will be met by the installation of 45 kW of solar photol'O/toicsftmded by MTc. In its rede.elopment Qf Qn hlstaric mill buiiding QS Q mixed-use office and commel<ÎQI focility, AltemQti... Unlimited has focused on the design of green building Qnd energy efficiency fiQtu", that will best meet ""cupant needs The copstone of this project will be th. restoration of 0 hydropowor SJlnem In Whitin",ille's Mumford Ri.., Qdja"ntto the mill to pro.idethe facility's electricity. r-- Published in USA for Massachusetts Technoiogy Collaborative CJ Copyright 2003 -- CREEI~ BUILDING COSTS AND FINANCIAl. BENEFITS Greg I(ats, Capital E INTRODUC1IDN Massachusetts is a leading state in the rapidly growing green building movement. Buildings consume 70% of the nation's electricity and a large part of the materials, water and waste used and generated in our economy. Buildings have traditionally been viewed as a relatively static sector of the economy experiencing relatively little change in technology or resource consumption patterns. To date there has been a widespread perception that green buildings- though more attractive from an environmental -- The Woods Hole Resl!tJn;/r Conter "",I""d a lolal of$soo, 000 in MTC owords Ia insla1/26.4 kW of solar photovollaic< ond a 100 kW wind turbine 01 the site of ils new hl!tJdquortors. Combined wilh Innovallve ,n,rgy effici,ncy moosures and hlgh-p'iformonce design, thes, renewables 11'11/ help Woods Hole ochl"", ils goal of a 'Z,ro En'rgy" facility, producing more energy thon il consumes. Pictured here, Ihe Ordway Building. and health perspective-are substantially more costly than conventional design and may not be justified from a cost benefits perspective. This perception has been the single largest obstacle to the more widespread adoption of green design. This paper reviews a major recent report on the issue of green building costs benefits, "The Costs and Benefits of Green Buildings," Kats' et at., October 2003' (the Report). Led by Capital E, the Report was prepared in partnership with the US Green Building Council and California's Sustainable Building Task Force for 40+ California state agencies. WHAT ARE GREEN aul LDI NGS:' "Green" or "sustainable" buildings use key resources like energy, water, materials, and land more efficiently than buildings that are just built to code. With more natural light and better air quality, green buildings typically contribute to improved employee and student health, comfort, and productivity. The United States Green Building Council (USGBC), a national non-profit membership organization, developed the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) System" to provide a guideline and rating system for green buildings. It is generally recognized that buildings consume a Large portion of water, wood, energy, and other resources used in the economy. For example, US buildings alone are responsible for more CO" emissions than those of any other entire country in the world except China.' If building green is cost effective, a broad shift to green construction offers a potentially promising way to help address a range of challenges facing Massachusetts, including: . Address growing costs of transmission and distribution congestion. The growth of Time of Use rates (TOU) by Massachusetts utilities, and the creation of congestion pricing in the form of locational marginal pricing' allows building owners to capture some of the benefits associated with lower overall and lower peak energy use in green buildings 1 The ..tho, " "'unding Prindpal of Capital E. a natlo",l clean technology deployment and '"'tlgy Arm. M,. Kals se"",d .om 1'9' to '001" the DÜector of "",ndng "" the $1.1 blWon dollar Office of energy Effidency and Renewable Energy at the US Departlnent of Enlrgy . the ~rgest dean technology '&0 and deploymenlprogram in the US. He I, Chair of the Energy And Atmosphere Technfcal AdvfsoryGroup "'r lEED and ,,~es on the lEED St..ri" Commi.... , "The Co'~ and 8eneA~ or Green 8ui~lng'.. A Report to CaU"'"ia', Sustainable Building T"k Fore. October ze003. Prindpal author Greg Ka~, For fun te" and summary ,lidos see WWW.cap-e.com -- 3 Kinzey ".l. "The Fed"aI8uf~lng' '..ouch and O."lopment Pro,ram, A Sha", Tool for Qimate Policy," '00' ACEEE p,oceedin". Section '.21. 4 "" http,//www,;'o'ne."m/iso_new5/S.D_Re~ren"_Gufde/OUo"tlo",I_.argln'LPridng_ClMP .pdf -- II Reduce or slow rise in electricity and gas prices through expanded green construction and building retrofits and reduced energy demand' .. Help cut pollution from fossil fuels (Massachusetts fuel mix includes 28% coal as of 1999 - US DOE) including fine particulates in urban areas .. Help Massachusetts meet EPA mandated emissions reductions targets II Improve quality of educational environment and improve school test scores '" Enhance competitiveness by providing work and living environments characterized by superior health and comfort and work environments How MUCH MORE DO GREEN BUilDINGS COST? -- Green buildings are commonly perceived to be a lot more expensive than conventional buildings and often not worth the extra cost. For example, an early 2003 article in the New York Times was entitled "Not Building Green Is Called a Matter of Economics." In order to determine the cost of building green compared to conventional design, several dozen building representatives and architects were contacted to secure the cost of 33 green buildings from across the United States compared to conventional designs for those same buildings. The average premium for these green buildings is slightly less than 2%, or $3-S/ft', substantially lower than is commonly perceived (See Figure 1). The majority of this cost is due to the increased architectural and engineering (A&E) design time, modeling costs and time necessary to integrate sustainable building practices into projects. Generally, the earlier green building features are incorporated into the design process, the lower the cost. -- The cost of green design has dropped in the last few years as the number of green buildings has risen. The trend of declining costs associated with increased experience in green building construction has been experienced in Pennsylvania, as well as in Portland and Seattle, Portland's three reported and completed LEED Silver buildings were finished in 1995, 1997, and 2000. They incurred cost premiums of 2%,1% and 0% respectively. Seattle has seen the cost of LEED Silver buildings drop from 3-4% several years ago to 1-2% today. Figurel Average Green Cost Premium vs.level of Green Certification for Offices and Schools 7.00% 6.50% 6.00% J ï 5.00% .!! 14.00% "'I ð 3.00% 2.00% ""'n 1.00% 0.66~é 0.00% Level 1 Certified (8bldgs) Level 2 Level 3 Sliver Gold (18 bldgs) (6 bldgs) 5ou",:USGB~Ca l1taIE!naiysb Level 4 Platinum (1 bldg) GREEN BUlrOINCS FIN~.NCIAL BENOFITS Green Buildings provide financial benefits that conventional buildings do not. These benefits include energy and water savings, reduced waste, improved indoor environmental quality, greater employee comfort/productivity, reduced employee health costs and lower operations and maintenance costs. This paper will focus an two of these benefits: lower energy costs, and health and productivity benefits. s s.. fin ""mple. '1mp"b of E",gy Efflómy and Renewable Ene<gy on 'a">at Gas ."keb'. Elliott et aL, AC"~ Sept 2003. S..: http,¡¡ace...oo¡ ,...- Energy Energy is a substantial and widely recognized cost of building operations that can be reduced through energy efficiency and related measures that are part of green building design. The average annual cost of energy in Massachusetts buildings is approximately $2.00/ft'. On average, green buildings use 30% less energy than conventional buildings-a reduction, for a 100,000 ft'state office building, worth $60,000 per year, with a 2O-year present value of expected energy savings at a 5% real discount rate worth about three quarters of a million dollars, -- A detailed review of 60 LEED rated buildings, demonstrates that green buildings, when compared to conventional buildings, are: II On average 25-30% more energy efficient II Characterized by even lower electricity peak consumption . More likely to generate renewable energy on-site III More likely to purchase grid power generated from renewable energy sources (green power and/or tradable renewable certificates) Figure 2 Reduced Energy Use in Green Buildings as Compared with Conventional Buildings (errified Siiyer Gold Average 16% JO% m, 2i1~<. 0% 0% 4% 2% 10% 0% 7% 6% 28% 30% 48% 36% ¡nerg7 b~;d""y (¡¡baYE \!."d,,'d code) On-Site Renewable Energy GreeaP.",' Total Source: USGS" Capital E Analysls -- Green building energy savings primarily come from reduced electricity purchases and secondarily from reduced peak energy demand. On average, green buildings are 28% more efficient than conventional buildings and generate 2% of their power on-site from photovoltaics (PV). (See Figure 2.) The financial benefits of 30% reduced consumption at an electricity price of $O,08/kWh are about $0.30/ft'/yr, with a 20-year NPV of over $5/ft', equal to or more than the average additional cost associated with building green. " r.~ i.i: ". , :~;1. The Gonzyme Corporølion's fllcently completed office in Cambridge is 0 ",orld-c/o.. eXJJmplo of g",en building construction, including odiionced doylighling and !hem/ot technologies. In addition Ie 0 photo.oltoic Installation Júndod by MTC, one of the most prominentjiotu",s Is 0 combinod helioSlOlond reflecti.e ponel system designed to chonnei daylight deep inta the 8-story building. The environmental and health costs associated with air pollution caused by non-renewable electric power generation and on-site fossil fuel use are generally externalized (not considered) when making investment decisions. The larger Report this paper draws from quantifies two of these benefits: the value of peak power reduction and the value of emissions reductions associated with the energy strategies integrated into green building design. The Report calculates these additional financial benefits are equal to about one third of that provided by energy savings alone. ,,--. Productivity and health There is growing recognition of the Large health and productivity costs imposed by poor indoor environmental quality (lEa) in commerdal buildings-estimated variously at up to hundreds of billions of dollars per year. This is not surprising as people spend 90% of their time indoors, and the concentration of pollutants indoors is typically higher than outdoors, sometimes by as much as 10 or even 100 times,' r- The relationship between worker comfort/pro- ductivity and building design/operation is com- plicated. There are thousands of studies, reports and articles on the subject that find sig- nificantly reduced mness symptoms, reduced absenteeism and increases in perceived produc- tivity over workers in a group that lacked these features.' For example, two studies of over 11,000 workers in 107 European buildings ana- lyzed the health effect of worker-controlled tem- perature and ventilation. The Report relies in large part on recent meta-studies that have screened tens or hundreds of other studies and have evaluated and synthesized their findings. Following are some relevant attributes common in green buildings that promote healthier work environments: . On average 25-30% more energy effident . Much lower source emissions from measures such as better siting (e.g., avoiding locating air intakes next to outlets, such as parking garages, and avoiding redrcuLation), and better building material source controls (e.g., required attention to storage). Certified and Silver level green buildings achieved 55'10 and Gold level LEED buildings achieved 88% of possible tEED credits for use of the following:' less toxic materials, low-emitting adhesives & sealants, paints, carpets, and composite woods, and indoor chemical & pollutant source controL Urba" Edge is d..o1opi"g a pio"oori"g "omplo of groO" buildi"g oppor"mi. Ii.. i" affordoblo housi"g. Through a" MTC gro"~ tho no"-profil will i"slal/ 63 kW of solar photovoltoics 011110 "OW Eglosto" erossi"g do""lopm..1 i" Jamaica Plai" a"d Roxbury. This i"slal/alia", i" cambi"alio" with mulliplo O"orgy officio"cr moasu,"" will ...duco Iho projoa's oloclrichy "oods by So%. . Significantly better lighting quality including: more daylighting (half of 21 LEED green buildings reviewed provide daylighting to at least 75% of building space'), better daylight harvesting and use of shading, greater occupancy control over light levels and less glare . Generally improved thermal comfort and better ventiLation-espedaily in buildings that use underfloor air for space conditioning . Commissioning, use of measurement and verification, and CO2 monitoring to ensure better performance of systems such as ventilation, heating and air conditioning Measuring the exact finandal impact of healthier, more comfortable and greener buildings is 6 us Envf..nm,""l P""c.on Ag.ney, "Indoor Ajr Oualfty," Janua,\, 6. 2003. Avanabl. at http'lIwww.epa.gov/faqf. 'Judith H...'..gon, 'S"talnabl.Oosign Can Be an Asletto th. Bottom LIne . "pand.d intemet edi.on," Envf,onmen"ID.'¡gn&Co"'tN<'ion. Posted D7/15fO2. Availablo at http://WWW.odcmag.eom/CDA/Artjelolnfonoa.on/featu,,,/BNP _leatulOL!t.m/D,4120,80724,00.htmL BCapitalEana\l'Sis ,IUSGBC da"(basod on analysis ,fp,inls actualty achieved in bui~!ng perfo,mance data submitted "'U5GBC). No"mb..and D"""be, 2DD2. Fo, more detail ,n achievable ,"'u<'ions I"m some 01 the.. indoo, omissi,", sou~... ple... Ie" Hodgson AT. .Common I.doo' Source"fV'la.LeOrganicC,mpound" Emi"lon5Rat"..dTechniqueslorRoduci.gConsumerExposure,," U.lversity,ICalifo"la.Lawrence ,.....Ley NationaL Lab,..",,\,. 1999. Prep<red 10, CaöFo"ia A!r Resourc.. Board. ,,-- Av,liable at, http:/fwww.arb.ca.gov/re..a~h/ap'/past/indo".htm#Tox!"'20Ai"'2DContaminIOU. , C"ltal E mLyris 01 U5G" data. Novlmb.. and Dmmb.. 2002. ,.-- difficult. The costs of poor indoor environmental and air quality-including higher absenteeism and increased respiratory ailments, allergies and asthma-are hard to measure and have generally been "hidden" in sick days, lower productivity, unemployment insurance and medical costs, However, four of the attributes assodated with green building design-increased ventilation contro~ increased temperature control, increased lighting control and increased daylighting-have been positively and significantly correlated with increased productivity. Increases in tenant control over ventilation, temperature and lighting each provide measured benefits from 0.5% up to 34%, with average measured workforce productivity gains of 7.1% with lighting control, 1.B% with ventilation contro~ and 1.2% with thermal control. Additionally, significant measured improvements have been found with increased daylighting, ,.-- There are also quantifiable green building gains in attracting and retaining a committed. workforce-an aspect beyond the scope of the Report. Attracting and retaining the best employees can be linked to the quality of benefits that workers receive, including the physica~ environmental and technological workplace. Green buildings are designed to be healthier and more enjoyable working environments. Workplace qualities that improve the environment of knowledge workers may also reduce stress and lead to longer lives for multi- disdplinary teams. LEED rated buildings all address some combination of measures that help reduce the pollutants that cause sickness and increase health care costs; improve quality of lighting and increase use of daylighting; and increase tenant control and comfort. LEED Green buildings consistently include a range of material, design and operation measures that directly improve human health and productivity. Gold and Platinum level LEED buildings are more comprehensive in applying IEQ-related measures and therefore should be viewed as providing larger productivity and health benefits than Certified or Silver level green buildings. Given the studies and data reviewed above, the Report recommends attributing a 1% productivity and health gain to Certified and Silver level buildings and a 1,5% gain to Gold and Platinum level buildings. These percentages are at the low end of the range of productivity gains for each of the individual spedfic building measures- ventilation, thermal contro~ light control and daylighting-analyzed above. They are consistent with or well below the range of additional studies reviewed in the Report. '.. -.---. ...-. ""...., , .. J Th. Blackston. "ail.y Vacalianal R.gianal School Dislricl is planning an ambilious Bo,ooo squa"'fool addition 10 aceommada" four now .oeolional programs, and will ",no.al. Ih. <XÎsling building which has sam. srs"ms lIIal da" back 10 Ih. '960" Daylighling will b, accomplish.d in this praj.cI by using lighllUb. uchnalogy, which will sa... am 500 kWa y.ar. Oth.,.ffici.ncy m,"sum includ. .ffici..1 aircandilioning .quipm.nl and ""riabl. spud dri...sforlh. air handling unil. Th. school will also incorpora" pholo.olloic pon./s mounl.d on III. roof and a solof thmnal dam.sUc wo"r preheating sys"m. ,.-- r- A 1% increase in productivity (equal to about 5 minutes per working day) is equal to $600 to $700 per employee per year, or $3/ft' per year. A 1.5 % increase in productivity (or a little over 7 minutes each working day) is equal to about $1000 per year, or $4 to $5/ft' per year. Over 20 years and at a 5% real discount rate, the present value of the productivity benefits is about $35/ft' for Certified and Silver level buildings, and $55/ft' for Gold and Platinum level buildings. The relatively large impact of productivity and health gains reflects the fact that the direct and indirect cost of employees is far larger than the cost of construction or energy. Consequently, even small changes in productivity and health translate into large financial benefits. Assuming a longer building operational life, such as 30 or 40 years, would result in substantially larger benefits. It is worth noting that: r- " Nearly one-fifth of Massachusetts' population spend their day inside schools " Only 43% of high-volume chemicals have been tested for potential human toxicity, and only 7'10 have been tested for their effect on children's development ~ " Asthma is the leading cause of admission of urban children into hospitals and the leading cause of days absent from school U Green building improvements-especially for new buildings-appear to be very cost effective compared with other available measures to enhance student performance. Under the recently adopted Federal Education sm, schools and states stand to lose billions of dollars in federal funding if students do not perform well on annual standardized tests. School and university systems should consider adopting whole building green design at the tEED Gold level or corresponding MASS-CHP scoring as a standard requirement in new school design and school retrofits. ,;.i.ii';:Z-;~~':: ,,"M . .":..... .. ",.. d~:~f~~'" ;~~ "..... . -.'.-"" fii-;~~ ,,' The MITRE Corporalion h de..loplng one.. state.o¡.the.art CQmpus center at its Sedfordfacility to be built according 10 a comprehensive energy plan and ".en building slDndard~ With assistanco from an MTC granl, the project ..ill ;"'arporate 16.5 kW of rooftop photovolta;cs and 12.5 kW of advancod "'mi.lrans' parent solar photovolta;c pan", installed on a co".red walkway. 10 Philip llndri", et ., .En,ico,m,,'" PoU,"nts "d Dim" 'n Ameri", Child,,", ".mot" of mo,bidlty. 'o,"'ity. .nd Costs of lud Po;,o,'", A.ltllm., Cln", Ind Developm.."1 Disobm..... En~"'nment.l H..lth P"'pec~ves, Volume 110. N,mb" 7. J,'y !DO2. A..I~ble It http,ffehpoet1.,'ehs.,'h.,ovfdocsf2002f1 Qp'21."8Ia,dri,.nf.b.t~'t.html 11 Ibid. r- ,.-- OVERALL COSTS AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS ,.-- Green Buildings provide financial benefits that conventional buildings do not. As indicated in Figure 3 below, the Report concluded that financial benefits of green design are between $50 and $70 per square foot in a LEED building, over 10 times the additional cost associated with building green. The financial benefits are in lower energy, waste and water costs, lower environmental and emissions costs, and lower operational and maintenance costs and increased productivity and health. Massachusetts already has established national leadership in green buildings, including achieving the first gold rated federal building (at EPA's Chelmsford Lab), and is well positioned to build on this. Doing so will involve developing policies that allow green buildings to capture the financial value of benefits associated with green design. Although this issue is beyond the scope of this paper, two disparate examples are worth noting: . Accelerated permissioning for the Manulife Financial Headquarters building in South Boston U resulting from the perceived benefits associated from its green design suggests one way to make these links more clearly. " An expected shift from zonal to nodal pricing system for load and generation pricing is a step towards allowing more accurate mapping of real cost into price signals that might allow green buildings to better capture the financial benefits resulting from green construction. The benefits of building green include cost savings from reduced energy, water, and waste; lower operations and maintenance costs; and enhanced occupant productivity and health. As Figure 3 indicates, the total financial benefits of green buildings are over ten times the average initial investment required to design and construct a green building. Despite data limitations and the need for additional research in various areas, the data demonstrates that building green is cost-effective today, particularly for those projects which.start "green" design early in the process. Figure 3 Financial Benefits of Green Buildings Summary of FinÖlngs (per tt2) (otegory Energy Savings EmissionsSovings WalerSavings Operations and Maintenance Savings Productivity and Health Benefits Subtotal Average Extra Cost of Building Green Tot.! 20-1'" Net Benefit 20-ye.. Ne! Present Value $5.80 $120 $050 $8.50 $36.90 to $SSJO $S2.% to 571.30 (-3.0010-$5.00) ¡IOta $65 I I I I -1 Source: Capital EAnalysls ,.-- 12 See, ht~"/www.b"k","d".d..m,".com/pub/'_91/comm"ti'V18S 2J. .htm[ -- -- WWW.MASSTECH.ORG IIR M,.ð.,.,S!\CHU:iETTS TELHNGt.OC'f co!. c¡.\!30RATIVE RENEWABLE ENERC'1 TRU~T MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATIVE 75 NORTH DRIVE, WESTBOROUGH, MA 01581 508.870.0312 FAX.508.898.9226 WWW.MASSTECH.ORG -- I"".".," ;. ,. ~. I ~I . .1 i I ; .I 'I . . I Bk~.&J21 ;: .Environmental Certainty . Though the" LEED rating sy¡¡tem does not certify products, third-party certification programs may offer a solution for selecting environmental building materials. The Leadership in Energy and Environmenral Desjgn (LEED"') . Green Building Rating System certifies buildings, not products. The products and materials that are' used in designing and constructing a project can only cotltribute to earning LEED points. However, some LEED points are dependent upon third-party certificatiol1 or proving equivalence to a given Standard. For example, in LEED For New Con- struction & Major Renovations (NC), Version 2.1, n Materials and Resources credit may be achie~ed with Certified Wood. The Mjng system states, "Use a minimum of 50 percent of wood-based materials and productS. certified in accordance With the Forest Steward- ship Council's Principles and Criteria. for wood building components..:' The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) promotes responsible forest man- agement globally by certifying forest products. The FSC (www.fscus.org) says its standards encour- age environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial and eco- nomically viable man- agement of the world's . forests. A LEED Environmental Quality point can be achieved for Low-Emitting Mate- rials: Paints and Coatings. LEED requires that "vac emissions from paints and coatings must Mt exceed the vac and chemical component Hmits of Green Seal's Standard GS-ll requirements." Green Seal (wwwgreanseal.org) is an independent, non-profit organizadon that strives to achieve á healthier and cleaner l environment bv identi- fying and pr¿moting products and services that cause less toxic pollution and waste. conseIVe resources and habitatS. and minimize global warm- /J. FSC 26s Environmental¡:¡.sign+C,'tIstrJotion iog and ozone depletiO1~. Among the tools Green Seal uses are product certification, purchasing guidance and policy recom- mendations. Another LEED point can be achieved' for Low-Emitting Materials by specifying ca'l'et systems that meet or exceed the requirements of the Càrpet and Rug . Institute's Green I) L,b,l '.d." A" Qualitv Test Pro- life. gram, The C~rpet & Rug InstItute . (CR!) "Green Labe]" . Testing Programs (www.carpet-rug.com) offer informa~on for selec~ng carpet, cushion and adhesive materials. The program iden~fies low- emit~ng products by requiring represen- tative product samples. to meet scientifically established standards. In the Sustainable Sites section of LEED, a point can be earned for reduc- ing the Heat Island Effect: Roof. It is at. . noted in LEED: . "Use ENERGY ~. STAR camp ¡- I! ant AND high . emissivity roof- ing for a minimum of 75 percent of the roof surface; aR install a "green" (vege- tated) roof for at least 50 percent of the rooF area..." ENERGY STAR (www. energystar.gov) is a government-backed program promodng energy efficiency. Another LEED point can be achieved for Green Power by providing at least 50 percent of the building's electricity from renewable sources by eng-.ging in at least a two-year renewable energy contract. Renewable so!,rees are as defined by the . Center for Resource Soludons Green-e (www.green'e.org) products certification requirements. According to the LEED rating systom, "Green power is derived from solar. wil1d. geothermal. biomass or low. impact hydro sources. Green power may be procured trom a Green.e certi- fied power marketer. a Green-e accredit- ed utility prugrarn. through Green-e July I August 2003 '" certified.Tradable Renewable Certifi. cates, or from.a supply that meetS the Green-e renewable power definition." ii, Additional Resources Environmenral and health Claims can be certified or reviewed by other third. party certification systems or organiza' ~ons such as: Scientific Certification Systems . (www.scsl.comj is ....SCS a certi.fier of multi- .-: pIe Facets; the 'OINTVIC"","""""""""'" e nviro nm en ta I division certifies Claims related to envi. ronmental achievement in product man- ufacturing. Specific product attributes, such as recycled content and biodegrad. ability. are certified under the Environ' mental Claims.Certification program. SCS also certifies Environmentally Preferable Products. In its Forest Can. servation Program, SCS audits Forest management prac~ces and then cerdFies defined forest areas as "wen managed" under the FSC's Principles and Criteria. SCS also offers an EnvironmentaJly Preferable Electlicity Program. The GREENGUARD (www.green- guard.org) Environmental Institute is a ~ global, non-profit ~. . J organization with a scientific, third- .. party board to estab- lish and test environmental standards for low-emitting indoor products and building materials. GreenSpec is BuildingGreen's (www.buildinggreen.com) product infor- mation service. It contains detailed list- ings fat more than 1,700 green building ~ products ~ with envi- ronmental data and manufacturer infor. madon. ED+C " ,;. This inform.tion w", cumpi!cd 1" Michelle Clark Hucal, editor of ED+C. For more information. vi,it the LEED Web site at www.usgbc.org. www.EDCmag.com i I I ~ AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN ,,-- EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. FOR PERCHLORATE ASSESSMENT AND ACTION PLAN East Valley Water District (District) and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) entered into an Agreement dated November 5,2003 (Agreeement No. 2003.13) for professional engineering services in connection with the initial assessment of perchlorate contanùnation in the groundwater at nine groundwater wells. This Agreement was executed in the amount of $25,000. Amendment No.1 will add the development of an implementation plan of the treatment solutions developed as part of the original agreement. The contract value will be increased by Amendment No.1 by $65,000 (Sixty Five Thousand and 00/100) to a revised total of $90,000 (Ninety Thousand and 00/100). Accordingly, the above parties hereby agree that the scope of work to be modified as follows: 1. Exhibit A - Scope of Work - The scope of work to be conducted under this exhibit shall be modified to include the following tasks: r- Task 8 - Assessment of Blending vs. Treatmentfor Nitrates. CDM will identify the necessary transmission, pumping, and treatment facilities to lower nitrate concentrations at wells exceeding the current MCL by either blending with low nitrate water or by treatment using Ion Exchange resins. The estimated cost of these facilities will be developed at a level of detail sufficient to assist the District with the selection of a preferred alternative. As part of this task, CDM will determine the availability of existing pipelines to convey raw water to the treatment location or the need to construct new facilities. The results of this facility assessment and cost analysis will be summarized in a technical memorandum including recommendations for implementation. Task 9 - Assessment of Getaway Capaeity. CDM will evaluate existing system facilities in the vicinity of potential treatment plant locations to determine whether the product water can be conveyed by existing facilities or if new transmission lines will be needed. Task 10 - Distribution System Analysis. CDM will develop a skeletonized model of the water system facilities in the Lower, Intermediate, and Upper pressure zones. This model will be used to evaluate transmission sizing and potential alignment alternatives for the necessary improvements to convey the product water from the treatment location(s) to existing reservoirs in the Intermediate and Upper pressure zones. CDM will estimate current water demands by pressure zone from billing information to be provided by the District. Ultimate demands will be estimated from parcel and land use information to be obtained from the wastewater master plan. ,,-- The skeletonized model will be developed using H.°Map modeling software and will contain all production plants in these three zones and the main transmission facilities between zones. The Page 1 of3 r- District will provide monthly production infonnation for each facility that will be used to estimate maximum demands in the system. In addition, the District will provide copies of SCE pumping test for all wells and pump stations in these zones as well as reservoir elevation and sizing parameters. Based on the infonnation available, water demands (current and ultimate) may be segregated by pressure zone and evenly distributed throughout each zone. The results of the hydraulic analysis will be documented in a technical memorandum. Task 11 - Manufacturer Coordination: CDM will develop a list of potential manufacturers to be contracted to implement perchlorate and/or nitrate treatment systems at each site. CDM will develop perfonnance specifications for nitrate and perchlorate removal for each site for distribution to identified manufactures. CDM will meet with manufactures to discuss the details of their implementation plan, cost of implementation. and schedule for completion. Task 12 - Other Agency Coordination: CDM will meet with other agencies as required as part of the implementation of the perchlorate and/or nitrate removal facilities. CDM will attend up to three meetings with other agencies. Task 13 -Implementation Plan: CDM will develop an implementation plan that addresses foreseeable processes leading up to the operation of perchlorate and/or nitrate treatment facilities. The implementation plan will include: . Proposed perchlorate and/or nitrate treatment plans . Necessary alterations to system flow and/or infrastructure r- . Detailed time schedule . Construction cost estimate for each component . Management structure 2. Exhibit B - Rate Schedule - The rate schedule under the original contract shall remain the same. The cost breakdown for the additional tasks included under Exhibit A is presented in the attached table. 3. Exhibit C - Activity Schedule - The following deliverables should be included under this exhibit. . Blending vs. Treatment Technical Memorandum - 45 days from Authorization to Proceed with Amendment No.1 . Hydraulic Analysis Technical Memorandum - 45 days from Authorization to Proceed with Amendment No.1 . Implementation Plan - 45 days from Authorization to Proceed with Amendment No. 1. r- Page20f3 ".- All other conditions of the contract shall remain the same as set forth in the Agreement between the District and CDM dated November 5, 2003 for consulting services for the Perchlorate Assessment. EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. By: £f!{{ General Manager By: , Ç) ¿:)~ dicott, P.E. - ".- Page 3 of3 ) ) ) Exhibit "B" East Valley Water District Perchlorate Implementation Plan Task TOTAL COST $ 8.0 Assessment of Blending YS. Treatment 100 $ 13,700 $ 100 $ 13,800 9.0 Assessment of Getaway Capacity 24 $ 3,300 $ 3,300 10.0 Distribution System Analysis 268 $ 35,200 $ 1,200 $ 36,400 11.0 Manufacturer Coordination 24 $ 2,800 $ 2,800 12.0 Other Agency Coordination 30 $ 3,700 $ 3,700 13.0 Implementation Plan 35 $ 4,500 $ 500 $ 5,000 481 $ 63,200 $ 1,800 $ 65,000 AMENDMENT NO.2 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN ,,-- EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. FOR PERCHLORATE ASSESSMENT AND ACTION PLAN East Valley Water District (District) and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) entered into an Agreement dated November 5, 2003 (Agreement No. 2003.13) for professional engineering services in connection with the initial assessment of perchlorate contamination in the groundwater at nine groundwater wells. This Agreement was executed in the amount of $25,000. Amendment No. I added the development of an implementation plan of the treatment solutions developed as part of the original agreement. The contract value was increased by Amendment No. I by $65,000 (Sixty Five Thousand and 00/100) to a revised total of $90,000 (Ninety Thousand and 00/100). Amendment No.2 adds the surveying, utility identification, and preliminary horizontal alignment of the raw and treated water pipelines. The contract value is increased by Amendment No.2 by $85,000 (Eighty Five Thousand and 001100) to a revised total of $175,000 (One Hundred Seventy Five Thousand and 00/100). ,,-- Accordingly, the above parties hereby agree that the scope of work under the original contract and subsequent Amendment No. I to be modified as follows: 1. Exhibit A - Scope of Work - The scope of work to be conducted under this exhibit shall be modified to include the following tasks: Task 14 - Prelimi1Ul1'J Alignment Design. CDM will provide preliminary design services for approximately 30,500 feet of pipelines. Services will include aerial surveying, utility research, horizontal alignment design, and opinion of probable cost on each pipeline run. The deliverable will be 40 scale plan drawings, two plan panels per sheet, showing the proposed alignment. The following pipeline alignments will be included as part of the preliminary design: . Raw water pipeline from Well II and Well 12 to Del Rosa Road along 6th Street. Approximate length: 5,000 feet. . Raw water pipeline from We1l28a from 3rd Street to 6th Street along Del Rosa Drive. Approximate length: 2,000 feet. . Raw water pipeline from Harrison Street to Mountain A venue along Lynwood Drive. Approximate length: 2,500 feet. . Raw water pipeline from Plant 25 to Plant 107 along Mountain A venue. Approximate length: 2,500 feet. r- Page 1 of2 r- . Product water pipeline from Del Rosa Rd. to Sterling Avenue along 6th Street. Approximate length: 2,500 feet. . Product water pipeline along Sterling A venue from 6th Street to CitruslHolly Vista. Approximate length: 12,500 feet. . Product water pipeline from Plant 107 to Sterling along Holly Vista Drive. Approximate length: 3,500 feet. 2. Exhibit B - Rate Schedule - The rate schedule under the original contract shall remain the same. The cost to conduct this additional task is $85,000 (Eighty Five Thousand and 00/100). The new contract cost, including Amendment No.1 and this amendment is $175,000 (One Hundred and Seventy Five and 00/100). 3. Exhibit C - Activity Schedule - The following deliverables are included under this exhibit. . Plan drawings - 40 scale drawings, two panels per sheet, showing ground topography, existing and proposed utilities and the horizontal alignment of the proposed raw water and potable water lines. All other conditions of the contract shall remain the same as set forth in the Agreement between the District and CDM dated November 5, 2003 for consulting services for the Perchlorate Assessment. r- EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. By: Robert Martin General Manager By: Jeffrey D. Endicott, P.E. Associate Date: Date: r- Page20f2 ) ) ') East Valley Water District Ultimate Development General Plan Land Use (acres) Land Use Type I Lower I Intermediate I Upper I Foothill I Other East I Other North I Total Agricu~ure 0 0 83 311 546 0 939 Commercial 323 301 325 78 45 0 1,072 HIGC 35 62 34 3 0 0 134 Industrial 215 162 72 0 0 0 449 Institution 0 0 82 173 0 0 255 Multi Family Residential 196 170 66 261 0 80 773 Open Space 5 20 275 1,425 3,698 1,683 7,107 Public/Quasi Public 0 118 92 29 0 0 239 REDC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBO 4,060 874 8 0 0 0 4,942 SBOC 17 78 72 14 0 0 181 School 21 143 143 45 0 0 352 Single Family Residential 570 920 1,260 3,408 2,007 1,779 9,945 Two Family Residential 0 45 68 4 0 0 117 Vacant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Facility 0 0 7 41 2 3 54 5,442 2,895 2,586 5,792 6,299 3,545 26,558 I""" I""" Flow Factors I Average Day Demand (gpm) Agriculture 0.00 Commercial 2.50 HIGC 0.00 Industrial 2.00 Institution 2.50 Multi Family Residential 6.00 Open Space 0.00 Public/Quasi Public 2.50 REDC 0.00 SBO 0.00 SBOC 0.00 School 2.50 Single Family Residential 2.30 Two Family Residential 2.60 Vacant 0.00 Water Facility 0.00 r ) ') ) East Valley Water District Projected Water Demands for Ultimate Development Land Use Type I Lower I Intermediate I Upper I Foothill I Other East lather North I Total Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial 807 753 812 194 113 0 2,679 HIGC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Industrial 431 324 144 0 0 0 899 Institution 0 0 205 432 0 0 637 Multi Family Residential 1,175 1,020 396 1,568 0 478 4,638 Open Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public/Quasi Public 0 296 230 72 0 0 597 REDC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 School 53 357 357 114 0 0 881 Single Family Residential 1,312 2,117 2,898 7,839 4,617 4,091 22,874 Two Family Residential 0 117 176 11 0 0 303 Vacant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,778 4,983 5,217 10,230 4,729 4,570 33,507 Total Average Demand 33,507 gpm 48.3 mgd 54,047 ac-ft per year 0.00144 1.61301 r East Valley Water District Projected Water Demand Analysis Month I I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jill Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee Total (ae-ft) Average (ae-ft/month) r Average Day Demand Max Month Demand Max Day Demand (1) Supply Required (2) Supply Required Current Supply (3) Additional Supplies Required 2003 Monthly Values Ratio I Production (ac-ft) 0.72 1,451 0.57 1,154 0.67 1,346 0.76 1,541 1.04 2,095 1.22 2,467 1.43 2,883 1.46 2,956 1.32 2,670 1.20 2,433 0.83 1,684 0.78 1,578 24,257 2,021 21.66 mgd 31.07 mgd 37.29 mgd 41.02 mgd 28,000 gpm 29,000 gpm I Projected Production I Requirements (ae-ft/month) to meet Ultimate Demands 3,234 2,571 2,998 3,434 4,667 5,497 6,424 6,586 5,949 5,420 3,751 3,515 54,047 4,504 48.25 mgd 69.23 mgd 83.08 mgd 91.39 mgd 63,000 gpm 34,000 gpm Notes: 1.- Max Day Demand estimated as 120 percent of the average demand during maximum month 2.- Supply reqlrired estimated at 110 percent of maximum day demand 3.- Based on an estimated 26.300 gpm capacity from wells and the 2,700 gpm (4.0 mgd) WTP r ) General Finalize Perchlorate/Nitrate Reduction Plan Property Acquisition: Plant 107 and 6th Street/Del Rosa Avenue Aerial Photography Survey and Utility Layout Raw Water ~tem 10% Design of Raw Water Pipelines Construction of Lower Pressure Zone Raw Water Pipelines Construction of Upper Pressure Zone Raw Water Pipelines Perchloratø_'[[JJatment Plants Development of Performance Specifications for Ion Exchange Treatment Ion Exchange Contract Procurement ) FInal Design of Additional Facilities at Ion Exchange Treatment S~es Construction of Additional Facilities at Ion Exchange Treatment Sites Installation of Ion Exchange Treatment Systems Connection of Ion Exchange Treatment to Distribution System Product Water Pi"elines Aiternative 1 40% Design of Potable Water Pipelines Review of 40% Design by District Pipeline Contract Procurement Construction of Potable Water Pipeline Alternative 2 40% Design of Potable Water Pipelines Review of 40% Design by District Final Design (100%) of Potable Water Pipelines Review of Final Design by District Pipeline Contract Procurement Construction of Potable Water Pipeline East Valley Water District Perchlorate Implementation Plan. Preliminary Schedule - February 6th, 2004 From 212104 212/04 2/16104 2123/04 3/8/04 411/04 4130/04 2115/04 4/2/04 4/20/04 5/10/04 4/30/04 819104 4130104 8/2/04 8/16/04 9/15/04 4/30/04 8/2104 8/16/04 11/15/04 12/1/04 12/31/04 T To 2112104 3/16/04 2116/04 4120/04 4/26/04 7/1104 7/15/04 3/1104 4/30/04 5/10/04 6/14/04 8/9/04 8/23/04 8/2104 8/16/04 9/15/04 3/15/05 8/2104 8/16/04 11/15/04 12/1104 12131/04 6/30105 ~1~'~I~I~'~I~'~~~~~!~I~I~I~I~'~'~ PI: : i : I ' , , , ct=J , . L¡ ! : : : ! I I : ! ! p, i I ¡ ¡ ¡ I . d : ~ ) ) ) EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2003-2004 LIGHTFOOT GOODIN NEGRETE STURGEON WILSON FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES JULY 1125.00 33.16 1125.00 75.80 1000.00 15.00 1250.00 90.00 1250.00 1273.73 AUG 625.00 1000.00 1151.00 625.00 15.05 1125.00 400.00 1250.00 626.74 SEPT 625.00 72.52 1250.00 1052.16 625.00 77.35 875.00 126.45 1250.00 779.85 OCT 750.00 69.78 1125.00 769.34 625.00 407.35 1250.00 664.88 1125.00 761.00 NOV 250.00 15.00 1125.00 15.00 250.00 284.00 1250.00 197.09 875.00 25.00 DEC 375.00 18.82 750.00 640.00 750.00 -58.00 1250.00 1271.00 1250.00 521.28 JAN 48.49 FEB MAR APRIL MAY JUNE TOTAL REIMB 3750.00 209.28-- 6375.00 --3703:30 3875.00 740.75 7000.00 -2749.42 - 7000.00 4036.09 TOTAL EXPENSES 3750.00 209.28 6375.00 3703.30 3675:00 740.75 7000.00 2749.42 7000.00 4O36.0B j) ) ) ) BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES QBAE[ FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 GLENN LIGHTFOOT DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE BOOKS NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS SUBSCRIPTIONS MISC LUNCH W/BOB 717103 18.77 LUNCH W/BOB 7/10/03 14.39 LUNCH W/BOB 9/4103 13.52 THE BUSINESS PRESS 9/22/03 59.00 LUNCH W/BOB 10/22/03 10.78 PRESS ENTERPRISE 10/28/03 59.00 STATE OF COMM LUNCH 11/25/03 15.00 LUNCH WIBOB 12/18103 18.82 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91.28 118.00 0.00 Page 1 ) ) ) BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 DON GOODIN DATE CONFERENCE CARFARE MILEAGE NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS EDUCATION SPECIAL DISTRICT 7/21/03 28.80 32.00 WRI BREAKFAST 7/29/03 15.00 LEG ADV 8/8/03 10.00 LEG ADV CXL 8/8/03 -10.00 SACRAMENTO 8/12/03 204.00 WESTCAS DC 8/14/03 291.50 CSUSB 8/18/03 655.50 SPECIAL DISTRICT 9/15/03 29.20 27.50 WESTCAS DC 09/20/03-09/24/03 33.75 721.42 16.29 CSUSB TEXT BOOKS 9/30/03 164.00 STATE OF INLAND EMP 9/26/03 60.00 MILEAGE 10/3/04 26.00 MEAL WI BOB 10/17/03 28.00 SPECIAL DISTRICT 10/20/03 32.00 WESTCAS CONF 10/25/03 196.00 WESTCAS CONF 10/29/03-10/30/03 150.00 153.37 20.25 124.70 39.02 STATE OF COMM LUNCH 11/25/03 15.00 CAL STATE PA615 FEES 12/4/03 601.50 MEAL W/ PAUL DOLTER 12/11/03 7.50 SPECIAL DISTRICT 12/15/03 31.00 TOTAL 150.00 844.87 166.00 846.12 275.31 1421.00 Page 1 ) ) ) BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES D RAFT FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 EDWARD NEGRETE DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS MISC WRI BREAKFAST 7/29/03 15.00 LUNCH W/ DIR GOODIN 8/27/03 15.05 LUNCH W/ DIR WILSON 9/10/03 17.35 STATE OF INLAND EMP 9/26/03 60.00 ACWA CONF 10117/03 395.00 LUNCH W/ DIR LIGHTFOOT 10/22/03 12.35 ACWA CONF 11/3103 269.00 STATE OF COMM LUNCH 11/25/03 15.00 REIMB ACWAI KERI 12/18/03 -85.00 MEAL 12/3/04 27.00 TOTAL 310.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 430.75 0.00 Page 1 ) ) ) BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES D RAFT FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 KIP STURGEON DATE CONFERENCE RAllFARE MilEAGE NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING lODGING MEALS MISC EAC MEETING 7/16/03 40.00 INTERNATIONAL WTR CF 7/30/03 50.00 WEF TOUR 8n/03 400.00 FACILITIES EXPO 9124103 52.47 STATE OF INLAND EMP 9126/03 60.00 ENTECH SEMINAR 9/30/03 13.98 GAL OSHA SEMINAR 10/8(03 30.00 REIMB CAL OSHA SEM 10/ar03 -30.00 WTR ED FOUNDATION 10/15/03 550.00 HIGHLAND COMM NEWS 10123/03 35.00 MILEAGE 10129/03 37.22 CSDA SEMINAR 10124/03 42.66 WORKSHOP (4) 11(1/03 100.00 SB C OF C LEG BRKFST 11/7/03 25.00 MilEAGE 11/30/03 72.09 SEMINAR 12/1/03 179.00 ACWA CONF 12/5/03 800.00 MEAL W/ PAUL DOlTER 12/11/03 22.00 ACWACONF 12/30/03 270.00 TOTAL 1589.00 0.00 204.44 800.00 120.98 35.00 Page 1 ) ) ) BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXPENSES GEORGE WILSON DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE LODGING NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING MEALS COMMENTS LUNCH/BOB 712103 18.77 LUNCHIPUBLIC RELATION 717/03 15.21 RADON TRIPI DC 07/12/03-07/16/03 435.50 774.86 14.39 WRI BREAKFAST 7/29/03 15.00 LUNCHI BANK REP 8/4/03 14.57 LUNCH W/ BOB 8/6/03 14.03 WASH DC 8/8/03 381.50 LUNCH W/ BOB 8/12/03 204.00 12.64 LUNCH W/ BOB 9/4103 13.52 LUNCH W/ BOB 917/03 45.90 ACWA FED AFFAIRS 9/8103 79.00 157.08 ACWA CONF FEE 919/03 395.00 DINNER W/ BOB 9/10/03 17.15 LUNCH W/ BOB 9/17103 12.20 STATE OF INLAND EMP 9/26/03 60.00 RADONIPERCHL TRIP 10/5/03-10/08103 60.00 684.84 MEAL WI BOB 1017/03 16.16 LEGISLATIVE BKFST 1117/03 25.00 ACWACONF 12/02/03-12/04/03 400.07 ASSOC WTR AGENCY 12/03103 & 12/05/03 99.00 LUNCH W/ BOB 12/15/03 22.21 TOTAL 395.00 1100.00 60.00 2016.85 415.75 Page 1 -- -- ... ",:5 z .... g¡¡¡ 9~ ~.., C/O=> .... z L5::!!j :::Ex ...1'" ....=> >0 ..,'" ",X 1-1- ....", ~:5 0 .... ~,..: ~~ -. -- .... c..> z .., ¡;: .., > ~ '" '" 0 cD .... .., ¡:¡ .., .... .... cõ '" .., ;! I- .... '" 0 => '" '" CD cD :¡: d .... EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT ,....DIRECTOR' ~~ .. MONTH OF' ~ ,oard MeetIngs: ---L- ~-- ~ Conferences and Other Meetinos Date: I/~ Organization &111./ {) I Date: I ~¡" Date: I/u I Organization ç VAl) Organization /3V ul) Description ~ ~I ~ ;y~, Description ~~ Description ~ -1'1/~ Date: Organization Description Date: Description Date: Description Date: Description "~";...."t¡p} ~þ~¡r -,_.(;!~¡;~" tí¥-.. .. "-.-' j Date: ' Date: ' Date: Organization 'es~tion~ . a~~ec L,)~:;)lJ1Ll~ .!?escL!J2!i.o[l Description -- Date: Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description TOTAL # OF MEETINGS s @125.00 each- $ 4>ZS .(}O Total Director's Expenses $ $ ø/ ø fr :ø , Personal Auto: Miles x .375 Parking Fees per mile- $ $ Total Lodoinos, Meals & Other: (Details on Back) :ned ~ ~~ Date of Board Approval Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ ~2$.øð Less any Advance Payments $ /' TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ 625'-()ð EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR: A) £(;~~~;;FEES AND EXPENSE ::~:TOF; 'JA,l\.Ju~t2 y .-. Board Meetings: /3 t 6 2- 7 Conferences and Other ~eeli~s Date: 2/) Organization~, U). {J¡ DescriPtioni£'Oé A--f At..<. I3lA:/d,~lI Dale: J 6 Organization £. {! (1/ IJ. Description '":'Ï%, 'J, 'f.,:.s. Date: D OrganlzationC '~,~ H..~j.¡.....~ DescrIPtionjY)~l~1 ~~:;r~.. Tp.w¡t!12. Dale: ').A OrganizationE, r.../. U.../.Q. DescrIPlio6..,~;"¡ ~ðt.4-t fJIJr,~ Date: Organization Description Date: Dale: Dale: Date: Date: .-. Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Organization Description Organization Description Organization Organization Description Description Organization Organization Description Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description TOTAL#OFMEETINGS-L-@125.00each_S 75() ðO X'f. Milesx .375 permlle_S 32.25 Parking Fees $ Personal Auto: Total Lodainas, Meals & Other: (Details on Back) Total DIrector's Expenses S $ 32,1.;$ 7 <ir2. 25 /.~ ~ ~ Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ Signed ~ / é é ~'f; -- Less any Advance Payments- $ Date of Board Approval I TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ '7 8'2... /-> .-. DIRECTOR: EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT Sturgeol'l MONTH OF: January 2004 r-'O8rd Me-etings: 13 - 16 - 22 - 27 Conferences and Other MeetinQs Date: 15 Organization RCC Description Seminar Description Dinner Date: 24 Organization Congressman Lewis Date: Organization Date: Organization Date: Organization Date: Organization Date: Organization Date: Or.ganization Date: Organization Date: Organization r- Date: Organízation Date: Organization Date: Organization Date: Organization Date: Organization TOTAL # OF MEETINGS Description Description Description DescriptiOn Description Description Description Description Description Description Description Description Description 5 @125.00 each- $ per rtiile- $ 625.00 Personal Auto: Miles x .375 Parking Fees May 2004 ACWA Fee Total LodQinQs, Meals & Other: (Details on Back) Meal Reimbursement Total Director's Expenses $ $ 301.00 120.00 - $ 181.00 Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ Less any Advance Payments $ TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ 806.00 r ed J Cc-~ Date of Board Approval 02/10/2004 806.00 DIRECTOR: EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTORS FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT Don Goodin MONTH OF: January, 2004 /"'"' 1ard Meetings: 13,27 Conferences and Other Meetinas: Date: 7 Organization CSUSB PA 615 Description Education Date: 8 Organization Highland ACC Description Installation Dinner Date: 14 Organization CSUSB PA615 Description Education Date: 16 Organization IEUA Description Building Tour Date: 19 Organization Special Districts Description Monthly Meeting Date: 21 Organization CSUSB PA 615 Description Education Date: 22 Organization EVWD Description Wor1lshop Date: 28 Organization CSUSB PA 615 Description Educaton Date: 29 Organization SBACC Description Installation Dinner /"'"' Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description TOTAL # OF MEETINGS 10 @ 125.00 eacl $ 1,250.00 Personal Auto: Miles X .375 Parking Fees per mile $ Total Lodainas. Meals & Other: (Details on Back) Total Director's Expenses $ 76.00 $ 76.00 $ 1,326.00 $ 1,326.00 ~ned .4t. .~/~ £) ~. e of Board Approval Feb 10. 2004 Total Director's Meetings & Expenses Less any Advance Payments TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR ""-~ F_..d ExponH __«doc Lodainas: (Receipts Attached) -- Date: Function Attended $ - Date: Function Attended $ - Date: Function Attended $ - Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ SUB TOTAL $ Meals: (Reciepts Attached) Date: 19 Function Attended Special Districts $ 31.00 Date: ~ Function Attended SBACC $ 45.00 I"""" Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ SUB TOTAL $ 76.00 Other: (Receipts Attached) Date: - Function Attended Date: - Function Attended $ Date: - Function Attended $ I"""" SUB TOTAL $ TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ 76.00 (Enter this total on the front of form) D;_.. Feu .od _... _doc DIRECTOR: EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT w/J. S 0..1 MONTH OF: :1 AJl.1 ðt,lo -ardMeetings: lIlt/.: ,¡~,; 1/~'7 Conferences and Other Meetinas Date: ,J ;? Organization ~ v kI () Date: (/I~ Description HIPErl'ì..'i 4,1 1)171 l. ,.IA .c....+- DescriptionHe..J,.þv ('~I(,~ Lt'!u,:~ ~1'.J.f Htlrli., Date: ,II S- '/1' Organization l'il.JltJn Organization uSA lA, n..A Organization ~vw'O Description Hn.,J1.ly )//E""~ Description Îf)tJft.f:' t St1.f) Date: Date: Description Description 71'/;" h IJ.~. Description rS~~-aU e y Date: -- Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: es~tion~ a...ef LJiSl.l~~L Descnpt,!Ql!.. . .. . . . .. .. Organization Description Description . Organization Organization Organization Organization Description Description Description TOTAL # OF MEETINGS q @125.00 each- $ per mile- $ II :¿¡;- Personal Auto: Miles x ,36 Parking Fees $ $ S'S"° Total Lodainas. Meals & Other: (Details on Back) Total Director's Expenses $ :Y.$' b Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ Less any Advance Payments $ TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ /6 ?b' ~ned 4#¿¿ Date of Board Approval ( "7'5 D;,,-. F... and e"",n.. R.oo" 2"" lodainas: ~ Date: Date: Date: Date:. bate: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: (ReCeipts attached) Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended . Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ SUB TOTAL $ ~ Meals: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: (Receipts attached) Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended Function Attended $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ SUB TOTAL $ Other: (Receipts attached) Date: 1-1"2. Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended /I1!!f)'(.<'b¡¡"'~ F~", ¡:;", ~rt.J" ~..(" $ $ $ S"t>'I!), d'O ~ SUB TOTAL $ .(;'$O.~ TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ (Enter this totaf on the front of form) (;'S'(!). (tt) o¡..- F... and ._n.. R.oo" 2001 ~~ AWARENESS CAMPAIGN 2004 STEERI.G COMNmDO e_- NOTROO'OUTN< WAT'" 01""""'.' 5."""". CAU"AN~ 'C""A' Em BAY NU.""'AL UTI"'" 0..",..", {VICE C""A' """,,,A".. OR c:.w"A.~ WmA M"O" CAU"'A.~ FAAN .UA"U F.."A""" ,,"U"'A.~ GA.U.OWA"'A As_A".. CAU"'A." UA"" WA"" C..".OVA".. COU",,'L c:.w"'A." WATER "~'A=. U.S. .UA"U .F A."'A.A".. .....,...,,"""'.... ,-. ,,"U"'A.'A FAA. WATEA CORuTlO. ".OR. VALLEY NU.'C"'L WATER O""~T U.'TED """" CON""AT"'. 0",",= "",,....... 0""""""" '" WmA A.SOU"".. '""U..'.G cc-S"""-, CAu""'.'A "'AT< """"ATlO..' COUN".. LEAGU. .. eAU","N. C",.. Flex ~. '. "O1ll' IPom ,-. ¡U, January 2004 Mr. RobertE. Martin East Valley WD PO Box 3427 San Bernardino, CA 92413 Mr. Martin Do you feel your customers and stakeholders are engaged with your agency? Do they understand the importance of water quality and water conservation? Do they even know where their water comes from? Do you feel if you had a little more help, a little more education or positive publicity, you could achieve your public education and outreach goals? The Qilifumia WaIEr Awan!ness Ounpajgn is bridging the water information gap for hundreds of water agencies and industries across the Golden state. What does 2004 hold for you as a valued contributor? The Water Awareness Campaign is joining forces with the highly successful Flex YOUl" Power program. In the months ahead, look for announcements on how the synergy of saving water and saving eIectricity will reach new heights on California's airwaves. The Campaign is proud to add this exciting new element on behalf of our contn'butors. As a contn'butor, you will continue to have available to you professionally designed public information materials at a fraction of the cost you wou1d pay on your own. The "Right at Home" program contams proven outreach materials. The Santa Clara Valley Water District used bus ads, English and Spanish print ads in 21 different newspapers, Spanish radio ads on two radio stations, and the television public service announcement on cable stations Other agencies throughout the state took advantage of these materials, designed specifically to speak to California audiences. There's more. Our Web site, www.wateraware.org, continues to improve and remain an important source of information. We will continue to support our future water leaders through the scholarship program and new education books. We appreciate your prior support and look forward to your contn"bution for 2004. Today, start the process to continue or begin your active role with the California Water Awareness Campaign. Together, we are making a difference. Sincerely, ~ tJ4- Denis Wolcott California Water Awareness Campaign Chair - 2004 "Use Wate- WJSeJ;y and. Keep it Clean - It's a Way ofLifu" 910 K STREET' SUITE 340 . SACRAMENTO CA 9S814.3577 (916) 325.2596 . FAX (916) 325-4849 . E-MAIC, CWAC@ACWANET.COM WWW.WATERAWARE.ORG r- STATEMENT California Water Awareness Campaign January 2004 699 A East Valley WD MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: California Water Awareness Campaign 2004 PO Box 2408 ' Sacr-amento, CA 95812-2408 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- r- 2004 California Water Awar-eness suggested Support paymnent 1,306.00 The following contact name will be, added to our Water Awareness list unless otherwise specified: ' Mr. Robert E. Martin Please give us the name of another person in your office who should ,receive campaign items (i.e. cempaign kit, newsletters, bulletins, etc.). r- With your continued support, this program will be a GREAT success. Please remit your- support payment as soon as possible. Your donations will be acknowledged through the mail. REMITTANCE COpy ~sociation of California Water Aiendes Aiameda County Farm Bureau Alameda County WD American Water Anaheim Public Utilities Anglola WD Antelope Valley.East Kern WA Atascodero MWC Banta-carbona ID Bay Area Water Users Association Bear Valley CSD Bella Vista WD Binkley Associates Consulting Engrs Broad,iew WD Butte County Farm Bureau Byron-Bethany ID Calaveras PUG California Farm Bureau Federation California Farm Water Coalition California Groundwater Assn. Califomla Rural Water Association California Urban Water ConselVatlon Coundl California Water Association Carpinterla Valley WD Castaic Lake WA ,...J;entral Basin MWD . 1tral California ID __ntral Coast Water Authority Central Valley Project Water Assn. Chino Basin WCD Citrus Heights WD City 0/ Alhambra City 0/ Calistoga CityO/Ciovls City of EI Monte City 0/ EI Paso de Robles City 0/ Escondida City of Fresno Water Division City 0/ Huntington Park Cltyo/lone City 0/ Kingsburg City of Long Beach City of Los Banos City of Merced City of Monrovia City of Oceanside - Water Utilities Dpt. City of Orange Cove City 0/ Poway Cityo/Rialto City of Sacramento Utilities Department City of Santa Barbara City of Santa Clara ~ of Santa Monica Utilities Division ,fSanta Rosa. Utilities Dept. City ofVacavllle Cityo/Vallelo City a/Winters City of Woodland Coachella Valley WD Coastslde CWO Columbia Canal Company Contra Costa County Fann Bureau Crestllne VIllage WD Cucamonga CWO CA Domestic Water CoJCadway Inc. CA Munidpal Utilities Association Dan Steiner, Consulting Engineer Dee laspar and Associates Del Paso Manor WD Del Rey CSD Dudley Ridge WD East Bay MUD Eastern MWD Easton Water Resources. Inc. EI Dorado County WA EI Dorado ID Elsinore Valley MWD Fair Oaks WD Firebaugh Canal WD Foothill MWD Foresthill PUD Fresno Metropolitan FeD Ceacon Clenn County Farm Bureau Craeagle Water Co. Heli,WD Hesperia WD Hidden Valley Lake CSD Hills Valley ID Humboldt Bay MWD Imperial County Farm Bureau ImperiallD Irvine Ranch WD Kaweah Delta WCD Keller.Wegley Engineering Kern County Farm Bureau Kern County WA Kem Delta WD Kern Water Bank Authority Kern-Tulare WD Kings County Farm Bureau Kings County WD Kings River Water Assn. La Canada ID La Habra Heights CWO La Puente Valley CWO Lake County Farm Bureau Las Virgenes MWD Lassen County Farm Bureau Last Chance Water Ditch Company Lincoln Avenue Water Company Llttlerock Creek ID Lone Tree MWC Los Angeles County Fann Bureou Luhdorff and Sealmaninl, CE Main San Cabrlel Basin Watermaster Marina Coast WD Metro WD of Southern California Mil Potrero Mutual WC Modesto ID Malave PUG Malave WA Montedto WD MBK Engineers MRWPCA Nevada County Farm Bureau Nevada ID Newhall CWO Newhall Land and Farming Company North of the River MWD North Delta WA Olldale MWC Ollvenhaln MWD Omochumne-Hartnell WD Orange County Farm Bureau Orange Vale Water Company Orchard Dale WD Pacheco WD Padre Dam MWD Palaro Valley WMA PalarolSunny Mesa CSD Palmdale WD panoche Drainage District Panoche WD Pica Water District Plain VIew WD Poso Canal Company Provost & Pritchard Engineering Grp.lnc Purlsslma Hills WD PSOMAS OOaru HIli WD Rag Gulch WD Rain Bird Corporation Rancho California WD Redamation Dist. #2035 Redamation Dlst. #2047 Regional Water Authority Rincon del Diablo MWD RiverdalelD Riverside County Farm Bureau. Inc. Riverside Public Utilities Rosamond CSD Rowland WD Rubio Canon Land & Water Association Sacramento Area Flood Control Aiency Sacramento County Farm Bureau Sacramento Suburban WD San Benito County Fann Bureau San Benito County WD San Bernardino County Farm Bureau San Bernardino Valley WCD San Die¡o County Fann Bureau San Gabriel CWO San Cabrlel Valley MWD San Corgonio Pass WA San loaquin River Exch. Contr. Wtr Auth. San Juan WD San luis Canal Company San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau, Ine. San Mateo County Fann Bureau Santa Barbara County Farm Bureau Santa Cruz County Fann Bureau Scolts Valley WD Solano County Farm Bureou Solano County WA Solano ID Southern CA Water Committee Stanislaus County Fann Bureau State Water Contractors Stetson Engineers. Ine. Stockton East WD Stone & Youngberg LLC Sunnyslope CWO Sweetwater Authority Tea Pot Dome WD Tehachapl-Cummlngs CWO Tasco Controls Trinity County Fann Bureau Tulare County Fann Bureou Tulare Lake Basin WSD Tuolumne Utilities District U.S. Bureau of Redamation Upper San Cabrlel Valley MWD Valenda Hel¡hts Water Company Valley CWO Valley Water Company Vandenberg VIllage CSD Wagner & Bonsignore Consulting Civil Eng Walnut Valley WD Water Association of Kern County Water Edueatlon Foundation West Basin MWD West San Bernardino CWO Western Carwash Association Western MWD Yolo County Farm Bureau Yolo County Fe & WCD Yorba Linda WD Yuba County WA Yu!ma MWD 20ne 7 WA Need more information to make your decision? Call the campaign headquarters at 916.325.2596 HRight at Home" Campaign Continues for the Second Year \c\\' Span ish i\1aterials Added .. . .", ' . . '.. Utilice una boquilla. Ahorre agua. 'S:E:::~="'- -- ._-"_.~ -..:.: :;::::-,._- ':::':'::-:':-'::'- .--...- ,-.--.--- ~ '- "'< Mness Campaign continued its "Right at ", "" i', in 2003 with new Spanish , :,: ,!ar of the campaign. The ,~ a radio public service announce- ":!' '::'~':"'~'::".',:' : ads featuring our new Latino Guy '¡" .,.. .'\.;.::r.: ;:",¡:::,:,..:".:':: ::acedonthreeSpanishradiosta- "::"', "':""':'!;::::>:':' ';:'lcramentoduringMay.Thesewere .:::..:.'", ,:.'!' "'i,,' " " "1' i"':' ~Jie estimated number of impressions ,;! . ..' ' } variety of the media materials The Santa Clara Vailey Water ':"'~::.'f::¡".,";'s:'" :',',' I Spanish print ads in 21 differ- ;:;::,;0..""""",::,,:, ,':' :,- 'Ño radio stations, and the ,'.'" ,,', ::;',":'::':.". ',,',:oncablestations, ';:.:õ.:!.;:,:,',","L""'.;'.,monthofMay.TheCity :"':'!:::',,'.,,""'::,..,':"'.: ,.,',: ::::nglishprintadsinthe $ant¡¡"CružSèj'¡tihêríiII¥tlmes in May and Coastside County W~tei;DIsiiÌ~ìh,H~lf'Mq~n Bay used both the English and , Sparií5hþiiiîtâ~s;ii¡lhf[ocal newspaper. These are just a few examplèsofhqwlçeal \\iåter agencies used the "Right at Home" cam~ign 'media rnatèitals to promote water awareness. Web Site, All of the "Rightát Home~ campaign materials are readily accessed for viewing on the Campaign's Web site at www.water- rare.org. The Web site was also re-organized to make it more r-friendly. Fourth Year of Scholars(tip Program Two high s~hool students were awarded $2500 scholarships. The students. one from Elk Grove and the other from Vallejo, received their awards from their local Assembly members. Thank you again to the East Bay Municipal Utility District for sponsoring one of the scholarships. School Education Book #3 Debuts The third education book in a series of five was completed during the fall of 2003. The third book is ail about water use in California and has learning activities for teachers to use in the classroom. flex 8' YQIII' PQJ!Eß Campaign to Begin New Partnership with Flex Your Power Expanding on the partnership developed last year with the Flex Your Power cam' paign, the California Water Awareness Saving Energy. Campaign is in the planning stages of how ...........ofllf.. the two entities can promote both water and energy conservation together. You wiil be hearing more about this partnership in the months to come. 2003 Steering Committee Campaign Co-Sponsors Metropolitan Water District of Southern Califomia (2003 chair) California Groundwater Association Camornia Farm Bureau Federation Association of California Water Agencies California Water Association U.S. Bureau of Reclamation California Department of Water Resources East Bay Municipal Utility District California Urban Water Conservation Council Elected Members California Farm Water Coalition West Basin/Central Basin Municipal Water District Kern County Water Agency Three Valleys Municipal Water District Water Education Foundation Campaign Partners California State Association of Counties League of California Cities 2003 Campaign Contributions: $124,904 Number of contributors: 270 California Water Awareness Campaign 910 K Street. Sacramento. CA 95814 (916)325.259619161325-4849 fax cwaC@acwanet.com weteraware.org "Use Water Wisely and Keep it Cleal1 - It's a Way of Life" /"""- ACCOUNT NUMBER 1. 0420012-01 2. 0541490-02 3. 1220513-00 TOTAL RELEASES OF LIEN JANUARY 26,2004 OWNERS NAME +PAID THROUGH TAX ROLLS /"""- /"""- Page 1 of 1 PROPERTY ADDRESS AMOUNT OWED $ 17.74 $ 103.36 $ 83.29 $ 204.39 LEEDS REPORT Prepared for EVWD by GMID Inc. Architecture + Planning + Interiors I. Background A. The United States Green Building Council (USBGC), a non-profit membership organization, developed the LEEDS System to provide a guideline and rating system for green buildings. Four levels are offered based on a point system - 69 points maximum 1. Certified 26 to 32 points 2. Silver 33 to 38 points 3. Gold 39 to 51 points 4. Platinum 52 to 69 points B. II. Decision Criteria A. What are benefits to District for Certification? 1. Prestige associated with being certified as committed to environmental issues a. What value does this have b. Should the District take a leading roll in environmental issues beyond water conservation? Savings in daily operating costs a. Will require a thorough energy audit to be exact in the amount of energy that might be saved (1) Current cost of energy for present facility (2) Probable savings beyond what would normally done as part of responsible engineering Should we limit energy savings to those items that have a 5 year or shorter return on investement? Possible increase in employee productivity a. Less absenteeism due to illness b. Better quality of employee is attracted to a well lit building with views The new building will likely accomplish this regardless of Leeds Certification How do we measure and value employee productivity and the value of an increase 2. b. 3. c. d. .t 1511 rer# ðvn'øI+iy III. IV. Costs to the District A. Certification only 1. LeedsConsultantcost ......,.................. $45,000.00 2. AdditionalA&E .................................8,000.00 3. Construction Cost Increase 7.5% of 4,183,450 = .... 313,758.00 4. Totalcost ..................................366,758.00 ~~Iver Seft-eost. ~~~~!~C6~f................ $50,000.00 2. AdditionalA&E .................................8,000.00 3. Construction Cost Increase 10% of 4,183,450 = .,... 418.345.00 4. Totalcost ..................................476,345.00 ~Old Sati-C9st. .~~.~(~t.(#.f............... $65,000.00 2. AdditionalA&E ................................22,000.00 3. Construction Cost Increase 15% of 4,183,450 = .,... 627,517.00 4. Totalcost .......,..........................714,517.00 Platinum 1. ~t.JJØ.,.CN.I4.I~t-.c~t............... $100,000.00 2. AdditionalA&E ................................35,000.00 3. Construction Cost Increase 20% of 4,183,450 = .,... 836,690.00 4. Totalcost ..................................971,690.00 B. C. D. E. Other impacts 1. More complex and potentially less reliable mechanical control systems a. More difficult to service Adds approximately one month to design time frame Adds approximately one month to construction and commissioning time frame Less variety in material selection 2. 3. 4. Conclusion A. Point status 1. 17 points can be easily be obtained by expending the above related costs 18 more are more challenging but can be obtained with a. Additional expense b. Proper design What value will be placed on the certificate? 2. B. ','.. ? 'No - y ~ !) Yes ? No - - '!( 4!j ð .~ A ¡¡ ..¡ ð () Yes ? No prereq 1 Credft 1.1 Credft 1.2 Credit 1.3 Credft2.1 Credft 2.2 Credft 3.1 Credft 3.2 Credit 4.1 Credft 4.2 Credft 5.1 Credft 5.2 Credft 6 Credft 7 prereq 1 prereq 2 Credft1 Credft 2 Credft3.1 Credft 3.2 Credft4.1 Credft 4.2 Credft 4.3 Credft 4.4 Credft 5 Credft 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credft7.1 Credft7.2 Credft 8.1 Credft 8.2 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Building Reuse, Maintain 75% of Existing Shell Building Reuse, Maintain 100% of Shell Building Reuse, Maintain 100% Shell & 50% Non-Shell Construction Waste Management, Divert 50% Construction Waste Management, Divert 75% Resource Reuse, Specify 5% Resource Reuse, Specify 10% Recycled Content, specify 5%(post-consumer + % post-industrial) , Recycled Content, Specify 10% (post-consumer + % post-industrial) LocallRegionalMaterials, 20% Manufactured Locally LocallRegional Materials, of 20% Above, 50% Harvested Locally Rapidly Renewable Materials Certified Wood Minimum IAQ Performance Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring Ventilation Effectiveness Construction IAQ Management Plan, During Construction Construction IAQ Management Plan, Before Occupancy Low-Emitting Materials, Adhesives & Sealants Low-Emitting Materials, Paints Low-Emitting Materials, Carpet Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Wood & Agrifiber Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control Controllability of Systems, Perimeter Controllability of Systems, Non-Perimeter Thermal Comfort, Comply with ASHRAE 55-1992 Thermal Comfort, Permanent Monitoring System Daylight &VieW$, Daylight 75% of Spaces Daylight & Views, Views for 90% of Spaces I.': Credit 1.1 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Credit 1.2 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Credft 1.3 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Credft 1.4 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title . Credft2 LEED'" Accredited Professional Yes ? No Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Required Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~~ ~¡;'~5\i(~ ¡f:~ ~i:¡:~;;;:;;Z;;¡~;¡f! ;~;Z:~~ ;;~~:;;~ CertIFied 26-32 points Silver 33-38 points Gold 39.61 points Platinum 52-69 points LEED Checklist LEEDTM Green Building Rating System 2.1 U.S. Green Building Council . ~""""'N"'~""~'ONN."^,.a~N Version 2.1 Registered Project Checklist Ves ? No r-- V v tß ~ )( O. v 'J Ves ? No ¡--ri-- L-.J_L- I Ves ? No l_lj_- - - - . ., " 'Ý ., prereq 1 Credl1 Credl2 Credl3 Credft4.1 Cred14.2 Credft 4.3 Credft 4.4 Credft5.1 Credft 5.2 Credft6.1 Credft 6.2 Credft7.1 Credft 7.2 Credft B Credft1.1 Credft 1.2 Credft 2 Credft 3.1 Credft 3.2 prereq 1 prereq 2 prereq 3 Credft1 Credft2.1 Credft 2.2 Credit 2.3 Credft 3 Credft 4 Credit 5 Credft B 1- ~h<J D- Silva EVWD Administration Building San Bernardino, CA Erosion & Sedimentation Control Site Selection Urban Redevelopment Brownfield Redevelopment Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms Alternative Transportation, Altemative Fuel Vehicles AlternatiVe Transportation, Parking capacity and Carpooling Reduced Site Disturbance, Protect or Restore Open Space Reduced Site Disturbance, Development Footprint Stonnwater Management, Rate and Quantity Stonnwater Management, Treatment Landscape & Exteñor Design to Reduce Heat Islands, Non-Roof Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands, Roof Light Pollution Reduction Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation Innovative Wastewater Technologies Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction Fundamental Building Systems Commissioning Minimum Energy Perfonnance CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment Optimize Energy Perfonnance Renewable Energy, 5% Renewable Energy, 10% Renewable Energy, 20% Additional Commissioning Ozone Depletion Measurement & Veñfication Green Power Required 1 1 1 1 Required Required Required 1 to 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LEEDTM Green Building Rating System 2.1 , , Association of California Water Agencies r-- ----_u_- Since 1910 January 22,2004 Dear ACW A Member Agency: As you know, some local water agencies have come under i.ntense scrutiny this past year for their financial practices and policies regarding travel and expenses. In response to that scrutiny, ACW A formed a task force in early 2003 to prepare a comprehensive set of suggested guidelines for the management of public water agencies. The statewide task force reviewed existing state laws applicable to ACW A members and compiled a set of sound, ethical practices to guide the operation and governance of districts. The task force issued a draft set of guidelines last fall for review and comment by ACW A members. Many agencies submitted comments, some of which were incorporated. -- The final document, "Guidelines for Conduct: A Primer for Water Agency Officials," is designed to be a resource for standards of accountability and to serve as a tool for ACW A mernbers to use in preparing and I or updating their own written policies and procedures. Though the document summarizes requirements of existing law, it goes beyond statutory requirements to suggest additional policies to ensure accountability and strengthen water agency operations. The purpose of these guidelines is not to dictate specific governing policies for water agencies, but to assist members in developing their own policies and procedures. ACW A recognizes that its members represent great diversity in terms of the type of agency and the enabling legislation under which they were formed. However, the task force urges all members to adopt agency policies to deal with these issues. The document also includes a resource list to direct water agency officials to additional information on related topics. We wish to acknowledge the hard work of the task force members and thank them for their time and commitment. ACW A also is grateful to the many members who provided copies of their own policies and offered comments on the earlier draft guidelines. The input was appreciated and contributed greatly to the final work product. ACW A will continue to work with its members as well as the Legislature to craft policies that ensure the highest level of accountability and help build public trust and confidence -- Association of California Water Agencies 910 K Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, California 95814-3577 916/441-4545 FAX 916/325-4849 Hall of the States 400 N. Capitol 5t., N.W., Suite 357 South, Washington, D.c. 20001-1512 2021434-4760 FAX 202/434-4763 www.acwanet.com Guidelines for Conduct January 22, 2004 -- in local public water agencies. The ACW A board also will soon consider development of guidelines for financial audits for public water agencies. We hope you will find these guidelines to be a valuable resource. Sincerely, h~ E.G. Jerry Gladbach ACW A President ~ ~~N\J Bette Boatmun ACW A Past President -- -- ) ) ) EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AFTER HOURS WORKSHEET 2004 (1) (1A) (2) (2A) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) TURN TURN PRESSURE> LEAKING NO MAIN SERVICE FLOWING. WATER SEWER MANHOLE MONTH ON OFF HI LOW METERS WATER LEAKS LEAKS WATER QUALITY STOPPAGE OVERFLOW MISC TOTAL JAN 26 16 2 5 3 4 5 5 7 73 FEB 0 MAR 0 > APR 0 MAY 0 JUNE 0 JULY 0 AUG 0 SEPT 0 OCT 0 NOV 0 DEC 0 TOTAL 26 16 0 2 5 3 4 5 0 0 5 0 7 73 ~ ) EAST VALLEY )TER DISTRICT ) MAIN LEAK SUMMARY 2004 MONTH 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 JANUARY 4 4 1 7 1 3 FEBRUARY 3 9 3 1 1 0 MARCH 7 6 8 2 0 4 APRIL 11 1 4 6 3 2 MAY 10 4 1 7 2 5 JUNE 13 5 8 4 1 5 JULY 15 4 8 8 2 1 AUGUST 7 8 2 5 0 3 SEPTEMBER 11 6 5 1 0 2 OCTOBER 6 2 3 1 3 0 NOVEMBER 12 5 2 1 6 3 DECEMBER 4 2 5 5 4 5 TOTAL 103 56 50 48 23 33 5.1W ) EAST VALLEY )TER DISTRICT ) HIGHLAND SYSTEM MAIN LEAK SUMMARY 2004 MONTH 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 JANUARY 7 2 0 4 3 2 FEBRUARY 2 1 0 1 1 2 MARCH 3 2 1 4 2 3 APRIL 4 0 0 4 6 2 MAY 6 0 0 3 3 2 JUNE 4 0 3 7 6 4 JULY 4 1 2 2 9 7 AUGUST 3 1 4 8 4 6 SEPTEMBER 3 2 5 2 7 3 OCTOBER 5 2 6 5 2 4 NOVEMBER 0 3 3 1 2 5 DECEMBER 0 3 2 2 4 2 TOTAL 41 17 26 43 49 42 5.1.1W ) ) ) EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT METERED CONSUMPTION SUMMARY 2004 MONTH 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 JANUARY 1339 1529 1620 1503 1368 1444 1289 FEBRUARY 968 1098 1170 1098 1277 1232 MARCH 969 1236 1212 1075 1423 951 APRIL 1061 1311 1438 1264 1422 1272 MAY 1324 1205 1526 1672 1657 1392 JUNE 1556 1630 2308 2133 2025 2090 JULY 2123 2289 2465 2416 2665 2235 AUGUST 2353 2365 2362 2443 2296 2727 SEPTEMBER 2411 2347 2546 2449 2300 2574 OCTOBER 1956 2108 1857 2058 1950 2125 NOVEMBER 1551 1801 1525 1765 1440 1857 DECEMBER 1456 1659 1388 1273 1328 1282 TOTAL 19067 20578 21417 21149 21151 21181 ) ) ) EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRiCT METERED CONSUMPTION 2004 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) CURRENT MONTH CURRENT MONTH CURRENT MONTH 5 YEAR PRIOR YEAR 5 YEAR MEANS PRIOR YEAR MONTH CONSUMPTION MOVING MEAN CONSUMPTION (AlB)-1 x 100 (AlC)-1 X 100 JANUARY 1289 1472 1444 -12.42 -10.73 FEBRUARY 1122 1232 -100.00 -100.00 MARCH 1183 951 -'i 00.00 -100.00 APRIL 1299 1272 -100.00 -100.00 MAY 1477 1392 -100.00 -100.00 JUNE 1930 2090 -100.00 -100.00 JULY 2392 2235 -100.00 -100.00 AUGUST 2364 2727 -'iOO.OO -100.00 SEPTEMBER 2411 2574 -100.00 -100.00 OCTOBER 1986 2125 -100.00 -100.00 NOVEMBER 1616 1857 -100.00 -100.00 DECEMBER 1421 1282 -100.00 -100.00 TOTAL 1289 20672.4 21181 -93.76 -93.91 ~""'~~~~~"" "I~ /"'" '" &00 Bernardino Coooty &pecial Districts ~ ~ February 1.6, ZOO4 , '- '- Hembe:~~.!~;!1eetlns ' '- '- Easf V aDey ResOÃ~f;o~serJa:fiO.D ~cf is hosting th: February meetin'- '- at~~,~;UJ~~,~,"S"I<1-~e~r¡;{L1M. "- '- ~e socia.I hour~þgi~¡~~ 6 ~~m. 'tt~.a call to order at 6:45 p.m. A ait.-down '- ~ ~:::n ~.~,'".,', ~~ ~ili~l:~,.".,."",;~; \"J\'\':$~2~84 ~ '- .JWO~J,,:, ,', '- ~~lL~~L,',:~,\duded~ar~ 8ala~ked, prtoJ.,! ' £rash vegetahlas, rolla, ~ '- ~ ea,'~r,er.an esse, "\'~: '- ~ Spealœr. DenniB'é' ger '~\:.j':,i . ~ ~ Chairman, S ardino County Su~&r, "Ibhd Diatrict '- '-TOPiC: "Reviewal' '. dtheStatealthe~#~"'~ " ~ ::::::::::::::: :::::: ::::: :::::::~~f:::::::::::::::::::t::::F ::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: "- RSVP to Ker¡~i~,.eal by noon Feb~a" ry 6th ~ Telephq:t;1e: 909-799-7407ij;~. '- Fax:(;909-799-1438", ~ 25864-Kij~ines8 Center Drive "\;.:;\. '- Re~)~~ CA 92374 ]:\~ '- '~:~ . " ,-,;,,"",',$/ ~, ',~{..e . '- '- '- '- '- ,,'- '- 'istrictl Associate ~ttendees: ' , , , ~ REMINDER: There is a $2 surclwge per pemn for reservations made after the deadliDe date and coming to the ~ dinner meeting without haVÙIg made reservations. Yau will also be billed for the dúmer if cancelJa1ion is lID! """"""" , .. , .,",..' . , ,"', J / The San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce , Invites You to Attend tb Legislative Breakfast State of the City Address . Featuring Mayor Judith Valles Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:30 a.m. National Orange Show $ 30- Includes Breakfast Tables of 10 Available $300 This will be the Mayor's only yearly State of the City Address Reserve early ****"**"*"*."Clip and Return*.""..**.""* Yes, I will attend the Legislative Breakfast Reserve a table of 10 - (please print additional names on reverse side) Name Business Name Phone Name Please make - reservations Enclosed is - . Return to: San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 658 San Bernardino, CA 92402 ,--. Southern California's Water Infrastructur-e -- Thuise/oy, Februcrry 2ó, 2004 DoubleTrce Hotel, O:ltorio, California , IlØtwater Resources !nstítute California S ~~/~-~~~V~~¡~I.~~~' BofllCl,dino ~ "'" , ',"-'.- -- Our infrr ):lure has recently been the subject of numerous media reI- Jits. From the massive power failure last year to the recent fires in our own region, infrastructure is being . more dosely scrotinized by the media and elected offióals. A national engineering organization has issued a national report card on infrastructure, with the overall grade being a D+. The estimated five-year need to upgrade our national infrastructure was $1.6 trillion. last fall, California voters resoundingly defeated a bollot initiative that would have set aside funds for infrastructure improvemenfs and upgrades. Was this initiative simply a victim of bollat timing, or do Californians not care about our statewide infrastructure? This yea~ the WRI will explore Southern Califomia' s water infrastrucJure, including waslewoter and sformwaler faólities and systems. From slalus reports of our infrastructure 10 finanóng issues 10 new technologies 10 asset management 10 examples of sustainable infrastructure, we will delve inlo this timely lopic. Who should attend? Water agency board members, managers, and staff; elected officials and their staffs; students and faculty in water resources programs; consultants to the water industry; representatives from environmental groups; the academic community; and business leaders interested in learning more about our local "wet" infrastructure. WRI The Water Resources InstiMe (WRI) at California Stale University, San Bernardino is pleased to host its fourth annual conference. The purpose of the conference is to bring logether representatives from the water industry, the academic community, environmental groups, and local govemmenfs to discuss the region's most valuable non-human resource - water. The WRI is an institution actively engaged in research, education, and water resources archival and data management activities. Its water resources archive is the largest in Southern California and provides information, maps, and data forsludents, teachers, researchers, and others interested in water resources in the Inland Empire and the Santa Ana Basin. Poster Session The conference will include a poster session where individuals actively engaged in water resources research can present their findings to conference attendees. Research need not be directly related to infrastructure. Attendees will have time during the conference to visit the poster session and to network with the researchers. ...... "" ) Registration moy be completed quickly ond easily onlinel Access online registration vio the conference Web site ot www.regweb.com/csusblwri02. You may also register by mail, phone, or fax. To register, complete the enclosed form and send along with payment, credit card .infarmation, or purchase order to: . Canference Services, WRI Conference Colifomia State.Univcrsily, San Bemardina College of Extended leaming 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 92407-2397 Phone: (909) BBO-5995 or fax to (909) 880-5907 Registration deadline is Februory 19, 2004. You will be mailed a confirmation notice upon receipt of your paid registrotian. After February 19, contact Conference Services far spoce availability. . Refunds Full refunds, minus a $25 odministrative fee, will be given far concellations received after February 19, 2004. Cancellations must be received In writing. Conference Fees $90 .....Early Registration before Februory 12, 2004 (fee includes parking, confinenfol breakfast, goodie bag, lunch, admissian 10 sessions, paster sessions, and conference materials). $100...Registration after February 12, 2004. $50 .....Paster Presenter with lunch (No charge withoul lunch). For infarmotion on sponsorship and exhibit opportunities, please coli (909) 880-7681. Please list odditional registrations on a separate sheet and attach. Name Compony Address- Cily, State, Zip E-mail Phone I require a vegetarian lunch.x Fax PIease.-: Conletenœ SeMœs will acœpt rosh. check, V"ISO/Moœ.card, or purchase order as payment for this """"'. /1egisIraficns without payment aI1oched win be reIumed. "payin¡¡ by purchase order, a copy of the aduaJ 00. must be attached 10 the regisfroJion """'. Enclosed is my check (payable to .CSUS8-CEL1 in the amaunt of $- Enclosed is a purchase order (copy must accompany registration farm). Charge my credit card: Account# MasterÇard VIsa Expiration Date Cardholder's Name Signature ~ u th ern 'c alìfd711iã ~ s Wa ter Infras tru'cturé '1' i i .f" I~ n ,.;~: ; W'\TtR ¡;r:SOlJRU:S ii'<S: i , ' r" '. :.',' ,- T: N TAT I V E . '..' , AGENDA 7:30 - 8:45 a.m,...................................................Paster Session 8:45 - 8:30 a.m................,........................Registration/Check In 8:30 - 8.45 a.m...........................................................Welcome 8.45 - 9:30 a.m..............................................Keynote Session 1 Keynote speaker: Bob Hertzberg Speaker"Emeritus, California Assembly Bob Hertzberg graduated from the Universily of Redlands and wrote his honors thesis on how Bear Valley Dam and Big Bear Lake helped supply water to the citrus 9roves of Redlands and Mentone. Twice elected Speaker of the California Assembly, Hertzberg provided leadership as California invested heavily in its infrastructure, housing, transportation, and water infrastructure. "If there is a theme to what I sought to do in the legislature, it is to create lasting value by building an infrastructure that will allow Califarnians to succeed," Hertzberg said upon his retirement as Speaker. He is currently a partner in the government relations section of Mayer, Brown, Rowe, and Maw in Las Angeles. 9:30 - 9:50 a.m. .........................................Break/Poster session 9:50- 11:15 a.m.................................................Sessions 2 & 3 Session 2 - Infrastructure and Changing Technology Is how we construct and how we manage our infrastructure changing due to improved technology? Hear the latest technological breakthroughs. ,. ) Thursday, February 26, 2004 DoubleTre.e Hotel, Ontario, California Session 3 - Sustainable Infrastructure Invited chair: Martha Davis, IEUA; Jolene Redva/e, Eastern MWD; Eliza Jane Whitman, IEUA Not all infrastructure is concrete and asphalt. Many organizations in our region are constructing infrastructure that is in hannony with the environment. This session includes examples of some of these. 11: 15 - 12: 15 p.m. .....................................................Session 4 Session 4 - New Directions in Infrastructure Management Chair: Ken Harlow, Brown and Caldwell; Pervaiz Anwa~ Brown and Caldwell; and Yaz Emrani, Advanced Infrastructure Management Asset management is one of the fastest grawing areas in the consulting arena. Hear fwo consultants talk about why this is important. 12: 15 - 1 :45 p.m.......................................Luncheon/Slide Show Infrastructure slide show: D" Hany Farran, Cal Poly Pomona 1 :45 - 2:00 p.m. .........................................Break/Poster Session 2:00 - 3:30 p.m. .........................................................Session 5 Session 5 - Examples of Regional Infrastructure SoIutions Chair: Michael Moore, RBF; Blake Anderson, Orange Counly Sanifotion District; Melodie Johnson, Western J.AWD; Susan Mulligan, Cal/eguas MWD 3:30 p.m. ......................................................................Adjoum /"""" r- /"""" , \.,~ '~ ".~ ' ,,;'<""-- . Ò. ~o~o~...r:. '~- e~\:~'\ 'ð.~ ~/. r'~~ , ",~,¡W:l\\~~~'ð.'Ç.ò.s~,<~ "..., ,', GO"'..' 'X'."~r;;./~ ~ \' \~'d ,\ ; ~ ,.,... '.... '. - " " ,7'" . L ; i , ,.¡ _:.~ - tt;. " " '. Z 1 ST A~N UAL. , EXECUT\Ve;. .13R\.EFtNG c\V\ARCI-I'11-1Z, ZO04, RADISSOJ:< HOTEL ~. SACRAMENTO <pC;;£' /r~ ~ ~~5 os",. "- ~~ fe' " l¡f//¡" =,..?!e,'",trJe,"':7 r~ A If::: t~ ) THURSDAY, MARCH 1 1 8:00 .... On-slte registration and ch.do:-In 8:45 W.I....... Rita Schmidt Sudrnan, Ex«utivo Dim:lor. Wol<r EdUalliou FoUluiation Th. Vision of CalIfornia Wa..rln lb. Now Schwarzon.ggor AdmInIsb'Otion Mliœ Chrisman, StcreltJry. California Resaurces ilgtncy T~~=':YPro""Hon Agmcy' Break TriDity - flows - Bow Will Roøølntlon of this Iss.. Affect DoIIa WaterVson and lb. Klamath w.o.-. _nt? To~:'~~: = MIznogor. MiJœ Orcutt, Fishtrns Dim:toT, Hoopø Valley 'Jri"" ~rw.~~ ~~ S"'J.~.-r;::~'f;:=NmuIa D- Kirk RadII""', Re¡¡imuú Dim:tor, U.S. Bu.....u ofReclønullitm, Mid-Pøcifù: Rtgion Moderator. J.ff Mount. Profrssor of GaI/ogy, U_rsilyofCalifomio,Dmn$ Lunch Loglsl.- Water Update Stale Son. MiJœ Machado, ChaiT, s....,. Agricullure IUId Wotor Rømtrcts Crmmlillor 1:30 ¡no 'I1dol flows and tho Delta - Loam Abo.t -- oa the Major RoIoTld.. PLay In lb. EaI1wy Exœrpls fro.. 0./,. 'IidaI Flows Vid.. Diana Jambs, Dtpuly Dim:toT, California Depa-ofFilhlUld = jon Bursu. Civil Enginær. U.S. G«>/agiad Survey" Barbara McDonnell, Chú/. DivIsion of-menial Smlic:ea, Oúifomio Dep/Irlmml ofWoter Rnau- Mod.rator. Kim '\àylor, Doputy Di- Science Program. CaUfamia Bay-o./,. Au1hority Break 9,00 9:30 10,00 10:30 Noon 2:45 FRIDAY, MARCH 1 2 8,30 am Impl......ting CAI.PIID - Th. Rol. of lb. Hapa Proposal, lb. OeAl'. lb. South Della Impnnem.nt Program and lb. Environmental Water A<coant Jason Peltio~ Deputy Assis..,1 StcI'dary for W_1UId Sa.nc.. U.S. IJ<parI"",,1 ofllœ Interior Palrick Wrigh~ Ex«utivo Dim:/or, California Bay-Dtlla Authority 11m Quinn, Vie< Prtsidonl, Slate Wotor Proi<cIIssUÐI. MWD ofSoullœm California John Herrick, Counsel, Soulh DelltJ Wotor ilgtncy 8rent Walthall. MalUlpl' of Bay-0./1tJ Resourœs DiDision, ~m~;:;;:" ~1tJ^ The Bay Inslilu" ~=~ Ex«u~ ,,:;,::'"£¡~~'r.=':I;k ~Ho. Chair, Cal:;::J. Bøy-o./" Public Adoiaory Ca...dllor' Window on WashIngton Rep. Jobn Doolittlo. R-Roddin, Member, Approprialiou. Conmtillor' Peace on lb. Colorado Rho< - What Hcnv'l Roborl Johnson. RqiaIUÚ Dim:lor, U.S. BlU'ttJu of &cl4nuJlion, Luwer Colortu/o Region Is -"" Working on lb. CoJondo- Gerald Zimmmnan. E=utivo Diro<tor, CalDrado RiTIor Board of California Donn!s Underwood, ""IU p¡",;, mI for CoIDrodo Riær MaIlers, Pa: :1:::'~~ Soullœm N..... W- Aulhari/y" SId WiJson Jr., GmmII MIuuJger, c...fnd Ariza... Wof... Conservation Districl Michael Cohen. Smœr Assada/O. PadJi. InsHI..k Moderator: Jim Lochhoad. AIIam'1J, Brrnunskin, Hyatt & Far"" 4:30 10:00 10,30 11,00 ~ì What this - to"tilar city or County 8..... Fujimoto, Chú/. S_tor 5«t/orI, Sial< Wotor - Control Board Jason UhIey, 5_... MIznogor, RiversUk County BID 8usath, Sm_MIznogor, City of- LosIio Gaul~ Wol<r Quality Coon/illlllar, P1øar Cmmty Judy MiIbon. EdUalIion/IOIlr Di,..",o Wotor EduaJlion -. Moderator: Roborl Collac:ott, Cnlifornia AssociaIion of s- M/tnDgeIIImI Agendts BOSTBD RECEPTION 12:30 p..... Adjoarn 'III11ita1 I!~ .""""0""" ......-.. ,.-_.. - ..."..,..........-.... ~.... """""""""""-"""""""'" ---....,..,...... """"_"""""" ""'""" - fIøuy ]. ",~]" Ph.D., UaI- .. CaIIIomJo: ..,. ........... ........ -........ "'-'... ........... 11<deouAa .. C- -luy. ..... .-.- ....... c-. - - "-"'< """"'" ......... MWH . D- an""" So...... """"""" ...'" Co.; x.,...n. o.oø.... Sou""" N~" ...'" A........... Fœd ean.... Kee&, - WøDd.1n<.; Huoll a..J. Low 0IIk0 .1 H'" CIa);""'" 0.'" CA CeaIal_"'" ConbaI "-' ..... - ~ CaUfo""" ...... ...",c-m..o. CøandJ; """"" -... .... Bay MaaIdpal VtlUly """"" PhIl Dunn,IDAW; _CO """"",",The", "".0UIe ""'-""'" ...wanlc. "]eny'GIodbo<h. "-takLW -......... Guy- c.......IU_"""" "'--"""C""'-"'Conoa'""""""ç Do"""""""""'"""",","",, "'"-- QuiM. MWD"",""'c.IiIamI«;_...u.m. RodWn........ An_""""'" """-.....-_FnnœøSpi.,..-...... ...... Caøualthe; """'"' 'Dofla< N- Aud.... .......... CJwIn T. ('l>d) "" CJI2M Hill; G"y -- -......'" .. 'l'ut&; "'" ...... >'<p. ....m.... 1M. "! .. " . Radisson Hotel. 500 Leisure Lane, Sacramento ~ (916) 922-2020 The briefing will be at the Radisson Hotel, 500 Leisure Lane, in Sacramento. Shuttle transportation from Sacramento International Airport to the hotel is available via Supershuttle, 1-800-BLUE VAN. Car rental and taxi services also are available at the airport. ~;II . II :! Hotel reservations can be made by calling the Radisson Hotel's reservation line, (BOO) 333-3333; be sure to tell them you are attending the Water Education Foundation conference to receive the special $84 room rate plus tax, per night. REGISTRATION ,.-... WATER EDUCATION rOUNDATION'S 21 BT ANNUAL EXECUTIVE BRIEF'ING New Directions on the Water Front. March 11-12, 2004 Please register me 0 $250 (WEF major contributor of $100 or more) 0 $300 (Non-contributor) 0 $175 (Wednesday-only, WEF major contributor) 0 $200 (Wednesday-only, WEF non-contributor) 0 $300 Exhibit Booth Thursday Cancellation policy - full refunds (less a $25 administrative charge) will be given if written notice is received by 5 p.m. March 5. Substitutions may be made at any time. Faxed registrations will be accepted with purchase orders or credit cards. Name TItle Organization Address City E-mail State- Zip Phone Lunch Choice 0 London Broil 0 Grilled Salmon 0 Vegetarian 0 No, r cannot attend, but please accept my tax-deductible contribution to the Water Education Foundation's educational program. 0 Visa 0 American Express 0 Mastercard Purchase order #- Card number Exp. Date -- Signature ~ (Must be signed to process credit card order) Please return with payment to: Water Education Foundation 717 K Street, Suite 317, Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone (916) 444-6240. Fax (916) 448-7699. -- The Water Education Foundation's 21st Annual Executive Briefing is designed to give the busy water professional the information needed to make deci- sions affected by water policy in .2004. It is a year of "New Directions on the Water Front"with a new state administration and a significant number of potential water agreements on the horizon. r- The issues and complexities surrounding these new directions will be the focus of panelists from state and federal agencies, water districts, businesses, and the urban, agricultural, and environmental stakeholder groups. The 2004 Executive Brief- ing will focus on: . . The Vision of California Water in the New Schwarzenegger Administration . Implementing CALFED - The role of the Napa Proposal, the OCAP, the South Delta Improvement Program and the Environmental Water Account . Is Peace Working on the Colorado River? - What next now that California parties have signed the QSA? What do the other states think? . Trinity River Flows - How will resolution of this issue affect Delta water users and the Klamath River's environment? . Urban Stormwater Discharge Requirements - What they mean for your city or county . Tidal Flows and the Delta - Learn about the research on the major role tides play in the estuary When: Where: Cost: Thursday, March 11 and Friday, March 12, 2004 Radisson Hotel, Sacramento $250 for Foundation major contributors ($100 or more annually); $300 for non-contributors - with an optional Thursday-only registration for $175 for major contributors; $200 for non-contributors. A limited number of Thursday exhibit booths are available. r- Proceeds benefit the Foundation's school programs. -- I fI ' ~~ Register T odaJJ! WATER EDUCATION FOUNDATION 717 K Street, Suite 317 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 444-6240 Fax: (916) 448-7699 Internet: www.watereducatlon.OIB Lower Colorado River Tour March 24 - 26, 2004 Presented by the Water Education Foundation The Colorado River is alife1ine to almost 25 million people in the Southwest. Development of the river has transformed arid areas - supplying vast agricuIturallands, expanding urban cities and creating world-reno~ recreational areas. In the Lower Basin virtually every drop of the river is allocated and yet demand is growing. How the Lower Basin states - . Arizona, California and Nevada - use and manage this water to meet agriCIÙtural, urban, environmental and industrial needs is the focus of the three-stateLowerColorado River Tour. r-- . . . .e tour travels along the Lower Colorado RivedÌ'Om Hoover Dam to the Salton Sea aJUlthe Coachella Valley. Along the way, speakers from various viewpoints discuss the needs and perspectives of agriclÙtural and urban users in Arizona, California and Nevada. The tour is a must Cor water policy-makers, water board managers and dIrec- tors, lawyers, consultants, journalists, and anyone interested in Colorado River issues. The tour is co-sponsored by the James Irvine Foundation, the San Francisco Foundation and the U.S. Bureau oCReclamation Lower Colorado Region. The fast-paced tour begins at the Clarion Hotel in Las Vegas at 7:30 a.m. on Wednesday, March 24, and ends at the Ontario International AIrport by 6 p.m., Friday, March 26. Prdposedactivities include a tour oCUoover Dam and a boat ride on Lake Mead. . . On this action-packed tour, you will learn about: . Lower Basin 'state perspectives -Arizona, California and Nevada . The California 4.4 plan and the state's Colorado River supply . The latest on the Imperial Valley-San Diego water transfer . Drought conditions and water storage within the Colorado River Basin . Tribal water rights and how they affect the river's water supply . Agricultural water use, iIrigation and drainage problems . Urban growth . Border issues between the Lower Basin and Mexico . Groundwater use, management and banking . Endangered species and mlÙti-species planning . Salton Seaecologiça1 and salinity issues r-- The mlssion of the Wa'e< Education Foundation, an impartial, non.prof. organization. iJ '0 crea,e a be.e, undemanding of wate, iJ,uos and help ",solve wa.., resource problell1J5 through educational prograll1J5. - Tentative stops on the proposed itinerary: . Hoover Dam and Lake Mead . Central Arizona Project facilities . Havasu National Widlife Refuge . Metropolitan Water Districtilf Southern California's Gene Pumping Plant . Imperial, Coachella and Palo Verde valleys . The Salton Sea . Registration fee for one person, single occupancy room - $575 Registration fee for two people, double occupancy room - $950 Register four or more people for the Lower Colorado River Tour and receive a discount - single occupancy rooms $525; double occupancy rooms, $900. . . The tour begins at 7:30 a.m. Wednesday, March 24, at the Clarion Hotel in Las Vegas and wil1 end by 6 p.m. Friday, March 26, at California's Ontario IntematiODalAirport. Travel will be by air-conditioned bus equipped with video monitors and restroom. The tour registration fee includes meals, transportation and rooms at file Holiday Inn in Lake Havasu City, AZ (Wednesday) and the Barbara Worth Country Club Hotel in HoItville, CA (Thursday), Tour participants are responsibIe Cor their own transportation to Las Vel!BS and home Crom Ontario. This is a one bus tour, seating is liDiited. All reservations are on a first-come, first-serve basis. Reservations can be made by completing the attached fom and returning it to the Foundation with payment. - Faxed reservations will be accepted with credit card or purchase order payments: Fee includes all meals, lodging,. transportation w1!Ïfë on the tour and background material. For cancelations, the deadline for a full refund is 5 p.m. March 12 .due to hotel, meal and transportation bookings. Request Cor a refund mnst be in writing. Substitutions mav be made at anv time. On-line registration is available at our web site, www.watereducation.org 11 For those arriving in Las Vegas on Thesday, March 23, the Clarion Hotel is holding a limited number of rooms at $80 a night. To reserve a room, call the hotel at 1-800-732-7889 beCoreMarch 2 and say that you are with the . Water Education Foundation tour group to get the special $80 rate. This is not included in the cost uCthe tour. I This activity has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal J Education credit by the State Bar of California in the amount of 20 t hours, The Water Education Foundation certifies that this activity con- I forms to the standards for approved education activities prescribed by the rules and regu1ations of the State Bar of California governing mini- mum continuing legal education. There is an additional charge of $1 00 to register for MCLE credit. -Additional tour information and complete itinerary will be mailed approximately one month before the tour. .llease notifv the Foundation Prior to the tour if vou have a medical condition or other special need we should be aware of to accommodate vou. Water Educatio.n Foundation Lower Colorado. River Tour Registration Form Name(s) r- Title(s) Organization Address City, State, Zip Phone No. E-mail Driver's Liœnse/ lD. Card No. State_Expo Date Date ofBirth (Necessary for security clearance at some facilities) My $- fee is enclosed (5575; 5525 per person if 4 or more are registering). Includes all transportation, -- meals andovernightlodgingwhile on the tour. based on single oersonoCCUDarlCVDerroom. O~ $ fee is enclosed (5950; 5900 if 4 or mo;e are registering). InclucÌe;';;u, transPortation, meRrs and overnight lodging while on the tour. for two neople sharinl!: a room. . - Yes, register me for MCLE credits for an additional $100 fee. $ - Total enclosed Credit card number: 0 American Express: I.Purchase Order No: . . Exp. date---1- For payment by 0 Visa 0 MasterCard Signature (must be signed to process order) We reserve as many non-smoking rooms as are available. If you WANT a smoking room, please check here: - 5 p.m. March 12 is the last date to cancel and receive a full refund. Refund request must be in writing. Substitutions may be made at any time. -- . Faxed reservations accepted with purchase order or credit card payments. Please make checks payable to Water Educa- tion Foundation and send with completed form to 717 KSt., Ste. 317, Sacramento, CA95814. Phone: 916-444-6240. FAX: 916-448-7699. f.........,-......'.C..:.'. 1.~: .c. ". ÇAUCORN,^ SPEC"" D'S,R'CCS "SSOÇ,A"O' . SPECIAL DISTRICT JÆ3 1m;! GOVERNANCE ACADEMY ~ ~ IE ß1j ¡øJ ~ß ItJ fJ [~ ~ Wi] ~ !\!1J ~ if¡J f~ Lhèl~t~~~;_f on ~!frcri,~ gov~rnan", b~ " ,,"", dirtCtori¡'rum~r with tl:t rkt~ '}",';.::.I diJ,ru.", r- r-- CITIZEN GOVERNANCE ~.i!I.f!¡Ilí1ma!ii!i!lilöifjj¡¡¡¡¡!itm! Citizen governance is the backbone of Amerian democracy. The basic assumption of our governance system is that ordinary citizens who are elected or appointed to public boards rdlect the bdiefi;, values and needs of the community. Equally important is that they bring those values to the board table and together, as a unified board, they will set a direction that is responsive to the needs and values of the community. r-- CSDNs Special District Governance Academy is a cutriculum-based set of courses designed specifically fot special district directors and ttustees. TheAcademy œptesentS the core serofknowledge created and a=pted by the special district community, and encompasses everything ditectors need to know about Governance Foundations, Setting Direction and Community Leadership, the Board's Role in Finance and Fiscal Accountability and the Board's Role in Human Resources. "...... It is strongly recommended that the Governance Foundations module be the first course taken. í'i~ ¡~ f!lc1 ;~~ 'ii t!t ~ ~ ~ j,! II Œi ~ ~ ~ ~ "...... ... CSDA's Special District Governance Academy is a groundbreaking continuing education program that recogruzes the necessity for the board and general manager to work closely toward a common goal. Ptogram participantS attend four sessions. which define the roles and responsibilities of special disttict governance teams. General managers are encouraged to enroll in the program as a member of the governance team. . The program consistS of24 hours ofinstruccion and participation. . In order to receive the best value &om this education, we recommend you complete the encireAcademy. . Individual module regiStrations are permitted, however we strongly recommend your taking the Governance Foundations module as the prerequisite to the other three modules. . Program participantS who complete the entire program receive a certificate of completion award. WOULD YOU LIKE TO BRING THE ACADEMY TO YOUR AREA? With a minimum enrollment of20 people. CSDA will be happy to bring the Academy to you. This will allow CSDA to provide the classes based on your schedule. at your location, and at the participants' pace. This is an excellent opportunity to team up with othet districts in your area or even your local chapter of CSDA, to customize your own schedule for completing the Aeademy. For mote information. contact Karen Diliberti at 877.924.CSDA or karen@CSda.net. CSDA SPECIAL DISTRICT GOVERNANCE ACADEMY COURSES . Governance Foundations . Setting Direction/Community Leadership . Board's Role in Finance and Fiscal Accountability . Board's Role in Human Resources "...... ( , !Ii\1 æ ~ w ~ ~ ~ IÆÎ ~ Ü!J g¡¡ ~ ¡¡j j f:W i'ij CSDA'S SPECIAL DISTRICT GOVERNANCE ACADEMY BECOMES PLATFORM OF SDLF RECOGNITION PROGRAM 5'" @~ SPI!CIALDI5IIUC1' """"""""RJ!JNDA11ON CSDXs Special District Govetnance Academy certi£ìcate of completion is the first step to realizing the Recognition in Sp.cial District Go"""""",,, developed by the Special District I..eadenhip Foundation (SDLF). In addition to theAcademy. a candidate must also complete 10 hours of elective coursework by one of the Foundation's sponsoring organizations; r- . Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) . California Association of Public Cemeteries (CAPe) . California Association ofR.=tion and Park Districts - (CARPD) . CalifomiaAssociation ofSanirationAgericies (CASA) . California Rural Water Association (CRW II¡ . California Special DistrictsAssociation (CSDA) . Fire DisrrictsAssociation of California (FDAC) . Mosquito and Vector Control Association of California DÙtricts that ar< m4mb4rs of one of the (MVCAC). sponsoring organizations will receive a The recognition is designed 50 that the Academy covers the essentials of good governance, and the electives cover service- specific knowledge. Districts that are members of one of the sponsoring otpnizations will receive a significant discount on the price of the Academy. For further informacion on SDLF, please contact SDLF Administratot Melissa Soria at 916.442.7887 or msoria@csda.net. significant discount on the pric4 of the Acfl/.Úmy. ,.. r- j " ' " As the core ofCSDAS Special[)~'f¡~G~~!làncefl.Ca.dœy;' this module s~ as the ."fo;;"cktioit foithe sen.. on the effective ~Ce bf spéGiàldisiricts. ThiS Course focus.. on the three critical cfunen.;ions of govem";'Cc: ' .. speci.i bistridTrustees as Policy Leaders .. The E£feccm: Special piStrict Board .. The Board's Responsibilities ""d Rol.. in Special Djstrlcts The central pan: of cl,jscoutse, th~ Effective Special District Board, will fucus on the foUr eSsential stePs leading to effective , govemai1ce !òcspecial disaicts. bireao!St"IÏu.stea willleari1haw: to: .. Develop ~ Up)ty,of putpose on their bo.ard .. Ùnders,r.ndandworkwitliin the board's role in thedisrrict .. Build ~ srrong;po;itive operational cul,cure on' rhe board .. Organizecheformal s~cture of the boud ... DATES AND LOCATIONS Mare.h '3,2004 - Ontario April 15.2004': FreÌIlont Apri122,:lOO4-Sàcram~to/I'DAèConÌerence ' Mayl!, 2(jO~ ~$~'=.m""tO, , ' , . .S<'F.~béi27,20~4 ~'¡>a¡m SprùJ.gs/çSDACom.r.nce ' 'qCcôber21!.2004-Yenttm . AG~~þA ,'. ' . .~S~ ::... 4:00É"n - Adjourn Hotel àc';'m,h1o4àtio;" for this cour",. . M.,.cl¡ 3, 2004 : Ontario Marriott .2200 E. Holt Bouie\l~rd ' . Önrario,CÀ91761 Hore! ReserVations: 800.228.9290 ratelcut-off date: $84.00/Febnwy 10, 2004 April 15, 2004 - Fremont Marriott 46100 Landing Parkway Fremont, CA'94538 Hore! Reservations: 800.228.9290 ratel~t-o£fdate: $99.001 April 1, 2004 April 22, 2004 - FDAC Annual Conference Col1rt}'2tdMidtoWnMarrioci: 4422 YStreet SacramentO, CA95817 HoreIReservations: 800.300.5191 rate/cut-o£fd~te: $79.00/April7, 2004 May II, 2004 - S=ento Marriott Rancho Cordova 11211PointEastDrive . Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 Hotel Rese,rvations: 800.228.9290 ratelcut-o!fd~te: $1 19.00/April 26, 2004 Septeinbet 27, 2004 - Palni,Springs - CSDA Conference '&méraldaResott ' . 44400 Indian Wells Lane Indl..nWdls,CA92210' " Hotel Re.;eiVations: ì:MO.HOTELs.l (468.3:>!1) ritelait,?lfdate..$!40,00/August 27,2004 ' .' Oct,;ber21,2ÓO4- VenturaB~Marri~¿' . ~l2t~:;~d' ". ' HoreIR.éscrvaci,om: 800.,228.9290 ' . ,ratelcut-off<iate: $99.00/Septeniber:l0,20P4, ,~¡¡." COURSE 2 -- ................ SETTING DIRECTIONS /COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP The second module in theAaulemy focuses on twO critical asp= of governance: the board's role in setting the long-term direction for the special distrier and the board's role in educating the public on the importance of the agency's agenda. The Setting Direction portion of this class will provide a srep-by- srep discussion of the board and senior management's roles in esra.blisbing the vision, mission, and. stn.tegic go.Js and success indiætOtS for the distrier. The Community Iadersbip portion of the class will address the impomnce of the board providing le:¡dership and infonrultion to the public on the essenti.! services provided by the speci.! disaier in their community. -- From the Setting Direction element of this course p:uticipants will: . Discuss why the process of setdng direction is important and the benefitS of the process for yout distrier . Leun to think strategically . Undersrmd the importance of being future orienred . Learn to make the transition from individu>! board member to member of a governance team . Undersrmd the sequence of steps in developing a setting- direction process Ftom the Community Leadership element of this course p:uticipanrs will learn: . Why it is important to be engaged with the community . To interacr with the person who approaches you in public on district business . To set protocols for the public's involvement in board meetings . To develop a board communiætions plan DATES AND LOCATIONS March 4,2004 - Ontario April 16,2004 - Fremont May 12, 2004 - Sacramento October 22,2004 - Ventura AGENDA 8:30 am - 9:00 am - Registration 9:00 am - Class Begins Lunch is inc/ud.din thecostofregistration. 4:00 pm - Adjourn . Hotel accommodation. for tIù. course. - March 4,2004 - Ontario Marriott 2200 E. Holt Boulevard Ontario, CA9l761 Horel Reservations: 800.228.9290 rate/cut-off dare: $84.00/February 10, 2004 April 16, 2004 - Fremont Marriott 46100 Landing Parkway Fremon~ CA 94538 Hore! Reservations: 800.228.9290 rare/cut-off dare: $99.00/Aptil 2, 2004 May 12, 2004 - Sacramento Marriott Rancho Cordova 11211 Point Easr Drive Rancho Cordova, CA95742 Horel Reservations: 800.228.9290 rate/cut-off date: $119.00/April26. 2004 October 22, 2004 - Ventura Beach Marriott 2055 Harbor Boulevard Ventura, CA93001 Hore! Reservations: 800.228-9290 rate/cut-off dare: $99.00/September 20,2004 . ,,"'.. ,.,:'.'" ..". ..<~,:-'.'.. , ".' oj:, ;~t~t~;.:Ni~{~(!~::>, .,.l't?:~:-.:~ ~, ;H'~~ ~:~2'~~f~Ëitt~;;: ,'." !'13Ó~~Rij';:s]~()Ù~'Ú~ i:]N~.\:\C'E: 'Bi' FISCAl.:' I\:(=ê:Ól;~rlXiÙipy:"'" ;",'~',"', , ", '", " " , '" , ",' , " ",' .'.. , ' " ,-',e":::¿,:;dd.,:""',ii",:'rie,;h"i",,';':,;,J::,;,,,,:.lci;;rr:,,- , ':" ',':~'~:'~~,~:~~~:;,~':i::¡;:~:~::~~:~',¡~~~':;,::,::::::;:,:::~;~:.,i::~~;~:,:: " ,. S:;tt1t;IE~~;~~~:~:,~f¿J;::': " " " ?""~:":,:s~:f;,:ii:.,yq.':d,,;,i:,I:r;'," ., " ' , " '. ;¿:¡;î:;l~i~i;:::~~!ËS::~: , ,", "" ',,' , .. ;>~I~t::'I::;~~:I~::~;:~'~::O:i~~';~~ir.. ,,~: ¿i'~:i;r's ',n:ll,":' ¡, bdg<~" ' ' ' , ' ,';:, , . ' , :.: ~~,~t:I~;~~~!~,';~,~;:,;;:~]:~oi~',=:: ": ,:.: ¡;::::I;o:;, ; ',: , lo-.....III8 . ',:, " ' " " . ......'.' ,::~~~;;t~:;~I~~:~:";è':~;;'" ~"' "":':::~'!,:~'.::,',;,",,:~,:,~,i~¡::~:'~:b,";:;;r," ,:::"';'c.:'" ,..'. ,'; , , '",..' ",".'0"., 0: ", ,:,,' .,1,~i",jü~ " , ", , :', , '" :,: '-' 5",.!:;;i: go':', ", : " " " '.. ' " ,':' .. " ' .- " ,., "', ,':,'; , D.i,'rESA.-.:'D LO,c.:.'\TIOKS'. .. \1,~"13J,20Ó,j.():",,,c Al',il 26, 2004, f"",',o:", ¡mi: 3, 20M: "~d;':"::'o::m '-:"".",hor4,2()(),1-\-¡,.'"", " ,'. : '. I/otd ~ccö;~mo~",iuJ;" ronhi"o",,:".:' " .', ;~~~:I:,,~!l;:~;~L:~\~~;~/ :'Úr:¡o,;~ o"",::u, c.:.... ;i1:,r,: , ' ,H",.I ¡\...",,:'o::,<: RJO,22;.9290 :;;r<: ,,::'::>'-: "".0' ~,,~ OO'~!;Jcll 9:20<:~ ',', i, '"' " ,',: ,I":.';,, " .' ',:',': " : " " \. "",:,.,' ','" ," ..: , , " , ; , , , ' , '" ,,' ,.. .... . ",; '" " ' :., man"er, ................ r- COURSE 4 BOARD'S ROLE IN HUMAN RESOURCES The fourth and final module in the series focuses on what might be the most difficult area for most special district boards: personnel The main employee hired by the governing board is the general manager. This module will address the board's ongoing relationship with the manager, the ,enior staff and other staff in the district. Ir will address general manager evaluation, the board', role in other staff evaluation, and whar to do and not do in human resources. Participants willicarn howro: . Develop guidelli"eswhen assessing the performance of the genera/manager . Determine a protocol for approving personnel policies . Develop a process for approving job descriptions and organizational structure . Understand confidentiality and lcgalliabilities of a district board member r- DATES AND LOCATIONS April 1,2004 - Ontario April 27, 2004 - Fremont June 4, 2004 - Sactarnento September 27,2004 - Palm SpringslCSDA Conference November 5, 2004 - VentUra AGENDA 8:30 am - 9:00 am, Registration 9:00 am - Class Begins Lunch is inclUlÚd in the cortofrtgistration. 4:00 pm - Adjourn Hotel accommodations for this course. April I, 2004 - Ontario Marriott 2200 E. Holt Boulevard Ontario,CA9176l Hotel Reservaåons: 800.228.9290 rate/cut-offdate: $84.00/March 9, 2004 April 27, 2004 - Fremont Marriott 46100 Landing Parkway Fremont, CA 94538 Hotel Reservations: 800.228.9290 rare/cut-off date: $99.00/ApriJ \3, 2004 June 4,2004 - Sacramento Marriott Rancho Cordova ll2ll PointEasrDrive Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 Hotel Rescrvaåons: 800.228.9290 rare/cut-off dare: $1 19.00/April 26, 2004 September 27, 2004. Palm Springs - CSDA Confcœnce EsmcraldaRcsorr 44-400 Indian Wells Lane Indian Wells, CA 92210 Hotel Reservations: 1.800. HOTELS.l (468.3571) rate/cur-off date: $140.00/August 27, 2004 - November 5, 2004 Ventura Beach Marriott 2055 Harbor Boulevard Ventura, CA9300l Hotel Rcservaåons: 800.228.9290 rate/cut-off date: $99.00/0ctober 4, 2004 (' ,. ,s "'"",,!,' '",u""'h'",kd ,h", Ii> :""""'"",,' F""",j,Il¡",hn""hkbc'c!,,' ",UIS'"";",,, 2004 SDGA COURSE SCHEDULE & PRICE SHEET Please rejèr to tbe corresponding colme page for botel accommodations, ~ ~ :::> Ontario a . Governance Foundations March 3 ~ . Setting Direccion/Community Leadership March 4 :r: . Board's Role in Finance & U Fiscal Accouncability March 31 en . Board's Role in Human Resources April 1 ~ Fremont 0 0 . Governance Foundations April;5 C"1 . Setting Direction/Community Leadership April 16 . Board's Role in Finance & Fiscal Accouncability April 26 . Board's Role in Human Resources April 27 I"'"' Sa=mento .. - . Governance FoundationslFDAC Annual Conference April 22 , Governance Foundations May 11 CSDA Member . Setting Direction/Community Leadership Sacramento continued . Board's Role in Finance & FiscalAccountability . Board's Role in Human Resources May 12 June 3 June 4 Palm Spring¡ . Governance Foundations . Board's Role in Human Resources September 27 September 27 Ventura . Governance Foundations . Setting Direction/Community Leadership . Board's Role in Finance & Fiscal Accountability . Board's Role in Human Resources October 21 October 22 November 4 November 5 SDLF SpolLloring Organization Member' Non-Member Governance FoundatiOILl - $160.00 $185.00 $250.00 Course 1 Setting Directiool Community Leadership - $160.00 $185.00 $250.00 Course 2 Board', Role in Finance & FIScal $160.00 $185.00 $250.00 Accountability - Course 3 Board', Role in Human Resources - $160.00 $185.00 $250.00 Course 4 r- 'To d,,"",inr if your district is a mrmbrrofo>ll of SDLF, ,pomoringorganirAtio"" pkasr "firmer pagr f. SDGA REGISTRATION FORM ................ -- P,LS r \!¡\IUl' - !UIIIUJ;ISTIUTI,)(\! H)I( AIL CUI IC'IS YES, I WOULD LIKE TO SIGN uP FOR THE FUlL ACADEMY! 0 CSDAMembers: $ 560.00 0 SDLFSponsorlngOrg.Member: 0 Non-members: $ 920.00 Full registration includes registr:UÎon for all classes in CSD& Special District GovernanceAcademy. Simplyindic:atewhkh classes you would be interested in attending by checking the appropriate box below. $ 660,00 Ií\DI\!!LJl'.\1. COll"SL IUCClStIUTI,)" -- .~~ 0 M;cl, 3, 2004 - On;"io ' 0 April 15,2004 - Fremont 0 April 22, 2004 - SacramentolFDAC Conference 0 May 11. 2004 - Saccamento 0 Sop_bet 27. 2004 - Palm SpringslCSDA Conr...= 0 Ocrober 21, 2004 - VentUtll 0 April 1, 2004 - Ontario 0 April 27, 2004 - Fremont 0 June 4, 2004 - Sacramento 0 September 27, 2004 - Palm SpringslCSDA Confeæna: 0 N....mbet 5. 2004 - Ventun CALCUlATE REGISTRATION COST: Course 1 $ Coursel $ Course 3 $ Course4 $ [Bml!1r.:.1 PLEASE MAIUFAX THIS FORM TO: California Special Districts Association 1215 KStreet, Suite 930 Sacramento, CA95814 Toll-f!ee: 877.924.CSDA I Fax: 916.442.7889 Register on-line atwww.csda.net 8 TOTAL ENCLOSED 1$ NameITide: DisttictlOr¡¡anizarion: Address: City'. State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Emili: Methad afPaymPft: 0 Check 0 VISa 0 Mastercud het. Name: Account N: -- Expiradon D..e: Si~..ure: Special ne.ds: 0 Wh.elchair hees, 0 Vegetariw 0 Visually Impaired 0 Other: 0 H.aring Impaired CanceUation Pallcy: CanceUatwru MUST b, mtUÚ IN WRITING na law than th,., days prior to the tVtnt in ardo to rrctive a ftúJ r.¡imå /m a $25 proeming fi'. Th", will b, NO EXCEPTIONS. 8 PRESORTED FIRST CLASS U,S, Postage PAID Pennn No, 2472 Sacramento, CA California Special Districts Association 1215 KStrect. Suite 930 Sacramento, CA95814 I!UsJ[!]r.i.1 GENERAL MANAGER EAST SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PO BOX 3427 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92413-3427 ~ to"!;' [,; '"", ,,' '" "', "....... 11,1.",1.1,1.,1."1',.,1,..,1,,'..1,,1,,1..,1,.1,1',,.1.11.,f ';~' ~'7