HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 01/11/2005
r\ni,þ East Valley
t' " Water District
3654 HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE #12, HIGHLAND, CA
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
January 11, 2005
2:00 P.M.
AGENDA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District
Secretary by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Tuesday meeting not requiring departmental
investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
Approval of Agenda
2.
Public Comments
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes for December 14,2004
4.
Resolution 2005.01 - Accept Conveyance of Pipeline Easement from Centex Homes
5.
Resolution 2005.02 - A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District
Disposing of Surplus Property APN: 1201-341-07 approximately 4.3 acres of vacant land located north
of Fifth Street, east of the 30 Freeway, in the City of Highland, County of San Bernardino, State of
California
6.
Approval of Liens for Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts
7.
Accounts Payable Disbursements: Accounts Payable Checks 199832 through 200116 were distributed
December 10, 2004 through January 5, 2005 in the amount of$I,388,068.47. Payroll Checks for period
ended December 10, 2004 and December 10, 2004 and included checks and direct deposits, in the
amount of $94,762.46 and $99,053.75. Total Disbursements for the period were $1,585,793.72.
OLD BUSINESS
8. Discussion and Possible action regarding Agreement to Develop and Adopt an Institutional Controls
Groundwater Management Program.
9.
Discussion and Possible action regarding the WET (Whole Effluent Toxicity) Litigation through
WestCas
10.
11.
Radon RulelPerchlorate Rule Update (General Manager)
Headquarters Project Review and Update (General Manager)
NEW BUSINESS
12. Approval to Renew Liens for Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Discussion and Possible action regarding the IRS standard mileage reimbursement rates for 2005.
Review and Accept Financial Statements for Period Ended November 30, 2004.
Resolution 2005.03 - Accept Employer Pickup Resolution Pre-Tax Payroll Deduction Plan for Service
Credit Purchases through PERS (Public Employees Retirement System).
Discussion and Possible Action regarding a letter from Sander A. Kessler & Associates, Inc., to appoint
Driver Alliant Insurance Services as the Districts Broker for Workers Compensation Insurance matters.
Discussion and Possible action regarding a recommendation from District Staff to Purchase an
Automatic Meter Reading System from Performance Meter, Inc.
Directors' fees and expenses for December 2004.
REPORTS
19. East Valley Water District Holiday Schedule for 2005
20.
21.
22.
East Valley Water District 2005 Board Meeting Schedule
General Manager's Report
Oral Comments from Board of Directors
CORRESPONDENCE
23. Appreciation letter from Ms Clarks and her fourth grade class regarding the East Valley Water District
Poster Contest and Calendars.
MEETINGS
24. Association of the San Bernardino County Special Districts January Membership Meeting hosted by
East Valley RCD / Inland Empire West TCD, Etiwanda Gardens, 7576 Etiwanda, CA., January 17,
2005.
25.
Legislative Breakfast, State of the City Address featuring Mayor Judith Valles, Radisson Hotel, San
Bernardino, CA., February 22, 2005.
2
CLOSED SESSION
26. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
[Government Code Section 54956.8]
Property:
8.2 +/- Acres of Vacant Land 9th
Street and Del Rosa Drive
San Bernardino County, California
APN: 278-201-30
Party with whom District will negotiate:
San Bernardino City Unified School
District
Party who will be negotiating on behalf of he District:
Under Negotiation:
Jim Cimino/Robert Martin
Price and Terms of Payment
27.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
[Government Code Section 54956.8]
Property:
27+/- Acres of Vacant Land
South of Highland Ave, West of
Central Ave.
San Bernardino, County, California
APN: 1191-251-01,03,04
Party with whom District will negotiate
State of California
Party who will be negotiating on behalf of the District:
Under Negotiation:
Robert Martin
Price and Terms of Payment
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
ADJOURN
- - - -- - - - - - - -- --- - -- - -- --- -- ------ ------ - ------ -- ---- -- --- --- -- - - - -- - -- -- -----
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability-related modification or
accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to paIiicipate in the above-
agendized public meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Assistant at (909) 885-4900 at
least 24 hours prior to said meeting.
-- - -- - --- - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- -- - -- --- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - --
3
Subject to Approval
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
DECEMBER 14, 2004
MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. by Preside!lt Goodin. Director Negrete
led the flag salute.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Directors Sturgeon, Negrete, Lightfoot, Wilson
Goodin
STAFF:
Robert Martin, General Manager; Paul Dolter, District Engineer;
Brian Tompkins, Chief Financial Officer; Justine Hendricksen,
Administrative Assistant
LEGAL COUNSEL: Steve Kennedy
GUEST(s):
Jo McAndrews, Charles Roberts (Hiúhland Community News)
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the December 14, 2004 Agenda be approved
as submitted.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
President Wilson declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 2:01
p.m. There being no written or verbal comments, the pu')lic participation section was
closed.
ADJOURN TO EAST VALLEY PUBLIC FACILITIES Cú:~PORATION MEETING
M/S/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the Regular Board Meeting be adjourned to the
East Valley Public Facilities Corporation Meeting at 2:02 p.m.
Minutes: 11114/04
RECONVENE TO EAST VALLEY WATER DlSEICT REGULAR BOARD
MEETING
M/S/C (Negrete-Sturgeon) that the East Valley Water District Regular Board
Meeting reconvene at 2:04 p.m.
APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 23, 2004 BOARD MEETI:>JG MINUTES
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the November 23, 2004 Board Meeting Minutes
be approved as submitted.
RESOLUTION 2004.32 - ACCEPT DEDICATION cr WATER DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM WITHIN TRACT 16003 IN THE CITY OF HIGhLAND was presented to the
Board for approval.
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that Resolution 2004.3¿, be approved.
RESOLUTION 2004.33 - ACCEPT DEDICATION OF SEWERS WITHIN TRACT
16003 IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND was presented to the Board for approval.
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that Resolution 2004.3~ be approved.
RESOLUTION 2004.34 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT IN RECOGNITION OF MARY CHIP.
BAXTER'S TWENTY -FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE was presented to the Board for
approval.
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that Resolution 2004.34 be approved.
The General Manager expressed his gratitude to Mary Chip-Baxter for her 25 years
of service with the District.
APPROVAL OF LIENS FOR DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the liens for delinquent water and sewer
accounts be approved.
DISBURSEMENTS
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that General Fund Disbursements #199594 through
199831 distributed during the period of November 22, 2004 through December 9,
2004 in the amount of $1,332,980.86 and Payroll Fund Disbursements for the period
ended November 26, 2004 in the amount of $97,007.76 totaling $1.429,998.62 be
approved.
2
Minutes: 12/14/04
RADON RULE/PERCHLORATE RULE UPDATE
The General manager reported to the Board that there w'iI probably be new rules for
Radon in the coming year; that there is a new Director at :=PA (Environmental
Protection Agency); that the District is waiting for the state to adopt regulations
regarding the Perchlorate Rule; that the final rule should be approved in 2006.
DIRECTOR GOODIN ARRIVED AT 2:11 P.M.
DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS SITE UPDATE
The General Manager gave an updated report on the ')istrict's Headquarters Site;
that he along with Brian, Paul and Justine met with GMIO to finalize a number of the
design issues; that a final package should be sent to t~e City of San Bernardino's
planning department for review in January. Information only.
BOARD REORGANIZATION
MIS (Sturgeon-Lightfoot) that the Board re-appoint the current Officers for a
second term.
Director Sturgeon rescinded his motion prior to a vote.
President Wilson declared nominatjons open for President.
Director Sturgeon nominated George E. "Skip" Wilson for President.
Director Goodin nominated Kip Sturgeon for President.
Vice President Sturgeon graciously declined the nomination for President.
M/S/C (Sturgeon-Lightfoot) that the nomination for President be closed and
the ballot be cast for George E. "Skip" Wilson as President to the Board.
Vote: Yes: (4) Negrete, Sturgeon, Lightfoot, Wilson
No: (1) Goodin
President Wilson nominated Kip Sturgeon for Vice President.
M/S/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that the nomination for Vice President be closed and
the ballot be cast for Kip Sturgeon as Vice President to t~le Board.
Vote: Yes: (5) Negrete, Sturgeon, Good;n, Lightfoot, Wilson
No: (0)
Minutes: 12114/04
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that Robert Martin L3 re-appointed as General
Manager.
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that Robert Martin :Je re-appointed as Board
Secretary.
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that Brian Tompkins be re-appointed as Chief
Financial Officer.
President Wilson stressed the importance of Committee Assignments and will bring
this item to the Board in 2005.
SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR HOLDING MEETINGS
President Wilson declared the time and place for holding regular meetings is
open for discussion.
M/SI (Goodin-Lightfoot) that the District's Regula; Board Meetings be held at
the District's Office located at 3654 E. Highland Avenue Suite 12, Highland,
California.
The motion was amended to included that the District's Regular Board Meetings be
held on the second (2nd) and fourth (4th) Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m.
M/S/C (Goodin-Lightfoot) that the District's Regular Board Meetings be held at
the District Office located at 3654 E. Highland Avenue ~uite 12, Highland, California
on the second (2nd) and fourth (4th) Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m.
SETTING METHOD FOR CALLING SPECIAL MEETIN(;S
President Wilson declared that the method for calling spc,cial meetings is open for
discussion.
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the board follow tI-,e government Code Section
54656 provision for calling special meetings.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AT
1677 PUMALO ST. APT #2, SAN BERNARDINO, CA., FROM BRENDA
STANDIFER AND MICHAEL DENTON was presented to the Board.
M/SC (Lightfoot-Goodin) that the Claim for Damages by Brenda Standifer and
Michael Denton be denied and referred to District's Legal Counsel and Insurance
Agency Caldwell & Moreland.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDINC A REQUEST FROM THE
CITY OF HIGHLAND TO RECEIVE WATER CONNECTION AND SEWER
4
Minutes: ]2/14/04
CREDITS FOR THE HIGHLAND COMMUNITY PARK (ì-l CENTRAL AVENUE was
presented to the Board.
The General Manager updated the Board regarding this request from the City of
Highland regarding water and sewer credits; that the City of Highland would like to
explore options to transfer water and sewer credits from one property to another; that
the current District Ordinances do not have a provision to accommodate this request.
Vice President Sturgeon would be inclined to worl~ with the City at staff's
recommendations.
Director Lightfoot voiced concern about the liability of transferring sewer rights, and
would like further information before making any decisions.
Director Goodin expressed concern regarding the financial impact this could have on
the District.
Director Negrete requested the District provide more information and justification in
order to make a decision regarding the City of Highlands request.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING DISTRICT PARTICIPATION
IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND'S 9TH ANNUAL CITRUS HARVEST FESTIVAL ON
APRIL 2, 2005.
M/S/C (Lightfoot-Goodin) that the District participate in the City of Highland's
9th Annual Citrus Harvest Festival on April 2, 2004.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGAhDING CANCELING OR
RESCHEDULING THE DECEMBER 28, 2004 BOARD MEETING.
M/S/C (Goodin-Lightfoot) that the December 28, 2004 be cancelled.
Vice President Sturgeon suggested staff provide the Eùard with a schedule of the
District's Holidays and a Board Meeting schedule for 20ú5.
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSES FOR NOVEMBER 2004 were presented to
the Board for approval.
M/S/C (Goodin-Negrete) that the Director's fees <~nd expenses for November
2004 be approved.
Director Goodin suggested when Board members attend special meetings or
conferences they report and update the information rec3ived to the Board regarding
the function they attended.
RELEASES OF LIEN FOR DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS.
Minutes: 12114/04
The list of liens released on December 14, 2004 was rev,;3wed. Information Only.
WATER QUALITY CONFERENCE BUDGET UPDATE
The General manager informed the Board a final report would be available at the
next regularly scheduled Board Meeting on January 11, 2005.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
The General Manager reported on the District's operatkms to date; that the CMUA
Sacramento Briefing is January 10, 2005; that the fuel ta:lk located at 1155 Del Rosa
Avenue has been emptied and a sub-contractor will be rê.moving the tank in the near
future; that the District will issue Cal Cards to employebs to purchase gas in January.
Information Only.
ORAL COMMENTS FROM BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Director Lightfoot informed the Board he has had a nU!:1ber of compliments on the
District's denim uniform shirts and suggested the District allocate an expense
account to purchase these shirts and use them for District functions and advertising.
Director Goodin wished everyone at East Valley Water District a Merry Christmas
and wonderful Holiday Season.
There being no further verbal or written comments froméhe Directors, this section of
the meeting was closed.
ASSOCIATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICT
MEMBERSHIP MEETING, RADISSON HOTEL, SAN BERNARDINO, CA.,
DECEMBER 20, 2004.
ACWA 2005 D.C. CONFERENCE, WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON, D.C., FEBRUARY 15-17, 2005
ACWA 2005 SPRING CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION,
CONVENTION CENTER, SAN JOSE, CA., MAY 3-6, 2CG4.
COURT
HOTEL,
SAN
JOSE
Information Only.
CLOSED SESSION
The Board entered into Closed Session at 3:00 p.m. as provided for in the California
Open Meeting Law, Government Code Section 54945.9(a), to discuss the item listed
on the Agenda.
Minutes: 12114/04
ADJOURN TO REGULAR SESSION
President Wilson declared that the meeting adjourn to regular session.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
The Board returned to session at 3:20 p.m. The item listed on the Agenda was
discussed in closed session with no reportable action being taken.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 3:20 p.m. until the next regularly scheduled Board
Meeting on January 11, 2005.
George E. "Skjp" Wilson, President
Robert E. Martin, Secretary
Minutes: 12/14/04
RESOLUTION 2005.01
A Resolution Of The Board Of Directors Of The Cast Valley Water District
Accepting Conveyance Of Pipeline Easement from Ce' :tex Homes, as Grantor of
an easement as described in Exhibit "A" and listed in Easement For The Right
To Construct, Use, Maintain, Alter, Add To, Repair, Replace and/or Remove
Pipeline Appurtenances, Under, Through And Across The Real Property Located
In The City Of San Bernardino, County Of San Bernaréino, State Of California.
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Conveyance of
Pipeline Easement dated December 7, 2004, and signed by Stan Stringfellow,
Manager Member for Highland Meadows Partners, LLC as grantor (s) grants to
the East Valley Water District, its successors and assigns a Pipeline Easement
over, under, through and açross the real property described therein, be and the
same is hereby accepted for and on behalf of said WElter Company.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of tilis resolution be attached
to said Conveyance of Pipeline Easement, and that th3 same be recorded in the
Office of the County Recorder, County of San Bernurdino, State of California,
and filed in the records of said Board.
********
The foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the Board of
Directors of the East Valley Water District by motion duly made, seconded and
carried on January 11, 2005.
Ayes: Directors:
Noes:
Absent:
EASTVALLE:.YWATER DISTRICT
George E. Wilson, Board President
ATTEST:
Robert E. Martin, Board Secretary
Job No. W2306
Tract 16607
12/15/04 jw
RECORD REQUEST OF AND MAIL TO:
East Valley Water District
P. O. Box 3427
San Bernardino, CA 92413
FEE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6103
CONVEYANCE OF PIPELINE EASEMENT
IJIOIUI) IIWJOIS..... u.c
. as Grantor(s). for valuable
consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to
the East Valley Water District, a County Water District. its successors and assigns, as Grantee. an
easement for the right to construct, use, maintain, alter, add to, repair. replace and/or remove pipeline or
pipelines together with all necessary appurtenances over, under, through and across the real property
located in the County of San Bernardino, State of Califomia, described as follows:
See Exhibit "A" and 'B" attached hereto and made a part hereof
Grantor(s) further agree to notify EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT of any future use across said
easement and to coordinate with EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT tho installation of any future facilities
within said easement.
/J IN WITNESS HEREOF G ( executed this instrument this ~ day of
V.tc... ,1tJe!!/... W ,the rantor s) has
(Attach Notary Cert.)
EXHIBIT "A"
15.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMK~T TO
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
TRACT 16607
A STRIP OF LAND 15.00 FEET IN WIDTH OVER PORTIONS OF PARCELS 8,12 & 27 OF
TRACT 16607, IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK -.- OF MAPS, PAGES
- THROUGH -' INCLUSIVE, RECORD OF SAID COUNTY, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL'A'
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 Ol' SAID TRACT; THENCE
SOUTH 89°59' 19"EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 124.07
FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SWEETMLWOW COURT, BEING A
POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE WITH A RADIUS OF 53.00 FEET, CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHWEST, A RADIAL LINE TO WHICH BEARS SOUTH 70°12' 18" EAST;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND IUGHT -OF- WAY THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF WO7'03", A DISTANCE OF 13.06 FEET TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A RADIUS OF 47.00 FEET, CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHEAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURve THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 04°49'47", A DISTANCE OF 3.96 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-
WAY NORTH 89°59'19" WEST, ALONG A LINE SOUTHE~Y AND PARALLEL WITH,
AND 15.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 8, A
DISTANCE OF 116.1] FEET, TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE NORTH
00°0] '33" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF ]5.00 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL'B'
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 12 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE
SOUTH 89°59'19"EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 12 AND 27, A DISTANCE
OF 249.74 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SPRINGMEADOW COURT,
BEING A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE WITH A RADIUS OF 53.00 FEET,
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, A RADIAL LINE TO WHICH BEARS SOUTH
70°12'18" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SND CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF WO7'O3", A DISTANCE OF 13.06 FEET TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A RADIUS OF 47.00 FEET, "::ONCA VE TO THE
SOUTHEAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURV:J THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 04°49'47", A DISTANCE OF 3.96 FEET; THENC LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-
PARCEL 'B' (continued)
WAY NORTH 89°59' 19" WEST, ALONG A LINE SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH,
AND 15.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOTS 12 AND 27, A
DISTANCE OF 233.84 FEET, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY OF SWEETMEADOW
COURT, BEING A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE \VITH A RADIUS OF 47.00
FEET, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, A RADIAL LINE TO WHICH BEARS NORTH
60°56'23" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-
WAY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4°49'47", A DISTANCE OF 3.96 FEET TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE WITH A RADIUS OF 53.00 FEET, CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHEAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF- WAY
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF WI7'03", A DISTANCE OF 13.06 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT "8"
15' WIDE
E.V.W.D.
SEWER EASEMENT
-rR No. 12306
ME. 22Ð/ß&-Bß
18
12
NOO"01 '33"W
15.00'
10
Ð
9
11
28
29
!
i
1" :: 80'
/Z/OZ/O4
CURVE TABLE
# R L TAN DElTA
1 47.00 3.96 1.98 4'49'47"
2 53.00 13.06 6.56 14'07'03"
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
before me, '1\ÌC",~~.:..;""\"'\J_,,_{ez-, NfYr¡.,v! P\'\~\'\C,
N_""'T..o""""(,_",-_Doo,"..~""",,
~-\T\fI",~e\k~
() ".mo(.)~-".)
'~ersonally kmwn to me
0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
State of Calffornia
County of \AJ') ~A(.\~}..
ð
\"1-10"1 \Otl-
,J . -f boIo:...J,
personally appeared '7-111.'<\
On
. WOÑNE"i:. ;'vAAi - f
Commission # 1408428
Notary Public 0 CaIIIamIa ¡
Los Angeles C<U1fy f
MyComm, Exp/resMar3O, 2007
}ss.
to be the pelson(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged Ie me that he/shelthey executed
the same in hisiher/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on 'he instrument the person(s), or
the entity UPOII behalf of which the person(s)
acted, execuled the instrument.
~apd.and fficlalseal.
If - :...",~~-."", '
OPTIONAL
Tlwugh thelnfolTMffoo below Is nolrequired bylaw. ftmBYProve woBble to persons re'; -,goo the docurnsnt Bndcoufdprevenl
fmudufentromovBfBnd roBttschrnsnlofthls form 10 BOOth., .1acurns"t.
Description of Attached Document
TItle or Type of Document: ( 0 '^ \! f "(r '^ (Q -
Document Date: \ ì..-k î \ n 4.
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
o~ 1(\ \(f\'\'<\Iì '(--C1~ MLvd:
Number of Pages:
1\
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name: ~V\ '-".\-v""'f'!.16'Î-C \ \r.. \
0 IndMdual
0 Corporate Officer-litie(s):
0 Partner-D Lim~ed 0 General
0 Attorney-in-Fact
0 Trustee
0 Guardian or Conservator
'j3:0Iher: Y\,',^n~-'.""~ ~\!..,,'-\.'v;.e<
Signer Is Representing:
fooot Ihm>b h...
0"" """""-"""""".'0'35000 "!oAwoo P.O, eo> ,...,. c..o_, CA"3"-""" --""""""""-"0
_"CoI1ToI.F~,'-800-"""27
RESOLUTION NO. 2005.02
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DlRECTORS
OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DISPOSING OF SURPLUS PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the East Valley Water District (hereinafter referred to as "the District") is a
county water district organized and operating pursuant to CalifoITlia Water Code Section 30000 et
seq.;
WHEREAS, the District is the owner of approximately 4.: acres of vacant land located north
of Fifth Street, east of the 30 Freeway, in the City of Highland, Cùunty of San Bernardino, State of
California, which is more particuIarlydescribed as Assessors Palce! Number 1201-341-07, and is
further described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (hereinafter referred to as "the Property");
WHEREAS, the District's Board of Directors has tentati ...~ly determined that the Property
is no longer necessary for use by the District; and
WHEREAS, the District's Board of Directors presently d"sires to sell the Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the East Valley
Water District as follows:
1.
The Property is hereby declared to be surplus lanè: however, the District's Board of
Directors reserves the right to reverse said declaration, which is haeby rendered without prejudice
to the ability of the District's Board of Directors to rescind thi:; Resolution any time prior to any
decision to sell or otherwise dispose of the Property.
2.
The District's General Manager is hereby direclc<1 cO send written offers to sell the
Property to all entities entitled to receive such notice pursuan~ to the applicable provisions of
Government Code Section 54220 et seq.
3.
The District's General Manager is also hereby directed to comply with all applicable
provisions of Government Code Section 54220 et seq. in negotiating the sale of the Property.
4.
The terms of any sale and/or disposal of the PPJperty are subject to subsequent
acceptance and final approval by the District's Board ofDirectOfs.
ADOPTED this 11111 day of January, 2005.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
George E. Wilson
President, Board of Directors
AITEST:
Robert E. Martin
Secretary, Board of Directors
2
.",
.,i,..
'i.:
¡¡ i
I [
H
I ."
J "
I ¡;
j ~
I
I
J
i
1
~
,I
"u,
u",
@
@
I
I ~~
\ ~>
I
i
¡:1
Î gr[
I ~-=
.1 .~~
1 ~-.
i "'~~
I ~,::.g
j n~
~~
"1 -
I'TI'
,'. ¡¡¡-
'.'., '< ~~
, ~:,
". i:=
:.......-.,'.'.
-
".."
....
,
..
"~
J,
'oo.' "',!
@ @)
""""(""¡
"
Coo,,
",dina, CA. 2003-2004 . 1201.34HJr.oOQO. . CA. She.t 1 of 1
.,..;, ~~~ r
,,~, ãi I
-v.< E;¡ I
."....' i; \
~! i
@
@
@
@
.'
341
@
.""'-~@¡
-"....---~-,,",-
@
@)
@
Ii;)
- ,
'"
"
@
!"
~
,.,",
"',
u',
;"",
......
...
~
~
~
;-
<.n
~
~
:-
¡;;
'"
~
<.n
¡"
i<:
I
l
~;!
~~
~[
"",
~
\!!)
-
~
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
1. 0080567-06*
2. 0082714-07
3. 0170027-01
4. 0192319-02*
5. 0250001-01
6. 0252100-06*
7. 0430049-10
8. 0542608-05*
9. 0720076-00*
10. 0720146-00*
11. 0730090-12
12. 0820009-11+
13. 0920170-00*
14. 0920185-09
15. 0930079-02
16. 0930106-03*
17. 0940246-03
18. 1010076-02*+
19. 1030089-06*
20. 1040045-05
21. 1040045-05*
22. 1110019-05*
23. 1210639-00
24. 1211531-02*
CI,:mFICATE OF LIEN
JANUARY 11,2005
OWNERS
NAME
Page 1 of 2
PROPERTY
ADDRESS
AMOUNT
OWED
$57.44
$48.30
$86.84
$81.26
$69.40
$384.89
$18.34
$22.11
$720.80
$146.32
$16.90
$417.34
$79.71
$140.85
$16.68
$135.67
$130.23
$480.07
$23.72
$53.60
$37.04
$12.17
$25.07
$162.55
25. 1231347-01
26. 1231390-03
27. 1360430-03
TOTAL
2x
* STILL OWNS PROPERTY
+ MULTIPLE UNITS
Page 2 of 2
$188.92
$169.42
$217.55
$3,943.19
r",i,þ East Valley
t' " Water District
Board Memorandum
Date: JAN. 11, 2005
From: Brian W. Tompkins / Chief Fi~Officer
Subject: Disbursements.
Recommendation:
Approve the attached list of accounts payable checks and
payroll issued during the period December 10, 2004
through January 5, 2005.
Background:
Accounts payable checks are shown on the attached listing and include numbers 199832 to 200116 for
A total of $1,388,068.47.
The source of funds for this amount is as follows:
Arroyo Verde Funds $189,033.48
Construction Fund -Loan
Unrestricted Funds $1,199,034.99
Payroll disbursed was for the period ended I:.ecember 10, 2004 and December 24. 2004 included
checks and direct deposits, Totaling $94,762.4f. and $99,053.75. Grand total $193,816.21.
Directors payroll disbursed was for the period elIded November 30, 2004 included checks and deposits,
Totaling $3899.04.
Total disbursements- $1,585,783.72.
Dale:
Time:
Usee
Check
Nbr
Thursday. January 06. 2005
09:03AM
KATHY
Check Check
Type Date
Acct 1 Sub: 13110
199832 CK 12/10/04
199632
199832
199832
199832
199832
199833
199833
199833
19983'
199835
199836
199837
199837
199838
199838
199838
199838
199838
199838
199838
199838
CK
12/10/04
CK
VC
12/10/04
12/10/04
VC
12/10/04
VC
12/10/04
CK
12/10/04
CK
12/10/04
CK
12/10/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
CK
12/16/04
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
12/16/04
CK
CK
12/16/04
CK
CK
12/16/04
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
Vendor ID
Vendor Namë
000000000000000
ÞI1~?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS
ÞI1~~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS
ÞI1~?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS
ÞI1~?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS
ÞI19-?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS
ÞI1~?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS
~I1Ë~?ÓAN EXPRESS
~~Ë~?ÓAN EXPRESS
~I1ËP8ÓAN EXPRESS
East Valley Water District
Check RecÌister. Standard
Peelods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6105
Period
To Post Closed
Ref
Nbr
06-04 06-04 039041
06-04 06-04 039042
06-04 06-04 039043
06-04 06-04 039041
06-04 06-04 039D42
06-04 06-04 039043
06-04 06-04 039044
06-04 06-04 039045
06-04 06-04 039046
Doc
Type
Invoice
Number
VO
VO
JUSTINE 1104
BOB/1104
AO
VO
BOB M 11/04
JUSTINE 1104
VO
BOB/1104
AO
BOB M 11/04
VO
JUSTINE
BOB
VO
AO
AME112904
~BB¡¡%ON MEDICINE CONSULTANTS 06-04
039178
-------
VO
12MO5
~~H~ö REFRIGERATION
~~Ë~AN PRIDE PRINTING
06-04 06-04 039175
06-04 06-04 039066
~~Ë~ltAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINES 06-04 06-iJ4 039CSO
~~Ë~1tAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINES 06-04 06-04 039189
~~Ë~lI!RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
~~Ë~lI!RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
~~Ë~lI!RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
~~Ë~lI!RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
~I1Ë~lI!RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
~~Ë~lI!RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
~~Ë~lI!RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
~t;1~~l~RIDE UNIFORM SERVICES
06-04 06-04 039116
06-04 06-04 039117
06-04 06-04 039118
06-04 06-04 039119
06-04 06-04 039120
06-04 06-04 039121
06-04 06-04 039122
06-04 06-04 039123
VO
276705
VO
12134
VO
VO
2126898
2179075
VO
L590048
VO
L590059
VO
VO
L595072
L59SO82
VO
L600135
L600146
VO
VO
L605166
VO
L605176
Invoice
Date
11/29/04
11/29/04
11/29/04
11/29/04
11/29/04
11/29/04
11/29/04
11/29/04
11/29/04
12/14/04
11/30/04
12/3104
10/13/~4
1219/04
11/2/04
11/2/04
11/9/04
11/9/04
11/16/04
11/16/04
11/23/04
11/23/04
Check Total
C:,9rk 70181
Check Total
Page:
Report:
Company:
Discount
Taken
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OD
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
G.U~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10f 27
03630.rpt
EVWO
Amount
Paid
56.57
39,420.26
-1.860.54
-56.57
-39,420.26
1.860.54
0.00
56.57
39,420.26
-1,660.54
-;;¡:;1-'- . -:
1,260.00
26.15
1,131.19
1,2b7.62
201.00
1,488.62
25.00
323.49
25.00
312.87
25.00
323.21
25.00
311.14
Dale- Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 2 of 27
T;me: 09:03AM Report: 03630,rpt
Usee: KATHY Check ReQister. Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06~4 Through 07~4As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check \ændorlD ---. ----. Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Typo Number Dato Taken Paid
199838 CK 12116104 ~~~~1PRIDE UNIFORM SERVICES 06-04 06-04 039124 VO L610198 11130/04 0.00 25,00
199838 CK 12116104 ~~~~1PRIDE UNIFORM SERVICES 06-04 06-04 039125 VO L610209 11/30104 0.00 311.14
Check Total 1,706.85
199839 CK 12116/04 ~8~RO~ACKFLOW & CHLORINATION 06~4 06-04 039067 VO 40132 12/2/04 0.00 260.00
199840 CK 12116/04 ~~~ß~HEAD UNITED WAY 06-04 06~4 039212 VO ARR121004 12/15/04 0.00 47.00
199841 CI< 12/16/04 ~m01 06-04 06-04 039126 VO 42506231104 11/28/04 0.00 28.16
199842 CK 12/16104 ~~~eß~-ARISTIDES 06-04 06-04 038796 VO 420166-3 11/17104 0.00 53.08
199843 CK 12116104 ~~W'ËtN-JOHN W 06-04 06-04 039127 VO 41562 12/3104 0.00 1,756.12
--------- -- -----'------------.------ - --- - -- -
199844 CK 12/16/04- ~8~gWo- TERESA L 06-04 036797 VO 520190-5 11/16104 0.00 25.62
199845 CK 12/16104 ~~8W~-INEZ 06-04 06-04 038798 VO 361015-4 11116/04 0.00 208.90
199846 CK 12116/04 ~~~~~bNICS 06-04 06-04 039068 VO ARIN101640 12Jl/O4 0.00 516.74
199847 CK 12116/04 ~~~~~S-JANET M 06~4 038799 VO 1320075-8 11118/04 0.(,0 46.54
199848 CK 12/16104 ~~§lJ.Jgss ENVIRONMENTS 06-04 06-04 039176 VO 153 11/30/04 0.00 1,479.41
199849 CK 12116104 8~CfjPt.UNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSO 06-04 039194 VO CAL121504 12/15/04 0.00 360.00
199850 CK 12116104 8~~~7rLO-GABRIEL 06-04 06-04 038801 VO 1440009-5 11119/04 0.00 45.58
199851 CK 12116104 8~~~tECH INTERNATIONAL INC 06-04 06-04 039051 VO EV309 11/17/04 0,00 2.674.44
-199852 CK 12116/04 8~99ÄL CO 06-04 06-04 038566 VO 360898 10122104 0.00 695.91
199852 CK 12116104 8~99ÄL CO 06-04 06~4 038567 VO 357499 9113104 0.00 536.71
Da'.: Thursday. January 06, 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 3 of 27
T;me: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
Usee: KATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendor 10 ---- - Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Nam". To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199852 CK 12116104 811~ÄL CO 06-04 06-04 038568 va 357498 9113104 0,00 687.99
Check Total 1,920.61
199853 CK 12116104 8CIßß=6RD L UTLEY 06-04 06-04 039190 va 78937 11122/04 0.00 50.00
199853 CK 12116104 8!:1~ß=6RD l UTLEY 06-04 06-04 039191 VO 78938 11/23104 0.00 210.00
199853 CK 12/16104 8C1~~=6RD L UTLEY 06-04 06-04 039192 VO 78939 11122/04 0.00 90.00
Check Total 350.00
199854 CK 12/16104 88~~t-VICTOR 06-04 06-04 039196 VO COR121504 12/15/04 0.00 650.00
199855 CK 12116104 88~~t4TRUSTEE 06-04 06-04 039213 VO COU121004 12/15104 0.00 135.00
199856 CK 12116104 88~~t4TRUSTEE 06-04 06-04 039214 VO COU121004.1 12/15104 0.00 275.00
199dol CK 12116104 8Iß!¡;iJ~AFE & lOCK SERVICE 06-04 Oô-Q. ,J9 I B5 VO 117237 126.'", .,lC IC. ,"
199858 CK 12/16104 BIËg{(: EVANS & CO LLP 06-04 06-04 039163 VO DIE1208O4 12/8104 0.00 107.75
199859 CK 12116104 B81:I/%k-PAUL R 06-04 06-04 039164 va DOl1213O4 12113104 0.00 105.00
1995GO CK 12116104 ~1P:f":BCOCK & SOi~S. iNC 06-04 06-04 039128 VO AK42493-0791 11129104 G.oo 135.09
199860 CK 12116104 ~~~O~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039129 VO AK42507-o791 11129/04 0.00 240.00
199860 CK 12116104 Ë~~ÄBCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039130 VO AK24278-0791 11129/04 0.00 60.00
199860 CK 12116104 ~~<¡¡~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039131 va AK42444-0791 11/29/04 0.00 330.00
199860 CK 12116/04 ~:¡'B~~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06--04 039132 VO AK42627-O791 11130/04 0.00 300.00
199860 CK 12116104 ~~~ÄBCOCK & SONS, INC 06--04 06-04 039133 VO AK4251D-0791 11/19104 0.00 270.00
199860 CK 12116/04 ~~~~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039134 va AK42552-O791 11/30104 0.00 540.00,
199860 CK 12116/04 ~~~ÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06--04 06-04 039146 VO AL40004-0791 1211/04 0.00 205.00
199860 CK 12116/04 ~~~ÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039147 VO AL40103.0791 1214104 0.00 30.00
199860 CK 12116/04 ~1J3.~ÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06--04 06-04 039148 VO Al40054-0791 1211104 0.00 30.00
199860 CK 12116/04 ~:¡'B~..IBCOCK & SONS.INC 06-04 06--04 039149 VO AL40168-0791 1212/04 0.00 150.00
199860 CK 12116/04 Ë1J3.~ÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039150 VO AL40183-0791 1212/04 0,00 270.00
Date: Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 4 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User: KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06.04 Through 07.04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendor ID Pertod Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Oate Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~¡¡'B~~BCOCK & SONS.INC 06-04 06-04 039151 VO AL40184-0791 12/2/04 0.00 60.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~1P.~o..IBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06.04 039152 VO AL40195-0791 12/2/04 0.00 135.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~1P.~OÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039153 VO AL40266-0791 12/3/04 0.00 100.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~1P.~~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04039154 VO AL40265-0791 12/3/04 0.00 120.00
199860 CK 12/16104 ~¡¡'B~~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039155 VO AL40233-0791 12/3/04 0,00 40.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~1P.~ÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039156 VO AL40330-0791 12/3/04 0.00 135.00
199860 CK 12/16104 ~¡¡'B~ÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039157 VO AL40327-0791 1213/04 0.00 135.00
199860 CK 12/16104 ~§J3.~OÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039158 VO AL40307-0791 12/3/04 0.00 60.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~§J3.~OÄBCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039159 VO AL40341.o791 1213/04 0.00 120.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~§J3.~OÄBCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039160 VO AL40287.o791 1213/04 0.00 270.00
1998FO CK 12/16/04 ~1,ßI¡PÄ3c.O~, K :_""ó. ,:,c 06-04 06-04 0~9161 VO AL40362.o791 12/6/04 oro 150.0C
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~§J3.~OÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039162 VO AL4O403.o791 12/6104 0.00 160.00
199860 CK 12/16104 ~§J3.~~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039202 VO AL40596 12/8104 0.00 30.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~:!,ß~ÄBCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039203 VO AL4052J..0791 1217/04 0.00 20.00
199860 CK 12/16104 ~:!,ß~~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039204 VO AL40527.o791 1217/04 0.00 90.00
199860 CK 12/16/04 ~§J3.C¡PJRGOCK 1\ SONS INC 06-04 06-04 039205 VO AL4057J..0791 1217/04 0.00 390.00
199860 CK 12116/04 ~'1~~~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039206 VO AL40503-0791 12/7/04 0.00 6G.00
199860 CK 12/16104 ~§J3.~OÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039207 VO AL40445-0791 1217104 0.00 240.00
199860 CK 12116104 ~:!,ß~~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039208 VO AL40712.o791 12/8104 0.00 30.00
199860 CK 12116104 ~§J3.C¡PÄBCOCK & SONS.INC 06-04 06-04 039210 VO AL4057J..0791 1217/04 0.00 330.00
199860 CK 12116/04 ~¡¡'B~OÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039211 AO AL40573.o791 1217/04 0.00 -390.00
Check Tota' 4,845.00
199861 CK 12116104 ~~~ßI§~HYDRO 06-04 06-04 039052 VO 59254 10/12/04 0.00 1.678.99
199862 CK 12116/04 ~~~~%FT. INC 06-04 06-04 039165 VO R482688 12/1/04 0.00 126.96
199863 CK 12/16104 ~*þgWjAN 06-04 06-04 039135 VO CO5080005398 11/26/04 0.00 75.12
Date' Thursday, January 06.2005 East Valley Water Djstrict Page, 5 of 27
Tome, 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpl
Use,., KATHY Check ReQister . Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendor 10 .----. Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice D'scount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name' To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199864 CK 12/16/04 Þ~I~IÇííEW FORD SALES.INC 06-04 06-04 039053 VO C66054 10/25/04 0.00 87.02
'199864 CK 12/16/04 Þ~I~IÇííEW FORD SALES.INC 06-04 06-04 039069 VO 424510 12/9/04 0.00 36.09
Check Total 123.11
199865 CK 12/16/04 ÞË~at¡JSON ENTERPRISES INC 06-04 039070 VO 252358 12/1/04 0.00 330.03
199866 CK 12/16/04 ÞI~g~8AMERICAN REAL ESTATE 06-04 06-04 039180 VO 11093432 11/30/04 0.00 59.80
'199867 CK 12/16/04 Þ8~~~1i STREET ROCK CRUSHER 06-04 06-04 039173 VO 221627 12/8/04 0.00 373.39
199868 CK 12/16/04 a~B~9ËL EQUIPMENT CO 06-04 06-04 039054 VO 62835 11/30/04 0.00 134.66
199868 CK 12/16/04 a~B~9ËL EQUIPMENT CO 06-04 06-04 039055 VO 62831 11/30/04 0.00 599.09
Check Total 733.75
.:9oÒû" CK 1/'15/¡)~ ~~Bf¡¡kR CONSTRUCTION 05-0.. Cû-tJ~ û38712 VCJ 9~;;JO73 111~8104 c.~a 2."
199869 CK 12/16/04 a~BWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038777 VO 370096-0 11/18/04 0.00 49,04
.199869 CK 12/16/04 a~BWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038778 VO 370093-0 11/18/04 0.00 49.04
Check Total 570.48
199870 CK 12/16/04 aË~eJ/~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039071 VO 855059 1217/04 0.14 7.00
199870 CK 12/16/04 8~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039072 VO 854961 12/6/04 1.98 97.04
199870 CK 12/16/04 aË~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039073 VO 855088 1217/04 1.98 97.04
199870 CK 12/16/04 aË~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039074 VO 855163 12/8104 1.41 69.00
199870 CK 12/16/04 aË~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039075 VO 855467 12/10/04 0.30 14.76
199870 CK 12/16/04 aË~eJ/~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039076 va 855409 12/9/04 3.57 174.77
199870 CK 12/16/04 aË~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039166 AD 855218 12/8/04 0.00 -37.71
Check Total 421.90
199871 CK 12/16/04 a~~WËLTER CLAIMS MGMT.INC. 06-04 06-04 039167 va RONALD LYON 12/8104 0.00 2.500.00
199871 CK 12/16/04 a~~~~L TER CLAIMS MGMT. INC. 06-04 06-04 039195 va PINE CREST APTS 12/15/04 0.00 2.500.00
Check Total 5,000.00
199872 CK 12/16/04 a8~21lEz-ROSA 06-04 06-04 038816 VO 420183-4 11/18/04 0.00 58.86
199873 CK 12/16/04 J8~t4R MERCEDES GONZALEZ 06-04 06-04 038817 VO 42009-4 11/18/04 0.00 5.211.07
Date, Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 6 of 27
Ti"",: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User KATHY Check ReQister . Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06.{)4 Throu9h 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vend~___. Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice DIscount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199873 CK 12/16/04 y8t1PtJ'k MERCEOES GONZALEZ 06-04 06-04 038818 VO 420078-5 11/18/04 0.00 3.730.48
199873 CK 12/16/04 Y8J1PtJ'k MERCEDES GONZALEZ 06-04 06-04 038819 VO 420077-5 11/18/04 0.00 4,139.04
Check Total 13,080.59
199874 CK 12/16/04 ~~~~1iL -GERALDINE 06-04 038826 VO 912109-4 11/17/04 0.00 25.38
199875 CK 12/16/04 ~18~W- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES 06-04 06-04 039056 VO HIC1104 12/1/04 0.00 4.177.20
199876 CK 12/16/04 1~~RIfJ6 WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 06-04 06-04 039077 VO 146811 1216/04 6.64 325.24
199877 CK 12/16/04 J8~ß~CLEANERS 06-04 06-04 039085 VO 133013 1219/04 0,00 3.96
199878 CK 12/16/04 J~~EEMAN CO.. INC 06-04 06-04 039078 VO 264904-1 12/2/04 0,00 29.60
.19967" C!; 12115/0'; irf.%EEMAN CO.. INC 05-C4 Oc -04 C;;907& VO 284rC4.2 1~!3'Q!. n.èG '
199878 CK 12/16/04 J~~EEMAN CO.. INC 06.{)4 06-04 039080 VO 264904-3 12/6/04 0.00 343.72
199878 CK 12/16/04 J~~EEMAN CO.. INC 06-04 06-04 039081 VO 284904-4 12/8/04 0.00 20.42
199878 CK 12/16/04 J~~EEMAN CO.. INC 06-04 06-04 039082 VO 284126-2 1217/04 0.00 27.63
199878 CK 12/16/04 J~~EEMAN CO.. INC 06-04 06-04 039083 VO 285697'{) 12/8/04 0.00 296.58
199~78 CK 12116'04 Ji>FQDI 06-04 06-04 039084 VO 285445-0 12/6/04 0.00 19.34
".K. ,REEII.AN CO.,INC
Check Tolal 741.91
199879 CK 12/16/04 ~'fe<¡1LUMBING SUPPLY 06-04 06-04 039057 VO 52852 11/4/04 0.00 11.08
199879 CK 12/16/04 ~'fe<¡1LUMBING SUPPLY 06-04 06-04 039058 VO 52884 11/17104 0.00 2.93
199879 CK 12/16/04 ~~e<¡1LUMBING SUPPLY 06-04 06-04 039059 VO 52936 11/19/04 0.00 16.27
199879 CK 12/16/04 ~'fe<¡1LUMBING SUPPLY 06.{)4 06-04 039060 VO 52955 11/23/04 3.04 10.55
199679 CK 12/16/04 ~'fe<¡1LUMBING SUPPLY 06-04 06-04 039220 VO 52955 11/23/04 0.00 0.30
Check Tolal 41.13
199880 CK 12/16/04 ~g'b1. PRODUCTS.INC 06-04 06-04 039061 VO 2665091 11/24/04 1.38 152.90
199881 CK 12/16/04 ~8~08êoTECHNICAL GROUP INC 06-04 06-04 039062 VO 8703 11/28/04 0.00 2.250.00
199882 CK 12/16104 ~æQ.1UAN 06-04 06-04 038840 VO 620032-8 11/16104 0.00 209,08
Dale. Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water Djstrjct Page: 7 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User: KATHY Check Reaister. Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendor 10 Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendo' Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Numbe, Date Taken Paid
199882 CK 12/16/04 ~m.l!.jUAN 06-04 06-04 038841 vo 620035-3 11/16/04 0,00 207.47
Check Total 416.55
'199883 CK 12/16/04 ~II:ßCf]EDZKI-JACEK 06-04 06-04 039168 VO MIL 120704 12/7/04 0.00 1,440.00
199884 CK 12/16/04 ~88~~~UDY K 06-04 06-04 039172 VO 210185-7 11/9/04 0.00 54.92
199885 CK 12/16/04 ~~~~t&-JaANN 06-04 06-04039136 VO 123139-4.1 11/1/04 0.00 61.17
199886 CK 12/16/04 ~18~'&S-DENNIS 06-04 038845 VO 440239-8 11/17/04 0.00 8.36
199887 CK 12/16/04 8~~ß~o PROPERTY MGMT TRUST 06-04 06-04 038849 VO 191844-8 11/15/04 0.00 34.21
¡q988g CK 1"'~"/04 f~8~&?cc-W;¡úR 06-04 06.04 038850 VO 720019-4 11/15/04 0,00 37,84
199889 CK 12/16/04 m~L~PRAFUL 06-04 038851 va 440053-2 11/16/04 0.00 2.974.24
199890 CK 12/16/04 Þ~~~MAR¡A R 08-04 038852 VO 1040019-2 11/18104 0,00 42.74
199891 CK 12/16/04 Þ~~RP-h:ANG M 08-04 06-04 038853 VO 730158-2 11/19/04 0,00 54.16
----- -----..
199892 CK 12/16/04 Þ~~\\!ìUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 06-04 06-04 039197 VO JUSTINE 12104 1218104 0.00 1.165.76
199892 CK 12/16/04 Þ~~?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 08-04 08-04 039198 VO BRIAN 12104 1218104 0.00 2,878.03
Check Total 4,043.79
199893 CK 12/16/04 8~~g~1 06-04 06-04 039184 VO 639415672 1217/04 0.00 18.41
199894 CK 12116/04 ~~~~tONSTRUCTION CO INC. 08-04 08-04 038807 VO 321175-1 11/19/04 0.00 1.342.38
199895 CK 12116/04 ~8~R'If-PAULA 06-04 038856 VO 1310152-6 11/18104 0.00 49.42
199896 CK 12116/04 ~~~R~~ARNULFO 06-04 06-04 038857 va 660081-1 11/16/04 0.00 17.01
199897 CK 12/16/04 ~~Þ9PJLO 08-04 08-04 039186 VO 04-1145 1213/04 0.00 806.20
Date: Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: B of 27
T;me: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User KATHY Check ReQister - Standard CompanY' EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Throu9h 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendor 10 ------ Period Ref Doc Invo;oo Invoice D'scount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199898 CK 12/16/04 ~~~CW~RNARDINO CHILD SUPPORT 06.04 06-04 039215 VO SAN121004 12/15104 0_00 269,00
199899 CK 12/16/04 ~~~CWÖNO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSN 06-04 06-04 039216 VO SAN121004 12/15/04 0,00 547.28
199900 CK 12/16/04 ~~~qfËRNARDINO VALLEY WATER 06-04 06-04 039137 VO SAN10/04 11/22/04 0.00 27,942.40
199901 CK 12/16/04 ~~~¡~RNARDINO COUNTY RECORDE 06-04 08-04 039169 VO SAN120B04 12/8/04 0,00 168.00
199902 CK 12/16/04 š~8001 06-04 06-04 039181 VO 80642021004 11/22/04 0.00 486.43
199902 CK 12/16/04 š~8O01 08-04 06-04 039182 VO 86204461104 11/28/04 0.00 17.83
Check Total 504.26
1~9903 CK 12/16/04 m~~~--Rn;, 06-04 06-04 039201 VO 1717 12/10/04 O-OJ 945.00
199904 CI< 12/16/04 Š~~ß~VCKI-RAYMOND 06-04 06-04 039199 VO SHY 1204 12/9/04 0.00 2.925.00
199905 CK 12/16/04 š~lee~, INC 06-04 06-04 039200 VO 548 12/11/04 0.00 340.00
199906 CK 12/16/04 š8<tDR~ EDISON COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039138 VO 22578937501104 1217/04 0.00 1,464.64
199906 CK 12/16/04 š8~R~ EDISON COMPANY 06-ù4 08-04 039139 VO 21985734201104 1217/04 0,00 7.090.13
199906 CK 12/16/04 š8<tDR~ EOISON COMPANY 08-04 06-04 039140 VO 22343809621104 1213/04 0.00 2.251.06
199906 CK 12/16/04 š8~RtEDISON COMPANY 08-04 08-04 039183 VO 22070486791104 12/11/04 0.00 11.469.74
199906 CK 12/16/04 š8'tDRt EDISON COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039187 VO 20775946951104 12/11/04 0.00 117,961.71
Check Total 140,842.28
199907 CK 12/16/04 ~8~egz..TAMI REDPATH 06-04 06-04 039218 VO SOW121001 12/15/04 0.00 250.00
199908 CK 12/16/04 Š:¡:~ß~~S CREDIT PLAN 06-04 06-04 039141 VO 603551785001759 11/29/04 0.00 281.06
199909 CK 12/16/04 ŠH~Ë4STREET BANK & TRUST 08-04 06-04 039217 VO STA121004 12/15/04 0.00 6,567,51
199910 CK 12/16/04 Š~~ßt¡¡k- TIMOTHY 08-04 06-04 038858 VO 1450073-1 11/17104 0,00 38.34
Dale.
Time:
Use"
Thursday. January 06.2005
09:03AM
KATHY
Check
Nbr
199911
199912
199913
199914
199915
199916
199916
199917
199918
199919
199920
199921
199922
199923
199924
199925
199926
Check Check
Type Date
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CI<
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
CK
12/16/04
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
CK
12/16/04
Vendor 10
Vendor Name
:¡:~I~~~K PACIFIC HOMES
:¡:~~ß'1lR-MARY
~8~9~ÄYMENT CENTER #5450
~~:¡:~ÀTE OFFICE
~~BgWGROUND SERVICE ALERT
~~I~%b PARCEL SERVICE
~~I~%b PARCEL SERVICE
~~I~gb STATES PLASTIC CORP
~§P~8hAL SERVICEIPOSTAGE
~~ß<¡JEZ-REYNALOO
~Ë~lPaN WIRELESS
~Ë~lPðN
~1~ellbAS-FERNANDO
~1§~~2pAINTS
W~f!¡!hNITARY SUPPLY
East Valley Water Distrjct
. Check ReQister - Standard
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Period
To Post Closed
Ref
Nbr
06-04
038788
06-04 06-04 039219
06-04 06-04 039142
06-04 06-04 039177
06-04 06-04 039143
06-04 06-04 039144
06-04 06-04 039170
---- .-----
06-04 06-04 039086
06-04 06-04 039209
06-04 06-04 038861
06-04 06-04 039188
06-04 06-04 039179
06-04 06-04 038863
06-04 06-04 039063
06-04 06-04 039064
W˧~g~N MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRI 06-04 06-04 039145
WI~g~hs WATCHDOG. LLC
06-04 06-04 039065
Doc
Type
Invoice
Number
VO
1450191-0
VO
TUR121004
VO
107822563
VO
P083511801011
VO
2004110244
VO
VO
000016XW86474
000016XW86494
VO
1161864
vo
USP120904
VO
730096-3
VO
1907357471
vo
18200921204
VO
720195-12
VO
17076587
VO
65937781
VO
18528
VO
26600
Page:
Report:
Company:
Invoice
Date
Discount
Taken
11116/04
12/15/04
11/30/04
12/1/04
12/1/04
11/20/04
12/4/04
9 of 27
03630,rpt
EVWD
Amount
PaId
0,00
32,26
0.00
225.00
0.00
768.43
0.00
1.131.22
0.00
207.20
0.00
0.00
22.02
16.00
'-Check ToIÓI---' - -'---;¡8.;¡¿
12/3104 0.00 296.26
12/9/04
11/17/04
11/25/04
12/4104
11/17/04
11123104
9/24/04
12/6/04
11122/04
0.00
1.000.00
0.00
46.01
0,00
124.LJ
0.00
45.59
0.00
66.46
3.25
159.19
0.00
297.05
0.00
1,680,00
0.00
23.72
Da'e, Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water Djstrict Pageo 10 of 27
Time, 09'03AM Report, 03630.rpt
U,ero KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06.()4 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendor 10 Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name. To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199926 CK 12/16/04 ~I~g~hs WATCHDOG. LLC 06-04 06-04 039171 VO 26783 12/6104 0,00 228.00
199926 CK 12/16/04 ~I~g~iss WATCHDOG, LLC 06-04 06-04 039193 VO 26644 11/23/04 0.00 206.83
Check Total 458.55
199927 CK 12/22/04 ~BþO02 06-04 06-04 039381 VO 334278 12/17104 0.00 326.95
'99928 CK 12/22/04 ~B~R~hD TELEMETRY SYS INTL 06-04 06-04 039228 VO 13168 11/29/04 0,00 1.380.97
199929 CK 12/22/04 ~I~ac¡¡;s WEST 06-04 06-04 039375 VO 103166463 11/30/04 0.00 41.70
199930 CK 12/22/04 ~~Ë~9~AN PRIOE PRINTING 06-04 06-04 039269 VO 12146 12/15104 0.00 1.013.95
199930 CK 12/22/04 ~~Ë~9~AN PRIDE PRINTING 06-04 06-04 039364 VO 12145 12/15/04 0,00 1.013.95
Check Total 2,027.90
19",3, C,. ,~":,r,: ~šé~~ 1 05-04 06 04 02~23 VC ASC0105 12/2~W 0 GC ?7733
199932 CK 12/22/04 ~~ŠIWWATER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 06-04 06-04 039425 VO 110404 11/2/04 0.00 5.980.78
199932 CK 12/22/04 ~~ŠIWWATER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 06-04 06-04 039426 AD 16481 WESTERN 11/12/04 0.00 -3,252.00
199932 CK 12/22/04 ~~Š!mvATER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 06-04 06-04 039427 VO 120304 12/3/04 0.00 5.472.50
199932 CK 12/22/04 ~~ŠIWWATER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 06-04 06-04 039428 AO 18528 WESTERN 12/6104 0.00 -1.680.00
Check Total _.n~21.2&.
199933 CK 12/22/04 ~18~9>.~D-DIAN L 06-04 039405 VO 530203-5.1 11/10/04 0.00 47.60
199934 CK 12/22/04 BI~BO~EFRIGERATION CO..INC. 06-04 06-04 039272 VO 41414 12/13/04 0.00 138.00
199935 CK 12/22/04 ~~~~9¿K. BATTERSBY. MCELHANEY. 06-04 06-04 039417 VO 149 11/30/04 0.00 4.031.47
199936 CK 12/22/04 8Ë~~ß'ky AUTO GLASS 06-04 06-04 039287 VO WO 8340 12/1/04 0.00 225.00
199937 CK 12/22/04 8~Ë£P-:¡'ECH INTERNATIONAL INC 06-04 06-04 039229 VO EV310 12/1/04 0.00 2.346,00
199938 CK 12/22/04 8~Iß<J¡bo TITLE COMPANY 06-04 039222 VO 1530423-3,1 12/8104 0.00 66.94
Dale, Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 11 of 27
T;me, 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpl
User KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company. EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendor 10 ---. p---'" Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Typ. Number Date Taken Paid
199939 CK 12/22104 88Bß<!.1EFF A 06-04 06-04 038802 VO 1220543.3 11/23/04 0.00 33.13
199940 CK 12/22/04 88cß~ADO-KEVIN S 06-04 06-04 038803 VO 1400131-2 11/23/04 0.00 45.60
199941 CK 12/22/04 88~R~~UBIAS-RICHARD 06-04 06-04 038805 VO 310035-1 11/23/04 0,00 3,60
199942 CK 12/22/04 B~RWkoSE. INC. 06-04 06-04 039357 VO 27376 12/8/04 0.00 1,230.10
199943 CK 12/22/04 B~te~OMPUTER CORP. 06-04 06-04 039230 VO C34861872 12/9/04 0,00 5.803.96
199944 CK 12/22/04 ~þtß.~¡"ERS INC 06-04 06-04 039361 VO 172885 12/2/04 0.00 165.00
199945 ('K 12/22/04 ~~::'ÀaCOCK K SONS, It;.:; 06-04 06-04 039240 VO AJ4134'-O'91 10/19/04 0.00 1,650.rry
199945 CK 12122104 ~:æf~BCOCK & SONS.INC 06-04 06-04 039241 VO AJ41570-0791 10/21/04 0.00 65.00
199945 CK 12122104 ~:æf~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039242 VO A140792-0791 9/13/04 0.00 240.00
199945 CK 12122104 ~:æC¡P~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039243 VO A14063D-0791 9/9/04 0.00 2,240.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~:æC¡P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039244 VO AI40546-0791 9/8104 0.00 60.00
199945 CK 12122104 ~:æ~0~8COCK & SONS- INt: 06-04 06-04 039245 VO A14O457-O791 9/8/04 0.00 60.00
199945 CK 12122104 ~:æ~~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039246 VO A140455-0791 9/8/04 0.00 240."0
199945 CK 12/22104 Ë:æC¡P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039247 VO A140489-0791 9/8104 0,00 360.00
199945 CK 12/22104 ~:æC¡P~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039248 VO A140516-0791 9/8104 0.00 90.00
199945 CK 12/22104 ~:æC¡P~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039249 VO A140509-0791 9/8104 0.00 60.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~~B~~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039275 VO AL40763-0791 1219/04 0,00 1.700.00
199945 CK 12122104 ~:æ~~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039276 VO AL40829-0791 1219/04 0.00 270.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~:æ~~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039277 VO AL40850-0791 12/10/04 0.00 120.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~:æC¡P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039278 VO AL40941-0791 12/10/04 0,00 240.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 Ë:æ~~BCOCK & SONS.INC 06-04 06-04 039279 VO AL41054-0791 12/13/04 0.00 40.00
199945 CK -12/22/04 ~:æC¡P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039280 VO AL41 064-0791 12/13/04 0.00 40.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~~B~°..lBCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039281 VO AL40964-0791 12/13/04 0.00 240.00
Dole: Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water Distrjct Page: 12 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
Usee KATHY Check Reçrister - Standard Company. EVWO
Periods: 06.()4 Through 07.()4 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check \!Ondor 10 --.-... Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~%BI/¡~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039282 VO AL40965-0791 12/13/04 0.00 30.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~§fI/P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 06-04 06-04 039283 VO AL40916-0791 12/10/04 0,00 270.00
199945 CK 12/22/04 ~%BI/¡°~BCOCK & SONS. INC 06-04 06-04 039284 VO AL40804-0791 12/9/04 0.00 390.00
Check Total 8,405.00
199946 CK 12/22/04 H~~iJ"b LLC, REFOUA LLC 06-04 06-04039418 VO ETE0105 12/21/04 0.00 400.00
199947 CK 12/22/04 ~~I~~EW FORD SALES,INC 06-04 06-04 039288 VO 426246 12/16/04 0.00 125.15
199948 CK 12/22/04 ~~~~l~R-JACQUELINE M 06-04 038814 VO 1615073-2 11/23/04 0.00 43.11
199949 CK 12/22/04 ~8~~C¡YATION FOR CROSS CONN 06-04 039286 VO 221 11/22/04 0,00 695.60
19~éõ') CK '2,'22/04 Þdj~O~u COMPUTE., PRCDUCTS 06-a4 Of-04 CêJ~:4 VC 3ß1 ~ ;25 121'jI04 0,00 2.9:,5r
199951 CK 12/22/04 8~RæËL EQUIPMENT CO 06-04 06-04 039289 VO 62857 12/9/04 0.00 495.54
199951 CK 12/22/04 8~R~?ËL EQUIPMENT CO 06-04 06-04 039290 VO 62830 11/29/04 0.00 98.56
199951 CK 12/22/04 8~R~?ËL EQUIPMENT CO 06-04 06-04 039376 VO 62848 12/6/04 0.00 388.33
199951 CK 12/22/04 ~~~~?ËL EQUIPMENT CO 06-04 06-04 039377 va 62861 12/14/04 0.00 21.01
199951 CK 12/22/04 8~Rß?ËL EQUIPMENT CO 06-04 06-04 039378 va 6:315 11¡3~iO4 0.00 130,J,
Check Total 1,160.34
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß'NkR CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038771 VO 370097-0 11/16/04 0.00 18.16
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß'NkR CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038773 VO 370101-0 11/23/04 0.00 44.04
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038774 VO 370095-0 11/23/04 0.00 55.63
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß'NkR CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038775 VO 370099-0 11/23/04 0.00 42.86
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß'NkR CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038776 VO 370100-0 11/23/04 0.00 50.63
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß'NkR CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 039273 VO 370097-0.1 11/16/04 0.00 40.00
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß'NkR CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 039384 VO 370062-0.1 11/15104 0.00 40.00
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß'NkR CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 039385 VO 370066-0.1 11/15/04 0.00 40.00
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~BWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 039386 VO 370067-0,1 11/15/04 0.00 40.00
Date: Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 13 of 27
T;me: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User: KATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check ~n~Ml!!- - ---- Period Ref Doc Invoice InvoIce Discount Amount
Nbr Type Dale Venda< Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Da'e Taken Paid
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~BWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 n6-04 039387 VO 370068-0.1 11/15/04 0.00 40.00
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 06-û4 06-04 039388 VO 370069-0.1 11/15/04 0.00 40.00
'199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 039389 VO 370070-0.1 11/15/04 0.00 40.00
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~BWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-û4 039390 VO 370071-0.1 11/15/04 0.00 40.00
199952 CK 12/22/04 8~~BWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 039391 VO 370072-0.1 11/15/04 0,00 40.00
Check Total 571.32
199953 CK 12/22/04 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039291 VO 855406 12/9/04 1.42 69.64
199953 CK 12/22/04 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039292 VO 856274 12/16/04 0.36 17.70
199953 CK 12/22/04 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039293 VO 855357 12/3/04 15.51 760.21
199953 CK 12/22/04 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039294 VO 855122 1217/04 1.65 80.79
199953 CK 12/22/04 8~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039295 VO 855121 1217/04 15.91 779.40
Check Total 1,707.74-
199954 CK 12/22/04 1ü~£(dN-JERRY 06-04 G6-04 038825 VO 1540776-1 11/23104 0.00 67.94
199955 CK 12/22/04 ~8~ß~ SOUTHWEST/ PRO PIPE 06-04 06-04 039231 VO C51259 11/15/04 0.00 1.050.00
199956 CK 12/22/04 1~11~'b DESERT SECURITY & 06-04 06-04 039223 VO RM34510105 12/20/04 0.00 598.64
----------- ---------
'199957 CK 12/22/04 1~1:m WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 06-04 06-04 039232 VO 147094 12/13/04 6.62 324.39
199957 CK 12/22/04 1~11~ WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 06-04 06-04 039433 VO 147364 12/20/04 8.53 418.16
Check Total 742.55
199958 CK 12/22/04 1:¡:~ßc¡.¡INC 06-04 06-04 039432 VO 252716 12/15/04 0.00 1,494.32
199959 CK 12/22/04 ~8~~¡¡'60N LIFT / HYSTER 06-04 06-04 039296 VO 064131 12/2/04 0.00 76.82
199960 CK 12/22/04 ~8~ß'ltCLEANERS 06.04 06-04 038521 VO 130935 11/9/04 0.00 5.94
199960 CK 12/22/04 ~8~ß'ltCLEANERS 06-04 06-04 039233 VO 133260 12/13104 0.00 3.96
'199960 CK 12/22/04 ~8~ß'ltCLEANERS 06-04 06-04 039238 VO 133460 12/15/04 0.00 3.96
199960 CK 12/22/04 J8~ß'ltCLEANERS 06-04 06-04 039270 VO 133414 12/14/04 0.00 6.93
199960 CK 12/22/04 J8~ß'ltCLEANERS 06-04 06-04 039434 VO 133623 12/17104 0.00 5.94
Dale: Thursday, January 06.2005 East Valley Water Distrjct Page: 14 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User: KATHY Check Re¡¡ister. Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Throu9h 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vendo-.rÆ-- . .-.--.---. Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199960 CK 12/22/04 J8~g?fCLEANERS 06-04 06-04 039440 VO 133882 12/21/04 0.00 3.96
199960 CK 12/22/04 J8~g?fCLEANERS 06-04 06-04 039441 VO 12/4/04 0.00 0.99
Check Total 31.68
199961 CK 12/22/04 Jf}{mEEMAN CO., INC 06-04 06-04 039234 VO 285973-1 12/14/04 0.00 112.71
199961 CK 12/22/04 Jf}{mEEMAN CO.. INC 06-04 06-04 039235 VO 285973-2 12/15/04 0.00 28.28
199961 CK 12/22/04 Jf}{mEEMAN CO.. INC 06-04 06-04 039236 VO 285973-0 12/13/04 0.00 198.38
Check Total 339.37
199962 CK 12/22/04 11~q9ÓJMBING CO 06-04 06-04 039224 VO 9762 11/24/04 0.00 189.033.48
199963 CK 12/22/04 ~~§e~S SWIMMING POOL SUPPLIE 06-04 06-04 039379 VO 413-62863 12/17/04 0.00 2Q.43
199964 ZC 12/22/04 ~~~ß?:1k SUSCO 06-04 06-04 038810 VO 16942 PO 11/30/04 0,00 3,317.26
199964 ZC 12/22/04 k1~~ßcm. SUSCO 06-04 06-04 0:;9422 AD 16942 PO 12/21/04 0.00 -:;,317.~3
Check Total 0.00
199965 CK 12/22/04 ~m.ß'j,. MINOLTA BUSINESS 06-04 06-04 039382 VO 203057339 12/13/04 0.00 1,146.61
199966 CK 12/22/04 ~88ß!.~ICHOLAS 06-04 06-04 039409 VO 210185-7.1 11/18/04 0.00 54.92
[9[>G67 CK 1:/2:</C4 ~~T?d~AL NOTARY ASSOCIP.TION o6-n~ G6-0~ 0:;938" VO 15~72243 17'21/0~ 0,00 45.èC
199968 CK 12/22/04 ~~~ß~~OJELIO 06-04 06-04 038844 VO 1210459-1 11/23/04 0.00 29.04
199969 CK 12/22/04 8~~Pf...bHULAM N 06-04 038848 VO 40030-5 11/23/04 0.00 43.05
199970 CK 12/22/04 Þ~811% COAST TOOL & SUPPLY 06-04 06-04 039297 VO 065570-00 11/24/04 0.00 18.78
199971 CK 12/22/04 Þ~8P~,ß CENTURY HOMES 06-04 039392 VO 200007-0.1 11/14/04 0.00 40.00
199972 CK 12/22/04 ÞHW.1CASH 06-04 06-04039419 VO PET1204 12/21/04 0.00 406.84
199973 CK 12/22/04 þlj~~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 06-04 06-04 039420 VO BOB 1204 12/8/04 0,00 315.11
Dale: Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 1501 27
T;me: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpl
Usee KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company. EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 116/05
Check Check Check ~ndor ID -~" pertod ReI Doc InvoIce InvoIce DIscount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken PaId
199974 CK 12/221D4 ~E~g~~R-MAROA 06-04 039412 VO 1210939~2.1 11/24/04 O.OD 45.76
199975 CK 12/22104 ~1~~<tJCK TECHNOLOGIES.INC, D6-04 06-04 039356 VO 20041034 9128/04 0.00 2.838.14
199976 CK 12/22104 ~88gWs ANOERSON MALODY & sCOrf6-O4 06-04 039358 VO ROG093004 9/30/04 0.00 20.000.00
199976 CK 12/22104 ~88~Ws ANDERSON MALODY & sCOrf6-O4 06-04 039359 VO ROG103104 10/31/04 0.00 13,474.00
Check Total 33,474.00
199977 CK 12/22104 ~8Šf-'bONALD 06-04 06-04 038855 VO 530258-10 11123104 0.00 67.39
199978 CK 12122/04 Š~8001 06-04 06-04 039362 VO 25310671204 1217/04 0.00 48.15
199979 CK 12122/04 ~~N9~1{-TECf'. SYSŒ!S. ~.L"C. 06-04 06-04 039285 VO 3337 12/15/04 0,00 2.270.C~
199980 CK 12/22/04 Š8ttü,RtGAS COMPANY 06-04 06-D4 039429 VO 12502172005 12/20/04 0.00 105.75
199980 CK 12/22/04 Š8ttü,RtGAS COMPANY 06-04 06-04 039430 VO 12292172009 12/20/04 0.00 249.35
Check Total 355.10
199981 CK 12/22104 Š89?,RèPUMP & WELL SERVICE 06-04 06-04 039237 VO 36600 10/21/04 0.00 9.919.00
199981 CK 12/22104 š89;!)\Ji! PUMP J, WELL SERVICE 06-04 06-04 039271 VO 36920 11/30/04 0.00 260.00
Check Total 10,179_00
199982 CK 12122104 Šf~~~30F CALIFORNIA 06-04 06-04 039239 VO STA121 004 12/15/04 0.00 20.393.15
199983 CK 12122/04 me~}EFF 06-04 039352 VO 1161601.3 12/2/04 0.00 61.74
199984 CK 12122/04 f~ER~tJRER-TAX COLLECTOR 06-04 039360 VO 0288101038001 11/23/04 0.00 60.97
199985 CK 12/22104 f~I£'~K PACIFIC HOMES 06-04 038789 VO 1450192-0 11123/04 0.00 10.31
t99985 CK 12/22104 f~I£,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 06-04 038790 VO 1450193-0 11/23/04 0.00 27.59
199985 CK 12/22/04 f~I£'~K PACIFIC HOMES 06-04 039393 VO 1450001-0.1 10/29/04 0.00 46,80
199985 CK 12122/04 f~I£'~K PACIFIC HOMES 06-04 039394 VO 1450182-0,1 11/18104 0,00 40.00
199985 CK 12/22/04 f~I£,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 06-04 039395 VO 1450183-0"1 11/8104 0.00 40.00
Dale: Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water Djstrict Page: 16 of 27
Time' 09:03AM Repo": 03630.rpt
User: KATHY Check ReQister . Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vend~ ,------ Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice D'scount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199985 CK 12/22104 :¡:~IRURK PACIFIC HOMES 08-04 039396 VO 1450184-0.1 11/8104 0.00 40.00
'199985 CK 12/22104 :¡:~IR,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 06-04 039397 VO 1450185-0,1 11/8104 0.00 40,00
199985 CK 12/22/04 :¡:~IR,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 08-04 039398 VO 1450188-0.1 11/18/04 0.00 40.00
199985 CK 12/22104 :¡:~IR,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 08-04 039399 VO 1450187-0,1 11/8104 0.00 40,00
199985 CK 12/22104 :¡:~IR,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 08-04 039400 VO 1450188-0.1 11/8104 0.00 40.00
199985 CK 12/22/04 :¡:~IR,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 08-04 039401 VO 1450189-0.1 11/8/04 0.00 40.00
199985 CK 12/22/04 :¡:~IR,1kK PACIFIC HOMES 08-04 039402 VO 1450194-0.1 11/8/04 0.00 40.00
Check Total 444.70
199986 CK 12/22/04 ~~19~ PARCEL SERVICE 06-04 08-04 039431 VO 000016XW88514 12/18104 0.00 16,00
199987 CK 12/22/04 ~~In~ RENTALS (TRENCH SAFETY) 08-04 08-04 039444 VO 44672157-001 12/2/04 0.00 486.50
1"-:" '-.:,( C2i22'0~ Ü~¡¥~Ï> RENTALS (TRENCH SAFETY) Oö-O~ 06-,:( 039445 VO 446'¡2157-00: 12/21/C4 0,)0 1"1<,7;0
Check Total 660.25
199988 CK 12/22/04 ~¡¡~8~ES 08-04 06-04 039403 VO 200329-0.1 11/24/04 0.00 60_63
199989 CK 12/22/04 ~:¡:leWv SUPPLY OF AMERICA 08-04 06-Q4 038494 VO 873273 10/1104 22.84 2,261.61
199989 CK 12/22/04 ~:¡:leWv SUPPLY OF AMERICA 08-04 08-04 038515 VO 862847 9/9/04 0.00 1.470.50
139089 CK 12/22/04 t;rIEWv SUPPLY OF AMERICA GE-04 06-04 039221 t.) 862047 9/3/04 O.~" -, .47G,5C
199989 CK 12/22/04 ~:¡:leWv SUPPLY OF AMERICA 06-04 06-04 039274 VO 859546 9/1104 0.00 1,381.34
Check Total 3,842.95
199990 ZC 12/22/04 ~~~lPðN WIRELESS 06-04 06-Q4 039363 VO 18140231204 1217/04 0.00 42.61
199990 ZC 12/22/04 ~~~lPðN WIRELESS 08-04 06-04 039442 AD 18140231204 1217/04 0.00 -42.61
Check Total 0.00
199991 CK 12/22/04 ~~~IP~N 08-04 08-04 039225 VO 16756511204 12/1/04 0.00 45.40
199991 CK 12/22/04 ~~~IP~N 06-04 06-04 039373 VO 88528041204 12/10/04 0.00 32.32
199991 CK 12/22/04 ~~~IP~N 08-04 08-04 039443 VO 18140231204 12/7104 0.00 42.61
Check Total 120.33
-199992 CK 12/22/04 ~~l:eg\UPPL Y CO. 08-04 08-04 038980 VO 0189024-IN 12/3/04 0.00 2,672.68
-199992 CK 12/22/04 ~mg1SUPPL Y CO. 06-04 06-04 039033 VO 0189023-IN 12/3/04 0.00 200.41
Date: Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water Distrjct Page: 17 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User: KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company: EVWO
Periods: 06-04 Throu9h 07-04 As of: 116/05
Check Check Check 'ŒQ!lor 10 ___m n- Pertod Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post C'osed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
199992 CK 12122/04 ~~ceg1SUPPL y CO. 06-04 06-04 039034 VO 0189022-IN 1213/04 0.00 6.817.14
199992 CK 12/22/04 ~IH:eg1sUPPL Y co, 05-04 06-04 039038 VO 0189022-IN 1213/04 0.00 608.80
Check Total 10,299.03
199993 CK 12/22104 ~IŠ~!j,,:W-DAVID M 06-04 039416 VO 841517-4.1 11/12104 0.00 35.12
199994 CK 12122/04 ~Jrff¿KEEVER 06.04 06-04 039226 VO 9248 1211/04 0.00 4.197.00
199994 CK 12122/04 ~Jrff¿KEEVER 06-04 06-04 039227 VO 9234 1211/04 0.00 754.00
Check Total 4,951.00
199995 CK 12122104 ~'W8?J..INGER INC 06-04 06-04 039380 VO 934-266382-1 12110/04 0.00 181,93
199996 CK 12122104 ~8~ß~-GARY 06-04 06-04 039421 VO YOU121304 12113/04 0.00 105.00
199997 CI( 12/?0.'°4 r.n~7 ~'3-04 06-04 r392~8 VO 140114-1 1213/04 0.00 4~.e'
Ad,5WOiHH-1HOMAS N
199998 CK 12/29/04 ~~B~fËSE-JANINE 06-04 039299 VO 1520228-1 1213/04 0.00 46.52
199999 CK 12129/04 ~~~ßc¡,¡¡HEAD UNITED WAY 05-04 06-04 039466 VO ARR122404 12129/04 0.00 47.00
200000 CK 12129/04 ~~CP¿~NSTr.!jC:TION 06-04 039301 VO 321183-0 11/30/04 0.00 1,447,85
200001 CK 12129/04 ~ËBßß~D-PATRICIA 06-04 06-04 039303 VO 80009-3 11/30/04 0.00 34.14
200002 CK 12129/04 ~~ß7..I ,D-BENJAMIN W 05-04 039305 VO 1400295-4 1213/04 0.00 24.70
200003 CK 12/29/04 8~WM>.c CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038868 VO 321169-0 11/30/04 0.00 1.500.00
200003 CK 12/29/04 8~WM>.c CONSTRUCTION 06-04 06-04 038869 VO 321220-0 11/30/04 0.00 1.500.00
Check Total 3,000.00
200004 CK 12129/04 8~Ëß!.~ANYA 06-04 06-04 039309 VO 820035-4 1212104 0.00 472.27
200005 CK 12129/04 ~¿¡~Wa OEBAY 06-04 038811 AD 720133-2 11/9/04 0.00 -20.98
200005 CK -12129/04 ~Õ~ßOa DEBAY 06-04 039458 VO 720133-2 11/9/04 0.00 20.98
Date: Thursday, January 06.2005 East Valley Water Djstrict Page: 18 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
Usee KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company: EVW':J
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Checl< Check Check Vendo~_.___.- - ... Period Ref Doc Invoice Invotce Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
200005 CK 12/29104 ~ð~ßOC DEBAY 06-04 039459 VO 120133-2 11/9/04 0,00 20.98
Check Total 20.98
200006 CK 12129104 BËšILqrA-SAMANTHA 06-04 039311 VO 440012-1 11/30/04 0.00 14,24
200007 CK 12/29104 BË~B~A-AURA 06-04 06-04 039312 VO 1360017-2 12/3104 0.00 20.86
200008 CK 12/29/04 meR~AUM-JASON A 06-04 039408 VO 1320099-2.1 11129/04 0.00 54.32
200009 CK 12/29/04 ÞII:R~-J.R. 06-04 06-04 039313 VO 321188-0 11130104 0.00 2.299.43
200010 CK 12129104 8~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 039253 VO 370094-0 11/30/04 0.00 43.85
200010 CK 12/29104 8~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 06-04 039254 VO 370096-0 11129/04 0.00 41.10
Check Total . 84.95
200011 CK 12/29/04 ~Ë~ß~~EX 06-04 039316 VO 841200-9 12/3104 0.00 17.14
200012 CK 12/29/04 ~18~1}.NOS STAR GROUP 06-04 039467 VO 163.3 12129/04 0.00 f,300.00
200012 CK 12/29104 ~18~1}.NDS STAR GROUP 06-04 039468 VO 138.9 12129/04 0.00 8,000.00
Check Total 9,300.00
2')0013 CI( 12129104 ~~~ß~î-PHILIP ELSTON 06-04 039407 VO 551257-1.1 11/30/04 0.00 38.58
200014 CI( 12/29/04 jË~~MS-TINA M 06-04 039318 VO 1520171-2 12/2/04 0.00 20,23
200015 CK 12129104 j8I:e~-WILLIAM 06-04 039454 VO 140099-1.1 10128/04 0.00 52.40
200016 CK 12129104 j'f.~EEMAN CO.. INC 06-04 08-04 039446 VO 286740-0 12122/04 0.00 53.88
200017 CK 12129/04 j~~~r¡&-GABRIEL 06-04 039319 VO 10177-5 11129/04 0.00 49.62
200018 CK 12/29/04 ~Ë~~RLY-PARLEY D 06-04 039456 VO 520028-2.1 1112/04 0.00 82.39
200019 CK 12129104 118~~A-THOMAS 08-04 039321 VO 1020166-4 11129104 0.00 11.527.74
Dale; Thursday, January 06.2005 East Valley Water District Page: 19 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
User I(ATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check Vend~. -.----- Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice DIscount Amo"nt
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
200020 CK 12/29/04 l:8~QRÏ1ANDER 06-04 039324 VO 361024-5 12/3/04 0.00 78,07
200021 CK 12/29/04 l:8~~kRISTEN 0 06-04 039325 VO 530180-1 11/30/04 0.00 99.88
200022 CK 12/29/04 ~I~~~ONTES-IRMA 06-04 039329 VO 520136-2 11/29/04 0.00 56.46
200023 CK 12/29/04 ~8~~RLO-KAREN C 06-04 039330 VO 520104-5 12/2/04 0.00 15.92
200024 CK 12/29/04 ~~~ßOCONSTRUCTiON 06-04 039457 VO 321103-0.1 11/22/04 0.00 75.62
200025 CK 12/29/04 ~81:RI(tCO-EMiLiO 06-04 039333 VO 620042-9 11/30/04 0.00 145.25
200025 CK 12/29/04 ~81:R~'bo-EMiLiO 06-04 039334 VO 620042-9.1 11/30/04 0.00 97.70
---. Check To¡¡¡¡--- 24:E95
200026 CK 12/29/04 ~8~~~AMERICAN RESIOENTIAL 06-04 06-04 039337 VO 1533043-0 12/3/04 0.00 7.83
200027 CK 12/29/04 ~~8R9.íb-JORGE 06-04 06-04 039411 VO 720044-2.1 12/2/04 0.00 28.40
200028 CK 12129/04 ~~m~'k DEPT CITY OF S B 06-04 039460 VO 5148191104 12/21/04 0.00 111.00
200028 CK 12/29/04 ~Ëm~'k DEPT CITY OF S B 06-04 039461 VO 5117351104 12/21/04 0.00 101.00
200028 CK 12129/04 ~~~ß~'k DEPT CITY OF S 8 06-04 039462 VO 5142231104 12/21/04 0.00 101.00
200028 CK 12/29/04 ~~~ß~'k DEPT CITY OF S 8 06-04 039463 VO 5126171104 12/21/04 0.00 894.47
Check Total 1,207.47
200029 CK 12/29/04 ~8š~th-NICOLAS J 06-04 06-04 039345 VO 10400114 12/2/04 0.00 59.84
200030 CK 12129/04 ~8~~~\.iLLE-RYAN 06-04 039346 VO 830171-12 1212/04 0,00 55.98
200031 CK 12/29/04 šB8O01 06-04 06-04 039484 VO 88480381204 12110/04 0.00 585.67
200031 CK 12/29/04 šB8O01 06-04 06-04 039465 VO 88417021204 12110104 0.00 27.71
Check Total 613.38
200032 CK 12/29/04 ŠNeWE COMMERCIAL 06-04 039349 VO 321225-0 11/30/04 0.00 1.553.14
200032 CK 12/29/04 Š~~eWE COMMERCIAL 06.04 039350 VO 321225-0.1 12/1/04 0.00 74.50
Dale, Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 20 of 27
Time' 09:03AM Report' 03630.rpt
Use.. KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company, EVWD
Periods: 06.{)4 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check VltndorlQ.__w ---------- - Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice DIscount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
Check Total 1.627.64
200033 CI< 12/29/04 ~8~W-i/.AND PROPERTIES 06-04 039351 va 520173-3 12/2/04 0.00 19_10
200034 CK 12/29/04 ~:¡:~9~30F CALIFORNIA 06-04 06-04 039469 VO 51a1224O4 12/29/04 0,00 20.082.01
200035 CK 12/29/04 ~:¡:~9IlsTREET BANK & TRUST 06-04 039470 VO 51a122404 12/29/04 0.00 6.567_51
200036 CK 12/29/04 ~:¡:~ßtING.YOCCA.CARLSON & 06-04 06-04 039471 VO 0014 12/29/04 0.00 2.697.00
200037 CK 12/29/04 :¡:~12IkK PACIFIC HOMES 06.04 039259 VO 1450190-0 12/3/04 0.00 7.70
200038 CK 12/29/04 :¡:~~~Wt-SANDRA 06-04 06-04 039353 VO 1020099-5 11/29/04 0.00 39.98
200039 CK 12/29/04 ~~~ß1RS-AVELARDO 06-04 039354 VO 1120139-1 12/2/04 0.00 122.89
200040 CK 12/29/04 ¡:j~e~-NORMANDIE J 06-04 039355 VO 520202-1 12/2/04 0.00 12.38
200041 CK 12/29/04 ZW~ËDICAL SERVICE # 06-04 039447 va 140763296 12/22/04 0,00 133.44
200042 CI< 1/5/05 ~BBP8fION MEDICINE CONSULTANTS 07-04 039549 VO ADD010305 1/3/05 0.00 9Q.OC
200042 CK 1/5I0S ~BB¡¡%ON MEOICINE CONSULTANTS 07-04 039550 VO CRANFILL 1/3/05 0.00 49.50
Check Total 148.50
200043 CK 1/5/05 ~BþO02 07-04 039502 VO 348340 12/24/04 0.00 20.04
200044 CK 1/5/05 ~~~~9¿AN EXPRESS 07-04 039543 VO BOB 12/04 12/30/04 0.00 1.265.41
200045 CK 1/5/05 ~~~f¿AN CLASSIC SANITATION 07-04 039519 VO 1-55436 12/5/04 0.00 77.00
200045 CK 1/5/05 ~~~~f¿AN CLASSIC SANITATION 07-04 039S20 VO 1-55437 12/5/04 0.00 88,66
Check Total 165.66
200046 CK 1/5/05 ~~~ß%10STPOULOS-PETER G 07-04 039300 VO 1560732-11 12/9/04 0,00 22.27
200046 CK 1/5/05 ~~~ß%10STPOULOS-PETER G 07-04 039561 AD 1560732-11 12/9/04 0.00 -22,27
200046 CK '115/05 ~~~ß%10STPOULOS-PETER G 07-04 039562 VO 1560732-11 12/9/04 0,00 22.27
Dale: Thursday. January 06, 2005 East Valley Water Djstrict Page: 21 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630,rpt
User: KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company: EVWO
Periods: 06-04 Throu9h 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
--
Check Check Check Ve.!1dorlD ------------- Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
Check Total 22.27
200047 CK 1/5/05 ~~~~9.,5FINANICIAL SERVICES 07-04 039551 VO 92191322 12/21/04 0.00 2.368.34
200048 CK 1/5/05 ~~~ß!.~OHN R 07.04 039302 VO 420061-2 12/8/04 0.00 11.00
200049 CK 1/5/05 ~~8~~k-GABINO S 07-04 039505 VO BECO105 1/4/05 0.00 50.00
200050 CK 1/5/05 ~m/ð.,N-JOSE L 07-04 039304 VO 920070-8 12/9/04 0.00 51.30
200051 CK 1/5/05 ~8~~'/ji OF WATER COMMISSIONERS 07-04 039521 VO BOA 12/04 1/4/05 0.00 5,530.00
200052 CK 1/5105 ~~~a:¡¡,¡¡S MOVING & STORAGE 07-04 039506 VO 3065JAN05 1/1/05 0.00 530.34
200053 CK 1/5/05 8~I:fl?dRNlA HYDRAULICS 07-04 039472 VO 045630 12/20/04 3.34 330.23
200054 CK 1/5/05 8~~WTON-BARBARA C 07-04 039308 VO 1450152-1 1217/04 0.00 49.14
200055 CK 1/5/05 8~~~~k HOMES 07-04 039250 VO 750145-0 1217/04 0.00 39.00
200055 CK 1/5105 8~~~~k HOMES 07-04 039251 VO 750143-0 12/9/04 0.00 37.67
Check Tolal -----76.6;-
200056 CK 1/5/05 8~~ß!.4-ANYA 07-04 039452 VO 820035-4.1 12/9/04 0.00 72-50
200057 CK 1/5/05 88~RíËkSTONE CHURCH OFTHE NAZ 07-04 039310 VO 820147-1 1219/04 0.00 47.54
200058 CK 1/5/05 B~le~1JOURNAL CORPORATION 07.04 039492 VO B759821 12120/04 0.00 82.95
200059 CK 1/5/05 ~1:~ßc¡fFENCE CO.. INC. 07-04 039473 VO 4978 12/10/04 0.00 685.00
200059 CK 1/5/05 êl:~ßc¡fFENCE CO.. INC. 07-04 039474 VO 4977 12/10/04 0.00 940,00
Check Tolal 1,625.00
200060 CK 1/5105 ~~!/¡~BCOCK & SONS. INC 07-04 039523 VO AL41111-0791 12/14/04 0.00 135.00
200060 CK 1/5/05 ~~'lPkCOCK & SONS. INC 07-04 039524 VO AL40991-0791 12/13/04 0.00 120.00
Check Tolal 255.00
Dale. Thursday. January 06, 2005 East Valley Water Distrjct Page: 22 of 27
T;me: 09:03AM Report: 03630,rpt
U'eL KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Compan~': EV"'fJ
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
Check Check Check '<.endorlD .-_u.. .-.- Period Ref Doc InvoIce InvoIce DIscount Amount
Nbr Type Dale Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Dale Taken Paid
200061 CK 1/5/05 ~~I~'tííEW FORD SALES./NC 07-04 039504 VO 429555 1/4/05 0.00 53.81
200061 CK 1/5/05 Þ~I~'tííEW FORD SALES.INC 07-04 039530 VO 429058 12130/04 0.00 68.36
200061 CK 1/5/05 ~~I~'tííEW FORO SALES.INC 07-04 039531 VO 429056 12130/04 0,00 282.60
200061 CK 1/5/05 Þ~I~'tííEW FORD SALES.INC 07-04 039532 VO 428902 12130/04 0,00 139,39
200061 CK 1/5105 ~~I~'tííEW FORO SALES./NC 07-04 039544 VO 429667 1/4/05 0,00 34,98
Check Total 579.14
200062 CK 1/5/05 ~~~~iJiIR BROS COFFEE 07-04 039533 VO 2894226 12129/04 0.00 112.67
200062 CK 1/5/05 Þ~~&R:1R BROS COFFEE 07-04 039534 VO 2894227 12/29/04 0.00 73.30
200062 CK 1/5/05 ~~~£a1R BROS COFFEE 07-04 039535 VO 2894227 12/29/04 0.00 146.47
Check Total 332.44
200063 CK 1/5105 8~R~9éL EQUIPMENT CO 07-04 039475 VO 62873 12120/04 0.00 278.57
200003 CK 1/5/05 8~R~9éL EQUIPMENT CO 0/-04 039536 VO 62876 12122104 0.00 83,71
Check Total 362.28
200064 CK 1/5/05 8~~ß9Jh CONSTRUCTION 07-04 039255 VO 370092-0 1217/04 0.00 35.00
200065 CK 1/5/05 8~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039476 VO 856244 12116/04 5.16 252.79
200065 CK 1/5105 8~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039484 VO 857624 12128104 0.32 15.43
200G65 CK 1:5/05 a~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039485 VO 857138 12123/04 0.23 11.41
200065 CK 1/5/05 8~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039486 VO 856985 12/22/04 3.76 184.38
200065 CK 1/5/05 8~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039487 VO 856728 12120/04 0.93 45.36
200065 CK 1/5/05 8~~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039488 VO 856220 12116/04 0.66 32.54
Check Total 541.91
200066 CK 1/5/05 8~8~9ffE-MICAH 07-04 039493 VO GEOI221O4 12121/04 0.00 150.00
200067 CK 1/5/05 881~!§1 JANITORIAL SERVICE 07-04 039552 VO 1312 12122/04 0.00 2,135.00
200068 CK 1/5/05 88~ß<¡¡N WEST TIRE 07-04 039489 VO 3605 12121/04 0.00 722.51
200069 CK 1/5/05 8HI~~REZ-SCOTT 07-04 039435 VO 720059-4 1217/04 0.00 23.88
200069 CK 1/5/05 ~HI~~REZ-SCOTT 07-04 039436 VO 720059-4.1 1218104 0.00 28.40
Date' Thursday, JanualY 06. 2005 East Valley Water Djstrict Page' 23 of 27
Time, 09:03AM Report, 03630.rpt
User KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Compano', EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Througil 07-04 As of: 1/6/05
--
Check Check Check Vendor 10 --- - Period Ref Ooc Invoice Invoice DIscount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid
200069 CK 1/5105 ~~I~~'kREZ-SCOTT 07-04 039437 VO 720059-4.1CR 12/21/04 0.00 75.00
Check Total 127.28
200070 CK 1/5105 ~~~~k EQUIPMENT COMPANY 07-04 039483 VO 039404 12/16/04 0.00 192.19
200071 CK 1/5105 ~~~~f~ COMPUTER SYSTEMS 07-04 039537 VO XTOOO01623 12/31/04 0.00 2.000.00
200072 CK 1/5105 ~1~e!§HARON J 07-04 039317 VO 20176-3 12/10/04 0.00 18.90
200073 CK 115105 ~8~~<¡'bN MACHINERY CO 07-04 039490 VO pcOO0659094 12/23104 0.00 462.38
200073 CK 1/5/05 ~8~~<¡'bN MACHINERY CO 07-04 039491 AD PROOO079922 12/28/04 0.00 -206.65
Check Total 255.73
200074 CK 1/5105 ~8~&~SON-CHERYL E 07.Q4 039455 VO 750064-1.1 12/7/04 0.00 46.98
200075 CK 1/5/05 ~8~ßWCLEANERS 07-04 039538 VO 134115 12/23/04 0.00 6.93
200075 CK 115105 ~8~ßWCLEANERS 07-04 039539 VO 134361 12/28/04 0.00 3.96
200075 CK 1/5105 ~8~ßWCLEANERS 07-04 039540 VO 132851 1217/04 0.00 4.95
200075 CK 115105 ~8~ßWCLEANERS 07-04 039546 VO 133972 12/22/04 0.00 6.93
Check Total 22.77
2000ï6 CK 1/5/05 ~i}[r¡p~EEMAN CO.. INC 07-04 039482 VO 2E6218-0 12/13/34 0.';1 144.48
200077 CK 1/5/05 ~Ä~ß<¡'¡R A, KESSLER & ASSOCIATES 07-04 039507 VO 214860 12/6/04 0.00 26,498.00
200078 CK 1/5/05 ~~g'b\ PRODUCTS,INC 07-04 039547 VO 2746223 12/20/04 2.36 259,63
200079 CK 1/5105 ~8~ßO~IGNS 07-04 039494 VO 13507 12/22/04 0.00 65.00
200080 CK 1/5105 ~~~ßtI'NADO-ARACELI 07-04 039327 VO 1160070-1 1217/04 0.00 13.22
200081 CK 1/5/05 ~8~¡L. OUCKWORTH & MC NEAL. 07-04 039508 VO OVERPAYMENT 1/4/05 0.00 601.75
200082 CK 1/5105 ~H~<ö'ÞOLlTAN LIFE INS CO 07-04 039509 VO MET0105 1/1105 0.00 405.65
Dale: Thursday. January 06, 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 24 of 27
Time: 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
Usee KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company: EVWO
Periods: 06.()4 Throu9h 07.()4 As of: 1/6/05
Checl, Check Check VendariD -- _m__.- Period Ref Dac Invoice Invoice mscaunt Amaunt
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name Ta Past Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken PaId
200082 CK 1/5/05 ~H~'ðÞOLlTAN LIFE INS CO 07-04 039510 AD MET0105,CR 1/1/05 0.00 -11,91
200082 CK 1/5/05 ~H~'ðÞOLlTAN LIFE INS CO 07-04 039511 AD MET0105.CR1 1/1/05 0.00 -23.82
Check Total 369.92
200083 CK 1/5/05 ~H~<¡)ICALL 07-04 039548 VO 28140355 1/1105 0,00 138.16
200084 CK 1/5/05 ~ltß<¡j1EOZKI-JACEK 07.04 039525 VO MIL122104 12/21/04 0.00 2,880.00
200085 CK 1/5/05 ~8~~tl-SHELLY L 07-04 039331 VO 910387-2 12/10/04 0.00 41.72
200086 CK 1/5/05 ~HPd~AL WATERWORKS 07-04 039374 VO 1924777 12/14/04 0.00 4.328.43
200086 CK 1/5/05 ~HPd~AL WATERWORKS 07-04 039503 AD 1924777,1 12/17/04 0.00 -0.01
Check Total 4,329.42
200087 CK 1/5/05 ~Ë~H COMMUNICATIONS 07-04 039553 va 426242026-032 12/31/04 0.00 1,313.12
200088 CK 1/5/05 ~8~mAMERICAN RESIDENTIAL 07-04 039335 VO 1533046-0 12/9/04 0.00 3.75
200089 CK 1/5/05 Þ~~~~-DANA 07-04 039410 VO 1020087-2.1 12/9/04 0.00 12.34
200090 C!( 1/5'05 ÞHtf1<SON-ROY 07-04 C39512 VO PAT0105 1/4/05 0.00 350.00
200091 CK 1/5/05 þ~S'. 07-04 039513 VO PER0105 1/1/05 0.00 35,456.40
200091 CK 1/5/05 þ'TfR°S'. 07-04 039514 AD PER0105.CR 1/1/05 0.00 -945.66
Check Total 34,510.74
200092 CK 1/5/05 ÞË~g~1..EMMA 07-04 039339 VO 710082-5 1217/04 0.00 104,67
200093 CK 1/5/05 Þ8~R06ISTRIBUTING CO 07-04 039541 VO 460305 12/23/04 0.00 977,22
200094 CK 1/5/05 ~H~R~THONY M 07-04 0393't3 VO 360069-2 12/10/04 0.00 37.73
200095 CK 1/5/05 W~ß%y F MOORE 07-04 039558 VO RISK121404 12/14/04 0.00 8.152.77
Dale. Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 25 of 27
Time 09:03AM Report: 03630.rpt
Usee: KATHY Co,eck ReQister - Standard Company: EVWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07-04 As of: 116105
--
Check Check Check YendorlD _~__.mm -. Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken PaId
200096 CK 1/5/05 ~~~08~oup 07-04 039479 VO 28510 10120104 0.00 1,705.00
200097 CK 115105 ~8Un~KENNETH C 07-04 039347 VO 1400325-1 1217/04 0.00 26.59
200098 CK 115105 Š~~~~RNARDINa-CITY OF 07-04 039009 VO SAN1104 12/7/04 0.00 420.604.99
200099 CK 115/05 Š~~~I~I-STEVE 07-04 039526 VO SAN122204 12/22/04 0.00 286.39
200100 CK 1/5105 Š~U~MR-CHRISTIAN 07-04 039348 VO 940214-2 12/9/04 0.00 47.46
200101 CK 1/5/05 š~8O01 07-04 039495 VO 42521421204 12/14/04 0.00 32.51
200101 CK 1/5/05 š~8O01 07-04 039496 VO 42506231204 12/14/04 0.00 82.55
20010'1 Co< 1/5/05 š~8O01 07-04 039497 VO 35119161204 1217/04 0,00 32",03
200101 CK 1/5/05 Š~8001 07-04 039498 VO 34219201204 12/7/04 0.00 485,06
Check Total 905.15
200102 CK 1/5105 š88m.s MUFFLER SERVICE INC 07-04 039477 VO 55477 12/16/04 0.00 102.37
200W3 CK 1/5/05 ŠHe'J!tJRNITURE & SYSTEMS. INC 07-04 039557 VO 32619 12/27104 0.00 9.003.55
200104 CK 1/5/05 Š~8~'I:~ARY OF STATE 07-04 039527 VO SEC120704 12/7/04 0.00 25.00
200105 CK 1/5/05 š~~g~1;ON-RON 07-04 039515 VO SEV0105 1/4/05 0.00 239.35
200106 CK 1/5/05 š8<t?.Rè PUMP & WELL SERVICE 07-04 039478 VO 36683 10129104 0.00 1.807.96
200107 CK 1/5/05 Š8't~EDISON COMPANY 07-04 039554 VO 22437458821204 1/1/05 0.00 501.11
200107 CK 1/5/05 Š8<t?A~ EDISON COMPANY 07-04 039555 VO 22512228571204 12/30/04 0.00 2.253.80
Check Total 2,754.91
200108 CK 1/5/05 U~I~~ PARCEL SERVICE 07-04 039501 va 00016XW88524 12/25104 0,00 16.00
200108 CK 1/5105 U~I~~ PARCEL SERVICE 07-04 039556 VO 000016XW885O4 12/11/04 0.00 25.81
Check Total 41.81
Dale' Thursday. January 06. 2005 East Valley Water District Page: 26 of 27
T;me' 09:03AM Report, 03630.rpt
User KATHY Check Re!:lister - Standard Company: E'JWD
Periods: 06-04 Through 07.()4 As of: 116105
Check Check Check VendorlD ---------.-- Period Ref Doc Involc. Invoice Discount Amount
Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Ciosed Nbr Type Number Date Taken PaId
200109 CK 1/5/05 ~~IB~ BANK OF CALIFORNIA 07.04 039516 VO UNI0105 1/4/05 0.00 73.563.75
200109 CK 1/5/05 ~~IB~ BANK OF CALIFORNIA 07-04 039517 VO UN10105.1 1/4/05 0.00 87,402.41
Check Total 160,966.16
200110 CK 1/5/05 ~~W8~ES 07-04 039260 VO 551309-0 1219104 0.00 40.82
200110 CK 1/5/05 ~~W8~ES 07-04 039261 VO 551311-0 1219/04 0.00 60.02
200110 CK 1/5105 ~~W8~ES 07-04 039262 VO 551312-0 1219/04 0.00 290,27
200110 CK 1/5/05 ~~W8~ES 07-04 039263 VO 551314-0 1219/04 0.00 53.30
200110 CK 1/5/05 ~~W8~ES 07-04 039264 VO 551316'() 1219/04 0.00 57.14
200110 CK 1/5/05 ~~W8~ES 07-04 039265 VO 551317-0 1219/04 0.00 58.10
200110 CK 1/5105 ~~~ES 07.04 039266 VO 551318-0 1219/04 0.00 4.34
200110 CK 1/5105 ~~'ï'18~ES 07-04 039267 VO 551329-0 1219/04 0.00 55.98
200110 CK 1/5/05 ~~'æ~ES 07-04 039404 VO 551310-0.1 1219/04 0.00 20.59
Check Total 640.56
200111 CK 1/5/05 ~~~?P~N 07-04 039499 VO 88868051204 12113/04 0.00 144.47
200112 CK 1/5/05 ~~~?PðN 07-04 039500 va 490009427979 1219/04 0.00 30.50
200113 CI; 1:5/05 WHI~ßí¡EAD-RaGER 07-04 039518 Vù V:¡CI0105 114/05 0.('0 295.72
200114 CK 1/5/05 Wll:gî~-M[CHELLE 07-04 039415 VO 1650188-2.1 1219/04 0.00 64.00
200115 CK 1/5105 WJrRP¿KEEVER 07-04 039480 va 9236 1211/04 0.00 1,048,00
200115 CK 1/5/05 WJrRP¿KEEVER 07-04 039481 VO 9198 11/1/04 0.00 4.107.89
Check Total 5,155.89
200116 CK 1/5/05 ~~~q;¡bcAL SERVICE # 07-04 039542 vo 140763303 12123/04 0.00 236.68
Dale'
T;me'
User:
Thursday. January 06. 2005
09:03AM
KATHY
East Valley Water Djstrjct
Check Re!!ister - Standard
Periods: 06.Q4 Through 07.Q4 As of: 1/6/05
Page:
Report:
Company-.
27 of 27
03630,rpl
EVWD
Check
Nbr
Check Check
Type Date
Vendor 10
Vendor Name.
partod
To Post Closed
Ref
Nbr
Doc
Type
Invoice
Number
Invo;ce
Date
Discount
Taken
Amount
Paid
Chock Count
286
Acet Sub Tota':
'f,388;-068.47
~~~Type ...--..----.. Count
___AI11ountPa ¡
Total:
283
0
1
0
2
0
286
1,425.684.76
0.00
-37.616.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
Regular
Hand
Vok!
Siub
Zero
Mask
1,388,068.47
Company Disc Total
113.29
Company Total
1,388,068.47
~wn~~~ .
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNr>W A'fER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AN INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
GROUNDWATER ]\;lANAGEMENT PROGRAM
This Agreement is made by and among the following parties (herein, collectively, "Parties"):
the City of San Bernardino and the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department
(collectively, San Bernardino); San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Muni District);
Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County (Western); City of River¡¡ide (Riverside); West
Valley Water District (West District); East Valley Water District (East Valley); City of Colton
(Colton); and Riverside Highland Water Company (Riverside Highland). The Parties other than San
Bernardino are collectively referred to as the "Public Water Purveyors."
This Agreement is effective beginning January 1, 2005.
RECITALS
1.
~
A.
San Bernardino is a party to a consent decree lodged with the United States District
Court, Central District of California, Western Division (Court), on August 18, 2004 (Consent
Decree). The Consent Decree settles litigation entitled Ci!y of San B.mardino t'. Unit.d Statu of
America, Case No. CV96-8867 and Sial< oj California Department ojToxic Substances Control I'. United
Statu of Ammca, Case No, CV 96-5205 (consolidated). The Consent Decree expressly provides that
the Court retains jurisdiction over any challenge to the groundwater management and pernút
program (GMPP) to be implemented by San Bernardino. The Consent Decree obligates San
Bernardino to operate and maintain a system of wells and treatment plants known, as a whole, as the
Newmark Groundwater Remediation Superfund Site (Newmark Site), The Newmatk Site
settlement addresses, in part, construction and implementation oi two operable units: the Newmark
Page 1 of24
64;710.5
ExECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTmn'IONAL CONTROLS GROUN!)W A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Operable Unit (Newmark OU) and the Muscoy Operable Unit (Muscoy OU). The Newmark Site is
intended to function as a groundwater treatment system to clean up contaminantS in a portion of the
Bunker Hill Basin. The primary contaminants of concern in that plume are tetrachlorethylene
(PCE) and trichloroethylene (fCE). Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decree, the Newmark
Site is subject to the oversight of either and both the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) or the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSq.
B.
Paragraph 111 of the Consent Decree states, "NotWÚhstanding any other provision
of this Consent Decree, the United States and DTSC retain all authority and reserve all rights to take
any and all response actions a)lthorized by law."
c.
As a condition of the Consent Decree, San Bernardino is obligated to institute the
GMPP to "ensure the effectiveness and integrity" of the Newmark Site that includes: (i) taking
appropriate actions to prevent or mitigate the potential harmful effects of new or increased
extraction from areas within the Management Zone described herein and referred to as the "Permit
Zone" in the Consent Decree, which zone is within the San Bernarclmo city limits, and (ii) taking
appropriate actions to prevent or mitigate the potential harmful effects of increased artificial
recharge within the Management Zone. San Bernardino has conducted a preliminary technical
appraisal to determine the areas within its city limits that warrant further technical review, in the
context of new or increased extraction ot artificial recharge, and has identified those areas as
"Management Zone" areas. The Management Zone boundaries for extraction and spreading are
designated on Exhibit A to this Agreement.
D.
Muni District is a municipal water district having a broad range of powers and
obligations to provide water and water-related services. Muni District's service area includes areas
64"10,5
Page 2 of24
ExECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTI1UTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
overlying the Bunker Hill Basin. Included in its broad range of powers and obligations are the
following specific obligations: under Orang. Counry Water District v. Ciry ofChino.1 aI, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 117628 (the Orange County Judgment), Muni District has certain
obligations to guarantee delivery of water downstream; under Westerlz Municipal Water District el af v.
Easl San B.rnardino Counry Waf" District.1 al., Riverside County Superior Court Case No. 78426 (the
Western Judgment), Muni District has certain obligations to replenish the San Bernardino Basin
Area, which includes the Bunker Hill Basin.
E.
Western is a municipal water district having a broad range of powers and obligations
to provide water and water-related services. Western is a party to both the Orange County and
Western Judgments and has certain rights and obligations arising thereunder and claims rights to
water pumped from the Bunker Hill Basin.
F.
Riverside, a municipal corporation, operates wells, treatment facilities and
transmission systems in the Bunker Hill Basin. Riverside is a party and a successor to a party to CitY
of San Bmzardino v. CitY ofRiv<rJid., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 13754 (the Riverside
Judgment), as amended, and has certain rights and obligations thereunder. Riverside is additionally a
plaintiff party and a successor to a plaintiff party to the WesrernJuùgment, which specifies the
amount of water that Riverside may export from the San Bernardino Basin Area (which includes the
Bunker Hill Basin).
G.
West District is a county water districr having a broad range of powers to provide
water and water-related services. West District is a party, through predecessor parties-in-interest, to
Lytl. C,...k Water and Improvem<nl Co, v. Grap<land Irrigation Disl. .1 aI, Los Angeles Superior Court
Case No. 20790 (commonly known as the "McKinley Judgment") and City of San Bernardino I'.
Page 3 of24
643110.5
ExECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEvELoP AND ADOPT AND INSTITU110NAL CONTROLS GROUNJJW A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Fontana Water Co. et aI., San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 17030 (the "Lytle Creek"
Judgment). The McKinley Judgment apportioned surface water rights to Lytle Creek among the
various parries; the Lytle Creek Judgment apportioned surface water rights and also granted certain
groundwater extraction rights within the Lytle Creek region to various parties. The Lytle Creek
Region is within the San Bernardino Basin Area as defined in the Western Judgment.
H.
East Valley is a county water district having a broad range of powers to provide
water and water-rdated services. East Valley operates wdls and trar,smission systems in the Bunker
Hill Basin.
1.
Colton, a municipal corporation, operates wdls and transmission systems in the
Bunker Hill Basin. Colton, through its predecessor parties-in-interest, was granted certain
groundwater extraction rights in the Lytle Creek region through the Lytle Creek Judgment.
J.
San Bernardino holds groundwater extraction rights in the Lytle Creek region
through the Lytle Creek Judgment. Additionally, San Bernardino is a party to the Riverside
Judgment, wlúch specifies the areas in wlúch it may extract groundwater and the amounts of
groundwater extracted in those areas.
K.
Riverside Highland Warer Company is a mutual water company and a plaintiff in the
Western Judgment. Under such Judgment, the Company has the right to extract and export certain
quantities of water from the Bunker Hill Basin.
II.
The Consent Decree
A.
On or about August 18, 2004, the Consent Decree was lodged with the Court. On
August 18, 2004, by means of notice published in the Federal Regisrer, the United States
"3110.5
Page 4 of 24
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTIlUTtONAL CONTROLS GROUNDIV A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Department of Justice (USDO]) and USEPA provided an opporronity for comments from the
public on the Consent Decree and the related Explanation of Significant Differences, respectively.
B.
As part of the Consent Decree, San Bernardino has agreed to undertake a number of
actions in connection with the remediation of the Newmark Site. One of the key obligations of San
Bernardino is the adoption of the GMPP, which obligation is generally desctibed in paragraphs 27-
29 of the Consent Decree. The GMPP requires San Bernardino, int", alia, to monitor and take
appropriate actions to maintain the effectiveness and integrity of the Interim Remedial Actions and
to take appropriate actions to "prevent ot mitigate" the potential harmful effects of new or increased
extractions or increased artificial recharge from areas within the Man,.gement Zone.
c.
The Consent Decree contemplates that San Bernardino will develop, adopt and
implement the GMPP desctibed in paragraphs 27-29 pursuant to its authority under California law.
The Consent Decree further contemplates that the GMPP will be based on San Bernardino's best
professional judgment, in consultation with USEP A and DTSC, and subject to approval by USEP A.
The Consent Decree provides that San Bernardino will institute its legislative process to approve
and adopt the GMPP and includes, as Appendix H, the draft of a prùposed ordinance that San
Bernardino intends to use as the starting point of such legislative process.
D.
On or about September 20, 2004, most of the Public Water Purveyors submitted
extensive written comments on the Consent Decree and, on or about October 1, 2004, most of the
Public Water Purveyors submitted extensive written comments on the Explanation of Significant
Differences. As a general matter, these comments objected to the proposed GMPP on the grounds,
inter alia, that it would: (i) interfere with the Public Water Purveyors' rights and obligations under a
series of state court judgments; (ii) interfere with other efforts to manage the Bunker Hill Basin to
643710.5
Page 5 of24
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS GROUND"" A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
maintain the safe yield of that Basin, to control high groundwater plOblems, and for the conjunctive
use of groundwater and surface water; (ill) violate California state water policy and California law;
and (iv) interfere with the exercise of certain existing water rights. Copies of these comments were
filed concurrently with USDa] and with USEP A.
E.
Shortly after the Public Water Purveyors subrnitted comments on the Consent
Decree and the Explanation of Significant Differences, the Parties began discussions aimed at
resolving the concerns of the Public Water Purveyors relating to the Consent Decree. During those
discussions, the Public Water Purveyors made clear their intent to file motions with the Court to
intervene in the underlying litigation if the Parties were not able collectively to resolve the serious
concerns expressed in the Public Water Purveyors' comments on the Consent Decree and the
Explanation of Significant Differences. Also during those discussions, San Bernardino made it clear
that it would likely oppose the Public Water Purveyors' motions to intervene in the underlying
litigation. All Parties, however, agreed that a mutually acceptable GM:FP that would satisfy the
requirements of the Consent Decree without interfering with certain state court judgments, basin
replenishment, control of IUgh groundwater, the conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water,
and the exercise of certain existing water rights was the desired outcome of the discussions. The
Parties further agreed that such a GMPP would eliminate the need for the Public Water Purveyors
to file motions to intervene in the underlying litigation by implementing a mechanism to resolve the
Public Water Purveyors' concerns about the potential impact of the Consent Decree.
F.
The Parties have actively negotiated the terms of this Agreement as a part of the
GMPP that the Consent Decree contemplates San Bernardino will promptly adopt and implement
upon the entry of the Consent Decree.
Page 6 of 24
601'71"
EXECUTION CoPY
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INST\TU110NAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
G.
The Parties agree that a mutually acceptable GMPP has tWo components: (i) this
Agreement and its successor agreement (the "ICGMP"), which apply to San Bernardino and the
Public Water Purveyors and which fully satisfy all provisions of the Consent Decree as those
provisions may relate to the Public Water Purveyors' activities; and (ii) an ordinance satisfying the
provisions of paragraphs 27-29 of the Consent Decree, which shall apply to all entities other than
San Bernardino and the Public Water Purveyors that engage in groundwater extraction or recharge
within the Management Zone. The ordinance shall not apply to a Public Water Purveyor for so long
as that Public Water Purveyor is a Party to this Agreement and/or the ICGMP.
III.
The Present Agreement
A.
The Consent Decree vests substantial discretion in San Bernardino in developing,
adopting and implementing the GMPP to satisfy the obligations created by paragraphs 27-29 of the
Consent Decree. The draft ordinance attached as Appendix H to the Consent Decree reflects only
one of several possible and legitimate approaches that San Bernardino could use as part of its efforts
to develop, adopt and implement a GMPP that would meet its obligations under the Consent
Decree. In light of the commitment from the Public Water Purveyors, as expressed in this
Agreement, to negotiate the ICGMP and to work cooperatively and collaborativdy with San
Bernardino to achieve the mutual objectives described in paragraph 3 below, San Bernardino
determines to exercise its discretion to adopt this Agreement and the ICGMP as part of the GMPP.
San Bernardino and the Public Water Purveyors, accordingly, shall be exempt from the provisions of
any ordinance or other legislative process that San Bernardino may adopt to implement paragraphs
27-29 of the Consent Decree, as described above in recital ILG and described below in recital IILB
and paragraphs 4 and 6.F. San Bernardino believes that the terms of this Agreement are consistent
\\~th the substance and terms of the Consent Decree and will so advocate to USEP A and DTSc.
Page 7 of24
6<3110.5
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTIroTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
B.
In light of the commitment of Public Watet Purveyors to cooperate in achieving the
purposes of paragraphs 27-29 of the Consent Decree as described in the previous paragraph, San
Bernardino determines, subject to the approval ofUSEPA if required in paragraph 27.d of the
Consent Decree, that it will include the following provisions in any ordinance or other legislative
process adopted to implement paragraphs 27-29 of the Consent Dectee: (i) San B"J:nardino and the
Public Water Purveyors shall be exempt from any such ordinance or legislative process during the
term of this Agreement or the ICGMP; and (ii) the development and implementation of this
Agreement or the ICGMP, in San Bernardino's best professional judgment, fully comply with all of
the requirements of the Consent Decree as they may relate to the Public Water Purveyors.
c.
In light of the provisions of this Agreement, the Public Water Purveyors will forego
their opportunity to me motions to intervene in the und"J:lying litigation.
D.
San Bernardino has det"J:mined that, based upon its best professional judgment, the
adoption of a GMPP as described in recital II.G above, represents the best course available to
ensure the adequacy of the Int"J:im Remedial Actions, to further the goals of the Consent Decree,
and to take actions consistent with the intent and objectives of the Consent Decree.
E.
The Parties intend that this A¡,-reement will function as an integral component of
overall basin management within the San Bernardino Basin Area. Therefore, the Parties intend to
make infonned decisions and implement institutional control strategies within the larger context of
basin management in a manner that satisfies the Consent Decree and, at the same time, furthers
overall basin management. To those ends, the Parties will coordinate efforts undertaken pursuant to
this Agreement and the ICGMP with other groundwater contamination remediation initiatives and
water reSOurce management programs in the San Bernardino Basin ~I\rea,
""'°"
Page 8 of24
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTITlITIONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
F.
The definitions applicable herein, which are also used in the Consent Decree, shall
have the same meaning.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals that are incorporated herein
and the mutual covenants and terms below, the Parties hereby agree to the following:
AGREEMENT
1.
This Agreement will commence on the date first indicated above. The term of this
Agreement is one (1) year, subject to the extensions contemplated in this paragraph and subject to
paragraphs 8 and 12 below. My extension to the Agreement must bc submitted for review and
approval to EPA. IfUSEPA does not approve an extension of this Itgreement within sixty (60)
days of the date the Parties submit such an extension to USEP A and the Parties have not agreed
upon the terms of an ICGMP, the Parties shall deem themselves to be at impasse and shall invoke
the dispute resolution provisions of paragraph 12 below. The term of this Agreement shall be
extended for the duration of the paragraph 12 dispute resolution process and any time needed for
review of the results of that process by USEPA. IfUSEPA does not approve the ICGMP
developed through this Agreement, San Bernardino shall commence the dispute resolution process
set forth in the Consent Decree. This Agreement shall automatically extend for the duration of the
Consent Decree dispute resolution process.
2.
Within five (5) business days after the latter of the effective date of this Agreement,
or the date on which a Public Water Purveyor executes this Agreement, that Public Water Purveyor
shall submit a letter supporting the entry of judgment of the Consent Decree to the Court, with
copies to USDOj, to USEPA, and to DTSc.
3.
During the term of this Agreement, the Parties agree to meet and confer in good
faith to draft and execute a successor agreement that is intended to accomplish the following
Page 9 of24
"3110.5
EXEamoN COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTITIJTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNUW A TER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
objectives: (1) management of extraction and artificial recharge to ensure the effectiveness and
integrity of the Newmark Site; (2) maintenance of water levels throughout the Bunker Hill Basin to
optimize water extractions; (3) maintenance of water levels in the artesian or pressure zone to
prevent high groundwater conditions; (4) coordination of Newmark Site activities that can affect
other contaminant plumes in the Bunker Hill Basin; and (5) optimizing conditions in the Bunker Hill
Basin for conjunctive use. Meetings shall be held monthly, at a minimum. This successor
agreement, for purposes of clarity within this document, shall be refetred to as d1e "Institutional
Controls Groundwater Management Program" or (lCGMP). These objectives will be considered in
the context of overall basin management and it is contemplated that the Parties will coordinate with
other management groups in implementing overall basin management strategies. The Parties may
create a technical advisory committee composed of the Parties' staff and/or appropriate consultants
to assist in the development of the ICGMP. The Parties shall meet regularly with both management
and techrùcal staff ofDTSC and USEPA to exchange information and describe the Parties' progress
towards completing the ICGMP.
4.
During the term of this Agreement and duting the term of the ICGMP, San
Bernardino and a Public Water Purveyor, for so long as that Public Water Purveyor remains a Parry
to these agreements, will be exempt from the provisions of any ordinance or other legislative
process to be enacted by San Bernardino that is intended to regulate groundwater extraction and
artificial recharge activities within the Management Zone (hereinafter, "Institutional Controls
Ordinance") and the Institutional Controls Ordinance shall so statc.
5.
The Parties have negotiated certain pre-approved or permitted activities. These pre-
approved or permitted activities have been quantified and are set forth in the attached Exhibit B.
Using its best professional judgment, subject to consultation with USEPA and DTSC, San
Page 100[24
643710.'
EXECUTION COpy .
AGREEMENI'TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INST!11JTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNrJW ATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Bernardino has determined that these pte-approved or permitted activities will not adversely affect
the effectiveness and integrity of the Newmark Site, will not increase the likelihood that
contaminants will migrate past or around the barrier wells that are part of the Newmark Site, and
will not otherwise interfere with the performance of the Interim Remedial Actions. Provided that a
Party adheres to the geographic and volumetric limitS set forth in E,hibit B, it shall be ftee to
conduct its operations without further review or approval by San Bemardino. All such operations
shall be exempt from all provisions of the Institutional Controls Ordinance, including, but not
limited to, the requirement for insurance for any pre-approved or penhitted activity set forth in
Exhibit B.
6.
The Parties agree that the ICGMP will include at least the following elements:
A.
All decisions under the ICGMP, including the addition of new Parties to the
ICGMP, shall be made by consensus of all the Parties where possible. When consensus is not
possible, any decision shall have the support of a supermajority of the Parties, provided that any
decision must be supported by San Bernardino, Muni District, Western and Riverside.
B.
With respect to any project proposed by or to the Parties pursuant to the ICGMP,
each Parry will comply with the provisions of ':he California Enviroamental Quality Act (CEQA), as
and if that Act applies. It is not intended that a Party shall assume Lead or Responsible Agency
status, as those terms are defined in CEQA, solely through participation in the ICGMP.
c.
Some reasonable assurance from the Public Water PUI veyors that any new extraction
or spreading activity approved through the ICGMP will not be used by the Public Water Purveyors
as the basis for a claim for damages against San Bernardino and some reasonable assurance from
San Bernardino that any new extraction or spreading activity approveJ througb the ICGMP will not
be used as the basis for a claim of damages by San Bernardino again~t the Public Water Purveyors.
64'"05
Page] 1 004
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENr TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
D.
The Parties will cooperate with each other in sharing of infonnation needed to
develop any groundwater model of any of the Parties, as it/they may relate to the ICGMP. No
Party shall be responsible or liable for another Party's use of information or models shared pursuant
to the ICGMP.
E.
No Party, by virtue of its participation in the ICGMP, shall be required to obtain any
insurance for an activity authorized through the ICGMP other than such insurance that such Party
would customarily obtain in the course of conducting itS regular business activities.
F.
After they have executed the ICGMP, San Bernardino and each Public Water
Purveyor for so long as that Public Water Purveyor remains a Party to th.e ICGMP shall be exempt
from the Institutional Controls Ordinance to be adopted by San Bemardino. This exemption shall
be expressed in the Institutional Controls Ordinance.
G.
Any changes to the Management Zone, after the Lead Oversight Agency approves it,
shall be made by consent of the Parties.
.H.
The Parties will define the concept of "adverse effeLts" for purposes of the ICGMP
and shall strive to avoid adverse effects in the development or impkmentation of the ICGMP.
1.
A dispute resolution process that avoids the need for the Parties to engage in
litigation in order to resolve disputes that may arise during the development or implementation of
the ICGMP.
The foregoing elements of the ICGMP may be modified or eliminated with the consent of the
Parties.
7.
While the ICGMP is being developed, each Party agrees thar ir will not undertake
any extraction or spreading activities that have not been pre-approved or permitted, within the
Management Zone, unless the Parties to this Agreement unanimously concur that the project will
643110.'
Page 12 of24
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTITlITIONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
not adversely affect San Bernardino's compliance with the requirements of the Statement of Work
(SOW) accompanying the Consent Decree for the Newmark Site.
8.
All decisions required to implement this Agreement shall be made by unanimous
consent of all the Parties. In the event that USEP A does not approve an extension of this
Agreement or the Parties disagree on whether to extend the term of this Agreement beyond the
initial one-year term, this Agreement shall automatically extend for a period of the greater of: (i) one
hundred twenty (120) days beyond that initial one-year term or (ü) the duration of the dispute
resolution process described in paragraph 12 below, together with any dispute resolution process
that may be necessary as between San Bernardino and USEP A and DTSC relating to the extension
of this Agreement.
9.
This Agreement, and any other agreements reached between the Parties arising out
of or relating to the Consent Decree, shall be subject to review by USEP A and DTSc.
10.
Other water purveyors with interests in the Bunker Hill Basin or interests in any of
the judgments initially referred to in recirals LD, LF and I.G above may become parties to this
Agreement and/ or to the ICGMP upon the consent of the Parties as provided for in this Agreement
or in the ICGMP, respectively. Specifically, the Parties agree that, "pan written request to the
Parties, the City of Rialto may become a Party to this Agreement and so subject itself to all of the
terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. No Party has made any representation as to
whether the City of Rialto will choose to become a Party to this Agreement.
11.
This Agreement shall not operate to validate or invalidate any Party's water rights,
Each Party to this Agreement reserves any and all claims and causes of acrion respecting its water
righrs claims, defenses against any water rights claims made by the other Parties to this Agreement,
and any claims arising from contamination or water quality degradation, In particular, nothing in
Page 13 of24
"'37105
EXEClITION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTITIJTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
this Agreement is intended to validate, invalidate or modify the warer rights of the Parties described
in recitals I.D through 1.K inclusive as they may exist as of the effec:ive date of this Agreement.
Further nothing in this Agreement is intended to modify or affect in any way the judgments initially
referred to in recitals LD, I.F and 1.G above. This Agreement shall not be used as evidence in any
water rights claim or cause of action, unless there is a claim that a Party has waived any of its water
rights or causes of action by signing this Agreement.
12.
The Parties agree to use the following dispute resohrtion process:
A.
In the event of the failure of the Parties to this Agreement to reach agreement on the
ICGMP or if such an agreement has not yet been reached and there is no approved extension of the
term of this Agreement, the matter shall be resolved by limited SCOP" mediation and arbitration.
The mediation and arbitration shall be conducted by JAMS (sometimes referred to as the mediation
service provider), and shall be administered, to the extent practical i" the San Bernardino office, or
the JAMS office closest to San Bernardino. In the event, for whatever reason, JAMS is not available
or lacks the necessary expertise, the parties shall first attempt to use ;be services of another judicially
oriented service, such as IV AMS, and use the American Arbitration Association only after all other
judicially based mediation and arbitration services have refused to undertake the mediation and
arbitration of the dispute.
B.
The Parties shall promptly initiate the process when they have reached an impasse
with regard to any issues preventing complete agreement on the ICGMP. The process shall require
the mediation of all disputes as a condition to the initiation of the arbitration process. The mediator
shall be selected by mutual agreement of all of the affected Parties, and the cost of the mediator shall
be borne on an equal basis by all of the Parties to this Agreement. In the event the Parties are
unable to agree on a mediator, the mediation service provider shall select a mediator with ci,~]
Page 14 of24
ExEamONCOPY
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTITUTIONAL CONfROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
judicial experience. The Parties shall meet and confer prior to the mediation and provide ro the
mediator an agreed Jist of matters to be resolved by the mediation. Unless all of the Parties to the
mediation agree otherwise, the only matters to be discussed at the mediation are those matters
submitted to the mediator following the meet and confer meeting of the Parties. Time shall be of
the essence during the process and all Parties shall cooper~te to promptly complete the process.
c.
In the event the Parties are unsuccessful in resolving any or all of the issues
presented to the mediator, a limited scope arbitration shall be conducted promptly following the
completion of the mediation. The mediation service provider shall provide to the arbitrating parties
a Jist of available arbitrators. The Parties shall first attempt to agree on an arbitrator having some
background or expertise in water law, groundwater contamination or environmental clean-up
matters, and failing to do such the mediation service provider shall select an arbitrator with complex
civil judicial experience. The scope of the arbitration shall be limited to the issues presented to the
arbitrator by the parties to the arbitration. The Parties shall meet aIo.d confer prior to the arbitration
and provide to the arbitrator an agreed Jist of issues to be resolved. The arbitrator shall be
instructed that the only issues for decision are those issues presented by the arbitrating parties, and
that the arbitrator shall comply with California law, unless the subject matter specifically relates to a
federal issue. It is specifically agreed that any decision of an arbitrator subjecting any of the Parties
directly or indirectly to the Institutional Controls Ordinance is outside the scope and authority of the
arbitrator and shall be unenforceable and void. The arbitrator shall have no authority to award costs
or attorneys' fees. Each Party agrees that the costs of arbitration shall be shared equally by the
Parties and that each Party shall bear their own attorneys fees and preparation costs. Time shall be
of the essence during the arbj¡ration process,
Page 15 of24
643710.5
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTmJTroNAL CONTROLS GROUNDW ATBR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
D.
The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding as to those matters presented for
detetnÚnation. Any matters included in the decision of the arbitrator outside the issues presented
for determination, including without limitation awards of costs and attorneys fees, shall be
unenforceable and not binding on the parties. In the event an arbitrator attempts to include matters
or issues outside the scope of the arbitration or any party fails to abide by the terms of this
Agreement limiting the scope of the arbitration, any other party shall have the right to file an action
for declaratory relief in United States Court for the Central District of California in the consolidated
cases, seeking enforcement of the provisions of this Agreement limiting the scope of arbitration.
13.
Defmed terms that are used in this Agreement and that are also used in the Consent
Decree shall have the meaning set forth in the Consent Decree. In the event that there is any
inconsistency between the definition of a term in this Agreement and a definition of the same term
in the Consent Decree, the definition of the term in the Consent Decree shall control.
14.
Each Party shall have access to and the right to examine any of the other Party's
pertinent books, documents, papers or other records (including, wiù,out limitation, records
contained on electronic media) relating to the performance of that Party's obligations pursuant to
this Agreement. The Parties shall each retain all such books, documents, papers or other records to
facilitate such review. Access to each Party's books, documents, papers and other records shall be
during normal business hours only. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to operate as a
waiver of any applicable privileges.
15.
Each signatory of this Agreement represents that s/:le is authorized to execute this
Agreement on behalf of the Party for which s/he signs. Each Party represents that it has legal
authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform all obligations under this Agreement.
Page 16004
""71"
EXEClmON COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTITlITiONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
16.
This Agreement has been arrived at through negotiations and each Party has had a
full and fair opportunity to revise the terms of this Agreement. As a result, the normal rule of
construction that any ambiguities axe to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not apply in the
construction or interpretation of this Agreement
17.
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the
subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes any prior oral or written agreement, understanding,
or representation relating to the subject matter of this Agreement.
18.
Each representation and warranty contained herein or made pursuant hereto shall be
deemed to be material and to have been relied upon and shall survive the execution, delivery and
termination of this Agreement.
19.
In performing their respective obligations under thio Agreement, the Parries shall
comply with and conform to all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances.
20.
This Agreement shall not create any right or interest in any non-Party or in any
member of the public as a third paxty beneficÜl1Y,
21.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, which may be
executed and delivered via facsimile transmission, each of which shall be deemed to be an original,
but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrillIlent.
22.
All notices, requests, demands or other communications required or permitted under
this Agreement shall be in writing unless provided otherwise in this J\greement and shall be deemed
to have been duly given and received on: Q) the date of service if served personally or served by
facsimile transmission on the Party to whom notice is to be given at the address(es) provided below,
(ü) on the Erst day after mailing, if mailed by Federal Express, U.S. Express Mail, or other similar
overnight courier service, postage prepaid, and addressed as provided below, or (iii) on the third day
Page 17 of 24
"3710.5
EXECUTION COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
after mailing if mailed to the Party to whom notice is to be given by .:irst class mail, registered or
certified, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
CITY OF COLTON
City of Colton
Eric Fraser
Director of Water & Wastewater, Colton Public Utiliries
160 S. 10th Street
Colton, California 92324
(909) 370-6101
(909) 370-6104 FAX
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
City of Riverside
Public Utilities Director
3900 Main Street
Riverside, California 92522
(951) 826-5485
(951) 782-5779 (FAX)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO and CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department
300 N. D Street, 5th Floor
San Bernardino California 92418
(909) 384-5141
(909) 384-5215 (FAX)
Attention: General Manager
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRlCT:
East Valley Water District
1155 Del Rosa Avenue
P.O. Box 3427
San Bernardino, CA 92413
(909) 885-4900
(909) 889-5732 (FAX)
Attn: General Manager
Page 18 of24
643710.5
ExEetrrlON COpy
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADoPT AND INSTITUT10NAL CONI'ROLS GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY
Riverside Highland Water Company
1450 East Washington St.
Colton, California 92324
(909) 825-4128
(909) 825-1715 (FAX)
Attention: General Manager
SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATERDISTRlCT:
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District
1350 S. "E" Street (92408-2725)
P. O. Box 5906 (92412-5906)
San B=ardino, CA
(909) 387-9222
(909) 387-9247 (FAX)
Attn: General Manager and Chief Engineer
WEST VALLEY WATER DISTRl CT
West Valley Water District
P.O. Box 920
Rialto, California 92377
(909) 875-1806
(909) 875-7284 (FAX)
Attn: General Manager
WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY:
Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County
450 Alessandro Boulevard
Riverside, CA 92508
(951) 789-5000
(951).780-3837 (FAX)
Attn: General Manager
Page 19 of24
64)7]05
1~/:N1:l1!1!4 1b: 01
! 1!! !!:.IbO!:l41!
(;1 iv AlllH'1:.~
I-'AI:i:. I!:¿¡ :.I
1!Jœc\m0t4 COPY
AOJII!I!MENTTO IJBVELOp MlO ADOPT AND J~ COImIou GROtJNI)WA'I1!II MANAOEMENT J'IIOCIIAM
CJ1Y OF COLTON
By:
Erlc F-
DØctxx ofW.œr &: Wutewaœr
DIlled: JUIU8%)' - 2005.
APfJIORd a to .fœm only:
'By:
Dc8n Dcœtb
Best, Bat &: Kziesu UP
CrIY OF JUVERSIDE
Br. n~é~
. .1no:åtn CityMmager .
A ppIOn:d .. 110 rom. oøJr.
'By: ~ d~~~ ~V~~
~ TeicheJt
Sap. Deputy City Aöamcy
-<~
Dated: ,ju.. z,f ," Ii
M:þ,8,'
PIp:20 of 24
Exi!cI.TI1ON CoPY
AORBEMBNI' TO DJ!VELOP t.ND AooPr t.ND INsTmmONAL CormlOLS GROUNDW A TI!Il MANAOBMBNT PROGRAM
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By,,1ft~1~--
Approved as to fO1D\ and legal content:
Dated: DeCeder ð 2004.
ATIEST:
J(o.eltRt lliÙ-J
Rachel C1adt, qyOerk.
~ ø~~ ~~,
CITY OF SAN BERNAP.DINO MUNIQP AI.. WATER. DEP ARThffiNI'
Dr )f:3~.i:ff¡!~?J
General Manager
Approved as to fo1D\ only:
Dated: Decembc~2004.
Page21 of 24
"'"'"
ExEamoN COPY
AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP AND ADOPT AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS GROUNl>W ATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
EAST VAlLEY WA1ER DISTRICT
By:
Robert E. Martin
General Manager
Approved as to form only:
By:
Steven M. Kennedy
Brunick, Battersby, McElhaney & Beckett
RIVERSIDE HIGHLAND WATER COMPANY
By:
Don Hough
General Manager
Approved as to form only:
By:
6<'710;
Arthur L. Littleworth
Best, Best & Krieger LLP
Dated: January -, 2005.
Dated: January ~ 2005.
Page 22 of24
ExBcuTION COPY
AOREI!MI!NT 1'0 DJ!VELOp ~ ADoPT AND INS1Tl'U110NAL CON11!.OLS GROONDW A TER ldANAoBIoŒNT PROGRAM
SAN BERNARDINO V AILEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISI'RICI'
By:' ~ 0.-;( ~
Robett L Reiœt
Gcneøl Man'2ger md Chief Eoginett
Approved as to fot:m only:
Thud: Decr:mber~ 2004.
By:
Mk:bae1 L Kttby
Joudw1 A. Boynton
Post, Kilby, NOOIWl & Sweat ILP
BY:~
David R£. .AJadjem
Downey Bmnd ILP
WEST V J.li.E'{ W A TBR. D ISTRI cI'
By:
Anthony ADiza
Geoe12l Mamger
Approved as to £osm. only:
Daœð: January -- 2005.
By:
""'IU
Page 23 of24
Bxøct1IIœrCOPr
AoRBI!NBNr TO DIIvELoP AIID ADoPT AIID INmnmotW. ComtcLs QIIomIDWA11!II. M.uwmIø!NT I'IIocJItAN
SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNlCJP M. WATER. DISTRIC l'
By;
Robert L Reiter
Geaetal ~ 8Dd Oùef Eøgiøccr
~.:øL
MïdI.el L Kitby
Jamm- It. BoyDÞx1
POI!, Kimy, NOOIWl &: Sweat u;P
Dall:d: Dcc:eraber -> 21104.
By:
David R.E. .AIMijcm
Dowuer Baud ILP
WE$"!' V AILEY '¡VATER. DISTRICI'
By;
Aalboay Aaiza
GeøcaI Mmagcr
.Appmvala 10 loan oaIy:
Dated: JIIINIf1-> 2005.
By;
Ml71U
P8p 23 of24
BxEctmON CoPY .
AOItBI!MBNT TO DI!vELoP ANI> ADOPT ANI> INsm'tmoNAL GoNnloLS OROUNDW A 11!R MANAGI3Mi!Kr 1'ItooRAM
WFSfERN MUNICIPAL WATER. D ISTRI cr OF RIVERSIDE C 0 UNIT
~~'
Approved as tõ foøn only:
Dated: December ;12004.
By; ~L.lødt~~
Arthur L Li1tIewottb.
Best. Best & Krieger UP
-,""
Page 24 of 24
.~tA
J/"-'\','/~--;:? o ~... 5,000 7.'" '~OOO 12,'" Fool ¡' ~
\ ROymo"'"""", _".'00< Q (/ . ~1
, ) ----....., L ""......-,."..-.--.--"""-" .;;O T ,
¿ V '-, /' =::.:::o;;:,".,'=:"'.':.:::..~~.;::::.~"'::' :-.,'
~ ( "-,,-,,,~s"'-"_t""31""",
/".... , (J~""'C"'~11r 'As P<""'ded by the Ssn Bem""noMunicipolWatsrDepsrtmenton
('~" '-.I""~, Dec:embsr 10, 20"". Plume 'un opproxlmotlon b88... on PCE
" ,', "'¡'!"~, ~'::=:~':=;:'~~o~=03:"':"~~::;';r,^"tsr
", ~"':-"'" ":'i;.." Oistrlct"",vsO..8ISsnBemord1noCounlyWste,l>strtct"",;C8se
---",""~'>( ""', ~:'::":':~~';:~::reC=e~t~;=':~thSC1tyOfColton.
,,\ \ \ -~', ", ,"
~'\ ~4"~ .~i, ,',.. '
\ \ ,,( V""" ,.,,:<::~~, p,
0 ,-' ~\~({~~~':~~~'~~>-~~PÄ
.~" '" Y;~1 .
""~, "}, J/I
~=:=::=::~-Ä( ! , tii~~! :°8
2.;.~ :=~~ :=~~o \>. 0 . \'i~~'., .
. All other <moers ....~...... ~
e City of Colton r--~\'\~, flCPJ
0 City of Rialto I "t
0 City of San Bernardino ¡-' "Z.
@ San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water oiŠirltt ""'"
. Wesl Valley Water District I \~
Volume 1AWeils' by Owner ~ ' , ,
" City of Riverside i~ , ,
°oe",llonal UnitWeUs ! r\..._~-ì '\e,(\Ð
8 Extraction Wells ! r-~J ~__l~-'" , "-'OU,-:-'--'-'-'---"
Plume Mon~oring Wells r" í L
.. Sfte Wide Monftoring Wells L_______J--( 1_-
:';;" Newmark-Muscoy Plume' !
- San Bernardino Basin Area ....
é!", Groundwaler Recharge Basins
Management Zones1
of the US EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
.
--1 ¡
O~!'lr
, L_-
.,
i-I
~ !
'" . "!
.
..,
Exhibit Bl
Pre-Approved Extraction Activities
Pre-approved activities include extraction of groundwater from within the
Management Zone by certain Parties to this agreement in volumetric
amounts as set forth below provided such extraction is from within specific
geographic areas as shown on Exhibits B 1 a through B 1 e.
Such extractions may be made by any means using either existing or new
extraction facilities, and may include extraction by others provided the
extraction is for the benefit of the Party. The amount actually extracted for
the benefit of each Party shall be reported to every other Party no later than
March 1st of each year.
The aggregate volumetric amounts of extraction in acre-feet per year
pennitted for each Party for each calendar year commencing in Calendar
Year 2005 and references to the respective attached maps showing the
geographic area in which the extraction is permitted are as follows:
htlY Amount 1,2 (AF/YR) Geo!;!l"aphic Areas
San Bernardino Area 1 32843 Exhibit B1a
Area 2 17724 Exhibit B la
Area 3 2544 Exhibit Bla
Area 4 2108 Exhibit Bla
Area 5 8243 Exhibit Bla
Area 6 1442 Exhibit B1a
Area 7 4165 Exhibit B1a
Area 8 17516 Exhibit B1a
Area 9 41777 Exhibit B1a
Area 10 3508 Exhibit B 1 a
Area 11 See Note 9 Exhibit B 1a
Area 12 See Note 9 Exhibit B 1 a
rM1Y AmOunt1.2 (AFIYR) Geographic Areas
Muni District 5,3337 Exhibit BIb
Riverside Area A 11,843 Exhibit B1c
Area B 368 10 Exhibit B1c
West District 1,597 Exhibit BId
Colton 7,417 Exhibit B1e
Ria1to 1,763 Exhibit BId
Pre-approved activities within the geographic areas shown on Exhibits B1a
through B1e include drilling and equipping of new wells, and the re-
equipping, refurbishing, re-construction and repair of existing wells and
extraction facilities.
1. Amount shown is not greater than the maximum amount extracted in any calendar year during the
period 1998 through 2003.
2. Amount actually extracted by any Party can be 10 percent greater than the amount shown provided
such greater extraction is caused by a reduction in the amount of water available fi:om sources
outside the Management Zone if such reduction is a result of water quality impainnent.
3. Maximum amount is 3284 AF plus the amount to be pumped fi:om the Newmark North PIant
Extraction Wells pursuant to the Consent Decree - Appendix D (Statement of Work).
4. Maximum amount can be up to 2412 AF provided the total extraction fi:omAreas 2 and 3 does not
exceed the amount of4316 AF extracted in year 2003.
5. Maximum amount can be up to 799 AF provided the total extraction fi:om Areas 6 and 7 does not
exceed the amount of 1858 AF extracted in year 2003.
6. MaJdmum amount can be up to 3021 AF provided the total extraction fi:om Areas 6, 7, and 8 does
not exceed the amount of3609 extracted in year 2003.
7. Muni District and San Bernardino may mutually agree to increase or decrease their respective
extractions in the Muni District geographic area and San Bernardino Area 9 provided such
changes do not cause the total extractions from the Muni District geographic area and the San
Bernardino Area 9 to exceed 9510 AF.
8. Maximum amount can be up to 561 AF provided the total extraction from Areas 4 and 10 does not
exceed the amount of2458 AF extracted in year 2003.
9. Maximum amount is the amount to be pumped from the Newmark and Muscoy Plume Front
Extraction Wells pursuant to the Consent Decree - Appendix D (Statement of Work).
10. MaJdmumamount can be up to 813 AF provided the total extraolion from Areas A and B does not
exceed the amount of12,211 AF extracted in year 2000.
Exhibit 81 - Cloan Copy 11-23-04 ¡ 116am (5),docFi
',.. ,.,." I ,"" ' ,. ,'......,
!,.ê1!æi;~ ~
V';I",riö1AWells'iiyowiier.."" .. ..,....-
;.;;:¡:, ~::;::;:;' .. "';i~f'"
'~,i'ExtractionWelis , "
. ,'Plume MonitÒring'Welis .... r'"
""1'¡~e VVide Monitoring Wells ' ï
;i:;"('¡ewmark-MÌJscoy Plume'
C3' Sah..Bemardino Basin Area,
ŒI Groundwater Recharge'Basins
Preapproved Are..'
'" SBMWD
¡[ Management Zone Boundary for Extr.ction~
¿\ Management Zone Boundary for Spreading'
t:J City of San Bernardino
Volume' Well.. by Owner
Q All other owners'
0 City of San Bernardino
Operational Unit Wells
'" Extraction Wells
0 Plume Monnoring Wells
~ Site Wide Monitortng Wells
;~/ Newmarl<-Muscoy Plume'
C3 San Bernardino Basin Araa
C'3 Groundwater Recharge Basins
'Mp..~dodbySBM"ID,
'M p,..,;ded bytheSen Bomnrdino MUTicipei WelerOe""rtmenl on Deœmber 10. 2004'. Plume is an
ep_motlon baed on PCE conoenlrations In e"".., of 5 "on f..m 200212003 monitcrtng da'a.
. Pe, Iha Westem-Sen Bernardino Watermaste, Weslorn Municipal Welo' District e'al. "'. Easl San Bornardlno
County Watar Oiotrtct 01 ".: c..a No, 7M26 Superior Court County of Rh..."ido,
, TheM!, Vemonw"i,"Area61.nowwhol~ owned by 'no SBMWO, Tha well. in Area. 11 and 12 are owned by
the EPAand operated bytheSBMlW, The well, in Area 12 are notYe! operal"nal.
. Management Zone. w... medlled tc ""dude the Crty 0' C~ton,
The SAN BERI\!ARDINO Preapproved Area'
of the Management Zone2
of the U:; EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
0 ¡500 5.000 7.500 10,000 ...1 ';¡' ~
Roymo"'."";;n Decembo21,2004 Q (, .. }
.......-.v.",---,........".."",...-.. ~ D "
:'~':;,'::.'::';;:"":=..:'.'p~~.:;'"':;'.';";:::'~":::":'::,':::: ":'N'iI'
"""""'_0",.'."0_",_"""""".
Exhibit B 1 a
I ,""
r
~!
" " """,
~
i
~
,.
".
""",..,'
>li
~_.
,. SIMIWD
Q ~ Zone Bound8y for ~
-,--..,-
. s.n ~ II8Iey ~ -- DIIIIfct
f?/ ,..,."..... I h.œy PUne"
C3 s.n IIenw*D Boon It-
The SbVMWD Preapproved Area1
of the Management Zonr
of the US EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
. ~- ,- -0:- --'8 C¡"
""...--.......--..-.. i. j
-."-::=:""'---"""- 0' ~
==:::"""::"'.._=::':--=- ~,_.,
""'-ÞI'--
". ....- ÞI' ... Son - .......... -1Io >8IIMnt at
o...w 10. 2Ol", _1o,,'---atPŒ
--o._of5 1 i1--_-
Ip.,..._...-__-"""",,-'
DIIfItt OIl II. ... -- 8on - CcIInIr - ~ ..... C8o
No. - ~Iar CaurI CcIInIr of -
Exhibit BIb
...:.:
" .-..
II
Exhibit B 1 c
Preapproved Areas'
ill' Riverside
¡[] Management Zane Boundary for Extraction'
/1f. Management Zane Baundary for Spreading'
~ City of San Bernardino
Votume 1 Wells' by Owner
0 City of San Bernardino
Volume 1A Welts' by Owner
. City of Riverside
e::, San Bernardino B.sinAre.
The RIVERSIDE Preapproved Area'
of the Management Zone2
of the Uß EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
0 "'" 1.000 I."'" ~OOO 'HI ">' :-.....
."m""'.-o P.œmbo<21."" e f'j'l-~
n"M_.'_"_._""""""""""""'~'" 1 ~
--"'.._~_...,.~,.......,.,~"""".""". .. 0 T #
:'~=.. 0:;::;:":,:':"0':"'. L~:::::':: ~ .:;;:;'.=)":,~~ n, ""~,~, ,
."'" p"""ded by the CltyotRlve..~e,
'As p'o~ded by"e Sa" Beme,dlno Munlclpel Water Departmoot on
Decembe, 10. 201),
'Pe, the Westem-Sa" Bemarot"" Wate""aslec Westem Mun~;pat Wale,
Dtstria el eo. vs, .", San Bemaro'no CoU"1y Wele' Dlstriclot al.: Case No,
78426 Sups'o, COUl' Couoly ot Rlve"tde,
Preapproved Areas'
t# Rialto & West Valley
~ Management Zone Boundary for Extraction'
¡,;:Jj Management Zone Boundary for Spreading'
0 City of San Bernardino
Volume 1 Wells' by Own..
@ City of Rialto
. West Valley Water District
c:3 San Bernardino Basin Area
The RIAL TO & WEST VALLEY Preapproved Area1
of the Management Zone2
of the U3 EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
0 ... '.000 '.500 ',OOOF.., .""'~
R.""ond'm~ D."....""."" e (¡'"
""s..........v."".......-.""",...,.."....",-",,' i
=:;':;;:.'=="',::'::"~.';'.;::.t:::'= ....0 "1
""."d"=...",,,..~S_',œ"""""7""5. ".-.'"
.... p"""dad by WW'IO.
.... p"'~ded by the San Bemerdlno Munlc;pal WBler Dopa"",en. on
Oecembe, 10. 2004.
'PertheWes"'m-5an BernardIno W.termaster: Westem MunicIpal Wale,
DISJrlct et ai, '" east San Bernardino Couniy Water D~Jrlct et al.; Cue
No. 78426 Supunor Coon Couniy of R'verslde.
Exhibit BId
Preapproved AJeas'
if' Colton
iL'I Management Zone Boundary for Extraction"
It:; City of San Bernardino
Volume 1 Wells' by Owner
. All other owners
. City of Colton
C3 San Bernardino Basin Area
The COLTON Preapproved Area1
of the Management Zone2
of the U~ EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
0 "'. 1.000 ,,"00 ~ooo Foot '¡.....
R",",ondB~" O....mb" 21 , 200" e (, \
"......-.....---.......",...-.. I .
",-"""","-",,-""""""'-""...,...,,........ ',,-0 I
::.:::.':.."':"...';~==~':;¡~<="=""' '>¡,,~.iF'
Exhibit B 1 e
'As p.."ded by WMWO.
'As p,"",ded by'" Sa" Bema"""o Mu"'dpa' Wa.. O",artme" 00
O.camber10,2004'.
'p.. the Westem-Soo Bema"""o Wate""a"a,, Western Munlcipa' Wetar
Oistrictetal. v. Oa" San Bama"'lno County WaterO~lrictalel.; eas.
No, 78426 Supe"m Court County of Riverside.
, Management Zu"OS wer. mod"ed 10 e,dude the City of Cdton.
,
"--,---"
,"'.'
~!'.'
,
r'
-.'
',!,I,'~'",
1 " '.
t ",'
Ii,' ,,'
,-,- '-"',.i,'""",,',,-
'f
-..',-;;."~.l
!-l,ef!
.",~,.-,_..,'
..._--_.......- -
"
Exhibit B2
Pre-Approved Spreading Ac.;~ivities
Pre-approved activities include spreading of State Water Project water by
certain Parties to tills agreement in specific spreading basins within the
Management Zone. The volumetric amounts of State Water Project water in
acre-feet that are pennitted to be spread by certain Parties in each water year
commencing in Water Year 2004-05 in spreading basins withín the
Management Zone are as follows:
Spreading Basin and Amount in AFNR
Party VVaterman/East Twin 2 Devil Can:,'!:'n/ Sweetwater 2 Badg~r2
San Bernardino 1 500 1700 0
Muni District 500 1700 0
Western 1 500 1600 0
Total 1500 5000 0
1.
The amounts of State Water Project water spread for the benefit of San
Bernardino and Western will actually be spread by M1:ni District.
2,
Two or more Parties may mutually agree to increase or decrease their permitted
amounts of spreading provided such changes do not cause the total permitted
amount of spreading in each basin to exceed the total amounts shown.
FinanceO2IACESladministrationlDLH Con'CslExhibit B2,doc
Extraction Data for Owners and Wells
Within the Draft Management Zone
Potentially Affected by the US EPA 2004 Consent lJ~cree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
Owne, Name (per Watermas'.,) Local Name (per SBVMWC WRDB) 199J 19" 199. 1996 1997 '99B 1999 2000 2001 2002 200J' Maximum"
Arrowhead Country Club No.1 399 410 488 537 521 482 531 566 436 467 4B5 566
,<"','~"""""""'~,..,....."..- ~,..,,""""'"
Atchison. Topeka & Santa Fe Railway C' 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Well 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Owner To"'/: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,----- a ---~--~ ,"-'F--V -,.",
Balcom None Provided 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 NA 0
,~ -~,~- =""""--.~=
Batchelor None Provided 1 l' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA
None Provided 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA
OWn.r Total: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2
",- ---- .- ---
Cal Mat Company Cajon Creek M . 0 0 0 0 0 18 138 140 130 140 NA 1M!
'è""'~-~- ""r....' -'"
Campus Crusade For Christ Perl<side 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA 0
,_-~ - """"-..."=,."",.,"""'",,.
Collon. City of 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
5 120 44 170 3J 344 287 317 16 0 0 NA
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
7 989 820 B73 95 0 750 1,084 997 783 448 0
8 91 153 436 264 362 173 287 348 137 385 360
13 232 143 366 445 516 528 710 728 434 1.095 652
14 338 387 276 27 158 212 203 266 363 0 NA
16 71 541 951 658 1,026 630 382 405 260 727 789
19 235 621 628 441 1.045 942 762 822 995 851 139
26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,027 1.995 2.0D3
27 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,047
28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 699
29 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 263
88mh! 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
No, 21 1.483 1,565 1,>63 2.054 2.020 2,204 2,6J1 1.798 1,3-W 1,915 1.412
No, 8B 278 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Plunge 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Owner Total: 3.835 4.402 4,961 4,017 5.471 5.706 6.346 5.3BO 5,339 7.417 7,3B4 7,417
."'â~_"_""""'-"-"""'" """"-"",,,..,"""""
Cet RoSa Mutual Watar Company Goldnav 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA 0
'=:<:k"-"'¡';'¡"'fI,:I""""--ã.,=",",,'¡/1 ,==~-""'"
Extraction Data for Owners and Wells
Within the Draft Management Zone
Potentially Affected by the US EPA 2004 Consent ['..;cree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
Ownec Name (per Waten1\asterl. Local Name (per SBVMWO WRDB) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Don9'0 Dahy None provided 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~=~",.~".,..-"",.;..'_,
East Valley Walec District PlentNo, 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Plan/No. 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Plan/No,l1A 2,694 2.174 2.737 2.474 1.966 2.591 1,898 2,033 2.411 1.756
Plent No. ðO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Own.r TotA': 2,694 2,174 2,737 2,474 1,966 2.591 1.898 2.033 2.411 1,756
.- --- -""""'"
Haza. None Provided 0 0 0 0 0 0
.- .- -..
Holme. Ice & Cold S/0"'ge Co, Inc. 2 6 4 4 3 12 23
None Provided . 0 0 0 0 0 0
Owner Total: 6 4 4 3 12 23
"" --
Kln9 Nona Provided
,., -
K",ntzOalry Nona Provided
,-~ .............................
Mount Vernon Water Company, MI. Vernon Wall
,~-----,--_._~".
Ml View Cemetery 0/ San Bemamlno 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 94 110 103 105 131 130 124 118 135 137
3 139 156 137 148 91 128 87 89 148 149
OwnerTotAl.' 233 266 240 253 222 258 211 207 283 286
---
Paciflc HI9h School Non. Provided
,- .. -.......
Plemon Non. Provided
,~~ -~""""""""
Rlalto. CIty 0/ CUy"" 1 564 220 80 81 673 153 974 1,486 773
CUy#6 237 30 3 12 7 2 5 1 7 3
CityNo,4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O"oerT,/;;I.' 238 594 2~3 92 88 675 158 975 1.493 776
'-""""'>C;;C:"'-",""'"""'-""""'",c-Ci""""'"
Rlvem!d.. City Of
Subarea " Coo/eyE
Coo/ey F
Gerner 3
2003'
Maximum"
NA 0
..~~
NA
NA
1.149
0
1.149 2,591
~
NA 0
.~-.~-<~
0
NA
0 23
"",,",,-.........-
NA 1
..- ~._-"'-.,.'~.
NA 0
;""""""""""~..
'-'= .." ..._~
NA
200
200
400 . 400
'~-". & -"""
NA 0
. =,~~~~._~."
NA 0
"""~
1.700
3
NA
1.763
1.763
.'¡,co..', . '"~.' "-'...
NA
NA
NA
Extraction Data for Owners and Wells
Within the Draft Management Zone
Potentially Affected by the US EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
Own., Name (per Wa..,master)
Local Name (per SBVMWD WROB)
San Bernardino Vaney MWO
San Bernardino. City 013
Gamer Well No.1
Gamer Well No.2
Gamer Well No, 4
Gamer Well No.5
Gerner Well No.6
Gerner Well No.7
Scheuer Well
T"tals:
Subarea 2: Silies Well
Owner Total:
~
9th Street Well
Perris Streel Well
Owner To:,':
"""':"""""A..i:-LC::'p'¡¡¡2'-'=>r"¡""",
Subarea 1: Newmerk No.1
NewmerkNo, 2
Newmark No, 4
Totals:
Subarea 2: 40th Streel
LynwoodWe!1
Totals:
Subaree 3: Gilbert Street
Perris Hill No, 4
Perris Hill No,S
Totals:
Subarea 4: 7th Street
AnüIWellNo, 4
Anlll Well No, 5
Anü! Well No, 6
Totals:
Subarea 5: 16th Slreal and SialTa Way
1993
723
461
0
1,368
3.476
0
826
6.874
679
7.553
2,169
3,062
5.231
573
1,383
1.782
3,738
107
808
915
23
405
1
429
1.502
0
0
510
2,012
2.458
1994
556
293
0
1.172
3.428
0
220
5.669
768
6.437
2.239
2,585
4.824
1.091
167
2.897
3,955
40
1.910
1.950
1.715
682
205
2,782
2,538
0
0
2,388
4.926
2,680
1995
1998
881 328
562 170
0 0
1,835 146
4.014 4,152
0 4,345
368 163
7.460 9.304
1,088 838
8.545 10.142
2.723 2.923
3.228 2.814
5.949 5.737
912
0
2.602
3,514
120
2.433
2.553
2,399
414
0
2.813
1.689
0
0
2.271
3,960
2.676
1,337
244
2.462
4,043
82
2.571
2,653
2.849
115
0
2.764
1.919
0
0
1.818
3.737
2.448
1997
IB1
67
0
1.456
4.173
2.298
36
8,211
538
8,7'9
2.765
2.567
5,352
1898
1999
2000
157 234 552
131 93 268
0 0 0
1.139 1,756 1,924
4,697 4.742 4.558
3.827 4,652 4.386
55 69 157
10.008 11.546 11,843
813 563 36B
1>,819 12.109 12.211
2.243 2,120 2.503
1.891 2.437 2.795
4,134 4.557 5.298
BB7
1,47B
1.7B9
4.154
117
994
1.111
2,157
282
0
2,439
2,916
0
0
2.375
5,291
2,597
842
901
B20
2,363
BB
1,74B
1.836
473
10
199
682
1,814
0
0
2.384
4,178
1,872
315
137
630
1.082
155
1,094
1.249
5
0
0
5
9
0
0
2.269
2,218
3
565
620
1.087
2,272
93
1,308
1.401
8
0
0
8
36
0
0
2.533
2.569
3
2001
2002
439 696
774 780
0 0
1,071 2,144
3,573 4.307
3.163 3.858
111 137
9.131 11,720
759 467
9.990 12,197
2.713
2.620
5.333
781
642
1,197
2,600
51
1,999
2.050
554
114
113
781
120
0
0
1,250
1,370
2
2,018
1.289
3,305
572
672
1.071
2,316
41
2.371
2.412
1.002
105
99
1.206
140
0
0
1.771
1.911
2
2003.
Maximum..
336
5
0
1,943
3.467
NA
8
6,759 11,843
530 813
6,289 12,211-
~,
1.824
2.070
3,894 6,333
c:,,"=r"""'.i,S£:."'Z";,
319
1.048
1,919
3,28'
55
1.717
1,772
1.753
428
363
2,544
101
0
0
1.407
2.109
9
3.284
2,412
2,844
2,108 -
Extraction Data for Owners and Wells
Within the Draft Management Zone
Potentially Affected by the US EPA 2004 Consent Oacree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
OWner Name (per Wale...ae'er) local Name (per 5BVMWD WRDB) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003" Maximum"
17th and SieITS Way No. 2 2.1D3 336 420 194 1 0 4 2 2 2 1
27th S"e! and Acacia Straal 0 0 75 544 334 126 2 224 306 340 488
30th and Alt. Vrew 1,679 2.832 1.838 1,226 1,327 397 1,732 1.594 1,365 2,268 2,702
31slandMI. View 182 0 0 18 71 29 280 131 63 689 1.033
Leroy We" 662 235 127 78 211 1,072 371 585 590 1.574 1,969
Walennan Avenu, 2.560 1.717 902 1.976 1,895 1.057 1.590 2,488 1.445 1,837 2,041
Totals, 9,624 7,800 6,238 6.482 6,436 4,353 3,962 5,027 3.773 6,690 8,243 B,243
Subarea 6: MI Vernon We" 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 7B6 778 975 1.442 1,442
Subarea 7: Baseline and California 289 675 642 590 782 560 799 480 492 438 416 799
Subarea 8: 19th S"e! No.1 45 656 506 1.056 1.2Dd 961 753 1.218 1.411 1,390 889
19th Streel No.2 544 2.647 2.435 2.467 2,480 1.259 1.067 1,781 1.247 1.631 862
Tomls, 689 3,303 2,941 3,523 3.688 2.220 1.820 2.979 2.658 3.021 1.751 3,021
Subarea 9: 10Ih.JS..,! 2,060 1.027 0 872 972 995 1,816 3.081 2,932 3.149 2.644
0';", ar1 Gampr wen 2,134 1.696 1.914 1.679 1.289 1,565 2414 1.764 1.672 2.487 1,533
Toral.: 4.0.4 2,723 1."4 2.551 ..241 2.5<3 4,230 4.845 4.50. 53'" 4,177 5,625
Subarea 1D: Mill. D 552 487 432 499 685 458 581 485 415 388 350 561
Newmark South Inhibito" EPA We" No.1 0 D 0 0 0 3.100 2.D21 1.792 1.732 2.024 1.690
EPA WeIINo, 2 D 0 0 0 0 3.200 2,206 1.908 2.432 2.210 1,778
EPA Well No. 3 0 0 0 0 D 3,400 3,139 3,037 2.829 2,788 2,043
EPA WeliNo. 4 0 0 0 0 0 3.200 2.322 2,371 2,865 2.434 1.871
EPA Well No. 5 0 0 a a a 3,200 2,346 2.429 1,940 2.091 1.695
Totals: 0 a 0 a a 16,100 12,034 11,537 11,598 11.547 9,075 16,100
Newmerk North Inloib#or. EPA Well No, 6 0 0 0 0 0 1,500 1.457 1,220 840 750 480
EPA WellNo. 7 D 0 0 0 0 2.400 1.B91 1.457 1,328 1.631 1,563
Newma'" No, 3 1.181 753 974 1,025 1,921 1.123 2,205 950 1,324 1.372 827 2,205
Totals: 1,181 753 974 1.025 1,921 5,023 5,553 3,627 3.492 3.753 2.870 5,553
Inactive: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17th Sl18etSw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2-Gilber1/Canyon Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
23rd S",t ,nd E, SI18" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acacia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Extraction Data for Owners and Wells
Within the Draft Management Zone
Potentially Affected by the US EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
Own", Name (per Wateone.terl
Local Name (per SBVMWD WRDB)
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003'
Maxlrnurn-
AnWWellNo, 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Anü/WeIlNo.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
AnðlWslINo, 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
BirchS/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Cilylols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
CoJims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dalby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gardsns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HsnfordNo, 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Hsn/orrINo, 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
MacfarlendJohnson 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 NA
NorlhESI",sl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perris HI/I No, 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Pe"is^,../No, 3 0 0 C r ú 0 COO r 0
SoGSt 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
WslINo, 1 Srels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OWner Total: 23,423 29.354 25.881 27.887 28.728 36.433 30.225 32.553 31.665 36.934 34.547 36.433 -
Subarea 4 + 10 Comhlned: 2,564 5.413 4.392 4,235 5,95. 4.635 2,839 3.054 1,785 2,297 2,458 4,836
Subs",. 2+ 3 Combined: 1.344 4,732 5,386 5.417 .;s50 2,518 1,254 1,409 2,831 3,818 4,315 4,318
Sub..... 5 +7 Combined: 289 875 642 590 782 560 1,111 1,255 1,270 1,413 1.858 1,858
Subare.. 2. 3. 4. 8. 7 & 10 To",/, 4,197 10.820 10,400 10,243 10,28; 7,714 5,204 5,729 5.885 7,328 8.532 8,532
:::::::::: ~õ;igJ ¡ ~kf~~ii~::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~2.~F :~~~~: :~~~~: :~:1~~:: ~~~~: :;Ñ~~: :;H~l: :~:~~~: :1:~1~: :i:1~~::: ~::~::: ~~F::::::
San Bernsrdlno. County of ""<~'~'c;'~;;~-"~-' 350 350 350 350 3bO 350 350 200 13 13 NA --;šõ""'~-
=""""'----~-~""~"-~'~ ~,-=-~
Smith None Provided 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NA 1
",.""""."""""""~""""""""""""""""",,,. ",."~~...=,,.""-="'"
Southern CalifornIa Edl,on Compsny Hsnford 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
SlmPl1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
SlmP/2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
Owner Total, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
f";J",'i."""""""",:".,,:,"',,",,:;""""'=<ii'" "",..".......,cr-,..""""""",,"'"
Smith
Extraction Data for Owners and Wells
Within the Draft Management Zone
Potentially Affected by the US EPA 2004 Consent Decree
for the Newmark & Muscoy
Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site
Owner N"ne (per Watermaster) Local Name (per SBVMWO WROB) 1993 199-4 1995 1996 1997 1"8 1999 2000 2001 2002
7errace Water Company La",al 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Small 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Well No. I-Small 35 0 0 548 18 331 176 362 264 272
Wall No.2 -Le",a 659 771 750 293 665 377 664 564 676 709
Owner Totel: 694 771 750 839 903 708 830 946 940 961
...... ri."--~
Trl City Concrete Planr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
on ----
Valencia Ave. Mutual Water Company Ware""an Ave 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
,_..----'M'~""
VIctoria Guernsey 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-- """"1'1-
West San Bernrdlno County Water DI.trice WeUNo,12 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
We/lNo, 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WellNo, 14 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WeUNo,15 1.366 683 629 600 1,041 932 661 752 625 1,597
WeUNo, 30 22 504 9 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
OWner Totel: 1.408 1.187 638 800 1,042 932 662 752 625 1.597
--.--
WIIHams Dahy None Providsd 0 0 0 0 0
¡-- - ~_."
2003'
Maximum""
NA
NA
304
609
913 981
"""""""~.~'~
NA 0
:'....."""". --.."
NA 20
""""-~~>"""
NA 0
...-=
NA
NA
NA
819
603
1.422 1,597
_.~-- -
NA 0
~-~-
51,862 56.089 57,166 60.717 61.256 73,757 67,893 70.370 66,212 73.190
61.134~ -
Grand Totel:
.. 2003 .""action data ,. unvarifted; "NA" sl9nifies data is no! yet available.
.. Ma,lmum e""action In any calender year durin9 the period 1998-2003
-The e""ections for 1998.1999 and 2000 were e><dudedtrom the determInation ofmaxJmum extnIction due to tha terms otthe1995amendmentto Rlve",ldeAntil Judgment
.... Owner Total and Grand Total a.. not equal to the sum of the subarea maximum. because subarea maximums occur In different yeauI.
, currently listed as 6u~ington NOI1hem and Santa Fa Rai....y Company
, current~ listed as West Valley Waler DisUid
3 City of San Bemardlno owns all of the Ml Vernon Watar Company stock. Therefore. extractions for the Mt Vernon wen are shown as part of the Ci~ of San Bernardino e><tractions.
i~"""""'"
".""'" ,""
.
RISK
SCIENCES
23 December 2004
I page via Email
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Board of Direct on, Western Coalition of Arid States (W,'stcas)
Tim Moore (tmoore@risk-sciencès.com; 615-370-1655)
Summary of Court Decision in WET Case
On Friday, December 10", the U.S. Court of Appeals - D.C. Circuit ruled agaiO';t us in our lawsuit against EPA's
whole effluent toxicity (WET) test metbods. Although we lost the case, the cou. t agreed with and afflID1ed many of
the most critical issues we raised. Several statements by the court conclusions are critically important to deal with
ionic interference and eohemeral streams in the west. Unfortunately, we must "OW fight the battle pennit-by-pennit
and state-by-state. It will be time-consuming and expensive. But, decision still increases our probability ofsnccess.
In essence, the court said that our concerns are more appropriately part of a permit appeal or enforcement hearing
than a methods challenge. The court drew a big distinction between the test method itself and how the resnlts from
that method get used. Throughout their decision, the court stated that the latter set of concerns was not properly
before them and they did not consider those issues. Here is a sununaty:
The Bad News
All of the WET test procedures, chronic and acute, lethal and sublethal, are valid and will remain part of 40
CFR Part 136 (standard methods).
The Good News
I)
The court concurred that there was significant variability i!Ù1erent in WET test methods that conld trigger
false pennit violations and enforcement actions and that:
"this is certainly a problem for which EPA~ system must account... Mdtiple measurements will exhibit
some degree of variation, yielding an error band that extends above and below some intermediate
value....Even EPA's calculations [show] WETtests will be wrong some of the time. ...Nothingwe have
written ... forecloses consideration of the validity ofa particular test i/1 un enforcement action. That issue
is not before us. The case involves only the validity of the WET test methods... we are concerned here only
with test methodology, not the results of particular tests in the field. Oflrdecision does not endorse the
validity of any test result in the jùture. nor does it foreclose a defense' 'Iat the result is wrong. Those issues
are simplyont presented in this judicial review of rule making. " (pg. 8& 9)
2)
The court found that EP A had only demonstrated a general correlation I,etween WET testing and instream
conditions and that was sufficient to approve the methods. However, the court noted that EP A:
"...took the sensible approach of relying on sampling techniques to draw general conclusions, while
leaving some implementation details to local entities. States retain d..cretion. subject to EPA guidance
and recommendations. to set their toxicity thresholds in order to compensate for local conditions at the
permitting stage. In light of this discretionOlY. rather than mandator)'. nature of state Implementation of
standards and thresholds... the WET program [is not] an illegal fede",,; water quality standard...Before
implementing a test method, EPA must establish that the measured characteristic bears a rational
relationship to real-world conditions... Petitioners are worried that tlli)' might be subject to excessive
restrictions; such limits. however, would be imposed by local authorities. and are not Dart of the rule-
makIn" under review in this case, The WET test methods offer only (I means of measU/'ing compliance with
those limits. individual discharge,'" remain free to challenge their perll'its, on a case-by-case basis. if they
believe the local authorities lire regulating lit a level that poses onlv II minimal risk to aquatic life" (p. 12
& 13)
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Argued October 15, 2004
Decided December 10, 2004
No. 96-1062
EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE, ET AL.,
PETITIONERS
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, EY AL.,
RESPONDENTS
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE,
INTERVENOR
Consolidated with
Nos. 96-II24, 03-1087, 03-1091, 03-Iu94
On Petitions for Review of an Order of the
Environmental Protection Agency
John C. Hall argued the cause for petitioners. With him
on the briefs were James N. Christman, Andrea W. Wortzel,
Alexandra D. Dunn, David E. Evans, Stewart F. Leeth, and
Richard H. Sedgley. Kristy A.N. Bul/eit entered all appearance.
Fredric P. Andes argued the cause and filed the briefs for
intervenor.
2
Christina B. Parascandola and David S. Gualtieri,
Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause and
filed the brieffor respondents. Daniel R Dertke, Attorney, U.S.
Department of Justice, enteœd an appearance.
Before: EDWARDS and RANDOLPH, CircuÙ Judges, and
WILLIAMs, Senior Circuit Judge.
Opinion for 1he Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge: Edison Electric Institute and
orgatrizations representing corporate and municipal dischargers
brought these consolidated petitions for review, claiming that
certain of EPA's "whole efiluent toxicity" or "WET' test
methods were invalid The tests are set forth in rules
promulgated pursuant to 1he Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251
et seq. (1he "Act'} The Act prohibits the discharge of pollutants
except in compliance wi1h individual pennits issued by EP A or
the states. States prescribe their own water quality criteria,
which EPA reviews for confomúty with the Act. Water quality
standards typically consist of two complementary parts:
numerical limits on the allowable concentration of particular
pollutants in ambient water (e.g., "no more mercu.'Y 1han 5 parts
per billion"), and a descriptive, "narrative" critelion regarding
the entire effiuent (e.g., "no toxic pollutants in toxi~ amOlmts").
See 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(3). WET tests are used to measure
compliance with standards of 1he latter type.
While 1he numerical restrictions comprise tile backbone
of the penIÚtting system, EP A has found that, standing alone,
these limits are not sufficient. Effluents may contain many
different pollutants. Even if no single pollutant \\<ore present in
a hatmful amount, the mix of different pollutap~ still might
have negative effects upon aquatic organisms. In light of the
myriad potential interactions among variou, pollutants,
3
traditional instrumental tests are ill-suited to making the
detennination. Instead, laboratories expose aqua~ic organisms
to samples of the effluent, at various concentrations, and
measure the extent to which the organisms are adversely
affected. If, in the laboratory, the effluent is hanDful to the test
organisms at a certain concentration, then it is pre~umed also to
be hannful to aquatic life in the stream-i.e., to be toXÌo-at that
concentration.
This approach has an appealing simplicity, but the use of
Jiving specimens introduces a significant potential for variability
between and within tests. 111 designing and refining the WET
test methods, EP A sought to minimize the effect of organic
idiosyncracy by taking experimental and statisticai precautions.
The crux of petitioners' complaint is that EPA has not gone far
enough. We disagree, and therefore deny the petitions for
review.
I.
These WET test methods were first implemented in
1995. 60 Fed. Reg. 53,529 (Oct. 16, 1995). Petitioners brought
an action challenging them, as a result of which the WET tests
were modified pursuant to a settlement of the action, after which
EPA repromulgated them in 2002. 67 Fed. Reg. 69,952 (Nov.
19, 2002) ("Final Rule").! It is this most recent version of the
! Petitioners object to four of the ten test procedures described in the
2002 Final Rule: the Fathead Minnow Larva] Growth Test Method
1000.0, the Fathead Minnow Embryo-larva] Teratogenicity Test
Method 1001.0, Ceriodaphnia dubio (water flea) Reproduction Test
Method 1002.0, and Green Alga Growth Test Method 1003.0. See 67
Fed. Reg. at 69,972. Each of these four tests measures chronic
toxicity, which is defined in relation to test organisms' growth and
reproduction, as opposed to acute toxicity, which is b"od on mortality
4
tests that we now review.
A
Petitioners' primary concern is that EPA did not adhere
to its usua1 criteria and procedures for ensuring the scientific
validity of the test methods.' These criteria include accuracy,
precision, practical applicability, establishment of detection
limits, and the minimization of external interference. See EPA,
Availability, Adequacy, and Comparability of Testing
Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Established Under
Section 304(h) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 3-2
to 3-5 (Sept. 1988) ("Report to Congress").' While EPA
concedes that its WET tests do not incorporate every one of
rates. [d. at 69,953.
, Petitioners suggest, without supporting authority, that because the
test results will be used as evidence in enforcement proceedings,
EPA's rulemaking had to comply with the standard for scientific
evidence articulated in FED. R. EVID. 702, as interpreted in Daubert v.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Evidentiary
rules govern the admissibility of evidence at trial, not the
establishment of the processes whereby such evidence will be created.
See FED. R EVID. 101 ("These rules govern proceedings in the courts
oftheUnitedStates... ."). Of course, insofar as some ofEPA'sown
criteria min'Or the Daubert standard, EP A may not ignore or contradict
them without explanation.
, This Report was an internal study on various testing methods,
undertaken at Congress's express behest. Pub. L. No.1 00-4, § 518(a),
101 Stat. 7, 86-87 (1987). The Report itself nowhere contemplates
being anything but a "study." It is not strictly binding upon EPA and
any deviation from the Report is not per se arbitrary and capricious.
Cf Report to Congress at 3-2 ("In most cases, no sin[:o [test] method
will contain all of the desirable characteristics.").
5
these factors, the real question is whether EPA adequately
accounted for any departures. We find that it did.
EPA explained at length, both in its response to public
comments and in the Final Rule, that there are two major
distinctions between WET tests and most other test methods
approved for assessing permit compliance under the Act. First,
v.1rile most tests rely on instnnnentation to conduct chemical-
specific nwnerical measurements, WET testing is biological,
using live organisms that cannot be, for example, calibrated.
Second, unlike properties such as chemical concentration,
toxicity is both measured and dejìned by the WEr tests (i.e., it
is a "method-defined analyte"). These are meaningful
differences, which serve to limit the usefulness of petitioners'
analogies between WET testing and chemical-specific
instnnnental methods.
EP A admits that accuracy, in its technical rather than
colloquial sense, is inapplicable to WET testing, but it does not
follow that the tests are therefore "inaccurate." Accuracy is a
composite of two distinct characteristics: "pLcision'" and
"bias." The former measures the variation among the results of
multiple tests of the same sample; the latter uescribes any
systemic and persistent deviation of the average v?lue of a test
method fÌ'Om an accepted "true value." Final Rule, 67 Fed. Reg.
at 69,965. While precision can be, and has been, evaluated for
WET methods, "bias" cannot be because it relies on
comparisons with an independent, objective, "true value."
When measming chemical concentration, for example, it is a
simple matter for a laboratory to combine pure water with a
given toxicant in a' certain ratio, and then assess the ability of
instruments correctly to ascertain this known conc~ntration. For
a method-defined analyte such as toxicity, howevet, there is no
such 1hing as a "true value" independent of the WET tests
themselves. This does not mean that the tests are inherently
6
unreliable, but ra1her 1hat 1heir scientific validity must be
assessed through o1her means. This is consistent wi1h EPA's
treatment of o1her method-definite analytes. See generally 40
C.F.R. pt. 136.
While conceding 1he inapplicability of bias. EP A stated
in 1he nùemaking that its WET test me1hods sa1!òf)r precision.
67 Fed. Reg. at 69,965. Petitioners argue 1hat this conclusion is
unsupported. The record contains extensive raw Gata, from 1he
main EPA Interlaboratory Study and otr':r privately
commissioned studies, regarding 1he variability of WET toxicity
measurements. See, e.g., EPA, Fina/ Report: Imer/aboratory
Variability Study of EP A Short-term Chronic and Acute Who/e
Effluent Toxicity Test Methods (Sept. 2001) ("Inter/aboratory
Study"). From essentially the same data, petitioners draw quite
clifferent statistical conclusions than EP A
Petitioners' analysis of 1his data does not convince us
that EPA's action was "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of
discretion, or o1herwise not in accordance with law." 5 U.S.C.
§ 706(2)(A). And this is not just because of the deference we
give to EP A when it evaluates "scientific data within its
techrùcal expertise." City of Wauk~ha v. EPA, 320 F.3d 228,
247 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (quoting Hu/s Am., Inc. v. Browner, 83
F.3d 445, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1996»; Appalachian rower Co. v.
EPA, 135 F.3d 791,801-02 (D.C. Cir. 1998). It is also because
there are several errors in petitioners' methodology. One is
petitioners' choice of units of measurement. According to EP A
procedure, WET test results are recorded as percentages,
representing how much dilution, if any, of an eftlx:nt sample is
required for a certain effect to occur (e.g., for 1he "No
Observable Effect Concentration" datapoints, 1he percentage
represents the level of dilution at which 1he mixture ceases to
affect 1he orgærisms). Effluent that must be diluted to a 25%
concentration before it ceases to cause demonstrable hann is
7
more toxic than effluent that need only be diluted to 50%. In
order to simplifY the expression and application of these test
results, EPA devised a scale of chronic toxicity units ("TU,"),
equal to 1 00 divided by the measured percentage value, such
that the 25% sample above would translate to 4 TU" while the
50% sample would be 2 TU,. Thus, the higher an dIluent's TU,
rating, the more toxic the effluent Petitioners make the mistake
of asswning that relying on this invented scale in perfonning
statistical analysis will yield valid conclusions about the
dis1ribution of the original data.' This error lies at the heart of
petitioners' claims of extreme variability in the results of WET
testing. EPA, on the other hand, finds that the data support the
conclumon that these WET test methods exIn'bit a degree of
precision compatible with numerous chemical-specific tests
already in use. We credit EP A's conclusions on this point.
Another of petitioners' central contentions is that the
WET test methods produce an unacceptably high number of
false positives. EPA's test design had contemplated a positive
error rate of no more than five percent, and as low as one
percent in certain instances; this understanding was reflected in
, The preferred metric for assessing precision is the coefficient of
variation (CV). which measures the extent to which multiple
measurements tend to depart from their average value. The greater the
CV, the less precise the measurement. By computin£ the CV using
toxicity units (TV,s) rather than the percentages originally recorded by
EPA, petitioners arrive at a grossly inflated result. For example,
analyzing reference toxicant data, Interlaboratory StlUiy at 81-82 tbl.
9.8, EPA's approach yields a CV of approximately 0.43-wel1 within
the range of EPA's other approved tests, Memorandum from Marion
Kelly, EPA Engineering and Analysis Division I (Oct. 16,2002) (CVs
of approved chemical methods range from 0.03 to 0.64, and CVs of
organic methods from 0.12 to 1.04). Petitioners' appr.,ach. however,
using the distorting TV, scale, results in a CV of IJl7-more than
triple the correct value.
8
the 1998 Settlement Agreement. Petitioners allege false positive
rates between 12.5% and 56%, Reply Brief at 2/, while EPA,
again analyzing the same data, finds an overall false positive
rate of 1.3%, with no individual test's rate exceeding 5%. See
Final Rule, 67 Fed. Reg. at 69,968. The discrepancy stems from
the parties' differing definitions of the tenn "I~lse positive."
EPA defines a false positive result as one indicanng toxicity in
a blank sample. Interlaboratory Study at 66. Su(,' ¡ results occur
quite inftequently. Petitioners' definition, howev<i, is far more
expansive, encompassing all results that exhibit uxicity greater
than the median toxicity for a given sample. Reply Brief at 25
n.29. Their concern is that some discharge permits may specify
an acceptable nonzero level of toxicity, which the effluent may
not exceed, and that the WET tests have the potential to produce
aIbitrary permit violations. For example, if a permittee were
subject to a toxicity limit of 3 TV" and a WET test of its
efi1uent would yield a 2 TU, result most of the time, but up to 4
TV, some of the time, the latter outcome would constitute a
permit violation and potentially trigger an EP A enforcement
action.
This is certainly a problem for which EPA's system must
account. It is not, however, a problem of false positives. What
petitioners describe relates to precision, which we already have
discussed. Multiple measurements will exln'bit &'me degree of
variation, yielding an eITor band that extends above and below
some intennediate value. This is the case with chemical-specific
instnnnental tests and, indeed, with virtua1Iy every water quality
test EPA uses. See 40 C.F.R. pt. 136. FurthennlJre, petitioners
neglect to mention that just as some pennittees who "should be"
in compliance may be deemed violators, other peimittees who
"should be" violators may be deemed in compliance. That is the
nature of any distribution: No matter how nar-ow the eITor
band, or how precise the test, there always will be some
measurements on the high end of the range, and some on the
9
low. The real question is whether this variation is excessive,
and EPA has demonstrated that it is not. EPA aiso offered an
additional safeguard by designing the tests to give permittees the
benefit of the doubt, limiting false positive rates to at most 5%,
while allowing false negative rates up to 20%. EPA,
Understanding and Accountingfor Method Variability in Whole
Effluent Toxicity Applications Under the Natio¡;al Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System 5-6 to 5-7 (June 2ú"ù).
It is worth pausing here before we examir.e petitioners'
other attacks on the WET test methods. There i~ an important
distinction between the validity of a test method and the validity
of a particular result from the test when it is used to detennine
compliance with pennit conditions. Even by EPA's
calculations, WET tests will be wrong some of t:'t: time, which
is why EP A warned against using a single test result to institute
an action for a civil penalty. See 67 Fed. RtJ' at 69,968.
Nothing we have written thus far, and nothing we write in the
balance of this opinion forecloses consideration of the validity
of a particular test result in an enforcement action. See 33
U.S.c. § 1369(b)(2). That issue is not before us. The case
involves only the validity of the WET test methods.'
, One page- of petitioners' opening brief contains whal ryurports to be
a constitutional argument--that if a particular WET test indicates
toxicity, this will constitute an irrebuttable presumption of petitioners'
guilt in violation of the Due Process Clause. As we stated in the text,
we are concerned here only with test methodology, not results of
particular tests in the field. Our decision does not endo:'se the validity
of any test result in the future, nor does it foreclose a ~dense that the
result is wrong. Those issues are simply not presentc:' in this judicial
review of ruiemaking. Furthennore, when the Supreme Court has
recognized the constitutional dimensions of presumptions, it has done
so solely with regard to statutory classifications, which tended to have
strong equal protection components as well. See, e.g., Weinberger v.
Saljì, 422 U.S. 749 (1975) (Social Security eligibility classifications
10
Petitioners' next objection is to EPA's failme to establish
detection limits for WET test methods. The public commenters
raised this point and EP A explicitly addressed it in promulgating
its Final Rule. 67 Fed. Reg. at 69,968. Detection limits are
applicable only to tests that rely on instnnnental measurements;
they represent the sensitivity thresholds of the technology,
below which measurements become unreliable or impossible.
Because WET testing is a biological and experimental, rather
than an instnnnentaI, method, "detection limit concepts are not
applicable." ¡d.; see also Report to Congress at 3-11. The
ratified test methods, however, entail a built-in mechanism that
serves the same basic purpose as detection linúts in instrumental
test&-to reduce the likelihood that random "nois.:" will result
in a false positive result A single WET test involves exposing
multiple batches of organisms to the effluent at various
concentrations, as well as to a "control" sample of pure water,
and then aggregating the effects on each batch. Statistical
analysis then is used to ensure that any observtd differences
between the organisms exposed to a given effluent concentration
and those exposed to the control blanks most likely are not
attributable to randomness-that they are statistically
sigrùficant See Final Rule, 67 Fed. Reg. at 69,957-58. This
safeguard addresses petitioners' concerns. EPA, in short, has
offered a reasoned and thorough explanation of iiò decision on
for spouses and stepchildren); Vlandisv. Kline, 412 U.S. 441 (1973)
(state residency classifications for college tuition); see also JOHN E.
NOWAK & RONALD D. ROTUNDA, CoNSTITUTIONAL LAW § 13.6 (5th
ed. 1995). There is no such classification here. fo the extent
petitioners' complaint is that in some future enforcement proceeding,
they will not be able to attack the WET test methodology (if we rule
in EPA's favor in this case), they are not speaking of an irrebuttable
presumption at all. This case is their chance to rebut the so-called
"presumption." Their inability to do so in some futuro proceeding is
simply a consequence of the judicial review provision in 33 U,S.c. §
1369(b)(2).
11
1his subject. The law requires no more. SEe, e.g., Int'!
Fabricare Inst. v. EPA, 972 F.2d 384,389 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
Petitioners also assert that EP A failed to demonstrate the
availability and applicability of WET testing-tœt is, the ability
of laboratories across the nation to conduct WET testing
properly and consistently. One of the main purposes of the
Interlaboratory Study was to ensure that a wide range of
laboratories could implement the prescribed test methods
without introducing an undue degree of variability or error.
More than 90% of laboratories were able to complete the ratified
tests in accordance with all mandatory procedures, with success
rates reaching 100% for several tests. Final Rule, 67 Fed. Reg.
at 69,955. When EPA was unable to find enough available
laboratories for a trial of ce.iain WET test methods, it withdrew
those methods from 40 c.F.R. pt. 136. Id. Although the
Interlaboratory Study clearly supports the availability and
applicability of the challenged tests, petitioners think that
procedural defects invalidate it. The claim is that because
laboratories chosen for the test knew in advance that they would
be participating, EP A violated its own guidelines, which
required the study to be "blind" Interlaboratory Study at A-21.
This misapprehends the nature of blind testing. EP A called for
"blind samples," ld. (emphasis added), and that is what the
laboratories received--samples with no indicatiü:1 about which
were the control "blanks" ~d which were the reference
toxicants, Proposed Rule, 66 Fed. Reg. 49,794,49,806 (Sept. 28,
2001). Petitioners also allege that EPA improperly ignored the
results of the peer review process. But EP A published an
extensive point-by-point response to peer comments and
acknowledged the peer-review process in its revisions to the
Final Rule, 67 Fed. Reg. at 69,954. The Interlaboratory Study
thus complied with the appropriate procedures rn,d established
the ratified tests' availability and applicability.
12
Another important test characteristic is
"representativeness," that is, the ability of test res,'¡ts to predict
instrearn effects accurately. Petitioners claim that EP A failed to
establish the presence of such COlTelations for several of the
WET tests, particularly with regard to Western state waters,
which differ chemically ITom their Eastern counterparts. EP A
responds by pointing to the results of numerous studies on this
subject conducted throughout the 1990s. These ~,ludies support
the representativeness of the WET test methods in general, and
several demonstrate representativeness with regal'J to particular
Western waters. See, e.g., EPA, A Review of S"zgle Species
Toxicity Tests: Are the Tests Reliable Predictors of Aquatic
Ecosystem Community Responses? 47-50 (July 1999). It is
unrealistic in the extreme to require correlation stuJies on every
stream in the nation. EP A took the sensible approach of relying
on sampling techniques to draw general conclusions, while
leaving some implementation details to local entities. See Am.
Iron & Steel Inst. v. EPA, 115 F.3d 979,1005 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act's National Pollulant Discharge
Elimination System, 33 U.S.C. § 1342(a), states retain
discretion, subject to EPA guidance and recomme,.Jations, to set
their toxicity thresholds in order to compensate for local
conditions at the pennitting stage. See 40 C.F.R. §
122.44(d)(I)(iii). In light of this discretionary, rather than
mandatory, nature of state implementation of standards and
thresholds, we also are unpersuaded by petitioners' assertion
that the WET program amounts to an iIleg:ll federal water
quality standard.
The role of state permitting authorities also should allay
the concern, which petitioners express, that lite correlation
between laboratory toxicity and instream impacts grows weaker
at lower levels of toxicity. Before implementing a test method,
EP A must establish that the measured characteristic bears a
rational relationship to real-world conditions; the available
13
studies reasonably support such a conclusion with regard to
chronic toxicity. EPA, Technical Support Docurnentfor Water
Quality-Based Toxics Control 8 (Mar. 1991) (fintling likelibood
that data may be explained by randomness, rathd than actual
correlation, to be 0.1 %). Petitioners are wonied that they might
be subject to excessive restrictions; such limits, however, would
be imposed by local authorities, and are not part of the
rulemaking under review in 1his case. The WET test methods
offer only a means of measuring compliance with those
limits-individual dischargers remain fi'ee to challenge their
permits, on a case-by-case basis, if they believe that local
authorities are regulating at a level that poses only a minimal
risktoaquatic]ife. See40C.F.R. §§ 124.19, 124.21.
The ratified WET tests are not without their flaws. But
perfection is not the standard against which we judge agency
action. WorldCorn, Inc. v. FCC, 238 F.3d 449, 4úl (D.C. Cir.
2001); Northwest Airlines,lnc. v. U.S. Dep'tofTransp., 15F.3d
1112, ] 119 (D.C. Cir. ]994). EPA's decision w~" infonned by
years of scientific studies, negotiation, and publ;'~ notice-and-
conunent, and it represents the agency's expert judgment
regarding the implementation of the aims o{ the Clean Water
Act. Petitioners have not demonstrated that EP A ignored
relevant record evidence, contradicted its own policies without
explanation, or otherwise acted arbi1rari1y and capriciously. See
Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n v. StateFarmMut.Autolns. Co., 463
U.S. 29, 41-42 (1983);ProFIPilotsFed'n v. FAA, 18 F.3d 758,
771 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Natural Res. Def Council, Inc. v. EPA,
822 F.2d 104, 111 (D.c. Cir. 1987).
11.
American Petroleum Institute ("API") seeks to intervene
for the purpose of challenging EPA's failure to rarifY for use in
the Pacific Ocean three WET test methods that measure acute
14
toxicity. "An intervening party may join issue only on a matter
that has been brought before the cmJrt by another party." lll.
Bell Tel. Co. v. FCC, 911 F.2d 776, 786 (D.C. Cir. 1990), citing
Vinson v. Wash. Gas Light Co., 321 U.S. 489, 498 \1944). The
issue presented by API overlaps with the issues petitioners raise
only insofar as both involve whole effluent toxicity. The bare
assertion that API "agree[s]" with petitioners' Jaims, Reply
Briefat 37, does little to cure this defect. The procedural device
of intervention does not contemplate so broad a compass. We
will not consider API's arguments.
ill.
For the reasons set forth above, having considered and
rejected petitioners' other arguments, we deny the petitions for
review.
Page 1 of 1
Bob Martin
From: Larry Libeu [lIibeu@sbvwcd.dst.ca.us]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 8:20 AM
To: Alec Hart; Bob Hollander; Bob Martin: Charlie Nylander; Chris "",.,ese; Dan Santantonio; Dennis
Stowe; Dick Corneille; Doug Karafa; Ed Curley; Peter Carlson
Subject: FW: Summary of Court's WET Decision
Fellow Board members. please let me know what direction you would like tc; take regarding this issue,
Larry
-----Orlginal Message-----
From: Tim Moore [mailto:tmoore@risk-sciences.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 12:45 PM
To: lIibeu@sbvwcd.dst.ca.us
Subject: Summary of Court's WET Decision
Thanks.
Hi Larry:
Attached. per your request, is a one-page summary of the court's decision ,,", the WET case.
I convened a conference call with the Litigation Oversight Committee yesterday to discuss the WET court decision
In detail. Harlan Agnew, Larry Bazel, Rod Cruze, Tad Foster, John Hall and myself participated in the 3-hour
marathon.
The committee is preparing a written recommendation that the decision be appealed. I am preparing a one-page
summary explaining the basis for such an appeal. In a nutshell, the judges decision rests on a set of
mathematical computations that they (the judges themselves) did. Those cnmputations contain a major math
error. The error favors EPA and, once corrected, is likely to lead to a very Jifferent decision by at least two of the
three judges.
If we intend to file an appeal we must do so by the end of January. I am rE',¡uesting that you convene a special
teleconference with the Westcas Board of Directors to discuss the pros and cons and make a final decision. I am
available anytime next week or the first week in January. All the members of the Litigation Oversight Committee
have agreed to participate and, if appropriate, John and Tad can also be on the line.
I will also prepare a budget and financing proposal for the Board's review. '\s always, I am not planning to
request any funds from Westcas' general account. Any appeal will be pail.' :::Jr, exclusively, by volunteer
sponsors, And, I am working hard to gather most (if not all) of the money from other sources. It will cost $1 0-15k
to file the Motion for Rehearing and another $20k+ if the court grants our motion.
Let me know if there is anything else I can do to assist the Board with this c:ecision.
Thank you,
Tim
Timothy F. Moore
Risk Sciences
1417 Plymouth Dr.
Brentwood, TN 37027
Office: 615-370-1655
Fax: 615-370-5188
Email: tmooretâ>.risk-sciences.com
1/5/2005
.
RISK
SCIENCES
3 January 2005
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Board of Directors, Western Coalition of Arid States (Westcas)
Tim Moore
Basis for Appealing the WET Decision
Back!!round
On December 10,2004 the U.S. Court of Appeals -D.C. Circuit ruled against our petition
challenging the whole effluent toxicity (WET) test methods. Fundamentally, the Court agreed
with EPA's two key arguments:
1)
Many of West cas' claims, while true, did not invalidate the method because they could be
dealt with by appealing our NPDES permit conditions or by raising the issue(s) during
subsequent enforcement actions. This applies to both the ionic interference problem and
the lack of correlation to actual instream conditions.
2)
The variability of WET test methods was "well within" the range of variation for other
chemical methods that EP A had previously approved. And, once again, to the extent
such variability was likely to effect compliance determinations erroneously, the error
band could and should be considered during permit implementation rather than method
adoption.
It is on the second point that we can mount a successful appeal.
Previous Ånrument
By the time we reached oral arguments, our case boiled down to the fact that EP A failed to
validate the WET methods at the level of intended use. In essenCt, EP A had no laboratory or
field data to demonstrate accuracy, precision or representativeness in the range between 1 TUc
and 4 TUc. This is contrary to very specific EP A guidance and v~rious court precedents.
In oral arguments, EP A admitted that there was only one data set that contained results relevant
to the crucial range of low-level toxicity: the Ceriodaphnia dubia reference toxicant tests from
the Interlaboratory WET Variability Study. EPA also acknowlede;cd that they had intentionally
omitted this dataset from consideration because the samples were "jess toxic than planned."
We prepared and submitted detailed statistical analyses to demonotrate that the Coefficient-of-
Variation was 400% higher in the omitted dataset than all the other high toxicity datasets upon
which EPA relied. In oral arguments, two of the three judges app'~ared to be strongJy persuaded
by our argument and exhibits. One judge, the one who wrote the Court's decision, was not.
Court's Decision
During oral arguments, and again in his written opinion for the court, Judge Randolph made it
clear that he thought our statistical analysis was "flawed." Judge Landolph has both engineering
and law degrees. He stated that our estimates of WET variability were "inflated" because we
improperly "transformed the test data." Specifically, he stated that we were wrong to convert
NOEC values into toxicity units (IUe's) prior to calculating the Coefficient-of- Variation.
When asked about this "error" during oral arguments, John Hall responded that EP A requires
that WET test results be transformed and reported as toxicity units. And, EP A's attorney agreed
that our calculations were "correct" Bear in mind that EPA never performed any calculations on
the Ceriodaphnia dubia reference toxicant results because they chose to disqualify that dataset
Nevertheless, Judge Randolph scowled at John's response and, latc:r, wrote that EP A procedures
require that WET results be "reported as percentages." Judge RanJolph also stated that he had
"perfonned his own calculations" on the reference toxicant data and concluded that the
Coefficient-of- Variation was approximately 43% and "well-withi" the range of other approved
test methods."
Judge Randolph correctly notes that our computations lie "at the heart" of our case. If our
calculations are wrong, then the WET methods are no worse than other chemical tests.
Moreover, it was clear from his demeanor during oral arguments that Judge Randolph believed
that we had intentionally manipulated the math in order to inflate the apparent test variability.
This seemed to anger him as he went to great lengths to make arguments on EP A's behalf that
the Agency itself never raised in it's written brief or in oral argument before the court.
Basis for Appeal
Judge Randolph made several errors. First, he erred in concludin:-: that it was "improper" to
transform NOEC's into toxicity units. Second, he erred in concluding that EP A guidance
recommends that WET test results be reported as percentages ratJ ,cr than as TV c's. Third, he
erred by introducing new evidence (his own calculations) that were not part of the administrative
record. And, finally, he erred when performing his computations by failing to use the correct
formula as specified in Appendix E-I of EP A's Technical Suppor ~ Document for Water Quality-
based Toxics Control.
If Judge Randolph has used the appropriate equation to estimate \ ariability based on toxicity
units rather than NOEC's, he would have confirmed that our matl~ was correct. The true
Coefficient-of-Variation for the only low-level toxicity data in tl1c entire administrative record
was 173% not 43% as he originally calculated. As such, the variability of WET test methods is
much worse as one moves closer and closer to 1 TUc. And, the variability of WET test methods
is much greater than that measured for any other chemical method previously adopted by EP A.
There are other issues which might be raised on appeal but, after considerable discussion, the
litigation oversight committee recommends that our attomeys focus exclusive on math errors.
2
Options
As Judge Randolph stated, the whole case turns on this one point. Win it and the court is likely
to rule in our favor on the original WET challenge.
We have three options: I) petition the Court of Appeals for re-hearing by the same three judges;
2) appeal the case to the full 9-member Court of Appeals for the D.c. circuit (aka "en bane"
panel); or, 3) appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We recommend that Westcas pursue
option I & option 2 simultaneously.
Most likely, the Court will prefer option #1. Although we would much prefer to go before a
different panel, the Court of Appeals is unlikely to grant an en baT1C hearing if the sole purpose to
correct a factual error made by the 3-judge panel. That panel must first have an opportunity to
evaluate the error and, if appropriate, reconsider their decision..
ðctions
In order to proceed we need three things: first, the Westcas Board vfDirectors must give their
permission to file an appeal before January 15th. Second, we must obtain affidavits from highly-
qualified and impartial statisticians attesting to the math errors in Judge Randolph's calculations.
And, third, our attorneys must prepare and submit a formal Motio!'. to the court requesting a re-
hearing and/or an appeal.
If the court accepts our motion, the judges will then direct us as tv what they want next. Most
likely, we will be asked to prepare an additional brief on this one very narrow issue. Such a brief
would not differ significantly from the Motion we must now prepare anyway. EP A will be given
an opportunity to respond. The judges mayor may not request additional oral arguments.
Cost
The cost of pursuing any form of appeal was not included in our original agreement with the
attorneys. John Hall tells me that he is willing to prepare the Mo:,on for a flat fee of$15,000.
He also estimates that an additional $5,000 will be needed to compensate the expert
statistician(s). If the motion is granted, additional costs may be incurred depending on what the
court asks us to submit. John is willing to cap the related follow-on expenses at an additional
$10-15k.
AMSA is unlikely to participate in any appeal. The WET Coalit;('ll (an industry group
represented by Hunton & Williams) bas yet to make a decision. 1 he sponsors appear to be
evenly split between those in favor and those opposed to filing an appeal.
At present, there are no funds remaining in the WET litigation account,. However, we have yet
to receive one final contribution of $5,000 pledged by LA County Sanitation District.
3
The litigation oversight committee does not recommend that Weslcas' general funds be used to
support an appeal. Rather, as before, we woùld seek voluntary cOJ;,ributions from those
members that sponsored all previous efforts on this issue. In addillon, I am seeking and expect
to receive significant contributions from other interested parties (especially those within the
WET Coalition if that group elects to withdraw from the field ofbattle.
Recommendation
I)
Authorize John Hall to file a Motion for Re-hearing and/or Appeal subject to receiving
sufficient pledges from various sponsors to fully cover the cost of all related efforts.
2)
Authorize Tim Moore to seek additional sponsors outside tile general Westcas
membership and to accept contributions from those agencies/companies to defray the cost
of filing all appeal motions.
3)
Authorize the Litigation Oversight Committee (Harlan Agnew, Larry Bazel, Rod Cmze,
Stacey Alstadt and Tim Moore to continue supervising the efforts of John Hall and Tad
Foster on this matter.
We must make a decision ASAP in order to file a timely appeal. A teleconference call is
planned for later this week so that the Westcas Board may discuss the issue further. A date, time
and call-in number will be sent by separate email.
Respecifùlly submitted,
~ .c--
Timothy F. Moore
Risk Sciences
1417 Plymouth Dr.
Brentwood, TN 37027
Office: 615-370-1655
Fax: 615-370-5188
Email: tmoore@risk-sciences.com
4
.
RISK
SCIENCES
5 January 2005
via E-mail
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Board of Directors; Western Coalition of Arid States (Westcas)
Tim Moore
Summary of Math Error in Court's WET Decision
The Judge made three math errors when he did his own calculation to estimate the Coefficient-
of-Variation (CV) for the Ceriodaphnia dubia Reference Toxicant dataset. First, he used NOEC
percentages rather than TUc values. Second, he assumed that the data was nonnally-distributed
when it is actually log-normally distributed (see Fig. I & 2).
Recall that EPA guidance states that IC-25 is preferred over NOEC. EP A guidance also states
that reporting results as TUc is preferred over reporting results as "percent effluent" Finally,
EP A's TSD guidance recommends using the "Delta Log-nonnal" equations to evaluate
lognormally-distributed datasets where a mixture of detect and nu:l-detect values have been
reported.
Table 1: Coefficient-of-Variation for NOEC in C. dubia Rclerence Toxicant Dataset
Assumed Data Distribution
CV Calculated as:
Normal Lognormal Delta Lognormal
Percent Effluent 43%* 102% 44%
Toxicity Units 147% 102% 179%
'CV=43% is the value Judge Randolph derivedfrom his calculations.
Table 2: Coefficient-of-Variation for IC-25 in C. dubia Rt'l'erence Toxicant Dataset
Assumed Data Distribution
CV Calculated as:
Normal Lognormal Delta Lognormal
Percent Effluent 35% 93% 67%
Toxicity Units 168% 93% 251%
Fig. 1: ~ Results of C. dubia Chronic Reference .¡ ..xicant Interlab Study
30
25
>. 20
u
:¡¡
~
L5
~
~ 10
0
10
15
20
25
303540455055
NOEC
60
65
70
75
60
85
00
95 100
Fig. 2: IC-25 Results of C. duhia Chronic Reference Toxicant Interlab Study
30
25
J:
I "
10
5
0
5
15 20 25' 30 35
75. 60
10
40 45 50 55
1C25
Note: tables and cbarb prepared by Hall & Asoociates
65
60
70
85
90 115 100
2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
1. 0020167-03
2. 0520090-00
3. 0710140-01
4. 0820029-00
5. 0830207-02
6. 08410655-01
7. 1010014-00
8. 1030096-04
TOTAL
RENEWING CERTIFICATES Of LIEN
JANUARY 11, 2005
OWNERS
NAME
Page 1 of 1
PROPERTY
ADDRESS
AMOUNT
OWED
$189.78
$118.08
$159.80
$543.07
$734.86
$61.02
$146.73
$85.28
ør $2,038.62
~ST VALLEY
~TER DISTRICT
---
-
Memo
To: Robert Martin, General Manager
From: Brian Tompkins, CFO i!;r
cc:
Date: 1/5/2005
Re:
Mileage Rates
The IRS has released the standard mileage rates for 2005. The Business rate is 40Yz It per mile, up
from 37Yz If; per mile for 2003.
I recommend that the we adjust the rate at which the District reimbur~es employees and directors for
mileage during 2005 to conform with the IRS rate.
. Page 1
East Valley Water Distr:~t
Balance Sheet - UnaudHed
November 30, 2004
ASSETS
UTILITY PLANT - at cost:
Utility plant in service - water department
Utility plant in service - sewer department
$84,606,034
22.276,277
106,882,312
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(32,160,926)
74,721,385
4.611,782
1 ,904,686
Construction in progress
Land held for resale
81,237,854
RESTRICTED ASSETS:
Water department - bond funds - cash in bank
Certificate of Participation reserved funds - cash in bank
Reserved funds - designations - cash in bank
6,475
11,619,492
2,186,450
13,812,417
CURRENT ASSETS: '
Cash and Investments
Less: Restricted Cash and Investments
Accounts receivable (net of allowance)
Other receivables (net of allowance)
Inventory
Prepaid expenses
22,751.015
13,812,417
8,938.598
1,001,109
48.183
905.225
567,153
11,460,269
OTHER ASSETS AND DEFERRED COSTS (Net of Amortization):
Bond discount and incidental bond expenses
Deferred financing charges
19.828
350,581
370,409
TOTAL ASSETS
$106,880,949
East Valley Water District
Balance Sheet - Unaudited
November 30, 2004
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LONG-TERM DEBT:
Certificates of Participation due after one year
Installment payment obligation
Less: Deferred amount on refunding of COPs
$12,231,539
10,000,000
(606,207)
21,625,332
CURRENT LlABILITlES:
Accounts Payable
Accrued payroll and benefits
Customer service deposits
Deferred Rental Income
Accrued interest payable
Deposits - refundable
Certificates of Participation due within one year
1,749,339
438,583
1,295,525
2,500
6,475
361,100
1,726,266
5,579,788
TOTAL LIABILITIES
27,205,120
EQUITY:
Contributed capital:
Invested in utility plant
Other contributed capital
Retained earnings:
Reserved for water bond funds
Reserved for emergencies
Reserved for unemployment insurance
29,028,411
3,695,064
6,475
2,170,000
16,450
Unreserved
Net Income for current year
TOTAL EQUITY
41,519,146
3,240,282
79,675,829
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$106,880,949
OPERATING REVENUES:
Water Sales & Services
Sewer Services
OPERATING EXPENSES:
¿.'UO,CE 0" SI '~?L Y
PUMPING PLANT
WATER TREATMENT
SEWER TREATMENT - City of SB
TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS - Meter Shop
SEWAGE COLLECTION
ADMINISTRATIVE & GENERAL
Supervisioo and Labor
DireciolS Fees & Expenses
Utilities & Telephone
Office Supplies & Expenses
Facilities & Equipment Expenses
Other Contracted Services
Outside Storage Rental
Professional Services
Regulatory & Compliance
Employee Programs
General Insurance
Employee Benefits
Ed u ca tiool Sem in a rslCon fe re n ees
Miscellaneous
Totai General and Administrative
Total Operating Expenses
OPERATING INCOME
East Valley Water District
Statement Of Revenues And Expenditures - Unaudited
For the Fjve Months Ending November 30, 2004
'§~;;!¥&~s"ü,:!:~è;:,.~ ..';;~>""J:;~~~;";;;'
$726.739
603.457
1.330.196
$1.024.700
648.967
1.673,667
($297,961)
{45.51 0)
(343,471)
___'l;!i:?."
197.372
27,699
883.694
48.890
26.628
18J47
--~ QCQ --
243.100
38.033
439,750
54.583
30.9B3
27,050
- (2é.4JÐ
45.728
10.334
(44~)
MlIl
4.355
8.303
119.858
6.862
9.682
50.788
56.344
1.729
21.222
120.215
8.620
15.575
23.700
30.600
11.650
54.600
2,800
1,000
35.400
81,000
7.550
3.450
396,160
357
1.758
5.893
(27.088)
(25.744)
11.650
(1.729)
33.378
2.800
(7,475)
(7.005)
(48.244)
(4.592)
-Æ.
(65.995)
8.475
42.405
129.244
12,142
3.403
462,155
1,748,677
1,287,659
(461,018)
(418,48J)
386,008
1804,489)
$5.619.591
3.424.021
9,94],612
--~:¡;U)l
1.276.514
165.200
2,280.469
275,476
153.749
105,941
605.272
26.970
49.800
145.705
263.901
4.5,30
139.055
7,806
11,376
205.458
525,406
25,497
11.641
2.022,617
6,473,899
2,569,714
$5.674,900
3.245,034
8.919,934
($55.309)
178.987
123,678
___IB.ô,Q.
1,425.600
190.366
2.198.750
271.766
155.017
135.550
-- __J~3ß:q
149.086
25.166
(81.719)
(3.710)
1.268
29.609
598,935
42.990
77.775
114.425
153.500
58,350
145.050
14.050
5.500
177.100
405.000
37.350
17.450
1,847,475
(6,337)
16.020
27.975
(31.280)
(110AOI)
58.350
(4.530)
5.995
6.244
(5,876)
(28.358)
(120,406)
11.853
5.609
(1J~~)
6,3~4,624
(79,2I§)
2,525,310
44,404
NON-OPERATING ACTIVITY:
Revenues:
Interest Income
Other Income
Gain on Sale of Fixed Assets
Expenses:
Amortization of bond discount
'\'T1C't'.,tIC," :f COP issue/refund costs
Debt Service:
Interest on L T Debt
Total Debt Service
Capital Expenditures:
Wells
Pumping Plant
Trealment Plant
Reservoirs & Tanks
Pipeline - Water
Pipeline - Sewer
Meters & Services
Buildings
Vehicles & General Equipment
Office Furniture & Equipment
EXCESS OF REVENUE
OVER EXPENDITURES:
Add Back Capital Expenditures & Principal
NET INCOME
East Valley Water District
Statement Of Revenues And Expenditures. Unaudited
For the Five Months Ending November 30, 2004
',,'NO:~~~....~~~"~ ; :Jã~~~ifi:,"
$7.678
76.998
$4.000
73.452
$3,678
3.546
84,676
77,452
(7.224)
305
--~
9,841
(305)
(9.536)
(9,841)
(560)
560
(560)
560
61.404
2.179
(61,404)
(2.179)
8.200
11.200
(27,432)
26.313
11.475
(21.433)
(39.900)
4,149
300
81.432
2.187
14.525
51,433
39.900
851
8.200
11.500
54.000
28.500
26.000
30.000
5.000
254.212
163,200
(91.012)
(597,297)
300,260
(897,557)
(91.012)
254.212
163.200
(343,085)
463,460
(806~)
$57.861
376.851
228.787
663,500
1.525
47,lÌ81
49,207
(56.275)
(56.275)
231.948
57.757
300
329.091
10.166
101.604
89.785
57.009
21.390
899,050
2,341,232
899.050
3,~282
SUd:?;P
$50.000
367.454
417,454
40.900
57.500
272,000
142,000
130,500
60.000
35.000
20.000
757,900
2,184,864
757.900
2,9~764
Variance
$7.861
9.397
228.787
í<!.1!>.046)
(1,525)
147 ,8~)
(49,207)
56.275
56,275
(231.948)
(57.757)
40,900
57,200
(57,091)
131,834
28,896
(29,785)
(22,009)
(1,390)
(14J" 150)
156,368
(141,150)
297,518
Reoolutioo 2OJ5.æ
Return to CaIPERS. Unit 830
En,ployer code:
EMPLOYER PICKUP RESOLUTION
PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN
FOR SERVICE CREDIT PURCHASES
(CONTRIBUTION CODE 14)
WHEREAS, the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement
System (CaIPERS) at the April 1996 meeting approved a pre-tax payroll deduction plan for
service credit purchases under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 414(h)(2); and
WHEREAS, the Fa"¡: VAll,*, Water District {Employer} has the authority to
implement the provisions of IRC section 414(h)(2) and has determined that even though
implementation is not required by law, the tax benefit offered by this section should be
provided to those employees who are members of CaIPERS; and
WHEREAS, the 'East Valley Water District {Employer} elects to participate
in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan for all employees in the following CalPERS coverage
group(s):
{Membership Coverage Group(s)}
All miscellimeous coverage groups ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
I. That the East Valley Water District {Employer) will implement the
provisions of IRC section 414(h)(2) by making employee contributions for service credit
purchases pursuant to the California State Government Code on behalf of its employees
who are members of CalPERS and who have made a binding irrevocable election to
participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan. "Employee contributions" shall mean those
contributions reported to CalPERS which are deducted from the salary of employees and
are credited to individual employee accounts for service credit purchases, thereby resulting
in tax deferral of employee contributions.
II. That the contributions made by the East Valley Water District
{Employer} to CaIPERS, although designated as employee contributions, are being paid by
the East Valley Water District {Employerì in lieu of contributions by the
employees who are members of CaIPERS.
III. That the employees shall not have the option of choosing to receive the contributed
amounts directly instead of having them paid by the
East Valley Water District {Employer} to CaIPERS.
IV. That the ¡¡'",.,. V"llry \oÉItPr Di,.,.rirt {Emp!oyer} shall pay to CalPERS the
contributions designated as employee contributions frol'.1 the same source of funds
as used in paying salary, thereby resulting in tax deferral of employee contributions.
V. That the effective date for commencement of the pre-tax pay,oll deduction plan cannot be
any earlier than July 1, 1996, or the date the completed resùiution is received and approved
in CaIPERS, whichever is later.
VI. That the governing body of the East Valley Water District {Employer}
shall participate in and adhere to requirements and restrictions of the pre-tax payroll
deduction plan by reporting pre-tax payroll deductions when authorized by CalPERS for
those employees of the above stated Coverage Group(s) who have elected to participate in
this plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the governing body of the East Valley Water District {Employer}
this 11th day of Januarv 2005 . {year}
BY
George E. Wi.1ron
Boord Pre!Jident
ATIE5l':
RETURN ADDRESS:
Robert E. M3rtir, Boord Sa::retary
East Valley Water District
P.O. Box :;"27
San Bernardino. CA 92413
---""'-'-'-"-"""'-"'-"'--"""'-'" .......--.-.-..........., . -..............
FOR CALPERS USE ONLY
Pre.tax Payroll Deduction Plan Effective Date:
Approved by: I Title:
MEMBER SERVICES DIVISION, Service Credit Section - Unit 830
Sa~1 der A.
Kess er 8-
ì\SsoCiates, InC
Insurance
"Commitment to Service"
Since 1956
December 17, 2004
\'I.'.'
Mr. Brian Tompkins
East Valley Water District
P.O. Box 3427
San Bernardino, CA 92413
Dear Mr. Tompkins,
I am pleased to announce that I will be joining Driver Alliant Insurance Services as Vice
President. Although based in Escondido, I will be making frequent trips to the Los
Angeles and Orange County areas.
With your approval, I would like to continue as your insurance broker through the offices
of Driver Alliant. Steve Kessler, CEO of Sander A. Kessler & Associates, mutually
agrees and supports this opportunity.
So that I can better service your account, please copy the attacl1ed "Broker of Record
Letter" on to your company letterhead, add your signature, and fax it back to me at: (760)
740-2052.
Please don't hesitate to call me with your questions.
Sincerely,
~
Joshua Merel
Vice President
(310) 710-5553 Cell
SKt::-
Steven Kessler
Chief Executive Officer
(310) 309-2264
.--
~" ;c..: :~ ", .
c,.,',..
" 'I.'.
',C!
." -'
.. --'"
;0><-':'"
I',
Date:
Policy Number:
#4086171495
East Valley Water District
Insurance Company: U.S. Fire Insurance Company I Crum & .::'orster
To Whom It May Concern:
We hereby appoint Driver Alliant Insurance Services as our Broker of Record for all our
insurance and bonding matters.
This appointment revokes and supercedes all premium appointments and authorizes
Driver A11iant Insurance Services to receive any and all information requested on our
behalf. This authorization rescinds any such previously dated Broker of Record letter
with no waiting period.
Sincerely,
Title:
r\ni, D East Valley
t' " Water District
January 6, 2005
MEMORANDUM
To:
Subject:
Board of Directorsd
Robert Martin 7~
Automatic Meter Reading System
From:
For the last several years, District staff has been investi '~ating the emerging technology
being used for automatic meter reading. This has included ccnducting interviews with many
different vendors and visiting other water agencies to learn from their experiences.
During our recent budget discussions, the Board approved an allocation of $100,000 for
EVWD to start the transition process to all Automatic Meter Reading System. District staff
solicited performance information aIld proposals from several suppliers marketing these systems.
A series of interviews and demonstrations were conducted to help select the best system for
EVWD.
Attached to this memo is a proposal from Performance Meter Inc. for the pricing of the
basic equipment to begin implementing this program in our District. Performance Meter received
a unanimous recommendation from our staff who were on the selection committee. They have
supplied meters to our District for many years now and are a known quantity from a support and
service standpoint.
Specifically, we are proposing to purchase the computer aIld radio equipment that will
allow one of our employees to read a Book of meters by simply driving their vehicle through the
neighborhood where the services are located. In addition to this equipment, we are proposing to
make all initial purchase of 500 'I.-inch meters to start our repla~ement program. We will select a
specific Book of meters to begin the replacement program. Once we have completed our initial
conversion and follow-up evaluation, we will begin using thesc new style meters for all new
installations (typically I-inch).
One of our main concerns with this program is the time that it will take to do a complete
conversion. In consideration of the cost and effort involved, I am anticipating an 8 - 10-year
conversion period. During this time period, we do not WaIlt to be operating two different billing
systems. This system we are proposing will be integrated Witìl our existing billing system. In
addition, we are proposing to replace our existing handheld read~rs with a set of 7 new machines.
January 6, 2005
Automatic Meter Reading System
Page Two
Our existing handhelds are 7-years old and becoming very diJlïcult to maintain and suppOli.
These new machines will have the capability of processing reads for our meter readers as well as
communicating with the new radio equipped meters. These new handhelds will provide great
flexibility as we begin this conversion process.
Although not contained in this proposal, we will also want to begin the conversion of
many of our large meters that are in vaults. These meters are very time consuming to read and in
maI1Y cases require more than one individual to obtain the read, The ability to simply drive by
these vaults and obtain a read will be a welcome change.
One of the other benefits of the new meters is that each unit contains a built-in data
logger. This is aI1 invaluable tool for staff when working with a customer who has an
unexplained high consumption reading on their account.
District staffhas invested a tremendous aITIount of time and effort researching this issue. I
strongly believe that we are ready to move forward with this n~w technology and recommend
that the Board approve this purchase of equipment and software contained in the Proposal from
Performance Meters dated December 17,2004.
Performance Meter, Inc
a California Corporation
P.O. Box 427
Beaumont, CA 92223-0427
(951) 922-2485 Fax (951) 922-2395
(800) 872.2723
Website : www.performancemeter.com
E-Mail: billing@performancemeter.com
Quoted to:
East Valley Water Dist.
P.O. Box 3427
San Bernardino, CA 92413
USA
Attn:
Pur~hasing
909-!!89-9501
909-888-6741
Quotation
Quote Number:
1000
Quote Date:
Dee 17, 2004
Customer ill Good Thru Payment Terms Sales Rep
1131 1/16/05 Net 30 Days HOUSE
Quantity
1
Item
R3-PKG
500
PMN-03PNRBR
7
ersaTERM
1
L-4M USB
1
outeManger
1
RYREPORT
3
RN-AMR
2
TRN-EMR
Phone:
Fax:
Description
jPanisonic Tuff Book, Softnet, Mobile
ruck Unit, GPS Software, GPS Receiver,
þps Training, Mobile Training
þ/4"SL Performance Nitro Meter, Pulse
!Register, NetRadio ER-3 Attached,
Stainless Steel Bracket Attached
lversaTerm CE Hand-Held Computer with
32MB RAM and 32MB Flash Disk, Meter
~eading Application Software, Writst
¡trap and Shoulder Strap wi Bluetooth
actio Board
odel CL-4M USB Charger Link Loader
/Charger Cradle, 4-S1ot Master with
Data / Power Cables
S[outeManager CE Software License for
IBM-Comptible PCs running Windows 20uO
r XP
rystal Reports with RouteManager
Interface (Embedded in the RouteManager
oftware I
retRadio AMR Training - Per Day 3 Day
rinimum
~nstallation and Training (2-days
þn-Site) , Electronic Meter Reading (£l4R)
I
TRUU1lk YíOìm1r f@lt Y@ID1Ir
.o".:)ì A~,
C@rtll§)lw!B]",2! tft@h
Unit Price
22,145.0C
Extension
22,145.0
160.05
80,025.0C
3,400.00
23,800.0C
1,550.00
1,550.00
2, 900.00
2,900.00
200.00
200.00
1,250.00
I
3,750.001
I
3,700.001
I
!
1,850.00
I
Total!
Continued!
Performance Meter, Ine
a California Corporation
P.O. Box 427
Beaumont, CA 92223-0427
(951) 922-2485 Fax (95Ù 922-2395
(800) 872-2723
Website : www.performancemeter.com
E-Mail: billing@performancemeter.com
Quotation
Quote Number:
1000
Quote Date:
Dec 17, 2004
Quoted to:
East Valley Water Dist.
P.O. Box 3427
San Bernardino, CA 92413
USA
Attn:
Phone:
Fax:
Purchasing
909-889-9501
909-888-6741
I Customer ID Good Thru Payment Terms Sales Rep I
1131 1/16/05 Net 30 Days HOUSE I
Quantity Item Description Unit Price Extension
1 NTWKUPGRADE outeManager Upgrade, USB HUB 1,000.00 1,000.00
Installation
3 L-IM USB Model CL-1M USB Charger Linke Loader / 260.00 780.00
harger Cradle, Single Slot with Data
able
*** Reading of the route during the
Pilot will be performed by Performanc¿
1eter, Inc. for 2 months at no
charge. ***
I
I I
, I ¡ I
I
Total \
139,850.00'
I
f"TI"'\P. fl. f!".
R lfUllIffift.{ YO!ìJìJi 1l@]'{' Y(ÐfwHf
(r; (!II Iill § ide F' 21 Ît~Æb Iill
'" '"
z co
- co
"'N
C ,
C co
~ M
""~
~§5
",,"""
~ '"
::¡;'"
- =>
~ c::>
~ c:
>",
""I-
f=g
~co
~:,
~~
~"""
~
z
""
12
;;
.,;
M
:;¡!
=>
I-
~
'"
0:>
~
:::
I-
~
C
=>
0:>
c::>
co
g
c::>
.,;
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2004 - 2005
LIGHTFOOT GOODIN NEGRETE STURGEON WILSON
FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES
JULY 875.00 24.21 750.00 758.93 1000.00 31.00 1000.00 128.71 1250.00 1108.39
AUG 750.00 13.03 500.00 375.00 1250.00 205.15 1125.00 25.80
SEPT 750.00 575.81 500.00 113.54 250.00 1250.00 15.00 1000.00 658.91
OCT 750.00 228.21 1250.00 195.00 750.00 1250.00 264.53 1125.00 214.36
NOV 500.00 18.00 750.00 25.00 250.00 15.00 1000.00 58.00 900.00 1555.45
DEC 13.00 277.00 -337.83
JAN 90.00 25.00 90.00
FEB
MAR
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
TOTAL REIMB 3625.00 872.26 3750.00 1182.47 2625.00 46.00 5750.00 973.39 5400.00 3315.08
TOTAL EXPENSES
3625.00
872.26
3750.00
1182.47
2625.00
46.00
5750.00
973.39
5400.00
3315.08
BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES
DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 - 2005 GLENN LIGHTFOOT
DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE BOOKS
NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS SUBSCRIPTIONS MISC
MEAL W/BOB 7/8/04 12.41
MEAL W/BOB 7/21/04 11.80
MEAL W/BOB 8/5/04 13.03
ACWA FALL CONF 9/28/04-9/30/04 125.00 75.67 305.96 69.18
WTR CONF 10/26/04-10/29/04 52.27 175.94
ICWA LUNCHEON 11/18/04 18.00
MEAL W/BOB 12/6104 13.00
TOTAL 125.00 0.00 127.94 305.96 313.36 0.00 0.00
Page 1
BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES
DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 - 2005 DON GOODIN
DATE CONFERENCE CARFARE MILEAGE
NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS EDUCATION
WESCAS 6/23/04-6/25/04 150.00 102.25 364.66 111.02
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 62.00
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/20/04 -31.00
TRANSPORTATION SEMINAR 9/24/04 40.00
CSUSB TEXT BOOKS 9/28/04 73.54
WRI BREAKFAST 10/5/04 15.00
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 10/18/04 33.00
WTR CONF 1026104-10/29/04 147.00
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 11/15/04 25.00
LEG BRIEFING 01/10105-01/11/05 90.00
TOTAL 280.00 0.00 102.25 364.66 362.02 73.54
Page 1
BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES
DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005 EDWARD NEGRETE
DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE
NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS MISC
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 62.00
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 -31.00
STATE OF COMMUNITY 11/23/04 15.00
TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.00 0.00
Page 1
BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES
DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 - 2005 KIP STURGEON
DATE CONFERENCE RAILFARE MILEAGE
NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS MISC
EAC SEMINAR 7/14/04 40.00 20.00
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 31.00
BUSINESS CARDS 7/29/04 37.71
SB VL Y COLLEGE REG 8/16/04 75.00
SB VL Y COLLEGE REG 8/16/04 81.77
FIVE STAR 8/24/04 48.38
RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 9/15/04 15.00
CLASS FEE 10/6/04 24.00
WTR CONF 10/26/04-10/29/04 93.53 147.00
ICWA LUNCHEON 11/18/04 18.00
RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 11/19/04 25.00
STATE OF COMMUNITY 11/23/04 15.00
MEAL W/ BOB 12/1/04 252.00
RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 12/17/04 25.00
RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 1/21/05 25.00
----:¡30.00
TOTAL 0.00 ~41.91 0:00- 463.00 238.48
Page 1
BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXPENSES GEORGE WILSON
DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005
DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE LODGING
NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING MEALS MISC
MEAL W/BOS 7/8/04 12.41
MEAL W/SOS 7114104 43.65
WASCN CONVENTION 07114/04-07/17104 352.40 672.13 -15.00
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 62.00
SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/20/04 -31.00
MEAL W/BOS 7/21/04 11.80
MEAL W/BOS 8/3/04 12.77
MEAL W/BOS 8/5/04 13.03
LEGIST BRKFT 9/17/04 25.00
ACWA FALL CONF 9128104-9130104 616.00
MEAL WIBOS 9124104 17.91
MEAL WIBOS 10/7/04 15.93
MEAL WIBOS 10/8/04 18.31
MEAL W/BOB 10/14104 15.34
MEAL W/SOB 10/26104 17.78
WTR CONF 10/27/04-10/29/04 147.00
WASH DC 11/15/04-11/17/04 735.82 786.63
leWA LUNCHEON 11/18/04 18.00
STATE OF COMMUNITY 11/23104 15.00
MEAL WIBOB 12/1/04 72.38
REIMBURSEMENT 12/29/04 -347.91 -62.30
LEGIST BRIEFING 1110/05-1111/05 90.00
TOTAL 706.00 740.31 0.00 1458.76 410.01
Page 1
DIRECTOR: Don Goodin
Board Meetings: 14
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENS:::: ::ŒPORT
MONTH OF:
December. 2004
Conferences and Other Meetinas
Date: 16 Organization EVWD
Organization Special Districts
Description Awards Banauet
Description Monthly Meetina
Date: 20
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Organizatjon
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Organization
Description
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS
3
@125.00 each- $
375 00
Personal Auto:
Miles x .375
Parking Fees
Total Lodainas. Meals & Other: (Details on Back)
per mile-
$
$
27.00
Total Director's Expenses
$
27.00
Signed Ð~J.12. N ~
Date of Board Approval January 10. 2005
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $
Less any Advance Payments $
TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ -
402.00
402 00
Lodainas: (Receipts attached)
Date: 20 Function Attended Special Districts $ 27.00
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
SUB TOTAL $ 2700
Meals: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
SUB TOTAL $
Other: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
SUB TOTAL $
TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ 2700
(Enter this total 0,; the front ofform)
DIRECTOR:
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTR:':;T
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT
?ti¥J:d' . MoNTH OF:
/Z(Í'I
Conferences and Other Meetinqs
Date: /~ Organization
Date: /1/q Organization
~
Board Meetings:
Date: 12/1{.,
Organization
Ð/LJI)
&;/lÚtI; 8~,
£//¿¡JD
Descripiion ~ ../14 U
Description !)jzi1J ~
Descri~.tion ~ ~
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Descri¡:;tion
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS
i/
@125.00 each_$ StJIJ.lJ!J
Personal Auto:
Miles x .365
Parking Fees
per mile- $
$
$
$
ø
'çf
ø
¡
ø
Total Lodqinqs, Meals & Other: (Details on Back)
Total Director's E;:penses
Signed 9/t«'t4t
Date of Board Approval
v.~~
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ S"{){). DO
Less any Advanco: Payments $ ø
TOTAL DUE DIR.=:CTOR $ !)(J{!, OC
Lodqinqs: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Meals: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Other: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
SUB TOTAL $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
SUB TOTAL $
$
$
$
SUB TOTAL $
TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $
(Enter this total éJn the front of form)
al/a7/2aa5 a7: 25
9a9862866a
PAGE al/al
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT
DIRECTOR:
Kip sturgeon
MONTH OF: December 2004
Board Meetings:
14
Conferences and Other Meetinas
Date: 1 - 2 Organization ACWA
Date:
6, 30 Organization EVWD
Organization SCE
Description Conference
Description School
Description Sicrn Checks and Docs
Date: 2. 9. 16 Organization SEve
Date: 15
Date: 16
Date:
Date:
Description Lighting Seminar
Description Public Relations Seminar
Description Meet with Bob and Jo
Date:
Organization
Description
: ~ ~~~\la1J €' }'
te r' [) i s "iT! ct:-
J?~§.Ç!!I?~9..I1.. .. .. . '
Description
Date:
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS 10
@125.00each_$ 1.250.00
per mile- $
$
$
$
Personal Auto:
Miles x .375
Parkjng Fees
Total Lodainas. Meals & Other: (Details on Back)
Total Director's Expenses
\ } 'Ë --""-----..
Signed Of..
Date of Board Approval 0 1 / 11 / 2005
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ 1.250.00
Less any Advance Payments $
TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ 1.250.00
DIRECTOR:
(..JJ{.Sd),
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE Fž¿PORT
t,.ONTH OF: [)&<:... (f) 4J
Board Meetings: ¡fl./!<£-
Conferences and Other Meetinqs
Date: a/, " 12/"Z-- Organization Ac IN A
Descrip:!on
f-ð 1/ ÚJ..f
Date: 12/2./
Organization IE 1/ ¡.J ()
Description 'rrt. £1>/ I?" ~ðn"'} 0..."'/1:'< ';ï""",¡
. /!3¡,¡, havill..
Description
Date:
Organization
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Description
Date:
Description
Date:
Description
~;~-........+. '\ ~ ~ ~,~,
%.:. <::::~U,àSG.riPti6J1 '..- ,.' ~ !1:~~,: ill
't, e!?Ct~i t::;¡n----1.-~ ~ .. .,
"'~. """,.,,".'~:,¡-"-!! ,.~.¡;-..-t"""...,.,_...-.
';r a \;~ ~ R....# ~ ~$ :6. ~ ~ \"" t"
De~.9!!E.tlo..'J ... '. .
Date:
Organization
Descripton
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Description
Date:
Organization
Descripiion
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS
f
@125.00 each- $
SOD
Personal Auto:
Miles x .36
Parking Fees
per mile- $
$
Total Lodqinqs. Meals & Other: (Details on Back)
Total Director's Expenses
$
$
't~'f. 7'f
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $
Less any Advance Payments $
TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $
?J.'i.7'f
Signed
Date of Board Approval
72'f,7f-
Lodajnas: (Receipts attached)
Date: 11/3"'; It{&. Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
ACL"JA Ct>lfJrr:./l.r:IJc..E
$ 2 z-+. 7'1'
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Meals: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Other: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
SUB TOTAL $ 2.:;>.,..7'f
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
SUB TOTAL $
$
$
$
SUB TOTAL $
TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ -¿N.?7<-
(Enter this total on the front of form)
MEMORANDUM
FROM
DISTRICT EMPLOYEES J
ROBERT E. MARTIN, GENERAL MANAGER ~
2005 HOLIDAY SCHEDULE
TO:
SUBJECT:
The following holidays will be observed during the 2005 calendar year:
January 3, 2005 (Monday) New Years Day (observed)
January 17, 2005 (Monday) Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
February 21, 2005 (Monday) Presidents' Day
May 30, 2005 (Monday) Memorial iJay (observed)
July 4,2005 (Monday) Independence Day
September 5, 2005 (Monday) Labor Day
October 10,2005 (Monday) Columbus Day (observed)
November 11, 2005 (Friday) Veterans Day
November 24, 2005 (Thursday) - Thanksgiving Day
November 25, 2005 (Friday) Day after Thanksgiving
December 23, 2005 (Friday) Christmas Eve (observed)
December 26, 2005 (Monday) Christmas Day (observed)
December 30, 2005 (Friday) New Years Eve (observed)
RM:jph
MEMORANDUM
TO:
ROBERT MARTIN
CC:
FROM:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
.
JUSTINE HENDRICKSEN )~
SUBJECT: 2005 BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE
The Board Meetings will be held at 2:00 p.m. on the Second and Fourth Tuesday
of each month.
January 11, 2005
January 25, 2005
February 8, 2005
February 22, 2005
March 22, 2005
March 8, 2005
April 12,2005
May 10, 2005
June 14, 2005
April 26, 2005
May 24, 2005
June 28, 2005
July 12, 2005
July 26, 2005
August 9, 2005
August 23, 2005
September 13, 2005
September 27,2005
October 11, 2005
October 25, 2005
November 8, 2005
November 22, 2005
December 13, 2005
December 27,2005
.-,,_... ".-'..."..
, '
. ",""
"-
..P:~
1'-
v
, ,
: ~ (\
Ì;)
~
:~
-.. ,.-- - -
.
r¡J;
¿j
~ .
~
:J~
'-, ... .' ~. 7..':;..;,,~. .." .".( "'. .
'.. .:~,:"~\>/.~
1~
--------'
.,.ð~~2 ~,~Q-I
J}'-on- Z/ ~ .J ~.l/4 ZA;i;;...é1 Ä-tv.;,J,.
.'J4nÆ ~ ~ cJl d 4, ~,ö.¿
~. he WVw ~ zr/~,
rh.ca~'€- (XU¡: (f>.iP-.,d - 7i& ~ on .&fie
Y 1~ ~. 2ue /k.,./t 'Y~ ~
n l~CL if.¡k!.6V~.'lt? 11<ru. ~ J"l4 ;!¡:.¡, ¡~
1//'< ,/', 11:'.1 ~ ~¿1/. I
w -e..- /-if(.â' ~ ~. -~>-(C'c.. ~'.'
2~ Zl~
J ;1~ , clJJ~\-
y if¡ ~~ ~IvL
I
';
1
~
;
¡~-'
---I
¡
1
!
~ê!; -~ ~ ~'- I
'Y~f'1 ~. -,*~'~ i
,h, '1 -" t::J @ !
? J:..:1 ,~~? ~ !
:::f.. \- \ ~ - ¡~ ¡
r.- ~~ ,~-" \-',
c: ---->.. \; <:- \.. -, , . (0, I
s;:: ';:; l/Ì - .... '- .. C'::\ --, i
~ Y (J ~. ~ ~ ;¡~ . ~.)!,.; I :
~', ~ f-), - , ~ ~ $~h~' ~;' !, I
a¿.",4; .,. I+~, / 1
. ' '. s.v ~;~-) , '" ( i)) i,',-,', =1
..) , -;..;,. ,V'} ~, .. , ' { ,... t, i ,~
~; , ~ \: , '- 00') ,~
~ ~ ~, J ~ ~';g¡ ~
.~~ "1'<.1 .,. :;-;H ~ '
J ~i lJ j ~;,~~,
. ~ J ci L;~ Þ-\ .;;
)
.~
!
i
i
- i
r- --
j
I
......--,--
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
~ Association of ~e ~
~ San Bernardino County Special ~
r¡/ Districts r¡/
I!t J ;!a,.l4a,y 11, 2006 I!t .i
~ MtllIt( tI'94Ip MtltllI,." ~
I!t .i East Valley RCD / Inland Empire West RCD are hosting the January I!t .i
~ membership meeting at Etiwanda Gardens in Etiwanda. ~
: ~ Tbe "dal boue will heg;. at 6 p.m. wHb a eall t. oedoe at 6,45 p.m. A '" jI
~ .uff.' dinnor will ...m.d. V
'" J Tossed green salad (choice of 3 dressings) Cost: $32 ~
~ Lemon Herb Chicken ~
I:!t .i Chicken Tarragon I:!t .i
~ Red Roasted Potatoes ~
I!t .i Fresh Vegetables I:!t .i
~ Carrot Cake for Dessert ~
V Vegetarian Dish available: r¡/
V Pasta Primavera V
r¡/ Speakers: DIRK VOSS & KATHLEEN ROLLINGS-McDONALD I:!t .i
I!t .i RSVP to Carmen FlemÎIlg ~
~ Inland Empire West RCD by V
I!t.i January 8, 2005 I:!t .I
~ Telephone: 909-393-9511 V
r¡/ District/Associate V
V Attendees: V
V V
V V
V V
I!t J REMINDER: There is a $2 surcharge per person for reservations made atter the deadline date and coming to the dinnJl!lt ;
~ meeting without having made reservations. You wj] also be billed for the dinner if cancellation is not received PRICV
vvVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
y¡vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvy¡
~ J ETIW ANDA GARDENS ~ i
V// 7576 Etiwanda Ave. V// .
tel Etiwanda, CA 91739 V
~ '!lÄHoor. ~f~" "wo, D, ~
V// ¡"aiwanda .. II Red~\'oocl Dr V//
teIteI I ; Bð!~d{~~r tel
B"'" S~ tel
Ii J ","I ~ ,', r~I=::>1
'II,,;, ,,'II' 11 I '-' , I -
,?, \~ !I II ""! \-
rp/' ~ ~lJ~~. jí£J~ji IIÆn !f~ rp/
~ J! !i.. r= n ':: -II S~¡arCl¡" qt ~ i
V//ì ill"" j "'" O:~--" ¡¡_..H.", V//
~ iF~~~~~~~,ø~=" /--~¥';f~~( ~
V ! ! \tçl r"--":::' /;::::::,::::> V
~ ::m D, I ij 1J!ì. IL~ ~~Æ;y~J ~
~; iii Jr~;~~ li~~ 1~~¡(lí~;::>' ('~ ~i
V~:t r:.:-í'"-e"~'al(5:'1J¡j}~J¿~tt'\"sbUrgs~L. I,1 ,()c,,-,,;:", V//
~i;1 I\I¡¡S.i¡\WiJ,-;¡-.. -~"Lilll _,I;i)~' \"~(;;:-";};"'.' tel
V -.---' I - - <t I it/) ~d' i'.J.- ,-:., Ç<'.. '.
~ i 'i ,":.---¡,',", -, ¡ ,pi L. -"..,"'&">~,;"'>'
~ t:~ Y'h~~~~t~~,~~~V ~tztJ~r:~: ' ~
tel tel
tel tel
tel tel
telteIteIteIteIteIteIteIVVVrtlVVVVVV
The San Bernardino Area Chambu of Commerce
Governmental Affairs Division
invites you to attend
Legisla five B reakfas t
State of the City Address
Featuring
Mayor Judith Valles
Tuesday, February 22~ 2005
7:30 a.m.
Radisson Hotel
$ 30 - includes breakfast
........ .............. ............. .Cut and Return............"....................
Yes, I will attend the Legislative Breakfast
Name
Name
Phone
Business
Name
Please make reservations - Enclosed is $
Make check payable to: San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce
P. O. Box 658
San Bernardino, CA 92402
(909) 885-7515
T;SUIKTSIAØA.D-ITEMS g¡ 883-0766
PKINTING~BANNERS œ
EMBROIDERED ITEMS ~?,;;~~~-~~!!.~~~n~;'~~~~~