The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 02/08/2005 r\ni'D East Valley t' " Water District 3654 HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE #12, HIGHLAND, CA REGULAR BOARD MEETING February 8, 2005 2:00 P.M. AGENDA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District Secretary by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Tuesday meeting not requiring departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors". -- - -- - - -- -- --- -- ------ --- --- ---- -- --- - - - ---- - -- -- - ------- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - --- CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A!,-p¡'ovalof .o\genda 2. Public Comments CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes for JaI1UaI'Y 25, 2005. 4. Resolution 2005.04 - Accept Conveyance of Pipeline Easement from Carlos Hagar aI1d DeaI1a L Hagar. 5. Resolution 2005.05 - Notice of Completion for redesign of Booster #5 at PlaI1t 129 located at 7800 Calle Del Rio in the City of Highland. 6. Approval of Liens for Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts. 7. Accounts Payable Disbursements: Accounts Payable Checks 200299 through 200481 were distributed JaI1Uary 26, 2005 through Febmary 2, 2005 in the amount of $935,043.08. Payroll Checks for period ended January 21,2005 and included checks and direct deposits, in the amount of $102,620.73. Total Disbursements for the period were $1,037,663.81 OLD BUSINESS 8. Discussion aI1d Possible action regarding Agreement to Increase Assessments for the Arroyo Verde Mutual Water Company Assessment District. 9. Discussion aI1d Possible action regarding a Proposal from Law Plumbing to provide construction equipment and manpower for the District's 6th Street/Sterling Avenue Pipeline Project. 10. Radon Rule/Perchlorate Rule Update (General Manager) 11. Headquarters Project Review and Update (General Manager) NEW BUSINESS 12. Discussion and Possible Action regarding Proposed Rehabilitation of two Tanks located at Plant 39. 13. Directors' fees aI1d expenses for January 2005. REPORTS 14. General Manager's Report 15. Oral Comments from Board of Directors MEETINGS 16. Association ofthe San Bernardino County Special Districts Membership Meeting. hosted by Cucamonga Valley Water District, Siena Lakes Golf Club, FontaI1a, February 21, 2005. 17. , 0 10. 19. 20. San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce, Legislative Breakfast State of the City Address, Radisson Hotel, San Bernardino, February 22,2005. San Bernardino Area CÌ1aI11ber of Comm~rcc "Busincss After Hours", ilOStcd Ly the Radisson Bottl Boomer's Lounge, San Bernardino, February 24,2005. San Bernardino Area ChaInber of Commerce, Legislative Breakfast, ShaI1din Hills Golf Club, San Bernardino, March 11, 2005. Water Education Foundation Lower Colorado River Tour, Clarion Hotel, Las Vegas, NV, April 6 - 8, 2005. CLOSED SESSION 21. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR [Governrnent Code Section 54956.8] 22. Property: 27 +1- Acres ofVacaI1t Land South of Highland Ave, West of Central Ave San Bernardino County, California APN: 1191-251-1, 03, 04 Party with whom District will negotiate: State of California Paliy who will be negotiating on behalf of he District: Under Negotiation: Robert MaIiin Price and Terms of Payment CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITlGA nON Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to [Government code Section 54956.9(b)] One Potential Case 2 23. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR [Government Code Section 54956.8] Property: 4.3 Acres of Vacant LaIld Located NOlih of 5th Street, East of the 30 Freeway HighlaIld, CA APN: 1201-341-07 Party with whom District will negotiate: Mission Development Company Party who will be negotiating on behalf of the District: Under Negotiation: Robert Martin/Jim Cimino Price and Terms of Payment ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS ADJOL'RN -- -- - - --- - - -- - -- - ----- -- -- -- - - - --- - - - --- - - -- -- - - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- -- - - -- - - -- ----- Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability-related modification or accomI:lodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought j¡l order to participate in the above- agelldized pubiic meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Assistant at (909) 885-4900 at least 24 hours prior to said meeting. --- --- ---- - -- ---- - ----- - ---------------- -------- - ---- - - ---- --- -- ---------- .-- 3 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT REGULAR BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2005 MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. by President Wilson. Director Lightfoot led the flag salute. PRESENT: Directors: Negrete, Lightfoot, Sturgeon, Wilson ABSE};1': Goodin STAFF: Paul Dolter, District Engineer; Brian Tompkins, Chief Financial Officer; Justine Hendricksen, Administrative Assistant LEGAL COUNSEL: Steve Kennedy GUEST(s): Jo McAndrews, Anibal Blandon (CDM), Shaun Stone (CDM) APPROVAL OF AGENDA M/S/C (Lightfoot-Sturgeon) that the January 25, 2005 Agenda be approved as submitted. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION President Wilson declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 2:02 p.m. There being no written or verbal comments, the public paIiicipation section was closed. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 11,2005 BOARD MEETING MINUTES. M/SIC (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the January 11, 2005 Board Meeting Minutes be approved as submitted. M:nutes: 01/25/05 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES TO PROVIDE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE TO (253) TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE DWELLING UNITS IDENTIFIED AS TRACT 16014 WillCH IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF IDGHLAND A VENUE AND CHURCH STREET IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA was presented to the Board for approval. M/SIC (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the Development Agreement between East Valley Water District and Standard Pacific Homes be ¡>~proved. APPROVAL OF LIENS FOR DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS. The Administrative Assistant stated that the charges identified by Account Numbers 0010192-02, 0020160-14, 0520242-02, 0842775-04, 1231153-02, 1420142-07 had been paid and should be removed from the lien list. M/S/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the liens for delinquent water and sewer accounts be approved for processing with the exceptions as noted by the Administrative Assistant. DISBURSEMENTS M/SIC (Sturgeon-Negrete) that General Fund Disbursements #200117 through 200298 distributed during the period of January 7, 2005 through January 19, 2005 in the amount of $557,996.87 and Payroll Fund Disbursements for the period ended January 7, 2005 and December 31, 2004 in the amount of $93,274.03 and $3,280.37 totaling $654,551.27 be approved. RADON RULE UPDATE / PERCHLORATE RULE UPDATE President Wilson stated that he was pleased with the recent appointment of Congressman Jerry Lewis to chair the Appropriations Committee. Vice President Sturgeon stated that he had attended a meeting regarding Perchlorate where Senator Soto was the speaker. DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS SITE UPDATE President Wilson reported on the District's operations to date. Information only. ADOPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION; ADOPT THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; ADOPT A DE MINIMUS ïlV1PACT FINDING; AND FILE THE NOTICE OF DETERMINATION AND CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND THE STATE 2 Minutes: 01/25/05 OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE was presented to the Board for approval. M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the District adopt the Negative Declaration; adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; adopt a De Minimus Impact Finding; and file the Notice of Determination and Certificate of Fee Exemption with the County of San Bernardino Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the State Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse be approved. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AD HOC COMMITTEES. President Wilson stated he would like all Board Members to be involved in Ad Hoc Committees; that the first Ad Hoc Committee will be to Review the District's Property, Casualty and Workers Compensation Insurance; that he and Vice President Sturgeon will be serving on the committee. REVIEW AND ACCEPT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004. M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the Financial Statements for period ended December 31, 2004 be accepted. DIRECTOR GOODIN ARRIVED AT 2:16 P.M. THE GENERAL MANAGER ROBERT MARTIN ARRIVED AT 2:17 P.M. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE PIPING MATERIAL PROCUREMENT PACKAGE FOR THE STERLING & 6TH STREET PIPELINE PROJECT. The District Engineer updated the Board on the anticipated Perchlorate Project; that the proposal package prepared by CDM consists of specifications to bid for the purchase of the pipeline materials. The General Manager stated that the proposal is for materials only; that to control installation costs District staff will be installing the pipeline; that the District will serve as Main Contractor on the project; that he recommends approval on the Procurement Proposal Package. Steve Kennedy concurs with the General Manager but recommends the proposal be subject to minor changes recommended by the General Manager and concurrence by Legal Counsel. M/S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that the Piping Material Procurement Package for the Sterling & 6th Street Pipeline Project be approved. Minutes: 01/25/05 RELEASES OF LffiN FOR DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS. List of liens released on January 18,2005 was reviewed. Information only. INVESTMENT REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 The Investment Report for quarter ended December 31, 2004 was reviewed. Information only. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT The General Manager reported on the District's operations to date; that proposed Legislation regarding an alternative to the Ortiz Bill from last year is being reviewed; that the 7 Oaks Dam holding pools have risen more than expected and are much higher than anticipated: th?t Edison is shut down et the present time due to tÌ'e floors; that the water being released is contaminated and the District's Trea!ment Plant is unable to process the water; that the General Manager is concerned that our water supply is being compromised; that a number of agencies are going to set up a meeting with the County of San Bernardino Flood Control and the Army Corps of Engineers to address this problem. Information only. ORAL COMMENTS FROM BOARD OF DIRECTORS Director Goodin apologized for being late to the Board Meeting; that he was attending the funeral for Robert E. Dodson. Vice President Sturgeon suggested the District send a condolence card to Mrs. Dodson on the death of her husband; that he suggested the District possibly contact and resume negotiations with Nextel and would like to know if the Board is interested in adding this item to the Agenda. Information Only. There being no further verbal or written comments from the Directors, this section of the meeting was closed. SAN BERNARDINO AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, NINETY-SEVENTH INSTALLATION OF OFFICERS, VALENCIA ROOM AT THE NATIONAL ORANGE SHOW, SAN BERNARDINO, CA, FEBRUARY 8, 2005. CSDA NEW BOARD MEMBER TRAINING WORKSHOP FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS, DOUBLE TREE SANTA ANA/ORANGE, CA FEBRUARY 18,2005 4 Minutes: 01/25/05 WATER EDUCATION FOUNDATION'S EXECUTIVE BRIEFING, RADISSON HOTEL, 500 LEISURE LANE, SACRAMENTO, CA, MARCH 24-24, 2005 A WW A 124TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, MOSCONE CENTER, SAN FRANCISCO CA JUNE 12-16,2005 CLOSED SESSION The Board entered into Closed Session at 3:09 p.m. as provided for in the California Open Meeting Law, Government Code Section 54945.9(a), to discuss the item listed on the Agenda. ADJOURN TO REGULAR SESSION President Wilson declared that the meeting adjourn to regular session. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS The Board returned to regular session at 3:20 p.m. The item listed on the Agenda was discussed in closed session with no reportable action being taken. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 3:20 p.m. George E. Wilson, President Robert E. Martin, Secretary Minutes: 01/25/05 RESOLUTION 2005.04 A Resolution Of The Board Of Directors Of The East Valley Water District Accepting Conveyance Of Pipeline Easement from Carlos Hagar and Deana L. Hagar, as Grantor of an easement as described in Exhibit "A" and listed in Easement For The Right To Construct, Use, Maintain, Alter, Add To, Repair, Replace and/or Remove Pipeline Appurtenances, Under, Through And Across The Real Property Located In The City Of San Bernardino, County Of San Bernardino. State Of California. BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Convevance of Pipeline Easement dated January 17, 2005, and signed by Carlos Hàgar and Deana L. Hagar as grantor (s) grants to the East Valley Water District, its successors and assigns a Pipeline Easement over, under, through and across the real property described therein, be and the same is hereby accepted for and on behalf of said Water Company. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be attached to said Conveyance of Pipeline J=asement, and that the same be :'eco~dE.d in the Office of the County Recorder, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and filed in the records of said Board. ******** The foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District by motion duly made, seconded and carried on February 8, 2005. Ayes: Directors: Noes: Absent: EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT George E. Wilson, Board President ATTEST: Robert E. Martin, Board Secretary Job No. W2306 Tract 16607/12396 9/11/02jw RECORD REQUEST OF AND MAIL TO: East Valley Water District P. O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, CA 92413 CONVEYANCE OF PIPELINE EASEMENT CAi<..LOS HAGAR. 17€NJA l Hf\§f¡~s Grantor(s), for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to the East Valley Water District, a County Water District, its successors and assigns, as Grantee, an easement in, over, under and across lands herinafter described to construct, use, maintain, alter, add to, inspect, repair, replace and/or remove pipeline or pipelines together with all necessary appurtenances within the easement, and ingress and egress throughout the entire easement in connection with the exercise of any of the foregoing rights. The property subject to this easement, located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" and "8" attached hereto and made a pait hcrecf Grantor(s), successor(s), and assigns (Grantors) further agree to notify EAST VALLEY WATER DiSTRICT of any future use across said easement and to coordinate with EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT the installation of any future facilities within said easement. Grantors further agree that no buildings, fences, walls, structures of any kind, trees, shrubs, or other plants or vegetation, shall be installed, constructed, erected, placed, planted or maintained in the easement and that the existing ground level will not be raised or lowered without the prior written concent of the Grantee. Grantee shall have the right to use gates in all fences which now cross said easement. Grantee shall have the right to trim, cut down or clear away any trees, shrubs, plants or vegetation whenever in the Grantee's judgement it is necessary for the convenient and safe exercise of the rights hereby granted. Grantee shall take reasonable steps to restore Grantor's land to the extent practicable to the pre- construction or pre-maintenance condition, within said easement or outside the limits of said easement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor(s) has executed this instrument this n day of \ \". t'Jl "c=.... ' ..lA!)\1f1 ~ ,2°J..J>-.> ;::;¡~. , ~~ (Attach Notary Cert.) EXHIBIT "A" 10.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT TO EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TRACT 12396 A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH OVER A PORTION OF LOT 10 OF TRACT 12396, IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 229 OF MAPS, PAGES 65 THROUGH 66, INCLUSIVE, RECORD OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNEl<.. OF LOT 10 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'36" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 135m FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 00°02'48" EAST ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'36" WEST, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 10.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BONITA DRIVE, A DISTANCE OF133.42 FEET, BEING A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 53.00 FEET, CONCAVE TO THE EAST, A RADIAL LINE TO WHICH BEARS NORTH 75°24'40" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°57'56", A DISTANCE OF 10.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "a" 10' WIDE E.V.W.D. SEWER EASEMENT 3 13 'à~ 'ò~ 'i,'Î.C!I\ 4 \\.~' f.:J.~', \\c}.r;:!>~ 12 \,r;:!>\~ ~~~~~ " P.O.B'11 ~~ ~~ ~c.r;:!> ~ ~ 135.01' '\\~ ~r;:!>r;:!>~ S89'59'36"E - ÑŠ9'5š'3š"W - SOO'ot 48"E 6 133.42' 10.00' 10 7 9 ! Î 1" = 80' CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT } SS. "J ~j ~j I~" II! ill j~1 ¡j:~ ¡¡I~ II. \11 ~: I! ~. i I ¡ I~ !!II II r~ ~j ~r gp~nally known to me lJJ1>roved to me on the basis of satisfactory t';vidc:nct'; to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that..belshe/they-executed the same ~er/Ahei:r authorized capacity(ies), and that by~eli4!teif signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity '-~rOll bcÍlalf of whi"h the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. .II ~.. " . - LAJ;i~~'; "',¡ to COMM. #148487< 0 g ~~"è~~ .... } - - "'~'"",:....",.,=" '[ WITNEStM1rd ~ ',"-'01 ObuyPu 0 OPfIONAL Though the infonnation below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document ::::: Œnu ~1~ ~~ ~g:ø ,~mfm Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity (ie~) Cl~ed by Signer Signer's Name: Top or!humb """ 0 Individual DCorpomte Officer- Title (8): [JPartner - DLimiled 0 General 0 Attorney-in-Fact OTrusteo OGuardian or Conservator OOther: . .R Signer Is Representing: CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California } ss. ,I ~. il! ~\¡ ",' ¡II ¡it III ",' ~. w II' \1 I' I !! County of &-~ Rhr1l2dmö On ì j{2J(JII~g.n/)'5beforeme, personally appcart:d Opersonally known to me cBProved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/3heft!rey executed the same in hi~ authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/herftheir signature(s) on the instrument the pç;~vn(ó), or th~ entity u;JOn behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument l..~.- ~ . ~U-RI~ S'Hê"lT;N- - ~ t NM~~:"~8~.. ~ f- -. ",,~~0~~¡;;,."1 OPTIONAL Though tho information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Titl< ~ Typo of 0,=1 ~e &\ p 1pt:~mer,L Document Date: tJo. n u 0. 5 \) Number of Pages: \ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: I Ii! w 111 ~¡ !¡¡ ;, Çapacity (ies) Çl\\imed by ~igner Signer's Name: DIndividual DCorporate Officer - Title (8): DPartner. OLimitod OGeneral 0 Attorney-in-Fact 0 Trasto. 0 Guardian or Conservator oOther: Top of""... h". Signer Is Representing: I J I Ii I ,II m I~! '" '", ~~ / PROJECT NOTICE ,~ Notice Dated: November 30, 2004 .Ç;t!L Project Planner: Marnun Faruque f .. ".. .' AITENTION INTERESTED PARTIES: THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL LISTED BELOW HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. YOU ARE INVITED TO COMMENT BECAUSE YOU MAY OWN PROPERTY IN THE AREA OR YOU MAY HAVE A REGULATORY INTEREST IN DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. WE I UNE FIT£ Minor Design Review DRB 04-029 (TII6607) ~ % ~ ~ % ~ APPLICANT: Highland Meadows Partners, LLC ~ PROPOSAL: An Application Major Design Review (DRDO4-0:;:J) ìor Tentative ,fact 16607 to construct a total of 3 8 residential homes on an approximate 9.08 acres Site. S1!<tt! NORWOOD TDlPI.[ST '"""" "'" LOCATION: The Site is located at the southwest corner of Church Avenue and Norwood Street in an R-l- 7, 200 Zone. APN:1201-031-01 & 02 ! N f VICINITY MAP H.T~. YOUR COMMENTS MUST BE RECENED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 20,2004. COMMENTS RECENED AFTER THATDATEMA YNOTBECONSIDERED IN THE DECISION. PLEASE REFER TO THIS PROJECT BY THE FILE/INDEX NUMBER ABOVE. IF YOU HAVE NO COMMENT, NO REPLY IS NECESSARY. THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IS TENTATNEL Y SCHEDULED TO MAKE A DECISION REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL ON JANUARY 4, 2005. COMMENTS: EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION 2005.05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT NOTICE OF COMPLETION BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District, as follows: WHEREAS, based upon the certificate of completion executed by the District for redesign of Booster #5 at Plant 129 located at 7800 Calle Del Rio in the City of Highland. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors hereby determine that said contract is completed and the President and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Notice of Completion on behalf of the District, and the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to record said r",y;ce of Com;:>letion in the office of the County Record3r, County f)f San Bernardino, State of California. * * * * * The foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District upon motion duly made, seconded and carried on February 8, 2005. Ayes: Noes: Absent: EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT George E. Wilson, Board President Attest: Robert E. Martin, Board Secretary (Seal) \V2~26 jw 01/28/05 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Name East Velley Watec District Stce.. 1155 Del Rose Avenue Address City & San Bernardino. CA 9241 0 State Attention: JennyWllllems APNNI210-38HO SPACE A8OVE TH'S LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pu",uant to Civil Code Section 3093. must be filed within 10 deys eftec completion. (See reveese side foc Complete requirements.) Notice Is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of Ihe Interest or estate stated below In the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner Is East Vallev Water Dlstcict 3. The full address olthe owner is PO Box 3427 San Bernardino CA 92413 4, To, ..tJre ofthe iolarest or ..tate oflhc ownar is. in fee. NONE (It oOherlhan fee. stnke "0 feo' and iosert. 10, examplo, 'pucchmr ""doc co"'a" ot p"chaso. 'or loss..') 5. The full names and full addresses of all peesons. if any. who hold (;tIe with the undersigned as joint tenanls or as tenants In common are: NAME ADDRESS East Vallev Water District a Countv Weter District 6. A work of Improvement on Ihe property hereinaftec dascribed was completed on Januarv 21 2005, The work done was: See Exhibit "N 7. The name of the contractor. ~ any. for such work of improvement was SoCal Pumo & Well (It 00 oont""O'lorworkotimprovemeot.. 0 who"; insort 'nono' 10/18/04 (Dato ot Con""I) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed Is In the city of Hiohlend County of San Bernardino . State of Cellfornla. end is described es follows: See Exhibit "A" 9. The street address of seld property is 7800 Calle De' Rio (It 00 sl"ol addc'" has boeo diffioolty ..signed. insert, 'none'.) Date: Februarv 8 2005 VerlficaliOil for IndIvidual OM'" Slgnal"eofownecoccorpo"teofficerolownec nemed In pe"gc",h 2 oc hIs agenl George E, Wilson, Board PresIdent VERIFICATION I. the undeeslgned, say: I am the Secretarv the declarant of the foregoing ("President of", " Manager of'. "A pertner of', "Owner of'. Etc,) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on Februarv 15th (Da:e of sigoat",,) . 2005, at San Berna,dino , California, (Cily,wheraslgned.) (Pe"onal sigoat". 01 the in""dual who is ewaa'ng that 'h. contento 01 the notice ot comp'etton ace true.1 Robert E, Martin, Secretary c x ~ ;; . - :" ~ = ""-0 þ¡; "'~ ~~ ~ S'. "",,> "o~ "O~ f~~ è-.¿,o:: ~~.g 0", ~'" ~ ~ ~ii~~ §! ~~~". I @ San Bernardino. CA. 2003-2004 - 1210-381-10-0000. Sheet: , of Will ~ ,.m , " . ~:: ¡¡ ~~ - " " ".,.' ..., - ::> T1 :.-. ----- N <.n CD " C> - -I :.-. ~ ;:0 tN ::E <.n å:. i;:: ~ --<0 =0 _0 :;;::x~ "'~~ ø", ~ ~[ @ 71."'" '" '" '-' = @ "-';:;~;::-(;:~ @ @ @ @ II."".'" @ @ @ ."." @ @ ".""."'" II."".W/,m II.""."'" 1I.lIk"'"" j ¡g ,oT" ~ (ÔÏ9ì'j ~ CERTIFICATE OF LIEN FEBRUARY 8, 2005 ACCOUNT NUMBER 1. 0010146-02* OWNERS NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS AMOUNT OWED $106.45 $15.19 $17.48 $47.80 $131.56 $14.79 $104.28 $37.06 $11.21 $82.49 $85.29 $260.42 $120.79 $99.90 $83.23 1f $1,217.94 2. 0070123-03 3. 0240107-04* 4. 0430117-01* 5. 0710119-04 6. 0730005-04 7. 0730172-02* 8. O~~ 0754-00 9. 0920078-01 10. 0920123-05+ 11. 0930055-02* 12. 0930098-01* 13. 1120303-02* 14. 1350039-10 15. 1560928-00 TOTAL * STILL OWNS PROPERTY + MULTIPLE UNITS Page 1 of 1 r\ni'D East Valley t' " Water District Board Memorandum Date: FEB. 8, 2005 From: Brian W. Tompkins I Chief Financial Officer Subject: Disbursements. ~ Recommendatjon: Approve the attached list of accounts payable checks and payroll issued during the period January 26, 2005 through February 2, 20')5. Background: Accounts payable checks are shown on the attached listing and include numbers 200299 to 200481 for A total of $935,043.08. The source of funds for this amount is as follows: Arroyo Verde Funds Construction Fund -Loan Unrestricted Funds $935,043.08 Payroll disbursed was for the period ended January 21, 2005 and included checks and direct deposits, Totaling $102,620.73. Total disbursements- $1,037,663.81. ODiC' Wedne' ,ay. February 02. 200! East Valley Water District Page: 1 of 17 Time: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt Usee: I<ATHY Check ReClister - Standard Company: EVWO Periods: 07-04 Throu9h 08-04 As of: 2'2/05 Check Check Check Y~~oo:I~ - ...--- Period Ref Doc Inveice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Pa'd Accll Sub. 13110 000000000000000 200299 CK 1/26/05 ~6tg~bMM, INC. 07-04 040059 VO 25-35770 1/18/05 0.00 290.62 200300 CK 1/26105 ~BþO02 07-04 039948 VO 391 ~)~6 1/14/05 0.00 324.87 200301 CK 1/26/05 ~I~ag¡;s WEST 07-04 039966 VO 103188123 12/31/04 0.00 42.84 200301 CK 1/26105 ~I~ag¡;s WEST 07-04 039967 VO 103944721 1/13/05 0.00 230.84 Check Total 273.68 200302 CK 1/26/05 ~~Ë~f6AN CLASSIC SANITATION 07-04 040106 VO 1-59974 12/31/04 0.00 77.00 200302 CK 1/26/05 ~~~~f6AN CLASSIC SANITATION 07-04 040107 VO 1-59(;-5 12/31/04 0.00 88.66 Check Total 165.66 200303 CK 1/26/05 ~~~ß~HEAD UNITED WAY 07-04 07-04 040130 VO ARRè12105 1/26/05 0.00 47.00 200304 CK 1/26/05 ~~:¡:ß~TED GATE SERVICES,INC 07-04 040123 VO 23424 1/13/05 0.00 168.00 200305 CK 1/26/05 ~8~~'l:8RO-JEANETTE L 07-04 039744 VO 720~21-1 12/28/04 0.00 27.54 200306 CK 1/26/05 6~~~96K, BATTERSBY, MCELHANEY, 07-04 040104 VO 150 12/31/04 0.00 6,688.93 200307 CK 1/26/05 ~~le~~BUSTER 07-04 039746 VO 321~34-0 12/30/04 0.00 1,470.08 200308 CK 1/26/05 ~~þt¡g~O/CALDWELL & MORELAND INS 07-04 040002 vo K. SCHNEIOER 1/20/05 0.00 99.00 200308 CK 1/26/05 ~~þt¡g~O/CALDWELL & MORELAND INS 07-04 040084 VO KENNETH BOOKER 1/24/05 0.00 720.73 Check Total 819.73 200309 CK 1/26/05 8~tP~8RNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT 07-04 040094 VO DOLTER 1/25/05 0.00 97.00 200310 CK 1/26/05 8Ë~~g\ HOMES 07-04 039717 VO 750141-0 12/28/04 0.00 21.67 200311 CK 1/26/05 8~ËætECH INTERNATIONAL INC 07-04 040040 VO EV3,4 1/5/05 0.00 2,028.84 200312 CK 1/26/05 88~ßq;zPROPERTY MANAGEMENT 07-04 039720 VO 140r74-4 12/30/04 0.00 45.60 Dö'e: Wednes,'<lY, February 02, 200! East Valley Water Dist¡, -Í Page: 2 of 17 Thne: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt U'er: KATHY Check ReQister - Standard- Company: EVWO Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of: 2/2/05 Check Chec"- Check VendodD______------ Period Ref Doc ¡nvo;ce 'nvolce mscoun! Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type "" -_~er Date Taken Paid 200313 CK 1/26/05 88[9ß~ TRUCK SUPPLY 07-04 039968 VO 1-~J5,45 1/13/05 0.00 31.17 200314 CK 1/26/05 E8~~<¡4TRUSTEE 07-04 040131 VO COU012105 1/26/05 0_00 135_00 200315 CI( 1/26/05 88~~1-4TRUSTEE 07-04 040132 VO COL'O12105 1/26/05 0.00 275.00 200316 CK 1/26/05 E~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 039522 AC CM521386 12/17/04 0.00 128.82 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 039528 VO 521'"36 12/17/04 0.00 12_35 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 039529 VO 52 ;-;26 12/17/04 0_00 73.23 200316 CK 1/26/05 E~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 039559 AD CM¿;: 1386 12/17/04 0_00 -128_82 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëßq_1CHEVROLET 07-04 039560 AD CM521386 12/17/04 0_00 -128_82 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 039970 VO 527177CVW 1/12/05 0.00 68.23 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 039971 VO 527.17-1 CVW 1/13105 0.00 1.51 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 039972 VO 527860CVW 1/14/05 0.00 167.10 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 040006 VO 520470 12/14/04 0.00 41.31 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 040007 VO 521130 12/16/04 0.00 25.54 200316 CK 1/26/05 8~Ëß~1CHEVROLET 07-04 040124 VO 530561 1/25/05 0.00 38.51 Check Total 298.96 200317 CK 1/26/05 Bl)(rO~AFETY CONSULTANTS 07-04 040112 VO DALO12605 1/26/05 0.00 510.00 200318 CK 1/26/05 BI8alJf-KE'TH 07-04 039747 VO 720102-3 12/30/04 0.00 29_69 200319 CK 1/26/05 ËE~9R1\GING INC. 07-04 040056 VO 4294 1/3/05 0.00 2,883.43 200320 CK 1/26/05 Ë8~08¿NSTRUCTION 07-04 039748 VO 321206-0 12/30/04 0.00 718.52 200321 CK 1/26/05 ËmR~b-JAMES 07-04 039721 VO 340044-2 12/30/04 0.00 237.80 20032-1 CK 1/26/05 ËI~R~1D-JAMES 07-04 039722 VO 340~45-2 12/30/04 0.00 216.80 200321 CK 1/26/05 ËI~R~b-JAMES 07-04 039723 VO 34C~46-1 12/30104 0.00 176.90 200321 CK 1/26/05 §I§g~k IMAi=~ 07-04 039724 VO 340047-1 12/30/04 0.00 242.00 Dote: Wednesday, r~ebruary 02, 200! East Valley Water Distr:~t Page: 3 of 17 T;me: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt User' KATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07.Q4 Throu9h 08-04 As of: 2/2/05 Check Check Che k Vendo"D Pedod Ref Ooc InvoIce Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Naniè-'~ To Post Closed Nbr Type Nu",ber Date Taken Paid Check Tolal 873.S0 200322 CK 1/26/05 [¡,BI/P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039949 VO AA'iO843-0791 1/11/05 0.00 1,390.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:Jj3~<JIBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039950 VO Më0912-0791 1/11/05 0.00 40.00 200322 CK 1/2G/05 ËSSB~O~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039951 VO AA50828-0791 1/11/05 0.00 615.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:Jj3I/P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039952 VO AA5U/99-0791 1/11/05 0.00 180.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:¡'B'/¡O~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039953 va AA51161-0791 1/12/05 0,00 200.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë1J3C¡°~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039954 VO AA51164-0791 1/12/05 0.00 120.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:Jj3~<JIBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039955 VO AA51014-0791 1/12/05 0.00 300,00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:Jj3'/¡O~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 039956 VO AAé~975-0791 1/12/05 0.00 270.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:¡'~C¡°~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040044 va AA51645-O791 1/18105 0,00 30.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë§;B,/¡<JIBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040045 VO AA:'16116-0791 1/18/05 0,00 300.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë1J3~O~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040046 VO AA5;527-0791 1/18/05 0,00 270,00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë1J3I/P"IBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040047 VO AA51488-0791 1/17105 0.00 295,00 200322 CK 1/26/05 ~1,Bc¡<JIBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040048 VO AAë1502-0791 1/17/05 0.00 315.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë§;B~O~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040049 VO AA51388-0791 1/14/05 0.00 30.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë1J3I/P~BCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040050 VO AA5~350-0791 1/14/05 0.00 210.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë§;Bc¡<JIBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040051 VO AA51192-0791 1/13/05 0.00 1,000.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 ËS:f.~<JIBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040052 VO AA51211-0791 1/13/05 0.00 315.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:¡'BC¡<JIBCOCK & SONS, INC 07-04 040053 VO AA51256-0791 1/13/05 0.00 135,00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë:¡'B~O~BCOCK & SONS, tNC 07-04 040054 VO M51286-0791 1/13/05 0.00 270.00 200322 CK 1/26/05 Ë§;~~<JIBCOCK & SONS, rNC 07-04 040055 va AAG~292-0791 1/13/05 0.00 30,00 Check Total 6,315,00 200323 CK 1/25/05 Hþg~ß-CELERINA C 07-04 039749 VO 350204-1 12/30/04 0.00 34.98 200324 CK 1/26/05 HË~9>.1 LLC, REFOUA LLC 07-04 07-04 040030 VO ETE 2/05 1/21/05 0.00 400.00 200325 CK 1/26/05 Þ~I~IQ¡EW FORD SALES,INC 07-04 039969 VO 433096 1/19/05 0.00 249,87 20032G CK 1/2G/05 8~~~9~L EQUIPMENT CO 07-04 039973 VO 628ê2 12/24/04 0.00 103.54 Dale' Wedne,,'lay, February 02, 200! East Valley Water Djstrict Page; 4 of 17 Time: 02:53PM Report; 03630.rpt Usee; KATHY Check Reqister - Standarr! Company: EVWO Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of: 2/2/05 Check Check Check y'emlgrJI:L- - Period Ref Doc Invoke Invoice Discount Arnount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid 200326 CK 1/26/05 S~~~9ËL EQUIPMENT CO 07-04 039974 VO 62809 12/17/04 0.00 82.92 Check Total 186.46 200327 CK 1/26/05 S~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 07-04 039728 VO 37C090-0 12/28104 0.00 37.60 200327 CK 1/26/05 a~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 07-04 039729 VO 370089-0 12/28/04 0.00 33.76 200327 CK 1/26/05 a~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 07-04 039730 VO 370005-0 12/30/04 0.00 34.92 200327 CK 1/26105 8~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 07-04 039731 VO 370082-0 12/30/04 0.00 45.67 200327 CK 1/26/05 ~~~ßWER CONSTRUCTION 07-04 039732 VO 37CCB1-0 12/30/04 0.00 24.11 Check Total 176.06 200328 CK 1/26/05 aË~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039975 VO 860296 1/19/05 0.45 21.90 200328 CI< 1/26/05 ~Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039976 VO 86C246 1/18/05 0.09 4.37 200328 CI< 1/26/05 ~Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039977 VO 860343 1/19/05 0.09 4.37 200328 CI< 1/26/05 ~Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039978 VO 859673 1/14/05 0.08 3.94 200328 CI< 1/26/05 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039979 VO 859594 1/13/05 1.42 69.64 200328 CK 1/26/05 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039980 VO 859593 1/13/05 1.42 69.64 200328 CK 1/26/05 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 039981 VO 8596EY! 1/14/05 0.30 14.76 200328 CK 1/26/05 8Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 040057 VO 860199 1/18/05 0.54 26.27 200328 CK 1/26/05 ~Ë~ß9~E PARTS COMPANY 07-04 040125 VO 861191 1/25/05 1.10 53.80 Check Total 268.69 200329 CK 1/26/05 ~~flf~REZ-ANDRES 07-04 039751 VO 4003J-5 12/30/04 0.00 46.60 200330 CI< 1/26/05 ~~R'/o'k EQUIPMENT COMPANY 07-04 040126 VO C38673 1/20/05 0.00 100.70 200330 CI< 1/20/05 ~~R'/o'k EQUIPMENT COMPANY 07-04 040127 VO C3S916 1/21/05 0,00 271.08 Check Total 371.78 200331 CK 1/26/05 ~~~W!Š-LASHUN M 07-04 039753 VO 220G67-4 12/30/04 0.00 47.50 200332 CK 1/26/05 ~~~Rf40N-KANDI 07-04 040115 VO 1630242-2 1/26/05 0.00 10.28 200333 CK 1/2€!05 ~Ë~2i~N WEISSKER INC 07-04 039755 VO 32</27-0 12/30/04 0.00 1,328.79 200334 CI< 1/26/05 ~18~l!j"NDS STAR GROLIP 07-04 040060 VO 1634 2/1/05 0.00 1,300.00 Dol., Wedne"Joy, February 02, 200! East Valley Water Djstr¡;;t Page, 5 of 17 Time, 02,53PM Report, 03G30.rpt Use" KATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company, EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of, 7.:2105 Ch.cl< Check Check Vendor 10 u_.-.- Petlod Ref Doc Invol,e Invoice DIscount Amount Nbr Type Date iìendorName- To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Pa'd 200334 CK 1/26105 ~1§~ThNDS STAR GROUP 07-04 040061 YO 13ù.IO 2/1105 0.00 8,000.00 Check Total 9,300.00 200335 CI< 1/26/05 ~rw,p~ SAFETY 07-04 039982 YO 440G~ 1/12/05 0.00 1,620.67 200336 CK 1/26105 ~8¡¡goMART INC 07-04 040128 YO 793_" 1/24/05 0.00 16.11 200337 CI< 1/26/05 ~8~R\n'N-JULIE A 07-04 039927 VO 12EG495-7.1 12/28/04 0.00 58.98 200338 CK 1/26/05 ~~~B~ý,-PHILIP ELSTON 07-04 039407 VO 55 ¡257-1.1 11/30/04 0.00 38.58 200338 CK 1/26105 ~~~B~ý,-PHILIP ELSTON 07-04 040100 AD 551~57-1.1 11/30/04 0.00 -38.58 :100338 CK 1/26/05 ~~~B~ý,-PHILIP ELSTON 07-04 040101 YO 551257-1.1 11/30/04 0.00 38.58 Check Total 38,58 200339 CK 1/26/05 ~~~~W-TIEN DAT DINH 07-04 039756 YO 6202~2-7 12/30/04 0.00 27.69 200340 CK 1/26/05 I~Jj~~ DESERT SECURITY & 07-04 039957 va RMö4510205 11120/05 0.00 478.64 200341 CK 1/26/05 I~JjIfJb WATER WQRI\S SUPPLY CO 07-04 039983 YO 148104 1/18/05 173.97 8,524.69 200342 CK '1/26/05 1~:¡:g~~ATIONAL RUBBER & SUPPLY 07-04 039984 VO 20503 12/21104 5.12 250.99 200342 CK 1/26/05 1~:¡:g~~ATIONAL RUBBER & SUPPLY 07-04 039985 YO 2062'\ 1/10105 2.21 108.23 Check Total 359.22 200343 CK 1/26/05 j~~~I/o~UI-RAQUEL a 07-04 039757 YO 620128-6 12/30/04 0.00 117.94 200344 CK 1/26/05 j<i;TOfUcKER & SON, INC. 07-04 039986 YO 0004S801 1/11/05 0.00 582.63 200345 CI< 1/26/05 j8~~'!;10N-SARAT 0 07-04 039758 YO 361J11-9 12/28/04 0.00 97.22 200346 CK 1/26/05 j8~~1/o2CLEANERS 07-04 039987 YO 135455 1/15/05 0.00 6.93 200346 CK 1/26/05 J8~Bc¡fCLEANERS 07-04 039988 YO 135731 1/19/05 0.00 3.96 200346 CK 1/26/05 j8~~c¡fCLEANERS 07-04 040026 YO 135790 1/20/05 0.00 4.95 200346 CI< 1/26/05 j8~~II?CLEANERS 07-04 040028 va 135~ô8 1/20/05 0.00 4.95 Dale; Wednesday. February 02. 20m East Valley Water Distrj-:.t Page: 6 of 17 TIme; 02.53PM RepM. 03630.rpt Usee; I<ATHY Check Reqister . Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Throu9h 08-04 As of: 2/2/05 Checl< Check Check Vcn~or.ID_. - Pertod Ref Doc InvoIce InvoIce Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken PaId 200346 CK 1/26/05 J8~ß'ltCLEANERS 07-04 040071 VO 135918 1/21/05 0.00 7.92 200346 CK 1/26/05 Jmß~CLEANERS 07-04 040092 VO 1359.18 1/22/05 0.00 3.96 200346 CK 1/26/05 J8~ß~2CLEANERS 07-04 040129 VO 136:"4 1/25/05 0.00 3.96 Check Total 36.63 200347 CK 1/26/05 JI},Br¡p~ANDT CONSTRUCTION 07-04 039759 VO 321218-0 12/30/04 0.00 1.500.00 200348 CK 1/26/05 J'}f~EEMAN CO.. INC 07-04 040070 VO 288603-0 1/20/05 0.00 46.79 200348 CK 1/26/05 f?fifO~EEMAN CO., INC 07-04 040108 VO 2893C5-0 1/25/05 0.00 183.11 Check Total 229.90 200349 CK 1/26/05 ~~8ßI!iY-YACOUB 07-04 039760 VO 220160-4 12/30/04 0.00 10.08 200350 CK 1/26/05 ~~I~%NANCE SOLUTIONS INC 07-04 040098 VO 1119403 1/11/05 0.00 145.91 200351 CK 1/26/05 ~~Šß~-LAWRENCE M 07-04 039762 VO 430019-2 12/28104 0.00 9.38 200352 CK 1/26/05 ~aß~lb-LAURA 07-04 039763 VO 411439-1 12/30/04 0.00 23.84 200353 CK 1/26/05 ~8~R?;~nCARR 07-04 040109 VO 16032719 1/12/05 0.00 157.53 200354 CK 1/26/05 ~Ë~B1:\'ZA-LEO 07-04 039784 VO 530232-5 12/30/04 0.00 139.96 200355 CK 1/26/05 ~ICßijiEDZKI-JACEK 07-04 039990 VO MILO~ 1905 1/19/05 0.00 1,440.00 200356 CK 1/26/05 ~}bW\.v. MILLER 07-04 040038 VO 0407 ;-11 1/13/05 0.00 3.237.50 200357 CK 1/26105 ~I:¡:ß~ELL -CHRIS P 07-04 039765 VO 920073-2 12/30104 0.00 13.56 200357 CK 1/26/05 ~I:¡:ß~ELL -CHRIS P 07-04 039766 VO 920073-2.1 12/30/04 0.00 148.92 Check Total 162.48 200358 CK 1/26/05 ~8~2íKLO-KAREN C 07-04 039928 VO 5201C4-5.1 12/30/04 0.00 34.46 200359 CK 1/26/05 ~H~~MP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 07-04 040029 VO 2005096 1/19/05 0.00 2,295.00 Dole, Wednes<'JY. February 02. 200! East Valley Water Distr~ct Page, 7 of 17 Time, 02,53PM Report, 03630.'pt User' KATHY Check ReQister - Standard Company' EVWD Periods: 07 -04 Through 08-04 As of: 2;2105 Check Check Check Vend°rlD ,--' -- Period Ref Doc Invol.e Invoke 01", "t Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid 200360 (;K 1/26/05 ~8t¥~3ASSOCIATES,INC 07-04 040008 VO 50., '67 1/11/05 0.00 2,850.00 200361 CK 1/26/05 Þ~ER!lt CENTURY HOMES 07-04 039918 VO 200005-0.1 12128/04 0.00 54.87 200362 CK 1/26/05 ÞË1WhsH 07-04 07-04040102 VO PET:J105 1/25/05 0.00 248.00 200363 CK 1/26/05 Þ~8g~1x HOME LIFE 07-04 040097 VO PHO0205 1/25/05 0.00 426.08 200364 CK 1/26/05 Þ~¥?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 07-04 039958 VO STEVE 0105 1/10/05 0.00 71.65 200364 CK 1/26/05 Þ~¥?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 07-04 039959 VO PAL;,- 0105 111 0105 0.00 30.00 200364 CK 1/26/05 Þ~~?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 07-04 039960 VO BRIAN 0105 1/10/05 0.00 86.13 200364 CK 1/26/05 Þ~~?~UM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 07-04 039961 VO JUSTINE 0105 1/10/05 0.00 483.50 Check Total 671.28 200365 CK 1/26/05 ~ËBO¿fRNATION INVESTAMENTS 07-04 039767 VO 321203-0 12/30/04 0.00 1.425.50 200366 CK 1/26/05 ~1t\1~~CK TECHNOLOGIES.INC. 07-04 040069 VO 200;;',006 1/3/05 0.00 385.00 200367 CK 1/26105 ~1~g,/¡1,IDE BLUEPRINT 07-04 040041 VO 257666 1/10/05 0.00 192.68 2003G8 CI< 1/26105 ~R;1~08~oup 07-04 07-04040111 VO 286;'3 1/10/05 0.00 484.50 2003G9 CK 1/26/05 ~88RI/íLRST UNIVERSITY 07-04 040062 VO 400517597-001 1/12/05 0.00 199.00 200370 CK 1/2G/05 ~8B~rÖUEZ-REYNALDO 07-04 039768 VO 10202-8 12/30/04 0.00 11.10 200371 CK 1/26/05 Š~~'WËRNARDINO CHILD SUPPORT 07-04 040133 VO SANO~2105 1/26/05 0.00 269.00 200372 CK 1/26/05 Š~~'WÓNO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSN 07-04 040134 VO SANJ12105 1/26/05 0.00 553.73 200373 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~'HBNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040010 VO INOO~ 8805 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CK 1/26/05 Š~~'HBNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040011 VO INOO,8810 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 Dole: Wednesc;3V. February 02. 200! East Valley Water Distr:.t Page: 8 of 17 Time: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt User' I(ATHY Check Re¡¡ister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of: 2/2/05 Check Check Check Vendor![) - . Period Ref Doc Inv"ice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid ;>00373 CI< 1/26/Q5 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040012 VO ]NLv;a811 11M/OS 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO F]RE DEPT 07-04 040013 VO ]1:"0 :8803 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 C]( 1/26/05 Š~~O~ðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040014 VO INOU]8806 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CK 1126/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040015 VO INoe 18804 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1/26105 Š~~ogðNO CO F]RE DEPT 07-04 040016 VO INOJ18813 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE OEPT 07-04 040017 VO iNOC18802 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CK 1/26/05 Š~~O~ðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040018 VO INOC18807 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CK 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO F]RE DEPT 07-04 040019 VO ]NOû18809 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO F]RE DEPT 07-04 040020 VO INOO18816 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CK 1126/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040021 VO INO018815 11M/OS 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO F]RE OEPT 07-04 040022 VO INOC~8808 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CK 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040023 VO ]NCG 18814 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CK 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040024 VO II\:OC18817 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1126/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FiRE DEPT 07-04 040025 VO INOC18812 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040063 VO INO018799 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040064 VO INOë1B800 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 200373 CI{ 1/26/05 Š~~ogðNO CO FIRE DEPT 07-04 040065 VO INO018801 1/14/05 0.00 277.00 Check Tota! 5,263.00 200374 CI< 1/26/05 š~8001 07-04 039962 VO 34213200105 117/05 0.00 466.09 200374 CK 1/26/05 š~8001 07-04 039963 VO 25310670105 117/05 0.00 48.30 200374 CI< 1/26/05 š~8001 07-04 040066 VO 86(80380105 111 0105 0.00 300.62 200374 CI< 1/26/05 š~8O01 07-04 040083 VO 34119160105 117/05 0.00 323.24 Check Total 1,138.25 200375 CI< 1/26/05 Š~~~~Y-TECH SYSTEMS. L.L.C. 07-04 039964 VO 33"',, 1/15/05 0.00 2,270.00 200376 CI{ 1/26/05 Š~~ß~VCI<]-RA YMOND 07-04 040009 VO SHY0105 1/15/05 0.00 2.300.00 200377 CI< 1/26/05 š8ttIJ(Jc GAS COMPANY 07-04 040067 VO 12~92172009 1/20/05 0.00 229.50 Dele, Wednesc;oy, Febru",y 02, 200! East Valley Water Distrõd Page: 9 of 17 r,me: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt lIser I(ATHY Check Re~ister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Throu9h 08-04 As of: 2:7/05 Check Check Check Vendor 10 Period Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date VeiidorÑãme -, To Post C'osed Nbr Type NII",er Date Taken Paid 200377 CK 112<5/05 š8c(;ogc GAS COMPANY 07-04 040068 VO 12502172005 1120105 0.00 120.19 Check Total 349,69 200378 CK 1126105 Š8~~~'hND PROPERTIES 07-04 039770 VO 1550675-1 12/30104 0,00 26,52 200379 CI( 1126105 Š8~e~~TAMI REDPATH 07-04 040135 VO SOW012105 1126105 0.00 250.00 200380 CK 1126/05 Š:¡:~%4STREET BANK & TRUST 07-04 040136 VO STA0121 05 1126105 0.00 6.759.72 200381 CK 1/26/05 Š:¡:~~~6BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 07-04 040105 va 36-015294 1/25/05 0.00 167.00 200382 CK 1/26/05 šn~1iJ-Js ENTERPRISES. INC. 07-04 040031 VO 014cong-IN 11/9/04 0.00 27.22 200383 CI< 1/26105 Š:¡:~Rß'tJNG.YaCCA.CARLSON & 07-04 040103 VO 22407 #0014 1118105 0.00 216.00 200384 CK 1/26105 Š:¡H&IVAN-GARY 07-04 040003 va STU011305 1113105 0.00 35.64 200385 CK 1126/05 š~l:e~~MILLER CONTRACTING CO 07-04 039771 va 321222-0 12/30104 0.00 1,334.76 200386 CI< 1/26/05 :¡:8~08ÓDsaN & ASSOCIATES 07-04 040042 VO EV G70 4 1/12/05 0.00 1,464,50 200387 CI( 1/26/05 t~ßßfc SPECIALTIES 07-04 039969 VO 904138 1/13/05 0.00 1,610.86 200388 CK 1126/05 :¡:~~~WR-MARY 07-04 040137 VO TURO12105 1126105 0.00 225.00 200389 CK 1/26105 ~8~¡¡gÄYMENT CENTER #5450 07-04 039965 VO 108041185 12/31/04 0.00 791.36 200390 CK 1126/05 ~~I~gib PARCEL SERVICE 07-04 040004 VO 000G16XW88035 1115/05 0.00 16.00 20039'1 CI( 1/26:05 ~Š'IP8~ES 07-04 039920 va 2003'160.1 12/28/04 0.00 54,60 200392 CI< '1126105 ~:¡:leWv SUPPLY OF AMERICA 07-04 040099 va 906789 12/16104 1.65 163.13 Da'e: Wednes<::oy. February 02. 20m East Valley Water Djstr:-:t Page: 10 of 17 T;me: 02:53PM Report: 03630.'P1 User: KATHY Check Reqister - Standard c . dny: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of: 2/2/05 Check Check Check Vendor 10 Period Ref Doc Invo'ce Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Ñãiii.- To Post Closed Nbr Type Num"er Date Token Po'd 200393 CK 1/26/05 ~r~P2ðN 07-04 040082 VO 88,,::8040105 1110105 0.00 32.40 200394 CK 1/26/05 ~Ë~P2ðN 07-04 040081 VO 490009501421 1/9/05 0.00 30.50 200395 CK 1/26/05 ~~:¡:g~\DUCATON FOUNDATION 07-04 040005 VO WAT012005 1/20/05 0.00 1,950.00 200396 CK 1/26/05 ~~¡j£IhAN[TARY SUPPLY 07-04 040093 VO 67658484 1/19/05 0.00 329.03 200397 CK 1/26/05 ~JrR\EKEEVER 07-04 040039 VO 9276 1/1/05 0.00 322.94 200397 CK 1/26105 ~JrR.\EKEEVER 07-04 040043 VO 9273 1/1/05 0.00 1,220.96 Check Total 1,543.90 200398 CK 1/26/05 ì}'~ffi>8ËR 07-04 040095 VO 934-302828-9 1/13/05 0.00 461.60 200399 CK 1/26/05 ~W¡;JèDICAL SERVICE # 07-04 040096 VO 140763532 1/21/05 0.00 73.65 200399 CK 1/26/05 ~ËËoaËDICAL SERVICE # 07-04 040110 VO 140:63458 1/25/05 0.00 238.02 Check Total 311.67 200400 CK 1/28/05 ~1f'aß'sT OFFICE 07-04 040164 VO USP012805 1/28/05 0.00 5.000.00 200401 CK 2/2/05 ~BþOO2 08-04 040170 VO 404477 1/21/05 0.00 66.45 200402 CK 2/2/05 ~~Ë~f¿AN GENERAL CNGNEERING 08-04 039906 VO 32'1232-0.1 1/5/05 0.00 54.80 200403 CK 2/2/05 ~~~~~~ERESA 08-04 039809 VO 112~088-4 1/6/05 0.00 57.00 200404 CK 2/2/05 ~~~~~2COMMUN[CATION INC 08-04 040225 VO 9291322 1/21/05 0.00 2,368.34 200405 CK 2/2/05 ~~Š~~ATER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 08-Q4 040172 AD 010505.1 1/5/05 0.00 -2,400.00 200405 CK 2/2/05 ~~Š~~ATER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 08-04 040215 VO EV'N-010505 1/5/05 0.00 5,466.89 Check Total 3,068.89 200406 CK 2/2/05 ~Ë~~:.30HN R 08-04 040027 VO 42r061-2.1 1/7/05 0.00 5.28 D,le: Wednesday, February 02, 200! East Valley Water Distrjct Page: 11 of 17 T;me: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt Usee: KATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of: 212105 Check Check Check V,"<!9.rl!L . .-- -- ----- . --- Period Ref Doc Involce tnvolee Dlseount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Num'.er Date Taken Paid 200407 CI( 2/2105 ~t8ß~~A-GABINO S 08-04 040216 VO BEo,,205 2/2/05 0.00 50.00 200408 CK 2/2/05 ~8~ß~ OF WATER COMMISSIONERS 08-04 040213 VO BOAO105 2/1/05 0.00 6,058.00 200409 CK 2/2/05 ~~~ef~OFF-MICHAEL 08-04 039907 VO 310037-0.1 1/5/05 0.00 49.14 200410 CK 2/2/05 ~~8W~-MERLE D 08-04 039908 VO 830374-1.1 1/5/05 0.00 34.36 200411 CK 2/2/05 8t~~~1< HOMES 08-04 039718 VO 750151-0 10/6/05 0.00 5.67 200411 CK 2/2/05 a~~&1< HOMES 08-04 039719 VO 750151-0.1 1/6/05 0.00 40.00 200411 CI( 212/05 8~~~~1< HOMES 08-04 039909 VO 750140-0.1 1/6/05 0.00 40.00 200411 CK 2/2105 8~~~~1< HOMES 08-04 039910 VO 750141-0.1 1/6/05 0.00 40.00 200411 CK 2/2105 H~~~1< HOMES 08-04 039911 VO 7501~6-0.1 116/05 0.00 40.00 200411 CK 2/2/05 8t~~~1< HOMES 08-04 039912 VO 750148-0.1 1/6/05 0.00 40.00 200411 CK 2/2/05 8Ë~~&1< HOMES 08-04 039913 VO 750~!9-0.1 1/6/05 0.00 40.00 Check Total 245.67 200412 CK 2/2105 a¡:~°Z;F HIGHLAND 08-04 040173 VO CIT012505 1/25/05 0.00 50.00 ?OO413 CK 2/2/05 8I:Ißß~JRD L UTLEY 08-04 040240 VO 0082277 1/5/05 0.00 175.00 200414 CK 2/2/05 8~tg~1CHEVROLET 08-04 040194 VO FL7-/6150 1/27/05 0.00 43,669.54 200414 CK 2/2/05 8~tg~1CHEVROLET 08-04 040208 VO 531732 1/28/05 0.00 72.26 Check Total 43,741.80 200415 CI( 2/2/05 BI~¡¡'O~AFE & LOCK SERVICE 08-04 040165 VO 119558 1/28/05 0.00 2.63 200416 CI( 212/05 B~~ß~1..JOHN 08-04 040226 VO OR;;012605 1/26/05 0.00 192.54 200417 CI( 2/2105 tl~R~b-JAMES 08-04 039725 VO 340(;54-2 1m05 0.00 133.00 200418 CI( 2/2/05 ~~8P~ËERING RESOURCES OF 08-04 040231 VO 31545 1/25/05 0.00 6,278.75 Dale: Wednesday, ï ebruary 02. 200! East Valley Water Distri"t Page: 12 of 17 Tm,e: 02:53PM Report: 03630.!pt U,ec I<ATHY Check Reqister - Standard. Compeny: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of: 2/</05 - Check Check Che!:, V_en<Js:>rlD.--__.. --~ --.. Period Ref Doc Involoe Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken PaId 200419 CK 2/2/05 PSB!/PÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040154 VO AAó ¡ 783-0791 1/19/05 0.00 40.00 200419 CK 2/2/05 ~§;B~OÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040155 va AAó1811-0791 1/20/05 0.00 135.00 200419 CK 2/2/05 PSB!/PÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040199 VO AA52116-0791 1/25/05 0,00 150.00 200419 CK 2/2/05 f~B~iJl8COCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040200 VO AA52089-0791 1/24/05 0.00 20.00 200419 CK 2/2/05 ê§;B!/PÄ8COCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040201 VO AA52037-0791 1/24/05 0.00 40.00 2004'19 CI< 2/2/05 ê§;B!/PÄBCOCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040202 VO AA51970-0791 1/24/05 0.00 30.00 200419 CK 2/2/05 PSß~OÄ8COCK & SONS, INC 08-04 040203 VO AA51969-0791 1/24/05 0.00 270.00 200419 CK 2/2/05 ê§;B~iJlBCOCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040204 VO AAé2006-0791 1/24/05 0.00 135.00 200419 CK 2/2/05 ~§;8~OÄBCOCK & SONS, INC 08-04 040205 VO AA52192-0791 1/25/05 0.00 30.00 200419 CK 2/2105 ê]3!/PÄBCOCK & SONS, INC 08-04 040206 VO AA5Z179-0791 1/25/05 0.00 30.00 200419 CK 2/2105 ê§;B~iJl8COCK & SONS. INC 08-04 040207 VO AA52144-0791 1/25/05 0.00 135.00 Check Total 1,015.00 200420 CK 2/2/05 ê~Þ!WÖZA-JIMMY 08-04 039814 VO 1140020-3 1n/05 0.00 27.64 200421 CK 2/2/05 ~~~~O~R BROS COFFEE 08-04 040146 VO 2894426 1/26/05 0.00 104.19 200421 CK 2/2/05 ~~~Ra1R BROS COFFEE 08-04 040147 VO 2834429 1/26/05 0.00 158,72 Check Total 262.91 200422 CK 2/2105 ~~~~Ä1JI-ABDOLLAH 08-04 039815 VO 1221011-4 1n/05 0.00 8.17 200422 CK 2/2105 ~~~~11J-A8DOLLAH 08-04 040079 VO 1221011-4.1 1m05 0.00 8.17 200422 CK 2/2/05 ~~~~l1JI-ABDOLLAH 08-04 040198 AD 1221011-4.1 1m05 0.00 -8.17 Check Total 8.17 200423 CK 2/2/05 Þê~BqysON ENTERPRISES INC 08-04 040193 VO 5:30537 1/26/05 0.00 1.111.71 200423 CK 2/2105 ~ê~BqysON ENTERPRISES INC 08-04 040212 AD 530537.1 1/27/05 0.00 -0.14 Check Total 1,111.57 200424 CI< 2/2/05 m~~9-H STREET ROCK CRUSHER 08-04 040148 VO 222439 1/13/05 0.00 1,130.85 200424 CI< 2/2105 m~~9-H STREET ROCK CRUSHER 08-04 040149 VO 222506 1/24/05 0.00 368.05 200424 CI< 2/2/05 m~~9-H STREET ROCK CRUSHER 08-04 040150 VO 222523 1/19/05 0.00 732.64 200424 CI< 2/2/05 ~8~~9-H STREET ROCK CRUSHER 08-04 040209 VO 222:30 1/27/05 0.00 368.48 Check Total 2,600.02 Dale: Wednesd.1Y, I'obruary 02. 200! East Valley Water Djstr:'.:t Page: 13 of 17 Time: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt User: KATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08.tJ4As of: 2;7"'05 Check Check Check Ven<!<1! 111.___. - ---... ..-- Period Ref Doc Invo:e" 'nvolce Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Numoer Date Taken Paid 200425 CK 2/2/05 8~~~9ËL EQUIPMENT CO 08-04 040195 VO 62914 1/27/05 0.00 1.514.36 200426 CK 2/2/05 8~~ß~ER CONSTRUCTION 08-04 039733 VO 370030-D 1/6105 0.00 36.33 200426 CK 2/2/05 8~~ß~Jh CONSTRUCTION 08-04 039734 VO 370ü65-0 1/6/05 0.00 121.66 200426 CK 212/05 8~~ß~ER CONSTRUCTION 08-04 039735 VO 370078-0 1/7/05 0.00 35.00 200426 CK 2/2/05 8~~B~ER CONSTRUCTION 08-04 039736 VO 370078-0 1/7/05 0.00 33.67 200426 CK 2/2105 8~~ß~ER CONSTRUCTION 08-04 039737 va 370779-0 1/7/05 0.00 33.67 200426 CK 2/2/05 8~~B~ER CONSTRUCTION 08-04 039738 VO 370081-0 1/7/05 0.00 33.67 CheCk Total 294.00 200427 CK 2/2105 8~ß~'};-KEVIN R 08-04 039816 VO 370100-1 1/7/05 0.00 21.86 200428 CK 212/05 881~~1JANITORIAL SERVICE 08-04 040156 VO 1502 1120/05 0.00 2,135.00 200429 CK 2/2/05 ~~§~9~-CORDEL1A 08-04 039754 VO 810009-3 12128/04 0.00 17.92 200430 CK 2/2105 wle COVEY. INC 08-04 040232 VO 305C23-01 12128/04 0.00 3,980.00 200431 CK 2/2105 ~I~~~%v & ASSOCIATES INC- 08-04 039817 VO 321192-1 1/7/05 0.00 1,423.12 200432 CK 2/2105 ~I'W..N SAFETY 08-04 040196 VO 44235 1/19/05 0.00 215.50 200433 CK 2/2105 ~~~08¿NSTRUCTI0N SPECIALTIES 08-04 040158 VO P11009249 1/20/05 0.00 190.18 200433 CK 212/05 ~~~08¿NSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES 08-04 040166 VO P11011494 1/24/05 0.00 69.98 Check Total 260.16 200434 CI< 2/2/05 ~~B~tt1-SCAPE PROD. INC. 08-04 040188 VO 374C21-00 1/27/05 9.37 459.20 200434 CK 212/05 ~~BW8-SCAPE PROD. INC. 08-04 040189 VO 37~':557-00 1/24/05 3.61 176.98 Check Total 636.18 200435 CK 212/05 l~tRl/Jb WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 08-04 040151 VO 148,54 1/19/05 14.22 696.93 200435 CI< 2/2/05 ~tR¡¡jb WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 08-04 040210 VO 148569 1/28/05 24.96 1.223.22 200435 CK 2/2/05 1~[R¡¡jb WATER WORKS SUPPLY CO 08-04 040211 VO 1485°3 1/28/05 1.51 73.92 Check Total 1,994.07 Dato' Wednesc'oy. Fet)fuary 02. 200! East Valley Water üistrict Page: 14 of 17 nme: 02:53PM Report, 03630.'p1 Use" I<ATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Throu9h 08-04 As of: 2:2/05 Checl< Chect< Check Ve~!!",m__u-- --- pertod Ref Doc Invoice Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Nuo,,¡'er Date Taken Paid 200436 CK 2/2105 J8~ßi2CLEANERS 08-04 040167 VO 1362'34 1/27/05 0.00 4.95 200436 CK 2/2/05 J8~ß9lCLEANERS 08-04 040184 VO 1364~1 1/29/05 0.00 3.96 200436 CK 2/2/05 J8~ß9lCLEANERS 08-04 040185 VO 136225 1/26/05 0.00 4.99 Check Total 13.90 200437 CK 2/2/05 J'}fSttlEEMAN CO.. INC 08-04 040162 VO 280505-0 1/26/05 0.00 1,727.22 200437 CK 2/2/05 J'}f,IJP~EEMAN CO., INC 08-04 040233 VO 389éa5-2 1/31/05 0.00 27.37 200437 CK 2/2/05 J'}f,<Jf\1.EEMAN CO.. INC 08-04 040234 VO 289505-1 1/28/05 0.00 14.34 Check Total 1,768.93 200438 CK 2/2/05 ~:¡:~O~NDSCAPING 08-04 040174 VO 46~ 1/27/05 0.00 8,350.00 200438 CK 2/2105 ~N~O~NDSCAPING 08-04 040235 va .1',9 1/27/05 0.00 225.00 Check To1al 8,575.00 200439 CK 2/2/05 ~~~ß'ktLY-JOHN J 08-04 039931 VO 742473-2.1 1/5/05 0.00 84.54 200440 CK 2/2/05 ~Ä~ß~~ A. KESSLER & ASSOCIATES 08-04 040217 VO 21Cù18 212/05 0.00 26,498.00 200441 CK 2/2105 l1~g£rN PRODUCTS,INC 08-04 040152 VO 2eó1376 1/19/05 1.86 184.19 200442 CK 2/2/05 ~NP¿A CORP 08-04 040159 VO 98425 1/13/05 0.00 960.25 200443 CK 2/2/05 ~8'}.,%1ÖREWS & BOYD 08-04 040190 VO 12403 1/24/05 0.00 5,240.00 200444 CK 2/2/05 ~R~~EZ-SANDRA A 08-04 039821 VO 92~~39-5 mlO5 0.00 1.76 200445 CK 2/2/05 ~H~9iÞOLlTAN LIFE INS CO 08-04 040218 VO MET0205 2/1/05 0.00 431.06 200446 CK 2/2/05 ~H~~CALL 08-04 040157 VO 23 a7497 211/05 0.00 138.16 200447 CK 2/2/05 ~1l:ß'tIEDZKI-JACEK 08-04 040175 VO MIL012505 1/25/05 0.00 1,440.00 200448 CK 2/2/05 ~8~th-sOFIA 08-04 039822 VO 810:53-4 1/6/05 0.00 41.94 Dale: Wedn,," :,lY. éelJ.uary 02. 200! East Valley Water District Page: 15 of 17 Time, 02:53PM Report: 03630,rpt User: KATHY Check Reqister - StandarC! Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08-04 As of: 212105 Check Check Check y..o.dor!D___. ._---- PerIod Ref Doc Invc!ce Invoice Discount Amo""' Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid 200449 CI< 2/2/05 ~~~~~L COMMUNICATIONS 08-04 040186 VO 4:2'0"42026-033 1/31/05 0.00 1.458.90 200450 CK 2/2/05 ~lj3~~ #259-SABRAJ 08-04 039823 VO 420083-6 1/6/05 0.00 2.077.75 200451 CI< 2/2/05 Þ~BIf&.-RAYMOND 08-04 039824 VO 135~O59-7 1/6105 0.00 51.18 200452 CK 2/2105 Þ~m~SON-ROY 08-04 040219 VO PAT0205 212105 0.00 350.00 200453 CK 2/2/05 þ¡¡~~<J"tL COMPANY 08-04 040236 VO 52523 1126/05 0.00 3.232.00 200454 CK 2/2105 þ~O&. 08-04 040220 VO PERC205 212105 0.00 33.396.85 200455 CK 2/2/05 þ~~~'2.'I-10ANG T 08-04 039825 VO 8302J8-4 1/7/05 0.00 39.95 200456 CK 2/2/05 þ~~~O_~HAJ Q 08-04 039826 VO 370036-1 1m05 0.00 28.23 200457 CK 2/2/05 Þlf~~\ BOWES 08-04 040227 VO 321~26 1/14/05 0.00 143.32 200457 CJ( 2/2105 Þ¡:Fß~\ BOWES 08-04 040228 VO 796366 1/14/05 0.00 317.47 200457 CK 2/2/05 ÞI:¡:ß~\ BOWES 08-04 040229 VO 4072ô8' 1/16105 0.00 203.65 Check Total 664.44 200458 CK 2/2/05 Þ8~ROðISTRI6UTING CO 08-04 040138 VO 462196 1/24/05 0.00 324.59 200459 CK 2/2/05 ~~~08Aoup 08-04 040177 VO 011005 1131/05 0.00 1.145.75 200460 CI< 2/2/05 ~88ß~\ PAVING 08-04 040178 VO 1101-4A 1/21/05 0.00 3.491.46 200461 CK 2/2/05 Š~~~~lõR-CARMEN L 08-04 039828 VO 830237-3 1m05 0.00 43.79 200462 CK 2/2/05 Š~~'W~RNARDINO-CITY OF 08-04 039692 VO SAN1204 1/11/05 0.00 424.790.98 200463 CK 2/2/05 š~~OJtRNARD1NO COUNTY ASSESSOR08-Q4 040176 VO 100432 1118/05 0.00 60.00 Daleo Wedne"..lay, Fou,uary 02, 200! East Valley Water District Page: 16 of 17 Time. 02.53PM Reporl: 03630.rpt Usee: KATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company: EVWD Periods: 07-04 Throu9h 08.04 As of: 2/2105 Check Check Checl, Ve)ldor 10.- '-.- '____H'_- Period Ref Doc 'nvolce Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor!<ame To Post Ctosed Nbr Type Nu",ber Dale Taken Paid 200464 CK 2/2/05 §~8001 08-04 040179 VO 4252H2 1/14/05 0.00 32.10 200464 CK 2/2/05 §~8001 08-04 040187 VO 4250623 1/14/05 0,00 83,87 Check Total 115,97 200465 CI( 2/2/05 §Ë~~~\ON-RON 08-04 040221 VO SEVC205 212105 0,00 239.35 200466 CK 2/2/05 ŠË~~~:¡" TRENT SERVICES 08-04 040160 VO 1109710 12130/04 0.00 637,00 200467 CI( 2/2/05 šl~~BNS-LiZ 08-04 039829 VO 40229-6 1/6/05 0,00 39.96 200468 CK 2/2/05 š8ce>2i! PUMP & WELL SERVICE 08-04 040161 VO 37105 1/19/05 0.00 411,21 200468 CK 2/2/05 š8ce>2i! PUMP & WELL SERVICE 08-04 040180 VO 37132 1/25/05 0,00 47,746.80 200468 CK 2/2/05 š8ce>2è PUMP & WELL SERVICE 08-04 040238 VO 371% 1/19/05 0.00 698.35 200468 CK 2/2105 š89::o.á'i! PUMP & WELL SERVICE 08.04 040239 VO 37104 1/19/05 0.00 1,592.61 Check Total 50,448,97 200469 CK 2/2/05 §8ce>2tEDISON COMPANY 08-04 040230 VO 22512228570105 1/29/05 0,00 2,106.80 200470 CK 2/2/05 Š8~~~5COAST A,Q.M.D. 08-04 040181 VO 1653828 1/18/05 0.00 77.25 200470 CK 2/2/05 §8~~~5COAST A,Q.MD. 08-04 040182 VO 1652933 1/18/05 0,00 207,82 Check Total 285,07 200471 CI( 2/2/05 g:¡:~~~30F CALIFORNIA 08-04 040153 VO STA012105 1/26/05 0,00 20,164,80 200472 CI< 2/2/05 §t~~~ARD REGISTER 08-04 040237 VO 5055971 1/6/05 0.00 372.55 200473 CK 2/2/05 WllÀ9J~ INTERNATIONAL 08-04 040169 VO 2154998 1/24/05 0.00 21.50 200474 CI( 2/2105 ~~I~~b PARCEL SERVICE 08-04 040183 VO 000016XW88045 1/22105 0.00 20.89 200475 CK 2/2/05 ~~IßìJ BANK OF CALIFORNIA 08-04 040222 VO UNIOl05 212105 0.00 87,402.41 200475 CK 2/2105 ~~IßìJ BANK OF CALIFORNIA 08-04 040223 VO UN10205,1 2/2/05 0.00 73,563.75 Check Total 160,966,16 200476 CK 2/2/05 ~Ë~!P¿N 08-04 040145 VO 888[8050205 1/13/05 0,00 151,91 Date: Wednes"oy, February 02, 200t East Valley Water Djstrirt Page: 17 of 17 Time: 02:53PM Report: 03630.rpt User: I<ATHY Check Reqister - Standard Company. EVWD Periods: 07-04 Through 08.04 As of: 212105 Check Check Check \I~mfor Ip "'--'-----" . - Period Ref Doc Invoire Invoice Discount Amount Nbr Type Date Vendor Name To Post Closed Nbr Type Number Date Taken Paid 200477 CK 212/05 ~~ŠnN~N TECH SERVICE 08-04 040168 va 3431 1/22105 0.00 641.60 200478 CK 2/2/05 ~~19~BEAD-ROGER 08-04 040224 VO WHI0205 212105 0.00 295,72 200479 CK 2/2/05 ~/~~'fR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 08-04 040197 VO 50001190 1/24/05 0.00 284.49 200480 CI< 2/2/05 ~88ß1~ONSTRUCTlaN 08-04 039830 VO 321234-0 1/7105 0.00 1,331.02 200481 CK 2/2/05 ~~gWANO-JOSE L 08-04 039833 va 1130277-5 1/6/05 0.00 57.96 Check Count: 183 Acct Sub Total: 935,043.08 Check Type Regular Hand Void Stub Zero Mask Totat: Count Amount Pa'd -~-- 183 935.043.08 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 183 935,043.08 Company Disc Tota' 243.97 Company Total 935,043.08 AGREEMENT TO INCREASE ASSESSMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of ,2005, by and between EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a public agency ("District"), and , the owner of real property within District's jurisdictional boundaries ("Owner"). RECITALS A. District is formed and organized pursuant to the County Water District Law, Water Code Section 30000 et seq. B. Owner's holds title to property located at City of Highland, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and more particularly described as ("the Property"). C. The Property is located within the service area of the Arroyo Verde Mutual Water Company, is a private corporation organized and operating as a mutual water company that provides water service to its shareholders ("Company"). D. Company's water system consists of a well, booster pump, and various types of piping that are inoperable andlor not in compliance with the legal standards enforced by the State of California Department of Health Services ("the Water System"). As a result, Company's shareholders are currently receiving domestic water service by virtue of two (2) emergency connections to District's water distribution system. E. In or about 1999, Company's shareholders formally requested that District permanently assume the operation and control of the Water System and that the properties served thereby become part of District's official service area. District agreed to consider said proposal if outside funding can be obtained to repair and replace the Water System and a majority of the shareholders of Company consent to the financing mechanism deemed appropriate by District to repay the costs thereof. F. On December 11,2000, District's Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 2000.26 which authorized the submission of an application for construction monies from the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund ("the Fund") for the purpose of securing revenue to be used for the construction offacilities necessary to bring the Water System into a condition deemed appropriate by District to assume the operation and control thereof ("the Project"). G. In or about January of 2002, District and Company entered into a Notice of Application Acceptance issued by the State of Califomia Department of Water Resources on or 1 about December 19, 2001, for Project No. 3610064-01, wherein the Fund would provide a construction loan in the amount of$136,034.00 ("the Loan") and a construction grant in the amount of$544, 136.00 ("the Grant"), for a total contribution by the Fund of$680, 170.00 to be applied to the cost of the Project, the total price of which is currently estimated to be the sum of $810,170.00. H. On June 11,2002, District's Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 2002.25 which authorized the initiation of proceedings to form the Arroyo Verde Assessment District ("A V AD") in accordance with California law to repay the Loan and reimburse District for the portion of the Project costs not covered by the Fund. I. On November 26, 2002, District's Board of Directors adopted a Negative Declaration for the proposed Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.). J. On or about May 20, 2003, District caused a Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing and Official Ballots ("Ballots") to be delivered to the records owner(s) of each parcel within the A V AD as determined from the last eqltalized property tax roll as set forth in the Water System Improvement Project report prepared by W.J. McKeever, Inc., anå WilliaI1l J. McKeever, a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California ("the McKeever Report"). K. The McKeever Report also sets forth the amount of each assessment to be levied on the properties within the A V AD. At the time the S1cKeever Report was being prepared, Owner (or Owner's predecessor) was given the option of making private arrangements for the connection of the Property to the Project (and paying for the costs thereof) or choosing to have the District make the connection of the Property to the Project (and having the costs thereof incorporated into the amount of the Property's AVAD assessment). Owner (or Owner's predecessor) chose to make private arrangements for the connection of the Property to the Project, so the costs thereof were not included in the amount of the assessment to be levied on the Property under the McKeever Report. L On June 10,2003, District's Board of Directors conducted a public meeting on the proposed AVAD. M. On July 8, 2003, District's Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the proposed A V AD and heard all public testimony offered in connection therewith and accepted all Ballots returned to District until the close of the public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, District's Board of Directors found that a majority protest to the Project did not exist and thus adopted Resolution No. 2003.30 approving the McKeever Report and the formation ofthe A V AD. N. Owner now requests that the District make the service connection from the Property to the Project and have the costs thereof included in the amount of the A V AD assessment levied on the Property. 2 COVENANTS IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS, AGREEMENTS, REPRESENTATIONS, AND WARRANTIES CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. District shall perform such services as prudent in the exercise of its sole discretion to connect the Property to the Project so as to enable the District to provide water service from the Project to the Property. District shall not be responsible for any subsequent maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of said service connection. 2. Owner hereby agrees to the following: (a) Owner consents to an increase of the annual assessment to be levied on the Property pursuant to the A V AD such that the annual amount of such assessment shall be $ (b) Owner waives and reI inquishes any right to challenge the formation of the A V AD or the aluount of any assessmel11 levied on the Properly pursuant to the A VAD; (c) Owner shall comply with the terms and conditions of all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and policies that have been or may hereafter be adopted by District; and (d) Owner shall duly execute, acknowledge, and deliver the District's Water/Sewer Service Order for the Property and any further deeds, assignments, conveyances, and other assurances, documents, and instruments of transfer reasonably requested by District, and will take any other action consistent with the terms of this Agreement that may reasonably be requested by District for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this Agreement. 3. Owner hereby releases the District from any liability as follows: (a) Owner, on behalf of himself and his descendants, ancestors, dependents, heirs, executors, administrators, agents, servants, employees, representatives, assigns, and successors ("Releasors"), hereby fully releases aI1d discharges District and its officers, directors, administrators, assigns, agents, servants, stockholders, employees, representatives, and successors ("the Released Parties") from all claims, demands, damages, debts, liabilities, obligations, contracts, agreements, causes of action, suits, and costs of whatever nature, character, or description, whether known or unknown, anticipated or unanticipated, which Owner and Releasors now have or may hereafter have or claim to have against District and the Released Parties arising out of or related to the Project, the A V AD, the levy of any assessments on the Property, District's connection of service from the Project to the Property, District's provision of services to the Propeliy, District's termination of services to the Property, and/or any other acts or omissions performed by District under this Agreement. (1) This Release, notwithstanding Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which 3 provides that "a general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor," shall act as a full release by Owner and Releasors of any and all claims that may arise against District and/or the Released Parties regarding the above whether such claims are currently known, unknown, foreseen, or unforeseen. Owner understands and acknowledges the significance and consequence of such specific waiver of Section 1542, and hereby assumes full responsibility for any resulting liabilities. 4. The parties hereto agree as follows: (a) This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter contained herein, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations, and understandings of the parties. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by all of the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. (b) This Agreement may be executed simultaneously or in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. ( c) This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns, and any subsequent owners of the Property. (d) If any legal action or any arbitration or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default, or misrepresentation in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it or they may be entitled. (e) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by laws of the State of California. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed on the day and year rust above written. OWNER By: Name EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT By: Robert E. Martin, General Manager 5 .!t° East Valley Water Dl Attention: Robert MartI K. Walton Enterprises, Inc. LAW PLUMBING CO. 32312 Dunláp Blvd. Yucaipa, California 92399-1725 81. Lie. # 797763 (909) 446.8809 FAX (909) 446-8812 February 3, 2005 Perchlorate Treatment Project Sterling Avenue Pipeline Rental & Labor Rates Excavator CAT 322L w/Compaction Wheel operated and maintained, fueled, greased & serviced daily Excavator CAT 322-325 operated and maintained, fueled, greased & serviced daily Loader CAT 950E 3\1, Yard operated and maintained, fueled, greased & serviced daily Backhoe FORD 655E w/Compaction Wheel operated apd maintait .d, fueled, greas~d & serviced :1aily JD 450 Dozer w/Slope Boards operated and maintained, fueled, greased & serviced daily Harnm 56" Wide Sheepfoot Roller for compaction operated and maintained, fueled, greased & serviced daily CAT 248 Skidsteer w/Bucket and Sweeper operated and maintained, fueled, greased & serviced daily 1 Three Man Crew w/Truck and all related pipeline tools includes flow liners, builder levels, etc. Grizzly Rock and Sand Screener Monthly Rental Trench Shields Weekly Rental @ @ @ $ 176.00 Hr $ 176.00 Hr $ 120.00 Hr @ $ 90.00 IIr 4'High x 24'Long 6'High x 24'Long 8'High x 24'Long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 120.00 Hr $ 105.00 Hr $ 95.00 Hr $ 195.00 Hr $ 900.00 Mo $ 325.00 Wk $ 500.00 Wk $ 650.00 Wk Normal working day for installation of pipeline would be limited to the use 00 machines at one time plus 1 Three Man crew. 2 - Excavators 1 - Loader 1 - Three Man Crew 8 Hrs per excavator $ 2,816.00 8 Hrs 960.00 8 Hrs 1.560.00 8 Hr Day Total $ 5,336.00 Average estimated installation 100 to 150 feet per day. Some days possibly 200 feet. Not including crossing intersection and tie-ins. Example: 100 LF per day approximately $ 55.00 per LF 150 LF per day approximately $ 36.00 per LF 200 LF per day approximately $ 27.00 per LF At other times during construction other pieces of <:quipment could be used for compaction, clean up, etc. Because of our working relationship with East Valley Water District, Law Plumbing would not be charging the district unless the equipncent in being used. $176.00 per hour @ $120.00 per hour @ $195.00 per hour@ Thap!yyou, ~~cd~ K~nneth M. Walton, President East Valley Water District Memorandum "'""»,""'~ To: Bob Martin, General Manager; Paul Dolter, District Engineer From: Andy Quach, Associate Civil Engineer ;4J2 2/1 ((;IS Date: 2/1/2005 Re: Proposed Rehabilitation of Tanks at Plant 39 As part of the District's annual reservoir maintenance program, staff had contracted with Harper and Associates Engineering, Inc. to perform a condition and corrosion evaluation of the two water storage tanks at Plant 39. The associated report was reœllily COLlpkted in Jan¡;ary 2005. D~¡e to the condition of the interior coating as shown in the report, rehabilitation of the 1.4 MG water tank should be of high priority. This work will require the tank to be removed from service during rehabilitation, therefore this work needs to be started and completed during the winter months when demand on the tanks are low. The'report recommends the 0.9 MG tank, referred to as tank 39A, exteriGr be repainted to repair random rust spots and overcome the chalking and fading appearance. The report recommends the 1.4 MG tank, referred to as tank 39B, exterior be repainted to repair random rust spots and overcome the chalking and fading appearance. Although the exterior coatings are in fair to good condition, it is anticipated the coating will degrade increasingly faster with time. It is more cost effective to do all this work at one time, instead of waiting a few more years to do the exterior coating. The coal tar coating on the interior shell and roof of tank 39B has exceeded its life expectancy of 20 years and exhibits large areas of cracking and de-lamination with excessive corrosion. The interior roof and shell of tank 39B is recommended to be abrasive blast cleaned with an epoxy coating applied to the roof and shell afterwards. The tank 39B bottom is recommended to be completely abrasive blast cleaned with an epoxy coating applied afterwards. The report also recommends various items of structural work to conform to safety and health codes. Overall cost of the tank rehabilitations will be approximately $185,000 to $215,000. Please see the attached cost estimate for details. Further delay could result in increased repair and maintenance cost, along with inconvenience to our customers, should a structural tank failure due to corrosion be experienced. It is recommended that the District request multiple bids from qualified responsible prescreened contractors for this rehabilitation work. East Valley Water District Plant 39, Tank Rehabiiitations Estimated Cost Tank 39A Item Description Low HiQh EXTERIOR, Brush off blast cleanin9, 1 spot abrasive cleanin9, Prime, $ 27,646.00 $ 33,175.00 Epoxy/Urethane paint, Nonhazardous Materials/Waste Project Subtotal at 39A = $ 27,646.00 $ 33,175.00 Tank 39B Item Descriotion Low Hioh I EXTERI OR , Brush off blast cleaning, 1 spot abrasive cleaning, Prime, $ 40,840.00 $ 49,008.00 Epoxy/Urethane paint, Hazudous MaterlalslWaste Pro'ect INTERIOR ROOF. STRUCTURAL 2 MEMBERS. AND SHELL. Abrasive $ 73,219.00 $ 85,422.00 Blast Cleaning and apply 15 mils epoxy coating. '----- INTËH/OR BO1TOM , Abrasive Blast 3b Cleaning of complete interior bottom $ 25,848.00 $ 29,732.00 surface, 20 mils of epoxy coating Subtotal at 39B = $ 139,907.00 $ 164,162.00 Additional Structural Safety Items I 39A Secondary Roof Hatch $ 3,200.00 39A New Exterior ladder $ 3,200.00 39A Install Air Break in Overflow $ To be done by EVWD 39B Modify existing handraii and install self $ 5,000.00 closing gate 39B Install exterior ladder and interior $ 6,400.00 fiberglass ladder 39B Install Air Break in Overflow $ To be done by EVWD Subtotal Safety Items = $ 17,800.00 Low I High I Total without structural safety items = $ 167,553.00 $197,337.00 Low High Total wjth structural safety items = $ 185,353.00 $215,137.00 Estimated Cost Provided By: Harper: Associates Engineering, Inc. Rev. 1/31/05, AO Jan. 2005 -----~ HARPER & ASSOCIATES ENC2~EERING, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEE.ì."ZS 1240 E. Ontario Ave., Ste. 102-312 Coro¡w l-'A 92881-8671 Phone (951) 372-9196 Fax (95,) .172-9198 "'.. - "".."..".... .." .."" ".. .. ." ~~- ~-~-~c~~~~~-~~~-~-----~- ,_-'-. .. - - ...:"~---~._-,..----_.~............. --~~ ENGINEER'S REPORT CORROSION ENGINEERING EV AL'JA TION OF TWO WELDED STEEL WATER TANI~S AT PLANT 39 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFOR::'iIA JANUARY 2005 PREPARED FOR: East Valley Water District Mr. Ron Buchwald 1155 Del Rosa San Bernardino, CA 92413 ----- CONTENTS 1. Plant 39 A Corrosion Re[Jort 2. Plant 39 B Corrosion RctJort 3. Lab Report HARPER & ASSOCIATES EN~rNEERING, INC. CONSULTING ENGNÆRS 1240 E. Ontario Ave., Ste. 102-312 Cor,mo. CA 92881-8671 Phone (951) 372-9196 Fax (9:Jj) 372-9198 "'on ;;1;.' .. "".." "..".. .. ......"'" .. .. --,-"--.....,,~;"'-_......~~~,-,,-,--,--..~._-'-~"""--~~ ".. " """, _...._--~~::,.;...,",,-":"::~.. PROJECT: STRUCTURE: OWNER: LOCATION: CORROSION REPORT Corrosion and Condition Evaluation of Two Water Storage Tanks 900,000 Gallon Welded Steel Water Stc,rage Tank (Plant 39 A) East Valley Water District San Bernardino, California INVESTIGATED BY: DATE: Andre Harper January 2005 L GENERAL INFORMATION A. B. C. Construction and Maintenance Details Structure is a welded steel water storage tank located in San Bernardino, California and is designated as the Plant 39 A Tank. The tank is 24 ft. high and 80 ft. in diameter with a cone roof supported by a center column. Access to the roof is via and exterior caged ladder and a safety climb device is installed on the ladder, Site Conditions The tank is on an unpaved site enclosed by a chain link f~nce, There is adequate space for large equipment around the tank, assuming use of nonnal portable air compressor and related equipment. There are homes that would be adversely affected by dust and contamination associated with abrasive blast cleaning and painting operations, Residential streets arc near the site, Accordingly, extreme caution must be exercised duri~gail cleaning and painting operations. Existing Paint System Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District 1. This tank was recoated in 1994 and the specili')f ~ns indicated the paint system to be the following: a. Exterior Surfaces - An alkyd paint sTlcm. D. Title 22 Heavy Metal Analyses Samples of exterior paints were removed for analyses for presence of heavy metals, specifically lead, chromium compounds and zinc. Iwalysis was accomplished by an approved Department of Health Services laboratory. E. Contract Information Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. was retained 0:: the District to accomplish field investigation ofthe tank to observe exterior surfaces ar,,\ conditions with photographs taken to record conditions. This report has been prepared witL rer,¡edial repair/recoating/repainting recommendations and cost estimates. This corrosion report is prepared solely on the baÚ of noted field investigation. Conclusions and recommendations are strictly tho~e (1etermined by Consultant to be consistent with the best and most experienced pract:cc within the corrosion engineering profession. II. INVESTIGATION: A. Investigation was accomplished as follows: 1. Exterior Surfaces a. Investigation of roofsurfaces and app'h~"nanCes on roof was accomplished by traversing the roof. b. Investigation of the lower shell course and accessible appurtenances was accomplished by traversing perimeter oftank from ground level, examining areas ",ithIn reach. c. Investigation of shell and appurtcnances above lower course was accomplished by climbing ladder, and by traversing perimeter oftank from ground level, observing and noting appèarance of inaccessible areas. d. Various chipping tools were employd tJ examine typical areas ofdefective coating and corrosion within reach. e. Photographs were taken of typical and "pccific areas to illustrate condition of surfaces. III. OBSERVATIONS A. Based upon the above reported investigation, the folío\/;ng observations were noted: Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-fileslCorrosionlEast Valley PInt. 39 A carr. -2- 1. Exterior Surfaces a. b. . 2. Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District Roof and Appurtenances 1) Overall the paint system is in fair condition with moderate oxidation and fading of the pa.jl1t system present. (Photos E-2 through E-15) 2) Moderate to severe corrosion is present on the center vent structure, cover and screening. (Photos E-3 through E-6) 3) The roof exhibits random mecha~ ical damage with exposed primer and random corrosion present. (?hotos E-7 through E-II) 4) An adhesion test (ASTM D3359 option A) was performed randomly on the roof. (Photo E-12) 5) Moderate corrosion is present on the hatch curb and irregular surfaces of the LLI piping. (fhotos E-13 through E-15) Shell, Ladder and Appurtenances I) Overall the paint system is in fai,- to good condition with moderate oxidation and fading of paint. (Photos E-I, E-17 through E-34) 2) Random painting patchwork is present on the shell. (Photos E-I, E. 16, E-17, E-18,E-24, E-28, E-29 and E-33) 3) Corrosion is present on the LLI gauge board target. (Photos E-17 and E-28) 4) Random spots of corrosion ace present on the shell. (Photo E-21) 5) Minor corrosion is present on the upper flange and lower piping of the stilling well, inlet/outlet compression flange, overflow flanges and steel grade band. (Photo::. E-22 and E-31 through E-33) 6) Minor corIosion is present along a horizontal weld. (Photo E-25) 7) Adhesion tests (ASTM D3359 option A) were performed randomly on the shell. (Photos E-26 and £-27) 8) An asphalt covering is present over the bottom plate extension (BPE). (Photo E-34) Safety, Health and Code Features a. A single roof hatch does not comply with the current A WW A Dl 00 Standard. Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-fileslCorrosionlEast Valley PInt. 39 A corr. -3- b. c. d. e. IV. CONCLUSIONS: A. Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District Exterior ladders do not meet OSHA regulation. Corrosion is present on the center ve¡,1 sòreening. There is no gap or àir break present in the overflow. No observations were formulated as ll1 the tank meeting current seismic codes. Based on the above noted observations, the following .:onclusions are drawn: 1. Exterior Surfaces a. b. Roof and Appurtenances 1) The overall condition of the paint system must be rated as fair to good. 2) Moderate oxidation (chalking) and fading offinish is normal for an alkyd paint system ofthis age. 3) Corrosion on the center vent cover and structure is typically the result of poor application techniques, as these irregular surfaces require brush application of th,; paint. Also the moist warm air passing through the vent cau:.cs a more corrosive condition. 4) The random mechanical dam:>ge on the roof is the result of personnel working on the roof or vandals throwing missiles on to the roof. Overtime corrosioa L.velops in the damaged areas. 5) Adhesion testing was performed by method ASTM D3359 Option A, illustrating marginal adheòiun of the paint. 6) Corrosion on the hatch curl; and LLI piping is the result of poor application techniques, as the configuration of theses surfaces requires brushing on the paint. Shell, Ladder and Appurtenances J) Conclusions and comments noted above for roof surfaces generally apply to these surfaces. 2) Corrosion present on the ladder, vandal guard, overflow, inlet/outlet, and manhole is the result of poor application techniques as the painters "fLen do not brush these irregular surfaces. 3) Painting patchwork on the ëh.:l1 may be the result of the District Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-fileslCorrosionlEast Valley Pint. 39 A corr. -4- Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District covering up graffiti. 4) Corrosion present on the LL' '.,:¡:;et is due to the surface never being coated. 5) Random spots of corrosion on t~, shell are the result of personnel working around the tank or vanc!ds throwing missiles at the tank. Overtime corrosion develops in l;,e damaged areas. 6) Corrosion present on the stillio1f, well, overflow, inlet/outlet, steel grade band and horizontal wr.id is typical as the painters often do not spend the extra time ne~cssary to ensure these surfaces are totally and correctly painted by brushing between coats. 7) Adhesion testing was perforn,ed ~y method ASTM D3359 Option A, illustrating fair to poor adhcsion of the topcoat. 8) The asphalt covering holds moisture on the surface longer which tends to accelerates the corros ;0;1 process on the BPE. 2. Safety, Health and Code Features a. b. c. d. A single roof hatch is not in complian.;e with A WW A 0100 Standard. Exterior ladder is undersized for curr~n~ OSHA regulations. Rusting, fouled or torn screening 011 vents is a violation of health and sanitation regulations. The lack of an air break in the overDOW pipe is a violation of health and sanitation regulations. v. LABORATORY TESTING OF COATING AND PAINT At the request of the District, samples of the paint v','re removed, by Consultant, from exterior and interior surfaces. Samples were forwarded to testing laboratory for analyses. Reports were prepared on basis oflead, chromium and zinc concentrations. The test results are as follows: A. Exterior roof - Lead at 826 PPM is below H:e maximum allowable concentration of 1,000 PPM. Zinc at 2,935PPM is below the maximum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. No chromium compounds w :re detected. 1. Exterior shell. Lead at 82.6 PPM is below (,.~ maximum allowable concentration of 1,000 PPM. Zinc at 2,616 PPM is below t~e :naximum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. No chromium compounds were detected. 2. B. The levels of lead, chromium compounds and zinc nn all exterior surfaces are below the allowable concentrations or were not detected, thereîore removal operations on the exterior surfaces do not need to be classified as a hazardous mQ;~rials/waste project. Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-filesICorrosion\East Valley PInt. 39 A corr. -5- Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District c. The process for working with heavy metal based '.";ë:ings and paints and for final determination of spent abrasive as hazardous waste is f.S 'ollows: 1. 2. 3. All personnel working on and around site .aust strictly adhere to OSHA and NIOSH regulations for working with lead pai 'Is. Regulations include personnel biological testing and monitoring of workcis air and air in vicinity of site. Inclusively, regulations outlined in 29 CFR Part 1926 and Cal-OSHA Title 8 must be strictly adhered to. Paints must be removed by vacuum blasting, or by conventional methods with total containment of tank, or by grit blasting with total containment and recovery of abrasive, partial containment in areas wh'~re water blast cleaning is being accomplished. Other methods, which remove the coating and paint without any abrasive, include the following: a.,':' Roto peening with dust collector outlet attachment and vacuum: this method propels a tungsten carbide tipped flap assembly and performs like a controlled shot blasting system. A minimum of 8" clearance is required in most cases. This method dramatica':y reduces the cost of hazardous waste operations, because only the paint is bulked for handling and disposal. However, this method leaves an irregular profile, generally . necessitating the abrasive blasting of the surface with a conventional abrasive after completion of the pow~r tool cleaning. b. Needle scaler with dust collector "utlet attachment and vacuum: this method propels a series of steel needles against the surface. Unlike the Roto Peener, this method is also used for corners, around fittings and other restricted areas. This method also dramatically reduces the cost of hazardous waste operations as only the paint is bulked for handling and disposal. However, this method leaves no surface profile, necessitating the abrasive blasting of the surface wilh a conventional abrasive after completion of the power tool cleaning. c. Water blast cleaning with bicarbonate vf soda abrasive: This method is new and unseasoned, so with this meflod water containing the removed paint particles must be collected otfore it touches the ground or surrounding surface. Contaminated wa:orthen requires settling of particles and removal of residual waste, or d :sposal of the total sum as hazardous waste. AdditiDnally, the blast cleaning leaves no profile in the steel, necessitating the abrasive blasting of the surface with a conventional abrasive after completion of the witter blasting. d. Chemical Stripping System: This metllDd applies a chemical paint stripper to the surfaces, and after a number of hours is peeled off, removing the paint with the stripper. As with the \':ater blast method, this method leaves no profile in the steel, necessitating the abrasive blasting ofthe surface with a conventional abrasive after compktion of the stripping operations. Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\Corrosion\East Valley Pint. 39 A corr. -6- ---- D. VI. Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District Upon completion of coating and paint removal from tank s'.lrfaces, a representative sample of the spent abrasive, with the r~moved coating and p~int particles within the abrasive, is taken and sent to an approved testing laboratory for test¡:1g under Title 22 and Land Ban requirements. E. Iftests indicate the spent abrasive with removed coating a!ld paint particles is not hazardous, wastes can be disposed of in a local Class III or unclassified dump, regardless of presence of heavy metal coating or paint particles. However, t!te local Regional Water Quality Control Board which has jurisdiction over the landfill may require further testing to ensure the waste does not violate any of their local regulations. This could result in the waste being classified as a Designated Waste, which requires disposal at a Class II landfill. F. If tests still indicate excessive levels of lead or zinc, spent abrasive must be placed in approved containers, be removed to an approved Clafs I landfill via a licensed hazardous waste transporter, and disposed of in strict conformance to Title 22 and Land Ban regulations. G. The District can eliminate the landfill disposal requirement by specifying the use of an additive in the abrasive which will render the heavy meta: waste non-hazardous. The waste can then be incinerated or encapsulated in concrete o. '),:Ier binder-type materials, thereby eliminating the City's "cradle to grave" responsibi:i:y created by the landfill disposal method. PLEASEREMEMBER:THEOWNEROFTHETA~KiSALWAYSTHEGENERATOR OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE!!!!!!!!!! This liability ~annot be transferred to any other party involved in the project, regardless of the contract provisions or specification requirements. The City can meet its responsibility to properly and legally handle and dispose ofthe toxic or hazardous wastes generated by the surface preparation requirements of a project by including this work as part ofthe work to be accomplished by the Contractor on the project. This work includes, but is not limited tc, the following: H. 1. Obtaining all permits and EP A numbers, for the District 2. Processing all related project paperwork 3. Blood testing of all involved personnel 4. Sampling and testing oÍ\\laste as required 5. Bulking, packaging and storing waste at jobsite 6. Using licensed hazardous waste transporters ',0 deliver the hazardous wastes to their ultimate legal disposal site RECOMMENDA nONS A. Based on the above noted observations, conclusions and laboratory test results, the following recommendations are offered. 1. Exterior Painted Surfaces Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\CorrosionlEast Valley Pint. 39 A corr. -7- ---- 2. VIT. COST ESTIMATES A. Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District a. The exterior SUI fac~s are in generally iair to good condition except for random spots of corrosion and mecha,,; ,al damage present. Therefore it is recommended that the District repaint the exterior surfaces to repair random rusting areas and overcome ti,e chalking and fading appearance. Because of the changes in the VOC reguiations and the new coatings used on the exterior surfaces, it will be necessary to brush-off blast clean the exterior surfaces in accordance with SSPC-SP7. Rusting spots on the roof and shell should be spot vacuum blast cI~aned or spot vacuum power tool cleaned to SSPC-SPIO, a full coat of epoxy primer applied, an epoxy intermediate coat and urethane finish GO~t applied to all surfaces. I) Prior to application of new p&;n~ system, it would be advisable to accomplish additional adhe~iJI1 testing and application of test samples of new paint to en~u.e good adhesion of new paint to existing finish. b. The asphalt covering over the BPE retains water against the BPE. It is recommended that the district potho:e around the tank to examine the condition of the BPE. Safety, Health & Code Features a. A second roof hatch should be installed to meet A WW A DIOO Standards. b. A new exterior ladder meeting OSHA regulations should be installed. c. Rusting, fouled or torn screening on ',cuts should be replaced. d. An air break should be installed in tk dterior overflow pipe. e. An evaluation should be accomplished I)y an experienced tank structural engineer to enable rendering a decision as to the seismic reliability of the structure. Based on current and previous projects of similar scope, preliminary cost estimates for work as noted in RECOMMENDATIONS, were calculate<l by using data from those projects. I. Exterior Surfaces a. Brush-off blast cleaning of exterior slll'låces, spot abrasive blast cleaning via vacuum method or power tool 'le'd1ing to SSPC-SPIO, priming and. application of an epoxylurethane p?i:}~ system would be in the range of $2;',646 to $33,175, based on sllrfac~s being classified as a non-hazardous materialslwaste project. b. Total removal of paint by abrasive blast cleaning to SSPC-SPI 0, and application ofa three coat epoxy/ure'\"'.ne paint system to complete exterior Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\Carrasian\East Valley PInt. 39 A carr. -8- Evaluation of Plant 39 A Tank East Valley Water District ofthe reservoir would be approximate;,' :71,879 based o~ surfaces being classified as a non-hazardous materials/waste project. This estimate is not recommended, but is furnished for Cof'1p.\rative cost purposes. 2. Structural Safety Items a. Installation ofa secondary roof vent wou;d be approximately $3,200. b. Installationofa new exterior ladder would be approximately $3,200. c. Replacement of the screening can be ac~omplished when the exterior is painted. d. Installation of an air break in the overflow would be approximately $8,000 Respectfully submitted, HARPER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC. cj/~~ -Andre Harper Project Engineer Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae.filesICarrasion\East Valley Pint. 39 A carr. -9- HARPER & ASSOCIATES ENG~NEERING, INC. CONSULTING ENGINì22:èS 1240 E. Ontario Ave.. Ste. 102-312 Coro.~{.. CA 92881-8671 Phone (951) 372-9196 Fax (95) ';72-9198 :::..ec.:_~~"...--~~~.......::.~::"'~-"~-...J;,.~~",:,_-~~_.~~ :.:;~" , --"._.._------._....-..-~ PROJECT: STRUCTURE: OWNER: LOCATION: CORROSION REPORT Corrosion and Condition Evaluation of'~'wo Water Storage Tanks 1.4 MG Welded Steel Water Storage Ta¡¡k (Plant 39 B) East Valley Water District San Bernardino, California INVESTIGATED BY: DATE: Andre Harper January 2005 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. B. c. Construction and Maintenance Details Structure is a welded steel water storage tank located in San Bernardino, California and is designated as the Plant 39 B Tank. The tank was :únstructed in 1982 by Resource Development Company. The tank is 24 ft. high and 104 ft. in diameter with a cone roof supported by a center column with rafters extending t'om the center to the shell. Access to the roof is via an exterior caged ladder and an inte! ¡qr ladder. Safety climb devices are installed on both the ladders. Site Conditions The tank is on an unpaved site enclosed by a chain link fe,1ce. There is adequate space for large equipment around the tank, assuming use of normal portable air compressor and related equipment. There are homes that would be adversely affected by dust and contamination associated with abrasive blast cleaning and painting operations. Accordingly, extreme caution must be exercised during all cleaning and painting operations. Existing Coating and Paint Systems 1. Based on the field investigation the coating an.! paint systems appear to be the following: Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District a. Interior Surfacez - A solvent cutback cf'al tar coating is on the roof, structural members and shell. Coal tar Cl1al ,el is on the the bottom surfaces and 8 ft onto the lower shell. b. Exterior Surfaces - An alkyd paint syst~m. D. Cathodic Protection System The tank has no cathodic protection system installeò for interior surfaces, nor is there indication of a system for the subgrade under the bottom ~fthe tank or the piping. E. Title 22 Heavy Metal Analyses Samples of interior coatings and exterior paints were Icmoved for analyses for presence of heavy metals, specifically lead, chromium compounds and zinc. Analysis was accomplished by an approved Department of Health Services laboratory. F. Contract Information Harper &'Associates Engineering, Inc. was retained by the District to accomplish field investigation of the tank to observe interior and exterior surfaces and conditions with photographs' taken to record conditions. This report has been prepared with remedial repair/recoatinglrepainting recommendations and cost estimates. This corrosion. report is prepared solely on the basis of noted field investigation. Conclusions and recommendations are strictly th05C determined by Consultant to be consistent with the best and most experienced practice within the corrosion engineering profession. II. INVESTIGATION: A. Investigation was accomplished as follows: I. Exterior Surfaces a. Investigation of roof surfaces and appur'.enances on roofwas accomplished by traversing the roof. b. Investigation of the lower shell couno ~nd accessible appurtenances was accomplished by traversing perimeter of tank from ground level, examining areas within reach. c. Investigation of shell and appurtcnaaces above lower course was accomplished by climbing ladder, anC: :,y traversing perimeter oftank from ground level, observing and noting a;,pearance of inaccessible areas. d. Variouschippingtools were employed to examine typical areas ofdefective coating and corrosion within reach. e. Photographs were taken of typical and s¡'~cific areas to illustrate condition Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\CorrosionlEast Valley Pint. 39 B carr. -2- 2. . Interior Surfaces a. b. c. d. e. ill. OBSERVATIONS: Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District of surfaces. Underside of roof, support structure, and shell above the top capacity level were inspected via inflatable raft, traversing the entire circumference ofthe tank and systematically traversing all structural elements and the roof. Vertical surfaces below the water level were investigated by diving the tank and traversing the bottom and perìmetcl or the tank. Light was supplied via high intensity portable light and natural light from roof hatch and center vent. Various chipping tools were employed to examine typical areas of defective coating and corrosion within reach. Photographs were taken of typical and specific areas to illustrate condition of surfaces. A. Based upon the above reported investigation, the following observations were noted: 1. Exterior Surfaces a. Roof and Appurtenances I) Overall the paint system is in fair to good condition with moderate oxidation and fading of the paint system present. (Photos E-2 through E-21) 2) Moderate to severe corrosion is present on the center vent structure, cover and screening. (Photos E-3 through E-S) 3) Random debris is present on the roof. (photos E-6 through E-8) 4) An area of corrosion is present on the roof adjacent to a lap weld. (Photo £-9) 5) Adhesion tests (ASTM D3359 option A) were performed randomly on the roof. (Photos £-12 and E-13) 6) Random ponding is present along the edge of the roof. (Photo E- 14) 7) Random mechanical damage with corrosion (Photo £-15) present on the roof. 8) Moderate corrosion is preseD' on the nuts and bolts of the auxiliary Harper & Associates Engineeting, Inc. Hae-files\CorrosionlEast Valley Pint. 39 B corr. -3- b. 7) 2. Interior Surfaces a. Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District hatch, irregular surfaces of J,e LLI piping, roof hatch and handrailing. (Photos E-I6 throug¡~ E-2I) Shell, Ladder and Appurtenances I) Overall the paint system is in fair to good condition with moderate oxidation and fading of paint. (Photos E-l, E-23 through E-35) 2) Random corrosion is present on tho ladder rungs, side rails, vandal guard, and cage. (Photos E-22 through E-24) 3) Minor staining is present on the ur.derside of the top angle. (Photo E-2S) 4) Random minor corrosion is present on the vent cap and nuts and bolts ofthe overflow, inlet/outlet compression flange and manhole mono-bolt. (Photos E-26, E-30, ;::.32) 5) Coating runs and random spots of corrosion are present on the shell at a horizontal weld. (Photo E.17) 6) Adhesion tests (ASTM D3359 opdon A) were performed randomly on the shell. (Photos E-28 and £-29) Painting patchwork is present on the secondary manhole and shell. (Photo E-31) 8) Minor corrosion and staining is present along the edges of the identification plate. (Photo E-33) 9) Minor to moderate corrosion and debris are present along the edge of the bottom plate extension anj concrete ringwall. (Photos E-34 and E-35) Underside of Roof and Structural Membors 1) Overall the underside of roof and structural members are in poor. condition with moderate to severe general corrosion present. (Photos 1-1 through 1-34) 2) Random severe corrosion is present on the center support plate and adjacent rafters and roof plates. (Photos 1-2 through 1-4) 3) Numerous areas of cracked and delaminating coating are on the roof plates and rafters with general corrosion present in these areas. (Photos 1-3 through 1-34) 4) Random rafters have been twist~d. (Photo 1-24) Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\CorrosionlEast Valley Pint. 39 B corr. -4- b. c. Evaluation afPlant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District 5) Blistering of the coating is plesr,nt on the shell and at the roofto shell transition. (Photos 1-30 thru,¡gh 1-34) Shell and Appurtenances I) Coating on shell and appurtenances is in overall poor condition. (photos 1-35 through 1-49) 2) The ladder exhibits severe cor~o:;jon on the safety climb rail and random corrosion on the side r~i!s and rungs. (Photos 1-35 through 1-38) 3) Cracked and blistering coatillg with corrosion is present on the shell and column. (Photos I-36tl1IGugh 1-44 and I-50 through I-52) 4) Severe corrosion is present on ihc inner circumference of the shell penetrations, inlet/outlet and ma!.hole covers and davit. (Photos 1- 44 through 1-49) Bottom Surface, Column and Appurtena¡;ces I) Coating on bottom and appurt;mances appears to be in overall fair condition where surfaces coù1-: rye observed through the silt and debris. (Photos I-53 through I-58) 2) Corrosion is present at the bottom of the liquid level indicator guide wires and inner circumference of the drain. (Photos I-53 and I-58) 3) Random tubercles are present on ,he bottom. (Photos I-54 and I-55) 4) The bottom exhibits minor mudcracking of the coating. (Photo 1- 56) 3. Safety, Health and Code Features a. b. c. d. e. f. Handrailing assembly does not meet the aSH. \. regulations and creates a safety hazard. No safety gate is pres~nt at the terminat;ùn of the ladder at roofleve!. Corrosion is present on the center vent screening. Interior/exterior ladders do not meet OSHA regulation. No gap or air break is present in the úV<'~now pipe. No observations were formulated a; Ie Gle tank meeting current seismic codes. Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\Corrasian\East Valley Pint. 39 B carr. -5- IV. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District A. Based on the above noted observations, the following cOtdusions are drawn: 1. Exterior Surfaces a. 5) b. Roof and Appurtenances 1) The overall condition of the paillt system must be rated as fair to good. 2) Moderate oxidation (chalking) and fading offinish is nonnal for an alkyd paint system of this age. 3) Corrosion on the center vent co"er and structure is typically the result of poor application techniques, as these irregular surfaces require brush application of the ¡Jaint. Also the moist warm air passing through the vent causes a more corrosive condition. 4) The random debris and mechal,ical damage on the roofis the result of personnel working on the roof or vandal throwing missiles on to the roof. Overtime corrosion will develop in the damaged areas. Adhesion testing was performed by method ASTM D3359 Option A, illustrating marginal to fair adhesion of the paint. 6) Ponding is the result of poor original construction of the tank. The ponding allows water and debris to remain on the roof surface longer which accelerates the "ùrrosion process and can cause the topcoat to delaminate. 7) Corrosion on the auxiliary hatch, LLI piping, roof hatch, and handrailing is the result of pOD. application techniques, as the configuration of theses surfaces requires brushing on the paint. Shell, Ladder and Appurtenances 1) Conclusions and comments noted above for roof surfaces generally apply to ihese surfaces. 2) Corrosion present on the ladder, vandal guard, overflow, inlet/outlet, and manhole is the result of poor application techniques as the painters ,'ftcn do not brush these irregular surfaces. 3) The staining on the top angle is the result of the water and dirt running off of the roof and collecting under the top angle. 4) Coating runs present on the shell are the result of poor application Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\Corrosion\East Valley PInt. 39 B corr. -6- 2. Interior Surfaces a. .1) Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District practices. It may be the result of ¡he spray gun malfunctioning in this are~. al,d the applicator nu' s~~ding out the drips. 5) Adhesion testing was perform," JY method ASTM 03359 Option A, illustrating fair to good adh~Lon of the paint. 6) Painting patchwork at the overflew may be the result ofthe District covering ~p gr:lffiti from vandals. 7) Corrosion at the edges of the ~D plate is typically due to the applicators not painting the mo:mting area before installing the plate. 8) Corrosion present on the edge olthe bottom plate extension is the result of poor application tecl:nic¡ues as the applicator often does not bend down to properly paint ihis surface. Rock and debris on the bottom plate extension is the result of the vegetation in close proximity to the tank. Dirt and debris hold moisture on the surface longer which accelerates the corrosion process. Underside ofRoofanå Structural Me,,"lbers The overall condition of the coating on the roof plates and structural members must be ra\ed as poor. 2) Overall n. c coating is in poor condition with several large areas of cracked evating with corrosion present. The coating is about 23 years old and this coating typically has a life expectancy of20 to 25 years. Even though the coating has basically reached the life expectancy, the large areas ~f cracked coating and corrosion is excessive. 3) Corrosion present at the center npport column and adjacent rafters is the result of these surfaces nl): being properly coated originally and the moist warm air passing through the vent causing a more corrosive .condition. 4) Delamination of the coating ort the roof plate is probably due to contaminants between coats ouring application process. 5) The twisted rafter is either the r. ,suit of seismic activity generating a wave that makes contact with the support structure or poor original construction practic~ of forcing the rafter into the desired position. 6) The blistering on the sheil IS cither the result of poor surface preparation, the presence of noisture or contaminates on the surface at the time the coati"g was applied. Additional testing Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\Corrasian\East Valley Pint. 39 B carr. -7- b. c. Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District would be required to determine t:;,- exact cause. Shell and Appurtenanccs I) The overall condition ofthe coatie,; on the shell and appurtenances must be rated as poor. 2) Severe corrosion present on the .'l'ety climb rail is probably the result of these surfaces never being coated 3) As noted ahove, the solvent cut b,.ck coal tar coating on the upper shell has e;(ceeded the life expectancy. The severe cracked coating and corro5'on on the shell is a result of this being the most severe environmcnt within the tank. Tilt: :1Ot/cold and wet/dry cycle of the shell caused by the weather and ""tier fluctuations tends to dry out the coating causing it to become orittle and crack, 4) Random blistering on the shell ar,d column is probably the result of contamination or moisture preoent on the surface during coating application. 5) Corrosion present at the edges and inner circumference of the lower shell penetrations, inlet!c"tlet and manholes is typical as these areas are difficult to cont and often are not thoroughly holiday detected to identify the existing coating defect. Bottom Surfaces and Appurtenances I) The overall condition of the botbm surfaces and appurtenances must be rated as fair where surfaces could be observed. 2) Corrosion present on the inner ~ircumference of the drain and , bottom of the LLI guide wires ¡, .robably due to poor application techniques, as the configuration of these members requires due diligences on the part of the appiìcator. 3) Random tubercles on the bottom are the result of not electrically detecting the bottom thorough:y prior to acceptance of the project as complete. 4) The cracking of the coating is r. result of the age of the coating and possibly overheating the enamel during the original application. Overheating the enamel cooks the oils out of the product leading to premature deterioration as 6e ~namel becomes brittle and cracks exposing the substrate to the corrosion process. 3. Safety, Health and Code Features a, The handrailing assembly at the roofhatchlladder work area is a violation of OSHA regulations and creates a safety hazard because it does not extend Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc, Hae-files\Corrosion\East Valley PInt. 39 B carr, -8- ----- v. Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District onto the roof. b. Lack of safety gate at the terminatior, of the ladder at roof level is a violation of OSHA regulations. c. Rusting, fouled or torn screening on veats is a violation of health and sanitation regulations. d. Interior and exterior ladders are undersized for current OSHA regulations. e. The lack of an air break in the overflow pipe is a violation of health and sanitation regulations. LABORATORY TESTING OF COATING AND PAINT A. B. c. D. At the request of the District, samples of the paint were removed, by Consultant, from exterior and interior surfaces. Samples were forwarded to testing laboratory for analyses. Reports were prepared on basis oflead, chromium and zinc concentrations. The test results are as follôws: 1. Exterior roof - No lead was detected. Zinc at J 4,540 PPM is above the maximum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. No chromium compounds were detected. 2. Exterior shell - No lead was detected. Zinc at 8,420 PPM is above the maximum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. No chromium compounds were detected. 3. Interior roof- No lead was detected. Zinc at 44.; PPM is below the maximum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. No chror. '¡um compounds were detected. 4. Interior rafter - No lead was detected. Zinc at 18.1 PPM is below the maximum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. No chromium compounds were detected. 5. Interior shell - Lead at 360 PPM is below the Ilux:mum allowable concentration of 1,000 PPM. Zinc at 76.8 PPM is below the ffiax:mum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. No chromium compounds were Óiected. 6. Interior bottom - Lead at 206 PPM is below the maximum allowable concentration of 1,000 PPM. Zinc at 39.9 PPM is below the ",..ximum allowable concentration of 5,000 PPM. Chromium compounds at 21.3 PPM are below the maximum allowable concentration of3,065 PPM. The level ofzinc on the exterior surfaces are above the allowable concentrations, therefore paint removal operations on the exterior surfaces will be classified as a hazardous materials/waste project. The levels of lead, chromium compounds and zinc on all interior surfaces are below the allowable concentrations or were not detected, therefore rzmoval operations on the interior surfaces do not need to be classified as a hazardous ntatcrials/waste project. The process for working with heavy metal based co.lIings and paints and for final -9- Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\Corrosion\East VaHey PInt. 39 B carr. Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District determination of spent abrasive as hazardous waste is as follows: I. 2. 3. AIl personnel working on anJ around site must strictiy adhere to OSHA and NIOSH regulations for working with lead paints. Regul¡¡tio:ls include personnel biological testing and monitoring of worker's air and air ¡" vicinity of site. Inclusively, regulations outlined in 29 CFR Part 1926 and Cal-OSHA Title 8 must be strictly adhered to. Paints must be removed by vacuum blasting, or by conventional methods with total containment of tank, or by grit blasting with total containment and recovery of abrasive, partial containment in areas where water blast cleaning is being accomplished. Other methods, which remove the coating and paint without any abrasive, include the following: a. Roto peening with dust collector outlet attachment and vacuum: this method propels a tungsten carbide tipped :lap assembly and performs like a controlled shot blasting system. A n.iDÌ!1lllm of 8" clearance is required in most cases. This method dramaticaliy reduces the cost of hazardous waste operations, because only the t;~i"t is bulked for handling and disposal. However, this method leaves an irregular profile, generally necessitating the abrasive blasting of the surface with a conventional abrasive after completion of the power tool cleaning. b. Needle scaler with dust collector outlet attachment and vacuum: this method propels a series of steel needies against the surface. Unlike the Roto Peener, this method is also used for corners, around fittings and other restricted areas. This method also dramatically reduces the cost of hazardous waste operations as only the paint is bulked for handling and disposal. However, this method leaves no surface profile, necessitating the abrasive blasting of the surface wi:h a conventional abrasive after completion of the power tool cleaning. c. W'lter blast cleaning with bicarbonate of soda abrasive: This method is new and unseasoned, sO with this mç(r.od water containing the removed paint particles must be collected be [ore it touches the ground or surrounding surface. Contaminated wate:' then requires settling ofparticles and removal of residual waste, or disposal of the total sum as hazardous waste. Additionally, the blast cleaning leaves no profile in the steel, necessitating the abrasive blasting of lhe surface with a conventional abrasive after completion of the water:' ."sting. d. Chemical Stripping System: This method applies a chemical paint stripper to the surfaces, and after a number of hours is peeled off, removing the paint with the stripper. As with the water blast method, this method leaves no profile in the steel, necessitating the abrasive blasting of the surface with a conventional abrasive after complet:on of the stripping operations. Harper & Associates Engineering, lnc, Hae.:ïles\Carrasian\East Valley Pint. 39 B carr, -10- VI. Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District E. Upon completion of coating and paint removal from tan:' ~ urfaces, a representative sample ofthe spent abrasive, with the removed coating and pc,:nt particles within the abrasive, is taken and sent to an approved testing laboratory for testi:!g under Title 22 and Land Ban requirements. F. If tests indicate the spent abrasive with removed coatinga¡, ! paint particles is not hazardous, wastes can be disposed of in a local Class III or unclassified dump, regardless of presence of heavy metal coating or paint particles. However, the local Regional Water Quality Control Board which has jurisdiction over the landfill may require further testing to ensure the waste does not violate any of their local regulations. III is could result in the waste being classified as a Designated Waste, which requires dispùsai at a Class II landfill. G. If tests still indicate excessive levels of lead or zinc, f.,cnt abrasive must be placed in approved containers, be removed to an approved Class I landfill via a licensed hazardous waste transporter, and disposed of in strict conformao;ce to Title 22 and Land Ban regulations. H. The Districtcan eliminate the lanùfill disposal requirement by specifying the use of an additive in'the abrasive which will render the heavy metal waste non-hazardous. The waste can then be incinerated or encapsulated in concrete or ether binder-type materials, thereby eliminating the City's "cradle to grave" responsibili:y created by the landfill disposal method, I. PLEASE REMEMBER: THE OWNER OF THE TANK IS AL WAYS THE GENERATOR OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE!!!! I!!!!! This liability cannot be transferred to any other party involved in the project, regardless of the conl,~ct provisions or specification requirements. The City can meet its responsibility ~o properly and legally handle and dispose of the toxic or hazardous wastes generated by the surface preparation requirements of a project by including this work as part of the work:o lJe accomplished by the Contractor on the project. This work includes, but is not limited lO ¡he following: 1. Obtaining all permits and EPA numbers, for ;I'e !)istrict 2. Processing all related project paperwork 3. Blood tes'.ing of all involved personnel 4. Sampling and testing of waste as required s. Bulking, packaging and storing waste atjobsite 6. Using licensed hazardous waste transporters to deliver the hazardous wastes to their ultimate legal disposal site RECOMMENDA TrONS A. Based on the above noted observations, conclusions and laboratory test results, the following recommendations are offered. Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-filesICorrosion\East Valley Pint. 39 B carr. -11- ---~ 1. 2. 3. Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District Exterior Painted Surfaces a. The exterinr surfaces are in generally fRir to good condjtion except for ranùom spots of corrosion and mechanical damage present. Therefore the District may want to repaint the exterior surfaces when the interior is recoated to repair random rusting areas and overcome the chalking and fading appearance. Because of the chanbc3 in the VOC regulations and the new paints used on the exterior surfaces, it will be necessary to brush-off blast clean the exterior surfaces in accordance with SSPC-SP7. Rusting spots on the roof and shell should be spot vacuum blast cleaned or spot vaouum power tool cleaned to SSPC-SPII, a full coat of epoxy primer applied, an epoxy intermediate coat and urethane finish coat applied to all surfaces. I) Prior to application of new paint .,ystem, it would be advisable to . accomplish additional adhesion testing and application of test samples of new paint to ensure good adhesion of new paint to existing finish. b'. The vegetation at the bottom plate extension(BPE) should be removed and the District should schedule regular maintenance to keep the vegetation away from the BPE. Interior Roof, Structural Members and Shell a. As noted above, typically the solven~ cutback coal tar coating system has a twenty to twenty five year life cyc1~ and this coating is reaching the end of the life cycle, The roof surfaces are already exhibiting metal loss on the rafter flanges. Therefore it is recommended all interior roof and shell surfaces should be abrasively blast cleaned to Near White Metal (SSPC- S1'10) and apply a three-coat epoxy coating to a total dry film thickness of i 5.0 mils on surfaces above the bottcm, Interior Lottom a. The bottom surfaces appear to be in fa.ir condition and typically coal tar enamel has a life cycle of 50 to 15 years, but it is impossible to determine the exact condition of the coating w:,hout removing the silt. In addition it is impossible to determine how brittle the coating is without draining the reservoir. It may be possible to spot repair and overcoat the coal tar enamel on the bottom, but it can not be determined for sure until the reservoir is drained, b. The technical specification can be prepared based on the bottom being spot abrasively blast cleaned to Near White (SSPC-SPIO), and complete surfaces Brush-off Blast Cleaned (SSPC-SP7) to remove surface contaminants, Exposed metal would be spot primed with a coal tar adhesive and complete surfaces would receive a 3/32" of coal tar enamel coating applied to the bottom surfaces and 6" onto the shell. There would also be an alternate item for total removal of the coal tar enamel coating Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc, Hae-files\Corrosion\East Valley Pint. 39 B corr, -12- 4. VII. COST ESTIMATES Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District and replacing it with either 3/32" of coai (ar enamel again or 20 mils of an epoxy coating. Safety, Health & Code Features a. Handrailing meeting OSHA regulatioDs s"ould be installed attopofladder. b. A safety gate meeting OSHA standards must be installed at the termination of ¡he ladder at roof level. c. Rusting, fouled or torn screening on vent; should be replaced. d. A new exterior and interior ladder meeting OSHA regulations should be installed. e. An air break should be installed in the exterior overflow pipe. f. As the tank is over twenty years of age, a possibility exists the tank will not m~et current seismic codes. An evaluation should be accomplished by an experienced tank structural engineer to e¡¡able rendering a decision as to the seismic reliability ofti,e structure. A. Based on current and previous projects of similar scopc, preliminary cost estimates for work as noted in RECOMMENDATIONS, were calculated ry using data from those projects. 1. 2. 3. Exterior Surfaces a. Brush-off blast cleaning of exterior surîaces, spot abrasive blast cleaning v:a vacuum method or power tool cleaning to SSPC-SPII, priming and application of an epoxylurethane paint system would be in the range of $40,840 to $49,008, based on surfaces being classified as a hazardous materials/waste project. b. Abrasive blast cleaning of complete exterior surfaces and application of an epoxylurethane paint system to complete exterior of tank would be approximately $106,185, based on surfaces being classified as a hazardous materialslwaste project. This estimate is not a recommendation, but is furnished for comparative cost purposes. Interior Roof, Structural Members and Shell a. Abrasive blast cleaning of interior surfaces and application of 15 mils of c;>oxy coating to interior roof and she;; surfaces will be in the cost range of $73,219 to $85,422, based On surfac-òs being classified as a non-hazardous rnaterials/waste project. Interior Bottom Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-files\Corrosion\East Valley Pint. 39 B corr. -13- 4. Respectfully submitted, Evaluation of Plant 39 B Tank East Valley Water District a. Spot abrasively blast cleaning to Near ';\,'h ,e (SSPC-SPI 0), Brush-off Blast Cleaning of complete surfaces ~,>,PC-SP7) to remove surface contaminants, spot priming of exposed metal with a coal tar adhesive and ar¡:>Iication ofa3/32" of coal tarenamc; c;:¡atingto the bottom surfaces and 6" onto the shell will be in the cost ra!'.ge of $16,989 to $21,237, based on surfaces being classified as a non-hazardous materialslwaste project. b. Abrasive blast cleaning of compkte interior bottom surfaces and application of either 3/32" of coal tar enamel coating to complete interior bottom surfaces or 20 mils of an epoxy c;¡3ting will be in the cost range of $25,484 to $29,732. This estimate is no: a recommendation until further evaluation of the bottom surfaces is accunplish but the cost is fumished for co'11parative purposes. Structural Safety Items a. Modification of existing handrailing and installation of a self closing gate would be approximately $5,000. b~ Replacement of the screening can be a:complished when the exterior is painted. c. Installation of exterior ladder and interior fiberglass ladder would be arproximately $6,400. d. Installation of an air break in the overfiow would be approximately $8,000. HARPER & ASSOCIA TESENGINEERING, INe. ~ Andre Harper Project Engineer ;~ William B. Harper Registered Corrosi . Certificate No. CR ~~~ ~,~./.~¥' ~~~~ ~B' ~ ' r<' ')O'~ .s:- " cr. , . ginef¡R 786 ~ 85 Exf iZ¡ûÇ * \ .., , !:ç';f/!~~'?; {{'!jJF C(\.~\~~ ~- Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc. Hae-fileslCorrosionlEast Valley Pint. 39 B corr. -14- ~ ~mru~[J'o(Ç[h)~mru [j@@3UO[ñ)@j !b~!bJ@[J'fID~@!J'W 1761 N.BataviaS!. Orange, CA 92865 (714) 921-1550 FAX: (714) 921-4770 ~~ REPORT NUMBER: SC-2372 CLIENT: Attn,: Krista Harper Harper & Asspciates Engineering, Inc 1240 E. Ontario Ave., Ste 102-312 Corona CA, 91719 REPORT eN: Paint Samples East Valley Water Dis. Plant 39 Tanks A& B DATE RECEIVED: 01111/05 DATE REPORTED: 01/13/05 Analysis of Paint Samples: Lead Analysis - EP A 7420, Detection Limit = 5 mg/kg Chromium Analysis - EPA 7190, Detection Limit = 5 mV;ikg Zinc Analysis - EP A 7950, Detection Limit = 5 mg/kg SAMPLE ID. LEAD CliROMIUM ZINC A. Tank A 1. Exterior Roof 826 ND 2,935 2. Exterior Shell 82.6 ND 2,616 B. Tank B 1. Exterior Roof ND ND 14,540 2. Exterior Shell ND ND 8,420 3. Interior Roof ND ND 44.2 4. Interior Rafter ND 1'<D 18.1 5. Interior Shell 360 ND 76.8 6. Interior Floor 206 21.3 39.9 /J Ú ~ ' tv'" Peter T. Wu Lr.!J Director ..., ¡¡¡¡¡¡ §c;; --'>- "'~ <n'" ~ Z C<c< ~~ d§ .. 0 c< a:: a:: :I: .... .... w.,. ~g gN ~>- "'~ ~ Z c< ¡¡: c< .. .,. '" cri ~ è ët ::J >-- U c< '" '" ~- ;:: .... ~ 0 ::J '" 0 0 d ß ~ EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2004 - 2005 LIGHTFOOT GOODIN NEGRETE: STURGEON WILSON FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES JULY 875.00 24.21 750.00 758.93 1000.00 31.00 1000.00 128.71 1250.00 1108.39 AUG 750.00 13.03 500.00 375.00 1250.00 205.15 1125.00 25.80 SEPT 750.00 575.81 500.00 113.54 250.00 1250.00 15.00 1000.00 658.91 OCT 750.00 228.21 1250.00 195.00 750.00 1250.00 264.53 1125.00 214.36 NOV 500.00 18.00 750.00 25.00 250.00 15.00 1000.00 58.00 900.00 1555.45 DEC 500.00 13.00 375.00 625.00 29.35 1250.00 277.00 625.00 -113.09 JAN 213.70 410.00 216.70 Ft==B MAR APRIL MAY JUNE TOTAL REIMB 4125.00 872.26 4125.00 1306.17 3250.00 75.35 7000.00 1358.39 6025.00 3666.52 TOTAL EXPENSES 4125.00 872.26 4125.00 1306.17 3250.00 75.35 7000.00 1358.39 6025.00 3666.52 BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 . 2005 GLENN LIGHTFOOT DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE BOOKS NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS SUBSCRIPTIONS MISC MEAl. W/BOB 7/8/04 12.41 MEAL W/BOB 7/21/04 11.80 MEAL W/BOB 8/5104 13.03 ACWA FALL CONF 9/28/04-9/30/04 125.00 75.67 305.96 69.18 WTR CONF 10/26/04-10/29/04 52.27 175.94 ICWA LUNCHEON 11/18/04 18.00 MEAL W/BOB 12/6104 13.00 TOTAL 125.00 0.00 127.94 305.96 313.36 0.00 0.00 Page 1 BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 - 2005 DON GOODIN DATE CONFERENCE CARFARE MILEAGE NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARf(ING LODGING MEALS EDUCATION WESCAS 6/23/04-6/25/04 150.00 102.25 364.66 111.02 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 62.00 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/20/04 -31.00 TRANSPORTATION SEMINAR 9/24/04 40.00 CSUSB TEXT BOOKS 9/28/04 73.54 WRI BREAKFAST 10/5/04 15.00 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 10/18/04 33.00 WTR CONF 1026/04-10129/04 147.00 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 11/15/04 25.00 LEGIST BREIFING 01/10105-01111105 90.00 193.40 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 1/20105 27.00 LEGIST BREIFING REIMB 1/28/05 -96.70 TOTAL 280.00 96.70 102.25 364.66 389.02 73.54 Page 1 BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005 ED'NARD NEGRETE DATE CONFERENCE MILE:\GE NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING LODGING MEALS Mise SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 62.00 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 -31.00 STATE OF COMMUNITY 11/23/04 15.00 LUNCHEON 12/10104 29.35 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.35 0.00 Page 1 BOARD OF DIRECTOR EXPENSES DRF"T FISCAL YEAR 2004 - 2005 KIP STURGEON DATE CONFERENCE RAILFARE MILEAGi:: NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKI;\:G LODGING MEALS MISC EAC SEMINAR 7/14/04 40.00 20.00 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 31.00 BUSINESS CARDS 7/29/04 37.71 S8 VL Y COLLEGE REG 8/16/04 75.00 SB VL Y COLLEGE REG 8/16/04 81.77 FIVE STAR 8/24/04 48.38 RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 9/15/04 15.00 CLASS FEE 10/6/04 24.00 WTR CONF 10/26/04-10/29/04 93.53 147.00 ICWA LUNCHEON 11/18104 18.00 RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 11/19/04 25.00 STATE OF COMMUNITY 11/23/04 15.00 MEAL W/ B08 12/1/04 252.00 RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 12/17/04 25.00 RVSD CC SEMINAR REG 1/21/05 25.00 SPRING CONF 1/10/05 385.00 TOTAL 515.00 0.00 141.91 0.00 463.00 238.48 Page 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXPENSES GEORGE WILSON DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005 DATE CONFERENCE MILEAGE LODGING NAME OF MEETING FEES AIRFARE PARKING MEALS MISC -- MEAL W/BOS 718104 12.41 MEAL W/BOS 7/14/04 43.65 WASCN CONVENTION 07/14/04-07/17104 352.40 672.13 -15.00 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7/19/04 62.00 SPECIAL DISTRICTS 7120104 -31.00 MEAL W/BOB 7121/04 11.80 MEAL W/BOS 8/3104 12.77 MEAL W/BGB 8/5/04 13.03 LEGIST BRKFT 9/17104 25.00 ACWA FALL CONF 9128/04-9/30/04 616.00 MEAL W/BOB 9/24104 17.91 MEAL W/BOB 10/7/04 15.93 MEAL W/BOS 1018104 18.31 MEAL W/BOB 10/14/04 15.34 MEAL W/BOS 10126/04 17.78 WTR CONF 10/27/04-10/29/04 147.00 WASH DC 11/15/04-11/17104 735.82 786.63 ICWA LUNCHEON 11/18/04 18.00 STATE OF COMMUNITY 11/23/04 15.00 FALL CONF 11/30/04-12102104 224.74 MEAL W/BOB 12/1/04 72.38 REIMBURSEMENT 12/29/04 -347.91 -62.30 LEGIST BRIEFING 1110105-1111/05 90.00 96.70 STATE OF COMMUNITY 1/22105 30.00 TOTAL 736.00 837.01 0.00 1683.50 410.01 0.00 Page 1 ------ 1IRECTOR: Joard Meetings: EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT o/-~ MONTH OF: ¡/~~ I,P~ ~onferences and Other Meetinas Date: l~ - Organization ¡¡flUb Date: 112-.. Organization £//t{jl) Date: 1ft:¡ Organization )-I3~/I. ;"'1, tA}. D. Date: 'IUJ Organization Date:----6-7 ;¡;.."!). Organization, '~ Date: ~~ Or ' , Description 7!/~ ~I ~?il1tbk Description ~ 4( v6bJ. ~" - Description ßM/J-¡J .:../~~. Description #'¿'Æ~ /1{/ .4JÚ1 , ~1 , Description ~J ~~ Date: ..... Description Date: - Description "",,=..,¡..,\l~..-.,~¡\#,,>......¡;¡ -- dP$S9!jptiq¡i '.::.~. ~ ~ ~-..~ y Ji Date: ; 't ¿ii" 0escription '¡.,;f""'i'¡",W "~;C' 'f "-Jr. ~ t;, \1 ,Q.€Jê,grjp"lign Date: Date: Organization Description ')ate: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description TOTAL # OF MEETINGS h @125.00 each- $ 79). OCJ Personal Auto: per mile- $ $ Miles x .405 Parking Fees Total Lodaings. Meals & Other: (Details on Back) ----:=> Total Director's Expenses $ $ çJ Signed C~~ ~~t I ' Date of Board Approval Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ 1St). to Less any Advance Payments S; TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ 750- GO DIRECTOR: Don Goodin Board Meetings: 11, 25 EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT MONTH OF: January, 2005 Conferences and Other MeetinQs Date: 9 Organization CMUA Description LeQislative MeetinQ Date: 10 Date: 13 Date: 17 Date: 20 Date: 27 Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Organization CMUA Description Leoislative Meetino Organization PA690 Description Education Organization Special Districts Description Monthlv MeetinQ Organization PA690 Organization PA 690 Description Education Description Education Organization Description -Organization Description Organjzation Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description TOTAL # OF MEETINGS 8 @125.00 each- $ 1000.00 Personal Auto: Mites x .405 Parking Fees CMUA Total Lodaings, Meals & Other: (Details on Back) per mile $ $ 465.14 61.75 Total Director's Expenses $ 526.89 Signed fJ~~ l) ):2. . -,fl. . Date of Board Approval February 8, 2005 Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ Less any Advance Payments $ TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ 1526.89 1526.89 Lodainas: (Receipts attached) Date: 9.10 Function Attended CMUA $ 280.76 Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ SUB TOTAL $ 280.76 Meals: (Receipts attached) Date: 10 Function Attended CMUA $ 40.21 Date: 17 Function Attended Special Districts $ 32.00 Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ Date: Functìon Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ SUB TOTAL $ 72.21 Other: (Receipts attached) Date: 9.10.11 Function Attended CMUA Rental Car $ 112.17. Date: Function Attended $ Date: Function Attended $ SUB TOTAL $ 112.17 TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ 465.14 (Enter this total on the front of form) ---- FEB-03-20a5 11:32 AM ... NEGRETE. GENERAL. CONTRACT 909 Sd" 5684 P."" EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECT.OR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT DIRECTOR AJ e y(' ~~- MONTH OF, JA iUU it '(2/ Board Meetings: ~ ¡! '5 - Conferences and Other Meetings ~ Date:-L9.-organlzatlon--S.11.JJLf1..-- Description LufIJ. Go rn 11 a Data: ?.. ï Organization -E:.~j. uJ ,t). Description $N AAJ./ t-< e I () pen /1IJr:¡ Date: Organization Description V Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Description Date: Organization Date: Organization Description Data: Date: Organization Organization Description Descríptíon__- Description Date: Organization Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Descrlption- Description- Date: Organization Date: Organization Description_- TOTAL # OF MEETINGS 1- @125.00each_$ 50t) °0 Personal Auto: Miles x .365 Parking Fees Total Lodgings, Meals & Other: (Details on Back) per mile- $ $ $ -.0-.. Total Director's Expenses $ ~_. '" . ~- ¥--,",~reoto" Meeli,g, & E><¡>eose' $ -5 0 ~ Signed. . /' þ' Less any Advance Payments $'--;;;;-¡:r Date of Board Approval ------. - TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $,- 5 00 . JIRECiOR: Sturgeon EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT MONTH OF: January 2005 30ard Meetings: 11 & 25 Conferences and Other Meetings Date: 10 Organization MWD Organization PIA Description Committee Meetings Date: 20 Date: 22 Date: 24 Date: 26 Date: Date: Description Tour Organization Senator Soto Description Community Forum Organization SBVMWD Description Baseline Feeder Committee Description Seminar Description Meeting at SBVWCD Date: Organization Description Baseline Monitorinq Meeting .'1""" . -If. ~- n . .~ *;' d;;Sijpt~A a i ~ p. Y' -_.-- "" '-'-""'J} 'f¡ ~iption~ , 'cer UæSl.rr~L.'t . DesCljp)io_n Description Date: Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description Date: Organization Description TOTAL # OF MEETINGS 9 @125.00 each_$ 1,125.00 Personal Auto: Fuel Receipts Miles x .405 Parking Fees per mile- $ 100.14 $ $ 60.87 $ 161.01 :rotal Lodoinos. Meals & Other: (Details on Back) Total Director's Expenses 02/08/2005 Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ 1 ,286 .01 Less any Advance Payments $ TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ 1,286.01 Signed Date of Board Approval ,. m-- 0..." . ------ Lodaings: (Receipts attached) Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ SUB TOTÞL $ Meals: (Receipts attached) Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Other: SUB TOTAL $ (Receipts attached) Date: 01/26/0 5Function Attended EAC Seminar Date: 11/30/04Function Attended ACWA Internet Usage Date: 01/10/05Function Attended MWD Train Fare $ $ $ 40.00 5.52 15.35 SUB TOTAL $ 60.87 TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ (Enter this total on the front of form) 60.87 ~.d'_,- -d- uO 0..__--- '--.-"-- .~ EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT DIRECTOR: ./{J I ¿ s o.rJ MONTH OF: Board Me5tings: 1/11 j I/ZS- Conferences and Other Msetings Date: I. I{) Organization c h ¡j A TAN cf):,~ Date: -/"1 Date: 1- '2. 7 Date: Date: DatI: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Description I.A:¡ B",e.{.',~ Description /I OM/';,)!' 1t+¡J , Description ßt!/J-"d.}{ 1-3 . Date:~- Organization Organization 5ßV /1 k! I? U $. A ú) Iì.A Organization Description .fl.>,;" H'3".J v1!3 Description Organization lJ5/!-/)JltA Organization Description Organization - ---- Description ---- Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description Organization Description t. @125.00 each- $ ? SD. 00 TOTAL # OF MEETINGS Personal Auto: Miles x .36 Parking Fees per mile- $ $ $ $ Total Lodgings, Meals & Other: (Details on Back) Total Director's Expenses 1 :;os-. ~¿¡- Signed 4"qj/ Date of Board Approval Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ Less any Advance Payments $ TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ ~g>-.2'f- 'I? "86" ,2'{ -y Lodgings: (Receipts attached) Date: to I tJ Function Attended c. J.1 <.J 19 Date: Function Attended rt ~ - S¡!c-r-D $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ } 36. -:>'f Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended . Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Meals: (Receipts attached) Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date:_- Function Attended SUB TOTAL ~ /3.5',21- $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ SUB TOTAL $ $ $ $ SUB TOTAL $ Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Other: (Receipts attached) Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended Date: Function Attended TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ /3",- .:2j- (Enter this total on the front of form) EAST VALLEY WATER DISTF;iCT METERED CONSUMPTION SUMMARY 2005 MONTH 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 JANUARY 1529 1620 1503 1368 1444 1289 1365 FEBRUARY 1098 1170 1098 1277 12:'\2 1291 MARCH 1236 1212 1075 1423 951 1163 APRIL 1311 1438 1264 1422 1272 1842 MAY 1205 1526 1672 1657 13;:;2 2070 JUNE 1630 2308 2133 2025 209J 2403 JULY 2289 2465 2416 2665 2235 2703 AUGUST 2365 2362 2443 2296 2727 2512 SEPTEMBER 2347 2546 2449 2300 2574 2665 OCTOBER 2108 1857 2058 1950 2125 2200 NOVEMBER 1801 1525 1765 1440 1857 1384 DECEMBER 1659 1388 1273 1328 1282 1571 TOTAL 20578 21417 21149 21151 21181 23093 1365 EAST VALLEY WATER DISTR:CT METERED CONSUMPTIQf: 2005 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) CURRENT MONTH CURRENT MONTH CURRENT MONTH 5 YEAR PRIOR YEAR 5 Y¡:AR MEANS PRIOR YEAR MONTH CONSUMPTION MOVING MEAN CONSUMPTION (A/B)-1 x 100 (A/C)-1 X 100 JANUARY 1365 1445 1289 -5.52 5.90 FEBRUARY 1214 1291 MAKCH 1165 1163 APRIL 1448 1842 MAY 1663 2070 JUNE 2192 2403 JULY 2497 2703 AUGUST 2468 2512 SEPTEMBER 2507 2665 OCTOBER 2038 2200 NOVEMBER 1594 1384 DECEMBER 1368 1571 TOTAL 1365 21598.2 23093 -93.68 -94.09 EAST VALLEY WATER DlSTFiJCT HIGHLAND SYSTEM MAIN LEAK SUMMARY 2005 MONTH 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 JANUARY 2 0 4 3 2 1 4 FEBRUARY 1 0 1 1 2 2 MARCH 2 1 4 2 3 0 APRIL 0 0 4 6 2 8 MAY 0 0 3 3 2 2 JUNE 0 3 7 6 4 2 JULY 1 2 2 9 7 6 AU('.IJST 1 4 8 4 6 4 SEPTEMBER 2 5 2 7 3 9 OCTOBER 2 6 5 2 4 5 NOVEMBER 3 3 1 2 5 10 DECEMBER 3 2 2 4 2 6 TOTAL 17 26 43 49 42 55 4 5.1.1W EAST VALLEY WATER DlSTf:lCT MAIN LEAK SUMMARY 2005 MONTH 1999 2000 2001 2002 ?'03 2004 2005 JANUARY 4 1 7 1 3 1 4 FEBRUARY 9 3 1 1 0 2 MARCH 6 8 2 0 4 5 APRIL 1 4 6 3 2 2 MAY 4 1 7 2 5 4 JUNE 5 8 4 1 5 1 JULY 4 8 8 2 1 3 AUGUST 8 2 5 0 3 3 SEPTEMBER 6 5 1 0 2 3 OCTOBER 2 3 1 3 0 3 NOVEMBER 5 2 1 6 3 7 DECEMBER 2 5 5 4 5 4 TOTAL 56 50 48 23 33 38 4 5.1W EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AFTER HOURS WORKSHEEï 2005 (1) (1 A) (2) (2A) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) TURN TURN PRESSURE LEAKING NO MAIN SERVICE FLOWING WATER SEWER MANHOLE MONTH ON OI=F HI LOW METERS WATER LEAKS LEAKS WATER QUALITY STOPPAGE OVERFLOW MIse TOTAL JAN 43 20 2 4 10 16 7 9 111 FEB 0 MAR 0 APR 0 MAY 0 JUNE 0 JULY 0 AUG 0 SEPT 0 OCT 0 NOV 0 DEC 0 TOTAL 43 20 0 2 4 10 16 7 0 0 0 0 9 111 .............................................. . . " . " .. : Association of the : ~ San Bernardino County Special: : Districts : ~ . . . ~ February 21, 2005 ~ ~ Membership Meeting 'I¡j' ~ ~ ~ Cucamonga Valley Water District is hosting the February . ~ membership meeting at Sierra Lakes Golf Club in Fontana. ; ÇI The social hour will begin at 6 p.m. with a call to order at 6:45 p.m. A ~ q buffet dinner will be served. Y ~ ~ : Buffet: Sirloin beef tips with noodles: chicken parmesan ; ~~ w/pasta; seasonal vegetables, green salad, rolls & c:¡~ V butter, fruit cobbler for dessert. Water, coffee, tea, iced Ý ~ tea . ~ ~ ~ Cost: $32 ~ ~ ~ : Program: Rich Atwater ; ~ "Washington's New Influence in San Bernardino County" " ~ ~ " :================= == ========= == === === ======= === === ======= = ========: .... : RSVP to Beth Barry by 2/7/05 ; " Telephone: 909-987-2591 ~ : Fax: .909-476-8032 E-Mail: bethb@cvwdwater.com : ~ 10440 Ashford St., Rancho Cucamonga 91730 "" ~ ~ ~ District/Associate . '$? ~ ~ '0/ Attendees: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 ~ I¥ REMrNDER: There is a $2 surcharge per person for reservations made after the deadline date and coming to the 'Q Ç) dinner meeting without having made reservations. You will also be billed forthe dinner if cancellation is not ~ Q received PRIOR to the deadline date. I(» Q ~ VVVV~~~~V~~~~~~~~~~.~.....~~..~~~~~~~~~~~~.W~ç .............................................. . . . . . . ~ . ~ . w . ~ . . . . Sierra Lakes Golf Club . ~ 16600 Clubhouse Drive ., : Fontana, CA 92336 ; : From high desert take 1.15 S towmd SAN BERNARDINO, Take the SIERRA AVENUE exit : Q Turn LEFTonto SIERRA AVE Turn RIGHT onto CLUBHOUSE DR End at 16600 . 'iP CLUBHOUSE DR FONTANA CA " V ~ ~ From West take 1.10 E toward SAN BERNARDINO. Merge onto 1-15 N toward ~ : BARSTOW/LAS VEGAS,: Merge onto CA.210 E Take the SIERRA AVE Turn LEFT onto ! ~ SIERRA AVE, Turn LEFT onto CLUBHOUSE DR End at 16600 CLUBHOUSE DR ~ FONTANA CA ~ ':"'A"QVE~".,: !..- '~ oc"':"'1i.¡',,1ml " ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ", I!$' ~ ~ ~ ~ . 0 . ~ ~ i ':""""-"~-"-~I~,.,.,~~I,.,-,'..,',o:_:/,---.._.,.,-_¡,~t~f;,r_~~~_¡,_,i.~,.,.~,,-' --','.,-:t.F§:,_~,:~,:,...-.~,~...4"',,., '.M¿fÒÒY~.,-" ~ ; -,?N-. 1:'\\0,,1 J, d,;'",., , ' : ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ';~ ç v ~ 7 Q ~ ~ V V V ~ Q ~ Q ~ Q Q v~v~~~~~v~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..~~~~~~~~~v~~~~vVv.V -----~ The San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce Governmental Affairs Division invites you to attend Legislative Breakfast State ~fthe City Address Featuring Mayor Judith Valles Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:30a.m. Radisson Hotel $ 30 - includes breakfast *** ***. **** *.**. *..** ** **** .*... "*Cut and Return ............*...... *... ........ .** Yes, I will attend the Legislative Breakfast Name Name Phone Business Name Please make reservations - Enclosed is $ . ¡"take check payable to: San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 658 San Bernardino, CA 92402 (909) 885-7515 ~~l-'g~~:~~ìl~ g 883-0766 .. EMBROIDERED ITEMS ;~ B~~nH,¿.~7~~~~:~~~~~ ------ You are cordially invited to attend the San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce "Business After Hours" hosted by Radìsson Hotel Boomer's Lounge Thursday, February 24, 2005 5:00 pm to 7:00 pm Î~!!:lJ,;, i /) ~ Hotel San Bernardino 295 North "E" Street San B¡Jrnarciino, Califo;'nia Cover charge $5.00 Please R.S.V.P. by Feb. 18,2005 . M. (COMPANY NAME) will- will not- be attencüng the San Bernardino Area Chamber of Connnerce "Business After Hours" hosted by Radisson Hotel Boomer's Lounge 295 Nor1h "E" Street San Bernardino, California 9240 I In my company will be: The San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce Governmental Affairs Division Invites you to attend 1': .. I' I if I Legislative Breakfast Featuring Supervisor Josie Gonzales Friday, March 11,2005 7~30 a.m. Shandin Hills Golf Club 3380 Little Mountain Drive $25 - includes breakfast , !" I I I II !~ i I I Come meet our new San Bernardino County Fifth District Supervisor Hear where she stands on our local issues Ask questions #################################Cut&Return########################### Yes, I will attend the Legislative Breakfast Name Business Name Name Phone Please Make _reservations - Enclosed is $ - Credit Cards are accepted: ---- Make check payable to: San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce P. O. J:lox658 San Bernardino, CA 92402 (909) 885-7515 I Î i I I " ~ .~ '1::: ~ ...... ;¿¡ 'J) ~ R: Ie' " " \ I> ¡;, , \ ¡~ i ¡.'; ,"'i ~ " 0;' ""'~'.', ".;~ : ~~" .~. , . t ..." r f'I,- ,. ,r.", 1"5' f 'ÎÎ 'r 11--. ""_';"'~'.",," J}.~.. :~~~ ~;'i~;2~~~~'~:' »Drought conditions and water storage in the Colorado River Basin »Lower Basin state perspectives - Arizona, California and Nevada »The latest on the Imperial Valley-San Diego water transfer ÞTribal water rights and how they affect the river's' water supply »Agricultura~water use >Urban groJth »Endangered species and multi-species planning »Salton Sea ecological and salinity issues This fast-paced tour begins at 7:30 a.m., Wednesday, April 6 at the Clarion Hotel in Las Vegas and will end at approximately 6 p.m., Friday, April 8 a ~ Ontario International Airport. Registration: $575 per person, single occupancy room; $950 for two people sharing a room, Register four or more people for a discount - single occupancy rooms, $525; double OCCUPaI1CY rooms, $900. Fee includes all meals, transportation and hotel accommodations while on the tour. Participants are responsible for their own transportation to Las Vegas and home from Ontario. . To register, return form to the Foundation with payment; faxed reservations accepted with credit card or purchase orders, Or, register securely on-line at www,watereducation.org/tours.asp All reservations are on a first-come, first-serve basis, Deadline to cancel and receive a full refund is 5 p.m. March 25 due to hotel, meal and transportation bookings, Refund request must be in writing, Substitutions may be made at any time, For those arriving in Las Vegas April 5, the Clarion Hotel is holding a limited number of rooms. To reserve a room, call the hotel at 1-800-732-7889 before March 6 and request the Foundation tour group special $80 rate. This is not included in the cost of the tour. This activity has been approved for MCLE credit by the State Bar of California in the amount of 20 hours. There is an additional $100 charge to register for MCLE credit. Additional information and an itinerary will be mailed approximately one month before the tour. Please notify the Foundation prior to the tour if you have a medical condition or other special need. ~,.'L< ~ ~{d; f!.ølJJ~:((:@a_1]J@:JÆûf~)¡jfJh1f@M¡¡ 0 " Name(s) TItle(sL Organization, Address / City Phone <--) Driver's LirenselI.D. Card No. State Zip \ ì . ¡ Email Stale Date of Birth (necessary for security clearance at some facilities) Enclosed is my fee: 0 $575 each, single occupancy room; 0 $525 each, if 4 or more are registering 0 $950 for two people sharing a room; 0 $900 per room, if 4 or more people are registering 0 $100 additional for MCLE credits Total enclosed $- For payment by: 0 Visa 0 MasterCard 0 American Express P.O. No., Credit Card No. Exp. date. ~ WATEREDUCATION foUNDATION 717K Street, Suite 317 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 444-6240 (916) 448-7699 fax www.watereducation.org Signature (lilust be signed to process credit card order) We reserve as many non-smoking rooms as are available. 1£ you WANT a smoking room, please check here: 0 5 p.m. March 25 is the last day /0 cancel and receive a full refund. Refund request must be in writing. Substitutions may be made at any time. /.,'," '1,':: .~, "",,~'.oit.,- .,~. '.\} . ß .~¡+,. ;iiII ,~ r[:@ll@1f@J@]@ ]J~tlfP)Œ1f 1I@OO1f:: : / The Colorado River is a lifeline to 25 million people in the Southwest. In the Lower Basin, virtually every drop of the river is allocated and yet demand is growing. How the Lower Basin states - Arizona, California ànd Nevada - use and manage this water to meet agricultural, urban, environmental and industrial needs is the focus of this tour. The tour travels along the Lower Colorado River from Hoover Dam to the Salton Sea and the Coachella ValÌey. The tour is a must for water policy-makers, water district managers and directors, lawyers, consultant~¡ journalists, and anyone interested in Colorado River issues. The tour is co-sponsored by the James Irvine Foundation and the u.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado Region. Tentative stops: :> Hoover Dam, and a boat ride on Lake Mead Central Arizona Project facilities . . Havasu National Wildlife Refuge. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California's facilities ..' Farms in the Imperial, Coachella and Palo Verde valleys The Salton Sea