The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 09/27/2005 t'rND East Valley Water District 3654 HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE #12, HIGHLAND, CA REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 27, 2005 2:00 P.M. AGENDA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the District Secretary by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Tuesday meeting not requiring departmental investi sation, will be considered by the Board of Directors". -- ------ --- - - --- - - - - -- - - - -- --- - --- - --- - -- - -- --- - -- -- - - ----- - ----- -- -- -- CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ---- - --- -- - -- - - - --- - - - - ---- - ----- - - - --- - -- -- - - - - --- - - ---- ---- -- - - --- ---- I. Approval of Agenda 2. Public Comnents CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes for September '13, 2005 4. Resolution 2005.25 - A Resolution to approve and adopt the National Incident Management System (NIMS) 5. Accounts Payable Disbursements: Accounts Payable Checks 203188 through 203366 were distributed ~:eptember 8, 2005 through September 21, 2005 in the amount of $2,372,717.35. Payroll Checks for period ended September 16,2005 and August 30, 2005 and included checks and direct deposits, in the amount of $129,097.77 and $4,168.94. Total Disbursements for the period were $2,505,984.06. OLD BUSINESS 6. Headquarter" Project Review and Update (General Manager) 7. Radon Rule Update 8. Discussion ,md Possible action regarding LAFCO's 2919 - Service Review and Sphere of influence Update for the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District NEW BUSINESS 9. Discussion and Possible action regarding the renewal of the District's Commercial and Liability Insurance Package from Arroyo/Caldwell & Moreland Insurance Services 10. Discussion and Possible action regarding renewal of the Integrated Management Program Demonstration Project Agreement 11. Discussion aad Possible action regarding Proposal from Basin Water Technology Group, Inc. for Uranium treatment at Well 40 12. Discussion a:ad Possible action regarding the IRS increase for the standard mileage rates for the remainder of 2005 13. Discussion and Possible action regarding the Association of California Water Agencies (ACW A) 2005 Sponsorship Program 14. Discussion and Possible action regarding Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement Between East Valley Wate:: District and Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM) dealing with the Seven Oaks Dam Water Quality Impacts REPORTS 15. General Manager's Report 16. Seven Oaks ;)am Water Quality Update 17. Oral Comments from Board of Directors CORRESPONDENCE 18. Letter of appreciation to the District from the Kiwanis Club of Highland, Inc for the District's participation in the Car and Motorcycle Show in conjunction with the Highland Area Chamber of Commerc'~ Discover Highland Night. MEETINGS 19. Highland Area Chamber of Commerce Benefit Golf Tournament, San Bernardino Golf Club, October 20, :W05. CLOSED SESSION 20. CONFEREi\'CE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR [Government Code Section 54956.8] Property: 4.3 Acres of Vacant Land Located North of 5th Street, East of the 30 Freeway Highland, CA APN: 1201-341-07 Party with whom District will negotiate: Mission Development Party who will be negotiating on behalf of the District: Robert Martin/Jim Cimino UndEr Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment 2 21. CONFEREi\CE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR [Government Code Section 54956.8] Property : 12.2 Acres of Vacant Land Located at 5th Street and Webster Street, Highland, CA APN: 1201-361-01,02,03 Party with whom District will negotiate: Mission Development (Greenspot Village and Market Place LLC) Part) who will be negotiating on behalf of the District: Robert Martin/Jim Cimino Und,:r Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment 22. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR [Government Code Section 54956.8] Property: 27+/- Acres of Vacant Land South of Highland Ave, West Of Central Ave San Bernardino County, California APN: 1191-25-01-03-04 Party with whom District will negotiate: State of California Party who will be negotiating on behalf of the District: Robert Martin/Jim Cimino Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS ADJOURN - -- ---- - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - -- -- - -- -- --- -- - - - -- -- - - - --- - - -- --- ---- -- - -- --- --- Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability-related modification or accommodation, induding auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above- agendized public meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Assistant at (909) 885- 4900 at least 24 hours prior to said meeting. - ---- - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - -- - - ---- - - - --- 3 Subiect to Aooroval EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 13, 2005 REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. by President Wilson. Director Lightfoot led the flag salute. PRESENT: Directors Lightfoot, Sturgeon, Negrete, Wilson, Goodin ABSENT: None STAFF: Ron Buchwald, Assistant District Engineer; Brian Tompkins, Chief Financial Officer; Justine Hendricksen, Administrative Assistant LEGAL COUNSEL: Steve Kennedy G~ST(s): Jim Cimino (Cimino Realty), Charles Roberts (Highland Community News) APPROVAL OF AGENDA M/S/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the September 13, 2005 Agenda be approved as submitted. PUBLIC PARrICIPATION President Wilson declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 2:01 p.m. There being no written or verbal comments, the public participation section was closed. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 23, 2005 BOARD MEETING MINUTES M/S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that the August 23, 2005 Board Meeting Minutes be approved as submitted. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL BOARD MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 M/S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that the September 1, 2005 Special Board Meeting and Public Hearing be approved as submitted. Minutes: 09/13105 RESOLUTION 2005.22 - NOTICE OF COMPLETION EXECUTED BY THE DISTRICT FOR LINER AND TEST PUMP FOR WELL llA IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND, was presented to the Board for approval. M/S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that Resolution 2005.22 be approved as submitted. RESOLUTION 2005.23 - ACCEPTING CONVEYANCE OF PIPELINE EASEMENT FROM JACK R. WIDMEYER, TRUSTEE OF THE JACK R. WIDMEYER SEPARATE PROPERTY REVOCABLE TRUST, was presented to the Board for approval. M/S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that Resolution 2005.23 be approved as submitted. RESOLUTION 2005.24 - NOTICE OF COMPLETION EXECUTED BY THE DISTRICT FOR REMOVAL OF TREES, CONCRETE BOX, OLD WATER PIPE, CHAIN LINK FENCING, AND DIG FOOTINGS FOR BLOCK WALL AT PLANT 27, was presented to the Board for approval. M/S/C O~egrete-Lightfoot) that Resolution 2005.24 be approved as submitted. DlSBURSEMI:NTS M/S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that General Fund Disbursements #202928 through 203188 distribLted during the period of August 24,2005 through September 9,2005 in the amount of $1,725,802.08 and Payroll Fund Disbursements for the period ended August 19, 2005 and September 2, 2005, 2004 in the amount of $124,768.39 and $143,371.37 totaling $1,993,941.84 be approved. HEADQUARTERS PROJECT REVIEW AND UPDATE No update. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, was presented to the Board for approval. M/S/C (Lightfoot-Negrete) that the Memorandum of Understanding between East Valley Water District and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association be approved as submitted. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF A PORTION OF AN EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FROM EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AT PLANT 37 (FOOTHILL & STERLING A VENUES). 2 Minutes: 09/13/05 Ron Buchwald updated the Board regarding the request from the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department; that only a few small changes are needed; that CDM is currently reviewing the request and the District is awaiting their recommendations. No action taken. DIRECTORS' FEES AND EXPENSES FOR AUGUST 2005, were presented to the Board for appwval. MlS/C (Sturgeon-Negrete) that the Directors' fees and Expenses for August 2005 be approved. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT The Board Pre~;ident reported that he had met with Congressman Lewis regarding the Seven Oaks Dam water quality issues. Ron Buchwald updated the Board on both the Sterling Pipeline project and Plant 27 project. Information only. SEVEN OAKS DAM WATER QUALITY UPDATE No update. ORAL COMMENTS FROM BOARD OF DIRECTORS Director Sturg,~on commented on the "Discover Highland Days" event; that the event was well received md complimented staff on their participation; that the Insurance Committee had met during the week, and will meet again on September 19,2005. Director Goodin would like clarification a:s to who is acting General Manager when Bob is away on business. Director Negrete indicated that Congressman Lewis is receiving conflicting information on water quality i:;sues from the Army Corps of Engineers. Director Lightfoot received a water test data form on his door, and would like the District to inform customers via calls, newsletters etc. that this form and the request to sample customers wat'~r is not from the District. Information Oaly. LETTER TO THE DISTRICT FROM ANDY HORNE REQUESTING DISTRICT SUPPORT TO SERVE AS VICE PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES. No action takEn. 3 Minutes: 09/13/05 ASSOCIATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICTS MEMBERSHIP MEETING HOSTED BY VICTOR VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, RAMADA INN, VICTORVILLE, CA SEPTEMBER 19, 2005. THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA TOUR PRESENTED BY THE WATER EDUCATION FOUNDATION, SACRAMENTO, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, SEPTEMBER 21-23,2005. SAN BERNARDINO AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, BUSINESS AFfER HOURS, PRESENTED BY GREYSTONE EXECUTIVE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, INC., 201 E. AIRPORT DRIVE, SUITE C, SAN BERNARDINO, CA, SEPTEMBER 22, 2005. 4TH ANNUAL ACHIEVEMENT IN WATER RESOURCES AWARD BANQUET, CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY (OBERSHA W DINING ROOM), SAN BERNARDINO, OCTOBER 8, 2005. THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TOUR PRESENTED BY THE WATER EDUCATION FOUNDATION, ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, OCTOBER 19-21, 2005. CLOSED SESSION The Board entered into Closed Session at 2:33 p.m. a:s provided for in the California Open Meeting Law, Government Code Section 54945.9(a); to discuss the item(s) listed on the Agenda. ADJOURN TO REGULAR SESSION President Wilson declared that the meeting adjourn to regular session. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS The Board returned to regular session at 2:38 p.m. The items listed on the Agenda were discussed in Closed Session with no reportable action being taken. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 2:38 p.m. until the next regularly scheduled Board Meeting on September 27, 2005. George E. Wilson, President Robert E. Martin, Secretary 4 Minutes: 09/13/05 - RESOLUTION 2005.25 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA Date: September 27,2005 WHEREAS, the President of the United States in Homeland Security Directive (HSPD)-5, directed the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to develop and administer a Nationallncidenl Management System (NIMS), which would provide a consistent nationwide approach for Federal, State, local, and tribal governments to work together more effectively and efficiently to prevent, prepare for, respond to and recover from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size or ce,mplexity; and WHEREAS, the collective input and guidance from all Federal, State, local, and tribal homeland security partnerE has been, and will continue to be, vital to the development, effective implementation and utilization of a comprehensive NIMS; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that all Federal, State, local and tribal emergency agencies and pe rsonnel coordinate their efforts to effectively and efficiently provide the highest levels of inciden': management; and WHEREAS, to facilitate the most efficient and effective incident management it is critical that Federal, State, local, and tribal organizations utilize standardized terminology, standardized. organizational structures, interoperable communications, consolidated action plans, unified command structures, uniform standards for planning, training, and exercising, comprehensive resource management, and designated incident facilities during emergencies or disasters; and WHEREAS, the NIMS standardized procedures for managing personnel, communications, facilities and resources will improve the Utility's ability to utilize federal funding to enhance agency readiness, and streamline incident management processes; and WHEREAS, the Incident Command System (lCS) components of NIMS are already an integral part of various incident management activities at East Vallev Water District, including current emergency mar agement training and exercise programs; and WHEREAS, in !2005) the East Valle v Water District adopted the statewide Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS), and participates in an emergency management program involving all local water utilities through the Water Emergency Response Organization of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the California Standardized Emergency Management System substantially meets the objectives of the National Incident Management System; and WHEREAS, Garv Sturdivan. the Emergency Management Manager, appointed by the General Manager, will ensure that personnel who are part of the emergency organization, and who are designated as California Disaster Service Workers (according to California Government Code 3100-3109), are trained and prepared to respond; and WHEREAS, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks (9-11 Commission) recommended adoption of a stElndardized Incident Command System; WHEREAS, pur:,uant to the President's Executive Order, Homeland Security Directive (HSPD) 5, local governrrents are required to establish the National Incident Management System (NIMS) as the standard for incident management. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the East Valle v Water District's Board of Directors does hereby approve and adopt the National Incident Management System as the Utility's standard for incident management, and further more directs staff to implement NIMS, including the delivery of a employee trainin9 program. t'rND East Valley Water District Board Memorandum Date: September 27, 2005 From: Brian W. Tcmpkins / Chief Financial Officer Subject: Disbursements. :z;-r- Recommendation: Approve the attached list of accounts payable checks and payroll issued during the period September 8, 2005 through September :~1, 2005. Background: Accounts payable crecks are shown on the attached listing and-include numbers 203188 to 203366 for A total of $2,372,717".35. The source of funds for this amount is as follows: Arroyo Verde Funds Construction Fund -Loan Unrestricted Funds $2,372,717.35 Payroll disbursed was for the period ended September 16, 2005 and included checks and direct deposits, Totaling $'29,097.77. Directors payroll disbursed was for the period ended August 30, 2005 and included checks and direct deposits totaling $4168.94. Total disbursements $2,505,984.06. -", '" "' Q!j 1::1 '" ... '" <:\ 0;; ... .... <:\ .... <:\ '" ~re '" 1;'1 ~ ... c ,_ '" '" .... '" "' '" '" '" '" ..., ,0 .; c>> .; ,..: co< .,; co< .,; <Xi .,; <Xi .,; 0 .,; 0 r--:crl ... ~ co< .... 00. ;;; ~ E '" .... '" '" ~ '" '" '" 0 '" '" '" .... "'''' ~ '" "'. '" '" '" '" '" ... "'- to 'Oe- <( ~ ~ ......00 "';: to> ~w >. -c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..t: ~ ,~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 ~8.E ~I- .. 0 i5 .."'<.> ~ I- ... u .. .<: U "' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 '" 0 0 '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u ~ ~ 0 '" ~ 0 0 0 0 '" ~ '" ~ N ~ ~ N 0 ~ \::! 'OS ~ (;; ~ ~ ~ \::! (0 ;;, 0 as \::! ... > 0 ai ai ~ '" ~ ai ai N ~ '" '" ai \::! ~ ai ai .50 as as as as as as as '" (j; i I ;; 0 '" '" 0 ~ '" 'I' '" ;J\ '" ... M 0 '" ~ ~ - N ;0 ... ~ .... '" '" '" 1!l '" 0 0 '" N '" M <h - . . " 0 N '" N 0; N to Ii; .... ... '" '" " ... U U.o ;; "' " 0 N '" III en 0 0 0;; 0;; ;; C!; '" ~ ~ (; E 0 0 0 to 0; 0; to ;; ;; .... .... 0;; ;; 0 'i: 'E In 0 to '" N '" en '" 0 0 a; a; N "' > , 0 N '" ~ 0 .... ... ... ~ '" '" '" '" ~ .... N '" - ,"0 .5z "' ~ '" ~ ~ ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ~ 0 N "' ~ .!!! "C ~ C "'01 U . ... J9 ~ 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) UJ ~ O~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - . ~ Cll .. 0 :i: .,.. 1ij<( >._~ Q) ., '" lili '" .... 3l N N .... '" '" 0 0;; N '" " "' '" '" '" to ;': en = 0:::0 '" to ... to ::0 ::0 ~ fil fil N N N fil ~ '" '" '" n:J ~-c ",z '" N i N ~ '" '" '" .'" '" '" '" N N " " :J: " :J: g :J: :J: :J: g g g ::f g " :J: " " > ".2 " " C!; " " " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... I>> ; "ll '" '" '" en .<: 0. . 'i' 0 0 CllU ",E '" M M W 0<'> 0 0 0 ~-;; '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0.0 0 0 'i' 0 0 'i' 0 0 0 0 0 0 'i' 0 0 0 'i' 0 0 0 0. M M '" M M '" M M M M M M '" M M M '" M M M ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~ W W W W W W W W W W U U U U U U U U U U >- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ U ...J n. a: z n. w w w w w w w w w w - =0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 z 00 .( ::;; ::;; ::;; ::;; ::;; ::;; ::;; ::;; ::;; ::;; 0 0 ...J W a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a: > ~ 0 00 0 < e: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: w < u 0 '" 0 lL lL lL lL lL lL lL lL lL lL 0 I- 0: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0: Z 0 0 w ..: 0 00 I U I- =0 =0 =0 =0 =0 =0 =0 =0 =0 =0 < =0 '" 0 =0 U a: 00 w w W W W W W ::;; ::;; '" W 0 0 W W W . 0 , W W 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" , ::;; w 0: E 0 ~ Z ::;; ;: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0 0 n. < c. 0 "g ~ Z U I _z g~ N ",00 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. 0lCl. ~ N< "'<t ~ "' 00 0 0C2 oa: 0C2 0C2 0C2 d2 ~ 0C2 0C2 0C2 g,... 0 o oZ 0:;; 0 00 0< O...J g,.. Oz ;;c, 0 "'''' = << "-"- = 00 Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll Ulll ~ << """ """ N CC = = '" """ ::;;::; ::;;::; ::;;::; ::;;::;::;;::;::;;::;~ ::;;::; ::;;::; ::;;::; """ co< .. ;:;: << ~ lWJ Ulll >> << << << << << << << <<<< < << << << << << a>:Il """ N Ii; '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "' "' "' "' "' "' .0 "' "' E "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. ~ 0 ~ ~ N \::! N \::! ~ N ~ N \::! \::! ~ N N N N N N C. u. N :;; :;; :;; ~ :;; :;; :;; :;; as " " " " :;; :;; .. "- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .co 00 <'>0 (j; (;; 0; 0; 0; (j; (j; 0; (j; 0; (j; 0; 0; (;; (j; (j; (j; (j; (j; (;; ~~>- ~. 0 "On. gg; ~" ""'I " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " -"'l- iiI- ~'-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' ~";2 .c~ 1-0 .c , '" en 0 0; N '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" C!; '" '" .... '" ~ <Il", '" '" en '" en en '" en '" '" '" en '" en en en en a; a; t.: U - ~ ;;; ~ ;;; ~ ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ~ ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ~ ;;; ;;; ~ "F6.E 3l . - 1l~ '" '" '" '" '" .c.o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ot=::l <.>Z <(N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~." 18 .... oo 0 "' ;;; '" '" .. ... ill .... :il !l!8 0 0 0 "' .. 0 0 e_ N 0 0 0 '" '" 0'" ~ 0 ~ 0 ... ...0 <> , . M <D 0; 0; .; en <D ;t cOo ;;! 0; ccici 0; ;;; 0; en aid ci ... ea. :t .i "' "' Q) .... ~ N ~"' oo 5l:J: "' N '" ~"' "' ~ ....- N ~'" "'- 0 '" .... '" ....0 00 N N ~ N uSai ,.: ~ '02- ~ ... NOCl 16~ ~w >. ~ e 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 <> <> <> <> 0 e . 0 0 <> 0 0 <> <> <> <> <> <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e '" d 0; d 0; d 0; d 0; 0; d 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; ci 0; 0; ci ..t ~ e " ~8..E ~.... .. e 2i O-<>:u <ii <ii <ii ~ "5 "5 .... .... " ... ... " " " " " . .c .c .c () () () "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' on 0 "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 "' 0 <> 0 8 <> <> <> <> <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ r::: "' a M ~ N ill ~! Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N !:; N ~ ~ .5c a; c; r::: a; a; a; ;;:; ;;:; oo ;;:; oo oo ~ N "' "' '"i "' <? <? 0 0 0 :il 0 <> d> <h ... ... w ... 8~ ;;; '" N N ::;: <; '" ... 00 N <> "' "' oo () <> "' N N N N ;1; ;1; .... oo Q) .... '" N oo '0 E <; <5 '" N N N N N ... '" ~ <> .... '" ;;; oo .;: " > , '" :il <> <> 0 <> <D > > (;J .... Q) ::;: ::;: <> ~ .. N '" "' "' "' "' C3 C3 N t;; 0 u; .. <> .5z .... "' ~ ... ... ... ... .... ~ w w "' ... ... N <> .- " ~ Cl c " . 0 .. N 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 .. - e Co CllU) 0; c~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... , '0 ell ~ ;:~ on <( .. >> .- 'i' Cll '" .. ~" <> ... <> ~ N "' '" <> a) "' = 0::0 ." "' "' '" N N "' ,... I I i oo "' "' "' "' on o:z N '" .... N N N .... '" '" :J: '" '" '" .. ro~-c .... .... :J: :J: .... .... .... 15 .... 15 :J: 15 15 :J: .. > U.!2 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... g <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> ..... C) Qj ii "' "' "' "' "' Ul .c "- . <> <> 'i' <> <> lllU .".2 M M '" M M W eU <> <> <> <> <> "t:~ .. on "' "' "' "' "' on "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' on a.e <> <> <;' 0 <> <> 0 <> <> <> <> <;' 0 <;' 0 <> <> <> <> 0- M M '" M M M M M M M M '" M '" M M M M M ~ <> <> <> 0 <> 0 <> <> 0 <> <> <> 0 0 <> <> <> <> 0 '" '" (J) w () z () u '-' 0 ;!; ;!; ;!; 'i: c;; ;;! ...J ...J "- c..i (J) <( <( (;; :E z z z 0 ~ 0 0 0 z (!) r5 <( ::; ~ ~ ~ 15 0 C3 0 u '" '" 0:: u 0:: z z z <( '" "' "- .... z '" '" '" '" 0 0 z '" (J) w U w .... '" w U w w w z z '" "- "- w ::; ~ (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) !z .... .... 5 5 w 0 0 0 ...J W W W W W W W Z Z "' W Z ...J ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; I - - - I I '" '" w >; w U z ~ (J) . I 0 0 0 0 0 '" I I I (!) (!) <( 5 5 >- E (!) "- w I I I I I <( U U u 'i: 'i: 0 c" z 0 w w w w (J) ...J ...J ~ W _z ai ;;g z oi:i oi:i oi:i oi:i oi:i ~ N-;- ,..". N- "- "- "- <( <( ~ c; 00 &0 "'" ~ 01- 01- 01- 01- 01- :5::i ~ ~ ~ 1:P 1:P gp ~ ~ Ct/l "'" <> ."." <(<( ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ UJ.J.J UJ.J.J UJ.J.J UJ.J.J 0>- ~ ~ = = ZZ :D N e e ZZ (>) """ lW.J lW.J lW.J lW.J UJ.J.J = = = = H- ::w ::w (>) (>) . . = 00 tx.) tx.) N >> <= <= tx.) tx.) tx.) tx.) tx.) tx.) tx.) tx.) tx.) tx.) {)(j {)(j {)(j N a; "' "' "' "' "' "' "' on "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' .0 "' E <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> 0 <> 0 0 <> 0 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 " " N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N C. ~.e ;! .... :;, .... .... .... ;! .... .... .... :;, .... .... .. :;, " .c. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a; a; ~ (J) uc a; a; c; (j; (j; (j; c; a; a; c; c; 01 01 a; c; a; 0\ ~~>- ". ~g,I M~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" " '" ~2~ B.... u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u () () U ....0'" '" 0 <; N N N N N '" .... g .... "' "' .... oo oo Q) 0 " '" 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 N Qj al;'; " ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ E 5l . ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .c" <> <> 0 0 <> 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> <> <> <> oi==> uz N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .. .~. . g . ~ 8. 8 8 8. 8 8 8 8 . g . . 8 8 8 8 8 . H".-..". o. 0 0 0 0 0 · · " · · · · " · , ~ E" '" '" '" " " CO< '" '" '" .... " '" '" -. -, -, .. < .., .. .."" u .. u -- l) e- C\l C") ",gO "'~ guJ ,,~CO 0 c' 0 0 0 ogog0800go000g0go . ,. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · .H ... · · · · · ................. 8,R E ~ I- (tIl'o) 0 - ~o:::o a .. 15 .... ~ " ., t) 8 '" ~l 8 8'" 88"'82"'2"'2828"'g2gLOgg " 0 0 " 0 0 g o~gOO~o~~~~F<:N~CO<~~ ~. ~ . " ~ S ~ S. S S S . S · · · · · · · · · · >~ CO< 03 0) ~ ~ ~ '" N CO< N CO< N N N N '" CO< CO< '" CO< '" '" '" .,. . . . . . ..........."..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ .................................................................... .; ~ q~'i'O"l'i''i''i'''IO'i''i''i'qO'i' ",J..~N",co<"'d>O~"""''"CO<o _UJ ~ '" ......"'~<ooo~co<"'''''''~"'<D ~ ... .' ....",..".......... . ..' .. . . . .. """"."".".""""".. .....S..."" ................. ...>.00 ..." """""""'" ;; <0 H" · · · .. .. < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ._ "C ~ 'O~"".. 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000 .0'."" ,." > ,>,>,,>,,>""'>' ... .- III ... 0 ~ ~~ >0. .- ~ . o. .. .... · · · · · 0 0 .. " . · · · . · 0 =.0".' ,". o. ................. . ' <.' . . . " " ................. >""'u' ' "", """""""'" ._ 0 0 . 0 . 0 ., 0 0 0 0 . 0 · · 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 in .r:. l 1 2 ~~ ca (.) "0- M ,.., W ~u o'~ ,,-.; '" '" '0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0.00 q ,:;> 9 0 0 00000009000000000 0.," '" ,<, '" '" '" "''"'"''''"'"'"''''"'"''''"'"'''''''"'" 000" 0 0 0 00000000000000000 .... ~ ~ U U U U U U U U U t) t) U t) U U U 0 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ffi 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 W W W W W W W eo 0 <Jl ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ r .... 0'"' 00000000000000000 ~ ~ uJ 0 <( <Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<JlC/)<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl<Jl ~ 000 Z .................................. uJ " Z .:J .51"'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''"''''''' i" >uJ uJ .. " " UOUOOOOOOOOt)t)t)OOO "E>- u.. uJ 0 <( 00000800008000000 UJ :t: 0 u.. _ t) 00000 0000 000000 e ~ ~ .....u Z 4: C\lU( ~I ~ro ~ro ~ro ~ro ~ro ~ro ~~ ~ro ~ro ~ro ~ro ~ro ~ro ~ro ro co ro . "", "" '" "" "" '" '" '" '" '" '" "" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ .. o ."." ::c) Ulll ~ ~ rJ"IJ) ro . aJ . """ ro' """ """ aJ . aJ . """ """ """ """ """ aJ' aJ . aJ . """ " ,,?? '" - = '" ~ '" '" ~ '" ~, ~. '" '" ~, ~ ~-. ~- ~ "'. '" '" ~, " ,,- - = - - = ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~== i.. · · · · ................. , 00000000000000080000000 . . ~ ~ ~ g @ ~ g~g~ggggg.@"""""" 0." liS""'''''''''' "......""..."..."..."...:;j':;j':;j':;j' :;j' :;j' J:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . 00....... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ~~ >- ~ II .," .' < < < < < < < < < < < < < < " . < < < " < < < :;.~.I-:;2 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 C J:~ ....0 o ~ N '" .., '" <0","''''"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ~. ~. " 0 N CO< N N N N CO< N CO< CO< CO< CO< CO< CO< '" '" N CO< '" '" '" '" , -" ... . . . . . ................, 0"-, .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' .. 0"" " " " " " """"."""""""""""' ..'C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<0 <0 'd' CO N..... to CD "lI'<<:l ..... N ,.... CO 0 COO S'ia ~ ~ ~ C! q q q ~O'! q ~ C'1 C'!~ ~ tq O'!O'! ~ O'! ~ ": O'! ~q f'.. QD. 0 0 LO 0 10 0 0 0<0 CD <0 CO MCO O'l"" COt.O ..... 0 "'" N to 'ltO ..... E C"? (f) C":l N CO') 0 0 ~N en ..- CD mo ..... 0 coo ..... 0> CO) lO ..... ........... ..... c( ..... ..... ..... ..... CO') "':,..... ..... iN ('liLt) .................... CO') O~ ('II "<toO '"';: "'> 8w >. ,%,r:: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l.() 0 CO CO C\l 0 r:: $11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MO)l"-- 0 M 0 ..tll oi/i ci d ci c::i ci ci ci ci 0 ci ci ci ci 0 ci ci CO; 0 ....; ci ci ~8.E liP- 11I Q) 0 - a.. 0:: 0 C jij Cii (; iii '0 '0 '0 '0 I- to-.... I- ~ ~ ~ ..:.:: o u u u ~ m m m .c. .c.c. .c U 0 (J U lOlOlC)lOLO I,() 1.0 It) IOLOLO OOOOOl.OlO lO 1.0 LOO 1.0 Olt) 0 IOlO000 1.0 II 000000000000000000000 U NNNNNOO 0 0 ON 0 NO N OONNN 0 '0 aa;::;:::;::~C:! ~ ~ t:!o N ;:~ lO NNC\lMM N >! M M C') M M .......... ...... CO t::..... C.i5 M C\J ..... CO 03..... ..... Ci3 .50 CiS as 05 05 CO 01 as 0; c.n 0> CO m as 05 05 0; as Oi m en m ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... en m 0> CJ'l O'l ..... ..... r-- ,.... ,.... I'- ..... CJ) 0'1 ..... o 0 000 ,.... I'-- ~. " " 0 NM.nN.....9, M om ~L()o)IOMMC")..... <0 co 00..... I() -.:t,....-.:t,........ ...., BGJ (0 (0 co m en 0 ~ ,.... <0 0 co co N "It It) M,........ '<t <0 o ._~ N N N iN N..... 10..... <0 to N ,......... 0 CD CD LO co <0 ..... '-'C oElOl.OLOlOlOgg C"? co mO:l N.......... <0 00............... l.O ......IO~=IIIII__ 10 co COCO C"') C")C"') N O'lCDO'lmO:l <0 U;cao_z<(<(<(<(<(<c<( a::: 'V NN N CD to ~ a:la:la:la:la:l 'V ._ "'O~ C...S~g8.0000000 0 0 00 0 00 0 00000 0 (1)cn~c~>>>>>>> > >>> >>> > >>>>> > - . ~ III ~ 0 :> '" ~ > en cI; >-.- :!;1 (1) ~ g 't.5 g 0.; ~ &5 ~ lO ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:i ~ ~ M ~ ~;$j ~ ~ .. ~Z M M M M M M M M ~ S ~ ~ S 'V N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'V >~'& ~ ~ ~ :& ; ::!; :t ; ;J.; ; .;;t:]: ; :!;:&;; :]: ~.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -I/).c:' i ~ Il') 1O1O 1l')1O~~~ 0- 9 999 99999 ra 'tl.2 M M M M M M M M M W oU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t~ ~ lO lO Il') ~ lO ~ ~ lO lO Il') Il') ~ Il') 1O ~ 1O 1O Il') ~ Il') Cl.O 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 q q Q 0 q q 0 0 0 0 q 9 0 a.MMMMMMM M M MM M MM M MMMMM M 0000000000000000000000 I- 0:: W J: Ul uuu'~uuu U ~ >->->->->- ~~~~~~~ ~. 0 00 ~~~~~ . . . ,- - . - en W W ::s:: u u c.. a.. a. a. a. ~~~~~~~ W ~~ U 1-1- ::E:E~~~ 000::>000 <J. u..u.. 0 zz 00000 w (/)C/)C/)'f)(/)CI".JCI".J Cf) 00 0:: ww uuuu<.) ~ Cl!l~~~~0!50!5 0 UU tu 5:5: U)C/.lC/)Ct:Jcn I- ::s::::t:::s::~::s::::s:::::s::: U a::: C/'J(/) W -- cI; 1-1-1-1-1- t- UU():,)UUU ~ 0 00 a::: =:l=:l z a::: a:::: a:::: a:: a:: U'J ClI 0000000 - u.. 0::0:::: I-- 00 <C <(c:(<(c{c:( w E uuuuuuu ti: ,. alal Ul WW 0 a. a. a. a. a. ;: c~ m m m rn m m m 0 > a::: a::: T ~ ~ I W W W W W gjj) _Z ~c{ ~c:( ~c:( ..-c:( ~<( ....<( ~c:(...... W .....-:-'- ....-w....-w a:::: r-z r-.z r--.z r-z r-z ~ 6 a 8co 8m 8a:l gCJ 8a:l 8a:l 8m gQ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8C2 ~ a!J 85 85 85 85 85 6Cl o "c"c CIl." CIl." CIl." a: ' CIl." CIl." CIl." LWJ C50C = = ::D "'" "'" D!J = = = = = -1...J N. ~ ~ W~ rJY~ CIt'~ f.I;~ W~ W~ CIt'~ >> <{<( <{<( <(c:( co <(<( <(c:( L1.lJ.l UllJ UlU UlU U1JJ LWJ ex:> gj > > il.1JJ UliJ UliJ LLW UliJ U1.U UllJ UllJ I.L.ll.. u..u.. u..u.. u..u.. ~ ex!) CX!l a!> C.!X!) C.!X!) C.!X!) C.!X!) 00 ~ l.OIOLOU:~LOl.O U') ~ lOlO U") lOll') Il') 101l')1/)U")~ l.O E oooeoco 0 0 00 0 00 0 000000 ocoeooo 0 0 00 0 00 0 000000 .!l JII: ~~~~~~~ ~ s:::! ~~ ~ C:!C:! ~ s:::!NNNN N ~ Ms 'V "<t '<t ..q v v..q- v '<t "<t "<t "<t V "<t "<t v:;a: ~ :;;r ~ :;a: ..... .J::.ra ~...... .......... .... .... ........ .... ........ .... .................... U) UQ m 05 m a as Oi en 05 en Oi 0; en 0; 0; en en as m Gi m m ~~>- ::':'cu ~g;I Mg;::s::::s::::s::::t::s::::s:::::s::: ::s:: ::s:: ~::s:: ::s:: ::s::::s:: ::s:: ::s::::s:::::s::::::s::::t: :::s:::: ~ ~ 1-:;; c3l- U U U (..1 U U U U U U U U U U C,) U U U U U U -'=- 1-0 CD CD CD ~I CD CD CD r- ~ m ~ 0 ........ N M M M M M "<t QjC1i~"ti NNN~iNNN N N NN ~ gj~ ~ gj~~gf~ ~ rn.s;~ ~.c888t:888 8 8 88 8 88 8 888888 Cll-=:! uz N N N C'l N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~c 't:l M 0 C!l 10 '<t (0 <0 .... ..... It) r-- en 0 (0 '<t ..... '<t in 0 ..... ~ ii C! C! C! ~ ~ cq q f"': ~ O'! C! cq q C"! "! CIC! CIC! ~ q ~ ..... 00. '<t C\l en co (") C\l '<t 0 N '<t N 00 ..... co 0 CO,...I.O ..... ..- E 0 0 (') en ..... 0 M C) T'" Il) "'It (0 0 N M..... _ 0( .......... 10...... M M M~ M M N. ..... q..... 'Qe- co co.... N LOOO ~~ oW >. 'EC 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 ..... 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ::If>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..t 8. o~ ci d d ci ci ci ci ,...: d d ci ci ci d c:i ci ci ci ~8. E l;ll- ~~8 i5 S S o 0 I- I- ... ... " " '" .. .<: .<: U U 10 l") lO 10 It) L() 10 an 10 10 LO 10 LO 0 C~ 0 Lt'l I{) 0 0 0 an LO 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 Gl 00 c:> 000000000000000 lJ 0 N C\l C::! 0 0 N N N 0 0 C\l N N N NON "O!l ~ N r:: ..... C::! ~ 0 M ;:: ~ C::! ;:: (5 0; as 05 C::! 0 .5~Oi 05 ~a a; a; Oi as 0; ~m~ ~ ~~ii5?i3 ai ii5 <> <> 9 ..... N ..... ..... N .....9 10 0090..... M I::J <0 (0 en m 0'1 en ..... . .... 111"'(0 u& '<t...t '<:t .....<oM cno>.......... ~ ~ U (J 1: 0 OJ I") ..... (0 8 M ..... to 0 10 (0 to CI; '<t I N "t:'C 'SE~ ~~::!:g ~..... 8 r:::: a;~;: 0 ~~C)~ 0 ~ ~1t)>::IM a)'~ C) "'It 0 N 10 -.:t101O co MMC"JM N 0 en CI:I 0 .5 z..... en '0 '<t co 0 ..... .... .............. '<:t .................. ..... ..... ._ "C ~ o CN ....!9~ g& 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0000 0 0 (1)f/)~ o~ > > :> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - ,- IV ~ 0 :> .. ~ > 1;;< ;.,'- 9 (1) CI) M ...... LO '<t D (V)' CD 0') I""- 0 0 to <0 O'l to..... en 0 10 LO 0:: 0 GJ.Cl 0) M .n M Cl) N '<t (") (0 c.o (0 '<t ("') M M! OJ - ~ ~ ~z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ >tio "" ~ " " ~ ~ ~ " ... ~ ~ ~ ,,~ ~.~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -:;:.co.<II '21,{) 10 ~ 10 l.O ~lJ")l.O l.O 1l)~l,{)l.O on ,,, ;; 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 Q 0 0 ca- 0 10M' 0 0 I I M I MOl W ~u 8 a 0 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 0 8 8 t; It) l.O lO 10 It) lJ") lJ") l.O lJ") lO lO 10 LO l.O LO LO l.O l.O CL.O 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 CL.C") C") C"') M M C") M C") MMM M MMMM M M ~o 00000000000000000 (f) 0 I- W U Z _ >- W ci ~.J ::E !z :!; it Ii: W () ~ <( C! W en a. 0. W Iz (f) ~ >->->->- 0 z 0::: .J.J.J.J en . w 0 ...J {9 a.. a.. a.. a.. w <( () ::; W -I- ..J ~ (f) (f) (f) zo..o.. 0.. 0. () C3 z a. () w:> 0::0::0:: a:: :J:J:J=:l -- -. 5 z >- () u z 0::: UJ W W <( en en en U'J > 0:: C( 0 w tii ~ ~ 0::: w Z Z Z 0 ~ or5 06 or5 ffi ~ u ~ W gs u. I- I- C3 ~ L5lfii1i ~ .J.J.J.J U'J 0... e I- Cl ...J <( 0::: en I :> .J.J..J 0 0 0 0 UJ I Q~ :) Z l.1. en ~ 3 z :> () () 0 Zoo 0 0 en ~ ., -;: _ = -0; .,' ~>- M~ ~ :go ,,,0 N" N.. N.. ~<( <01- <01- <01- <01- ....~ ~ o 00 go ~ C:)Cf.! 0<( &u go on oz; ~8U8U ~ f?ln~8f.Il~ 00 ~ g 'g'g ~ C!X.9 ~ ~ UXI"J= ~ ~ 9:S >->- >->- >->- I-t- ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ~ . .. ~ _ _ _ ~~ ~~ = = = = <(<( UllJ UllJ UllJ UllJ <(<( UllJ N >>II II II II II II :::c:I: _ ...,...,...,...,...,..., ~ ~::c:,:: ~ ~ -L..J .J.J N .8 lO LO LO LO 1.0 1.0 I,{) LO I.OlOlO 10 101.0101,{) LO lJ") Egg g g g g g g ggg g gggo 0 0 ~ gs ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ~cu....................-.......-..................-..-.......-.......-..-.......... C/) uc 05 05 Oi 0; en Oi en en en en en en en en en en Oi en ~~ >- "'. '00.. " ~O)I G)~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::l: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :3 ~ I-~ 01- 0 () () () 0 0 0 U 0 (,) 0 U 0 0 () () (,) (,) ~~ 1-0 lJ") co f"'"- co 0) 0 ..... N M M M .q- an I() LO lJ") co f"-. .::Jl. N N N N N M M M MMM C"'l C"'lC")C"'l("') C"'l M <Owl: (,l N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 16.~:g ~.a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ell-=> tJz N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C\l g~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... 00.. It) Il) "C"'"CO CO tt) "<t m co.....o ~ N 0)0 9. 0 P2 S!: CD", .... E C\l N It) CO ~ ~ C\l !9 a; ~ <0 C5 "<t ~ N C) .., CO .... 'Oe. 0( ....~ ~ ....~ ll'i to.= rD 'r".....: .0 M CO~s: "'> 8Ul ~ Eli g g :5 :5 8 g g g g g 8 g g g :5 g g ..i:~ g~ 0 0 ci ci ci 0 0 ci 0 ci ci c::i c:i c:i ci 0 c:i ~8. E ~ I- III ClJ 0 .- c..a:::u C ~ ~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ u u w w ~ ~ u u Il) 1.0 10 10 LO 10 LO It) 1.0 II) 10 10 LO 0 0 If) 0 0 It) 0 0 0 0 0 It) 0 to 0 1IJ 00000000000000000 u 00 N NON NO N N N N NON 0 N 'oS ~ ~ ;::: Ci3 r::! ;;., (0: ~ en N in r:;::: Oi ~ ;::: ~ it; .6~ a5 ~ ~ ~ ~ a; ~ a;; a; ~ ~ a; ~ ~ a; ~ ~ ..... (0 ..... 0 '"": t"') CO CO 0 It) m M..... "C"'" 0 CO 0 It) ~ M .... Glt ~ ~ ~ en (0 0 Ol C"') rh "";' ~ M r-:.. OJ ~ ..... ...... (J ~.c O? or ~ t:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t; ua; t; :g ~ 0': "C ~ E C"') MOO .... N M..... 0 l.O 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 M .........'4') c:~ .......... N N .q '<t 0 0 N M M N N 0 ..;t '<t ..... en C'IS 0 _ Z "<t '<t N '<t M ...... .......... 0:1 0 to M V N ..... ..... .... ._ "C ~ ~~~ g8.. 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1)UJ~ c~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .... ,~ ell ... 0 3: "* .::! >.'- 9 CI) Q) M ....... co 0) 0 M 0 co M..... .... 10 ..... ..... 0 v 0 co M C! 0 Gl.c (0 (0 (0 (0 ..... co (0..... I'- ! U'"l co ..... <0 ..... M 10 "iU .. D::Z -.:t ~ N N 10 N S lO N N N N '<:t N lO N >~"'C ::: '<t :t: ::l: ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ':J: S ::f ~ ~ '<t ~.g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C! ....IIJ .r. ~ -g It) l,() 10 iJ") It) LO 1.0 LO l.O 011199 09 99 9 9 " ca 'tl.2 M M M c") ("') c") c") ("') ("') W 0(.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.0 9 9 9 " 9 " 0" 0 " " 9 " 9 " 0 " 0. ("') ("') ("') ("') CO) ("') M ("') M ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') CO) cJ, ("') {:.oo 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 Ul Ul ::J ::::l ~ ~ . ~ ~ U ~ ~ Z (I') (I') -~ --' --' Vl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o C) (I') c:: ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 0 I C2 f- Z 0 Z ~ ~ . LU U t; ~ c:: ~ ~ I c:: ~ :E ~ < :E Z w c.. c.. 0:: ~ ~ w a.. U w :S GI ~ ~ - ~ Ct: T f5 f5 -. :::! ~ ~ ct ~ 7 :f ~ e (/) (I') _ ct W N () U ':::t:." :E OJ c:: ;!; c.. W I Q ~ rJ) (I') ~ ~ ~ ,...~ C\([ C\([ lDU :? I I lO,ct :E ......uI I- ,...Cl ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ = ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ o 0 0 O...J o.J 0)" ......... ............ 01- ~ ~ 0...1 .....>- ~....... ,....... '-""'- 6(J a- ~ .......... ~ ]~ ffm ffm g:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ gj 5::i 65 ll1il ~ tttt ~ c,j >>-L-l -L-l ....LJ ....I-..J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2!) ~ ~ ~ ZZ 00 CXJ 00 '" ..8 ~ ~ ~ U') ~ l,() LO ~ U') It') LO 10 LO to l,() LO l,() E gg g g g g gg g g g g g g g g 0 .2:1 ~ ~t::! t::! t::! ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ g- ~Ls v v v v v v v v -.: -.: v -.: -.: v v ~ ~ rJ) c3~ a; a; a; 0; a5 05 a; ~ en ai a; ai as as m en ai ~5: >- ~ ClI lI)Q':II ClI~ ':::t:. ':::t:. :::.:::: ~ ~ :::.:::: ':::t:. ':::t:. :::.:::: :::.:::: ':::t:. ':::t:. ':::t:. ':::t:. :::.:::: ~ :::::c:: ~ ~ 1-;2 Qf- U U U U U U U () U U U U () U U 0 U .c~ ~o co co en 0 ..... N CO) ("') V l,() lD ,... aJ en 0 ,... N ..!II: ("') M c") 'V V V 'V 'V -.: '<t 'V "<t V -.: l,() l.(J 1.0 '11);': U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -@.~ 3l ~B 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Cl\-::l (.)z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N e:s! 0 0 "' '" ::I "' N :;:~ le N N 0 '" _N '" g '" "' '" ... '" ... "' 0 '" 0 - _N ... - ~ ~ ,,; oJ ci ;:Ii <ci ,,; oJ cOm oJ <6 g ci .; ric::i ci ;:Ii ,..: ... 00. ~ E 0 .... 0 "' "' "' N'" "' '" "' '" co N "' ... N - - - '" "t - - .... "' - ~ .... 'Oe. ... ~ - <6 ..; ..; ~ ..: ......ciO '" "' 16~ 8w ;;. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..t ~ ~.. ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 8 ~ ~8.E .... ." 0 C 0.0:0 "iii ~ "0 .... ... ... " " " " .r: .r: U U "' "' "' "' "' "' "' '" '" "' "' 0 0 "' 0 0 "' '" 0 0 0 0 "' "' 0 0 0 "' 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N 0 N '" 0 0 N N N ~ 0 0 ~ ~ '" 0 gs 0 "' ~ "' ;:: ~ ~ 0 il; iil ~ ~ "' g a; ~ ~ a; ~ a; a; ~ '" "' a; a; ~ a; .E~ - iD (;; iD iD (;; iD '" en ~ - - "' 't '? "i N ~ 0 ;,;; N 9 M u ~ ~ ... 0 '" g "' S; '" "' "' '" <h , 0 .... 8 ~ "' 0 10 en f::j U'; N 0 0 0 0 0 en U en 0 ... ... N ,;, ,.:. ,;, 1> 1> en 0 _.c 0 0 .... 0 N g ... ~ '" 0 0 z ";:: 'E \0 o E "' 1> .... '" 0 0 ~ N '" ro ro ro "' 0 0 > , "' ~ "' '" '" 0 '" '" '" <( en C'lS g .5z - ~ ~ ~ "' .... .... '" ~ 0 0 0 - .... .... VJ ._ "C N C CO! " . L. .B C:! o 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 CD en ~ of:: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .... ,~ ClI ~ 0 :s: .l!l ~ en >-.- 9 III "'''' ~" "' '" 0 ... ... '" '" "' '" "' '" ~ ~ "' ,"' .~ '" (ij 0:0 ." ... "' ... 0 "' ::I ~ ~ 0 "' "' ... 0 "' oXi:i ",z '" '" .... '" '" '" '" '" .... .... '" '" N .... ... .... .... .... .... ::I .... ~ ~ ::I ::I ::I ~ .... .... .... > u ,2 ... ~ .... ~ .... ~ .... .... .... .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... Q) lLi 1l "' "' "' "' "' '" "' "' "' Ul .c: 0. . 0 0 0 'i' 0 0 'i' 0 0 ClIU ..,.2 M M M '" M M '" M M W 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "I:~ ". "' '" "' "' "' "' '" "' '" "' "' "' '" "' "' "' "' 0.0 0 0 ~ 'i' 0 ~ 0 0 'i' 0 'i' 'i' 0 'i' 'i' 0 'i' 0. M M '" M M M '" M '" '" M '" '" M '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... '" w ti i ;!; >- 0 0 W 0. Z -' '" '-' '-' 0 -' 0 Cl Cl t3 VJ <( '" '-' Z z <i. en w > VJ ;;: >= >= <( ::l <( '" 0 >-' Z w W ::l ::l ~ '" ~ Cl Cl Cl VJ 0 9 z <( -' ~ al al ti z z z :5 z 0 <( -' <( 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ::l <( :1 ~ ~ ::; Cl :5 '" " ~ ~ VJ Z '" 0 E I W ti l- e!, 0 ::l 0. 0. 0. ::l 0 I <( o. N=F VJ VJ I ::; VJ '-' <( 0 >- 0 z _z ~ ~ gffi ~ g,6 g,6 ~ ",I ot!! ot!! ot!! "'i' ~ ~ '" ~ " " ;tp, ~ ~ 00 Ob! d.lJ ~ O-J d.) i5<C i5<C Oll- ow = = = ~ = 0 ..,.., t;t; err< UJ!J = ::;::; ::;::; ~ >->- >->- = = = <ml UJ!J '" 00 ...w = ~~ <(<( <(<( UJ!J UJ!J = = UJ!J UJ!J = = = = <(<( <(<( <(<( oJ = "-"- "-"- "-"- "-"- "-"- "-"- err< err< err< err< err< err< <ml <ml <ml '" '" "' "' "' '" "' "' "' "' "' "' "' '" '" '" '" '" .0 "' E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " .. '" ~ N ~ '" ~ N '" ~ '" ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" 15. ". ~ ~ ~ ;!: ~ ~ ~ :! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .0. ~ ~ ~ VJ 00 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; (;; ~~ >- .." ..,0. "0. ~",I ".. >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< " " " " " ~"'I- ti... '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' L;2 -"~ 1-0 '" U'; '" <0 ... "' '" en 16 - '" '" '" '" Cb '" <0 .. ,~ '" '" '" '" '" '" <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 "' <0 Qj Qi;.; " '" N '" N N '" '" '" '" '" '" N '" '" '" '" '" ifJ 5 3l . " M '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cli-~ oz '" '" '" '" N '" '" '" '" N '" N '" '" '" '" '" ~" 0 ;;; ~, CO 0 0 0.... '" ~~ 0 0 0'" 0 :; CO ~ 0 c ,_ 0 '" '" 0 0 0'" '" ~ '" 0'" 0 CO 0 , . d oi ",; '" '" <0 0:>"": ,,; t.:t-.: ,.; ,.; LriC\i <0 ~ ,,; N g .... 00. ~ E CO ~ c' .... '" 00 "' "'~ '" " ....'" ~ .... "' <( ~I '" ~ "", " .... ~ ~ "'CO ~ 0{ 'Qe. N N ~ Q)a~ ~ ~ .... 8w >- ~ c 0 8 c, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c . 0 c, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,,;: ~ '''' d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d o . .8.E ~.... f6>G.l8 is 0. a: 1ii 1ii Ii "0 "0 0 .... .... .... '" '" '" " " " " " " .c .c .c " " " "' '" "' on "' on "' '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 '" . 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u '" ~ N ~ '" N N ~ ~ ~ S::! S::! ~ S::! 0 S::! 0 0$ ;:: (3 (D Ul C5 .... ~ .... ~ ~ > . '" ~ ,- ai ~ '" a; ~ ai ~ ~ ~ ~ Eo ;:: i: a; a; a; a; a; a; a; a; '" ~ ~ '" '" 0 ~ ~ .... '" '" co '" co '" '" ~ ~ .... ~ '" l;; ~ ~ '" .... on co ..,. .,; co '" co 0 0 1- 0 " '" <0 <0 '" '" .. B~ '" ~ ;g .... '" .... ;; .... co co l;; 0 " .... N '" '" '" 0 '" N i::: ~ .... 0 '" '0 E .... co ," 0 N '" .... .... 0 0 0 0 .... c;; '" .- " 0 '" N ~ '" .... 0 0 0 '" 0 '" ~ .... ... ...'" > , 0 0 '0 .... '" 0 N 1:1 '" 1)1 0 0 N 0 ~ '" .. Ill" Ez ~ '" .~ ~ ,., ,., N '" co ~ 0 0 '" ~ ~ .~ -C ~ a l;.. u. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ -~ 0" Q)cn~ o~ > > :> > > > > > > > > > > > > .. .- (ll ... 0 S: ., 0 Uj< ~._It) Q) CD ~ ....0 .... .... '" '" '" " [;; '" '" ,., co .... co '" '" '" ~ = ~c '" ~ co '" '" 0 ~ N '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ttJ ~.c; <<z '" " '" ,., '" ~ '" '" '" '" ::i .... ~ .... " .... .... ... .... ~ ::t .... ~ ::t .... ~ .... > ".2 .... " " .... .... .... .... .... .... ;g ;g 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... CD ; "5i '" '" '" '" III '<:'0. . " " 0 0 nlU .".2 '" '" '" '" w 0" 0 0 0 0 'E:~ .. '" "' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0.0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 '? '? 0 0 '? ~ 0 0 '? 0 " 0. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ,., '" '" '" '" ,., ~ 0", 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [;: '" co .... w '" '" w w i5 '" co II II 0 <( w II 5 ~ '" < << >- [;: ~ ;g II w .... a: >- >- w 1i: !;( z ~ !z w w Z Z 'It II W => co '" g <( a: ::;; ;; 0 => W ...J ...J 0. ~ ~ ...J II 0 ::;; ...J ...J ::;; ::;; < <( z n. w w 0 0 < <( z w u. n. 0 - 0 ;; ;; u u z z w '" 0 u Z ...J c5 - Z is ~ 0 0 :c 0 .... w ...J a: n. 0. n. a: a: z II n. => . <( ~ w ::i ::i co co w 0 0 w a: n. ::i E z w 0 => => 15 15 '" ~ ~ ::;; < => n. :c 0. 0- W W 0 I I 0- '" ::J z o. a: a: ~ (!) (!) >- Z ...J g)] _Z ~ ~ ~u g:J ('O')...J M...J ~~ ~I ~~ ~<( ~ ~ m ~ ., 00 0 ~ go:( g< ~ ~ 0 0 BuBu 01- 0 "" = llU ...J...J 60 (JJ (JJ llU = OJ=> O...J """ 01 'hJ) N E:E: Ii: = .. <<( axe u.1JJ 00 00 00 00 >->- """ """ llU R= u.1JJ 00 u.1JJ N >> 'hJ) rnn rnn rnn rnn rnn rnn rnn rnn >-+- >-+- = OJ=> = >> >> ;;;; N 2 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" E 0 0 0 <> 0 <> 0 <> 0 <> <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 .'!! '" S::! N N N N S::! '" '" ~ ~ '" :J! S::! :J! '" '" :J! Q. u. .... :;; :;; :t :;; .... :;; :;; :;; .... :;; :;; .~ " ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (/J "a a; c; c; c; c; - c; c; c; c; c; c; c; c; a; a; '" ~::E >- "'. ~~I kl~ " " '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 5~!;;: ij.... u u u u U II II II U II II U II U II II II .c ~ ....0'" .... co '" 0 ;:: ;:: '" '" '" .... .... '" co .... '" '" 0 '" co co co .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... '" iU C; t: U '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" N '" '" '" iii.~ 5l . . '" '" " " '" " ,., ,., ,., '" '" ,., '" ,., " '" ,., ...0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a....=> "z N '" '" N '" '" '" '" '" '" '" N N '" '" '" N ~" 1'1 1'1 0 NO 0 0 0 0 ;j! ON ., "'1'- '" ;;; ., 0 8 c_ I'- I'- 0 1'-0 0 ... 1'1 ~ .,~ C> -., ~ 0 ... , . I'- 00. 0; <0 N U d <0 .,; ,.: ..; ~g ~ "":0 .; .,; t, en .,; ~ e '" ;;; '" ~ 0 ~ ., N C1;a; on ~ ... 1'1 1'1 ~ .... NC> <> 'Ce- o( <. ~ c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 c c. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. . '" d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d ..t:: 0. o . ~8. E ~.... . ID 0 5 ..0:" ~ ~ "iii {2 0 .... .... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ . . . .<: .<: .<: " " " on on on on ., on on on on on on on '" on 0 <> on 0 0 on 0 0 0 0 0 on 0 0 0 0 <> . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 <> u ~ ~ <> ~ 1'1 0 ~ ~ 1'1 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 1'1 1'1 ~ .o.s 1'1 0; ~ N ~ ~ N I'- ~ a; ~ ~ on ;;; > . a; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .Ec a; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; a; a; '" i on ... I'- " ~ 8 '" on ~ ., on on - 1'1 '1' 8.8 '" 0; 1'1 d> 1'1 0 0 , M ... <h 1'1 ... on 0 <> '" C> <> CJ '" ~ 0 '" 1'1 N ~ U U '" ~ '" '" 0 "0 e '" '" '" ., <( ., I'- C> 0 0 N "i: "E 1'1 '" on ~ 0 0 '" '" on 0 1'1 ., '" > , 0 1'1 1'1 >-- ... ;; 0 <> '" ~ ;; 1'1 M '" ~ on iii co 0 .Ez ~ '" M '" ~ ~ ~ <( on '" M ~ ~ 0 .- .., 1'1 C c N ~ . co ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ...- 00. QlI/I c~ > > > > > > > > > > 0( > > > > > ... , "" III ... 0 3:~ ~ <( ., >- .- 'i' QI '" M ~- i(j 1'1 1'1 0 ., I'- ., 1n 0 ~ on ., C> on C> I'- ., = c::: C) ." C> on ., '" ~ ;; on ., 0 N j C> OJ ~ co ~ i:i o:z 1'1 M ~ on '" on '" on on '" M ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ... ... > u.S! ... ... ... ... ;:\ ;:\ ... ... 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 <> <> 0 0 0 0 ..... Q) i; " on en .c Q. . . 9 lllU 0 ,,- M W ou 0 "C~ .. on on on on on on on on on on on on on '" on '" on 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 a. M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M {!. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,: ;;i UJ UJ Z 0 " <( ~ '" :I: :::l ..J '-' 1I 0 UJ ...J -, '-' ..J -, '" ::; r.5 <!) ~ UJ '" <( ,: UJ 0 C> UJ '" 0( ai ::; '" ..J '" Cl r.5 ;;: z '" ...J :I: J: ;:: s: UJ <( '" UJ ~ 1I Z u: 1< :J :I: Z 0 UJ 1-. is '" :5 z UJ '" ...J j:: '-' ~i ~ :J Q. >-- I-- :I: '" ...J UJ ~ ~ <( ::; Cl '" '" 0 '" ~ ::; <( . , Cl '-' UJ UJ UJ UJ ~ UJ <( I '" e ::; '" ") lL I-- I s: s: I Q. ~ Z c. '" ") ...'" .,0 ~ ~ Z I " ~ <( -L _Z gf ~ <?JJ on'" on'" ~ ~ ~ ::; ~ ~ - - ~~ 8li ~ 0 0 OQ 00 = a.u i50 b<( 0<( 0<( &, 0 Oz 01- a.u <5Z 0 "" '-Xl """ ""'0 ex> 0(0( '-Xl :::l:::l O<!) O<!) '-Xl """ <rxf) s:;: = :::l:::l N CC 00 """ """ ca;;: .. ;:;: S:S: s:-; >-+- '-Xl ex> <rxf) <rxf) Ulll 00 00 """ N >> ,. """ <rxf) 0(<( <(<( 0(0( <(<( <(<( <(0( arc """ """ """ arc arc N ~ on on on on on on on on '" '" '" on on on on <> on on E 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . " 1'1 ~ 1'1 ~ 1'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s: s: s: s: s: s: s: 15. u. ~ ... ~ 0; ~ OJ ~ ~ N . .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a1 ~ a1 a1 aJ aJ .co a1 aJ '" "c 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; C> 0; Ol 0; C> ~~>- ". ",,- ~g; ~",:I: " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " :S~~ 5.... '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' .c~ 1--0" a; 1'1 1'1 M ... on '" I'- I'- ., ., C> 0 0; 1'1 M C1i " ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., C> '" C> Qj CD t..: U 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1ii.5 ~ ID _ M M '" M M M M M M M M '" '" M '" M M .c<> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 0 0 0 a...." uz 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 ~" 0 0; ", '" l8 0 m N gj ~O '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c- O a, ~ C! '" m 0)0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ . ci ... ai <0 ,.: a; .,; ,.: uici ~ ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ~ 00. ~ E '" 0 '" .... '" '" N ~ "'N ... .... '" N m N '" N .... "' '" co '" N ~ ~~ N N ~ ~ ~ N 'Oe- < oJ oJ oJ ri oJ coO ~ N ~~~ 8w ;;. ~ c 0 0 c, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c. 0 0 c, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" Hi: ~ ~~ ci ci d ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 8~ ~8.E . o. 0 i5 o."'U :s a f- ... u . .r:: () '" "' " '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 " '" 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 '" '" '" '" "' "' "' 8 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ ,~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;, N ;;; ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~~ '" ., ill ~ ~ ill ~ ~ <. '" ~ ~ ~ ~ a; ~ :;; .Eo 01 <0 r:: ii3 01 ii3 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 ~ ~ a; a; a; a; a; a; a; a; a; ~ oJ .... 9 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... c; ;1 <;> 0 0 '" ;1 '" 0 ,~ N ti5 M '" <b oh . 0 , 0 N - . . '" ,~ '" '" '" '" .... '" "' .... ... m on ~ '" 0 .!:!n ~ m .~ m ... '" 10 .... m '" ... ... ... 0 0 0 '" N 0 ,~ N '" '" '" ~ fil 0 0 0 0 0 "C "E an ~ E N ,~ "' '" .... "' on "' '" ;;; on "' on "' "' "' "' "' c ~ 0 0 '0 0 iU ... '" ill m ::;: ;;' ;;' ;;' ;;' ;;' ;;' ;;' ;;' ;;' U; CO g _Z '" '" ,~ ~ .... m on ~ ._ "'C N C "'" u . 0 0 lUN o 0. 0 0 .:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... -- o~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Q) en ~ - . ~ III ... 0 3: '" " 1;;< >t'- It':l Cll ",:i: ~. '" N '" m '" '" '" 0 ~ '" m ~ N '" '" .... '" m 0 1ij = 0:::0 ..c '" '" " '" '" 18 ~-g ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ... ... .. ... ... ... u_ 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...... CIJ t " Ul J: D- . . lIlO ".2 W oU 'C~ . . on on "' "' on '" "' on "' '" '" on on '" on "' "' '" on on 0.0 <;> <;> 0 0 0 0 0 <;> <;> <;> <;> <;> 0 <;> 0 <;> <;> <;> 0 0 0. M M , , M M M M M '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" t!- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <f) U U u t.i z J: - -' Z ;;! D- W -' ~ - 0 U () () () () () () () () u en z w 0 Z C) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Z Z W W - - - (5 '" ~ B 0 <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii <Ii () '" '" w w ::; z Z < D- O <f) Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ Z W .... tu '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. w '" z '" w () () <f) <f) <f) <f) <f) <f) <f) <f) <f) '" -' w '" -' -' w '" <f) 0 f- W Cl 0 ~ () 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .... w w ~ '" w '" -' '" '" '" '" '" '" <f) '" Z '" '" '" <f) ::; <5 z ~ > iU w '" () U () U U () () U U . < <f) 0 I < W u.. w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Z W I U Cl I I '" I en Cl u.. () () () () () () () () () o. '" ~ w ",:J () () < '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" _Z ~ C@ N0;- li.. Z ., 00 ~ ~ gp 85l ~ Cr ~ ....<Jl ~< ~< ~< T""<J: .....<{ ~< .....<( .....<( .....<( 0 OCL c>- ~ CIJl CIJl &n 8m 8m 8m ~8rn 8m 8rn8m8rn 0 "" -'-' ~ = << UJJ.J i5>- = UJJ.J UJJ.J "'. "'. ~~ ~~",.",.~ N CC << << UJJ.J = = H- = """ """ << ClXll iifIl. iifIl. . . iifIl. iifIl. . .. ()() = = oJ >> ()() ()() ()() ()() ()() ()() ()() ()() UJJ.J UJJ.J UJJ.J UJJ.J UW I.WJ u.1.U U1.Ll L1.lLl N ~ "' "' "' "' on '" "' '" '" '" '" on on "' on "' on "' "' "' E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l'j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c. gs ~ OJ OJ OJ ~ OJ OJ OJ OJ ~ . .co ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en uo m 01 01 01 01 01 01 a; a; ~~>- ~. ",,,- "c. ~mI 1!~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" E:~ U u () u () () U U U U U () () () U () () () () () U f-o'" '" '" .... '" m 0 0 N N '" ... "' on on "' "' "' on "' "' ~ m m m m '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qj Qi L: " N N N N N '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ro.!; 5'l . . '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .coO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0....'" UZ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ '" 0 0 0 :2;2; 0 l8 C- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q~ .... .... '" "' .... , . c:i c:i c:i c:i .0 .0 c:i c:i c:i g c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i .0 ...'" N N ~ en aiw 00 M ~ 00. E 0 ... ... '"' '"' '"' '" 0 "' ... '" '" '" '" - "'"' "' '"' "'''' '"' "' '"' '" - - - '" '"' '" - - - ... - N,", O~ .. N .,; .....ciCl .....~~ oW ;:. - c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "" .... :g '" 0 0 0 0 c . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ "' - 0 0 0 ..1:: g, '" c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i - c:i M c:i c:i c:i c:i o . 8,8. E ~I- ..0 C 0.0:1.) ~ "iii "0 I- ... ... " " .. .. .s:; .s:; <J <J on "' on "' "' "' "' on "' "' "' "' "' on on "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 '" !:o! '" !:o! '" !:o! !:o! ~ '" ~ '" '" !:o! ~ !:o! '" !:o! !:o! !:o! as '" ~ !:o! ~ '" ;;< ... ;;< '"' M '"' '"' N N M '"' "' in ... ... '" > . a; ~ iO a; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - !:o! ~ - Eo a; a; a; a; a; a; a; a; a; a; a; c; c; c; a; a; c; c; c; "" c; 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> 1>> .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ .... .... .... .... '" <;> 0 0 0 0 <;> 0 0 0 <1 0 <;> <1 0 <;> N '" N 6 6 en en > 1>> '" '" '" "' .... N N "' N '"' CJ "' "' ~ "' "' 0 0 en en "" "" .... .... .... "' "' '"' 0\ 0 "' 1>> 0'6 0 0 0 fil u; u; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fil 0 '" "' en en 0 .- "t:l "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' on "' "' ;;; 1>> c; 1>> c; 0 "' ... ... ... > , <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( - '" "' Ui .. <:> Ez <0 '" "" "" "" - "' "' <:> ._ "t:l ~ o c u . .. o c- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...- ;;; o~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GlVl .. . - III ... 0 ;:$ 0 '" III ... >- .- 9 Gl ., M 'l;.a '" '"' ... '" "' 0 ';:: N '"' ... "' "' .... en 15 a; '" "' .... :g '" "' ... '"' = 0::;:0 en '" en a- en .... ..... .... .... 10 .... .... .... "' "' "' "' 0 0 "' co .:t:. i;j o:z "' "' "' '" "' "' <0 "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' ;j: ~ "' ;j: ... ... ;j ;j: ;j: ;j: ;j: ;j: ... ;j: g ... ;j: g g ;j: ... ;j: ... ... ... > "'.2 ... ... ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ... 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....., Q) i ... Ul .<: Q. . . IIlU ...!! W oU 'c_ .. "' "' "' ~, "' "' "' "' "' "' "' on "' "' "' on "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' 0.0 <1 0 0 ~' 0 0 0 <1 <1 <1 0 0 0 <1 0 <1 0 0 0 0 ::\ <1 <1 0 0. '"' '" '" ~, '" '" '" '"' '"' '"' '" '" '" '"' '" '"' '" '" '" '" '"' '"' '" 0 0 0 0 c- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l t.l <J t.l t.l >- >- >- >- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 z z z z '" if. if. '" <Ii en en <Ii en en en en en en en <Ii en en en en <J Q. Q. 0 -' ::; ::; ::; ::; 0: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z !z J: '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <J I.) Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul W t.l t.l t.l t.l 0 0 >- '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ::; Ul Ul Ul Ul ~ J: '" a. l;: l;: l;: l;: t.l ~ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 5 I 1 t.l " " " t.l " t.l " " " " t.l " " 8 " 0 '" if. '" '" N 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. a. a. 1 W -' E t.l " " " " t.l " " " " " " " " " " W C> 0 W o. m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -' W W W W Z ~ ~ _z -", -", -'" .-'" -", -'" -'" -", -'" -'" -", -'" -'" -'" -", -'" c;!;1 ....z ....z ~ ....z ~ ~ 00 &> &> &> gal &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> &> <50' 85 85 0::> ~ 0 ...... gJc4 gJc4 gJc4 050 gJc4 gJc4 gJc4 m' gJc4 gJc4 gJc4 gJc4 m' gJc4 gJc4 m' m:n = = = = = em: = N co ... o . UlUl. c;;oo. c;;oo. "'''' lWJ lWJ lLIJJ lWJ "'''' lWJ ex) N >> lWJ lWJ lWJ UU lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ lWJ <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl = = = N Q; "' "' "' "' "' on "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' on on on .0 "' on E 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. .. !:o! !:o! !:o! ~~ !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! !:o! ~ ~ !:o! !:o! !:o! ~ C. g5 N N N ,- N N - N N ~ - N - N N N N - - N .. ". " !:o! !:o! ~ !:o! ~ ~ ~ ~ N Ul uo c; c; c; cii 0; en 0; en 0; 0; '" 0; en ;;; a; 0; a; a; c; ~~ >- ... ...0. ~g;; 0enJ: " " " ,< " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " ~'"'>- <31- " " t.l I) t.l " " " " t.l " " " " " " " " " " " " " " L;;; ,,- >-0 on on on '0 on on on "' on on on on "' on on "' "' .... .... .... .... "" '" 0 ... 0 0 0 ., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Qi as ;..: " '"' '"' '"' <0 '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' is.E el .. ~ '"' '"' '"' " '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' ".0 0 0 0 ., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01-:0 I.)Z '" N N " N N '" N '" '" '" N '" N '" N '" N '" '" N '" N N ~:E ~ ~ c~ ~g g g~ ~ ~ ~ m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ::J C'lI . .' .. . .. ... .. ..... .. . .. .. r--. ~o.. ~ a; g~ ~~ ~ ~8 (2; ~ ~~:o M M t"') M LO (:::i~ N fO u:; ~(O _ < It) CD 'It ..... N I.()..... 'It CO 02- (\100 .....~~ oUJ ~ ~i g 8 g g:5 g :5 8 8 :5 :5:5 g g g g g g g g ..i:: II oil ci ci c:i d ci d ci c:i ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci c::i d ci ci ~8.. E ~ t- ~&8 i5 S Iii I9 ]j B o 0 0 0 0 t- i- I- I- I- ~.jt!, ~ ~ .::.:: u 0 u 0 0 G) G) C1l Q) CI) ~ J:: .s::. .z: .::: "" (.) " u it) lO LOll') l.t) LOI.OLO l() 1010 LOLO l,() It) 10 o LOC:l 00 0 000 0 OOLt':lOCl 0 0 LOIO 0 CD 0 DC) 00000000000000000 uN ON NC:! N NNN N (::!.NON(::! N ~ 00 N 'gs ~ ~try ~~ ~ ::M~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .:~ CO Olcn 0;(;) Ci OiCi'iOi 0.; 05i3'icnCTicn 0; ii5 0>0> j:::: z 4: ~:~ < ~ :: ..... ~ 0 "7 "<t It) 0 ~ ..... .,!. 0 dJ m"!' ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ I ~ it) m ro m m LO ro ~ N ..... N *' u.o t- C,) -' 'It 0 0 N Cl <0 (0 I'- ..... (J) "<t 0 '<t f") 0 .... 'oE 0 ~'e 01- C"') .....0("') 0 COcoC\lmc:o m 0 0,0 LO "i:"C 0 en _ MC")M LO .......................... t-..... 0>0 It) .... ... It) ~ Z' 0 00 ~ UJ' '" ::e M M C"') ..... LO to LO LO LO 0 (0 M 'It LO en <<so _ N -' '""'.... N N N ..... ......................... M ..... .......... LO ._"'C ~ C eN ...Ss::!ge, 00::> 00000000000000000 (1)(I)~ c~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .... ,- III ~ 0 > "''' ;> en <( >-.- q (1)CUM....... I(') N..... 1'-00 N v LOt- LO (,Or--.....~o 'V C'l LOCO..... 0::: 0 GI.c ..... 1.0 I,() C1l 0> 1.0 I.() 1.0 OJ ...... 1.0 It') OJ (,0 0) 'V 0 (,0 W W ca .. o::z N lO to l.O 1.0 (,0 1.0 1.O W to 1.O lO 10 to (0 to 'V <0 <0 lO >~-g :;~~; 'V ~~'V; ~~~;:: 'V::J:::::: g.c 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 .....J:l1) 'g f/) ,...a. 1/1 ca - 'Os W 0" 'C~ GlI/I 10 1.0 l.O lO l.O I.() 10 I.() LO I.() 10 I.() 1.0 LO 1.O l.O 1.0 l.O l.O 1.O ~o 9 9 9 9 0 9 9 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 11. M MM MM M MMM M MMMMM M M MM M ~ 00000000000000000000 (/) (/) UJ W ~ ~ 4: <( "" u u >- UJ UJ f- 0... 0... C2 (/) (fJ (fJ >- (J) en ::l ~ ~ ~ C) >- >- ~ z z u cr::: 0::: 0::: Z...J...J a. ...; 00 LU LUWW - o..o...::J ...J ;::;:: (/) ~ ~ ~ (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) 0 . Q. Q. (/) W 00 I- C(<< UJ ffiffiffiffiffi 0 (/'J ~~" ~ fi~ ffi COaJCO ~ zzzzz Z ~ ~o.:l Z . (J >->- (J) UJUJUJ 4: L1jL1j4:L1j4: 4: O...J...J 1ii E ~ (/) (fJ LU ~ ~!;;( :c ...J...J ~ ...J ~ ~ --, 0 0 :E e~ Ml ~ ~ 0 I- I- I- Y u u u u u ltl A ~ ~ :3 .. " " 0U1 ~-, ~-, ~ ~ .,.fl on(/).d!J on(/) g}" N.. N.. N.. N.. N.. ::;CO ~;=; cn o 0 0 o'::t:. Cf-..I au 8.:r: 8< C2; ~ CJLl., ~ a..u 2?0 g) 2?0 go g) OIL o-! 8YJ gq, 0- ~ -g -g 88 ~ ~ ;:;: ~~ 9:S ~ ~ ~ zz >->- >->- >->- >->- >->- ~ ~ zz zZ ~ N ~~ II II II ~ tx.) ~ zz ~ ~ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ ~ -n ;g ~ ~ ~ N ~ 10 LOIO LOlO lO LOl.OLO l.O LOlOLOl.OLO l.O to LOLO l.O E 00000000000000000000 ~ ..v: ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~?i3~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~g ~ Co ~ Cl ;:: :;::;:: :;:::;:: :;:: :;:::;:::;:: ;:: ;::;:::;:::;::;:: ;:: ;:: ;:::;:: ;::: (/)Ql .c;7a t:::! N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 m m m m ~ m m m m m m m m m ~ m m ~ ~ m ~:2 '- ..v: ClI 'Oa......-- (,l !!?O'lI GIg:; :::s:::: :::s:::::::s:::: '::t:.::x::: '::t:. :::s:::: '::t:. '::t:. '::t:. ~ '::t:. ::t: :::s::::::x::. ::t: ~ ~ ~ ~ :J ~ 1-;2 QI- U U U () (,) () U () U () U () U U U U U U U U .c~ >-0 ..... NN C"')('f) 'V l.OlOlO (0 r---r--f'-r--r-- OJ 0) 00...... ..v: ..... .......... .......... ..... ................ ..... ......................... ..... ..... N N N (riQ.i;.; 0 M M ('f) (") CO) M M M M CO) M M M M CO) M M CO) M ('I") ro.S ~ ~.E 8 8 8 a 8 8 8 a 8 8 8 a g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 01-:::1 UZ N N N N N N N N N N N C\I N N N N N N N N H ~ · ~ · ., " · " · · " ~ · " ~, ... ~ ....... %. . . _ . . . . _ . 0 . . . . 0 0'. · · 0 · · · · · _ . _ ... _ .. _..0 0 · · - · · · _ . ... _, . ., ., " 0, . . . ..... o · :~~ 8w ,H................ · · ..gg.' ,," !' d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d g.H~"" ~tt.U 0 ] - o ~ ~ .... ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ u <.> ................ . . ...... . 000000.00,..000000000000 . ...000.......... . . 0000.. oe"'~...~...~<til\;n<O<J5<or-iJl~~ ~:;; ~,,!~~a'" ., . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . 0... - - ,. c" · · · · · · · · · .' · · · ...... 'i -g, '7 => ~ ~ "'u ".. 0 . . . . 0 _ . . . · · · g." 0 - · · · · _EI.OO(',l~l,C'}toMC"'~<o<or-~<O~ ~ '" ~~",,,,,,,,,, ,,' ...... .... ... .... -.--'- ..... _.... .... ... . _ . . o. 0 0 0 0 ...H...............O. - ------ ._"0 ~ ~ g " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s.".,>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. > > >>>>>> ~ :.. '0 ~ ~~ >>-q ... _........ 0 - · · · · · ~ · · · - · · · · ;; ., 1< . . . , . . . . . " " " " " ". · 1 ...".. -*. ...,....".,.,.... ,...,. _ ,< 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . . 0 0 . 0 . 0 0 0 · .. 0 · · 0 ... .c ~ 'i Ul 0 l>. ~ <G "0.2 IU 0" " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ...... .. . . . . 0 . 0 0 . q q 0 . q 0 q q 0 · 0 0 q 0 · ..,.,............ . ' ...." 00000 00. 0 0 0 0 0 . . o. 0 · · 0 0 0 · 0 .... m m Ul :.; :.; :.; :.; :.; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::; ::;::; z 0 (l. (l. (l. l>. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (ii ;.J (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. (l. => uJ """""""" . 0 000000 ................ < " 000000 0000000000000000 " ~ 000000 ................ . , ...... o ................ ~ ' ...... ,.>>>>>>.>>>>>>>> . " >>>>>" o' , 3 ' , , , , , , , , , , , " " , "" " " ,< d '" it -t it d d it it d d d it it '" -.t "" >J! '" '" !>' = oil .2 . .. ~~~,~~~~~~~~~~"'~~ .. = ",~"f"'"'" ~ . ' it;1:?:: ~r! ?:: ?:: ?:: ?:: ?:: ?:: it it ;1: ~ ;1:?:: ~ '3 ''is ~ ~ ~ l[!, l[!, N I .................. ...... , OOO"go..oo,o,oo... .00.00 , ,,@@.no.@@@@....... @ @.@.@@ , ,." - . " - . - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - " - , ., " " . " " " " . " " " . " . .. . . ....,," . O. . · · '" · '" · ;, ;, ;, · · ;, · ;,' · · .....;, ~~>- ~~ ". ,................. . . ...... ,., ., 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o~ ,,-- -----.------ . . ...... . .."".......".... . . ."..." -.,,, ....".............. ...... ,,' .................... ....'- ad .."..,............ · · ".""., ~:s! "" 0 ,.. 0 .... '" "" 0 .... ... 0 CO oo oo oo '" """" N oo cr, 0 '" CO "" 0 ~ .... 0 '" ~ '" '" '" "'N ~ 0 .. ~ ,,; 0 en d N d en M d N N U; ,..: ~ r-:,..: .... cro. ~ E '" 0 ... N ~ ~ '" oo ~. '" ~ ~ "'''' <( .... N N 0 ~ CO 'Qe- <<5 N M" ~ ~O~ ~'" CO '" oUJ >. ~ c 0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :5 0 0 C C . 0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 il;~! ~'" d 0 d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d 8 0 ..... O. is ..<r ~ ~ .lC " " .r: U oo .., oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo 0 oo <> 0 0 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 . 0 :5 <> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 N ~ S; N S ~ ~ ill N ~ '" ill ~S ... ... ... ~ ... ~ '" ~ N a; N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ .s~ 01 ii3 05 01 01 01 01 05 0; oo 'i' 0 0 'i' "" " oo ~ ~ 0 oo ,f, ,.:. ... :t co .;. ,..: '" ;! '" 0 .. 5 ~ Sl c\ .... .... .... .... 0; .... "" .... oo U ::> '" co co N co ~ :;: ~ ~ ... ._ .c 0 ::> '" 0 "" co '" .... ... g ... ~ N "t: -e ~ E 0 9 ::> 10 0 ;; ~ '" "" ~ N '" '" ~ oo .s~ '" '" ;; N ~ 0 "" ~ ;! co co co co "lii .. 0 oo 0 N co ~ ~ N ~ ~ - ~ ~ 0 ._ "tl N o c N " . .. N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5? 5? 0 0 ...- 00. GlUl 01 c~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .. , '5 (lJ .... 3:~ " <( >- .- oo 'i' Gl ., '" -" '" ~ 0 .... ;; "" '" '" oo 0 ~ oo ~ N '" ... ~ = 0::0 ..c 0 ~ co N oo as ;l; 0 0 0 j ~ ~ ~ ttJ .::tf. -D ",z ... co ... co' CO CO ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ... ... ... ~ ~ g ~ ... g ~ g > u.2 ... ... <! ... <! ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Q.l t Ii 1/1 .c a. . (lJU 0 ,,- W oU ,,~ .. '" '" oo '" '" '" '" '" '" '" oo '" '" oo oo oo oo 0.0 'i' 0 0 0 'i' 'i' 0 0 0 'i' 0 'i' 'i' 'i' 0 0 0 .. M M M M M M M , M M '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... -' ;;;' -' -' < < < i= i= ~ i= z z z w w w w z 0 Cl Cl Cl 0 en en en en !;: w w w w () '" '" '" '" '" '" ci z z w s: z z z z 0 1 () - () ~ <( ~ <( a. '" z '" < Cl () () w ~ '" < tj - a. w I ;;; "' "' "' "' . 0 " 5 () '" '" .... -' 5< w w w w ::; g 8 w -' ~ < E '" () Cl I as W ::; ("j N ::; ::; ::; ::; W CO W W Z ~ Cl gEgEgEgE Z ~ <( ""<( ~ I .... _z ~ ~ <'II ~ W ~ ", "" ~ 00 ~ m O!:P ~ 0 cro OW i5U =- 0 "" = 0.0.. = ...u = ~ ~ H- 50 = a::o:::o::o::::c:ar::~ = N CC 01 ...u !?5 01 <(< <(<( U1U ...u = ===00 u.u. ~~ U1U = rr ::0::;: u.u. N ...J...J ::r::; ...u ...u ;::;:;; ;::;:;; ;::;:;; ;::;:;; ;::;:;; ;::;:;; ZZ :zz ZZ ZZ 00 N V oo oo '" oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo '" oo '" .0 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ 0 0 2 '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. ". .~ N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ N . .co al ~ I::! ~ a! ~ ~ ~ C/) UC 0; 0; '" '" 0; 0; 0; '" 0; 0; a; ~~>- "'. -g@;I "0. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 5~~ ~~ () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () -"~ () ....0'"' oo CO .... <Xl '" 0 ;;; N '" ... oo CO .... .... .... .... "" '" N N N Pl N '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" l!i ~ ~ " '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"' . " '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"' '" '" '" '" '" '" g '" '" a):: :3 .c.c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uz N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~." 0 <Xl <Xl "''' 0 0 '" III 8 0 l5 0 0'" " 8 0 " " ;J;8 co 0_ " ... co~ N N ~ q q ."" " 0 co co <Xl , . ~ oj "":c6 .,; .,; oj d......: en NM .,; 12 .,; .,; .,; ~Lri '" " ~.. ~ 5 5 ~ ~ '" co'" " .,- '" "' .... ... '" ~ ~ ..,'" '" N ~ ~ ~ ~ ...'" ~ N N ~ ~ N _15. M '" ..j ~ ~ '" o ~ '" IOciQ ~~~ 8w ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..i:: ~ '-" d d d d d d d C C d d C d C d C C d oj o . ~8. E ~.... m m 0 E ..c<o .. .. .. S a ~ ~ i2 I- "" ~ "" "" " " ~ m m .<: .<: .<: .<: tJ tJ <.) <.) '" "' '" ., 8 ., "' '" '" '" '" 8 '" '" 0 0 0 0 '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 g '" '" 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u Co! Co! Sj ~ 0 0 0 Co! ~ Co! ~ ~ 1<1 ~ 0 1<1 0 0 Co! N ~ N N ~ Co! 011 ~ ... t: t: '" '" 03 '" > . Co! N ~ ~ a; ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .!;C <Xl <Xl 03 a; '" '" a; a; a; a; a; a; 0; a; ;:: '" '" " '" ~ ?:j <D '" " '" '" ~ 0 <Xl ... N ~ ., co ~ 0; 0; 0; 0 0 0 ,;, ~ ,..: d.i '" ... N <Xl ill ... '" ,:. <Xl 15 <6 <6 ;:i; ;a 0; 0 '" 0 <Ii ... . . '" .... '" ., ., '" '" ,:. 0 co co ~ co co ... ?:j N '" '" u ~'E ,;, 0 0 '" '" 0 0 ~ 5 0; ;1; ;1; '" N :g Z ~ >- ::> N 't: "C N 0 '" ~ <Xl <Xl ~ '" '" <Xl ... ~ '" > , ~ S! N <Xl '" '" co :;; 0 0 0 '" <( '" :L 8 '" I- 0 (/) cuo .!;z ~ '" '" <Xl <Xl <Xl ., '" ., 0 en '" en Cl en <Xl ._ "C ~ o c" u 8- '- S ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 Ql en ~ g~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... ,- < ~~ ::f ... ... ... ... ... ~ ... ... ... ~ ~ ::f: ~ ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... ;; ;; ... ;; ... ;; ... ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...., IV ; ." (/) or 0- . . <<10 .".2 W .2" ~~ ., ., ., on on on on on on on on 9 on on on 9 on on '" m. 0.0 '" 0 '" 0 '" '" '" 0 '" '" '" 0 <1 0 '" 0 0 .. M M M M M , M '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 8 '" '" '" ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :;: >- Q. ~ ::; ::; u 0 0 tJ 0 ..J '" '" CD CD CD CD ..J <( (3 w w c.? 2 Z '" III '" en <Ii <( <( ~ ;:: IL IL IL IL ::; Cl Z Z z 0 0 0 0 W 2 ~ ~ ?:: ?:: ~ ?:: t; 0 c< '" <( ::; 0 0 >- >- 2 '" '" ti U U ti c.? >- ~ IL lL '" ;:: 2 Z '" W en :J :J <( w 0 c w b: I- b: I- Z Gi J: <( 13 (!) ...J en ~ '" w 0 " ~ Q. Q. () , 0 I J: . ...J I , W W ~ W I- W !2 z z z E w o " Cl Cl Cl Q. '" t;- O '" '" <( '" c. ~O ~~ CD oW I > , _z ~ ~ d-:- a, ~~~~ ~ df ~ ~~ "'- ~ ~ 00 01- ~ g-, ell:: oa em em em 0:::1 C5::l 0:=. CD = 01- 01- 01- 01- 0 ."." <(<( 02 lWJ lWJ lWJ 88 0...J N 00 I-+- H- I-+- ;;:;;:~;;:;;: u..u. lJ..I.L. u.u... L1.LL = = >->- = 0::> ::>:::> >->- ~~ VXf) lWJ Ull lUJ.J UJ.U w.u Uli1 <(<( lWJ = CO CO I-+- <(<( N' = Q.Q. IlJJ. a:a: 00 00 """ """ """ """ """ VXf) VXf) VXf) VXf) UXJO UXJO 1-1- N :;; on on on on on on on on on ., on 2 on 2 on on on on .D on E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m " Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! ~ Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! Co! 15. h ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ m .em Co! N Co! N C:! Co! ~ a: '" uo '" a; 0; '" 0; 0; 0; '" 0; 0; '" 0; ~:E >- ". -g%iI ~g; '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ::;c:1~ 13.... u u () u u u u () 0 () U 0 () () U U U () U .c~ 1-0'" '" 0 0 ~ N N N '" '" '" '" ~ on CO " <Xl <Xl '" 0 " '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... on Qj Q.i i...: ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"' 10 E 5l '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .e.c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0):: =:t Uz N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N -" '" f2j ;:t ~ 0 N g NOO '" 0> 0> COO 0 0 0 CO '" 0 c_ '": "'" <<> "'''' '" N N COO 0 0 C 00 ~ .. , . <'i 0 0 lricci ,,; ,..: ,..: d"": 0 ,,; ,,; cieri .; 0 ~ 0" N a: ::; .... E - I"- .... "'''' .... '" <<> 0 <<> '" I"- ~'" '" oo ~'" 0> 0> ~ ~ N ....'" .... '" _0. <( ,.; 0 0 0_ ~ - ~ (CoO , -16~ ~ 8w >. - c 0 0 e, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c . .. .. c. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,,1:: ~ ,~ 0 0 ei 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o . ~&. E ~>- ." 0 is ""'Ll ;; ;; ~ 15 15 {!. >- >- ... ... ... " " " " " " .c .c .c (J (J (J oo oo u, '" '" '" '" oo '" oo '" oo oo '" oo 0 0 " oo 0 0 0 0 "' 0 0 oo 0 .. 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 .. 0 0 0 .. 0 .. N N " 0 N ~ ~ '" ~ N 0 '" ~ ~ N N ~ i3 i3 il ~ ~ in Cl ~ - .~ S <<> '" ~ ~ 1; N ~ N '" ~ ~~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .E~ 03 '" " Cl 03 '" Cl 0> Cl Cl oo ;::: '" g '" ,- '" ! '" '" oo '" "' '" oo "' "' '" '"' ri ~ - ~ 0 0 0 10 g 0 0 0 0 .. <h .. 9 0 0 oo '" '" <<> <<> <<> '" '" - '" <> ,f, ,.:. C;; N N 0 ~ C;; C;; C;; C;; 0; .... a> I"- <<> <<> I"- a> ~.8 '" .... <> 0 N 0'; N 0 oo 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 .. .. (J 0 0 N '" '"' a. a; '" '" '" 0: ::J ::J Z Z ~ ,- " g E '" 0 .. 0 ~ 'i ~ '" w w 0 0: 0 0 <( <( 0 '- ..."' .E~ "' '"' :! 0 '" al ~ ;;: .... .... '" C - '" 0 '" '" ::J ~ <( () () '" '" '" .!!! "C ~ o c- ",'" u " 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ... -~ 00- (1) CI)~ o~ > > :> > > > > <( > > > > > > .... .- cu ... 0 3: .. .. t;<( ~._It) (1) Q) ~ ~- <<> l"- 'D '" 0 <<> I"- '" l"- N '" '" [;; '" a> 0 ~ '"' = 0:::0 ..0 ::; j .~ 10 0 10 ~ a> 0 '" '" a> 0> 0 0 0 ro .::tt: .g o:z ; '" <<> <<> ;;; ; '" <<> <<> <<> I"- ~ I"- ~ .. .... ~ .... .... ;! .... .... g .... .... .... > u.2 g ;!; ;!; ;!; .... .... ;!; .... .... " 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 .. ...., Q) t "5l oo "' Ul .c: a. .. 0 0 CUU "'.!! '" '" W oU 0 0 "t't; oo "' .n '" '" oo ~ "' ~ '" oo oo "' '" oo oo oo oo "0 9 0 " 9 0 0 " " 9 9 0 0 0 9 9 0 .. '" '" '" il '" '" '" '" , '"' ,., '"' '"' '"' '" '" '"' '"' '"' {!. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" 0: '" Z w w Ii;; '" Z Z '" ~ ... 0 <( '" '" .... <( ct. a. w '" a. a. w t >- >- ::J >- i (/) 0 w 0 l- I- '" 0 <Ii () :; :; --' () w --' 0. J: >- '> >- 0 0 () 0 r ::i ~ '" '" '" w w '> w () w ~ w 0 Ii;; Ii;; .... 0. <( en '" 0 () 0 Z z w Z w w :J 0 <( ...J ::J W W w l!:! z w >- ell W 0 '" en en ::J .... 0 to '" '" en '" () u. W W ...J 0 '" '" '" ::J :E " z '" <( cr 0 0 <( L5 ::J ::J <( 0. E <( :1 ell 11: (/) en (/) .. z z () cr 0: Z 0 ~ o. '" I W W W W Z ~~ 0 J: .... .... 0: Z _Z g!; <d':- ~ ~ M::i M::i M::i <cD- ~ ..w ~ ~~ ~ ~ f2l.1 c; -- ~~ ~ g;: g::; 00 8.) oz i5Z ""'''''' ~ .. "0" << ern:: a.' ern:: <hJ) <hJ) UllJ ern:: =::J::J = = N cc = em: ::J::J z:z <hJ) <hJ) <hJ) Ci'fll UllJ UllJ UllJ UllJ ern:: 8383 <(<( <<:: 00 N' ::~ H- H- H- ::J::J ::D ::>:::> ::0 = >> ;;:;;: ;;:;;: "'" << <hJ) <hJ) <hJ) N Q; oo oo oo oo oo oo 8 '" ~ oo '" '" oo oo oo "' "' '" .D E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 .. is 0 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 <:> 0 0 0 0 0 <:> .. .. " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 15. u. ~ N N N ~ ~ N ~ N N ~ N N N N ~ " 0- '" al al ~ al ~ ~ en .c. 0; Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl uo 0> ~~>- ~o ~~I uQ. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" () () '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0" ~~~ G>- () () () () () () () () () N N () () () () () () () >-0'" 'i N '"' ~ oo oo "' <<> I"- oo '" a> 0 10 10 N '"' .... ~ "' on on oo oo on '" on '" '" <<> <<> <<> '" OJ ill t.: U '"' '"' '"' '"' '" '"' '"' '" '" '" '"' '" '"' '"' '" '" '"' '"' 1ii E 5l o _ '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' .c.o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. .. .. Oi=::l <JZ '" N '" N N N N N '" N N '" N N N N ~:2 '" 0 '" '" .. 0 ... ... , . N .,; ,..: ,..: .... 0" E '" '" ~ ~ ~ OJ '" .... ... oe. " .; N N ... .... J"-oD ... ... -...;: N N "'> 8w ;;. ~ c 0 0 c C . 0 0 ..t:: !l ,~ d d o . ~8. E ~.... .. 0 C o-o:u S 0 .... S ,., c 0 ~ .... e. " E '" "' , 0 0 0 '" U B 0 0 1l ~ ~ ~~ N ~ " .Ec as ." 1.000000 '" 0 ~ (")00000 ... '" 0- r--:cicicicici ,..: .,; ~ r::: ~ ~ c ... , N N "' '" 0 0 0 E .... ... ... ... "' "' " N N " 0; 0; - . . u -a~ 0 0 .- " ~ '" ... ... '" > , ::;) (jj nI 0 .Ez '" .... 0 .- " ~ C l: " . S .. N o e. 0 0 ...- a; C~ > > ~ CIlUl - . '" u \0 ... 0 c co 000.....0 '" 0 3::~ ~ , .... ... Q' 0 ~ ~ ,., '" U C ;>"- . 0 e. CIl .. '" -" '" .. E = ~O ." 0 0 0 ca ::.:. iJ o:z .... .... U .. .. > ".~ .. C\ 0 .... Q.l ~ " (/) J: 0- . 0 \OU .".9 W oU 1:~ '0 "' "' 0-0 0 0 o. M M ~ 0 0 . e. ~ " ~ . " "5"O"O.ae~ :s . ~ g' ffi.o.3 11l co 0 .... U CI::C>(f.)N::::!: .... '" ::;) '" .... o<! " Z " CD .... f w E w " '" ::; o. .... I '" ~ _z "'" ~ 00 Of- i5Z 0 ."." "" """ N c c N .. H- = >> <fXJl H- N :;; "' "' '" " .... E 0 0 ~ 0 0 . ~ ~ !::! li ". ~ N . .~ ~. '" UO Oi ~~>- ~. -g~I ~g; " " "....... B.... t) t) ~ .~ ~- C ....0 " 0 "' "' u ~ "' "' ~ " Qj (ri ;.: " ... ... . ~.~ 3:l . " ... ... ~ ~" 0 0 U C>-:J UZ '" '" . . RESEARCH AND THEORY NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF MITIGATING RADON IN DRINKING WATER Robert Raucher, afmmder ROBERT S. RAUCHER and senior partner at Sl1"Q- tus Consulting, holds a Stratus Consulting Ph.D. in natural reSO'.lrce economics and p"blic DOUGLAS CRAWFORD-BROWN finance from the Unhersity University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill of Wisconsill-Madisol1. MEGAN HARROD Douglas Crawford-Btown Stratus Consulting received his B.S.. M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Phy.,ics and Nuclear ScienceJ Tom The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued proposed afederal drink- Georgia Tech. He currently is a professor in the depart- ing water standardfor radon, in 1999. A final rule is anticipatedfrom the EPA in ments of environment,ll sci. 2005 or 2006. In this article, important additional insights are gleaned by applying enees and engineerin,? pub- an incremelltal net benefits perspective to the data and analyses p~esented by lic policy, and ecology, and Vitaliano in a 2003 article published in this journal. In addition, updates to director a/the campur-wide Vitaliano's risk analysis are made, based on emerging scientific evidenc~ on the Carolina Environmental risks posed by radon at levels seen in residential settings. The updated analysis Program. indicates the relevant policy insights that are obtained by applying an incremental net benefits approach in lieu of average net benefits, and suggests the proposed Megan Harrod is a senior standard may require careful reconsideration. associate at Stratus Con- sulting and doctoral (andi- Keywords: radon,' drinking water,' regulations; benefit-cost analysis; risk date in economics at Ihe assessment University of Colorada in Boulder. Colorado. She In its April 2003 issue. Public Works Management &: Policy published an article by Donald received an M.A. in fea- Vitaliano (an economics professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) titled "Costs and Ben- nomics from the Univ,~rsity efits of Mitigating Radon in Drinking Water" that examined the costs and benefits of the pro- of Colorado and a BA in posed federal drinking water standard for radon, based on case studies of29 modest-sized com- ecology from William:' munities in New York State. These federal standards are known as Maximum Contaminant College. Levels (MCLs), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a proposed MCL of radon at 300 pico-curies per liter (pCilL) in 1999 (U.S. EPA. 1999). Vitali ana (2003) provided many useful results and insights on the benefits and costs of the proposed radon MCL and concluded that the benefits might outweigh the costs, based on his AUTHORS' NOTE: Analyses provided in this paper were supported in party by the Water Industry Tech- nical Action Fund (WlTAF) and by the National Rural Water Association. WITAF is administered by the American Water Works Association and is funded through member dues. WITAF funds information col- lc::ction and analysis and other activities in support of sound and effective legislation, regulation, and drink- ing water policies and programs. PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLlCY. Vol. 10 No.1. Ju[y 2005 [0-22 DOl, 10. [177/10B7724X052BOO76 @ 2005 Sage Publications [0 .._. .... -. .~. .. ---,-..--.--.- Raucher, Harrod f COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RADON 11 assessment of radon risks for the communities he analyzed. However, important additional insights can be glean"d from the data and analyses presented in his article. In addition, some necessary rnodHication is required for his risk analysis. and several important updates can now be made to the benefits' estimates based on emerging scientific evidence on the risks posed by radon at levels seen h residential settings. This article examines these issues. In specific, the aUlhors: . Summarize Vit,i!iano's (2003) discussion of the likely costs of the proposed MCL for the 29 communities, concur that the EPA cost estimates may be understated, and agree that the New York ~Hate-derived cost estimates, while potentially low as well, are the better cost estimates to apply. . Review the basis of the health risks estimated by Yitaliano for radon at the exposure levels found in the 29 communities, critique the design and findings of the ecological epidemio- logical study of Vitaliano's (2003) own risk analysis, and explain why the risk faclors developed by t:," National Research Council (NRC, 1999) and adopted by the EPA are more suitable t:-tan VitaIiano's estimates. . Provide expanc ed benefit-cost results for the 29 communities based On the above and pro- vide alternatiVE, policy interpretations. We ask not only the base question of whether the proposed MC!. yields benefits that might outweigh the costs, but proceed to more detailed and policy-relevant questions about what MCL level may provide the greatest net social benefit (i.e., whether 300 pCiIL, or some other level, may be the best choice for set- ting the MCL ,n terms of generating the greatest returns to society). Show how much these results cen vary by community size. . lntroduce a modification to the NRClEPA risk estimate based On peer~reviewed scientific research recently emerged regarding radon risks at residential-type exposure levels (rather than occupational exposuFes to uranium miners). Also examined are implications for separating out the portion of the .elevated risks borne by smokers due to their use of tobacco, so th~lt the base risk can be properly attributed to radon exposure rather than smoking behavior. BACKGROUND ON THE REGULATORY HISTORY OF THE PROPOSED RADON MCL The proposed rad ,n MCL has been the subject of considerahle debate ever since it was ini- tially proposed. in I'91 (U.S. EPA. 1999). As in the 1999 rulemaking, the 1991 proposed rule called for an MCL cf 300 pCiIL. The issues that emerged following the 1991 proposed rule focused on (aJ disagreement over the EPA's estimated cost of compliance, with severa! organi- zations developing studies that suggested EPA's costs might be understated, perhaps by an order of magnitude or me,re (e.g., Raucher & Drago, 1992; Raucher et aI., 1995; U.S. General Accounting Office. 2002), (b) the disproportionate cost burden imposed on households in small communities became these community water systems (CWS) often rely on groundwater sources and Jack ecoJlomies of scale in radon removal treatment, and (c) the relative inefficiency of reducing radon-associated human health risks from drinking water in contrast to mitigating indoor radon originating from soH gas. The issues were so contentious that Congress acted to have EPA table the radon rule. The radon MCL remained dormanc until the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 (SDWAA) mandated that EPA proceed with an alternative regulatory approach. Under the SDWAA. an MCL sIll must be set by EPA and the rule must also provide a mechanism by which cost burdens could b" largely avoided ifa CWS set up and maintained a state- or EPA-approved "Multi-Media Mitigation Program" (MMMP). An MMMP would address soil gas radon issues ins lead of the relatively minor contribution of human exposures to radon from drinking water and must achieve an equivalent or better risk reduction from soil gas mitigation than would be achieved by a given CWS by meeting the MCL. iz PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLlCY I July zOOS In accordance with the statute, EPA's 1999 radon rule proposes an MCL of 300 pCi/L, and also includes a provision for the MMMP. Under the rule as proposed, a CWS with an approved MMMP could comply with a 4,000 pCiIL "Alternative MCL" (AMCL) in lieu of the far more stringent MCL. The proposed AMCL was established, as specified by the SDWAA, as equiva- lent to the national average outdoor ambient level of exposure to radon (i.e., the point where, on average, opening a window would expose the household [0 as much radon risk as would routine use of tap water in the home). The 1999 regulatory proposal of a 300 pCi/L MCL, combined with the MMMP option and its 4,000 pCiIL AMCL, has itself created considerable controversy. On the positive side, the MMMP approach provides communities with an opportunity for more local autonomy and con- trol in terms of how it decides to invest in reducing radon-related risks. Thus, localities would have choices about how to address the economic efficiency (e.g., cost per case avoided, and equity implications) (e.g., whose homes receive how much risk reduction, associated with the different risk mitigation options for soil, ga.s, or water-borne radon). However. on the negative side, even with the MMMP option, many of the same issues as arose in response to the 1991 proposal remain a concern: how high the costs might be, especially for small systems, and whether the risk reduction benefits outweigb the costs. Many concerns were aired about the potential equity aspects of the MMMP approach, as may arise where arela- tive small number of community homes may receive soil gas mitigation benefits in lieu of all community households realizing some smaller level of risk reduction benefit from a water- oriented approach. Finally, a key concern exists about the institutional viability of the MMMP approach and few if any states are now inclined to offer that option to CWS within their jurisdiction (e.g., Stratus Consulting, 20(0). This reluctance on the part of states to embrace the MMMP approach is often based on their lack of the financial or other resources to institute another regulatory pro- gram. There also are concerns about the potential negative public perceptions and confusion of setting a "duar" standard" with the MMMP (1.e" the MCL and the AMCL) rather than a single standard (the MCL). Whether the MMMP approach remains a viable component of the future EPA rulemaking, the issues raised by Vitaliano (2003) remain very relevant, as EPA has postponed attempting to finalize the radon MCL until late 2005 or beyond. Accordingly, it is important to refine and update Vitaliano's work to better reflect the Current state of knowledge and to extract valuable insights about the regulatory options under consideration. ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH COST OF COMPLIANCE ESTIMATES A useful frame of reference for evaluating the benefits and costs of the proposed radon MCL is at the level of small community water systems (CWS) (Vitaliano. 2003) because the prepon- derant share of compliance costs will be borne by small systems. Figure I depicts EPA-based estimates used to reveal the percentage share of estimated national costs and benefits that will be borne by CWS in each of the various system size categories. starting at the left with the smallest CWS of 25 to 100 persons served. For example, this figure reveals thnt 37% of the CWS with radon levels above the proposed MCL are in the smallest size category of 25 to 100 persons served, and that the households served by these extremely small systems would bear about 18% of the national regulatory compliance costs but realize only 1 % of the aggregate risk-reduction benefits. Vitaliano (2003) starts with EPA-based cost estimates for the 29 small systems in his study and then shows what New York State (NYS) estimated as site-specific costs for these 29 sys- tems. He found that the site-specific estimates of cost\ were roughly three times higher than pro- jected by EPA-even though usually a low cost compliance approach is favored and costed with the NYS data (e.g., assuming a new, low radon well can be developed in lieu of installing treat- meot to remove radon from waters drawn from existing weUfields). Rauch". Harrod I COSTS AND BENEmS OF RADON 13 45 .. 40 Percent of: _ 35 IiJBenefits 0 .. E. Ii'JCosts .S 30 DeWS >MCL .. ,~ 25 ;;; .: 20 0 C ~ 15 of 10 5 0 Very very Very very Vcry Small Medium Large small small small (3.3K-IOK) (lOK-100K) (> I 00,000) (25-100) (101-500) (501-3300) Figure 1: Percenhll:c of National Regulatory Benefits and Costs for Radon, by System Size (population a.ned) (at MCL = 30') pCIIL) SOURCE: Derived from U.S. Environment~1 Prorecclon Agency (1999) Based on several independent reviews of the estimated compliance costs for radon (e.g., U.S. General Accounting Office, 2002), the costs of the radon MCL will likely be higher than EPA projected. Thus, it is prudent to stick with the state-based cost estimates Vitaliana provides, rather than adopt EPA's estimates. [n fact, the cost estimates may still be lower than the actual costs (Vitaliano, 2003). ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH RADON RISKS AND THE BENEFITS OF THE MCL Viwliano (2003) starts with a risk estimate provided by the NRC (1999) and applied by EPA (1999). However, he then proceeds to develop his own estimate of radon-imposed risk in the 29 communities studied. based On inferences drawn from a simple ecologic epidemiological inter- pretation of lung c meer incidence relative to radon levels in the zip codes served by his sample ofCWS. Unfortunately. Vitaliano's epidemiological study is not generally valid. It is of an ecological design that has no more credibility than the study by Cohen (1989, 1995) that Vitaliano cites and that shows a nega1lve correlation between radon home concentration and cancer. The Cohen study is no longer considered valid, for reasons discussed by the NRC in its BEIR VI report (NRC. 1999). T1lf problem with the approach taken by Vitaliano is that the contribution of water to the overall radon concentration in the home air is a few percent at most, so small varia- tions in underlying geology of a town (which ultimately produces mast of the radon in home air) will swamp the differences in water-borne radon. Similarly, small variations in home construc- tion faclors such as insulation and window design can lead to significant differences in indoor radon concentration and movement of individuals between structures during the day averages out differences in '~xposures. As Vitaliano himself notes. "the occurrence of basement radon is very erratic so that group-level radon readings (e.g., by town or zip code) are less reliable indica- 14 PUBLIC WORKS MJ,NAGEMENT & POLICY I July 2005 tors of exposure" (p. 298). Yet it is these soil gas radon levels in basements that contribute most strongly to total radon exposure in homes; hence, fluctuations in soil gas radon would result in similar fluctuations in home air radon. Accordingly, Vitaliano's (2003) radon risk estimates appear not to represent sufficiently sound science to justify moving from the much better established NRC risk estimates, and therefore this article adopts the NRC-derived and EPA-applied risk faclor as the starting point for assessment. Later, it will introduce new scientific evidence to suggest risks posed by radon at exposure levels typically found in residential settings may be far lower than currently estimated. COMPARING BENEFITS TO COSTS: AN INCREMENTAL APPROACH MAXIMIZES SOCIAL WELFARE Beyond the discussion of the individual data components of the benefit-cost analysis (BCA) is the obligation to address how the benefit-cost analysis was conducted. The goal of a BCA should be to help guide decision making toward options that lead to the highest level of well- being for society as a whole. Economists refer to this as umaximizing social welfare," an idea that means looking for the MCL at which the benefits exceed the costs by the widest margin. At this point the "net benefits" are the greatest (net benefits equal benefits minus costs).' To identify the MCL that yields the greatest net benefit, economists look for the point where "marginal benefits" are equal to umarginal costs." These "marginal" concepts refer to the change in benefits and the change in costs for each possible increased stringency of an MCL (Le., what the additional benefits and costs would be if an MCL were to be made I pCilL more stringent than the last option considered). In reaLity, rarely data examines how marginal benefits and costs change at such a tiny (Le., I pCiIL) change in an MCL. Therefore, the terms "incremental benefits" and "incremental costs'" are used instead of marginal benefits or m~gina1 costs. These "incremental" tenns refer to examining how benefits and costs change from one MCL option to the next (e.g., moving from a 700 pCiIL radon standard to a500 pCiIL MCL option and then examining the incremental bene- fits and costs of moving from 500 pCiIL to 300 pCiIL). The incremental perspective allows one to view regulatory options one step at a time, and to identify the point (MCL option) at which moving to the next more stringent option would add more costs than benefits (where incremental benefits become outweighed by incremental costs). By selecting the lowest MCL for which the incremental benefits still outweigh the incre- mental costs, the poiicy will yield the greatest possible net benefits to society. Ergo the SDWAA now specifies that EPA reveal the incremental costs and incremental benefits of each MCL option-the comparison of these incremental benefits and costs enables one to maximize social welfare. Vitaliano (2003) simply evaluated whether a 300 pCiIL MCL would pass the total benefit- cas! test. However, to best inform policy decisions, we should instead look for the MCL that maximizes social welfare using the incremental approach described above, rather than deter~ mining whether a given MCL migbt provide positive net benefits. Therefore, Vitaliano (2003) limits his approach in not presenting an incremental benefit-cost comparison. Instead, he examines total benefits and total costs, and suggests that the proposed MCL seems justified based on benefits being roughly the same size as costs. This type ofbenefit- cost comparison only indicates that the regulation may be a "break-even" proposition at best (net henefits of zero). Application of an increment analysis is needed to maximize net benefits. Below, we provide such incremental analyses. A COST.PER-CASE-AVOIDED APPROACH There are two ways to ..amine the risk-cost tradeoffs inherent in the proposed radon rule. The risk-reduction benefits are the estimated number of cases of premature mortality from i- l , l. Raucher, Hmod I COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RADON 15 ! f I Thblel: lncremenlalAnalysis oreost per Fatality Postponed: DirrerentMCL Options (millions 1997 dollars) < MeL Optiotl Anra.ge Casl per Fatality Postpon~d ($) IncMmental Cost pu Fatality Pcmponed ($) , ~ 1.000 pCi/L 2.17 2.17 ! ; 700 pCiIL 3.75 5.33 500 pCiIL 5.01 6.89 300 pCiIL 7.24 12.20 , , radon-associated lung cancers that are avoided at a given MCL. One way to evaluate these com- . pares the risk red Jctions directly to costs, thereby developing a cost~effectiveness measure of cost per prematur" fatality avoided. This approach, used by Vitaliano (2003) is developed iD this section. The second approach is to explicitly assign monetary values to the risk reductions asso- ciated with a poteltial MCL, using an approach based OD the "Value ofa Statistical Life" (VSL) to monetize the r: sk reductions. This second approach enables a more traditional benefit-cost comparison and is developed in the next section. The first step in the cost-per-case avoided approach estimates the number of cases avoided in each community, for each MCL. Using the NRC/EPA uDit risk factor for radon, Table I repli. cates Vitaliano's results (Vitaliano, 2003, p. 293). Using the NYS cost estimates from Vitaliano ! replicates his "b",ak'eveD YSL" results iD his Table 4 (2003, p. 298). These are the community. specific estimate" of average cost per premature fatality avoided for the MCL of 300 pCiIl.. (compared to baseliDe, unregulated radon conceDtratioDs). Reevaluation "fthese results for differeDt possibleMCL OptiODS of I ,000,700,500, aDd 300 pCiIl..' provides ,dditional insight on the proposed radon standard and is accomplished by inc1~ding costs and risk reductioDs only for those commuDities that would be impa,ted by a given MCL option. For example, a CWS with radon at 450 pCiIl.. would not incur compliance costs--{>r realize risk reduction benefits-if the MCL were set at 500 pCi/L or higher. The results of this aDalysis arC; provided in Table I. As eXpected, the average cost per case avoided is lowesl at the least stringent option evaJuated. In addition, the incremental analysis (shown in the right-hand column in Table I) shows how fast the cost-per-case avoided increases as the MeL beco~es more stringent. Forexample, the incremental cost per case avoided when moviDg from 50C' pCiILto 300 pCiIl.. is $12.2 million shows how costly it becomes to consider increasingly strir,gent MCL oprions. Another inter'~sting perspective can be gained by examining how the cost per premature fatality avoided \ arles across systems of different sizes. Table 2 provides these results, assum- ing the MCL is 300 pCiIL. If the regulation applied only to systems serving 3,300 persons or more. then incremental cost per case avoided is only $1.74 million. By adding in systems serv- ing 1,000 or mor" persons, the incremental cost-per.case avoided more than doubles, reachiDg $3.76 million, ard this doubles again if systems of 500 or more persons served are included. Finally. by adding the smallest systems (serving between 25 and 500 persons), the iDcremental cost is over $16 millioD per case avoided. As shown by rhe incremental perspectives provided in Tables I aDd 2, the cost.effectiveness of a radon MCL declines considerably as the MCL becomes increasingly stringent, or if the smaller sized communities are forced to comply. Table 3 provides a glimpse of how the cost- effectiveness vades if one simultaneously considers both stringency and community size. Clearly, gains an realized by considering the various regulatory options in this, more thorough fashion. For example, If one were to believe that the cost.per-case avoided should not exceed $5 mil~ lio", then the datil suggest the most suitable MCL may be 1,000 pCiIl.. (ifapplied to all CWS, as iDdicated by the incremental values in Table I). Alternatively, if the MCL is set at 300 pCiIl.., then one might e'Jasider waiving systems of less than] ,000 persons served from the regulatory requirements (as per the incremental results in Table 2). Upon examiDing combination options as per Table 3. ol1e might be drawn to considering an MCL of 700 pCiIl.., with a CWS size cut. off of 500 persor s served. Regardless of the perspective taken, the incremental evaluation indi~ 16 PUBUC WORKS MA~'AGEMENT '" POLley I July 2005 Table 2: Incremental Analysis of Cost per Fatality Postponed: Different System Size Cutoffs for an MCL or 300 pCi/L (millions 1997 dollars) Average Cost ptr Incremental Cost per MeL Option Fatality Postponed ($) Fatality Postponed ($) MeL = 300 pCiIL; systems ~ 3.300 served 1.74 1.74 MeL =300 pCiIL; systems i:! 1,000 served 3.41 3.76 Met =: 300 pCilL; systems ~ SOO served 4,34 7.53 Met = 300 pCiIL; all systems 7.24 16.35 Table 3: Incremental Analysis of Cost per Fatality Postponed: Different MCL and System Size OptiOfl5 Com- bined (millions 1997 dollars) Averagl!' Cost ptr Incremental Cost peT Met Option Fataliry Postponed ($) Fatality Postponed ($) Met = [.000 pCiIL: sYi'ltems ~ 3,300 served 1.39 1.39 Met = 700 pCiIl.: systems:2: 3,300 served 1.55 1.71 Met = 700 pCilL: systems ~ 1,000 served 2.22 2.45 Met = 700 pCiIL; systems ~ 500 served 2.48 4.59 Met = 700 pCiIL; all systems 3.75 6.81 MCL = 500 pCiJL: all systems 5.01 6.89 MCL = 300 pCiIL; all systems 7.24 12.20 cates clearly that the MCL as proposed (300 pCiIL applying to all CWS size categories) is not a relatively cost-effective option for protecting public health. MONETIZED BENEFIT-COST COMPARISONS I ! The above cost-effectiveness assessment begs the question UWhat cost per premature fatality i I avoided is too high?" and, in turn, leads to the need to consider evidence of monetary values for I the willingness to pay (WTP) to enjoy such risk reductions. Herein empirical evidence from the 1 body of research on VSL becomes relevant. EPA currently applies a VSL estimate of $5.5 mil- lion, in year 2000 dollars (Inside EPA, 2004). This is equivalent to $5.1 million in 1997 dollars 1 and is consistent with the cost data used in Vitaliano (2003) and here. , Next, some adjustment to this value of $5.1 million is suitable because the VSL estimates ! pertain to immediate death of a person of or near median age (e.g., late 30s), thus reducing the i victim's life expectancy by about 40 or more years. In contrast, a radon-induced lung cancer I , would involve a latency period of several decades and reduce a typical victim's life expectancy j . by fewer than 20 years. Simply discounting to account for a 20-year latency period (but not I accounting for the difference in life years saved), one would obtain a more radon-suitable , adjusted VSL of $ 1.3 million or less (in 1997 dollars). i Using the VSL information leads to examining the Vitaliano (2003) analysis from a benefit- ! cost perspective. As above, total benefits were calculated by multiplying the NRClEPA unit risk . factor that Vitaliano began with (8.93E-09 risk per pCiIL annually) by the population served by I I systems with radon concentrations exceeding a given MCL option. Vitaliano then multiplied i these case estimates by a range of VSL estimates with a high of $5.8 million and a low of $2.4 I million. His lower end VSL ($2.4 million) is used for convenience, even though the estimate may be elevated relative to the discussion above. The current EPA estimate of $5.1 million > (1997 dollars) applies as the high end. This is a high-end VSL forthe radon application because , it does not account for the delay in reali2ing the benefit, nor the lessernumber oflife years saved i I relative to the risks underlying the EPA base case VSL estimate, , ~. ! 4 , ?, ~ , ! i .j Raucher. Harrod' COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RADON 17 Table 4: I nc~mentaJ E,en~nts and Incremental Net Beneftts by MCL (millions 1997 dollars) 300 "CVL 500 pCi/L ($) 700 pCi/L ($) 1,000 pCilL ($) Incremental benefit-VSL = $2.4m. 0.14 0.10 0.22 0.30 Incremental benefit-VSL = $S.lm. 0.29 0.22 0.47 0.64 Incremental net benefit- v'SL = $2.4m. (0.15) (0,14) (0.02) 0.09 Incremental nce benefit- \lSL = $.5. 1m. 0.01 (0.02) 0.23 0.43 Using the Vitaliano-based estimates for total benefits (using the NRCIEPA risk factor), we then break out the ref;ults to provide an incremental perspective. Thus, incremental benefits are calculated as the additional benefits attainable by moving from a 1,000 pCiIL MCL to the next most stringent option. Incremental benefits and costs are based on additional water systems becoming subject to the increasingly stringent MCL options. Once a CWS is picked up by the analysis (i.e.. once the community's radon concentration exceeds an MCL option), no changes were assumed in risk levels in that community for more stringent MCL options. Therefore the number of fatalities avoided does not change between MCLs for a given CWS, onCe it hits a regulatory threshold. Although this is a simplifying assumption, it is not entireiy unrealistic. As Vitaliano (2003) notes. due to the nature of radon removal technology, the incremental cost of removing addi- tional radon is very s naIl. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that a facility would remove most (e.g., 90% to 99%) ofche radon in its raw water, effectively reducing the risk to near zero, once the system was SUbjf:ct to an MCL. Therefore the sole difference in costs and benefits between MCL options arises Tom the number of systems that would be subject to regulation under each scenario. . Table 4 summari:~es incremental benefits, as well as incremental net benefits. of four MCL options. Incrementa' costs increase dramatic,ally as the MCL b~comes more stringent. with an over five-fold diffe",nce between the incremental cost at 1 ,000 pCiIL and 300 pCilL. However. the difference in incremental benefits between 1,000 pCiIL and 300 pCiIL is a little over two- fold. Due to difference 5 between rates of increase of incremental benefits and costs, incremental net benefits decrease as the MCL is made more stringent. Under the $2.4 million benefit value per case avoided, the MCL option of I ,000 pCiIL is the most justified (I.e., it maximizes social welfare or net social benefits). The high-end VSL suggests an MCL of 700 pCiIL might maxi- mize net benefits. ACCOUNTING FOR SYSTEM SIZE IN THE BCA APPROACH An additional po ot to consider in comparing benefits and costs is the need to break the anal- ysis down by system-size category. As Vitaliano (2003) points out, drinking water treatment costs (the costs of compliance) tend to be relatively high on a per unit basis in small (rural) sys- tems, Therefore, households served by smail and/or rural water systems typically bear a dispro- portionately high share of the regulatory costs relative to customers in larger systems that enjoy economies of scale in treatment. Although a uniform MCL for small and large systems does provide households with roughly "equal health protection" (i.e., comparable-risk reductions) regardless of where they Jive or the size of the CWS th, t serves them, the cost burden each bears can be significantly different. In essence, any given MeL is likely to impose much higher costs perunit of risk-reduction benefit received on househ<)lds served by small systems relative to the costs~per-risk reduction borne by households in larger communities. When EPA pres< nts its SCAs. it typically provides national aggregates of benefits and costs. Under the national perspective, small-system benefit-cost impacts are buried under the prepon- , 18 PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY I Ju]y 2005 Table 5: Average Radon Concentrations, by System Sizes, of29 NYS Systems Exceeding potential MCLs (pCV L) Syst~m Siz~ (popldation st!rv~d) 301J pCVL 500 pCi/L 701J pCVL J.OIJOpCVL System size >3.300 810 985 985 1.115 1.001-3.300 789 988 1.178 1.545 501.1.000 609 668 7fIJ - <500 2.224 2.957 4.493 6.378 All system sizes ].]07 1.4]6 1.940 3,084 % CWS subjecl to rule 100 69 41 21 Table 6: Incremental Net Benefits. by System Size Category, for MCL or300 pCiIL (millions of 1997 dollars) VSL = $5.1 MiUiorf , Sysum Sizt VSL = $2.4 Millioll , I l >3.300 om 0,06 1 1.001-3.300 (0.08) 0.01 i , 501-1.000 (0.02) (0,02) l <500 (0.05) (0.05) l , Table 7: Most.Stringent MCL at Which Net Social Benefits Would Be Maximized, for Lower and Upper I I Bound VSL Estimates. Based on Vltaliano's Cost per Premature FataJity Cutoffs I VSL = $2.4 Million VSL = $5.1 Million Sysremsize 1 >3.300 300 pCilL 300 pCilL 1.00]-3.300 1.000 pCilL 300pCilL 501.1.000 > 700 pCilL >700pCilL <SOO > 1.500 pCilL > 1.500 pCilL All system sizes 1,000 pCiIL or above 700 pCilL derant share of total costs and benefits borne by larger systems. But BCA results should also be t made available on a system-size basis, so that the benefit-cost tradeoffs borne by small-system customers can be readily evaluated. These may reveal that the cost per unit of risk reduction (e.g., the cost per cancer fatality avoided) may be unreasonably large for households served by small systems. This type of finding can then be used as a basis for considering alternative MCLs, or providing supportive compliance funding to small systems, or both. Table 5 sununarizes average radon concentration of systems that would be subject to each regulation, by system size, for the communities in Vitaliano's (2003) data set. The smallest systems have the highest radon concentrations but the smallest population served, thus decreasing the incremental benefits. Therefore. incremental net benefits are very low for the smallest systems. Table 6 summarizes incremental net benefits, by system size. for the MCL proposal at 300 pCi/L. The results show positive incremental net benefits only for the larger systems in this data set (those of 3,300 or more served, using the adjusted VSL of $2.4 million to monetize risk reductions, or systems of 1,00 I or larger when the higher VSL is applied). Again, the EPA risk factor and Vitaliano's (2003) cost estimates were used in these I calculations. Although this research advocates the use of incremental net benefits to detennine how to maximize social benefits, Vitaliano (2003) uses the concept of break-even VSL to determine I whether 300 pCiIL can be justified. Therefore, for comparison's sake, we evaluate the break- even VSL across system sizes and MCLs. to evaluate whether the potential benefits from radon mitigation exceed benchmark VSLs of $2.4 million as the lower bound and $5.1 million as the i upper bound, in which case the social benefits of regulation would outweigh the costs. Vitaliano 1 (2003) calculated break-even VSL as the average cost of compliance per premature fatality I avoided. I ~ I , ! .t " } Rauchcr. Harrod I COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RADON 19 . ~ . " Table 7 show,; the most stringent MCL for which the social benefits, defined by the lower and N i upper bound VSL estimates used here of $2.4 and $5.1 million, respectively, would outweigh t the costs by the greatest degree. Assuming the upper bound VSL estimate, if one looked across i? all system sizes, it would appear the optimal MCL would be 700 pCiIL. However, for the small- , .. est size categOl):, the only community with positive net benefits is a CWS with radon at morc , than 11,000 pCL L (and the CWS with the next highest radon level, of I ,505 pCilL, shows nega- .. tive net benefits even using the high-end VSL and a potential MCL of 1,000 pCiIL). " NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE RADON RISK FACTOR: ~: NONLINEARITY OF THE DOSE-RESPONSE FUNCTION . The above analysis is based on the NRCIEPA risk factor for radon in drinking water, based on the scientific: evidence available in 1999. Several advances in the science of radon risk assessment have ensued since that analysis. The first advance is a significant new study at low , doses and dose-rates by Monchaux and Morlier (2002) and Monchaux (in press). These publi- cations allow ar examination of the exposure-response curve at exposure-rates that begin to approximate background exposures and that 8rc much more relevant to exposures from house. hold water than are the occupational mining studies upon which the NRCIEPA risk estimates .. arc based. The second important scientific advance is the finding by Moolgavkar, Cross, t Luebeck, and D,'gle (1990) and Moolgavkar, Luebeck, Krewski, and Zielinski (1993) that the bulk of the risk from inhaled radon may be due to promotional effects rather than initiation effects. This latt,,, finding in particular has significant implications for the assignment of cessa- tion and latency lags, as well as the shape of the dose-response relationship. , The &tudies by Monchaux et a!. (2002) and by Monchaux (in press) appear to offer signifi- cant improvements in the understanding of effects of radon at low exposures and exposure- :~ rates. These stuclies extend the exposures and exposure rates down to levels that are an order of magnitude lowe:-than any conducted before, encompassing expo"sures in home air; the previous studies in animals were at exposure levels significantly above those found in the home. The new studies show tw J important differences from past studies: (a) they indicate nonlinearity in the risk coefficient at low total exposure, with linearity producing a significant overestimate of effect at these 10?,I exposures, and (b) they demonstrate that the inverse dose-rate effect, wherein lowered exposUlc rate produces higher probability of cancer, is confined to regions of exposure typical of mining populations but not to exposures at levels found in homes. The latter finding is the most significant here, especially as it contributes to the first finding because it demonstrates the inverse dose-rate effect is reversed at the low exposures found in homes. This finding in turn, is important because the EPA assumes that the risk values can be taken from the lowest exposures in the mining data and may even underestimate risk at exposures found in homes (based on the argument that the inverse dose-rate effects implies the value of excess absolute risk [EAR] per working level month [WLM] increases with decreasing expo- sure). However, the results of the Monchaux group (2002) show otherwise. Note that in the upper exposure, (characteristic of the mining population), the inverse dose-rate effect does occur. At lower exposures, however, the traditional dose-rate effect occurs (Le., decreasing dose-rate decref.ses the risk coefficient). The newer data show a clear decrease in EAR per WLM by at leaS! a factor of 3 or 4 at exposures on the order of 10 WLM. This decrease is likely to be significanl.ly larger for the incremental risk imposed by radon released from drinking water. As a point of reference, a 70+ year lifelong exposure to drinking water at a radon concen- tration of 1,000 pCiIL is roughly equivalent to an accumulated lifetime exposure level of 1 WLM. At exposure levels of I WLM or less, the NRCIEPA approach may overstate risks by a factor of 5 or more. These new stldies. along with any other scientific inquiries of merit that may have come to light since the NRC review published in 1999, need to be reviewed and carefully considered for future radon-related regulatory policy actions. The rationale for these studies would be to reduce apprecial)ly the implied levels of risk that are associated with radon at levels relevant to . . ~O PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY I July 2005 Table 8: Incremental Net Benefits of RadOb MCL Options In 29 NYS Communities. Using Nonlinear Dose. Response Implied by Monchaux and Marlier (ZOOl) and Monchaux (2004) (mllUons 1991 dolJars ptr )ear} MCL Option VSl. = $2.4 mi/llcm VSL = $5. J million 1.000 (0.15) (0.08) 700 (0.19) (0.14) 500 (0.23) (0.20) 300 (0.26) (0,22) U.S. households, and therefore have significant implications for the benefit-cost evaluation of regulatory alternatives as detailed below. Thus the scientific community and the policy makers who will make regulatory determinations need to consider fully and appropriately the merits, limitations, and suitable role of this emerging research for standard setting. The issue of using nonlinear dose.response functions in lieu of the traditional default assumption of linearity is a controversial scientific and policy matter but one that deserves serious consideration for radon, in view of emerging scientific evidence. What does the new risk perspective of nonlinearity in dose-response mean for the radon BCA presented above? It implies that the risk estimates (hence the estimated benefits) would be overstated by a factor of 5 or more. For example, the incremental cost per premature fatality avoided would now be more than $60 million for moving from an MCL option of 500 pCilL to 300 pCiIL (and over $10.5 million per case for an MCL of 1,000 pCiIL versus no MCL, based on the systems in the data set). In terms of the BCA, Table 8 shows the incremental net benefits using the nonlinear dose-response model are negative for all MCL options evaluated, implying an MCL greater thlll> 1,000 pCiIL would be warranted. Therefore, the new scientific evidence on the risks posed by radon in drinking water suggest that the rule as proposed would be a wiry expensive investment in public health protection and. that the benefits would be outweighed by the costs. INTERPRETING THE RADON RISK FACTOR: NETTING OUT THE RISK POSED BY TOBACCO SMOKING An additional consideration is that the NRClEPA risk factor reflects a weighted average of separate risk factors for smokers and nonsmokers. There is a strong synergistic interaction between tobacco smoking and the lung cancer risk associated with exposure to radon. The sci~ entitic data are well enough established that the NRC (1999) estimated radon risks to nonsmok- ers at an order of magnitude lower than risks borne by smokers. U.S. EPA's (1999) estimates reflect a weighted mix of these risk factors, but the agency's approach attributes to radon a con- siderable portion of risk that is more suitably assigned to tobacco, For example. the estimated median risk among nonsmokers is 2.5 X 10' at a lifetime exposure to radon in drinking water of 300 pCiIL. The risk is roughly 60% lower than the mix of smoker and nonsmoker risk factors the EPA applies to the general population. The EPA and other risk estimates described above all reflect risk to the general population, including to both tobacco smokers and nonsmokers. Thus, the risk estimates above attribute to radon some measure of risk that is more suitably attributed to tobacco. A key policy issue is whether it is more suitable to examine radon risks using risk assessment data for nonsmokers (as applied to the entire population). Iftllis perspective is applied (I.e., assigning the net-of-tobacco risk factor to the entire population rather than only to nonsmokers), then the total risk levels are reduced by almost a factor of 3. The reduction means that the costs per case avoided, as noted above, increase by a factor of 3, and the benefits estimates decline by a factor of 3. This sug- gested approach of basing the radon regulatory analyses on the risk factor for nonsmokers (applied to both smokers and nonsmokers) is a matter of policy choice, and would be consistent , Raucher. Harrod I COSTS AND BENEFITS OF RADON 21 with national antismoking effoItS, under which a guiding principle is to force smokers to bear the burden of theu own choices relative to using tobacco products. If one combines the impact of netting out of tobacco-attributable risks with the nonlinear dose-response interpretation for radon at in-home exposure levels, the impact is compounded. In other words, the 3-fold impact associated with correcting the risk estimates to net out tobacco conUibutions, wh"n combined with the S-fold impact from the recent evidence regarding the shape of the dose.response model, results in a IS-fold reduction in the level of risk (cases avoided) compared to the results presented above. For example, the incremental cost per prema- ture fatality avoided would now be over $180 million for moving from an MeL option of 500 pCi/L to 300 pCI/L (and over $31 million per case for an MCL of 1,000 pCi/L versus no MCL, based on the systems in the data set). CONCLUSION The proposed f,deraJ standard for radon in drinking water has been controversial for many years, and is agail1 a highly relevant policy matter because finalization of the rule is anticipated in the coming yea: or two. Vitaliano (2003) provides some useful insights of regulatory rele- vance but is limiwd in several important manners. This article has revisited and embellished Vitaliano in order to draw a more in-depth and policy-relevant set of insights. First, by applyi Jg an incremental perspective to the cost-effectiveness and benefit~cost anal- yses, this examim,tionshows MeL options less sUingent than the one proposed by the EPA appear to make more sense in terms of the efficiency of publlc health protection. Whereas Vitaliano (2003) s"ggests that, in total, benefits may well exceed costs for the proposed radon MCL of 300 pCI/I., the incremental analysis shown above reveals-using the same underlring data-that a less stringentMCL is more cost-effective and provides greater net social benefit. Second, this article's approach also shows how disaggregating the analysis to account for the size of the community water system reveals important insights about the efficiency and equity implications ofha"ing the MeL apply uniformly to all CWS. The net benefits and cost per fatal- ity postponed tene to be much higher for the smaller systems and raise key policy issues about the eql1ity of alteroative rulemaking approaches. On one hand, a unifonn standard imposes a much higher cost per household (and cost per level of household risk reduction) in small sys- tems than in larger oncs that can be viewed as an unfair cost imposition on residents in srnaller entities. On the ott er hand, having different standards applied to different-sized systems creates a possible perception that less protection is being provided to residents of smaller communities. Although in this case, small communities ca.n always opt on their own to reduce radon concen. trations in water to whatever MCL is applied to larger systems. Third. the authors' work offers new insights and perspectives on the risk assessment for drinking-water rajan. showing the considerable extent to which the cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost findings based the current NRCIEPA risk factors are affected if new scientific evi- dence is considered regarding the nonlinearity of the dose-response function. Assllming the recent scientific c\ idence ofnonIinearity is robust enough to be taken fully into policy consider- ation, the level of 11Sk currently assigned to the relevant levels of radon exposure in U.S. homes probably is overstated by a factor of 5 or more. An overstatement means that the proposed MCL is probably too stringent by a considerable degree, based on typical benefit-cost criteria. Finally, the examination presents an alternative policy perspective with respect to whether a net-of-tobacco risk factor should be applied to all radon-exposed persons. Applying this policy perspective of attributing to radon only the radon-relevant portion of the risk (rather than also embedding tobacco-attributed risk), we show that the benefits estimates are reduced by one third. When the abov" perspectives are applied, eitherindividually or collectively, the new risk and benefit-cost insights derived suggest that a less stringent MCL should be considered by the EPA. in lieu of th" 300 pCilL level initially proposed. . 1" 111 II' \\ lll~""" ,\I:\N,\t il"M".N'1 &. l'OI.It'Y I July 2005 Noles I. Sometimes the ratio ofbenellts to costS (SIC) is used as a way ro evaluate a policy. If the B/C ratio is greater than I. that means that benefits outweigh costs. The use of a tile ratio is valid for considering alternative investments because one can try to identify the option the yields the greatest ratc of return (highest SIC ratio). However. for regulatory poli- cies like setting an Maximum Comaminant Levels (MeL), it is more appropriate to apply the net benefits concept (bene- firs minus costs) radlcrthan the SIC ratio. This is because the objective is to identify the MCL that maximizes social wel~ fare (net benefits) and not to develop an investment strategy that maximizes rates of return. 2. MCL options sbove 1,000 pico.curies per liter (pCiJl.) are worth evaluating too. but the radon levels for the 29 communities provided only limited observations above that level. References Cohen, B. L. (1989). Expected indoor222 Rn levels in counties with very high and very low tung cancer rates. Health Physics, 57 (6),897-901. Cohen. B. L. (]995). Test of the linear no.threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis for inhaled radon decay products. Health Physics, 68, 157-174. Inside EPA. (2004, May 19). EPA /OWus bt!nefirsfor ktyair ~gulatiol1J ill economic tests. Washington. DC: Author. Monchaux. G. ([0 press). Risk of fatal lung tancer in radon-exposed rats: A re.analysis of French data. Radiation ReSt!arch. Monchaux, G.. & Morlier, J.p' 2002. lnnuenceofexposureraceon radon-induced lungcancu in rats. Journal afRadio. logical Protection, 22, A81.A87, 2002. Moolgavkar, S.. Cross. F., Luebeck, G., &: Dagle G. (1990). A Iwo.rnutation model forradon.induced lung tumors in rats. Radiation Research, 12/, 28-31. Moolga....kar. S., Luebeck, E.. Krewski, 0., &Zielinslci, 1. (1993). Radon, cigarette smoke. snd lung.cancer: A re-analy- sis of the Colol1ldo plateau Uranium miners' data. Epidi!miology, 4, 204-217. NalkmaJ Research Council. (1999). Risk assessment of radon in drinking water: Committee on the Risk Ass~ssmi!nr of Exp.osures to Radon in Drinking Wmer. National Academy of Sciences, Board ofRacfiation Effects Research, COm- mission on Ufe Sciences. National Research Council. Washington. DC: National Academy Press. Raucher. R., & Drago, J. A. (l992. March). Estimating the cost of compliance {or the drinking ~ter standard forraoon. JournaL AWWA. SS-6's. Raucher, R., Castillo, E. T., Dixon, A., Breffle, W., Waldman, D., &: Drago. l.A. (J 995): Estimating the cost of compli. ance witll drinking water sta.ndards: A IIlU'S guidi! (ISBN 0.89867.828-5). Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation. Stratus Consulting. (2000. January 5). Start! response to the proposed mulrimedia mitigation program option. Report prepared by StratuS ConsultJng Inc. for the AWWA Government Affairs, Boulder, CO. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999. November 2). National primary drinki/1g water regulations; Radon. 222; proposed rule (40 CFR Parts 141 and 142). Washington. DC: Federal Register. U.S. General AccountingOffice. (2002. February). Revisions toEPA 'seost allalysisforthe radoll nile wOllldimprove Irs credibiliry and IIsefulltess (OAO.02.333). Washington, DC: Author. VitalizlOo, D. F. (2003). Costs nnd benefits of mitigating radon in drinking Water. Public Works Managt!mt!flt &: Policy, 7 (4).291.303. D East Valley 'Nater District - serving Our community for Over 50 YeelrS Board of Directors President George E. (Skip) Wilson Vice President Kip E. Sturgeon Ju:y 7, 2005 Donald D. Goodin Edward S. Negrete Glenn R.. UghtfoOt Ka,thJeen Rollings-McDonald, Executive Officer Robert E. Martin Local Agency Formation Commission General Manager Ccunty of San Bernardino Paul R. Dolter 175 West Fifth Street, Second Floor District Engineer Saa Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 Brian W. Tompkins Chief Financial Officer Re: LAFCO 2919 - San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District p.o. Box 3427 Dear Ms Rollings-McDonald: San Bernardino,CA 92"'13 3654 Highland Avenue Reference is made to LAFCO's current service review of the San Bernardino Suite 18 Valley Water Conservation District (LAF.CO 2919). You recently made a 'land. CA 92346 presentation on this .issue at the Upper Santa Ana Water Resources Association. 1'I10ne: (909) B89-950 I Following your preseJ;ltation, you stated that the Commission had requested comments from the various water agencies' in this basin, especially those' that Office Hours: op'~rate within the boundaries of the Water Conservation District. The Board of Monday - Friday Di::ectors of the East Valley Water District has reviewed this issue and the various opjons being considered by the Commission and wishes to offer the following 8:00 am . 5:00 pm comments, which were approved by the Board at its regularly scheduled meeting On July 12,2005. I) East Valley Water District strongly recommends that LAFCO reject the option for consolidation of the Water Conservation District with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. In our view, these two agencies have distinctly different functions and operational goals. An example of this concern is the ongoing problems we are experiencing with water quality degradation at the Seven Oaks Dam. While the dam is operating effectively from a flood control perspective, it has created serious problems from a water supply and water quality standpoint 2) With respect to all other options being considered by the Commission, the District's view is that the existing organization and sphere of influence of the Water Conservation District is satisfactory and should not be subjected to any modifications. East Valley Water District is satisfied with the operation of the Water Conservation District and their willingness to work - Administration (909) 885.4900, Fax (909) 889-5732 . Engineering (909) 888-8986, Fax (909) 383-1481 Customer Service & Finance (909) 889-950 I, Fax (909) 888-6741 - LAFCO-2919 Page Two July 7, 2005 with other agencies on regional problems. We are plea:sed with many of the regional projects and agreements that are being forged in the Bunker Hill Ba:sin area with the intent e,f creating effective water management programs. The Water Conservation District has been an integral part of many of these agreements. It is also our understanding that the Water Conservation District is nearing a settlement with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District regarding their competing water rights applications. This has been a major concern of our District and we are encouraged that a resolution of this dispute appears to be imminent. 3) If the Commission should decide upon some form of consolidation, we strongly recommend that the revenue stream from existing mining operations be committed to groundwater recharge and Basin Management programs. The use of these funds for any other pupose would be highly Qbjectionable. We wish te, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this very important matter being considered by the Commission. If there is any further information that we can provide, you in this matter, we encourage you to contact our staff. Sincerely, cKGC L...... -'---......... Kip Sturgeon Vice President - .. LIJCAL AOENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 17S west Fifth street. Second Floor San Bl~mardlno. CA 92415-0490 . (909) 387-5866 . Fax (909) 387.5871 E-mail; lafcO@lafco.sbcounty.gov www.sbdafco.org DATE; S''''!'EMBER 13, 2005 ~~ FROM; KATHLEEN ROLLINGS-McDON , Exe~ v~. 'mc~r TO: U)CAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION SUBJECT: AJ~eDda Item #7: Consideration of LAFCO 2919 - Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update for San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District RECOMMENDATION: . If the CommisBion supports the staffs position that the concept of a basin-wide water conservation entity should be pursued, it is recommended that it support the ultimate consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, by taking the following actions; 1. Determine that the designation of a zero sphere of influence for the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District is statutorily exempt from environmental review and direct the Clerk to me a Notice of Exemption within five days; 2. Designate a zero sphere of influence for the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District indicating that it is the position of the Commission that the District should ultimately consolidate with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District; 3. Direct the Executive Officer to establish a committee to review the possible consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, to be made up of the LAFCO Executive Officer and the General Manager, or designee, of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District; and a representative from each of the major water stakeholders identified as: the City of Redlands, the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, East Valley Water District, Bear Item ~7 - LAFCO 2919 September 13, 2005 Valley Mutual Water Cornpany, and the City of Riverside, to develop the parameters needed for consolidation. A report of the terms and conditions needed for such a consolidation, developed by the Committee, will be due back to the Commission no later than the February 15, 2006 hearing. 4. Adopt LAFCO Resolution #2893 setting forth the Commission's fmdings and determinations related to this consideration. However, if the Commission determines that the municipal service review shows affirmation of the District's existing sphere of influence or a coterminous sphere of influence is appropriate, it may take the following actions to close this consideration: 1. Determine that the affirmation of the District's existing sphere of influence or the amendment to a coterminous sphere of influence through LAFCO 2919 is statutorily exempt from environmental review and direct the Clerk to fIle a Notice of Exemption within five days; 2. Make the findings related to a service review required by Government Code Section E,6430 and determine that the sphere of influence for the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District should be affirmed.in its present configuration or amended to be coterminous with the District's boundari.es; and, 3. Defer adoption of the resolution making these determinations to the consent calendar for the October 19, 2005 Commission hearing. BACKGROUND: At the August 17th hearing, the Commission continued consideration of LAFCO 2919 to the Se::>tember hearing at the request of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (hereinafter SBVWCD). Its request was to allow the District suffIcient time to respond to the Staff Report presented. A copy of the Staff Report for the August Hearing including only its Attachment # 1 maps, Attachment #9 LAFCO Environmental Consultant responses, and Attachment # 10 the draft resolution is p)~ovided as Attachment # 1. The entire report is available on the LAFCO web site. Included with this report, as Attachment #2, is the SBVWCD's response to the August Staff Report which also provides additional information on its position related to the options presented by staff. The District's response indicates that new information is available since the prior report related to a Settlement Agreement with San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (hereinafter Muni) and the Western Municipal Water District regarding their competing water interests and ':0 eliminate protest to the various Water Rights Applications flied with the State Department of Water Resources. This is important new information 2 Item 87 - IAFCO 2919 September 13,2005 for the Commission's consideration. This Settlement Agreement (included as Exhibit A in the: District's response) and its Exhibit "A" provides that the protests to the Water Rights Applications for SBVWCD and Muni and Western Municipal Water District 'will be rescinded. The terms of the Settlement Agreement also require that the: Seven Oaks Accord will be modified to include SBVWCD. The District identifies in its materials that the staff has omitted critical information related to the C'pper Santa Ana River Wash Land Management and Habitat Conservation Plan, also known as the "Wash Plan" under the frrst factor required by Government Code Section 56425. Staffs response is that the Wash Plan was discussed, but not in the context of existing and planned land uses related to the District. The land use authorities for the territory of the District in its entirety are the Cities of Hi:shland, Loma Linda, Redlands, San Bernardino and Yucaipa and the County of San Bernardino. The land use authorities within the Wash Plan are the Cities of Highland and Redlands and the County of San Bernardino. The District has no land use authority within this area known to staff; therefore, the response provided in the previous materials described the myriad of land use types available throughout the area of the District's jurisdiction. It is the staffs understanding that the District has spearheaded this effort to identify future recharge and mining areas given the sensitive environmental nature of the Santa Ana' River Basin. However, the response by the District still does not answer the basic questipn asked by staff since the inception of this review, which is: "Why are there three overlapping agencies within the eastern portion of the Bunker Hill Basin authorized to provide the same service - water conservation - and is this division appropriate?" While the Distlict's response indicates that "if it ain't broke don't fIx it" is the appropriate position to take, staff believes that the answer is that such a duplication is not appropriate. The staff's position remains that groundwater recharge/repknishment efforts for the entirety of the Bunker Hill Basin are the appropriate service area to be considered. Therefore, in its opinion, the options for the Commission remain: l. Expand the sphere of influence of the SBVWCD to include the whole of this Basin; cr, 2. Evaluab~ the possibilities of consolidating this agency with one of the other entities who have authority to perform groundwater recharge/replenishment activities throughout the Bunker Hill Basin. In addition, two new questions were asked of staff at the August hearing: 3 Item n - LAFCO 2919 September 13, 200S 1. Who are the members of the Upper Santa Ana Water Resources Association to which the question of support for the options was posed? 2. Is there a potential for double taxation as outlined in the City of Rialto response? In response to Question #1, the members of the Upper Santa Ana Water Resources Association are identified in its "Articles of Association", copy included as Attachment #3, as the water producers within the Upper Santa Ana River watershed. These agencies include: East Valley Water District City of Rialto West Valley Water District City of Riverside Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Bear Valley Mutual Water Company San Bernardino Valley MWD Riverside-Highland Water Company Western Municipal Water District Fontana Water Company San Bernardino Valley WCD County Flood Control District (by the City of San Bernardino Public Works Department) Municipal Water Department Robertson's Redi-Mix City of Redlands .Additional participants in the meetings of the Association include the State Department of Health Services, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Consultants, the California State University San Bernardino's Water Resources Institute, and others. The options presented to the Commission were reviewed with this Association in an effort to reach the water producers within the territory of SBVWCD and their individual positions on these options requested. However, since the publication of the Staff Report for the August hearing, the positions of some of these agencies have been modified. The City of Riverside has shifted its position to one of supporting the consolidation with Muni through discussions with Muni and Western Municipal Water District. A copy of its letter and the draft memorandum of understanding are included as Attachment #4 to this report. The following is a revised listing of the water producers' positions on the options before the Commissicn: Amount of Water Pumped Amount of Service Review Option from January 1 , 2004 Groundwater Waler Producer Chosen lhrouah December 31, 2004 Assessment Paid East Vallev Water District Suooorts Status Quo 22,755.2 $131,723.01 Citv of Riverside Supports consolidation with Muni 19,973.1 $115,917.15 Gage Canal Company (understood to be " part of No separate position the Citv of Riversid3) orovided 10,717.6 $40320.41 Citv of Redlands Supports consolidation with Muni 17.320.1 $95.403.48 Citv of San Bemardino Supports consolidation with Muni 7.055 $40.917.82 4 Item iI7 - LAFCO 2919 September 13, 200S Meeks & Daley (primary owners are City of Riverside and Elsinore Valley Municioal Water District) Supports Status Quo 2,037 $9 336.63 SBVMWD No oosition 776.2 $4,667.80 Bear Valley Mutuai Water Supports consolidation Comoanv with Muni 0 $0.00 Luaonia Water Comranv Supports consolidation not identified on listina with Muni Redlands Water Comaanv Supports consolidation nat identified on Iistino with Muni In response to Question #2, regarding the possibility of double taxation, the staff response is that the situation exists today within the boundaries of the SBVWCD and Muni. Municipal Water District law allows for the charging of an assessment or a special tax, through a separate review and protest process, which could be proposed within the area where the SBVWCD currently charges a groundwater assessment or outside it. In the response provided by the SBVWCD, Exhibit B illustrates that in 1980 a water production assessment was considered by Muni in order to [manct: needed capital facilities. No such tax was imposed; however, the possibility remains unchanged by the potential consolidation of the agencies. However, the question as outlined in the City of Rialto letter indicates its concern that.ff the SBVWCD was consolidated with Muni, it would allow Muni to charge a pump tax, in the same manner as the existing pump tax imposed by SBVWCD. Such a change would not occur as a result of this consolidation. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, ':he staffs position remains unchanged by the additional materials submitted by SBVWCD. The staff applauds the efforts of the District in negotiating its Settlement Agreement related to the Seven Oaks Accord, but on the basis of the elements outlined in the August hearing staff report, outlined below, the position remains to support a further review of a potential consolidation. Those element!! are: 1. During the hearings by the Commission on Local Governance for the 21 st Century and adoption of Assembly Bill 2838 rewriting LAFCO law, the direction has been emphasized that the Commission is to provide for the most efficient and effective service boundaries for the agencies under its purview. The Municipal Service Review/Sphere ofInfluence update process requires that the Commission evaluate, as a part of its review, local governance issues, hurdles to consolidations and reorganizations. The most efficient and effective boundary, in the staffs view, would be to address the whole of the Bunker Hill Basin. That would require either the expansion of the SBVWCD sphere of influence to encompass that territory or the consolidation of the District with Muni. S Item *7 - IAFCO 2919 September 13, 2005 2. Passage of AB 2067 which allows for the consolidation of special districts not formed under the same principal act. Absent this legislation, the only alternative available would be through dissolution of the Water Conservation District. Such an action would require the completion of the processes as specified by Water Conservation District Law, which requires the submission of a petition to initiate dissolution and a vote which must exceed 60% in support. 3. The position that the Bunker Hill Basin should be considered as a single unit when evaluating agencies with recharge responsibilities or operations. In evaluating this economic community of interest, the changed circumstances in the Bunker Hill Basin through the completion of the Seven Oaks Dam and the subsequent signing of the Seven Oaks Accord and the proposed amendment with SBVWCD should be considered. As staff understands it, 90% of the recharge of the Basin occurs through natural recharge (snow melt, rainfall, river water through the area, etc.) and the remaining 10% is through artificial recharge efforts. To maximize those efforts, they should, in the staff view, be coordinated at the regional level, or basin-level, and that would point toward either the expansion of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District sphere of influence to include the whole of the Basin, o:r the consolidation with a regional entity. Therefore, it remains the staffs opinion that an evaluation of consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District should be pursued as outlined in the staff recommendation on pages 1 and 2 of this report. It should be clear that the actions presented by staff do not mandate that this consolidation will occur. There are a number cf reviews, stakeholder and Commission considerations, and a protest proceecing that would be required if such an application were to be submitted by joint application of the Districts or initiated by the Commission. The staffs recommendation includes the establishment of a committee to gather information to evaluate such a consolidation, with the specific direction that a report back to '[he Commission occur no later than February 15, 2006. However, if after reviewing the original materials submitted, the supplemental materials in this report, and the presentations at the hearing, the Commission does not support the staffs recommendation and believes that sufficient information has been presented to support retention of the District, it can: 1. Affmn the District's existing sphere which includes approximately 1,980 acres outside its existing boundaries within the Santa Ana River stretching from approximately Boulder Avenue on the east to the junction of the 1-215 and I-Ie, freeways on the west; or, 2. It can e1:tablish a sphere of influence coterminous with the District's existing boundaJies. This action would remove the ability of the District to expand 6 . Item n-LAFCO 2919 September 13, 2005 its boundaries without a subsequent sphere of influence application and reView. The necessary actions to be taken by the Commission for this determination have also been included as part of the recommendation outlined at the start of this report. KRM/ Attachments: l. Staff Report dated August 9,2005 with only the Attachments #1 copy of maps, #9 response from LAFCO Envirorunental Consultant and #10 draft Resolution 2893 2. Response dated September 7,2005 from the San Bemardino Valley Water Conservation District 3. Anicles of Association of the Upper Santa Ana Water Resources Association 4. Responses from other Agencies including Letter from the City of Riverside dated September 12, 2005 regarding its position 7 , Staff Report dated August 9, 2005 with only the Attac:hments #1-copy of maps, #9-response from LAFCO Environmental Consultant, and #10- draft Resolution No. 2893 Attachment 1 , LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 175 West Fifth Street, Second Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 . (9091 387-5866 . Fax (9091 387-5871 E-mail: lafco@lafco.sbcounty.gov WWW.sbclafcO.org DATE: AJGUST 9, 2005 , ~~dl FROM: KA.THLEEN ROLLINGS-Me TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION SUBJECT: Agenda Item #6: Consideration ofLAFCO 2919 - Service Review a:lld Sphere of Influence Update for San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District INITIATED BY: Local Agency Formation Commission RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission supports the staffs position that the concept of a basin-wide water conservation entity should be pursued, it is recommended that it support the ultimate consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, by taking the following actions: 1. Determine that the designation of a zero sphere of influence for the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District is statutorily exempt from environmental review and direct the Clerk to me a Notice of Exemption within five days; 2. Designate a zero sphere of influence for the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District indicating that it is the position of the Commission that the District should ultimately consolidate with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District; 3. Direct ':he Executive Officer to establish a committee to review the possible consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District to be made up of the Item 116 - IAFCO 2919 August 9, 2005 LAFCO Executive Officer and the General Manager, or designee, of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District and the San Bernardino Valley Mun'.cipal Water District; and a representative from each of the major water stakeholders identified as: the City of Redlands, the City of San Bernardino Mun:.cipal Water Department, East Valley Water District, Bear Valley Mutual Water Company, and the City of Riverside to develop the parameters needed for consolidation. A report of the terms and conditions needed for such a consJlic;l.ation, developed by the Committee, will be due back to the Commission no later than t4e January 18, 2006 hearing. 4. Adopt LAFCO Resolution #2893 setting forth the Cornmission's fmdings and determinations related to this consideration. However, if the Commission determines that the municipal service review shows affirmation of the District's existing sphere of influence or a coterminous sphere of influence is appropriate, it may take the following actions to close this consideration: 1. Determine that the afflrmation of the District's existing sphere of influence or the emendmeIl:t to a coterminous sphere of influence through LAFCO 2919 is statutorily exempt from environmental review and direct the Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption within five days; 2. Mak,~ the findings related to a service review required by Government Code Section 56430 and determine that the sphere of influence f9r the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District should be affirmed in its present configuration or amended to be coterminous with the District's boundaries; and, . 3. ' Defe:~ adoption of the resolution making these determinations to the consent calendar for the September 21,2005 Commission hearing. BACKGROUND: At the March 16th Commission hearing the consideration of the municipal service review and sphere of influence update required for the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (hereinafter SBVWCD) was initially presented (a map of this district is included as Attachment #1 and the original staff report is included as Attachment #2).. The basic questions presented in that staff report in response to the municipal service review factors were and remain today to be: On the issue of agencies: 'Why are there three overlapping agencies within this portion of the Bunker Hill Basin of the eastern San Bernardino Valley authorized to provide water conservation services? Is this division appropriate?", and, 2 Item #6 - LAFCO 2919 August 9, 200S If the division of responsibility is appropriate then the question would be: "If the Bunker Hill Basin is to be addressed for water recharge and replenishment as a unit, why isn't the SBVWCD sphere of influence drawn to address the whole of the Basin, rather than being isolated to the eastern portion?" The staff's review of the factors related to a municipal service review as identified in Government Code Section 56430 and sphere of influence update as identified in Government Code Section 56425 have attempted to answer these questions. The Commission continued its consideration of LAFCO 2919 to the June hearing to allow staff additional time to gather information regarding the mandatory factors to be considered by Government Code Section 56430. In addition, the Commission directed LAFCO staff to review the options presented in the original staff report regarding a potential change in the future government structure for water conservation services to the water producers within the boundaries of the District and request 1heir opinion and position on these options. An additional continuance was requested by LAFCO staff at the May 18, 2005 hearing, with support from the staff of SBVVlCD, to the August hearing. Thy staIfviews this service review/sphere ofinf1.uence update as timely for tWo . reasons. Fir:st, this service review discussion is timely "due to changes that have occurred in the eastern portion of the San Bernardino Valley related to water recharge and replenishment activities. These changes occurred primarily through the completion of the Seven Oaks Dam as a part of the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project. The completion of the construction of the Seven Oaks Dam to fulfill its responsibility in controlling the flood waters has resulted in a number of applications to the State Water Resources Control Board related to the appropriation of the waters of the Santa Ana River. In addition, it has resulted in an auspicious agreement, known as the Seven Oaks Accord, signed by Bear Valley Mutual Water Company, the City of Redlands, the East Valley Water District, Lugonia Water Company, North Fork Water Company, Redlands Water Company, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and Western Municipal Water District related to future water diversion from the Santa Ana River. A copy of this agreement is included in Attachment #5 to this report. . Missing from this group was the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District, who has med a separate application to the State Water Resources Control Board for diversion from the Santa Ana River. Second, SB 2067 (Harmon) signed by the Governor on September 10, 2004 with an effective date of January 1, 2005 has altered the possibilities for reorganization/ consolidation that the Commission is required to evaluate during its Service Review process. Th:.s change in statute allows for the consolidation of two special districts formed under different principal acts (the legislative act that defines a special district's abilities and responsibilities). The signing of this legislation allows the Cornmission to consider the possibility of consolidating the San Bernardino Valley 3 . Item #6 - LAFCO 29 I 9 August 9, 2005 Water Conservation District with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District or the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Mandatorv Sl~rvice Factors: The areas of Ule mandatory service review factors were originally reviewed and outlined in th,~ materials provided in the original staff report (copy included as Attachment #2) and will not be reiterated here. However, areas where questions were identified included District Finance issues primarily related to achieving a better understanding of the District's groundwater charge, its mining revenues and any restrictions on their use, and the costs for the Board of Directors, and Government Structure Options primarily related to an understanding of the positions of the water producers within the District on the possible options for changes, as they are identified as the primary constituents of the District. Those areas are more fully discussed below. Financial Issues: On May 17th 8taff forwarded a letter to the District requesting additional fmandal information summarized as follows: a. An explanation of the District's expenditures for the current and past two fiscal yj~ars related to water spreading activities, including, but not limited to, purchase of state project water and the agreed upon repayment schedule, if any. b. An outline of existing District policies related to expenditures for the Board of Directors, including, but not limited to, payment for attendance at meetings, conferences, travel costs, etc. as well as the expenditures for the current and past two fiscal years related to payments to the Board of Directors. c. An explanation of the District's revenues for the current and past two fiscal years related to the groundwater assessment charge. It was requested that the inf(>fInation provided include a description of the restricted use of these revenues, if any, how the expenditures are separated by the District from its other a-:tivities, and the process by which the charge is established each year. d. An explanation of the District's revenues from mining leases or other mining- related income, including a description of any restrictions on the use of these revenues, how expenditures are separated by the District from its other activities, the lease rate policy for current and future mining leases on District lands including any annual inflationary factor, etc. e. An exp:.anation of the $5,000,000 pre-payment of mining leases, including, but not lirnited to, an identification of the source of the revenue, the terms of 4 Item #6 -lAFCO 2919 August 9. 2005 the payment, the adjustment for lease increases upon actual lease signing, etc. On June 17th lhe District submitted its response to the LAFCO staff request and a copy of that response is included as Attachment #3 to this report. As the fmancial materials in the response were reviewed, one item still resonated with the staff !md that is the question of the cost for replenishment activities versus administration. The information provided shows that for every dollar spent in replenishment it has an expenditures of more than 100% of that amount for administration. The following illustrates this point: In FY 2002-03 for every $1.00 spent on replenishment there was an expenditure of $1.42 for administrative costs (identified as General Fund). In FY 2003-04 for every $1.00 spent on replenishment there was an e~penditure of $1. 77 for administrative costs. In FY 2004-05 for every $1.00 spent on replenishment there was an e~penditure of $1.26 for administrative costs. During the District's annual determination of the groundwater assessrnent charge, it identifies in its staff reports that "the groundwater charge should continue to help defray the increasing.costs of operations and investigations that are necessary to conduct the recharge program" (taken from March 2, 2005 report to the Board of Directors on the required engineering investigation). So its intent is to supplement the other revenues of the District for the provision of this service. However the financial docu.ments show that it almost funds the entirety of the replenishment activities. The documents included in the materials identified as the "Profit and Loss by Class for July 2004..May 2005" show that the District has made efforts to control its expenditures. The staffs question in the original report related to concerns that the expenditures of the District, on a yearly basis, exceeded its revenues. The Profit and Loss by Class documents for Fiscal Year 2002-03 identify this shortfall at $604,602 ane. Fiscal Year 2003-04 at $591,903. The material provided through the end of May 2005 appears to show that expenditures will be at least covered by revenues received during this Fiscal Year. In response to the questions raised regarding the costs for the District's Board of Directors, the District has provided supplemental materials for review. In these materials they note that the District's policy allows for payment of up to a maxim urn of 10 meetings per month (as authorized by law), a stipend payment at the present time of $162 per meeting with an allowance for an annual 5% increase dependent upon certain conditions, and the payment of specific expenses. In addition, the supplernentaJ, response materials provide a table identifying director expenses per 5 Item <<6 -IAFCO 2919 August 9,2005 year. Based upon the information presented by the District, the estimated per Director cost by Fiscal Year has been calculated by LAFCO staff to be: FY 02-03 $11,445 FY 03-04 $12,093 FY 04-05 (estimated yearly total $90,154) $12,879 However, if the maximum number of meetings were paid for each member of the Board of Directors at the present stipend rate of $162, the cost for stipend alone would be $136,000 ($19,440 per Director for seven Directors). Issues related to Local Governance Options: In its letter to the District, staff requested the official position of the Board of Directors of the SBVWCD as to the options presented for its future governance. Of no surprise, the District has responded through submission of Resolution No. 409 (copy included as a part of Attachment #3 - Appendix F) that it wishes to maintain its current sphere of influence and operations - not as a part of San Bernardino Valley Munic:ipal Water District or the San Bernardino County Flood Control District or with an expanded sphere of influence. SBVWCD indicates that it does not favor consolidation with the County Flood , Control District since the fulfillment of the mis~ion of SBVWCD and the County Flood Control District are at cross purposes - noting that effective flood control requires the movement of the waters safely through the watershed as quickly as possible; while the efforts of water conservation are to retain the waters within the facilities long enough to allow percolation to occur. The response by Mr. Patrick Mead, Director of the County Department of Public Works, on behalf of the County Flood ControL District in general concurs with this position (copy included as Attachment *'4). SBVWCD haB also indicated it does not favor consolidation with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (hereinafter "MWD") since the purposes identified during the creation of the agencies, in their view, are different. Specifically noted in the SBVWCD response is its position that it was formed to conserve water in the Bunker Hill Basin. Staff would note, however, that the previous materials submitted by SBVWCD indicated that the District was formed to "protect against excessive export of the local surface water by downstream agencies" -- not necessarily the same purpose. The SBVWCD response continues that the purpose for creation of the MWD in 1954, in their opinion, was to serve as the agent for importation of State Project Water into the eastern portion of the San Bernardino Valley. Supporting statements for this position within the SBVWCD's materials submitted are: l. SBVWCD's comrnitment to groundwater rnaintenance and enhancement of the B"l.nker Hill basin is its paramount mission. 6 , Item 116-LAFCO 2919 August9,2005 2. SBVWCD has significantly more experience in groundwater recharge than does the MWD since its spreading activities began more than 70 years ago. 3. SBVWCD has "no potentially conflicting interests or responsibilities' which rnight result in a shift of water priorities. Mr. Robert Reiter, General Manager of the MWD has provided a response to the LAFCO staff request for information and to the positions of SBVWCD as outlined in their materials on file with the Commission. A copy of this response is included as Attachment #5. This response indicates Mr. Reiter's opinions that the consolidation is viable, especially in light of the signing of the Seven Oaks Accord, identifies the position that should such a consolidation be supported for the two agencies the financing of tb.e groundwater replenishment/ recharge functions would be funded by the existing revenue stream from property tax, mining revenues and interest income and th.e groundwater assessment would be abolished. Inteerated Water Manae:ement Plan: At the March hearing, questions were raised regarding the status of an Integrated Groundwater Management Plan or Regional Water Management Plan for the Basin.. The response submitted by the SBVWCD indicates that no such document exists at the present t:me but that 'a Regional Water Management Group has been formed to develop such a document. The MWD response to the question raised by the Commission and the response of the District notes concurrence that no such document currently exists, but indicates that a group made up of the Water Conservation District, San Bemardino Valley Municipal Water District, and other agencies are working to prepare a Planning Grant Application for filing with the State of California. This application, according to the document, is to be filed by the MWD, as the lead agency. If the grant application is successful, the MWD will work with SBVWCD and the other members of the water community to meet the requirement8 of the Seven Oaks Accord, as well as addressing the needs of other water producers not a party to the accord. Water Spreadine: Activities: In the staffs view additional information was needed to clarify the water spreading, water recharge relationship of entities within the overall Bunker Hill Basin. In an effort to gather that information, staff requested that the County Flood Control District and MWD outline their efforts at recharge. Mr. Patrick Mead, on behalf of the San Benlardino County Flood Control District notes that the District's facilities are used for recharge purposes during non-flood periods and they have a number of agreements '.vith various water agencies in place to allow for water percolation and replenishment to occur. The District however does not track the amounts of water spread but does provide reports on storm water captured. His response indicates that within the westem portion of the Valley storm water captured during the period 7 Item f6 - LAFCO 2919 August 9. 2005 from 10/1/0t. to 6/30/05 was 11,144 acre feet. Mr. Robert Reiter's response, on behalf of the MWD, indicates that it has spread a total of 42,814 acre feet over the five-year period. Other water agencies within the basin also recharge water, such as the City of Redlands, Bear Valley Mutual Water Company, and East Valley Water District, but clue to time constraints staff has not requested information on the amounts of water recharge by these agencies. . A comparison of the known recharge within the Bunker Hill Basin is identified as follows: Entity Water Water Water Water Water Spread Spread Spread Spread spread Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Water Conservation 6,811 1,750 15,622 13,820 2,934 District (Santa I\na and Mill Creekl San Bernardino Valley 4,705 10,772 16,805 8,147 2,385 Municipal Wat,:r District (various areas\ An average of the water spreading accomplished by these agencies over the five (5)- year period S::10WS that the SBVWCD spread an average of 8,187 acre feet and the MWD spread an average of 8;563 acre feet. The waters spread by the Conservation District include its native Santa Ana River waters and supplemental water purchased during the drought period. No information was provided as to the types of water sprea.d by the MWD, but it is assumed to be State Project Water. Review of Options with Wat-er Producers: Of particular importance during the discussion of local governance issues at the prior hearing, was the need to initiate discussions with the major water producers within the boundaries of SBVWCD and outline the govemance options presented to the Commission for its consideration. In order to accomplish this, staff included in its letter to S BVWCD the request for a listing of the name and address of the water producers within the District's boundaries. stafrs purpose was to send a letter outlining the options being reviewed and seeking each entity's position on those options identified as: a. Consolidation with the County Flood Control District, b. Consolidation with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, c. Expansion of the SBVWCD sphere of influence to include the area identified by engineers as the "Bunker Hill Basin" to address the regional water conservation efforts, or, d. Retention of the SBVWCD as it is presently configured - the status quo option. In discussion between the LAFCO Executive Officer and SBVWCD General Manager, it was deternlined that rather than contact each producer, large and small, that 8 Item *6 - LAFCO 2919 August 9,2005 LAFCO staff should review the materials with the group identified as the "Upper Santa Ana Water Resources Association", which, in the District's opinion, provided a broad cross-section of the water stakeholders within the District. The Executive Officer met with this group on June 9th to review the service review/sphere of influence up6ate for the SBVWCD currently being processed, outlined the options being discussed by the Commission, and requested that each agency within the boundaries of the SBVWCD provide a response to LAFCO staff by August 1st on their position on tl1ese options (copies included as Attachment #6). The following chart provides an outline of the responses received from the various water producers, the total amount of water they pump from within the District's boundaries during the 2004 calender year which includes agricultural and non-agricultural water, and the total cost of their groundwater assessment for that period: Amount of Water Pumped from January 1 Service Review Option 2004 throu9h Amount of Groundwater Water Producer Chosen December 31. 2004 Assessment Daid East Vallev Water IJislrlel Suooorts status Quo 22755.2 $131 723.01 Supports the receipt of additional information prior to position on City of Riverside consolidation, supports 19.973.1 maintenance Qf sahere $115 917.15 Gage Canal Company (~i~erstood to be " part of the No separate position Ci of Riverside) . orovided 10717.6 $40.320.41 City of Redlands SUCDOrts Consolidation 17.320.1 $95,403.48 City of San Bernar,jino No position as vet identified 7055 $40917.82 Meeks & Daley (primary owners are City of Riverside and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District) Supports Stalus Quo 2,037 $9.336.83 SBVMWO No cosition 776.2 $4,667.80 Sear Valley Mutual Water Comoanv Supports Consolidation 0 $0.00 Luqonia Waler Conoanv SUOOOrtS Consolidation not identified on listina Redlands Water Company Supports Consolidation not identified on listina In addition, correspondence was received from water producers outside the boundaries of SBVWCD. These include the Riverside-Highland Mutual Water Company, the City of Rialto and the West Valley Water District who have indicated their SUPPOIt for maintenance of the status quo. A copy of each of these responses is included as Attachment #7 to this report. In establishing its position of support for consolidation, the City of Redlands City Council included the requirement that a memorandurn of understanding be signed by both the City of Redland and the MWD. A draft copy of this memorandum is included in the City of Redlands staff response included as Attachment #8 to the report. Thi1; memorandum outlines the City's position that the employees of the District rnu:,t be protected, that the operations of recharge are protected, that the revenue stream of the Water Conservation District be isolated and accounted for by 9 Item H6 -lAFCO 2919 August 9. 2005 the MWD to support solely these activities, and its position related to the return of certain facilities to the City of Redlands. CONCLUSION: Based upon the information outlined above, and in the original staff report, for the review of LAFCO 2919 and the policy directions of the State Legislature to LAFCO to develop the most efficient and effective service boundaries for agencies, LAFCO staffs recommendation is that the .CoIJimission should amend the sphere of influence of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District to a zero sphere indicating its position that a consolidation with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District should be undertaken. The staffs recommendation does not initiate the consolidation, it does not change the area in which the Water Conservation District currently provides its services, nor does it eliminate the groundwater charge. Its intent is to set forth a method for gathering the specific detailed information that could be used by the SBVWCD and MWD to me ajoint application for consolidation, much like that initiated by the Resource Conservation Districts, or lor a future presentation to the Commission to initiate an application on its own volition to consolidate the districts pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 56375. The staffs position is not taken on the basis that the District is mismanaged or derelict in th,~ perfoimance of its responsibilities, the District is well-managed and performs its :,esponsibilities. The staffs recommendation is, however, based upon three elements: 1. During the hearings by the Cornmission on Local Governance for the 21st Century and adoption of Assembly Bill 2838 rewriting LAFCO law, the directiJn has been emphasized that the Commission is to provide for the most efficient and effective service boundaries for the agencies under its purview. The Municipal Service Review jSphere of Influence update process requires that the Commission evaluate, as a part of its review local governance issues, hurdles to consolidations and reorganizations. The most efficient and effective boundary, in the staffs view, would be to address the whole of the Bunker Hill Basin. That would require either the expansion of the SEVWCD sphere of influence to encornpass that territory or the consolidation of the District with the MWD. 2. Passage of AB 2067 which allows for the consolidation of special districts not formed under the same principal act. Absent this legislation, the only alternative available would be through dissolution of the Water Conservation District. Such an action would require the cornpletion of the processes as specified by Water Conservation District Law which requires the submission of a petition to initiate dissolution and a vote which must exceed 60% in support. 10 Item .6 - LAFCO 2919 August 9. 2005 3. The po:;ition that the Bunker Hill Basin should be considered as a single unit when elTaluating agencies with recharge responsibilities or operations. In evaluating this economic cornmunity of interest, the changed circumstances in the Bunker Hill Basin through the completion of the Seven Oaks Dam and the subsequent signing of the Seven Oaks Accord should be considered. As staff understands it, 90% of the recharge of the basin occurs through natural recharge (snow melt, rainfall, river water through the area, etc.) and the remaining 10% is through artificial recharge efforts. To maximize those efforts they should, in the staff view, be coordinated at the regional level, or basin-level, and that would point toward either the expansion of the San Bemardino Valley Water Conservation District sphere of influence to include the whole of the Basin, or the consolidation with a regional entity. In reviewing the option of a sphere of influence expansion to encompass the whole of the Bunker Hill Basin with the SBVWCD and its major water production stakeholders no support for this option was received; therefore, staff has not evaluated this option further. In reviewing the option for consolidation with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, no support for this option was received; therefore, staff has not evaluated that option further. However, some support frorn the water producer stakeholders for further review of the option of consolidation with the MWD has been received. In addition, Htaff supports the consideration of this option for the following reasons: 1. The Sml Bemardino Valley Municipal Water District has responsibilities for the maintenance of the- safe yield of the Bunker Hill Basin as the watermaster for The Orange County Judgment and The Western Judgment. 2. A reduction in cost for the operation of the general fund administrative activities could be achieved through a reduction in the Board of Director and meeting expenses, legislative services, while maintaining the replenishment activities. A reduction in the expense to the water producers in the area could be achieved through the abolition of the groundwater assessment charge currently imposed while maintaining the groundwater replenishment! recharge activities with the balance of the SBVWCD revenue stream. 3. The Seven Oaks Accord specifies agreements between the water producers within the eastern end of the Bunker Hill Basin as to the diversion of waters within the Santa Ana River. In addition, the MWD is working with these stakeholders, the SBVWCD, and others to develop a grant application to the State Jf California, which if successful, will fund the development and implementation of an Integrated Groundwater Management Plan. 4. Numerous agencies currently spread water for recharge within the Bunker Hill Basin within and outside the boundaries of the Water Conservation District. Coordination and maximizing these efforts to secure the water 11 Item #6 - IAFCO 2919 August 9.2005 supply for the 400,000 plus residents anticipated within the boundaries of the SB\,WCD and the 500,000 plus residents within Riverside County that rely on this Basin for their domestic water supply should be the paramount consideration. Therefore, in the staffs opinion, an evaluation of consolidation of the San Bemardino Valley Municipal Water District and the San Bemardino Valley Water Conservation District should be pursued. In closing, it should be clear that the actions presented by staff do not mandate that this consolidation will occur. There are a number of reviews, stakeholder and Commission considerations, and a protest proceeding that would be required if such an application were to be submitted by joint application of the Districts or initiated by tl:.e Commission. The staff's recommendation includes the establishment of a committee to gather information to evaluate such a consolidation, with the specific direction that a report back to the Commission occur no later than January 18, 2006. However, if after reviewing the materials and the presentations at the hearing, the Commission does not support the staffs recommendation and believes that sufficient information has been presented to support retention of the district, it can: 1., Affirm 1:he District's existing sphere which includes approximately 1,980 acres outside its existing boundaries within the Santa Ana River stretching from approximately Boulder Avenue on the east to the junction of the 1-215 and 1-10 freeways on the west; or, 2. It can establish a sphere of influence coterminous with the District's existing boundaries. This action would remove the ability of the District to expand its boundaries without a subsequent sphere of influence application and review. The necessary actions to be taken by the Commission for this determination have also been inc:,uded as part of the recommendation outlined at the start of this report. KRM/ Attachments: 1. Maps of San Bemardino Valley Water Conservation District and related agencies 2. Original Staff Report for March 16, 2005 hearing on LAFCO 2919 with Attachment #4 only (a full copy of staff report with attachments is available on the Commission's web site at www.sbc1afco.org) 3. SupplEmental Information on the Municipal Service Review/Sphere of Influence Update from the San Bemardino Valley Water Conservation District dated ,June 17, 2005 12 . , Item #6 - LAFCO 2919 August 9, 2005 4. Memorandum from Patrick Mead, Director, County Department of Public Works en behalf of San Bernardino County Flood Control District 5. Letter from Robert Reiter, General Manager, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District with copy of Attachments #7 and #20 Included 6. Response on Four Options Presented in Service Review from Water Producers within the Boundaries of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District 7. Response on Four Options Presented in Service Review from Water Producers outside the Boundaries of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District 8. Letter from Douglas Headrick, Chief of Water Resources for the City of Redlands Dated August 2,2005 9. Response from Commission Environmental Consultant, Tom Dodson of Tom Dodson and Associates Dated January 20, 2005 on Affirmation of the District's Sphere of Influence and August 8, 2005 on Reduction to a Zero Sphere of Influence 10. Draft LAFCO Resolution #2893 13 CROYDON RISK CONSULTANTS 198 North Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92408 U.S.A. Telephone 909.884.8294 Facsimile 909.381.7610 Croydonrisk@earthlink.net September 22, 2005 Robert E. Martin, P.E., General Manager EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3645 East Highland Avenue Highland, CA 92346 Re: Insurance Renewal Project - October I, 2005 Policy Expirations Dear Bob: The Insurance Renewal Management Project lead by Croydon Risk Consultants (CRC) will conclude on September 27, when your Board of Directors considers insurance coverage, calTier selection and costs your recommended by your Insurance Committee. I have reviewed the Insurance Committee recommendations and concur with them. The attached Executive Summary'and Insurance Renewal Report is based on information provided by EVWD managers and staff and by Arroyo Insurance Services (Arroyo), formerly Caldwell and Moreland Insurance Services. East Valley managers and staff have done a good job of considering general risks faced by water districts and the particular risks associated with EVWDs' unique business model, in sel ~cting levels of insurance coverage and the scope of coverage deemed appropriate to the proper protection of EVWD assets and interests. Arroyo has done a good job of presenting EVWD risks to the insurance marketplace, in securing competitive proposals from insurers that have historically been reliable and fmancially sound, and ir. organizing policyholder services needed by EVWD. I am pleased to have been a part of the process that has resulted in favorable offerings of insurance coverage amounts, policy terms and conditions, carrier security and services for consideration by your Board of Directors. -, , , ~i~cerelr" , , " , ." . ~.~..- ~- . '. .....- " , Paul W. Pinckney, CPCU. Principal I CROYDON RISK CONSULTANTS Insurance Renewal Management Project For EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT September 27, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - INSURANCE RENEWAL REPORT East Valley Water District manages major aspects of its Property and Casualty insurance program thro'lgh its Insurance Committee, which reports to the Board of Directors. Insurance brckerage services are provided by Arroyo Insurance Services (Arroyo) for property, liability, auto and pollution coverage. Workers' Compensation coverage (not a subject ofthi, project) is placed through Sander Kessler Insurance Services in Los Angeles. Croydon Risk Consultants (CRC) is an independent insurance and risk management consulting fIrm located in San Bernardino. CRC was hired by EVWD as an independent advisor to aS~iist Arroyo in setting goals for the October 1,2005 renewal of coverage they handle, to advise EVWD about cmTier relationships, coverage aspects, elements of risk and coverage amounts and to assist EVWD in analysis and selection of alternative coverage and cost plans proposed through Arroyo. Arroyo has placed the majority of coverage through a specialized water district program underwritten by American Alternative Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Munich Reinsurance, historically one ofthe world's strongest and most reliable insurer groups. Coverage and premium cost plans offered by this specialized program are uniquely tailored to water district risk exposures at very competitive costs. We are assured by Arroyo that coverages and insurance amounts selected by your Board of Directors 'Nil! be put into effect on the October 1, 2005 expiration of current coverage without interruption of coverage. Also, Arroyo has disclosed a commission of 10% applying to all policies, with no profIt-sharing or contingent income arrangements with insurers. In my experience a commission of 10% is within the reasonable range of broker income. Renewal terns and conditions proposed for the 2005-2006 policy term, on a like-to-like basis, shows a slight (4%) reduction in overall premium rates, however with a 10% increase in insured property values, the total premium cost, year-to-year, shows a 2% premium increase - a very attractive renewal offering given the current state of the insurance market. Total insurance costs through Arroyo have gone from $526,373 for the 2004-2005 policy year to $537,573 for 2005-2006. The Insurance Committee recommends a few changes to the renewal policies, centered principally on increasing earthquake and flood coverage amounts to recognize EVWD property insurance risks and exposure to such losses, including: 2 ~ Increasing Earthquake and Flood coverage on real and personal property, and tc include resulting loss of income, from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 for an estimated additional premium of $21,100. ~ Increasing Earthquake and Flood coverage on underground water and sewer p:.ping from $5,000,000 with a 7.50% deductible to $15,000,000 with a 5.00% d,:ductible for an estimated additional premium of$58,800 (another proposal for an estimated additional premium of$67,600 was not selected). ~ Increasing Excess Liability coverage for General Liability and Auto Liability risks from $10,000,000 to $15,000,000 (for a total limit of $25,000,000 above tnderlying coverage) for an additional premium of$13,203. ~ The Insurance Committee did not recommend proposals to drop coverage now included within the expiring policies. The Committee recommends: 0 Retaining Auto Medical Payments and Uninsured Motorists coverage with a premium of$12, 672 - deemed to be good value for money spent. 0 Renewing Comprehensive and Collision coverage from EVWD vehicles for a prer,nium cost of$15,173 - deemed to be good value for money spent. ~ The balance of coverages, in terms of scope of coverage, deductibles and a:nounts, remain as per expiring policies. Total additional premiums for added coverage are approximately $93,200, most of which are allocable to the 10% increase in insured property values and more than doubling the amount of insured earthquake and flood coverage. Authorization of the additional coverage and costs will result in a net increase of insurance costs for the 2005-2006 policy year (Jf course excluding Workers' Compensation) of about 16%, for a total of approximately $630,773. 3 - - -- - AQROYO INSCRANCE SERVICES .. '__~'.,w'___'"_'___'____"_'____ -.__,_._..'"_._____>~~____.__~_ .- INSURANCE PROPOSAL .- PREPARED FOR: OIl OIl .. East Valley Water District .. OIl PRESENTED BY: OIl .. Arroyo Insurance Services 685 East Carnegie Dr. Suite 180 San Bernardino, CA 92408 License # OB54203 . (909) 889-0295 . This presentation is designed to give you an overview of the insurance coverage's we - recommend for your company. It is meant only as a general understanding of your insurance needs and should not be construed as a legal interpretation of the insurance policies that will be written for you. Please refer to your specific insurance contracts for . details on coverage's, conditions and exclusions. OIl 1 .. - .. II I INTRODUCTION .. This proposal is based upon the information made available to us and our knowledge of .. the exposures inherent to your type of business. Our proposal is designed to display the services we are committed to provide your . business, a brief description of coverage's being proposed, the cost of those coverage's and any recommendations or alternatives to coverage we might recommend. . We appreciate the confidence you have shown in allowing us to prepare this presentation for you. We believe we are personally responsive to all our clients' needs and our agency will respond in a manner that assures your business will receive the . insurance representation it deserves. In addition to myself, these are the people who will be handling your account: ... Commercial Lines Service - Julie Rybak .. Claims Service - Leslie Jacklin Personal Lines Service - Ann Thompson . Please remember, staff members are available to answer any question or assist with ... any aspect of your insurance program. Please feel free to contact us at any time. Telephone (909) 889-0295 ... Fax Number (909) 888-3422 ... Mailing AddresH POBox 6185 San Bernardino, CA 92412-6185 .. e-mail: Richc@arroyoins.com Julier@arroyoins.com .. We look forward to continuing a long term working relationship. .. . II ~ LOCATION SCHEDULE . 2 ... - .. Location Buildil1lg Location Address Number NumtMlr (Street, City, County, S_. Zip) .. 1 1-9 1155 North Del Rosa Avenue San Bernardino, CA 2 1-6 7479 San Francisco . San Bernardino, CA Plant #132 3 1-7 8m Comer of VictoriafT ample San Bernardino, CA Plant #9A 4 1-4 S/S 6th St. W of Pedley Road .- San Bernardino, CA Plant #11 5 1-7 S/E of 6th St. & Pedley Road San Bernardino. CA Plant #12 6 1-7 N/E Comer Lynwood/Harrison .. San Bernardino, CA Plant #24 7 1-9 N of Foothill Drive San Bernardino. CA Plant #37 8 1-7 Date 51. E of Valaria .. San Bernardino, CA Plant #39 N Side of 3rd/E of Palm Ave 9 1-7 San Bernardino, CA Plant #40 10 1-5 Shasta Dr. E of Hemlock Dr. San Bernardino, CA Plant #56 .. E of Orange St., S of 5th St. 11 1-4 San Bernardino, CA Plant #121 GONE 12 1-2 N of VictorialTerminus Indian San Bernardino, CA Plant #123 .. S of GreenspoUE of Cone Camp 13 1-7 San Bernardino, CA Plant #125 14 1 N/E of Highland Ave/Amber St. San Bernardino, CA Plant #126 GONE .. 15 1-4 S/W Comer of 9th & Sterling San Bernardino, CA Plant #127 16 1-5 Waf Cloverhill/N of Willowood San Bernardino, CA Plant #131 . 17 1-5 Waf Central/Stratford & Mansfield San Bernardino, CA Plant #133 NOT IN USE 18 1 N Highland Ave. E. City Creek B San Bernardino, CA Plant #134 .. 19 1-5 N/E of Live Oak Rd/Summit Dr. San Bernardino, CA Plant #137 20 1-4 S/S Pumalo St./W of Guthrie St. San Bernardino. CA Plant #41 21 1-6 S/E Comer Mountain & Marshall .. San Bemardino. CA Plant #25 22 1-3 Marshall Blvd. Waf Sterling San Bernardino. CA Plant #27 23 1-4 Court St. between Del Rosa Ave - San Bernardino. CA Plant #28 24 1-6 N/E of Steriing & Marshall San Bernardino, CA Plant #33 25 1-4 PerrisHitI .. San Bernardino. CA Plant #34 26 1-4 N of Aspen & Hemlock San Bernardino, CA Plant #59 . .. I I I I .. 3 .. - - Location Buildifl,g Location Address Number NumlHtr (St....t, City. County, S_. Zip) - 27 1-5 N of 28thIW of Lapraix San Bernardino, CA Piant #99 28 1-4 N/E of Mountaintop Drive San Bernardino, CA Plant #101 29 1-4 Baseline & Palomino St. . Hinhland. CA Plant #104 30 1-4 Citrus St. between Lorna/Mountain San Bernardino, CA Plant #107 31 1-5 E of Highland Ave/N Baseline II San Bernardino. CA Plant #1 08 32 1-8 Greenspot Road San Bernardino. CA Weli #120 33 1-3 N VictoriafTerminus Ind Reservation II San Bernardino, CA Plant #124 34 1-4 Pacific & Del Rosa San Bernardino, CA Plant #130 35 1-4 3rd & Sterling San Bernardino, CA Piant #141 .. Church Street 36 1 San Bernardino, CA Plant #135 37 1 Dunkirk Street San Bernardino. CA Plant #136 .. Palm Street 38 1-2 San Bernardino, CA Plant #138 39 1-2 E. Highland Ranch San Bernardino, CA Plant #140 II N of GreenspotlE of Plunge Creek 40 1-2 San Bernardino, CA Plant #142 41 1-5 5fu St W of Church Street San Bernardino, CA Plant #146 II 42 1 Abbey Way Weii San Bernardino, CA Plant #143 43 1 City Creek Water Treatment 4588 Highland Avenue .. Hinhland. CA Plant #134 44 1-5 Greenspot Rd E of Cone Camp San Bernardino, CA Plant #120 45 1 3654 East Highiand Ave #18 Temoorarv Office Hinhland, CA 92346 .. N/E of Rockford & Hoiiy Vista 46 1 San Bernardino, CA Vacant Weii 47 1 8/W of Satinwood Court. S. of Svcamore, San Bernardino, CA Vacant Land .. West Side of Lankershim, South 48 1 of CVDress. San Bemardino. CA Vacant Land 49 1 S/E Comer of 9th & Mckinley San Bernardino, CA Vacant Land - 1441 East Baseiine 50 1 San Bernardino. CA Storaoe USA 51 1 Fairfax Dr. between 7th & Union San Bernardino. CA Inactive Well #15 - 52 1 Lynwood Way. South of Baseline San Bernardino. CA inactive Well #17 53 1 7th Street. East of Sterling San Bernardino. CA Inactive Well #20 .. 54 1 N Rosemary Dr.. E Los Feliz Dr. San Bernardino. CA Inactive Well #21 55 1 S Railroad RIW E of Del Rosa San Bernardino. CA Inactive Well #26 II 56 1 E/S Arden at Walnut Street San Bernardino. CA Inactive Well #30 SOLD 57 1 N/S 11th St.. E of Cole Avenue San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #31 . 4 .. - .. S/S Baseline, E Olive Tree Lane 58 1 San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #32 59 1 Date St., W of Big Sand Creek San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #42 .. 60 1 Church St.. N of 5th Street San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #43 61 1 WIS Boulder & N Eucalyptus St. San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #49 - 1 112M North of Foothill Dr. 62 1 San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #57 SOLD 63 1 Upper Little Sand Creek San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #58 SOLD iIlI 64 1 Little Sand Creek Canyon San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #61 SOLD 65 3999 Atlantic 1 San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #94 iIlI 66 1 N Victoria Between Lynwood & Citrus San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #98 SOLD 67 1 N 3rd St.. E of Calhoun San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well #102 iIlI 68 1 Highland Avenue, W of Danair San Bernardino. CA inactive Well #113 SOLD 69 1 S of Sycamore, E Satinwood San Bernardino, CA Vacant Land 70 1 9th & McKinley iIlI San Bernardino, CA Vacant Land 71 1 9th & McKinley San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well # 145 SOLD 72 1 W/S Fairfax, N of Date Street iIlI San Bernardino, CA Inactive Well 73 1 Church Street San Bernardino, CA Vacant Land 74 1 Highland Ave. W of Central Ave .- San Bernardino, CA Vacant-Patton 75 1 North Fork. Intake Santa Ana River San Bernardino. CA North Fork Canal 76 1 Parcel #1201-361-01 & #1201-36 Fifth Street. Hiohland. California Vacant Land .- APN #1 192-201-23 & 24 77 1 Hiohland. California Vacant Land 78 1 East of Fifth Street San Bernardino. CA Vacant Land . Orchid Ave 79 1 San Bernardino, CA Vacant Land 80 1 "? SUBet Bonnie & Del Rosa San Bernardino. CA Vacant Land . 81 E Greenspot Road 1 San Bernardino. California Vacant Land 82 1 6th Street & Sterling Avenue San Bernardino. California Vacant Land . 83 1 9'" Street (Parcel #1192.071-05) Hiohland. California Vacant Land . iIlI . .- 5 . '.. ... Commercial Automobile Schedule Veh Vehicle Make Med Specified Causes of ColDslon - Year Vehicle Model Llsb PIP UM UIM Loss or Deductible # Serial Number Pay ComDrehenslve Perils [ ] Specified Causes . 1 1986 Ford F800 ID#3663 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 2 1988 Heavy Equipment Trailer ID#0625 X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 ,. $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 3 1989 Ford F250 ID#3155 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 4 1987 Ford F250 ID#1970 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 5 1987 Ford F700 ID#9939 X X X [x I Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 6 1989 Ford F800 10#9675 X X X [ x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 7 1990 Ford Supe.. Duty ID#5661 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 8 1988 Ford F700 Dump ID#1311 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 9 1991 Ford F350 ID#3291 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 10 1992 Ford Super Duty ID#4544 X X X [ x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 11 1992 Ford F250 10#5444 X X X [ x ] Comprehensive $1000 ,. $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 12 1993 Ford F250 10#9483 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 13 1994 Ford F150 ID#2977 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes ,. 14 1994 Ford F150 ID#9954 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 15 1994 Sewer Jetter Trailer ID#1206 X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 ,. $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 16 1995 Ford F150 10#4853 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible ,. [ ] Specified Causes 17 1995 GMC 1 TOil ID#8614 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 18 1996 Ford F250 10#3738 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . 6 . - - [ ] Specified Causes 19 1996 Ford F250 10#3015 X X X [x I Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes - 20 1997 Ford F150 10#4254 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 21 1997 Ford F150 10#2637 X X X [ x I Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 22 1995 ARC Dump Trailer X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ I Specified Causes 23 1995 ARC Dump Trailer X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 24 1997 Ford F150 10#1371 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 25 1996 Wells Ca'flo Trailer #25719 X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 26 1997 GMC Surburban 10#12356 X X X [x I Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ I Specified Causes 27 1996 Ford Vactor Sewer 10#29224 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 28 1997 Ford F150 10#84995 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 29 1997 Ford F150 10#28740 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 30 1998 Buick Cen':ury 10#15496 X X X [x I Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 31 1998 Ford Exple,rer 10#28635 X X X [ x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 32 1999 Ford F250 Truck 10#80263 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 33 Dual Axle Trailer X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 34 Bi9 Tex Trailer 10#37933 X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] SpeCified Causes 35 2000 Ford F350 10#42027 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 36 2000 Ford F250 Truck 10#71839 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 37 2000 Ford F250 Truck 10#71838 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 38 2000 GMC Siena Truck 10#85547 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . 7 . - - [ ] Specified Causes 39 2001 Ford Explorer 1D#27886 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ I Specified Causes - 40 2001 Ford Explcrer ID#42663 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 41 2001 GMC Safari Van 1D#10735 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ I Specified Causes 42 2002 Ford Explcrer 1D#44205 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 43 2002 Chevy Suburban ID#07935 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 44 2000 Chevy 2500 ID#21672 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 45 2002 Sterling ID#40849 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 46 2003 Chevy CHiOO 1D#71229 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 47 2003 Ford F350 ID#30103 X X X [x I Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 48 2004 Chevy Truck ID#82340 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 49 2004 Sterling LF'9500 1D#99244 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 50 1954 Chevy Picl<up ID#0675011 F54X X X X [x ] Comprehensive $50 . $50 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 51 2004 Chevy SiI,erado 1D#50642 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ I Specified Causes 52 2004 Carson Trailer 1D#78250 X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ ] Specified Causes 53 2004 Chevy Truck ID#93516 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes . 54 2005 Chevy Sil,erado Truck 1D#53800 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ I Specified Causes 55 2005 Chevy SiI,erado Truck 1D#56878 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ J Specified Causes 56 2004 Big Tex Trailer 1D#50438 X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . [ J Specified Causes 57 2005 Ford F250 Truck ID#13401 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ J Specified Causes . 58 2005 Chevy CC4500 Truck ID#15557 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible . 8 . - .. [ I Specified Causes 59 2005 Ford F250 Truck 10#70047 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes .. 60 2005 GMC Sierra Hybrid 10#53029 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 $1000 Deductible [ ] Specified Causes 61 2005 GMC Sierra Hybrid 10#51144 X X X [x ] Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible [ I Specified Causes 62 2005 GMC Yukon 10#81380 X X X [x I Comprehensive $1000 . $1000 Deductible . . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. .. 9 .. - .. II II POLLUTION LIABILITY .. Provides coverage for any environmental impairment, emanating from any of the covered locations, causing bodily injury or personal damage to a third party. The .. coverage also provides for defense costs. Environmen'tallmpairment Liability .. Steadfast Insurance Comoanv .. $2,000,000 Each Loss $2,000,000 Total All Losses .. $50,000 Deductible . Retroactive Dale: October 1, 1996 . Endorsements 8, Exclusions to the policy: --Schedule of Forms and Endorsements, STF-EIL-406-A CW --Exclusion for Maintenance or Upgrading, STF-EIL-521-B CW .. --Fungus Exclusion, STF-ENVL-1420-A --Minimum Earned Premiums is 100% --Covered Locations Endorsement, STF-EIL-425-A CW .. --43 locations per submission --Service of Suit, STF-ENVL-1437-A CA --Terrorism DisGlosure Notice, U-GU-693-A CW .. --Amendment of Claims Provisions, STF-ENVL-1455-A CW --(3) Underground Storage Tanks, STF-EIL-205-B CW .. Premium: $33,744.00 Taxes & Fees: $ 1.388.24 Total Annual Premium: $35,132.24 .. Optional Quotl!S: .. $5,000,000 Eac;h Claim $5,000,000 Total all claims $50,000 Deductible $49,526.97 .. $10,000,000 E.lch Claim $10,000,000 Te,tal all claims .. $50,000 Deductible $63,241.44 .. 10 .. .. "" ~ DIFFERENCE IN CONDITIONS I . Company Nam<~: Pacific Insurance Company Ltd . RENEWAL #1 Difference in Conditions including Earthquake and Flood. (Flood: Excludes property .. within the 100 year flood zone...zones A&V) Excluding Asbestos, certain computer- related loss, contamination, pollution. Definition of Eel Occurrence amended to 168 hours in lieu of 72. .. $5,000,000 per occurrence and in the annual aggregate as respects Flood & . Earthquake, Real Property, Personal Property, Contingent Liability from Building Laws. $500,000 Sub-limit, Increased Cost of Construction, Demolition. . Deductibles: $25,000 per occurrence, Difference In Conditions. 5% Values per unit of insurance with respect to Earthquake. 2% Values at Time & Place of Loss, as respects Flood. . Optional 10% deductible quote: .. Premium: $91,625.00 Premium: $73,240.00 Taxes & Fees: $ 5.254.91 Taxes & Fees: $ 4.161.99 Total Premium: $96,879.91 Total Premium: $77,401.99 . .. Optional auote!s includina Business Income ($5,250.000) . Optional 10% deductible quote: - Premium: $108,110.00 Premium: $86,420.00 Taxes & Fees: $ 6.185.55 Taxes & Fees: $ 5.482.77 Total Premium: $114,296.55 Total Premium: $91,902.72 - .- . .. 11 . - ... II DIFFERENCE IN CONDITIONS I - . RENEWAL #2 Company NamEl: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance ,. Difference in Conditions Including Earthquake and Flood ,. Covering Underground Water & Sewer Piping with $5,000,000 Aggregate Limit Deductibles: 7.1i% (5% Deductible no longer available) of the total replacement cost of ,. the damaged pipe which includes the excavation and reburial cost. Subject to $100,000 minimum per occurrence as respects earthquake. ,. Premium: $70,000.00 Taxes & Company Fee: $ 2.957.50 Total Premium: $72,957.50 .. Optional 10% Ileductible Quote: Premium: $64,200.00 . Taxes & Company Fee: $ 2.720.45 Total Premium: $66,920.45 ,. ODtional QuotllS to include Business Income ($5.250.000) . Premium: $75,000.00 Taxes & Company Fee: $ 3.168.75 Total Premium: $78,168.75 . Optional 10% [)eductible Quote: Premium: $69,200.00 .. Taxes & Company Fee: $ 2.931.70 Total Premium: $72,131.70 . ,. .. ,. 12 ,. - ... II ~ COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE - Named Insured: East Valley Water District Company: American Alternative Insurance Corporation Policy Term: 10/01/05 to 10/01/06 - $33,199,092* Real & Personal Property (Owned), Fine Arts, & Mobile Equip (Owned), per schedule . $3,000,000 Co'/ered Property & Coverage Extensions . *125% margin Glause - claim payment will not exceed 125% of the amount shown on the statement of values on file with company. .. Covered Propllrty: (Covered Property and Coverage Extensions will be covered up to the respective blanket limit) --Aboveground Piping .. --Accounts Receivable --Ammonia Contamination .. --Communication Equipment --Computer Equipment/Media --Debris Removal .. --Demolition & ICC --Expediting Expenses --Extra Expense .. --Loss of Income --Non-owned Mobile Equipment --Outdoor Prop'3rty & Signs . --Paved Surfac'3s --Penstock --Preservation of Property . --Property in COC --Real and Pel1.onal Property of Others --Rental Value . --Underground Piping on Insured Premises --Utility Interruption --Vacant Buildings .. --Valuable Papers & Records . . .. 13 .. - .,; These Extensions will be covered up to their respective sublimit: --$250,000 Pollutant Cleanup & Removal --$100,000 Bridge Collapse - --$50,000 Tree!!, Shrubs, & Landscaping Planting --$25,000 Fire Department Service Charge . --$10,000 Arson & Crime Reward Deductible: $2,500 per occurrence except for pump motors which has the greater . deductible of $~~5 per horsepower or the property deductible. Covered Perils: All risk of direct physical loss or damage to covered property, including salvage . charges which commences during the policy period except as hereinafter excluded. Loss Payment: ~Ictual Cash Value to replace paved surfaces, vacant buildings, and valuable papers; Market "alue to replace fine arts; Replacement cost value to replace geomembrane . covers, mobile equipment, and commandeered property; Replacement cost value to replace buildings, other $tructures, fixed equipment, personal property, outdoor property, communications equipment, computer equipment and electronic media, trees, shrubs, and . landscape planting; Actual loss sustained for losses arising from accounts receivable, expediting expenses, extra expense, loss of income, and rental income. . Property Excluded: --Aircraft, Auto~, --Dams, ditches, canals, levees, flumes, aqueducts, or any type of water/wastewater . conveyance --Excavations, underground flues or drains --Foundations, piers, or other supports that are below the surface of the ground . --Furs, fur garments, jewels, jewelry, pearls, precious and semi-precious metals and alloys . --Land, atmosphere, or any body of water --Power transmission and feeder lines --Property that is separately described and specifically covered by other insurance --Saltwater piers, docks and wharves . --Stamps, letters of credit, cash or tickets --Standing timber, growing crops, or animals --Wells including submersible pumps greater than 50 feet - --Underground piping away from insured premises Notable Exclusions: - --Mold/Fungus IS excluded where allowable --Course of Construction Excluded for the 10 acre administrative and operating facilities - to be valued at $13 million. . . 14 . ... - East VallllY Watllr District Locations as of 10-1-05 - 1155 North Del Rosa Office Bldg $ 246,840 San Bernardino Storage Bldg $ 36,740 Shop Bldg $ 76,340 .. Storage Warehouse $ 108,900 Field Module Bldg $ 29,437 Engineer Bldg $ 52,272 .. Telemtry $ 20,000 Admin Bldg $ 99,000 Welding Bldg $ 22,000 .. 7479 San Francisco (Plant #132) Equipment $ 220,000 San Bernardino Electical $ 88,000 Chlorination Equip $ 30,000 .. Telemetry $ 10,000 S/W Corner of VictoriallTemple (Plant # 9A) Building $ 33,000 .. San Bernardino Equipment $ 88,000 Tank $ 44,000 Booster Pump $ 44,000 Electrical $ 55,000 .. Chlorination Equip $ 22,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 III S/S 6th Street, West of Pedley Rd (Plant #11) Building $ 44,000 San Bernardino Equipment $ 88,000 Electrical $ 49,500 III Telemetry $ 10,000 Chlorination Equip $ 20,000 III S/E of 6th Street & Pedley Rd (Plant #12) Building $ 44,000 San Bernardino Equipment $ 88,000 Tank $ 44,000 Booster Pump $ 66,000 .. Electrical $ 66,000 Chlorniation Equip $ 22,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 .. N/E Corner LynwoodlHarrison (Plant #24) Building $ 80,000 Equipment $ 176,000 III Reservoir $ 88,000 Booster Pump $ 88,000 Electrical $ 55,000 .. Chlorniation Equip $ 30,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 . III III - . North of Foothill Drivll (Plant #37) Telemetry $ 25,000 San Bernardino Booster Station $ 478,386 Vaults,Pipes,Elect $ 1,381,474 . Retaining Wall $ 26,918 Access Curb,Fence $ 465,262 Reservoir & Elect $ 5,223,523 . $ Date st., East of Valaria (Plant #39) Building 100,000 Materials $ 250,000 .. Equipment $ 88,000 Tanks $ 1,000,000 Booster Pump $ 300,000 Electrical $ 55,000 .. Chlorination Equip $ 22,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 .. North Side of 3rd/E of Pam Ave (Plant #40) Building $ 44,000 San Bernardino Equipment $ 88,000 Tanks $ 44,000 .. Booster Pump $ 44,000 Electrical $ 49,500 Chlorination Equip $ 40,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 . Shasta Drive/E of Hemlock Dr (Plant #56) Building $ 44,000 San Bernardino Tanks $ 203,500 . Booster Pump $ 44,000 Electrical $ 44,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 .. N of VictoriafTermunJs Indian (Plant #123) Tanks $ 33,000 San Bernardino Telemetry $ 10,000 .. S. of Greenspot/E of Come Camp (Plant #125) Equipment $ 100,000 San Bernardino Tanks $ 44,000 Booster Pump $ 44,000 .. Electrical $ 49,500 Chlorination Equip $ 10,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 - S/W Corner of 9th ard Sterling (Plant #127) Building $ 44,000 San Bernardino Booster Pump $ 55,000 - Electrical $ 49,500 Telemetry $ 10,000 W of Cloverhill/N of Willowood (Plant #131) Booster Pump $ 40,000 - San Bernardino Electrical $ 22,000 Tank $ 5,500 Telemetry $ 10,000 .. Equipment $ 30,000 .. .. .. ... NtEt of Live Oak RdlSummit Dr (Plant #137) Tanks $ 55,000 San Bernardino Hydro T anklBld $ 33,000 Telemetry $ 10.000 - Electrical $ 38.500 Generator $ 27.500 Booster $ 40,000 - Equipment $ 30.000 City of Highland Repeater System $ 10.000 .. StS Pumalo StfW of Gutherie St (Plant #41) Equipment $ 100.000 San Bernardino Electrical $ 49.500 StEt Corner Mountain & Marshall (Plant #25) Equipment $ 100,000 . San Bernardino Booster Pump $ 44.000 Electrical $ 49.500 Telemetry $ 10.000 . Chlorination Equip $ 22,000 Marshall BlvdlW of SI:erling (Plant #27) Equipment $ 200,000 . San Bernardino Electrical $ 80,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 Chlorination Equip $ 30,000 . Court SU Between Del Roas Ave (Plant #28) Equipment $ 300,000 San Bernardino Electrical $ 49.500 Chlorination Equip $ 22.000 . Telemetry $ 10,000 NtE of Sterling & Marshall (Plant #33) Building $ 88,000 . San Bernardino Equipment $ 60,000 Tanks $ 1,232,000 Booster Pump $ 88,000 Electrical $ 55,000 . Chlorniation Equip $ 22,000 Telemetry $ 11,000 . Perris Hill (Plant # 34) Tanks $ 302,500 San Bernardino Hydro TanklBldg $ 50.000 Telemetry $ 5.500 .. Electrical $ 36.500 N of Aspen & Hemloc:k (Plant #59) Tanks $ 242.000 - San Bernardino Hydro TanklBldg $ 33.000 Telemetry $ 10.000 Electrical $ 36.500 .. N of 28thIW of LaPralx (Plant #99) Building $ 44.000 San Bernardino Tanks $ 203,500 Booster Pump $ 44,000 . Electrical $ 44,000 Telemetry $ 20,000 Equipment $ 20.000 . . - - N/E of Mountaintop Drive (Plant #1 01) Tanks $ 385,000 San Bernardino Hydro TanklBldg $ 33,000 - Telemetry $ 10,000 Electrical $ 38,500 Baseline & Palomino St (Plant #104) Booster Pump $ 22,000 - San Bernardino Well Site $ 11,000 Telemetry $ 5,500 Electrical $ 38,500 . Citrus SVBetween L'lma/Mountain (Plant #107) Equipment $ 200,000 San Bernardino Electrical $ 100,000 .. Chlorine Station $ 22,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 ,. E of Highland Ave/N of Baseline (Plant #108) Building $ 44,000 San Bernardino Tanks $ 374,000 Booster Pump $ 44,000 Electrical $ 49,500 ,. Telemetry $ 10,000 Greenspot Road (Plant #120) Equipment $ 88,000 ,. San Bernardino Tanks $ 50,000 Booster Pump $ 40,000 Electrical $ 55,000 . Chlorination Station $ 40,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 . N VictoriafTerminus Indian Reserve (Plant #124) Booster Pump $ 44,000 San Bernardino Electrical $ 33,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 . Pacific & Del Rosa (Plant #130) Booster Pump $ 40,000 San Bernardino Telemetry $ 10,000 Electrical $ 22,000 ,. 3rd Street & Sterling (Plant #141 ) Equipment $ 200,000 San Bernardino Electrical $ 49,500 . Chlorine Station $ 22,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 East Highland Ranch (Plant #140) Equipment $ 20,000 - San Bernardino Tanks $ 522,500 Telemetry $ 10,000 Booster Pump $ 40,000 - Electrical $ 40,000 .. . .. - .. N of Greensport/E of Plunge Creek (Plant #142) Equipment $ 150,000 San Bernardino Electrical $ 44,000 .. Tanks $ 40,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 P04 Chlorine $ 40,000 .. 5th StIW of Church SI (Plant #146) Chlorine Station $ 40,000 San Bernardino Equipment $ 185,000 ,. Telemetry $ 10,000 Electrical $ 44,000 Abbey Way Well (Plant #143) Building $ 125,000 . Equipment $ 75,000 P04 Chlorine $ 40,000 Electrical $ 40,000 . City Creek Water Treatment (Plant #134) Tanks/Boosters, $ 10,000,000 4588 Highland Ave Treatment Equip, ,. San Bernardino Chemical storage, Chlorination System, Electrical Panels & Telemetry .. Greenspot Road/E of Cone Camp (Plant #129 Building $ 93,500 San Bernardino Tank $ 693,000 ,. Booster Pump $ 176,000 Electrical $ 93,500 Telemetry $ 10,000 ,. 3654 East Highland Ave #18 Contents $ 275,000 San Bernardino ,. N Fork Intake Santa Ana River (Canal) Equipment $ 50,000 San Bernardino Telemetry $ 10,000 .. Abbey/Church St (Plant #147) P04 Chlorine Station $ 40,000 APN# 1210-211-24 Equipment $ 40,000 Telemetry $ 10,000 .. Electrical $ 40,000 Van Leuven/Highlancl (Plant 148) Tank $ 300,000 .. APN# 1210-211-24 Telemetry $ 10,000 Equipment $ 20,000 .. N/E of Rockford & Holly Vista (Vacant Well) Liability Only San Bernardino S/W of Satinwood CrJS of Sycamore (Vacant Land) Liability Only .. San Bernardino .. .. - - Westside of Lankers~ip/S of Cypress (Vacant Land) Liability Only San Bernardino .. S/E corner of 9th & McKinley (Vacant Land) Liability Only San Bernardino .. Liability Only 1441 East Baseline (Storage USA) San Bernardino .. Fairfax Drive (InactivE! Well # 15) Liability Only San Bernardino . Lynwood Way/South of Baseline (Inactive Well #17) Liability Only San Bernardino .. 7th StreeUEast of Sterling (Inactive Well #20) Liability Only San Bernardino .. N Rosemary Dr/E Lm; Feliz Drive (Inactive Well #21) Liability Only San Bernardino S Railroad/E of Del Rosa (Inactive Well #26) Liability Only .. San Bernardino N/W 11th SUE of ColE! Avenue (Inactive Well #31) Liability Only .. San Bernardino S/S Baseline/E Olive Tree Lane (Inactive Well #32) Liability Only .. San Bernardino Date StreetIW of Big San Creek (Inactive Well #42) Liability Only . San Bernardino - with plant #39 Church StreeUN of 5th Street (Inactive Well #43) Liability Only San Bernardino .. W/S/ Boulder & N Eucalyptus Street (Inactive Well #49) Liability Only San Bernardino ,. 3999 Atlantic (Inactivo Well #94) Liability Only San Bernardino - N 3rd StreeUEast of Calhoun (Inactive Well #102) Liability Only San Bernardino .. S of Sycamore/East ~;atinwood (Inactive Well #122) Liability Only San Bernardino . W/S Fairfax/North of Date Street (Inactive Well) Liability Only San Bernardino .. .. .- ... Highland AvelW of C,antral Ave (Vacant Land - Patton) Liability Only San Bernardino - East of Fifth Street (Vacant Land) Liability Only San Bernardio - Orchid Avenue (Vacclnt Land) Liability Only San Bernardino ,. 7th StreeUBetween Bonnie & Del Rosa (Vacant Land) Liability Only San Bernardino ,. E Greenspot Road (Vacant Land) Liability Only San Bernardino . 6th Street & Sterling Ave (Vacant Land) Liability Only San Bernardino - APN# 1192-201-23 & 24 ,. 9th Street (Parcel # 1192-071-05 Vacant Land) Liability Only Highland ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. - - ,. ,. ,. ,. - - II I COMMERCIAL CRIME COVERAGE - Named Insured: East Valley Water District Policy Term: 10/01/05 to 10/01/06 . . Limits IDeductible Coveraae DescriDtion $250,000 $250 Employee Dishonesty [x] Blanket [ ] Schedule ,. $250,000 $250 Forgery and Alteration $250,000 $250 Theft, Disappearance and Destruction per occur. - $100,000 $250 Computer Fraud . Note: Coverage extended to directors and authorized volunteers. . ,. II I COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE COVERAGE ,. Named Insured: East Valley Water District Policy Term: 10/01/05 to 10/01/06 . Coverage/Limit: $1,000,000 Owned Automobile - $1,000,000 Hired/Non-owned Automobile $1,000,000 Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist - $10,000 Medical Payments $1,000 Deductible Comprehensive (ACV) $1,000 Deductible Collision (ACV) - $50,000 Hired Car Physical Damage Special Coverages: - --Broad Form Pollution --Glass Repair/Replacement . . 15 ,. - - ~ II GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE - Named Insured: East Valley Water District Policy Term: 10/01/05 to 10/01/06 - . Bodily Injury & l:Jroperty Damage $1,000,000 Per Occurrence $3,000,000 BI & PD Aggregate . Personal Injury & Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Per Person $3,000,000 PI & AI Aggregate .- Professional Liability $1,000,000 Per Claim $3,000,000 PL Aggregate . Wrongful Acts $1,000,000 Per Claim $3,000,000 Aggregate . Employment Practices Liability $1,000,000 Per Claim $3,000,000 Aggregate . Employee Benettit Liability $1,000,000 Per Person $3,000,000 Aggregate . Fire Damage Limit $1,000,000 Anyone Premises .- Medical Payments $10,000 Per Accident Non-monetary Liability $5,000 Per Incident .- Pre-Termination Counseling $2,500 Per Incident - Deductible: $2,500 Per Occurrence Bodily Injury $2,500 Per Occurrence Professional Liability $2,500 Per Occurrence GL Property Damage - $2,500 Per Occurrence Wrongful Acts $2,500 Per Occurrence Employment Practices Liability $2,500 Per Occurrence Employee Benefits Liability - Excess Liability Coverage $10,000,000 Per Occur/Aggregate . . 16 . .. - Liability Coverage Summary: --Advertising Injury --Backpay Awal"ds - --Broad Named Insured --Canals & Levees . --Civil Rights --Contractual --Defense Outside Limit . --Diminution of Property Values --Discrimination --Disinfectants I~elease . --Duty to Defend --Employee Benefits --Employment Practices .. --Extended Boclily Injury --Extended Personal Injury --Failure to Supply . --Fire Legal Liability --Inverse Condl3mnation --Liquor . --Marital Estates & Trusts --Medical Payments --Negligent Training/Supervision . --Non-monetary --Non-owned Aircraft --Non-owned Watercraft . --Outside Directorship --Owned Watercraft --Personal Injury . --Pollution/Limited-- --Pre-Judgement Interest --Premises/Operations .. --Pre-Termination Counseling --Products/Completed Operations --Professional Liability - --Public Officials --Railroad Protective --Sewer Backup - --Sexual Harassment --Water Contamination --Water Testin~1 E&O .. --Wrongful ActH . . 17 .. - .. **Limited Pollution: Pollution Liability arising out of: --Products Hazard - --Potablo Water --Propane or Natural Gas .. --Pest Abatement or spraying --Weed Abatement or spraying --Hostile Fire .. --Explosion, lightning, windstorm, vandalism, or malicious mischief, collapse, riot and civil commotion, flood, earthquake, collision, upset or overtum of mobile equipment. --Use, handling, storage, discharge, dispersal, release, or escape of any .. chemical used In the water treatment process. .. Policy Notes: --Duty to Defend policy --Defense COStH outside the limit of liability . --Prior acts are not available --Mold/Fungus is excluded where allowable --Coverage for acts of terrorism included at no additional premium charge .. .. . .. .. . .. - . . 18 .. .. .. - II EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE I .. Company: Axi!! Specialty Insurance Company . Limits of Liability: $10,000,000 Each Occurrence .. $10,000,000 General Aggregate $10,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate .. Schedule of Underlying: First Underlyinn Insurance: Umbrella Liabillty- . Carrier: American Alternative Ins Corp 10-1-05/06 Limits: $10,000,000 Each Occurrence $10,000,000 General Aggregate .. $10,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Defense Expense - In addition to limits .. Premium is a minimum and deposit premium. 25% eamed premium at policy inception. All fees are 100% fully earned. .. Exclusion: Pollution; Asbestos; War or Terrorism; Fungi or Bacteria; Cyber Liability; Punitive Dama!~es; Employment Practices Liability; Failure to Supply; Directors and .. Officers Liability; Subsidence; Silica; and Violation of Statutes that Govem Emails, fax or phone calls. e Premium: $32,000.00 Taxes & Fees: $ 2.032.00 Total Premium: $34,032.00 .. Optional Quote: .. $15,000,000 E;Jch Occurrence $15,000,000 General Aggregate $15,000,000 Plroducts/Completed Operations Aggregate .. Premium: $44,500.00 T.axes & Fees: $ 2.735.13 T,otal Premium: $47,235.13 .. .. 19 .. .. . .. . PREMIUM SUMMARY . RENEWAL QUOTE - American Alternative Insurance Corporation .. Pilckage Policy .. (Includes: Property/Automobile Crime/Genera/ Liability/Excess Liability) $306,017.00 .. P,)lIution Policy $ 35,132.24 . DIC (Real & Personal Property $5mil) $ 114,296.55 DIC (Water/Sewer Piping) $ 91,902.72 $'IOmil Excess Liability $ 34,032.00 . .. 2004-2005 Exa:lirina Premiums Package Policy $283,523.00 .. (this does not include endorsements during the year) .. Pollution Policy $ 37,687.06 DIC (Real & Pers Prop $5mil) $ 76,224.26 DIC (Water/Sewer Piping) $ 94,857.33 .. $'IOmil Excess Liability $ 34,082.00 .. Note: --Property limits have been changed per updated schedule provided by Consuiltant with - the exception of Plant #134 at 4588 Highland Avenue which has been increased approximately 43%. .. --Various vehicle changes .. 20 II INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AGREEMENT This Integrated Management Program Demonstration Project Agreement (Agreement) is between the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County, the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, the City of Redlands, and East Valley Water District and effective from the date of execution by an parties to the Agreement (parties). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Parties have various missions, but intend through this Agreement to provide a management structure for the purposes of (I) spreading native water as and when available; (2) spreading supplemental water when native water is not otherwise available to increase water levels in the upper basin (forebay); and, (3) managing recharge to avoid deleterious impacts in the pressure zone; and, WHEREAS, there are pre-existing agreements or judgments that impose conditions 011 some or all of the Parties, including, the "Seven Oaks Accord," the Western Judgment, the 1977 Big Bear judgment and the "Exchangll Plan"; and, . . . WHEREAS, the Parties intend that this Agreement will implement a demonstration program, pending the preparation and full implementation of the Integrated Management Program, as that term is defined in the "Seven Oaks Accord," and, as such, is intended to be of limited duration. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: TERMS OF AGREEMENT 1. This agreement shall have a term of one (I) year from execution by all Parties (Initial Term). The Initial Term may be extended by the consent of all Parties for four (4), one-year periods (Extension Terms). Unless all Parties make an express determinatioa that the Agreement may extend beyond five (5) years, the Agreement shall expire at the end of the Extension Terms. 2. The Parties shall establish replenishment targets (Replenishment Targets) for recharge areas for the Initial Term. The Replenishment Targets established for the Initial Term are attached hereto as Exhibit "A". At any time that it is determined necessary, tbe Parties will review and revise the Replenishment Targets; provided, however, that at the beginning of each Extension Term, the Parties will meet and confer in good faith to review and revise the Replenishment Targets. Any revision to the Replenishment Targets will be incorporated as though set forth in fun in this Agreement. Integrated Mana.~ement Program Demonstration Project Agreement 3. The Parties will meet and confer in good faith to prepare a mechanism for evaluating thE' effects of the proposed Replenishment Targets, using such technical tools and analyses as they may collectively develop. At a minimum, the Parties agree that the groundwater model prepared by United States Geological Survey (USGS) for SBVMWD will be utilized to determine potential effects. Additionally, available, current groundwater levels will be analyzed. The Parties may determine that additional data are required for analysis and, by mutual consent, develop technical rnemoranda setting forth the information that will be considered to re-evaluate the effects of Replenishment Targets. 4. The Replenishment Targets are not intended to be fixed limits. They are intended to SE:rve as thresholds for additional review and analysis. In the event that any party to this Agreement requests a change to the Replenishment Targets, then all Parties to the Agreement shall meet and confer in good faith to evaluate the proposed change to spreading targets, using the evaluation methodology set forth in the technical memoranda that may be prepared as set forth in Paragraph 3. In order to change Replenishment Targets, the Parties must achieve consensus. 5. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, the Parties will meet quarterly, or more frequently as required, to discuss, review and analyze this demonstratioa program and its effectiveness. 6. This Agreement may be executed in coul!-terparts. 7. This Agreement may be terminated with the written consent of all Parties. 8. This Agreement does not confer a benefit on any other person, corporation, organization, agency or municipality; no third party beneficiary is created through this Agreement. 9. This Agreement does not obligate funds on behalf of any Party. 10. No Party to this Agreement may use this Agreement, or any actions taken pursuant to this Agreement, as evidence in any pending water rights proceedings. SAN BERNARDINO V ALLEY WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Ei/~ By: :r ~- DATE: /oJ.1')c; / 2 I 0 0 ll. 0 OJ 00 >- .0 I '0 Cll I ~ -g . Cll 0 III a. G= .~ in 003 Cll Q) 0'- <5 ml.1...U _OCll z Cll OJ e: , =CI)~ Ul e: Cll Cll 0 ~ Cll 0. Cll Cii ::I at e: '0 ~ -- IV g. Ul III e: I .s~QJ ~ c:- E 'OCllCll ctl > g ~ ?O' ~ rl5"EE ~ 3= '" !o '" '" '" '" '" 0 '" '" ~ ,~ ~ ~ .... t;::OC/) -i:i:ll- ~a..() ~s:E U(/)::I OcE E ~.~ e.!: ~ :::.e!C1) (ij-ro :.: ;e =0 0:: -'=~ - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :0 .l!l_ 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 0 :;: ~e:ll. 0 0 ... '" '" 0 "'. 0 x Cll ::I <( .; ..,: tti ... w CllO_ ~ ,..: r~~ ~ ~ Cll s...."'nj CllClls: s: ~ 0- r 51-s: :::I.OCI) , CllO I o~E 1-00 ?;1'::: .l!l 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro5LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "'. 0 "'. "'. '" o. '" 0 "'. 0 CllO~ CD ci ~ ~ CD '" ~ ci r E ~ ~ ... ~ <( ~ --0 I Cll Cll ~ ?: ~ g I ....~ rJl o _ 1 ::::g~ I .$ , E ~ ~;;e I I I I I o- f '" , , , 1 I I ! I I II ' 10; I I I i ! I I I I !fiil i , I~I I i I I I , i ! Cll, , I '=1 l"lji ,Cll I , ' , Ul i , ~I i 'e:' Cll ,01 I~ '00 i I ~ Ie- 10 I ,- I ,0 I e: I CI) ~ <( ! , <c 'l1li I 0 I , '~: Cll '''' , or >- I I~. Cll e: Cll, 'Ul, e: I ; c; chi Ie' <(, Cll, ''0 ::I , Cll ~' E' Cll 01 e: liil Ie: '0, Cll ~ 0., J:: Cll Cll )3 .- 0>, Cll .' ro ~ , : 'E' '6 - 0 ~, > "Oi '" 0, Cll ;rol I~ Cll 16' :!D, ,Cll is: ,::I, n: ioo n: 10: 0- ,0 :cc' :r Integrated Management Program Demonstration Project Agreement DATE: Id / ~/(J y . , WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY By: ~r Ji ~ DATE: 1,/)-~'6lf. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT By:~J~ ~ DATE: / c It Ie r/ , , CITY OF REDLANDS B~ !f~J>1f/k DATE: /rJ-~ - "y Attest: B'9'& ~3'~ DATE: /6-&-0.( EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ By: A~L DATE: d.c - Ocf / 3 Aug 31 05 12:17p Larry 'N. Rowe (949) 631-8108 p.2 BasinWater@j2l' East Valley Water District Proposal Outline Well 4() August 31, 2005 1. Descliption. Basin Water Technology Group, Inc. ("Basin") will supply one (I) Uranium wellhead treatment unit to East Valley Water District ("District") for use to reduce Uraniuna concentrations in its Well 40. 2. Unit Description. The wellhead treatment unit is completely self-contained and is hous~:d in a mobile container measuring lO'x40' and 9' high utilizing a strong anion type I resin.. The unit requires a minimal electrical supply and has a foot print of approxinaately 725 square feet. 3. Unit :Performance. The unit is designed to process up to 1,300 Gallons per Minute ("GPM"). Uranium In = 35 ugll Uranium Out = < 10 ugll Feed Rate = 1,300 gpm Product Water = 1,300 gpm Waste Rate = 0 gpm 4. Basin's Responsibility. Basin is responsible for the following: A. Provide and install complete unit. B. Assist '>/i th disposal of spent resin. C. Guarantee Unit Performance. D. Remote Monitoring of Unit Operation. E. Assist with appropriate permitting. 5. East Valley Water District Responsibilities. The District is responsible for the following: A. Provide Pad or other suitable location for the unit. 5200 River Aven'J€. i'le.......port 8~acJ.. CCilifornia 92663 Tel: 1(909: 233.9605 F::,x: (94S') 631.8:1.08 ...Jv.......:.I]rl~irr.fJ.:ltD._Cl.im Aug 31 05 12:18p Lany W. Rowe (949) 631-8108 p.3 Basin Water@jil' East Valley Water District Proposal Outline Well 40 August 31, 2005 (Continued) B. Provide electrical power (Approximately 40 amps). C. Routine Operator attendance (Approximately 3 to 5 hours per week). D. Provide for all on-site piping necessary to connect BWT Unit to the District's distribution System. 6. Finaneial Conditions. A. Take or Pav Contact 1.. The District will be obligated to pay Basin One Hundred and Eighty ($180) Dollars per acre-foot for water processed that meets or exceeds the mutually agreed to water quality objective. It is important to note that resin disposal is one of the most significant cost associated with treating uranium at this well. If Basin is successful in locating a less costly resin, resin disposal method or site, an adjustment to the per acre-foot charge will be made. 2. The District will pay Basin a one time Deployment and Mobilization Fee of ($50,000). ~ Contract Term is Ten (10) Years from the time the unit is ~. permitted by the California Department of Health Services. Basin also offers the opportunity to purchase its Ion Exchange Unit after the initial contract term. Basin Water representatives are available to discuss this option. 4. Take or Pay contract for a minimuna of One Thousand Seven Hundred (1,700) Acre Feet per year. B, Purchase Ovtion with Water Service Contract 1. The District will pay Basin Water $511,271, for the purchase of one 1,300 gpm Uranium treatment system. This amolUlt includes 5200 River Avenue. Newpor: Bea:h. California 92663 Tel: ::fg09) 233.9605 FGx: (94'::-) G31 SlOB \'I',,"N.oaSlmV2.leLCOm Aug 31 05 12:18p Larry W. Rowe (949) 631-8108 p.4 Basin Wafer({!;JJ! East Valley Water District Proposal Outline Well 40 August 31, 2005 (Continued) deployment, start up and assistance with California Department of Health Services permitting. 2. The District will enter into a Water Services Contract with Basin for spent resin replacement and assistance with its disposal. The term of the Water Services Contract will for a minimum of Five (5) years and provide for annual renewals thereafter, at the option of the District. The Treatment Fee for all water processed by the Basin Water Uranium Treatment System will be $125 per acre foot. .' 3. The District will be responsible of all applicable sales tax and . fees associated "'lith the purchase of the Basin treatment system. Basin will invoice the District separately for such Fees and or Fees. 7. Existing and Future Water Oualitv . This proposal is based on Basin's understanding of existing quality of water produced by Well 40 and assumes a resin life of 75,000 bed volumes. Should the quality of the water produced by Well 40 change over-time resulting in a resin life less than that assumed. Basin resen es the right to adjust the writ treatment charge to reflect the increased costs of meeting the water quality objectives. 5200 Ri'.,ter A':OilUC, Nm"'port Beach. California 92663 Tel: ?009) 233-9605 Fco<.: (949) 63i-S1.0f: w~",'w.l~3!:inwctf!r.cOI11 EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Mel1AO To: Robert Martin, General Manager From: Brian Tompkins, CFO CC: Date: 9/20/2005 Re: Mileclge Rates The IRS has raised the standard mileage rates for the remainder of 2005. The Business rate is now 48)12 rt per mi e, up from the 40)12 rt per mile rate previously adopted for 2005. The increase,j rates are effective for the period September 1, 2005 through December 31,2005. . . I recommenc that the we adjust the rate at which the District reimburses employees and directors for the remainder of 2005 to conform with the IRS rate. . Page 1 IRS Increases Mileage Rate Until Dec. 31, 2005 Page 1 of 1 . Internal Revenue Service IRS.goY UE PAWIiE liT Of THE THASURY IRS Increases Mileage Rate Until Dec. 31, 2005 IR.2005-99, Sept. 9, 2005 WASHINGTON _ The Inlemal Revenue Service and Treasury Department announced today an Increase to the opUonal slandan:! mileage rates fo{ the nnal foor months of 2(105. The rate wllllncrease to 4e.5 cent!. a mile for all business miles drlven between Sept. 1 and Dec. 31, 2005. ThIs is an Increase of 8 cents from the 40.5 cent rale in effect for the first eight months of 2005, .s sel forth in Rev. Proc. 2004-64. "This is about fairness for taxpayels: said IRS Comrrissloner Mark W. Everson. .PeopIe are entitled to deduct the real cost ofoperaUng a vehicle. We've responded to the l"l!cenl gas price Increases by making this special adjustment so taxpayers get the tax benefit they deserve,- In recognillon of recent gasoline pllee Increases, the IRS made this special adjustment for the final months of 2005. The IRS normally updates the mileage rates once a '/ear In the fall for the next calendar year. "With many predIcting a decline In gas prices over comIng months, we will hold off on seiling !he 2006 rate until doser to January; Everson said. Next year's rate could be ICMer than 48.5 cents. VVhlle gasoline Is a major factor In the mileage figure, ether Items enter Into the calculation of mileage rat&!, such as the price of new vehicles and insurance. The optional business standard m,leage rate Is used 10 compute the deductible costs of operating an automobile for buSiness use in lieu of the extra burden of tracking actual costs. this rate Is also used as a benchmar1t by the federal government and many businesses to reimburse their emplOyees for millage. The new fQU(-monlh rate foreomputing deductible medical or moving expenses will be 22 cents a mile, up from 15 cents for the first alght months of2oo5. The rate forprovi:llng services for charitable organizations Is set by statute, not the IRS, and remaIns at 1<4 cents a mile. The annual Revenue Procedure lreludes Ilmltatlons on who Is not eligible to use the standard mileage rate. Links: . Ar1flDUncement 2005-71- Announcing an Incre.se to the optional standard mila age rates for the final four months of 2005. (POF SKB, 2 pages) Subscribe to IRS Nf'!W!Ilwlrf! http://www.irs.gov/newsroomlarticle/0,,id=14 7 423 ,00.html 9/20/2005 .- ~,I . '1 "~~\f:t'.';' . I"'''' . >.,:;.-}..f.~~O\" .;:;~';i'.. ~~J ,0/";.', _II'" ,0 ':Wr."', " .~_" $' . N~t~...:.' ~, -!i < ,,(i,~l'fj ;:\ ~ ",. ~ ~ 0 ....~'J:' <:. ,~)1 '~. 'fW. "?':if. ~.;. ~,~-~-"j. - . ",,.,' :, ~l~""'~ ifi,h ," ',~)':.f~i~:~ ~:J,i!j, '~'$.~t;t'..l ~.~~~~ 1,t(I;..~. ~ "OS'" -, '", X~'''~~~~~i;~t:~~~~~-:{~'''1~~~~~f~'ilfi' ~-d:,"'l~,,;.~f~~)"'i;;'S'~~.),~j\l}:1f,d~ ' i::Jl~~,W"6i".g!tQ.l~aLton:;li!,l~w~'.Q . O"H"JJ'''~J'''''O:" ~,~ely.~-!1'~C~@IL[011;~\j;~*:~~'~ " .: t}i!~~~.iE~';;'i:~~'""fl';;:;i;'0t4"3.,~;p,';r,)~}.l,fi"l>'1~~~ir~tli!p;;~~;'~~~"'I;~~. ;;li:~~~\I"~<;1:<~,tJit~.~ ' , J/:l:(uvIlew.S'Ll1.ar,te eC '}'uur,specl 'c'con~~Uu ron'1ey,el":M.ll:5'i'",omuma:UOl11li-Jjitdf' "'" tf[~~:'f"~~~~~'K.~!:, 1.,'*"l'..~,t':t.~};~~ /t~m~~~;;:'1~~f{,~f~'J<-'$~;~*~~r:-biifi~~-'~~;~~, :l'~-;-;:~~~~:~a" ~~~~ ~~ l},,<"'"O lU'ogsors~~lpS'Ov:eF'a o,ge-year;r anUm-.uecemller) ca enUar'l1euo ;i;"..:,,,",,,J!!'Y' ~1ti~*:';'.fi':tt~~'Lt~~~~?:l"~~~~~~<\J.;Wt~~~ ~~llf1;l'~~~~!5l~}','~~;'~idff1f~il~it'~~b~~~'1'~~f,rai~j~~~~\~~~~~m ~:~,'~9.U,LU es'your;orgaD1ZauOn'd.Or me::leVelS v.<.a eU. e O,vy..,1,;;.>,'tilf;]"'\ki'j;IJ:%"";;.~h:;,,,"~' ~~!:"~";<l. '5 ~~:.'~ ~ >;;7~'"'" J;,.'~'"':. ~:'I.\"~ ~if." ~'tt. i~4~. wlf ;t: f~;~~../~~,\f\i~?;;;'iifit?;;i...'].-':"-;fr<~ I'l"'~~,~'?lf<d~n:'~.v.;~;...; "!"":'!f~,,?'~?:~:~%t~ ~~~1~~~;1i.f~~,~~~&~1ft-P~~:$;~~ft~i~]~Jr~~:$i~;.~q~~~~~~$~?"4~~~~Fit1~~~1ESP~~~)~'~~'~;' '~i:~~\~~~'t1tf~~; ~l!;:rd.t'i'i! ~ ~'i""2f%;\~*;g~'.{ '9f"~.15~~~Sf,.\t~ ;:v.:z.1~: :~;~- }:,~trJf: '. ~~w'~,~-~1t~ JI ~~: S4~~,~:~;l$rf/,~:~'j!r, }$,~~~~,1i!i~~~ ,: 1!i;~'f~~~1:!$.j!~~~ '.c~el'~ IlSlU'N\-" '[E E["'-~1-0 OGG"&''''>;':''''H''''~~'!~ "''''''''''''''''''''"''1/--''0'' _lih, ~ ~ _~, , .~":Y " ~ \' ~l:"~;'$';;l't~/,-,.;,,-~ '" .,",~"1, ~'t~~*r~F4t,'J~<,.'t<~:,,:;,_i*$lL;1.; ,";"'r , ... . " ,'- c ,;: ...~, ....,::;r:~~. ~,.::" ",,-~f':;!; ~,,""'(?~ ,. ,A,~>~~.",'I; ~ -'t" ~ ~~:;~1'~"1~1~,~Jli~;r~~t,(j;::~~\1~;('~'}I~,:,,,,;.~-;:f~~~~~W4~Vt~lfr~j~~jii'~t~i~i:;lt~~~1~1~~ -f_:,';;'il.~anner;WlLn logo' ihsplayed Ji.t'Fall',Lionretence,.".,.t;.,."",,; ;",,,"'," ,~t,;]]~~, >,.,ij;-'~'!~\f,"ii)O ,f?}, .,' ~.~~~~~&~ :~~?~~'f:, s ,\I~"4;' /~, "?,'nt' ;::~ir~".: .'f' fi'-:^> :t;}: \\~""~ :"tf" t\~:.t\~l'i~~j;:,^~P--:' ;~~\~tt~~~~~~~;~~bit.h:~'V!it~; $1!J};ot:3i l?iI~pf4.'Zi ~ ~ ,"'n,c,'Our com'P;l1men mycon eregceregls a IOn"'nacKages";::''''''',:,i,''\r{~\i;"~iiill.J)f%.~'i2 '~JI!'* '?'P . ,,~ i~~:~~~.;,~ ~... ~'.~.'>i '~'?1''.> ,:,:fri:J;f.~ -.~;~~a"rfk~\ -v+~?'8;~ ~..;~.' '~f.S"f;'1T\R~'I~~:?:~'>~1f~~:~~r1~:~~~ >1r:$:~~';~i!~~~( ~;~ 's,.,' .Com an 00 nnte on.s onsortauto ;[':a, lSoy"erenCeN;' ".",,,,.,"t-,,'" "".,;~.",'.' "'Ie "~'f)'{);~('';:lh.",p,''i':J,,' '~0P:!"".""" ~h, ., P1':C:,:'}t,,~,~-;.t~~.&tf;~~1f~;'&,;a'r'.j.t*"~~;&"'l'i ""~,r ,iI'i~ .il iE~}::: .~\\ 50 Hrrnehta CO.llie4enCe'vMAAVl ~lJPO,UI,~5:"";~';:;<'0~.\~)\f"F:-"';'>;"~:!-(~- !'~}, ::1>1' ,:, ...;0.' ~ .~\ ,'5- ,F~h.~;-, ' r;:ttW':;;'\^I~",:%f;:":d"'{;rLH;'rt";',i, 'fjJ'I,,~,~x~:.ll+\~~)j;~'i~lt~'$~~~~at~~;,~r~~~~'~$i:~~~"~1'" -'i.'~*' . if, ~;::r" ...esenre 'l.4[}le'a con erenv,e uaM"1-~e"'i"~~"~">'i~'\~~\f"f,\?lI'!~1\i"Wn"*'~"'~~'i!l\l<!il:;'!:\!.~I'.'" , " ~~~I~~fll~~~~'lii~t1\!f.I~.lt~(~~~111~~f4~I~' ;) !,<;"&(~i;~~}<'1~t-"'1:;'~~'Ji;;< :~~~~,t.1";;i~'i,,",~j {~:":;>~"<E.'lf!~!,,*~'(fi}":. .;,}k:::~::i'~;"~I1?%<'!i:1,,;~,:J\?~~,",",J4:.' "by 'FR;/.,i't;;;.~~\2 ;t~~>-\:":;'A ~~!,.'f;f~S;!j~~"",r:~":~:~,~~.: .:'::~.,~'>:;<1t ~^~;;~;J.::<i?~:';.-{-l;~-~' ~~:,. ...;~' '.:rt':.:c .:::x~~,~ f, ~~.;~-$~:::12' }i" ' R,.~S<~(J1~~~i@'~~!;~U'~fO~~~:?E~';\~~~~E~'~~t'~ F~~~f~5~ !~~;Oo'?~O~<t~,;-O' ~'~i:~~\:$.'i'~~t9~iJ9'~::f9:~~9-~::~7~{~'~[~:J,:CfJiC"~A'"-" , " ,,'.', -" . - .. ~'f$' .. , ,-..'- "<,, - , ?~."..r . . ..,.,), \ .' ~"",. ", ~ -",~.... ~, .~ "....J^' , '-,. ~_, ' ~ ~.. ',->'" ~ _ . . ),". .~ , , r~~,~~M6~'&~~ri~~'Jb'lite~~~~ii~)}~~;~'ni;~~~::;:s" '~~-f!if, ~'t"flC~'" ~~t}~fMr(~rffi1fj.~Jf1:ifiNi\iffi1feff ii{i3~btz~' Level '. -~R'-:i!:1e";"S~"~~1"5~ '-C .i~!~I""''ilr 1;. ,.u, ~'_ ._...,l.",'.,."\.~_,~", ~_,~;:. , ' "T _or. """F~~' ~.f~~,,' .-,;>...;.~"",... ' K~~~~"JI~, ..,.~",~'Mif~..li ~~ ~l1.;,;r;:?i'(l.:,l..,:.i ........:~'!>~>f1''' ,,,v~X::-',,,l,' " J;, 'F'./ff, ~,~ II" W-J "t~"-', ~. <l .-:-...._.lfr;' .~" i;t" ~''i'~' .. }.~~;-:'\::Q~~,<.~-;;:;, ~--:.~1.-; ':r:,"':;,.r.~~\~"~'ti/'W"'~":}jJ;<,":,.."," '..... ~.~ A ; ". ~ ~y '" ~ 1';t<< <'1., j~~~{~:~':~~~~~:';f~;}%~:.~(f~~r~~ ' ~ &~~t~: '''l . ,v_~~~ ~ "I .~~ ' iif.~~/~.Jfl.;. !~';~""S"<CII"'t""M<:'E"R"'~>I.i:'E"M;f.;;E":[?';' $1 500 '&$''''i'''9'''''1'9.'.''''-I'' :~t~m,;~,\r~~~~~il;~<;;~ r ~r, ' " .. ,,;'i'f. ~:,l';; .~., ;:;~'''~J1i,iIi)'." .'. "~<",iri.' ,-, ~,;;;~. ';'"....-<.;.... ~ ..,.' -., ....._,<.. I 6':-1I,J;i1 C',.A "v" :':'''J:~~t~;fu,~ N ',~ ~t~'f'''';'!>: Wtr,,_" <1'_)' ",;;'I.\~;;?';"~;W .,,f_-;M\..~~->,,,,<;,i -t ,rrl"~~~~~ki ,~~M'#if~~.f;'.,y.:l""~~ ;::~~.h \;,.w;~~, >t>''\''~ ~:,,!',~~2~':\'f.~ \' Sl~.~~~ ".,." ,~~~.;;'*' ~' !i '?it"!,' ~"~f~'. ~~~1~/I. '1fi.,.,r~,,, ;~;,,:';:~:rwofconiplinientary conference regi~1i I I'; ac1(a:ges'$~!.~!""~t ~~~1I~1~~'&~*~ ~~%_-l> ~f~ :~'"~:~' ;,.' ';'''. . ,.~_,%<rw't7~ :~''':'}f,;;,,,,,\..;,,>.t~~?!I1''lW,:::~-4;~~l1\f;J'fi!)'("~~~;::1l~t~\:;f~'~Y< ~,~i,-:,:,,~~ll of the benefits mcluded III Br(}fli2:e.[,'eY~ " ;', It(jlt,~.:(~ ;;;~j"fiJc<,:~""'Zr"!"\""~"'t~"::X'';", o::~,<~fJ ~s ~4J'( ".., ~r.<' ,,"" t. 0 "'t :i.:~;;"'? ~~ tiJ,'\'i~.\"':t'i-:,t".;:'rn ~_'~i~\lf.J."l)_''''.J,''f.''' -.;5""~"-'<(''-'''.-r..L~ ('t' :~'~"'~~';},:~!l;',J'" '1.;,' ...:..4: ';.~_")i(fio:~~:,?,,,,~2 'iE',':';'<~.." =' 1.:.r~::.v~'l"1;',s, '.;{":'1r,;::;:,~~d\'~~:..."..: ,,~t .?t.~2:r,~~,~;{~X~'" 'g ~ -.,~~..:....~' "''''," "'iA,,>,,~,~,'''''~tih'J>'5" r{"'~ ""-~-""hl,~:J::Ii"'"""":"::!""'^~."~~' '", ~ '';>-;'.1'''''-'';> I ~_'-;:'-\i i ..~\; ;..;;.. ,...}~' . 1;;' ,,{(l' ,..,.p~ '~~...:' -.:,::;-?i-'!., ,;j,t~_l}"'~i:: ~"':'I.<f ";) ;,; ,~;,ii:'-....\I~:it 16:, ;;'1."1./ r ~,p:' \:-/ .\.~: ':,.."fJ~ '.. ~\ '".Y; l~ ',.,'-~..,.\ <" i1<;;.,' ~ '~".~,-:;;f. iY~-I" {~I".E,,:'V1':.{flJ.'I..f':\1~\' 57->&~ .~bi1:(h~~f "";'i :;,;,j.~4i, ;;,,/;:, 'L' ~...;<.).:.>ltit ."',~". ,~ ~~, ". \~ "' ; 'f, .<- I'f;t$~' ~, 'Oli W !C'~'~".l'$~"~'ttf'f'P~'I~<; . \i<"';.,'''';;,:,~:tif!}t.,,.lc-~. "j,-, ..,O:>~:~""~', ,~~~,,~ ~.'\ 't1:'-..':/< ',", BRONZE LEVEIl->- 3 0 ":.:.<: T/?l-99!"~;~',;?-~,~:\",\.',~a;",::"'f",Y'i"N'\ ~t; ~~ ~;:~c' ~-,N~ '~.i,:,'~~~~, ~ :' ~l, -\~~~!\,~ ~'f}~:~:~i~ ~{~:t;~ ?~~i:~~:~~~y '?,f:i~:~~~f~'~~'S~~ :':""~;~ .:', ~: ,Acknowledgement inACWA N:ews;"1'iliic;liis:read by morethaii,'5,590,wateOeaders-.:~ ", '.: Company logo displ~y~d(;ri~:P6i-'erPoiD'tpresenclitI6kdu.dItgACWA'sSpriiig&:';::;;:;]' : Li:t~g ~~:~:~:~:;ce'~r~J~:rJl:~~:~~~~~~~t~~ :J~f;r~nc~;",',::?7"~(',:::: .~:{:~...:::. . Representatives from sponsoring 60mpanies who attend ACVVA comerences will .'.., be identified iLsa sponsor on ~is!hermime badge'" ., . ;,"~~i~I~~ft,~;] [ ....-".~ ",..'.'''.....Pk +C' ~'" :.:~&~Ii~ti<;v.~%~f7;~;"" '~~ ~i-u" ~ ~~~~~~. ~ - Ad.ob~ Illust;'ator .~i o,r.ejJs ,file'. , ' :<:",: :~".'::~ '~: }:.': ."<{ "'~~~'i Ad'b'lA 'b" 't df --r, ,"~'. " ;;, .", '"~',,, ~,' 'd' ',.".l:'$;'" - 0 e ~ CJO a.p v,,' <, ,/1. ~ . ' ,.r<. .v' '-;. -:: ,i~,' !.(, ,,',;; )~>~{\; ... j_., 0"> ~ - . ",':." I ',", . '~'i\v.,,~". '-~'~~'-.' ',;,;%\- NOTE: When sendlIig vector files, please convert all fqnts to .outlines, and":'~i':". "',:,~"".J - lIicludeall images and fonts used't~tii.l! .. .......... .',i, ,,' .'. . ",~ti~~ ""'MEDIA. '.' .... <J1if' ," :' ': ..... ,....'..',' :." . ," :,.... "\:'~':?if> -E-Mail: Sendfilestolorid@acwanei.com .' ..... .,~~{: . 3 S'.'ft" . 'd'" k .' . . " '\. ....;:l\:1fi~:; - . . oppy IS S '" .'. ' ',':~':.j}" " - CD-ROM ",:.!fi. - ZIP diSkS)~f!~" c> Please include the following with your submitted art~J~f . . .'-. - The name and version of the programs used. - All fonts and links ifusing PageMaker. _ If sending a disk or CD, include a hard copy print of the art. '!d~ /"1.-;;;:.. -<" "<{!' ~<"' '. .'" . ._ 4"" ~ ' . '. . .~ . , . AMENDMENT NO.2 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INe. SEVEN OAKS DAM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS East Valley Water District (District) and Camp Dresser & McKee mc, (CDM) entered into an Agreement dated January 31, 2005 (Agreement No. 2005,01) for professional engineering services in connection with services to report on the long and short term treatability effect of the Santa Ana water discharged from the Seven Oaks Dam on the District's Plant 134. This Agreement was executed in the amount of $20,000. Amendment No.1 to this agreement dated June 17,2005 added the Plant 134 Treatability, Upgrade and Expansion Study to the original scope of work. The contract value was in(Teased by $97,600 to a revised total contract value of $117,600. The District desires to have all work associated with the Seven Oaks Dam Santa Ana River water quality impacts in one agreement. Amendment No, 2 includes the evaluation of the water quality impacts of the Seven Oaks Dam relative to the Santa Ana River Watershed Association Group and preparing a briefing report to present their collective position on the problem and recommended improvements or approiilches to help mitigate the adverse impacts, It also deletes the Plant 134 Treatability, Upgrade and Expansion Study and incorporates this study into a separate new agreement No. 2005,19 with a contract value of $97,600. The contract value for Amendment No.2 will increase by $145,323 to a revised total contract value of $165,323. Accordingly, the above parties hereby agree that the following provisions of the original Agreement shall be modified as follows: 1. Agreement Convenants Number 23 Notice- notices to ENGINEER should be addressed to Richard Comeille, P .E. 2. Exhibit A- Scope of Work- The scope of work to be conducted under this exhibit shall be modified as shown in Exhibit A-I attached hereto. 3. Exhibi: B- Payment Schedule- The payment schedule is modified as shown in Exhibit E-l attached hereto including a fee summary table and schedule of hourly rates. 4. Exhibit C- Schedule- The schedule is modified as shown in Exhibit C-l attached hereto, C:\Documents and Settings\comeillerw\My Documents\EVWD\SOD Agreement AMENDMENT 2 9.13-05 (rev l).doc 1 . All other conditions of the contract shall remain the same as set forth in the Agreement between the District and ENGINEER dated January 31, 2005 for consulting services for the Plant 134 Treatability Study of Seven Oaks Dam Discharges. EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAMP DRESSER & McKEE !Ne. By: By: ~J~ ~R-(it Rober: Martin Richard W. Comeille, P,E. General Manager Vice President Date: Date: V.?-o / oS" ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A-1 Scope of Work Exhibit B-1 Payment Schedule Exhibit C-1 Schedule' C:\Documents and ;enings\comeillerw\My Documents\EVWD\SOD Agreement AMENDMENT 2 9-13.05 (rev I).doc 2 EXHIBIT A-I Study of Seven Oaks Dam Water Impacts Scope of Work: The following is a scope of work to provide an evaluation of the water impacts associated with the new Seven Oaks Dam relative to the Upper Santa Anna River Watershed Association Task Group charged with evaluating this issue and preparing a briefing report to present their collective position on the problem and recommended improyement or approaches to help mitigate the adverse impacts. Task 1 - Project Management: Specific project management tasks include daily informal staff interaction to maintain commlmication within the project team, communication and coordination with the District, attendance at SOD Water Task Group Meetings (up to 5 meetings assumed), and preparation and review of project invoices. Task 2,A -Data Collection - Background: This task involves reviewing background information provided by the Task Group members to assist in developing background write-ups on the Task Group Agencies and to help define the problem situation requiring rectification by the Army Corps of EnginE,ers as a result of the Seven Oaks Dam impacts on the Santa Ana River. Section 2 of the attached report outline identifies the background information to be developed. The data to be collected and reviewed will pertain to describing the Task Group Agencies, the Seven Oaks Dam, the historical water quality and Current water quality impacts, historical flows and flow impacts, and the quantity of SAR water allocated to the Task Group Agencies. Figures will be developed to compliment the background presentation in the report. Howe'1er, CDM will only be responsible for developing schematic type figures. Costs associated with GIS based figures development are not included with the exception of minor coordination and direction activities by CDM. These figures are assumed to be develcped and provided using the Task Group Agencies staff and resources. Task 2,B -Alternatives Development and Evaluation: This t,sk involves developing general descriptions and approaches for altematives to mitigate the impacts of the Seven Oaks Dam relative to water quality and flows. The Task Group objective is to for the Army Corps to supply SAR water that is no worse than historic water quality, The impact of the Seven Oaks Dam relative to flows will be reviewed relative to documentation already developed and will be surrunarized in the report. The alternatives to be developed for plarming level purposes are listed in Section 3 of the attached report outline. Conceptual level layouts and plarming level costin:s will be developed for alternatives evaluation. Detailed, site specific features will not be included as those are more appropriate for more detailed follow-up studies. A recommended alternative or grouping of alternatives will be developed in conjunction with the Task Group, Recommendations for improvements that can be imple:nented in the short term will also be provided. The assumption is that these COM 1-1 c.\Oo..........nts and Seltir>gs\com.ilervM1y DoclJlTl.IlII'.EVWO\SOD wa Seepe ~t>,bils A.c ll.S.05.doc will all be planning level recommendations and will require further confirmation and development in follow-up studies not included in this Scope. Task 2,C - Letter Report: A letter report will be prepared per the attached outline. A draft will be developed and provided to the Task Group agencies for review. Comments will be addressed in a group meeting and those for which there is a consensus will be addressed in the report. It is anticipated that the letter report will be between 20 to 40 pages in length including figures and appendices. Figures will be developed to compliment the backgrc'und presentation in the report. However, CDM will only be responsible for developing schematic type figures. Costs associated with GIS based figures development are not included with the exception of minor coordination and direction activitiES by CDM. These figures are assumed to be developed and provided using the Task Group Agencies staff and resources. Task 3 -- Quality Management: This task includes a quality technical review and project closeout activities. COM 1-2 C-\Ooclnlenls Ind Set1ings\colNill.,wMy ()gCl.menls'EVWO\.SOO '0'10 Scope E;.hib,!s A-C &-5-05 doc . SEVEN OAKS DAM WATER IMPACTS Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 2,0 Background 2. I Seven Dab Dam 2,2 Upper Santi Ana River Water Users 2.3 Historical Water Quality 2.4 Historical Flows 2.5 Water Quality Impacts due to SOD (including regulatory issues) 2.6 Flow Impac ts due to SOD 3,0 Alternatives for Mitigating SOD Water Impacts 3,] General 3,2 Treatment Approaches 3,2,1 Centralized Pre-Treatment 3,2.2 Centralized Potable Treatment 3,2.3 De-Centralized Water Treatment 3.2.4 In-Reservoir Treatment 3.3 Diversion Approaches 3,3.1 Harden SCE FacilitieslNew Upstream Diversion 3.4 Operational Approaches 3.4,} Modify the Seven Oaks Dam Control Manual 3,5 Alternatives Evaluation 4.0 DiscussionJReccmmendalions 4,} Recommended Alternative 4.2 Recommended Implementation Schedule 4,3 Recommended Shon-Term Improvements List of Figures 1-1. Location Map 1-2. SAR W atef! hed 2-1. Seven Oaks Dam 2-2, Upper Santa Ana River Water Users 2-3. Direct Delivery - EVWD, City of Redlands 2-4, Groundwater Recharge - SBVWCD 2-5, Conservatio 1 -SBVMWD 2-6, Historical Water Quality Chart 1 2-7, Historical Water Quality Chart 2 2-8. Historical Flows Chart I 2.9, Historical Flows Chart 2 2-lO. S0D Impacted Water Quality Chart I 2-11. SOD Impacted Water Quality Chart 2 3-1. Centralized :?re- Treatment Process Flow Diagram 3-2. Centralized :Potable-Treatment Process Flow Diagram 3-3. De-CentraJb:ed Potable-Treatment Process Flow Diagram 3-4. In-Reservoir Treatment Process Flow Diagram 3-5. Upstream D;version Process Flow Diagram 3-6. Seven Oaks Dam Figure (to help explain operational control mods?) 3-7. Alternative Locations for Centralized Pretreatment 3-8, Alternative Locations for Centralized Potahle-treatment 3-9, Location for Upstream Diversion 3-10, Combined Alternatives?? 4-1. Recommended Alternative EXHIBIT B-1 PAYMENT SCHEDULE See Fee Summary and Schedule of Hourly Rates attached. COM 1-3 C;\Oaeumenl' .reI S.llingl\cOmtill........My Dcx:vmlnll\E'IWO'SOD we Seep. e..hIbi" A-C !.5-OS dOl: ~ i~~ ~~~~~ !~~I~ ~~I~ !~~ ~ . o~~ ~~m~ om~~= .=~~ ~~~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~-_...... ~ .. WW~ __KKK WWK"K "KKK MMK _ ! ~ ' , C~ MM" MMMMM MM" M MMMK ft" M ~-~ :ll~-2~ G_~~~ N2X~ 8~- ~ . ~E~ ~~g8o ~~~~m S~NM .W~ S ~*t ~- . --~ =N__~ ~ _ C' '" MM_ _MMMK ft" M ft" M MM_ M 2~~ .~ ~m ~-~~~ ~re.~ a~~ 0 ~D: ~~~ ~ ~~ g~m~~ ~_~~ :~~ ~ ~~M ==~ ~~~== ~==! ~~~= ~~- ~ 0., ".1 MM" MMMM" MMMM" MMMM MM" _ ~ ..JC":2 co ~ci~ gm~ ~m~~~ ~~_.~ =~~~ .O~ m g~~ _~. ~~_~~ W_m=_ _~_~ WM_ ~ ~22 i~~09. ogi~~ ~gRg ~~~ 0 ~ .,Mw ...~~ ~~NN. ~~ ~ ~_~ S ~JJ" ....:..: ...... ,.: -aJ ~ M MM" _ MM" MMMMM MMM" MM" M . ~ ~~ ~m. .==~.. maWMm ~N_N ONm 0 II) :.. N... N ... N .... .- 1; ~ ~ Q ~ ~ m~2~~ S ~ 0 .E ",:: S'~'M ,..tot:'j~_ 00,.2., ~ - 5 ... =N_ N m ~ ~.~.. ~ & M MMK MMMM" MMMM" MMM" MMK . Cl /; .si;: ~ ClOO =o~Ot;'l If;gj~..,~ ,..00,.. ClOO ~ ~"" ~~ s :~~XX G~~NG ~~~~ G ~ ~ tn.:;) ~..... -tlZlco1did,. ~~iti.8~ l\f.~m ~ 'N "l ti0d; ~~... "" C"l..... IIH.l....."'.... N_ :;: ~~E ~ ........... .,................. ................ ............ ......... ... - "" - ~ ,Q::;" ili E~W f C100 j:!fD~~~ :;;pj~~~ ~~C"l0l fIION ! l!ffi .l.! l/J i'l ~~~~2 ,,~~~O ill"o" 0 0 ~ cqW ~.....,. l~.....~. ~~"I."'~ ~;;;ia ~.~ =l O u. .a.... a_~.....~ ..'<tC"lN.. "N .... GO ~~ ~ ~ N ~ ~... .......... .............. .............. ............... ........... .,.. ell ili _ ~ C100 ~N_=fD ~N..m..... M~~N NON ~ o ~ ""_M__ .....MN_C"l M_ .... N ~. >. '"< ~ ~ ~ B~~ B~~~~ m~~~~ !~~~ m~~ ~ o .a... ~""'M ~"'''''''''N ~"'MM ~N.... N ..~ ........ .. ! .......... .,............. ................. ............... ....... ... oJ; ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ R~c~ c..'" ~ 2 8~~ 00022 ~~088 220 ~o 0 ~ - ~~.. ~~~~~ ~~~.....~ ~....~ ~~, ~ ~.a... ~"'M M_ N..... .. ell ~~ - ~ .,.. .......... ................ .................. ... ....... .......... ... ~ ~~ ~~~ ~MMMM ~fDC"l_~ ~C"l....M ~~o ~ · 1 J i j" d!l~ ~ ~ ~.. l~ j~h~1 h~ o ~ ~...:> a: 0: _ = i~% ~~ ~ w~&i~ ~~i~ ~J ~ t~~ 'ta 'a >_<~<!l ~OOi.i: ==1 ~'3& ~o.il8 ~~.~~~ ~!!~~ ~~B io~ ~ag~j ~S~eE t~~~ ~~<!l ~ ~: ~ ~ 2l.~ 1i ~ ~ ~ ill S! Ii: a>:g ~ ~ 5: ~ ~ ;:;t[J!; Uf./l<~u.. llIt-cc5'<i: ~c..<cc.. ..;;I-U lI'l f" - ~ ;..... ~ ~ a.. ~ ~ 0: <3 : .... ~ ~ ~ C"l .. . Exhibit B-1 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. SCHEDULE OF HOURL Y RA TES EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT January 1, 2005 Categories Hourly Rate Engineers/Scientists/Planners: Grade 1 $ 90.00 Grade 2 100.00 Grade 3 115.00 Grade 4 125.00 Grade 5 135,00 Grade 6 145.00 Grade 7 155.00 Principal 165.00 Associate 180.00 Vice President 190.00 Sr. Vice President 200.00 Support Service: Designer Drafter 1 55.00 Designer Drafter 2 .65,00 Designer Drafter 3 75.00 Designer Drafter 4 80.00 Designer Drafter 5 85,00 Designer Drafter 6 95.00 Designer Drafter 7 110.00 Designer Drafter 8 120.00 Administrative Manager 85.00 Administrative Assistant/Word Processor 70,00 Office Clerk 50.00 Financial Manager 100.00 Contract Administrator 85,00 Finance Assistant 55.00 Miscellaneous Expenses; Auto Mileage Current IRS Rate Computer Time - PC 4,OO/Hour Computer Time - AutoCAD 12.00/Hour Reproduction Services Black and White Copies $O,10/Page Color Copies $1.00/Page Outside Services Cost + 10% Materials and Other Expenses Cost + 10% c, \OccUltlents .nd Settjn9s\corneiller...\l~ Documl!nt.S\EVl'lD\E~1D !U\.'::'ES 2005.doc . EXHIBIT C-l SCHEDULE The Se...en Oaks Dam Water Impacts letter report will be completed by November 18, 2005. COM 1-4 C:\Ooeumeols Incl S_W"'iS\I;Q,nc,llel'Vl\M'/ Oe<:.......nl'IEVWO\SOD we Scope &.h,boll A.C 5.S.05.do~ ...I ~ ~COCOl!)~;g~reoooo co '" ~ .,-mcoC'JT"""T"""T"""'T""" co ~ 0 ~ tIl "'.v..-.,...r--.co,....,'" '" ~ ~ <t - w=:: ...10 ~o...l OJ:LL C ~Zll: - W <C> ;:;;0 w a:O ~w~ "'~ '" i'- cn:i:Q. ~ -w tIl~ tIl I- a:~ 01- -w _L1J::; a:W e!i<l: C\l"-C":)"-T""" ~ 0> I-:I: !Qcn :i:g 0:11:: 0 a: a: WO Z.ll: ~::Lrl ~3Ew 0 CO!;;: ::cn8 ...I=:: >a:(\I LL W::l ~tIl .JO .J:I: ~>~ f.........cn(Q-..;tCO(o~ i'- ~ffi "'a: <I: It) - W W...I I-l:i: tIl ~<{ ZUl ~-~ ~;ecocn~~~......CO It) UJ 1t)<C<I: -:;;;w CO ...I ll: ~OW '~LnCOCOcx)CO"'d"1.O <t ::!.Z!;;: U"l 3: Otll Zll: c;-S2w q-O'.l(j)"""NC")I.O~ 0> -<c1- <t WW ...I:;; ::tW=:: <t ",ll:0 '" T"""'T"""'('I')I.OC\J _::1...1 ~ tIl Ul ~W_ t'oIll:J: '" '" <t -Q. ~ZLL '" <ca:LL ~"""CO~~~~f'.. 0 ~::IO ~ -I- Z U"l ~ll:Z ('l"),...ol.()C"')L!)O')m C~O ",,"1.{)--r~1.OC?([)"'" ~ I- <t :r ...I I- W>- I- ~ Z Z<Il~a:~Z...I(')o..G>U 0 <(Lll 0.. :J:J:JUJ OUJ 0 :;; ...,LL::<<(::<...,...,<((f)OZO f- It) 0 '<tCO..-C'lC'lO..- C\l 0 ..- CII .., 0 ..- 1:':' C'l C\l '<t ..- C'l C'l C\l C'l to- '<t <0 0 C'l CII l- e? 0 0 C'lC>'<tC\ll!ll!l..-C'lC\l0C'll!l C'l a: 0 C'l C\/ 1-)- ClJa: B< a::!: w:!: I- ::l . ic(CIJ:g C\/ 3::~o g ..- T- 0, C'l N. ..- C\l 0 0 C'l to '<t C') )- < N. C\/ N WW ..J..J ..JZ <- >< I-:!: CIJ .,.. < 0 ....... -r- C\J CO ....... "\t CO 10 'r" .,- T""" LO CO W 0 <t C\/ g ..- I') CO '<t ..- CO CO N l!l C') C\/ l!l 0 0 l!l C\/ Ol Ol '<t ':n <0 ..- '<t l!l '<t OJ <0 C\/ l!l C\/ <0 Ol l!l .,.. a: >- wa:ffiffi ~ )-a: I-rowroro a:<(I (j)~ro~~ ~ J: <(::JO--l ::JWOww --l L() I- ~ Z ~ ffi a: a: >- ~ ~ c:di:: f- > 0 0 <(w<(a. <(::J::J::JwOOw 0 :E -,LL~<(~-,-,<(j)OZO f- It) 0 LO(')CDM..-C\Io:r..- LO 0 C\I N o:r 0 ..- I:\! 0 CO M ..- CD LO OJ LO ~ CD CD 0 LO N I- M 0 C\I:\lMC\lC\lo:r.....CDMo:rLOC\I C\I 0 0 o:r a: N I- >- en:: 0: OW <I: 0:1-:: Wen:: 1->-;:) N <l:enenLO 0 M~C\ICDMCDOJo:r.....C\IC\1o:r OJ ~a~8 0 o:r . Z <I: N N ~:3w -I::r::-I -IGZ <I:-<i: >::r:::: Ii; ..- 0 o:r..-o:ro:rM.....C\JCOC\JLO..-C\J M <I: 0 o:r W N 0 0 OO..-OOMC\Jo:rLOCDMC\J CD 0 C\J N en en C\J-r-C\lOOO-r-,..-C\JC\l(Y')Ct') ..... en ..- ... 0: >- W 0:0: S >-0: coO:WW ~ <( I-:i: WCO co ~ ::r:: ~::>I CJ)wCO:i::i: -I L!) I- ::>O:O:::! W>-::>I-OWW ~ z Z coO: O:>-Z...JC9Q..I->O 0 <(W<(Q..<(::>::>::>wOOW 0 :a -,u..:i:<(:i:-,-,<(CJ)OZ0 I- X I- Za:o octO ::i:W"" OC')COI'-I'-~vco C\J ......1->->< O"lL!lOlOlL!lOlv~ V f:!:!.zIX"': ,~ovOlcci .(') ~ wOG' LOC\lC\lNC\I.C\J. v I I I I , a:i'2~ a:D..~ :) 0 X I-(J) ZZO O~~ C\JC')OC')LI')C')O<D I'- ::i:::i:X ......1- LOLC?-:LO~r-O>-.::t C') I- B-Za:"7 . <0..- . C\J .0 . r-: (,) W~""" U;>"-C\I~,....9-r-~ C') ii:z a: lD " , . 1-0 a:>-~ (J)- :)It) -I- 0 CD.. a::E W:) a:Z ~ ~ ltl, ~e 3:08 C') >-D.. Ol~C')C\JOC')C')C\JLI')ov~ >- (,) C\J ...... ::i: COOl<DvI'-OO~<DOCOI'- Ol' W C Q. a::) C\JC\J~COovI'-LI')<DC\JC')LI') 0 C') ..JW O(J) ,.-..-,-..-C\JC\lNNC\lC\l..-..- C\J ..Ja: -z ctw a:o >1- D..(,) I-W (J):E <l: Z W ct a:W C\J ...... ct::i: Ll')vLl')COC')C\JI'-COI'-COvCO cci ED WCl v~<Dv<DOlOl<DOC')Ol<D Ol ~ >-z vC\J~v<D~vvLl')OLl')C') LI') It) > T"""T"""..-,-..-C\lC\lC\JC\lC\l,-..- ~ C\J 0 ::i: X I-Z ZO 0- ::i:li: Ll')C')OlC\JCOOlOlC\J I'- Ci' I-::i: C\J <D~~COLl')CO<DC') LI') ~ Z:) C')OOlC')v~l'-v C') W(J) .,......- ..-..-C\JC\JC\J ~ a:z a:o :)(,) 0 a: >- LU a:a: >-a: roa:LULU a:ct I-::a;LUroro X <e::>I (J)LUro::a;::a; ...J I- ::>o:o...J LU>-::>I-OLULU <e Z zroa:a:>-z...JCDo..l->o I- 0 <eLU<(o..<(::>::>::>LUOOLU 0 ::i: .....,LL::a;<e::a;.....,.....,<((J)ozo I- III IOC':lOJC\lCOOJOJC\I r-- C\I 0 COT""",-COLOCO<OM 10 0 C':lOOJC':l-.t~r---.t C':l N .,-,- T""",-C\JC\J:C\J ~ o:r OJ~C':lC\lOC':lC':lC\lLOO-.t~ C':l OJ 0 COOltO-.tr--OO~tOOCOr-- 0 0 C\IC\1~COO-.tr--LOtOC\lC':lLO C':l N '-"-'-T"""C\lC\lC\JC\JC\lC\1,-,- C\I >- .....0: 0<C -.tC\~C\IC\10LOr---.tIOr--C\1 ~ -::ii: M CO O:::ii: 0 -.t C':' 10 r-- OJ OJ C':l C\I r-- C\I 10 CO 0 ~ .....~ o:r C\I OJ C\I C':l 0 C\I r-- LO ~ CO C\I ~ !Qcn N '-'-' T"""T"""C\JC\IC\IC\lC\lT"""T""" C\I Cz 0:0 w- !;ili:1O ~ 3:::ii:0 N co "", C':l C\I r-- 10 LO to 0 0 0 CO 10 ~C 0 to "", C\I C\I 10 C\I to OJ .0 10 -.t C\I' >-cnC\l 0 C':l C\I-.t -.t to,O to C\I C':l OJ-.t C':l ~. N T""" T'"' T""" T""" T""" C\I C\J C\J C\I T""" T""" T""" ~ Wz C\I ...10 ...10 ~C .....W cnO: ... C':l 0:1 10 -.t C\I C':l to C':l OJ CO LO C':l OJ <cW 0 ocnr--tOr--C':l~-.t-.tlOtOr-- -.t Wtii 0 IOCIOC\ltO~o:r-.t-.tOr--C\1 ~ ~ N T"""r.T"""T'""T"""C\lC\lC\lC\JC\I,-,.... C\I ::ii: 0 o Cl C\I CO to CO LO C\I to r-- 10 CO r-- 0 C\I ,..., ~ C':l C\I 0 to to -.t LO C\I CO ~ 0 to ... C\I -.t 10 C':l -.t C':l 10 CO 10 C':l -.t ~ N T"""T'"-T""",-,....C\lC\lC\lC\JT"""T"""T'"" C\I en OJ a) to ~ 10 0 OJ LO r-- CO ~ OJ CO r-- en C\I 0) C':l ~ 0 C':l CO to -.t 0 0 LO 10 en 10 C) C\I C':l C\I to C\I C':l C':l ... CO to 0 ... T""" T'~ T""" T'"" T""" T""" C\I C\I C\l C\I T""" ,- C\I a: >_ W a: a: >- O. lD a: W W a:<C I-:2WlDlD J: <c-)I (f)WlD:2:2 -l I- =:lC.O-l W>-::>1-0WW ~ Z z c5 a: a: >- Z -l 0 0... I- > 0 0 <CU<Co...<c::>::>::>wOOW 0 ::a; -, L_ :2 <c :2 -, -, <c (f) 0 Z 0 I- Kiwanis Club of Highland, Ine ~ PO Box 1066 "_ __ Highland CA 92346 L,i0ltliw::o Ed Morden, President 2004-~ 16 2005 .'..tV"lf^y 1;'--' D' . ... H..ll)) rii::ler i':j'~';f't lJ~i 1\,/. 2004-2005 OffICers September 14, 2005 Ed Morden, President Linda Brook, Pres, Elect On behalf of the Kiwanis Club of Highland, Inc. I would like to thank you for Paul Scott, Vice Pres Darticipating in our first Car and Motorcycle Show held last weekend in Jerry Patterson, Treasurer Sue Hulse, Secretary conjunction with the Highland Area Chamber of Commerce Discover Highland Night. Board of Directors Penny Lilburn The turnout far exceeded our expectations, and your involvement really made Harriet Foucher Heck Thomas the entire evening a great success, In addition, this activity will allow our club to Arlene Johnson make a major donation to the Kiwanis International Foundations' Relief Fund to Marshand Noriega directly benefit those impacted by Hurricane Katrina. For this, we appreciate Hazel George your generosity! Sponsored Youth Pacific HS Key Club Although our main service is to the children of the world, this event proved to us Warm Springs Ele K-Kids that there is no age limit to being a child. Thank you for sharing your hobby and passions not only with our club members, but with the city of Highland! Please feel free to drop us a line with your comments and/or concerns on how the evening went for you. We hope to possibly make this an annual event, and your input is welcome, And, we hope you will consider being a part of it! Again, thank you for your involvement. Sincerely, ~ 4LiL ' V? ,/ , Sue Hulse, Secretary CeiebraJuorvg;J 1/J JF?iaJrs of Se/ivoce to the Commlmir!jr Benefit Golf Tournament ~1.GHL~ G ~ ~ Q Coming together to celebrate and support ~ ~ Highland's continued growth! ~ 0 October 20" 2005 ~ ~ :l(!J(!J{j San Bernardino Golf Club $75.00 per person / $300.00 per foursome The following sponsorship Toumament Registration Includes: Opportunities are available to you. Please let us know which ones 4-Person Scramble Play, 18 Holes of Golf and Cart you would like Goodie Bag at Check In and Awards Dinner to take advantage of.. .. .- Toumamerit Schedule Check-In Begins at 11:15am Gold Suonsor - $500 Foursome - Tee Sign Free Range Balls Banner on Course from 11:30am-12:30pm Recoguition on Program Putting Contest Recognition at Awards Dinner at 12:00pm Contest Soonsor - $300 Shotgun Start (lncludu Putting Conr-It Longrst DrivI at 12:30pm and Cltn,st to th. Pin) Twosome - Contest Tee Sign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . Recognition on Program 0 ~: Recognition at Awards Dinner o 4-Person Scramble GOLF REGISTRATION 0 0 0 Tee Sitm Soonsor - $125 o Name: 0 Tee Sign 0 0 0 0 Recognition on Program o Company: PIL 0 Recognition at Awards Dinner 0 0 0 . o Address: City, Zip, . Hole-in-One Soonsor 0 . Tee Sign . . o Player 1: Shirt Size_ Ph, . Recognition on Program 0 . Recognition at Awards Dinner 0 . o Player 2: Shirt Size_ Ph. 0 0 . Door. Rarne or Auction Prize 0 Shirt Size_ Ph, 0 Recognition on Program o Player 3: . . . Recognition at Awards Dinner . Player 4: Shirt Size_ Ph. . . . Product Soonsor (Otv 144) . 0 . Total Enclosed $ . Recognition on Program . . Recognition at Awards Dinner . Make check payable to: Highland Area Chamber of Commerce . . Mail with entry form to P.o. Box 455, Highland Ca. 92346 . For more information . . . The H:ghland Chamber is a non7Jrofit orgalJizaffon. . . A POrtiOIl ofyollr golff..s are tax deductible. Tax J.D. # 33-047-0J17 . 864-4073 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Please hdp us continue to be Highland's Information Center along with supporting our efforts in supporting our Business Community!