HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 06/13/2006
,r\ni'D East Valley
''It::.' " Water District
365'~ HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE #12, HIGHLAND, CA
REGULAR BOARD MEETING . june 13,2006
2:00 P.M.
AGENDA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"In order to comply with legal requirements for posting of agenda, only those items filed with the
Dis1rict Secretary by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday prior to the following Tuesday meeting not requiring
departmental investigation, will be considered by the Board of Directors".
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
CA~L TO ORDER
PUDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
.......................... --.... -- --........ --.......................................................... -- ---.... --.. --........
1. Public Comments
2. Approval of Agenda
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Approval of Public Outreach Committee Meeting Minutes for May 22, 2006
4. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes for May 23,2006
5. Approval of Development Agreement between East Valley Wf1ar District and Williani Lyon
Homes, Inc., to subdivide and develop certain real property which will consist of one hundred
twenty-one (121) dwelling units located at east of Boulder Avenue, north of 5th Street and west
of Orange Street, identified as Tract No. 17682, in the City of Highland, County of San
Bernardino, State of California
6. Accounts Payable Disbursements: Accounts Payable Checks 206426 through 206677 were
distributed May 18, 2006 through June 7, 2006 in the amount of$I,577,844.92. Payroll Checks
for period ended April 30, 2006 and May 26, 2006 and included checks and direct deposits, in
the amounts of $5,570.85 and $122,394.16. Total Disbursements for the period were
$1,705,809.93
OLD BUSINESS
7. Discussion and Possible action regarding sponsorship levels for the Highland Library &
Environmental Learning Center
8. Discussion and Possible action regarding Addendum to East Valley Water District's Design
Contract with GMID
9. Headquarters Project Review and Update (General Manager)
NEW BUSINESS
10. Discussion and Possible action regarding hosting the Association of the San Bernardino County
Special Districts meeting on December 18,2006
11. Discussion regarding Yucaipa Valley Water District's Water, Sewer and Recycled Water Rate
Analysis Report
12. Discussion and Possible action regarding East Valley Water District's 2006-2007 Budget
13. Discussion and possible action regarding the scheduling of a Public Hearing for consideration
of a water and sewer rate increase
14. Discussion and Possible action regarding official ballot for the Special Districts election for
Regular and Alternate LAFCO Members
15. Discussion and Possible action regarding Croydon Risk Consultants analysis of Alternative
Insurance Proposals for the District's Commercial and Liability Insurance Program
16. Discussion and Possible action regarding the District's participation and sponsorship levels for
the Solar Cup Boat Races at Lake Skinner
17. Review East Valley Water District's Board of Directors' meeting fees and expense allowances
18. Directors' fees and expenses for April 2006
RE,PORTS
19. General Manager I Staff Reports
a. Washington Report
b. Project Summary
20 Consultant Reports
21 , Committee Reports
a. Public Outreach Committee Meeting on May 22, 2006
b. Insurance Committee Meeting on June 5, 2006
22. Oral comments from Board of Directors
O)RRESPONDENCE
2, . Letter of appreciation to Bob Martin from' Wilma Silva regarding the District's Santa Ana River
Tour on May 19,2006
2
MEI:TINGS
24. Association of the San Bernardino County Special Districts Membership Meeting, sponsored by
West Valley Water District, EI Rancho Verde Royal Vista Country Club, Rialto, June 19, 2006
25. San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce "Business After Hours Fiesta Party" hosted by 1 sl
Valley Credit Union, 401 West 2nd Street, San Bernardino, June 22,2006
CLOSED SESSION
26. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
[Government Code Section 54956.8]
Property:
27+/- Acres of Vacant Land South of
Highland Ave, West of Central Ave
San Bernardino County,
California
APN: 1191-25-01,03,04
Party with whom District will negotiate:
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
party who will be negotiating on behalf of the District:
Under Negotiation:
Robert Martin
Price and Terms of Payment
27. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGA TrON
[Initiation oflitigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c)]
One Potential Case
M!NOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
ADJOURN
----------------------------------------------------------------.------
PW'suant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability-related modification or
ac( ommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above-
agmdized public meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Manager at (909) 885-
491 JO at least 24 hours prior to said meeting.
--------------------------------------------------------._-
,
J
Subiect to Approval
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _ .
PUBLIC OUTREACH COMMITTEE MEETING
May 22, 2006
MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 10:02 a.m. by Director Goodin who led the flag salute.
PRESENT:
Directors: Goodin, Lightfoot,
ABSENT:
None
STAFF:
Robert Martin, General Manager; Justine Hendricksen, Administrative
Manager; Eileen Bateman, Executive Assistant
GUEST (S):
None
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
There being no verbal or written comments the public participation section was closed.
DISCUSSION REGARDING SPONSORSHIP LEVELS FOR THE HIGHLAND
.LIBRARY & ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
The Committee discussed the possibility of supporting the Environmental Learning Center
and deferred this item to the next Board meeting for further discussion due to the lack of
representation from the City of Highland.
DISCUSSION REGARDING EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FACILITIES &
EDISON TOURS
The Committee discussed the District's Facility and Edison Tours; that the tours promote
public awareness; that each tour should be held once a year.
Director Goodin stated that he had attended the Solar-Powered Boat Races sponsored by the
Metropolitan Water District, and that High School Students use science to develop solar
powered boats. Each High School Team is sponsored by local organizations. Director Goodin
requested that this item be added to the next Board agenda.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 10:37 a.m. until the next scheduled Meeting
Robert E. Martin, Secretary
Kip E. Sturgeon, Board President
Subiect to soorovsl
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
May 23, 2006
MINUTES
President Sturgeon called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. Director Negrete led the flag
salute.
PRESENT:
Directors: Lightfoot, Negrete, Goodin, Sturgeon, Wilson
ABSENT:
None
STAFF:
Robett Maltin, General Manager; Ron Buchwald, Assistant District
Engineer; Brian Tompkins, Chief Financial Officer; Justine
Hendricksen, Administrative Manager
LEGAL COUNSEL: Steve Kennedy
GUEST(s):
10 McAndrews, Jim Cimino (Cimino Realty), Dennis Barton (City .
of Highland), Mary Chip-Baxter (EVWD), Matt Armitage (EVWD),
Daniel Davis (EVWD)
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Pursuant to Government Code Section, 54954.2(b)(2), the Board determined by a
unanimous decision, and at the request of the General Manager, to add the following
CLOSED SESSION item(s) to the agenda as the need to take immediate action thereon
arose after the agenda was posted:
27. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
[Government Code Section 54956.8]
Property: 15+/- Acres of Vacant Land
APN(s)1192-191-03-0000,
192-191-02-0000
Property Owner with whom the District will negotiate:
NedjatolIah Cohen
Albert S. Cohan
Party who will be negotiating on behalf of the District: Robert E. Martin
Jim Cimino
Under Negotiation:
Price and Terms of Payment
Minutes: OS/24/05
28. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
[Government Code Section 54956.9(a)]
Name of case: Water Rights Application No. 31174 (Santa Ana River) pending before
the State Water Resources Control Board
MlS/C (Wilson-Negrete) that the May 23, 2006 Agenda be approved with the
revisions recommended by the General Manager.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
President Sturgeon declared the public participation section of the meeting open at 2:01
p.m.
The General Manager introduced employees from East Valley Water District; Mary Chip-
Baxter, Matt Armitage and Daniel Davis.
There being no further written or verbal comments, the public participation section was
closed.
APPROVAL OF APRIL 25, 2006 BOARD MEETING MINUTES
MlS/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that the April 25, 2006 Board Meeting Minutes be
approved as submitted.
DIRECTOR NEGRETE ABSTAINED FROM THE VOTE
APPROVAL OF MAY 16, 2006, SPECIAL BOARD MEETING MINUTES
MlS/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that the May 16, 2006 Special Board Meeting Minutes
be approved as submitted.
APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAST VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT AND CF HIGHLAND I, LLC TO SUBDIVIDE AND
DEVELOP CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH WILL CONSIST OF
. .
TWENTY-SIX (26) DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND CHURCH STREET, IDENTIFIED AS
TRACT NO. 17263 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, was presented to the Board for approval.
MlS/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that the Development agreement between East Valley
Water District and CF Highland I, LLC be approved.
RESOLUTION 2006.08 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF
SEWERS ON WATER STREET/VIA DEL DENE, was presented to the Board for
approval.
2
Minutes: OS/24/05
M1S/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that Resolution 2006.08 be approved.
RESOLUTION 2006.09 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ACCEPTING CONVEYANCE OF
PIPELINE EASEMENT FROM TOLL LAND xxn LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FOR TRACT 16914, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF mGHLAND, COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, was presented to the Board for
approval. .
M1S/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that Resolution 2006.09 be approved.
REQUEST FROM THE GENERAL MANAGER FOR BUY-BACK OF
V ACA TION TIME
M1S/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that the request from the General Manager to buy-back
vacation time be approved.
DISBURSEMENTS
M1S/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that General Fund Disbursements #206051 through
206425 distributed during the period of April 25, 2006 through May 17, 2006 in the
amount of $1,581,432.11 and Payroll Fund Disbursements for the period ended April 28,
2006 and May 12, 2006 in the amount of $117;387.09 and $126,610.03 totaling
$1,825,429.23 be approved.
HEADQUARTERS PROJECT REVIEW AND UPDATE
The General Manager requested that his report regarding the Headquarters Project be
deferred at this time.
DISCUSSION AND POSSffiLE ACTION REGARDING AMENDMENT TO THE
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
AGREEMENT.
The General Manager reviewed the Integrated Management Program Demonstration
Project with the Board; that the District entered into the agreement approximately two
years ago; that the agreement deals with groundwater spreading and the recharge basin;
that last year the District extend the agreement for one year; that capturing native water
will improve groundwater levels throughout the basin; that he recommends approval of
the amendment to the Integrated Management Program Demonstration Project.
M1S/C (Negrete-Goodin) that the Amendment to the Integrated Management
Program Demonstration Project Agreement be approved.
3
Minutes: OS/24/05
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE ALIGNMENT
STUDY FOR GREENSPOT ROAD NEAR SEVEN OAKS DAM AND ITS
IMP ACT UPON EXISTING DISTRICT PROPERTY
The General Manager reviewed the alignment study prepared by CDM with the Board;
that the City of Highland had contacted the District regarding their future alignment plans
for Greenspot Road; that staff had met with Mr. Barton regarding the City of Highland's
proposed alignment for Greenspot Road; that a geotechnical evaluation of the property
needs to be performed.
Director Negrete asked if there would be any negative impacts to existing District wells if
the realignment of Greenspot Road moves forward.
The General Manager stated that there would be no impact on the groundwater supply due
to the realignment of Greenspot Road.
Director Lightfoot would like to know what the estimated cost for a geotechnical study for
this project would be.
The General Manager stated the cost could be between 10K-30K.
Mr. Barton stated that the City of Highland is currently performing biological surveys of
the project; that they are presently trapping for the Kangaroo Rat; that they will continue
and move forward with the environmental process as needed.
Director Lightfoot would like to Imow if the City of Highland would pay for a portion of
the geotechnical evaluation.
Mr. Barton stated that the City of Highland would provide the District with the findings
from their environmental reports.
Director Wilson inquired as to the City of Highland's timetable for the project.
MlSI (Goodin-Wilson) that the District initiate a complete geotechnical evaluation
of said property.
Director Goodin amended the motion to included that the geotechnical evaluation not
exceed 25K without Board approval.
MlS/C (Goodin-Wilson) that the' District initiate a complete geotechnical
evaluation of said property and that the geotechnical evaluation not exceed 25K without
prior Board approval.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE DISTRICT'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY OF HIGHLAND'S "4TH OF JULY PARADE" ON
. JULY 4, 2006
4
Minutes: OS/24/05
M1S/C (Negrete-Lightfoot) that the District participate in the City of Highland's
"4th of July Parade" on July 4, 2006.
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE DISTRICT'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY. OF SAN BERNARDINO'S ROUTE 66
RENDEZVOUS ON SEPTEMBER 14-17, 2006
President Sturgeon deferred this item to the Public Outreach Committee.
The Public Outreach Committee will convene on June 13, 2006 at 1 :30 p.m. to discuss the
District's participation in the City of San Bernardino's route 66 Rendezvous, September
14-17,2006.
No action taken.
REVIEW AND ACCEPT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDED
APRIL 30, 2006
M1S/C (Wilson-Lightfoot) that the Financial Statements for the period ended April
30, 2006 be accepted.
2005 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE YEAR
ENDING 2005 .
MlS/C (Negrete-Goodin) that the 2005 Annual Drinking Water Program Report for
the year ending 2005 be accepted.
DIRECTORS' FEES AND EXPENSES FOR APRIL 2006
MlS/C (Lightfoot-Wilson) that the Directors' fees and expenses for Apri12006 be
approved.
GENERAL MANAGER 1 STAFF REPORTS
The General Manager reported on the District's operations to date; the General Manager
commented on the Army Corps of Engineers Appropriation Bill; that the San Bernardino
Search and Rescue Team would like to schedule a photo shoot with the Directors; that the
debate on groundwater recharge is ongoing and that proposed by the Regional Board
regulation has been postponed.
The photo shoot has been scheduled for June 25, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. at the rialto Airport.
Information Only.
CONSULTANTS REPORTS
No reports at this time.
5
Minutes: OS/24/05
COMMIITEE REPORTS
Customer Service Committee:
1) The committee met and reviewed the request from District employees to close
the District offices on July 3, 2006, and use a vacation day to allow for a 4-day
weekend.
Public Outreach Committee:
The Public Outreach Committee met and reviewed the following topics:
1) Levels of support for the Highland Library
2) District Tours
ORAL COMMENTS FROM BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Director Wilson stated that he recently attended the ACW A conference in Monterey.
Director Goodin stated that the Water Resources Institute is currently interviewing
potential candidates for the Director's pqsition.
President Sturgeon offered his gratitude to staff for theit work at this years ACW A
Confl~rence, and the recent District tour; that he recently presented awards to several of
the District's poster contest winners. '
There being no further verbal or written comments from the Directors, this section of the
meeting was closed.
LEITER TO ROBERT E. MARTIN, GENERAL MANAGER OF THE EAST
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FROM RON COATS
LETTER OF APPRECIATION FROM DANIEL MARTINEZ REGARDING
EXCEPTIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE HE RECEIVED FROM MICHAEL
MOORE
LETTER TO THE DISTRICT FROM SUSAN LIEN LONGVILLE REGARDING
THE WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD
BEING PRESENTED TO CONGRESSMAN JERRY LEWIS, NOVEMBER 4, 2006
PRESIDENT STURGEON REQUESTED A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK AT 2:55 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION
The Board entered into Closed Session at 2:59 p.m. as provided for in the California Open
Meeting Law, Government Code Section 54945.9(a), to discuss the items listed on the
Agenda.
6
Minutes: 05/24/05
ADJOURN TO REGULAR SESSION
President Sturgeon declared that the meeting adjourn to regular session.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS
The Board returned to session at 4:02 p.m. The items listed on the Agenda were discussed
in closed session with no reportable action being taken.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 4:02 p.m. until the next regularly scheduled Board Meeting
on June 13,2006.
Kip E. Sturgeon, President
Robert E. Martin, Secretary
7
Minutes: OS/24/05
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
1HIS AGREEMENT is made this /sr dayof Jc.!/J E/ ,2'0':"(, by and between EAST
\'ALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a public agency (hereinafter "the DISTRICT"), and William
Lyon Homes, Inc (hereinafter "the DEVELOPER").
RECITALS
A. The DISTRICT is a County Water District organized and operating pursuant to
California Water Code Section 30000 et seq.
B. The DEVELOPER proposes to subdivide and develop certain real property within
t le boundaries of the DISTRICT which is located at east of Boulder A venue, north of 5th Street
md west of Orange Street, in the City of Highland, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, and is generally identified as Tract No. 17682 (hereinafter "the PROPERTY"). A
copy of the Tentative Tract Map for the" PROPERTY is attached hereto as Exhibit "An and is
incorporated herein by this reference.
C. The development of the PROPERTY will consist of 121 dwelling units, and the
DEVELOPER desires that the DISTRICT provide domestic sewer service to the PROPERTY.
. [be DEVELOPER intends to design and construct the facilities necessary for sewer service to be
furnished to the PROPERTY.
D. The DISTRICT supplies dome.stic sewer service within the area to be served and
,s the public agency empowered by law to provide such services to the PROPERTY.
E. The purpose of this AGREEMENT is to provide the terms and conditions under
which the DEVELOPER will design and construct the facilities necessary for the DISTRICT to
mpply sewer service to the PROPERTY (hereinafter "the PROJECT").
COVENANTS
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding Recitals and the mutual
Covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. DESIGN OF FACILITIES. The DEVELOPER agrees to design the sewer
hcilities for the PROPERTY in the following manner and according to the Rules and
f'.egulations of the DISTRICT:
a. The DISTRICT agrees to provide to the DEVELOPER tentative
sewer plans which conform to the requirements of the DISTRICT.
t. The DEVELOPER agrees to design the sewer facilities for the PROPERTY in
accordance with the DISTRICT'S Standards for Design and Processing of Sewer
Plans. The designs shall be submitted to the DISTRICT in a complete form which
shall provide sufficient information for review and approval by the DISTRICT in
the exercise of its sole discretion.
c. The DISTRICT may request certain changes in the plans, which
DEVELOPER agrees to incorporate into the plans and specifications for the
PROPERTY.
d. The DEVELOPER shall furnish the DISTRICT with any and all
easements necessary for the construction, operation, maintenance, and repair of any
and all sewer facilities to be installed and/or used for the PROJECT. AU easements
shall be submitted to the DISTRICT for review and approval by the DISTRICT in
the exercise of its sole discretion prior to the DISTRICT'S acceptance of any
dedication of the PROJECT facilities under Section 6 of this AGREEMENT.
e. The DEVELOPER shall submit all plans, drawings, specifications,
and contract documents, for all work to be performed pursuant to this
AGREEMENT, to the DISTRICT for review and approval, if acceptable to the
DISTRICT. The DISTRICT- agrees to review all such documents in a timely
manner and, upon inclusion of all changes thereto requested by the DISTRICT in a
manner satisfactory to the DISTRICT, the DISTRICT will provide the
DEVELOPER with authorization to proceed. The DEVELOPER shall not proceed
2
with the construction of the PROJECT and any other sewer facilities for use on the
PROPERTY until the DISTRICT so authorizes.
Section 2. CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES. The DEVELOPER agrees to construct the
I ROJECT and all other sewer facilities necessary for the PROPERTY in the following manner
sllbject to the DISTRICT'S approval:
a.
The DEVELOPER shall obtain all necessary permits from the (city
or county) and all other public or private agencies required for the construction
thereof. The PROJECT and the faciliti~s appurtenant thereto shall be constructed
at a location determined by the DISTRICT, and shall be relocated by the
DISTRICT at the DEVELOPER'S sole expense if such relocation is deemed
necessary by the DISTRICT in its sole discretion. The DEVELOPER hereby
grants the DISTRICT full access to the PROPERTY and all other locations where
the work contemplated herein is to be performed.
b.
All facilities constructed pursuant to this AGREEMENT shall be
in accordance with accepted standards and practices in the industry and in
compliance with all local, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations. The
DEVELOPER shall be responsible for providing all labor, materials, and
equipment necessary to perform the work for the PROJECT, and such work shall
be performed in a timely and workmanlike manner by a party or entity acceptable
to the DISTRICT. All such facilities shall conform to the DISTRICT'S Standard
, .
Specifications for the Furnishing of Materials and the Construction of Sewer
Pipelines. All costs and liabilities in connection with the design and construction
of the PROJECT shall be borne solely by the DEVELOPER.
c.
The DISTRICT shall inspect and approve all work to be performed
under this AGREEMENT. However, any approval by the DISTRICT of such
work, or of the designs, speCifications, reports, ancllor materials furnished
hereunder, is understood to be conceptual approval only and will not operate to
3
relieve the DEVELOPER or its contractors, consultants, or subcontractors of
responsibility for complying with all laws, codes, industry standards, and liability
for damages caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with
industry standards, or their own willful misconduct. Further, neither the
DISTRICT'S review, approval, or acceptance of any of the work or services
performed in connection with this AGREEMENT shall be construed as a waiver of
any rights hereunder or of any defense or cause of action which the DISTRICT
may have arising out of the performance of this AGREEMENT or any previous or
subsequent agreements. The D?VELOPER shall cause the facilities constructed
under this AGREEMENT to be inspected as required by any and all other public or
private agencies.
Section 3. DEVELOPER'S COSTS. In addition to all other obligations imposed upon the
I: EVELOPER under this AGREEMENT', the DEVELOPER shall be responsible for the payment
0: all of the following:
a. The DEVELOPER shall pay to the DISTRICT all, or any portion,
of the applicable connection fees for the PROPERTY at the time of application for
sewer service therefor. The DISTRICT will provide sewer service only to those
specific subdivision lots within the PROPERTY for which payment in full has been
made to the DISTRICT.
b.
The DEVELOPER shall be solely responsible for the payment of
all costs, fees, and expenses associated with the construction, inspection, operation,
maintenance, repair, and relocation of the PROJECT, including all costs, fees, and
expenses incurred for the environmental analysis, engineering, and design of the
PROJECT.
c.
The DEVELOPER shall comply with all rules, regulations,
resolutions, and ordinances of the DISTRICT that are currently in place or may
hereafter be adopted, and shall pay when due any and all fees, deposits, charges,
4
rates, [illes, penalties, taxes, and/or' assessments that may be levied by the
DISTRICT.
d.
The DEVELOPER hereby consents, and waives any objection, to
the exercise of any and all collection remedies that are available to the DISTRICT
under the law upon the PROPERTY and/or the person and/or propelty of
DEVELOPER and its shareholders and partners.
Section 4. SECURITY.
a.
The DEVELOPER shall provide performance, completion, and/or
payment bonds for the PROJECT in the minimum amount of not less than 100
percent of the estimated construction costs containing covenants which are
acceptable to the DISTRICT and the (city or county) .
b.
The DEVELOPER shall provide a maintenance bond for the
PROJECT in the amount of 100 percent of the construction cost,' which shall
contain covenants which are' satisfactory to the' DISTRICT. Such bond shall
,
remain in force for at least twelve (12) months from the date of acceptance by the
DISTRICT of the dedication of said facilities.
c.
The DEVELOPER shall also procure and maintain during the
performance of this AGREEMENT such policies of insurance, bonds from an
acceptable surety, cash deposits, escrow accounts, letters of credit, and other forms
of security, in amounts and upon terms deemed sufficient by the DISTRICT in its
sole discretion to protect the DISTRICT from any and all exposure to loss and/or
liability.
Section 5. COSTS FOR OVERSIZING. Pursuant to Section I.e. of this AGREEMENT, the
DISTRICT agrees to pay to the DEVELOPER the incremental cost of oversizing any PROJECT
facilities greater than ten inches (10") in diameter for sewage collection pipes. The DISTRICT
shall determine the amount of the incremental cost of oversizing and the method of payment in
the exercise of its sole discretion prior to its acceptance of the PROJECT facilities.
5
Section 6. DEDICATION OF FACILITIES.
a.
The DEVELOPER shall, upon completion of the construction of
all facilities to be installed hereunder to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT, dedicate
said facilities to the DISTRICT by a deed of dedication or such other instrument as
the DISTRICT may prescribe, and the DISTRICT agrees to accept the dedication
thereof by formal action of its Board of Directors. Thereafter, such dedicated
facilities shall become and be operated and maintained by the DISTRICT as part of
the DISTRICT'S sewer system. The DISTRICT shall not accept dedication of said
sewer facilities until all connection fees have been paid unless otherwise allowed
under Section 3.a. herein.
Section 7. SERVICE RESTRICTIONS. Any obligation on the part of the DISTRICT to
provide sewer service to the PROPERTY pursuant to the terms of this
AGREEMENT shall be excused in the event that. the performance thereof is
interrupted for any of the following reasons: riots, .wars, sabotage, civil
disturbances, insurrection, explosion:, court order, natural disasters such as floods,
earthquakes, landslides and fires, and other labor disturbances and other
catastrophic events which are 'beyond the reasonable control the DISTRICT.
Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, the DISTRICT may suspect or
refuse sewer service to the PROPERTY if the DEVELOPER is in breach, default,
or violation of this AGREEMENT or any rule, regulation, resolution, and/or
ordinance of the DISTRICT that is currently in place or may hereafter be adopted,
or if such service would adversely affect the health, safety, or welfare of the
DISTRICT'S customers, or Jor .any other reason deemed paramount by the
DISTRICT in its sole discretion.
Section 8. LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES. The DISTRICT shall not be held liable or
:esponsible for any debts or claims that may arise from the operation of this AGREEMENT, or
for any damage claims for injury to persons, inciuding the DEVELOPER and/or its officers,
6
d:rectors, shareholders, guests, invitees, trespassers, agents, contractors, consultants, and
employees, or for property damage, from any cause arising out of or in any way related to the
PROPERTY, the PROJECT, and/or the DEVELOPER'S obligations hereunder.
Section 9. RELEASE. The DEVELOPER hereby expressly waives and releases the
r: ISTRICT and its agents, officers, directors, and employees from any and all liability for the
caims, actions, and/or losses set forth in Section '9 above and for any costs and expenses
incurred in connection therewith. The DEVELOPER, notwithstanding the provisions of
California Civil Code ~ 1542, which provides as follows:
"A general release does not extend to claims which
the creditor did not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the
time of the executed release which if known by him or her must have
materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor."
expressly waives. arid relinquishes all rights and benefits afforded to the DEVELOPER
t lereunder and under any and all similar laws of .any state or territory of the United States with
,
r~spect to the claims, actions, and/or losses referenced above. This AGREEMENT shall act as a
release of any claims that may arise from the aforementioned whether such claims are currently
Inown or unknown. The DEVELOPER understands and acknowledges the significance and
consequences such specific waiver of Civil Code ~ 1542 and hereby assumes full responsibility
for any injuries, damages, losses, or liability that may result from the claims identified above.
This AGREEMENT shall also act as a release of any claims, actions, and/or losses set forth in
,)ection 9 above, that may arise in the future whether such claims are currently foreseen or
mforeseen.
Section 10. HOLD HARMLESS. Excepting the sole or active negligence or willful
nisconduct of the DISTRICT, the DEVELOPER shall indemnify and hold the DISTRICT and
its officers, directors, agents, and employees harmless from and against all claims and liabilities
0f any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, any and all acts or omissions on
the part of the DEVELOPER and/or its officers, directors, shareholders, partners, assignees,
7
Euests, invitees, trespassers, agents, contractors, consultants, and employees in connection with
tIe PROPERTY, the PROJECT, and the performance of their obligations under this
AGREEMENT, including design defects, even if occurring after the completion of the
PROJECT, and defend the DISTRICT and its officers, directors, agents, and employees from any
wits or actions at law or in equity for damages, and pay all court costs and counsel fees in
wnnection therewith. In addition, the DEVELOPER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the
DISTRICT harmless from and against all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, demands, actions,
judgments, causes of action, assessments, penalties, costs, expenses (including, without
limitation, the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel, expert witnesses, and
accountants), and all foreseeable and unforeseeable consequential damages which might arise or
he asserted against the DISTRICT and/or the DEVELOPER with regard to the PROPERTY
;Uld/or the PROJECT which are alleged and/or determined to be tortious, and/or in violation of
present and future federal, state, and local laws "(whether under common law, statute, rule,
regulation, or otherwise), including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act,
:'ublic Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the Guidelines adopted thereunder, California
:ode of Regulations Section 15000 et seq., all as the same may be amended from time to time.
Section 11. NOTICES. Any notice, tender, or delivery to be given hereunder by either
party to the other shall be effected by personal delivery in writing or by registered or certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and shall be deemed communicated as of mailing
or in the case of personal delivery, as of actual receipt. Mailed notices shall be addressed as set
forth below, but each party may change * address by written notice in accordance with this
section.
If to the DISTRICT:
East Valley Water District
P.O. Box 3427
1155 Del Rosa Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92413
Attn: General Manager
If to the DEVELOPER:
8
Attn:
Section 12. DISPUTES. Any dispute or controversy arising out of, under, or in connection
with, or in relation to this AGREEMENT, and any amendments thereto, or the breach thereof,
which is not resolved informally by prior mutual agreement of the parties hereto, shall be
S'lbmitted to arbitration in accordance with the California Arbitration Act, Sections 1280 through
1 Z94.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The cost 'of such arbitration shall be paid by the parties
e ~ually; however, the prevailing party in the arbitration shall be entitled to reimbursement of its
a:tomeys fees and other costs incurred in connection therewith.
Section 13. ATTORNEYS FEES. If a dispute arises which cannot be resolved by
arbitration, regarding the breach or enforcement of the provisions of this AGREEMENT, the
prevailing party therein. shall be entitled to recover all attorneys fees and other costs actually
incurred in connection with reaching a resolution of the dispute whether or not an action, claim,
or lawsuit is filed. In any action brou~t, t:J:ie entitlement to recover attorneys fees and costs will
be considered an element of costs and not of damages.
Seetion 14. INUREMENT. This AGREEMENT and all provisions hereof shall be jointly
aad severally binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto. their respective heirs,
s Ilccessors, legal representatives, and assigns, and each of the shareholders and partners of the
DEVELOPER in their individual, separate, and/or other capacities.
Section 15. ASSIGNMENT. This AGREEMENT may not be assigned to any individual or
entity without the written consent of the parties hereto.
Section 16. INTEGRATION AND AMENDMENT. This AGREEMENT constitutes the
mtire understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes
my and all prior agreements, whether oral' or written, between the parties in connection
t1erewith. This AGREEMENT may not be amended unless in writing and signed by the parties
lereto.
9
Section 17. CAPTIONS. The captions of sections and subsections of this AGREEMENT
a:'e for reference only and are not to be construed in any way as a part of this AGREEMENT.
Section 18. INTERPRETATION AND ENFORCEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall not
be construed against the party preparing it, but shall be construed as if both parties jointly
prepared this AGREEMENT and any uncertainty or ambiguity contained herein shall not be
interpreted against anyone party. Failure by either party to enforce any provision of this
J.GREEMENT, or any waiver thereof by such party, shall not constitute a waiver of said party's
rght to enforce subsequent violations of the same or any other terms or conditions herein. This
j,GREEMENT shall be enforced and governed by and under the laws of the State of California,
and venue for any action brought to interpret and/or enforce any provision of this AGREEMENT
shall be in a state or federal court located in the State of California that would generally have in
rem jurisdiction over the PROPERTY.
Section 19. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of 'this AGREEMENT is declared by a court
(,f competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this
AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect.
Section 20, TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this AGREEMENT, and
t he parties hereto agree to proceed in good faith: with due diligence, to complete all covenants
,md conditions set forth herein and to perform such further acts as is reasonably necessary to
f:ffectuate the purpose of this AGREEMENT,
Section 21. AUTHORITY. Each individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of a
:)arty hereto represents and warrants that he or she is fully and duly authorized and empowered to
;0 execute on behalf of such party, and that this AGREEMENT is binding in the manner set forth
n Section 15 hereof.
10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties .hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be
e;~ecuted by their respective officers as of the date first above written.
DISTRICT
By:
East Valley Water District
President, Board of Directors
JlTTEST:
Secretary
DEVELOPER:
")
,v
/,- " /0/. r.
hTTEST:
Notary Public
11
C~ALlFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
}~~~~~~~~~~'1f....~~.c,l!!(.'~~~~,)'!C~~
mate of California
County of ;ell f ;?S J ;0 €---
UU/../f- /, 206/
Date "
f,ersonally
appeared
before me,
;fe-4 ;lJ
} ss. "
vE/j/J / I( c;;;,i:'c:?f ~ U
On
b Nam{~1 :11)J ~Jane Doe, Notart Pubnci
Name(s) of Signer(s)
~nallY known to me
Q_ JENNI K. GARCEAU
- COMM. #1547409
i NOTARY PUBLIC. CAliFORNIA
. ' RIVERSIDE COUNTY
j ~ My Comm. Expires Jan. 27.2009 1
o proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
Place Notary Seal Abo....
1~NysS my hand and o,ffic'al
0-~---~
OPTIONAL
Though the informatIon below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the dOCUm?nt
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document /
litle or-~Document: ./
Document Date~ Number of pages:/"//
Signer(s) Other Than Na~ ,/.
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
o Individual
o Corporate Officer - litle(s):
o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
o Attorney in Fact
o Trustee
o Guardian or Conservator
o Other:
RlGHT1HUM8PR1NT
OF SIGNER
Top ot thumb here
/
//
/
-'
/'
~/
Signer's Nam6:
/
o Individual
,orporate Officer - Title(s):
l'at!.ner - 0 Limited 0 General
, 0 Attoi'rrey, in Fact
o Trustee ~
o Guardian or Cb..",ervator
o Other: ,_
""'-
"'"
RIGHT THUMBPRINT
OF SIGNER
Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
Signer Is Representing:
",
-'
/'
-'
./
EXlllBIT "A"
[Site Plan for the PROPERTY]
12
!
"I
1'1
Ii
l
I
/
./'
/
,/
/
//
/'
"'111
Hi I'
~i
".l+r-
,.;;t1.Il: ,
l-;I,n:::J
Eioo..
!',;!:!:!\.
(i?;o
;"ln3
G) ()
r 0
,m z
'2 0
~:c "03
~05~
~(J)-i~
~m"'Dc
, >'"
l:Dzm
:):> ril
I. '2 :c
II ~ ~
I-
I. '\,) ij;l\)i
L: '
/'11111
iil'~
r,
I
I
II
,i
II
I
.
I
I
i; !--L
:1 ~~
,- ~
--"'1
i
I
,
I
I
I
1'1
! !'
I "
~!
~ll
,
I
I
I'
q
~I
1-
I
I
-
-
/
nn~\
'i' \'
11,\
l~
"...
t~,l" ~
~.' +If'- l!
t~ i -e:.s: ,
~~ ~ t36.
!HC!~
.- ,CllO
~.~. i.~3
i;
.4 ~,
G)f" .-
r~
n rnz :4
~ .-
S!.::C ~
$O<n
Z (j) (-
~rn';;
" 0
~:D:s
11 ):> '!l
.zo
z
o,~
\ :I:>j;
d "-
\ 1. c..>l;lt'V"'
\ i '
--
\
\i
'\
i
,.f / "/
./' ,/,/ //,1/
/ ~
, -7
. P'
.''/.''':;"
\
\
I
\
Ii
.\
i\
,-
"
I
I
\\ I
~ t
.
,
)
I
\
\ ~
~
---
,\';
,
\ .
,
\
,
\
l ~l
\ It
1.\ h
~f
d ~\\
I'j
l
\
\
~r\ni'D East Valley
t:.' " Water District
Board Memorandum
DATE: JUNE 13, 2006
Frc m: Brian W. Tompkins 1 Chief Fin~Officer
Subject: Disbursements. pi
Re.=ommendation:
Approve the attached list of accounts payable checks' and
payroll issued during the period May 18, 2006 through
Jure 7, 2006.
Background:
Acc:ounts payable checks are shown on the attached listing and include numbers 206426 to 206677 for
A tlltal of $1,57'7,844.92. .
Thll source of funds for this amount is as follows: .
Co lstruction Fund - Loan $118,546.60
Un 'estricted Funds $1,459,298.32
Pa/roll disbursed was for the period ended May 26, 2006 and included checks and direct deposits
totaling $122,394.16.
Directors payroll disbursed was for the period ended April 30, 2006 and included checks and deposits
totiling $5570.85.
Total disbursements $1,705,809.93
Date: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 East Valley Water District Page: 10f 5
Time: , l3:39PM Report: 20600.rpt
User: <ATHY Check ReQlster - Standard Company: EVWD
As of: 6/7/2006
Bank Ace ::lunt: Citizens Business Bank 13110 00-00-000-0-000-00-00
Check JI Tn Check Payee Clear Period
Nbr Tp Tp Date ID Payee Name Date Post Amount
000001 - 206425 Missing
206426 AP CK 5/1812006 SOC005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 5/22/2006 11-05 1.522.53
206427 AP CK 5/19/2006 TUR007 TURNER-MARY 5/2312006 11-05 225.00
206428 AP CK 5/2312006 HIG007 HIGHLAND AREA CHAMBER 6/1/2006 11-05 30.00
206429 AP CK 5/24/2006 AAR002 AARON GRAPHICS LLC 61212006 11-05 47.05
206430 AP CK 5/24/2006 ACB001 A.C.BYERS TRUCKING INC 11-05 3,187.00
206430 AP VC 6/212006 ACB001 A.C.BYERS TRUCKING INC 12-05 -3,187.00
206431 AP CK 5/24/2006 ADP002 ADP 61212006 11-05 413.93
206432 AP CK 5/24/2006 AIR005 AIRGAS WEST 5/30/2006 11-05 118.31
206433 AP CK 5/24/2006 AME001 AMERICAN EXPRESS 5/30/2006 11-05 4,54
206434 AP CK 5/24/2006 A TT007 AT&T 5/31/2006 11-05 83S.84
206435 AP CK 5/24/2006 AWAOO4 AWAD-A!-iLAM 11-05 21.93
208436 AP CK 5/24/2006 BA T002 BATTEEN-JOHN W 5/30/2006 11-05 1 ,883.34
208437 AP CK 5/24/2006 BOOO09 BOOKMAN-DENNIS 11-05 24.92
208438 AP CK 5/24/2006 BOSOO4 BOSTICK-VALERIE B 6/1/2006 11-05 42.52
208439 AP CK 5/24/2006 BRI009 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC 5/30/2006 11-OS 2.122.02
206440 AP CK 5/24/2006 CHA066 CHAMP III-ROBERT T 6/212006 11-05 20.44
208441 AP CK 5/24/2006 CHE007 CHEM-TECH INTERNATIONA 6/5/2006 11-05 2,197.36
206442 AP CK 5/24/2006 CHE01S J CHENG, C CHENG, C LAU,. 6/5/2006 11-0S 800.00
206443 AP CK 5/24/2006 CLlO03 CLIFFORD L UTLEY 61212006 11-05 375.00
206444 AP CK 5/24/2006 COH004 COHEN-ALBERT 6/5/2006 11-05 2,600.00
206445 AP CK 5/24/2006 COL001 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 5/31/2006 11-05 22.15
206446 AP CK 5/24/2006 CON029 CONTRERAS-NOE A 11.0S 40.20
208447 AP CK 5/24/2006 DAI001 CAlLY JOURNAL CORPORAT 5/31/2006 11-05 . 57.60
208446 . AP CK 5/24/2006 DEOO01 DE ORO PROPERTIES 6/1/2006 11-OS 29.01
20844S AP CK 5/24/2006 DIA001 DIAMOND FENCE CO 5/31/2006 11-0S ,290.00
20845C AP CK 5/24/2006 DIB001 DIB'S SAFE & LOCK SERVICI 11-05 770.41
206451 AP CK 5/24/2006 DIE007 [}IETER1CH-POST 6/1/2006 11-05 50.00
206452 AP CK 5/24/2006 DON001 DONEGAN TREE SERVICE 6/5/2006 11-05 1,105.00
20845, AP CK 5/24/2006 DOW007 DOWDY-ROBERT 6/6/2006 11-05 30.41
206454 AP ZC 5/24/2006 ECF001 CONSTRUCTION-ECF 5/24/2006 11-05 0.00
20845~ AP CK 5/24/2006 EKE001 EKE-EUCHARIA & CLlFFOR[ 11.05 274.08
206451 AP CK 5/24/2006 ENG001 ENGINEERING RESOURCES 11-05 9,301.00
20645, AP CK 5/24/2006 ESB001 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC 5/30/2006 11-05 2,460.00
206451 - 206459 Missing
20646( I AP CK 5/24/2006 FAR001 FARMER BROS COFFEE 11-05 348.60
20546 AP CK 5/24/2006 FED001 FEDERAL EXPRESS 5/31/2006 11-05 60.82
20646: ' AP CK 5/24/2006 FED004 FEDEX FREIGHT WEST, INC. 5/31/2006 11-05 S1.59
20646: I AP CK 5/24/2006 FL0024 FLORES-JUAN 6/5/2006 11-05 103.24
20646. I AP CK 5/24/2006 FUE003 FUENTE-DENNIS DE LA 11-05 95.70
20846 ; AP CK 5/24/2006 GAB001 GABRIEL EQUIPMENT CO 5/31/2006 11-0S 353.30
20646, ; AP CK 5/24/2006 GEN007 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 5/30/2006 11-05 20.95
20646 ' AP CK 5/24/2006 GEN011 GENIE-ERNIE 5/31/2006 11-0S 48.90
206461 AP CK 5/24/2006 GOL002 GOLDEN WEST TIRE 6/2/2006 11-05 173.72
20646l AP CK 5/24/2006 GON056 GONZALES-GILBERT 6/212006 11-05 58.43
20647 ) AP CK 5/24/2006 GRA041 GRAHAM-DlON 6/6/2006 11.05 159,34
206471 AP CK 5/24/2006 HAR009 HARPER AND ASSOCIATES, 11-05 4.228.75
206472 AP CK 5/24/2006 HEROn HERNANDEZ-RUDY 11-05 30.72
206473 AP CK 5/24/2006 HIC002 HICKS - RICHARDSON ASSO 11-05 4.000.00
20647\ AP CK 5/24/2006 HIW001 HI WAY SAFETY 6/1/2006 11-05 545.00
20647; AP CK 5/24/2006 HON003 HONEYFIELD-JAY CARL 11-0S 533.36
206475 AP CK S/24/2006 HUB001 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECI 5/31/2006 11-05 1.293.62
206477 AP CK 5/24/2006 HYD001 HYDRO-SCAPE PROD. INC. 5/31/2006 11-05 918.39
206478 AP CK 5/24/2006 INL004 INLAND DESERT SECURITY 5/31/2006 11-05 373.35
206479 AP CK 5/24/2006 INL005 INLAND WATER WORKS SUI 5/31/2006 11.05 5,255.48
206410 AP CK 5/24/2006 INT003 INTERNATIONAL RUBBER & 6/2/2006 11.05 78,15
206411 AP CK S/24/2006 JOY002 JOYCE CLEI',NERS 6/5/2006 11-05 12,87
206412 AP CK 5/24/2006 KIR007 KIRSCHNER-EDWARD 5/31/2006 11.05 72,94
Date: Wednesday, June 07,2006 East Valley Water District Page: 2 of S
TIme: 03:39PM Report: 20600,lpl
User: KATHY Check Rellister - Standard Company: EVWD
As of: 6nt2l106
Bank Ac count: Citizens Business Bank 13110 00-00-000-0-000-00-00
Check JI Tn Check Payee Clear Period
Nbr Tp Tp Date 10 Payee Name Date Post A.mount
20648, AP CK 5/24/2008 LAW002 LAW PLUMBING CO 6/2/2006 11.05 1,875.00
206484 AP CK 5/24/2006 LAW003 LAWSOI'-I PRODUCTS,INC 5/30/2006 11-05 1.137.11
20648, AP CK 5/24/2006 LES002 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES, II 6/512006 11-0S 83.90
20648€ AP CK S/24/2006 LEW013 LEWIS-GEORGE 6/2/2006 11.0S 30.01
206487 AP CK 5/24/2006 LOP039 LOPEZ-FRANK 11-OS 10.22
20648€ AP CK 5124/2006 MA Y008 MAYO-TAUNYA 11.0S lS.81
20648\ AP CK S/24/2006 MCC001 MC CRAY ENTERPRISES 6/5/2006 11-0S 1,262.12
20649C AP CK 5/24/2006 MCMOO2 MCMASTER-CARR 6/1/2006 11-0S 1,701.74
206491 AP CK 5124/2006 MILOOl MILOBEDZKI-JACEK 5/31/2006 11-05 1,600.00
20649~ AP CK 5/24/2006 MWH002 MWH LABORATORIES 5/31/2006 11.05 220.00
20649, AP CK 5/24/2006 I'-IAF002 I'-IAFZGAR- TERRY 11-0S 3.54
20649A AP CK 5/24/2006 NOR023 NORTH AMERICAN RESIDEN 11-0S 23.69
20649, AP CK S/24/2006 OFF007 OFFICETEAM 6/1/2006 11-0S 2,362.40
20649f AP CK 5/24/2006 OTT002 OTTWAY-ALICIA 11.0S 42.84
206497 AP CK 5/24/2006 PAC010 PACIFIC TITAN INC. 5/31/2006 11-OS IS,467.20
20649E AP CK 5/24/2006 PAC032 LANDSCAPE-PACIFIC SOUT 6/2/2006 11-0S 1,633.17
20649E AP CK 5/24/2006 PHI007 II'-IC-PHIPPS & BIRD 6/2/2006 11.0S 54.73
206S0C AP CK 5/24/2006 RAl004 RAINBOW BOLT & SUPPLY II 6/1/2006 11.0S 27.54
206S01 AP CK 5/2412006 RAM037 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLU 5131/2006 11-OS 2,532.00
206S02 AP CK 5/24/2006 RAMOSS RAMIREZ-RUBISEL 11-0S 39.7S
206S03 AP CK S/24/2006 ROBOOl ROBERTS SERVICES INC 6/1/2006 11-0S 500.00
208S04 AP CK 5/24/2006 ROB006 ROBERTSOI'-l READY MIX 5/31/2006 11-OS 9,643.90
206S05 AP CK 5/2412006 ROQ001 ROQUET PAVING 6/1/2006 11-05 19.694.00
206506 AP CK. S/24/2006 ROS030 ROSALES-CYNTHIA 6/S/2006 11-OS 58,43
206507 AP CK 5124/2008 SAN203 SANTOS COY-GUADALUPE 11-05 3.35
206S08 AP CK 5/24/2006 SHY001 SHYPTYCKI-RAYMOND 5/31/2006 '11-05 3.832.50
206509 AP CK 5/24/2008 SOC002 SO CAL GAS COMPANY 6/1/2006 1H5 81.12
206S10 AP CK. 5124/2006 SOC003 SO CAL PUMP & WELL SERy 5/30/2006 '11-05 19,402.26
206511 AP CK 5/2412006 SOC004 SO CAL EDISON COMPANY 5/31/2006 11-05 109,994.88
206S12 AP CK 5/24/2008 ST A003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 611/2006 11-05 24,996.65
206513 AP CK 5/24/2006 ST A054 HOMES-STANDARD PACIFIC 11-05 337.12
206514 AP CK 5/24/2008 SUN008 SUNSHINE PROPERTIES 6/212006 11-05 93.99
20651S AP CK 5/24/2006 TH0033 THORNBURGH-FRITZ 6/1/2006 11-oS 44.30
206S16 AP CK 5124/2006 TRE014 TRE8()R COMPANY-THE 6/1/2006 lHS 640.00
206S17 AP CK 5/2412008 T51002 INVESTMENT5-T & 5 6/2/2006 11-OS 76.67
206518 AP CK 5/24/2006 UNI002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5131/2006 11-05 16.00
206519 AP CK 5/24/2006 USP006 U.S. PIPE & FOUNDRY CO 11-0S 40,633.46
206S20 AP CK S/24/2006 VER004 VERIZON 5/31/2006 11-05 248.69
206521 AP CK 5/24/2006 VULOOl VULCAN MATERIALS COMP~ 5130/2006 11-OS 825.82
206522 AP CK 5/24/2006 WAXOOl WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 5/31/2006 11-05 527.96
206S23 AP CK 5/24/2006 YOU024 YOU-YONG HYE 11-05 7.44
206524 AP CK 5124/2006 ZEEOOl ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE # 6/512006 11-05 S7.11
206S25 AP CK 5/24/2006 ETEOOl ETEHAD LLC, REFOUA LLC 6/5/2006 11-05 400.00
206S2€ AP CK 5124/2006 FAI002 FAIRVIEW FORO SALES,INC 6/1/2006 11-0S 113.49
206527 AP CK 5/24/2006 CAL002 CALIF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 11-05 3.081.20
206528 AP CK 5/24/2006 KEN017 WILLARD L KENLEY 6/2/2006 11-05 2S.00
206529 AP CK 6/2/2006 ARR009 ARROWHEAD UNITED WAY 12-05 60.00
206530 AP CK 6/2/2006 ART005 ARTHUR-LARRY 12-05 63.18
206531 AP CK 6/212006 A TT007 AT&T 12-05 302.16
206532 AP CK 6/212006 A V A005 AVAYA FINANICIAL SERVICE 12.05 2.559.88
206533 AP CK 6/2/2006 BAK006 BAKERSFIELD WELL & PUM! 12-05 355,950.18
206S34 AP CK 6/2/2006 BAR024 BARR LUMBER CO INC 12-0S 119.39
206535 AP CK 6/2/2006 BA T002 BATTEEN-JOHN W 6/6/2006 12-05 490.00
206536 AP CK 6/2/2006 BMIOOl PROPERTIES-BMI 12-0S 24.10
206537 AP CK 6/2/2006 BOA001 BOARD OF WATER COMMI5: 12-05 632.00
206536 AP CK 6/2/2006 BUR022 BURGESS MOVING & STOR!' 12-05 555.66
206539 AP CK 612/2006 CAB010 CABRAL-STt=PHANIE V 12-05 62,98
206540 AP CK 6/2/2006 CAL083 CALIA-JOHN 12-05 48,32
Date: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 East Valley Water District Page: 3 of 5
Time: ( 3:39PM Report: 20600.rpl
User: I:A THY Check Re"lsler . Standard Company: EVWD
As of: 61712006
Bank Acct lunt Citizens Business Bank 13110 00-00-000.0-000-00-00
-
Check JI Tn Check Payee Clear Period
Nbr Tp Tp Date 10 Payee Name Oate Post Amount
- CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE It 6/612006 12-0S 54,636.21
206541 AP CK 6/2/2006 CAM004
206542 AP CK 6/2/2006 CENOOl CENTEX HOMES 12-05 104.80
206543 AP CK 6/2/2006 CIT018 CITISTREET 12-05 7,982.50
206544 AP CK 61212006 COU024 COURT TRUSTEE 6/6/2006 12-05 410.00
206545 M' CK 6/2/2006 DIBool DIB'S SAFE & LOCK SERVICI 12-05 7.6S
206546 AP CK 61212006 DUR009 DURAN-NESTOR 12-05 1.28
206547 AP CK 6/2/2006 EKEOOl EKE-EUCHARIA & CLlFFOR[ 12-05 242.93
206548 M' CK 6/2/2006 EPAOOl ePARTNERS INC 12-05 41.25
206549 M' CK 6/2/2006 ESBOOl E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC 6/612006 12-05 3.465.00
206550 AP CK 6/2/2006 ESP015 ESPIN'OZA-E'STHER 12-05 5.68
2065S1 AP CK 6/2/2006 FER009 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES I 6/6/2006 12-05 541.88
206552 M' CK 6/2/2006 FOXOOl FOX-JANA 12-05 348.55
206553 AP CK 6/2/2008 FRAOOl FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 12-05 77.10
206554 AP CK 6/2/2006 GAR07S GARCIA-MARIA 12.05 32.00
206555 M' CK 61212006 GOIOOl GOINS JANITORIAL SERVICE 12-05 2,135.00
206556 M' CK 6/2/2006 HAR004 HARRINGTON" INDUSTRIAL F 12-05 19.45
206557 AP CK 6/2/2006 HAR060 HARMON-DAVID 12-05 43.14
206558 AP CK 6/2/2006 HEN002 HENDERSON-MICHAEL R 6/212006 12-05 105.00
206559 M' CK 6/2/2006 HER078 HERNANDEZ-JENNY 12-0S 30.65
206560 M' CK 6/212006 HIGOOS HIGHLAND COMMUNITY NEV 6/612006 12-0S 35.00
206561 AP CK 6/2/2006 HIG018 HIGHLANDS STAR CENTER, 12-05 10,304.00
206562 AP CK 6/212006 HUG007 HUGHES SUPPLY CA. LLC 12-05 917.78
206563 M' CK 6/212006 HUROOl HURT-GERALD E 6/612006 12-05 1,824.00
206564 AP CK 6/2/2006 INL005 - INLAND WATER WORKS SUI 6/6/2006 12-05 39,067.13
20656S AP CK 6/2/2006 JAR005 JARAMILLO-MICHAEL 6/512006 12-05 161.19
206566 AP CK 61212006 JOY002 JOYCE CLEANERS 12-05 16.83
206567 AP CK 6/212006 LEW005 LEWIS-KENT 6/612006 12-05 58.56
206568 . AP CK 61212006 LOM006 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY 6/512006 12-05 1,380.00
206569 AP CK 61212006 LON012 LONG-CINDY 12-05 40.70
206570 M' CK 6/2/2006 L Y004 L Y-LOAN T 12-05 32.21
206571 AP CK 6/2/2006 MAK003 MAKNOJIA-ALEXANDER 12-05 202.07
206572 AP CK 6/212006 MAL021 MALKIN-WILLIAM 12-05 12.99
206S73 AP CK 61212006 MAR005 MARTIN-ROBERT E 6/5/2006 12-05 39,90
206574 AP CK 6/212006 MARl 01 MARTORELL-ALBERTA 12-05 9.82
206575 AP CK 6/2/2006 MCAOOl MC ANDREWS & BOYD 6/612006 12-05 11,402.76
206576 M' CK 61212006 MCM002 MCMASTER-CARR 12.05 369.70
206577 AP CK 6/212006 MET002 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS CC 12-05 409.59
206578 AP CK 61212006 MILOOl MILOBEDZKI-JACEK 12-05 1.600.00
206579 AP CK 6/2/2006 MOR062 MORENO-GERALDINE 12-05 65,51
206580 AP CK 6/212006 MWH002 MWH LABORATORIES 6/6/2006 12-05 220.00
206581 AP CK 6/2/2006 NET005 NETCOMP TECHNOLOGIES. 6/6/2006 12-05 180.00
206582 AP CK 6/2/2006 NEXOOl NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 12-05 967.85
206583 M' CK 61212006 NHSOOl N:H.S. OF INLAND EMPIRE 12-05 19.24
206584 AP CK 6/212006 NOR023 NORTH AMERICAN RESIDEN 12-05 110.99
206581 AP CK 6/212006 OAKOOl MGT-OAK PROJECT 12-05 84.49
20658E AP CK 6/212006 OFF007 OFFICETEAM 6/6/2006 12-0S 3.382,40
206587 AP CK 6/2/2006 OLlOOl OLIVE-KENNETH 6/6/2006 12-05 294.92
20658E AP CK 6/212006 P AS003 JR-ERNESTO PASION 12-05 58.94
20658~ AP CK 6/2/2006 PAT005 PATTERSON-ROY 12-05 3S0.00
20659( AP CK 6/212006 PER006 P.E.R.S. 6/6/2006 12-05 36,258,39
20659' AP CK 6/212006 PER065 PEREZ-EUSTOLIA 12-05 46.83
20659; AP CK 6/212006 PHA014 PHAM-MINH 12-0S 87,31
20659: AP CK 6/212006 PHOOOl PHOENIX HOME LIFE 12.05 213,04
20659' AP CK 6/212006 POU004 POULAN_NOVENA 12-05 13.56
20659~ ' AP CK 6/212006 PRI020 PRINCETON eCOM CORP OR 12.05 77,80
206591- AP CK 6/212006 REY023 REYES-LORENZO L 12.05 38.66
20659" AP CK 6/212006 REY028 REYES-ENRIQUE 12-05 29,43
2065911 AP CK 6/212006 SAFOOl SAFETY KLEEN CORP 6/6/2006 12.05 171.40
Date: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 East VaHey Water District Page: 4 of 5
Time: 03:39PM Report: 20600.rpl
User: KATHV Check ReQlster - Standard Company: EVWD
As of: 6/7/2006
Bank Ac count Citizens Business Bank 13110 00-00-000-0-000-00-00
Check JI Tn Check Payee Clear Period
Nbr Tp Tp Date 10 Payee Name Date Post Amount
- COMPANY-SAFETY COMPLl 12-05 250.00
20659f AP CK 6/212006 SAF005
20660C AP CK 61212006 SAN002 SAN BERNARDINO CHILD Sl 12-05 269.00
206601 AP CK 61212006 SAN007 SAN BDNO PUBLIC EMPLOYI 12-05 475.74
20660, AP CK 6/212006 SAN021 SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY \ 12-05 3.139.02
20660: AP CK 61212006 SEV001 SEVERSON-RON 6/6/2006 12.05 190.92
20660' AP CK 6/212006 SHY001 SHYPTYCKI-RAYMOND 6/6/2006 12-05 4,410.00
20660~ AP CK 6/212006 SOW002 SOWLE-TAMI REDPATH 12-05 250.00
20660{ M> CK 6/212006 STA054 HElMES-STANDARD PACIFIC 12.05 256.67
20660, M> CK 61212006 TEA005 TEAT-LARRY 12-05 23.08
206601, AP CK 6/212006 TOM001 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATE 12-05 8S0.00
20660! ' AP CK 61212006 TOR012 TORRES-EVA 12-05 61.43
20661l ' AP CK 6/212006 TUR007 TURNER-MARY 6/6/2006 12-05 225.00
20661' M> CK 61212006 UNI002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 12-05 32.00
20681:' AP CK 6/212006 UNI013 UNION BANK OF CALI FORNI, 12-05 159,917.52
20661:, M> CK 6/212008 VER009 VERIZON 12.05 854.67
20661.. AP CK 6/212006 VUL001 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPJ 6/5/2006 12-05 2,772.63
20661 ~, AP CK 61212006 WHI005 WHITEHEAD-ROGER 12-05 311.9S
2066111 AP CK 6/212006 WIC004 WICK-HEATHER M 12-05 19.88
20661:' AP CK 61212006 WIR003 WIRELESS WATCHDOG, LLC 12-05 232.00
2066111 M> CK 6/512006 SAN038 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 12-05 444.00
20661!1 M> CK 61712006 ACB001 A.C.BYERS TRUCKING INC 12-05 3,187.00
2066211 AP CK 6f712oo6 ADP002 ADP 12-05 352.80
20662' M> CK 61712006 ATI001 A.T. & T. 12-05 90.49
20662: ~ AP CK '617/2006 A TI007 AT&T 12-05 542.11
20662: I AP CK 61712006 ATW001 ATWELL-JOSHUA D 12-05 43.02.
20662, , AP CK 61712006 BOY011 BOYD-JOHN, 12-05 14.12
20662! i AP CK 61712006 CLI003 CLIFFORD L UTLEY 12.05 375,00
206621 i M> CK 6f712006 COL001 . COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 12-05 10.00
20662' , AP CK 617/2006 COM002 COMSER CO, INC 12-05 1,162.74
20662: I AP CK 617/2006 DEL022 DELL COMPUTER CORP. 12-05 2,344.31
20662: I AP CK 617/2006 END001 ENDERS SE9URITY & 12-05 12.666.60
2066311 AP CK 61712006 ESB001 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC 12-05 2,670,00
20663 I AP CK 61712006 EVE001 EVERSOFT, INC 12-05 130.78
20663: ! M> CK 61712006 EXP002 EXPERIAN 12-05 76.20
20663,1 M> CK 617/2006 FAI002 FAIRVIEW FORD SALES,INC 12.05 273.83
206631 AP CK 61712006 FEOO04 FEOEX FREIGHT WEST, INC. 12-05 51.83
20663 ; AP CK 61712006 GAR076 GARCIA-BETTY J 12.05 164.22
20663 5 AP CK 61712006 GEN007 GENUINE PAins COMPANY 12.05 408.51
206631 M> CK 61712006 GOL002 GOLDEN WEST TIRE 12.05 627.53
206633 M> CK 617/2006 GON057 GONZALEZ-FAUSTO 12-05 36.08
20663l M> CK 61712006 GRI015 GRIFFIN-DENHAM-MAURA 12.05 55.99
20664 ) AP CK 61712006 HAA001 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMP, 12.05 72.65
206641 AP CK 6/7/2006 HAI003 HAIG-BILL Y A 12.05 S6.52
206642 AP CK 61712006 HAP001 HAPPY BOY CAR WASH 12.05 252.77
20664 3 AP CK 61712006 HAR009 HARPER AND ASSOCIATES, 12-05 1.572,50
206644 AP CK 61712006 HIC002 HICKS - RICHARDSON ASSO 12-05 4,000.00
206645 AP CK 6f712006 INLOOS INLAND WATER WORKS SUI 12-05 12.104,70
206646 AP CK 61712006 INT005 INTERSTATE BATTERY 12-05 124.13
206647 AP CK 61712006 JOY002 JOYCE CLEANERS 12-0S 9.90
206646 AP CK 6f712006 JRF001 J.R. FREEMAN CO., INC 12-05 1,406,94
206649 AP CK 6f712006 KLH001 K & L PLUMBING SUPPLY 12-05 237.67
2066:0 AP CK 6/7/2006 KOD001 KODEIH HOMES INC 12.05 88.35
2066:1 AP CK 6/7/2006 LAW002 LAW PLUMBING CO 12-05 33,418.50
2066:2 AP CK 6/7/2006 LLU001 L.L.U. RADIOLOGY MED GRF 12-05 233.00
2066:3 AP -cK 6/7/2006 LOW007 LOWMAN-LINDA 12.05 60,29
2066:4 AP CK 6/7/2006 MAR102 INVESTMENTS. INC-MARQU 12-05 1.67
2066~5 AP CK 6/7/2006 MCC023 MC CROMETER INC 12-05 5,672,69
2066~6 AP CK 6/7/2006 MET008 METROCALL 12-0S 132.12
Date: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 East Valley Water District Page: 5 of 5
Time: 03:39PM Report: 20600.rpt
User: KATHY Check Reaister . Standard Company: EVWD
As of: 6/7/2006
Bank ACt. .aunt Citizens Business Bank 13110 00-00-000-0-000-00-00
Check JI Tn Check Payee Clear Period
Nbr Tp Tp Oate 10 Payee Name Date Post Amount
206657 AP CK 6n12006 MOB002 MOBILE MINIINC 12-05 80.53
206658 AP CK 6n12006 NAT019 MGMT -NAT'L PROPERTY 12-05 158.90
206659 AP CK 6n12006 NOR023 NORTH AMERICAN RESIDEN 12-05 66.63
206660 AP CK 6n12006 OFF007 OFFICETEAM 12-05 1,307.60
206661 AP CK 6n12006 PED004 PEDERSON-JOE 12-05 61.46
206662 AP CK 6n12006 PMIOOl PMI 12-05 644.22
206663 AP CK 6n12006 ROS037 ROBERTSONS 12-05 1.409.26
206664 AP CK 61712006 SAN004 SAN BERNARDINO-CITY OF 12-05 412,021.13
206665 AP CK 617/2006 SOC004 SO CAL EDISON COMPANY 12-05 3.996.12
206666 AP CK 6n12006 ST A003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12-oS 25.678.59
206667 AP CK 617/2006 STA054 HOMES-STANDARD PACIFIC 12-05 289.37
206668 AP CK 61712006 STR004 STRADLlNG,YOCCA,CARLSC 12-0S 5,395.60
206669 AP CK 617/2006 TUROO8 TURKEL-~ANDRA 12-05 151.00
206670 AP CK 617/2006 UND002 UNDERGROUND SERVICE A 12-05 219.20
206671 AP CK 617/2006 UNIOOl UNITED STATES DEPT OF IN 12-05 26.25
206672 AP CK 617/2006 UNI021 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF ' 12-05 282.11
206673 AP CK 6n12006 USF002 US FILTER WESTATES 12-05 11,380.00
206674 AP CK 6n12006 VER003 VERIZON WIRELESS 12-05 127.70
206675 AP CK 61712006 VEROO4 VERIZON 12-05 31.24
206676 AP CK 61712006 VULOOl VULCAN MATERIALS COMP~ 12-05 824.52
206677 AP CK 61712006 ZEEOOl ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE # 12-05 37.39
Check Count 251 Bank Account Total 1,577,844.92
Count Amount Paid
Regular 249 1,581.031.92
Hand 0 0.00
Void 1 -3,187.00
Stub 0 0.00
2ero 1 0.00
Mask 0 0.00
Outstanding 0 0.00
Unused 0 0.00
251 1.577,844.92
Friends of the Highland Branch Library
Apri125,2006
Mr Kip Sturgeon
c/o East V alley Water District
Dear Mr. Sturgeon:
The City of Highland has been awarded a five rnillion dollar grant to build a new
library and environmental learning center on Central Avenue next to a park and the
community center on city owned land. Groundbreaking is expected in spring 2006.
This library will be state of the art and a significant asset to the community with a
computer lab, literacy lab, young adult study areas, an environmental roof garden,
meeting rooms and an amphitheater.
It will also serve as the school library for'Cypress Elementary School located
across the street, and will house all of the textbooks used in the classrooms. Students will
be able to use ~e library evenings and on Saturdays when school libraries are nbrmally .
closed. The area serving Cypress School is low income. These children are not likely to
have the advantages such a~ personal90xnputers available ill their ho~es. Additionally,
the library will be within walking distance from home for many children, eliminating
transportation problems. This library will help give students from a disadvantaged
neighborhood a safe, quiet environment in which to learn.
Friends of the Highland Library, a 501 (c) 3 co=unity support group, has
committed to raise $125,000 to furnish the children and young adult areas of the library.
East Valley Water District has an established presence in our community and we
ask for your support as a major corporate sponsor. The library will provide permanent
reeognition via a donor wall in the library. We believe this library is a quality project
worthy of your support. It will be a long lasting presence for East V alley Water District
in the city and will serve Highland and its neighbors with pride for many years to come.
S:incerely,
'~tAh c'-- O~.
Donna Call
Chairmen, Fundraising Committee
CJ-e-lVv~
J&Z Timmer
( lA/~.,""",-'--------.
[f/ENDS Of THE HIGHLAND BRANCH L1BRAR Y.,. A California non-profit corporation. Tax ID #90-010-1162
FRIENDS OF THE 'HIGHLAND LIBRARY
SPONSORSHIP LEVELS
BRONZE $1,000
SILVER $2,500
GOLD $5,000
PLATINUM $10,000
DIAMOND
$25,000
NAMING OPPORTUNITIES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE
CONTACT INFORMATION:
DONNA CALL
909-862-9316 "
OR
,
HIGHLAND 'BRANCH LIBRARY
909-862-8549
A Project ofThe City of Highland
Rosa Jones, May:or Lany M,cCallon, Mayor Pro Tern
Penny Ulbum, Council Member John P.l1mmer, Council Member Jody Scott, Council Member
Sam Raeadio, City Manager
County of San Bernardino
Bill Postmus, Rrst District Supervlsor Paul Blane, Second District Supervisor Dennis Hansberger, Third District Supervisor
Gary Ovitt, Fourth District Supervisor Josie Gonzales, Fifth District Supervisor
Ed K1eczykowski, County Librarian
~:fl~.~~~W~~k~~m~~1!~1m~~r~~~11~~~le~1n~1~~'
~!li:II...Rlti&lg&1..IlB~ ctyQfHlgt'lllrld ',r~'" "',
Impl'OY'me~"~p=utnry SlllB~ ", ~~ ~~ "
COnsI\lCl!l: ktol'2 COW'lIyutnry .~,:'Y . I 'W". ..... t'; I,';" .", .~. SUl!lmll.Des~gn \
COn;rasn'NlJIIT"f~ FMJX!sllflheHlghllrltlLb1.ry .~,~... ~:...."")I,::.'.~,'" .':"
Courttct~I\Semard~ EPA . ,." ........--,.. mo- Edge Development
;:~}i~t~i~%~1;1tf:~2'~{~li~i~~!~~it.~t.11~:~~);~t~l~~~l~Y~~~:~ftI:;:?~1!~~~~j~~::M~~~~~~~f~1~j:~s~~..:i
STKNchitecl!Jre Inc.
CASE STATEMENT
HIGHLAND LIDRARY & ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
wtStT.twp..tivn.
The County's Highland Library and Environmental Learning Center and its professional stafffaee a
growi ng daily need to provide full-spectrum access to an ever-expanding complexity, variety, and
quanl ity of rapidly changing information and ideas, often on a global scale.
The new Highland Library and Environmental Learning Center will provide innovative information
reSOL rees, technologies,. and user-centered serviees to meet the enormous challenge of the
evolv ing information demands of the public. Residents and patrons need to find, evaluate, and use
infornation at a very rapid pace, requiring access to a wide variety of printed, recorded, or online
infornation, often through the assistance of a highly trained staff.
A gift to the Highland Library and Environmental. Learning Center can
. Help purchase books, journals, videos, CDs, DVDs and databases in support of expanded
library capacity, and create a Special Collection of Environmental Education material;
" .
. Provide new exhibit areas and special features that will showcase the library's treasures and
resources for thousands of visitors and patrons every year;
. Equip new study rooms and the Young Adult Internet Cafe where students can perform
research and assignments collaboratively;
. Provide technology kiosks that teach youth about the environment and the natural world
through exciting and intellectually stimulating games;
. Equip the Multimedia Auditorium and Outdoor Amphitheater with audio-visual technology to
support educational and community programs;
. Provide environmental technology and equipment to support K-12 curriculum standards.
No !i'reat community can exist without a great library. As a society, we are challenged on
many fronts to provide the free and equitable access to information that sustains a
democracy. In a world full of economic and educational barriers, America's libraries have <I
unique role and responsibility. They are places where people OIf all ages and backgrounds
come to learn, enjoy and better their Jives.
, .
Donor Ontions
Engxaved Brick $50
Engxaved Book Spine $75
ELC Major Donor Board: Laser Engraved Granite Tile, various sizes, configurations
$250 - $5,000
"Official Californja" Exhibit sponsorship - 1 0 selections, various sizes
$2500
Room Sponsorships:
Environmental Wet Lab
Exhibit Hall
Discovery Zone animal habitats
Children's Library
Children's Special Feature
Rooftop gardens -21 selections
Computer Lab
Young Adult Center
Multimedi\l Auditorium
Entire Building
$50,000
tbd
tbd
tbd
$25,000
vanous
tbd
tbd
tbd
$1 million+
"OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA"
Saber Tooth Tiger
(Donor Text Here)
,PI "__, 11(~:;
\~. - ~. ~l."
1 -, . . -,
- eZJ~~@o{tl~
[?~ L"~~. ~,"
", ~...=" ~'!.I.~ ~ --. \~<
Gmkgmfg golklkl olll.. ;
;fffdiffjidsur,:.. '{findaiorf
ff~~
o.[i'if
'"
"l,[lrtj
:X:~E~-
o;q' d (J"::t:
~ 9 "l,oo'
.~..",
fl.:rn:[
en...
"'~~
.-~
;;n
&a.~
G'''' l
e[i'",
~ fie
::;d'
"5; ~ -
"'''' ~
tnW~
;I!;"-
~2D
-. I:;;!
....1:
~
8'''' it
ff,g.
bi
Jf 1:) F;
'"""'~
Q "I ~
~as:
. ,~
'JS'g.
9f
L
fl 0
G il
[~
"if
~: '"
8'<>-
01 .
2"
;:t ~.
~ -
~ -
~<r
~~
qo
o{!l
Ji~
"'fi
~ ~ () ::>-: :! " .,.;:r l'>..;:;' <;1:. ~ tJ:j ~
!-!:l ~ ~: ~ ;:;' ~ .. 0<;' /0' 8" Iii " S:il
';+-l ~ ..!'l~' l'>.. S}- ;r ~ so. g' ~ e; ;.
a S' ~ N' ;:;' ~ ~ tT'J '" t1i 1:) ':;; ;:t ~ !:::l
.!'lS:;~~ ~ !tR.t:l.~::>-:-ti ~ex, ~~'
~ ~ -- ~ -- ;::t ~ N ~ ~ -. Q a $:L
en l'l. ".. '" !'l. El ~ '" ~ " " .a I': '" ",-.
~ ell '" ~ ". ;:;.: ~ _. t1i.... ::t. <ri .. '" ~~.
~ g. ~ ~ .....;:to ~;:) ~ 0 -N 0 tn
~ g 'S: 8 ~ ~ [ 1;; E. ir ~ ~ ;;' ~ ...
fJ'J' -. ;:t ::t ~ ::t: g-. ~ "' ~ ~ ~. f.r.i
g; S;' ;:; ~ ~ ~. ex, -Q., ~ Q if ~ l'>.. it '-Q,
i'l ~~~8 ~ ~ ~ ,f~tT'J!" ~~it
~ ~ n -. g' l'>.. l'>.. E" ~ ... 1'l 0 El <<: ,,;.
" " H.O ;:t l'>.. 8 i'l '" '" .... '" 0 r;::. I':
;1 ;::t ~;::t =-t d (:) -- !! ~. d hi :-i Ri ~
l":L.~~$:lt:i~::<"............~~o~ a:
~ !l !l. E. g, ~~.~ ! ~,~ ~ 8" s:: ;ci'
d .... ......0 J:l ~ tn ........ J:l .... .... ~ J:l _.l)Q
c:l-~~"""'_,< t:r"fJ'J.... nnr~
t:L.~_f'1:l... ~ a.~~' ~ S"~~~~.
~-.: ~ it a ;:f ~ ~ ~ H - t< ~ (I') "-
o '" en -. q- " &; i:l.. ;:r. ~ S>.. '" s- :!
o "' J;::l ,a 0 ;::t..", Q'" 1'::1 ~- n ~ ~
~ fi ;1 .,~ ;- ~ J:l $:I.. ;:;.: ~ ~. ~ fj) .....
~ tJ:j8~~ti~ ..tns.;::t-r,j!;)~
~~S ~[~?~ ~~ ~~~ ~
6 <;l ~ !:::l '" '0- .. iil. ~ ~ ~ @ ;:t ~
o '" E, ~. El ... '" 0;" ~_. - ;:t!l l'>..
___ en _ ..... ... nil !'to ~
5;:::: ""t tn . ~
1;;' s: t1i
"'t:I..,t~ ~
d :r ~~
"'l :1 !r- 0
~ ':r- t ~
G'I' fi ~
"", G
""t " -. 8:
a.!! ::::::;:
;- ii R'""i
~ n. ~ i"
!'> :1 i it
11 .... ;;)
.. ....::r
14 e...,
L,
~.:...J
~ · · .. · · · · n
........::r:>n:;.....Nno~
...U100 ~ ~Ct0-4g.;i ~
oo:!::! '" "'N!i>~'
OCl:l ~ E.~,trfn n ~~
oi1lEl,<;:tni1l):!".Hb
en ..... 0 t-tOQ ;:t'" - ...... 0
~~*~~ii~~ir:.;'
.. -g. Q.~ ~o'a ~ 'i' ):!"il
'<l' ... .. "'" ",. <<: ':oh 0 ~ '"
o if ~ ,..,,a El '=l ~ '" ~
- ~ ...'"'t t'OI~ (!S' 0 ~ ~ 0.9 ""-.
1':. ~ El .. .. >1- ft if ~ ~.
.... ..., _. ~ ;:t it -.. if ~
i5' ~ s: ~ @ ::t".;;:- ....l;1f
~ $:l.. J::) ~. '"i 0 ;3 N .~
'<l' '" 8 s: 0 ill l'>.. ,<0 _: -.
-.tt:!",'l '<0';::';::
l)l ,;.~!1- &; !i. ~ g.. ~
-~~+:: 'N-_ -
::;::::~ $:l.. ~.... c:r" ~
'"i $::I ft~ ""-iOQ 0
8~cnd ~~~
~$:I ~ 0 ~ $:I...U)
~ -Q.,~ ~!tn
en $:I ..... tn t:1
g.... '" ""
o $:l..;::t S"
o '" "" 0 ..
- ~_ -<:: l'>..
0::>-: ;::, 0 '"
_. ~ ..,., '" :=.
[.~ ~. ~ ~
"""'" - ~ e:. .:If
lit fi. to 0'. ~
H "'"..
~ 8
8 &r;t
~, '" I':
;:t ;:t
l'>.. ~
:!
,~...,Q
1'l ..
r :.
~~.. .~
.' ~',' {I:
~. S(
* .&t.
- l'l
'" ;:!
.. $:1.
;:t ~
j n
..
<>Q l'l'
'" ::t".
'" ~
H
"]
il fi
"l,
~1
if[
"!..
s 3-.
".~
..~
- .
~ .
,H
g"~-
Q ~
~~
if
rl'
I'
;, --,
,\,~.,. ... '
I.::,.' ... ;-.
l .,;. ::t
k'~:: " "1 ~~h,
ij",:."'i. -fl"'!\~'
~~H f~J
1..,""..1 ~..__.
e,<i;'.'<;;;.''\ '1'-"
~'.'-".:'j:.l '..
~..~~24 . ~'; .,;;.
II'
., .
0"
~1L..,~~
',"ill. "
~ ~'1 ,
'-' I,
':; :'~:~';:;i~:Y
':...,..::c...:' ..:',
/f~~j
'!::,:, .,.
'C'"'
.....
CI
.....
""<
CI
:::I,
Co.
......,
:::I
<
.-...
..... '
CI
:::I
3'
CD
:::I
-,
CI
":<.
~
..
if
r--
CD
CI
.....
:::I
-.
:::I
CCI
r-\
CD
:::I, "
..........
CD,:';,
.',"""
..:.;....~-'-~~
., .,
, -,,-,,-:1'" [
. . r ~.'. i' - I.
,.... '.,::."'.:;~~\.~~.~r
.~.:. ::}~'.:~i
..<: ,..~~':>':'~~'}~:h
'-""i. ~
c CI) .e '0
<:>
- - ~ <:>
r:: c: N.....
CI) CI) Ji ~g
-C E ~ ~<"l
r:: r:: Cl') -2 ., ~
<C Q r:: ~.~
0- -
....' r:: .l:! ~8-
> ..... '" ~
Cl J 0
c: i
L.L.I C1), , ~ t.:J
~-' <::!
....
~
IE
/.C> ~
I]]~
.r::. .:::
." >
, :c c:
\= I.&.l
..c:
t-
~-l
"''.
-
c
.,
......
"',
c: '
c:
~
Cl
..
-"
~l:>
.E; I::S t'
_ l~~
. l:::1.J l
I ,,~~;
V ~ ...., l::: ~
\! l::: :::t i5
J5~~
rtf, E
ti
-ml>>
o Ol '"
u~,,~O\
.-=~5 -5 ~ <<: ~
liJ ~u N
k,CQ .. \0
o~t-..soo
]'O"'jl I
,,~!:i bOg
~:&, fE 0\
;.:;J;E!
~
.
. 't
. 0:
thI1~ii>
.Q~~.2:i""'"
"0 j:j 0 ;;s 0
~ ~ ~ 5'] g>" 8:
~..up.l::~O
~ <<.aESaI"
.~ " 8 ".f;'o
A.. 4.' i> (ll
~ ~g..!lg"'g.
~~ r~ ~ ~
I;>, ><
Ul
Yes, I would like to help build tht 7llW Highland Library and EnvironmmlaI c.nfer.
Today. Date:
Name'
Address:
Phone.
email'
Zip'
D Please accept my donation of:
(J P1E!ase contact me about volunteering with The Friends of the Library
(] Plese check here if you do NOT want your name used in any public recognition or donor list.
Detach and Mail to: Highland Branch Ubrary, At!n: FOL
27167 Baseline, Highland, CA 92346
We are a 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation. All proceeds are tax deductible. #90-0101162
We II11mk J"" for J""' support!
GMID
Invoice
Architecture - Planning - Interiors
350 W. 5th Street, #201
San Bernardino, CA 92401
509-889-4480 Fax 909-384-9034
10181810 831VM
A311V ^ lSV3
Invoice Date:
Invoice #:
9DOl S 0 (ldV
~
2/2212006
03683-24
Bill To:
Project:
East Valley Water District
Brian fompkins
East \ alley Water District
1155 ')el Rosa Avenue
P.O. l.ox 34273
San B,mardino, CA 92413
Terms: Please Remit ... Project Man... Project
Due on receipt 2122/2006 GM 03683
Percent Due Previously Contract
Item Contract Task Decimal Contract Amt Billed Balance Amount Due
Equivelent
Addendum to Agreement Dated: November
18,2003
Fees Phase l.A-1. 1 70,000.00 0 0 70,000.00
Two requested increases in the size of the -
Administration Building which resulted in
design changes for GMID and all
Consultants. Increase in scope for
Landscape Architect for the slope easement.
Design changes for the Operations Building
and Warehouse initiated by new staff (eg.
Special ventilation for weld shop,
warehouse and warehouse racks).
Fees Phase tAll. I 10,000,00 0 0 10,000.00
Coordination, Project Management and Bid
Solicitation with EVWD vendors for new
andlor specialized equipment. (eg.Gym
equipment and warehouse racks).
Fees Phase tAll! I 60,000.00 0 0 60,000.00
Additional Coordination, Project
Management, & Bid Soiicitation with
Client Consultants, Geotechnical Engineer,
Fire Suppression and Art Consultant.
Adding these Consultants to the Architects
Contract.
Fees -1,!'hase IAlY, I 60,000.00 0 0 60,000,00
Project Manager Approval: Total Due This Invoice
Page 1
GMID
Invoice
Architecture - Planning - Interiors
350 W. 5th Street, #201
San Bemardino, CA 92401
~09-889-4480 Fax 909-384-9034
Invoice Date:
Invoice #:
2/22/2006
03683-24
--
BiI To:
--
Brian Tompkins
East' /alley Water District
1155 Del Rosa Avenue
P.O. 30x 342'13
San liemardino, CA 92413
Project:
East Valley Water District
Terms: Please Remit ... Project Man... Project
Due on receipt 2/2212006 GM 03683
Percent Due Previously Contract
Iterr Contract Task Decimal Contract Amt Billed Balance Amount Due
Equivelent
Unforeseen complexity and time regarding
the site design. The complexity issues
include:
1, Slope easement - Owner requested.
2. West side channel was piped and
covered over. Additional meeting. and
City coordination required.
3. Sewer service road required San
Bernardino City Engineering Department.
4. Alternative grading concepts designs
requested.
Fees Phase IAV. 1 10,000.00 0 0 10,000.00
Increased Scope ofWark for Emergency
Control Center, Security and Site Access.
Fees Phase l.A. VI. 1 20,000.00 0 0 20,000.00
Increase in Scope of Work for Furniture and
Fixtures design and specifications. The
increase was the result of:
1. Increase building size.
2. Multiple layout options due to new
Department Directors.
-
Fees Phase I AVII. I 20,000.00 0 0 20,000.00
Coordination of Special Equipment and
needs of Buildings B, C, D, and E. New
equipment, furniture and fixture design.
.
Project Manager Approval: Total Due This Invoice
I I
Page 2
GMID
Invoice
Architecture - Planning - Interiors
350 W. 5th Street, #201
San Bemardino, CA 92401
\109-889-4480 Fax 909-384-9034
Invoice Date:
Invoice #:
2/22/2006
03683-24
-.
BilITo:
Brian Tompkins
East ~, alley W:3.ter District
1155 Del Rosa Avenue
P.O.llox 34273
San E emardino, CA 92413
Project:
East Valley Water District
--
c>
Terms: Please Remit ..' Project Man... Project
Due on receipt 2/22/2006 OM 03683
Percent Due Previously Contract
Item Contract Task Decimal Contract Amt Billed Balance Amount Due
Equivelent
Fees Phase I.B.1. 0.8 20,000.00 0 0 16.000.00
Coordination for L.B.E.n. increasing to
gold certification with L.E,E.D. Consultant
and with Southern California Edi:lon
Savings by Design. Pursuing the Gold
options have involved more coordination
with the Consultants.
Fees Phase I.B.II. 0 10,000.00 0 0 0.00
Coordination and ordering of specialized
equipment with Vendors for the project ,
,
during construction. (eg. Furniture,
specialized lighting and art work.)
Fees ... Phase I.B.lII. I 20,000.00 0 0 20,000.00
Increase in the cost of the project, greater
scope of work resulting in more work for
the design team.
Fees Phase 2.A1. 0 200,000.00 0 0 0.00
Provide Project Management during
Construction Document phase and during
the construction of the project. This service
i~: in addition to construction administration
which only covers answering RFI's, Field
Observation and reviewing submittal.
Project Management will include
coordinating with the various vendor and
Consultants and building commissioning.
Project !lI1anager Approval: Total Due This Invoice
$286,00000 I
Page 3
JUN-)5-2006 MON 04:10 PM
FAX NO.
p, 01/40
A'~
f! Yucaipa Valley Water District
~... ..
12770 Second Street, Yucaipa, California 92399
Water, Sewer arid Recycled Water
Rate Analysis
April 29, 2005
JUN-C5-2006 MON 04:10 PM
FAX NO.
P. 02/40
YucaIpa Valley Water District
W:lter. Wastewater and Recycled Water Rale Analysis
Table of Contents
E lC.ecuttve Summary _....... ..................I............u.... ..................... ......... .................u..................... ......3
1 IntroducUon .... ........ It ......,....... ..". '0' n' ....... on .0..... 0" t. ..0.... It ...... '....f'. nl.. .... '0..0. ,..u.'" ......... ,_.....5
'(.1. Overview of the Yucaipa Valley Waler District .....................................................6
1.1.1. Land Use Within the District .................................._..................................6
1.1.2. Governance and Managemant.....,...........................................................6
1,1.3. Development Impact Fee Overview..........................................................8
1.1.4. Supplemental Water Purchases In 2004 and 2005...................................9
1.2. Common Questions and Answers........................................................................9
:~. Economic Assessment ........ ....... ............. ..._.............. ................................................"u...13
2.1. The E:conornic Nature of Utility Operations ........................................................13
2.2. Basis of Accounting in Utility Operatlons............................................................13
2.3. Fiscal Year 2004 Audited Financial Statements................................................. 14
2.4. Evaluation of Current Financial Condmon ..........................................................16
2.4.1. Net Operating Revenue Analysis............................................................16
2.4.2. Capitalization Ratio Analysis ..........................................:.......................16
2.4.3. Rate of Return Ana1yslsu.,......,.....................,I..;.....n.......u..........~..........H 16
2.4.4. Depreciation AnalysIs .................................................... ...................,.....17
2.4.5. Comparison of Capital Assets ............................................................:...1 B
3. An Assessment of Projected Revenue Requirements ...................................................19
3.1. Current and Projected Customer Base ........................................._....................19
3.2. Evaluation of Water Demands .....................,.....................................................21
3.3. Operating expense Projections.................................................................,........22
3.3.1. Water Division Expense Projeclions.......................................................23
3.3.1.1. Cost of Supplemental Waler Supply - SElVMWD...................23
3.3.1.2. Cost of Supplemental Water Supply - SGPWA ....................24
3.3.2. Wastewater Division Expense Projectlons..............................................24
3.3.3. Recycled Water Division Expense Projections .......................................25
3.4. Capital Expenditures and Debt Service Obligations .......................................,...25
3.4.1. Water DIVision Capital Improvement Projects.........................................25
3.4.1.1. Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Filtration Facility ..................25
3.4.1.2. Non-Potab'le Water System Improvements ...........................26
3.4.1.3. Potable Water Distribution System ~ Storage Reservoirs ......26
3.4.1.4. Potable Water Distribution System. Pumping Facilities ........26
3.4.1.5. Potable Water Distribution System. Transmission Pipelines 26
3.4.1.6. Potable Water Distribution System. Distribution Pipelines....27
3.4.1.7. Potable Water Distribution System. Wells ............................27
3.4.2. Wastewater Division Capi\allmprovement Projects................................27
Page 1
Apr1129,2005 '
JUN-0!j-2006 MON 04: 10 PH
FAX NO.
p, 03/40
_.~-- - _. - - - ._.. ---
Yuoalpa Valley Water DistrIct
W;lter, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rata Analysis
3.4.2.1. Wastewater Treatment..........................................................28
3.4.2.2. Western Regional Interceptor Facilities.................................28
3.4.2.3. Lift Station Improvements .....................................................28
3.4.2.4. Wastewater Collection System..............................................28
3.4.3. Debt Service Obliga!ions........................,......,........................................29
3.5. ERAF III and the Implications for YVWD............................................................29
3.5.1. California Property Tax Overvlew...........................................................29
3.5.2. Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund III (ERAF B1),........................30
3.5.3. Overview of Property Tax Revenues for YVWD .....................................32
Jr. Summary of Rate Structure Changes............................................................................34
4.1. Assembly Bill 2115 - Property Tax Shift ............................................................34
4.2. Water and Wastewater Overview.......................................................................34
4.2.1. Water Division ............................................ ...........................................,..36
4.2.2. Wastewater Division .......u~~.~~~..............., ............. ............................. ...... 36
4.3. The 'fVIND Financial Rate Projecllo~ Model......................................................37
4.3.1. Future Conditions and Projected Parameters ...."...................................38
4.3.2. Water DIvision Ana[ysls ......n...... ........ .............. ......................................38
4.3,3. Wastewater Divi.slon Analysis.................................................................39
4.3.4. Recycled Water Division Analysis ..........................................................39
4.3.5. Important Elements Included and Nollncluded in Rate Analysis ............39
5. Attachments:
Attachment A Proposecl Resolution No. 13.2005...........................................40 '
Attachment B Resources & Citations UUlized in the Preparation of this
Rate Analysi~ ...:...... .............................,..... ........ ................:........54
Attachment C
Attachment 0
Attachment E
Attachment F
H.R. 1008 ................... ..........................,.....................................55
stale and CIty Gives & Takes since Proposition 13 .................59
ERAF III Shift Confirmation ......................................................65
Waler Related Regulations ......................................................67
Page 2
April 29, 2005
JUN-(15-20013 MON 04: 10 PM
FAX NO,
p, 04/40
Y lcaipa Val/eyWater District
\'I 'afer, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
Executive Summary
I.t the board workshop on November 8, 2004, the District staff presented a proposed
E upplementaJ water rate structure for the purpose of purchasing imported water from San
Bernardln.o Valley MunIcipal Water District and San Gergonie Pass Water Agency. Upen
cliscusslng this propesed rate structure, the Beard recommended that District staff prepare a
more comprehensive rate analysis that takes into c.onslderati.on, not .only supplemental water,
'Jut alse all preposed projects, regulat.ory requirements, inflation, custamer grawth, system
demands, and ather related issues. District staff cempleted the comprehensive financial repart
:3nd rate analysIs which was provided to the board and the pUblic at a werkshap on March 23rd.
This rate analysis was further refined with input from the public and beard members at
subsequentwerl<shops on March 281h, April 71", April 111h, April 181\ April2Slh and May2.nd.
The reason far preparing this comprehensive rate analysis is primarily dUB to the fell OWing
slgnincant financial issues experienced by the Olstrict:
· The Dislrlctlost over $2.2 million in property tax' revenue to the State of California as a
result of EMF III in fiscal years 2005 and 2006, While the District Is pursuing legislation
for the early reinstatement of property taxes in fiscal year 2006. the Dlstriot is
anticipating a total loss of $2.2 million" wilh the return of the pr.operty tax increment
beginning again In fiscal year 2007.
· Th!" District Is purchasing supplemental water supplies from San Bernardlne Valley
MunicIpal Water Dlstrlct and the San Gorgenlo Pass Water Agency to offset current
groundwater production as a method of making our Watet resources more reliable.
During 2005 and 2006, the District will operate an interim water filtration facility ta help
meet prejected w<;tter demands. '.
. The District is required to upgrade the wastewater treatment plant to meet stringent'
nitrogen limits and te prepare for the addition of reverse .osmesis technology pursuant to
the basin plan adopted in late 2004. The facilities necessary ta meet the new n1lrogen
requirements are expected to cost $27 mlllion. The District has not budgeted for the
costs associated with the reverse osmosis facility that will be reqUired in the future.
· The District Is experiencing significant overall increases in expenses such as prevailing
wages. concrete, steel, fuel, workers compensation, pension payments. ete...
.. The District's workers cempensallon expenses have Increased from $52,666 in 2001
to $335,297 In 2004. This represents an overall Increase .of 637%.
.. At the wastewater treatment plant, the'District has experienced:
. A 9% annual Increase in biosolld disposal rates over the past five years; and
. A 17% annual (ncrease In "the cost'of disinfection related chemicals.
· The Districtls required to canstruct facilities ta remeve water from San Tlm.otee Creek ta
meet the basin plan. requirements. This pipellne project Is estimated to cost $17.5
millien. This pIpeline will allow the Plstrict greater access to recycled water and
minimize future NPDES related casts.
This rate analysis is intensely comprehensive due te the fact that II incorperates the
im~l~menlation of numerous financial, environmental, regulatory and long-term visianary
" policIes Into one document that can be used as a tool to communicate with the public.
spf~cmcally, this document includes numerous policy discussions that are presented In such a
manner that allows the public to understand the broad concepts and how each issue Is
intertwined with other issues In the general operation of the District. It is not the intent of this
documentt.o secure .or promote full funding for all policies discussed. Rather, the intent is to
P~ge 3
April 29, 20Q5
JUN-05-2000 MON 04:10 PM
FAX NO,
P. 05/40
Yucaipa Valley Water Distriot
\~ater, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analvsls
l;how that the District Is a complex and multifaceted business with the responsibility of protectlng
Bnd enhancing the infrastructure that is required to promote the local and regional economy and
Iwerall quality of life of our customers. Throughout this document, the following policies will be
addressed:
. Maximization of the protection of the groundwater basins with respect to quality and
quantity of available water; -.
. Development of a regional recycled water project wilh the capability to integrate
additional water supplies to enhance the drought tolerance of the entire community;
· Implementation of reasonable depreciation planning consistent with the requlrl!ment of
asset management Included in GASB 34;
. Implementation of methods for increasing the reliability and redundancy of various local
water resources;
· Achievement of full compliance with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and State
Water Resources Control Board basin plan objectives and maximum benefit analysis;
. Ability to implement a wireless grid .for interactlve facility control and customer meter
monitoring;
. E;stablishment of methods to improve communications with customers;
. Clearly identified classifications for development Impact fee scenarios based on the type
of development;
. Implementation of alternative customer payment methods;
. Implementation of rate stabilizing allematlves;
· Construction of regional recycled water facilities which will minimize the future cost
impacts assocIated with environmental regulations and NPDES permits;
· Full recovery'of costs associated with delinquent payment liensj and
· The establishment of benchmarking tools to continuously evaluate the financial health of
the organIzation. ' . .
In summary, the goal of the District Is to provide a falr and reasonable financial plan that invests
in the community we serve. Perched in the upper portIon of the Santa Ana Watershed between
the San Andres and San Jacinto fault lines, we are constantly reminded that the region we
serve is both beautiful and unique, The challengell we face are not the same, or in some cases
even remotely similar, to our neighboring agencies. Therefore, [t is incumbent upon the
leadership of the Board and management staff to direct the District in such a manner to rematn
commilled to professionally manage the precious water, wastewater and recycled water
resources of the Yucaipa Valley in a reliable, efficient and cost effective manner In order to
provide the flnest service to our customers.
Joseph B. Zaba
General Manager
Page 4
April 29. 2005
JUN-(15-20013 MON 04: 10 PM
FAX NO,
p, 06/40
Yucaipa Valley Water District
'^ ater, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
1.0 Introduction
The Yucaipa Valley Water District Is made up of a proactive and diverse group of elected
cfficials and employees dedicated to provIding reliable water and wastewater service In an
efficient, cost effective manner that provides a high level of customer satisfaction. On May 1.
~ .002, tile Board of Directors adopted the following mission statement to c1eal1y reflecl the vision
~Ind principles that guide tile dedicated elected officials and employees of the District.
Yucaipa Valley Water DIstrict Is committed to professionallY managing the
precious water, wastewater and recycled .water resources of the Yucaipa Valley
In a reliable, effiolent and cost effective manner in order to provide the finest
selVice to our customers, both present and future.
We are entrusted to selVe the public for the benefit of the community.
We believe In responsive, Innovative and aggressive service, and take prIde In
getting the job done right the first time.
We encourage a work environment that fosters profess(onali!;m, creativity,
teamwork and personal accountability.
We treat our customers and one another with fairness, dignity, respect and
. compassion and exhibit the utmost Integrily in all we do. '
We believe in enhanoing the environment' by following a general philosophY of
, eliminating waste and maximizing recycling and reuse of our natural resources.
We are' commilted to using the following operating principles as a guide to
accomplishing our mission;
. We are proacllve in our approach to issues,
· We are committed to Integrity and consistently high ethical standards in
all our business dealings.
· We use the strategic plannIng process to focus our efforts and minimize
our crisis management mode.
. We make informed, rallonal and objective decisIons.
· We aggressively pursue technologJcal solutions to improve operallons.
· We are Inclusive in our decision making and delegate responsibility
whenever possible.
· We design our servIces around customer wanls and needs to the degree
possible within our financial and regUlatory constraints.
· We cultivate widespread commitment to common goals.
We believe our success depends on every employee knowing and sharing these
values and principles " .
This comp~ehensive Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis has been prepared
with the District's mIssIon statement in mind to link the financial health of the District with our
commitment to professionally manage the precious water. wastewater and recycled water
Page 5
April 2.9, 2005
JUN-05-2006 MaN 04:11 PM
FAX NO.
p, 07/40
Yucaipa ValleyWaler District
We :er, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate AnalysIs
re~ources of the Yucaipa Valley In a reliable, efficient and cost effective manner in order to
provide the finest service to our customers. both present and future,
Tc meet the mission of the District, the Board and staff members continue to proactively focus
on water quality issues, water supply issues, Infrastructure deficiencies, maintenance of existing
systems and compliance with Increasingly stringent regulatory requirements.
1.1 OvervieW of the Yucaipa Valley Water District
Tile Yucaipa Valley Water District was fanned as part of reorganization. pursuant to the
Reorganization Act of 1965, being Division I of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of
California. This reorganl;>;ation consisted of the fonnalion of the DIstrict, dissolution of the Calimesa
Vlater District and formation of Improvement District No.1 of the District as successor-In-Interest.
arid dissolution of Improvement Distrlct"A" of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District
and the formation of Improvement District of\' of the District as successor-In-interest. On
~,eptember 14, 1971, the Seeretaty of Slate of the State of California certified and declared
f mnation of the Yucalpa Valley County Water District. The DIstrict operates under the County
'Vater District law, being Division 12 of the State of California Water Code (the "Act"). Although
the immediate funellon of the District was. to provide water service, the District has assumed
I esponslbility for provIding recycled water and wastewater service in Yucaipa Valley.
The District is located about 70 mires east of Los Angeles and 20 miles southeast of Ban
3ernardino In the foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains and has a population of appr.oximately
48,3qQ, The District 15 SItuated In both San BernardIno County and Riverside County.
1.1.1 Land Use Within the District ,
The altitude of the District rises from about 2.000 feet above sea level at the western end of the
valley to about 5,000 feet at the eastern end. with average elevation of roughly 2,650 feet. The
topography of the area is characterized by rolllng hills separated by deeply entrenched stream
beds, namely, the Yucaipa and Wilson Creeks. The District lncludes the incorporated cities of
Yucaipa and Calimesa which are In San Bernardino and Riverside Counties respectively.
The District projects that the undeveloped land within its boundaries will continue to be developed
consi-otent with the general plans as provided by the City of Yucaipa and the City of eal/mesa. The
projected population of the District in the year 2030 will be approximately 94,800, which refiects
build-out of the City of Callmesa and the Oak Valley development. Although approxlmately 49.8%
of the land within the boundaries of the District is currently undeveloped, less than 1% of District
water sales are to agricultural water users.
1.1.2 ,Governance and Manaoement
The District is governed by a 5-rnernber bOard of directors (the "Board"). the members of which are
elected from five separate divisions of the District for staggered 4-year terms.
Page 6
April 29. 2005
JUN-Oj-2006 MON 04:11 PM
FAX NO,
P. 06/40
yucaipa Valley Water District .
W3ter, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Anal~lsls
, '
ri
1\
The current Board members and theIr occupations are provided below.
Member 01 the
Board of Directors
llruce Granlund, President
Oavid lesser, Vice PresIdent
Tom Shalhoub, Director
HenlY Wochholz:. Director
Scott A. Bangle. Dlreclor
DivIsion
Two
Three
One
Five
Four
InllIal Date
olSel\llce
12/23/1998
11/28/1989
12/05/1997
11/03/1971
06/0212004
Occupatlon
Social SeJVlces InvesUgator
Engineer
Rellred Entrepreneur
ReUred Benk EXCQUlive
Asst General Manager. Riv. County
Rt'!~lonal P~rk eod Ooen Soaee Dlslrict
The following Individuals have served as President of the Board since the District was created in
19i'2,
October 1971 to November 1973
OElcamber 1973 to November 1975
December 197510 October 1977
November 1977 to November 1979
December 1979 to December 1983
,Ianuary 1984 to December 1987
,Januarv 1988 to November 1889
YUCaipa Valley Water District
PresIdents of the Board
Harold l.ockwood November 1989 to December 1991
Hank Wochholz January 199210 November 1993
Geno Gasponl December 1993 to December 1995
Eve Kraft December 199510 December1\l98
Pete Squires January 199910 November 2002
Fred Childs' December 2002 10 Present
Georr,e Sardeson
Hank Wochho1:z
David l.esser
Conrad Nelson
Steve Copelan
Conrad Nelson
Bruce Granlund
Page 7
April 29. 2005'
JUN-Of-2006 MON 04:11 PH
FAX NO.
P. 09/40
'- -~ - "- - - - - "-- _. _.. "-'~P,
YUI:alpa Valley Water District
W~,ter. Wastawater and Recycled Water Rate Anal~sls
D'ly-tcrday management of the District Is delegated to the General Manager who works closely
.wi ~ an execullve team who ullimately oversee all of the Dlstrlct's services and functions,
(- - )
Tam Sha1haub
Dlrld_~ - OMs~ ,
- '-1 ,-- -
I
~ t.W111....... )
Da~M~er.~(..
tlUl:ll.U.81
I
.W.ttrP(~
. WltarTr.iImfflt
. Watt/' Quomv
. WiI~WIlIltfT"DJme.nt
. _Wolor
. R~lIlQf)' Com.Pll_neo
. 11ldl.l1tNJ1 Pt.lnlWl\enl
[ .' ']
p(tlQl GranfwKf
DOcI:g~-OM~loft~
- -1'- .
[o~?-~::~:J (o~~~~~i~n~) (~~~.J
_ I
( JQSlph lob. )
a.....1 M...~"
(.sid!; NCrCM )
Antltant Gtnot1l
"''''''''
I
( ""'n H.. )
t ~.Stl!(8fory
( Vld<y er.,oId, )
t;llttrld.Cor.frOllor
1
,( ClW/o D"'V )
Opotitklnl MJnlO't
1
. UtllilySOfYlelIs
. Mil" hMct5
. Valve Me.i"'ItorIInco
. HydrMl"".Il.fnt.~
. envJttM\a~ SJV(a
. Maln"-nara 01 wailC'.
Wq~.,~
R.eydt<lWalar
lrifal\r\ldurl
I
( '''ri~ )
EI'oQIno,"""P'''lOCl
M<<wfl'IIl'
. """,,,.,J.,
MtlnaglJ1'lont
. P,q"'._~
. P!lV.klpfnlrt PINvlitQ
. OIS/Mod.flllQ
. f1jsnCteck&.
tMpoct\on
I
.^-
.. CW1omor SlrvWd
. PayrallseMcn
. NllIlIt MMaQom4nt.
1.1.3 Oevelooment Imoac! Fee Overview
The Dislrlct charges each new unit a development Impact fee for water. wasteWater and
recycled water service. This fee is used to offset the capItal cost of the water, wastewater and
recycled water facilities needed to provide service all new customers regardless of their
classification .- residential, schools, parks,' or businesses. The development impact fee is
calculated based on a common reSidential unit, therefore it is common to see In this report
references to equivalent dwelling unlls, which takes all users and equates their demand on the
infrastructure as the equivalent of one or more dwelling units,
O~er the past three years, the pace of new development within the District hall continued at a
moderate pace, not as fast as other tocal areas such as Beaumont and Fontana. The pace of
development over the past 36 months has averaged 45 water equIValent dwelling units per
monlh and 48
wastewater
equivalent dwelllng
units per month. This
development pace
results tn a total of
540 to 576 dwellings
per year. This annual
rate of development
m~IY be sustainable
based on the future
growth rate .within the
District considering
the current state of
the Oak Valley
140
120
~ 100.
~ SO
'll
i 60
40
20
o
..... or- .... t"'I C'\I ('of C'4 N
~11~~~~~
~ (J) z ~ :s ::E ~ ~
. # o( Water eous Paid
N M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~';!~~'i~~~'t
o m ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ .~
z ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~
II # 01 Wastewater eou. Paid
Page 6
APrl129. 2005
JUN--05-2006 NON 04:14 PN
FAX NO.
P. 10/40
'l"ucalpa Valley Waler District
IIVater, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Anall/sis
Project, JP Ranch and the remainder of the" Chapman Heights Development.
For fiscal year 2004, ending June 30. 2004, the District received $1,706,991 in water
development fees for 617 !:::qUivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) and $2,608,454 in wastewater
development fees for 621 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs).
Water Developmenllmpael wastewater Developmenl
Feeo Received In FY 2004 Impacl Fees ReceIved In FY 2004
600 . ,
...... --- ~-- 0"1 800 C
600 500 ~
~OO /" ----r.-.
/ 400 /
300 300
- - - .../...... .. - .. - 111_-II1II/"."-- W .
200 200
100 L 1DO ./- (
0 111111 0 UIB..~
~ t "" ~ it, I l!''''IR''''''l;;-;;!;If~llt:'-
c ~ !!l
S $: ~ e~ e~~~$:~d~l*
# 01 EDU'. Paid per Month # 01 EOU'. Pard perMonlh
CummulaU... ofFe.s Conecled Cummulalive # olFees Co_
. 242 WalorFeos conecled In FY2001 . . - 238 Sewer Fe.. CoIIeda<l1n FY2001
- 591 WalBrFoos CaUecled In FY2002 - - 470 Sower Fe.. Col!ecled In FY2OO2
~35 WalorF.e. C.Uecled In FY2003 558 Sew'erfoes Coneded In FY2003
1.1.4 Suoolemental Wate~Purchase in '2004'and 2005
In 2004, the District purchased supplemental water from San Bernardino Valley Municipal Waler
District for direct delivery (in the recycled water system) and for spreading activities. The
District purchased 1,200 acre feet of water for direct delivery Into the non-potable water system
at ~I cost of $ 125,80/AF, or $150,960 which was paid for by the District's recycled water
customers. An additional 1,800 acre feet of imported supplemental water was purchased for
recharge of our groundwater basin at a cost of $118.40/AF, or $213,120.
In 2005, the DIstrict purchased 2,140 acre feet of supplemental water from San Bernardino
Valley MuniCipal Waler District for a sum of $269,212 and 555 acre feet of supplemental water
from the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency for $77,145.
1.2 Common Questions and Answers
This comprehensive Water, Wastewater, and Recycled Water Rate Analysis has been prepared
to evalUate the overall rate ~tructure and components for the services provided by the District.
Specifically, the services of drinking water, sanitary sewers and non-potable/recycled water will
have been reviewed for all users In the "residential. commercial, instituticnal and industrial
sectors. Funding for lhese critical services wrthln the Yucaipa Valley are recovered from those
who use the service - that is, a "user pay" basis. Use is measured by the water meters (both
potable and recycled) installed on the water supply to your home/business and on a fixed basis
for thcse customers connected to the sanitary sewer. The following questions and answers
have been prepared to help explain how the future rates will need to address system. growth,
regula!ory changes and full cost accounting principles applied to the District and commonly
Page 9
April 29, 2005'
JUN-I)5-2006 MON 04: 15 PM
FAX NO,
P. 11/40
Yucaipa Valley Water District
Water, Wastewater ana Recycled Water Rate Analysis
used for govemmental agencies even though the District is managed and operated more like a
private, business.
Why change the existing rate structure?
The District maintains a very cost effective rate structure designed With our customers In mind.
Unfortunately, the District has recenlly encountered a series of local, regional and statewide
Issues that reqUire the District to complete a comprehensive analysis of our current rate
structure. In summary, some of the issues pressuring the District's existing rate structure
Include:
· Statewide Issues - EMF III diverted over $2.2 million In local properly taxes previously
reoeived by the District to balance the budget of the State of California. See Seclion 3.5
for additional information.
. Reqional Issues - In 2004, the State Water Resources Control B.oard approved the
Basin Plan for the Santa Ana Region of fhe Water Quality Control Board. This regulation
requires the District to maintain groundwater quallly similar to the quality that existed in
the late 1~60's and early 1970's. In the near-term, thIs regulation will require the District
to Implement nitrogen and TDS reduction strategies immediately on water supplies and
wastewater dIscharges. In the next decade, the District will be required to construct
facilities necessary to remove salt molecules from the water and wastewater supply to
protect the local groundwater supplies.
· Local Issues - The District continues to experience accelerated costs associated with
the operation and maintenance of the water, wastewater and recycled water systems. .
Specincally. the District's finances have been,negatlvely impacted by accelerated steel
costs, fuel oosts,' construction costs, blosollds handling costs, and supplemental waler
purchases. .
In summary. as a result of stringent regulatory requirements placed upon the District's'
wastewater treatment process and water filtration prooess, and the Integrated approach to solve
water/wastewater quality and quantlty Issues with an aggressive investment in local
infrastructure, the DistrIct has determined that It is necessary to adjust the water, wastewater
and recycled water rates.
What will be accomplished by adjusting the rates?
The District has designed the proposed rate structure and full-sized billing to accomplish the
following goals:
· Improve overall revenue stability of the District;
· Enhancement of the ability to discuss the complex issues of the District with our
customers by providing details 10 allow our customers to better understand the individual
cost elements Included in the waler, waslewater, and recycled water rates;
· Modification of the billing units and fixed costs to allow for a more natural system based
on the cost per day and cost per 1,000 gallons for services provIded by the District.
Why .are the Yucaipa Valley Water' District's water rates dIfferent from other
municipalities?
Water and wastewater rates are a function of costs and how those costs are recovered. There
are specific characteristics unique to each munIcipality's utility operations and dlffering
regulatory requirements based on geographical location and servIce population. Yucaipa Valley
District currently draws water from local groundwater wells but Is progressing towards a more
Page 10
April 29, 2005
JUN-05-200G MON 04:15 PM
FAX NO.
p, 12/40
Yucaipa Valley Water District
Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
diversified water supply system relying on groundwater, local surface water, recycled water and
aupplemental water supplies. This resource mix has been planned for over the past forty years
'md is now coming to fruItion to provide our local community with the highest quallty water
'esources available in a cost effective and reliable manner.
Additionally, the District operates a water and recycled water system over a very unique
topographical area. Consider for a moment that the District office on Second Street is
approxImately 70 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean and at an elevation of 2,000 feet above
sea level. If you compress this 70 mile distance into a five mile distance keeping the 2,000 feet
in elevation change the same, thIs would represent the working conditions of our water supply
system. It takes a great deal of non-renewable energy to move water up in elevation, and
llkewise, it takes a great capital investment to collect surface water from the upper elevations of
the District (when available) and transport this local water supply to the area of water demllnd.
Overall, the District operates a truly unique water deliveJy system that Is more complex than
most other water providers in the region,
Why ara the Yucaipa Valley Water District's wastewater rates dIfferent from other
munIcipalities?
The District discharges wastewater and ulilizes recycled water In the Yucaipa and San Timoteo
Water Management Zones as defined by the basin plan adopted on Octobar 2004 by the State
Water Resources Control Board and the' maximum benefit analysis approved by the Regional
Water Quality Control Board In Aprll 2005. Located at the t9P of the Santa Ana Watershed,
these management zones, or groundwater basins, are highly coveted as superior groundwater
qualtty that must remain pristine under the Porter-Cologne Act. This means our' wastewater
treatment reqUIrements are more stringent than most, if not all other munIcipalities In southern
California, While some communities achieve an economy of scale by having fewer, larger
wastewater treatment plants, the District needs to maintain smaller, sub-regional facilitfes to
effectively deat with the severe topography of the area. There are many other variables
lncluded in the District's wastewater costs, but the examples above highlight some unique
aspects of the District's operations,
What factors does the District consider when setting water, wastewater and recycled
water rates?
Since the District acts more like a business than a classical government bureaucracy, cost
recovery Is a key consideration in our rate review. Other factors in the proposed rate structure
include revenue stability, conservation, fairness, economic development, competitiveness,
financial sufficIency. cost recoveJy, ease of Implementation and understanding. As the focus or
Importance of these factors change, the rate structure will be changed as well,
When would the new rilte structure likely take effect?
The proposed rate structure requires' Board approval. To ease the Impact on property owners,
~enants, and businesses and allow customers time to plan for rate adjustments, the structure
'inc:ludes adjustments over a long periOd of time. starting on June 1, 2005.
Why is there a multi-level rate structure on water rates for customers?
The main objectives of the mullf-Ievel rale structure Is to:
Page 11
April 29, 2005
JUN-OE-200B MON 04:15 PM
. .. .
FAX NO.
p, 13/40
Yucaipa Valley Water District
Water. Wastewater and Recvcled Waler Rate Analvsts
. encourage conservation; and,
. recover the costs associated with peak use from customers who place a heavier
demand on the system.
1 he average residenlial customer consumes about 33 hundred cubic feet or 25,000 gallons of
water per month. The multl-level rate structure Ineludes rates that are increased for excess
consumption which affects the above average !lsers as weir as lower tiers designed to benefit
\Iater users who practice effective conservation.
How would the current and proposecl rate structure compare for residential customers?
There are two components to the proposed water and wastewater rate structure.
;:ixed Charges - A monthly fixed charge has been established to cover the fixed costs
regardless of the amount of water consumed or wastewater discharged. These fixed costs In
!he water division represent a small percentage of the overall District's water revenues, currently
15%. The wastewater monthly charge Is. a fixed fee since the .operation of the biological,
mechanical and filtering systems of the wastewater treatment plant must continue to operate 24
hours per day 7 days per week regardless of whether a customer Is homa. at work or on
vacatton,
Consumption Based Charges - A consumption based charge on water and recycled water
st;l1Vice has been adopted to oharge customers proportionally to the amount of water, they use.
This multi-tiered consumption charge is used to assist In conservation and fairly allocate th~
cost of water based on consumption. . .
,
Will the District reevaluata the costs Included In this proposal?
The District staff will be reviewing the informatfon in this document at least twice per year. The
first review begins in late winter/early spring and conoludes with the adoption of the District's
budget in June. The second review occurs with the completion of the financial audit report
prepared during the summer wllh Board review and adoption in September.
How can I become more Involved in the activltres of the Olstrlct?
As a consumer, resident or business owner, the best way to become involved in the activities of
the District is to subscribe to our regular meeting agendas. Tnls can be done through our
webslle at www.vywd.dst:ca.us. The regular committee meetings, workshops. and board
meetings are conducted as public meetings and scheduled late in the day and evenings to
encourage pubic partIcipation, Also, local government is one of the most effective forms of
government since your elected officials and the majority of District employees are also your
nei~,hbors. Please feel free to provide us with questions, comments or concerns.
Page 12
April 29. 2005
JUN-05-20D6 MON 04:15 PM
FAX NO.
P. 14/40
Yucaipa Valley Water District
V fater. Wastewater and Racycl8d Water Rate Analysis
~~,O Economic Assessment
I\n important component In the economic evaluatlon of a municipal seeviee provider Is to begin
fly understanding and evaluating the overall financIal health of the District. This section briefly
reviews and evaluates the historical and future economic assessment for providing seeviee to
Ihe community.
2.1 The Economic Nature of Utility Operations
Public utility operations, such 85 the DIstrict's water, wastewater and recycled water operations,
provide a seevice to the communlly which Is essential to public health, protection of the
environment, and the local economy. Public utUity operations differ from most other types of
business entities in that they are highly capital Intensive; in capital construction; capital
operation/maintenance; and capItal replacement This means that a large amount of capital
investment is required to begin and operate a utility compared to most other businesses.
The large amount of capital required to fund a utility, combined with operating labor, Insurance
and other costs of operation which do not vary with consumption of water consumed, means
that a majority of the costs Incurred by a utility (typically 70 to 90 percent) Bre fixed. Fixed costs
are incurred whether or not customers consume water or dispose of wastewater, and are
associated with providing the availability of seevice at the point of consumer use. A smaller
proportion of a utility system's cost Is variable and changes with the volume of water consumed
or quantity of wastewater treat~d (i.e. the oost of chemicals, power for treatment and pumping,
etc.). Due to the large amount of capital required to build and operate a water, wastewater and
recycle.d water utility, most public utilities are monopolies in their service areas.
. .
Financing Is orten requIred to construct facilities; those providing the capital should receive a fair
return on Invested funds. Public polley has been established to provide a fair return on invested
funds to customers of a pubIc utillly through relatively low water, wastewater and recycled water
rates. These lower rates generally result from the fact that: 1) pUblic utilities do not pay federal
income taxes; 2) public utilities receive lower interest rates on financing through tax-exempt
bonds; and 3) public utilities do not have to pay dividends to stockholders. Operating funds of a
PUbllc utility in excess of operatlng expenses end debt seNice on financing can be re-Invested
in the utlllty system. This reduces the need to finance addttional capllal and. thus. allows utlllly
rates to be set at a lower level.
2.2 BasIs of Accounting in Utility Operations
Significant differences exist between the cash and accrual basis of accounting in utility
operations. Many public utilities prefer to set rates on the basis of cash requirements. This
helps to keep rates at lower levels In the short term. The 'cash basis includes only cash
expenditures of a utility and does not include an allowance for deprecIation expense.
Depreciation, ~owever, is a significant means of developing cash reserves for future pay-as-
you~go capital Inyestment an~ replacB!""enl. Publicly owned utilities generally use the accrual
baSIS of accounting for finanCIal reporting. ThIs method includes depreciation as an operating
expense, and Identifies an appropriate rate' of return whlch the utility can earn on its investment
In the system asset$. Under the accrual basis, depreciation expense (a non-cash item) is
inCluded as an operating expen$e.
Page 13
April 29. 2005
JUN-05-200B MON 04:1B PM
FAX NO.
p, 15/40
-, --- -' "- - ~_. --
'(ucalpa Valley Waler Distrlcl
Waler, Wastewater and Rec~clecl Weter Rate AnalysIs
The District's Audited Financial Statement is conducted on an aocrual basts in accordance with
lhe Generally Accepted Accounting Princlpals (GAAP) and standards promulgated by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASS)" and the Governmental Accounting Standards
Board (GASB). However, because the District prepares its budgets and long-range capital
planning on a cash basis, a cash basis is utilized for this study.
2.3 Fiscal Year 2004 Audited Financial statements
Historical income and expense data for the Distnct have been complied from the Audited
Financial Statements for FY 2004. A couple of brief notes may help to explain this financial
summary to customers not familiar wilh the District's operating statemenL
. Depreciation Expense - The following financial statement is provided with depreciation
listed as an operating expense, both funded and unfunded portIons. Most utilities when
they examine this type of Information do not always list depreciation as an expense
since it is a non-cash expense. However, in order to be perfectly truthful, honest and fair
to our customers, it is important to convey the fact that not all of the appropriate
depreciation is listed. Ttlis will result In higher cosls In the future when the District will
need to replace aged assets without appropriate funds set aside. A summary of the
Dislrict's recent financial performance Is provided In the followIng table,
. 1995 Revenue Bond Payoff - In t=Y 2004,. the District paid off the balance of the 1995
Refunding Revenue Sands which incurred additional expenses not anticipated In the
beginnIng of the fiscal year.
. Capital Contributions . "Capital contributions are appropriatelY listed in the District's
audited financiar statements as a non-opera ling revenue. For this analysis, the capi!al
contributions are not included as part of net income. , .
. Assessment Districts - In preparation of the 2004A Series Revenue Bonds. the District
closed all remaining assessment districts, "
Page 14
April 29, 2005
JUN-C5-200Ei MON 04:16 PM
FAX NO,
p, 16/40
--. - _. --.
Y Jcafpa Valley Waler DIstrict
Vraler, Wastewaler and Recycled Water Rale Analvsfs
_ " . _ " . . " " _ _ _ . " FISCAL YIOAR ~D04 - " . - - - - - " . - - . -
Soureo. and Uses of Funds WAter Wastewater Recycled Assessment Tol.1
W.tor Dlstrlc.ts
Nol Ass.ls-July1, 2003 $ 4B,B28,458 $ 72.715,2.1 $ 1,839.B59 $ 191,09~ , 123,635,450
OperaUng Revenues: 706,851 114,280 1.697,719
proporty Taxe. 816,588
Chaf\le. lor Currenl SeNIct!s 5,772,280 4,663,119 127.624 10,563,003
mher f{evenue 767.564 34.158 B01.722
Operallng Rev.nue. 7.358,412 S,4~f128 241,904 13.062,~
Operating E><pense.: 2,80B.457 ' 4,202.885
Salanes and Weg.. 1.398,428
Elecl!ical Power 1,398,494 421,710 1,820,204
Waler Purcha..s 214.839 -" 165,023 379,862
AdmlnlSIraUve Services 376,321 B25,604 891 1,202,816
OperaUng Supplies 233,143 721,022 889 955,034
Molnl.nonce and Repairs 310,579 424.991 4,539 740,109
DepreclallonlAmorlI%llUon, Funded' 1,000,000 725,000 1,725.000
DepredallonfAmorllzaUon, Unfunded' 348,780 M79,820 10,712 1,539,312
Insurance. Professional fees 8. O\11er 720_837 231,169 4~3 958.229
Tol.' OperaUng ~pens.. 7,409,450 51925.744 188,'257 13,521,451
Nel Operattng Revenue (53,036) (461,616) 55,847 (540,993)
Net Operallng Revenue a8 a Porcentage (0.7~.) (8.4",) 23.0% (4.1%)
of Operallng Revenue
Non-Oporilung Rovenue (Expenses): 168.417 291,087
Intorust Income 121.842 ~38 5\10
Other Income 8,710 15,li80 14.960 39,270
Los. on Disposal 01 AssetsIBond Co.ts (3ag,51~) (137,257) l528,769)
Inlerest 8. Other Expense _~3681 (541.030) 6Oo-.398~
Tol.ll'lol\.()perallng (318.328) (509.8701 15,816 15,570 (796,810)
Nellneome (Los.) (971,366) (911,496) 71 ;465 15.570 (25.5.817)
Interlund Transfer In (Transfolll Out) 206,852 (206.662) 0
Capital Conlrtbutions 7,682,819 4,588.081 4,530,246 17.001,146
Chango In Net Assets 7,511,453 3.823.257 4,801,711 (191,092) 16,745,329
Net AssetG -June 30. 2004 68,340.921 76,,598.478 8MMBO 139,390,779
As shown in the table above. the percentage of net operating revenue to total operallng revenue
is negative 0.7% for the water, negallve 8.4% for the wastewater division, and a positive 23%
for the recycled water division. These low net operating revenues are due primarily to Including
the unfunded depreciation/amortization In these divisions, If depreciation/amortization was not
included in the financial summary above, the District would show the percentage of net
operating revenue to total operating revenue In the wateT, wastewater and recycled water
divisions of 17.6%, 26.4%. and 27.4%, respectively_
1 The FY 2004 Operating BUdgel did not Include lull funding for lhe deprecIation 01 the assets used by the existing
ratepayers. In FY 2004, !he Dlslrfct funded a lotal of $1,725,000 with a tolal of $1.539,312 In unfunded depreciation.
As discussed In Section 2.3.4, depreCIation Is IdenUlled by the District as an expenses even though II represents an
estimale of Ihe annual cost 01 USing the assets. Other agencIes Illay nolldentlly depreCiation In tholr rata analyses
since a cost Is not Incurred, but by Showing Ihis expense, the DIstrict IS able 10 evaluate our economic condition both
wilh lha lunded portion of depreclallon and the total deprecIation.
· In the FY 2004 Audlled Financial Statements, depreclatlonlamortlzatlon for the water division Is $1,348,780,
dopreclationlamortizallon {or the waslewater diviSIon Is $1.904,820 and Ihe and depredation/amortization lor the
recycled waler division Is $10.712. '
Page 15
April 29, 2005
JUN-O!i-2006 HON 04: 16 PH
FAX NO.
p, 17/40
Y Joalpa Valley Water District
~^,ater, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
2.4 Evaluation of Current Financial Condition
The financial condition of the District can be evaluated by applying several of the economic
~Iarameters. Among these methods is the percentage of net-to-total operating revenues,
(.apilalization ratio, rate of return, and the fundlng/depreciallon policy. Each of these
parameters provides valuable Information when assessing the District's financial adequacy.
:~.4.1 Net Ooeratina Revenue Analvsis -
'Jet operating revenues represent the amount of funds remaining after day-to-day operatlng
expenses are subtracted from operating revenues. Net revenues provide for debt service
payments and revenue-paid capital expenditures. Since a positive cash flow is required for debt
payments, net operating revenues should always be positive, and should be 20 to 40 percent of
total operating revenues. This range depends largely on the level of net non-operating
revenues and expenses. such as interest earnings, debt service, and in-lieu taxes. If net
operating revenues are negaUve. revenues collected are nol provldlng for ongoing operating
,costs and are not contributing to payment of,utillty capital costs.
As indicated previously, while the District Is approprIately coverIng the dally operating expenses,
the District is not generating a sufficient level of operating revenues to fully fund deprecial1on.
2.4.2 Caoitallzalion Rallo Analvsls ,
The r.apitalizalion ratio Is a measure of the amount of the ulllity plant In service which is oWned
and has been paid for'by the ratepayers and the amount of the utility assets which has been
financed. The capitalization ratio for a utility systt1m relates the amount of debt outstanding
relatlve to the present depreciated cost of the utility assets, and equals one minus the debt ratio,
where the debt ratio Is the total debt divided by the total value of the fixed assets. Under normal
financial conditions, utility operations are considered financially sound If the capitalil:atlon ratio is
at least 30 percent.
Capitalizati01/_ Rallo'" 1 - Debt _ Ratio
Debt Ratio = Total_ Olltsal/ding _Debt
- Depreciated _Fixed _Assets
If net operating revenues are positive by an appropriate amount, a ulmty will have funds to pay
for new capital projects and the capitalization ratio for the utility will remain at the same level or
Increase. If net operating revenues are less than sufficient to maintain the utility's capitalization
ralio. the ratio will decline. A declinIng capitallzation ratio Indicates revenUes are not providing
for the same proportion of paid capital expenditures (equity) as had occurred in the past and
that the debt ratio is increasing.
Since the District was essentially without capital debt during FY 2004, the capitalization ralla
analysis is not appropriate as a measure of economlo health. This tool will be applied in future
rate studies as an economic Indicator of the District.
2.4.3 Rale of Return Analvsis
Utilities that finance all capItal requirements should have a computed rate of return which is
equal to the interest cost on its debt. Normally. utilitles which use financing to a large extent
own 10 to 40 percent of the utility's assets. The rate of return for these utilities typically ranges
Page 16
Aprl129,2005
JUN- )5-2006 tlON 04: 17 PM
FAX NO.
p, 18/40
Yucaipa Valley Water DIstrict
Water. Wastew"tar and Recycled Water Rete Analvsis
from 5 to 8 percent. When 40 to 70 percent of the assets are owned, a rate of return allowance
of 8 to 11 percent Is generally common, if the utility desires to maintain a capitalization ralio In
thfs range. For utilities which are 70 to 100 percen\.owned, rates of return ranging from 12 to 16
percent are required if the ulllity desires to continue to pay for all or most of additional capital
expenditures from revenues.
From the proceeding, It is concluded that with greater ownership in the utility, a higher rate of
return on investment is required to maintain or Improve the equity positlon of the utility and to
maIntain or Improve its bond rating, Rate levelS should be set so that the rate of return
allowance is positive and adequate debt service coverage 15 provided.
The District's rate of return is indicated by the ratIo of net operating revenues (total operating
revenues minus total operating expenses) to, the District's rate base (property, plants and
equipment asset value). The District's property, plants and equipment totals $120,315,329. A
summary is provided below for each division for the purposes of calculating the rate of .retum.
Water waslewater Recycloa waler
OM.lon O[v(slon I'l./$lon
Ploperty. Plants and Equipment $49,846.148 $63.526,473 $6,942.708
Net Opetallng Revenue (53,038) (461,616) 55.647
Wilh Full PepreclaUon
Rsla 01 Ralurn (0.1%) (O.W,) 0.8%
Net Opetallng Revenue 295,742 716.20.4 . 66.359
Without Unfunded OepreclaUon
Rala or Re\urn 0.6% 1.1% 1.Q%
Net Operallng flovanue 1.295,742 1,443,204 66,359
Wilhou\ OepreclaUon
Rala or Relurn "2.6% . 2.3Y, uiy,
2.4.4 Deoreciation Analvsis
Depreciation is a source of internal cash, used for financing normal system replacements or
increasing ratepayer's equity in a utility system. Depreciation expense Is, in utility financial
statements, an estimate .of the annual cost of using an asset. Wear and tear, corrosion, action of
the elements on a utility asset, and obsolescence are reasons why depreciation expense is
recorded as a cost of utility operation. Since depreciation does not normally incur a cost which
requires an immedlate cash oullay on a day-to-day basis, ills considered a non-cash expense.
Cash generated by the recognlllon of a non-cash expense, such as depreciation. is usually a
source of internal financing which allows the utility to pay for and preserve lts original
lnvllstment. In other words, It pays for capital projects involving system renewals and
replacements, and funds the retirement of bond debt seNics, Cash retained should be used in
such a manner as to minimize or reduce future capital costs.
An example of depreciation funded projects includes the followIng examples:
A. Water Service LIne Replacement Program - Consider the 10,000 water service lines
currently maintained by the District with a 40 year service line life would require
replacement of 250 service lines per year. At a replacement cost of $1,000 per service
line. this program requires an annual budget of $250,000.
Page 17
April 29, 20C5
JUN-[5-20~~ MON 04:17 PM
YucaIpa Valley Water District
V later, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analvsis
FAX NO,
p, 18/40
Ei. Water Meter Replacement Program - Consider 10,000 water meters with a 15 year life
expectancy would require replacement of 667 water meters per year. At a replacement
cost of $325 per water meter, this pr9gram requires an annual budget of $216,775.
-'hese examples of asset replacement are required as part of the GASB 34 Asset Management
requirements to ensure the District adequately maintains the extensive assets under our contro\.
:!.4.5 Comoarison of Caoital Asse~
.~nother useful financial measurement tool Is a comparison of capital assets: As shown below,
',he capital assets of the District have Increase steadilY over the past fifteen years. Since 1989,
:he total capital assets have increased 115% percent to exceed $120 mimon.
$120
Historical Accumlllsllon of Assets
/j
~.
$100
$80
I
.-/
~
"
" $60
~
::;.
$40
$20
,
$CI
__Audhed Property, Flant & Oqulprrent
. . . . . . . . .
m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The amount of capital assets Is a useful tool to quiCkly understand the complexity,
responsibilities and obligations of an agency. The table below is provided to understand how
the District compares to other local water and wastewater providers.
Acencv
San Bernardino Valley Waier Conservation Dlsl
Soulh Mesa Mutual Watar Company
Western HeIghts Mutual Water Company
Beaumont Cherry Vatley Water District
Palmdale Water District
San Bernardino Vatley MunIcipal Water Dlatrlct
East VatleYWater District
YucaIpa Valley Water DIstrict
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
Padre Dam Municlp;ll Waler District
Weslem Municipal Water Dlslrict
Helix Water District
Cucamonga County Water Dlslrlct
Eastern Munrcinal Water Dlslnct
Page 18
FIscal
Year
2002
2003
2003
2004
2002
2004
2004
2004
2004
2002
2004
2004
200S
2004
Reported Capital Assets
rPrnoertv. Plent & gQuiomentl
$2,675,96S
$4,765,953
$7,723,732
$25,554,216
$67,640,979
$69,534,640
$78,030,065
$120,315,329
$135,532,622
$142,113,000
$143,939,223
$160,500,000
$200,847,000
$849.597.359
AprU 29, 2005
JUN-Qlj-2006 MON 04: 17 PM
FAX NO,
YJcaipa Valley Water District
1/1 'ater, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analvsls
~,.O An Assessment of Revenue Requirements
p, 20/40
I" order to property assess tha Dlstrlct.s future revenue requirements, one must first evaluate
find understand trends within four specific areas. These areas are: 1) current customer base
"nct projected changes; 2) evaluation of water demands, 3) significant changes in operating
l!xpenses including water filtratton and wastewater treatment costs, and 4) capital expanditures
and dabt service obligations, The following is a brief discussion on the impact of.these factors
1m the District's revenue requirements. .
3.1 Current and Projected Customer Base
A. fundamental element for developing service projections Is the quantificallon of customer
demand characteristics and the revenues derived from the current schedule of utility charges.
This information provides -the foundation for Integrating projected changes In demands and
customer unit rate adjustments,
As of .June 30, 2004, the District's customer base consisted of the following:
. Water S6IVice was provided through 10,674 water seIVice connections to a total of 15, 674
Equivalent Dwelling Units.
. Wastewater service was provided through 11,844 service connections to 18,671
Equivalent Dwelling Units.
". Recycled water service was prOVided to a total of 26 service connectJons,
The table below contains a detalled breakdown of service connect1ons and EDUs selVed by each
customer. The difference between the nu'mber of service connections and the number of dwelling
units is represented by multiple units on a property and larger meter sizes for commerclal, industrial
and Institutional customers. The detailed rate analysis focuses on dwelling units for the water
division and service connections for the wastewater division.
Water UWity
Customer iype
SIngle Family
Multiple Units
Commercial
ln$UluUonal
Industrial
Irrigation
Fire Detectors
Constnl<:fIM
"Total'
Number of
Connec6ons
9,732
491
193
57
21
78
56
4R
10,674
Number
of Units
9,732
5,166
294
67
25
7B
56
46
1MB4
Wll$lewaler UIlllty
Numllerof Number
Connecilons of Units
10,924 10,924
641 7,317
220 326
51 65
a 39
o 0
o 0
o 0
'11,844 18,671
Non.Polab1e!Recycled
Water UUflty
Number of
Connections
o
o
o
o
o
23
o
3
26
The detailed description of the existlng customer base Is used as a starllng point to project the
number and rate of new customers. The chart below Illustrates the number of EDUs added to the
District's water and wastewater system each year, Notice the slow development period for a fiva-
year period in the early to mid-1990's is part of the economIc cycle Which wIll return at some point
in time.
Page 19
April 29. 2005
JUN-1l5-200B MON 04:18 PM
FAX NO.
P. 21/40
"ucaipa Valley Water DIstrict
Waler, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
Even wilh several large
residential and
commercial development
projects prepared to
initiate construclion at a
potentIally rapid pace, like
Summerwind Ranch,
Mesa Verde Estates and
JP Ranch. the Dlstr1ct will
not over eslimate this
development polential In
this rale study. Several
municipalities fell into this
trap in the lale 19805 and
early 19905 and a rapid
pace of development was
believed to be normal.
When development
stopped. many agencies
found themselves financIally over extended since they relied sa heavily on the steady cash flaw of
development impact fees and charges from new growth.
1000
800
~ 800
"0
i
:iil 400
\ -
~...[1 n. n..Djhril
8! 3i ~ Ii! g: 81
tEE i ~ ~
~ i
~ ~
200
o
~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~
it it it ~ B: it it
IJ Waler Development Feel Collected
IJ Wastewater Developmenl Fees Collec\e
Instead, this comprehensive financial report will use the data represented in the graph above as
a standardized growth cycle coverIng a period of fifteen yea~. ThIs development cycle resulted
in an average long-term growth rate of the District is 2.8% per year with the past three years in
excess of 5% per Year. .
,~. j
12.Q%
10.0%
6.0% \
6.0%, ,'-
4.0%
2.0% - ...
0.00/, ~
~ iii '" '" ;t
'" 81
'" '"
~ r - ~
it it it it it
-% Water
AnnUlI! Peroentage Chango In Servloe Conneclfons
,,,""--
I~
/_______.3"
-=--=-'
* ~ 8i '" '" ~ - '" '" ~
s: en C> C> '"
'" c a ~
- - - ~ r '" '"
it it ?c ?c it it it it it C;:
-'Va Sewer
-2.6% Long-Term Annual Change
In summary, customer growth affects the DistrIct's revenue requIrements in two ways. First, it
increases the customer base, which provides additional accounts subject to user charges.
Secondly, It Increases operating costs associated with the delivery and provision of utility
Page 20
April 29, 2005
JUfHJ5-2006 NON 04: 18 PM
FAX NO.
p, 22/40
_ _. _. _~ ._w __ _" ._.....
Yucaipa Valley Water District
Water. Wastewater and Recycled Water Rata Analysis
f,ervices. The growth projection within the rate analysis model includes a growth projection of
:~.8%, which is equivalent to approximatelY 440 dwelling units in FY 2005.
While this Is a 70% decrease from
'he development activity in 2003
and 2004. the District staff
oellevEls that the economy is "
prepared to soflen based on
leadIng economic Indicators that ...
fell 0.4% in March 2005. This Is
the biggest decline In the
0.4
composite Index slnce 2001.
While the current weakness of the
index of leading economic ...
Indicators in part reflects Ihe
effects of higher energy costs, -'.4
thare were eight of the ten
indicators that were nagative ....
contrIbutors to the index In March.
Specifically, Ihese negative
indicators included, jobless claims, vendor performance, building permits, average factory
workweek, money supply, consumer expeclations, stock prices and non-defense capital goods
ordered. The only two posilive contributors were the yield curve.and consumer goodS ordered.
COJ1lpo.lle In~ot .1 10 LOOdlnG lOOI.otor.
.. en.n... p.r(fcffl f'tfT.~ ''''-100
COJ1lpo.lte Indot 0110 l.lIedlng (OOI.olar.
'1111-f'O
.1"
."
.t<
.10
".
"r" I' 'n"' I" J" I' ..... 1'"1" I' 'fI,," I' "I" I
'.II'.u~ 'nil C",,"r.nu ...,ef m."., AnltrtlU DcnHU ~
,II
3.2 Evaluation of Water Demands
The District only produces polable water sufficient to meet the' demands of the community. If
there is a large demand for water. like In the summer season, the District will activate most of
our water sources to meet the demands. When analyzing the amount of potable water
produced on a monthly basis, the seasonality of the water demands becomes readily apparent.
4.000
~ 3,500
"-
Ii
~ _ 3.000
8 ~ 2.500
~;s 2.000
'" 8
~ ~ 1,500
,;;-
-!ll 1.000
~ 500
o
---=
~~
~~
/'/
~~
.~
......
~
il
u.
~
~
~
::0
5
..
"S
...,
'"
~
"-
II;
8
i'i
2:
~
-2001
-2002
-2003
-2004
The diagram belOW illustrates a historical perspective of potable water consumption each year.
This chart illustrates the generally increaslng trend of water consumption that conlinues to occur
over time. In 2004, the District produced 5.4% more water than in FY 2003 and 3.2% more
. Pago 21
April 29. 2005
JUN-O!i-200B MON 04: 18 PM
FAX NO,
p, 23/40
Yucaipa Valley Waler Dlstrtct
VI aler. Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
p;>table water than In FY 2002. Since 1988, the District has averaged an annual water demand
increase of 5.5%,
$,500
iii 3,000
)0-
il. 2,500
~ 2,000
~ 1,500
<:
,g 1,000
!i,\ 500
o
! m '" - !l! '" :!I; 8l :R Ii; '" ~ g ~ ~ ~ C5
81 Sl 31 ~ '"
Q} 0> '" ." '" l'l 0
~ ~ - - - ~ - ~ - - - - ... '" '"
~ 1:: a: It It ?i: It ?i: 1:: it it it it it it 1:: li:
Gal Pllor Vear Water ConsumpUon
_Wal.r Consumption (Year.t<>-oale6
- Une., Trendlln. based on Wal.r on.umptlo" 01 Pilor Ve.",
The District has been working dillgenlly to expand the non-potable water distribution system
throughout the YucaIpa Valley. The chart 10 the right lIIustrates how the potable water demands
have been held relatively constant with the Introduction of non-potable water in August 2002.
This chart to the right
illustrates ttie 15.0%
percMtage of non-
potable water demand 12.5%
as a percentage of total
water demand [potable 10.0%
plus non-potable waler
demands). The District 7,5'l4
has set a goal of
exceeding a 10% non-
5.0%
potable water demanc1
which was achIeved in
June 2003 and has
rou!~hly been
essentially achieved
each summer, This
goal has. been
significant for the
District, since the quantity of non-potable water demand removed as a demand on the potable
water system is equlvalent to a large production well producing 1,000 gallons per minute 24
hours per day, seven days a week.
2.5% to:
~::!
o.o%~
~
~
~
~~
~'I
'"
'l
.t
..,
~
.,
..,
s:
u
o
2
~
~
..,
...
~
~
i
to
.,
3.3 Operating Expense Projections
The main component to project revenue requirements is to prOVide an estimate of operating
expense projections for each District division.
Page 22
Apr1l29, 2005
JUN-O!i-2006 /10N 04: 19 P/1
FAX NO.
P. 24/40
Y Jcalpa Valley Water Dll;trict
!:'aler. Wastewater and Reoycled Water Rate Analysis
3.3.1 Water Division Expense Proiecllons
The primary cost component of the District's water utility is water supply-related expenses. The
Elements of these expenses are generally categori~ed as water purchases, labor, treatment,
f,ower/pumping, and debt obligat1ons. Since each of the District's sources of supply lncur
c1ifferent costs, the water supply plan will significa~t1Y impact utility revenue requirements.
Currently, the District's available water supplies consist of three primary sources, local
!lrOundwater supplies, Oak Glen surface water supplies and supplemental water supplies. The
I~osts associated with the groundwater supplies and Oak Glen surface water supplies are fairly
~table fr9m a perspective of available supply and .operating expense. The quantity of water
available from Oak Glen surface water sources has been limited by agreement with residents in
lhe community of Oak Glen to 500 gpm, when it is available. local groundwater sources have
been heavily relled upon to deliver the majority of the District's water supply. This supply is also
limited; but well managed to provIde a slable and reliable source of water.
Recent drought conditions have resulted in the Distncl Shifting our production capabllilies away
from local surface water supplies in favor of addilfonal groundwater produotion. This has
Increased water related expenses due to the additional groundwater pumping and booster
pumping to replace the relatively inexpensive local surface water sources. To property manage
our groundwater supplies, the Dislrlct has purchased supplemental water from San Bernardino
Valley MunicIpal Water District to recharge the local groundwater supplles and has constructed
non-potable water facilllies to alleviate the quantity of groundwater production within the region.
The non-potable water facilities provide a benefit to both our potable water customers with
Improved reliability and. provided our non-potable, water customers with an untreated water
supply which is more appropriate for non-potable uses. Both the non-potable water system and
the purchase of supplemental water have resulted in additional water expenses not previously
Incorporated into the water division rate struclure.
3.3.1.1
Cost of Suo1?fementaf Water SuoDfies - SBVMWD
The District receives supplemental water from the San Bemardino Valley Municipal
Waler DIstrict and the San GorgonIo Pass Water Agency. Both agencies have
established a rate structure tor water delivered from the East Branch ExtensIon that
includes fixed, variable and marginal components.
On November 18, 2002, tl1e San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District adopted
revised rules and regulations for the sale and delivery of water. The adopted water rates
consist of a $1 08/AF energy charge and a $40/AF conveyance charge for a total base price
of $148/AF. The following chart illustrates the discounts and surcharges that apply to
supplemental water purchases.' .
Criteria paym.nt Method Dlaeountl Waler RaUl
Surcharge
-~ ordered ~ - f'e,.ment 10(1/12" olll1e water 0% Discount of
Water p~or 10 O<dered due at !he end or each moolh lor $146/AF
~~ Oea:mb<lr 31. lor delivery 1/10 base p~ca. base waler rate
In \he folloWfng calendar
~ year. QIl.l12n2. Pa\'ll1ent In lull by Jandaty 31. 15% Discount of
p. $125.8DIAF
rord~un!ed rale. base water rate
Page 23
Apr1l2\!,2005
JUN-(15-2006 MON 04: 19 PM
FAX NO,
p, 25/40
"ucalpa Valley Water District
Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
--
Water ordered for Ql!!iQD..1- Payment for 115'" of the waler 0% DJ$coUnt of
",all. groundwater recharn& pMor ,. dije al!he end 01 each 'I1er II month for base wator 1'310
~U to Deoornber 31" for the base price.
del1vtlry during January
\I1roijgh May of the follQ\'ling ~. Payment In fun by January 31" 20% DIscount 01
year. (or dlsCllunted IlIle. ba.. waler rale
Eli Water Oldered at any time 25% Surellallle
dij~ng the calendar year for Paymenl method pu",u.nl to Section of base water
~_!! delivery In the same 4.070{ the Ru!es end Regulations. ral.
~.t calendar year.
.,lC W'ler pun:/1a.ed from payment method ptmluant to section
~~ SBvMWO lor Use outside 01 4.07 of the Rule. end Regijlaticns. f1ate
0- the boundary of SBVMWO. baSed on OWR Bulletin 132 Appendix B.
~
$14B1AF
$11e.401AF
$165/AF
$37B.B9IAF
Overall, SBVMWD offers the best water rates for planning ahead and paying for the
requested water delivery within the first month of the year. However, tl1ere Is no guarantee
with respect to receiving water ordered and paid for at the beginning of the year. It is
possible that operational Issues with the State Water Project, not the fault of YW'JD, and/or
lack of rainfall in nortl1em California can result in less water being delivered than paid for by
the Yucaipa Valley Water District.
For 2005, the Yucaipa Valley Water District has requested the purChase-of 2,140 acre
feet of supplemental water from San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Plstrict at a cost
of $269,212. This supplemental water purchase includes watei' for direct delivety
processed by the Interim Water Flltrallon Facility and non-potable water for tl1e recycled
water system.
3.3.1.2
Cast of Suoo/emente/ Weter SUDDlies - SGPWA
On February 7. 2005, the San Gorgonlo Pass Water Agency adopted rules and regulations
for the sale and delivery of supplemental water within their selVice area. The Yucaipa
Valley Water District subsequently purchased 555 acre feet of supplemental water from the
San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency in 2005 at a cost of $77,145. This supplemental water
purchase inclUdes water for direct delivery processed by the Interim Water FIltration Facility
and non-potable water for the recycled water system.
3.3.2 Wastewater Division Exoense Proiections
The expenses for the wastewater division are anticipated to Increase as a result of new
regulatory requirements, specifically nitrogen and TOS. These regulatory requirements will add
new treatment technology at both facilities In order to meet \he low stringent limits established
by l,he Regional Board.
Within the next five years the DistrIct antlcipates receiving grant funding for the brlneline
construction. This will requ1re a local match that will be made up of state grant funding and local
funds. This projection is not included in the wastewater rates at this time since the amount of
local participation is unknown.
Paga 24
April 29. 2005
JUN-05-2006 MON 04:20 PM
FAX NO,
P. 26/40
"ucalpa Valley Waler District
Water, Wastewater and Recycled Waler Rate Analysis
--
')epreciation continues to be underfunded In this division.
3.3.3 Recvcled Water Division Exoense Proiections
The new recycled water division has received matching funds from the water and wastewater
divisions. This inter fund transfer is based on the fact that the new recycled water system
provides a direct regIonal benefit to both the water and wastewater divisIons. There are no
unusual expenses related to this divisIon in this rate analysis.
3.4 Capital Expenditures and Debt Service Obligations
Capital expenditures and debt service obligations are projected to comprise a slgnmcant
component of the District's water and wastewater utility revenue requirements in the future. The
majority of the District's capital expenditures are driven by water supply Issues. wastewater
trealment requirements. and regulatory Issues. A projection of the anticIpated capItal
improvement expenditures and each project's funding source is Included in the annual budgets.
3.4,1 Water Division Caoilallmorovement Protects
The Water DivIsion Capital Improvement Program (Water - CIP) has been developed to
accommodate facility upgrades and system enhancements that have been identified in the 2002
Water Master Plan. Overall. the Water - ClP has Identified over $193 million In proposed
projects. The proposed Water. clP has been divided into four phases over Ihe next twenty
years. An annual breakdown by fiscal year (FY) Is provided for Phase 1 tnat covers FY 2003
(July 2002 - June 2003) through FY 2007 (July 2006 - June 2007). Phase 2 covers the time
period from FY 2008 through FY 2012; Phase 3 covers FY 2013 through FY 2017; and Phase 4
covers FY 2018 through FY 2022. FuMe phases extend from 2023 through 2050. PeriodIc
updates to this Water - CIP will be necessary to readjust priorities and confirm recommended
expendllures.
.
A major expenditure over the next five years Is required for design and construction of the new
Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Filtration Facility. Other major expenditures Include potable
water transmission mains to convey water from the new filtration faclllty, potable water storage
reSllrvoirs, and the non-potable water system. Additional identified projects are needed to
Improve the existing system to continue to prOVide adequate service to the existing customers in
the waler service area, Some Improvements are also needed to prOVide service for antle/pateo
fulure development. . .
3.4.1.1
Yuaaf/38 Vallev ReQional Water Fiflration Facllitv
The first phase of the Yucaipa VaHey Regional Water Filtrallon Facility will involve the
construction of a 12.0 mgd state of the art filtration facility with site planning and layout
provisions for the future expansion to an ultimate capacity of 36.0 MGD. This project is
being constructed to provide a redundant potable water supply to the existing community
and future development, with the, goal of eliminating the overdraft on the existing
groundwater basin and maXimizing the management of the local water resources.
Page 25
April 29, 2005
JUN-[)5-2006 MON 04:21 PM
FAX NO,
p, 27/40
. (ucalpa Valley Waler District
,~ Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
3.4.1.2
Non-Potable Water sv~tem Improvements
The District is developing faCililles to use non-potabJe water to meet a portion of the
water demands of the region. The objective of the non-potable system is to supplement
the local potable supply in the most cost effective and efficient manner possible. Thls
project is being constructed to;
, . Reduce dependence on local groundwater supplies:
. Minimize imported waler from Northem California;
. Reduce groundwater overdraft conditions;
. Reduce costs associated with construotion and operation of the regional water
filtration faoUity; and
. Provide a fully integrated water supply for the Yucaipa Valley.
3.4.1.3
Potable Water Distribution System . storaoe Reservoirs
It is recommended that the District construct eleven reservoirs by the year 2050 (one 4
mg ,reservoir currently under construction), three addlllonal reservoirs by 2020 and
seven additional reservoirs by 2050. This will add 21.5,5.0 and 17.0 mimon gallons of
storage respectively, for a total added capacity of 43.5 million gallons, ihe reservoIr
construction recommendations are based on desIgn criteria for fire, operational and
reserve storage capacity on a zone by zone basis, storage capacity requirements are a
function of average daily flow and thereby Increase as new development occurs.
Additional rehabilitation or replacement projects are also Included to maintain existing
facilities and preserve system reliability.' . .
3.4.1.4
Potable Water Distribution Svstem - Pumplna FacilIties
The improvements and new facilll1es needed for booster pumping are summarized on
the CIP summary sheets located in the master planning document. Five existing
facilities require rehabilitation and upgrade inclUding such modifications as pumping
equipment replacement, electrical system and/or SCADA upgrade, and miscellaneous
modifications. These modifications are.required to maintain system reliability. Five new
booster pump facilities are required to serve the needs of new development.
3.4.1.5
Potable Water Distribution Svstam - Transmissfon Pine/loss
Transmission system projects are required to convey water from the regtonal water
filtration facility to distributed zones In the service area. Major transmission project by
phase are as follows:
elP Phase
PhaSe 1 . FY 2005
Phase 1 . FY 2006
Phase 1 - FY 2007
Phase 2 FY 2008-2012
Ultimate System
Transmission Pipeline Projects
Pipe Sizes Total Lenglh
(Inches In diameter) (feel)
16,20,24,30 72.422
16,20,24,30
16,20,24,30
10,12',16,24,36
12,16.20,24
102,775
42,041
217,238
Total Cost
($1.000)
$ 5,681
$ 5,581
$ 5,581
$22,138
$ 9.556
$48,437
Total:
Page 26
Aptil29,2005
JUN-05-2000 MON 04:22 PM
FAX NO.
p, 28/40
Yucaipa Valley Water District
Water, Wastewater and Recycled Waler Rete AnalysIs
--
;3.4.1.6
Potable Water DIstribution System - Distribution Pioellnes
Distribution pIpelines projects are necessary to address growth and operational
deficiencies. Major projects by CIP phase are as follows:
CIP Phase
Phase 1 - FY 2003
Phase 1 - FY 2004
Phase 2 FY 2008-2012
Phase 4
Ultimate System
Plstrlllu\lon Pl\'lellne Pro/eels
. Pipe Sizes Total Length
(Inches In diameter) (feet!
18,20,24,30 18,188
16,20;24,30
12,16,20
16,18,20
10,12.16,20
29,673
10729
16.376
74.966
Tolal Cost
1$1.000)
$ 1.675
$ 1.675
$ 5,710
$ 2,202
$ 2,782
$14.044
Total:
3.4, 1.7
Potable Water Distribution Svstem - Wells
The CIP Inc/udes several well projects to rehabilitate existing facilities as required to
maintain reliable grounclwater supply. This new groundwater supply source is necessary
to replace other well facilllies that are reaching the end of their useful life. Due to the
age of most of the Dlstrlct's wells, the District should embarl< on deprecialion funcled
capital Improvement projects to re-drlll and re-equip the older watsr producUon wells.
3.4.2 Wastewater Division Caoitallmorovement Projects.
The Wastewater DivisIon Capital Improvement Program (Wastewater - CIP) has. been
developed to accommodate the facility upgrades and system enhancements that have been
Identified as par! of the 2001 Wastewater Master Plan. Overall. the Wastewater - elP has
identified over $68 million /n proposed projects. The proposed Wastewater - CIP has been
divided into four phases over the next twenty years. An annual breakdown is provided for
Phase 1 that covers fiscal 2001-2002 (FY 2002) through fiscal 2005-2001'1 (FY 2006). Phase 2
covers the I1me period from FY 2007 through FY 2011i Phase 3 covers FY 2012 through FY
2016; and Phase 4 covers FY 2017 through FY 2021. Future phases extend from 2021 through
2050. Periodic updates to this Wastewater - elP will be necessary to re-adJust priorities and
confirm recommended expenditures. .
A major expenditure over the next five years Is required to upgrade and expand the capacity of
the existing Wastewater Treatment Plant. Modifications are required at Lift Station No. 1 to
address operation and maintenance iSSUes. Other identified projects are needed to Improve the
exisUng system to continue to prOvide adequate service to the existing customers in the
wastewater service area. Some improvements are also needed to prOVide service for
anticipated future developmenL
The costs of major facilities associated with new developments have \leen assumed to be
incurred by the developers. The funds for the new wastewater treatment facility and coUection
system located In the Oak Valley Davelopment will be provided by both the District and by
deVelopers through connection fees or other financial mechanisms. 'fhe developer wl11 provide
funding to cover the capacity needed by the Oak Valley Development. The District will
supplement the collection system and treatment facility projects to increase the capacity as
needed to serve other District connections In the southern portion of the service area.
Page 27
April 29 . 2005
_.. J~~~ J5~2006 MON 04: 24 PM
FAX NO,
P. 29/40
'(ucalpa Valley Water DistrIct
:~ Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
3.4.2.1
Wastewater Treatment
The Henry Wachholz Wastewater Treallnent Plant currently treats all wastewater flow
collecled from the District's $ewer system, A Phase I Renovation Project Is being
considered as part of an overall analysis of existing WWTP and will include items such
as an Integrate Fixed Film Activated Sludge process, aeratron equipment upgrades,
blower controls, additlon of membrane treatment and ultraviolet disinfection. This
renovation and expansion project Is scheduled to begin construction in 2006.
3.4.2.2
Western Regiona' '"lemen/or Facilities
This project Involves the construction of a wastewater collectton system. fift stalion and
'force main required to serve the western portion of the service area. Construction for
this projept Is planned for FY 2007. It fs anllclpated that once this project is complete,
many of the septic systems in the area will transition from septic service to sewered
service due to the availability. PreViously there has not been a major collector
constructed in thIs portion of the District's service area.
3.4.2.3
Lift Slatlon lmoravements
The District is antlcipallng the removal of several existing lift stations with the
construction of the Oak Valley MeR WWTP. The removal of these facilities will require
the construction of gravity pipelines upstream and downstream from the lift stations. to
provide ,the necessary gravity flow condillons.
Improvements at L1n Slation No. 1 are needed to provIde for maintenance activities in
the wet well and force maIn. This facility will be relocated with the development of the
Mesa Verde Estates Project.
A new North Bench lift Station is planned to serve Tract 14429 and will be constructed
in 2006. The project will consist of a lift station, 5,000 of parallel 6-lnch force mains and
2,600 feet of a-Inch .gravity sewer. It Is anticipated that developers will construcl another
lift slation and 3,500 feel 01 parallal 6-inch force mains to serve remaining areas. The
District's portion of the project will be funded with Development Impact Fees.
3.4.2.4
Wastewater Collection Svsfem
The' collection system improvements are required to provide adequate flow capacity in
the collection system and to meet the District's design crlteria. The Calimesa Blvd
collector is the highest priority collection system project. Callmesa Blvd, 4lh
Streef/Yucaipa Blvd/S1h Slreet, and Avenue L projects are all planned for Phase , of the
elP.
The collection system hYdraulic model completed as part of the master plan Indicates a
need to increase the capacity of several other collectors. These needs are based on
development projections and assumed start-up timing of the new WWTP in Oak Valley
sometlme after 2010. The need for these projects should be re-evaluated as actual
conditions are realized.
A series of miscellaneous projects consistIng of short pipe lengths and minor
Page 28
Aprl! 29, 2005
JUN-05-2U06 MaN 04:26 PM
FAX NO.
P. 30/40
YucaIpa Valley Water District
Water. Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
Improvements have also been Identified. It is assumed that these projects will be
Incorporated into regular District operations and malntenam:e activities.
3.4.3 bebt Service Obliaat1ons
The YucaIpa Valley Water District Financing Corporation was established on May, 24, 2004 as
a nonprofit public benefit corporallon organized for the sole purpose of acquiring, constructing,
rehabilitating, financing and refinancing of, or providing for the sale or leasing of, facllities, land
and equipment for the use, benefit and enjoyment of the public served by public agencies in the
State of California and any other purpose incidental thereto. In June 2004, the Yucaipa Valley
Water District Financing Corporallon issued $45,730,000 In revenue bonds for the construction
of water related facililles related to the Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Fillrallon Facility. The
District received strong financial ratings from Fitch Ratings Inc. ("Fitch") and Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. ("Moody's.) of "Aaa" and "AA,A" .respectively, based on the District's financial
strength, minImal risk of default and the issuanca of commonly Issued bond related Insurance.
The District anticipates a similar Issuance in 2005 for wastewater related Improvements.
3.5 ERAF III and the Implications for YVWD
Based on the FY 2005 Budget, water fixed revenues (I.e" servlce charges) only comprise of
15% of the total water division revenues. Accordingly, the District's water rate structure is highly
sensitive to water usage which causes flnanciallnstablllly In wet years when water consumption
Is reduced or durlng dro.ughts or emergencies when water del1veries are curtailed or voluntary
conservation Is requested.
Considering this Variability, the Dlstrict has become heavily dependent upon property taxes for
the long-range rate stability which has significantly benefited our customers. Due to the
District's Intense capital improvement projects. the Boa~d has allocated property tax dollars to
fund projects that improve the service to our customers by dedicating this funding source to
projects instead of operational costs, such as labor, pension. etc. This maximizes the benefit of
the [ocal properly taxes to the people who pay them _:. our customers.
3,5.1 California Prooertv Tax Overview
California-like most other states In this country-relies extensIvely on local governments to
protect the public, help the needy, educate students, and respond to local concerns. For nearly
a (;entury, California's properly tax has been reserved for the exclusive use of local
governments and has served as the mainstay of local finance.
Before passage of proposition 13, local governments and their residents controlled property tax
rates and the distribution of property tax revenues to local agencies. Proposition 13, however,
plac~d Into lh~ California Constitution a maximum rate for non-debt related property taxes and
spElCJfied that Its revenues are to be allocated to local agencies "according to law."
pag e 29
April 29. 2005
JUN-05-200B MON 04:27 PM
FAX NO,
p, 31/40
VI calpa Valley Water District
W~ter, Wastewater and Recycled Weter Rate Analysis
--
A; Figure 1 shows, Immediately after Proposition 13's passage, the Legislature established a
pi operty tax allocation system Figure' .
tt at reduced the share of
p 'operty tax revenues allocated Properly TalC Allocation OverTime
tel edur.ational local agencies
from a statewide average of 54
percent to 39 percent-an!, fic,,~
increased the share of property
taxes allocated to cilles, 50
counties, and special districls.
(The slate replaced the shifted 40
~:-14 district property taxes with 30
i'lcreased state funding.)
Bpecific: property tax allocation 20
formulas then were assIgned to
Hvery area of Ihe stale, 10
designating Ihe portion of the
properly tax to be allocated to
,~ach local agency serving the
;~rea. These property tax .Rtd~.lopm.nl...ncI...rdop.dlld.~io'"
,~lIocatlon shares were based on SaJf""ao.Jd01 EqU.nr>ll>1.
~ach agency's proportionate share of property taxes in the mid-1970s and are commonly
referred to as "AB 8" shares, after the bJII that created this property tax allocation system......
Chapter 282, Stalutes of 1979 {AB 8, L. Greene). With the exception of several relatively minor
,changes, the state dId not alterthese AB 8 shares until the early 19905.
,
Faced with significant budgetary challenges in 1992 and 1993, the state twice enacted major
changes to the state's AB 8 property tax arlocation system to direct larger shares of property tax
revenues to K-14 districts - and reduce slate General Fund spending for educatlon accordingly.
These changes reduced non-educational .local agencies' share of the property tax from a
statewide average of 65 percent to 48 percent. The properly taxes shifted to K-14 districts
because of the 19905 property tax shift now tolal about $5 b1llion. (For context, total property tax
revenues fn the current year are esllmated at $29 billion.) These property tax allocation
changes commonly are referred to as "ERAF," after the name of the fund into whIch the shIfted
property taxes inltlally are deposited, the Educational Revenue AugmentatIon Fund.
Percent Q( Properly 7lIl(es Alloett led to Local Agencies
1(-14
_ Co~nt1G$
_ cnJ~.
\ _ _ Olh.r I.oall EnU6os> I
/
V \
------------- ----
/.....--
-"
, , , ' ,
75.7fi 7e.711 01412 8+US a7.es OQ.91 Q3.Q4 116-97 011.00 02.03
SOUl""" Leglslafive Analys/'s Office, AnalysTs of/he 2004-05 Budget Bill, Febru8ry 2004.
3.5.2 Educational Revenue Auamentation Fund III (EMF" nn
PropOSition 98 reqUIred the Slate to fund education at specified levels. In order to meet this
obrlgation, the state enacted legislation thai caused local govemment to bear some of the
financial responsibility for thIs mandate. County Auditors were dIrected to establish Educational
Revenue Augmentation Funds (ERAF) by transferring a portion of loeal properly tax revenues
from local governments into the fund. EMF supports school districts, county offices of
education, and community college districts. The first ERAF shift of $1.3 billion occurred in FY
92-93. ERAF III for FYs 04-05 and 05-06 Includes $1.3 billion each year, wllh the burden
allocated as follows: - .
Page 30
April 29,2005
JUN-O'j-2006 MON 04: 29 PM
__ .. __ w~._ ._
FAX NO.
P. 32/40
Yucaipa ValleyWaler District
.Y latar, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
. E:RAF III Annual Contribution
Counties
Cities
Special Districts
Redevelopment Agencies
Annual Totoal (04-05 & 05-06)
$350 million
$350 million
$350 million
$250 million
$1.3 billion
The basis varies for determining the amount an Individual county, city or district will contribute.
County contributions are based on each county's share of VLF revenues. City contributions are
based on shares of sales tax, properly tax. and VLF revenues, The minimum city contribution is
. 2% of its general fund revenues and the maximum is 4%, as reported in the FY 01-02 State
Controller's clly report. ' .
Special district contributions have two levels: enterprise districts will contribute 40% of property
tax revenues and non-enterprise agencies wlll contribute 10% of property tax revenues, The
maximum contribution by any specIal district Is 10% of total revenues. Transit districls will
contribute up to 3% of their property tax revenues.' Mosquito abatement distrIcts are exempted.
as well as fire, police. hospital/health care, library and veterans' memorial districts.
Redevelopment agencies will collectively contribute $125 million based on gross tax increment
and $125 million based on net tax Increment. Agencies may be granted an extension based on
the remaining life of the redevelopment agency.
. ,
The cilies and counties will 'make their 'contribution" through a reduction in the amount they
receive from the State for .property taxes In lieu of VLF". .The special districts will contribute
directly to theIr county's ERAF.
The Department of Finance calculates the amount each special district must contribute; the
County Auditor-Controller will reduce each agency's tax Increment by this amount and transfer
the funds into the
ERAF. Because the
EMF contribution Is
based on property
tax revenues from
two years ago, there
may be instances
whl~re a district's
current tax increment
is nol sufficient to
cover the required
ER:AF contribution if
revenues have
declined recently.
Local agencies will
receive their full tax
increment agaIn
beginning in FY 06-
07,
+$2.0
State and City Gives & Takes Since Prop 13
In COfu,tant 20CM don.lr. :sInce ttlo Aaa etaUout fallowtng Prop 13
+$1.5
_SIlrl<AHltt_
(N...., If~ ,gee)
.... CIJa h Stile ^"'ltfnca 1n4
1.0011 Rt'ffilua l~nQ eAAF
A -Stir. C4MIII Fund Attllllnoo
~ CKlel .lrQ 1978
+$1.0
+SO.5
+$0.0
g
_-$D.5
~
..S1.0
-$1.5
-$2.0
-$2.5
eo 82 J:yB4
FYS t 83 F'f65
l'Y1l:!~
; Nit
fYgcs fIY04
$17 fY ~
...
Page 31
April 29. 2005
. JU~95-2006 NON 04:30 PN
FAX NO,
p, 33/40
Yucaipa Valley Waler Dlsmcl .
V\ aler. Wastewaler and Recycled Waler Rate Analysis
--
3.5.3 Overview of Prooertv Tax Revenues for VVWD
Each County levies a 1% property tax on behalf of all taxing agencies in each County, including
the District. The taxes collected are allocated to taxing agencies wIthin each county, Including
the District, on the basis of a formula established by state law enacted in 1979. Under this
f,)rmula, each County and a\l other taxing entitles receive a base year allocation plus an
Ellocation on the basiS of .sItus" growth In assessed value (new construction. change of
(Iwnership and inflation) prorated among the Jurisdictions, which serve the tax rate areas within
Hhich the growth occurs. Tax rate areas are specifically defined geographic areas, which were
developed to permIt the levying of taxes for less than countywide or less than citywide special
districts.
I=or 2004, the allocation received by the District of the 1% property tax is estimated to be
~p1,648,334, compared to $1,476,441 In 2003. Property taxes as a percentage of the total
'evenues of the District averaged 10% over the last five years.
From lime to lime legislation has been considered as part of the State budget to shift the share of
the 1 % property tax revenues collected by counties from special districts to school districts or other
governmental entities. While legIslation enacted In connection with the 1992-93 State budget
shifted approximately 35% of many speCIal district's shares of the countywide 1% property tax
revenues, the share of the countywide 1% property tax revenues allocated to multicounty special
dismcls such as the Dlsmct was exemptecf. While none of the State Budgets enacted since 1992-
93 have reallocated additional portIons of the .special districts' shares of the countyWide 1%
property tax revenues, the Stale has a large budget deficit for the current Fiscal Year. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that. the allocation formula currently established by State law will be
continued in the future. If the formula is changed In the future It could have a material adverse
effect on the receipt of property tax revenue by the District. The results of the state's budget
resulted in a 10% decrease In the District's property tax base for fiscal year 2005 and 2006.
The following tables show the secured assessed valuation within the District in each County and
the amount received by the Dismat of the 1% property tax during the five most recent Fiscal Years.
As a result of the implementation of the tax distribution system commonly referred to as the "Teeter
Plan" by the County of San Bernardino and the County of Riverside and the participation by the
District beginning in July 1984, the District receives 100% of Its share of the 1 % property tax levies
wilhout regard to delinquencies. There can be no assurance thai the Teeter Plan or the
particIpation of the District therein will be continued Indefinitely,
~
Pan:entago
Change 01
Property Tax
Income
San Bemardlno ro....l$lde C<>tInty YVWD AllocaUon YVWD
County Total Total Secured of San Bernardino Allocation of To!,jj YVWD
Secured Assessed County Proporty Riverside AllocaUon 01
Assessed Valuation T County properly Property Taxo.
ValuaBoo axes Taxe.
,WOO 2,614,611,302 415.183,202'" 1,166,944 103,061 1,290,005
2001 2,733,121,447 445,931,126 1,232,593 '110,693 1,343,286 4.1\6
,:002 2.879.961,092 485.424,330 1~72,898 117.045 1,383,591 . 3.0%
,!OO3 3.123,175.798 654,852,744 1,355,673 120.700 1,476,441 6.7%
2004 3.522.249.936 612.064.850'" 1,515109 133,225 1,646.334 11.6%
Sources: San Bomardino Countysnd Rl....rslds County AUdilor.COtl~oIlers lor Tota! Secured Assessed Valuationl Yucaipa vauoyWater
0lsU1cl ror OisUlcl A1locaUon.
(1) e,;Umaled ~ased on pro-rata all_tion for Fiscal Ye.r 2001
(2) Estimated ~a.ed on pro-rata all_tion for FIscal Voar 2003
FI.cal V..r
Page 32
April 29, 2005
~N-iJ~1.906 NON 04: 31 PM
FAX NO,
p, 34/40
Yucaipa Valley Water District
: Neter, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rale Analysis
Secured assessed valuation for the portion of the District In the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year
2003/04 as reported by the County of Riverside is $133,225, a 10.3% increase over the prior year.
Secured assessed valuation for the portion of the District in the County of San Bernardino for Fiscal
Year 2003/04 as reported by the County Is $1,515.109, an 11.8% increase over the prior Year.
Page 33
April 29, 2005
JUN-!J5-2006 NON 04:32 PN
FAX NO,
p, 35/40
Yucaipa Valley Water Oistrlct
~~Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
'l.O Summary of Rate Structure Changes
,1.1 Assembly BII/ 2115- Property Tax Shift
In September 20, 2004, Governor Arnold Schw8rzenegger signed Into law AB 2115 which was
approved by the legislature to shift property tal< revenue normally received by the District to the
State of California to provide the state with additional revenue to minimize the current and
ongoing financial crisis. This legislation would take a minimum of 40% of the property taxes up
to 10% of the total revenue of the special district untll a total of 350 million was shifted from
special districts to the state.
The specific language of AS 2115 had a provision that would have suspended the legIslation
with the passage of Proposlllon 65 at the general elections on November 2, 2004. Proposition
65 was originally designed to limit the ability of the State to take local revenues, however.
several associations that generally represent local governments shifted their support for
Proposflion 65 in favor of Proposition 1A, which did not have the same protection. The
November general elections resulted in Proposition 65 failing and Proposition 1A being
approved by the voters, The election resulted In AS 2115 being implemented.
Subsequently; the San Bernardino County and Riverside County Treasurers offices completed
their allocallons of taking property taxes from the District and on February 1, 2005 notified the
District that a total of $1,135,556.39 would be withheld by the County (see Attachment "E'), .
While the District Is considered fiscally conservative, this shift in property taxes has a significant
impact on the DistrIct's financial stability. This reputation has resulted from the District: (1)
maintaining a lean workforce with additional staff members only hired when absolutely
necessary; (2) prudently spending funds on facilities that benefit our customers by prOViding
reliablllty and redundancy; (3) maintaining competitive' salaries whfle not adding extravagant
benefitsj and (4) respecting the fact that each dollar received by the DistrIct Is one less dollar
our customers are able to spend on theIr famllies and theIr lifestyle. The District takes our rates,
fees. and charges seriously and does not take the money our customers spend on services for
granted, It is our desire that the dollars spent by the DistrIct continue to beneftt and add to the
quality of life our customers enjoy In the Yucaipa Valley.
It is prud~nt for the District to maintain a reasonable reserve fund for unexpected situations,
While the District could utlllze reserve funds for funding operational deficits, it is recommended
that the District maintain reasonable reserve funding levels adequate to provide for unexpected
and emergency situations. ThIs is especially important since the District is one of the few
California communities located immediately adjacent to the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault
line,s.
Information from the past Is a reasonable way to predict the future. Projections 'of future
op,;ratrng and capital costs have been utlllzed as the basis for this study as they provide the
best information to determine future rate requirements. While historical information is important,
it is only beneficial to the e~ent that it helps to indIcate future financial needs. To meet the goat
Page 34
April 29. 2005
..JUN-1l5-200B NON 04: 33 PM
FAX NO,
'(Ucalpa Valley Water DIstrict
: Nater, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
p, 36/40
of planning for the future, expenses need to be projected with the best available informatton,
utilizing both engineering and accounting resources.
While the District should be commended for the hard work and dedication to Improving the
infrastructure of the Yucaipa Valley, It is difficult to finance the water, wastewater and recycled
water Improvements while completing extensive capital Improvement projects. gvery year there
are increased stresses associated with the existing infrastructure of the water and wastewater
systems. For Ihe water division, this Is primarily due to the consolidation of several mutual
water companies to form the current Plstrict service area. For the wastewater division, the
stresses are generally caused by regulatory requirements and the inflexIbility of treatment
processes, The proposed rates need to account for the uncertaInty that exIsts with the
increased pressures placed upon the aging Infrastructure by funding additional depreciation.
Materials Prices Soar
Asc.vtlt! snonage tn wall mc~l pushcl;l struc.
tural steel BfJd rffnfarclng oar prtcc, to tCCCNd
1".\$ 10 2O<M IE/m 312VM p, 221:StruC11l'"
11001 pri<Ol jumpo~ 31 % ._Ilclo/lrr 2003.
level vffille feoor prleCS t1imbC~ ,,:1%. ""Ices for
olher fMtllrkll, 1I1SO m:IISe JMQc yeat-lo-Y!lr gal",
""" Cemont P/lcas I: M!m~er Prlc8~
85 .... . ~
aD
. ! SOO
10 t l~
, i 15 ,
! 60 I ' ' :
, l:' 65 '94 'lIS'Il6'87'98'09'OO'ot '02'83'0}
1O'.'lC~cw.C(t4TIl...rtOI(tt/rIcU~tl(....)OtfT'fr.{l.l.C(
f1.a'Olltlf'{-tt'ro:rf'I).OIllQ;U,IIt.
-..---
"'..
tOO
175
1ro
145
j\sph,!11 Prices,. ._...
'30
t1!.
100 i
'.9~ .95'90 1)7193'99 '00'01 '02 '03 '04
1O\.1Il",PIlantJ1li"Cl)c'aHlV.QorP'lJQ'C1'l'.'MJoI:t
rAQ:fI)\I.DJOkJll,tlASil\o\.l.l.1
_______ -J
400
350
. '
300 ~
'9.\ 'SS'Il6'S7 'ODW'OO'01'02'll3'OoI
lO(JlCi:[fllca~~<<WU<<P1.rucm""t1W'l
f1'afOR2~.~'*'otAl'1:R:nJlXt.,l,\l:lIOlJlln
roo' .... .~JYY.'Q~.d..~f.i~e8 "
&00
,600
soo
500
450
400
't)..('SSfQ6:01'G8'9!)'OO'OI'02.'03'04
1lUoCl: WI(t)IGl1'U:JlCIlrUltM;$QCI'119 arrJ.~.wl
~C('~YI.tlt\'t'ffOCIOl'(Kno.lt.\,'il)SQfT
Souroe: ~ngln.erinfl Nows.Rocon:!. Oecembllr 2004, p. 61.
In :zoo..,lneIudinQ. 31'.1. 1M coppervraler tuhina
and ~,.. for PVC waler f)ipe. ptyWoQd prkes lay-
e1O<1I1t1l1ltcr Jumplno SS% in 2003. lumber plll::es
.'. up 25% III tll.ll\SI two yoar.,
.,..,
:>I
32
30
.28
2G
Structural. stee.! Prices '; I
: I
1
. !
I
t
I
\
2l
22
. '04 '05 'oG '91 '1l8'!r9'00'll1 'O2'03'll4
JQIlX;r""l:atfl'lftQalf~om2l>cnYq"'-U
f'CIICtfC'UJWNL.....D(..u.ta ~1""M
KII....OfI(\l'll.'tIQI'I.
_J
';' n~lnforctng Bar Prlc,es
34
31
30
28
2&
Ol
'9'" '9$'90'91'98'99'00'01'02'03'0.:1
$lUIt:ll[N!lQjf~l~CPJf(I.o,.,~
I'RItCrOll~DC.c.Qf(UCA]HQW
4.2 Water and Wastewater Overview
Water and wastewater re~ulations In the next five to ten years will continue to become more
stringent and contentious, The Increase In regUlations Is compounded by the fact thai a large
3 Water and wastewater r~ulatlons are Included as Atlachment UF".
Page 35
Aprtl ~9, 2005
JUN-~~~2006. NON 04:35 PN
FAX NO.
p, 37/40
Y Jcaipa Valley Water District
~~astewater and Recycled Water Rate AnalysIs.
majority of California's water and wastewater facilities were Installed just after World War 1\ and
~ re now reaching the end of Iheir useful life. Therefore, In addition to the costs associated with
regulatory compliance, which often includes major modifications to facilities, water and
\I'astewater utilities must also place a high priority on the replacement of existing facilltles.
"hese two factors generally result In the cost of water and wastewater service increasing faster
lhan inflation, unless utiliUes experience sIgnificant customer growth.4 The District's customer
rate base is structured such that new customers will contribute to facility development and offset
. his increase to some extent.
4.2.1 Water DivisIon
The District's audited financial reports have been reviewed to provide a historical summary of
water and wastewater expenditures over the past twelve years, The graph below Illustrates the
audited expenses for the waler division from FY 1990 to FY 2004. .
Hlstorlcal Water Relaled !:Xpenses from Audited Financial Reports
$9,000,000
$2,000,000
$8.000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000.000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
~ ~ " " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " "
11190 11191 1992 1993 1994 1995 19S6 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Over the past fifteen years of audited financial records, the Water DivIsion expenses have
Increased an average of 7.23% per year. The cost Increases have bean the result of several
factors, such as constructIon material, sleel. concrete. power, labor, workers compensation,
etc...
· Thi$ Is due to lhe use of onginal cost rate base and rate of retum latemal<ing. As pip...s and reservoIrs ara replaced,
.the rale base Increases dIsproportionately, because today's dollars are replacing 40yearcld feeliiUss. -
Page 36
April 29, 2005
JUN-mi-2006 NON 04: 35 PN
FAX NO,
p, 38/40
Yllcaipa Valley Water District
Waler, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Analysis
--
4 2.2 ~astewa\er Division
The fjQ\lre below Illustrates the audited expenses for the water divisIon from FY 1990 to FY
2304. .
HIstorical Wastewater Related expanses 1rom AUdited Financial Reports
$7,000,000
$3,000,000
$6,000.000
S5,Ooo.000
$4.000,000
$2,000.000
$1,000,000
$0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ff ~ ~ ~ ff ~
1~~m~~~1~1~1_1m1~2~~ ~~~~~~
Over the past fifteen years of audited financial records, the Wastewater DiVision expenses have
Increased an average of 5.85% per year. The cost increases have been the result of several
factors, such as regulatory requirements, chemicals, biosolids disposal, power, labor, workers
compensation, etc...
4.3 The YVWD financIal Rate Projection Model
The Yucaipa Valley Water District Financial Rate Projection Model has been created to provide
a ten year projection to 2015 of revenues and expenses based on reliable information at this
point In time. The District staff has taken'lnto consideration a wide varillty of variables as the
basis for the model. These'variables include: growth rates; water and power rates/demands;
and water demands.
With any model. the further the projection Into the future, the less certainly exists. It is important
to bear in mind that the practical use of the model should be Judged with reference to the
structure of rates into the near future, This model Is not intended to be a long-lerm predIctive
Instrument. Rather, it Is to be used as a 1001 to identify long-term financIal needs In order to
establish a rate structure that prOVides Information to our customers about our long range plans
and objectives. As such, this model will be used to establish a rate structure for the next five
Page 37
April 2.9, 2005
JUN-05-2006 HON 04:36 PH
FAX NO,
P. 39/40
"-. .--- -~ -.. --
"ucaipa Valley Water District .
Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate AnalysIs
"-
{ears with a review conducted every two years. This will allow for smaller incremental changes
n the rates rather than unplanned major fluctuations. '
4.3.1 Future Condltlons and Prolected Parameters
The first step In using the model is to provide certain statistIcal elements that are used as the
basis for adJustlng costs over a ten year p.eriod, Each of the following elements Is included in
the model together with a conservallve estlmate of the annual change from 2005 to 2015.
. Growth Rates:
.. Cost of Living - This projection ranged from 1.5% in 2005 to 2.0% In 2015.
.. Potable Water Oemand - This projection remained fixed at 4% per year.
~ Supplemental Water Demand - This projection ranged from 3.0% in 2005 to 5.0% in
2015
~ Percentage Change in Assessed Valuation - ThIs projection ranged from 10.0% In
2005 to 4.0% in 2015.
.. Number of New eous - This projection consistently averaged 2.8% per year and
resulted in 440 homes in 2005 to 580 homes In 2015.
.. Employee Salaries and Benefits - This projection remained fixed at 4.0% per year.
.. Administrative Services Expenses - This projection remained fIXed at 1.0% per year.
~ Operating Supplies - This projection remained fixed at 2.0% per year.
~ Maintenance and Repairs -ihis projectIon remained fixed at 2.0% per year.
.. Insurance - This projection remained fixed at 2.0% per year.
.. ,Professional Fees":' This projection remaIned fixed at 3.0% per year.
.. Other Expenses - This projection remained .fixed at 1.5% per year;
. Water & Power Rates: "
.. E:nergy Charges - This projection remained fixed at 2.0% per year.
· Demand Cl1arges vs. Consumption Charges: Tt1is factor changed from 15.0%.ln 2005
to 20.0% In 2015.
4.3.2 Water DivisIon Analvsis
The revenue requirements for the water division have been based on property taxes, waleI'
sales (potabte water commodIty oharges), supplemental water sales (supplemental water
commodity charges) and fixed water servIce charges. The water division expenses are
categorized as laborlbenefits, electrical power, waler purchases, filtration expenses, debt
service coverage, and other operational costs. '
The District's finanoial model provides for a modest rate stabilization fund to smooth future rate'
changes of less than 1.0% of waler revenues per year. This fund will SlOWly accumulate and be
expended when needed and not exceed 5.0% of the annual water division revenue.
The audited financial statements of June 30, 2004 expensed $1,348,780 of
depreciation/amortization expenses for the water division, which Is expected to Significantly
in(~rease with the completion of the YucaIpa Valley Regional Water Filtration Facility and related
Improvements. The funding for depreciation has been limited to $900,000 in 2005 and is
expected to attain reasonable compliance with GASB 34 requirements in 2012.
flage 36
Apri129.2005
JUN-05-2006 110N 04:37 PN
FAX NO,
p, 40/40
'- ,_. -,-, _. ._~
l'ucalp;l Valley Water District
. Naler, Wastewater and Recycled WElter Rate Analysis
4.3.3 Wastewater DivIsion Analvsis
The revenue requirements for the water divIsion have been based on only two sources property
taxes and fixed wastewater service charges. The wastewater dMslon expenses are
categorized as laborlbenefils, electrical power, treatment expenses, debt service coverage, and
other operatlonal costs.
The Districl's financial model does not provide for a rate stabilization fund for the wastewater
division at this lime. In the future, the 130ard may consider such a fund with a sImilar slow
growth rate and a total fund accumulallon not to exceed 5,0% of the annual wastewater division
revenue.
The audited financial statements of June 30, 2004 expensed $1,904,820 of
depreciation/amortization expenses for the wastewater division, which Is expected to
,significantly increase with the completion of the Wochholz Wastewater Treatment Facility
improvements and the newly constructed Oak Valley Membrane 8ioreactor Facility. However,
due to management's perceived financial constraints and rate sensitivity of our custqmers, the
funding for depreciation has been limited to $0 in 2007, $1.65 million in 2010, and $2.9 million in
2015. While this level of depreciallon funding is not sufficlent to fully charge current customers
for the use of the existing and proposed Infrastructure In a manner consistent wilh the
requirements of GAS13 34, the District will be making an effort to more adequately fund
wastewater division depreclallon In the future.
4.3.4 Recvcled Water Division Analvsis
The revenue requirements for the recycled water division nave been based on the tecycled
water commodity charge and fixed recycled water service charges. The recycled water division
expenses are categorized as labor/benefits, water purchases, electrical power, and other
operational costs. '
The District's financial model does not provide for a rate stabilization fund for the recycled water
division at this lime. In the future, the Board may consider such a fund with a similar slow
growth rale and a total fund accumulallon not to exceed 5.0% of the annual wastewater division
revenue.
The District anticipates fully funding the' depreciatlon of the newly completed recycled water
facilities, .
4.3.5 Imoor/ant Elements Included and Not Included in Rate Analvsls
A draft copy of Yucaipa VaHey Water DIstrict Resolutlon No. 13-2005 is provided as' Attachment
"N'. It Is important to r!'lmember that the comprehensive rate study anticipates the retum of
property taxes in Fiscal Year 2007 and does n9t Include the anticfpated cosls associated with
th/~ construction of the brineline to San Bernardino.
'Page 39
April 29, 2005
JUN-mi-2006 NON 04: 04 PN
FAX NO,
p, 01
Resolution No. 37-2005
A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Yucaipa Valley Water District Setting Rates Fees and Charges for Water,
Wastewater and Recycled Water Service
WHEREAS, the Yucaipa Valley Water District (the "District") Is a public agency of the
~,tate of Califomia organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of the County Water District
Law of this State (Section 30000, et seq. of the Water Code); and
WHEREAS, the Board of DIrectors.. have previously approved Resolution No. 13-2005
~ietllng Rates, Fees and Charges for Water, Wastewater IiInd Recycled Water Service; and
WHEREAS, the Board Intends to adopt Resolution 37-2005 updating the timing of
~ayment for development related fees and charges and changing the OO$t of supplemental
vlater based on recent cost Increases adopted by the San Gorgonlo Pass Waler Agency.
Table of Contents
purpose and Implementation ................ ....... .n............., ............................ .... U' ......n.n .......3
1.1 purpose of Resolution........ .....:n..................... ........... 'u ..................... ......... .....:... 3
1.2. Implementation of Rates, Fees and Charge.s.......................................................3
:~. Development Related Fees, Charges and Deposits ........................................................3
2.1 Potable Water Development Impact Fees ................................................................3
2.2 Wastewater Development Impact Fees .............................,.................................3
2.3 Recycled Water Development Impact Fees ..........................,..............................3
2.3.1 Commercial Landscaping with Potable Water ..................:.......,...............3
2.3.2 Dual-Plumbed Communities I........ .............. ............................ .",................3
2.4 Application of Development Impact Fees Based on Development Type...................4
2.5 Payment of DevelPpment Related Rates, Fees and Charges...................................4
2.5.1 Fees and Charges Due Prior to Recordation .........................:......................4
2.5.2 Fees and Charges Due Prior to Bulldlng Permit .....:.....................................4
2.5.3 Fees and Charges Due Prior to Occupancy .................................................4
2.6 Development Impact Fees Fixed on Date Building Permits are Issued ....................4
3 Construction Related Fees and Charges.............................................:.,.........................5
3,1 SUb-Regional! Project Specific Master Plan.............................................................5
3.2 Plan Check 8ervices...........:...............:.....................................................................5
3.2.1 Residential, Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Developments ............5
3.2.2 Storage Reservoirs .......... ................... ........... ......... ........................ ......................5
3.2.3 Wells, Pump Equipment and/or Boosters .....................................................5
3.2.4 Plan Rechecking ........... ................. ................. ....... ........................ ...............5
3,3 tnspection Services...... ........... .......... 'n ~..... ......... ........... 10..... ..... n.......... ......... ..............6
3.3.1 Residential, Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Water & Wastewater
FacUlties.......... n.' .......................... ................ ....................... ................. ..........6
3.3.2 New Water Service Unes and Wastewater Laterals .....................................6
3:3.3 Connecting to an existing Wastewater Lateral..............................................6
3.3.4 Water and Wastewater Pump Stations .........................................................6
3.3.5 Reinspection .... .....,. ..... ....... ...... ........ .......... ...... ,......,.. .... ". ...., ....... ...... .........6
3.3.6 Overtime Inspection Services ............................:..........................................6
Yl/WD Resolution No. 37.2005 .
Page 1
JUN-)5-2006 MON 04:04 PN
FAX NO.
p, 02
3.4 Water and Wastewater Mainline Extension Charges................................................6
3.5. Water Service Line and Wastewater Lalerallnstallation Charges ............................7
3.6 Fire Hydrant and FIre Service Installation Charge .............................,......................7
3.7 Potable Water & Recycled Water Meter Installation Charge.....................................7
3.8 Construction Meter Deposit. Demand Charge and Consumption Charge.................7
3.8.1 Construction Meter Deposit ....,~""'....U..UH.........I....I.......nu.u................n........7
3.8.2 Dally Demand Charge ..................................................................................7
3.8.3 Potable Construction Water Consumption Charge .......................................7
3.8.4 Recycled Construction Water Consumption Charge.....................................7
4 Administrative Charges.........h...................................... .................. ................. .......................8
4.1 Credit Card I Check Card Payment Surcharge ..................................................:......8
4.2 Delinquent Payment Charge ....... ........... ........... ....... ................................. ...... .............8
4.3 Retumed Check Charge ............................................................................,.............8
4.4 Disconnection and ReconneCUon Charge......................................................,..........8
4.5 Unauthorized Use ofWatsr & Wastewater Servlces.................................................8
4.~ Property Uens.............................. .......a..... .............................. ..................................8
4.7 Security Depo~it.....h......n..ua...... ............................. ................ ....... ........ ........... ..........8
5 Water and Recycled Water, Charges ..........:.........................................................................9
5.1 Water and Recycled Water Service Charge .........................................,.....................9
5.1,1 Multiple Residential Water Service Charge...................................................9
5.2 Potable Wamr Commodity Charge .........................................................................,.9
. 5.2.1 Multiple Residential Water Commodity Charge ....................,.......................9
5.3 Recycled Water Commodity Charge.................................. ...............,.....................1 0
5.4 Supplemental WaterComniodity Charge ...............................................................10
5.5 Meter Te:s:t Charge...... ......... ....If............... ...,....... ................ ....................................10
5.6 Fire Service Demand Charge ..................................,...............;...............................10
5.7 Fire Rows Measurements and Reports..................................................................10
5.8 Water Meter Reactivation/Conversion Charge........................................................10
:; , Wastewater Charges ....................... ........a..... ......................... to, .................14 ........................11
6.1' Wastewater Service Charge .................................:.................................................11
6.1.1 f:,1ultlple Residential Wastewater Servic;e Charge ...................................:...11
6.2 Wastewater Septage ReceMng Charge.................................................................11
6.2.1 Deposit and Annual Pennit Fee..................................................................11
6.2.2 Sewage Disposal Fee...................................................................,.............11
6.3 Wastewater Pretreatment Fees ... .........................,..................................................12
6.4 Commercial Wastewater Service Charge...............................................................12
6.4.1 Water Meter Requirement ..........................................................................12
Table 1
Potable Water & Recycled Water Facilities Impact fee .....................................13
Table 2
Wastewater Facilities Impact Fee ......................................................................14
Table 3
Application of Development Impact Fees Based on the Type of Developmenl..15
Commercial Rate Factors ..................................................................................16
Table 4
YVWD Resolution No. 37.2005 .
Page 2
JUN-mi-2006 110N 04: 04 PN
FAX NO.
P. 03
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Yucaipa Valley
Water District, as follows:
'I. Purpose and Implementation:
1.1 Pumose of Resolution: The fees and charges set forth herein are for the purpose of
meeting all of the District's water, wastewater and recycled water operating
expenses, including but not limited to: distribution system maintenance; collection
system maintenance; purchase of vehicles and equipment; pump maintenance;
well maintenance; groundwater management; vehicle and equipment maintenance;
facility maintenance; regulatory compliance; permitting compliance: staffing;
purchase of supplemental water; water filtration; wastewater treatment; material
costs; administrative costs; long-term debt repayment; and reserve fund needs.
Upon the effective date below, the contents of this resolution shall replace
Resolution No, 13-2005.
1.2 Imolementatlon of Rates. Fees and Charoes: The water, wastewater and recycled
water related rates, fees and charges shall be effective based on the date(s)
provided herein. Implementation of rate changes will occur on the effective date
regardless of the service period. .
:!. Development Related Fees, Charges and Deposits
2.1 Potable Water Oevelooment Impact Fees: The potable water development Impact .
fee shall be applicable to .all customer classes, Including' but not limited to
domestic, commercial, Industrial, Institutional. and potable agricultural water service,
excepting fire services. and shall be based on the EquIvalent Dwelling Units as
provided in Table 1. The water development Impact fee components are provided
in Table 2.
2.2 Wastewater Development Impact Fees: The wastewater development Impact fee
is applicable to 'all customer classes, InClUding but not limited to domestic,
commercial and industrial users and shall be based on the Equivalent DWelling
Units as provided In Table 1. The wastewater development impact fee
components are provided in Table.2.
2.3 Recvcled Water Development Imoact Fees: The recycled water development
impact fee shall be applicable to all customer classes for the purpose of providing
a recycled water source for irrigation purposes and shall be based on meter
size/type and number of units as provIded In Table 1.
2.3,1 Commercial Landscaolno with Potable Water: The Recycled Water
Development Impact Fee shall apply to potable irrigatlon water meters
when required for commercial developments only if the landscape
irrigation system is installed consistent with the District's Recycled Water
Rules and Regulations.
2.3.2 Dual-Plumbed Communities: In dual-plumbed communiiies, this fee may
be waived at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors when it can be
NWD Reoolulion No. 37-2005
Page 3
JUN-05-2006 MON 04:04 PN
FAX NO,
P. 04
clearly demonstrated that the recycled water system components such as
recycled water storage. and recycled water' conveyance are also
constructed. .
2.4 Aoollcation of Development Imoact Fees Based on Development Tvpe: .
Development Impact Fees shall be charged a minimum of one Equivalent Dwelling
Unit (EDU) per each dwelllng unit for each service providad by the Pistrlcl The
developer shall pay all water, wastewater. and recycled water development
impact fees based on the fee in effect on the date the building permit is issued to
the property owner or developer. Table 3 outlines the manner in whIch the
development impact fees shall be applied to new developments.
2.5 Payment of Develol?ment Related Rates. Fees and Charges: The payment of
development related retes, fees and charges are contained in the most recently
adopted Resolutlon stating Rates, Fees and Charges for Water, Wastewater and
Recycled Water Service and generally occur as pre-paid deposIts prior to
completing a task or providing servIce. The following fees are required payable
during the' development planning and approval process as follows.
2.5.1 Fees and Charoes Due Prior to Recordation: Prior to recordation. the
District Will require the following:
. Digital map of the proposed parcels;
o 100% Performance bond;
o 100% MateriaVLabor bOnd;
o 100% MaIntenance bond;'
O' Preliminary Acco\lnt EGtablishment Charge'" $25 per parCel
2.5.2 Fees and CI1~raes Due Prioe to Buildlna Permit: TI1~ following charges
are due payable prior to the issuance of a building permit:
· Wastewater Collection System property Access Charge;
. Water & Recycled Water Distribution System Property Access Charges;
o Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Development Impact Fees.
2.5.3 Fees and Charaes Due Prior to Occuoancv: Any and all outstanding
invoices relatecl to the development shall be paid prior to releasing any'lot
or home for occupancy.
2.6 Development Impact Fees fixed on Date BuildinCl Permits are Issued:' All
development-related rates. fees and charges shall be fixed at the amounts in
effect when the developer or property owner has been issued a building permit(s)
for the construction of buildings. In the event that development Impact fees are
prepaid to the District prior to the Issuance of the building permit and the amount
prepaid or deposited is less than the actual amount In effect at the time that the
building permit has been Issued, then the developer or property owner shall pay
the difference between the prepaid amount or deposit and the actual amount of
the development impact fee In effect on thel date the building permit is issued. In
the event that the actual development impact fee in effect on the date that the
building permit Is issued is less than the prepaid amount or deposit, then the
District shall refund the difference to the developer or property owner.
YVWD Resolulion No. 37-2005
Page 4
JUN-IJ5-2006 NON 04: 05 PN
FAX NO,
p, 05
3. Construction Related Fees, Charges and Deposits
3.1 Sub-Reaional / proiect Soecific Master ~Ian: The District shall collect a deposit for
the purpose of conducting a sub-reglonal or project specific master plan to
evaluate water, wastewater and recycled water service requirements. This
service shall be required of projects In areas wIth insufficient service capacity or
within areas where water, wastElwater or recycled water services do not currently
exist. If the actual cost of thIs service Is greater than the deposit provided, then
an additional deposit shall be required prior to completing the written evaluatlon.
At the conclusion of the evaluation, the District will provide a refund equal to the
amount of deposited funds which were not utilized by the District, or apply the
difference to plan check services. If at the conclusion of the evaluation, the
Dlsmct has exhausted all depositEid funds and a balance due remains. then the
property owner or developer shall remit that" balance due immediately upon
receipt of an invoice from the District.
3.2 Plan Check Services: The District shall collect a plan check deposit for the
purpose of plan checl5.lng services by the District staff or a representative
aut/lOrfzed by the District. If the actual cost of plan check services Is greater than
the deposit applied, the District will require an additional deposit be made prior to
continuing plan cheCking services. At the conclusion of the plan check review
process, the DistrIct will provide a refund equal to the amount of deposited funds
which were not utilized by the District for plan checkIng servIces, or apply the
difference to future Inspection -services: If at the conclusion of the evaluation, the
DIstrict has exhausted all deposited funds and a balance due 'remains, then the
property OWner or developer shall remit that balance due immediately upon
receipt of an invoice from the District, '
3.2.1 Residential. commercial, Institutional. and ifldustrfal develooments: For
development related projec;\s, the plan check deposit shall be 3% of the
estimated water and wastewater construction value. The estimated
construction value shall lle reviewed and approved by the District prior to
recordation.
3.2.2 Storace Reservoirs: For water storage reservoirs. the plan check deposit
shall be 2% of the estimated construction cost or $10.000.00 which ever
;s greater.
3.2.3 Wells. Pump Equioment and/or Boosters: For wClter and wastewater
related pumping equipment the plan checl< deposit shall be 2% of the
estimated construction cost or $10,000.00 which ever is greater, '
3.2.4 Plan Recheckino: The District reqUires a resubmittal of all construction
plans every year after being initially approved. Rechecking of plans after
plans have been approved by the District shall be performed on a cost
basis with ,a deposit paidprior to InitiaUng this serviCe. The District will
not approve the plans until all unpaid plan checking service charges have
been paid.
'fVWD Resolution No. 37.2OQ5
Page 5
JUN-(5-200B l10N 04:05 PN
FAX NO,
p, 06
3.3 Insoectlon SeNlces: The District requires an inspection deposit for the purpose of
conducting inspection services by the District starr or a representative authorized by
the District. If the actual. cost of the Inspection servlce$ provided by the District is
greater than the deposit appHed, the District will require an additional deposit be
made prior to continuing Insp9ction services. At the conclusion of the project, the
District will provide a refund equal to the amount of deposited funds which were not
utilized by the Dlslfict for inspection sllIVices. If at the conclusion of the evaluation,
the District has exhausted all deposited funds and a balance due remains, then the
property owner or developer. shall remit that balance due immediately upon receipt
of an Invoice from the District.
3.3,1 Residential. CommerCial, Inslltutional and Indust(lal Weter & Wastewater
Facilities:' For installation of residential, commercial, institutlonal, and
industrial water afld wastewater facnities, a deposit in the amount equal to
seven percent (7.0%) of the estimated construction cost shall be provided to
the District prior to recordation.
3,3.2 New Water Service lines and Wastewater Laterals: For water servlce Hnes
and wastewater laterals constructed by contractors between the public
waterfwastewater rnalnUne and the property line, the owner.s~1I provide a
$500.00 deposit and be responsible for the actual cost of inspection
services.
3.3.3 ccinnectlna to an Existina Wastewater Lateral: For verlfying a proper sewer
lateral connection. to an existing sewer lateral, the owner shall provide a
$180,00 flat fee for the cost of Inspection services, ,
3.3.4 Water and Wastewater Pumo stations: A deposlt for the inspection of water
and wastewater pump stations shall be 7.0% of the estimated construction
cost.
3.3.5 Reinsoection: Where relnspection is required due 10 test failures,
damage, litigation or" other causes beyond normal construction, the cost
of relnspectlon will be paid by owner at the actual cost Incurred.
3.3.6 Overtime Inspection Services: Any overtime inspection provided, Including
'saturday, holiday, evening, and night will be provided If Inspectors are
available and 72 hour advance notification is given to the District All costs
for overtime Inspection shall be paid by owner.
. 3.4 Water and Wasf:@.water Mainline Extension Charne$: When a water or wastewater
mainline Is extended past or to properties oat contributing toward the cost of the
mainline, and those properties have not paid a direct assessment or its
equivalent, the property owner or developer who paid for the mainline extension
shall be reimbursed, pursuant to 'the acllve reimbursement agreement for a
portion of the cost of such extension. The amount of reimbursement shall not
exceed the cast of an equal length and depth of a-inch diameter mainline, as
determined by the General Manager, or deSignee. In the avent an active
re.imbursement agreement does not exist, the DIstrict shall be paid the mainline
extension charges. . .
Page 6 .
NWP Resolution No. 37-2005
JUN-(S-2006 MON 04:05 PN
FAX NO,
P. 07
3.5 Water Service Une and Wastewater I..ateral Installation Charaes: Tha cost
associated With the Installation of a water service line (potable and non-potSble), fire
service line, and/or a wastewater laleral shan be ~he actual cost of all labor,
material, and equipment charges, plus employee benefits, overhead and
administrative surcharges per District RB&olution, A deposit shall be made with
the District equal to the estimated cost of Installation. as determined by the
District, prior to initiating installation. FInal job costs will be determined and the
customer will be billed or refunded the difference in cost
3.6 Fire Hvdrant and Fire SIlC{)CS Installation Charos: The cost associated with the
. installation of a fire liydrant and/or fire service shall be the actual cost of all labor.
material, and equipment charges, plUS employee benefits. overhead and
administrative surcharges per District Resolution. A deposit shall be made with
the District equal to the estimated cost of installation, as determIned by the
District. prior to inltraling installation. Final job costs will be determined and the
customer will be billed or refunded the difference In cosl
3.7 Potable Water & Recvcl~ Water Meter Installation Charae: The cost associated
with the Installation of a %" water meter shall be $325 Qer meter and $375 fOl" a 1"
water meter. The cost associated with the Installation of larger water meters shalt
be the actual cost of all labor, materIal, and equipment charges, plus employes
benefits, overhead and eclmlnlstrallve surcharges per District Resolution with a
deposit collected prior to Installation.
3.8 .Constructlon Meter Deposit. Demand Charae and Consumotlon Charq~:
3.8.1 ConstriJctfon Meler Deooslt: . A construction meter deposit of $1,500 per
mpter shall be paId prior to the District installing the temporary ~nstrucllon
meter at a fire hydrant as determined by the District. .
3.8.2 Dallv Demand Charqe: A service charge of $2.30 per calendar day shall be
charged for the' rental and fixed costs associated with this service. .
3.8.3 Potable ConstructIon Water ConsumPtion Cherae; Potable water used for
construction pUrposes is considered to be interruptible and charged at a rata
per thousand gallons equal to 1.2 times the highest tier of potable water
. charged to District customers,
3.8.4 Recvcled Construction Water Consumction Charae: Recycled water used
for construction purposes is considered to be reliable and less subject to
InterruptJons. This water shall be charged at a rate per thousand gallons
equal to 1.2 times the highest tier of recycled water charged to District
customers.
YVWD ResolulJon No. 37.2005
Pege 7
JUN-OE-2006 NON 04:06 PN
FAX NO,
p, 08
4. Administrative Charges
4.1 Credit Card I Check Card Pavment Surcharoe: A$1.75 charge shall be added to
all payment transactions completed by credit card or check card.
4.2 Delinauent Payment CharaB:. The District shall charge a basic penalty of ten
percent (10%) of the amount of each service bIlling not paid on time, plus an
additional penalty of one-half of one percent (0.5%) per month on each late billing
and its associated basic penalty,
4.3 Returned Check Charoe: The charge for a returned check shall be $35.00 per item.
4.4 Disconnection and Reconnection Charae: For potable water and recycled water
service, the disconnection charge Is hereby established at a rate of $35.00 per
occurrence.
A water reconnection charge of $40:00 will be oharged par occurrence with the
payment of all delInquent fees and charges If received by 3:00 p.m. on a regular
business day. A reoonnectlon charge of $50.00 will be charged per Occurrence
when the payment of all delinquent fees and charges Is made after 3:00 p.m. on a
regular business day and the customer requests reconnection of water service
between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. or on weekends/holidays.
The disconnection and r'econnection charge associated with wastewater service Is
established at cost plus 15%.
4.5 Unauthorized Use of Water & Wastewater Services: The unauthorized use of
water and/or wastewater service shall be chai'ged to any person, organli!=ation,
corporation, or agency for each unauthorized use of Plstrict water or for
tampering in any manner with any meter belonging to the District. The
unauthorized use of water charge Is hereby established at a rate of $750.00, or
$65 per day, whichever is greater.
4.6 ProoertY Liens: A delinquent utility account that results in a property tax lien shall
be charged $100 per lien per property,for administrative and processing costs.
4.7 Security Deposit: A security deposit charge of $60.00 will be assessed on aU
accounts that have either of the following: (1) water service disconnected for non.
payment; (2) a property lien for delinquent collections; or (3) a retumed check for
insufficient funds. The security deposit charge will be credited to the account after
eighteen (18) months with no late charges or upon closIng the account.
NWD Resolution No. 37.2005
Page 8
JUN-(15-2006 NON 04: 06 PN
FAX NO,
p, 09
5. Water and Recycled Water Charges
5,1 '!:Jater and Recvcled Water Service Charae; The daily water service charge shall
be applied to the greater of (1) meter sIze or (2) number of Equivalent OwelUng
Units served. This charge shall be applicable to potable water and recycled water
users.
effective EffectIve Eff8c:tIve EffeCUve EffQCtIVe
Wllfar Service Charge 6/1/05 1/1/06 1N/01 1/1/08 1/1/09
Sarvtce Cha<ga per EOU $O.2691day $O.299IOOy $O.309lday $O.319/day $O.329/day
WeJ& Meter BallElll Chwge:
~"Wa~r MeIer 1.00 EOU $O.289/day $O.2ll9Jday $O.S09/day $O.319Iday $O.32ll1day
1" Water Meter 1.67 EDU $O,4831day $OA991day $C.B16/day $O,533Iday $O.5491day
1%'WalurMelar3.33 EOU $O.962/day $0.996/clay $1.0291day $1.062Jday $1.0961day
TWalerMeler 5.33EDU $1.5401day $1.5941OOy $1.641Iday $1.700lday $1.754/day
3" WalBr Meter 10,00 EDU ~2.8901day $2.990/day $3.090/day $3.1S0/clay $3.290/day
4'WaterMe~r 16.61 EDU $4.S1S/daY $4.984/d8V $5.151/day $5.3161day $5A64Iday
6" Water Meter 33.33 EDU $9.632/d8)' $9,9661day $10.29/day $10.63/day $10.97/day
S"Water Meter 53.33 EDU $15.41Idav $15.95Idav $16.47/dav $17.01/dav $17.55ldav
5.1.1 Multlole Residential Water Service Charoe: Multiple Residential Dwellings
of more than 30 dwelling units on the same parcel constructed prior to May 1, 2005
shall be calculated based on the formula provided i(l Section 5.1 multiplied by the
MUltiple Residential Water Service Charge Factor of 0.80 to calculate the Multiple
Residential Water Service Charge.
5.2 Potable Water CommodilV Charas: The water commodity charge rate Is the charge
per one thousand gallons (kgal) for. all water registered by the custome(s water
meter in a monthly billing cycle and is herein established as follows:
Potable Water EffoctiVG EffoctlvlI Effective Effilctlvlt Effoctlve
ConsumptIon tkgal) 6/1/05 111/06 1/1/01 1/1/08 1/1/09
1-15 Billing Units $1.125 $1.218 $1.279 $1.349 $1.429
16 - 60 Bllllng Units $1.515 $1.638 $1,719 $1.809 $1.919
61 - 100 Billing Units $1.655 $1.788 $1.679 $1.079 $2.099
101 am:! t:lreater Billinp Units $1.925 $2.078 $2.179 $2.2B9 $2.429
5.2.1 MUltjple ResIdential Water .CommodilV Charoe: Multiple Residential
Dwellings of more than 30 dwelling units on the same parcel constructed prior to
May 1, 2005 shall be calculated based on the formula provided In Section 5,2
multiplied by the Multiple Residential Water Service Ch~rge Factor below to
calculate the Multiple Residential Water Commodity Charge. .
Eff9ctlve Oata
!:lfactlVa 6/1105
EffectIVe 011/05
Effective 1/1108
EffectIve 3/1/06
Multiple Resldentlal
W;star Commodlty
Charge Factor
0.250
0.325
0.400
0.475
Effective Date
Effective SI1106
Effective 9/1106
l':1Nctlve 1/1101
Effective 3111C1T
Multiple RaaldenUal
Wawr CommodIty
Charge Factor
O.5!50
0.625
0.700
0.600
YVWD Resolution No. 37.2005
Page 9
JUN-0:-2006 MON 04:06 PN
FAX NO,
p, 10
5.3 Recvcled Water Commodity Charae: The recycled water (non-potable) commodity
charge rate is the charge per one thousand gallons (kgat) for all recycled (non-
potable) water registered by the customer's recycled (non-potable) water meter in a
monthly billing cycle and is herein estabnshed as follows:
Effoctlve Pele
Effective 6/1105
Effective 1/1/06
'Effective 1/1/07
Effective 1/1108
Effective 1/1/09
Effective 1/1110
Supplemental Waler
Oonoumptlon (kgoO
$0.909
$0.979
$1.029
$1.085
$1.155
$1.175
Effective Date
Effeclive 1/1111
Effective 111112
EffaclivB 111/13
Effective 1/1/14
Effective 1/1116
Supplomental Water
Consumption lkllal)
$1.235
$1.265
$1.305
$1.375
$1.425
5.4 Supplemental Water Commodilv Chame: The supplemental water commodity
charge rate is the charge per one thousand gallons (kgal) of potable water
consumption registered by the customer's water meter in a monthly billing cycle and
is hereIn established as follows:
Effective OlltEl
Effective 6/1/05
Effective 1/1/06
Effective 1/1107
Effective 1/1108
Effeetive 1/1/09
Effectjvs 111/10
Effectlve 1/1/11
Supplemental Water
Consumption (legal)
$0.018
$0.034'
$0,119
$0.160
$0.206
$0.212
$0.219
E!ffectlve Date
Effective 1/1/12
Effectlve 1/1/13
Effectlve 1/1114
Effadlve 1/1/15
Effectlve1/1116
EffeclivB 1/m7
Effllctive1/1118
Supplemental Wator
ConsumpUon (kgol)
$0.225
$0.232
$0.239
$0.246
$0.254
$0.261
$0.260
5.5 Meter 1'est Charge: The cost associated with testing water meters shall be not less
than the actual cost Incurred by the District.
5.6 Fire Service Demand Charne: The fire service $tandby charge shall be a 'daily
charge per Inch diameter of the main fire line detector check valve Installed to the
premises as provided below:
Fire Sorvlce
Pemand Charge
Charas per Inch dIameter
Effective
1/1/0T
SO.080/day
.Effective
6/1105
So.o751dav
Elfectlve
1/1/06
$O.077/dav
Effective
111/08
$o.o821dav
Effective
1/1/09
~O.0841dev
Water usage through the bypass meter is billed at two times the highest potable
water rate.
5.7 Fire Flow Measurements and Reoorts: The charge for providing results of each fire
flow test shall be $75.00. The charge must be paid prior to the District providing
any tire flow data to the requesting party. '
5.8 Water Meter ReactlvationlConvefllion Charae: Prior to converting a water meter
that has been locked off by the District for greater than one year within the previous
five years, the customer requesting meter conversIon to one or more smaller water
meters shall be required to pay the current water/recycled water service charge
multiplied by the number of days the meter was locked off.
Y'l'NO Resolution No. 37.2005
Page 10
JUN-O!i-200B MON 04: 07 PM
FAX NO,
p, 11
8. Wastewater Charges
6.1 Wastew'lter Service Charae: A dally wastewater service charge shall apply to all
customers' based on the number of equivalent dwelling units.
E:ffeCllve Date
Etfectlve 6/1/05
Effectlve 9/1/05
Etrectlva 1/1/06
EffeolIve 311/0B
Effective 6/1/OB
Effective 0/1/06
Effecllva 111/07
ElfeclJve 311/07
Effecttve 6/1107
Effective 9/1/07
Wu!ewater Service Charge
DaVv Co51 per !::DU
$0.771/day
$0.8001c1ay
$0.6291day
$0.B581day
$0.867fday
$0.91&'day ,
$0.9451day
$0.974/day
$1.003lday
$1.0321dsv
Wastewater Servloo Charge
DailY cost per EDU
$1.061/day
$1,0901day
$1.119/day
$1.1481day
$1.177/day
$1.206/day
$1,2351day
$1.264fday
$1.240fday
$1.2/l4/dav
Effactlve Pate
Effective 1/1/08
Effective 311fOB
Effective 6/1/08
Effedlve Of1/OB
EffBctlve iii/DO
Effective 311/09
EffBctlve 6/1109
Effective 9/1/00
Effecllve 1f1/10
Effecllve 311/10
6.1.1 Multiple Residential Wastewater Service Charoe: Multiple Residential
Dwellings of more than 30 dwelling units on the same parcel constructed prior to
May 1. 2005 shall be calclllated based on the formula provided in Section 6.1
multiplied by.the Multiple Residential Wastewater Service Charge Factor proVIded
in' the folloWing table to calculate the Multiple Residential Wastewater Service
Charge.
EffectlveDm.
Effective 6/1/05
Effecllve 1/1/06
Effectlve 1/1/07
Multiple Residential
W'loStawater S4rvlce
Chame Fac:tor
0.825
0.845
0.866
MUltiple Rssldentlat
W8lIlGwater Service
Chame Faclor
0.B85
0.905
0.925
Effective Ollie
Effective 1/1f08
Effective 1/1/09
EffectIve 1/1/10
, 6.2 Wastewater Sactaoe Recelvlng Charoe: A wastewater seplage receIvIng charge is
herein estabrlShed 3S follows:
6.2.1. Decoslt and Annual Permit Fee: Septic tank pumpers shall post with the
District a $500.00 deposit and will be. charged an annual permit fee per vehicle as
provided in Section 6.4 below,
6.2.2 Sewaae Disoosal FeEl: Septic tank pumpers will be charged aJ the rate of
four cents ($0.04) per gallon for saplage originating from within the Yucaipa Valley
Water District Sewer boundaries., For septage pumpings originating outside the
Dismct's sewer boundary, 'the charge is established at eight cents ($0.08) per
gallon. In all cases, the minimum charge shall be the total rated lank capacity of the
W~. '
YVWD Resolution No. 37-2005
Page 11
JUN-05-2006 MON 04:07 PM
FAX NO,
p, 12
6.3 Wastewater Pretreatment Fees: The District has adopted an ordInance which
regulates the discharge of non-domestlc wastewater Into the sewerage system of
the District in accordance wlth General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part
403). In order 10' enforce the requirements of the District's Industrial Wastewater
Pretreatment Ordinance, it Is neCessary to issue fNe separate classes of
Industrial User Permits and charges as follows:
PermIt Effactllla Effactlve Elfecllve
Class Industrial U$er type 5/1/05 111/07 1/1109
I Fedaml CetegQ1lta1 $450.00 plus $475.00 pIUS $500.00 plus
sampUro CQsls sampang cosls sampUng costs
II SIgnificant User , $460.00 plus $475.00 plus $500.00 plus
sampling costs sampRng costs sampling costs
III No....sIgnltlcanl User $240.00 plus $255,00 plus $2.70,00 plus
sampling COsb sampang costs sampang costs
IV Temporary User $180.00 plus $1GO.00 piuS $200.00 plus
sampling costs sampling costs sampling costs
V Sepias" Waste Hauler $150.00 per $160.00 per $170.00 per
vehicla vehicle vehIcle
6.4 Commercial Wastewater Servl(le Charae; A daily wastewater service charge shall
apply to all commercial, Industrial., and institutional customers based on the
following formula and rate factors with a minimum charge based on the number of
eous oharged pursuant to Sectlon 6.1:
CommercIal
Wastewater
Service
Charge
Wastewater
:: Service Charge x
(Section 6.1)
Commercial
Rate Factor
(see Table 4)
x
Consumption
(kgal)
A list of Commercial Rate Factors is provlded In'Table 4.
6.4.1 Water Meter Requirement: Each commercial unit shall be required to install
a separate water meter In order to properly assign a commercial wastewater
charge to the business.
This Resolution shall be effective as of December 22, 2005.
YUCAIPA VAU.E:YWATER DISTRICT
,ay~ A~~ ~
If! CE GR.4iLUND., President of the
Soard of DIrectors
:3
YVWD Resolution No. 37.2005
Pass 12
JUN-D5-20Cl6 1'101'1 04: 07 PN
FAX NO,
~
If
11
0.
e
-
~
;E
-
'u
&!
L-
"r"'.$
S~
.c"C
~~
u
g
0::
~
L-
oS
~
CI)
:c
.f1
o
0..
"1J
~ll
~]*~m ~~~~~~~~ON__~m~Q~~m~~m
1~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~2~~~~
g-M r~;~N~N~V~
~u.
~l
~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ffi~~l~~~~~~~i~
i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ijm$
If
-~
c:C:
~~~~~~~~~~a~B.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~w__~~~~~OQ_~~O~~~_~MOO~~~M~
0'''= or- ~ or 't- ~ (\f,...., C') V) "Cf' ~ U) <0 to t'o. C) (\I 'q" <0
UI ... -...........
~
,
Il~ " , '
~ia~~~22l5~~~~~2g~~~~~g2g~~~8~g
~a~ . N~~M~~~~~~_~~~NN
~~
IJ~~g~~~gg8~@8gB~~~g~~l~~~~~~
il ~_~~~~ID~~~~~~~~NNN~~~
ell
~ ,~~
"6:10- _:g ~ :e
:E'!i! ;.- F :;, ell Q) ~ Q)1Il<l)d>
~~1- B- =- E- ~~~ '~~ ~:e ~i~i
~~~lni;l~I]]~]~~~~~~g~~~~~~~
~ .m ~ ~ l;U 0. tn S 8. ~ &. - - .E 1- - i- -- ~ CD U) U';J U)
&~ot.J~E uE - ~~ s~~~~
~'Q~...oJ.81.~I~. ~m mmUO-u"n-
. ~~QUUO ~QO()()O 00 ou v~t.J
~~~~~N~MMh~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"
8
i
c:::
S
t::
'm
:E
"
<:
III
2'
~ 'cO
~'t1:::s
oil <(
~:!:~
~~<
SIIl,j;
g ~'~
C':::ll'l
igc
-2~
~.?l~
I!!l.s
j;:~
s ~lt
.,~fi
~. ~
-s
~~~
:<:fe
<('"
~~i
<(~e
;;;~j
:E::i!1!1
iil-"
";$~i5
~~'5
e ;Ie.
ol<16,
...:.i'i
Ill",!!
'lJ 13
t~i
~~5
~~~
~~1!1
iU 8-
'3::;:
Be!
.~.~ E
~~~
C)I"~~
N"'e
~~8
~~~
rii
t:!_N";
o
z
p, 13
..,
.,...
'"
lll'
0..
In
8
<:<
....
'"
o
:z
<=
~
'"
<1l
rr:
~
JUN-05-2006 NON 04:08 PN
FAX NO.
p, 14
... ~
oil "C
II) C.
~ .~
<:: l
8 '0
<11
~ a ~
III .-:: ;:
~ ~0>..,?B ~ 8l .:g
'"
<> "is. ~ ... Cl> ~.
i~~ ~i~C'\t ~ lii Cl>
\I'> ...~ .... ~i
....
t.) 'l5 '" lli
z :; ....
..., '".
1) :;
..., t:: III
fI) ~ 0>:>,
S 0 E-
c [Q II)gj
~ ~ *~
~ ~ 2l~
J ] <:~
at 100><'>18 is .- II)
.!!.! :6"
_,0 0 3~
u. ....i;:<'i eN
II>- ~~ "''l1 l t~
oW E:s
U + ~~
I'lS oX> I 2:5
Q. ....
e N ,2l ~ c.
;;; ",=
- ~i e.E:
m=
Nm .!i 6~
!~ &:
0>= 'i 16e "l"
-- ~j ....
..Q .- ~ CD
u 21;;
~Jf ~\l! '"
.!l ~,g ..
,:; Ql , g>- c..
... ~ ~ il -~ .2 e~
Q) mg J! :6~
iU .c: l~
e(.) 1:: 0
e a.. ~ '0,-
~ 8~ OJ ~o ;$ Q).21
S iii~ Cog. TIE
~~ a. ~g
III -
~ ~e .e -Q)
tiS J!S~ ~~ ~ ..-s
~ <11 s'-
.s OJ.a:! '" 002
BJ~j 15'fi C ('l=
me:; l~ i ~~
i!";: J~~~
1l~ .- tV
II! 8! 8 ~~
~ 15lil c._
11 <( CD ~~
j'll ~.re e-
filii i ZI_
~ ~~' <ll ~'i :g
=:<'8 "- (.) c~ 0
'1 ~ :6-- ~
'it '"
8- .
{"gj 0
~ e z
c::
a. ,g
<( In e~ "
~ ~ <5
c...2 ~
0
J f ~~ c
II a ~
t.) z
JUN-05-2006 NON 04:08 PM
FAX NO,
p, 15
Table 3
Application of Development Impact Fees
Based on the Type of Development
Development Type
Typical Single Family
Residential Home
Apartmen1s, Hotels and
Motele with a Master
Meter(s)
Individually Owned
Duplexes / Condominiums
Irrigation I AQnculture
Commercial Development
Meter Sl;e and
WllStewater Late",1
Each unltlo be served with
at least a 0/." water meter
and 4" wastewater leteral
Customer's engineer to
recommend melar size
based on unit <Xlunt. total
number of fixture units and
the reoommended meter
operating capacity as
shown In Table 1
Each unit to be served with
at least a y." water meter
and 4" sewer lateral
Own81's engineer to submlt
l1Ue 22 Engineering Report
With appropriala meter
sizing'
Customer's Engineer to
recommend meter sl2e
based on unit CQun~ total
number of fixture unlls and
the reoommended mater
operating capaclly as
shawn In Table 1
WalDr & Racyclod Water
DeveloPlllllntlmpl\Ct Fee
Development Impact Fee
will be a minimum of one
EDU With additional
development Impact fees
cha~ed based on
Increased meter size.
Development Impact Fee
wlU be based on a mlnllllllm
cha~e per each EDu with
addlllonal development
Impact fees charged based
on Increased meter size.
Developm!lnt Impact Fee
Will be based on the
number of EDU's with
addltfonal development
Impact fees chiuged based
on I_ed meter size.
Developll\ent Impact Fee
will be determined by meter
size
Development Impact Fee
Will be based on the
number of EDUs with
addlllonel development
Impact fees charged based
on Inoreased meter size.
Wastewalar Development
Impact F8Il
Development Impact F8Il
will be a minimum of one
EOU.
Development Impact Fee
win be based on the
mimberof EDU's
Development Impact Fee
wiD be based on the
number of EDU's
Not Applicable
Deve(opment Impact Fee
will be based an !he
number of EDU's
YVWO Resolution No, 37-2005
- page 16
JUN-)5-2006 NON 04:09 PN
FAX NO.
p, 16
Table 4
Commercial Rate Factors
BOO
(malll
20
180
150
1150
1000
200
130
150
340
250
500
310
450
670
150
800
290
130
1,000
830
200
800
CommercIal Rate Factolll CommercIal Rata Factors
S8
(malll
150
280
150
1250
600
200
100
160
316
100
600
120
,240
880
110
800
290
80
600'
510
200
800
without 8 separate
landscape meter
2.08
3.67
2.78
14,44
10.00
3.33
2.39
2.78
4.75
3.06
7.22
3,50
4.94
8.61
2,!?6
10.00
4.~
2.28
10.00
8.56
3.33
10.00
with a separate
landsCllpe metar
2,74
4.89
'3,70
19.26
13,33
4.44
3.19
3.70
6.33
4.07
9.63
4.67
6.59
11.48
3.41
13.33
5,78
3.04
13.33
11.41
4.44
13.33
T~ of Business
Automobile. Car Wash
Automobile. Repair Shop'
Automobile. Gas SlaUon '
Aulom()bile. Steam Cleaning
Bakery
Bar wllpout Dlnlna Fllclllty
Colleg!3
Department and Retail Stores
EMl..E.qod
Hospilal & Convalescent
Hotel with DIning Facili!y
~yiJ.!1lQ.ut Dining FaCility
Laundromat. Commercial
La\!.ndromat - Industrial
Laundromat. Local
Mortuary
Other Commarclal
Profe8Slonal OffIce
~rant
Restaurant with Mixed Retail
~!9l!
SuperrnarkOlt
YVW() Resolutlon No. 37-2005
Page 16
JUN-)5-2006 MON 04:09 PM
FAX NO.
p, 17
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTIES OF RIVERSIDE
AND SAN BE:RNARDlNO
)
loSS
)
)
I, Joseph B. Zoba, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Yucaipa Valley Wa~er Distrlct,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution being Resolution No. 37-2005 was duly
passed, approved arid adopted by said Board, approved and signed by the President, and
attested by the Secretary all at the Regul~.r Me~tin9 and Public Hearing held on the 21lJt day of
December 2005, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Directors Wochholz, Bangle, Granlund, Bogh and Shalhoub
None
None
ABSTAIN:
None
Executed this 22nd day of December 2005 at Yucaipa, ~aJjfornia.
of the Yucaipa V ey
Istrlct and of the Board
ors thereof
(SEAL)
"r\nlll\ East Valley
t:.' " II Water District
VlEMORANDUM
June 9, 2006
To:
Board of Directors d
Robert Martin r-r
2006/2007 Budget
Prom:
Subject:
On May 16th the Board conducted its annual Budget Workshop to review the District's
Draft Budget for next year. The overall Budget package contained a number of proposals for
staffing increases and water and sewer rate adjustments. I have taken comments from the Board
members and completed some additional updates in preparing this new Budget proposal for your
consideration
The revenue analyses and projections are based upon a series of rate adjustments, which.
the Board must still consider. Specifically, these new rate assumptions are as follows:
Water Consumption Charge (Water Rate)
Residential Sewer Charge
Commercial Sewer Charge
- $!. 06/hcf ($ O. 05/hcf increase)
- $22.00/month ($0.50/month increase)
- $IJO/hcf ($0.02/hcf increase
Although the Board may adopt this Budget today, a full public hearing will be required
for the Board to consider any changes to the District's water and sewer rates. The Budget also
contains a number of new staffing positions for the Boards consideration. At the Budget
Workshop, the Board reviewed the new positions which I had proposed. Since that time, I have
re-evaluated my proposal and am now proposing a third new position which will add additional
support to our field operations. The new positions I am proposing are as follows:
Executive Assistant (Engineering)
(2) Water Service Worker I
- Range 42
- Range 32
In addition to these new positions, I have one immediate change that needs your
consideration regarding our Meter Shop Supervisor's position. The existing pay range needs to
be increased from Range 51 to range 52 to bring this position in line with all of the other District
Supervisor positions.
I am presenting this Budget and associated proposals for your consideration today. I
recommend approval of this package, including the scheduling of a public hearing for the
purpose of considering the rate adjustments that I have proposed. Your consideration of these
matters is appreciated
~':R';.{!.
o 0 ~
lO16co
~ai<.O
~
,
~
~
'OJ'
<<i
~
g
'"
CO
8
~
~
(\I
8 8
;j Ii
~
8
g
'"
~
8 8
g l!!
~
o~
8
o
8
'"
'"
~
8
'"
CIl
~
8
6
'"
??
"-
Ol
<<i
o
o
o
00
~
(\j
o
o
o
.,,;
'"
'OJ'
00
o
o
o
.,;
'OJ'
U)
<<i
o
o
o
00
'"
~
'"
o
o
o
..:
'"
~
00
o
o
q
~
U)
Ol
N
.~....
g .'
..' ~!ft..
...~:.~,;: "':'"
>>l~M!:";"", ....
....:.Q.;..w.:....:.: ...:....!fi .
, ~~~1,~1.'.~ti.j i!"
!"j'li::i:~ :..... ..' '. ii~f' :.~. ..... ~
>uo::g eo' W
w-w~ Z<i: a:
a:li:;a.@ i=i: U ...J
<:)WqjZ ~(I) ~ ~
~~w5 w~ ffi 0
Cl;O'tJ:U D.llJ;:l; I-
a: <;>1": I":
w Z~ 0
D. 0
o Z
W
;:)
Z
w
~
a:
888
~g~
~ ~
8
..,;
~
888 8
~t~ ~
r-: cO
0S(8
8cso
~~~
.,j
~
888
ctSttio
ll)\CJO
"'CIlCll
0) ..,..~
~
888 8
PI ~ g 10_-
W,...{'l) 0
..: (f>
888 8
~gsi g
"",,~..,..a; J"-o.
~ CIl
~ ~
8
'"
...
'"
~
8
6
~
o
8
g
8 8
~ l!!
~
~~~~'#.<f!.'#.'#.
d';~cs8gs888
"'0:;"'8''';0.00
",:::;C\J..,.."l <;Jt\l
,
8~8.8888
05":6 66";"';
It) U') fOCO'-
~
, I I I I I , I
8~8
:g..:g
~
8888
gg~.,,;
8g88888g
oi ".; 6 ,,; ",- 6 6 N
co ~~~COC\l
I . , . . I I I
8g8888gg g
$,,;g~~ggN ~
co
~.. ~
~o w
~'!l!" ~
5~ W'
IJJ',
. x (3'
~..u:t. <(
. ; i: .....' 9
. . !r.9it ." wm iil
....... . :5g~w .. .::~ 5i
... ...I....:..m... ....... ~
.... '.~' .
'. . m~ ~~ ~:~ffi~w ~.
ffi~5<i:li:;O'!;t~~~
D.rt)oo::<wws:o<(a:
~o\l..>wl-~O'u..zli:;
a:...Ja::rz:rw-
<:)liJwuwu::>I-t-~
~iED.:c!;ta:oo::~:<
Cl;5Vl~s:ir~~~~
flirt)
a.
o
l/l
w
a:
::l
l-
S
Z
W
D.
X
W
~
~
'#"#.#-#.'#
~~888
cOciciuici
'OJ'
~
g
~8888
.,jt~~g
~ C\I'"
.,j
. I I I I
~
.,,;
"-
'"
~~~~~
~Ul;~~~
'"
g
..;
;b
8g888
~~~sig
'" C;J",
N
, , I I .
'"
'0
CD
OJ
'"
CL
8g888
~~~sig
'" C;J",
N
co
W
...J
::>
~O'
ww
sJ:
O'g
W,
~~
.u..
a:OlSffi
~~it
..J~a. (/)
ozzVl oc
WO' W
<(l-zwS:
5~~~~
OO::<...J2<O'
-w<(
.. 1i:...J a: W ~
S2wQwl-...J
""a.J:t-~w
~::>W<(<::>
:5(/)>::<:<u..
Q..
'"
W
...J
::>
0'
W
J:
U
, .., '.,
.:<.........'.
130,000 13ll,OOO 1 Sil,OOO 150,000 1~
150,000 150,000 155,000 155,000 3.33%
3.135.300 3.135.300 3.216.200 3.216.200 2.58%
88,000 88,000 112,200 112;l,3tf"":,. 27.50%
4,400 4,400 3,600 3,600:C. . -18.1SOk
17,000 17,000 14,000 14,000 -17.65%
30.000 30,000 25,000 25,000 -16.67%
30,000 30,000 50,000 50,000 66.67%
200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 25.00%
140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 0.00%
509.400 509.400 594600 594.aoo 16.76%
5,311,000 5,311.000 5,395,000 5,395,000 1.58%
5.311.000 5.311.000 5395.000 5.395.000 : 1.58%
365,000 365,000 335,000 335,000 -8.22%
62,400 62.400 65,400 65,400 4.81%
135,000 135,000 140.000 140,000 3.70%
55,000 55,000 65.000 65,000 18.18%
40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.00%
657.400 657.400 645.400 645.400 -1.83%
TR"AT"ENT"'-M''''''''~''''''''''''''' ........
r:: ty1 . 'un.+ ~:".::.,::<"::'~-:':<""'.:".,,
ADMINIST<>;i.",~ ..,.:n;.;.;;~~;:;;:::::,'::':<: : ':..,
nI'\:U';V'1i:.:v.y.~..,: ,.:....:.:~<::..:
Page 2 of 13
CUSTOMER A~:;::~=:'::::r(':>"
SUPERVISiq/Il ~~,;:~Dl!U:l,1 '
VEHICLE MA;Il'l~::a$$J> SQHl'lDVl,E a
~~)'......
SE~AGE dIJ~4\, .. E >
~~ SI~~:~~,~sl, .'"
V C E~,a~ ",$.OI'IOUlE,1l
MATERIAlS~!~~:, '" " ' ',' ,',
MAINTE~"'" , ,'... ,..,
ADMINIS4~~1~
GATE VALVE, .., ,"::, ,
SUPERVIS~~~fl'SCl1eDULE 1 '
VEHICLE ~~:F!(jEL'~HeD1Jl,E 13 "
ADMINISTRA:~~'. '
FIRE HYDRANT;i-:':,'
SUPERVISION!lND LABOR . SCHEDULE 1
MATERiAlS ANP SUPPLIES
TELEMETRY,
MAINTENANCE
314,000 314,000
33,900 33,900
45,000 45,000
5,000 5,000
10,000 10,000
407.900 407.900
192,000 192.000
43.000 43,000
32,000 32,000
35,000 35,000
40,000 40,000
342.000 342.000
29,000 29,000
4,400 4,400
4,000 4,000
37.400 37.400
16,000 16,000
3,000 3,000
19,000 19.000
25,000 25,000
25.000 25.000
Page 3 of 13
321,000 321,000 2.23%
32,500 32,500 -4.13"k
40,000 40,000 -11.11%
15,000 15,000 200.00%
20,000 20,000 100.00%
428.500 428.500 5.05%
200,000 200,000 4.17%
60,000 60,000 39.53%
34,000 34,000 6.25%
35,000 35,000 0.00%
35,000 35,000 -12.50%
364.000 364.000 6.43%
11,600 11,600 -60.00%
-100.00%
4,000 4,000 0.00%
15.600 15.600 -58.29%
11,600 11,600 -27.500A,
5,000 5,000 66,67%
16.600 16,600 -12.6..'>%
35,000 35,000 40.00%
35.000 35.000 40.00%
GiENERAL ANI:> "i,*","~ . . ,.,,$.<.:.;~:..,~":"': '.,
~~~... "'XY" vv.........' "'"
SUPERVISION:'#l~:~}'~f..
DIRECTORS~lil$''';::'''''';''::';':';''.i';''';'''''''::';'::' . ..... .
DIRECTORS ;;:..o;ti\ii~iilt~;:;:::.;. :.
"""""""""........, .~;;.......
~~~f~_:;:5~~3,
DUESANDSU~:!k~tE4.;":
. "~::~;::::::::::;::;i.::::::::'::;::::~,;:::::::::::::.:.:.::"::::::.:./:. :-
6~~~G:uPP!.il\t~i;;@:;;;:..':.. ... . ..
COMPUTERS'4llttif.~~::-, ............... .
~l1~l!~~'~7~U~;6:. '.
AUOITI ACOO';;,;-.....,-"'..,............... ....
L.tW',H~:;y~;.:.;.......: .....
TRUSTEE FEE$:l"".:t::::"}?::::...,.... ,....
ELECTION FEeii)';:::)i'if<..i;:: .:.:..., .
REGULATORVg:';:>,U;::'::'" .
RENTS AND l,~.. .....,..,.......,;.. ......
UCENSE;S ANd.~j.~tli;)l'$.
EMPLOYEE P~::: ::' '::
GENERALINSlnlj~ft': ........ '.'
~~~~J.~j~ES"
DISASTER EM~:' ". ..
LESS AMOUNTS jHPc.A'i1:PtQ~AATIHC3ExPENSE:
LESS AMOUN11lAO.9CA1~P:tO ~trAi. PRo..tECTS
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
1,980,000 1,052.000 3,032,000 2,212,000 1,169,000 3.001.000 11.51 %
$4.Q\)O 34,000 68,000 32.000 32,000 64,000 -5.ll8"~
17.500 17,500 35,000 15,000 15,000 30,000 -14.29%
90,500 56,900 147,500 85,600 54,900 140,500 -4.75%
23.soo 11,000 34,500 26,000 12,000 38.000 10.14%
59,OllO 29,950 89,000 66.850 35,100 101;950 14.55%
10,000 55.000 125.000 70,000 55,000 125,000 0.00%
54,000 . 30.000 84,000 53,000 29,000 ~,OOO -2.38%
51,000 44,000 95,000 45,000 40,000 85,000 -10.53%
26,300 14,000 40,300 27,500 14,BOO 42,300 4.96%
442,100 205,900 648,000 507,100 250,900 758,000 16.98"10
55,000 30,000 85,000 55,000 30.000 85.000 0.00%
25,000 15,000 40.000 25,000 15.000 40,000 o.
15,000 15,000 20.000 20,000 33.33%
15,000 15,000 30,000 -100.00%
20,000 10,000 30,000 24,000 12.000 36,000 20.00%
90,000 35,000 125,000
2,000 1,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 3,000 O.llO%
11,000 11,000 22,000 12,000 12,000 24,000 9.09%
300,000 170,000 470,000 320.000 170,000 490,000 4.26%
35,000 25.000 60,000 42,000 28,000 70,000 16.67%
6,000 4,000 10,000 9,000 6,000 15,000 50.00'%
4,000 2,000 6,000 5,000 3,000 8.000 33.33"10
(346,500) (40,000) (386,500) (362,000) (35,000) (397.000) 2.720/.
(12,000) (11,000) (23,000) (12,000) (11,000) (23,000) 0.000/0
2.977,550 1.782.250 4.759.800 3.370.050 1,973,700 5.343.750 12.27%
Page 4 of 13
. .
NON-OPERATINQ.I;i(P.i:'.
~~gg::~~L::\:",::,'<".i '. ....
2004 HEADQU~j~@Tt.lR~ilIITEREST
2005 CAPITAL~!.;'~~~\3I~E$T'
TOTAL NON-OPERATING EXPENSE
TOTAL EXPENSES
NET INCOME
CAPITAL ~=~~"":8 i:.. .. '. ... ..
SUPE ~~~..~US.l '.
=:~~~=~~:III~~r'~~~.~~
MUTUALWAT~~~:~ ..' ....
NON-DESIGNA.:......~'f4;:RepAlI'\S:: . .'
~~~::_....;......... ....
~~~:iO=~~ARlS'
RESERVOIR RaJNiOO: .
SAFETY EQUlf'~'
SEWER MAIN ~peS
TRUCKS
WATER TRUCK
DUMP TRUCK
WATER MAIN AePl.A66MENTS............................... .
METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT & TOOLS
TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE (DESIGN)
PLANT 1501107 DESIGN
WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
147,985 147,985 110,605 110,605 -2526%
403,979 403,979 376,460 376,460 -6.81%
292,600 146,738 439,338 282,774 141,811 424,585 -3.36%
250,000 250,000 294,785 294,785 17.91%
1.094.564 146.738 1 .241.302 1.064.624 141.811 1 .206.435 -2.81%
9.508.314 7.581.988 17.090.302 9.759.974 7.874.511 17.634.485 3.18%
3.442.686 605.012 4.047.698 3.785.026 558.489 4.343.515 7.31%
292,000 257,000 549,000 327,000 178,000 503,000 -8.38%
12,000 11,000 23,000 12,000 11,000 23,000 0.00%
60,000 40,000 100,000 60,000 40,000 100,000 0.00%
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.00%
65,000 25,000 90,000 70,000 25,000 95,000 5.56%
10,000 10,000 20,000 11,000 11,000 22,000 10.00%
2.500 2,500 5,000 2,500 2,500 5,000 0.00%
7,500 7,600 15,000
37,500 37,500 75,000 15,000 15,000 30,000 -60.00%
150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 16.67%
12.000 8,000 20,000 12,000 8,000 20,000 0.00%
50,000 50,000 40.000 40,000 -20.00%
105,000 45,000 150,000 150,000 50,000 200,000 33.33%
51.000 24,000 75,000
70.000 25.000 95,000
175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 0.00%
375,000 375,000 500,000 500,000 33.33%
10,000 5,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 0.000",
200,000 200,000 40,000 40,000 -80.00%
350,000 350,000 50,000 50,000 -85.71%
200,000 200,000
Page 5 of 13
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
OTHER USES OF ~~)::.". ". .'
COP PRINCIP~jt~~...
1996 - REFU~'.::i"
2001-REFU~>": ........... ....... . ......
2004 HEAD~if,\$'i.!/itF~'f$.IP1VRJ; PROJECT
2005CAPtTAii:~~lF~NG ... .
1,868.500
493.500
2,362.000
106,509
720,000
635,000
324,209
151,200
720,000
635,000
217,700
151,200
TOTAL - OTHER USES
1,723.900 106.509 1.830.409
CONTINGENCY EXPENSE
5.000 5.000 10.000
TOTAL EXPENSES
13.105,714 8,186,997 21,292,711
TRANSFER TO (FROM) RESERVES
(155.000\
(155.000\
BALANCE
286
289
3
Page 6 of 13
1.951,000
442,000
2,393,000
760,000
660,000
227,600
181,240
760,000
660,000
338,963
181 ,240
111,363
1,828.840 111.363
1.940.203
5.000 5,000
10,000
13,544.814 8.432.874
21,977.688
186
126
312
1.31%
5.56%
3.94%
4.55%
19.87%
6.00%
0.00%
3.22%
-100.00%
7.96%
OPERATING exP~~~RV!~N~Di!AeOR)
SOURCEOF$~Y::"'" .. ..
PUMPING ...' :." ::' . ',. :,' '.
WATERTReA.~' ............ '.'
TRANSMI~~~!i~pl~~..
CUSTOMEFt:~m$:::.. .: .
GATE VALVt!l}':.;:/<'/
FIRE HYDRANt:.. .... .'
SEWAGE C~<m~'
.. ....
. ......
69,000 69,000 68,000 68,000 -15.94%
372,000 372,000 402,200 402,200 8.12%
88,000 88,000 112,200 112,200 27.50%
365,000 365,000 335,000 335,000 -8.22%
314,000 314,000 321,000 321,000 2..23%
29,000 29,000 11,600 11,600 -60.00%
16,000 16,000 11,600 11,600 -27.50"-"
192,000 192,000 200,000 200,000 4.17%
1.253.000 192.000 1 ,445.000 1.251.600 200.000 1.451.600 0.46%
'TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES !SUPERVISION AND LABOR:
GENERALAND~~:::' .:......
SUPERVISldj;Uil!iti:~:.>:':'::: .'
TOTALDISTi.il'~~~/' :..
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
1,084,000 577,000 1,661,000 1,257,000 677,000 1,934,000 16.44%
896,000 475,000 1,371,000 955,000 492,000 1,447,000 5.54%
1.980.000 1.052.000 3.032.000 2.212.000 1.169.000 3.381.000 11.51%
292.000 257.000 549.000 327.000 176.000 503.000 -8.38%
3.525.000 1.501.000 5.026.000 3.790.600 1.545.000 5.335.600 6.16%
-.. -
CAPITAL PROJECTS (SUPERVISION AND LABOR)
TOTAL SALARIES AND BENEFITS
Page 7 of 13
. . ....... ..., .. .
. " ... ...." ."
GENERAL AND ~~HAtM;> . ..
GENERAL Of1fl~~!~
FORMS, BI\.IAi:~...
COMPUTERM~:::":::" .
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
26,000
8,000
20,000
16,000
4,000
10,000
42,000
12,000
30,000
25,000
7,000
21,000
15,000
3,000
11,000
40,000
10,000
32,000
-4.76%
-16.670/0
6.67'%
54.000
30.000
84.000
53.000
29.000
82.000
-2.38%
Page 8 of 13
. '. '. . . .<.:.:.:::::~::::::.~:~:::~?~::~~t~:::j~t?j~~;;;;r;::~;t~~:;;~:~:~::: '.:"
PUMPING . .... . .... ..
FUEL AND p~~ !ElECTf'!:K:;:AL)
TOTAL PUM,~:;::;:'.:'::;: '..
GENERALAND~~~..
UTILITIES: ....... ..... '.' .
ELECTRIC:::"::':-::: ".<. "';\<::-::. -:,.. .
NATURAL ~ ;i:".,.: ....,."... ""'. .. .',
. "''jN%t.::'::::
TELEPHON~........... ...........
TRASH :.;.::.::...:....:.i::.:.::..~,:.::.......::::.....i::::::,,;:: '"
. . /,>.:::::)::}}.:'.,:.?: .::.... .
TOTAL <3:EN~~(\tlMINI~;mAl1ve. .
TOTAL UTILITIES
2,200,000
2.200,000
2,200,000 2,200,000
2,200,000
0.00%
2.200000 2.200.000
2.200.000
0.00%
40,000 30,000 70,000 40,000 30,000 70,000 0.00%
1,600 900 2,500 1,600 900 2,500 0.00%
39,000 21,000 60,000 34,000 19,000 53,000 -11.67%
10,000 5,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 0.00%
90.600 56.900 147500 85.600 54.900 140.500 -4.75%
2.290.600 56,900 2.347.500 2.285.600 54.900 2.340.500 -0.30%
_nO
Page 9 of 13
, ~.';'
TOTAL DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
9,500 5,500 15,000 9,500 5,500 15,000 0.00%
150 100 250 150 100 250 0.00%
200 100 300 200 100 300 0.00%
2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 0.00%
13,000 13,000 14,000 14,000 7.69%
75Q 750 1,500 750 750 1,500 o.
1,500 1.400 2,900 1,700 1,800 3,300 13.790/.
200 100 300 200 100 300 0.00%
1,900 800 2,700 1,900 800 2,700 0.00%
250 250 500 3,500 3,500 7,000 1300.00%
700 700 700 700 0.00%
650 350 1,000 2,000 1,000 3,000 200.00%
200 100 300 300 100 400 33.33%
800 400 1,200 900 400 1,300 8.33%
6,500 3,500 10,000 6,500 3,500 10,000 0.00%
5,000 3,000 8,000 5,300 3,200 8.500 6.25%
2,500 2,500 5,000 2,500 2,500 5,000 0.00"",
150 150 300 150 150 300 0.00"/.
750 750
450 450 900
1,400 1,400 2,800 1,400 1,400 2,800 0.00%
100 100 100 100 0.00%
2,000 1,000 3,000 2,200 1,300 3,500 16.67%
350 350 350 350 0.00%
7,500 7,500 15,000 7,500 7,500 15,000 0.00%
1,300 700 2,000 1.400 800 2,200 10.
59.050 29.950 89,000 66.850 35.100 101.950
AWWARF~"lif~~e$ '.' .'
~~~UNI:~~llON:J... ....
~:.--~,,<
~~U:~~'~~~'t;;..
~~~.~!F.
LAFCO')'\i.. . .... ....:.: .' .
'," ,.,.. ..,
MISCELLA~. .... . ..
ARST AME~~~"TJ;:.
~~~1T"
UPPER $AurA.':"''':':':::':';''. '-:.:;'" '::. .
:~i~=~~=~ .
WATER Re@Ac$$WsTrru~ IC~ STATE)
WESTCAS . ..
Page 10 of 13
GENE~~~
E;~
~':>lT~~AL:~~(:"'" .'.
1.._R>.1!:~t:~
OFFICE EQ~t'{.} ...........': ....... .... .'.
CITIZENS ~~i_(;HANTFeEs
UNIFORMS:.:..d;>< ...... . .
MED1CAL~A~~.... . ."
~~:L~~~~M~i.lf":.'~~'. .
GENERAL E.1IIe~< .
FEDERAL FIi~NiA5: '. .
STATE RE~l\'fIQt\V.. .
OUTSIDE ~tsMP6fWIY
6~~I~_'~~E~N1OO
OUTSOUROE~i!:~11\!G (DATA PROSE)
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
88,000 27,000 115,000 88,000 27,000 115,000 0.00%
8,600 4,400 13,000 8,600 4,400 13,000 0.00%
50,000 25,000 75,000 46,000 24,000 70,000 -6.61%
11,000 5,000 16,000 10.000 5,000 15,000 -6.25%
10,000 5,000 15,000 8,000 4,000 12,000 -2O.GO%
10,500 5,500 16,000 10,500 5,500 16,000 O.OO"'{'
13,000 7,000 20,000 14.,000 8,000 22,000 10.00%
40,000 20,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 60,000 O.OO"k
16,000 9,000 25,000 26,000 14,000 40.000 60.00%
12,000 6,000 18,000 12,000 6,000 18,000 0.00%
7,000 4,000 11,000 8,000 4,000 12,000 9.09%
10,000 1 0,000 10.000 10,000 O.GO%
60,000 25,000 85,000 98.000 52,000 150,000 76A7%
15,000 10,000 25,000 16,000 11,000 27,000 8.00%
35,000 15,000 50,000 35,000 15,000 50,000 0.00%
28,000 12,000 40,000 28,000 12,000 40,000 0.00%
6.000 4,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 30,000 200.00"k
5,000 5,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 0.00%
6,000 6,000 12,000 8,000 8,000 16,000 33.33%
11,000 11,000 22,000 16,000 16,000 32,000 45.45%
442.100 205.900 648.000 507.100 250,900 758,000 16.98%
Page 11 of 13
. . ......:::.!!.:.;i::~;;i;:f:f~:::iii:j::~ff~;l;j::jj:~~i:'j:;":'::'"
~0~~ClE ANPE.~~~.~}?" '.
,"d.
TOTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND FUEL
~~~;: .
:~el~.:!..:::::::>:::::. ..
GENERAL&::............~iw... '.
~~:::~.:,::;::.;::.:.:.~.:..:.....
TOTAL VEHICLE I EQUIPMENT MAl NT AND FUEL
. 98,000 32,000 130,000 105,000 30,000 135,000 3.85%
75,000 25,000 100,000 100,000 30,000 130,000 30.00%
173.000 5?000 230.000 205.000 60,000 265,000 15.22%
-
~ 3,300 7,200 7,200 118.18%
38,300 38,300 54,000 54.000 40.99%
4,400 4,400 3,600 3,600 -18.18%
62,400 62,400 65,400 65,400 4.81%
33,900 3$,900 32,500 32,500 -4.13%
43,000 43,000 60,000 60,000 39.53"k
4,400 4,400 -100.00%
26,300 14,000 40,300 27,500 14,800 42,300 4.96.
173.000 57,000 230,000 190.200 74,800 265,000 15.22"1<
Page 12 of 13
TRAVEL, MEALS, LO~11'ilG ~CQNfERENYeS
17,500
17.500
35,000
15,000
15,000
30,000
-14.29%
TOTAL DIRECTORS EXPENSE
17.500
-
17.500
35,000
15.000
15.000
30.000
-14.29%
Page 13 of 13
COMMISSIONERS
PAUL BlANE. Chair
Board Of SUf,ervlsors
BOB COLVEN Vice Chair
SPECial DlstT ct
KIMBERlY C( X
Special Dlstr ct
DENNIS HAN ;BEROER
Board of SU'}E!rvlsors
lARRY McCA ~ON
City Membe '
MARK NUAIHI
City Membe '
RICHARD P. j'EARSON
Public Memt ler
ALTERNATI;S
JAMES V, CURATALO
S~lal Dtsb let
JOSiE CONZJ ,LES
Board of Su 7lervlsors.
A,R, "TONY' ;EDANO
Public Meml ler
DIANE WILLI \MS
City Membe'
STAFF
iG\iHLEEN R JLUNCS.McDONALD
executive 0 'fleer
SAMUEL MA mNEZ
lAfCO Anal) st
MICHAEL A, TUERPE
LAfCO Anah st
DEBBY CHAI1BERUN
Clerk to th1:: Comm{'S~,lon
ANGELA M. ;CHEll
Deputy Clelk to the CommIssion
LECAL COlJNSEL
ClARK H, AI SOP
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
175 West FIfth Street, SecondF/oor " San Bernard/no, CA 92415.0490
(9091387-5866 " Fax (909) 387-5871
E-mail: (afco@/afro,sbcounty.gov ," wWW.s!Jclafco.org
EstablIShed by the State Of california to serve the CltIzens. CIties. Special DIstricts anOthe coontv Of san flernarc1ino
DATE:
MAY 26,2006
FROM:
KATHLEEN ROLLINGS-McDONALD, Executive Officer
TO:
ALL INDEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICTS IN SAN
BERNAR:D1NQ COUNTY
SUBJECT: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ELECTION FOR REGULAR AND
ALTERNATE LAFCO MEMBERS
By distribution of this memorandum, the official voting process for the
Regular and Alternate Special District Members of the Local Agency
Formation Commission shall commence. Attached is, the ballot for the
selection of these positions. Pursuant to the provision of Government Code
Section 56332, the voting period will be for 35 days, commencing as of
today's date and ending on JUNE 30, 2006. The voting instructions for this
selection are as follows:
1.
Each District may vote for one nominated candidate only. The vote
shall be cast as directed by the Board of Directors of the District
through consideration at a Board Hearing and a roll call vote,
The signed original ballot, with the name of each voting Board
Member outlined, must be received in the LA.FCO Office by 5:00 p.m.
on June 30. 2006. If a faxed copy of the ballot is provided by the
June 30th date, the original signed copy must be received by 5:00
p.m., on July 5\h or the ballot will be declared invalid.
2,
3,
Twenty-seven (27) ballots are required to be received for selection of
the Special District Member positions,
The completed ballot is to be mailed to:
Kathleen Rollings-McDonald, Executive Officer
Local Agency Formation Commission
175 West Fifth Street, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490
MAILED BALLOT
LAFCO SPECIAL DISTRICT MEMBERS
MAY 26,2006
If you are faxing a copy of the ballot, the LAFCO Fax number is (909) 387-5871. As
outlined in Item #2 above, if the ballot is faxed to the LAFCO office, the original signed
copy of the ballot will need to be mailed to the above address and received by 5:00 p.m.
on July 5th to be considered in the election.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this selection
procedure. You may contact me at the address listed above, bye-mail at
lafc:o@lafco.sbcounty.gov, or by phone at (909) 387-5866.
Sincerely,
/ - -
~T~LEE~ -~d;~~{MCDONALD
Executive Officer
Attachment
BALLOT
REGULAR AND ALTERNATE
SPECIAL DISTRICT MEMBERS
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
The
hereby votes for the marked candidate as indicated below.
REGULAR MEMBER OF LAFCO:
Bob Colven (Incumbent - member of the Board of Directors
of the Big Bear City Community Services District)
Gerald Smith (member of the Board of Directors of the Baldy
Mesa Water Dis~rict)
ALTERNATE MEMBER OF LAFCO:
James V. Curatalo, Jr. (Incumbent - member of the Board of
Directors of the Cucamoriga Valley Water District)
Gerald Smith (member of the Board of Directors of the Baldy
Mesa Water District) ,
I, , do hereby certify that at its regularly
scheduled meeting of , the Board of Directors voted to
elect the above-marked candidates as the Regular and Alternate Special District
Members of the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Bernardino County,
by the following vote:
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
ABSTAIN: DIRECTORS:
District President/Authorized Board Member
Dated:
CROYDON RISK CONSULTANTS
198 North Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92408 U.S.A.
Telephone 909,884,8294 Facsimile 909381.7610
croydonrisk@carthlink.net
June 6, 2006
," . ~ -, ,~
Robert E. Martin, P.E., General Manager
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
3645 East Highland Avenue
Highland, CA 92346
Re: Alternative Insurance Facilities
Dear Bob:
As part of our "Alternative Insurance Facilities" consulting project, I met with senior
managers and executives of the Association of California Water Agencies - Joint Powers
Insurance Authority (ACW AlJPIA) and Special District Risk Management Authority
(SDRMA) in their offices on May 16,2006, Everyone I spoke with was very forthcoming
and each organization welcomed the opportunity to tell its story and to be introduced to
East Valley Wafer District.
I received detailed information about the risk pooling and insurance programs each
organization offers, and engaged in candid discussions of background, current
developments, goals and overall approaches each program takes to assist its constituents
with insurance and risk management needs,
The meetings and information I received provide a sound basis for the following report of
fmdings and recommendations to the EVWD Board Insurance Committee, which we
discussed in detail on June 5,2006.
Thank you for this opportunity to work :with EVWD and to advise your Insurance
Committee and Board of Directors on these important matters.
\SiyerelY~
J., " '--
~-...;;-...)\.~
Paul W. Pinckney, CPC ,
Principal
I
CROYDON RISK CONSULTANTS
East Valley Water District Risk Management Study
Alternative Insurance Facilities, June 2006
Executive Summary
Croydon Risk Consultants has been engaged by East Valley Water District to review the
characteristics, operations and financial aspects of two (2) prominent California joint
powers and risk management authorities, and to report to the Board Insurance Committee
about the possible viability of each program to provide proposals for upcoming liability,
auto, property and workers' compensation policy renewals.
Each program was created under California Government Code Section 6500 et seq.,
which allows public entities to pool risk. In addition to risk pooling, risk management and
related services and the joint purchase of excess loss insurance and reinsurance complete
the "insurance-like" package of services offered by each entity. Each program requires an
application for membership and approval by current members.
ACWAlJIPA was formed in 1979 to meet the specific needs of California' s water
districts. It operates a risk pooling program strongly supported by staff risk management
, and educational services as well as claim adjusters. Variable premium levels reflect
member self-retention of risk, selected risk pooling points and retrospective premium
adjustments for each member. Coverage is tailored to water agency, public entity risks.
Financial aspects appear to be very strong with reputable, stable reinsurance coverage of
catastrophic risks. Total insured limits of liability are $40 million, There is a one year
membership commitment. There is a goal to provide exceptional services and coverage
well below commercial market costs.
SDRMA was chartered in 1986. It accepts as members a wide variety of California's
"special districts", from Community Service Districts (117), to Water Agencies (47), to
O~meteries (17), to Libraries (9) and Cities (3). In addition to risk pooling, claims
control, risk management and related services are supported by outsourced resources. In-
house internet driven training and professional development programs provide
opportunities for premium credits by members. Coverage is crafted to meet the needs of
California public entities. Risk pooling and premium charges are prospective and have no
provision for future loss-responsive adjustments, Conservative actuarial margins are part
of premium charges, Total insured limits ofliability are $25 million. There is a three year
minimum membership commitment. The program seems financially strong and is
supported by recognized, stable insurance and reinsurance companies.
I recommend that each risk pooling entity be asked to provide risk survey services and
proposals for EVWD insurance renewals, along with commercial insurance proposals for
workers' compensation by Sander Kessler Insurance, and general and auto liability,
dlrectors and officers, property, machinery and criminal loss policies through Arroyo
Insurance Services,
2
CROYDON RISK CONSULT ANTS Risk Management Study for EVWD
Alternative Insnrance Facilities Insurance Committee Report
Croydon Risk Consultants (CRC) has been engaged by EVWD (District) to assist the
District in better understanding opportunities that may be presented by ACW NJPIA and
SDRMA, each a specialized risk pooling authority created under California Government
Code Section 6900, et seq, Each entity is a resource for proposing District liability, auto,
Directors and Officers, property, machinery, criminal loss and workers' compensation
policies as they renew October 1,2006. W!=lrkers' Compensation coverage is now
provided through Sander Kessler & Associates, with a July I expiration date. The other
policies are provided through Arroyo Insurance Services. All current coverage is
purchased from commercial insurers that have developed tailored coverage, pricing and
services for special districts.
CRC has been asked to meet with senior staff and managers of each entity in their
offices, to secure relevant printed materials and reports and to discuss with them
applications of their programs, CRC is asked provide the Board Insurance Committee a
report of fmdings and recommendations related to similarities of the programs, material
differences and the possibility that either or both programs could benefit the District as
sources of renewal proposals.
Senior management and staff we met provided all requested information, engaged in
candid discUssions of important aspects of each program and generally were hospitable,
welcoming ljIld collegial throughout'the process 0"1" organizing and conducting meetings
in their respective offices.
Key Issues Considered by CRC
~ The nature and character of ~ach program, the vision of its management and
approach to risk pooling, financial management and member services.
~ Membership requirements, given that the District is currently a member of
ACW A and CSDA, sponsoring organizations of the respective risk pooling
plans.
~ Range of coverage offered, underwriting criteria and risk selection approach.
~ Financial security including insurance and reinsurance against catastrophic
losses.
~ Service offerings, staff and outsourced resources,
~ Funding requirements, risk pooling contributions and ongoing financial
obligations, including exit requirements,
, ,
3
}> Estimation of costs to join and to participate in the risk pooling plan.
Findings and Recommendations
}> Each program is centered on member service, with major emphasis on
effective risk management, safety tridning, claims management, fmancial
controls and efficient operations.
o ACW NJPIA operates its risk pool with ample opportunity for members to
retain risk to individual tolerances, to share risk with other members and
to jointly purchased excess, catastrophe insurance and reinsurance, all on a
retrospective rating basis where subject losses determine ultimate costs of
coverage, over time. There is a general attitude toward developing in-
house service capabilities, with little outsourced services.
o SDRMA approaches risk sharing, risk control, risk management and
member services on more of a group basis, with prospective premiums,
cost smoothing reserve ac-cumulation and "first dollar" coverage, without
individual risk retention of self-funding. There is a systems-oriented
approach to member services, with claims and risk control services
outsourced to reputable service providers.
o Each program is accredited by California Association of Joint Power
Authorities (CAJPA) "with 'excellence",
.
o Each program provides member services without added charge, with costs
allocated within the General and Administration component of premium
charges,
)> Membership requirements and costs of each program are comparable, with a
detailed application for insurance proposals, followed by a thorough
underwriting assessment and proposals of coverage, services and costs, then if
the proposal is accepted, a detailed risk control inspection and
recommendations and agreement by the District to comply. There is also a
membership application which is reviewed and voted upon by Authority
management and, ultimately by its Board. Membership requirements seem
uncomplicated and straight-forward and costs are likely to be nominal.
;.. Coverage offerings are very similar, each with more of a "public officials"
viewpoint as opposed to a corporate "directors and officers" perspective. Each
program offers broadly-drawn coverage terms and conditions and the
underwriting approach taken by each program seems thorough, risk
management oriented and responsive to member needs.
o These are risk pools and not insurance programs, operations are governed
by California's Government Code and not the Insurance Commissioner,
4
although purchase and application of excess insurance and reinsurance is
subject to Insurance Department regulation.
o Limits of coverage differ materially between the plans. ACW AlJPIA
offers $40 million each occurrence general liability and auto coverage,
whereas SDRMA offers $10 million, basic limits and up to $15 million
excess coverage.
o Property coverage offerings include guaranteed replacement cost, no
coinsurance and boiler and machinery coverage, with valuation by
appraisal through ACW AlJPIA and "best estimation by District" basis
with SDRMA.
o It is interesting to note that ACW AlJPIA insures and reinsures primarily
with American International Group (AIG) companies and that SDRMA
uses mostly Munich Reinsurance resources - the parent of America's
Alternative Insurance Company (AAIC) the current underwriters of the
specialized commercial insurance program purchased by the District.
o There may be some risk should the District ask SDRMA for a proposal at
the same time AAIC is approached by Arroyo Insurance regarding the
. . same risk. It may be that the "Munich Reinsurance" group has a policy
against competing one of its 'companies against the other, with the
possibility of generating tv,ro distinct answers to the same question - how
. and how much to insure the District.
~ Each program is strongly supported by material financial capacity and large
catastrophe loss reserves and cost smoothing reserves.
o ACW AlJTJ> A states it has no debt and that at least 25% of its assets are
unencumbered by losses or liabilities. Net assets as of September 30, 2005
are reported to have been over $24.8 million.
o SDRMA has accumulated large reserve accounts and is further protected
by excess surplus within actuarial loss cost projections with at least 90%
risk margin to protect against severe adverse deviation and terrible loss
events. Net assets as of June 30, 2005 are reported to have been over $17.4
million.
o Neither program has protection offered to "admitted" commercial insurers
under California's insurance insolvency guarantee fund which, itself is
severely limited to, I believe, $500,000 any uninsured loss.
o Reinsurance is provided to each program through strong, reputable and to
date, highly rated sophisticated international insurance and reinsurance
organizations.
5
~ Each program offers a wide variety of public-entity directed services, with
emphasis on safety training, professional development, risk avoidance and
transfer and risk management serVices:
o ACW AlJPIA seems more directed toward developing and delivering in-
house capabilities and services with underwriting, claims, risk control,
appraisals and related services they.offer.
o SDRMA offers many services, as well, but uses contract resources for
legal, claims and risk control, with substantial input and direction from
reinsurers as to underwriting standards, risk acceptance and risk
management recommendations.
o Each program offers specific services that are accredited by California's
Department of Health and Human Services for "contact hours" to support
certification by District employees and managers.
~ Funding requirements of each program are dissimilar in approach and effect.
Each program uses conservative actuarial projections of losses and related
costs and is careful in husbanding resources and providing efficient, low
overhead operations. Each program allows settlement of small losses by
members, with input by program claim administrators.
o ACW AlJPIA charges a deposit premium based on payroll, previous loss
experience and mathematical formulae intended to recognize economies of
scale and credibility of expected losses and expenses. Minimum premiums
are based on payroll and retrospective allocation points vary with basic
premium computations. There is a.minimum one year program
commitment.
.
The ultimate premium for a given policy year is determined once
all reported losses for the period are closed, thus final "truing up"
of premium costs could take years to complete.
.
Computations begin 48 months after policy inception and are
conducted annually thereafter, with credit or debit amounts held in
a stabilization account until all losses are closed.
.
A member may withdraw from the programs at will, but will wait
until final retrospective premium adjustments for final
reconciliation of premium costs.
.
Distribution of excess surplus within reserve accounts is done
when "superabundance" is determined by ACW AlJPIA Board,
6
with distributions to members that participated in the programs in
the year(s) when e~cess. surplus was earned.
)> SDRMA computes premiums as a function of district budgets, on a
prospective, "guaranteed cost" basis with little or no self-funding or
deductibles, in a manner similar to commercial insurance risk transfer
transactions.
o Risk assessment, classification relativities and premium cost computations
are coordinated with reinsurers and the reinsurance intermediary used by
the program.
o Premiums are conservatively set and payments are made annually, in
advance for Liability and Property program, quarterly for Workers'
Compensation with annual voluntary audit provisions.
o There is a three year commitment requirement for joining the program(s),
with set premiums paid each year
o Excess surplus, stabilization and catastrophe accounts are managed to
smooth premium charges year-to-year, and are distributed as premium
holidays or dividends to members participating in the prog~m in the year
returns are declared.
)> The process of joinjng each program i& relatively simple and set;:ms not to be
costly. The key issue is the proposed insurance program(s) and acceptance by
Authority Board of the District as a member as well as a "policyholder" in the
risk pooling program.
o An insurance application along with financial statements, risk exposure
disclosure and loss history is required.
o Once a proposal is presented and accepted, thorough underwriting
inspections are conducted and recommendations need to be complies with
soon after coverage attaches.
o Application to California's Director of Self-Insured Plans needs to be
made and approved to allow District participation in the risk pools. The
good news is that California public entities are not required to bond loss
reserve amounts as are self-insured public corporations.
o Membership in the Authority needs to be authorized by District Board
resolution, followed by application to join the Authority, itself.
In summary, I believe ACW AlJPIA and SDRMA each represent viable, financially sound
and responsive risk pooling programs that can provide comparable coverage to the
7
District's current commercial insurance program, but with services tailored to public
entity and water district risks and needs, and possibly at lower total costs than at present.
Each program has unique characteristics and approaches to risk pooling, risk
management, cost control and member services, but neither program imposes
requirements that collide with District risk profile, operations or insurance-related goals.
~ ACW AlJPIA seems to say "let me help you manage risks and organize ways
for you to fund expected losses, while protecting you and your colleagues
from catastrophic loss", while providing at no additional cost a vast array of
valuable services and resources.
~ The SDRMA program is more centered on a risk management approach to
risk funding and payment of a sum certain for transferring risk to an
insurance-like entity, with past losses reflected in future premiums. Many
valuable services and resources are provided by SDRMA, without added cost,
as well.
I recommend the District by not later than Juiy 1, 2006, ask ACW AfJPIA and SDRMA to
meet with its Insurance Committee to discuss the possibility of each program providing
competitive proposals for District property, liability and criminal loss coverage in
October 2006, and, in the absence of compeUing reasons to the contrary, that each
proposal be considered to replace current commercial insurance policies. Note that while
Workers' Compensation coverage extends from July I, 2006~2007, given the Insurance
Committee recommendation of concurrent expirations for all. EVWD property and
casualty insurance, change of expiration dates may be achieved by either extending
current coverage to October 1,2006 or by.arranging that the successful program for the
other coverage to pick up Workers' Compensation for the period July 1,2007 to October
1,2007, and to continue annually, thereafter.
I would plan to meet with the EVWD Board of Directors on June 13 to discuss this report
in detail, and to review with them printed information and reports given to me by each
entity as part of this project.
For reference, details of each program may be viewed by visiting the respective web-
sites. ACWAfJPIA is at "acwajpia.com", SDRMA is at "SDRMAORG".
Please note that this report is intended solely for the confidential information ofEVWD.
AJ~y other distribution or use is not allowed without the written consent of CRe. The
proposal accepted by EVWD and that is the basis for this work is included herein by
reference, particularly in respect of conditions, limitations, representations and reliances
within the proposal.
8
Sp.~..,.d.Jlh.M.I"p"1l.~W.I.rllI1trlll.IS...tbrnt.Ii'.,nl.
Lake Skinner
May 19-21
A six-month program for high school students In
whlc! teams build, equip and race solar-powered
boats, Ie :Jrnlng about conservation of natural resources,
"Iectrlcal and mechanical engineering,
problem solving and more.
Solar Cup is sponsored by the Metropolitan
Water District of
Southern California.
Teams are sponsored
and financed
by local water
utilities, government
agencies, and
non-profits.
Qualifying events are Friday, May 19. Sprint
races U1 ing solar energy stored in batteri'es are
on Saturday, May 20, Endurance races using
solar energy collection panels, and awards
ceremony, are Sunday, May 21.
Free admission, Directions: Take 1-15 to
Rancho California Road, Temecula: go north
10 miles to main gote. Fees charged for RVs
and oVElrnight camping; reservations
'-800-2<4-7275.
Single-seat boats,
16-feet- ong and
about EO pounds, are
built fro n identical
kits of marine-caliber
wood provided by
Metropolitan Water
District. Boats may be equipped with up to four
solar ccllection panels, about 4-feet-square.
Maximum output allowed from all panels is 320
watts.
www,ml.dh2o.com www.bewaterwise.com
1-866-95-S0LAR
r
: Schools and Sponsors
City of Anaheim - Anaheim
High Transportation Academy,
Canyon High
City of Glendale -
Hebert Hoover High
City of Long Beach -
Long Beach Polytechnic High,
Millikan High
City of San Fernando - San Femando High
Calleguas MWD - Camarilla High
Central Basin MWD - Califamia High, Warren High
County of Riverside - Murrtetta Valiey High
Eastern MWD - Canyon Springs High, Perris High,
. Roncha High, San Jacinto High
Eastern MWD/Rancho California WD - Greot Oak High,
Chaparral High
Inland Empire Utilities - Upland High
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
and City of Chino Hills - Ayola
High, China Hills High
Irvine Ranch Water District
. and MWD of Orange County'
. - Ei Tor.o High
Rahus Institute and Imperial
. Irrigation District - india High
Three Valleys MWD - Chorter Oak High, Claremont High,
Garey High, Pomona High, San Olmos High
Three Valleys MWD/Rowland WD - Nogales High
Three Valleys MWD/Walnut Valley WD - Diamond Ranch
High, Diamond Bar High, Santana High
Upper San Gabriel Valley MWD -
EI Monte High, Gobrielino High, La Puente High, Los Altos High
Western MWD - Jurupa Valley High
West Basin MWD - Leuzinger High
To Be Announced - La Sierra
High, Norco High, Opportunities
Unlimited Charter High
MWD
METROPOLITAN WATER OISmlCT OF SOUTHERN CA
700 N. Alameda St., Los Angeles, CA 90012
P.o. Box 54153, Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153
12131217-6000
18001 CALL MWD
www.mwdh2o.com
bewaterwise.com
1/06 5M
Sponsored by The Metropolitan Water District 01 Southern California
iiJ ~.
~27~~J
SkinneJf
'~
,I~
~~.~.
~~ ,':',e\
~. SI/..\0' \eO
~~. O\(..'~ \0<\ 0 06
\; \(30'1. le\ ,?-O cu\O
leG _ (),Cl <00 \w0'e "',(), ~
",'0 <;\ fiJI q'l.q , Gu\00
'<;\e ~ 0'
\l-IWC oe '? . ~"O'"
"'u' u""
CO
tr,,\00
~"e
lI\petition
!r.:!1il1\'Ill', Is a CO h'gn
""'-Id~\!1 Jij w '\/o'le ,,\
;v"'" " ond pH ut
tor pU::lIIC ci nts tnroUgno d
nOc I stu 8 . sponsor8
SC Co\itorn\O, oter
soutne(n oliton'i'J.
the ME,troP cal\1orn\a
bY coutnern water
Oistril;t ot -, citieS ond
rnber Solar
and it',:: In Its tnird ye~;~s Kind
ger c\' \/ent 0\
o >he onlY e .'~.:-"'V'F;~'
cuP is I" '01.,. . '. ',' """"":
. Coli10rn\. ,~ . -;-
H\ l ~'., "Wi' -:
. . FREE
ADMISSION
. to Solar Cup;
overnight camping
and RV fees charged.
Camping reservations
1-800-234-7275.
"\',
2004
www.r1wdh2o.com
www.be..:;..::.:.>l.wise.com
May 13~15
~ili'
ro $11:1110
to" ke ISfi 11$:
'<On... ree.,.
G c"o C ova}'
. 0 nOrth 1 Olifomlo R.
mOln 0 miles t Ci,
90te. 0
s_.,
ellllt e""",_
and ~"".."@
boots ,compete SOlar.pconstrUct
,nVoIV1n.... oWered
olternat' g "Ie stud
IVe ener ents with
converso gy source
mech lOn, electrl s, SOlar
anlcal SYst Cal and
Of natural ems, stew
creatlv resources t ardship
e thinking ,eomWork
SPort ' PrObl .
smanshlp 0 em SOlVing
, ndnu '
other ott'/h.. merous
2004
",.
~:!\t:'!........-
._.""..r.!'."",,"~,,",,"-
-
!jllanifl:iE1Jiillliillll~ lllCln@@lI111:
Anah.,lm Public Utllllles- Anaheim High Transportation Academy. Canyon High School
Calle!IUaS Municipal Water Dlstrlct- Moorpark High School. High School at Moorpark College
Eastern Municipal Water D1strict- Chaparral/Temecula Valley High Schooi. Perrls High School. San Jacinto High School. West
Volley High School
Imper allrrigcltion Oistrlcl- India High School
Inlanc Empire Ulilllles Agency- Chino Hills High School. Ayala High School
Long lIeach Waler Deparlmenl- Long Beach Polytechnic High School
Municipal Water District of Orange County & Mesa Consolidated Water District- Costa Mesa High School
Rivers de County- La Sierra High School. Murrieta Volley High School
City 01 San Fernando- San Fernando High School
Three Valleys Municipal Water Dlstrict- Faith Lutheran High School. Glendora High School. Pomona HIgh School,
San D mas HI\lh School. Diamond Bar High School. Garey High School. Nogales High School. Charter Oak High School
Up pel San GClbriel Valley Municipal Waler Dislrlct- EI Monte High School. Gabrlelino High School. La Puenle High School,
Los AI iOS High School
Western Munk:ipal Water Distrlct- Norco High School
Unsp<lnsored- Centennial High School. Corona
i!.!ill:~IilI1ilkfil~Illl<l!Y Is a drinking waler reservoir owned and
operated ty Metropolitan Water District. It can hold up to
44,000 acre -feet O'f water (one af=360.000 gallons). Because It
holds future. drinking water.
even thau\:'h the water will
stili be treaied, no
swimming, 'Nadlng or
"body conbct' Is ollowed.
The lake's' f shing ond
camping a:::tivltles are
operated, I)y leas<,
agreement by tho
Riverside C :Junty Parks
and Open-Space District.
\!i,~~!ll~iIDe~ l!ile@liilD\l'I'!firw~J, Friday, May 13. events
are qualityi 19 rounds. Saturday, May 14, the boats run 90-
minute enelurance races around a 2-kllometer course, using
power frorr, solar panels and batteries. Sunday. May 15. the
boats remc,ve the solar paneis and speed-race on a 200-
meter course.
T{'>:"j;-:\!Ti.!'J. L"<'&q :U~i1L"l'z:fllli~\!il':.!:~~ There is no required minimum or
moxlmum number of team members. Teams have ranged in
number from one to 30. Each team must have a faculty
advisor. Seme teoms have several advisors. as well as the
assistance :Jf team members' parents.
,.;.0''''~t: are built from Identical kits of marine-caliber wood
provided ty Metropolitan. Single-seat boats are 16 feet long,
and weigh about 50 pounds.
...-.-......;,.:..
i::~;ld1&:![ ~ltr:TI!))!:'llil~;t'('; Boats
may use up to four solar
collection panels. which are
generally 4 feet square.
although configurations differ.
'. The maximum output
aliowed from all panels is 320
watts.
',"'>1" ."
. :..-.~ c:P,'~r~~ .
:_'M~ "
",.:"' ..
'-.- .-.-
c"-__~ ._'.','
~ .""
. , "
,.,,'". -,"
..... ~.
1JiW@Hilllli~ ~<3ll\lufillemeilJt: Maximum weight allowed for boat
and skipper is 451 ibs.; the minimum weight of the skipper is
132 ibs. Ballast-usually bags of gravel-may be added to bring
the pilot's weight up to 132 Ibs.
l'5alf~: Each skipper
must pass a Red Cross
swim test. Each boat is
equipped with a safety
cord attached to the
pliot's life vest; should the
cord be !=lisconnected
while the motor Is running,
the motor is automatically
shut off. In addition, a safety
boat and lifeguards hover
nearby.
lJl~UIltl(jjjjlfJ1f.: Metropolitan Water District assumes the costs of
the Solar Cup workShOps. main event, administration and
related costs totaling oppraxlmately $75,000. Participating
Metropolitan member agencies support each team with
$3,000 with which to equip their
boat. and reiated expenses.
~"':(fAt~;i! (?i'JJ~) begins with sign-
up in December. and
includes a boat-building
event and several
workshops focusing on
technical aspects such as
drive trains, electrical
systems. solar power collection
and steering systems. Teams are also
required to meet deadlines for submitting iliustrated
reports on these systems.
'- ,.' ::.'2,>:'..:~;[;' Each team Is required to present a visual
display showing how solar power can be used localiy and/or
globally to address a water probiem.
.JANUARY 2006
m__~____M__e_t__r_D_~_[p)_~-@~-~-'jff@--~._m_._.__..
NEW CONSERVATION COMMITMENT
As a resull of action by its Board of Directors, Metropolitan Water District will increase its financial
commitment to conservation by as much as $5 million over the next five years and refocus its
programs.
"With this commitment, we're sending a strong message that Southern California plans to
stay at the forefront of water conservation and is truly serious about encouraging everyone to
use water as efficiently as possible," said Metropolitan board Chairman Wes Bannister.
As part of a new five-year strategy developed in coordination with its 26 member
public agencies, Metropolitan will increase incentives to local agencies for new high
efficiency programs and devices from the current $154 for every acre-foot (326,000
gallons) of water conserved to $195 per acre-foot, up to 100 percent of the cost of
a device.
Metropolitan currently offers rebate packages for a variety of devices, including
ultra-low-flush toilets and urinals; high-efficiency clothes washers, weather-sensitive
irrigation c_ontroll~rs, waterbrooms, and cooling tower conductivity controllers.
Customized incentive programs aiso are available to homeowners' associations for
large landscapes and for industries that use water in processing or manufacturing. During
2005, Metropoiitan issued approximately 300,000 rebates for devices that are now saving 9,000
acre-feet a year in Southern California.
conYnued on page 3
RECORD 38 TEAMS IN FOURTH SOLAR CUP
STUDENTS BUILD, EQUIP BOATS FOR MAY 19.21 EVENT AT LAKE SKINNER
A record 38 high school
teams-totaling about 700
students-are participating in
Metropolitan's 2006 Solar Cup
program, up from 28 schools in
2005 and just eight in 2002.
"Solar Cup began just four
years ago with eight teams, and as the word spread among students and teachers, participation has
skyrocketed each year," said Metropolitan board Chairman Wes Bannister. "I think it's such a huge
success because the students not only apply their math, physics and engineering skills, they have a really
great time. Equally important, by working together closely, they develop new skills, like teamwork and
cooperation."
Russ Donnelly, Metropolitan's education programs manager, said, "Metropolitan's Solar Cup
program is the oniy high school-level solar boat competition in California, and the nation's largest at both
high school and collegiate levels. By comparison, the 2005 intercollegiate solar boat competition had 19
participants." -
(A compiete list of Soiar"Cup schools and their sponsors is at mwdh2o.com, under Press Releases
and Education Programs.)
continued on page 3
Metropolitan Waler Dis'lrict of Southern California.
METROSPECTIVES
www./1.WdIl2o.com
.un. mfLJ!Gl'!~JL&rrB\Yn!!_ J!iJJii>Jl:pJtll'JffL
. ~,;:;'l ~,p'- '" R" [""'" r EO i>:""~
.hr.", ~ -7 ..'~\.,J....., "t:'"1\
iC$; ';)'IJ'; :.1 ~.;. \ l'r ~...:,)
u.__u..... _". _ _ _".... ;;...___h.... .
As t~e new year gets under way, both federal and state lawmakers will
be consid !ring water-related legislation. Congress remains in recess until
early Febr lary, but the California Legislature is already in full swing, with
the legisla:ive year beginning Jan. 4 and bringing with it continued attention
from legi"lators and the Governor on flood protection, levees and the
Bay-Detta. Some of the highlights of issues and bills that have emerged.
eariy this :rear include:
. Fo :us on California infrastructure - including levee improvements
and water supply. The Governor's State-of-the-State address focused on
his long-tnrm infra~tructure vision - which he envisions being implemented
over the 'lex! 10 years. Specifically, this plan lays out more than $220
billion in infrastructure investments, of which $68 billion would be
financed tlrough general obligation bonds. The Governor proposes that the
Legislatura approve the entire 10-year plan as a single package; however,
the bond,: would be put before the people of California over a series of
elections n 2006 and 2010.
. Prrtentlal water measurement and urban water management plan
legislatior.
. PIltentially major changes to the California Bay-Delta Authority.
Various r>lviews of the California Bay-Delta Authority by the Little Hoover
Commiss on, the Department of Finance and a private management
consultinil firm have resulted in a series of recommendations for revamping
the Autho rity.
In December, the CBDA considered and supported key
recommendations, including the establishment of an executive leadership
council a the stat'9 and federal level, reassignment of CBDA staff to the
Resource; Agency and development of legislation to support changes in
CALFED (overnanee.
Additionaliy, in late December, state, federal and stakeholder negotiators
completelf a proposed Staternent of Principles to refocus and redirect the
CALFED Environmental Restoration Program and other activities and
to provid l financing for select actions for the nex! two years. Eighteen
organizations, to date, have agreed to present the principles to their
governin(. boards for approval.
Debra C. Man, inter m CEO /GM of MetropolITan Water District, spoke on South-
ern Calif, mia's wat"r supply reliability Dec. 8 at a Community Leaders Briefing
in Orangl: hosted by Assemblyman Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar). Joining Man
afterwan s were (lelt) Bill Campbell, chairman of the Orange County Board of
Supervis Jrs, and Wes Bannister, chairman of Metropolitan's board and a director
represen ing the Municipal Water District of Orange County .
2
TRAVELING ART
Artworks by 14 Southland secondary School students are
being displayed on the labels of MWD water bottles; another 36
works by elementary school students are being showcased in
Metropolitan's 2006 calendar.
The artworks, which illustrate water appreciation and
conservation messages, were selected in the annual "Water Is Life"
poster contest for publiC and private schooi stildents, cosponsored
by Metropolitan's member agencies and retail water agencies
throughout the region.
This month, the artworks became a traveling exhibit, vistting
participating water agencies. They also can be downloaded
from Metropolitan's Web site-www.mwdh2o.com. "Education
Programs"--as screensavers.
Thirteen of Metropolitan's mernber agencies and 16 retail
water agencies participated in the contest in May, Water Awareness
Month, acting as the first level of judging. From hundreds of entries
submitted to them, 214 finalists were submitted to Metropolitan.
ANAHEIM DIRECTOR SEATED
Marcie L. Edwards, general manager of
the Anaheim Public Utilities Department, has
been seated as the city's representative on
Metropolitan's board of directors.
She replaces Thomas F. .Tait, who had
served on the Metropolitan board since July
2004.
Appointed to her city position in January
2001, Edwards oversees Anaheim's water and power utilities with
a customer base exceeding 340,000 people and a service territory
of about 50 square miles. She oversees the department's 350-
member staff and $400 million capital budget.
Prior to joining tbe city, Edwards served in a variety of
management positions for the Los Angeles Departrnent of Water
and Power for nearly 25 years. A California native, Edwards holds
a bachelor's degree from the University of La Verne as well as a
state-issued steam engineer's license, which allows her to operate
any size electric generating facility in California.
President oHhe California Municipal Utilities Association Board
of Governors, Edwards is a past member of the governing board of
the California independent System Operator. She served as interim
chief executive officer of the California ISO during the summer
of 2004 while a search was conducted for a permanent CEO and
guided the state through seven all-time peak electricity usage
periods without experiencing supply shortages that necessitated
blackouts.
NOW ON CABLE
"The Pursuit of Balance," a two-part one-hour teievision show
produced by MWD about the importance of California's Bay-Delta
area and the competing interests to its long-term future, is now
airing on cable television stations throughout the state. You can
view the entire show on www.mwdh2o.comand click on the "Tap"
icon.
Complete press releases (on these and other topics) can be found at www.mwdh2o.com.
-...:_. (':",
..
..
For address changes and to receive
Metrospectives bye-mail, message us at
metrospectives@mwdh2o.com
. ,,\ ..
~ .-n-.----C<<"-N~~Effl-VA.TION__~o~timJ.dfrdiri_p3g"-1---:---'n_____:'n_____n__:_n::____:____n_::_______ __nn_:~:_ _____:_____n__::n_n___n._
Through the board's action, Metropolitan will expand its rebate list to include high-efficiency toilets that save up to 14,000 gallons of water
a year; high-efficiency urinals (20,000 gallons in .annual savings); waterless urinals (40,000 gallons annually); cooling tower controllers that
conse lie up to 844,000 gallons annually; and connection less food steamers that save more than 80,000 gallons a year.
"'-hese arH truly the next generation of water-saving devices," said Debra C. Man, Metropolitan interim chief executive officer and general
manaller. "When it comes to saving water, we have led the way in developing and promoting new technologies that will ultimately help us save
more' han 1.1 million acre-feet of drinking water a year by 2025."
While maintaining Metropolitan's Innovative Conservation Program, which provides $250,000 in competitive grants every two years for
resear:h into new water-saving devices, teChnOlogies and systems, the board also created an Enhanced Conservation Program.
Tile enhanced conservation pilot program will award $4 million in competitive grants every other year to pilot and develop programs and
improllements that maximize innovative water-saving devices and technologies.
DJtailed information on Metropolitan's conservation and rebate programs can be found on the district's Web site, www.mwdh2o.com.and
under the Rebates section of bewaterwise.com.
FOUR1"H SOLAR CUP conffnued from page 1
Teims gathered Dec. 3 and 10 under big tents on the grounds of Three Valleys Municipal Water District in Claremont to tum kits of precut
plywood pieces into 16-foot canoe-like boats.
M"tropolitan provides the teams with identical boat kits, and loans them a fully equipped tool chest. Then, using $3,000 provided by
local wlter utilities, government agencies and other sponsors, the teams spend the next three months outfitting their boats with steering and
solar-p lwer systems of their own design.
The Solar Gup event wili be held May 19-21 at Metropolitan's Lake Skinner reservoir near Temecula, open to the public free of charge.
Th 3 first day is qualifying tests. On Saturday, the teams use battery-stored solar-generated electricity to run 200-meter sprint races.
Sunday, the teams attach solar-collection panels to their boats for 90-minute endurance races around a 2-kilometer course.
In the 200!; competition, Canyon High School of Anaheim took first place for the third consecutive year. Glendora High School placed
second and Nogates High School, La Puente, placed third.
La;t year's Solar Cup results, along with rules, photos, videos, and other material is posted, under "Education Programs," on Metropolitan's
Web site, www.mwdh2o.com. .
Th'lrB is no required number of students for a Solar Cup team; teams have ranged in size from three to 30; this year's Upland High Schaal
team totals 52. Each team must have a teacher/advisor; some teams have several advisors, including participants' parents.
A t3am of experienced SOlar-competition professors and selected students from California Polytechnic University, Pomona, reviews and
grades' he students' reports, and also provides the technical inspections and support at the competition.
..
...u.u..__mn____ unun_..mm ._:___m..._nmum.._m.unmmu....um..u.-uu-..-mn.. u. ...mmu' .nW.W_w~mw.dh2o.~om....
MOJl&NG. fi'OISJll/JU:gD,f+iJO"f ~ACK.WARD.
what the Department of Water Resources in its recent Bulletin
. 160 called "the backbone system" - espeCially the State Water
Project. At this point, what's needed is added flexibility in the
way the state receives water supplies through the Bay-Delta. This
would allow water to be pumped at times when tt's available,
subject to strict environmental safeguards, thereby helping
maintain the balance between water supply and environmental
protection.
That would be accomplished through the South Delta
Improvements Program. In addition to providing more flexible
pumping practices, tt would also install tidal gates that wouid
improve conditions for fish and provide enhanced water quality
for farmers. The improvements are aiready paid for from state
water bond funds.
We share the frustration of those who see the Delta
fishery continue to struggle despite huge investments. Southern
California is committed to continue to do the environmentally
responSible thing, both through water pianning and through
. substantial investment of time and resources into Bay-Delta
ecosystem restoration programs.
Conversely, we believe there are environmentally minded
Californians who understand that disrupting a reliable water
supply helps no one. This is no time to return to the days of.
litigation or heavy-handed regulation. This should be solved in
the laboratory and the field, not in the courtroom.
Mr. Bakall is a Metropolitan director representing the
Municipal Water District of Orange County.
M!etro~[p)~cg~~\W~~
by Ergun Bakall
Chairman, CALFED/Bay-Delta Oversight
Subcommittee
It has been nearly 25 years since Sunne
McPeak, then a Supervisor of Contra Costa
County and more recently a member of
Governor Schwarzenegger's cabinet, called for
"policy before plumbing" regarding the future
of the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
Since that time, Southern California has clearly taken this
imperative seriously by completely revising our water management
strategies (througll the regional Integrated Resources Pian) and
by investi 19 heavily in the development of local water supply
resources
Conti luing this trend, the Metropolitan Water District board
recently ,pproved a 25 percent boost In financiai incentives
provided tor conservation, and expanded it to an array of cutting
edge hig:l-efficiency models. The region is continuing and
increasin~ its support for desalination and reclamation programs,
b.oth of Wllich reduce dependence on the Bay-Delta.
Despite events such as cutbacks in Colorado River supplies,
or bone-cry conditions in the Southland, the region's diversified
approach has not only averted rationing, but even allowed
Southern California to build up storage reserves to to times the
level that 3xisted in the 1990s.
Whilll local resource investments are central to the I RP, we
have alsc long nlcognized the need to maintain and improve
We. Banll.star
Chalnna 1 of the Bonrd
Joseph Farker
Vice Ch,lr
Larry D. 'lick
VlceCh<ir
James N. Rez
VlceChdlr
Ted Orar,dsen
V[ceChlir
Heten, Z. Hansen
" Secretay
Anthony R. Fello'W'
;'Chairml n, Communications and
. Leglslat on Commi1tee
Debra M lIn
Interim CEO/General Manager
Tlmot~y C. Worhl'
~ Int8"rfm Group Manager, External Affairs
Rob Hallwachs
.0:, ;'~'.:~'.EcfitOr,ll1etrospecti"es
;',".".'.'"
"'."J1.,-."".:
. ~ ':';;;~on',*""-}Ifrl",,,...,~iA
P.O. Box 54153
Los Angeles, CA
90054-0t 53
I FIRST-ClASS MAIL I
I PRE-SORT I
U. S. POSTAGE PAID i
I LOS ANGelES, CA I
i PERMI~NO.1197=-1
H'I
I.
We're making excellent progress toward
our May 13-15 event at Lake Skinner, near
Temecula.
Our second technical workshop was held
on Feb. 5. It was great to see so many
familiar faces!
The workshop kicked off with global water information related
to the flew visual display requirement. Cal Poly Pomona, which
is serving as our technical consultant, covered topics including
batteriE's, ffoa;tation, steering and the technical report rubric.
Feb 18 was the due date for the first technical report, "the
soiar a,Tay report. We had 23 teams meet the deadline. The
electrical report is due March 4.
'you 11 find the complete schedule of events and due dates
posted at our Web site, www.mwdh20.com. Scroll down the right
side to Education Programs, click on the apple icon to go to the
Education home page. In the middle of that page you wiff see
the Solar Cup logo; a click there and you'lf be transported to the
Solar Cup We!b page. Make sure you check this page.
frequentfy; we! update the "Frequentfy Asked Questions' section
often.
A goal of ours was to incorporate more water education and
information into this year's program. One way of achieving this
was to revamp the visual display guidelines.
Thi~ year we have a theme, and the display itself is worth
more {:.oints. The teams must apply solar technology to a local
or global watE1r issue. (Tip: teams can consult their local water
agency about local water issues.) Displays wiff be evaluated on
Sat. MolY 14.
There wiJI ,be no interview this year, so make your display
self-ex,J/anatory and audience-friendly. The display is now worth
150 points.
You probably noticed at the top of this page that Solar Cup
has a jazzy n,aw logo. We received several designs from student
partici~'ants, but chose one by Metropolitan graphic artist Erik
Erath. We will use Erik's logo on banners, T-shirts and trophies,
and wi./ incorporate the students' designs into the event, too.
Julie lv'iJler, Solar Cup Project Manager
The Name Game
What's in a number that's really a name?
A whole lot, judging by the entries in this
year's Solar Cup.
Solar Cup boats aren't allowed names. But
teams are allowed to choose-rather than be
assigned-their own identification numbers.
That means the choices are infinitesimal. In
fact, one school chose the symbol for infinity.
Symbols are allowed, as well as numerals.
So a few symbols have also been selected,
possibly from the same book in which the
Artist Formerly Known as Prince found his
short-lived sign.
Defending champion 'Canyon High, which in
the two previous years has chosen the year
of the event, 03 and 04, as their boat name,
has nabbed 05 in hopes of continuing its
winning streak.
The High School at Moorpark College is
challenging Canyon's rule, In part by
selecting #1. "The reason ," said team advisor
Judi Gould, is "Because we wantto be
number one!" Gould points out that the #-sign
is also equated with the game of tic tac toe,
and reminds them that they're also in Solar
Cup to have fun.
La Sierra High School also is gunning for first
place, choosing 01.
Costa Mesa High went with 55. because of
the song "I Can't Drive 55." The Gal State LA
solar car team used to play that song
because slower competitors could not go 55.
CMH solar team advisor Steve Nelson's
favorite race driver was Nigel Mansell, whose
car number was 5 when he won several
championships, and Nelson adds that "having
two 5's is good luck."
--Continued--
200i5 Participants
SCHOOL
Anah 3im High-Transportation
Aca,jemy
Ayala High Schobl
CanYJn High School
CentElnnial High School
Chap3rral High School
Charter Oak High School
Chine, Hills High
Coste. Mesa High
DiamJnd Bar High School
EI Me nte High
Faith Lutheran High School
Gabrielino High School
Gare', High School
Glenclora Hi~lh School
High School at Moorpark College
Indio High School
La Puente High School
La Si,ma High
Long Beach Polytechnic
Los Altos Hi~lh School
Moorpark HiUh School
Murril~ta Valh~y High
Noga es High School
Norcc' High School
Paloma Valley High
Pome na High School
San Dimas High School
San f'emando High
San Jacinto High School
West Valley High School
CONTACT
. CITY
BOAT
NUMBER
EMAIL
Brett Schumm Anaheim schumm@yahoo.com XL
Trent Munsey Chino Hills munsey@casusa.org 5
Kerry Langdale Anaheim klangdale@orangeusd.12.ca.us 05
Greg Schultz Corona mrfixit@bigvalley.net 11.3
D. Wooley Temecula jnllabs@speedband.com
Brian Sherman Covina bsherman@cousd.k12.ca.us ~
Caesar Tran Chino Hills Ibcesar@hotmail.com 13
Steve Nelson Costa Mesa EdD323@aol.com 55
David Hong Diamond Bar dhong@walnutvalley.k12.ca.us 00
Steven Swanson EI Monte MazdaRX7@aol.com CU
Mr. Nelson La Veme jnelson@lhslv.org 54
Evelyn Torres-Rangel San Gabriel ETroffesRan@aol GE
Stewart Solomon Pomona Stewart.Sokomon@pusd.org
Erminio Maganzini GI!3ndora kycbaskets@cs.com 07
Judi Gould Moorpark jgould@vcccd.net #1
Jeff Campbell Indio jeffreyc@dsusd.k12.ca.us ~2
Glen May La Puente Gmay@hlpusd.k12.ca.us 17
Linda Jirsa Riverside Iindajirsa@hotmail.com 01
Vinnie Delgado Long Beach vincon@ix.netcom.com 88
Robert Franz Hacienda Heights rfranz@hlpusd.k12.ca.us 11
Tim Hoag Moorpark timhoagie@aol.com CWJ
Pete Matus Murrieta pmatus@murrieta.k12.ca.us 10
Ezekial Chavez La Puente.. ""';"-. Ezekiel20@aol.com 20
Challyn LeFever Norco /.:- K::ao!l96@'hotmail.com 06 .
;J'" .. 'r "
Chuck MurphY..--M~ife~.. f'. :.- .,~.' .:':';'--'C~~I?h.y@pu.Q?d.Or9 09
Sonal Patel' . .Po!Jlo~~;;::, "" ;\..; i VSonal..p~tel~pu~d.org \ 61
Brian Elliott ',. -San:Dlmas!, '. ,t '. \ "I I;BnanElh@aol.com_'
Dana Neill. . '; > San Fernanilb;' dbactelt@la'usd.k12.ca.tii....~ ;-70 "
Peter Wong /. ':,.San.JachliC; :: . "--pwong3@i]i.'3r/~Om" ':<. 25". '.
Gary Norga,n. >. ;:';'.'~'l:Jem.~I>'" gncirgan@h~metusd.k.1.i~ll,us/.~.>~1t~ .;)
.,...../.... -'.
The rJame Game--continued from pag~~~e- .......
. .'
.' .
~
"./,/-. '.\
r....:<'
:"li
Faith Lutheran High School is right behind.them, with 54. ,'. ,"..
. !i~.-'.' .....,. .
Gabrielino High School liked the letlersGE; whichnotonly standJOr Giibrielino Eagles but are the well-known initials
of the gi3nt corporation whose long-time motto'was"We Bring ~ocid Things To Life: '.' '. .\ {'- , ..... .\' .
. .. ......,".. 1 ~ -. " .' .
Los Alto> HS Academy of Engineering chose 11, because "number 11'has been olJr.~choOl;s entrY'number for all
sorts of jifferent vehicles it has built and raced in sch_olasti.c competitions," a tea'ml member said; :'It's practically a
tradition" . . ., . ," . ,. . .
The stuclents on the Norco High School Solar Cup team ctiose' 06 because almost every f!'lam member is. currently a
junior, graduating in 06. "A week later we realized there is on'esenior, who will graduate this year, on our team. but
she said she is fine with 06-to everyone's relief!," said team 111~ll)bers Jordan Michles and Chris Long...
,.,' .
Anaheim High Transportation Academy selected XL, an electronic engineering symbol for inductive reactance.
Advisor 3rett Schumm told us, "This is an explanation of our team' to a tee. If I'm thecurrerii.. mY. students are the
resistance. As ,I induce more energy they counter with an opposlte'reaction proportional to'mine', thus at times
cancelin ~ out any net gain." '. ,"
He's probably not the first teacher to think that.
If you have any questions, comments or concerns please contact ;rulie:MiII~r
," 11" "', -',
Toll-free 866-95S0LAR 213-217-6738 jamiller@mwdfi2o,c'om
~www;mwdh2o.com
. .wwW~Bewater,w,se.con
ORDINANCE NO.
3~l
ORDINANCE OF THE
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
SETTING COMPENSATION FOR
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
w
.....
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water
Jistrict ("the District") finds as follows:
A. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 346 adopted by the Board of
Directors of the District on February 27, 1990, each director is
entitled to receive compensation in the amount of $100.00 for each
day's service rendered on behalf of the District, not exceeding a
total of ten (1.0) days in any calendar month.
B. Pursuant to Water Code Section 20202, said compensation
may be increased by an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) for
each calendar year following the operative date of the last
,...
adjustment.
w
C. The District has not made any adjustment in the amount of
compensation paid to a director since the adoption of Ordinance No.
346 referenced above.
THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the District does hereby
adopt and ordain as follows:
1. Each director of the District shall be entitled to
receive compensation in the amount of $125.00 for each day's
service rendered on behalf of the District, not exceeding a total
of ten (10) days in any calendar' month, after the effective date of
this Ordinance.
..,
Compensation shall be paid to a director only upon
approval by the Board of Directors of the District of a statement
2.
1
-
~ Eubmitted by the director indicating the date and purpose of the
day o:E service, which approval shall be reflected in the minutes of W
t.he Board of the District.
3. This Ordinance shall take effect sixty (GO) days after
adoption pursuant to Water Code Section 20204.
Adopted this
22nd day of
May
, 2000.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Directors: Goodon, Lightfoot, Negrete, Wilson
None
Director. Sturgeon
? '-k< .
Directors
'W
'=$/~
Secretary to the Board
W
I, Robert Martin, do hereby certify thet this
IS a tru nd rrect copy of the record.
-
ROBERT MARTIN, Secretary To the Board
East Valley Water District
..,
2
RESOLUTION NO. 2005.36
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR ITS
COMPENSATION, REIMBURSEMENT, AND ETHICS TRAINING
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the East Valley Water District finds as follows:
A. The East Valley Water District ("the District") is a county water district organized
and operating pursuant to California Water Code Section 30000 et seq.
B. The District is governed by an elected Board of Directors ("the Board") whose
activities are subject to the requirements of California law, including but not limited to the "Local
Gove=ent Sunshine Bill" ("AB 1234"), which .takes effect on January 1, 2006.
C. The purpose of this resolution is to ensure compliance withAB 1234 and to establish
policies with respectto (1) Board member compensation, (2) Board member reimbursement, and (3)
j30ard member ethics training.
NOW TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED BY TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the East
Valley Water District as follows:
Section 1.
COMPENSATION.
1.1. Amount. The amount of Board member compensation by the District shall be
determined in accordance with all applicable requirements of the California Water Code. Pursuant
to said requirements, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 361 on May 22, 2000, which provides that
each Board member of the District is entitled to receive compensation in the amount of$125.00 for
each day's service rendered on behalf of the District, not exceeding a total often (10) days in any
calendar month.
1.2. Dav's Service.
1.2.1. Meetings. F or purposes of determining eligibility for compensation of Board
members pursuant to Ordinance No. 361, the term "day's service" is defmed as attendance or
participation of a Board member, in person or by telephone, at a meeting with one or more other
1
parties for the performance of official duties on behalf ~fthe District. A "meeting" as used herein
inc1udl~s, but is not limited to, the following:
(a) Any occurrence that is listed in Government Code Section53232.l(a);
(b) A regular, special;or emergency meeting of the Board;
(c) A meeting of a standing, ad hoc, or advisory committee of the Board;
(d) A meeting with the District's General Manager involving the
operations of the District;
(e) A meeting with the District's auditors, attorneys, or other consultants
involving matters for which the consultants hiiVe been retained by the District;
(f) A meeting of a local, state, or federal body with subject matter
jurisdiction affecting the operations of the District;
(g) A meeting with a local, state, or federal representative concerning
matteI's involving the operations of the District;
(h) A meeting or' organizations with interests in matters involving the
functions and operationS of the District;
(i) A conference, seminar, or organized educational activity involving
matters related to the functions and operations of the- District; and
G) All other occurrences for which the Board member has obtained prior
approval from the Board to attend or participate on behalf of the District.
1.2.2. Dailv Limitation. If a Bpard member attends or participates in multiple
meetings in a single day, the Board member shall only be eligible for compensation for one meeting
on that day.
1.3. Procedure. To receive compensation for attendance or participation at approved
meetings, a Board member shall submit to the District's General Manager a payment request for the
calendar month by the first regular Board meeting of the following month, at which time the Board
will consider approval of the payment request.
2
Section 2.
REIMBURSEMENT.
The District shall reimburse Board members for costs incurred related to attendance or
participation at approved meetings as defined in Section I of this Resolution, as provided herein.
2.1. Elilrible EXDenses. Expenses eligible for reimbursement shall be limited to (1)
registration or tuition costs, or other charges for participation at the meeting; (2) transportation to
,md from the meeting, including airfare, car rental, or mileage for use of a Board member's own
automobile, and other miscellaneous transportation costs (shuttle, taxi, parking, etc.); (3) lodging at
the single-room rate; and (4) reasonable costs of meals.
2.2. Budl!:et Limits. The maximum am01mt of District-paid expenses that each Board
memb~r may annually incur without separate prior Board approval is $8,000 each fiscal year for the
Board President and $7,000 each fiscal year for each of the other Board members.
2.3. Rates.
2.3.1. Registration. Tuition. andMeeting Charg:es. The District reimbursement rate
for registration or tuition costs, or other charges for participation at a meeting, shall be the actual
amount incurred, no! to exceed th~ maximum rate published by the conference or activity sponsor
for timely registration after applying all applicable deductions for any available discounts.
2.3.2. TransDortation.
(a) Members ofth~ Board must use government and group rates offered
by a provider of transportation services for travel when available. If such rates are not available, the
District reimbursement rate for Board member transportation shall be the actual amount incurred,
not to exceed $100.00 per day's service (except for airfare, which shall not exceed the cost of round-
trip coach airfare).
(b) The District reimbursement rate for mileage by use of a Board
member's own vehicle shall be calculated on the basis of total miles driven for District purposes at
the rate specified in the Internal Revenue Code in effect at the time of the vehicle usage.
(c) The District reimbursement rate for vehicle parking by a Board
member shall be the actual amount inC\llTed.
"
.J
2.3.3. Lodlrinl!:. Members of the Board mustuse government andgroup rates offered
by a provider of lodging services when available.' If the lodging is in connection with an accepted
confi:rence or organized educational activity, lodging costs must not exceed the maximum group rate
published by the conference or activity sponsor, provided that lodging at the group rate is available
to the member of the Board at the time of booking. If a government or group rate is not available,
the District reimbursement rate for Board member lodging shall be the actual amount incurred, not
to exceed the rate for comparable lodging.
2.3.4. Meals. The District reimbursement rate for Board member meals shall be the
actual amount incurred, not to exceed $100.00 per day's service.
2.3.5. Other. District reimbursement of all other actual and necessary expenses
incwred by a Board member shall be computed using the applicable Internal Revenue Service rates
forre:imbursement as established in Publication 463, or any successor publication. All expenses that
do not fall within this reimbursement policy or the Internal Revenue Service reimbursable rates, as
provided above, shall be approved by the Board in a public meeting before the expense is incurred.
2.4. Ineligible Exnenses. Board members shall not be.eligible for District reiinbui:sement
, .
of any expenses incurred by any person traveling or attending a meeting as a guest of the Board
member. No Board member shall be eligible for District reimbursement of any expenses for
personal services not related to District business.
2.5. Exnense Forms. The District shall provide expense report forms to be filed by the
members of the Board forreimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred on behalf of
the District in the performance of official duties. The expense reports shall document that expenses
meet the policy reflected in this Resolution for expenditure of public resources. Board members
shall submit to the District's General Manager expense reports for the calendar month by the first
regular Board meeting of the following month, and the reports shall be accompanied by the receipts
documenting each expense. At the first regular Board meeting of each month, the Board will
consider approval of District reimbursement of Board member expenses incurred dmingthe previous
month. All documents related to reimbursa~le District expenditures are public records subject to
4
disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
2.6. Renort. Board members shall provide brief reports on meetings attended at the
expense of the District at the next regular meeting of the Board.
Section 3. ETHICS TRAINING.
3.1. Requirement.
3.1.1. Service Prior To 2006. Each local agency official in District service as of
Janua.ry 1,2006, except for Board members whose term of office ends before January 1,2007, must
receive training in ethics laws before January 1,2007. Thereafter, each local agency official must
receive such training at least once every two years.
3.1.2. Service On or After 2006. Each local agency official who commences service
with tl1e District on or after January 1, 2006, must receive training in ethics laws no later than one
year :from the first day of service with the District. Thereafter, each local agency official must
receive such training at least once every two years.
3.2. Annlication.
3.2.1. Local Agencv Official. As used in Section 3.1 of this Resolu.tion, the t<;rm
"local agency official" means all of the following:
(a) All Board members; and
(b) All executive staff of the District.
3.2.2. Ethics Laws. As used in Section 3.1 of this Resolution, the phrase "ethics
laws" includes, but is not limited to, the following: :
(a) Laws relating to personal fmancial gain by public servants, including,
but not limited to, laws prohibiting bribery and conflict-of-interest laws;
(b) Laws relating to claiming prerequisites of office, including, but not
limitl~d to, gift and travel restrictions, prohibitions against the use of public resources for personal
or political purposes, prohibitions against gifts. of public funds, mass mailing restrictions, and
prohibitions against acceptance of free or discounted transportation by transportation companies;
5
( c) Government transparency laws, including, but not limited to, financial
interest disclosure requirements and open government laws; and
(d) Laws relating to fair processes, including, but not limited to, cornmon
law bias prohibitions, due process requirements, incompatible offices, competitive bidding
requirements for public contracts, and disqualification from participating in decisions affecting
family members.
3.3 District Resl'onsibilities.
3.3 .1. Records. The District shall maintainrecords indicating (a) the dates that local
agency officials satisfied the requirements of Section 3 of this Resolution and (b) the entity that
provided the training. The District shall maintain these records for at least five years after local
agency officials receive the training. These records are public records subject to disclosure under
the California Public Records Act.
3.3.2. Notice. The District is required to provide information on training available
to meet the requirements of Section 3' of this Resolution to its local agency officials at least once
annually.
Section 4. REVIEW OF RESOLUTION ON ANNUAL BASIS.
Each year the Board shall review this resol)ltion to determine its effectiveness and the
necessity for its continued operation. The District's General Manager shall report to the Board on
the operation of this resolution, and make any recommendations deemed appropriate, including
proposals to amend the resolution. Upon conclusion of its review, the Board may take any action
it deems appropriate concerning this resolution. Nothing herein shall preclude the Board from taking
action on the resolution at times other than upon conclusion of the annual review.
Section 5.
SEVERABILITY.
If any provision ofthis resolution, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances,
is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this resolution
which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions
of1:.t'1is resolution are declared to be severable.
6
Section 6.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
The provisions of this resolution shall become effective on Januaxy 1, 2006.
<\dopt(:d this 13th day of December, 2005.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Directors: Goodin, lightfoot, Negrete, Sturgeon, Wilson
None
None
None
=KCC.~' ~
President, Board of Directors
ATTEST:
s~m
7
BRUNICK. McELHANEY &. BECKETT
RENE 5. ABRAHAM
STEVE" K. BECHETT
WILl-lAI1 J. BRUNICK
RAYMO ~D 1". DOLEN
STEVE~, M. KENNEDY
l.ELANt. P. McEI.HANEY
PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
1839 COM MER CENTER WEST
SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92408
MAILING ADDRESS:
POST OFFICE BOX 6425
SAN BEiRNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92412
215 CAJON STREET
P. O. BOX 1320
REOLAN05, CALIFORNIA 92373
TELEPHONE:. 19091 793-0818
01 CQUNSII!:I..
CHARL::5 A. PECKHAM
PLEASE:. REFER TO
TELEPHONE: 19091 aBg~8301
FAX: 19091 36B-laS9
E-MAI L: bbmb@bbmblsw.com
June 7, 2006
TO:
Board of Directors
EAST V ALLEY WATER DISTRICT
FROM:
Jill:
Steven M. Kennedy, General Counsel
Directors Compensation
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the District with information concerning the legal
requirements relating to the above-referenced matter.
i'n this regard, Water Code Section 30507 provides in pertinent part as follows:
"Each director shall receive compensation in an amount not to exceed one hundred
dollars ($100) per day for each day's attendance at meetings of the board or for each
day's service rendered as a director by request of the board, not exceeding a total of
six days in any calendar. month, together with any expenses incurred in the
performance of his or her duties required or authorized by the board." (Emphasis
added.)
However, notwithstanding the above, Water Code Section 20201 provides that the Board may, by
ordinance, provide compensation to its members in an amount not to exceed $100 per day for each
day's attendance at meetings of the Board, or for each day's service rendered as a member of the
Board by request of the Board. Additionally, Water Code Section 20202 allows the Board to
increase its compensation above this amount in a sum not to exceed five percent (5%) for each
calendar year following the operative date of the last adjustment. However, a director may not be
compensated for more than a total often (10) days in any calendar month. Water Code Section
20202.
Pursuant to these requirements, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 361 on May 22, 2000, which
provides that each director of the District is entitled to receive compensation in the amount of
$125.00 for each day's service rendered on behalf of the District, not exceeding a total often (10)
days i.n any calendar month. In accordance with the provisions of Assembly Bi111234, the Board
also adopted Resolution 2005.36 which establishes a written policy specifying the types of occasions
that constitute the performance of official duties for which a director may receive compensation from
the District. .
EVWD Board of Directors
June 7, 2006
P.lge Two
Therefore, if the Board wishes to increase the amount of compensation paid to a director, the
maximum amount allowable would be $125 per day of service plus 5% for each calendar year
following the operative date of the last adjustment [i.e., July 21,2000 (60 days after adoption of
Ordinance No. 361 on May 22, 2000)] for each coinpenSable day of service (the maximum allowable
being lO days per calendar month).
Any action to increase the amount ofthe Board's compensation may occur only by adoption of an
ordinance following a public hearing. Water Code Sections 20201, 20202-20203. Notice of the
bearing must be published in a newspaper of general circulation once a week for two successive
weeks prior to the hearing. Water Code Section 20203; Government Code Section 6066. After
adoption, the ordinance would not become effective until sixty (60) days after its passage and is
subject to repeal by referendum. Water Code Sections 20204-20207.
(c: Robert E. Martin, EVWD General Manager
Directors' Compensation
San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District
$l"O/meeting
50/< increase each year
No Benefit Package
ReImbursement for expenses for out of town copferep.ces (gas, food, mileage and lodging)
No annual cap on expenses (Board Member only, does not include spouse or companion)
Sail Bernardino Valley Municipal Water
$273/meeting (IO/month)
ACW A Medical and Dental Package
Reimbursement for expenses for out of town conferences (gas, food, mileage and lodging)
Nc annual cap on expenses (Board Member only, does not include spouse or companion)
Western Municipal Water District
$2~0.67/meeting
Hfalth, Dental and Vision Package ($962.33/month cap for benefits)
$13,000 Life Insurance (reduces every year)
Directors are considered employees of the District (on payroll)
NCI annual cap on expenses (Board Member only, does not include spouse or companion)
Yucaipa Valley Water
$400/month
No Benefit package
Rdmbursement for mileage and direct expenses
No annual cap on expenses (Board Member only, does not include spouse or companion)
City of San Bernardino Water
$300/year
Medical, Dental and Vision Package ($910/month for benefits)
$50,000 Life Insurance and $50,000 AD&D
No annual cap on expenses (Board Member only, does not include spouse or companion)
\\ est Valley Water District
$110/ Board meeting, special board meeting or" emergency board meeting
$: 5/Committee meeting that is three (3) hours or less, including travel time to and from the meeting
$J 10/Committee meeting that is greater than three (3) hours, including travel time to and from the
meeting
A list of approved attendance organization meetings and designated representative attendance meetings
is provided.
The Board President shall attend all outside meetings pertaining to the water industry
that is to be in the best interests or of benefit to the District.
R ~imbursement for mileage and direct expenses
ACW A Medical and Dental (mandatory) and Vision (mandatory) Package, the District pays
100% of premium for the Director, spouse, and dependent children
No annual cap on expenses (Board Member only, does not include spouse or companion)
Be it OJ-dained by the Board of Directors of the West Valley Water District as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 71
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
WEST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS
ARTICLE 100. MEETINGS
101. REGULAR BOARD MEETINGS. The regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of West Valley Water District ("Board of Directors") shall be held at 3:00 p.m. on the
first and third Thursday of each month. Business shall be conducted in accordance with Division
12, Section 30000 of the Water Code and g 54954 of the Government Code of the State of
Califomia and all other codes pertaining thereto, as well as any proceedings adopted by the
Board of Directors not inconsistent therewith.
102. SPECIAL BOARD MEETINGS. Special meetings of the Board of Directors
may be called in accordance with Government Code g 54956 of the State of Califomia.
103. EMERGENCY MEETINGS. Emergency meetings of the Board of Directors
may be called in accordance with Government code g 54956.5 of the State of California.
104. COMMITTEE MEETINGS. To assist the Board of Directors in its
deliberations for establishing policies of West Valley Water District ("District"), it is deemed
beneficial to have standing committees or ad hoc committees of the Board of Directors made up
of not more than two (2) members of the Board, who shall develop recommendations to be
considered by the Board of Directors for establishing policy by working independently or with
staff. The committee chairperson shall be appointed by the President of the Board.
105. OUTSIDE MEETINGS. Members of the Board of Directors (singularly,
"Director" and collectively, "Directors") may attend outside meetings to educate and inform
such Directors regarding issues affecting the District and the water industry and to make others
aware of the activities concerning the District. Periodically the Board of .Directors may ask a
Director to represent the District at an outside meeting or perform another duty for the District.
For purposes of this Ordinance, the term "Outside Meeting(s)" shall mean any meeting, activity,
conference, seminar, workshop, facility tour and other like or similar events, except for the
meetings listed in Sections 101 through 104. Except as provided in Section 106, a Director may
attend any Outside Meeting. However, the District shall compensate a Director for only those
Outside Meetings approved in Section 203.
1
Rev.02/04/04
106. PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD. It is in the best interests of the District for the
President of the Board of Directors to periodically meet with District staff and represent the
District at Outside Meetings with other elected officials of other public agencies, as well as other
functions pertaining to the District or the water industry. The President is authorized to attend all
Outside Meetings pertaining to the water industry that is in the good faith belief of the President
of the Board of Directors to be in the best interests or of benefit to the District.
2
Rev.02/04/04
ARTICLE 200. COMPENSATION
Each Director shall be compensated for attending District related meetings and functions
a1 follows:
201. BOARD MEETINGS. Each Director shall receive One Hundred Ten Dollars
(SlIO.OO) for attending a regular board meeting of the Board of Directors, a special board
IT eeting of the Board of Directors, an emergency meeting of the Board of Directors or an
adjourned regular, emergency or special meeting of the Board of Directors.
202. COMMITTEE MEETINGS. In the event a committee is established pursuant
to Section 104, each Director appointed to such committee ("Committee Member") shall receive
one ofthe following:
(a) If the committee meeting is three (3) hours or less, including travel time to and
from such meeting, the Committee Member shall receive Fifty-five dollars
($55.00) or
(b) If the committee meeting is greater than three (3) hours, including travel time to
and from such committee meeting, the Committee Member shall receive One
hundred ten dollars ($110.00).
For purposes of this Ordinance, "travel time" is computed to and from the Director's
main residence or place of employment, whichever is applicable.
203. OUTSIDE MEETINGS. Directors shall be compensated for Outside
Meetings as follows:
(a) Attached hereto as Schedule "A" is a list of Outside Meetings any Director may
attend without further approval of the Board of Directors. If a Director attends an
Outside Meeting listed on Schedule "A" such Director shall be compensated in
accordance with subsection (d) below.
(b) Attached hereto as Schedule "B" is a list of Outside Meetings the Board of
Directors desires designated Directors to attend. Each Outside Meeting listed on
Schedule "B" sets forth a primary representative and alternate representative.
Only the primary representative shall be compensated for attending the Outside
Meeting in accordance with subsection (d) below unless the primary
representative cannot attend, in which case the alternate representative shall be
compensated for attending the Outside Meeting in accordance with subsection (d)
below.
(c) Except as set forth in Section 204, .the District shall not compensate a Director for
attending an outside Meeting .(other than pursuant to subsections (a) and (b)
above) unless such attendance is approved by the Board of Directors. It is the
o
~
Rev.02/04/04
preference of the Board of Directors that Directors obtain approval of the Board
of Directors at a duly called meeting prior to the attendance of the Director at an
Outside Meeting. The Board of Directors recognizes that certain Outside
Meetings shall arise which shall not afford its Directors sufficient time to receive
prior approval of the Board of Directors. In such event, the Director may request
compensation at the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors. In the
event the Board of Director-s approves attendance at the Outside Meeting, the
Director shall be compensated in accordance with subsection (d) below.
(d) In the event a Director attends an Outside Meeting pursuant to subsections (a) or
(b), or the Board of Directors grants authorization for a Director to attend an
Outside Meeting either before or after the Outside Meeting, pursuant to
subsection (c) above, the Director shall receive one of the following:
(i) If one or more Outside. Meetings total three (3) hours or less during any
single calendar day, including travel to and from such Outside Meetings,
the Director shall receive Fifty-five dollars ($55.00) or
(ii) If one or more Outside Meetings is greater than three (3) hours during any
single calendar day, including travel time to and from such Outside
Meetings, the Director shall receive One hundred ten dollars ($1 IO.OO).
In addition to the foregoing, .to accommodate a reasonable travel time to' and from
authorized Outside Meetings, a Director may be compensated for up to one (I) day travel, the
day before an Outside Meeting is to occur and up to one (I) day after the Outside Meeting is
concluded, provided that the Outside Meeting is greater than sixty (60) miles from the District's
headquarters.
204. PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD.
(a) The President shall receive Fifty-five dollars ($55.00) for attending one or more
Outside Meetings during a single calendar day (whether or not it is approved
pursuant to Section 203), lasting three (3) hours or less, including travel time to
and from such Outside Meetings.
(b) The President shall receive One hundred ten dollars ($110.00) for attending one
or more Outside Meetings during any single calendar day (whether or not it is
approved pursuant to Section 203) lasting longer than three (3) hours, including
travel time to and from such Outside Meetings.
205. COMPENSATION LIMITATIONS. Section 20202 of Division 10 of the
California Water Code states:
"In any ordinance adopted pursuant to this chapter to increase the amount of
compensation which may be received by members of the governing board of a water
4
Rev.02/04/04
district above the amount ofGne hundred dollars ($100.00) per day, the increase may not
exceed an amount equal to 5 percent, for eac~ calendar year following the operative date
of the last adjustment, of the compensation which is received when the ordinance is
adopted.
No ordinance adopted pursuant to this chapter shall authorize compensation for more
than a total of 10 days in any calendar month."
There shall be no compensation for attending meetings or performing other duties for the District
on the same day as Board of Directors meetings.
5
Rev.02/04/04
ARTICLE 300. EXPENSES
The District shall reimburse each Director for expenses while on District business as
outlin,ed below.
Each Director shall be responsible for turning in appropriate District related expenses,
including receipts or other documentation, to the General Manager's office. It is to each
Director's benefit, as well as that of the District, that all expenses be turned in to the General
Manager's office in a timely manner for proper accounting.
301. LODGING, MEALS, AND OTHER EXPENSES. The District shall reimburse
each Director for expenses while on District business, including, but not limited to, payment of
registration fees for conferences, workshops, seminars, lodging, meals, and other related
expenses while attending or traveling to/from District related functions.
The following restrictions shall apply to District paid expenses:
(a) District paid air travel shall he the lowest applicable fare at the time of booking
based on the itinerary of the Director. If a Director elects voluntarily to remain at
a location longer than necessary to discharge his or her duties, and the longer stay
results in a saving on airfare, the District shall offset any savings against any
increased expenses incurred in the longer stay.
(b) In the event a Director is required to rent a vehicle to attend an authorized Outside
Meeting, the District shall reimburse the Director for the cost .of such rental
vehicle, provided that the cost shall not exceed the cost of a mid-sized vehicle,
regularly charged by such rental company for same day rentals. Any contractual
agreements between the District and car rental agencies shall be considered first
for booking of rental vehicles.
(c) Whenever appropriate, lodging and meals will be prepaid by the District or paid
for by District staff. When making prepayment of reservations for travel, meals,
lodging or other related expenses, it may be beneficial to the District to include
payment for spouses. Each Director shall reimburse the District for any
prepayment of costs for his/her spouse except as otherwise set forth in this
Ordinance.
Directors are authorized to incur expenses arising out of and in connection with the
meetings set forth in Sections 201, 202, 203 (a) and 203 (b) and Outside Meetings approved
pursuant to Section 203 ( c), without the further approval of the Board of Directors, provided that:
the expenditures do not exceed the amount set aside for each Director in the budget approved by
the Board of Directors, from time to time. Each Director shall be specifically allocated an
amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the total amount budgeted for Directors' expenses. All
6
Rev.02/04/04
(.ther expenses must be approved by the Board of Directors prior to reimbursement by the
District.
302. MILEAGE. Whenever a Director uses his/her personal vehicle for
transportation on District business or to/from District related functions; the District shall
leimburse the Director the same rate per mile as approved by the Internal Revenue Service at the
time the mileage is incurred. No mileage reimbursement shall be made for attending Board of
Directors meetings held at the District headquarters.
303. INSURANCE. In California, automobile insurance coverage follows the vehicle.
Therefore, when a Director attends functions on behalf of the District in their personal vehicles,
'heir insurance is primary.
If a claim exceeds the limits of a Director's personal insurance then the District's liability
insurance shall pick up the excess. Therefore, each Director should make sure his/her insurance
~over their District activities.
304. SUBMITTAL OF EXPENSE REPORTS. Each Director, including the
President, shall submit a report of all expenses, including but not limited to, compensation
requested pursuant to Article 300, to the General Manager in a handwritten form approved by the
Policy Committee or on a prepared form approved by the Policy Committee. Each submittal
shall be signed by the Director. If the General Manager does not observe any discrepancies, he
shall approve the report for payment. If the General Manager observes a discrepancy, he shall
bring it to the attention of the Director as soon as possible. In the event the discrepancy cannot
be resolved, the matter shall be presented to the Policy Committee for resolution.'
7
Rev.02/04/04
ARTICLE 400. BENEFITS
401. HEALTH PLAN. All Directors are eligible to participate in the District's group
health plan, along with their spouses and dependent children. If a Director chooses not to
participate in the health plan he/she must notify the General Manager in writing of his or her
dection not to participate.
(a) The District's health plan is administered by the Association of California Water
Agencies.
(b) The District shall pay 100% of the premium for the Director, spouse and
dependent children.
402. BENEFITS AFTER RETIREMENT OR DEATH. A retired Director and
,pouse (See Article 2, Section 217 of Personllel Policies), or spouse of a deceased Director or
retiree may continue his/her medical, dental, and vision insurance at the District's expense on the
basis of the following:
The Director is a minimum of fifty (50) years of age with a minimum of ten (10) years of
continuous service. If the spouse of a deceased Director, or retiree, remarries and becomes
eligibk for health benefits under his/her new spouse's health plan, all District benefits shall be
terminated: .
403. VISION CARE PLAN. Coverage is mandatory for all Directors, their spouse
and dependent children.
(a) The Vision Service Plan is administered by the Association of California Water
Agencies.
(b) The District shall pay 100% of the premium, including Director, spouse and
dependent children.
404. DENTAL PLAN. Coverage is mandatory for all Directors, their spouse and
dependent children.
(a) The Delta Dental Plan is administered by the Association of California Water
Agencies.
(b) The District shall pay 100% of the premium for the Director, spouse, and
dependent children.
8
Rev.02/04/04
405. RETIREMENT PLAN. Only the Directors elected or appointed prior to July 1,
1 ~94 an: eligible to participate in the District's retirement plan.
(a) The retirement plan is administered by the California Public Employees
Retirement system.
(b) The District shall pay all costs, which include the District's and the eligible
Director's share.
THIS ORDINANCE IS EFFECTIVE 'THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2004.
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED THIS 5th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004.
Alan Dyer, President
ATTEST:
-
Anthony W. Araiza, Secretary
9 _ .
Rev.02/04/04
SCHEDULE "A"
ORGANIZATION
ACW A Spring Conference
ACW A Fall Conference
ACW A Mini Conference
ACW A Legislative Symposium
and Day at the Capitol
California Special Districts Association.
California Special Districts Association
Government Affairs Day
Water Education Foundation Tours
Rev.02/04/04
DESIGNATED
REPRESENTATIVE
Any Board Member
Any Board Member
Any Board Member
Any Board Member
Any Board Member
Any Board Member
Any Board Member
10
SCHEDULE "B"
DESIGNATED
!:'RGANIZA TION REPRESENTATIVE ALTERNATE
I,CWAlJPlA Earl Tillman, Jr. Anthony W. Araiza
ACW A - Region 9 Alan Dyer Anthony W. Araiza
j,WWA Anthony W. Araiza Leon Long
CA.Water Awareness Campaign Betty Gosney Jackie Cox
Chino Basin Watermaster Anthony-W. Araiza Leon Long
Inland Counties Water Association Leon Long/Betty Getz Anthony W. Araiza
]nland Empire Employers Patricia Lundin Anthony W. Araiza
Advisory Council
:"ytle Creek Water Conserv. Assoc. Anthony W. Araiza Leon Long
'Jational Water Resources Assoc. Alan Dyer Betty Gosney
Nationwide Public'Projects Coalition Ira B. Pace .Alan Dyer
Rialto Business & Professional Women Betty Getz Alan Dyer
Rialto Rotary Anthony W. Araiza Betty Gosney
Rialto Basin Management Board Anthony W. Araiza Leon Long
San Bernardino Co. Special Districts Earl Tillman, Jr. Anthony W. Araiza
SBVMWD Advisory Commission . Alan Dyer Don Olinger
SBVMWD Board Meeting Anthony W. Araiza Leon Long/Alan Dyer
Special Districts Workers' Compo Alan Dyer Anthony W. Araiza
Upper Santa Ana Water Res. Assoc. Anthony W. Araiza Leon Long
11
Rev.02/04/04
!)RGANIZATION - (Continued)
'N ater Resources Institute
'.v estern Coalition of Arid States
West End Water Development, JPA
DESIGNATED
REPRESENTATIVE
ALTERNATE
Anthony W. Araiza
Leon Long! Alan Dyer
Betty Gosney
Anthony W. Araiza!
Leon Long
Alan Dyer
Anthony W. Araiza
12
Rev.02/04/04
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, ANTHONY W. ARAIZA, Secretary of the Board of Directors of THE WEST SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing
ORDD'IANCE NO.71 was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of said District at a Regular
meeting thereof, held the 6th day of September 2001, a full quorum present and acting through,
by the following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:'
ABSENT:
DIRECTORS:
DIRECTORS:
DIRECTORS:
ROE~ER,. SMITH, DYER, TILLMAN, RADEN
NONE
NONE
DATI~
Anthony W. Araiza, Secretary, West
San Bernardino County Water District,
and, the Board of Directors thereof.
13
Rev.02/04/04
CIl <Xl R 10 0 ~ 0 0> 10 0 <Xl <Xl
W "": ~ 0 ~ 0 Ll'! "! 0 M M
CIl ~ ,,; ~ m N ui .... ~ 0 ui ui
Z '" '" ~ ~ .... .... ~ 0> ~ <D <D
W ..... ..... <Xl '" , <D <D
ZCl. N .... ....
OX
CIlW
::! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0
(/) ui ui 0 ui 0 0 10 0 ui 10 0 0
W ..... N 10 N 10 0 ..... 0 N ..... 0 0
W <Xl ~ N ~ N 10 '" 0 ~ '" 0 0
LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0
~ ~
CIl 0 0 0 ~ 0 M R '" '" ..... 0 .... ....
W N 0 0> 0 "1 '" I'-: <Xl N N N
CIl ,..: 0 C\i ~ ui ~ en C\i 0 u:i ,..: ui ui
ZZ .... <D '" 0 N '" 0> M ~ <D '" ;:!: ....
OW .... M '" ~ M N ~ ~ 10 .....
WCl. ~ '" '"
<!JX
a:W
:J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0
CIl CIl 10 ui 0 10 0 ui 10 ui 0 0 0 0
W N ..... 10 N 10 N N N 10 10 0 0
W <D <Xl N ~ N ~ ~ ~ N N 0 0
LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
CIl 0> 0 ..... N 0 0 0 0 co '"
W ~ '"': 0 <D 0 0 0 0 "! 0>
CIl ~ ~ 0 <i C\i 0 ui 0 '" ,,;
Z ~ ~ 0> N M .... N ~ .... ....
WW ..... <D 10 0 0
I-Cl. N N
wX
a:W
<!J 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WCIl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- 0 ui 0 ~ ui ui ui 0 0 0 ui ui
S,2C1l Zw 10 N 10 ..... N ..... 10 0 10 ..... .....
a: a: W N <D ..... .", M ~ M N 10 ..... M '"
1-0 LL ~ 10 10
~I-
DO
a:W CIl 0 ~ 0 0 <Xl 0> M 0 ~ ~
wQ; <D
0 W ~ M 0 0 L(). ..... ..... 0 .... ....
I-D 0 CIl N 0 ui ,,; u:i en ,,; 0 0 0
<l:LL N Z '" .... M M R 0> N 10 N N
~O .;, W ~ <D <D '" '"
0 ZCl. N N
>-D 0 -X
Wa: N DW
-'<l: 0
-'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::;OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(!l CIl 0 0 ui 0 0 0 ui 0 ui ui 0 0
I- W 0 10 N 10 10 0 ..... 10 ..... N 0 0
CIl W 10 ..... <D N N 10 CO N '" <D 10 10
<l: LL ~ ~ ~ '" <Xl
W
CIl M '" '"
W '" '" "1
CIl ,,; ,,; '"
I-Z 0 0 0
OW 0> 0> 0>
00..
LLX
I-W
I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<!J ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0
:::; CIl 0 ui 0 10 0 0 0 ui 0 0 ui ui
W 0 ..... 0 ..... 10 0 0 ..... 10 10 ..... .....
W 10 <Xl 0 '" ..... 10 10 '" N ..... '" <Xl
LL ~ ~ CD CD
>- <!J l- I- > 0 Z [lJ a: --' >- W [lJ CIl
-' :J Cl. 0 0 W <l: W <l: a: <l: Z ::;: W
:J <l: W 0 Z -0 -, LL ::;: 0.. ::;: :J CIl
-, CIl <l: -, W Z
a: W
-' Cl.
<l: X
I- W
0 --'
I- <l:
l-
n
0
rn 0
~ 0
ci
rn
z
0
rn-
:,,::1-
Of!: 0
0eI: 0
coO ci
rn
ro
::>
rn
rn e
...I '-:
Lli ~ 0
::;: ";' '-:
~
~
.
I- C!l '"
0 2 CO
0 a Lri '"
u.. C) CO
I- a (0) Lri
:r: 0 C)
C!l ...I (0)
::;
z WC!l ....
2 ~~ L()
W ~ ....
...I
C!l ...leI: L()
-<( cO
::;:a. ....
W
rn 0:
W LE e ~
rn
2", 0: 0 '"
<;: ci '"
we &:.
a.o
[,5~ W
0:::3 0
~@ 2
Wrn 0
00: o:w e 0
~Lli WW ci 0
u..u.. ~ ci
->- z ~
a..J 0
u..<( 0
00
o!:!1
o:u.. L()
<C C!l ~
0 z
ro wf= ~
I-W e
<(W ,;,
a::;: g
u.. ....
0 ~
e
li: W
<( ::;:
a: <(
a Z
<C
o
rn
o
...I
<C
I-
o
I-
2
Ci
o
o
<9
2
o
o
(f)
W
(f)
2CJ:J
UJo
c..o
[;5';'
a:~
00
f-C\l
Ua:
UJ<(
a:UJ
->-
O...J
u,<(
Ou
O(f)
a:G:
<(
o
CO
2
o
~
U
=>
o
UJ
UJ<9
<92
USsz
...Ja:
-<(
::;;:c..
UJUJ
a: a:
it it
a: a:
<(<i:
U
UJ
U
2
UJ(f)
a:UJ
UJUJ
lLlL
2
o
U
<9
2
UJi=
f-UJ
<(UJ
0::;;
lL
o
f-
lL
<(
c:
o
~
O'!
~
'"
~
O'!
0;
(f)
...J
<(
UJ
::;;
co
....
..:
10
o
o
ci
~
~
'"
ai
....
'"
10
ci
<9
2
<9
o
o
...J
~ 0 ~
q 0 q
0 ci 0
~ 10 CJ:J
'<t 10 '"
0 0 0
'<t 0 '<t
oi ai ..:
'" 10
o
o
ci
~
en
Q)
'"
c..
00
00
No)
'" C\l
o
o
ci
....
co
....
N
'"
~
~
o
o
uj
C\l
,
000
000
LriC"iui
'" '" C\l
Deoecco
,...oo.,.-oC")
"":citrir--:dC\i
,...OC"J,...Q,...
,....,..- C\I""T"""
0000
C\J a a 0
o...foci
W-.::tOLO
C\l'
o
o
ai
C\l
CJ:J CJ:J
o 0
~LOLO~~c:oc:oIDIDWW~WID~WWWC:OWC:OID
oooooaaooaOOOOOC\loaoaaoo
oooNNoaoooo-ooNOOoaooo
~~~~m~~~~~~~~~m~C\J~~~~~
OOmC:OT"""""IDWmM~o ,...0 oo~am~C\J""
_""~_~__""'C\J~~~~NQ__C\JN"'-NC"J
~mmT"""~T""""'-~~~~O~N,...NC"J~m~~~
...-,... C"1 C\J
- -
~ C\l
UJ
::;;:
<(
2
Q)
c:
E :a5
IDe Q)+-'
E'E ::;; ijj
(l) a:l '- E
~~ ~Q)
+-'+-' --- +-' +-' Et_ ~E~
.g.g .g.g~ .g ~ ~ E~.g~'~a:lE
~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 'ffiO~z~u~E
66 661 6w~ 6wa:~686~~
-.",_-.",_a:lrnrn~<(corn"'co<(<(","'co~rn<(rnC:<(
w._._~ 00._0 ._ooo~._ ._n1
oo~oo_~~o~.~~~u~~oo~o~~
:g,:g,(f) :g,:g,g;::;;(f):g,~ 16'::;;::;;: :g,~(f) 5:g,u :g,gu
(f)(f)U(f)(f)>UU(f)>...JUU(f)>U...J(f)<((f)I<(
...J
<(
f-
o
f-
o
o
o
o
Cf)
~
Cf) 0>0 ltl OC\l 0 to
-' or: ,..-000<0 C! ....
L5 ......"":(\jNC\i 0 oi
,.....,....oq-,..-,..- ~ 0>
::;;
W e;) N 0 N
J- Z .... 0 ....
W oi .,; '"
0: e;) 0 N '"
e;) 0 to 1.0 ~
W 0 ~
z -'
0
0: We;) 0 0
<( e;)Z 1.0 1.0
:::: L552 r.: r.:
0 to to
-,0:
W -<(
::;;0..
~I 0
0
Cf) 0 ~
W u. OJ
en 0: Ol
Zto <i: <U
WO 0..
0..0
XN
W' W 0 00 0
o:~ 0 C! 00 0
Z 0 NO N
00 Wen 1.0 "'.... N
J-N to ....
00: o:w
W<( ww
u.u.
o:W Z
->-
0-, 0
u.<( U
Ou
o~ 1.0
o:u. 1.0 0
C5 e;) Q. l()N
Z LO 1.0 co LOa oC:O(OW
co wi= oo......CONoDo
J-W aDm-DC\! Doa
<(W C\I~I~ID"7~~~
-,....LOt::. LOcor---co
0::;; ~~Qa~Q~:!:::.:c:
u. "'co 'l:t",-OOC\J>;;;t'U)
0 ~ ~'"
-. -.
m ~
~
J-
u.
<(
0:
o
W
::;;
<(
Z
a.
:.c
'"
0;
c:
t:
<U
a.
..0..0 ..0 .0 .2
SS SS E
~~ ~~ g
..c..c<(..c...c<(o<(<(
gg::::gg::::Gl::::::::
.3.3:i.3.3:i~:i:i
-'
<(
J-
o
J-
z
o
W
<!J
a:
::>
I-
CJl
0..
S2
'CJl
W
CJl
zco
'WO
0..0
X'"
w'"
a:o
0::;]
I-
oa:
W<(
a:w
->-
0->
lL<(
00
OCJl
a:U::
<(
o
CO
0
<Xl
Z 0
0 ~
~ 0 i'- 0> '" .,. <Xl CO
0 i'- ":<Xl 0 M
0 0 M M ....: M N
0 M M ~ 0> M
::> ~ ~ ~ ~
0
W
CJl '" 0 0> M M ~CO 0 i'-
-> ~ 0 i'-<Xl '" .,..,. 0 0
<( ~ N r...:r--: 0 air...: 0 cO
W ~ ~ ~ '" ~ '"
:;; ~
<!J 0 0 0
Z i'- '" 0)
a ....: ....: ....
.,. '" i'-
0 ~ '" CO
0 ~
->
W<!J 0) 0 0 i'- 0 CO
<!Jz "l C! 0 CO 0 ~
<(- M 0 .,; 0 N ~
w:': M '" i'- '" '"
->a: '"
-<(
:;;0..
WW ~ ~ ~ 0 '0 ~
a: a: co "l M 0> "'1 '"
<(<( M 0)0; N <Xl .,; ~
lLlL ;;; "'''' M ~ co .;
->a: "'''' '" '" ~
<c- o
a:<( 0,
W 00 0 0 0 0000 0
0 00 0 0 0 aONe '"
Z LOci 0 0; M ciddci ....:
WCJl M.,. '" M M l.Ooc.ov .,.
a:w .,.
WW
lLlL
Z
0
0
<!J
z
wi=
I-W
<(W
0:;;
lL
o
l-
lL
<(
a:
o
~~l.Ol.O~~~~~~~~~l.Ol.O~~~~c.oc.oc.oc.oc.o c.owc.oc.o
goggggoaoooaoggoocogggga~oggg
NOC\lC\lC\lNC\lC\I~~~C\IC\1C\1C\1~C\IC\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\10 OC\lC\lC\l
-~----~~~~OO~O--l.Om~~----~Q~---
c.ol.OooroC\lO~~~~C\I~Mrom~~C\INmo~OO~M~~~C\1
~_~~~M_______NN____~MMC\I~ _C\IC\1N
~OOoooomm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~NM ~~~~
.0
o
CO
~
W
:;;
<(
z
~
::>
o
I-
-
~ (f.)'- ~.c
g g ~ ~ ~~ ~~
o oo~ w ~6 ffi~
cE ~E~m_~'~ ~~
co ro () ~ () ~.~ Co .~ Ol c6 ~.!:2 ctl co
~~~~~~~ti~~~~~~~i~8~~
EOUOmctlco~nmo~Oo'sm~~eoo
<(::><(<(CJlCJlCJl->CJlCJl~I-<(<(I-:;;CJl~COO
o
0. ~
:c "0
<I> 3
;;; 0
c lL
1:: <l>C
fJ!. ~ ,Q
C> ".0'-"03.0
C ...... o.ffi u 0
~ "Ecoctl:::lCO
CD g~~~~
<(o..co......c<t
(/)~UuO(])(,)>
cn:;;wc.crnc>
.30'!,!.3cJ55.3~
Cl
C
~
<ll
:;;
;;;
.0
E
to
.c
o
'0
c
to
:c
Cl
I
...J
<(
I-
o
I-
2
o
U)
.J
3:
W
(!l
a:
o
W
(!l
r/)
W
U)
2<0
WO
a.o
XN
WIO
U)o
a:O
ON
I-a:
frll1i
a:>-
-.J
0<(
lJ..()
OU)
oU:
a:
<(
o
<D
W(!l\
(!l2
l1iS2
.Ja:
-<(
:;;:a.
W
()
2
WU)
a:W
WW
lJ..lJ..
2
o
a
(!l
2
wi=
I-W
<(W
0:;;:
lJ..
o
I-
lJ..
<(
a:
o
()
U)
~
U)
.J
l1i
:;;:
~<O<O
<0 <0
MMM
~~~
10
~
~
~
10 00
000
<Ci~
~ ~
(!l
2
a
o
o
.J
N
m
to
'"
...
<>
<>
o
C')
C')
a;
~
.....00 N m ... N 0 00
10 <> C') ~ 00 ... ... <> ...
ll'iLricO M ci 0 C\i 0 a;
~ Nm ~ ~ ~ ~ ...
"7~ N
0 N
0 m
ci to
10 00
10 m
10
.....
tri
00
10
.....
tri
00
0 0 0 <>
m ~ 0 <> '"
C\i ,...: 0 0 Ol
C') ..... m 0 .",
N ~ ~ <0 a.
0 0 0000 0000 ..... 000 C')
0 0 00.,.... 0 OC')N <0 000 N
to 0 coiLrir--:ui oNd .. lriai ,...:
N 10 (C1.l).,....cn o~<o ;::: ...0 ...
N<o::;t.,.-V ~ ~ C') .....
N
W
a:
~
a:
<(
1010
~ gg <00"'0 <0
g ~OC\J 0
~1.l)~~~I.l)~~a~Q(C(C~~~~~~N~(Cm(C(C(C(C(C(C
oooooa_oa.,....C\Jooooooog~rog-ggoggg
~~~*~@~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~*~%
_~.,.....,....C\J~gM~gg~~.,....MMM.,....C\JQg.,....OC\JC\J~.,.....,....C\J
moo---mw-Omo.,.....,....------~~----v---
000000 .,....m"""C\JM .,.....,.....,.....,....C\JC\JC\JC\JC\J~MM v~1.l)
m ~~ N~ M
~ ~
W
:;;:
<(
2
m
.0
E
'"
.o.o.o..c.o.o 0.0
aooOoa ...0
comcoocom cCO
~~~-5"j"~<::E~
-5-5-5<Dtd5~ ~g~~~~
5SS@3S0~:J()()..:::u
..J..J..JU'J..J..J<((f)..J<(<(O<(
E aa
:J 00
'00 c c
o 00
Q. --
E 0l0l
.0 Ol >-.S .S ~
a.!: (/).c~~:c.g .g.g.g
<DO; g>as~~m <D <D<D<D
"i'~ ..J~>>' 3: 3~3
..ccn<(<(<(..c<{<(~<(..c<(..c..c.r::.
u.!!!::J::J~ u~~o1S~ u~ u u u
c O'J~ ~ U c () () CO () cUe c: c
.3.3uu<c.3<{<(co<(.3<t:.333
Ol
c:
~
Q)
:;;:
m
.0
E
'"
.c:
a
'0
c:
'"
:c
Ol
I
.J
~
o
I-
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT
DIRECTOR: Don Goodin
Board Ml3etings: 23
Conferences and Other Meetinos
Date: 1 Organization
MONTH OF: Mav 06
EVWD
Description Ins Committee Meetino
Description WRI Advisorv Bd Meetino
Description Director Search Committee
Description Budoet Workshop
Description Director Search Committee
Description Seven Oaks Tour
Description Solar Power Boats Tour
Date: 4 Organization
Date: 15 Organization
Date: 16 Organization
Date: H Organization
Date: 1B Organization "
/ " "
Date: 2'1 Organiz.ation '
Date: 22 Oiganizatio~
~
,
:124' . !';".< :". '-'.~
Date: ' Ofganizatidn
Date " , .'.,Organization
Date Organization
Date Organization
Date Organization
Date: Organization
Date Organization
WRI
WRI
EVWD
WRI
EVWD
Evwb
, ,
.':;EVW.o
.-1.- .-.
"Description ,PO C()mmittee Meetinq
Description Director Search Committee
Description
Description
Description
Description
Description
Description
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS --.19- @125.00 each
$
1250.00
Personal Auto:
M~es x' .
Parking Fees
Total Lod9in92, Meals & Other. (Details on Back)
per mile_ $
$
$
Total Director's Expenses
$
36.00
Signed lV6-v-...ll /Q A ..~e... "
~ ./
Date of Board Approval Mav 23. 2006
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $
Less any Advance Payments $
TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $
1286.00
1286.00
Lodoinas: (Receipts attached)
Dale: Function Attended $
Da':e: Function Attended $
Da':e: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
SUB TOTAL $
Meals: (Receipts attached)
Dete: 15 Function Attended Special Districts $ 36.00
Dete: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
SUB TOTAL $ 36.00
Other: (Receipts attached)
Date: Function Attended $
Date: Function Attended $
D3te: Function Attended $
SUB TOTAL $
TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ 36.00
(Enter this total on the front of form)
DIRECTOR: sturgeon
Board \'vIeetin~Js: 23
Conferences and Other Meetinas
Dat,~: 1 Organization Kay's Cafe
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT
MONTH OF: June 2006
Description Mtq. wi Don and Hiqhland
Datl~: 1, 3, 8 Organization SBve
Description School
Datl~: 3 Organization Highland Library Description Dedication
Datl~: 8 - 11 Organization ACWA Description Conference
Date:~
Description Budget Workshop
Description Seven Oaks Tour
Description Sign ACWA Documents
~t1P~.l~~~@:Yervice Cornrni tteE
'~c.jj!ption posDC4I>ntest Cerern9ny
CU...er IstrICl::'
DescriRtion Luncheon
, -
Date: 21
Date:
Date':
Date:
Date:
Organization MWD
Description Solar Cup
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS 10
@125.00each_$ 1,250.00
Personal Auto:
Miles x .445
Parking Fees
Total Lo(~, Meals & Other: (Details on BaCK)
per mile_ $
$
$
Total Director's Expenses
$
Signed
Date of E,oard Approval
ct! Lc--C----
June 13, 2006
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $
Less any Advance Payments $
TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ 1,250.00
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT
DIRECTOR: !tIlL 50"J MONTH OF: I1A V t!7 c,.
Board Meeti 19S: ...6'h; s IJ/~ '; .,.-; JH
ConferenceB and Other Meetinas
Date:_*-_Organization S B C H fA) 0 Description T/l C f1. fS
Date:--,~/s- _Organization &VNO
Date:s''7 - ~-II~ Organization A,- uJ A
Description 11M <<JI 5...... ;r ""uel
.
Description '3f' 0;"<; CD..~
Date: :"/17
u ~A {(}R-~
Description B.. ".,1 }'/ -I"j
Description /1..tl-u H, I r ~J.J
. Description 1-1 d.r wi 9..... Hd-lIae-J
Description
~i~(l ""1i. /, ~l!1 ~
"'..-~ .~4.~ .T!'t. ~ ~ #~f~~. N
~~_"C' u.2!'9.WtI0.F1 '.::-'~ \; :: 11C:. ;!
. .
Organization <; e C k IvO
,\ ;l!; 19Jes%iPtio.n
ill Vat..er'
" l?,.Sl"~gJp..ll9JJ"
Description
Description
~,...,) .< 09 .,
l,.,..,# ~ Sl rw ~ c: (",
Date: - Organization
Date: ... Organization
Date: ... Organization
Date:_ Organization
Date: - Organization
Description
Description
Description
TOTAL # OF MEETING:S /1.
@125.00 each_ $
12..stJ. &'10
per mile_ $
$
$
oersonal .~uto:
Miles x .405
Parking Fees
Cotal Lod~ Meals & Other: (Details on Back)
Total Director's Expenses
$
7"72.3 tb
./; J
~. d / I /;.1 b/
Qlgne ,J /..' /.t//f ___
.:../"....-(,.. -
Date of E,oard ,1;.pproval
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $ 1.() <f-2, 3{;
Less any Advance Payments $
TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $ -:20+:2 .3c.,
Lodoinas: (Receipts attached)
Date:~~ Function Attended
Date:_ Function Attended
Da1e: Function Attended
Date:_ Function Attended
Da':e: Function Attended
Da':e: Function Attended
Date:_ Function Attended
(Receipts attached)
D"te:_ Function Attended
D".te: Function Attended .
D~lte: Function Attended
Date: Function Attended
Date:
Date:_
Date:
Meals:
Date:
Date:_
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Other:
Date:
Date:
Date:
I1-culll-
(I)., !e,&lc.~
$ 7Q2. .~("_
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Function Attended
Function Attended
Function Attended
SUB TOTAL $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Function Attended
Function Attended
Function Attended
Function Attended
Function Attended
Function Attended
(Receipts attached)
Function Attended
Function Attended
Function Attended
SUB TOTAL $ lCfZ.. 3G
$
$
$
SUB TOTAL $
TOTAL LODGINGS, MEALS AND OTHER $ '(c1'230
(Enter this total on the front of form)
...I
< o CD LO . LO
I- l.ON.,..r---..,..OOOOOOO Cl)
0 ......com,....co,.... ...
I-
_. U
.... enO ~~CO~ ....
::. Sij~ ...
w3:
...10
~O...l
C. :c LL 0 ~ ~
,.. z a:
-- w
<>
:;0
w
a:~
~Wa..
0> 3: a.. ~....C\l ...
~W
eng
en
.....
0..... a:~
-w
O:w _W::i
.....::1: e!;(< OM C\l LO
!!!(fl 3:5
c~
0:0: ela:
WO 2!:w
~~ CD j::"3:!;( 0 0
0 -~o
~(fl 0 ...13:
>0: C'\I u.
w:J ~en
-10
-1::1: ->~ M
<0: "'a: < 'l::tLOCf)COl.O C\l
~ w
>w W...l
.......... en
(flU- zen
<<
w ~_:.:: co
'''<< C\lLOM......
..-:= w ~
...I
a:
W
~Ol- "'''I:tl.O(t)~ ....
.-z <C M
3:
elen
za:
'-52 w M<Df'.,LO~ C\l
~c(~ M
WW
...I:;
-W3:
<a:o O""T"'"C\JC\J '"
~::>-I
en
en
_w_
C'la:J: 0.... ~
~a..
~zu.
<a:u. ~CD~:;:f'-.. ....
....::>0 "
~I-
Z
-a:z co .... "'00> 0
~::)o LO " <OLOLO co
I- C\l
J: ...J
I- w>- I- <l:
Z zcocr:cr:>-Z...J(!JQ..I-> 0 I-
0 <:HJ~~~~;?3~;:;~~ 0
." I-
N
T'"
o
N
o
T'"
T'"
o
N
o
l-
e 0
a: ,..
0 0
1->- N
rna:
-<C
0:2:
a::2:
W::::l
~rnlO O'l
0
S:~o 0
>-<CC\I 0 0
wW C'II
..J..J
..JZ
<C-
><C
1-:2:
~ co
0
W 0 0
N
~.
o
C~
N
o
(0
c::>
c::>
N
C\I~C\I(l')T"""
0)
::1:
I-
Z
o
:lE
CC
>- W CCCC
>-CC IIlCCWW
CC<( I-~WIIlIIl
<(::>I cnWIIl~~
::> CC O::! W >- ::> I- 0 W.W
Z III CC<( CC >-<( Z -l CJ 0... I- > 0
<(W"",o..."",::>::>::>wOOW
...,u.."",<("",...,...,<(cnOzo
-l
<(
I-
o
I-
~
~
.n
N
,...
C'
N
o
...
...
C'
C'l1
o
I- 0
0 ... 0
0
ii: C'l
I- >
en::!Ea::
ew<(
a::l-::!E
Wen::!E
I->:::l
<( en en (0 O'l
C I:> 0 0
S:Z:lll::I:> 0
><(<(1'\1 C'II
W.JW
.JJ:.J
.JC)Z
<(-<c
>J:::!E
I-
en CO
<( 0 0
0
W C'II
.....
I:>
o
N
o
<0
'0
'0
oN
o-.:::t~T"""(t)
(j)
J:
I-
Z
o
:2
? ~ ~'~
?~ 1l5~ww
~::!;I I-:2;W!;@CIl
<(__ (f)WCIl",,:2;
~~()...J W?~I-OWW
ZCIl~~?Z...JCJc..I->()
<(W~c..~~~~W()OW
-,ll..""<(,,,,-,-,<((f)OZO
~
r-;
...J
<(
I-
o
I-
~
cO
., .,:....---=
.' 't',
;/"'ll--4"" I.......~... I '.~'''j. ~.'
.'rl' ~":.t.. ,I.. .';'1: j.....
'-,~_:.c... ___
....""-...Jtf\,..~.........
-...:..t:::..... ...4,.......:-.. -.:.....
...... .:~~ ,n,/'-4
7' .;;..,.
"
". ,"
<-
"
"
/;01-1-- .\.
"
"
r
\1
"
'4~f."..,JJ.t.,I,~- If) .
.' "'".''''' :~ h~
'Q.~~
~~~~~
~'\ ~ ~ ~~&-~
~~~~~~,
~o-a~~,~~o-
~ COb~~~~&>
,~ ~l\Jlcd~ ~~~
~~~~~
~ tt1' ~Vv ~lDk.~-
~ Q.,u,"",-SL" ~ ~
~~~t'CY"'~ ~'~ - '
~n~Cl~1
\JJ tlw ~9--
~~,',",
-.
.(\
--=-=1
_,,~I
.,. Y< Association of the
San Bernardino County Special Districts
June 19, 2006
Membership Meeting
~--'!'"'
'1\
-'
,'; ,./.
./~"""
West Valley Water District is hosting the June Membership Meeting at
EI Rancho Verde Royal Vista Country Club in Rialto.
The social hour will begin at 6 p.m. with a call to order at 6:45 p.m. A sit down
dinner will be served.
Menu: Northern Halibut with rice
New York Steak with baked potato -
Dinner roll, coffee, tea,
Dessert: Ice Cream Sundae
Cost: $35
Program: Tom Crowley, Assistant Manager for West Valley Water District
"New Development, Water Quality I Perchlorate Clean Up, and Source of New Supply"
RSVP to: Peggy Asche by June 9, 2006
by email to peQQv@wvwd.ora
or Fax 909875-7284
Mail checks to
ASBCSD
5822 Date Ave., Rialto, CA 92377
District/Associate
Attendees:
Entree:
~EMINDER: There is a $2 surcharge per person for reservations made after the deadline date and coming to the
dinner meeting without having made reservations. Yau will also be billed for the dinner if cancellation is not received
PRIOR to the deadline date.
Justine Hendricksen
From: Diana Araiza [dmaraiza@adelphia.net]
lient: Monday, May 22,200610:51 AM
1"0: Anthony "Butch" Araiza
Bubject: Program for ASBCSD June 19th meeting
This will be the program for the June 19th ASBCSD Monday night meeting.
Program: Tom Crowley, Assistant Manager for West Valley Water District
UN ~w Development, Water Quality I Perchlorate Clean Up; and Source of New Supply"
Oil na Araiza. Administrative Sccrehu.y
As!.ociatiOL'l orthe San Be-rllanlino
Co .mty Special Districts
58: 2 Date Ave.
Ri. Ito. CA 92377
l)()(' 874-5125
l)()~' 518-6682 Cell
C I',.., !""{\"".
Page 1 of 1
DIRECTOR jVC
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
D1REC R'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT
MONTH OF:
m/1y
Board Meetings:
Conferences and Other Meetinas
Date J Organization //1 U,,/l-i ;
Date !Z- Organization E. U .,(.-1.1, 0.
Dat~U. Organization /;": i j u.J. ()
Date,,2!'t- Organization E U.uJ. 0
Datef3U" OrganizatiorE: OJ )), {J.
"
Date'S I orga[lizatio~ II W.O.
,':,,:, .~~ ~~~.:,: ~~. . ;~; ~~.</.
Or~nlZatiotl* 'ii,', .~i-'
;.):,\:~~~t "k':;.~' 1',',.\ ^. /\ .",'
"r\'" M~ ., ~~:t
.,-,~allljl' ~;~ ~
.. :'}, ';;.:'
...~
:;../~j~:';-
Date
Date
Date;>
Organiz
Date:
Organization
Date:
Organization
Date:
Organization
Date:
Organization
Date:
Organization
Date:
Organization
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS
Personal c..uto:
Description
/!J(,@,/
t.UAY.t /3(.i JJl~(
Description
Description I ,/1 c?rL tV I S'6 t/}
~f'<<.//)r fc>'T ~r::::!:
Description:.!.?, ,7 /4A M'7 fCk" wd-<
De"riPti,";1k.d~ il~ ~
L!2~' / - 1;
Description , t:: t '-', U-'LC
Description
" ,., \,
Description i
3
<'
'i!!
i Description,
Y ," '
. 1,*
':'k i:
'c,'/:; ~
1'; J^
Desc;ription
Description
Description
Description
Description
Description
7
9rl '5 0~
@125.00each_$
Miles x .445
Parking Fees
per mile_ $
$
J
/3
/3
Total Lod ~ Meals & Other: (Details on Back)
75
75
Total Director's Expenses
$
~ ~ lotam"'olo',Meet"g,&E,pe",es .$'3 8',75
Signed ~t', y ~ Less any Advance Payments $ ,
Date of Bi)ard Jl,pproval TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $888,75
Drreclors Fees and Exoense R€oort.doc
DIRECTOR:
Board MI~etings:
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
DIRECTOR'S FEES AND EXPENSE REPORT
"
;t-j1r;4
5/2:3
MONTH OF: );tctq
I
Conferences and Other MeetinQs
Date:~fZ- Organization EV/,{//)
Date:
S;3
S/Ih
Date:
Date: .5"/2<.
Date: S-/J{J
Date:
Date:
D t .j,
ae:~
1'9'
1J(~<
Date:_
Date:
Date:_
Date:_
Date:
Date
Date:
Personal Auto:
~I #.A,z:15 A"~L~(
~4#~ ~.4; .~71-Y
&~crdL~4~
;J~' ~ult4 ~
Description 4PUL~ ..L'l.u;~~ ~2e7/.
Description
Description
Organization
(j4 if JJi'J,J
Description
Organization [ttd)
Organization EI/il' P
Description
Description
Organization E~/u/l)
Organization
:v~: '> ~~r \>,;~' "',1
.', oitJ~n~~iofi; "t;:
(;'" Jd't"~~0:},'~,J/ ,';;'
~a!;ganiz~ti~ ~:l!':jj;;
\~~~{" _7 W~~\ ~~~~~::
~aniza1icin ".'F
~::':!}lii ;.'
_-<1:"1'5/, ;1-
Organization
~g:*;~i"1:0
,- '~I~
\4,;\',
ili\n ",:'~'i~",
\j<:W ,0_
&,'~' ;1
. If;:
J:~i<f,;};::
0lffj;~~'
~\';J,:yfP
Description
:" ". ,d~$~ri ptibn
A'i] ..;
'^'\ :',t~~,.
JJ'lescription
.~ c""~ .,." ,,"
, :j:)~ K" ;~~,
Del)crjption
~!("<"'-;
c,/
, 1/"
.,
,;
""H'^"'"'
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
Organization
Description
@125.00 each_ $ 750. tJt>
TOTAL # OF MEETINGS {,
Miles x .445
Parking Fees
per mile_ $
$
$
Total Lod~ Meals & Other: (Details on Back)
Total Director's Expenses
Signed ~ '4{;w'
Date of Board Approval ~ - /3 ~
Total Director's Meetings & Expenses $
Less any Advance Payments $
TOTAL DUE DIRECTOR $
n""~'n'~ ""t'" "'" "'"........"". R"nf'rtnn.-
$
ff
~
IY
/'
7St? oC
j7'
7.FC>,t'"(J