HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - EVWD Board of Directors - 02/17/2009East Valley
W~~.ter District
3654 East Highland Avenue, suite 18, Highland, CA 92346 Serving Our Community for Over 50 Years
P.O. Box 3427, San Bernardino, CA 92413
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Donald D. Gootlin
President
SPECIAL MEETING George E."Skip" Wilson
Vice President
OF THE EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Wp
o eon
Direct
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Matt Le Vesque
Director
James Morales, Jr
February 17, 2009 Director
Robert E. Martin
12;00 p. m. General Manager
Brian W. Tompkins
Chief Financial Officer
CONGRESSMAN LEWIS OFFICE Ronald E. Buchwald
1150 Brookside Avenue, Suite J-5 District Engineer
Redlands, CA 92373
AGENDA
1. Public Comments
2. [7i;scussion with Congressman Lewis regarding the Seven Oaks Dam
Water (duality Issues
4. JaDJOURN
[Pur:;uant to Governtnent Code Section 54954(b)(5), this special meeting of the Board of Directors is being
held outside of the District's boundaries for the sole purpose of discussing with U.S. Congressman Jerry
Lewis certain legislative or regulatory issues affecting the District regarding the quality of water in the
Seven Oaks Dam over which federal officials have jurisdiction, and a local meeting with Congressman
Lewis is impracticaLi
Purstaant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for adisability-related modification or
accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above-
agendized public meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Manager at (909) 885-4900
prior to the said meeting.
Adrninistrttion (909) 885-4900, Fax (909) 889-5732 • Engineering (909) 888-8986, Fax (909) 383-1481
Custorner Service (909) 889-9501, Fax (909) 888-6741 • Finance (909) 381-6463, Fax (909) 888-6741
East Valley
bNater District
3654 East t-iighland Avenue, Suite 18, Highland, CA 92346
P.O. Box 3427, San Bernardino, CA 92413
Congr^essmaia Lewis
J3riefing
.February 17, 2009
Serving Our Community for Over
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Donald D. Goodin
President
George E. "Skip" Wilson
Vice President
Kip E. 3(urgeon
Director
Matt Le Vesque
Director
James Morales, Jr
Director
Robert E. Martin
General Manager
Brian W. Tompkins
Chief Financial Officer
Ronald E. Buchwald
District Engineer
The East Valley Water District dedicated its surface water treatment plant at 4588
Highland Avenue, Highland, CA in 1996. Three years later the US Army Corp of
Engineers (USAGE) completed construction of the Seven Oaks Dam in 1999. Since
then, operations of the dam have significantly degraded Santa Ana River water quality
and have adversely impacted the availability of water for the immediate downstream
users such as the East Valley Water District (The District). The District commissioned
a study entitled "Seven Oaks Dam Water Impacts Study" (published in December of
2005) to do<;utnent these issues and problems.
'Thanks to your efforts, the Congress authorized the Seven Oaks Dam Water Study in
the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 [PL 110-114, Section 3036] The
USAGE initiated a comprehensive water quality investigation to analyze the effects of
the dam upon the Santa Ana River. Although not completed, the Corps investigation
has concluded that the quality of water flowing through the dam has been degraded and
has negatively impacted the downstream users. They are now analyzing the value of
the water as part of their economic valuation of various alternative solutions.
East Valley Water District has been working with the USAGE and supporting their
efforts to complete this study. In the mean time, however, our District has been forced
to shut down its surface water treatment plant on regular occasions due to degraded
water coming from the Sevens Oaks Dam, or been forced to purchase expensive
imported water from the State Water Project. Given the current severe drought, the
fact that our State water system is controlled more by Federal judges rather than the
Sta1:e of California, East Valley has determined that our ability to meet current and
future challenges depends upon our ability to use every last drop of locally produced
water.
Adlrinistra(tion (909) 885-4900, Fax (909) 889-5732 • Engineering (909) 888-8986, Fax (909) 383-1481
Customer Service (909) 889-9501, Fax (909) 888-6741 • Finance (909) 381-6463, Fax (909) 888-6741
East Valley
Water District
Congressman Lewis
Briefing
February 17, 2009
Page Two
We; would like to propose a solution for our immediate problem and request your help
and guidance. We are in final design of upgrades and expansion to our surface water
treatment plant. This upgrade will replace our traditional filtration process with a new
membrane system that will enhance our ability to treat degraded water from the Seven
Oaks Dam. 7'he engineers cost estimate for this project is $16 million. We request
financial support from the USACE to assist in this construction project. You have
secured $2,000,000 in the FY07 Appropriations cycle for the Seven Oaks Dam Water
Quality Study and we understand that the Corps promised you that they would use
these funds for this purpose within the context of the year-long Continuing Resolution
for FY07. You have further secured $3,684,000 in the FY08 Consolidated
Appropriations bill, Energy and Water Appropriations, Corps of Engineers
Construction Account. And you have $1,500,000 in the House version of the FY09
Energy and Water Appropriations bill which we understand will soon be the subject of
an Omnibus.
Assuming that the $1,500,000 can be held in the FY09 Omnibus Appropriations bill,
that would be total of $7,184,000 for the Seven Oaks Dam Water Quality Study. We
also believe that the Seven Oaks Dam issue and our particular project would qualify for
Stirulus funding under both the House and Senate versions of the bill and also the
recently agreed upon conference agreement.
We understand that a premium will be placed on "shovel ready" projects in qualifying
for Stimulus funding. We recently awarded a contract for the purchase of membranes,
which allows us to complete the final design of the project. We also have the option to
convert our design efforts to a design build process allowing for a more immediate
construction schedule. Although this EVWD request will not solve all of the water
quality problems created by the Seven Oaks Dam, it will minimize the impacts upon
the East Valley Water District and it's customers and give us the assurance that we will
be able to depend upon the local Santa Ana River for our surface water supply as
opposed to the: State Water Project.
'PL t-a - ii~-
~, Cab ~ ~~°°~
H. R. 1495-7b
~~ SEC. 3036. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.
The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, authorized
by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(100 Stat. 4113) and modified by section 104 of the Energy and
Water Development Appropriations Act, 1958 (101 Stat. 1329-11),
section 102(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990
(104 Stat. 4611), and section 311 of the Water Resources Develop-
ment Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3713), is modified to direct the Sec-
retary-
~ r- (1) to include ecosystem restoration benefits in the calcula-
.'~ tion of benefits for the Seven Oaks Dam, California, portion
of the project; and
(2) to conduct a study of water conservation and water
~ quality at the Seven Oaks Dam.
SEC. 3037. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA
The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper
Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 101(aX9) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modi-
fied to authorize the Secretary to construct the project generally
in accordance with the Upper Guadalupe River Flood Damage
Reduction, San Jose, California, Limited Reevaluation Report, dated
March 2004, at a total cost of $256,000,000, with an estimated
Federal cost of $136,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $119,300,000.
SEC. 3038. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEk CALIFORNIA.
The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek
Channel, California, being carried out under section 206 of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is
modified-
(1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
56), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project
the cost of work carried out by the non-Federa] interest for
the project before the date of the partnership agreement for
the project; and
(2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national eco-
system restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest
in the project.
SEC. 3039. WD,DCATFJAN PAHLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.
The pproject for improvement of the quality of the environment,
WildcaUSan Pablo Creek Phase I, California, being carried out
under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary to
credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of
the Bost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership
agreement for the project.
SEC. 5040. WQ.DCAT/SAN PARLO CREEK PRASE ll, CALIFORNIA.
The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, WildcaUSan
Pablo Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under section
206 of the Water Resources Development Aet of 1996 (33 U.S.C.
2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
F-~ o `~
~ne.~~
32
Deferrals and suspensions.-The Committee recognizes that a
number of projects funded in fiscal year 2006 are not included in
this Act. The Committee directs the Corps to determine the costs
to defer or suspend those projects for which the Committee has not
provided appropriations in this Act and provide those estimates on
aproject-by-project basis to the House Committee on Appropria-
McClellan-Kerr Arkansas Riuer Navigation System, Arkansas
and Oklakoma..-The Committee has provided $300,000 to com-
plete the general reevaluation report for the developing cutoff that
threatens the recently constructed Montgomery Point Lock and
Dam. The funding is provided to assess best solution to ensure in-
tegrity of the navigation system.
American Riuer watershed, California.-The Committee has pro-
vided $49,800,000 for American River watershed activities. Within
this amount, not less than $15,000,000 shall be available for the
permanent bridge below Folsom Dam; the remaining funds shall be
directed to Folsom Dam Modifications, Common Features and the
Folsom Dam Raise.
The Committee has also provided $3,000,000 for the Secretary to
prepare a report that supplements the American River Watershed
Project, California Supplemental Information Report dated March
1996 for the purpose of identifying and evaluating any potential for
additional flood damage reduction to the Sacramento area that
would result from construction of a multipurpose storage facility
downstream of the confluence of the North and Middle Forks of the
Further, the Committee directs the Secretary to continue to expe-
dite all actions necessary for completion of the new bridge at Fol-
som Dam, California, including completing the environmental re-
view and documentation, completing the final design, negotiating
and executing the project cooperative agreement, utilizing abbre-
viated contracting procedures and other means of simplifying and
expediting necessary procedures for approval and construction. The
Committee directs the Secretary to consider the new bridge at Fol-
som Dam, California, as anon-Central Valley Project wmponent.
Inclusion of a feasibility study to contract a dam in Auburn, CA,
should not interfere with or delay efforts to proceed with the
projects at Folsom Dam and should be viewed simply as an effort
to explore additional flood control options in the region behold
those that can be implemented at Folsom Dam.
Sarzta Ana River mainsdem, Cali ornia. In total, the Committee
a provides $56,080,000 for Santa Ana River main stem in California,
of which $2,000 000 is available for the Seven Oaks Dam water
fAiaht~ v s~r?-
Z to onrmittee rewgnizes that the raising of Prado Dam has en-
dangered the existing Santa Ana River Interceptor brine line,
which is critical to the region's water resource infrastructure. The
Committee directs the Corps of Engineers to finalize planning and
enter into a cost share agreement consistent with the existing
Santa Ana mainstem cost share agreement.
Brevard County, Canaveral Harbor, Florida.-The Committee in-
cludes $10,000,000 for the project to provide for a full cycle of sand
bypassing as mitigation for the erosion to the Brevard County
e
ft Ji~B ~I' t ~ ~' G'~ f
®i8 ~J 27
CONSTRUCTSON
(AMOUNTS IN 7NOU5ANDS)
BUDGET NOOSE
REDUE57 RECOnMENDE0
ALABAMA
MOBILE NAR80N, AL .................. ..... .. .. .......... 2,068 2.800
NAL7f:R F GEORGE PONf:RP1.MIT, AL d GA (REPLACEMENT)..... 5,000 5.000
ALASKA
CH(GN[K HPR80R, AK ............... ..................... 5.000 ...
SAND PO[N1 W4RBOR, AK ................. .. .. ....... ..... 3,500 3.500
ARIZONA
NO&AtES. AZ ............................. .............. -•- 1.000
RIO DEL FLAG, FLAGSt-AFF, AZ .......... .... .. ........... ••- 7,500
R10 SOIADA, F'NLIENI% ANO TEMPE REACHES, AZ ... .... .. .... ••- 8,104
TRES RIGS. A'1 ......................................... ... 3.090
TUSCON DRAINAGE ARFh, f'IM COUNTY. A2 ................. --• 2,000
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY POINT LOCK AND DAM, AR ... .......... ..... _. 14,000 14,000
MCCLELLAN-KERB ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIBATTON SYS7EN, ARdOK -•- 300
tkLIFORNIA
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED. CA ... ..................... .. 48,800 49.800
CIM OF SANTA CLARITA, CA . .. .................. ...... .. ••- 1.000
CDRTE MAOT-.RR CREEK. LA ........ ............ ............ •-. 200
FARMIIIGTOW GROUNDWATER. CA .. .. ................. .. ..... --- 300
GUADALUPE RIVER, CA ....................... ... .. .. ..... 5,000 8,700
HANItTON AIRFt6L0 tiETIJINOS RESTORATION. CA... .. ....... 77,100 N.700
NARBORISOI/TH BAY WATER RECYCLING PROJECT, CA. .. ... .... -•- 800
NEACOCK d CACTUS CHANNELS ............... ............ .. ••. B00
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ORAIFUGE AREA, CA .. ..... .. ...... ... 5.584 5,584
LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEEPENING, CA ....... .......... ... .. -•• 2,090
MURRIETA I:REEK, CA ........ ........ ......... .......... ..- 2. QDO
NAPA RIVER. CA .................... .. ................ .. 9.000 ii,00D
DAKLAAtD HARBOR (50 F00T PROJECT). CA .................. 43,500 43.500
P£TALLNIA k{YER, CA ................... ..... .. .......... •-- 3, Z00
PLACEP. COIK'ITY St18•REGIOMAL WASTEEWITER TREAThEM. CA... --- 2,000
PORT OF L(NVG BEACH (DEEPENING), CA . .. .. ............... 5,700 ---
SACRA?IENT(1 AREA, EA ................................... ... 7.OOD
SACRATRiNTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA........ .. 70,860 75,000
SAN LDRENiEO RIVER. CA .......... ....... .. .............. ._. 50D
SANTA ANA RIVER MA7NSTEN, CA .......................... 54 A8D 58.080 ~_~
SOUTH PEtUtIS PROJECT, CA ... ........................... -•• 2,000
SOUTH SACENMENI'0 COUNTY STREAMS. CA .... ............ ... 7,313 9, 70D
S70CK1'ON NETRD 8.000 tONTROt REIMBURSE, CJ1. .. ....... .. •-• 1,500
SUCCESS DAN, TOLE RIVER, CA (DAM SAFETY) .............. 25.000 25.000
SURF510E-SIINSET-NEWPORT BEACH. CA /t ...... .... .. ...... -•- 7.200
{7PPER NEWF'DRT, CA ....... ... .................... .. ..... ••- 5.000
YIIBA IBAS[ti, CA ......... .... ..................... ...... ... 1.500
OELANARE
DELAWARE PJLY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TO LEWES /1 ••• 6a
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WASN111GTOM. DC d VTCTNi'TY ................. ....... .. ... 320 ••-
FLORIDA
BREYAIro COUNT'/, FL (f.ANAVERAI HARBOR) l1 ...... .. ...... --- 10,000
BROWAItD LOLMiTY. FL .......................... .......... ... 750
CEDAR HANN[ICK, NRRES CREEK. FL ........ ................ 8.000 8,000
Fy o$ w H~ x~
~ ~ a, ~ ~ ¢. . ~ns ~3 ~.1
A p p~< p . N~. i
sls
Sant¢ Ana River m¢insiem, C¢lifornia.-Funding in addition to
-
the budget request for this project is included to continue studies
to ascertain the nature and extent of water quality degradation in ;~
the Santa Ana River resulting from the construction and operation
of Seven Oaks Dam and to amend the Seven Oaks Dam water con-
trol plan in light of current conditions and requirements.
American Riuer Watershed (Folsom Dam Minimise), California.-
Within the funds provided for this project, $14,000,000 is for com-
pletion of the bridge.
Dade Courzty (Miami-Dade), Florida.-The Appropriations Com-
mittees are aware of the ongoing study by the Corps to determine
the availability of a domestizc source of sand for the Miami-Dade
Project, which was directed and funded by the Appropriations Com-
mittees in fiscal year 1999. The Committees continue to have con-
cerns over the lack of finalization of this study and thereby direct
the Corps to identify a compatible sand source for the project using
previously appropriated funds no later than March 1, 2008.
Modifzed Waters Delivery Plan, Florida.-The Appropriations
Committees recognize the national importance of this project, but
are concerned about the open-ended scope and the increasing costs
for the Corps participation in this project.
When the project was authorized in 1989, the pktn was to utilize
the culverts under the Tamiami Trail to provide the needed flows
to Everglades National Park. The next plan was a 3,000 foot open-
ing in the Tamiami Trail. Now various bridge options are being
considered.
Another option under consideration is raising the water level in
the Ir29 canal, utilizing the culverts to provide the flows and rais-
ing the low spots on the Tamiami Trail. The Appropriations Com-
mittees are concerned that this constantly changing endpoint for
N1~nds provided for Everglades restoration include $9,840,000 for
this project in fiscal year 2008. This is the Corps' full stated capa-
bility and is based on the apparent disarray in determining exactly
what will be accomplished in fiscal year 2008. The Corps is di-
rected to use this funding to improve flows through the culverts
under the Tamiami Trail. Any use of these funds for other activi-
ties requires a reprogramming request and House and Senate Ap-
propriations Committee approval. Within 90 days of enactment, the
Corps is directed to submit to the House and Senate Committees
on Appropriations its plan for completion of its role in the Modified
Waters Delivery Plan, providing a final project scope and identi-
fying, not only Corps funding requirements, but also corresponding
contributions from the Department of Interior and State of Florida.
To most effectively utilize the funding provided to the Corps of
Engineers for the Modified Waters Delivery project in fiscal year
2008, the Committees on Appropriations expect that the Depart-
ment of Interior will provide funding to match or exceed that pro-
vided to the Corps this fiscal year. The Committees further expect
that the Department of Interior share of the project costs will not
be provided in the form of in-kind services or credit for work pre-
viously performed.
;~~~ ~,, 8
r Gt! +tb" 1 r ~
a~
507
ISTR
(Alq uiAlos>
EISDGfi ANENOEO
PEOUEST Ent
ALAMMA
MODILE NAdldi TOIeliN6 9AS1N, Al.....
P[MWDC LMIifR. MEITSVILIh, AL.......
TIIEGU)OM, AL .....................
ANVTAN iWONIR, /4% ..................................... ••-
Al.L4KA LWRAL Fp0610N. AC ............................ .-.
CN7GNIN IWONRI, M .................................... _..
NONE N4Rept INPpNENEitf9, AR .......................... ...
6Y vAUL RAIM9R. AK .................................... ...
6iTIN N4R9pC 6RENOI4TfR OPGRAOE, AK ................... _.•
OINUSCR, IIX .......................................... ...
ARIZONA
MOGLES tWNf. AZ ......................................
RID SE F1AI:, iIAQTAFF, A2 ......... ...................
RYO SA+A00. PMOEIIIR AXD TENFE REANJIEi. AZ .... .........
TREE RI05. A2 .........................................
TUCSON OMSNAGE lVEA, 12 ..............................
ARKANSAS
D2AAK JEYA TAYIAR !Q{RNdl6E, Nt +NAIOR RENAq ......
RED RIPER UfLQi OENSEON GN, U, AR { TX ..............
RED RIYE11 P]6:RCENCY 6AMR PRDTEC'RON, AR t U..........
NlpTE R1VBi NTRIItUM FICAt, AR ..........................
<RLSEOp17A
NIERJGN RIPER WTER~RD jCpINON FfATUESi . G.......
ANERIGN RlVfll INTER6NID (i0L60R 04N NDDIFIGTIONS), C
ANER1c4M RIVfR IOLTERSMID (f6L6oN 04M RA1SE1• G.......
AlRRiCRM R7Y61 INTER6ME0, G ............... ...........
CALFED IlVEE STANIt1TY FROGRAM.G .....................
CITY OF fiANTA CLtRITA (PfP1TIl0MTE1, G ...............
CARTE RAOEISA CR&T(, G ................................
fARRIRG70R RFCNAlYt 0EN06ETGTIDN PItOUWAR, G.........
GOAMRUrE IUY6t. G ...................................
NMILTON AIRFIEtA N6TUNb5 RESTORATION. G............
MAR{ORr50MfN MT RECYCI.iNC rROJECf. G ................
l9NfR YALNOT CREf.K, t0)RM COA6TA COIAITY. G..........
NJO.W14LEY hRFA 6EYEE IECONSTRIILTSOM ..................
61Rtl1lETA CIER, G ..... ...............................
RAM RIVER. G ........................................
IOI0.TN YALLfY RECYONK fIATER JMfNALiRVRORE, G........
[NRUMO. MROOR L30•PoOY PROJECT), G ..................
ItiTAL9M R[V61 FL000 CINRROL. G ......................
PLACER CORNY'(. G ......................................
i1MT OF IAN: aEAat. G ................................
IN1Rr OF LDS ANGEILES CNNINEL DE9HiINC, G .............
t:KRNCE7iT0 MEEFY4TER AIIP pININEi. G .................
1lACMlaNSO NIVtR IIJIR( tNtDTERION PROJER. G..........
tlALW7E:NT0 RIPER, ULEMI-COLUSA IM10AilON DiETR1R, G
SAY ROYrCI5C0 MY 1'0 EtUCKiON (Jral, tA ...............
RAR LVSE RFf RIVER, G .. ..............................
tiro RATION PACIFY RIxYCLEO WTER, G ...................
tLWTA ftlfA PtYER NATN6T'P1. CA ..........................
RAN7A NMIA RfYER, G .................................
tiDUTN tJGMANENTO QA9R't STRFNIS. G ...................
aYCCEtO. GN, TOLE RIVER. G (OAR SAFETY) ..............
:iVRF'S7IE - SUMSES - NDIPORi eEAtll, CA
'(MOE IKYIN RE6TOWITiOt It067 .........................
I/T[R IRlAOALYPE 0.1VFR, c:A .............................
UPPER +Ri004T MY. CA .................................
NESY tYfQHNERTO FL000 90NTROl, G .....................
RUOl1 SlYVER'. OAEIN, CA ..................................
anRrtRlslrt
IIR10GffRXt1' ENVIRONMENTAL JMPRASTRULTVIE. R...,....,.
DELLWRE
OfWN1tE MY C0/ET, {ETNANY TO SOUTN tIETIMNr, DE......
DEIA6NtE MY C0IETLIRE, 6RDAW11 eEACN, OE...........
I+EIJAHN~ MY COA6TLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TD tiAIES 6bICN
9ElAN7Nlf Ct7A6T 16011 GPE NELOrEM 10 fENNSCK [StAND. FE
nEtfAd4itE LDAST FRgI GIE iEIMEN TO FENIRCN ISIANO, AE
IIELNPoE TDPbi rROYERIDN, OE .........................
17,000
56,600
1.900
7,590
/z.ooo
100
x1,616
600
17.000
6.000
16,090
t00
en xoo
219 JIO
1, 6x0 710
NOD
K8 {OD
1,{20 600
Cal Tp0
1,N6 000
x.eoe voa
660 1060
6, 3i5 1100
+200
Liar 1500
/,6Cp ty00
t,77t 1600
to,ezs nxo
T,eea +ra
1800
22.652 1900
2.060 x009
5.27r 1100
%6 2120
J3W
7.6r2 25W
6,96 x1{D
17,220 2600
x600
1.0x0 x700
IM 36W
7N SOOD
3T6 J1O0
t, 705 5200
e.a12 s56o
8,606 RIOD
662 5600
166 J700
1.615 seo0
to.{xa saoo
sIx 1100
++.Sxe IzoD
1.666 NDO
9J6 HW
J,y15 1500
1,600 1696
116 IT00
xt.652 IeW
1,0x0 ICW
102 6000
1.J7a 6100
x.600 6200 /~
x0,661 +rr6-~
D700 (
x60 \
6100
10.M6 6600
+I.aoe X60
{,xs{ sTOD
I,Ixi 5600
IL 6000
2.2x2 6000
I,SrS a+aD
La1 az6o
656D
1{7 6100
6300
14t {69D
x51 6700
03 6600
w 6{00
x.637 roo0
su nao