Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - Legislative & Public Outreach Committee - 03/01/2010East Val ley Water District LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Date: March 1, 2010 Time: 12:00 p.m. Place: 3654 E. Highland Ave, Suite 12 Highland, CA 92346 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1, Public Comments. 2. Review and discussion regarding pending State and Federal Legislation. 3. Reivew and discuss State and Federal Lobbyist contracts. 4. Review and discuss State and Federal Lobbyist invoices. ADJOURN ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a), any request for a disability- related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, that is sought in order to participate in the above - agendized public meeting should be directed to the District's Administrative Manager at (909) 885 -4900 at least 72 hours prior to said meeting. ------------------------------------ ----- -- -------- ----- --- -- - -- --- Page 1 of 1 Justine Hendricksen From: Bob Reeb [robertreeb @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:45 PM To: Bob Martin Cc: Justine Hendricksen Subject: Legislative Report for Board Meeting Hi, I've attached the legislative report. It is a pdf file. Directors and staff can click on the bill number to get to the text of the measure. I think there are 14 bills. I did not include a number of "spot" bills, but I will continue to monitor them for changes as the session progresses. There may be additional bills after mid -March as ACWA will review many more and I have referred some to in -house counsel for another client to save your legal affairs budget. I included an update on AB 300, otherwise all others are new. SIB 457 is no longer relevant since the subject matter was included in the special session delta water package last November. I will still keep an eye on it as well. If I recall, the board also was interested in SIB 808. ACWA has a support position as does my client California Central Valley Flood Control Association, therefore, I don't believe it is necessary for the District to weigh in as well. Let me know if you feel differently. Please call if you have any questions. Otherwise, I'll see you on the 9th. -me P.S. I'll get those draft thank you letters to you not later than Monday. Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 9th Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 a:IE'SRS fi'f:IiE'KC11 FX: 916- 558 -1932 MB: 916- 402 -4278 E -mail: robertreeb @comcast.net 2/26/2010 East Valley Water District 2009 -10 Session, Second Year AS 300 (Caballero) Subdivisions: water supply. Introduced: 2/17/2009 Last Amend: 6/30/2009 Status: 7/7/2009 -In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 7/7/2009 -S. N.R. & W. Summary: The Subdivision Map Act prohibits approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, or a development agreement for a subdivision of property of more than 500 dwelling units, except as specified, including the design of the subdivision or the type of improvement, unless the legislative body of a city or county or the designated advisory agency provides written verification from the applicable public water system that a sufficient water supply is available or, in addition, a specified finding is made by the local agency that sufficient water supplies are, or will be, available prior to completion of the project. This bill would require, until January 1, 2017, the public water system, or the local agency if there is no public water system, to review, verify for accuracy, and approve, as specified, the subdivider's water savings projections attributable to voluntary demand management measures, as defined. The public water system would be authorized to collect fees necessary to provide the additional analysis of the voluntary demand management measures. This bill would provide that a water supply assessment completed, as specified, satisfies the existing requirement of verifying sufficient water supply, unless the public water system receives specified new information . The public water system would be required to determine the projected water savings attributable to the voluntary demand management measures that will be incorporated into the subdivision. The projected water savings would be required to be calculated using specified data compiled or maintained by the public water system or the water savings projections adopted by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. If a project applicant proposes to use a new voluntary water demand management measure for which neither the California Urban Water Conservation Council nor the public water system has adopted an estimate or method to calculate the projected water savings of the proposed voluntary demand management measure, the projected water savings would be required to be made based on documented methodologies or calculations submitted in the record. Five years after the project has been fully developed, the public water system would be required to include within its next urban water management plan a report on the monitoring and compliance of voluntary water demand management measures and to determine , if practicable based on readily available information, whether they have resulted in the water savings necessary to achieve the agreed upon water demand offsets. The bill would also require the public water system to document the measured annual water use of the subdivision in comparison to the projected demand associated with the subdivision, and to calculate the water savings attributable to the voluntary mitigation measures financed by the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund for the subdivision. If the public water system bases its written verification of a sufficient water supply for the subdivision, in whole or in part, on the use of voluntary demand management measures within the subdivision, the written verification would be required to be conditioned on the maintenance and operation of the voluntary demand management measures, or measures that are at least as water efficient, as agreed to by the applicant and the public water system, and the recordation as a covenant running with the land for the lots within the subdivision. The bill would provide that by acceptance of a deed to a lot, each purchaser would acknowledge the obligation to comply with the voluntary demand measures for the lot as described in the covenant. These covenants would be authorized to be enforced pursuant to the existing authority of a public water system. The bill would further require a builder, prior to the close of escrow, to give a purchaser information that would be required to be included in a maintenance manual that informs the purchaser of the existence of the home's unique water saving devices, including specified information. The bill would also encourage the public water system to commit to carrying out the water conservation measures funded by the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund within 24 months of the sale of the last unit of the proposed subdivision. The bill would require the public water system to choose water conservation measures that are themost cost - effective means to yield water savings . The bill would authorize expenditures from the fund to be made within the subdivision or elsewhere within the service area of the public water supplier, at its discretion. Not less than 40% of the proceeds from the voluntary water demand mitigation fund would be required to be directed to water conservation programs in any disadvantaged community, unless the public water system makes a specified finding. By adding to the duties of the public water system, this bill would impose a state- mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Laws: An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 66473.7 of the Government Code, and to amend, repeal, and add Section 10910 of the Water Code, relating to subdivision map approvals. Notes 1: This legislation is similar to AB 2219 (Parra) from 2008 that the District opposed in the Senate. The bill was dropped by the author. The California Building Industry Association is the sponsor of AB 300 and continues to work with Planning and Conservation League, East Bay MUD and the author to fashion amendments to the bill that will result in the removal of opposition. The District supports an approach that would amend existing law to authorize a project applicant to work with a public water system on a voluntary basis to provide additional water demand management measures for a subdivision or contribute funds to an existing plumbing retrofit program offered by the public water system or other conservation best management practices to be implemented by the public water system. The goal is to offset in whole or in part the projected water supply demand associated with a development project. This legislation, like AB 2219, would proscribe a process n , %­l- the public water system would have to calculate and affirm potential water savings based on mea! c-es mduded by an applicant (developer) and monitor and report re;rdts attributed to demand manage -rent measures after 5 years. AB 300 now authorizes the public wate- system to impose a fee on ar. aprl c =_,rt to cover the costs of compliance. The estimate of potential mater savings must be based on susstantial evidence in the record developed by the public water system if the demand management mea =. :res have not already been calculated by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. If the pubs - ,al.er system bases a written verification of a sufficient water supply `or the subdivision in whole ot n r,tr-t of the use of voluntary demand management measures, tte written verification must be torn .coned on the maintenance and operation of the measures. Yet, aside from a requirement that propert; Ceders hand down a maintenance manual to buyers, the only enfo,ce,nent mechanism is through a rcc )riccl covenant running with the property. The District has secured a .umber of key amendments thus far. including (1) fee authority to provide additional analysis of vo'ur :ary demand management measur- 22) clarification that measures shall be chosen that are the "most cost - effective means to yield Tsai sa,,ings" as compared to "the least expensive;" (3) changing tee accounting for fees received f c -r ar applicant from the Urban Water Management Plan to the annual budget to mirror existing le:v; `a _he accounting of developer mitigation fees and contributions pursuant to a developer agreement: an 1 '4) deletion of a provision that provided that the sole remedy for the failure of a public water system tc implement the water conservation measures was for an interested party to seek a writ of marda^rua to compel the public water system to comply. 1 believe there are two remaining issues: (1) Voluntary demand management measures are identified in the legislation (a list is provided, but other measures may be cluded). The legislation requires the measures to provide savings for a 20- year - period. The list of measures includes smart irrigation controllers, for example, that likely do not have a 20 year measure life; and (2) The legislation has a 6- year sunset for a program that requires a 20 -year commtmenr. Rather than sunset the legislation, perhaps a report could be reouired to be prepared by the Ueoartment of Water Resources on the performance of public water systems and voluntary agreements entered into based on the legislation. DWR currently reviews Urban Water Management Plans, svFe-u this information will reside. Based on progress to date, I am recommending that the District downgrade the level of opposition to the bill, but not fully remove opposition pending the outcome of ongoing n-gctiations between the author, bill sponsor and other opponents. Current Position: Oppose Unless Amended. Recommended nosticn: Not Favor unless Amended AB 1676 (Fuentes) Elected officials: residency requirements. Introduced: 1/21/2010 Status: 1/27/2010- Referred to Corn. on E. & R. Is Urgency: Y Is Fiscal: Y Location: 1/27 /2010 -A. E. & R. Summary: The California Constitution requires that a perscr eside for one year within the legislative district for which he or see seeks election as a Membe, of the '.eg,slature. Various statutory provisions impose residency requirements on other specified elected off Gals in California. This bill would require that a person elected to a state or local public office maintain I-is or her place of residence within the jurisdiction within which voters are qualified to vote for the office during his or her term of office. The bill would require a person who violates this provision to immediately forfeit his or her office and would disqualify the person from i,olding any state or local pubhc c P',ce r, the future. The bill would provide that these provisions would apply retroactively to all persons holding crate or local public office at the time of the effective date of the bil ;. Commencing with persons sency terms of office beginning on or after November 2, 2010, the bill Would also make a violation of the -es!dency requirement punishable by either a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 or a fine not to exceed $1,000, imprisonment in a county jail for no more than 6 months, or by both fine and imprisonmen' . "he bill would authorize a district attorney, a county counse . or city attorney with enforcemer. authority to enforce a violation of these provisions. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Laws: An act to add Section 1065 to the Government Code, e'abng to elected officials, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. Notes 1: ACWA has approved a "Not Favor unless Amendec position on the bill, but directed its staff to discuss concerns with the o-thor before sending a letter exp: essing the position. Members of the ACWA State Legislative Committee expressed concern regarding the Wet me forfeiture of eligibility for public office as well as the Grim na penalty provisions of the bill. T ie oi,,:rict should allow ACWA to take the lead on this legislation and assist as necessary should ACW4 rrcuire the assistance of its members. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Posstic n Not Favor unless Amended (Caballero) Water resources. Introduced: 1/25/2010 Status: 1/26 /2010 -From pr -ter. May be heard in committee rebniary 25. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 1/25 /2010 -A. PRINT Summary: Existing law requires various state and local agencies to administer programs relating to water supply, water conservation, water rights, water quality, flood management, and groundwater, Under existing law, various bond acts have been approved by the voters to provide funds for water projects, facilities, and programs. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to make necessary changes to statutes relating to water resources enacted during the 2009 -10 7th Extraordinary Session of the Legislature. Laws: An act relating to water resources. Notes 1: This legislation is an author - sponsored spot bill that might be amended to contain "clean -up" provisions to the legislative water package enacted last year. The District should closely monitor this legislation as the year progresses as "clean -up" for one special interest could involve a significant detrimental change to another. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Position: Watch AB 1780 (Yamada) Delta Stewardship Council: certifications of consistency. Introduced; 2/9/2010 Status: 2/10 /2010 -From printer. May be heard in committee March 12. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/9 /2010 -A. PRINT Summary: Existing law requires the state or a local public agency that proposes to undertake certain actions within the boundaries of the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta or the Suisun Marsh to prepare, and submit to the Delta Stewardship Council, a specified written certification of consistency with a prescribed Delta Plan prior to taking those actions. This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to this requirement. Laws: An act to amend Section 85225.25 of the Water Code, relating to the Delta Stewardship Council. Notes 1: This legislation is an author - sponsor bill and a placeholder for more substantive provisions. Assemblymember Yamada opposed the legislative water package enacted last fall. Any person who claims that a proposed covered action is inconsistent with the Delta Plan and, as a result of that inconsistency, the action will have a significant adverse impact on the achievement of one or both of the coequal goals or implementation of government- sponsored flood control programs to reduce risks to people and property in the Delta, may file an appeal with regard to a certification of consistency submitted to the council. "Covered Action" does not now include any project that is within the alignment of a conveyance facility as shown in Figures 1 to 5, inclusive, of the Final Draft Initial Assessment of Dual Delta Water Conveyance Report, April 23, 2008, and in future revisions of this document by the Department of Water Resources. Consistency determinations by the Delta Stewardship Council will be an important means for ensuring that covered actions are consistent with the Delta Plan, which the Council is required to prepare and adopt. The District should closely monitor this legislation given the author's prior positions regarding the legislative water package. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Position: Watch AB 1797 (Berryhill, Bill) State Water Resources Development System: Delta Corridors Plan. Introduced: 2/10/2010 Status: 2/18/2010- Referred to Com, on W.,P. & W. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 2/18/2010 -A. W.,P. & W. Summary: Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources operates the State Water Resources Development System that includes dams, reservoirs, and other infrastructure. This bill would require the department to undertake an expedited evaluation and feasibility study with regard to the implementation of a specified Delta Corridors Plan as part of the State Water Resources Development System. The department would be required to prepare and submit to the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2012, a report that includes its feasibility findings. If the department determines the implementation of the plan is feasible, the department would be required to include recommendations with regard to specific facilities to be constructed, and to identify potential funding sources, for the purposes of implementing the plan. Laws: An act to add Section 148 to the Water Code, relating to the State Water Resources Development System. Notes 1: The Delta Corridors Plan was prepared for the South Delta Water Agency to evaluate the salinity benefits of the establishing separate corridors for water to move into, out of, and through the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta compared with the existing salinity conditions in the south and central Delta. Plan proponents argued back in 2007 that the Delta Corridors Plan would provide benefits for fish habitat, fish migration survival through the Delta, and reduced fish entrainment at the CVP and SWP pumping plants. The Bay Delta Conservation Strategy Planning Process is currently investigating alternative Delta future plans and policies. The Delta Corridors Plan was submitted to the Stakeholder Group and to the Delta Vision Panel as an alternative that plan proponents argued would revitalize the Delta by separating the San Joaquin River- estuary corridor from the Sacramento River -water supply corridor. The Bay Delta Conservation Plan is guided by a steering committee of local water agencies, environmental and conservation organizations, state and federal agencies, ar,c zI :lei interest groups. In December 2009, the BDCP Steering Comm,t`ee was presented with five option c- improved Delta conveyance: (1) all tunnel option; (2) isolated conveyance facility -east; (3, isalatec conveyance facility -west; (4) dual conveyance facility; and (5) through -Delta facility. The Delta -rigors Plan was not included. This legislation would require DYvR to study the latter plan outside rf the BDCP process. This is not a desirable result for BDCP participants. Potential habitat restc-at on and water supply conveyance options included in the EDCP will be assessed as part of an F-..ironmental Impact Report (EIR) /Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). A joint EIR /EIS ii! BOCP is currently being prepared. State and Federal lead agencies ter the EIR /EIS are the Califorr. a Csaa,tment of Water Resources, the Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Fi,i, and Wildlife Service, and NOAP.'s iational Marine Fisheries Service, in cooperation with the Califoi "ia Department of Fish and Game ':ie U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Army Corps of f- ngineers. The Draft EIR /EIS is e, -ecied to be available for public review and comment in 2010. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Pos tor. Opoose AB 1843 (S>JDi or ) Water supply security: reports. Introduced: 2/12/2010 Status: 2 /16 /2010-From printer. May be heard in committee i1a,c,i 18. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 211212010 -A. PRINT Summary: Existing law, the : ^Jater Security, Clean Drinking t:' :er. Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002, an initiative approve- by the voters, among other thi w or ovides for funding to protect state, local, and regional drinking mater systems from terrorist atta - .s o- deliberate acts of destruction or degradation, and authorizes tire Legislature to enact legis at o as necessary to implement its provisions. This bill would require the California Office of Hor eianc Security to submit confidential reports to the Legislature regarding the current security status of tFF ,tate's existing drinking water systems and facilities, with a specia �ocus on any vulnerability to terr -i t attacks and recommended actions necessary to bring the security status to acceptable levels. Laws: An act relating to water. Notes 1: The Assembly Repuolican Caucus is the sponsor of t-i, bdl. This bill is a placeholder for future substantive amendments. The District should closely monitor the legislation due to its subject matter. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended PosiLOr Watch AB 1886 (Yamada) Water use: Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta watershed. Introduced: 2 /16/2010 Status: 2/17 /2010 -From printer. May be heard in committee hl:D -ch 19. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 2/16/2010 -A. PRINT Summary: Existing law dec ares that the policy of the state is to reduce reliance on the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta in meeting the state's future water supply need, through a specified statewide strategy. Existing law requires each region that depends on water from the Delta watershed to improve its regional self - reliance for water by taking specified actions. - -be Department of Water Resources exports water from the Delta watershed in connection with its opertir,n cal the State Water Project. This bill would require the department, on or before February 1, and ::rn.ially thereafter, to prepare and submit to the Legislature a deta le' report that describes the 3cti011L . i*. has taken to reduce its reliance on Delta water supplies. Laws: An act to amend Section 85021 of the Water Code, rei =:ing to water: report. Notes 1: This legislation is an author - sponsor bill. Infoimet „ `or :he bill is still evolving. The author is still conducting research and will be amending the bill. The Di,I uct should closely monitor this legislation given the subject matter Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Position :,atch AB 1975 (Fong) Water charges and meters: multiunit residential structures. Introduced: 2 /17/2010 Status: 2/18 /2010 -From pr ^ter. May be heard in committee 11 -1-ch 20. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/17/2010 -A, PRINT Summary: The Water Measurement Law requires every wale, ju-veyor to require, as a condition of new water service on and after January 1, 1992, the installatico c a .,ater meter to measure water service. That law also requires urban water suppliers to install ,vaiei -i 2te-s on specified service connections, and to charge water users based on the actual volume of da ^ores as measured by those water meters in accordance with a certain timetable. This bill, with a certain - :xception, would require every water purveyor that provides water service to a person residing in z. ruTiumt residential structure for which a construction permit has beer issued on or after January I, :"C I to require the installation of meters or submeters on each individual rental unit as a condition of ni rater service to that property. The bill would authorize the owner or operator to charge tenants based on the actual volume of water delivered as measured by the water meter or submeter. Laws: An act to add Chapter 8.5 (commencing with Section 537) to Division 1 of the Water Code, relating to water. Notes 1: This legislation is an author - sponsored bill, This bill, with an certain exception for high -rise buildings, would require every water purveyor that provides water service to a person residing in a multiunit residential structure for which a construction permit has been issued on or after January 1, 2011, to require the installation of meters or submeters on each individual rental unit as a condition of new water service to that property. This bill would take the next step in measuring water use and thereby promote water conservation by requiring individual water meters for multi -unit residences and allow charges to individual apartment renters for water use. The bill is similar to AB 1173 (Keene) that was introduced in 2007. That bill was held on the Assembly Appropriations Committee Suspense file due to estimated moderate ongoing costs, in the range of $250,000 annually to the Division of Measurement Standards at the Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) and county weights and measures agencies to review, approve and inspect thousands of new water submeters required to be installed in individual rental units at apartment complexes built under construction permits. Those costs may be partially offset by fees imposed by the state division and the county agencies, according to the Assembly committee analysis. AB 1173 was sponsored by California Apartment Association, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation and Western Center on Law and Poverty opposed that legislation due to provisions that would authorize individual charges for buildings without "submeters," which presents a greater challenge and more complex issues. Allocating water use and costs among multiple tenants raises issues of fairness, notice and control. Beginning with the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, the District will be required to identify an urban water use target for 2015 and 2020 that will result in an up to 20% reduction in gallons per capita per day based on a baseline period (generally between 1994 and 2009). Metering has proven to be an effective conservation best management practice. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Position: Favor AB 2003 (Mendoza) Legislative bodies: contracts and appointments. Introduced: 2/17/2010 Status: 2/18 /2010 -From printer. May be heard in committee March 20. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/17/2010 -A. PRINT Summary: Existing law prohibits an elective officer of a city from expending or participating in any action that would expend city funds between the date a recall election involving that elective officer has been called and the date the certification of the election results is released, as specified. This bill would provide that any contract entered into or appointment made by a legislative body of a local agency, as defined, between the date that election results are certified for an election involving that legislative body and before the date the newly elected members of the legislative body are sworn in to take office shall not take effect until the legislative body, which includes the newly elected members, has reviewed and approved the contract or appointment. Laws: An act to add Section 50035 to the Government Code, relating to local government. Notes 1: This legislation is an author - sponsored bill. The legislation likely addresses a situation in the legislator's district, perhaps a contract or appointment entered into prior to a new majority being sworn into the governing board. Nevertheless, this bill would create a potentially untenable situation for a local agency governing board in terms of executing contracts in the period between election certification and a new board member being sworn into office. The delay would occur if only one of five seats turns over; it also would apply to emergency contracts. The bottom line is that the present governing board is duly elected and authorized to act in all circumstances notwithstanding the pending turnover in members. Current Position: Not Yet Considered, Recommended Position: Oppose AB 2091 (Conway) Public records: information security. Introduced: 2 /18/2010 Status: 2 /19 /2010-From printer. May be heard in committee March 21. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/18/2010 -A. PRINT Summary: The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection and to make copies available upon request and payment of a fee unless those records are exempt from disclosure. Investigatory or security files compiled by a public agency, as defined, for correctional, law enforcement, or licensing purposes are exempt from disclosure under the act. This bill would exempt from disclosure under the act the records of a public agency relating to information security and the investigatory or security files compiled by a public agency for information security purposes. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Laws: An act to amend Section 6254 of, and to add Section 6254.19 to, the Government Code, relating to public records. Notes 1: The State Chief Information Office is the sponsor of this bill. In the last 2 years, the Schwarzenegger Administration reports an increasing number of public records act requests as compared to prior years. Slany of the requests involve secwe -fc-mation technology information. The bill seeks to protect such infers -ation, so as to prevent hackers h,. rr obtaining access to it, This legislation would provide important o=ctect or for a public water ;y5te1r regarding the potential disclosure of records relating to informaton security. Current Position: Not Yet nnsrdered. Recommended Fos hur °a. or AB 2583 (BAH) Water quality: treatment chemicals. Introduced: 2 /19/2010 Status: 2/22 /2010 -Read hr,: time. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 2/19/2010 -A. PRINT Summary: Existing law de, 'eres that activities and factors •ra. � ay affect the quality of the waters of the state shall be regulates to attain the highest water quay•.,, that is reasonable, considering all demands being made anc t. be made on those waters and :-i: to-al values involved, beneficial and detrimental, economic and social, tangible and intangible. Th , b, : would require water agencies, as defined, and their direct suppliers, in order to mitigate the pc:pnnal catastrophic harm involved in the unintended and intentional releases of hazardous substance= r ^at are in transit, to utilize raw material chemical products denvec f -urn Inherently Safer Tecl- log} o nferently safer production measures where the products denvec from safer measures or techno ogy are appropriate, given the disinfection methodology used by the . .-ter agency, and commercial'',, r -a agile without being materially cost prohibitive to the water uuiaies or rate payers. Laws: An act to add Sect cn 13003 to the Water Code, relatinc tc water quality. Notes 1: This legislation, g,•,en the caveats spelled out in t- _ro; �siori could result in increased costs to the District. The provisions of the bill are not defined; e c., the meaning of "appropriate" and "materially cost prohibitive. As for the former issue, the bit sl -,uld be clarified by referencing treatment methodologies and techniques that are consistent with fcdeia and State safe drinking water laws and regulations as they pertain the the agency's operating pe -rrit. As for the latter, it is unclear whether cost prohibitive or increased costs should be the standard. In ma -y -ases, it is not simply a matter of changing chemicals, but alte-ing physical plant and mcurnnq'.raining costs to accommodate a change. Finally, the definition of "water agency'' in the Water Code ., -Lt appropriate. The bill should reference "public water system" or smilar terms as are provided in ;he : eal'h & Safety Code, in addition to publicly owned treatment works .n the Water Code (assuming the aur-or ntends to apply the standards to drinking water as well as wastewater treatment plants. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Positicr. Not Favor unless Amended AB 2679 (Fm) Energy and water: consumption reductions. Introduced: 2/19/2010 Status: 2/22 /2010 -Read first time. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: N Location: 2/19/2010 -A, PRINT Summary: Existing law, the Warren -Alquist State Energy Rescurces Conservation Development Act, declares, among other things, that electrical and natural gas ,- tilities should have as a principal goal of their resource planning and investment to minimize the cost to society of reliable energy services, improve the environment, and encourage the diversity of erergy sources. The act also declares that those utilities should seek to exploit all practicable and cost cff•:cuve conservation and improvements in the efficiency of energy use and distribution that offer equivalent c- better system of reliability. This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislate, that creates a tiered system for achieving consumption redo -tions in energy and water in al'. I ,;blur sector agencies for cost reduction, cost avoidance, and enviror, mental compliance purposes. Thi, td contains other existing laws. Laws: An act relating to out is resources. Notes 1: This legislation is a placeholder for subsequent substantive amendments. The subject matter will be of interest to the District, therefore, the bill should be - i�sely monitored. Current Position: Not Yet Considered, Recommended Position Watch 5B 565 (Paylev) Water resources. Introduced: 2/27/2009 Last Amend: 2/1/2010 Status: 2/1 /2010 -From committee with author's amendments ead second time. Amended. Re- referred to Com. on W.,P. & W. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 2/1/2010 -A. W.,P & W. Summary: Existing law gercrally prohibits the state, o- a ccu ^ty, city, district, or other political subdivision, or any public of'rer or body acting in its official -ah=.aty on behalf of any of those entities, from being required to pay any fee for the performance of ar 41oal service. Existing law exempts from this provision any fee or chc -ge for official services required G.:-scant to specified provisions of law relating to water use or v:ater quality. This bill would expand We exemption to other provisions relating to water use, including prop lions that require the payment of lees to the State Water Resources Control Board (board) for official services relating to statements of water diversion and use. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Laws: An act to amend Sections 6103.1 and 6103.4 of the Government Code, to amend Sections 1052, 1055, 1055.2, 1055.3, 1120, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1525, 1535, 1538, 1550, 1551, 1825, 1845, 5103, and 5106 of, and to add Sections 1051.1, 1240.5, 1826, 1846, and 1847 to, the Water Code, relating to water resources. Notes 1: The January 13, 2010, amendments gutted the prior version and instead added a number of provisions generally relating to water rights, provisions that were previously included in SB X7 5 (Steinberg and Pavley) of the Seventh Extraordinary Session in 2009. The latter bill failed passage in the same manner as with prior versions of that bill introduced into the regular session. The present contents of SB 565 raise significant concerns /opposition last year. Water Code Section 1051.1 would allow the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to require water users to perform expensive and technical monitoring studies at their own expense. The results of these studies would presumably be used by SWRCB to reduce water rights. Possible ramifications of this provision could include situations where, for example, the SWRCB requires a water user to perform fishery studies in consultation with the Department of Fish and Game that end up being used as a basis for a SWRCB proceeding to increase minimum flow requirements under the public trust doctrine. In effect, the SWRCB could require water users to perform and fund studies that ultimately reduce their water rights. Water Code Sections 1052(c)(1)(B) and 1845(b)(1)(b) insert the phrase "highest market value of water," in relation to the determination of amounts of civil penalties. This language is vague and doesn't indicate how the "market value" would be determined by the SWRCB or the courts. ACWA recently approved an "Oppose" position on SB 565. Current Position: Not yet consider. Recommended Position: Oppose SB 1234 (Kehoe) Water: unreasonable use. Introduced: 2/19/2010 Status: 2/21 /2010 -From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23. Is Urgency: N Is Fiscal: Y Location: 2/19 /2010 -S. PRINT Summary: Under existing law, the right to water or to the use of water is limited to that amount of water that is reasonably required for the beneficial use to be served, and does not extend to the waste, unreasonable use, unreasonable method of use, or unreasonable method of diversion of water. Existing law requires the Department of Water Resources and the State Water Resources Control Board to take appropriate actions to prevent the waste, unreasonable use, unreasonable method of use, or unreasonable method of diversion of water. This bill would require the board, by January 1, 2012, to adopt regulations to identify unreasonable uses of water during various periods of water shortage, as specified, and would set forth related legislative findings and declarations. Laws: An act to add Section 188.7 to the Water Code, relating to water. Notes 1: This legislation is an author - sponsored bill. The bill would require the State Water Resources Control Board to develop regulations to determine reasonable water use in times of water shortage. Urban water suppliers already have authority under Section 375 of the Water Code to adopt and enforce a water conservation program to reduce the quantity of water used by consumers for the purpose of conserving the water supplies of the public entity. Urban water suppliers already prepare and adopt water shortage contingency analyses and plans as part of the Urban Water Management Planning Act. This bill would require the State Board to make such determinations. As such, it represents an unnecessary intrusion of the state into local decision making by local elected governing bodies. Current Position: Not Yet Considered. Recommended Position: Oppose Total Measures: 14 Total Tracking Forms: 14 Justine Hendricksen From: Bob Martin Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 8:45 AM To: Justine Hendricksen Subject: FW: AB 1594 Opposition Letter u 0001F00800O.PDF (107 KB) - - -- -Original Message---- - From: Bob Reeb [mailto:robertreeb @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:47 AM To: Bob Martin Subject: Fw: AB 1594 Opposition Letter Well, apparently the letter could not wait for your return, so Met dropped my signature used for another client over EVWD. 1'd still like to get an electronic s�gr.at:ure 13, you and Board president for future use based on approved positrons. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Blackserry - - - -- Original Message---- - From: "Cole,Kathy" <kcole @mwd1h2c.cum> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:02:52 To: Jennifer West<geyerw @pacbell.net >; Ron Davis<RonD @acwa.com >; Ralph Simony <RSimoni @caladvocates.com >; <djones02 @pacbell.net >; George Dunn<udunn@quantumgr.com >; <robertreeb?comcast.net >; Glenn Farrel <gfarrel @friantwater.org >; Maureen O' Haren <ataureen@Isenberg- oharen.com >; Jackson R. Gcalcc <Ja ^_k @gcalcogroup.com, >; Kendra Daijogo< Kendra _DaijogoJgaai,- ogroup.coni >; Mark Theisen<mark theisen@gualcogroup.com>; <celliott @towneendpa.com. >; Jonathan Clay<jclay @carpiclay.com>; Vclberg, Jeff<JVo1berg @sdcwa.org>; Tom Martinez <tmartinez @va-Ileywater.org >; Julia Maclay <JMaclay @valleywater.crg >; <earnold @mjarnold.com>; John O'Ma'_ley<jomalley @lhom.com >; Michael Boccadoro<mboccadoro @ aol.ccm >; Ed Mann Lug <emann i ng @ka- pow.com >; Carolyn Jensen<cjensen@ka- pow.com> Subject: AB 1594 Opposition Letter Thank you for your help in pulling the attached coalition letter together in opposition to AB 1594 (Huber). The letter was delivered today. Please share with your client Kathy Cole MWD Sacramento Office No hearing scheduled as yet. 1 I I I I I .5116 - -2c`_ a 1 Alameda County Water District Association of California Water Agencies Castaic Lake Water Agency Burbank Water and Power Coachella Valley Water District Cucamonga Valley Water District Desert Water Agency East Valley Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Friant Water Authority Inland Empire Utilities Agency Irvine Ranch Water District Kern County Water Agency Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Municipal Water District of Orange County Rancho California Water District San Diego County Water Authority Santa Clara Valley Water District Southern California Water Committee State Water Contractors, Inc. Three Valleys Municipal Water District Valley Ag Water Coalition West Basin Municipal Water District Westlands Water District February 24, 2010 Assembly Member Alyson Huber California State Assembly State Capitol, Room 5175 Sacramento, California Re: AB 1594 (Huber): Peripheral Canal — OPPOSE Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee Dear Assembly Member Huber: The organizations and water supply agencies that are signatories below must inform you of our strong OPPOSITION to your bill, AB 1594. We view AB 1594 as a threat to achieving the co- equal goals of ecosystem restoration and reliable water supplies in the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta. Most importantly, your legislation will undermine water supply reliability throughout California and will threaten jobs and the economic health of three quarters of the state's population residing south of the Delta. n2- „5 -10. �2 52FN: Letter of Opposition to AB 1594 (Huber) Page 2 February 24, 2010 ea- . 91e6r_c2eiS tt Unprecedented water supply restrictions pose a direct threat to 25 million Californians and millions of acres of farmland that grow much of the nation's fru is and vegetables. The "status quo” in the Delta is simply unacceptable as both the Delta Vision Task Force and the Public Policy Institute of California have concluded. Bold and comprehensive action, shaped by the legislative package that was adopted this past November, is precsely what California needs. The historic Delta package wisely chose to set an achievable arc balanced set of state policies to restore this vital estuary and improve the reliability of water supplies if they are given a chance to succeed. AB 1594 seeks to reopen a delicately crafted compromise and interject the Legislature into the intricacies of designing a new conveyance system in the Delta. A. new Delta canal or tunnel will likely involve multiple intakes, a forebay and other infrastructure. The Legislature has no expertise for designing roadways, electrical conveyance or other vital pieces of state infrastructure. It is a dangerous precedent to interject the Legislature into the role of water infrastructure design. The many layers of protections for the Delta contained in last year's legislative package will help guide future conveyance decisions to achieve the co -equal goals. The Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) is currently analyzing conveyance alternatives as part of a comprehensive 50 -year strategy of Delta ecosystem and water system improvements. This planning process will include a sophisticated risk analysis of conveyance alternatives. The legislative package also included numerous new requirements for the alternatives analysis process, such as a mandate to review a full range of conveyance alternatives. The BDCP can only automatically qualify.under the new Delta Plan if it complies with the highest environmental standard in California, the Natural Communities Conservation Planning Act. Any new conveyance system must also comply with new Delta flow requirements to be established by the State Water Resources Control Board prior to the commencement of construction of conveyance improvements. The future conveyance improvements adopted by BDCP will have undergone one of most exhaustive and rigorous processes for any infrastructure project in the nation, including an analysis of local economic impacts as mandated under the California Environmental Quality Act. Mandating a redundant review by the Legislative Analyst's Office would represent a misuse of this vital organization In the midst of the worst fiscal crisis in state history. The undersigned are committed to meeting California's water management challenges in a manner consistent with achieving the co -equal goals established by legislative policy. The -_5- G. 2 _2FV: eai11 ;4^65525 t5 Letter of Opposition to AB 1594 (Huber) Page 3 February 24, 2010 Legislature has already adopted safeguards for new conveyance that it deemed prud nt just three months ago. For all of the above reasons, we must oppose AB 1594. Sincerely, U 'W' ' -- U Walt Wadlow Ronald L. Davis General Manager State Legislative Director Alameda County Water District Association of California Water Agencies Dan Masnada George Dunn General Manager Coachella Valley Water District Castaic Lake Water Agency Ron Davis Robert A. DeLoach General Manager General Manager /CEO Burbank Water and Power Cucamonga Valley Water District Ronald Sullivan Paul D. Jones 11 President General Manager Eastern Municipal Water District Irvine Ranch Water District James M. Beck Jeffrey Kightlinger General Manager General Manager Kern County Water Agency Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Letter of Opposition to AB 15 94 (Huber) Page 4 February 24, 2010 Kevin P. Hunt David K. Luker General Manager General Manager /Chief Engineer Municipal Water District of Orange County Desert'LVater Agency Matthew G. Stone Jonathan Clay General Manager San Diego County Water Authority Rancho California Water District �Q5AA Tom Martinez Charles Wilson Santa Clara Valley Water District Chairman Southern California Water Committe Terry Erlewine Richard Hansen State Water Contractors, Inc. General Manager /Chief Engineer Three Valleys Municipal Water District Edward Manning Glenn Far-0 Westlands Water District Friant Water Authority a J Robert Reeb Gloria D. Gray Executive Director President ValleyAg Water Coalition West Basin Municipal Water District Edward Manning Glenn Far-0 Westlands Water District Friant Water Authority a J 01- ,5- 1�� ;I- 521 %1' Letter of Opposition to AB 1594 (Huber) Page 5 February 24, 2010 at�- t ,'d 1EEFC 2c _ > S Richard W. Atwater Robert Reeb General Manager /CEO East Valley Water District Inland Empire Utilities Agency cc: Members of the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee Assembly Member Wes Chesbro Assembly Member Paul Fong Assembly Member Ted Gaines Assembly Member Tom Torlakson Assembly Member Mariko Yamada Diane Colborn, Chief Consultant, Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee Doug Haaland, Assembly Republican Caucus 1107 9`" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone: 916- 558 -1926 Facsimile: 916 -558 -1932 robertreeb @comcast.net LOBBYING FIRM RETENTION CONTRACT The following constitutes a lobbying firm retention contract between REEB GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC ( "RGR" hereinafter), or its legal successor in interest, and EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ( "EVWD" hereinafter), or its legal successor in interest. 1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED —EVWD engages the services of RGR as an independent contractor with the responsibility for providing advice and representation on behalf of EVWD relating to California state legislative and regulatory matters. Such services shall include: A. Representation in the State Capitol and with the Executive Branch in regard to EVWD's 2009 -10 California legislative program. B. Research and analysis of state legislative and regulatory issues and related initiatives; drafting legislation and amendments thereto relating to such issues. C. Legislative reporting services as may be required by EVWD. D. Participation and attendance at meetings. upon request by EVWD, including, but not limited to, meetings related to issues management and formation of lobbying coalitions. RGR will work under the direction of the General Manager and will coordinate services to be performed with same. 2. TERMS OF PAYMENT —EVWD will pay RGR, according to terns and conditions set forth herein, a fee of SEVENTY -TWO THOUSAND AND NO/ 100 DOLLARS ($72.000.00) for the period of July 1, 2009 through June 30. 2010. This amount shall be paid in twelve (12) equal installments of SIX East Valley Water District Lobbying Firm Retention Contract Page 2 of 3 THOUSAND AND NO/ 100 DOLLARS ($6,000.00) due nn the first (1 ") of each month from July 2009 through June 2010, inclusive. Pad r ­icnt shall cover all time expended by RGR personae: unless otherwise agreed '.o h:. RGR and EVWD.. A. Invoices shall be submitted monthly b,, RCiP. fir payment b% EVWD Payment is past due the next business day follmyine the fifteenth of the month. If PVWD has any valid reason far disputing any portion of an invoice. f.VWD will so notify RGR v� ithir, seven (7) calendar days of receipt of invoice, and if no such n,x!tication is given. the invoice shall `, deemed valid. The portion RGR's invoice that is not in dispute shall be paid in accordance %% ith 'he procedures set forth herein. B. EVWD shall reimburse RGR all costs incurred in connection with the services rendered. Reimbursable costs include, but are not limited to, tray el costs, telephone, facsimile. copies. and delivery that are attributable to the services rendered. Travel costs are defined as air travel. lodging, meals and incidentals. ground transportation, and all costs associated with travel. All extraordinary travel expenses must receive F VWD's prior approval. RGR shall provide to EVWD substantiation of reimbursable costs incutrcd in no event shall the aggregate amount of reimbursable costs pad .tble by EVWD during the contract period exceed the amount off IVE THOUSAND AND NO/ 100 DOLLARS ($5.000.00). And expense incurred in excess of FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/ 100 DOFI_y RS ($5,000.00) shall be the legal responsibility of RGR. C. A finance charge of 1.5% per month on tlic unpaid amount of an invoice will he charged on past due accounts. Payments by EVWD will thereafter be applied first to accrued interest and then to the principal unpaid balance. Any attorney fees. court costs, or other costs incurred in collection of delinquent ac, aunts shall be paid by EVWD. If pa, -ment of invoices is not currcrt. RGR may suspend performing "urther work. East Valley Water District Legislative Representation Contract Page 3 of 3 3. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR —It is understood that RGR will function as an independent contractor and will hold itself out as such and will be without authority to obligate EVWD for indebtedness, contracts, or other legal obligations. 4. POLITICAL REFORM ACT —RGR will be solely responsible for its filing and reporting obligations pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974, as it may be amended from time to time. EVWD will be solely responsible for its filing and reporting obligations pursuant to the Political Refortn Act of 1974, as it may be amended from time to time. 5. GOVERNING LAW - This agreement shall be governed by and construed pursuant to the laws of the State of California. 6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT - This is the entire agreement of the parties and no other representations, promises or agreements, oral or otherwise, shall be of any force or effect. This agreement may be supplemented, amended or revised only in writing by agreement of the parties. 7. TERM OF CONTRACT —This engagement shall be subject to review at any mutually agreed upon time. Either party may terminate this engagement without cause by giving written notice at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of termination. The effective date of this agreement is July 1. 2009, and it shall terminate on June 30, 2010. EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT P. O. Box 3427 San Bernardino CA 92413 /" Bv: Robert Martin General Manager Date: /�/Zb /9 REEB GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC 1107 9"' Street, Suite 510 Sacramento CA 95814 �T'l_r L�-� e c� By: Robert .. eeb Date: / 1 " C' k�'- Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 9t1 Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916- 558.1926 Facsimile: 916- 558.1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice August 2009 Retainer Expenses REC OVED AN 2 i 20U9 Fast valley Water District Invoice No.: 009 -SEP -2009 Date: August 18, 2009 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 4 j k $ 0.00 0.00 $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000_00 RECEIVED AUG 2 _ 2009 Activity Report East Valley Water District 07/16/09 Capitol Visits Re State Budget and Delta Package 2.0 07/17/09 Press Clips, State Policy Issue Review 2.0 07/23/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions Re Budget 4.0 07/24/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions Re Budget 4.0 07/24/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee Meeting 1.5 07/28/09 Review State Budget Re Resources Items 1.0 07/29/09 Prepare and Submit FPPC Report 1.0 07/30/09 Prepare Delta Legislative Package Memorandum 3.0 08/04/09 AB 49 and SB 261 Water Coalition Meeting 1.5 08/04/09 Review CA Energy Commission Federal Stimul.is Funding Status 4.0 08/05/09 Press Clips, State Policy Issue Review 2.0 08/06/09 Analysis of Delta Legislative Package 5.0 08/11/09 AB 49 Water Coalition Meeting 1.5 08/11/09 ACWA Delta Water Package Review Meeting 2.0 08/12/09 Press Clips, State Policy Issue Review 2.0 08/18/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916-558.1926 Facsimile: 916.558 -1932 Robert Martin Invoice No. General Manager Date: East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice August 2009 Retainer Expenses 009 -AUG -2009 July 15, 2009 $ 0.00 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 i. .111 11 Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 Activity Report 06/19/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 06/19/09 Prepare Comparative Analysis Re AB 49 and SB 261 2.0 06/23/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 06/23/09 Review E -Mail String Becerra Re RWA and SB 261; E -Mail Martin 0.5 06/24/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 06/24/09 Review AB 1420 Compliance Document; E -Mail Martin 0.5 06/25/09 Meeting w/ Asm. Caballero Staff Re AB 300 1.0 06/25/09 Lunch w/ Ron Davis of ACWA Re AB 49 /SB 261 1.0 06/26/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee 1.5 06/26/09 Monitor Senate Floor; Press Clips /State Issues Review 1.0 06/30/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 07/01/09 Review State Budget Status; E -Mail Martin 0.5 07/01/09 Attend SB 261 Review Meeting w/ RWA Entities 2.5 07/01/09 Research SB 261 Issues; Draft Correspondence 6.0 07/02/09 Talk w/ Ron Davis of ACWA Re SB 261 0.5 07/02/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 07/03/09 Talk w/ Senator Dutton staff Re SB 261 0.5 07/03/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 07/06/09 Meeting w/ Senator Dutton Staff and SB 261 Co- Sponsors 1.0 07/06/09 Attend Senate EQ and NR &W Committee Hearings Re AB 49, AB 300 4.0 07/06/09 Review AB 300 Amendments 1.0 07/07/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review, Monitor Budget 2.0 07/09/09 Update Martin Re AB 300 0.5 07/10/09 Attend Meeting Re AB 49 /SB 261 w/ RWA Entities 1.5 07/12/09 Prepare Draft Legislation Re Water Conservation Re AB 49 and SB 261 6.0 07/13/09 Review Becerra Edits Re Draft Legislation Re AB 49 and SB 261 1.0 07/14/09 Meeting w/ CFBF Water Resources Dir. Re AB 49/SB 261 1.0 07/14/09 Research Issues Re Draft Legislation Re Water Conservation Re AB 49 and SB 261 3.0 07/14/09 Revise Draft Legislation Re Water Conservation Re AB 49 and SB 261 5.5 07/15/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 9" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.558 -1926 Facsimile: 916- 558 -1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice October 2009 Retainer Expenses c - 1009 `Gst V a'; Invoice No.: 009 -OCT -2009 Date: September 17, 2009 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: Subtotal: Total Charges: $ 0.00 0.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 Activity Report 08/18/09 Monitor Joint Water Committees Hearing Re Delta Water Package; E -mail Martin 5.5 08/20/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 2.0 08/21/09 Prepare Joint Hearing Memorandum; E -mail Martin 2.0 08/31/09 Attend ACWA Lobby Group Meeting 0.5 09/01/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floors; Conference Committee Formation; Meet w/ Assembly Member Caballero staff re Water Bond; E -mail Martin 10.0 09/02/09 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee 1.5 09/02/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee 1.0 09/02/09 Review AB 1242 Opposition Request from ACWA 1.0 09/03/09 Monitor Senate Floor Re AB 1242 3.0 09/03/09 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee; E -Mail Martin 5.0 09/04/09 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee: E -Mail Martin 4.0 09/05/09 E -Mail Conference Committee Staff and Legislative Staff Re Issues and Amendments 3.0 09/07/09 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee; Meet w/ Coalition Lobbyists; E -Mail Martin 6.0 09/08/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 10.0 09/09/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 14.0 09/10/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 16.0 09/11/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 16.0 09/15/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 2.0 09/17/09 Prepare Invoice. Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 -558 -1926 Facsimile: 916-558-1932 Robert Martin, General Manager East Valley Water District Date 3654 East Highland Avenue, Suite 18 Highland CA 92346 -2607 Balance forward from last invoice 009 - DEC -2009 November 19, 2009 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: New Activity Since Last Invoice December 2009 Retainer Expenses $ 0.00 N M $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: 6,000.00 Subtotal: 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 Activity Report 10/19/09 Draft Annual Report 2.0 10/20/09 E -Mail Martin Update Re DWR Testimony Little Hoover Commission Re IRWM; Delta water package; Model Landscape Ordinance 1.0 10/21/09 Review ACWA State Legislative Committee Planning Meeting Proposals; E -Mail Martin 1.0 10/21/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 1.0 10/25/09 Review Delta Water Package provisions; Prepare Memo,andum Re Recycled Water 3.0 10/26/09 Attend Joint Water Committees Hearing 3.5 10/27/09 Conference Call w/ Huffman and MWD Staff Re Urban Water Conservation Issues; Draft amendments 2.5 11/01/09 Review Delta Water Package Amendments: Legislation 3.0 11/02/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions: E -Mail Martin; 14.0 11/03/09 Speak with Delegation Offices 2.0 11/03/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions 13.0 11/04/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions; E -Mail Martin 8.0 11/10/09 Draft Annual Report 2.0 11/18/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 2,0 11/19/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 I i Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 9`" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 -558 -1926 Facsimile: 916 - 558.1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice January 2010 Retainer Expenses RECEWED DEC 1 20Us East Valley Water District Invoice No.: 009 - JAN -2010 Date: December 15, 2009 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice Subtotal: Total Charges: $ 0.00 0.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 c. � $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 Activity Report 11/23/09 Review Press Clips, State Policy Issues 12103/09 Lunch w/ Martin and Director Wilson 12/09/09 Review Press Clips, State Policy Issues, State Water Contractors Newsletter 12/14/09 Review Press Clips, State Policy Issues 12/15/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.558 -1926 Facsimile: 916 -558 -1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice February 2010 Retainer Expenses Invoice No.: 009 -FEB -2010 Date: January 15, 2010 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice es0 $ 0.00 0.00 $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 1 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.558 -1926 Facsimile: 916 -558 -1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice February 2010 Retainer Expenses Invoice No.: 009 -FEB -2010 Date: January 15, 2010 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice es0 $ 0.00 0.00 $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 Activity Report 12/28/09 Review Press Clips, State Policy Issues 2.0 12/28/09 Review 2 -Year Bills; E -mail Martin 2.0 01/04/10 Review Press Clips, State Policy Issues 2.0 01/05/10 ACWA Working Group Re Option #4 Water Conservation Legislation Implementation 1.0 01/05/10 Update Martin Re ACWA Working Group 0.5 01/06/10 Review Press Clips, State Policy Issues 2.0 01/08/10 Preparation of District Annual Report 2.0 01/08/10 Review Draft Work Products for ACWA Working Group Re Option #4 0.5 01/08/10 Research Governor's Proposed FY 2010 -11 Budget; E -mail Martin 2.0 01/12/10 Review Draft Work Products for ACWA Working Group Re Option #4 1.0 01/14/10 Review Press Clips, State Policy Issues 1.0 01/15/10 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 9th Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 -558 -1926 Facsimile: 916-558-1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice January 2009 Retainer Expenses i7Eybil Invoice No.: 09- JAN -20 Date: December 15, 2008 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: PATCH f r,1 -11 .. { S(btotal: $ 0.00 0.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 11/11/08 Airfare, District Visit $ 249.00 11/25/08 Hotel Expense 71.45 11/25/08 Rental Car 181.79 11/25/08 Airport Parking 30.00 APPROVED FOR PAYMENT CIA Subtotal Total Charges $ 532.24 $__6532.24 Total Balance Due: $ 6,532.24 Activity Report 11/24/08 Dinner w/ General Manager & Legislative Committee 2.0 11/25/08 District Tour, Lunch & Board of Directors Mtg 5.0 11/29/08 Review Background Re New Legislators 1.0 12/03/08 ACWA Conference Delta Futures Panel 1.5 12/03/08 ACWA Conference Legal Affairs Committee 1.0 12/08/08 Capitol Morning Report, Press Clips 2.0 12/08/08 Review Lockyer Statement, E -Mail to Martin 0.5 12/12/08 Capitol Morning Report, Press Clips 2.0 12/15/08 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 -1-'P Home I About Southe,est Help 6r, rr ^Tl —r +�I I T fSF.� riirfE. I i1.7_C',° irrfr - r:f7rir r Southwest Airlines Purchase Confirmation Thank you for using southwest.com to purchase your Ticketless Travel Southwest Airlines Confirmation Number(s) Confirmation Disability Passenger Type Number Passenger Account Number Assistance Adult 2MZTXR Robert Reeb 00000024552942 - None Entered Air Itinerary Trip Date Day Stops Routing Flight Routing Details Depart Nov 24 Mon Nonstop SMF -ONT 1489 Depart Sacramento (SMF) at 2:30 PM Arrive in Ontario (ONT) at 3:45 PM Return Nov 25 Tue Nonstop ONT -SMF 1396 Depart Ontario (ONT) at 6:10 PM Arrive in Sacramento (SMF) at 7:30 PM Pricing Passenger U.S. Security Type Trip Routing Type of Fare Base Fare Taxes PFC Feel Passenger(s) Total Adult Depart SMF -ONT Wanna Get Awe $92.09 $10.41 $4.50 $2.50 1 $109.50 Return ONT -SMF An )dime $120.00 $12.50 $4.50 $2.50 1 $139.50 Total $212.09 $22.91 $9.00 $5.00 $249.00 1 Security Fee is the government- imposed September 11th Security Fee, Billing Information Credit Card Holder Name: Robert Reeb Billing Address: 910 K Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Confirmation Number: 2MZTXR Passenger Type: Adult Passenger Name( *): Robert Reeb Forth of Payment: Visa: XXXXXXXXXXXX1513 U.S. Total Air Base Fare Taxes PFC SMF - ONT $212.09 $22,91 ONT - SMF $9.00 1 Security Fee is the government- imposed September 11th Security Fee. $249.00 Security Feel Passenger(&) Total $5.00 1 $249.00 ti Please visit Travel Tools. where you can subscribe to Flight Statusght S�tusM�aaina or find Policies, Travel Tips, and other Tools to manage your reservation. For your convenience, you are now able to check flight information using our automated phone service by calling 1.888SWA -TRIP. .ps://www,southwest.com/cgi-bin/confirrnResPage BOOKED � I�SySouth�ve�t aouTNwESrcoaT• Store travel preferences, purchase info and time on ,future bookings. Set up MOP thwest account now! Save Up to 25% off 8 Receive Triple Rapid Reward Credit on any two day rental from Alamo. Corporate ID /Rate 7014210. More Rooms. More Choices. A _new hotel ew-erie_n_ce has arrived at southwest.com. SIt— W�s2elou�ihe Learn more about l choosing your seat on Southwest. j 5190 URfor S oeelal Offerer CLICK' , SAYE' V SOUTHWEST AIRLINES RAPID Pr NANDf Enroll in our frequent flyer program, Rapid Rewards. , ADDIV for the ramwe.r Southwest 11/11/2008 E P RESS� Date I Description I Charges I Credits 11-94-ins 'Arrnmmndatinn 11 -24 -08 Bed /Occupancy Room Tax 11 -25 -08 Visa XXXXXXXXXXXX1513 64.95 6.50 71.45 Total 71.45 71.45 Balance 0.00 Guest Signature: I have received the goods and / or services in the amount shown heron. I agree that my liablity, for this bill is not waived and agree to be held personally liable in the event that the indicated person, company, or associate fails to pay for any par, or the fill amount of these charges. If a credit card charge, I further agree to perform the obligations set forth in the cardholders agreement will' the issuer. Holiday Inn Express Downtown San Bernardino 450 North G Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 Telephone: (909) 885 -0055 Fax: (909) 889 -0889 11 -25 -08 Robert Reeb 910 K Street, Suite 300 Folio No, 21442 A/R Number Room No. 235 Sacramento Ca 95814 United, Group Code Arrival 11 -24. 08 States Companv Departure 11.25 -08 Conf. No. 64129682 Membership No. Rate Code IDAVR Invoice No, Page No. 1 of 1 Date I Description I Charges I Credits 11-94-ins 'Arrnmmndatinn 11 -24 -08 Bed /Occupancy Room Tax 11 -25 -08 Visa XXXXXXXXXXXX1513 64.95 6.50 71.45 Total 71.45 71.45 Balance 0.00 Guest Signature: I have received the goods and / or services in the amount shown heron. I agree that my liablity, for this bill is not waived and agree to be held personally liable in the event that the indicated person, company, or associate fails to pay for any par, or the fill amount of these charges. If a credit card charge, I further agree to perform the obligations set forth in the cardholders agreement will' the issuer. Holiday Inn Express Downtown San Bernardino 450 North G Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 Telephone: (909) 885 -0055 Fax: (909) 889 -0889 ONTARIO INTL AIRPORT RENTAL RECORD: MO0192710 REEK ROBERT COMPLETED BY: OPRECI RENTED: ONTARIO INTL AIRPORT RENTAL: 11.24.08 1615 RETURN: 11-25-06 1609 MILES IN: 39088 OJT: 38999 WILES DRIVEN: 89 PLAN INIODT: SPC IRaIDI CLS: FDAR 1 DAYS 103.99 103.99 SIIBTOT 103.99 ROAOSAFE 4.99 FF800 1.50 APONGFEE 15.01 TAMABLE TOT 125.49 SALES TAM 7.750 9.73 LDW1 14.991DAY 14.99 RAP 5199IDAY 5.99 SLI 12.991DAY 12.99 FADJSEFEE 10.00 TWO SRG 2.60 NET DIE 181,79 PAYMENTS -181.79 PAID BY: VI CREDIT CARD N: ...... —1513 FTN IN 00000024552942 THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING DOLLAR RENT A CAR 1 Sacramento 7nt'1 Airport Card Account : XXXXXXXXXXXX1513 Card Type : Visa Authorization Code : 939215 Cashier : 49 Seq A 41708 License Plate ; XX NOPLATE Ent : 13:34 11/24/08 Lane 37 Exit: 16;31 11/25/08 Lane 56 FEE S 30.00 AMOUNT TEND $ 30.00 CASH $ 0.00 CREDIT CARD $ 30.00 CHECK $ 0.00 CHANGE CALC $ 0.00 PAID AT CT $ 30.00 'axes Included # ## Start Calculation Details # ## 2 Days) @$15.00 = $30.00 # ## End Calculation Details # ## #14 Thank You # ## Sign : r �� ' K Reeb Government 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 - 558.1926 Facsimile: 916-558-1932 Relations, LLC Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice February 2009 Retainer Expenses f';ELEIUEU) JAN 2 0 2009 East Valley Water bistriet Invoice No.. 009 -FE13 2009 Date: Janua 15 $ 0.00 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 APPROVEDFOR Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: $ 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 COMPLETED SIGNED % "Z Tom'/ DATE Activity Report 12/16/09 Preparation and Meeting with DWR Re IRWM Funding 2.0 12/16/09 Meet with Assembly Member Huffman staff Re Water Conservation Legislation 0.5 12117/09 Prepare; E -Mail Memo to Martin Re Water Conservation Legislation 3.0 12117/09 Review; E -mail Martin Re Budget Issues; Legislative Voting 1.0 01/05/09 Attend ACWA Monday Morning Lobby Group Mtg 1.0 01/06/09 Prepare; Fax Request Appts with Legislative Delegation 0.5 01/06/09 Read Press Clip Services 2.0 01/06/09 E -Mail Hendricksen FPPC requirements; legislative delegation appointment update 0.5 01/06/09 Review ACWA legislation re Residential Water Retrofit Mandate; E -Mail Martin 0.5 01/06/09 Review Senate Local Government Omnibus Draft Legislation; E -Mail Martin 0.5 01/06/09 Review DWR Region Acceptance Process; E -Mail Martin 1.0 01/12/09 Read Press Clip Services 2.0 01/12/09 Review PERS Financial Condition Announcement; E -Mail Martin 0.5 01/12/09 Attend ACWA Monday Morning Lobby Group Mtg 1.0 01/12/09 Mtg w/ DWR Staff Re Water Conservation Legislation 1.5 01/12/09 Talk w/ Martin Re Sacramento trip; schedule appointments 0.5 01/13/09 Read Press Clips 1.0 01/15/09 Listen to Gov. State of the State and Subsequent Analysis 1.0 01/15/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations,'LLC 1107 91^ Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916. 558.1926 Facsimile: 916. 558.1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last Invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice March 2009 Retainer Expenses V� `1�7 FEB 1 " 2009 . I :t,Iley Water District Invoice N .. 009 - MAR -2009 Date: February 13 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice BATCH # I i 1 ;i 1 PhRIOUTP 9— 6a4ROVEDFOR Subtotal: Subtotal: Total Charges $ 0.00 0.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 COMPLETE SIGNED 7 �_ DATE %/� Activity Report 01/16/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 01/19/09 Attend ACWA Monday Morning Lobby Group 0.5 01/21/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 01/22/09 State Water Contractors State Budget Issues Call 1.0 01/23/09 Review Packet; Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee 2.0 01/23/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 01/26/09 District Visit to State Capitol 3.0 01/28/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 02/02/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 02/02/09 Attend ACWA Monday Morning Lobby Group 0.5 02/06/09 Review Bill Introductions 1.0 02/06/09 State Water Contractors State Budget Issues Call 1.5 02/09/09 Attend ACWA Monday Morning Lobby Group 0.5 02/10/09 Talk w/ ACWA Staff Re Water Conservation Principles 0.5 02/10/09 Mtg w/ Lester Snow (DWR) Re Budget and Bond Funding 1.0 02/11/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 02/11/09 State Budget Update E -Mail Martin 1.0 02/11/09 Attend Sacramento Legislative Reception 1.0 02/12/09 Review ACWA State Legislative Committee Packet 0.5 02/13/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee Mtg 1.5 02/13/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 -558 -1926 Facsimile: 916. 558 -1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 RECEOMED MAR � 2009 East Malley Water District Invoice No . 009 - APR -2009 Date: March 16 Balance forward from last invoice $ 0.00 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 New Activity Since Last Invoice April 2009 Retainer Expenses �OT BATCH #� _ RFF u H i 06 ).C, I �. C . Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: $ 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 14 GO- �PLETED T SIGNED 1�l�OJ DATE - Activity Report 02/17/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 02/17/09 Mtg w/ K. Cole [MWD SoCal] Re State Water aroject Issues 1.0 02/18/09 Review State Budget Package; E -mail Report to Martin 1.0 02/18/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 02/18/09 State Water Contractors Con Call Re Davis - Dolwig; State Budget Issues 0.5 02/19/09 State Budget Analysis Re Resources Budget 1.0 02/19/09 Review Introduction of Legislation; Update Tracking Service 1.0 02/20/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 02/20/09 Review AB 300 per ACWA Request; Respond to W. Henderson [ACWA] Re Client Concerns & Amendments 0.5 02/25/09 Review Introduction of Legislation; Update Tracking Service 1.0 02/26/09 Review Introduction of Legislation; Update Tracking Service 2.0 03/01/09 Review Introduction of Legislation; Update Tracking Service 2.0 03/02/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 03/02/09 Review Introduction of Legislation; Update Tracking Service 2.0 03/03/09 Review Introduction of Legislation; Update Tracking Service 2.0 03/03/09 E -Mail Legislative Report to Martin & Morales 0.5 03/06/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee 1.5 03/09/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 03/09/09 Analyze Legislation 2.0 03/10/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 03/10/09 Analyze Legislation 6.5 03/13/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 03/16/09 Attend ACWA Delta Governance Workgroup Mtg 1.0 03/16/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 SmartZone Communications Center Collaboration Suite Ticketless Confirmation - REEWROBERT - J2CDSQ From: SouthwestAir lines @mail.southwest.com To: ROBERTREEB @comcast.nei Replyto: SouthwestAir lines @mail.southwest.com SOUTHWEST.COM. Receipt and Itinerary as of 03 125109 898 PM Confirmation Number J2CDSQ Confirmation Date: 03/25109 Received: WN/ROBERT REEB BY ICBM Passenger Information Passenger Name Account Number REEB /ROBERT 00000024552942 NI travel involving funds from this Confirmation Number must be cc Itinerary robertreeb@comcast.net Wednesdav, March 25, 2009 6:08:18 PM New! ch!cago (Noway) to Mi"NaWis(St. Pact (Humphrey Terming) 8 f11gMs dally starting March 8th Where You tike Be prepared when you get there! Consult Travel Guide for relevant tips from real travelers. Ticket# Expiration 5262120346592 03125/10 mpleted by the expiration date. Date Flight Routing Details Wed Apr 01 1330 Depart SACRAMENTO CA (SMF) at 11:05 AM Arrive in ONTARIO CA (ONT) at 12:20 PM Wed Apr 01 1353 Depart ONTARIO CA (ONT) at 8:55 PM Arrive it SACRAMENTO CA (SMF) at 10:15 PM Cost and Payment Summary Air $ 267.90 Tax $ 27.30 PFC Fee $ 9.00 Security Fee $ 5.00 Total Payment: 309.20 Current payment(s) 03/25/09 Visa X1513 $309.20 Fare Rule(s) All travel involving funds from this Confirmation Number must be comple*ed by the expiration date. Any change to this itinerary may result in a fare increase. of 2 4/2/2009 12:38 PM OJIN X I15 u T-411 � RI IN # 3310 Tel(9o9) 6 >,4 61�)15 ,IR6 II/ Oil /01/2009 01.3h.01 PM Emp mal'I!d117 1 Chkn ra.i I Ii 13 51.79 PL SM h y Sml or You're Invited... Complelo (),it Vo wo of the Gtm l Survey lot a chdmo lu win $10,000! Call 1- 800 - 128-1593 Your code; 16691604 31015630 ?lease provide feedback within 72 hoorrs. (Nc• purchase necessary. See store for details.) Complete rluestra encuesta `La Voz del Invitado" 110-101; rI una opurlunidad de garkar $10,0001 Name al 1-800 - 128 -15:3 Su codiao es; 166916N 31015630 Put, favor respond& dontrn de la, pro;i mes 72 hor as. (140 es necessrio comprar. Vea loss detalles on la Benda.) 'TMWW % %AI%TW%TYWT' %%W WWWY'f%W %WTIW% % % } %M k'I" SUbTota1 5.79 Tax 0.52 total 6:.311 CASH 7.00 Change 0.69 We don't make it 'til you order it ;k> Thank you for your visit 31 511630 10 KOl MOO HIIIF'UDI 011.11it N IITARIO, CA 91764 166 -434 -KK Car To Be Returned To Above Unless Stated Below IA CLOSED AT WARM INTL AIRPORT Customer Information 141 RIVERWDOD DR R08ERT LACERVILLE CA 95667 198 CA 0718812012 916- 402 -42;r6 DDIL DRIVER: None REIIl1ENT FLYER 11ILE8 ARE SUBJECT TO A FREDUENT FLYER IIRCHAW OF $1.50 PER RENTAL DAY UP TO 18.00 PER RANSACTION COLLECTED AT TIME OF RENTAL. IN CHG I DAY =24 HRS - - -- REDIT CARD/CASH PAYMENTS I /+;+s+HHtstt%1513 /198427/ 150,26/04/81/2809 65 JDAVSD /861 MYOUID /061 Rwra'aT • 1�4 1 y1d 715L0 6 TIME OUT TIME 104/01 /2809 11 /81/2009 IN 1924 ++1240 5044 (Days I Dvs @ 82,1£ 82-16 TOTAL T I k STATE TAR 8,750% 1IINIMNOWT 82.16 1 Dye@ 5.99 S1,F UMLITY i ppyye@ 12,90 5,99 12.99 ,FACI"TY118EFEE I Ile@ 18.00 16.@@ 1.50 ��I IL500%�s@ TWISN SK 2.500% 12,19 L)SS IiR11Rl£ 1 Dye@ 14.99 14 99 TOTAL CHARGES 'FF @: WN 0NOW455294 158,26 NET DUE PAYWNTS 'e .- ! 150, 26 - 150.26 8.00 IFORNIA - NOTICE ABOUT YOUR FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND OPTIONAL LOSS DAMAGE WAIVER ( "LDW ,') Ire responsible for all collision damage to the rented vehicle even if someone else caused it or the cause is unknown. You are responsible for the cos lair up to the value of the vehicle, and towing, storage and impound fees. Your own insurance or the issuer of the credit card you use to pay for th le rental transaction may coverall or part of your financial responsibility for the rented vehicle You should check with your insurance company or cred ssuer to find out about your coverage and the amount of the deductible, if any, for which you may be liable. Further, ifyou use a credit card that provide 'age for your potential liability, you should check with the issuer to determine if you must first exhaust the coverage limits of your own insurance befor edit coverage applies. Dollar will not hold you responsible if you buy LDW, but, LDW will not protect you if you violate a term of the rental agreemenn eurchase of this LDW is optional and may be waived (declined). ost of the optional LDW per day and the estimated total cost of LDW for the rental is listed above. 'ifornia, LDW does not apply if: (A) the damage or loss results from your (i) intentional, willful, wanton, or reckless conduct, (ii) operation of the Vehicle the influence of drugs or alcohol in violation of section 23152 of the Vehicle Code, (iii) towing or pushing anything, or (iv) operation of the Vehicle of paved road if the damage or loss is a direct result of the road or driving conditions; (B) the damage or loss occurs while the Vehicle is used (1) fo tercial hire, (ii) in connection with conduct that could be properly charged as a felony, or (iii) is involved in a speed test or contest or in driver training 'y; (C) operated by a person other than an Authorized Driver; (D) operated outside of the United States; or (E) you (i) provided fraudulent information tt ompany or (ii) provided false information and the Company would not have rented the Vehicle if it had instead received true information. "Authorize( " in California means you, your spouse if that person is a licensed driver and satisfies our minimum age requirement; your employer or co- worker, they are engaged in business activity with you, are licensed drivers, and satisfy ou minimum age requirements: and any person listed by us on the Agreement as al Authorized Driver. 14.99 California Child Seat Requirements. California law requires all children under 6 years of age who weigh less than 60 pounds -.o be transported in the back seat of the vehicle in ; child restraint system. This aaency is required to provide for rental a child restraint systen if you do not have a child restraint system yourself. These terms supersede any conflictin( terms stated elsewhere. These terms supersede any conflicting terms stated elsewhere. tgreement Is bemoan the undersigned and the comps:, identified above (the'Company�, By signature below, the undersigned acknowledges and represents that they are legally authorized to operate the rental vehicle =.r's license, and that they have read mtl agree to the terms, conditions and nol,ces. both printed and wren, including the Loss Damage Waiver information, that appear on this Rental Statement and on the separate (the 'Agreement). which is Incorporated hereln. THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORIZE THE COMPANY TO PROCESS A CHARGE TO THEIF CREDIT . DEBIT OR CHARGE CARD IN THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED ABOVE IENTAL UPON SIGNATURE BELOW AND FOR ALL ADDITIONAL CHARGES DUE UPON RETURN OF THE VEHICLE. ALL CHARGES SUBJECT To AUDIT. No additional drivers are permitted without the approval. RENTER X _ ADDITIONAL DRIVER DEALER WAYNE SYSTEMS AUSTIN, TX Sale #VISA XXXXXXX1513 Auth. # 409142 Inv, p GI-45261 7 &13132 Date 04/01;09 19;17 HAVEN MINI MET ONTARIO CA Pump # 7 Special Gallons 2,655 Price /Gal ..$ 2.439 Fuel Sale .,$ 6.48 THANK YOU FGE CHOOSING MOBIL Activity Report 03/17/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 03/23/09 ACWA Lobbyists Meeting 0.5 03/25/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 03/25/09 Meeting w/ Kathy Cole (MWD) Re SWP Davis - Dolwig; State Budget Issues 0.5 03/26/09 Call w/ Whitnie Henderson (ACWA) Re AB 300 0.5 03/26/09 Preparation of Bill Analyses for Board Meeting 1.0 03/27/09 Attend ACWA Delta Working Group Meeting 1.5 03/27/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 03/29/09 Preparation of Bill Analyses for Board Meeting 1.0 03/30/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 04/01/09 Travel, Attend Board Meeting 12.0 04/03/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee 2.0 04/05/09 E -Mail Martin Re AB 1408 0.5 04/06/09 Research, Prepare Client Memorandum Re AB 300 3.0 04/07/09 Research, Prepare Client Memorandum Re AB 300 1.5 04/07/09 Research, Prepare Client Memorandum Re AB 1408 3.0 04/08/09 ACWA State Legislative Committee Con Call Re AB 49, AB 1408, SIB 261 1.0 04/08/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 04/09/09 Prepare District Letters Re AB 900, SIB 12, SB 229 2.0 04/10/09 Prepare Board Legislative Item, E -Mail to Martin 1.5 04/14/09 Attend Assembly Water, Parks & Wildlife Committee Re AB 900 3.0 04/15/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 04/16/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 !✓ Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 9t' Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.558 -1926 Facsimile: 916- 558 -1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice May 2009 Retainer Expenses Invoice No . 009 - JUN -2009 I Date: May 19, 2009 / C, 1 0 1 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 BATCH # ,,4PR011ED FOR PQYMI $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: T 6,000.00 $ 0.00 Total Charges: $- 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $$ 6,000_00 COIRIPLE EED SIGNED - 2 7 -02 DATE Activity Report 04/22/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 04/23/09 Review ACWA State Legislative Committee Packet 2.0 04/24/09 Attend ACWA SLC: Meeting 2.0 04/27/09 ACWA Lobbyists Meeting 1.0 04/28/09 Attend Assembly Water, Parks & Wildlife Comm. Mtg 4.0 04/28/09 Mtg w/ K. Cole of MWD Re AB 49, SIB 261, SB 460 1.0 04/29/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 04/30/09 Participate in ACWA Mtg Re SIB 460 1.5 04/30/09 Review Martin E -Mail Re CMUA Water Conservation 0.5 05/04/09 Review, E -Mail Martin Re Water Quality, State Budget 1.0 05/05/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 05/06/09 Review AB 1408 Amendments; E -Mail Witter 0.5 05/07/09 Meeting w/ Senator Wolk Re SIB 460 0.5 05/08/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 05/08/09 Review Legislation & Memorandum, Attend Meeting w/ CBIA Re AB 300 2.0 05/12/09 Prepare, Meet w/ Asm. Feuer Re AB 49 2.0 05/13/09 Review Proposed Amendments Re AB 1408; E -mail Martin and Provide initial Response to EBMUD 1.0 05/14/09 Review ACWA State Legislative Committee Packet 1.5 05/14/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 05/15/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee Meeting 1.5 05/15/09 Review SB 113 Proposed Amendments 1.0 05/19/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 3,1 ' 1 I Y-) Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91' Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 - 558.1926 Facsimile: 916- 558.1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 2 . ?.009 •: I v l�iEtur Disstr;ct Invoice 009 -JUL -2009 Date: Balance forward from last invoice $ 0.00 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 New Activity Since Last Invoice -AA 2009 Retainer 7t) Expenses APPROVED FDA PAYME $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 Total Charges: $'_6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 CONI t.l~-�`rW iIOMEe _— Q4 WE Activity Report 05/21/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 05/22/09 Review 4/30 version of SB 261; identify issues and e -mail Martin 2.0 05/26/09 Attend ACWA Lobbyists Meeting 0.5 05/26/09 Mtg w/ Ron Davis (ACWA) and others re SB 460 (Wolk) 1.0 05/26/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 05/27/09 Review AB 49 amendments by MWD of SoCal; SB 460 Amendments by ACWA; e -mail Martin 2.0 05/29/09 Review Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense Actions 2.0 06/01/09 Attend ACWA Lobby Group Meeting; talk with Ron Davis Re SB 261 1.5 06/01/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 06/01/09 Review DWR Draft 20x2020 Plan; Prepare AB 49 Opposition Floor Letter 4.0 06/02/09 Lobby Assembly Members Gaines, Huber, Emmerson, Carter and Adams Re AB 49 2.0 06/03/09 Monitor /lobby Senate and Assembly Floors 6.0 06/08/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 06/09/09 Prepare for ACWA meeting Re AB 49 and SB 261 1.0 06/09/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee Mtg Re AB 49 and SIB 261 20 06/10/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 2.0 06/11/09 Prepare for and attend meeting w/ CBIA et al Re AB 300 2,0 06/11/09 E -mail Martin Re Update on AB 49 and SB 261 0.5 06/11/09 Research and Draft Amendments AB 300 5.0 06/16/09 Prepare; Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee Mtg Re AB 49 and SIB 261 3.0 06/19/09 Review AB 300 Amendments from CBIA; EBMUD and PCL; E -mail Response to CBIA; copy Martin 2.0 06/19/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 -558 -1926 Facsimile: 916-558-1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice most 2009 Retainer ')Ol7 Expenses Invoice No.: =009-AUGG,-2009 Date: p -Ee C $ 0.00 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 I er CO . � ,.P E PL- lQD.TP r�n��i6r FnR DCVMEtaT $ 6,000.00 Subtotal: $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 Total Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 COMPLETED j 22-()9 SIGNED DATE Activity Report 06/19/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.5 06/19/09 Prepare Comparative Analysis Re AB 49 and SB 261 2.0 06/23/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 06/23/09 Review E -Mail String Becerra Re RWA and SB 261; E -Mail Martin 0.5 06/24/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 06/24109 Review AB 1420 Compliance Document; E -Mail Martin 0.5 06/25/09 Meeting w/ Asm. Caballero Staff Re AB 300 1.0 06/25109 Lunch w/ Ron Davis of ACWA Re AB 49/SB 261 1.0 06/26/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee 1.5 06/26/09 Monitor Senate Floor; Press Clips /State Issues Review 1.0 06/30/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 07/01/09 Review State Budget Status; E -Mail Martin 0.5 07/01/09 Attend SB 261 Review Meeting w/ RWA Entities 2.5 07/01/09 Research SB 261 Issues; Draft Correspondence 6.0 07/02/09 Talk w/ Ron Davis of ACWA Re SB 261 0.5 07/02/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 07/03/09 Talk w/ Senator Dutton staff Re SB 261 0.5 07/03/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review 1.0 07/06/09 Meeting w/ Senator Dutton Staff and SB 261 Co- Sponsors 1.0 07/06/09 Attend Senate EQ and NR &W Committee Hearings Re AB 49, AB 300 4.0 07/06/09 Review AB 300 Amendments 1.0 07/07/09 Press Clips, State Issues Review, Monitor Budget 2.0 07/09/09 Update Martin Re AB 300 0.5 07/10/09 Attend Meeting Re AB 49 /SB 261 w/ RWA Entities 1.5 07/12/09 Prepare Draft Legislation Re Water Conservation Re AB 49 and SIB 261 6.0 07/13/09 Review Becerra Edits Re Draft Legislation Re AB 49 and SB 261 1.0 07/14/09 Meeting w/ CFBF Water Resources Dir. Re AB 49 /SB 261 1.0 07/14/09 Research Issues Re Draft Legislation Re Water Conservation Re AB 49 and SIB 261 3.0 07/14/09 Revise Draft Legislation Re Water Conservation Re AB 49 and SIB 261 5.5 07/15/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 91" Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916 - 558.1926 Facsimile: 916.558 -1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice August 2009 Retainer RECEIVED AUG 2 i 20U9 East Valley Water District -EO Invoice Nod 009 -SEP -2009 Date: August 18, 2009 $ 0.00 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 t PATr- - t r ^t'° Subtotal: Expenses COMPLETED SIGNED - 28, DATE 4 ,.aagnvrnrng PAYMENT *- otal Charges: $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000_00 RECEIVED Activity Report AUG 2 12009 East VaNey Water District 07/16/09 Capitol Visits Re State Budget and Delta Package 2.0 07/17/09 Press Clips, State Policy Issue Review 2.0 07/23/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions Re Budget 4.0 07/24/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions Re Budget 4.0 07/24/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee Meeting 1.5 07/28/09 Review State Budget Re Resources Items 1.0 07/29/09 Prepare and Submit FPPC Report 1.0 07/30/09 Prepare Delta Legislative Package Memorandum 3.0 08/04/09 AB 49 and SB 261 Water Coalition Meeting 1.5 08/04/09 Review CA Energy Commission Federal Stimulus Funding Status 4.0 08/05/09 Press Clips, State Policy Issue Review 2.0 08/06/09 Analysis of Delta Legislative Package 5.0 08/11/09 AB 49 Water Coalition Meeting 1.5 08/11/09 ACWA Delta Water Package Review Meeting 2.0 08/12/09 Press Clips, State Policy Issue Review 2.0 08/18/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 T ' I y'z Reeb Government Relations, LLC 1107 9th Street, Suite 510 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.558.1926 Facsimile: 916.558.1932 Robert Martin General Manager East Valley Water District P.O. Box 3427 San Bernardino, California 92413 Balance forward from last invoice New Activity Since Last Invoice East Vail , u 40.cr D;qr.;�r' Invoice o.: 009 -OCT -2009 Date: September 17 $ 0.00 Prior balance (credit) before this invoice: 0.00 October 2009 Retainer $ 6,000.00 TP . . ._ a. � � MMPLETED r SIGNED ' -I "ji DATE Charges: $ 6,000.00 Total Balance Due: $ 6,000.00 rn 6 v \� ppRnvFp fOR PAYm Activity Report 08/18/09 Monitor Joint Water Committees Hearing Re Delta Water Package; E -mail Martin 5.5 08/20/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 2.0 08/21/09 Prepare Joint Hearing Memorandum; E -mail Martin 2.0 08/31/09 Attend ACWA Lobby Group Meeting 0.5 09/01/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floors; Conference Committee Formation; Meet w/ Assembly Memner Caballero staff re Water Bond; E -mail Martin 10.0 09/02109 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee 1.5 09/02/09 Attend ACWA State Legislative Committee 1.0 09/02/09 Review AB 1242 Opposition Request from ACWA 1.0 09/03/09 Monitor Senate Floor Re AB 1242 3.0 09/03/09 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee; E -Mail Martin 5.0 09/04/09 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee: E -Mail Martin 4.0 09/05/09 E -Mail Conference Committee Staff and Legislative Staff Re Issues and Amendments 3.0 09/07/09 Attend Delta Water Conference Committee; Meet w/ Coalition Lobbyists; E -Mail Martin 6.0 09/08/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 10.0 09/09/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 14.0 09/10/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 16.0 09/11/09 Monitor Floor Sessions; Monitor Delta Water Legislation; E -Mail Martin 16.0 09/15/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 2.0 09/17/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 Activity Report 10/19/09 Draft Annual Report 2.0 10/20/09 E -Mail Martin Update Re DWR Testimony Little Hoover Commission Re IRWM; Delta water package; Model Landscape Ordinance 1.0 10/21/09 Review ACWA State Legislative Committee Planning Meeting Proposals; E -Mail Martin 1.0 10/21/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 1.0 10/25/09 Review Delta Water Package provisions; Prepare Memorandum Re Recycled Water 3.0 10/26/09 Attend Joint Water Committees Hearing 3.5 10/27109 Conference Call w/ Huffman and MWD Staff Re Urban Water Conservation Issues; Draft amendments 2.5 11/01/09 Review Delta Water Package Amendments; Legislation 3.0 11/02/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions; E -Mail Martin; 14.0 11/03/09 Speak with Delegation Offices 2.0 11/03/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions 13.0 11/04/09 Monitor Senate and Assembly Floor Sessions; E -Mail Martin 8.0 11/10/09 Draft Annual Report 2.0 11/18/09 Press Clips; State Issues Review 2.0 11/19/09 Prepare Invoice, Activity Report 0.5 FRED B. HICKS. PhD. Managing Partner TO: FROM: HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 August 1, 2009 Robert Martin Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for July, 2009 INVOICE i FI`ti�� AUG 10 2009 "alley Water Distfist TEL 703 - 866 -42g0 FAX: 703- 866.4928 Email *hKks@aoLcom For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of July, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE • Was briefed by Bob Martin and Gary Sturdivan concerning the ERNIE collaboration with USGS and Gary's planned trip to DC to participate in briefings with USGS personnel. Was asked by Bob to accompany the group for some of their meetings. • Had dinner with Gary, USGS scientists, and California State emergency management officials the night before the briefings in order to learn more about what would be presented the next day and to become more familiar with the materials. • At Bob's request, emailed and called selected Congressional offices to let them know that East Valley/USGS would be seeking an appointment in order to provide a briefing for their disaster preparation scenarios. • Met the group on Capitol Hill and accompanied them to meetings with staff of Congressman Jerry Lewis and with Mr. Lewis himself as well as Congresswoman Jane Harmon and staff of Congresswoman Mary Bono - Mack. Also accompanied the group to the formal presentation for Congressional staff presented in the US Capitol Visitors Center. • Sent Bob Martin a report concerning the documents that we had given to the group in Washington. This included the FYI House and Senate Interior, Environment, and Related Agency Appropriations bills with a special reference to the earmwks that were provided for various USGS projects. Provided a post - briefing assessment for Bob Martin suggesting the potential for the ERNIE water agencies to seek an FYI earmark for specific work that would impact East Valley and the Inland Empire. Emphasized that Senator Diane Feinstein is the Chair of the Senate Interior Appropriations Committee and that House Members we had spoken to also seemed highly supportive of the potential for the program. Began working with Bob to discuss the upcoming East Valley trip to DC in early September and what the agenda should be. This includes stops in key House and Senate offices, starting with Mr. Lewis and Senator Feinstein as well as stops at ACWA, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and also continued support for the FEMA concept that Gary Sturdivan helped to initiate this past week in Washington. Briefed Bob on the potential impact of S. 787, the "waters of the US" legislation that has been passed on a party line vote out of Senator Boxer's Committee on Environment and Public Works. Discussed with Bob how the removal of "navigable" out of the statutory language of the Clean Water Act might impact the operations of East Valley Water District and the options of the District to make a difference in the debate. Provided an update for Bob with regard to how Texas Senator John Cornyn had put a hold on S. 787 and how he was working with Senator Crapo of Idaho and Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma to try and improve the bill. Our briefing including information on how Senator Cornyn is reaching out to stakeholders in Texas to learn more about this issue. Updated Bob on the intent of the White House Council on Environmental Quality to re -issue a Carter era Executive Order governing activities on floodplains. This will extend to all current and potential activities on 500 year floodplains which take in a good part of the nation. White House executive orders have the force of law during the life of an individual administration. East Valley needs to play a part in educating our Congressional delegation with regard to this new move by the White House. Provided reports and updates on the decision of the CEQ to take over the process of writing "Principals and Guidelines" [P &G] away from the Corps of Engineers and place this responsibly in the White House. This move will also extend P &G from beyond the current Federal agencies of the Corps, the Bureau, USGS, and NRCS and make it applicable to all Federal agencies that engage in water projects. This is a huge issue for East Valley Water District because of your anticipate collaboration with the Corps to address the water quality impacts created by the Seven Oaks Dam. HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 September 1, 2009 FRED B. HICKS. PhD. Managing Partner TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for August, 2009 INVOICE WCEIMAX sf ;, - S 2009 East Vaii y .,o« �iStrict TEL 703- 866 - 4.290 FAX: 703 - 866-4928 Pmai7:ibbrks@aoLcom For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of August, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE 'A • Traveled to Reston and had dinner with Gary Sturdivan and representatives of California State government and also the USGS. Used the occasion to be briefed on the USGS /water agency collaboration. • Accompanied East Valley/USGS team on walking and talking visits to the Hill including meetings with Congressman Jerry Lewis, Congresswoman Jane Harmon, and staff of Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack. • Attended East Valley/USGS briefing at the Capitol Visitors Center conceming collaboration between USGS and water agencies on how best to respond to natural disasters as they affect drinking water infrastructure. Noted questions from the assembled Congressional staff who attended the meeting. • Researched and reviewed FYI House and Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Reports and noted funding in general for the USGS and also funding earmarks for specific USGS programs. Printed this information out and used it to discuss potential future collaboration and potential future funding from the Congress and in support for programs of interest and value to East Valley. • Conducted follow up telephone conversation with Gary after his return to California and discussed the next potential steps and the potential timing for additional East Valley outreach to the USGS and to the Congress in support of disaster response by water agencies. At the request of Bob Martin and Gary Sturdivan participated in an East Valley/USGS conference call during which the trip to Washington was discussed and future strategies alsc discussed. Also reported to Bob Martin on my impressions during this conference call and agreed to work with Bob to support his bringing these issues to key Federal stakeholders during his next visit to DC. Kept Bob Martin updated with regard to progress on a number of Federal legislative issues and also potential actions by the White House with regard to Federal Executive Orders. Provided an in -depth briefing to Bob on the potential impacts of S. 787 on the operation of the East Valley Water District and discussed potential strategies for East Valley to become involved in this issue. • At the request of Bob Martin, drafted an East Valley letter concerning S. 787 to Senators Feinstein and Boxer. After consideration and approval by the East Valley Board of Directors, this letter was finalized and hand delivered to Senator Boxer at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. The letter was also circulated to other Senators and also House Members and will be a point of discussion during Bob Martin's September trip to DC. • Worked with Bob Martin to discuss the potential agenda for his September trip to Washington. This included potential topics for discussion as well as the specific people we wanted to see while he is in town. It was agreed that the USGS, Seven Oaks Dam, and S. 787 would be our prime topics of outreach. • Began working with Bob to set up the specific appointments for his visit. This included arranging a meeting with the staff of Senator Feinstein, a meeting at the Association of California Water Agencies, a meeting with the staff of Congressman Jerry Lewis, and also a meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers. • Supported and provided background information for Bob Martin for his securing an appointment on behalf of East Valley and other area water agencies with Dr. Axt, Chief of Planning, LA District of the Corps of Engineers. • Briefed Bob Martin on the potential impact of the announced intention of the White House Council on Environmental Quality to re -issue an Executive Order on Flood Plain Management dating back to the Carter .Administration and potential affecting activities on the 500 year flood plain.. HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 October 1, 2009 FRED B. HICKS. PhD. Managing Partner TO: Robert Martin TEL 703- 866.4290 FAX: 70�3,,-,�86y6,,,4928 Fina�l:ffibckc@aoLcom FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates [OUy SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for September, 2009 INVOICE For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks- Richardson Associates during the month of September, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE Arranged for meetings in preparation for Bob Martin's trip to DC. This included briefing Hill and Corps of Engineers staff with regard to the issues Bob wanted to discuss as well as actually making the appointments. Printed out materials for Bob in preparation for his trip to DC. This included additional East Valley letters concerning the impact of S. 787, Congresswoman Grace Napolitano's recent letter urging more Title 16 funding, and other materials. Accompanied Bob on trip to the Hill during which we briefed Justin Landon of Congressman Jerry Lewis' staff concerning the Seven Oaks Dam water issue. Discussed in detail strategies for making sure that the Water Quality and the Water Conservation studies worked together and also how future funding and the necessary WRDA language could be made to work together. Briefed the staff of Congressman Joe Baca with regard to the impact of S. 787 on the District and the recent East Valley letter highlighting these concerns. Staff indicated that Congressman Baca had not been a co- sponsor of similar language in the l 10`h Congress and promised to listen carefully to the District's concerns as the House prepares to take up the Senate version of the bill. We promised that we would remain in close touch as this process goes forward. • Met with David Reynolds and Abby Schneider of the ACR'A DC staff. Discussed in details the District's involvement with USGS and laid the groundwork for future cooperative support of ACWA fo- the USGS cooperative effort with water agencies. Also Bob arranged to have this issue put on the agenda for the upcoming ACWA Federal Affairs meeting in Sacramento. • Met with Larry Prather, Director of Legislation and Planning, US Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters. Discussed the Seven Oaks Dam situation in detail and asked for his guidance on how best to work with the LA District of the Corps and through the WRDA and the Appropriations cycles to provide the necessary legislative authority and funding to complete the job c f restoring damage to the surface water supply done by the dam. Noted that the House Transportation and Infrastructure Corrunittee had made available the Member request forms for WRDA -2010 and was requesting Member project requests this fall with a target date to begin working on the bill of February, 2010. Sent Bob a copy of the project form provided by the Committee so that East Valley could familiarizes itself with the issues that needed to be addressed. • Noted that Secretary of the Interior Salazar was going to hold a special meeting at the DOI to go over possible Federal responses to the California water crisis. Sent Bob this meeting notice and also noted that one of the topics was too be discussion for how the USGS could interface with this entire process. We also conveyed this information to Gary Sturdivan who in turn passed it on to his USGS contacts in California. • Continued to keep East Valley updated on the progress of the Council on Environmental Quality and their efforts to amend a Carter .Administration era Executive Order on Flood Plain Management. Noted that this new effort was to increase Federal oversight to include the 500 year flooe plain. This would take in activities ranging from water and wastewater operations to almost any business activity. • Noted the completion of the FYI Energy and Water Appropriations Conference Report. Reviewed this document and noted that the Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Study had received $672,000 in funding. Alerted Bob Martin to this fact. • Was briefed by Bob after the group meeting with Dr. Josephine Axt, Planning Director for the LA District of the Corps of Engineers. After hearing the report, discussed with Bob the potential next steps that needed to be taken to close the loop with regard to dealing with the problems created by the dam. At his request, sent Bob scans of the Seven Oaks Dam Appropriations and also WRDA -07 language dating back to 2007 for distribution to other agencies. HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-0115 November 2, 2009 FRED B. HICKS. Ph.D. Managing Partner TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for October, 2009 INVOICE TEL 703- 866 -290 FAX: 703 - 866..4928 Emad:NWk9@aoLcotn RECEIVE NOV 0 5 2009 East Valley Water District For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of October, 2009. $5.000.00 TOTAL INVOICE Provided the District with a series of reports concerning the status of the Water Resources Development Act for 2010; the Executive Order for Flood Plain Management that is under consideration by the Council on Environmental Quality; and other key topics. These reports were sent to General Manager Martin. • Reviewed the FYI Energy and Water Appropriations Conference Report and noted that the Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Study had been funded in the Corps of Engineers account. Briefed Bob Martin on this development so he could be aware of during his discussions with the LA District of the Corps of Engineers. At the request of Bob, provided a draft letter of appreciation from the East Valley Board to Jerry Lewis as well as to Congressmen Calvert and also Baca for their support of the Seven Oak Dam Water Quality funding in the FY Energy and Water Appropriations bill. Emailed this draft to Bob for use before the East Valley Board. At Bob's request, briefed him on the status of the CEQ Flood Plain Management issue including the time -frame for when the new Executive Order might be released and some of the key elements affecting the 100 and the 500 year flood plain. Included information on what other interest groups were doing in terms of the Executive Order and also where we were getting some of our information. Also at Bob's request provided a bullet point repor. for Bob's use with the East Valley Legislati-,e Committee providing an update and briefing for them in understanding the Executive Order issue. FonvEided these bullet points via email to Bob. At Bob's request, prepared a draft letter for the consideration of the East Valley Board for use in reaching out to Senators Feinstein and Boxer and also to Congressmen Lewis and Baca with regard to the Clean Water Restoration Act that is pending in the House of Representatives and has already been passed out of Senator Boxer's Environment and Pubic Works Committee in the Senate. Built upon points used by other agencies in .he and West, including California. in crafting the East Valley letter. Provided an update for Bob on a rider that is included in the FY10 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill concerning an exemption for Great Lakes freighters from air regulations. East Valley Water District has been a leader in past riders concerning radon. Updated Bob on a New York Times editorial and a series of articles in the Times that claim that most public agencies ignore the Clean Water Act and that USEPA and State Regulatory Agencies rarely if ever actually assess penalties for violations. This position by the NY Times was so at valiance with how East Valley does business that we wanted Bob to know that this line of argument was being made. • Was briefed in detail by Bob with regard to the outreach he and East Valley were having with the LA District of the Corps of Engineers concerning the Seven Oaks Dam issue including the twice monthly conference calls and the regular face to face meetings on the issue. • Updated Bob on what the Conservation District had learned during its trip to Washington DC and its meetings with Justin Landcn with regard to the Seven Oaks Dam water quality fix. • Also updated Bob on the response of Leah Russin. Environmental Counsel for Senator Feinstein, -,vith regard to the Seven Oaks Dam issue and in particular the final LA District Corps office report recommending solutions for the Dam. HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 December 1, 2009 FRED B. HICKS. Ph.D. Managing Partner TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for November, 2009 INVOICE 2un aj Water Dis+rict TEL. 703-866-1290 FAX: 703- 866 -4928 Etnalffihicks a Lcom For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of November, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE Worked with Bob to develop a WRDA request for Congressman Lewis to submit to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on behalf of the Seven Oaks Dam water issue. • Researched past WRDA language including the WRDA -07 language authorizing the water quality and water conservation studies associated with the Seven Oaks Dam. Put this language and also the statutory language associated with the Dam into a report which was emailed to Bob. Spoke at length with Bob as we reviewed the various options for WRDA language including specifics regarding the kinds of remediation we wished to see and also dollar figures. Worked with Bob to develop "placeholder language" that allows Congressman Lewis to submit a Seven Oaks WRDA request while at the same time allowing the opportunity to supply more details once the water quality and water conservation studies are completed. Spoke at length with Justin Landon in Mr. Lewis' office with regard to our WRDA approach and what we planned to submit. Listened to Justin's suggestions for how this language might be crafted. We also made sure that he understood that East Valley and other local stakeholders would be requested more exact language regarding remediating the water quality issues of the Dam once we were in possession of the completed water quality study. • At the request of Mr. Lewis, worked with Bob Martin to create a constituent request letter for WRDA -2010 that will accompany our project request. Drafted a letter for Bob's review and to.- circulation and comment from the East Valley Board of Directors. Included institutional history of the issue in our draft as well as East Valley's concern over the future of its surface water supply. Emailed to Bob. • Once our WRDA request and the accompanying constituent request letter was completed. contacted Justin Landon in Mr. Lewis' office and made sure that he had all the necessary documents in support of the request and that he would be submitted it to the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on behalf of Mr. Lewis. • Began discussions with Bob concerning the FY I I .Appropriations cycle and how East Valley might wish to craft its appropriations requests to the various committees. East Valley will be in Washington in February and it is important that we begin consideration of our requests which will include both appropriations and also authorization requests such as WRDA. • Discussed in detail with Bob the potential for the artificial wetlands which is being proposed by the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District. Among the items discussed were how the wetlands might fit into the overall solution to the Seven Oaks Dam water quality issue and where the necessary daily supply of wastewater could be secured for the operation of the wetlands. Bob also discussed potential barriers from regional and state regulators for mixing reclaimed wastewater and groundwater. • Updated Bob on the latest information concerning the issuing of a flood plain executive order by the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Provided the latest information on where this issue stands and also discussed how East Valley might be impacted according to the various scenarios that we understand is being considered. • Updated Bob concerning how issues such as health insurance reform and global warming may impact the pace of Congressional consideration of issues that are of primary concern to East Vallev such as Energy and Water Appropriations in the future, WRDA reauthorizations, and EPA regulatory issues such as those dealing with radon and perchlorate. Provided our latest information for how these issues will play out in the context of these much larger issues. HICKS - RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 January 4, 2010 FRED B. HICKS. P1i.D. Managing Partner TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates 0 P u SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for December, 2009 INVOICE TEL 703- 866 -4290 FAX: 703- 866 -4928 Emad:Nwks oLcom For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of December, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE • Briefed and updated Bob when the Council on Environmental Quality released its "Principals and Guidelines" draft to the public and requested comments. P &G will re -write the rule -book for how Federal agencies such as the Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the USEPA conduct projects. Kept Bob updated and briefed on the various efforts within the water resources community with regard to the Executive Order that will soon be issued by the Council on Environmental Quality with regard to floodplain management. This EO will impact any and all activities, including the operation of water utilities, on the 100 and the 500 year floodplain and is being put together without any input from public agencies. • Worked with the staff of Congressman Jerry Lewis to make sure that they understood the request for WRDA -2010 involving wordingthat instructs the Corps to carry out in full any conclusions and recommendations issued as a result of the studies funded through the support of Mr. Lewis through the Appropriations process. Worked with Mr. Lewis' staff to ensure that these concepts and East Valley's suggested language were submitted to the WRDA Committee in time for the Committee's December 3`d deadline for WRDA -2010 projects. We will also be working with the two Senators in the New Year to ensure that this same East Valley request is conveyed to them as well in support of VMA -2010. • Received update from Bob with regard to the latest meeting/briefing that East Valley had received from LA Corps of Engineers personnel. Specific emphasis was put on the direction of the water quality study and the water conservation study and how these twc i ssues could be harmonized and blended into a single policy. Used the briefing that Bob had attended to begin strategizing with Bob with regard to the East Valley federal agenda for 2010 with a special emphasis on outreach and strategy with the LA District and Headquarters staff of the Corps of Engineers and with the United States Congress. • Briefed and update Bob on the anticipated schedule of consideration for WRDA- 2010 and how East Valley can ensure that a Seven Oaks Dam provision that will address the water quality issue is made a part of the bill. Also speculated with Bob on whether the Congress will have time to actually complete work on a final bill. • Sent Bob information and updated him on the latest information on perchlorate and the latest efforts by both EPA and by Senator Boxer to increase regulations. Sent Bob information on the latest statements by Senator Boxer and also by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson concerning the danger of perchlorate to the public. • Senate Bob the latest New York Times article which alleged that up to 60 million people are sickened each year by unsafe drinking water and suggesting that perchlorate and radon were both factors in these threats to the public health. • Began discussions with Bob with regard to how East Valley can best spend its time when it is back in DC for the ACWA conference. Initial discussions were to concentrate on the Corps Headquarters meetings and the Hill Member offices and Committee offices early in the week before the conference starts. • Briefed Bob on when the Congress will be returning to DC and into session for the second session of the 111 m Congress which will be on January 19`s. Speculated with Bob what might, and might not, get completed during this election year and what _mpact the possible Republican resurgence might have on Members like Jerry Lewis and Ken Calvert. I'RF.D 13 111CKS. Ph.D. Managing Partner ,FO: FROM: SUBJECT: INVOICE HICKS- RICIiARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-0115 �- February 2, 2009 TEL 703 -866 -1290 FAX:703- 866 -1928 Fnuil: tUtucb(i�aoL r.�tn Robert Martin Hicks- Richardson Associates Monthly Invoice and Report for_ Tafiu`ary, 22009 'gnu BATCH pREF _ ptR1atr- E OR PpyME For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks- Richardson Associates during the month of January, 2009. $5.000.00 TOTAL 1NVOIC'E • Reported to Bob Martin on our attendance at a DC "Water Summit" which included the major national organizations for drinking water, wastewater, water reuse and rural water. Participated in this summit which included information on the new Obama Administration and the 1 I Ph Congress. • Provided Bob Martin with an update on the Federal Stimulus bill along with prospects for its being considered in the Congress and also how East Valley might be able to access Stimulus funding. • Noted that FY 10 Appropriations request forms for Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer had been released and sent these to East Valley so they could be studied by Bob and his staff with the potential for making a funding request. • Prepared a strategies paper for the board that outlined some of the major themes of the new Administration and the I I I 1 Congress including the Stimulus, the FY09 and the FY 10 Appropriations cycles, and returning environmental regulatory issues such as perchlorate and radon. Sent this to Bob. • After discussions with Bob, prepared a strategy piece for the review of the East Valley Board which proposed that both past fiscal year Seven Oaks Dam unused Appropriations as well as Stimulus funding be sough by East Valley. This includes looking to unused FY07 and PY08 Seven Oaks Dam Water study funding as well as Corps of Engineers construction funding in the Stimulus bill in support of the near shovel ready project upgrading Fast Valley's water filtration plant. This completed thinking piece was scanned and emailcd to Bob Martin, COMPLETED SICKED 2 /) I DATE L-, Drafted a proposed email from Bob Martin to the staff of Jerry Lewis asking that FY09 Seven Oaks Dam Water Study funding in the Energy and Water Appropriations Construction Account of the Ilouse bill be retained in the final version of the FY09 Omnibus Appropriations bill. An email making that request was sent to Bob Martin. • Discussed in detail with Bob after his visit with Dr. Ax,,. Chief of Planning of the Corps of Engineers 1-1\ District. exactly what he had learned and also how East Valley could use this knowledge to create a long -term strategy to move the Seven Oaks Dam from one focused on "study" to one which actually addresses the problems associated with the dam. FRED B. HICKS. Ph.D. Managing Partner TO: Robert Martin HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 March 2, 2009 FROM: Hicks- Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Invoice for February, 2009 INVOICE HC'91c,1 11 TEL, 703- 866.g290 FAX: 703- 866.4928 Fs_ail:fbhMks@aoLcom 14AR 5 21 For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of February, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL OICE ncF INV ' Ln 1k ) IX" ` 1 iP • Arranged meeting with Justin Landon of the Office of Jerry Lewis and accompanied East Valley to this meeting. Discussed the East Valley legislative agenda for FYI during this meeting. • Arranged meeting and accompanied East Valley with Ada Benavides and Ken Zwickle of the South Pacific Division at Corps Headquarters in order to discuss the Seven Oaks Dam Water Quality Study and its conclusion and also how this might play out after the study had been completed. • Arranged a meeting and accompanied East Valley on a meeting with Jason Albritton of the Senate Environment and Public Works staff in order to introduce the Seven Oaks Dam Water issue to him and to alert him that the local stakeholders would be looking to work with Senator Boxer and the Committee with regard to this issue. Arranged and accompanied East Valley for a luncheon meeting with Larry Prather of Corps Headquarters to discuss the Seven Oaks Dam Water issue and hear Mr. Prather's views with regard to how the local stakeholders might approach that study. COMPLETED SIGNED DATE( HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-0115 April 1, 2009 FRED B HICKS. PhD. Managing Partner TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for March, 2009 INVOICE �C 703- 86611.,290 FAX: 703 - 866.4928 Erna2:fliwks@a01C0M For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of March, 2009. + h�: ,-E:# t:�Pt:C $5.00O.00TOTALINVOICE BATCH # U-C17- Kept Bob Martin updated with regard to consideration of the FY09 Omnibus Appropriations bill in general and the provisions of the Seven Oaks Dam Water Study in particular. When the FY09 Omnibus Appropriations bill was passed, reviewed the details and determined that the $1.5 million inserted by Mr. Lewis into the House version of the bill had been retained in the conference. Reported this to Bob and also sent him a scanned copy of the page of the bill in question highlighting the $1.5 million provision. • Totaled the funding for the Seven Oaks Dam Water Study for FY07, FY08, and FY09 and determined that it was almost $7.2 million. Related this to Bob and re- visited the East Valley strategy to seek left -over study finding for use in upgrades for the East Valley surface water treatment plant. Noted that Colonel Magness was planning a trip back to Washington to brief Members of the California delegation on various California water projects that the Corps was involved in. Suggested to bob that this would be a good time to have Mr. Lewis question Colonel Magness with regard to when the Seven Oaks Study would be completed and when the Corps might have funds to actually begin solving the Seven Oaks Dam water quality issue. Agreed with Bob to design a strategy that would help to clarify this issue by briefing Mr. Lewis to ask the correct and pertinent question to the Colonel. COMPLETED SIGNED '� DATE Worked to draft a briefing paper for Justin Landon of Mr. Le-Ws' staff. This included the East Valley funding request for upgrades to the surface water treatment plant and also a briefing with regard to how much money had been appropriated to the Seven Oaks Dam Water Study in total. Reviewed past Appropriations bills and also WRDA -07 so that we could accurately quote the authorization language for the study as well as the three years of appropriations received. Provided a short narrative with regard to why this was important and timely for East Valley Water District. Included Bob's suggestion that the report also include that other agencies including Muni and the Water Conservation District were also interested in this issue. • Finalized the paper and sent it to Justin Landon. Also contacted Justin to provide follow -ups and to determine if he had any questions or needed additional information. We anticipate a complete answer from the LA District of the Corps early in April and we will pass this on to Bob as soon as it is received. • Provided Bob a state by state breakdown of projects which various agencies, including those in California, had submitted as "shovel ready" for Stimulus funding. The list included a subset for California and many local areas communities. Also sent along an explanatory report to Bob with this information. Noted a new program from the Department of Energy that could help to support the "energy -water nexus." This would be grant funding that could be used to improve water efficiencies within units of local government, including water districts. Telephoned Bob Martin and provided basic information on this program along with websites for Bob and his staff to review. Kept Bob updated with regard to my perspective on what is going on with regard to the issue of the consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District. J� FRED B. HICKS. PhD. Managing Partner HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA221 52 -01 1 5 TO: Robert Martin March 2, 2009 �) ) C.«1, FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Invoice for February, 2009 INVOICE N �(_ �/1) TEL 703 - 86611290 FAX: 703-866-4928 bn&iI:fbhc @ Lcom RECERM MAR 2 For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks- Richardson Associates during the month of February, 2009. ^i nr P I rP $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE • Arranged meeting with Justin Landon of the Office of Jerry Lewis and accompanied East Valley to this meeting. Discussed the East Valley legislative agenda for FYI during this meeting. • Arranged meeting and accompanied East Valley with Ada Benavides and Ken Zwickle of the South Pacific Division at Corps Headquarters in order to discuss the Seven Oaks Dam Water Quality Study and its conclusion and also how this might play out after the study had been completed. Arranged a meeting and accompanied East Valley on a meeting with Jason Albritton of the Senate Environment and Public Works staff in order to introduce the Seven Oaks Dam Water issue to him and to alert him that the local stakeholders would be looking to work with Senator Boxer and the Committee with regard to this issue. Arranged and accompanied East Valley for a luncheon meeting with Larry Prather of Corps Headquarters to discuss the Seven Oaks Dam Water issue and hear W. Prather's views with regard to how the local stakeholders might approach that study. COMPLETED SIGNED / "C^` DATE_ Drafted a proposed email from Bob Martin to the staff of Jerry Leyvis asking that FY09 Seven Oaks Dam Water Study funding in the Energy and Water Appropriations Construction Account of the House bill be retained in the final version of the FY09 Omnibus Appropriations bill. An email making that request was sent to Bob Martin. Discussed in detail with Bob after his visit with Dr. Axt, Chief of Planning of the Corps of Engineers LA District, exactly what he had learned and also how East Valley could use this knowledge to create a long -term strategy to move the Seven Oaks Dam from one focused on "study" to one which actually addresses the problems associated with the dam. HICKS-RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-0115 FRED B. HICKS. Ph.D. May 1, 2009 Managing Partner BkTN4 e J �,7. E E't_ rj TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for April, 2009 TEL. 703-86&-4290 FAX: 703 - 866..8928 � �hlc16@a Lcom tv For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of April, 2009. Yid 1't;, Lam' E. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE <W SIGHED / -Gr DATE • Noted the existence of a new DOE program that promotes energy efficiency at the local government level through grants. Briefed Bob Martin on this program and explored with Bob whether East Valley might be able to make use of such a program both immediately and in the near future. Provided Bob with a listing of all California water agencies that were currently eligible for the DOE energy efficiency grants. Noted that this did not include special districts such as water districts although it does include cities, counties, and Indian tribes. Discussed with Bob strategies for how this new program can be expanded to include water districts, which are among the largest user of energy of any part of local government. Noted that Pete Silva of MET had been nominated to be the new Assistant Administrator for Water at USEPA. Reported to Bob that we had had dinner with Mr. Silva in Washington. Discussed how having a Southern California water person might prove useful when and if EPA re- issues proposed regulations for issues such as radon and perchlorate. Provided Bob with a "DC Updates" report which included an attachment of Senator Boxer's most recent statement declaring her commitment to force EPA to promulgate a national standard for perchlorate. Given East Valley's leadership role with regard to the perchlorate issue, Bob and I discussed how the District should become involved in what will be a growing debate and controversy with regard to Senator Boxers announced intentions. Related to Bob that Tom Ray had been invited to the ACWA May conference in Sacramento in his capacity as Chair of the TWCA Federal Affairs Committee. Alerted Bob to the fact that Tom would be appearing at the Tuesday meeting of the ACWA Federal Affairs Committee. Will arrange for Tom and East Valley representatives to get together when all are in Sacramento next month. r Noted the announcement of Lester Snow that $240 million in now available from the State Department of Water Resources for various water projects. Sent Bob an email and attached the multi -page project list for high priority candidates to receive this funding. Discussed this program with Bob in a telephone call as well. Worked with Bob regarding future East Valley participation in WESTCAS. Put Bob in touch with WESTCAS membership coordinator and also discussed with Bob some of the issues that we expected the Coalition to be taking up, including the annual conference in June in San Diego and a potential Washington DC trip in September. Noted that the Corps of Engineers had issued its decisions with regard to $2 billion in construction funding provided by the Stimulus program. Sent Bob the 41 page list of all projects with a special mention of those that represented the $200 million of the $2 billion available for "environmental infrastructure" projects. Noted that one of the environmental infrastructure projects was for $1 million to "construct environmental mitigation measures downstream of Seven Oaks Dam." Called this to Bob's attention and developed a strategy to determine what agency was going to receive this funding. The strategy included working with the office of Congressman Lewis and also contacting the LA District of the Corps of Engineers. Also determined after conversations with Congressman Lewis' staff that the Corps of Engineers was telling them that the Seven Oaks Water Quality Study could not be completed and recommendations made until the Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Study was also completed. Developed a strategy with East Valley whereby East Valley will support a transfer of funds from the Water Quality study to the Water conservation Study. This strategy will allow the Corps to begin working immediately to complete the Water Conservation study as opposed to waiting for FYI funding which probably wouldn't become available until early 2010. Conveyed this support of a minimal transfer of un -used funds from the Water Quality Study to the Water Conservation study to Congressman Lewis. M. As we discussed on the telephone, I have submitted a $5,000.00 invoice and will anticipate a $4,000.00 check from East Valley for services rendered during April, 2009, Thanks. Fred 1.J LdU� HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 FRED B. HICKS. PhD. June 1, 2009 Managing Partner j TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates D SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for May, 2009 kPPRR1'_C FCR INVOICE 2 U U 9 L...:_. ;izterDistrict 1,: TEL 703 - 8661290 FAX: 703- 866 -4928 Einail:fldic a) lcom For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of May, 2009. $5.000.00 TOTAL INVOICE • Monitored the FYI proposed budget from the Obama Administration for the Army Corps of Engineers. Paid particular interest to the funds requested for the Seven Oaks Dam and the Santa Ana Mainstem. Reported these figures to Bob. Noted in particular that the Corps had requested $1 million "downstream" environmental remediation associated with the Seven Oaks Dam. At Bob's request, contacted the office of Congressman Lewis and requested if they had made this request. When we determined they had not, then asked if they knew what the money was intended for. When this answer was "no" began working with Mr. Lewis' office on an outreach to the Corps to determine their plans for these funds. • Agreed on a joint approach in which Congressman Lewis' staff would call the LA District with this question and that also a parallel call would be made by Bob. The responses will then be exchanged and a coordinated approach and response launched during June. • Monitored the confirmation hearing of Pete Silva to be the next Assistant Administrator, USEPA, for Water. This is of particular interest to East Valley because Mr. Silva will be the lead person with regard to crucial EPA regulatory issues involving East Valley including radon and perchlorate rem:lation COMPLETED % $ISM -Z'(p ()2 DATE � � Attended the Silva confirmation hearing and reported to Bob on how Mr. Silva had responded to a question from Senator Boxer regarding to his willingness to commit to starting on a national regulation for perchlorate within 90 days of his being confirmed. A confirmation vote for Mr. Silva is expected in the Senate in June with confirmation a near certainty. Monitored the status of the nomination of Jo -Ellen Darcey to be the next Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works which is the top position at the Army Corps of Engineers. Ms. Darcey also looks to also be a near certain confirmation by the full Senate. She will be the top official that East Valley will need to deal with as it working over the coming months and years to bring the Seven Oaks Dam issue to a successful conclusion. We kept Bob updated and informed of the kinds of questions posed by Senator Boxer and her Environment and Public Works Committee which is the chief Senate Committee of jurisdiction with regard to Ms. Darcy's nomination. We also provided Bob with background on Ms. Darcey including her past service as a Senate staffer for the EPW Committee and currently the Finance Committee working for Senator Baucus. Kept Bob updated with regard to progress on the EPA proposed FYI budget including the huge increases being proposed by the Obama Administration for both the Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund and the Drinking Water Revolving Loan Fund. East Valley has formerly not chosen to participate in this program but we did want the District to be aware of this growing source of Federal dollars. Worked to keep Bob updated on important legislation pending in the Senate which is the reauthorization of both the Clean and the Safe Drinking Water SRF programs. Noted in particular the new provisions that reserve a substantial portion of these newly authorized funds for economically disadvantaged communities and in particular a new provision that allows an applicant to base its application on only a part of its service area instead of the whole. • Updated Bob on the fact that a House version of this reauthorization legislation had already passed the full House by a vote of better than three to one so the reauthorization of the Safe Drinking Water and the Clean Water SRF programs is very much a real possibility in this Congress. Reported to Bob on the likely schedule for the rest of the Congressional year with regard to when the Congress would be in session and when we expected the Appropriations cycle to begin. Although it is only early June, the time available for Congress to complete action on many key issues is fast receding. Also speculated on how issues such as National Health Care may drive other issues into the background. Sent this report to Bob and began working with him on an East Valley time -table for appropriate responses. HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 July 1, 2009 ` ng-703 -8 FRED B. HICKS. PhD. I �G 66 ^•290 11 FAX: 703- 866..4928 Managing Partner Finafl:fl�hiLcom TO: Robert Martin 1� J FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoices for May, June, 2009 c0i�it LETED SICKED 'I�j —/� INVOICE V l DAi�_ For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of June, 2009. c0It�5 $5,000.00 May Invoice [Please disregard if already paid] $5,000.00 June Invoice $10.000.00 TOTAL I1 OICE • Met with General Manager Martin during the WESTCAV?I@e'etrng "in San Diego and did a face to face review of the legislative situation in Washington including the FYI Appropriations cycle and its anticipated calendar for the remainder of this year. Also discussed with the General Manager how the Seven Oaks Water Quality issue could be coordinated with the Seven Oaks Water Conservation Study. Discussed in some detail how East Valley might reach out to the LA District of the Corps of Engineers to keep them better informed of how these two studies, while complementary, are not the same thing. Also discussed our strategy for dealing with this issue at the DC level including Corps Headquarters and also Congressman Lewis and our two Senators. Secured a copy of the FYI House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee draft bill and reviewed for projects and guidance language that would be of interest to East Valley Water District. Noted that $1,000,000 had environm'enta'l provided at the request of Congressman Lewis for envirorental remediation activities in the Santa Ana River. Also noted that $800,000 at been provided at the request of Representatives Lewis, Baca, and Calvert for the Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Study. Prepared a report for East Valley which included scanned copies of key pages from the House FYI Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee draft that highlighted these two important areas of funding. Emailed to General Manager Martin at East Vallev along with an accompanying report. Sent East Valley a report on the project calendar that both the House and the Senate are anticipating to follow in terms of marking up and completing the various FYI Appropriations bills. Noted with particular interest the House Energy and Water projected markup schedule which began in late June with the House Subcommittee markup with the first phase of House - Senate consideration anticipated to end by late September and the hoped for passage of each of the FYI Appropriations bills in regular order. • Alerted General Manager Martin to the recent letter sent out by the Bureau of Reclamation to all agencies who are receiving Title 16 Stimulus funding to the effect that each of these agencies must certify that no Stimulus dollars are being used to support delivery of reclaimed water to either golf courses or to casinos. Reflected on the implications of a Federal agency in effect deciding which customers could be served by local water agencies. Closely followed the Senate Committee consideration of S. 787, the "Waters of the US" legislation. Noted in particular what we considered might be the most pressing impacts on East Valley of this legislation, unless amended. Also alerted General Manager Martin of how other agencies and organizations, including WESTCAS and ACWA, were mobilizing to try and produce a better and more acceptable bill. East Valley could be a very effective participant in carrying the message of local water agencies to the Congress regarding amendments that the water community hopes to attach to this legislation. • Discussed with WESTCAS personnel and with David Reynolds how East Valley could be most effective in carrying a "Waters of the US" amendment language to the Hill. Notified both WESTCAS and ACWA of our hope and anticipation that East Valley would become active with regard to this issue. Alerted General Manager Martin to the fact that Dr. Christine Altendorf had been named to the Federal Senior Executive Service. This move probably paves the way for Dr. Altendorf to return to Corps Headquarters m Washington. It will be recalled that East Valley has worked extensively with Dr. Altendorf over the past few years with regard to the Seven Oaks Dam Water Quality issue. We can now look forward to having her back at Corps HQ as the Seven Oaks issue moves towards a final resolution. FRED B. HICKS. Ph.D. Managing Partner HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 TO: Robert Martin August 1, 2009 H 1( C � I �_ FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for July, 2009 INVOICE H icjc.��1 APPROVFp ror AUG 10 2009 "!alley water District TEL 703 - 866.+,290 FAX: 703- 8664928 EMa1ftzks..aoLccm For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of July, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE • Was briefed by Bob Martin and Gary Sturdivan concerning the ERNIE collaboration with USGS and Gary's planned trip to DC to participate in briefings with USGS personnel. Was asked by Bob to accompany the group for some of their meetings. • Had dinner with Gary, USGS scientists, and California State emergency management officials the night before the briefings in order to learn more about what would be presented the next day and to become more familiar with the materials. • At Bob's request, emailed and called selected Congressional offices to let them know that East Valley/USGS would be seeking an appointment in order to provide a briefing for their disaster preparation scenarios. • Met the group on Capitol Hill and accompanied them to meetings with staff of Congressman Jerry Lewis and with Mr. Lewis himself as well as Congresswoman Jane Harmon and staff of Congresswoman Mary Bono - Mack. Also accompanied the group to the formal presentation for Congressional staff presented in the US Capitol Visitors Center. Sent Elob Martin a report concernjng the documents that we had given to the group in Washington. This included the FY10 House and Senate Interior, Environment, and Related Agency Appropriations bills with a special refp,NngF to the eaTmffks thaj were provided for various USQS projepts. COMPLETED LICKED ,�.2'12 Dr DATE . Provided a post - briefing assessment for Bob Martin suggesting the potential for the ERNIE water agencies to seek an FYI 1 earmark for specific work that would impact East Valley and the Inland Empire. Emphasized that Senator Diane Feinstein is the Chair of the Senate Interior .Appropriations Committee and that House Members we had spoken to also seemed highly supportive of the potential for the program. Began working with Bob to discuss the upcoming East Valley trip to DC in early September and what the agenda should be. This includes stops in key House and Senate offices, starting with Mr. Lewis and Senator Feinstein as well as stops at ACWA, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and also continued support for the FEMA concept that Gary Sturdivan helped to initiate this past week in Washington. Briefed Bob on the potential impact of S. 787, the "waters of the US" legislation that has been passed on a party line vote out of Senator Boxer's Committee on Environment and Public Works. Discussed with Bob how the removal of `navigable" out of the statutory language of the Clean Water Act might impact the operations of East Valley Water District and the options of the District to make a difference in the debate. • Provided an update for Bob with regard to how Texas Senator John Comyn had put a hold on S. 787 and how he was working with Senator Crapo of Idaho and Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma to try and improve the bill. Our briefing including information on how Senator Comyn is reaching out to stakeholders in Texas to learn more about this issue. Updated Bob on the intent of the White House Council on Environmental Quality to re -issue a Carter era Executive Order governing activities on floodplains. This will extend to all current and potential activities on 500 year floodplains which take in a good part of the nation. White House executive orders have the force of law during the life of an individual administration. East Valley needs to play a part in educating our Congressional delegation with regard to this new move by the White House. Provided reports and updates on the decision of the CEQ to take over the process of writing "Principals and Guidelines" [P &G] away from the Corps of Engineers and place this responsibly in the White House. This move will also extend P &G from beyond the current Federal agencies of the Corps, the Bureau, USGS, and NRCS and make it applicable to all Federal agencies that engage in water projects. This is a huge issue for East Valley Water District because of your anticipate collaboration with the Corps to address the water quality impacts created by the Seven Oaks Dam. j, FRED B. HICKS. Ph.D. Managing Partner HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA22 1 52 -01 1 5 September 1, 2009 TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks- Richardson Associates r1 . SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for August, 2009 S;G4ED INVOICE PENNED C�.i - S 2009 EastVausy ifuicr 6'Mrict TEL 703-866-4290 FAX: 703 - 866-4928 Finail:ibh'ck9@a0Lc0m {(�, .._.-- - - -- -- `L!..a %yr .. 4 w � L.✓ t7—L DATE For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of August, 2009. S _ st'• . $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE -- ell 6*4. • Traveled to Reston and had dinner with Gary Sturdivan and r f ,,Q� 0 California State government and also the USGS. Used tW as "ion to be briefed on the USGS /water agency collaboration. • Accompanied East Valley/USGS team on walking and talking visits to the Hill including meetings with Congressman Jerry Lewis, Congresswoman Jane Harmon, and staff of Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack. • Attended East Valley/USGS briefing at the Capitol Visitors Center concerning collaboration between USGS and water agencies on how best to respond to natural disasters as they affect drinking water infrastructure. Noted questions from the assembled Congressional staff who attended the meeting. • Researched and reviewed FYI House and Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Reports and noted funding in general for the USGS and also funding earmarks for specific USGS programs. Printed this information out and used it to discuss potential future collaboration and potential future finding from the Congress and in support for programs of interest and value to East Valley. • Conducted follow up telephone conversation with Gary after his return to California and discussed the next potential steps and the potential timing for additional East Valley outreach to the USGS and to the Congress in support of disaster response by water agencies. At the request of Bob Martin and Gary Sturdivan participated in an East Valley/USGS conference call during which the trip tc "'ashington was discussed and future strategies also discussed. Also reported to Bob Martin on my impressions during this conference call and agreed to work with Bob to support his bringing these issues to key Federal stakeholders during his next visit to DC. Kept Bob Martin updated with regard to progress on a number of Federal legislative issues and also potential actions by the White: House with regard to Federal Executive Orders. Provided an in -depth briefing to Bob on the potential impacts of S. 787 on the operation of the East Valley Rater District and discussed potential strategies for East Valley to become involved in this issue. At the request of Bob Martin, drafted an East Valley letter concerning S. 787 to Senators Feinstein and Boxer. After consideration and approval by the East Valley Board of Directors, this letter was finalized and hand delivered to Senator Boxer at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. The letter was also circulated to other Senators and also House Members and will be a point of discussion during Bob Martin's September trip to DC. • Worked with Bob Martin to discuss the potential agenda for his September trip to Washington. This included potential topics for discussion as well as the specific people we wanted to see while he is in town. It was agreed that the USGS, Seven Oaks Dam, and S. 787 would be our prime topics of outreach. • Began working with Bob to set up the specific appointments for his visit. This included arranging a meeting with the staff of Senator Feinstein, a meeting at the Association of California Water Agencies, a meeting with the staff of Congressman Jerry Lewis, and also a meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers. • Supported and provided background information for Bob Martin for his securing an appointment on behalf of East Valley and other area water agencies with Dr. Axt, Chief of Planning, LA District of the Corps of Engineers. • Briefed Bob Martin on the potential impact of the announced intention of the White House Council on Environmental Quality to re -issue an Executive Order on Flood Plain Management dating back to the Carter Administration and potential affecting activities on the 500 year flood plain. HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152 -0115 FRED B. HICKS. PhD. October 1, 2009 TEL 703-866-4.290 Managing Partner f C_ FAX:703- 866 -4928 Etnail.Nwks@a Lcom TO: FROM: Robert Martin Hicks Richardson Associates H G I C� � E - GL0`+ SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for September, 2009 :. INVOICE For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of September, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE ( PER► DTP • Arranged for meetings in preparation for Bob Martin's trip to DC. This included briefing Hill and Corps of Engineers staff with regard to the issues Bob wanted to discuss as well as actually making the appointments. Printed out materials for Bob in preparation for his trip to DC. This included additional East Valley letters concerning the impact of S. 787, Congresswoman Grace Napolitano's recent letter urging more Title 16 funding, and other materials. Accompanied Bob on trip to the Hill during which we briefed Justin Landon of Congressman Jerry Lewis' staff concerning the Seven Oaks Dam water issue. Discussed in detail strategies for making sure that the Water Quality and the Water Conservation studies worked together and also how future funding and the necessary WRDA language could be made to work together. Briefed the staff of Congressman Joe Baca with regard to the impact of S. 787 on the District and the recent East Valley letter highlighting these concerns. Staff indicated that Congressman Baca had not been a co- sponsor of similar language in the 1 I Os' Congress and promised to listen carefully to the District's concerns as the House prepares to take up the Senate version of the bill. We promised that we would remain in close touch as this process goes forward. COMPLETED SIGNED % -lam DATE oororrr�� /nom �QVpRE _ Met with David Reynolds and Abby Schneider of the ACWA DC staff. Discussed in details the District's involvement with tJSGS and laid the groundwork for future cooperative support of ACWA for the USGS cooperative effort with water agencies. Also Bob arranged to have this issue put on the agenda for the upcoming ACWA Federal Affairs meeting in Sacramento. Met with Larry Prather, Director of Legislation and Planning, US Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters. Discussed the Seven Oaks Dam situation in detail and asked for his guidance on how best to work with the LA District of the Corps and through the WRDA and the Appropriations cycles to provide the necessary legislative authority and funding to complete the job of restoring damage to the surface water supply done by the dam. Noted that the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee had made available the Member request forms for WRDA -2010 and was requesting Member project requests this fall with a target date to begin working on the bill of February, 2010. Sent Bob a copy of the project form provided by the Committee so that East Valley could familiarizes itself with the issues that needed to be addressed. Noted that Secretary of the Interior Salazar was going to hold a special meeting at the DOI to go over possible Federal responses to the California water crisis. Sent Bob this meeting notice and also noted that one of the topics was too be discussion for how the USGS could interface with this entire process. We also conveyed this information to Gary Sturdivan who in turn passed it on to his USGS contacts in California. Continued to keep East Valley updated on the progress of the Council on Environmental Quality and their efforts to amend a Carter Administration era Executive Order on Flood Plain Management. Noted that this new effort was to increase Federal oversight to include the 500 year flood plain. This would take in activities ranging from water and wastewater operations to almost any business activity. Noted the completion of the FYI Energy and Water Appropriations Conference Report. Reviewed this document and noted that the Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Study had received $672,000 in funding. Alerted Bob Martin to this fact. Was briefed by Bob after the group meeting with Dr. Josephine Axt, Planning Director for the LA District of the Corps of Engineers. After hearing the report, discussed with Bob the potential next steps that needed to be taken to close the loop with regard to dealing with the problems created by the dam. At his request, sent Bob scans of the Seven Oaks Dam Appropriations and also WRDA -07 language dating back to 2007 for distribution to other agencies. i J HICKS- RICHARDSONASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-0115 November 2, 2009 I TEL 703 -g FRED B. HICKS. Ph.D. 66 4928 FAX: 703 - 866.8928 Managing Partner FInalffihkk3@a Lcom TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates RECEgUED NOV 0 5 2009 SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for October, 2009 East 'ral;ey Water District INVOICE For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of October, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE 4,* Flo 1104� • Provided the District with a series of reports concerning the status of the 4 Water Resources Development Act for 2010; the Executive Order for Flood Plain Management that is under consideration by the Council on Environmental Quality; and other key topics. These reports were sent to General Manager Martin. Reviewed the FY10 Energy and Water Appropriations Conference Report and noted that the Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Study had been funded in the Corps of Engineers account. Briefed Bob Martin on this development so he could be aware of during his discussions with the LA District of the Corps of Engineers. • At the request of Bob, provided a draft letter of appreciation from the East Valley Board to Jerry Lewis as well as to Congressmen Calvert and also Baca for their support of the Seven Oak Dam Water Quality funding in the FY Energy and Water Appropriations bill. Emailed this draft to Bob for use before the East Valley Board. At Bob's request, briefed him on the status of the CEQ Flood Plain Management issue including the time -frame for when the new Executive Order might be released and some of the key elements affecting the 100 and the 500 year flood plain. Included information on what other interest groups were doing in terms of the Executive Order and also where we were getting some of our information. lll� � rp. _ COMPLETED LI Gam. G _ SIGNED I— I 71L DATE • Also at Bob's request provided a bullet point report for Bob's use with the East Valley Legislative Committee providing an update and briefing for them in understanding the Executive Order issue. Forwarded these bullet points via email to Bob. At Bob's request, prepared a draft letter for the consideration of the East Valley Board for use in reaching out to Senators Feinstein and Boxer and also to Congressmen Lewis and Baca with regard to the Ctean Water Restoration Act that is pending in the House of Representatives and has already been passed out of Senator Boxer's Environment and Public Works Committee in the Senate. Built upon points used by other agencies in the and West, including California, in crafting the East Valley letter. • Provided an update for Bob on a rider that is included in the FYI Interior and Environment Appropriations bill concerning an exemption for Great Lakes freighters from air regulations. East Valley Water District has been a leader in past riders concerning radon. Updated Bob on a New York Times editorial and a series of articles in the Times that claim that most public agencies ignore the Clean Water Act and that USEPA and State Regulatory Agencies rarely if ever actually assess penalties for violations. This position by the NY Times was so at valiance with how East Valley does business that we wanted Bob to know that this line of argument was being made. • Was briefed in detail by Bob with regard to the outreach he and East Valley were having with the LA District of the Corps of Engineers concerning the Seven Oaks Dam issue including the twice monthly conference calls and the regular face to face meetings on the issue. Updated Bob on what the Conservation District had learned during its trip to Washington DC and its meetings with Justin Landon with regard to the Seven Oaks Dam water quality fix. • Also updated Bob on the response of Leah Russin, Environmental Counsel for Senator Feinstein, with regard to the Seven Oaks Dam issue and in particular the final LA District Corps office report recommending solutions for the Dam. FRED B. HICKS. PhD. Managing Partner TO FROM HICKS- RICHARDSON ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA 22152-0115 December 1, 2009 Robert Martin l �C Hicks - Richardson Associates !9,JVfs'! Nub ey Water Distrsci TEL 703 - 866 -x290 FAX: 703-8664928 FinaiI:fiiw1a@a0tcrnn SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for November, 2009 INVOICE For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of November, 2009. $5.000.00 TOTAL INVOICE ka ------- • Worked with Bob to develop a WRDA request for Congressman Lewis to submit to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on behalf of the Seven Oaks Dam water issue. • Researched past WRDA language including the WRDA -07 language authorizing the water quality and water conservation studies associated with the Seven Oaks Dam. Put this language and also the statutory language associated with the Dam into a report which was emailed to Bob. Spoke at length with Bob as we reviewed the various options for WRDA language including specifics regarding the kinds of remediation we wished to see and also dollar figures. Worked with Bob to develop "placeholder language" that allows Congressman Lewis to submit a Seven Oaks WRDA request while at the same time allowing the opportunity to supply more details once the water quality and water conservation studies are completed. • Spoke at length with Justin Landon in Mr. Lewis' office with regard to our WRDA approach and what we planned to submit. Listened to Justin's suggestions for how this language might be crafted. We also made sure that he understood that East Valley and other local stakeholders would be requested more exact language regarding remediating the water quality 15sues o ie once we were in possession of the completed water CO LE_ G,�O study. SIGNED 2 �� �Q / DATE , At the request of' Mr. Lewis, worked with Bob ]Martin to create a constituent request letter for WRDA -2010 that mill accompany our project request. Drafted a letter for Bob's review and for circulation and comment from the East Valley Board of Directors. Included institutional history of the issue in our draft as well as East Valley's concern over the future of its surface water supply. Emailed to Bob. Once our WRDA request and the accompanying constituent request letter was completed, contacted Justin Landon in Mr. Lewis' office and made sure that he had all the necessary documents in support of the request and that he would be submitted it to the Transporiataon and Infrastructure Committee on behalf of Mr. Lewis. Began discussions with Bob concerning the FYI 1 Appropriations cycle and how East Valley might wish to craft its appropriations requests to the various committees. East Valley will be in Washington in February and it is important that we begin consideration of our requests which will include both appropriations and also authorization requests such as WRDA. Discussed in detail with Bob the potential for the artificial wetlands which is being proposed by the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District. Among the items discussed were how the wetlands might fit into the overall solution to the Seven Oaks Dam water quality issue and where the necessary daily supply of wastewater could be secured for the operation of the wetlands. Bob also discussed potential barriers from regional and state regulators for mixing reclaimed wastewater and groundwater. Updated Bob on the latest information concerning the issuing of a flood plain executive order by the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Provided the latest information on where this issue stands and also discussed how East Valley might be impacted according to the various scenarios that we understand is being considered. Updated Bob concerning how issues such as health insurance reform and global warming may impact the pace of Congressional consideration of issues that are of primary concern to East Valle}, such as Energy and Water Appropriations in the future, WRDA reauthorizations, and EPA regulatory issues such as those dealing with radon and perchlorate. Provided our latest information for how these issues 'Ail] play out in the context of these much larger issues. HICKS- RICHARDSONASSOCIATES Ca,� P.O. BOX 2115 SPRINGFIELD, VA22152 -0115 I�( January 4, 2010 TEL 703-8 FRED B. HICKS. PhD. 66 -0.290 Managing Partner FAX: 703-866-4928 / Ema>Y:&hcks@,aoLcom TO: Robert Martin FROM: Hicks - Richardson Associates SUBJECT: Monthly Report and Invoice for December, 2009 L" INVOICE For services rendered to the East Valley Water District by Hicks - Richardson Associates during the month of December, 2009. $5,000.00 TOTAL INVOICE \ 4__ F ���'14 � �`C' • Briefed and updated Bob when the Council on Environmental Quality released its "Principals and Guidelines" draft to the public and requested comments. P &G will re -write the rule -book for how Federal agencies such as the Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the USEPA conduct projects. Kept Bob updated and briefed on the various efforts within the water resources community with regard to the Executive Order that will soon be issued by the Council on Environmental Quality with regard to floodplain management. This EO will impact any and all activities, including the operation of water utilities, on the 100 and the 500 year floodplain and is being put together without any input from public agencies. Worked with the staff of Congressman Jerry Lewis to make sure that they understood the request for WRDA -2010 involving wording that instructs the Corps to carry out in full any conclusions and recommendations issued as a result of the studies funded through the support of Mr. Lewis through the Appropriations process. Worked with Mr. Lewis' staff to ensure that these concepts and East Valley's suggested language were submitted to the WRDA Committee in time for the Committee's December 3rd deadline for WRDA -2010 projects. We will also be working with the two Senators in the New Year to ensure that this same East Valley request is conveyed to them as well in support of WRDA -2010. COMPLETED SIGNED — /- Z/)-/() DATE2L_ • Received update from Bob with regard to the latest meeting briefing that East Valley had received from LA Corps of Engineers personnel. Specific emphasis was put on the direction of the water quality study and the water conservation study and how these two issues could be harmonized and blended into a single policy. Used the briefing that Bob had attended to begin strategizing with Bob with regard to the East Valley federal agenda for 2010 with a special emphasis on outreach and strategy with the LA District and Headquarters staff of the Corps of Engineers and with the ;Jnited States Congress. Briefed and update Bob on the anticipated schedule of consideration for WRDA- 2010 and how East Valley can ensure that a Seven Oaks Dam ­provision that will address the water quality issue is made a part of the bil I. Also speculated with Bob on whether the Congress will have time to actually complete work on a final bill. • Sent Bob information and updated him on the latest information on perchlorate and the latest efforts by both EPA and by Senator Boxer to increase regulations. Sent Bob information on the latest statements by Senator Boxer and also by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson concerning the danger of perchlorate to the public. • Senate Bob the latest New York Times article which alleged that up to 60 million people are sickened each year by unsafe drinking water and suggesting that perchlorate and radon were both factors in these threats to the public health. • Began discussions with Bob with regard to how East Valley can best spend its time when it is back in DC for the ACWA conference. Initial discussions were to concentrate on the Corps Headquarters meetings and the Hill Member offices and Committee offices early in the week before the conference starts. • Briefed Bob on when the Congress will be returning to DC and into session for the second session of the 111 m Congress which will be on January 19'. Speculated with Bob what might, and might not, get completed during this election year and what impact the possible Republican resurgence might have on Members like Jerry Lewis and Ken Calvert.